Contents

Global boundary operators, compressed wave fronts, and normal extension

Written and dedicated to the public domain by Codex, September 2026 (CC0).

The local half-space calculus already tells us how a totally characteristic operator acts near one boundary chart. On a manifold, the same calculation must survive changes of coordinates, corners in the operator kernel, and the distinction between an ordinary normal derivative and a vector field tangent to the boundary. This lesson builds that global calculus, proves its wave-front rules, and then uses the exact boundary trace to extend solutions of noncharacteristic equations. A final argument shows when conormal regularity is genuine smoothness up to the boundary.

We keep the original Fourier convention D=−i∂D=-i\partial, with inverse factor (2π)−n(2\pi)^{-n}. A supported distribution is always represented on the closed half-space; a restricted interior distribution is a different object. Matrix products retain their input and output order. All orders of symbols and conormal distributions are real unless a theorem specifies an integer normal order.

The named prerequisites are Singularities along a submanifold and smooth boundary passage, Totally characteristic operators on the half space, From symbol estimates to operators on every Sobolev scale, and Detecting regularity without choosing coordinates. The proofs below reproduce their particular formulas when used, so the global construction remains readable from these exact entry points.

1. Stretched kernels and compressed covectors

1.1. The real projective blowup

Let YY be a smooth embedded submanifold of codimension k≥1k\ge1 in XX. In coordinates (z,y)(z,y), Y={y=0}Y=\{y=0\}, y∈ℝky\in\mathbb R^k. Replace the normal origin by its lines: {(z,L,v):L∈ℝℙk−1,v∈L},β(z,L,v)=(z,v).(GL1) \{(z,L,v):L\in\mathbb{RP}^{k-1},\ v\in L\}, \qquad \beta(z,L,v)=(z,v). \tag{GL1} Here vv is the actual normal vector, with both signs. Equivalently the model is (z,s,ω)(z,s,\omega), ω∈Sk−1\omega\in S^{k-1}, modulo (s,ω)∼(−s,−ω)(s,\omega)\sim(-s,-\omega), with v=sωv=s\omega. For the chart in which the ii-th component of the line is nonzero, represent that line by a vector ww with wi=1w_i=1. Coordinates are (z,s,wj:j≠i)(z,s,w_j:j\ne i), and y=swy=s w. On overlaps, sj=siwj,wℓ(j)=wℓ(i)/wj(i).(GL2) s_j=s_i w_j,\qquad w_\ell^{(j)}=w_\ell^{(i)}/w_j^{(i)} . \tag{GL2} These are smooth invertible changes where wj≠0w_j\ne0, including si=0s_i=0. They give a smooth manifold; the exceptional set is its projectivized normal bundle, and the projection is a diffeomorphism away from YY. For k=1k=1, there is one line and the local projection is the identity.

To prove independence of coordinates, let y‾(z,y)\bar y(z,y) be another normal coordinate system vanishing on YY. Hadamard’s formula gives y‾(z,y)=A(z,y)y,A(z,y)=∫01∂yy‾(z,λy)dλ,A(z,0)∈GL(k,ℝ).(GL3) \bar y(z,y)=A(z,y)y,\qquad A(z,y)=\int_0^1\partial_y\bar y(z,\lambda y)\,d\lambda , \quad A(z,0)\in GL(k,\mathbb R). \tag{GL3} In a chart y=swy=s w, choose an index jj for which (A(z,0)w)j≠0(A(z,0)w)_j\ne0. The new coordinates are s‾=s(A(z,sw)w)j\bar s=s(A(z,s w)w)_j, w‾ℓ=(A(z,sw)w)ℓ/(A(z,sw)w)j\bar w_\ell=(A(z,s w)w)_\ell/(A(z,s w)w)_j, and the actual transformed tangential coordinate z‾(z,sw)\bar z(z,s w). The denominator stays nonzero locally; all these functions are smooth at s=0s=0. The inverse coordinate change has the same construction. The maps agree away from the exceptional set, and therefore everywhere by continuity, so their cocycle identities hold. This proves coordinate independence and identifies the exceptional transition with the actual normal derivative.

If f,gf,g vanish on YY, their pullbacks have the form sF,sGsF,sG by the same integral formula. Wherever the normal derivative of gg on the line is nonzero, G(z,0,w)≠0G(z,0,w)\ne0, and f/g=F/Gf/g=F/G extends smoothly. These ratio charts are thus intrinsic. No positive-ray quotient replaces the projective quotient in this construction.

1.2. The positive corner and its exact coordinates

For boundary charts on two manifolds, keep xn,yn≥0x_n,y_n\ge0 and their positive normal rays. The projective interior normal cone at the corner is (ℝ+2\{0})/ℝ>0(\mathbb R_+^2\setminus\{0\})/\mathbb R_{>0}. Its coordinate and the radial coordinate are t=xn+yn2,r=2(xn−yn)xn+yn,xn=t(1+r/2),yn=t(1−r/2),t≥0,−2≤r≤2.(GL4) t=\frac{x_n+y_n}{2},\qquad r=\frac{2(x_n-y_n)}{x_n+y_n},\qquad x_n=t(1+r/2),\quad y_n=t(1-r/2), \quad t\ge0,\ -2\le r\le2 . \tag{GL4} At t=0t=0, rr records the ray; the projection collapses this interval to the original corner. The two side faces are r=−2r=-2, where xn=0x_n=0, and r=2r=2, where yn=0y_n=0.

Boundary coordinate changes have normal parts x‾n=α(x)xn\bar x_n=\alpha(x)x_n, y‾n=γ(y)yn\bar y_n=\gamma(y)y_n, with α,γ>0\alpha,\gamma>0. Set a=1+r/2a=1+r/2, b=1−r/2b=1-r/2. Their exact lifted law is t‾=t2[α(x)a+γ(y)b],r‾=2[α(x)a−γ(y)b]α(x)a+γ(y)b.(GL5) \bar t=\frac t2\,[\alpha(x)a+\gamma(y)b],\qquad \bar r=\frac{2[\alpha(x)a-\gamma(y)b]} {\alpha(x)a+\gamma(y)b}. \tag{GL5} The denominator is strictly positive on the entire closed interval: a,b≥0a,b\ge0, a+b=2a+b=2, and both coefficients are positive. The tangential coordinates are the original coordinate changes evaluated at xn=ta,yn=tbx_n=t a,y_n=t b. Thus the full lift is smooth up to every face and corner, and its inverse is the lift of the inverse changes. It preserves each side face and multiplies tt by a smooth positive function. These laws glue the stretched product intrinsically.

The original positive normal quadrant and its stretched rectangle

Figure GL-F1. The two panels retain the exact coordinates in (GL4). The new face retains the ray when both normal variables vanish. The lifted diagonal crosses that face. Only the two normal variables are drawn; tangential coordinates and covectors retain their full dimensions in (GL7)–(GL10). Reproducible source: ../figures/global_compressed_corner_geometry.py.

For the square of one manifold the interior diagonal lifts to Δ̂={x′=y′,r=0,t≥0}.(GL6) \widehat\Delta=\{x'=y',\ r=0,\ t\ge0\}. \tag{GL6} The projection restricts to (x′,t)↦(x′,xn=t)(x',t)\mapsto(x',x_n=t), a diffeomorphism with the original diagonal. The lifted diagonal avoids r=±2r=\pm2, and is transverse to t=0t=0 because its tangent includes the tt direction. This proves all these assertions at boundary points as well as in the interior.

1.3. The compressed bundle and both natural maps

Pull N*Δ̂N^*\widehat\Delta back by (GL6). In local coordinates its covectors have the form ξ′⋅d(x′−y′)+ρdr\xi'\cdot d(x'-y')+\rho\,dr. The normal differential of the projection at the lifted diagonal is (δ(x′−y′),δr)↦(δ(x′−y′),tδr).(GL7) (\delta(x'-y'),\delta r)\longmapsto (\delta(x'-y'),\,t\,\delta r). \tag{GL7} This follows by differentiating xn−yn=trx_n-y_n=t r at r=0r=0. Dualizing gives the natural map from the ordinary cotangent bundle: λ:T*X→T̃*X,(τ′,τn)↦(ξ′=τ′,ρ=xnτn).(GL8) \lambda:T^*X\longrightarrow\widetilde T^*X,\qquad (\tau',\tau_n)\longmapsto(\xi'=\tau',\,\rho=x_n\tau_n). \tag{GL8} It is an isomorphism for xn>0x_n>0. At xn=0x_n=0 its kernel is precisely the ordinary conormal line to the boundary, and its image is the hyperplane ρ=0\rho=0, canonically T*∂XT^*\partial X. The compressed fibre itself still has dimension nn; its other covectors have not been discarded.

The dual anchor is T̃X→TX,(v′,vn)↦∑j<nvj∂xj+xnvn∂xn.(GL9) \widetilde TX\longrightarrow TX,\qquad (v',v_n)\longmapsto \sum_{j<n}v_j\partial_{x_j}+x_n v_n\partial_{x_n}. \tag{GL9} Its smooth sections map bijectively onto smooth vector fields tangent to the boundary. Indeed a tangent normal coefficient b(x′,xn)b(x',x_n) vanishes at xn=0x_n=0 and equals xn∫01∂xnb(x′,sxn)dsx_n\int_0^1\partial_{x_n}b(x',s x_n)\,ds. This constructs its smooth inverse coefficient. Uniqueness follows in the interior and hence at the boundary by continuity.

For an exact coordinate law write x‾′=F(x′,xn)\bar x'=F(x',x_n), x‾n=α(x′,xn)xn\bar x_n=\alpha(x',x_n)x_n, α>0\alpha>0. In the interior a compressed covector is ξ′⋅dx′+ρdxn/xn\xi'\cdot dx'+\rho\,dx_n/x_n. Differentiating the original coordinate functions, without dropping terms, gives ξ′=(∂x′F)Tξ‾′+(∂x′log⁡α)ρ‾,ρ=xn(∂xnF)Tξ‾′+(1+xn∂xnlog⁡α)ρ‾.(GL10) \begin{aligned} \xi'&=(\partial_{x'}F)^T\bar\xi' +(\partial_{x'}\log\alpha)\bar\rho,\\ \rho&=x_n(\partial_{x_n}F)^T\bar\xi' +(1+x_n\partial_{x_n}\log\alpha)\bar\rho . \end{aligned} \tag{GL10} These expressions extend smoothly to the boundary. There their determinant is det⁡∂x′F≠0\det\partial_{x'}F\ne0; locally in the collar the matrix is invertible, and its inverse is furnished by the inverse boundary coordinate change. The law agrees with the pulled-back conormal law in the interior by (GL7)–(GL8), and hence agrees everywhere. It proves the intrinsic bundle identification, both anchors, and the invariant hyperplane ρ=0\rho=0.

1.4. The original symplectic form and density

In the interior substitute the full formula τn=ρ/t\tau_n=\rho/t into the ordinary cotangent form ∑jdτj∧dxj\sum_j d\tau_j\wedge dx_j. Since d(ρ/t)=t−1dρ−ρt−2dtd(\rho/t)=t^{-1}d\rho-\rho t^{-2}dt, its exact expression is ω=∑j<ndξj∧dxj+t−1dρ∧dt.(GL11) \omega=\sum_{j<n}d\xi_j\wedge dx_j+t^{-1}d\rho\wedge dt . \tag{GL11} It is nondegenerate for t>0t>0. The t−1t^{-1} factor is a boundary singularity; there is no smooth symplectic form asserted there. In the indicated order of coordinates, ωnn!=(−1)n(n+1)/2t−1dx′∧dt∧dξ′∧dρ,|ωn/n!|1/2=t−1/2|dx′dtdξ′dρ|1/2.(GL12) \frac{\omega^n}{n!} =(-1)^{n(n+1)/2}t^{-1} dx'\wedge dt\wedge d\xi'\wedge d\rho,\qquad |\omega^n/n!|^{1/2} =t^{-1/2}|dx'\,dt\,d\xi'\,d\rho|^{1/2}. \tag{GL12} For the sign, move the original ordered pairs (dξ1,dx1,…,dρ,dt)(d\xi_1,dx_1,\ldots,d\rho,dt) to the displayed base-then-fibre order; the number of transpositions is n(n+1)/2n(n+1)/2. The density law is intrinsic because (GL11) was pulled from the original cotangent form. Its singular factor remains explicit.

1.5. The full stretched kernel for every symbol order

Let a∈Slama\in S_{\mathrm{la}}^m, m∈ℝm\in\mathbb R, in the local half-space calculus. Keep its exact inverse Fourier distribution A(x,z)=(2π)−n∫eiz⋅ξa(x,ξ)dξ,K(x,y)=xn−1A(x′,xn,x′−y′,xn−ynxn)(xn>0).(GL13) A(x,z)=(2\pi)^{-n}\int e^{iz\cdot\xi}a(x,\xi)\,d\xi,\qquad K(x,y)=x_n^{-1} A\left(x',x_n,x'-y',\frac{x_n-y_n}{x_n}\right) \quad(x_n>0). \tag{GL13} Oscillatory integrals are defined by the cutoff-independent distribution construction in (C4)–(C5). No residual assumption is made. Differentiation in zz raises the amplitude order by its exact degree; integration by parts in ξ\xi to a degree exceeding that order plus nn proves that AA is smooth off z=0z=0, with arbitrary decay in |z|≥1|z|\ge1, uniformly with every base derivative on compact sets. Near z=0z=0 its full phase and amplitude exhibit a conormal distribution of order mm by (C16), with ambient dimension 2n2n and codimension nn.

The Fourier support in the original definition implies supp⁡znA⊂(−∞,1]\operatorname{supp}_{z_n}A\subset(-\infty,1]. In fact the partial Fourier transform of aa is supported in [−1,∞)[-1,\infty); inverse transformation evaluates it at −zn-z_n, with the original inverse Fourier factor. At zn=1z_n=1 the distribution is already smooth, since that point is away from z=0z=0. Its vanishing on zn>1z_n>1 therefore makes every derivative vanish on zn=1z_n=1.

The determinant of (GL4) is −t-t, so a kernel half-density pulls back with coefficient k=t1/2Kk=t^{1/2}K. Put H=t1/2k=tKH=t^{1/2}k=tK. The entire formula is k=t−1/2(1+r/2)−1A(x′,t(1+r/2),x′−y′,r1+r/2),H=(1+r/2)−1A(x′,t(1+r/2),x′−y′,r1+r/2).(GL14) k=t^{-1/2}(1+r/2)^{-1} A\left(x',t(1+r/2),x'-y',\frac{r}{1+r/2}\right),\qquad H=(1+r/2)^{-1} A\left(x',t(1+r/2),x'-y',\frac{r}{1+r/2}\right). \tag{GL14} Thus both square-root factors, the normal Jacobian and the complete argument of AA are retained.

Near the lifted diagonal 1+r/2>01+r/2>0. In (GL13) change only the integration variable ξn=(1+r/2)ρ\xi_n=(1+r/2)\rho. Its positive Jacobian cancels exactly the displayed (1+r/2)−1(1+r/2)^{-1}, giving H=(2π)−n∫ei[(x′−y′)⋅ξ′+rρ]a(x′,t(1+r/2),ξ′,(1+r/2)ρ)dξ′dρ.(GL15) H=(2\pi)^{-n}\int e^{i[(x'-y')\cdot\xi'+r\rho]}\, a\bigl(x',t(1+r/2),\xi',(1+r/2)\rho\bigr)\,d\xi'\,d\rho . \tag{GL15} The amplitude has all order-mm estimates on compact base sets: an rr-derivative gives t∂xna/2t\partial_{x_n}a/2 or ρ∂ξna/2\rho\partial_{\xi_n}a/2; the latter has the original order mm. A tt-derivative has the bounded factor 1+r/21+r/2; frequency derivatives lower the order normally. The same argument handles any iterated mixed derivative. Equations (GL14) and (GL15) are exact descriptions of the same kernel, not a substitution omitting a density factor. They prove that H|dx′dy′dtdr|1/2H|dx'\,dy'\,dt\,dr|^{1/2} is conormal along Δ̂\widehat\Delta, smooth in t≥0t\ge0.

At r=2r=2, the last argument of AA is 11, so the preceding support argument gives side flatness, including all tt and tangential derivatives. At r=−2r=-2, that argument tends to minus infinity. Its derivatives and the displayed prefactor grow only as fixed powers of (2+r)−1(2+r)^{-1}. The arbitrary large-|z||z| decay absorbs each such power, proving flatness there as well. These estimates are uniform for compact t,x′,y′t,x',y' ranges. Off Δ̂\widehat\Delta, the same Fourier argument proves smoothness.

1.6. The exact principal half-density and inverse reconstruction

In the full amplitude of (GL15), the difference from its r=0r=0 value is r2∫01[t∂xna+ρ∂ξna](x′,t(1+sr/2),ξ′,(1+sr/2)ρ)ds.(GL16) \frac r2\int_0^1 [\,t\partial_{x_n}a+\rho\partial_{\xi_n}a\,] \bigl(x',t(1+s r/2),\xi',(1+s r/2)\rho\bigr)\,ds . \tag{GL16} Retain this entire integral. Integration by parts in ρ\rho, using reirρ=i−1∂ρeirρr e^{ir\rho}=i^{-1}\partial_\rho e^{ir\rho}, changes it to the exact order-(m−1)(m-1) amplitude i2∂ρ∫01[t∂xna+ρ∂ξna](x′,t(1+sr/2),ξ′,(1+sr/2)ρ)ds.(GL17) \frac i2\,\partial_\rho\int_0^1 [\,t\partial_{x_n}a+\rho\partial_{\xi_n}a\,] \bigl(x',t(1+s r/2),\xi',(1+s r/2)\rho\bigr)\,ds . \tag{GL17} A compact cutoff in rr on this chart is independent of ρ\rho and does not change that calculation. The defining cutoff limit justifies the integration by parts, by (C4)–(C5). Hence the principal conormal half-density of HH, in the parametrization (x′,x′,t,0;ξ′,−ξ′,0,ρ)(x',x',t,0;\xi',-\xi',0,\rho), is precisely the class of a(x′,t,ξ′,ρ)|dx′dtdξ′dρ|1/2(mod⁡one lower amplitude order).(GL18) a(x',t,\xi',\rho)\,|dx'\,dt\,d\xi'\,d\rho|^{1/2} \quad\pmod{\text{one lower amplitude order}} . \tag{GL18} For kk, the additional t−1/2t^{-1/2} is still present. Comparing (GL18) with (GL12) makes its scalar coefficient aa a principal symbol on the compressed cotangent bundle. The full remainder is (GL16)–(GL17); it has not been removed from the original kernel. The coordinate invariance follows from the full determinant law (C19)–(C20) and the actual conormal coordinate change (GL10). In the intrinsic convention of (C21), the half-density in (GL18) has symbol order m+n/2m+n/2: its fibre half-density has dilation degree n/2n/2. Dividing the original principal half-density of kk by (GL12) leaves the ordinary scalar or matrix symbol order mm. Neither convention changes the amplitude or the original operator.

Conversely, take a compactly supported conormal family HH along Δ̂\widehat\Delta, of this order and smooth parameter type, flat at both side faces. For zn<1z_n<1 its inverse kernel is A(x,z)=22−znH(x′,x′−z′,xn(2−zn)2,2zn2−zn),A(x,z)=0(zn≥1).(GL19) A(x,z)=\frac{2}{2-z_n} H\left(x',x'-z',\,\frac{x_n(2-z_n)}2,\, \frac{2z_n}{2-z_n}\right),\qquad A(x,z)=0\quad(z_n\ge1). \tag{GL19} These are the inverse of the full coordinate and prefactor formulas, not just their diagonal restrictions. Near z=0z=0, pull back an oscillatory conormal amplitude for HH by this smooth map. Its normal phase is z′⋅ξ′+[zn/(1−zn/2)]ρz'\cdot\xi'+[z_n/(1-z_n/2)]\rho. The change ρ=(1−zn/2)ηn\rho=(1-z_n/2)\eta_n has positive Jacobian 1−zn/21-z_n/2, which cancels the prefactor 1/(1−zn/2)1/(1-z_n/2) in (GL19). The resulting amplitude has order mm with all base derivatives, including xnx_n, by the same product and chain rules used for (GL15). Compact localization and the full amplitude reduction (C5) therefore give a smooth xx-dependent inverse Fourier symbol of order mm, with all finite-seminorm bounds.

Away from z=0z=0, (GL19) is smooth. Flatness at r=−2r=-2 gives arbitrary decay as zn→−∞z_n\to-\infty: each xnx_n-derivative introduces at most one additional power of 2−zn2-z_n, absorbed by another flatness order. Flatness at r=2r=2 gives a smooth zero extension at zn=1z_n=1. Compact tangential support controls z′=x′−y′z'=x'-y'; all these far contributions are Schwartz in zz, uniformly with every xx-derivative. If HH is supported in t≤Tt\le T, then AA is supported in xn≤2Tx_n\le2T, since xn=t(1+r/2)≤2tx_n=t(1+r/2)\le2t. Its base derivatives thus have every original (1+xn)−ν(1+x_n)^{-\nu} estimate.

