Equation form expr-022690f2601dfe04
Read as: p implies necessarily q
Means: p implies necessarily q
Normal Modal Logics
Read as: p implies necessarily q
Means: p implies necessarily q
Read as: formula A sub k belongs to Delta
Means: formula A sub k belongs to Delta
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: n sub i is less than or equal to n
Means: n sub i is less than or equal to n
Read as: Delta is accessible from Delta prime under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta is accessible from Delta prime under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: necessarily formula B
Means: necessarily formula B
Read as: formula A is valid
Means: formula A is valid
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Delta
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: inverse box of Delta sub one is a subset of Delta sub two
Means: inverse box of Delta sub one is a subset of Delta sub two
Read as: necessarily formula A does not belong to Gamma
Means: necessarily formula A does not belong to Gamma
Read as: formula B sub k belongs to Gamma
Means: formula B sub k belongs to Gamma
Read as: falsity belongs to Gamma
Means: falsity belongs to Gamma
Read as: not necessarily formula A
Means: not necessarily formula A
Read as: formula B sub m belongs to Delta sub two
Means: formula B sub m belongs to Delta sub two
Read as: n equals zero
Means: n equals zero
Read as: p
Means: p
Read as: Delta sub three belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Means: Delta sub three belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Read as: necessarily formula A does not belong to Gamma
Means: necessarily formula A does not belong to Gamma
Read as: necessarily formula B sub one
Means: necessarily formula B sub one
Read as: formula A does not belong to Delta
Means: formula A does not belong to Delta
Source-census fragment. Read the complete source formula tr053-reader-composite-math-0001. The original fragment is preserved as forensic source evidence, not as a complete reader equation.
Read as: n
Means: n
Read as: p is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: p is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta prime belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Means: Delta prime belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Read as: box of inverse box of Gamma derives necessarily formula A
Means: box of inverse box of Gamma derives necessarily formula A
Read as: necessarily formula A implies necessarily necessarily formula A
Means: necessarily formula A implies necessarily necessarily formula A
Read as: Delta belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Means: Delta belongs to world set W superscript Sigma
Read as: Gamma equals inverse box of Delta sub one union diamond of Delta sub two
Means: Gamma equals inverse box of Delta sub one union diamond of Delta sub two
Read as: Delta sub two equals Delta sub three
Means: Delta sub two equals Delta sub three
Read as: formula A is not true throughout model M superscript logic K
Means: formula A is not true throughout model M superscript logic K
Read as: diamond of Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub one
Means: diamond of Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub one
Read as: formula B or formula C belongs to Delta
Means: formula B or formula C belongs to Delta
Read as: formula B belongs to inverse box of Delta
Means: formula B belongs to inverse box of Delta
Read as: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub two
Means: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub two
Read as: formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: not formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: not formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta
Means: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta
Read as: Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Means: Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Read as: Delta sub one
Means: Delta sub one
Read as: class C subscript axiom four
Means: class C subscript axiom four
Read as: valuation V superscript Sigma, followed by the source closing parenthesis
Means: valuation V superscript Sigma, followed by the source closing parenthesis
Read as: Delta sub three is accessible from Delta sub two under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta sub three is accessible from Delta sub two under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Sigma derives not possibly falsity
Means: Sigma derives not possibly falsity
Read as: the set of formula A such that necessarily formula A belongs to Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Means: the set of formula A such that necessarily formula A belongs to Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Read as: necessarily formula A implies formula A
Means: necessarily formula A implies formula A
Read as: formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta sub n plus one
Means: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta sub n plus one
Read as: not formula A is derivable in system Sigma
Means: not formula A is derivable in system Sigma
Read as: necessarily q
Means: necessarily q
Read as: inverse box of Delta sub one is a subset of Delta sub three
Means: inverse box of Delta sub one is a subset of Delta sub three
Read as: not open scope, formula A or formula B, close scope belongs to Gamma
Means: not open scope, formula A or formula B, close scope belongs to Gamma
Read as: not necessarily not formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: not necessarily not formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta
Means: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: object p sub zero
Means: object p sub zero
Read as: not formula A does not belong to Delta
Means: not formula A does not belong to Delta
Read as: necessarily formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: necessarily formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Delta
Means: inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Delta
Read as: the subset relation
Means: the subset relation
Read as: canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: inverse box of Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Means: inverse box of Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Read as: Delta equals the union over n of Delta sub n
Means: Delta equals the union over n of Delta sub n
Read as: p belongs to Delta
Means: p belongs to Delta
Read as: Gamma derives falsity in system Sigma
Means: Gamma derives falsity in system Sigma
Read as: possibly not formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: possibly not formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: Four set operations. Box Gamma is the set of all necessarily B such that B belongs to Gamma. Diamond Gamma is the set of all possibly B such that B belongs to Gamma. Inverse box Gamma is the set of all B such that necessarily B belongs to Gamma. Inverse diamond Gamma is the set of all B such that possibly B belongs to Gamma. End definitions.
