Equation form expr-01cadf2075e66b6d
Read as: A subscript k
Means: A subscript k
Normal Modal Logics
Read as: A subscript k
Means: A subscript k
Source-census fragment. Read the complete source formula tr051-reader-composite-math-0001. The original fragment is preserved as forensic source evidence, not as a complete reader equation.
Read as: structure M satisfies: for every set X, for every x, if for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Means: structure M satisfies: for every set X, for every x, if for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Read as: i equals one
Means: i equals one
Read as: u belongs to V of p
Means: u belongs to V of p
Read as: s
Means: s
Read as: structure M satisfies that for every x, Q relates x to itself
Means: structure M satisfies that for every x, Q relates x to itself
Read as: R relates w subscript two to w subscript three
Means: R relates w subscript two to w subscript three
Read as: B is false in modal model M prime at world w
Means: B is false in modal model M prime at world w
Read as: A is true in modal model M at world w if and only if structure M prime satisfies the standard translation at x of A under assignment s
Means: A is true in modal model M at world w if and only if structure M prime satisfies the standard translation at x of A under assignment s
Read as: structure M satisfies: if, for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Means: structure M satisfies: if, for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Read as: u
Means: u
Read as: the interpretation of a subscript two in structure M
Means: the interpretation of a subscript two in structure M
Read as: if necessarily A, then A
Means: if necessarily A, then A
Read as: M prime
Means: M prime
Read as: p
Means: p
Read as: A is valid in the class of models C
Means: A is valid in the class of models C
Read as: V of p
Means: V of p
Read as: the conditional from possibly p to necessarily possibly p is not valid in frame F
Means: the conditional from possibly p to necessarily possibly p is not valid in frame F
Read as: n
Means: n
Read as: the interpretation of Q in structure M
Means: the interpretation of Q in structure M
Read as: the interpretation of a subscript i in structure M subscript k equals i
Means: the interpretation of a subscript i in structure M subscript k equals i
Read as: the conditional from necessarily p to possibly p is valid in frame F
Means: the conditional from necessarily p to possibly p is valid in frame F
Read as: necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Means: necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Read as: structure M satisfies F
Means: structure M satisfies F
Read as: the equivalence class of w equals the set of worlds w prime in W such that R relates w to w prime
Means: the equivalence class of w equals the set of worlds w prime in W such that R relates w to w prime
Read as: the conditional from necessarily p to possibly p is false in modal model M at world w
Means: the conditional from necessarily p to possibly p is false in modal model M at world w
Read as: p subscript i
Means: p subscript i
Read as: possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Means: possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Read as: p is true in modal model M at world u
Means: p is true in modal model M at world u
Read as: if necessarily not p, then not p
Means: if necessarily not p, then not p
Read as: R relates u to z
Means: R relates u to z
Read as: the conditional from p to necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Means: the conditional from p to necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world u
Read as: structure M prime satisfies the standard translation at x of A under assignment s
Means: structure M prime satisfies the standard translation at x of A under assignment s
Read as: z belongs to V of p
Means: z belongs to V of p
Read as: for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then R relates u to v
Means: for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then R relates u to v
Read as: x
Means: x
Read as: the interpretation of Q in structure M prime equals R
Means: the interpretation of Q in structure M prime equals R
Read as: possibly A is true at this world
Means: possibly A is true at this world
Read as: possibly p is false in modal model M at world v
Means: possibly p is false in modal model M at world v
Read as: w subscript two
Means: w subscript two
Read as: s prime of y equals s of x
Means: s prime of y equals s of x
Read as: modal model M prime equals the ordered triple W prime, R prime, V prime
Means: modal model M prime equals the ordered triple W prime, R prime, V prime
Read as: R relates w to u
Means: R relates w to u
Read as: R relates u to v
Means: R relates u to v
Read as: the equivalence class of v
Means: the equivalence class of v
Read as: A is valid in frame F if and only if structure F prime satisfies A prime
Means: A is valid in frame F if and only if structure F prime satisfies A prime