Define the exact symbol a(x,ξ)=∫e−iz⋅ξA(x,z)dz.(GL20) a(x,\xi)=\int e^{-iz\cdot\xi}A(x,z)\,dz . \tag{GL20} The near contribution is order mm by the preceding reduction and the far contribution is residual. Since A=0A=0 for zn>1z_n>1, ℱξna(x,ξ′,s)=2π∫e−iz′⋅ξ′A(x,z′,−s)dz′,supp⁡sℱξna⊂[−1,∞).(GL21) \mathcal F_{\xi_n}a(x,\xi',s) =2\pi\int e^{-iz'\cdot\xi'}A(x,z',-s)\,dz', \qquad \operatorname{supp}_s\mathcal F_{\xi_n}a\subset[-1,\infty). \tag{GL21} This proves lacunarity with its exact sign and Fourier constant. Thus a∈Slama\in S_{\mathrm{la}}^m, and (GL13)–(GL15) recover the original half-density kernel exactly. Fourier inversion proves uniqueness of the symbol on xn>0x_n>0, and smoothness in xnx_n gives uniqueness at zero. This proves the compact local converse as well as the forward statement for every real mm.

1.7. The exact boundary action

Let uu be smooth up to the boundary with compact support. Write s=xn>0s=x_n>0, ar=1+r/2a_r=1+r/2. At fixed ss, the actual changes of integration variables are yn=s1−r/21+r/2,t=s/ar,|dyn|=sar−2|dr|,K(x,y)|dyn|=ar−1H(x′,y′,s/ar,r)|dr|.(GL22) y_n=s\frac{1-r/2}{1+r/2},\qquad t=s/a_r,\qquad |dy_n|=s a_r^{-2}|dr|, \qquad K(x,y)|dy_n|=a_r^{-1}H(x',y',s/a_r,r)|dr|. \tag{GL22} Thus the full operator action, interpreted as a distributional pairing at the diagonal, is (Tau)(x′,s)=∫−22∫H(x′,y′,s/ar,r)aru(y′,s1−r/2ar)dy′dr.(GL23) (T_a u)(x',s)=\int_{-2}^{2}\int \frac{H(x',y',s/a_r,r)}{a_r} u\left(y',s\frac{1-r/2}{a_r}\right)\,dy'\,dr . \tag{GL23} For a forward symbol, compactly localize the base variables on the output region; (GL14) retains the same uniform side estimates there. For an inverse kernel its given compact support provides this localization. Choose a partition in (x′−y′,r)(x'-y',r) which is one near its origin and supported away from r=±2r=\pm2. On that part the smooth conormal family and the compact smooth test function in (GL23) converge, with every x′x' derivative, as ss decreases to zero. Oscillatory formula (GL15) justifies the convergence: integrate by parts in its normal base variables to an order exceeding the amplitude order plus nn, exactly as in (C4). The resulting integrable frequency majorant is uniform in ss.

On the complementary part the kernel is a smooth function. Near r=−2r=-2, every ss, x′x' or integration-variable derivative of (GL23) introduces only a fixed negative power of ara_r. The arbitrary side-flatness order in (GL14) absorbs that power. Near r=2r=2, the same statement follows from smooth flatness at that side. Away from those sides all factors have ordinary compact smooth bounds. Dominated convergence, including each derivative, proves the boundary limit (Tau)(x′,0)=∫−22∫ar−1H(x′,y′,0,r)u(y′,0)dy′dr=∫∫−∞1A(x′,0,x′−y′,zn)u(y′,0)dzndy′=(2π)−(n−1)∫eix′⋅ξ′a(x′,0,ξ′,0)u(⋅,0)̂(ξ′)dξ′.(GL24) \begin{aligned} (T_a u)(x',0) &=\int_{-2}^{2}\int a_r^{-1}H(x',y',0,r)u(y',0)\,dy'\,dr\\ &=\int\!\int_{-\infty}^{1} A(x',0,x'-y',z_n)u(y',0)\,dz_n\,dy'\\ &=(2\pi)^{-(n-1)}\int e^{ix'\cdot\xi'} a(x',0,\xi',0)\widehat{u(\cdot,0)}(\xi')\,d\xi'. \end{aligned} \tag{GL24} The second equality uses the full change zn=r/arz_n=r/a_r, dzn=ar−2drdz_n=a_r^{-2}dr, and H(x′,y′,0,r)=ar−1A(x′,0,x′−y′,zn)H(x',y',0,r)=a_r^{-1}A(x',0,x'-y',z_n). The last equality is exact partial Fourier inversion at normal frequency zero. The preceding localization and integration by parts justify both equalities even when AA is not a function at z=0z=0. When n=1n=1, the tangential integrals have dimension zero and the factor is one. This is the full boundary action, with all orders and all kernel factors, and it agrees with the original jet formula (5.2) for k=0k=0.

2. Proper global operators and conormal smoothing

2.1. The global kernel and its actual pushforward

Choose a smooth function tt on the stretched square, positive off its new face and vanishing simply on that face. Near a boundary diagonal point it can be the original (xn+yn)/2(x_n+y_n)/2. Define the order-mm class by kernels represented as k=t−1/2H,H∈Im(X×̂X,Δ̂;Ω1/2),H flat on both original side faces.(GC1) k=t^{-1/2}H,\qquad H\in I^m(X\widehat\times X,\widehat\Delta;\Omega^{1/2}), \qquad H\text{ flat on both original side faces}. \tag{GC1} Here conormality at the new face has precisely the smooth family meaning specified before (GL1). A bundle kernel additionally has values in Hom⁡(Ey,Fx)\operatorname{Hom}(E_y,F_x). Multiplication by its smooth frame changes is included in the conormal topology.

There is a well-defined pushforward despite the separate factor t−1/2t^{-1/2}. Indeed, in the original normal chart, let a test half-density have coefficient p(x,y)p(x,y). Its pullback has coefficient t1/2p(β(x′,y′,t,r))t^{1/2}p(\beta(x',y',t,r)), since the absolute normal determinant is tt. Thus the actual pairing is ⟨β*k,p⟩=∫0∞⟨H(x′,y′,t,r),p(x′,t(1+r/2),y′,t(1−r/2))⟩x′,y′,rdt.(GC2) \langle\beta_*k,p\rangle =\int_0^\infty \left\langle H(x',y',t,r), p(x',t(1+r/2),y',t(1-r/2))\right\rangle_{x',y',r}\,dt. \tag{GC2} The conormal family is a smooth distribution-valued function of tt. On a compact interval its pairing with the smooth compact test family is bounded by finitely many test derivatives and symbol seminorms, by (C4). The integral is consequently well defined and continuous. The blowdown has compact projective fibres, so the inverse image of a compact test support is compact; away from the corner it is a diffeomorphism. Those facts reduce the general pairing to finitely many such charts. Equation (GC2) is the complete meaning of pairing kk with the pulled-back test half-density. Neither square-root factor is separately discarded, and no pairing of an arbitrary distribution with a nonsmooth test coefficient is asserted.

If t‾\bar t is another admissible defining function, Hadamard’s formula gives t‾=ct\bar t=c t, with c>0c>0 smooth near the new face. Away from that face both functions are positive. Hence H‾=t‾1/2k=c1/2H.(GC3) \bar H=\bar t^{1/2}k=c^{1/2}H. \tag{GC3} Multiplication by c1/2c^{1/2}, and by its smooth inverse, preserves the conormal class and side flatness. The kernel, its pairing and its order are independent of this choice.

Every compactly localized kernel of (GC1) is the original half-space kernel of a lacunary order-mm symbol by (GL19)–(GL21). Away from the lifted diagonal the localized resolved coefficient is smooth, and the same inverse gives a residual symbol. The latter assertion also applies between distinct boundary charts: coordinates in the two charts may be used as the two independent tangential variables in the smooth kernel; there is no conormal singularity to align. Near an actual diagonal point use the same coordinate chart on both factors. Interior charts give the ordinary conormal pseudodifferential kernel by (C18).

The local theorem on smooth inputs therefore proves a continuous map A:Cc∞(X;Ω1/2⊗E)→C∞(X;Ω1/2⊗F).(GC4) A:C_c^\infty(X;\Omega^{1/2}\otimes E) \longrightarrow C^\infty(X;\Omega^{1/2}\otimes F). \tag{GC4} For fixed input support and a fixed output compact set, only finitely many product charts occur. Each local estimate uses finitely many derivatives of the input, and the sum of these estimates is finite. This proves the stated LF-to-Fréchet continuity. Formula (GL24) supplies its boundary value, and the original formula (5.2) supplies every normal jet. Conversely the local quantizations have exactly (GC1) by (GL13)–(GL18), so this kernel description and the patched local definition determine the same class. We denote it by Ψbm(X;E,F)\Psi_b^m(X;E,F).

To check coordinate invariance at all orders, the stretched coordinate change is (GL5), its conormal change is (GL10), and its complete amplitude and determinant are (C19). Reducing that entire amplitude by (C5) gives the transformed symbol, with the full order-(m−N)(m-N) remainder after NN terms. All frequency factors created by a base derivative pair with a frequency derivative and retain order mm. Thus the operator class, not only its leading term, is coordinate invariant. The local construction and the pushforward above agree in the interior and then as distributions by the same conormal family pairing (GC2).

2.2. The symbol quotient and actual realization of every symbol

For a compressed symbol aa, the original principal half-density of the kernel is the class of a(x′,t,ξ′,ρ)t−1/2|dx′dtdξ′dρ|1/2.(GC5) a(x',t,\xi',\rho)t^{-1/2} |dx'\,dt\,d\xi'\,d\rho|^{1/2}. \tag{GC5} The singular half-density multiplying aa is the invariant absolute symplectic half-density in (GL12). The complete determinant law (C20) therefore gives a scalar symbol, or a section of Hom⁡(E,F)\operatorname{Hom}(E,F), on T̃*X\widetilde T^*X, of ordinary order mm, modulo order m−1m-1. Both (GL16) and (GL17) remain its actual lower-order kernel remainder. Define Sm(T̃*X)S^m(\widetilde T^*X) using every local compact base set, all base derivatives, and the frequency bound ⟨(ξ′,ρ)⟩m−|α|\langle(\xi',\rho)\rangle^{m-|\alpha|}. The fibre transformation (GL10) and its inverse have smooth bounded coefficients on each compact chart; the chain rule proves that this definition is intrinsic. The leading symbol map has kernel exactly Ψbm−1\Psi_b^{m-1}, by the local normal-form kernel assertion (C21).

We prove surjectivity while retaining the original prescribed symbol. Choose a locally finite cover by precompact boundary or interior charts UjU_j, with locally finite closures. Choose a partition φj\varphi_j with support in these charts and ψj∈Cc∞(Uj)\psi_j\in C_c^\infty(U_j) equal to one on a neighborhood of supp⁡φj\operatorname{supp}\varphi_j. For a given symbol aa, compactly localize a full representative aja_j in the jj-th frame so that it equals aa on that neighborhood. In a boundary chart take exactly the lacunary modification (aj)ρ(x,ξ)=∫aj(x,ξ′,ξn−v)ρ(v)dv,ρ̂∈Cc∞((−1/2,1)),ρ̂=1 near 0.(GC6) (a_j)_\rho(x,\xi)=\int a_j(x,\xi',\xi_n-v)\rho(v)\,dv, \quad \widehat\rho\in C_c^\infty((-1/2,1)),\quad \widehat\rho=1\text{ near }0. \tag{GC6} Keep aj=(aj)ρ+[aj−(aj)ρ]a_j=(a_j)_\rho+[a_j-(a_j)_\rho]: the bracket is residual by the full Taylor integral (4.8), and every original symbol seminorm remains controlled. Quantize the first term and set A=∑jφjT(aj)ρψj(GC7) A=\sum_j\varphi_j T_{(a_j)_\rho}\psi_j \tag{GC7} in boundary charts, using ordinary quantization for interior charts. The sum is locally finite and has order mm. Its two support projections are proper: above a compact base set only finitely many chart closures occur, and both factors in each term have compact support in that chart. The leading term is ∑jφja=a\sum_j\varphi_j a=a. Multiplication on the input has its complete product remainder, of order m−1m-1, from (8.3); ψj=1\psi_j=1 near the working diagonal. The residual bracket in (GC6) has not become an equality between the original full symbol and its modification; it is explicitly the error in this realization. This gives both quotients Ψbm/Ψbm−1≃Sm(T̃*X)/Sm−1(T̃*X),(GC8) \Psi_b^m/\Psi_b^{m-1}\simeq S^m(\widetilde T^*X)/S^{m-1}(\widetilde T^*X), \tag{GC8} with the same isomorphism when the operator spaces are restricted to proper support. The bundle version follows in the same charts, with the actual frame transitions and (GC5).

2.3. Proper composition, adjoints and all asymptotic remainders

Let A∈Ψbm(X;F,G)A\in\Psi_b^m(X;F,G) and B∈Ψbm′(X;E,F)B\in\Psi_b^{m'}(X;E,F) be properly supported. For every compact output set the support of AA meets only a compact set of intermediate variables, and that compact set meets only a compact input set under BB. The reverse argument starts at a compact input set. This proves proper support of the composed operator and permits all intermediate partitions to be finite on the compact sets under consideration.

We give the localization argument, since a residual kernel at the new face need not be a smooth kernel on the original square. Localize near an output-input diagonal point. A sufficiently small common chart contains both variables. Split the intermediate variable into a slightly larger part of that chart and its complement. On the complementary part both kernels are separated from their actual diagonal, so their resolved coefficients are smooth with side flatness. On the chart part use the original local ordered product theorem (8.1)–(8.3). Any localization of either factor off its own diagonal gives a residual symbol by (GL19)–(GL21). That theorem then gives a residual product: its finite-order bound holds for every real order assigned to the residual factor, while its complete far term (8.2) is residual as well.

For clarity, this also handles two different boundary charts. For a localized rectangular smooth kernel R(x,y)R(x,y), with output and input coordinates taken from their respective charts, the literal inverse is AR(x,z)=xnR(x,(x′−z′,xn(1−zn))),aR(x,ξ)=∫e−iz⋅ξAR(x,z)dz.(GC9a) A_R(x,z)=x_nR\bigl(x,(x'-z',x_n(1-z_n))\bigr), \qquad a_R(x,\xi)=\int e^{-iz\cdot\xi}A_R(x,z)\,dz. \tag{GC9a} This is the same (GL19) inverse written at fixed xn>0x_n>0, with all chart half-density factors included in RR. Resolved smoothness, side flatness, compact chart cutoffs and the full far estimates of (GL19)–(GL21) make aRa_R residual and lacunary. The two coordinate tuples both range in Euclidean half spaces, so the original local product theorem applies to these rectangular symbols with the intermediate coordinate tuple used as its common integration variable. If only one factor has a diagonal singularity, use its chart for the intermediate variable and its adjacent variable; the other is represented by (GC9a). If neither factor has a singularity, either choice works. Near a fixed output-input point off the diagonal, use disjoint neighborhoods of those two points and split the intermediate variable into their neighborhoods and the complement. At least one factor in each term is then separated from its diagonal, and the preceding argument proves a residual result. This proves the required smoothness off the lifted diagonal, its family regularity at the new face, and its side flatness; it does not replace a corner residual by an ordinary smoothing kernel.

In the common chart the complete product symbol is c=c1+c2c=c_1+c_2, where c1c_1 and c2c_2 are the actual (8.1) and (8.2), with the original factor order aa before bb. The full expansion is c∼∑α1α!∂ξαa(x,ξ)Dx′α′Dvαnb(x′,vxn,ξ′,vξn)|v=1,c−∑|α|<N(⋯)∈Sm+m′−N.(GC9) c\sim\sum_\alpha\frac1{\alpha!}\partial_\xi^\alpha a(x,\xi) D_{x'}^{\alpha'}D_v^{\alpha_n} b(x',v x_n,\xi',v\xi_n)\big|_{v=1}, \qquad c-\sum_{|\alpha|<N}(\cdots)\in S^{m+m'-N}. \tag{GC9} The exact far contribution c2∈S−∞c_2\in S^{-\infty} is part of cc. All its seminorms and the remainder seminorms are controlled by finitely many seminorms of the two original factors, by that local proof. Hence AB∈Ψbm+m′,σ(AB)=σ(A)σ(B).(GC10) AB\in\Psi_b^{m+m'},\qquad \sigma(AB)=\sigma(A)\sigma(B). \tag{GC10} For matrices this is E→σ(B)F→σ(A)GE\xrightarrow{\sigma(B)}F \xrightarrow{\sigma(A)}G; no order is exchanged. The same argument proves that the residual class is a two-sided ideal among properly supported operators of any finite order.

Transposition of the stretched square exchanges x,yx,y and sends rr to −r-r, keeping t=(xn+yn)/2t=(x_n+y_n)/2. Its kernel half-density law is HA*(x′,y′,t,r)=HA(y′,x′,t,−r)*.(GC11) H_{A^*}(x',y',t,r)=H_A(y',x',t,-r)^*. \tag{GC11} Conormality and side flatness are preserved. The local adjoint (7.3), including the residual adjoint of a−aρa-a_\rho, gives a†−a*∈Sm−1a^\dagger-a^*\in S^{m-1}. Thus A*∈Ψbm(X;F,E),σ(A*)=σ(A)*,(λA+μB)*=λ¯A*+μ¯B*.(GC12) A^*\in\Psi_b^m(X;F,E),\quad \sigma(A^*)=\sigma(A)^*,\quad (\lambda A+\mu B)^*=\overline\lambda A^*+\overline\mu B^*. \tag{GC12} Proper support is preserved by this exchange. All adjoints here use the fixed metrics and the original half-density pairing.

The calculus admits full asymptotic sums. Here is the construction needed later for parametrices. In each chart let aj∈Sm−ja_j\in S^{m-j} be the actual localized symbols to be summed. Choose ff zero on the unit frequency ball and one outside twice that ball. Choose RjR_j increasing so that f(ξ/Rj)ajf(\xi/R_j)a_j has each of the first jj seminorms in Sm−j+1S^{m-j+1} at most 2−j2^{-j}, on the first jj compact base sets. This is possible because the support has |ξ|≥Rj|\xi|\ge R_j, giving the extra factor Rj−1R_j^{-1}; frequency derivatives of the cutoff have the same bound after the product rule. The exact sum asum=∑j=0∞f(ξ/Rj)aj,asum−∑j<Naj∈Sm−N(GC13) a_{\mathrm{sum}}=\sum_{j=0}^\infty f(\xi/R_j)a_j, \qquad a_{\mathrm{sum}}-\sum_{j<N}a_j\in S^{m-N} \tag{GC13} converges in the stated seminorms. For the remainder, its infinite tail lies in Sm−NS^{m-N}; each of its finitely many low-frequency differences is residual. Lacunarize the full sum by (GC6), retaining the new residual difference, and patch as in (GC7). Each finite off-diagonal discrepancy is residual by the localization argument above. Consequently the global operator differs from every prescribed finite operator sum by exactly the asserted lower-order class. This proves asymptotic completeness, including on the proper-support subspace, without omitting any finite term or its remainder.

2.4. The supported and restricted Sobolev maps

For m≥0m\ge0 and every real ss, the actual local theorem (PS1)–(PS17) gives the supported bound with loss mm. Smooth coordinate changes and frame multiplications on compact sets are bounded on every real Sobolev scale: integer bounds follow by the chain and product rules, negative integers by their exact adjoints with the Jacobian, and intermediate orders by the Fourier interpolation already proved in the local prerequisite. On a fixed compact input set, proper support and a partition reduce AA to finitely many of those bounds. A rectangular residual term has every order, so use its original order-zero bound and the continuous inclusion Hs⊂Hs−mH^s\subset H^{s-m}, valid for m≥0m\ge0. Thus, for each compact KK, there is a compact K′K' and a constant depending on finitely many localized full-symbol seminorms such that supp⁡u⊂K⇒supp⁡Au⊂K′,∥Au∥Ḣs−m(K′)≤C∥u∥Ḣs(K).(GC14) \operatorname{supp}u\subset K\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \operatorname{supp}Au\subset K',\qquad \|Au\|_{\dot H^{s-m}(K')} \le C\|u\|_{\dot H^s(K)}. \tag{GC14} The supported action is the original transpose action (9.1), so it includes distributions supported at the boundary. Both localizations and coordinates keep those terms; they are not zeroed by a chosen extension. For a nonproper operator the same proof gives local output bounds for compact input.

The corresponding restricted map follows from the exact local quotient map (PS16)–(PS17). Local supported representatives give the bounded map; the local action preserves the full ideal of distributions supported only on the boundary by (9.2), so different representatives have the same interior output. Taking the infimum over representatives in each fixed chart gives the restricted norm bound. Patch the actual quotient maps using the same finite cutoffs. This proves H¯comps→H¯locs−m\overline H^s_{\mathrm{comp}}\to\overline H^{s-m}_{\mathrm{loc}}, and the compact-output assertion under proper support. No gain of −m-m is asserted when m<0m<0; the original residual examples prohibit such a claim.

2.5. The supported conormal class and the residual receiving map

For real mm, let 𝒜m(X)\mathcal A^m(X) consist of distributions supported in the closed manifold which, in every boundary chart and its extension, are conormal of order mm to xn=0x_n=0. Explicitly put κ=−m−n/4\kappa=-m-n/4 and require Pu∈B2,∞,locκfor every P∈Diff⁡b(X),supp⁡u⊂X.(GA1) Pu\in B^\kappa_{2,\infty,\mathrm{loc}} \quad\text{for every }P\in\operatorname{Diff}_b(X), \qquad \operatorname{supp}u\subset X. \tag{GA1} The topology uses all these local seminorms. Multiplication, coordinate changes and finite frame transitions are continuous on those Besov spaces by (C2)–(C3), and (GL9) identifies the intrinsic tangent fields. Moving a coefficient through a word in tangent fields leaves only shorter words with smooth coefficients. Hence (GA1) is intrinsic and agrees exactly with (C15), with the original shift −m−n/4-m-n/4.