Means: Four set operations. Box Gamma is the set of all necessarily B such that B belongs to Gamma. Diamond Gamma is the set of all possibly B such that B belongs to Gamma. Inverse box Gamma is the set of all B such that necessarily B belongs to Gamma. Inverse diamond Gamma is the set of all B such that possibly B belongs to Gamma. End definitions.
Read as: A belongs to Sigma
Means: A belongs to Sigma
Read as: object p sub n
Means: object p sub n
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub two
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub two
Read as: diamond of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Means: diamond of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Read as: Delta prime is a superset of inverse box of Delta
Means: Delta prime is a superset of inverse box of Delta
Read as: necessarily not formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: necessarily not formula A belongs to Gamma
Source-census fragment. Read the complete source formula tr053-reader-composite-math-0001. The original fragment is preserved as forensic source evidence, not as a complete reader equation.
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Delta prime
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Delta prime
Read as: not formula A implies open scope, not formula B implies not open scope, formula A or formula B, close scope, close scope
Means: not formula A implies open scope, not formula B implies not open scope, formula A or formula B, close scope, close scope
Read as: Sigma derives the nested conditional from B sub one, through B sub n, to formula A
Means: Sigma derives the nested conditional from B sub one, through B sub n, to formula A
Read as: logic K D derives formula A
Means: logic K D derives formula A
Read as: formula A is true throughout canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula A is true throughout canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Gamma does not derive falsity in system Sigma
Means: Gamma does not derive falsity in system Sigma
Read as: inverse box of Delta
Means: inverse box of Delta
Read as: formula A, then not formula A derives falsity in system Sigma
Means: formula A, then not formula A derives falsity in system Sigma
Read as: Delta sub n
Means: Delta sub n
Read as: not formula B belongs to Delta
Means: not formula B belongs to Delta
Read as: V superscript Sigma
Means: V superscript Sigma
Read as: Gamma
Means: Gamma
Read as: Delta sub n union the set containing not formula A sub n
Means: Delta sub n union the set containing not formula A sub n
Read as: not formula A does not belong to Delta
Means: not formula A does not belong to Delta
Read as: formula A belongs to Delta prime
Means: formula A belongs to Delta prime
Read as: Delta belongs to valuation V superscript Sigma applied to p
Means: Delta belongs to valuation V superscript Sigma applied to p
Read as: falsity is false at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: falsity is false at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Gamma is a subset of Delta
Means: Gamma is a subset of Delta
Read as: formula A belongs to Delta sub two
Means: formula A belongs to Delta sub two
Read as: formula A and formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: formula A and formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: necessarily formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: necessarily formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: box of inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Gamma
Means: box of inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Gamma
Read as: inverse box of Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Means: inverse box of Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Read as: formula A is true throughout model M
Means: formula A is true throughout model M
Read as: formula A sub i
Means: formula A sub i
Read as: diamond of Delta is a subset of Gamma
Means: diamond of Delta is a subset of Gamma
Read as: Sigma derives formula A
Means: Sigma derives formula A
Read as: accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Formulas A sub one through A sub n, together with possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m, derive falsity in system Sigma.
Means: Formulas A sub one through A sub n, together with possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m, derive falsity in system Sigma.
Read as: logic K T derives formula A
Means: logic K T derives formula A
Read as: Delta sub two
Means: Delta sub two
Read as: necessarily possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Means: necessarily possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: logic K extended by schemas A sub one through A sub n
Means: logic K extended by schemas A sub one through A sub n
Read as: possibly formula A implies necessarily formula A
Means: possibly formula A implies necessarily formula A
Read as: diamond of Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub two
Means: diamond of Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub two
Read as: necessarily not formula A does not belong to Gamma
Means: necessarily not formula A does not belong to Gamma
Read as: Delta equals the union of Delta sub n for n from zero to infinity
Means: Delta equals the union of Delta sub n for n from zero to infinity
Read as: Delta derives not possibly falsity in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives not possibly falsity in system Sigma
Read as: necessarily not formula A does not belong to Gamma
Means: necessarily not formula A does not belong to Gamma
Read as: Necessarily A belongs to Delta if and only if A belongs to every Delta prime accessible from Delta under relation R superscript Sigma.