Read as: structure M subscript k satisfies F
Means: structure M subscript k satisfies F
Read as: R relates w subscript two to w subscript one
Means: R relates w subscript two to w subscript one
Read as: structure M satisfies X of x under assignment s
Means: structure M satisfies X of x under assignment s
Read as: A is true in modal model M at world u
Means: A is true in modal model M at world u
Read as: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Means: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Read as: axiom T is true in modal model M at world w
Means: axiom T is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: the conditional from necessarily p to necessarily necessarily p is valid in frame F
Means: the conditional from necessarily p to necessarily necessarily p is valid in frame F
Read as: the domain of structure M subscript k equals the set of integers from one through k
Means: the domain of structure M subscript k equals the set of integers from one through k
Read as: P subscript i
Means: P subscript i
Read as: M
Means: M
Read as: w subscript one
Means: w subscript one
Read as: V prime of p equals the intersection of V of p with W prime
Means: V prime of p equals the intersection of V of p with W prime
Read as: R relates v to w
Means: R relates v to w
Read as: Q
Means: Q
Read as: X
Means: X
Read as: v
Means: v
Read as: possibly A is true in modal model M at world w prime
Means: possibly A is true in modal model M at world w prime
Read as: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Means: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Read as: w
Means: w
Read as: the possibility operator
Means: the possibility operator
Read as: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Means: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Read as: possibly p if and only if necessarily p
Means: possibly p if and only if necessarily p
Read as: p is false in modal model M at world w
Means: p is false in modal model M at world w
Read as: if A, then necessarily possibly A
Means: if A, then necessarily possibly A
Read as: p is true in modal model M at world z
Means: p is true in modal model M at world z
Read as: Gamma
Means: Gamma
Read as: W prime is a subset of W
Means: W prime is a subset of W
Read as: z
Means: z
Read as: s of X equals the set of z such that R relates x to z
Means: s of X equals the set of z such that R relates x to z
Read as: P
Means: P
Read as: R relates u to y
Means: R relates u to y
Read as: s prime
Means: s prime
Read as: the integers
Means: the integers
Read as: axiom D is true in modal model M
Means: axiom D is true in modal model M
Read as: possibly A is false in modal model M at world w
Means: possibly A is false in modal model M at world w
Read as: A is true in modal model M
Means: A is true in modal model M
Read as: for every x and every y, if Q relates x to y, then Q relates y to x
Means: for every x and every y, if Q relates x to y, then Q relates y to x
Read as: modal model M equals the ordered triple W, R, V
Means: modal model M equals the ordered triple W, R, V
Read as: X is a subset of W
Means: X is a subset of W
Read as: the interpretation of Q in structure F prime equals R
Means: the interpretation of Q in structure F prime equals R
Read as: A is true in modal model M at world w prime
Means: A is true in modal model M at world w prime
Read as: if possibly necessarily p, then necessarily possibly p
Means: if possibly necessarily p, then necessarily possibly p
Read as: necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world w
Means: necessarily possibly p is false in modal model M at world w
Read as: R relates w subscript one to w subscript two
Means: R relates w subscript one to w subscript two
Read as: V of p subscript i
Means: V of p subscript i
Read as: for every X subscript one through X subscript n, and every x, the result of simultaneously substituting X subscript one through X subscript n for P subscript one through P subscript n in the standard translation at x of A
Means: for every X subscript one through X subscript n, and every x, the result of simultaneously substituting X subscript one through X subscript n for P subscript one through P subscript n in the standard translation at x of A
Read as: W prime equals the equivalence class of w
Means: W prime equals the equivalence class of w
Read as: if p, then necessarily possibly p
Means: if p, then necessarily possibly p
Read as: the standard translation at x of A
Means: the standard translation at x of A
Read as: the interpretation of P in structure M equals R
Means: the interpretation of P in structure M equals R
Read as: P subscript n
Means: P subscript n
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the conjunction of the standard translation at x of B and the standard translation at x of C
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the conjunction of the standard translation at x of B and the standard translation at x of C
Read as: R relates w to w prime