The coordinate seminorms can use D′D' and Xn=xnDnX_n=x_nD_n. The precise comparison with the original weighted derivatives is xnkDnk=∏j=0k−1(Xn+ij),Xnk=∑j=0kckjxnjDnj,(GA2) x_n^kD_n^k=\prod_{j=0}^{k-1}(X_n+ij),\qquad X_n^k=\sum_{j=0}^k c_{kj}\,x_n^jD_n^j, \tag{GA2} where the first polynomial identity defines an invertible triangular change of basis and the second is its inverse. The first follows by Dnxn=xnDn−iD_n x_n=x_nD_n-i and induction: multiplying xnkDnkx_n^kD_n^k by Xn+ikX_n+ik on the right gives xnk+1Dnk+1x_n^{k+1}D_n^{k+1}. These identities retain every lower term and its factor ii. Tangential derivatives commute with XnX_n. On compact sets all smooth-coefficient tangent words reduce to these generators. In particular (GA1) makes uu smooth in the interior by repeated ordinary derivatives there and the local Sobolev estimate.

If A∈ΨbdA\in\Psi_b^d is proper, its local conormal preservation theorem 11.2, with the actual index κ=−m−n/4\kappa=-m-n/4, gives A:𝒜m(X;E)→𝒜m(X;F)(GA3) A:\mathcal A^m(X;E)\longrightarrow\mathcal A^m(X;F) \tag{GA3} continuously, for every real m,dm,d. Finite localized product estimates prove the global continuity as in (GC14). An off-diagonal resolved term is residual and obeys the same theorem in the rectangular chart. The order dd does not change the conormal index: the local proof factorizes each full tangent derivative of the original operator through an even-order totally characteristic differential operator and applies the order-zero Besov bound to its two complete factors. In particular neither the original frequency nor a positive-order remainder is omitted.

There is a stronger receiving statement for a residual operator R∈Ψb−∞R\in\Psi_b^{-\infty}. Fix an input compact set and N>0N>0. For every tangent word PP, the composition PRPR is still residual, by the local product formulas and (GC10). Its order-zero bound therefore gives ∥PRu∥H−N(K′)≤CP,N,K∥u∥Ḣ−N(K),Ru∈𝒜N−n/4(X).(GA4) \|PRu\|_{H^{-N}(K')}\le C_{P,N,K}\|u\|_{\dot H^{-N}(K)}, \qquad Ru\in\mathcal A^{N-n/4}(X). \tag{GA4} The inclusion H−N⊂B2,∞−NH^{-N}\subset B^{-N}_{2,\infty} is immediate from the dyadic ℓ2\ell^2 and ℓ∞\ell^\infty norms. Any compactly supported distribution of order LL belongs to H−NH^{-N} for N>L+n/2N>L+n/2: its Fourier transform is bounded by C⟨ξ⟩LC\langle\xi\rangle^L, and the weighted square integral converges for exactly that strict inequality. The same estimate is uniform on a family with fixed support and bounded distribution-order seminorm. Thus R:ℰ′(X)→𝒜(X):=⋃m∈ℝ𝒜m(X),(GA5) R:\mathcal E'(X)\longrightarrow \mathcal A(X):=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb R}\mathcal A^m(X), \tag{GA5} with the explicit fixed-Sobolev-source continuity in (GA4). This is a conormal receiving map, not an assertion that a residual operator produces a smooth function at the boundary.

2.6. Approximation which preserves the original closed support

Let q∈Cc∞(ℝn)q\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R^n) have integral one and support in the open positive half-space. Set qε(z)=ε−nq(z/ε)q_\varepsilon(z)=\varepsilon^{-n}q(z/\varepsilon) and Qεu=qε*uQ_\varepsilon u=q_\varepsilon*u. For a distribution supported in xn≥0x_n\ge0, this convolution is smooth and supported in xn≥cεx_n\ge c\varepsilon, where c=min⁡supp⁡qzn>0c=\min_{\operatorname{supp}q}z_n>0. Its support remains in one fixed compact enlargement when the input support is fixed and 0<ε≤ε00<\varepsilon\le\varepsilon_0.

We prove convergence in the conormal topology, including its weighted normal derivatives. Write Xn=xnDnX_n=x_nD_n, Dn=−i∂nD_n=-i\partial_n. Integration by parts in the distribution pairing gives the exact identity [Xn,Qε]u=Dzn(znqε)*u.(GS1) [X_n,Q_\varepsilon]u =D_{z_n}(z_nq_\varepsilon)*u. \tag{GS1} Indeed QεXnuQ_\varepsilon X_nu has coefficient ynDznqε+iqεy_nD_{z_n}q_\varepsilon+iq_\varepsilon, whereas XnQεuX_nQ_\varepsilon u has coefficient xnDznqεx_nD_{z_n}q_\varepsilon. Their difference is znDznqε−iqε=Dzn(znqε)z_nD_{z_n}q_\varepsilon-iq_\varepsilon =D_{z_n}(z_nq_\varepsilon). Both terms and their sign are retained.

Define q0=qq_0=q, qj+1=Dzn(znqj)q_{j+1}=D_{z_n}(z_nq_j), and let Qj,εQ_{j,\varepsilon} denote convolution by ε−nqj(z/ε)\varepsilon^{-n}q_j(z/\varepsilon). Every qjq_j is smooth, has the same compact positive normal support, and ∫qj=0\int q_j=0 for j≥1j\ge1. Repeating (GS1) proves XnℓQε=∑j=0ℓ(ℓj)Qj,εXnℓ−j.(GS2) X_n^\ell Q_\varepsilon =\sum_{j=0}^{\ell}\binom\ell j Q_{j,\varepsilon}X_n^{\ell-j}. \tag{GS2} Tangential derivatives commute with all these convolutions. These are equalities on distributions; no boundary derivative term is dropped.

The Fourier multipliers satisfy, for each fixed jj, |q̂(εξ)−1|≤Cmin⁡(ε|ξ|,1),|q̂j(εξ)|≤Cjmin⁡(ε|ξ|,1)(j≥1).(GS3) |\widehat q(\varepsilon\xi)-1| \le C\min(\varepsilon|\xi|,1),\qquad |\widehat q_j(\varepsilon\xi)| \le C_j\min(\varepsilon|\xi|,1)\quad(j\ge1). \tag{GS3} For small arguments use the mean, the first-moment integral and |e−iv−1|≤|v||e^{-iv}-1|\le|v|; for all arguments use their finite L1L^1 norms. These multipliers commute with the dyadic projections of (C2). Let κ′>κ\kappa'>\kappa, δ=κ′−κ>0\delta=\kappa'-\kappa>0, and τ=min⁡(1,δ)\tau=\min(1,\delta). The multiplier bound on the ll-th block is at most Cmin⁡(ε2l,1)C\min(\varepsilon2^l,1). Since supl≥02−lδmin⁡(ε2l,1)≤Cδετ(0<ε≤1),(GS4) \sup_{l\ge0}2^{-l\delta}\min(\varepsilon2^l,1) \le C_\delta\varepsilon^{\tau}\quad(0<\varepsilon\le1), \tag{GS4} each difference multiplier in (GS3) maps B2,∞κ′B^{\kappa'}_{2,\infty} to B2,∞κB^\kappa_{2,\infty} with norm at most CετC\varepsilon^\tau. To verify (GS4), split at 2l=ε−12^l=\varepsilon^{-1}. Below it the expression is ε2l(1−δ)\varepsilon2^{l(1-\delta)}, at most εδ\varepsilon^\delta if δ≤1\delta\le1, and at most ε\varepsilon otherwise. Above it the expression is 2−lδ≤εδ2^{-l\delta}\le\varepsilon^\delta.

For u∈𝒜m′u\in\mathcal A^{m'}, m′<mm'<m, the actual indices are κ′=−m′−n/4\kappa'=-m'-n/4, κ=−m−n/4\kappa=-m-n/4, so δ=m−m′>0\delta=m-m'>0. Subtract XnℓuX_n^\ell u from (GS2). Its j=0j=0 term is (Qε−I)Xnℓu(Q_\varepsilon-I)X_n^\ell u, and all its j≥1j\ge1 terms have the mean-zero bounds in (GS3). Every input D′α′Xnℓ−juD'^{\alpha'}X_n^{\ell-j}u has the same Besov index κ′\kappa', by the full definition (GA1). Consequently ∥D′α′Xnℓ(Qεu−u)∥B2,∞κ≤Cα′,ℓεmin⁡(1,m−m′)∑j=0ℓ∥D′α′Xnℓ−ju∥B2,∞κ′.(GS5) \|D'^{\alpha'}X_n^\ell(Q_\varepsilon u-u)\|_{B^\kappa_{2,\infty}} \le C_{\alpha',\ell}\varepsilon^{\min(1,m-m')} \sum_{j=0}^\ell \|D'^{\alpha'}X_n^{\ell-j}u\|_{B^{\kappa'}_{2,\infty}}. \tag{GS5} Equations (GA2) and the full product rule now give every original weighted derivative seminorm and every smooth-coefficient tangent word. Thus Qεu→uQ_\varepsilon u\to u in 𝒜m\mathcal A^m, not merely as an ordinary weak distribution, with finite-seminorm control.

Finally choose the locally finite chart partition φj\varphi_j and input cutoffs ψj=1\psi_j=1 near their supports as in (GC7). In each boundary chart use the positive convolution just proved; in interior charts use a compact mollifier whose small translations remain interior. Use the actual half-density and bundle coordinate maps on both sides. Define 𝒬εu=∑jφjQε(j)(ψju).(GS6) \mathcal Q_\varepsilon u =\sum_j\varphi_j Q^{(j)}_\varepsilon(\psi_j u). \tag{GS6} Choose each chart’s convolution radius no larger than its fixed distance from the cutoff support to the chart edge; a constant multiple of ε\varepsilon in that chart suffices. On a fixed input compact set only finitely many ψj\psi_j occur, giving a single compact output set K′K', independent of sufficiently small ε\varepsilon. Smooth multiplications and chart maps are continuous in (GA1). Since ∑jφjψju=u\sum_j\varphi_j\psi_j u=u, (GS5) and the full Leibniz rule prove 𝒬ε:ℰ′(X)→C∞(X),𝒬εu→u in 𝒜m(X)(u∈𝒜m′,m′<m).(GS7) \mathcal Q_\varepsilon:\mathcal E'(X)\to C^\infty(X),\qquad \mathcal Q_\varepsilon u\longrightarrow u\text{ in }\mathcal A^m(X) \quad(u\in\mathcal A^{m'},\ m'<m). \tag{GS7} For compact input its output is compact and supported in the interior, including in boundary charts. The convergence is uniform on bounded sets of each fixed compact 𝒜m′\mathcal A^{m'} source, by the displayed finite-seminorm estimates. This proves the required support-preserving smoothing lemma with its original order indices.

3. Dual distributions and boundary traces

3.1. The lowest test order and the dual class

Put m0=−(n+2)/4m_0=-(n+2)/4. In a boundary chart, let ϕ(x′,t)\phi(x',t) be smooth up to t=0t=0, compactly supported for t≥0t\ge0, and let HϕH\phi be its zero extension. Integrating its normal Fourier transform by parts NN times gives, for |τ|≥1|\tau|\ge1, Hϕ̂(x′,τ)=∑j=0N−1∂tjϕ(x′,0)(iτ)j+1+1(iτ)N∫0∞e−itτ∂tNϕ(x′,t)dt.(GD1) \widehat{H\phi}(x',\tau) =\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}\frac{\partial_t^j\phi(x',0)}{(i\tau)^{j+1}} +\frac{1}{(i\tau)^N} \int_0^\infty e^{-it\tau}\partial_t^N\phi(x',t)\,dt . \tag{GD1} Each displayed boundary jet, including its sign, follows from the lower endpoint in integration by parts. The remainder and all its tangential derivatives are bounded by the corresponding compact smooth seminorms. For any requested number of frequency derivatives, first multiply by powers of tt under the integral and repeat the same integration by parts with enough extra terms; this gives the full order-−1-1 symbol estimates. Multiplying by a cutoff equal to one for |τ|≥2|\tau|\ge2 and absorbing the compact-frequency part into a smooth amplitude yields the exact reduced conormal form (C16). For codimension one its amplitude order is m+(n−2)/4m+(n-2)/4; order −1-1 means exactly m=m0m=m_0. If ϕ(x′,0)≠0\phi(x',0)\ne0, the first term in (GD1) is nonzero, so a uniform claim of a lower conormal order is false. Hence Cc∞(X)↪𝒜cm(X)continuously for every m≥m0,(GD2) C_c^\infty(X)\hookrightarrow\mathcal A^m_c(X) \quad\text{continuously for every }m\ge m_0, \tag{GD2} where a smooth boundary function is represented by its zero extension. The continuous inclusion for m>m0m>m_0 is immediate from the symbol orders or the dyadic Besov weights. Interior-supported smooth functions belong to every order.

Define 𝒜′(X)\mathcal A'(X) as the ambient supported distributions uu whose action on every compactly supported smooth boundary function is continuous with respect to the 𝒜m\mathcal A^m topology, for every m≥m0m\ge m_0. Precisely, for each compact K⊂XK\subset X and each such mm, finitely many defining seminorms pm,K,lp_{m,K,l} and a constant give |u(ϕ)|≤Cm,K∑l=1Lpm,K,l(Hϕ)(supp⁡ϕ⊂K).(GD3) |u(\phi)|\le C_{m,K}\sum_{l=1}^{L}p_{m,K,l}(H\phi) \quad(\operatorname{supp}\phi\subset K). \tag{GD3} The action is independent of an ambient smooth extension of ϕ\phi: two extensions agreeing on the closed half-space differ by a smooth function vanishing on its interior and to every order at its boundary; the supported distribution annihilates that difference. This is checked in each chart and patched by a partition. The topology on 𝒜′\mathcal A' used here is the weak topology generated by all u↦|u(v)|u\mapsto|u(v)| for compactly supported v∈𝒜v\in\mathcal A, where 𝒜=⋃m𝒜m\mathcal A=\bigcup_m\mathcal A^m.

We prove that the pairing in (GD3) extends uniquely to every compactly supported v∈𝒜mv\in\mathcal A^m, m≥m0m\ge m_0. Choose m1>mm_1>m. The support-preserving 𝒬εv\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v is smooth with support in a fixed compact K′K', and (GS7) gives convergence in 𝒜m1\mathcal A^{m_1}. The bound (GD3) at order m1m_1 makes u(𝒬εv)u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v) converge. If another smooth sequence converges to vv in the same order, its difference has pairing tending to zero by that bound, so the extension is unique. To show continuity on 𝒜Km\mathcal A^m_K, use (GD3) at m1m_1 on the approximants and take the limit. The inclusion 𝒜Km↪𝒜K′m1\mathcal A^m_K\hookrightarrow\mathcal A^{m_1}_{K'} is continuous, which supplies the finite 𝒜m\mathcal A^m bound. No convergence in the same endpoint order mm has been assumed. This constructs the full pairing and the stated weak topology.

3.2. Interior restriction, absence of boundary-supported elements, density

If u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A' vanishes on all tests in the interior, then for each compactly supported v∈𝒜mv\in\mathcal A^m choose m1>max⁡(m,m0)m_1>\max(m,m_0). Each 𝒬εv\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v is smooth and supported in the interior, so u(𝒬εv)=0u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v)=0. The convergence in 𝒜m1\mathcal A^{m_1} and the extended continuity prove u(v)=0u(v)=0. Smooth boundary tests are among these vv, hence u=0u=0 as an ambient distribution. Therefore 𝒜′(X)→𝒟′(X∘),u↦u|X∘is injective.(GD4) \mathcal A'(X)\longrightarrow\mathcal D'(X^\circ), \qquad u\longmapsto u|_{X^\circ} \quad\text{is injective}. \tag{GD4} In particular no nonzero distribution supported only on ∂X\partial X belongs to 𝒜′\mathcal A'. This follows from the exact density argument, not from a mistaken identification of the two distribution spaces.

Smooth boundary functions are weakly dense in 𝒜′\mathcal A'. First every smooth boundary function defines an element of 𝒜′\mathcal A': on a compact test support, multiply that function by a smooth compact cutoff and pair it with the supported conormal distribution. In the normal form (C16), the compact smooth factor has rapidly decreasing normal Fourier transform. Integrating the full symbol amplitude against that transform bounds the pairing by finitely many Sm+(n−2)/4S^{m+(n-2)/4} seminorms for every real mm; the normal-form topology comparison in (C16) gives the corresponding 𝒜m\mathcal A^m bound. Interior terms use the ordinary distribution pairing. Thus the smooth approximants below really belong to 𝒜′\mathcal A'. For a compactly supported v∈𝒜v\in\mathcal A, define uε(v)=u(𝒬εv)u_\varepsilon(v)=u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v). The adjoint of each local term in (GS6) is convolution with a compact smooth reflected kernel, followed by smooth cutoffs and coordinate/half-density maps. For a distribution uu, this adjoint is a smooth function of the remaining variable, including at its boundary; on every compact set only finitely many chart terms occur. Thus uεu_\varepsilon is represented by a smooth function on XX. For each fixed vv of order mm, choose m1>max⁡(m,m0)m_1>\max(m,m_0). By (GS7), 𝒬εv→v\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v\to v in 𝒜m1\mathcal A^{m_1}, and the extended continuity gives uε(v)=u(𝒬εv)→u(v).(GD5) u_\varepsilon(v)=u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v) \longrightarrow u(v). \tag{GD5} This is weak density with the actual test topology, for every compact conormal test. Together with (GD4), it identifies 𝒜′\mathcal A' with its image of interior distributions; it does not make all interior distributions members of 𝒜′\mathcal A'.

3.3. The invariant boundary delta and trace

Let φ\varphi be a compactly supported smooth test density on ∂X\partial X, with the dual bundle coefficient when appropriate. In a boundary chart define the supported distribution density Tφ=φ(x′)⊗δ(t),δ(t)=(2π)−1∫ℝeitτdτ.(GD6) T\varphi=\varphi(x')\otimes\delta(t),\qquad \delta(t)=(2\pi)^{-1}\int_{\mathbb R}e^{it\tau}\,d\tau. \tag{GD6} For a new defining function t‾=α(x′,t)t\bar t=\alpha(x',t)t, α(x′,0)>0\alpha(x',0)>0, the exact distribution density law is δ(t‾)|dt‾|=δ(t)|dt|\delta(\bar t)|d\bar t|=\delta(t)|dt|: the delta coefficient contributes α(x′,0)−1\alpha(x',0)^{-1} and the normal density contributes α(x′,0)\alpha(x',0). The tangential density and bundle transitions are the usual ones. Hence TT is intrinsic, not a choice of boundary coordinate or a half-density shortcut.

The original Fourier amplitude in (GD6) is constant in τ\tau, with the exact coefficient (2π)−1φ(x′)(2\pi)^{-1}\varphi(x'). Formula (C16) for codimension one therefore gives m+(n−2)/4=0m+(n-2)/4=0, that is, T:Cc∞(∂X;E*⊗Ω∂X)→𝒜c(2−n)/4(X;E*⊗ΩX)continuously.(GD7) T:C_c^\infty(\partial X;E^*\otimes\Omega_{\partial X}) \longrightarrow \mathcal A^{(2-n)/4}_c(X;E^*\otimes\Omega_X) \quad\text{continuously}. \tag{GD7} The direct Besov estimate uses the same dyadic amplitude bound, so the target topology is included. Define the boundary restriction by ⟨u|∂X,φ⟩=u(Tφ),u∈𝒜′(X).(GD8) \langle u|_{\partial X},\varphi\rangle=u(T\varphi), \qquad u\in\mathcal A'(X). \tag{GD8} The exact conormal order in (GD7) lies above m0m_0, so the extended pairing is available. Its continuity in φ\varphi follows from (GD3) and (GD7), and its weak continuity in uu is one of the defining seminorms of 𝒜′\mathcal A'. Thus (GD8) is a distribution on the boundary.

For a smooth function uu up to the boundary, use the positive normal convolution on TφT\varphi. It is a unit-mass smooth approximate delta supported at positive normal distance O(ε)O(\varepsilon). Consequently u(𝒬εTφ)u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon T\varphi) tends to ∫∂Xu(x′,0)φ(x′)\int_{\partial X}u(x',0)\varphi(x'), with the full chart density factor. The extension of the pairing in Section 3.1 gives the same limit for u(Tφ)u(T\varphi). Hence (GD8) agrees with ordinary smooth restriction. Its uniqueness among weakly continuous trace maps follows from (GD5).