Means: Necessarily A belongs to Delta if and only if A belongs to every Delta prime accessible from Delta under relation R superscript Sigma.
Read as: formula A implies formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: formula A implies formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: Delta derives necessarily falsity in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives necessarily falsity in system Sigma
Read as: formula A does not derive falsity in system Sigma
Means: formula A does not derive falsity in system Sigma
Read as: Delta derives possibly falsity in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives possibly falsity in system Sigma
Read as: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Means: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Read as: Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Means: Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Read as: formula A does not belong to Gamma
Means: formula A does not belong to Gamma
Read as: falsity does not belong to Gamma
Means: falsity does not belong to Gamma
Read as: Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub two
Means: Delta sub three is a subset of Delta sub two
Read as: n is greater than or equal to one
Means: n is greater than or equal to one
Read as: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Means: inverse box of Delta is a subset of Delta prime
Read as: Delta sub n plus one
Means: Delta sub n plus one
Read as: formula A belongs to inverse box Gamma, which is a subset of Delta
Means: formula A belongs to inverse box Gamma, which is a subset of Delta
Read as: Gamma does not derive necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Means: Gamma does not derive necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Read as: Delta sub n plus one equals Delta sub n union the singleton containing formula A sub n, if that union is Sigma consistent; otherwise it equals Delta sub n union the singleton containing not A sub n. End cases.
Means: Delta sub n plus one equals Delta sub n union the singleton containing formula A sub n, if that union is Sigma consistent; otherwise it equals Delta sub n union the singleton containing not A sub n. End cases.
Read as: inverse box of Gamma does not derive formula A in system Sigma
Means: inverse box of Gamma does not derive formula A in system Sigma
Read as: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub one
Means: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: formula A
Means: formula A
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to diamond of Delta
Means: possibly formula A belongs to diamond of Delta
Read as: Gamma derives necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Means: Gamma derives necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Read as: logic K does not derive formula A
Means: logic K does not derive formula A
Read as: class C
Means: class C
Read as: formula B is false at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula B is false at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: formula B belongs to Delta prime
Means: formula B belongs to Delta prime
Read as: necessarily formula B sub k belongs to box of Gamma
Means: necessarily formula B sub k belongs to box of Gamma
Read as: Sigma is a subset of Gamma
Means: Sigma is a subset of Gamma
Read as: box of Gamma
Means: box of Gamma
Read as: q
Means: q
Read as: Gamma does not derive formula A in system Sigma
Means: Gamma does not derive formula A in system Sigma
Read as: not formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: not formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta prime is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta prime is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta prime is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta prime is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: necessarily necessarily formula A implies necessarily formula A
Means: necessarily necessarily formula A implies necessarily formula A
Read as: Delta sub two is accessible from Delta sub three under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta sub two is accessible from Delta sub three under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Gamma equals the empty set
Means: Gamma equals the empty set
Read as: formula A sub zero
Means: formula A sub zero
Read as: diamond of Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Means: diamond of Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Read as: formula B belongs to inverse box of Delta sub one
Means: formula B belongs to inverse box of Delta sub one
Read as: belongs to Gamma
Means: belongs to Gamma
Read as: inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Delta
Means: inverse box of Gamma is a subset of Delta
Read as: necessarily formula A sub n belongs to Delta sub one
Means: necessarily formula A sub n belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: inverse box of Delta prime is a subset of Delta
Means: inverse box of Delta prime is a subset of Delta
Read as: necessarily necessarily formula A implies necessarily formula A
Means: necessarily necessarily formula A implies necessarily formula A
Read as: Sigma derives the nested conditional from necessarily B sub one, through necessarily B sub n, to necessarily A
Means: Sigma derives the nested conditional from necessarily B sub one, through necessarily B sub n, to necessarily A
Read as: formula C
Means: formula C
Read as: Delta sub n sub i is a subset of Delta sub n
Means: Delta sub n sub i is a subset of Delta sub n
Read as: Delta derives formula A in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives formula A in system Sigma
Read as: formula B belongs to Delta sub three
Means: formula B belongs to Delta sub three
Read as: not formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: not formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: possibly formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: possibly formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: formula A belongs to Delta
Means: formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Means: Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Read as: formula A sub i belongs to Gamma
Means: formula A sub i belongs to Gamma
Read as: logic K derives formula A
Means: logic K derives formula A
Read as: the nested conditional from A sub one, through A sub n, to falsity