Means: R relates w to w prime
Read as: necessarily possibly A
Means: necessarily possibly A
Read as: u and v belong to W
Means: u and v belong to W
Read as: the natural numbers
Means: the natural numbers
Read as: the interpretation of Q in structure M subscript k equals the less than relation
Means: the interpretation of Q in structure M subscript k equals the less than relation
Read as: W equals the set containing u and v
Means: W equals the set containing u and v
Read as: s of x equals w
Means: s of x equals w
Read as: structure M satisfies the conditional from Q relating x to y to X holding of y, under assignment s prime
Means: structure M satisfies the conditional from Q relating x to y to X holding of y, under assignment s prime
Read as: A
Means: A
Read as: k
Means: k
Read as: open bracket w close bracket
Means: open bracket w close bracket
Read as: the interpretation of Q in structure M equals R
Means: the interpretation of Q in structure M equals R
Read as: F
Means: F
Read as: R relates w to v
Means: R relates w to v
Read as: for every u there exists a v such that R relates u to v
Means: for every u there exists a v such that R relates u to v
Source-census fragment. Read the complete source formula tr051-reader-composite-math-0002. The original fragment is preserved as forensic source evidence, not as a complete reader equation.
Read as: C
Means: C
Read as: the interpretation of a subscript one in structure M
Means: the interpretation of a subscript one in structure M
Read as: the conditional from necessarily p to p is valid in frame F
Means: the conditional from necessarily p to p is valid in frame F
Read as: the standard translation at x of the conditional from necessarily p to p
Means: the standard translation at x of the conditional from necessarily p to p
Read as: R
Means: R
Read as: q
Means: q
Read as: possibly p is true in modal model M at world w
Means: possibly p is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: frame F belongs to the class of frames F
Means: frame F belongs to the class of frames F
Read as: if, for every y, Q relates x to y only if P holds of y, then P holds of x
Means: if, for every y, Q relates x to y only if P holds of y, then P holds of x
Read as: for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then R relates v to u
Means: for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then R relates v to u
Read as: u belongs to V of p if and only if v belongs to V of p
Means: u belongs to V of p if and only if v belongs to V of p
Read as: the interpretation of P subscript i in structure M prime equals V of p subscript i
Means: the interpretation of P subscript i in structure M prime equals V of p subscript i
Read as: necessarily possibly A is true in modal model M at world w
Means: necessarily possibly A is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: necessarily p is true in modal model M at world w
Means: necessarily p is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: F prime
Means: F prime
Read as: the equivalence class of u
Means: the equivalence class of u
Read as: structure F prime satisfies A prime
Means: structure F prime satisfies A prime
Read as: M prime
Means: M prime
Read as: y
Means: y
Read as: structure M satisfies the conditional from Q relating x to itself to X holding of x, under assignment s
Means: structure M satisfies the conditional from Q relating x to itself to X holding of x, under assignment s
Read as: R relates w subscript three to w subscript two
Means: R relates w subscript three to w subscript two
Read as: R relates w prime to w
Means: R relates w prime to w
Read as: p is true in modal model M at world y
Means: p is true in modal model M at world y
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the disjunction of the standard translation at x of B and the standard translation at x of C
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the disjunction of the standard translation at x of B and the standard translation at x of C
Read as: necessarily A is true in modal model M
Means: necessarily A is true in modal model M
Read as: V of p equals W with w removed
Means: V of p equals W with w removed
Read as: structure M subscript k satisfies A subscript i
Means: structure M subscript k satisfies A subscript i
Read as: R equals the interpretation of Q in structure M
Means: R equals the interpretation of Q in structure M
Read as: i is less than or equal to k
Means: i is less than or equal to k
Read as: necessarily p is true in modal model M at world u
Means: necessarily p is true in modal model M at world u
Read as: the ordered pair W, R
Means: the ordered pair W, R
Read as: for every w, R relates w to itself
Means: for every w, R relates w to itself
Read as: R prime
Means: R prime
Source-census fragment. Read the complete source formula tr051-reader-composite-math-0001, complete source formula tr051-reader-composite-math-0002. The original fragment is preserved as forensic source evidence, not as a complete reader equation.