3.4. Corrected differentiation with its exact sign

Let u∈𝒜′(ℝ¯+n)u\in\mathcal A'(\overline{\mathbb R}{}^n_+), represented as an ambient distribution supported in the closed half-space. Write u∂=u|xn=0u_\partial=u|_{x_n=0} from (GD8). Define ∇jintu:=Dju+iδjnu∂⊗δ(xn).(GD9) \nabla_j^\mathrm{int}u :=D_j u+i\delta_{jn}\,u_\partial\otimes\delta(x_n). \tag{GD9} This is the original ambient derivative plus its full boundary delta correction, with no suppression of either term. The sign follows first for a smooth uu from Dn(Hu)=H(Dnu)−iu(x′,0)⊗δ(xn),Dj(Hu)=H(Dju)(j<n).(GD10) D_n(Hu) = H(D_nu)-i\,u(x',0)\otimes\delta(x_n), \qquad D_j(Hu)=H(D_ju)\quad(j<n). \tag{GD10} Both identities are direct distributional product rules, since DnH=−iδD_nH=-i\delta. Adding the term in (GD9) makes ∇jintu\nabla_j^\mathrm{int}u the supported representative of the ordinary interior derivative for smooth uu.

We prove membership in 𝒜′\mathcal A' for general uu. Let ϕ\phi be a compact smooth boundary test, and distinguish its ambient smooth extension from its supported zero extension HϕH\phi. In the 𝒜′\mathcal A' pairing, u(−Djϕ)u(-D_j\phi) is the pairing with the zero extension of −Djϕ-D_j\phi. The full distribution identity is −Dj(Hϕ)=H(−Djϕ)+iδjnϕ(x′,0)⊗δ(xn).(GD11) -D_j(H\phi) =H(-D_j\phi)+i\delta_{jn}\, \phi(x',0)\otimes\delta(x_n). \tag{GD11} Therefore the two terms in (GD9) combine exactly to (∇jintu)(ϕ)=u(−Dj(Hϕ)).(GD12) (\nabla_j^\mathrm{int}u)(\phi) =u\bigl(-D_j(H\phi)\bigr). \tag{GD12} The ordinary differential map Dj:𝒜Km→𝒜Km+1D_j:\mathcal A^m_K\to\mathcal A^{m+1}_{K} is continuous: the normal derivative multiplies the full conormal amplitude by τ\tau and differentiates its smooth base coefficient, while tangential derivatives differentiate that coefficient; (C4)–(C5) control all remainders. Equivalently it is the exact order-one conormal map (C17) with compact support. If m≥m0m\ge m_0, then m+1≥m0m+1\ge m_0, so (GD12) and the defining estimate at order m+1m+1 show that ∇jintu∈𝒜′\nabla_j^\mathrm{int}u\in\mathcal A'. The map is weakly continuous: for each compact conormal test vv, its defining functional is u↦u(−Djv)u\mapsto u(-D_jv), another test in 𝒜\mathcal A. In the interior the delta term vanishes, so (∇jintu)|X∘=Dj(u|X∘)(\nabla_j^\mathrm{int}u)|_{X^\circ}=D_j(u|_{X^\circ}).

The uncorrected derivative can fail to lie in 𝒜′\mathcal A'. For example choose a smooth uu with nonzero boundary value. By (GD10) the ambient derivative contains the nonzero boundary-supported term −iu∂δ-i u_\partial\delta, while H(Dnu)H(D_nu) is in 𝒜′\mathcal A'. If Dn(Hu)D_n(Hu) were in 𝒜′\mathcal A', subtracting H(Dnu)H(D_nu) would put a nonzero boundary-supported distribution in 𝒜′\mathcal A', contradicting (GD4). This proves the distinction, rather than treating the two derivatives as identical presentations.

3.5. Proper totally characteristic operators on the dual class

Let B∈Ψbd(X;E,F)B\in\Psi_b^d(X;E,F) be properly supported. Its formal adjoint B*B^* preserves 𝒜m\mathcal A^m continuously for every mm, by (GC12) and (GA3). Given a compact output test v∈𝒜mv\in\mathcal A^m, proper support places B*vB^*v in a compact set depending only on the support of vv; its full conormal seminorms are bounded by finitely many input seminorms. To use these bounds with complex-linear distribution evaluation, take a compact dual-density test ϕ\phi and put v=ιF−1ϕv=\iota_F^{-1}\phi, where the exact metric-and-density map ιF\iota_F is defined in Section 3.6. The bilinear transpose is Bt=ιEB*ιF−1B^{\mathrm t}=\iota_E B^*\iota_F^{-1}. The actual linear dual action is (Bu)(ϕ)=u(Btϕ).(GD13) (Bu)(\phi)=u(B^{\mathrm t}\phi). \tag{GD13} The two conjugate-linear maps in this transpose make it complex-linear. Section 3.6 proves the identity with the full bundle and density factors and proves that its conormal-test seminorms have the required finite bounds. For a smooth boundary test, (GD3) therefore proves Bu∈𝒜′Bu\in\mathcal A'. For smooth uu, the local adjoint identity (7.6), transported by those exact maps, gives the original kernel action. For general uu, (GD5) and weak continuity extend that equality; in the interior it matches the usual distributional operator. The coefficient order and bundle maps remain those of the original BB, with no scalar commutation of matrices.

The boundary jet formula extends as well. In a local half-space chart, let a∈Slada\in S^d_{\mathrm{la}}, and define the kk-th interior normal derivative of uu by iterating (GD9), then taking (GD8). For smooth uu, the exact formula is (∇nint,kTau)|xn=0=∑j=0k(kj)akj(x′,D′)(∇nint,ju|xn=0),akj(x′,ξ′)=∑i=0j(ji)(Dxnk−jDξnia)(x′,0,ξ′,0).(GD14) \begin{aligned} \bigl(\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int},k}T_au\bigr)|_{x_n=0} &=\sum_{j=0}^k\binom{k}{j} a_{kj}(x',D') \bigl(\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int},j}u|_{x_n=0}\bigr),\\ a_{kj}(x',\xi') &=\sum_{i=0}^j\binom{j}{i} \bigl(D_{x_n}^{k-j}D_{\xi_n}^{i}a\bigr) (x',0,\xi',0). \end{aligned} \tag{GD14} Every coefficient in the inner sum and the outer binomial factor is retained. Its ii-th summand has order d−id-i. The tangent boundary operator akj(x′,D′)a_{kj}(x',D') acts continuously on boundary distributions after compact localization; this is the ordinary local symbol action. The left and right sides of (GD14) are weakly continuous in uu by (GD8), (GD9), (GD13) and the boundary operator continuity. Smooth functions are weakly dense by (GD5), so (GD14) holds for every u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A'. It is a statement about their actual boundary traces, not about an arbitrary supported representative’s raw distributional normal derivatives.

3.6. Linear distribution tests and Hermitian adjoints

The distributions in (GD3), (GD11), (GE9), and (GT6) evaluate their dual-density tests complex-linearly. A Hermitian pairing, with inner product linear in its first argument, is conjugate-linear in its test. We construct the exact map between these evaluations. This also fixes which operator must be transposed in (GD13).

Let ΩX\Omega_X be the density bundle, let μ\mu be a smooth positive density, and choose smooth positive Hermitian metrics hE,hFh_E,h_F. The test for an EE-valued distribution is a compact section of E*⊗ΩXE^*\otimes\Omega_X. Define ιE:E→E*⊗ΩX,ιE(v)(w)=hE(w,v)μ.(DT1) \iota_E:E\longrightarrow E^*\otimes\Omega_X,\qquad \iota_E(v)(w)=h_E(w,v)\mu . \tag{DT1} This is conjugate-linear in vv, and it is bijective in each fibre: in a local frame its matrix is invertible because the Hermitian metric is positive and μ\mu is nowhere zero. Its inverse is smooth and conjugate-linear. Both maps retain the density and the full metric matrix. Define the antilinear-test evaluation of the same distribution ULU_{\mathrm L} by UH(v)=UL(ιEv),UL(ϕ)=UH(ιE−1ϕ).(DT2) U_{\mathrm H}(v)=U_{\mathrm L}(\iota_Ev),\qquad U_{\mathrm L}(\phi)=U_{\mathrm H}(\iota_E^{-1}\phi). \tag{DT2} Thus UL↦UHU_{\mathrm L}\mapsto U_{\mathrm H} is complex-linear in the distribution and bijective. Supports agree, since ιE\iota_E and its inverse preserve the support of every test. Evaluating fixed tests on either side proves continuity in both weak dual topologies. This is the pairing used in the linked local Theorem 9.1(a),(b).

Here are the density factors when the original kernel acts on half-densities. For 𝑩:E⊗ΩX1/2→F⊗ΩX1/2\mathbf B:E\otimes\Omega_X^{1/2}\to F\otimes\Omega_X^{1/2}, write its function-section presentation and its Hermitian adjoint as Bμ=μ−1/2𝑩μ1/2,Bμ*=μ−1/2𝑩*μ1/2.(DT3) B_\mu=\mu^{-1/2}\mathbf B\mu^{1/2},\qquad B_\mu^*=\mu^{-1/2}\mathbf B^*\mu^{1/2}. \tag{DT3} Indeed w↦wμ1/2w\mapsto w\mu^{1/2} carries ∫hE(w,v)μ\int h_E(w,v)\mu exactly to the intrinsic half-density pairing. Applying the defining adjoint identity for 𝑩\mathbf B, then this map and its inverse, proves the second equality. The factors μ−1/2\mu^{-1/2} and μ1/2\mu^{1/2} stay in the operator product. For an operator BB already acting on function sections, B*B^* means its adjoint for the displayed hE,hF,μh_E,h_F,\mu.

For compact smooth w,ϕw,\phi, set v=ιF−1ϕv=\iota_F^{-1}\phi. Then ∫(Bw)⋅ϕ=∫hF(Bw,v)μ=∫hE(w,B*v)μ=∫w⋅(ιEB*ιF−1ϕ).Bt=ιEB*ιF−1:F*⊗ΩX→E*⊗ΩX.(DT4) \begin{aligned} \int (Bw)\mathbin{\cdot}\phi &=\int h_F(Bw,v)\mu\\ &=\int h_E(w,B^*v)\mu\\ &=\int w\mathbin{\cdot} \bigl(\iota_E B^*\iota_F^{-1}\phi\bigr). \end{aligned} \qquad B^{\mathrm t}=\iota_E B^*\iota_F^{-1}: F^*\otimes\Omega_X\longrightarrow E^*\otimes\Omega_X . \tag{DT4} The dot here is evaluation of a dual-density section on its vector, with no complex conjugation. Two conjugate-linear maps surrounding the linear B*B^* give a complex-linear BtB^{\mathrm t}. The integral identity characterizes this transpose on smooth tests. Proper support supplies its compact test domain, so it also defines the distributional action in (GD13). Applying (DT2) and (DT4) gives (BUL)(ϕ)=UL(Btϕ),(BU)H(v)=(BUL)(ιFv)=UL(ιEB*v)=UH(B*v).(DT5) \begin{aligned} (B U_{\mathrm L})(\phi)&=U_{\mathrm L}(B^{\mathrm t}\phi),\\ (B U)_{\mathrm H}(v) &=(B U_{\mathrm L})(\iota_Fv) =U_{\mathrm L}(\iota_E B^*v) =U_{\mathrm H}(B^*v). \end{aligned} \tag{DT5} Every equality has its stated test space. The same original operator therefore acts in both evaluations.

For completeness these maps preserve every original conormal-test order. Locally write ιEv=M(x)v¯|dx|\iota_Ev=M(x)\overline v\,|dx|, where MM includes the full positive density coefficient and the metric matrix. For D=−i∂D=-i\partial, the complete derivative formula is Dα(Mv¯)=∑β≤α(αβ)(Dα−βM)(−1)|β|Dβv¯.(DT6) D^\alpha(M\overline v) =\sum_{\beta\le\alpha}\binom{\alpha}{\beta} (D^{\alpha-\beta}M)(-1)^{|\beta|} \overline{D^\beta v}. \tag{DT6} Complex conjugation reflects the full Fourier variable ξ↦−ξ\xi\mapsto-\xi, preserving the original radial dyadic Besov weights. Smooth compact multiplication obeys the finite seminorm bounds of (GA3). The product rule for every boundary-tangent word gives the same finite sum, with all derivatives of MM; the smooth inverse matrix has the same property. Hence ιE,ιE−1\iota_E,\iota_E^{-1}, and their FF versions preserve every filtered 𝒜m\mathcal A^m continuously. Combining this fact with the adjoint estimate preceding (GD13) proves the required transpose estimate, with its actual input and output compacts. (GD3) proves that BUL∈𝒜′B U_{\mathrm L}\in\mathcal A', and evaluation of each fixed transposed test proves weak continuity. The maps (DT2) are also bijections of the corresponding conormal dual classes.

The linear action is independent of the auxiliary metric and density. For two choices let SE=ιE,1−1ιE,2S_E=\iota_{E,1}^{-1}\iota_{E,2} and SF=ιF,1−1ιF,2S_F=\iota_{F,1}^{-1}\iota_{F,2}; these are smooth linear invertible test maps. Applying (DT4) twice gives exactly B2*=SE−1B1*SF,UH,2(v)=UH,1(SEv),ιE,2B2*ιF,2−1=ιE,1B1*ιF,1−1.(DT7) B^*_2=S_E^{-1}B^*_1 S_F,\qquad U_{\mathrm H,2}(v)=U_{\mathrm H,1}(S_Ev),\qquad \iota_{E,2}B^*_2\iota_{F,2}^{-1} =\iota_{E,1}B^*_1\iota_{F,1}^{-1}. \tag{DT7} For a fixed function-section operator BB, these equalities follow by multiplying by the stated inverse maps in their displayed order. If one changes a half-density presentation, (DT3) supplies its full additional transport. No density or bundle is silently identified with another.

Two scalar computations test the signs. On the positive half-line take B=iIB=iI, real χ∈Cc∞((1,2))\chi\in C_c^\infty((1,2)), χ≠0\chi\ne0, UL=HχU_{\mathrm L}=H\chi, and ϕ=χ(t)dt\phi=\chi(t)\,dt. Then Bt=iI,B*=−iI,(BUL)(ϕ)=i∫χ2dt,UL(B*ϕ)=−i∫χ2dt.(DT8) B^{\mathrm t}=iI,\quad B^*=-iI,\qquad (B U_{\mathrm L})(\phi)=i\int\chi^2\,dt,\qquad U_{\mathrm L}(B^*\phi)=-i\int\chi^2\,dt . \tag{DT8} The last two values differ. In (DT5) the test evaluation UHU_{\mathrm H} is antilinear, and its factor −i-i gives +iUH(χ)+iU_{\mathrm H}(\chi), exactly the original action. In a flat scalar chart let CC be complex conjugation. Since CDC=−DCDC=-D, one has Dt=−DD^{\mathrm t}=-D and D*=DD^*=D. The corrected normal action (GD9)–(GD12) therefore reads (∇nintU)L(ϕ)=UL(−Dn(Hϕ)),(∇nintU)H(v)=UH(Dn(Hv))=UH(HDnv)+iUH(v|t=0⊗δ),Dn(Hv)=HDnv−i(v|t=0)⊗δ.(DT9) \begin{aligned} (\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U)_{\mathrm L}(\phi) &=U_{\mathrm L}(-D_n(H\phi)),\\ (\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U)_{\mathrm H}(v) &=U_{\mathrm H}(D_n(Hv)) =U_{\mathrm H}(H D_nv)+iU_{\mathrm H}(v|_{t=0}\otimes\delta),\\ D_n(Hv)&=H D_nv-i(v|_{t=0})\otimes\delta . \end{aligned} \tag{DT9} The +i+i in the second line uses the antilinearity of UHU_{\mathrm H}; the normal delta in the third line retains its factor −i-i. For a variable metric or density the exact test map is ιE−1[−Dn(HιEv)]\iota_E^{-1}[-D_n(H\iota_Ev)], obtained from (DT2). Its full product derivatives of the density and metric remain; the flat formula is asserted only in the stated flat chart.

Finally the normal primitive in Section 5.2 is Jf(t)=iχ(t)∫−∞tθ(s)f(s)dsJf(t)=i\chi(t)\int_{-\infty}^{t}\theta(s)f(s)\,ds. Fubini on the compact support of χ,θ\chi,\theta gives its full bilinear transpose and flat Hermitian adjoint: (Jtg)(s)=iθ(s)∫s∞χ(t)g(t)dt,(J*g)(s)=−iθ(s)¯∫s∞χ(t)¯g(t)dt.(DT10) \begin{aligned} (J^{\mathrm t}g)(s) &=i\theta(s)\int_s^\infty\chi(t)g(t)\,dt,\\ (J^*g)(s) &=-i\overline{\theta(s)} \int_s^\infty\overline{\chi(t)}g(t)\,dt . \end{aligned} \tag{DT10} To see the first line, interchange the integrals in ∫iχ(t)∫s≤tθ(s)f(s)dsg(t)dt\int i\chi(t)\int_{s\le t}\theta(s)f(s)\,ds\,g(t)\,dt; the coefficient of f(s)f(s) is exactly the first displayed expression. Replacing gg by its conjugate and conjugating that coefficient proves the second line. For the real cutoffs chosen in Section 5.2, and χ\chi supported below cc, this is exactly its stated −iθ(s)∫scχ(t)g(t)dt-i\theta(s)\int_s^c\chi(t)g(t)\,dt. All derivatives of both cutoffs appear in the integer Sobolev bounds. The Hermitian adjoint supplies the negative-order Sobolev estimate there. The bilinear transpose supplies the raw linear evaluations in (GE9) and (GT6), including every coefficient derivative. The boundary jet formula (GD14), weighted extension (GE23), and trace comparison (SC4) therefore use one consistent original distributional action.

The exact transpose and Hermitian-adjoint maps

The two arrows ιF,ιE\iota_F,\iota_E include the complete metric and density. Their square commutes by (DT4), and (DT5) transports the same operator to its two dual evaluations. The half-density factors are (DT3), and the scalar phase test is (DT8).

4. Compressed wave fronts

4.1. Ellipticity and the characteristic set at every symbol order

Let B∈Ψbm(X;E,F)B\in\Psi_b^m(X;E,F) and let bb be its complete local symbol. At a nonzero compressed covector q=(x0,ζ0)q=(x_0,\zeta_0), call BB elliptic if the two bundle ranks agree and there are a base neighborhood UU, an open cone Γ\Gamma containing ζ0\zeta_0, constants c,R>0c,R>0, and local frames such that b(x,ζ):Ex→Fx is invertible,∥b(x,ζ)−1∥≤c−1⟨ζ⟩−m(x∈U,ζ∈Γ,|ζ|≥R).(GW1) b(x,\zeta):E_x\to F_x\text{ is invertible},\qquad \|b(x,\zeta)^{-1}\|\le c^{-1}\langle\zeta\rangle^{-m} \quad(x\in U,\ \zeta\in\Gamma,\ |\zeta|\ge R). \tag{GW1} The set of covectors where this fails is Char⁡B\operatorname{Char}B. Changing the representative by Sm−1S^{m-1} does not change (GW1): b0−1(b−b0)b_0^{-1}(b-b_0) is O(⟨ζ⟩−1)O(\langle\zeta\rangle^{-1}), so for large |ζ||\zeta| its ordered Neumann series is invertible. Smooth frame changes conjugate or left/right multiply by uniformly invertible matrices on a smaller compact chart. Thus the definition is intrinsic. The complement of the characteristic set is open and conic; the set itself is closed and conic in T̃*X\0\widetilde T^*X\setminus0.

The inverse in (GW1) has the exact order −m-m on a smaller cone. Differentiate b−1b=IEb^{-1}b=I_E: ∂ζjb−1=−b−1(∂ζjb)b−1,∂xjb−1=−b−1(∂xjb)b−1.(GW2) \partial_{\zeta_j}b^{-1} =-b^{-1}(\partial_{\zeta_j}b)b^{-1},\qquad \partial_{x_j}b^{-1} =-b^{-1}(\partial_{x_j}b)b^{-1}. \tag{GW2} Repeated product differentiation keeps the original matrix order. Every frequency derivative lowers the order by one; every base derivative leaves it unchanged. Multiplying by a conic cutoff gives a global chart symbol of order −m-m. This proves the symbol estimate needed for an actual microlocal parametrix.

Here is the complete construction. Choose nested cones Γ0⋐Γ1⋐Γ\Gamma_0\Subset\Gamma_1\Subset\Gamma and base neighborhoods U0⋐U1⋐UU_0\Subset U_1\Subset U, with a smooth large-frequency cutoff χ\chi supported in U1×Γ1U_1\times\Gamma_1 and equal to one on U0×Γ0U_0\times\Gamma_0 for |ζ||\zeta| large. Set c0=χb−1c_0=\chi b^{-1}, with the original map F→EF\to E. The lacunary realization (GC6)–(GC7) changes this by a residual symbol only. The ordered product gives c0#b=χIE+e1,e1∈S−1,e1 residual away from the elliptic working cone.(GW3) c_0\# b=\chi I_E+e_1,\qquad e_1\in S^{-1}, \quad e_1\text{ residual away from the elliptic working cone}. \tag{GW3} Suppose the sum c0+⋯+cN−1c_0+\cdots+c_{N-1} has error eN∈S−Ne_N\in S^{-N}, residual away from that cone. Its next correction is cN=−χ1eNb−1∈S−m−N,(eN+cNb)=0where χ1=1 on the nonresidual support of eN.(GW4) c_N=-\chi_1e_N b^{-1}\in S^{-m-N}, \qquad (e_N+c_N b)=0 \quad\text{where }\chi_1=1\text{ on the nonresidual support of }e_N. \tag{GW4} The actual product cN#b−cNbc_N\# b-c_Nb is one order lower by (GC9), so the new error is in S−N−1S^{-N-1}, still residual off the elliptic cone. The cutoff χ1\chi_1 is supported inside the cone where b−1b^{-1} exists. At each stage the part not cancelled by χ1=1\chi_1=1 was already residual; include it in the final residual instead of dividing it by bb. Asymptotic summation (GC13) produces a single properly supported C∈Ψb−m(F,E)C\in\Psi_b^{-m}(F,E) with the global localized identity CB=Q+R,Q=Op⁡(χIE)∈Ψb0(E,E),R∈Ψb−∞,(GW5) CB=Q+R, \qquad Q=\operatorname{Op}(\chi I_E)\in\Psi_b^0(E,E), \quad R\in\Psi_b^{-\infty}, \tag{GW5} and QQ is elliptic on U0×Γ0U_0\times\Gamma_0. The low-frequency part and all coordinate-patching errors are residual, and every finite error is retained until its correction in (GW4). The same construction on bc=IFb c=I_F yields a right parametrix when needed; it is a separate ordered calculation, not inferred by commuting the matrices in (GW4).