Means: the nested conditional from A sub one, through A sub n, to falsity
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: necessarily formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: necessarily formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: possibly formula A implies necessarily formula A
Means: possibly formula A implies necessarily formula A
Read as: inverse box of Delta derives falsity in system Sigma
Means: inverse box of Delta derives falsity in system Sigma
Read as: not formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: not formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: formula A is not true throughout model M
Means: formula A is not true throughout model M
Read as: formula A belongs to Delta sub three
Means: formula A belongs to Delta sub three
Read as: n sub i
Means: n sub i
Read as: Delta sub zero equals Gamma
Means: Delta sub zero equals Gamma
Read as: class C subscript axiom T
Means: class C subscript axiom T
Read as: inverse box of Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Means: inverse box of Gamma union the set containing not formula A
Read as: logic S five equals logic K T five, which equals logic K T B four
Means: logic S five equals logic K T five, which equals logic K T B four
Read as: formula C belongs to Delta
Means: formula C belongs to Delta
Read as: Sigma derives the nested conditional from A sub one, through A sub k, to falsity
Means: Sigma derives the nested conditional from A sub one, through A sub k, to falsity
Read as: formula A belongs to Gamma
Means: formula A belongs to Gamma
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Means: possibly formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: formula A sub i belongs to Delta sub n sub i
Means: formula A sub i belongs to Delta sub n sub i
Read as: valuation V superscript Sigma applied to p equals the set of Delta such that p belongs to Delta
Means: valuation V superscript Sigma applied to p equals the set of Delta such that p belongs to Delta
Read as: Sigma does not derive not formula A in system Sigma
Means: Sigma does not derive not formula A in system Sigma
Read as: formula B is true at Delta prime in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula B is true at Delta prime in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: not formula A is not derivable
Means: not formula A is not derivable
Read as: formula B does not belong to Gamma
Means: formula B does not belong to Gamma
Read as: formula A is not derivable
Means: formula A is not derivable
Read as: formula C is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula C is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: formula B or formula C is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula B or formula C is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: formula A is derivable
Means: formula A is derivable
Read as: Delta sub n derives falsity in system Sigma
Means: Delta sub n derives falsity in system Sigma
Read as: falsity does not belong to Delta
Means: falsity does not belong to Delta
Read as: inverse box of Gamma
Means: inverse box of Gamma
Read as: Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Means: Gamma derives formula A in system Sigma
Read as: Delta is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta is accessible from Delta under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: inverse box of Gamma union the set containing not formula A is a subset of Delta
Means: inverse box of Gamma union the set containing not formula A is a subset of Delta
Read as: class C subscript axiom D
Means: class C subscript axiom D
Read as: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta
Means: necessarily formula B belongs to Delta
Read as: Delta sub three is accessible from Delta sub one under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta sub three is accessible from Delta sub one under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta sub three
Means: Delta sub three
Read as: formula B
Means: formula B
Read as: Delta sub n union the set containing formula A sub n
Means: Delta sub n union the set containing formula A sub n
Read as: model M
Means: model M
Read as: possibly not formula A
Means: possibly not formula A
Read as: necessarily formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: necessarily formula B is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Sigma
Means: Sigma
Read as: necessarily formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: necessarily formula A is true at Delta in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta sub two is accessible from Delta sub one under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Means: Delta sub two is accessible from Delta sub one under accessibility relation R superscript Sigma
Read as: Delta prime
Means: Delta prime
Read as: class C subscript axiom B
Means: class C subscript axiom B
Read as: necessarily possibly formula A belongs to Delta
Means: necessarily possibly formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: formula A sub n
Means: formula A sub n
Read as: formula A sub one
Means: formula A sub one
Read as: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta
Means: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta
Read as: Delta sub zero is a subset of Delta
Means: Delta sub zero is a subset of Delta
Read as: Displayed derivation. Formulas A sub one through A sub n, together with possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m, derive falsity in Sigma. By the deduction theorem, the proposition on derivability facts, the deduction-theorem clause of the derivability facts, and tautology, the A formulas derive that the conjunction of possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m implies falsity. Normality converts this to the necessity of the negation of the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m. The lemma lifting a derivation into boxed premises and conclusion licenses the boxed step. Using the schema if necessarily necessarily A then necessarily A yields that Delta sub one derives that necessary negation. By monotonicity, the proposition on derivability facts and the monotonicity clause of the derivability facts preserve that derivation. Deductive closure puts the necessary negation in Delta sub one. Accessibility from Delta sub one to Delta sub two then puts the negation of the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m in Delta sub two. End displayed derivation.