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals: for every y, if Q relates x to y, then the standard translation at y of B
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals: for every y, if Q relates x to y, then the standard translation at y of B
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the negation of the standard translation at x of B
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the negation of the standard translation at x of B
Read as: for every w there exists a v such that, for every u, R relates w to u if and only if u equals v
Means: for every w there exists a v such that, for every u, R relates w to u if and only if u equals v
Read as: s of x belongs to W
Means: s of x belongs to W
Read as: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Means: frame F equals the ordered pair W, R
Read as: necessarily necessarily p is true in modal model M at world u
Means: necessarily necessarily p is true in modal model M at world u
Read as: R relates u to w
Means: R relates u to w
Read as: p is true in modal model M at world w
Means: p is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: A is true in modal model M at world w
Means: A is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: w prime
Means: w prime
Read as: for every u, v, and w, if R relates u to v and R relates v to w, then R relates u to w
Means: for every u, v, and w, if R relates u to v and R relates v to w, then R relates u to w
Read as: possibly A
Means: possibly A
Read as: V of q
Means: V of q
Read as: A is valid in the class of frames F
Means: A is valid in the class of frames F
Read as: A is true in modal model M at world v
Means: A is true in modal model M at world v
Read as: for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then u equals v
Means: for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then u equals v
Read as: W is the singleton set containing w
Means: W is the singleton set containing w
Read as: if necessarily necessarily p, then necessarily p
Means: if necessarily necessarily p, then necessarily p
Read as: R relates w to itself
Means: R relates w to itself
Read as: s of x
Means: s of x
Read as: s of X
Means: s of X
Read as: w prime belongs to W prime
Means: w prime belongs to W prime
Read as: A is true in modal model M prime at world w prime
Means: A is true in modal model M prime at world w prime
Read as: the ordered pair W, R
Means: the ordered pair W, R
Read as: M prime
Means: M prime
Read as: structure M satisfies: if for every y, Q relating x to y implies itself, then Q relates x to itself, under assignment s
Means: structure M satisfies: if for every y, Q relating x to y implies itself, then Q relates x to itself, under assignment s
Read as: B
Means: B
Read as: M
Means: M
Read as: P subscript one
Means: P subscript one
Read as: B is false in modal model M at world w
Means: B is false in modal model M at world w
Read as: w belongs to W
Means: w belongs to W
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals P subscript i of x
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals P subscript i of x
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals falsity
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals falsity
Read as: the ordered triple W, R, V
Means: the ordered triple W, R, V
Read as: the conjunction of Q relating a subscript one to a subscript two, continuing through Q relating a subscript n minus one to a subscript n
Means: the conjunction of Q relating a subscript one to a subscript two, continuing through Q relating a subscript n minus one to a subscript n
Read as: axiom B
Means: axiom B
Read as: the less than relation
Means: the less than relation
Read as: structure M satisfies A
Means: structure M satisfies A
Read as: V
Means: V
Read as: A subscript n
Means: A subscript n
Read as: V of q equals the empty set, followed by a closing parenthesis
Means: V of q equals the empty set, followed by a closing parenthesis
Read as: F
Means: F
Read as: if necessarily p, then necessarily necessarily p
Means: if necessarily p, then necessarily necessarily p
Read as: w belongs to its equivalence class
Means: w belongs to its equivalence class
Read as: structure M satisfies that, for every y, if Q relates x to y then X holds of y, under assignment s
Means: structure M satisfies that, for every y, if Q relates x to y then X holds of y, under assignment s
Read as: for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then there exists a w such that R relates u to w and R relates w to v
Means: for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then there exists a w such that R relates u to w and R relates w to v
Read as: t
Means: t
Read as: the set of integers from one through k
Means: the set of integers from one through k
Read as: x belongs to W
Means: x belongs to W
Read as: R relates v to u
Means: R relates v to u