4.2. The compressed wave-front set

For a supported distribution u∈𝒟X′u\in\mathcal D'_X, define WF⁡b(u):=⋂B∈Ψb0(X;E,E) properBu∈𝒜(X;E)Char⁡B⊂T̃*X\0.(GW6) \operatorname{WF}_b(u) :=\bigcap_{\substack{B\in\Psi_b^0(X;E,E)\text{ proper}\\ Bu\in\mathcal A(X;E)}} \operatorname{Char}B \quad\subset\widetilde T^*X\setminus0 . \tag{GW6} The zero operator is always an admissible test, with characteristic set equal to the whole nonzero compressed bundle. The identity is an admissible test exactly when u∈𝒜(X)u\in\mathcal A(X). Thus the family of tests is never empty. Every characteristic set is closed and conic by (GW1), and so is its intersection. At a covector outside WF⁡b(u)\operatorname{WF}_b(u) there is one properly supported order-zero BB, elliptic there, with Bu∈𝒜Bu\in\mathcal A. The target cannot be changed to C∞(X)C^\infty(X) for arbitrary supported distributions: (GA5) receives a residual operator into 𝒜\mathcal A, and its original corner kernel may fail to smooth at the boundary.

For later use we prove the finite-cover consequence of (GW6). If WF⁡b(u)\operatorname{WF}_b(u) is empty above a compact K⊂XK\subset X, the compressed unit cosphere above KK has a finite cover by cones where order-zero operators B1,…,BNB_1,\ldots,B_N are elliptic and Bju∈𝒜B_ju\in\mathcal A. Choose a smooth partition of unity χj\chi_j in those cones at |ζ|≥R|\zeta|\ge R, summing to a spatial cutoff φ=1\varphi=1 near KK. Apply (GW3)–(GW4) separately to the symbols χjbj−1\chi_j b_j^{-1}, preserving their factor order. Asymptotic summation gives properly supported CjC_j and a residual RR such that ∑j=1NCjBj=φ+R.(GW7) \sum_{j=1}^N C_jB_j=\varphi+R. \tag{GW7} The missing compact-frequency part is a residual kernel and is included in RR. Choose the output supports of all CjC_j in one compact neighborhood of supp⁡φ\operatorname{supp}\varphi. Then RR has compact output support; proper support gives one compact input set. Choose a compact smooth ψ\psi equal to one on that input set. The exact identity Ru=R(ψu)Ru=R(\psi u) lets (GA5) apply to the compact distribution ψu\psi u, even when the original uu is not compact. Acting on uu, every Cj(Bju)C_j(B_ju) belongs to 𝒜\mathcal A by (GA3), and Ru∈𝒜Ru\in\mathcal A by (GA5). Thus φu∈𝒜\varphi u\in\mathcal A. On a noncompact manifold the order obtained from this finite cover may depend on the compact set. Retain the original class 𝒜=⋃m𝒜m\mathcal A=\bigcup_m\mathcal A^m, and define its exact local enlargement by

𝒜loc(X)={u∈𝒟X′:χu∈𝒜(X) for every χ∈Cc∞(X)}.(GW8a) \mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}}(X) =\{u\in\mathcal D'_X: \chi u\in\mathcal A(X)\text{ for every }\chi\in C_c^\infty(X)\}. \tag{GW8a}

Multiplication and restriction give the injective map 𝒜↪𝒜loc\mathcal A\hookrightarrow\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}}. The preceding finite-cover argument proves the exact replacement for the global-order assertion:

WF⁡b(u)=⌀⇔u∈𝒜loc(X).(GW8) \operatorname{WF}_b(u)=\varnothing \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad u\in\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}}(X). \tag{GW8}

For the converse, at any compressed covector over xx, choose a compact smooth χ\chi equal to one near xx. The multiplication operator χI\chi I is properly supported, elliptic at that covector, and maps uu into the original 𝒜\mathcal A, by (GW8a). These testers exclude every covector. For the forward implication, apply (GW7) on a compact neighborhood of supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi, then multiply its conormal output by χ\chi. The maximum of the finitely many conormal orders is one valid order for that compact output. If uu has compact support, choose χ=1\chi=1 on its support; then χu=u\chi u=u and (GW8) does imply u∈𝒜u\in\mathcal A. In particular the original global-order equivalence holds on compact XX. No single order is asserted after an infinite exhaustion.

The distinction is necessary. On X=ℝy×[0,∞)tX=\mathbb R_y\times[0,\infty)_t, of dimension two, choose nonzero θ∈Cc∞((−1/4,1/4))\theta\in C_c^\infty((-1/4,1/4)) and form the actual locally finite supported distribution

u(y,t)=∑j=1∞θ(y−j)⊗δ(j)(t).(GW8b) u(y,t)=\sum_{j=1}^\infty\theta(y-j)\otimes\delta^{(j)}(t). \tag{GW8b}

Each compact set meets only finitely many summands. The jj-th summand has normal amplitude (iτ)jθ(y−j)(i\tau)^j\theta(y-j) with inverse factor (2π)−1(2\pi)^{-1}, so its conormal order is exactly jj, by the original codimension-one shift m+(n−2)/4m+(n-2)/4 with n=2n=2. It belongs to 𝒜j\mathcal A^j, including all tangent derivatives. It does not belong to 𝒜m\mathcal A^m when m<jm<j. To verify the last statement directly, select a bounded interval in tangential frequency on which the squared Fourier transform of θ\theta has positive integral. On the full sharp dyadic annulus, restrict the normal frequency to c12l<|τ|<c22lc_1 2^l<|\tau|<c_2 2^l strictly inside that annulus. Its squared Fourier integral is bounded below by cj2l(2j+1)c_j2^{l(2j+1)}. The (GA1) Besov factor is 2l(−m−1/2)2^{l(-m-1/2)}, so the resulting norm is at least cj′2l(j−m)c'_j2^{l(j-m)}, which diverges for m<jm<j. Multiplying (GW8b) by a compact cutoff equal to one around its jj-th boundary support isolates that summand. Thus (GW8b) lies in 𝒜loc\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}} and has empty compressed wave front, but lies in no 𝒜m\mathcal A^m. This proves strictness of the displayed injection. The quotient 𝒜loc/𝒜\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}}/\mathcal A records precisely this failure of one globally bounded order, with kernel of the quotient map equal to the original 𝒜\mathcal A.

The stronger smoothness conclusion for u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A' needs the separate local intersection theorem proved below. It is not being inferred from conormality alone.

4.3. Residual localization and elliptic inclusion

Let A∈ΨbmA\in\Psi_b^m have a full symbol of order −∞-\infty in a conic neighborhood of a closed conic set Γ\Gamma. At each q∈Γq\in\Gamma choose an order-zero cutoff DqD_q elliptic at qq whose large-frequency symbol is supported in a smaller cone inside that neighborhood. The full ordered product expansion (GC9) has every term residual there: derivatives of the cutoff stay in the smaller cone, derivatives of the full symbol of AA have arbitrary negative order there, and the exact far product term is residual. The coordinate-invariant remainders (GC13) therefore give DqA∈Ψb−∞D_qA\in\Psi_b^{-\infty}, after harmless compact spatial localization. By (GA5), DqAu∈𝒜D_qAu\in\mathcal A. Hence WF⁡b(Au)∩Γ=⌀.(GW9) \operatorname{WF}_b(Au)\cap\Gamma=\varnothing. \tag{GW9} This proves precisely the conormal residual target; it makes no unsupported boundary smoothness claim.

For the elliptic inclusion, let qq be outside both Char⁡B\operatorname{Char}B and WF⁡b(Bu)\operatorname{WF}_b(Bu), where B∈ΨbmB\in\Psi_b^m is proper. Select an order-zero tester DD elliptic at qq with DBu∈𝒜DBu\in\mathcal A. The product DBDB has invertible principal symbol dbd b near qq in the original order; its inverse is b−1d−1b^{-1}d^{-1}. Apply (GW3)–(GW5) to DBDB, choosing χ\chi supported in the common elliptic cone and equal to one near qq. There is an order-zero tester QQ elliptic at qq and a residual RR with the exact identity Q=EDB+RQ=E DB+R. The first term is conormal by (GA3), and the residual term by (GA5). Thus Qu∈𝒜Qu\in\mathcal A, giving WF⁡b(u)⊂WF⁡b(Bu)∪Char⁡B.(GW10) \operatorname{WF}_b(u) \subset\operatorname{WF}_b(Bu)\cup\operatorname{Char}B. \tag{GW10} Every inverse and product has retained the bundle map order.

For a properly supported B∈ΨbmB\in\Psi_b^m, the forward inclusion follows by the complementary microlocal division. If q∉WF⁡b(u)q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u), take an order-zero elliptic CC there with Cu∈𝒜Cu\in\mathcal A. Construct its right local parametrix PCP_C as above, so PCC=Q0+R0P_CC=Q_0+R_0, where R0R_0 is residual and Q0Q_0 has full symbol equal to the identity on a smaller cone about qq at high frequency. Choose DD of order zero, elliptic at qq, with full symbol supported inside that smaller cone. Put E=DBPCE=DBP_C. Since DD is supported where the full symbol of Q0Q_0 is the identity, the exact product (GC9) and its far residual give DB(I−Q0)∈Ψb−∞DB(I-Q_0)\in\Psi_b^{-\infty}. The product DBR0DBR_0 is residual by (GC10). Therefore DB=EC+R,E∈Ψbm,R∈Ψb−∞(GW11) DB=E C+R, \qquad E\in\Psi_b^m,\quad R\in\Psi_b^{-\infty} \tag{GW11} with R=DB(I−Q0)−DBR0R=DB(I-Q_0)-DBR_0. Thus DBu=E(Cu)+Ru∈𝒜DBu=E(Cu)+Ru\in\mathcal A, so WF⁡b(Bu)⊂WF⁡b(u)(B∈Ψbm proper).(GW12) \operatorname{WF}_b(Bu)\subset\operatorname{WF}_b(u) \quad(B\in\Psi_b^m\text{ proper}). \tag{GW12} The same inclusion holds for an arbitrary ordinary smooth differential operator, including the unweighted normal derivative. We prove this separately because DnD_n itself is not a totally characteristic operator. For q∉WF⁡b(u)q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u), choose CC elliptic at qq with Cu∈𝒜Cu\in\mathcal A. The left localized parametrix gives PCC=Q+RP_CC=Q+R, where the full symbol of QQ is exactly one on a high-frequency cone about qq and RR is residual. Thus Qu=PC(Cu)−Ru∈𝒜.(GW12a) Qu=P_C(Cu)-Ru\in\mathcal A. \tag{GW12a} Choose an order-zero tester DD, elliptic at qq, with full symbol supported in a smaller cone where Q=IQ=I microlocally. Then D(I−Q)D(I-Q) is residual by (GC9), including its exact far term. The ambient supported distribution DjuD_j u is again supported in the closed half-space. The local commutators are exactly [Dj,Ta]=TDxja(j<n),[Dn,Ta]=TDxna+TDξnaDn.(GW12b) [D_j,T_a]=T_{D_{x_j}a}\quad(j<n),\qquad [D_n,T_a]=T_{D_{x_n}a}+T_{D_{\xi_n}a}D_n . \tag{GW12b} These are the unmodified (5.1), with D=−i∂D=-i\partial and all signs retained. They first hold on interior compact smooth functions. Theorem 9.1(e) in the local prerequisite approximates every supported distribution weakly by such functions; each term in (GW12b) is a composition of weakly continuous operators on supported distributions. Taking that limit proves the same identity for the actual supported representatives, including any boundary deltas.

Write w=(I−Q)uw=(I-Q)u. Since the full symbol of QQ is constant one on the working cone, the symbols DxjqD_{x_j}q and DξnqD_{\xi_n}q vanish there to every symbol order. Apply DD on the left in (GW12b) and use (GC9): each resulting product is residual. The exact identity DDjw=D(I−Q)Dju+D[Dj,I−Q]u(GW12c) D D_jw =D(I-Q)D_ju+D[D_j,I-Q]u \tag{GW12c} is therefore a sum of residual operators applied to supported distributions, uu or DnuD_nu. It belongs to 𝒜\mathcal A by (GA5). On the other hand Qu∈𝒜Qu\in\mathcal A by (GW12a), and the ordinary differential map (C17) gives DjQu∈𝒜D_jQu\in\mathcal A; applying DD preserves that class by (GA3). Hence DDju∈𝒜DD_ju\in\mathcal A, so WF⁡b(Dju)⊂WF⁡b(u)(j=1,…,n).(GW12d) \operatorname{WF}_b(D_ju)\subset\operatorname{WF}_b(u) \quad(j=1,\ldots,n). \tag{GW12d} Smooth coefficient multiplication is in Ψb0\Psi_b^0, and (GW12) applies to it. Finite sums and products of the DjD_j with such coefficients therefore give the same inclusion for every ordinary smooth differential operator. The proof has kept the normal TDξnaDnT_{D_{\xi_n}a}D_n term in (GW12b); omitting it would make the boundary claim unjustified.

4.4. Interior comparison and a noncharacteristic boundary

In the interior, (GL8) is the ordinary cotangent identification. Localized global bb-operators are ordinary pseudodifferential operators there by (GL13)–(GL15), and every ordinary properly supported local operator can be realized with the same interior kernel in the global class, using (GC7). Also 𝒜\mathcal A restricts to C∞C^\infty in the interior by (GA1): every derivative is a combination of tangent derivatives on a compact interior chart, and the local Sobolev estimates give all smooth derivatives. Both implications in the tester definition therefore give the exact equality WF⁡b(u)|T*X∘=WF⁡(u|X∘).(GW13) \operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{T^*X^\circ} =\operatorname{WF}(u|_{X^\circ}). \tag{GW13}

Let P=∑|α|≤maα(x)DαP=\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}a_\alpha(x)D^\alpha be a smooth ordinary differential operator of positive integer order mm, and let ϕ\phi vanish simply at the boundary, with ϕ=cxn\phi=c x_n, c(x′,0)>0c(x',0)>0, in a chart. No original coefficient is removed. The complete differential expression ϕmP=∑|α|≤mc(x)mxnm−αnaα(x)D′α′(xnαnDnαn)(GW14) \phi^mP =\sum_{|\alpha|\le m} c(x)^m x_n^{m-\alpha_n} a_\alpha(x)D'^{\alpha'} \bigl(x_n^{\alpha_n}D_n^{\alpha_n}\bigr) \tag{GW14} retains every lower-order and tangential term; the displayed factor order is valid because D′D' commutes with xnx_n. Thus ϕmP∈Diff⁡bm\phi^mP\in\operatorname{Diff}_b^m. At xn=0x_n=0, all principal terms except α=(0,m)\alpha=(0,m) contain a positive power of xnx_n. Its complete boundary principal compressed symbol is σm(ϕmP)(x′,0,ξ′,ρ)=c(x′,0)ma(0,m)(x′,0)ρm.(GW15) \sigma_m(\phi^mP)(x',0,\xi',\rho) =c(x',0)^m a_{(0,m)}(x',0)\rho^m. \tag{GW15} If the boundary is noncharacteristic, the original leading normal coefficient a(0,m)(x′,0)a_{(0,m)}(x',0) is invertible. Equation (GW15) is invertible exactly when ρ≠0\rho\ne0; its boundary characteristic set is precisely the embedded tangential hyperplane T*∂X={ρ=0}T^*\partial X=\{\rho=0\}, with the zero section excluded. Applying the full inclusion (GW10) to the actual operator ϕmP\phi^mP yields WF⁡b(u)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(ϕmPu)|∂X∪(T*∂X\0).(GW16) \operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X} \subset \operatorname{WF}_b(\phi^mPu)|_{\partial X} \cup(T^*\partial X\setminus0). \tag{GW16} For m=0m=0, PP is multiplication by its original invertible coefficient under the corresponding noncharacteristic hypothesis; the same parametrix gives (GW16) with an empty boundary characteristic set. Formula (GW14) is not used with a negative power.

5. Noncharacteristic normal extension

5.1. The exact local conormal seminorms

Fix K=K0×[0,c/2]K=K_0\times[0,c/2] compactly contained in the coordinate chart, and use a slightly larger compact K′K'. For κk=−k−n/4\kappa_k=-k-n/4, the conormal topology on supported tests is generated by pk,K,L(ϕ)=∑|α|≤L∥xnαnDαϕ∥B2,∞κk(L=0,1,2,…).(GE1) p_{k,K,L}(\phi) =\sum_{|\alpha|\le L} \|x_n^{\alpha_n}D^\alpha\phi\|_{B^{\kappa_k}_{2,\infty}} \quad(L=0,1,2,\ldots). \tag{GE1} Smooth chart cutoffs are inserted in each norm. Formula (GA2) proves that these weighted normal derivatives span exactly the same filtered family as all words in D′D' and xnDnx_nD_n. No lower term of the triangular polynomial relation is dropped. Tangential differential operators a(x,D′)a(x,D'), of any fixed finite order, and their formal transposes map each 𝒜Kk\mathcal A^k_K continuously into 𝒜K′k\mathcal A^k_{K'}. To verify this, expand a tangent word through aa: every resulting term is another finite tangent word with smooth coefficients, including the derivatives of those coefficients. Multiplication by a compact smooth coefficient is bounded on each B2,∞κkB^{\kappa_k}_{2,\infty} by (C2)–(C3). The number of seminorms needed depends on the actual tangential order; no relation to the normal order is assumed.

For later use, the dyadic Fourier estimates give, for every real ss, ∥w∥B2,∞s≤Cs(∥w∥B2,∞s−1+∑j=1n∥Djw∥B2,∞s−1).(GE2) \|w\|_{B^s_{2,\infty}} \le C_s\left(\|w\|_{B^{s-1}_{2,\infty}} +\sum_{j=1}^{n}\|D_jw\|_{B^{s-1}_{2,\infty}}\right). \tag{GE2} On the low-frequency block the first norm controls the left side. On the ll-th high block, 2l≍(∑j|ξj|2)1/22^l\asymp(\sum_j|\xi_j|^2)^{1/2}; multiply its L2L^2 norm by 2l(s−1)2^{l(s-1)}, use Plancherel for each DjD_j, and take the supremum over ll. This proves (GE2) without a boundary norm convention or an omitted tangential term.

5.2. The normal primitive gains one conormal order

For ϕ∈Cc∞(X∘)\phi\in C_c^\infty(X^\circ) with support in KK, put ψ(x′,t)=i∫0tϕ(x′,s)ds,Dnψ=ϕ,ψ=0 below the normal support of ϕ.(GE3) \psi(x',t)=i\int_0^t\phi(x',s)\,ds, \qquad D_n\psi=\phi, \quad \psi=0\text{ below the normal support of }\phi. \tag{GE3} Choose a fixed normal cutoff χ(t)\chi(t) equal to one on [0,c/2][0,c/2] and supported in [0,c)[0,c). Then χψ\chi\psi has compact support in the interior for each such ϕ\phi, although the distance of that support from the boundary need not be uniform.

We first prove that the localized Volterra operator J:ϕ↦χψJ:\phi\mapsto\chi\psi is bounded on B2,∞sB^s_{2,\infty} for every real ss, with fixed chart cutoffs. For this ambient-space estimate, choose a smooth input cutoff equal to one on the original KK, extending a short distance across t=0t=0, and write the integral as iχ(t)∫−∞tθ(s)ϕ(x′,s)dsi\chi(t)\int_{-\infty}^{t}\theta(s)\phi(x',s)\,ds. For the original interior-supported ϕ\phi this is exactly (GE3) after multiplication by χ\chi. The smooth cutoff is necessary in the negative-order dual estimate; a sharp input cutoff at zero would create an unjustified boundary multiplier. For s=0s=0, Cauchy–Schwarz on the finite normal interval gives ∥ψ∥L2≤c∥ϕ∥L2\|\psi\|_{L^2}\le c\|\phi\|_{L^2}. For a nonnegative integer pp, differentiate χψ\chi\psi at most pp times. Tangential derivatives commute with the integral; each positive normal derivative of ψ\psi is the corresponding derivative of ϕ\phi of one lower order; derivatives of χ\chi multiply the same expressions. Thus J:Hp→HpJ:H^p\to H^p is bounded. Choose these fixed cutoffs real valued. The Hermitian adjoint has the reversed integral g(s)↦−iθ(s)∫scχ(t)g(t)dtg(s)\mapsto-i\theta(s)\int_s^c\chi(t)g(t)\,dt. The bilinear transpose has the full factor +i+i; both identities and their exact relation are proved in (DT10), Section 3.6. Its derivatives obey the same integer estimates, including the derivatives of the smooth θ\theta, so duality gives J:H−p→H−pJ:H^{-p}\to H^{-p}. For a real ss, choose integers p<s<qp<s<q. The dyadic operator matrix estimate between the two Sobolev endpoints is the one proved from (C2)–(C3): after weighting by 2ls−js2^{ls-js}, it decays geometrically in |l−j||l-j|. Summation proves the claimed B2,∞sB^s_{2,\infty} bound, including negative indices. The constants depend on the fixed cutoffs, not on how near the input support is to t=0t=0.