Means: Displayed derivation. Formulas A sub one through A sub n, together with possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m, derive falsity in Sigma. By the deduction theorem, the proposition on derivability facts, the deduction-theorem clause of the derivability facts, and tautology, the A formulas derive that the conjunction of possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m implies falsity. Normality converts this to the necessity of the negation of the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m. The lemma lifting a derivation into boxed premises and conclusion licenses the boxed step. Using the schema if necessarily necessarily A then necessarily A yields that Delta sub one derives that necessary negation. By monotonicity, the proposition on derivability facts and the monotonicity clause of the derivability facts preserve that derivation. Deductive closure puts the necessary negation in Delta sub one. Accessibility from Delta sub one to Delta sub two then puts the negation of the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m in Delta sub two. End displayed derivation.
Read as: formula B does not belong to Delta
Means: formula B does not belong to Delta
Read as: formula A is true at Delta prime in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Means: formula A is true at Delta prime in canonical model M superscript Sigma
Read as: not formula A sub n
Means: not formula A sub n
Read as: box of Gamma derives necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Means: box of Gamma derives necessarily formula A in system Sigma
Read as: possibly formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A
Means: possibly formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A
Read as: formula A or formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: formula A or formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: not formula A belongs to Delta
Means: not formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: canonical model M superscript Sigma is the ordered triple of world set W superscript Sigma, accessibility relation R superscript Sigma, and valuation V superscript Sigma
Means: canonical model M superscript Sigma is the ordered triple of world set W superscript Sigma, accessibility relation R superscript Sigma, and valuation V superscript Sigma
Read as: necessarily formula A implies possibly formula A
Means: necessarily formula A implies possibly formula A
Read as: Delta derives not formula A in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives not formula A in system Sigma
Read as: box of inverse box of Gamma equals the set of necessarily formula B such that necessarily formula B belongs to Gamma
Means: box of inverse box of Gamma equals the set of necessarily formula B such that necessarily formula B belongs to Gamma
Read as: necessarily formula A sub one
Means: necessarily formula A sub one
Read as: n is less than or equal to m
Means: n is less than or equal to m
Read as: necessarily necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub one
Means: necessarily necessarily formula B belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta
Means: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: possibly formula A belongs to diamond of Delta sub three
Means: possibly formula A belongs to diamond of Delta sub three
Read as: formula B belongs to Delta
Means: formula B belongs to Delta
Read as: the necessity operator
Means: the necessity operator
Read as: Delta
Means: Delta
Read as: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta sub m
Means: Delta sub n is a subset of Delta sub m
Read as: inverse box of Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Means: inverse box of Delta sub two is a subset of Delta sub three
Read as: Delta derives falsity in system Sigma
Means: Delta derives falsity in system Sigma
Read as: possibly the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m implies the conjunction of possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m
Means: possibly the conjunction of B sub one through B sub m implies the conjunction of possibly B sub one through possibly B sub m
Read as: not formula A belongs to Delta
Means: not formula A belongs to Delta
Read as: not formula A is not derivable in system Sigma
Means: not formula A is not derivable in system Sigma
Read as: class C is the intersection of the model classes for schemas A sub one through A sub n
Means: class C is the intersection of the model classes for schemas A sub one through A sub n
Read as: necessarily formula A
Means: necessarily formula A
Read as: possibly formula C
Means: possibly formula C
Read as: possibly formula A if and only if necessarily formula A
Means: possibly formula A if and only if necessarily formula A
Read as: formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A
Means: formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A
Read as: class C subscript axiom five
Means: class C subscript axiom five
Read as: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Means: necessarily formula A belongs to Delta sub one
Read as: formula B sub one
Means: formula B sub one
A set Gamma is complete Sigma consistent exactly when it is Sigma consistent and, for every formula A, contains either A or not A.
The source lists deductive closure, inclusion of Sigma, exclusion of falsity, inclusion of truth, and membership conditions for negation, conjunction, disjunction, the conditional, and the biconditional. Active source-profile clauses remain in source order.
Complete the source-selected missing cases in the proof of the proposition on complete Sigma consistent sets. The exercise remains unsolved.