Read as: the domain of structure M prime equals W
Means: the domain of structure M prime equals W
Read as: A is true at this world
Means: A is true at this world
Read as: A prime
Means: A prime
Read as: the interpretation of P subscript i in structure M prime is a subset of W
Means: the interpretation of P subscript i in structure M prime is a subset of W
Read as: v belongs to W
Means: v belongs to W
Read as: W prime
Means: W prime
Read as: axiom W, the Loeb formula: if it is necessary that necessarily p implies p, then necessarily p
Means: axiom W, the Loeb formula: if it is necessary that necessarily p implies p, then necessarily p
Read as: for every set X and every x, if for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Means: for every set X and every x, if for every y, Q relates x to y only if X holds of y, then X holds of x
Read as: for every x and every y, Q relates x to y
Means: for every x and every y, Q relates x to y
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the conditional from the standard translation at x of B to the standard translation at x of C
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals the conditional from the standard translation at x of B to the standard translation at x of C
Read as: if possibly p, then necessarily possibly p
Means: if possibly p, then necessarily possibly p
Read as: for every x, Q relates x to itself
Means: for every x, Q relates x to itself
Read as: if necessarily p, then possibly p
Means: if necessarily p, then possibly p
Read as: the set of z such that R relates x to z
Means: the set of z such that R relates x to z
Read as: the necessity operator
Means: the necessity operator
Read as: frame F, equal to the ordered pair W, R, belongs to the class of frames F
Means: frame F, equal to the ordered pair W, R, belongs to the class of frames F
Read as: Q relates x to itself
Means: Q relates x to itself
Read as: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals: there exists a y such that Q relates x to y and the standard translation at y of B
Means: the standard translation at x of the current formula equals: there exists a y such that Q relates x to y and the standard translation at y of B
Read as: V of p equals the empty set
Means: V of p equals the empty set
Read as: necessarily possibly A is true at this world
Means: necessarily possibly A is true at this world
Read as: the equivalence class of z
Means: the equivalence class of z
Read as: if possibly p, then necessarily p
Means: if possibly p, then necessarily p
Read as: axiom D is true in modal model M at world w
Means: axiom D is true in modal model M at world w
Read as: the domain of structure F prime equals W
Means: the domain of structure F prime equals W
Read as: Gamma equals the set containing F and A subscript one, A subscript two, and so on
Means: Gamma equals the set containing F and A subscript one, A subscript two, and so on
Read as: the domain of structure M equals W
Means: the domain of structure M equals W
Read as: p is true in modal model M at world v
Means: p is true in modal model M at world v
Read as: either it is necessary that, if p and necessarily p, then q; or it is necessary that, if q and necessarily q, then p
Means: either it is necessary that, if p and necessarily p, then q; or it is necessary that, if q and necessarily q, then p
Read as: necessarily A
Means: necessarily A
Read as: w belongs to V of p
Means: w belongs to V of p
Read as: modal model M equals the ordered triple W, R, V
Means: modal model M equals the ordered triple W, R, V
Read as: if necessarily p, then p
Means: if necessarily p, then p
Read as: W
Means: W
Read as: A is valid in frame F
Means: A is valid in frame F
Read as: w does not belong to V of p
Means: w does not belong to V of p
If a model accessibility relation has the property in the first correspondence table, then every substitution instance of the modal schema in the corresponding row is true in that model.
The outer table contains the source caption and an inner row-and-column table. The inner table is the sole listener structure authority, avoiding duplicate readings of the same twelve formulas.
Five source-ordered rows pair seriality, reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, and euclideanness with their defining relation conditions and the modal schemas labelled D, T, B, four, and five.
Complete the proof of the theorem on five sound correspondence schemas. The source proves only the symmetry case; this edition does not add the omitted proofs.
The outer figure contains the caption and an enclosed two-world accessibility diagram. Its inner diagram is the sole structural listener authority.
World w is labelled with A and necessarily possibly A true. World w prime is labelled with possibly A true. One accessibility arrow goes from w to w prime and a second returns from w prime to w; no loops or other edges are printed.