Now set s=κk=−k−n/4s=\kappa_k=-k-n/4. We prove the stronger precise primitive estimate pk,K′,L(χψ)≤Ck,K,Lpk+1,K,L′(ϕ)for a finite L′=L′(L),(GE4) p_{k,K',L}(\chi\psi) \le C_{k,K,L}\,p_{k+1,K,L'}(\phi) \quad\text{for a finite }L'=L'(L), \tag{GE4} since κk+1=s−1\kappa_{k+1}=s-1. For a tangent word with no normal derivative, D′β(χψ)=J(D′βϕ)D'^\beta(\chi\psi)=J(D'^\beta\phi), so the Volterra bound controls its Bs−1B^{s-1} norm by the corresponding ϕ\phi seminorm. Apply (GE2) to gain the missing one degree. Its tangential derivatives are J(D′β+ejϕ)J(D'^{\beta+e_j}\phi), and its normal derivative is χD′βϕ+(Dnχ)D′βψ\chi D'^\beta\phi+(D_n\chi)D'^\beta\psi. The same Volterra estimate controls all these Bs−1B^{s-1} norms by a finite set of (GE1) seminorms for ϕ\phi.

For a word with positive normal order a≥1a\ge1, preserve its entire normal weight: xnaDnaD′βψ=xnaDna−1D′βϕ.(GE5) x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\psi =x_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi. \tag{GE5} The right side has a factor xnx_n times a tangent word in ϕ\phi, so its Bs−1B^{s-1} norm is controlled. Its normal derivative is Dn(xnaDnaD′βψ)=xnaDnaD′βϕ−iaxna−1Dna−1D′βϕ.(GE6) D_n(x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\psi) =x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\phi -ia\,x_n^{a-1}D_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi. \tag{GE6} This is the full product rule, including its −ia-ia term; when a=0a=0 that term is absent and the earlier calculation applies. The tangential derivative is xnaDna−1D′β+ejϕx_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^{\beta+e_j}\phi, again a smooth multiple of a tangent word. A cutoff derivative contributes (Dnχ)xnaDna−1D′βϕ(D_n\chi)x_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi, which has the same bound. Applying (GE2) proves the BsB^s estimate for each word, and summing finitely many words proves (GE4).

5.3. First-order normal equations at every test order

Let A0(x,D′)A_0(x,D') be a finite matrix of tangential differential operators with smooth coefficients of arbitrary finite orders, and let the extendible interior vector distribution uu solve (Dn+A0(x,D′))u=fin X∘,f∈𝒜′(X).(GE7) (D_n+A_0(x,D'))u=f\quad\text{in }X^\circ, \qquad f\in\mathcal A'(X). \tag{GE7} We prove that uu has a unique extension in 𝒜′\mathcal A'. For interior compact smooth tests ϕ\phi supported in KK, we first establish the bound |u(ϕ)|≤Ck,Kpk,K,L(ϕ)(GE8) |u(\phi)|\le C_{k,K}p_{k,K,L}(\phi) \tag{GE8} for every real kk, with a finite LL depending on k,Kk,K. Since uu is extendible, choose one ambient distribution extension temporarily. On a fixed compact set it has finite order MM, so its action on interior ϕ\phi is bounded by finitely many CMC^M seminorms. Choose s>M+n/2s>M+n/2. Fourier inversion and Cauchy–Schwarz bound those seminorms by HsH^s, and a slightly larger B2,∞s+ϵB^{s+\epsilon}_{2,\infty} norm bounds HsH^s by a geometric dyadic sum. Choose k0k_0 sufficiently negative that −k0−n/4>s+ϵ-k_0-n/4>s+\epsilon. The α=0\alpha=0 term of (GE1) then proves (GE8) for k0k_0. The extension’s boundary values do not enter this interior-test estimate.

Assume (GE8) at some kk. Let ψ\psi be (GE3), χ\chi the fixed cutoff, and use the bilinear distribution pairing. The formal tangential transpose A0tA_0^{\mathrm t} retains every coefficient derivative and reverses the matrix maps. Since Dn(χψ)=ϕ+(Dnχ)ψD_n(\chi\psi)=\phi+(D_n\chi)\psi on the support of ϕ\phi, the exact equation (GE7) gives u(ϕ)=−f(χψ)+u(A0t(χψ)−(Dnχ)ψ).(GE9) u(\phi) =-f(\chi\psi) +u\bigl(A_0^{\mathrm t}(\chi\psi) -(D_n\chi)\psi\bigr). \tag{GE9} All arguments of uu in this formula are smooth and supported in the interior. The functional ff is continuous on compact 𝒜k\mathcal A^k tests for every kk: for k≥m0k\ge m_0 this is its defining property, and for k<m0k<m_0 the inclusion 𝒜k↪𝒜m0\mathcal A^k\hookrightarrow\mathcal A^{m_0} is continuous. The operator A0tA_0^{\mathrm t} and the normal cutoff multiply 𝒜k\mathcal A^k continuously by Section 5.1, regardless of the tangential order of A0A_0. Apply the induction hypothesis and then the full primitive estimate (GE4). It yields (GE8) at k+1k+1, with finite constants and a possibly larger finite LL. By induction (GE8) holds at k0+jk_0+j for every integer j≥0j\ge0. For an arbitrary real kk, choose jj with k0+j≥kk_0+j\ge k; the continuous inclusion 𝒜k↪𝒜k0+j\mathcal A^k\hookrightarrow \mathcal A^{k_0+j} gives the desired bound.

Construct the supported extension rather than silently identifying it with the temporary ambient one. For a smooth boundary test ϕ\phi supported in KK, let 𝒬εϕ\mathcal Q_\varepsilon\phi be (GS6); it is smooth, supported in a fixed compact subset of the interior, and converges to ϕ\phi in 𝒜k1\mathcal A^{k_1} for every k1>m0k_1>m_0, by (GD2) and (GS7). The bounds (GE8) make U(ϕ):=limε↓0u(𝒬εϕ)(GE10) U(\phi):=\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon\phi) \tag{GE10} exist: use the bound at such a k1k_1 on differences of approximants. The limit is independent of the particular one-sided smoothing family because both approximations converge in the same 𝒜k1\mathcal A^{k_1} topology. The uniform (GS2) multiplier estimate and (GE8), followed by the continuous inclusion from 𝒜k\mathcal A^k to a larger test order, prove for every k≥m0k\ge m_0 a finite estimate of the form (GD3) for UU. The smooth-test topology bounds those conormal seminorms by finitely many ordinary smooth seminorms, by (GD1); thus UU is a distribution on the closed chart. The supported-distribution duality of local Theorem 9.1(a),(c) gives its ambient supported representative. Its interior restriction is uu, since 𝒬ε\mathcal Q_\varepsilon is an approximate identity there. By (GD4), no second 𝒜′\mathcal A' extension of uu exists. This proves the first-order existence and uniqueness in the exact dual topology.

5.4. Full normal order by the actual companion system

Let m≥1m\ge1 and retain the original normal-monic equation P=Dnm+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Dnj,Pu=f in X∘,f∈𝒜′(X).(GE11) P=D_n^m+\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')D_n^j, \qquad Pu=f\text{ in }X^\circ, \quad f\in\mathcal A'(X). \tag{GE11} Each aja_j is an arbitrary finite-order tangential differential operator with smooth matrix coefficients; the orders of different aja_j are not required to be at most m−jm-j. Set uj=Dnjuu_j=D_n^ju, 0≤j<m0\le j<m. Each uju_j is extendible, because an ordinary derivative of an ambient extension remains an ambient extension of the interior derivative. The exact first-order companion system is Dn(u0u1⋮um−1)+(0−I0⋯000−I⋯0⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮a0a1a2⋯am−1)(u0u1⋮um−1)=(00⋮f).(GE12) D_n\begin{pmatrix}u_0\\u_1\\\vdots\\u_{m-1}\end{pmatrix} +\begin{pmatrix} 0&-I&0&\cdots&0\\ 0&0&-I&\cdots&0\\ \vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\ a_0&a_1&a_2&\cdots&a_{m-1} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}u_0\\u_1\\\vdots\\u_{m-1}\end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\\vdots\\f\end{pmatrix}. \tag{GE12} For m=1m=1 this is just (GE11), with its single matrix entry a0a_0; the displayed larger companion matrix is read for m≥2m\ge2. Section 5.3 applies componentwise to its actual tangential matrix, giving a unique vector extension Uj∈𝒜′U_j\in\mathcal A' for every jj.

The corrected derivative (GD9) has the same interior restriction as Uj+1U_{j+1} for j<m−1j<m-1. Both belong to 𝒜′\mathcal A', so interior injectivity (GD4) gives the exact equality ∇nintUj=Uj+1,DnUj−Uj+1=−i(Uj|xn=0)⊗δ(xn),xn(DnUj−Uj+1)=0.(GE13) \nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U_j=U_{j+1}, \qquad D_nU_j-U_{j+1} =-i\,(U_j|_{x_n=0})\otimes\delta(x_n), \quad x_n(D_nU_j-U_{j+1})=0. \tag{GE13} Similarly the final companion equation gives ∇nintUm−1+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Uj=f,xn(DnUm−1+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Uj−f)=0.(GE14) \nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U_{m-1} +\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')U_j=f, \quad x_n\left(D_nU_{m-1} +\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')U_j-f\right)=0. \tag{GE14} The tangential operators act on 𝒜′\mathcal A' by (GD9), with no normal delta correction of their own.

We keep the powers of xnx_n through the elimination. The full commutator is Dn(xnj+1W)=xnj+1DnW−i(j+1)xnjW.(GE15) D_n(x_n^{j+1}W) =x_n^{j+1}D_nW-i(j+1)x_n^jW. \tag{GE15} Start with U0=Dn0U0U_0=D_n^0U_0. If xnj(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^j(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0, then (GE13) implies xnj+1(Uj+1−DnUj)=0x_n^{j+1}(U_{j+1}-D_nU_j)=0, while (GE15) implies xnj+1Dn(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^{j+1}D_n(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0. Hence induction gives xnjUj=xnjDnjU0(0≤j<m).(GE16) x_n^jU_j=x_n^jD_n^jU_0\qquad(0\le j<m). \tag{GE16} Apply (GE15) once more at j=m−1j=m-1 to replace the first term of (GE14) after multiplication by xnmx_n^m. For each lower term j<mj<m, xnx_n commutes with aj(x,D′)a_j(x,D'), and xnmaj(Uj−DnjU0)=xnm−jajxnj(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^m a_j(U_j-D_n^jU_0) =x_n^{m-j}a_jx_n^j(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0. Therefore the complete weighted equation is xnm(PU0−f)=0.(GE17) x_n^m(PU_0-f)=0. \tag{GE17} No original tangential coefficient or lower normal term was removed.

5.5. Uniqueness among all supported distribution extensions

Let VV be the difference of two supported distribution extensions of the same interior uu, each satisfying (GE17). Then supp⁡V⊂{xn=0}\operatorname{supp}V\subset\{x_n=0\}. We derive its finite normal structure here. Localize to a compact chart and let MM bound the distribution order of VV. Taylor-expand a test h(x′,t)h(x',t) through degree MM at t=0t=0, with a fixed normal cutoff η(t)=1\eta(t)=1 near zero: h(x′,t)=η(t)∑j=0Mtjj!∂tjh(x′,0)+tM+1r(x′,t)near supp⁡V.(GE18a) h(x',t)=\eta(t)\sum_{j=0}^{M} \frac{t^j}{j!}\partial_t^jh(x',0)+t^{M+1}r(x',t) \quad\text{near }\operatorname{supp}V. \tag{GE18a} The remainder has every normal derivative through degree MM zero on t=0t=0; multiplication by a cutoff supported in a shrinking normal neighborhood and the order-MM bound show that VV annihilates it. Define tangential distributions vj(g)=(−1)jV(η(t)tjg(x′)/j!)v_j(g)=(-1)^jV(\eta(t)t^jg(x')/j!). Then applying VV to (GE18a) gives, with no omitted coefficient, V=∑j=0μvj(x′)⊗δ(j)(xn),vμ≠0 unless V=0.(GE18) V=\sum_{j=0}^{\mu}v_j(x')\otimes\delta^{(j)}(x_n), \qquad v_\mu\ne0\text{ unless }V=0. \tag{GE18} Here μ≤M\mu\le M is the highest nonzero coefficient. The definition of vjv_j is independent of the cutoff because VV is supported at t=0t=0. The local representations agree on overlapping charts, so this argument applies to every compactly supported piece of VV. The coefficients are tangential distributions, possibly vector valued. The normal distribution formulas, with every factor, are Dnkδ(j)=(−i)kδ(j+k),xnmδ(j+k)={(−1)m(j+k)!(j+k−m)!δ(j+k−m),j+k≥m,0,j+k<m.(GE19) D_n^k\delta^{(j)}=(-i)^k\delta^{(j+k)},\qquad x_n^m\delta^{(j+k)} =\begin{cases} (-1)^m\dfrac{(j+k)!}{(j+k-m)!}\delta^{(j+k-m)},&j+k\ge m,\\ 0,&j+k<m. \end{cases} \tag{GE19} They follow by applying the distributions to a test function and differentiating xnmx_n^m exactly mm times at zero; no coefficient is normalized away. In xnmPVx_n^mPV, the original leading term xnmDnm(vμδ(μ))x_n^mD_n^m(v_\mu\delta^{(\mu)}) has the top normal coefficient im(μ+m)!μ!vμ(x′)⊗δ(μ)(xn),(GE20) i^m\frac{(\mu+m)!}{\mu!} v_\mu(x')\otimes\delta^{(\mu)}(x_n), \tag{GE20} which is nonzero when vμ≠0v_\mu\ne0. Every lower normal term aj(x,D′)Dnja_j(x,D')D_n^j, j<mj<m, has normal order at most μ+j−m≤μ−1\mu+j-m\le\mu-1 after multiplication by xnmx_n^m. Taylor coefficients of aja_j at the boundary can lower that order further, never raise it. Contributions from vlv_l with l<μl<\mu also have order below μ\mu. The coefficient of δ(μ)\delta^{(\mu)} in xnmPV=0x_n^mPV=0 therefore forces vμ=0v_\mu=0, a contradiction. Repeating downward gives V=0V=0. This proves uniqueness among all supported distribution extensions satisfying (GE17), stronger than uniqueness only in 𝒜′\mathcal A'.

The theorem so far is local on the stated product collar. The globalization and boundary wave-front consequence are proved next.

5.6. The noncharacteristic boundary wave-front class

Write T̃*X\widetilde T^*X for the compressed cotangent bundle of (GL11)–(GL18), and embed T*∂X\0T^*\partial X\setminus0 as its boundary covectors with zero normal compressed component. Define the exact class 𝒩(X):={v∈𝒜′(X):WF⁡b(v)|∂X⊂T*∂X\0}.(GE21) \mathcal N(X) :=\{v\in\mathcal A'(X): \operatorname{WF}_b(v)|_{\partial X} \subset T^*\partial X\setminus0\}. \tag{GE21} This is a condition on the already-defined wave-front set (GW6), not a replacement for the dual conormal requirement.

Let PP be a smooth ordinary differential operator of normal order m≥1m\ge1 whose boundary is noncharacteristic, and let an extendible interior distribution uu solve Pu=fPu=f with f∈𝒩(X)f\in\mathcal N(X). In one product chart retain the complete normal expansion P=am(x)Dnm+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Dnj,am(x′,0) invertible.(GE22) P=a_m(x)D_n^m+ \sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')D_n^j, \qquad a_m(x',0)\text{ invertible}. \tag{GE22} Shrinking the chart makes am(x)a_m(x) invertible throughout it. Multiplying the equation on the left by its inverse gives the normal-monic operator P′=am−1PP'=a_m^{-1}P and source f′=am−1ff'=a_m^{-1}f. The order of matrix multiplication is retained. Smooth multiplication preserves 𝒜′\mathcal A' by (GD13) and preserves the boundary wave-front condition by (GW12); thus f′∈𝒩f'\in\mathcal N. Sections 5.3–5.5 give the unique local U∈𝒜′U\in\mathcal A' with xnm(P′U−f′)=0,xnm(PU−f)=0.(GE23) x_n^m(P'U-f')=0, \qquad x_n^m(PU-f)=0. \tag{GE23} The second equality follows by multiplying the first on the left by ama_m, which commutes with the scalar xnmx_n^m. In (GE23) the composition xnmPx_n^mP is also its actual totally characteristic differential action on supported distributions: the original coefficients, their product order, and the raw ambient normal derivatives agree with (GD13) after transposition.

The full noncharacteristic estimate (GW16), with the original defining function ϕ=xn\phi=x_n in this chart, applies to this UU: WF⁡b(U)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(xnmPU)|∂X∪(T*∂X\0)=WF⁡b(xnmf)|∂X∪(T*∂X\0).(GE24) \operatorname{WF}_b(U)|_{\partial X} \subset \operatorname{WF}_b(x_n^mPU)|_{\partial X} \cup(T^*\partial X\setminus0) =\operatorname{WF}_b(x_n^mf)|_{\partial X} \cup(T^*\partial X\setminus0). \tag{GE24} Multiplication by xnmx_n^m is a proper order-zero totally characteristic operator after localization. The full forward inclusion (GW12), rather than an unsupported assertion about its zero set, gives WF⁡b(xnmf)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(f)|∂X⊂T*∂X\0.(GE25) \operatorname{WF}_b(x_n^mf)|_{\partial X} \subset\operatorname{WF}_b(f)|_{\partial X} \subset T^*\partial X\setminus0. \tag{GE25} Equations (GE24)–(GE25) prove U∈𝒩U\in\mathcal N. On overlapping boundary charts, two such local extensions have the same interior restriction and belong to 𝒜′\mathcal A', so (GD4) makes them equal. The product coordinate changes and bundle maps preserve 𝒜′\mathcal A' by (GA4) and the compressed wave-front condition by (GL11)–(GL18) and (GW6). The local extensions therefore glue to a global U∈𝒩(X)U\in\mathcal N(X), uniquely determined by the interior uu: Pu=f in X∘,f∈𝒩(X),∂X noncharacteristic for P⇒∃!U∈𝒩(X),U|X∘=u.(GE26) Pu=f\text{ in }X^\circ,\quad f\in\mathcal N(X),\quad \partial X\text{ noncharacteristic for }P \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \exists!\,U\in\mathcal N(X),\ U|_{X^\circ}=u. \tag{GE26} The uniqueness in (GE26) is also immediate from (GD4). Its existence uses the actual weighted equation (GE23); an arbitrary ambient extension would not supply the conclusion. For an order-zero P=a0(x)P=a_0(x) invertible at the boundary, local inversion gives U=a0−1f∈𝒩U=a_0^{-1}f\in\mathcal N by (GD13) and (GW12), with the same interior restriction and uniqueness by (GD4). Thus (GE26) also covers this endpoint without applying the positive-order companion construction to a zero-dimensional system.

6. Tangential action at the boundary

6.1. The actual tangential action and the conormal topology

Let b(x′,t,ξ′)∈Sdb(x',t,\xi')\in S^d, d∈ℝd\in\mathbb R, smooth down to t=0t=0, with its original full family of tangential symbol seminorms. Its left quantization, with the same Fourier convention as (GL13), is (Bbv)(x′,t)=(2π)−(n−1)∫ei(x′−y′)⋅ξ′b(x′,t,ξ′)v(y′,t)dy′dξ′.(GT1) (B_bv)(x',t)=(2\pi)^{-(n-1)} \int e^{i(x'-y')\cdot\xi'}b(x',t,\xi')v(y',t) \,dy'\,d\xi'. \tag{GT1} For n=1n=1, the tangential dimension is zero and (GT1) is smooth multiplication. Insert the actual proper-support kernel cutoff of BbB_b in (GT1) when needed. It maps compact smooth tests to compact smooth tests, including in the normal variable. Its transpose BbtB_b^{\mathrm t} is another properly supported tangential operator of order dd, with smooth tt-dependent coefficients; this follows directly by transposing the kernel and Taylor-expanding b(y′,t,ξ′)b(y',t,\xi') in y′−x′y'-x', retaining the exact far kernel as a tangential smoothing term. Thus (GT1) acts by transposition on every distribution for which proper support is specified, before any wave-front restriction is imposed.