Every Sigma consistent set Gamma is extended by a complete Sigma consistent set Delta. The construction enumerates formulas and adds each formula or its negation while preserving consistency.
Gamma derives A in Sigma exactly when every complete Sigma consistent extension Delta of Gamma contains A. The empty-Gamma case characterizes the modal system itself.
The display defines box Gamma, diamond Gamma, inverse box Gamma, and inverse diamond Gamma by adding or removing the corresponding modal operator from every member.
Four source-ordered equations define the direct box and diamond images and their inverse images. Each set-builder condition retains which modal operator is present.
If Gamma derives A in Sigma, then box Gamma derives necessarily A in Sigma. The proof applies the normal modal rule to a finite curried conditional derivation.
If inverse box Gamma derives A in Sigma, then Gamma derives necessarily A in Sigma, using the preceding lifting lemma and inclusion of box inverse-box Gamma in Gamma.
For complete Sigma consistent Gamma, necessarily A belongs to Gamma exactly when A belongs to every complete Sigma consistent Delta extending inverse box Gamma.
For complete Sigma consistent Gamma and Delta, inverse box Gamma is a subset of Delta exactly when diamond Delta is a subset of Gamma.
Possibly A belongs to complete Sigma consistent Gamma exactly when some complete Sigma consistent Delta contains A and has diamond Delta included in Gamma.
Prove the selected box-or-diamond characterization directly, without using the equivalence lemma. The exercise remains unsolved.
Worlds are all complete Sigma consistent sets. Accessibility is defined by inverse-box inclusion, equivalently by the selected diamond condition. Valuation V superscript Sigma assigns p exactly to worlds Delta containing p.
For every formula A, A is true at world Delta in the canonical model exactly when A belongs to Delta.
Complete the source-selected missing induction cases in the Truth Lemma. The exercise remains unsolved.
A model determines a normal modal logic Sigma exactly when it makes A true throughout if and only if Sigma derives A, for every formula A.
The canonical model for Sigma makes A true throughout exactly when Sigma derives A.
If A is valid, then A is derivable in basic modal logic K. The proof uses the canonical-model determination theorem contrapositively.
If Sigma contains one of axioms D, T, B, four, or five, its canonical model is respectively serial, reflexive, symmetric, transitive, or euclidean.
The outer table presents five source-ordered axiom schemas with the corresponding canonical-frame properties. Its inner tabular object carries the explicit row and column reading.
Columns are the axiom schema contained in Sigma and the resulting canonical-model property. Rows D, T, B, four, and five map respectively to serial, reflexive, symmetric, transitive, and euclidean.
For any selected schemas among D, T, B, four, and five, the normal system formed by adding them to K is determined by the intersection of their corresponding model classes.
The proposition associates the schema possibly A implies necessarily A with partial functionality, the biconditional version with functionality, and necessarily necessarily A implies necessarily A with weak density.
The display derives a contradiction from an assumed inconsistent intermediate set. It preserves every source step from the premise formulas, through normality and necessitation, to a negated conjunction in Delta sub two.
the deductive closure clause for complete Sigma consistent sets
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the lemma lifting a derivation into boxed premises and conclusion
the lemma deriving a boxed conclusion from inverse-box premises
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the proposition listing properties of complete Sigma consistent sets
the deductive closure clause for complete Sigma consistent sets
the lemma deriving a boxed conclusion from inverse-box premises
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the equivalence between the inverse-box and diamond accessibility conditions
the lemma lifting a derivation into boxed premises and conclusion
Read as: World set W superscript Sigma is the set of all Delta such that Delta is complete Sigma consistent.
Read as: Case: A is the falsity constant.
Read as: Case: A is the propositional variable p.
Read as: Case: A is the negation of B.
Read as: Case: A is the conjunction of B and C.
Read as: Case: A is the disjunction of B and C.
Read as: Case: A is the conditional from B to C.
Read as: Case: A is necessarily B.
Read as: Case: A is possibly B.
Read as: axiom D
Read as: axiom T
Read as: axiom B
Read as: axiom four
Read as: axiom five
Structure: table.
Correspondence table. Column headers: if Sigma contains the axiom schema; the canonical model for Sigma has the stated property. Row one, axiom D, necessarily formula A implies possibly formula A; property serial. Row two, axiom T, necessarily formula A implies formula A; property reflexive. Row three, axiom B, formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A; property symmetric. Row four, axiom four, necessarily formula A implies necessarily necessarily formula A; property transitive. Row five, axiom five, possibly formula A implies necessarily possibly formula A; property euclidean. End table.