The proposition assumes two worlds connected in both directions and identical propositional valuations. It claims every formula has the same truth value at the two worlds and hence every T instance is true. Its subsequent claim that the model is irreflexive needs the separately preserved source caveat because the stated hypotheses do not exclude loops.
Prove the two claims in the preceding proposition, including the induction on formulas. No proof is supplied.
The outer table contains the source caption and an inner row-and-column table. The inner table is the sole listener structure authority, avoiding duplicate readings of the same fourteen formulas.
Five source-ordered rows pair partial functionality, functionality, weak density, weak connectedness, and weak directedness with their relation conditions and corresponding modal formulas. The split weak-connected and weak-directed conditions remain joined in their row descriptions.
Show that each relation property in the second table makes every instance of its corresponding modal formula true in the model. No solution is supplied.
A frame is an ordered pair of a nonempty set of worlds and a binary accessibility relation. A model is based on that frame exactly when it adds a valuation to the same worlds and relation.
A formula is valid in a frame when it is true in every model based on that frame. It is valid in a class of frames when it is valid in every member frame.
A modal formula defines a class of frames exactly when it is valid in all and only the frames belonging to that class.
If one of the five modal schemas in the first table is valid in a frame, the accessibility relation has the corresponding property. The proof treats seriality, reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, and euclideanness in source order.
Any model in which axiom D is true is serial; unlike the other displayed correspondence results, this statement does not require quantification over all valuations on a frame.
Each modal schema in the first table defines exactly the class of frames having the paired accessibility property, by combining the soundness theorem with the full correspondence theorem.
For each additional relation property, start with a frame lacking it and choose a valuation making the paired modal formula false somewhere. The exercise remains unsolved.
The proposition records reflexive implies serial; under symmetry, transitive is equivalent to euclidean; symmetric or euclidean implies weakly directed; euclidean implies weakly connected; and functional implies serial.
Prove the preceding proposition about implications among accessibility properties. No proof is supplied.
A frame class is first-order definable when a sentence with one binary predicate Q holds in the corresponding structure exactly for the frames in the class, with the structure domain as worlds and Q interpreted as accessibility.
The displayed formula is the conditional from necessarily, if necessarily p then p, to necessarily p. The source states that it defines transitive converse well-founded frames.
An equivalence relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A universal relation relates every ordered pair of worlds.
The proposition lists equivalence; reflexive plus euclidean; serial plus symmetric plus euclidean; and serial plus symmetric plus transitive. Its source proof is only the word Exercise and is not expanded here.
Prove five stated implications among symmetry, transitivity, euclideanness, reflexivity, and seriality, then explain why they establish equivalence. No solution is supplied.
For an equivalence relation, each world belongs to its own class, the relation is universal within each class, and all equivalence classes form mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive subsets of W.
A modal formula is valid on all equivalence frames exactly when it is valid on all universal frames. The proof restricts a countermodel to the equivalence class of the world where the formula fails.
The outer figure contains the caption and an enclosed partition diagram. The shaded area represents W prime, the equivalence class of w; the inner diagram is the sole structural listener authority.
An outer rounded rectangle represents W. Two curved boundaries divide it into regions labelled the equivalence classes of w, u, v, and z. The shaded region represents W prime, equal to the class of w. This is not an accessibility graph and prints no arrows or valuations.
The selected source clauses translate falsity, a propositional variable, negation, conjunction, disjunction, conditional, necessity, and possibility. Necessity becomes a universal Q condition and possibility becomes an existential Q condition. Profile-excluded clauses are not invented.
For corresponding modal model M, first-order structure M prime, world w, and assignment s sending x to w, modal A is true at w exactly when M prime satisfies its standard translation under s. The source proof is induction on A.
Universally quantify one set variable for every propositional predicate in the standard translation and every world variable x, then substitute those set variables for the predicates. A modal formula is valid in the frame exactly when the corresponding first-order frame structure satisfies this second-order sentence.
A frame class is second-order definable when a sentence with one binary accessibility predicate and only monadic set quantifiers holds in the corresponding structure exactly for the frames in the class.