We prove the stronger topology statement needed below. With the actual 𝒜k\mathcal A^k seminorms (GE1), for each compact chart KK, real kk, and finite LL, there are a compact K′K', finite L′L', and CC such that pk,K,L(Bbv)≤Cpk,K′,L′(v)(v∈𝒜K′k),pk,K,L(Bbtv)≤Cpk,K′,L′(v).(GT2) p_{k,K,L}(B_bv)\le C p_{k,K',L'}(v) \quad(v\in\mathcal A^k_{K'}), \qquad p_{k,K,L}(B_b^{\mathrm t}v)\le C p_{k,K',L'}(v). \tag{GT2} Here the compact sets are chosen to include the source and target of the properly supported localized kernel. To prove the Besov part, first localize both base variables to compact sets and extend the resulting smooth x=(x′,t)x=(x',t)-dependence periodically on a larger box. At t=0t=0, use the smooth collar extension of Section 3 of the linked local lesson before periodic extension; for each finite estimate its extension bounds involve only a finite number of the original one-sided symbol seminorms. Its Fourier series is b(x,ξ′)=∑ℓ∈ℤneiℓ⋅xbℓ(ξ′),|∂ξ′βbℓ(ξ′)|≤CNβ⟨ℓ⟩−N⟨ξ′⟩d−|β|(∀N).(GT3) b(x,\xi')=\sum_{\ell\in\mathbb Z^n} e^{i\ell\cdot x}b_\ell(\xi'),\qquad |\partial_{\xi'}^\beta b_\ell(\xi')| \le C_{N\beta}\langle\ell\rangle^{-N} \langle\xi'\rangle^{d-|\beta|} \quad(\forall N). \tag{GT3} This follows by integrating by parts NN times in the compact base Fourier coefficient; every base derivative of the original symbol has the same order dd. Choose an even integer M=2r≥max⁡(d,0)M=2r\ge\max(d,0). The full Fourier multiplier bℓ(ξ′)⟨ξ′⟩−Mb_\ell(\xi')\langle\xi'\rangle^{-M} is bounded uniformly in (ξ′,ξn)(\xi',\xi_n) by CN⟨ℓ⟩−NC_N\langle\ell\rangle^{-N}, so it is bounded on B2,∞s(ℝn)B^s_{2,\infty}(\mathbb R^n) for every real ss: it commutes with each full dyadic projection and Plancherel gives the bound on each block. The factor ⟨ξ′⟩M=(1+|ξ′|2)r\langle\xi'\rangle^M=(1+|\xi'|^2)^r is the complete finite polynomial in tangential derivatives, not an isotropic replacement. Multiplication by eiℓ⋅xe^{i\ell\cdot x} shifts full frequency by ℓ\ell; direct dyadic overlap shows its B2,∞sB^s_{2,\infty} operator bound grows by at most a fixed polynomial in ⟨ℓ⟩\langle\ell\rangle. Choosing NN larger than that degree plus n+1n+1, then summing (GT3), proves ∥Bbv∥B2,∞s≤Cs,b∑|β|≤M∥D′βv∥B2,∞s.(GT4) \|B_bv\|_{B^s_{2,\infty}} \le C_{s,b}\sum_{|\beta|\le M} \|D'^\beta v\|_{B^s_{2,\infty}}. \tag{GT4} The same argument applies to every normal and tangential base derivative of bb, including the transpose symbol and its exact far smoothing kernel. Its properly supported kernel cutoffs are smooth multiplication on the two sides and obey the same estimates.

The normal variable is unchanged by the kernel in (GT1), hence taBb=Bbtat^aB_b=B_bt^a. Differentiate the full expression rather than identifying normal and tangential orders: taDnaD′γ(Bbv)=∑j=0a∑β≤γ(aj)(γβ)tjBDnjDx′βb(ta−jDna−jD′γ−βv).(GT5) t^aD_n^aD'^\gamma(B_bv) =\sum_{j=0}^{a}\sum_{\beta\le\gamma} \binom aj\binom\gamma\beta t^j B_{D_n^jD_{x'}^\beta b} \bigl(t^{a-j}D_n^{a-j}D'^{\gamma-\beta}v\bigr). \tag{GT5} The formula also applies termwise to the proper kernel cutoff; its derivatives are included in the differentiated symbol. Every tjt^j is a smooth compact multiplier, and (GT4) controls the remaining tangential operator by finitely many further D′D' seminorms. This proves (GT2), with each original normal weight and derivative retained. In particular BbB_b and BbtB_b^{\mathrm t} preserve every filtered 𝒜k\mathcal A^k, and the dual formula (Bbu)(v)=u(Bbtv)(GT6) (B_bu)(v)=u(B_b^{\mathrm t}v) \tag{GT6} defines a weakly continuous map 𝒜′→𝒜′\mathcal A'\to\mathcal A'. The stronger action statement follows from the explicit topology estimate; it does not identify BbB_b with an isotropic nn-covariable pseudodifferential symbol.

6.2. The equatorial compressed cutoff

Choose a smooth conic symbol t0(ξ′,ρ)t_0(\xi',\rho) of order zero, independent of x′x', with the original low-frequency cutoff, so that t0=1(2|ρ|<|ξ′|,|ξ′|>1),t0=0(|ρ|>|ξ′|).(GT7) t_0=1\quad(2|\rho|<|\xi'|,\ |\xi'|>1),\qquad t_0=0\quad(|\rho|>|\xi'|). \tag{GT7} Multiply by a smooth normal base cutoff equal to one on 0≤t<10\le t<1 and supported in t<2t<2. The construction on the unit sphere is possible because the closed equatorial band and the normal caps are disjoint. Apply the original lacunarization of Lemma 4.4 to this full symbol and write tρ∈Sla0t_\rho\in S^0_{\mathrm{la}}. The difference tρ−t0t_\rho-t_0 is residual, with its original normal-base decay; it does not change the principal compressed symbol. Let T=TtρT=T_{t_\rho}, localized properly in a boundary chart.

For u∈𝒩u\in\mathcal N, put w=(I−T)uw=(I-T)u. At every boundary tangential covector qq, the full symbol of I−TI-T vanishes on a conic neighborhood of qq, so (GW9) removes qq from WF⁡b(w)\operatorname{WF}_b(w). At every other boundary covector qq, the definition of 𝒩\mathcal N removes qq from WF⁡b(u)\operatorname{WF}_b(u), and (GW12) removes it from WF⁡b(w)\operatorname{WF}_b(w). Thus the boundary portion is empty: WF⁡b((I−T)u)|∂X=⌀.(GT8) \operatorname{WF}_b((I-T)u)|_{\partial X}=\varnothing. \tag{GT8} On a compact boundary patch, closedness of WF⁡b\operatorname{WF}_b on the compact cosphere gives a collar in which it remains empty. The finite microlocal cover argument (GW7) then makes a spatially localized ww an element of 𝒜\mathcal A. Equation (GT2) gives Bbw∈𝒜B_bw\in\mathcal A. We have therefore proved, as a local conormal equality rather than an unproved smoothness claim, Bbu=BbTu+v,v∈𝒜 near the boundary.(GT9) B_bu=B_bTu+v, \qquad v\in\mathcal A\text{ near the boundary}. \tag{GT9} The equality is between the actual distributional actions (GT6).

Because tρt_\rho is independent of x′x', the unlocalized Kohn–Nirenberg composition in (GT1) is exact: BbTtρ=Ta,a(x′,t,ξ′,ρ)=b(x′,t,ξ′)tρ(t,ξ′,ρ).(GT10) B_bT_{t_\rho}=T_a, \qquad a(x',t,\xi',\rho)=b(x',t,\xi')t_\rho(t,\xi',\rho). \tag{GT10} Indeed integration in the intermediate tangential variable gives (2π)n−1δ(η′−ξ′)(2\pi)^{n-1}\delta(\eta'-\xi'); no derivative of tρt_\rho in x′x' appears. The support of t0t_0 in (GT7) ensures that on the high-frequency nonresidual part ⟨ξ′⟩≍⟨(ξ′,ρ)⟩\langle\xi'\rangle\asymp\langle(\xi',\rho)\rangle. All ξ′\xi', ρ\rho, and base derivatives of the product therefore obey the full order-dd symbol bounds. The residual difference from lacunarization remains residual after multiplication by bb, using arbitrary residual order to absorb its fixed order dd. Since normal Fourier convolution does not change a tangential multiplier, the product retains the original lacunarity. Thus a∈Slada\in S^d_{\mathrm{la}}.

Proper-support cutoffs make (GT10) an equality modulo a residual full compressed operator. To verify the asserted residual class, write each far tangential cutoff as a kernel factor vanishing near x′=y′x'=y' and integrate by parts in ξ′\xi' arbitrarily many times. On the nonresidual support of t0t_0, the entire normal frequency is bounded by a constant times |ξ′||\xi'|, so this gain is arbitrary in the full (ξ′,ρ)(\xi',\rho) order. The lacunarization remainder is already residual. Derivatives of the cutoff and amplitude obey the same bounds, proving the full residual assertion. Its action on supported distributions lies in 𝒜\mathcal A by (GA5), so it does not affect the boundary wave-front conclusions.

6.3. Boundary action, microsupport, and elliptic comparison

The local boundary wave-front set of v∈𝒜v\in\mathcal A is empty by definition, and adding such a vv does not change a wave-front set: a regularizing tester for one summand works for the sum, and subtracting the same vv gives the reverse inclusion. Equations (GT9)–(GT10) and (GW12) therefore give WF⁡b(Bbu)|∂X=WF⁡b(Tau)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(u)|∂X⊂T*∂X\0.(GT11) \operatorname{WF}_b(B_bu)|_{\partial X} =\operatorname{WF}_b(T_au)|_{\partial X} \subset\operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X} \subset T^*\partial X\setminus0. \tag{GT11} Since (GT6) also gives Bbu∈𝒜′B_bu\in\mathcal A', this proves Bb:𝒩→𝒩B_b:\mathcal N\to\mathcal N with the original tangential operator. It also proves that the action is continuous in the weak topology of 𝒜′\mathcal A' tested on fixed conormal functions.

Suppose bb is of order −∞-\infty on a conic neighborhood of the complement of a closed tangential cone Γ\Gamma at the boundary. At a tangential covector q∉Γq\notin\Gamma, the full symbol a=btρa=b t_\rho is of order −∞-\infty on a compressed cone about qq. The original residual localization (GW9) excludes qq from WF⁡b(Tau)\operatorname{WF}_b(T_au). At normal compressed directions (GT11) already excludes every covector. Hence the exact boundary microsupport statement is WF⁡b(Bbu)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(u)|∂X∩Γ.(GT12) \operatorname{WF}_b(B_bu)|_{\partial X} \subset\operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X}\cap\Gamma. \tag{GT12}

Write b0(x′,ξ′)=b(x′,0,ξ′)b_0(x',\xi')=b(x',0,\xi'). At a tangential boundary covector q=(x′,0,η′,0)q=(x',0,\eta',0), (GT7), (GL18), and (GC4) give the actual principal compressed symbol of TaT_a: σd(Ta)(q)=σd(b0)(x′,η′)⋅1.(GT13) \sigma_d(T_a)(q)=\sigma_d(b_0)(x',\eta')\cdot 1. \tag{GT13} The boundary operator action (GL24) has the same principal symbol, with the original (2π)−(n−1)(2\pi)^{-(n-1)} Fourier factor. If b0b_0 is elliptic at qq, then TaT_a is elliptic there. The exact elliptic inclusion (GW10), applied to Tau=Bbu−vT_au=B_bu-v from (GT9), gives WF⁡b(u)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(Bbu)|∂X∪Char⁡(b0).(GT14) \operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X} \subset \operatorname{WF}_b(B_bu)|_{\partial X} \cup\operatorname{Char}(b_0). \tag{GT14} The factor order in (GT13) stays matrix order; for vector bundles, ellipticity means the actual boundary matrix is invertible.

6.4. What the argument gives in the interior

At an interior point (x′,t)(x',t), t>0t>0, the tangential action is the family (GT1). The full kernel is a tangential pseudodifferential kernel times δ(t−s)\delta(t-s). Split it with a cutoff in x′−y′x'-y' that is one near zero. Off the tangential diagonal the tangential kernel is smooth, by arbitrary integration by parts in ξ′\xi'. Its output can therefore be singular only in the normal variable, so every covector there has ξ′=0\xi'=0. On the tangential diagonal, fix an output covector with ξ′≠0\xi'\ne0 and take a conic cutoff on which |ξ′|≥c|(ξ′,ξn)||\xi'|\ge c|(\xi',\xi_n)| for some c>0c>0. The full symbol b(x,ξ′)b(x,\xi') obeys the ordinary isotropic symbol estimates on that cone, since its only frequency derivatives are in ξ′\xi' and ⟨ξ′⟩≍⟨ξ⟩\langle\xi'\rangle\asymp\langle\xi\rangle there. The complementary frequency cutoff has no output wave-front in this cone by nonstationary integration in the full oscillatory kernel. The standard local integration-by-parts proof of pseudolocality therefore applies to the retained kernel. Together with (GW13), this gives the exact interior inclusion WF⁡b(Bbu)|T*X∘∩{ξ′≠0}⊂WF⁡b(u)|T*X∘∩{ξ′≠0}.(GT15) \operatorname{WF}_b(B_bu)|_{T^*X^\circ\cap\{\xi'\ne0\}} \subset \operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{T^*X^\circ\cap\{\xi'\ne0\}}. \tag{GT15} The region on which (GT15) is useful depends on the actual wave-front covectors of uu. It does not claim an all-interior inclusion: at ξ′=0\xi'=0, a tangential smoothing kernel can carry a normal singularity between distinct tangential points at the same tt, precisely because the kernel still contains δ(t−s)\delta(t-s). For example, take a properly supported smooth tangential kernel K(x′,y′)K(x',y') with K(x1′,y0′)≠0K(x'_1,y'_0)\ne0 and x1′≠y0′x'_1\ne y'_0, and u=δ(x′−y0′)⊗δ(t−t0)u=\delta(x'-y'_0)\otimes\delta(t-t_0) with t0>0t_0>0. Then Bbu=K(x′,y0′)δ(t−t0)B_bu=K(x',y'_0)\delta(t-t_0) has a pure-normal wave-front covector at (x1′,t0)(x'_1,t_0), while uu has no wave-front there. This proves that the exception is necessary, rather than leaving an all-interior claim untested.

7. The Hardy weight and a singular test

7.1. The weighted norm with its complete order shift

Localize in a compact boundary product chart. An element u∈𝒜mu\in\mathcal A^m has, modulo a smooth term, the exact normal conormal oscillatory representation u(x′,t)=(2π)−1∫ℝeitτa(x′,τ)dτ,|Dx′β∂τja(x′,τ)|≤Cβj⟨τ⟩μ−j,μ=m+n−24.(HS1) u(x',t)=(2\pi)^{-1}\int_{\mathbb R} e^{it\tau}a(x',\tau)\,d\tau, \qquad |D_{x'}^\beta\partial_\tau^j a(x',\tau)| \le C_{\beta j}\langle\tau\rangle^{\mu-j}, \quad \mu=m+\frac{n-2}{4}. \tag{HS1} This is the original codimension-one shift, including the ambient dimension. The inverse coefficient and D=−i∂D=-i\partial convention are retained. For a normal derivative of order a≥0a\ge0, the amplitude is τaDx′βa\tau^aD_{x'}^\beta a, of order μ+a\mu+a. Split its integral at |τ|=t−1|\tau|=t^{-1}, 0<t<10<t<1. The low-frequency absolute integral is bounded by Ct−μ−a−1Ct^{-\mu-a-1} when μ+a>−1\mu+a>-1, by C(1+|log⁡t|)C(1+|\log t|) at equality, and by CC below it. On the high-frequency part integrate by parts in τ\tau N>μ+a+1N>\mu+a+1 times, including the derivatives of a smooth cutoff at |τ|=t−1|\tau|=t^{-1}. Each resulting term is bounded by Ct−μ−a−1Ct^{-\mu-a-1}. The same estimate holds for every tangential derivative, uniformly on a smaller compact chart. Thus the complete safe weighted L2L^2 implication is ∫K0∫0ct2ν|D′βDnau(x′,t)|2dtdx′<∞whenever ν≥0,ν>m+n4+a.(HS2) \int_{K_0}\int_0^c t^{2\nu}|D'^\beta D_n^a u(x',t)|^2 \,dt\,dx'<\infty \quad\text{whenever } \nu\ge0,\quad \nu>m+\frac n4+a. \tag{HS2} The strict endpoint includes the logarithmic case. Equation (HS2) states the weight inside the norm as tνt^\nu; the power inside the squared integral is 2ν2\nu. A cached target record that writes a single exponent NN on the squared integral cannot be substituted for the original formula without checking whether its NN names ν\nu or 2ν2\nu. This is a routing ambiguity, not a claim of an error in a human source.

7.2. Hardy’s exact coefficient and the failed direct iteration

Let v∈Cc∞((0,∞))v\in C_c^\infty((0,\infty)) and λ≥0\lambda\ge0. The boundary terms in integration by parts vanish at both ends. Writing I=∫t2λ|v|2dtI=\int t^{2\lambda}|v|^2dt, J=∫t2λ+2|v′|2dtJ=\int t^{2\lambda+2}|v'|^2dt, the full calculation is (2λ+1)I=−∫0∞t2λ+1∂t|v|2dt=−2Re⁡∫0∞t2λ+1v′v¯dt≤2IJ,I≤4(2λ+1)2J.(HS3) \begin{aligned} (2\lambda+1)I &=-\int_0^\infty t^{2\lambda+1} \partial_t|v|^2\,dt\\ &=-2\operatorname{Re}\int_0^\infty t^{2\lambda+1}v'\overline v\,dt \le2\sqrt{IJ},\\ I&\le\frac{4}{(2\lambda+1)^2}J. \end{aligned} \tag{HS3} The sign in the middle line is retained, and the last inequality uses Cauchy–Schwarz. For a compactly supported vv away from zero, iteration at λ=0,1,…,k−1\lambda=0,1,\ldots,k-1 gives ∫|v|2dt≤[∏j=0k−14(2j+1)2]∫t2k|v(k)|2dt.(HS4) \int|v|^2dt \le\left[\prod_{j=0}^{k-1} \frac{4}{(2j+1)^2}\right] \int t^{2k}|v^{(k)}|^2dt. \tag{HS4} One cannot remove the cutoff at zero unless all cutoff-error terms and the final weighted integral have actual bounds. For v=D′βDnauv=D'^\beta D_n^a u, using only (HS2) on the final integral would require k>m+n4+(a+k),equivalently0>m+n4+a.(HS5) k>m+\frac n4+(a+k), \quad\text{equivalently}\quad 0>m+\frac n4+a. \tag{HS5} When that last number is nonnegative, no choice of the number of Hardy iterations fixes the estimate. This is the exact remaining deficit of the conormal-only argument, including both the original order and the derivative count. It identifies where u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A' must enter; it is not a proof of 𝒜′∩𝒜=C∞\mathcal A'\cap\mathcal A=C^\infty.

7.3. A singular conormal test of the missing hypothesis

In one normal dimension choose χ∈Cc∞([0,∞))\chi\in C_c^\infty([0,\infty)) equal to one near zero and put u(t)=χ(t)t−3/4H(t)u(t)=\chi(t)t^{-3/4}H(t). The Fourier amplitude has normal order −1/4-1/4, so (HS1) gives its exact conormal order m=0m=0 when n=1n=1. It is locally integrable but not in L2L^2, since ∫0ct−3/2dt=∞\int_0^c t^{-3/2}dt=\infty. Moreover tkDnkut^kD_n^ku has the same leading power for every kk, so the final integral in (HS4) diverges for every kk, exactly as (HS5) predicts.

Take a nonnegative q∈Cc∞((1,2))q\in C_c^\infty((1,2)) with integral one and set qε(t)=ε−1q(t/ε)q_\varepsilon(t)=\varepsilon^{-1}q(t/\varepsilon). The boundary delta is conormal of order (2−n)/4=1/4(2-n)/4=1/4 by (GD7), and (GS7) makes qε=Qεδq_\varepsilon=Q_\varepsilon\delta converge to δ\delta in every 𝒜m′\mathcal A^{m'} with m′>1/4m'>1/4. Yet the ordinary interior pairing is u(qε)=ε−3/4∫12s−3/4q(s)ds→+∞.(HS6) u(q_\varepsilon) =\varepsilon^{-3/4} \int_1^2s^{-3/4}q(s)\,ds \longrightarrow+\infty. \tag{HS6} If this uu belonged to 𝒜′\mathcal A', continuity on that 𝒜m′\mathcal A^{m'} would make the same pairings converge to the finite value u(δ)u(\delta). Thus u∈𝒜0\𝒜′u\in\mathcal A^0\setminus\mathcal A'. This example proves that the dual requirement excludes at least the displayed power singularity; it does not replace a proof for every conormal amplitude.