Every class of frames defined by a modal formula has a corresponding class of accessibility relations defined by the monadic second-order sentence constructed in the preceding proposition.
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the proposition about the two-world model in which every T instance is true
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the theorem that five accessibility properties guarantee their corresponding modal schemas
the proposition on five implications among accessibility properties
the proposition giving four equivalent characterizations of equivalence relations
the proposition giving four equivalent characterizations of equivalence relations
the later proposition listing four equivalent axiomatizations of S five
the proposition that the standard translation preserves truth at a world
Read as: For every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then either R relates u to v, u equals v, or R relates v to u.
Read as: For every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then there exists t such that R relates u to t and R relates v to t.
Read as: axiom D
Read as: axiom T
Read as: axiom B
Read as: axiom four
Read as: axiom five
Read as: axiom L
Read as: axiom G
Read as: Case: A is the falsity constant.
Read as: Case: A is the propositional variable p subscript i.
Read as: Case: A is the negation of B.
Read as: Case: A is the conjunction of B and C.
Read as: Case: A is the disjunction of B and C.
Read as: Case: A is the conditional from B to C.
Read as: Case: A is necessarily B.
Read as: Case: A is possibly B.
Structure: table.
Five classical correspondence facts. Header: if R has the named property, then the paired formula is true in M. Serial row. Relation condition: for every u there exists a v such that R relates u to v. Modal schema: if necessarily p, then possibly p, labelled axiom D. Reflexive row. Relation condition: for every w, R relates w to itself. Modal schema: if necessarily p, then p, labelled axiom T. Symmetric row. The source first prints the modal schema if p, then necessarily possibly p, labelled axiom B, then on the following line its relation condition for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then R relates v to u. Transitive row. The source first prints the modal schema if necessarily p, then necessarily necessarily p, labelled axiom four, then its relation condition for every u, v, and w, if R relates u to v and R relates v to w, then R relates u to w. Euclidean row. The source first prints the modal schema if possibly p, then necessarily possibly p, labelled axiom five, then its relation condition for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then R relates u to v. End table.
Structure: diagram tikz.
Two-world accessibility graph for symmetry. The first node annotations, in source order, are A is true at this world and necessarily possibly A is true at this world. That node is world w. The second node annotation is possibly A is true at this world. That node is world w prime. The first directed arrow goes from w to w prime. The second directed arrow goes from w prime back to w. No loops, additional worlds, additional valuations, or other accessibility arrows are printed. End diagram.
Structure: table.
Five additional correspondence facts. Header: if R has the named property, then the paired formula is true in M. Partially functional row. Modal schema: if possibly p, then necessarily p. Relation condition: for every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then u equals v. Functional row. Relation condition: for every w there exists a v such that, for every u, R relates w to u if and only if u equals v. Modal schema: possibly p if and only if necessarily p. Weakly dense row. Modal schema: if necessarily necessarily p, then necessarily p. Relation condition: for every u and v, if R relates u to v, then there exists a w such that R relates u to w and R relates w to v. Weakly connected row. Modal schema: either it is necessary that, if p and necessarily p, then q; or it is necessary that, if q and necessarily q, then p, labelled axiom L. Relation condition: For every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then either R relates u to v, u equals v, or R relates v to u.. Weakly directed row. Modal schema: if possibly necessarily p, then necessarily possibly p, labelled axiom G. Relation condition: For every w, u, and v, if R relates w to u and R relates w to v, then there exists t such that R relates u to t and R relates v to t.. End table.
Structure: diagram tikz.
Equivalence-class partition diagram. Four region labels appear in source order: the equivalence class of w, the equivalence class of u, the equivalence class of v, and the equivalence class of z. An outer rounded rectangle represents W. Two curved boundaries divide it into the four labelled regions. The gray shaded region represents W prime, equal to the equivalence class of w, as stated immediately before the figure. This is a partition picture, not a Kripke accessibility graph: it prints no directed edges, relation labels, worlds inside the classes, or valuations. End diagram.