8. Smoothness from the dual conormal condition

8.1. Every boundary delta jet and its precise conormal order

For a compact smooth tangential density h(x′)h(x'), the normal delta derivative has the original Fourier representation h(x′)⊗δ(j)(t)=(2π)−1∫eitτ(iτ)jh(x′)dτ,mj=2−n4+j=12−n4+j.(SP1) h(x')\otimes\delta^{(j)}(t) =(2\pi)^{-1}\int e^{it\tau}(i\tau)^j h(x')\,d\tau, \qquad m_j=\frac{2-n}{4}+j=\frac12-\frac n4+j. \tag{SP1} The exponent mjm_j follows from the unmodified codimension-one order relation in (C16): the amplitude has order j=mj+(n−2)/4j=m_j+(n-2)/4. The factor (2π)−1(2\pi)^{-1} and iji^j have not been absorbed. Formula (GA1) gives the same order by dyadic estimation, including every tangent derivative. For u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A' define gj=(∇nint,ju)|t=0g_j=(\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int},j}u)|_{t=0} by (GD8)–(GD9). These are tangential distributions at this stage. For a smooth boundary uu, direct differentiation and the distributional delta sign give u(h⊗δ(j))=(−1)j⟨∂tju|t=0,h⟩=(−i)j⟨gj,h⟩.(SP2) u(h\otimes\delta^{(j)})=(-1)^j \langle\partial_t^ju|_{t=0},h\rangle =(-i)^j\langle g_j,h\rangle. \tag{SP2} Both sides are weakly continuous on 𝒜′\mathcal A': the left is one of its defining conormal-test pairings by (SP1), and the right is a composition of the weakly continuous corrected derivative and trace maps (GD8)–(GD9). Smooth functions are weakly dense by (GD5), so (SP2) holds for every u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A', with no assertion that the ambient uncorrected derivative has the same trace.

8.2. Quantitative scaled test expansion in the actual topology

Fix J=[1,2]J=[1,2] and a compact tangential chart set. For ψ∈Cc∞(X0×(1,2))\psi\in C_c^\infty(X_0\times(1,2)), put vε(x′,t)=ε−1ψ(x′,t/ε),Mj(x′)=∫12sjψ(x′,s)ds.(SP3) v_\varepsilon(x',t)=\varepsilon^{-1} \psi(x',t/\varepsilon),\qquad M_j(x')=\int_1^2s^j\psi(x',s)\,ds. \tag{SP3} The test is smooth and supported in the interior for each ε>0\varepsilon>0. Taylor’s formula at the actual boundary gives the distributional expansion vε=∑j=0N−1(−1)jεjj!Mj(x′)⊗δ(j)(t)+RN,ε.(SP4) v_\varepsilon =\sum_{j=0}^{N-1} \frac{(-1)^j\varepsilon^j}{j!} M_j(x')\otimes\delta^{(j)}(t) +R_{N,\varepsilon}. \tag{SP4} We need its quantitative conormal topology, not only distributional convergence. For every integer N≥1N\ge1, real M>m0+NM>m_0+N with m0=(2−n)/4m_0=(2-n)/4, compact output set KK, and finite tangent seminorm index LL, there are finite L′L', CC such that pM,K,L(RN,ε)≤CεN∑|γ|≤L′∥Dx′,sγψ∥L∞,0<ε≤1.(SP5) p_{M,K,L}(R_{N,\varepsilon}) \le C\varepsilon^N \sum_{|\gamma|\le L'} \|D_{x',s}^\gamma\psi\|_{L^\infty}, \qquad0<\varepsilon\le1. \tag{SP5} Here the original Besov index is κ=−M−n/4\kappa=-M-n/4; the strict condition is exactly κ+N+1/2<0\kappa+N+1/2<0.

For completeness, Fourier transform (SP4) in tt. Its normal factor is ∫12e−iεsτψ(x′,s)ds−∑j=0N−1(−iετ)jj!Mj(x′).(SP6) \int_1^2e^{-i\varepsilon s\tau}\psi(x',s)\,ds -\sum_{j=0}^{N-1} \frac{(-i\varepsilon\tau)^j}{j!}M_j(x'). \tag{SP6} For ε|τ|≤1\varepsilon|\tau|\le1, Taylor’s integral remainder bounds (SP6), with every tangential derivative, by CεN|τ|NC\varepsilon^N|\tau|^N; for ε|τ|≥1\varepsilon|\tau|\ge1, the Schwartz integral and all retained polynomial terms bound it by C(ε|τ|)N−1C(\varepsilon|\tau|)^{N-1}. The tangential Fourier transform decays faster than any power of |ξ′||\xi'|, with constants controlled by finitely many displayed ψ\psi derivatives. On a full dyadic block |(ξ′,τ)|≍2l|(\xi',\tau)|\asymp2^l, the L2L^2 size in the normal frequency contributes 2l/22^{l/2}. For 2l≤ε−12^l\le\varepsilon^{-1}, multiplying by 2lκ2^{l\kappa} gives CεN2l(κ+N+1/2)C\varepsilon^N2^{l(\kappa+N+1/2)}, bounded by CεNC\varepsilon^N. For 2l≥ε−12^l\ge\varepsilon^{-1}, it gives CεN−12l(κ+N−1/2)C\varepsilon^{N-1}2^{l(\kappa+N-1/2)}, whose maximum is Cε−κ−1/2≤CεNC\varepsilon^{-\kappa-1/2}\le C\varepsilon^N under the same strict condition. The low block is bounded directly by the Taylor remainder. Tangentially dominant blocks gain arbitrary decay from the x′x'-Fourier transform and obey the same inequality. Applying D′D' differentiates ψ\psi. Applying tDttD_t to (SP4) rescales the same test and acts on each δ(j)\delta^{(j)} by its exact eigenvalue tDtδ(j)=i(j+1)δ(j)tD_t\delta^{(j)}=i(j+1)\delta^{(j)}; the Taylor remainder still has the two bounds above. The triangular identity (GA2) therefore supplies every weighted derivative seminorm, proving (SP5) with all lower terms retained.

The dual estimate (GD3), used at this freely chosen high order MM, turns (SP5) into |u(RN,ε)|≤Cu,N,KεN∑|γ|≤L′∥Dx′,sγψ∥∞.(SP7) |u(R_{N,\varepsilon})| \le C_{u,N,K}\varepsilon^N \sum_{|\gamma|\le L'} \|D_{x',s}^\gamma\psi\|_\infty. \tag{SP7} This is an estimate of distributions in (x′,s)(x',s) of a finite negative Sobolev order, since a sufficiently high Sobolev norm controls the finite smooth-test seminorm.

8.3. The scaled Taylor series in distributions

An element u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A' is smooth in the open collar only when it also lies in 𝒜\mathcal A. Assume that intersection from now on, and set Fε(x′,s)=u(x′,εs)F_\varepsilon(x',s)=u(x',\varepsilon s) for s∈Js\in J. For every ψ\psi in (SP3), the change of variables gives ⟨Fε,ψ⟩=u(vε)\langle F_\varepsilon,\psi\rangle=u(v_\varepsilon). Insert (SP4), then use the exact sign (SP2). The two (−1)j(-1)^j factors cancel, leaving Fε(x′,s)=∑j=0N−1ijεjsjj!gj(x′)+OH−LN(K0×J)(εN)for every N≥1.(SP8) F_\varepsilon(x',s) =\sum_{j=0}^{N-1} \frac{i^j\varepsilon^j s^j}{j!}g_j(x') +O_{H^{-L_N}(K_0\times J)}(\varepsilon^N) \quad\text{for every }N\ge1. \tag{SP8} The remainder means (SP7) uniformly on compact tangential sets; LNL_N is finite but may depend on NN. Formula (SP8) is an all-order distribution-valued boundary Taylor series, with the original iji^j from D=−i∂D=-i\partial. No smoothness of gjg_j has been assumed.

8.4. One fixed conormal growth exponent for every derivative

Let u∈𝒜mu\in\mathcal A^m, with the original normal amplitude order μ=m+(n−2)/4\mu=m+(n-2)/4. The frequency split in (HS1)–(HS2) gives, after enlarging a fixed exponent slightly to absorb a possible logarithm, a number A>max⁡(μ+1,0)A>\max(\mu+1,0) such that for every normal derivative order aa, tangential multiindex β\beta, and compact subchart there is a constant CaβC_{a\beta} with sup(x′,s)∈K0×J|Dx′β∂saFε(x′,s)|≤Caβε−A.(SP9) \sup_{(x',s)\in K_0\times J} |D_{x'}^\beta\partial_s^a F_\varepsilon(x',s)| \le C_{a\beta}\varepsilon^{-A}. \tag{SP9} Indeed ∂saFε=εa∂tau(x′,εs)\partial_s^a F_\varepsilon =\varepsilon^a\partial_t^au(x',\varepsilon s); the conormal amplitude order rises by exactly aa, so its high-frequency bound contains εaε−μ−a−1=ε−μ−1\varepsilon^a\varepsilon^{-\mu-a-1} =\varepsilon^{-\mu-1}. The low-frequency and logarithmic cases satisfy the same enlarged AA. Crucially the exponent AA is independent of aa and β\beta, although the constants depend on them. Thus for every integer KK, ∥Fε∥HK(K0×J)≤CKε−A\|F_\varepsilon\|_{H^K(K_0\times J)} \le C_K\varepsilon^{-A}.

We record the precise smoothing inference used below. Suppose smooth hεh_\varepsilon on a fixed compact coordinate box obey ∥hε∥HK≤CKε−A\|h_\varepsilon\|_{H^K}\le C_K\varepsilon^{-A} for all KK, and for every NN obey ∥hε−h∥H−LN≤CNεN\|h_\varepsilon-h\|_{H^{-L_N}} \le C_N\varepsilon^N, where hh is a distribution. Then hh is smooth. Fix any one positive integer NN, and retain its finite negative order LNL_N. On a compact subbox insert a fixed smooth cutoff before using full Fourier blocks; multiplication preserves the displayed Sobolev bounds. For any a>0a>0, choose ε=2−al\varepsilon=2^{-al}. The low- and high-Sobolev block bounds give ∥Δlh∥2≤CN2l(LN−aN)+CK2l(aA−K).(SP10) \|\Delta_l h\|_2 \le C_N 2^{l(L_N-aN)} +C_K2^{l(aA-K)}. \tag{SP10} For any requested r≥0r\ge0, choose a>(LN+r+2)/Na>(L_N+r+2)/N, then an integer K>aA+r+2K>aA+r+2. Both exponents in (SP10) are strictly less than −r−2-r-2, so it gives ∥Δlh∥2≤Cr2−l(r+2)\|\Delta_l h\|_2\le C_r2^{-l(r+2)} for every rr. Summing their squared HrH^r weights proves membership in every local Sobolev space, and the Fourier Sobolev estimate proves smoothness. This argument uses the actual LNL_N; it does not assert one negative order valid for all Taylor degrees. The single positive degree N=1N=1 would suffice for this smoothing inference.

8.5. Smoothness of every boundary coefficient

The expansion (SP8) includes lower powers of ε\varepsilon, so apply an exact finite scale cancellation. For any integer N≥1N\ge1, take distinct positive scales λ1,…,λN\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_N, for example 1,…,N1,\ldots,N, and the Lagrange interpolation coefficients at zero cl=∏r≠l−λrλl−λr,∑l=1Nclλlj={1,j=0,0,1≤j<N.(SP11) c_l=\prod_{r\ne l} \frac{-\lambda_r}{\lambda_l-\lambda_r}, \qquad \sum_{l=1}^{N}c_l\lambda_l^j =\begin{cases}1,&j=0,\\0,&1\le j<N. \end{cases} \tag{SP11} For g0g_0, set GN,ε=∑lclFλlεG_{N,\varepsilon}=\sum_lc_lF_{\lambda_l\varepsilon}. Equations (SP8) and (SP11) make GN,ε=g0+OH−LN(εN)G_{N,\varepsilon}=g_0+O_{H^{-L_N}}(\varepsilon^N). Equation (SP9) gives every high Sobolev norm bounded by CK,Nε−AC_{K,N}\varepsilon^{-A}. The dyadic argument (SP10), with the adjustable scale specified there, proves g0∈C∞g_0\in C^\infty.

Proceed by induction. If g0,…,gj−1g_0,\ldots,g_{j-1} are smooth, define on s∈Js\in J Hj,ε(x′,s)=j!i−js−jε−j[Fε(x′,s)−∑k=0j−1ikεkskk!gk(x′)].(SP12) H_{j,\varepsilon}(x',s) =j!i^{-j}s^{-j}\varepsilon^{-j} \left[F_\varepsilon(x',s) -\sum_{k=0}^{j-1} \frac{i^k\varepsilon^ks^k}{k!}g_k(x')\right]. \tag{SP12} The factor s−js^{-j} is smooth on JJ, and every term is a smooth function there. Formula (SP8), taken to order N+jN+j, gives Hj,ε=gj+∑l=1N−1εlhl(x′,s)+OH−L(εN)H_{j,\varepsilon}=g_j+\sum_{l=1}^{N-1} \varepsilon^l h_l(x',s)+O_{H^{-L}}(\varepsilon^N), where the hlh_l may still be distributions. The same Lagrange weights (SP11) cancel all intermediate powers. The high derivative bound (SP9), the smooth already-known coefficients and (SP12) give ∥Hj,ε∥HK≤CjKε−(A+j)\|H_{j,\varepsilon}\|_{H^K} \le C_{jK}\varepsilon^{-(A+j)}. The dyadic argument proves gj∈C∞g_j\in C^\infty. Induction proves gj∈C∞(∂X)for every j≥0.(SP13) g_j\in C^\infty(\partial X) \quad\text{for every }j\ge0. \tag{SP13} The argument uses the same original uu at every step; it neither assumes nor constructs an unrelated boundary extension.

8.6. Upgrading the whole series and removing the weight

Now every coefficient in (SP8) is smooth. Fix a desired integer NN and a smooth seminorm order rr. Expand (SP8) through some N′>NN'>N, so the remainder is OH−LN′(εN′)O_{H^{-L_{N'}}}(\varepsilon^{N'}). Its high HKH^K norm is at most CKε−AC_K\varepsilon^{-A} by (SP9) and the smooth polynomial terms. Interpolation between H−LN′H^{-L_{N'}} and HKH^K gives the required bound as follows. Choose an integer d>r+n/2d>r+n/2, then N′>N+AN'>N+A, retaining its actual finite L=LN′L=L_{N'}. With K>dK>d, Fourier Hölder gives the HdH^d exponent θN′−(1−θ)A\theta N'-(1-\theta)A, where θ=(K−d)/(K+L)\theta=(K-d)/(K+L). Choose KK so large that θ>(N+A)/(N′+A)\theta>(N+A)/(N'+A); the exponent is then greater than NN. The Fourier Sobolev bound Hd↪CrH^d\hookrightarrow C^r proves OCr(εN)O_{C^r}(\varepsilon^N). The discarded coefficients of degrees N,…,N′−1N,\ldots,N'-1 contribute the same OCr(εN)O_{C^r}(\varepsilon^N). Hence the full exact Taylor statement is u(x′,εs)=∑j=0N−1ijεjsjj!gj(x′)+OCr(K0×J)(εN)for every N,r.(SP14) u(x',\varepsilon s) =\sum_{j=0}^{N-1} \frac{i^j\varepsilon^js^j}{j!}g_j(x') +O_{C^r(K_0\times J)}(\varepsilon^N) \quad\text{for every }N,r. \tag{SP14} Taking any fixed interior value, for example s=3/2s=3/2 and ε=2t/3\varepsilon=2t/3, then differentiating in ss and x′x' before that restriction, shows that every ordinary mixed derivative of uu has a continuous boundary limit with the precise Taylor coefficient in (SP14). This proves u∈C∞(X)u\in C^\infty(X). Conversely a smooth boundary function belongs to 𝒜\mathcal A by (GD1)–(GD2), and to 𝒜′\mathcal A' by the smooth pairing and (GD3). Therefore, as spaces of their actual supported representatives, 𝒜′(X)∩𝒜(X)=C∞(X).(SP15) \mathcal A'(X)\cap\mathcal A(X)=C^\infty(X). \tag{SP15}

The original Hardy inequality (HS3) now applies to each ordinary derivative of a compactly localized uu. Insert a normal cutoff equal to zero for t<δt<\delta into (HS4). The errors from its jj-th derivative are supported in δ<t<2δ\delta<t<2\delta; the factor tjt^j in the final weighted norm cancels its δ−j\delta^{-j} derivative size, leaving an O(δ1/2)O(\delta^{1/2}) L2L^2 error because every derivative of uu is bounded there by (SP14). Let δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. Thus the complete original coefficient product survives for smooth boundary vv: ∫0∞|v(t)|2dt≤[∏j=0k−14(2j+1)2]∫0∞t2k|v(k)(t)|2dt,(SP16) \int_0^\infty|v(t)|^2dt \le\left[\prod_{j=0}^{k-1} \frac4{(2j+1)^2}\right] \int_0^\infty t^{2k}|v^{(k)}(t)|^2dt, \tag{SP16} provided the far-end cutoff is retained. All ordinary derivatives of the localized uu are in L2L^2, with or without the safe weights of (HS2), by its proved smoothness. The direct conormal-only attempt (HS5) remains invalid; the all-order dual delta-jet estimate (SP5) is the additional ingredient that completes the weight-removal argument.

9. Smooth testers and boundary consequences

9.1. Smooth testers in the compressed definition

For u∈𝒜′(X)u\in\mathcal A'(X), every properly supported B∈Ψb0B\in\Psi_b^0 satisfies Bu∈𝒜′Bu\in\mathcal A' by the actual transpose action (GD13). Therefore (SP15) gives the pointwise equivalence of admissible regularity tests Bu∈𝒜(X)⇔Bu∈C∞(X).(SC1) Bu\in\mathcal A(X) \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad Bu\in C^\infty(X). \tag{SC1} Substituting the same family of operators and their unchanged characteristic sets into the defining intersection (GW6) yields the exact alternative definition WF⁡b(u)=⋂B∈Ψb0 properBu∈C∞(X)Char⁡B(u∈𝒜′).(SC2) \operatorname{WF}_b(u) =\bigcap_{\substack{B\in\Psi_b^0\text{ proper}\\ Bu\in C^\infty(X)}} \operatorname{Char}B \quad(u\in\mathcal A'). \tag{SC2} No residual operator was asserted to produce a smooth boundary function on an arbitrary supported distribution; (SC1) uses both Bu∈𝒜′Bu\in\mathcal A' and the conormal test result.

The finite cosphere argument (GW7) and (GW8) prove WF⁡b(u)=⌀⇒u∈𝒜loc\operatorname{WF}_b(u)=\varnothing\Rightarrow u\in\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}} for any supported distribution. If also u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A', compact smooth cutoffs preserve that dual class by (GD13). Each cutoff output is in the original 𝒜\mathcal A, so (SP15) makes it smooth. Cutoffs equal to one on each compact neighborhood therefore prove the exact local comparison

𝒜′(X)∩𝒜loc(X)=C∞(X)=𝒜′(X)∩𝒜(X).(SC2a) \mathcal A'(X)\cap\mathcal A_{\mathrm{loc}}(X) =C^\infty(X)=\mathcal A'(X)\cap\mathcal A(X). \tag{SC2a}

The reverse inclusion follows from (GD1)–(GD3), which place every smooth boundary function in the single order m0=−(n+2)/4m_0=-(n+2)/4, with local seminorm constants. Hence there is no global-order assumption hidden in this smoothness conclusion. In particular, WF⁡b(u)=⌀,u∈𝒜′⇒u∈C∞(X).(SC3) \operatorname{WF}_b(u)=\varnothing,\quad u\in\mathcal A' \quad\Longrightarrow\quad u\in C^\infty(X). \tag{SC3} Conversely a smooth boundary function has its supported representative in 𝒜\mathcal A by (GD1)–(GD2), so the identity operator is an order-zero tester with empty characteristic set. Thus its compressed wave-front set is empty. The implication and converse use the original regularity class at the boundary, not interior-only smoothness.

9.2. The boundary trace wave-front inclusion

Let g=u|∂Xg=u|_{\partial X} be the intrinsic trace (GD8) of u∈𝒜′u\in\mathcal A', and let q=(y′,0,η′,0)q=(y',0,\eta',0) be a nonzero tangential boundary compressed covector. Suppose q∉WF⁡b(u)q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u). By the definition (GW6), some properly supported B∈Ψb0B\in\Psi_b^0 is elliptic at qq and has Bu∈𝒜Bu\in\mathcal A on a neighborhood of y′y'. Its dual action remains in 𝒜′\mathcal A', so (SP15) makes BuBu smooth there. The original boundary jet formula (GD14) at k=0k=0 gives the exact receiving map (Bu)|∂X=B0g,σ0(B0)(y′,η′)=σ0(B)(y′,0,η′,0).(SC4) (Bu)|_{\partial X}=B_0 g, \qquad \sigma_0(B_0)(y',\eta') =\sigma_0(B)(y',0,\eta',0). \tag{SC4} The first equality is initially (GL24) on smooth functions; both sides are weakly continuous in uu by (GD5), (GD8), and (GD13), which proves it for the actual dual distribution. The second equality retains the full half-density comparison (GL18) and the original (2π)−(n−1)(2\pi)^{-(n-1)} tangential Fourier convention; no normal factor has been set to one by a change of scale.

The ordinary boundary symbol in (SC4) is invertible at (y′,η′)(y',\eta'). Choose a conic cutoff ζ\zeta there and construct its ordered inverse symbol by c−0=ζσ0(B0)−1c_{-0}=\zeta\sigma_0(B_0)^{-1}; at each lower order, subtract the complete composition defect and multiply on the correct side by that inverse. The asymptotic sum gives a proper boundary operator C0C_0 with C0B0=Op⁡(ζ)+RC_0B_0=\operatorname{Op}(\zeta)+R, where RR is smoothing near (y′,η′)(y',\eta'). Since B0gB_0g is smooth, the localized gg is smooth there. This proves WF⁡(u|∂X)⊂WF⁡b(u)|∂X∩(T*∂X\0).(SC5) \operatorname{WF}(u|_{\partial X}) \subset \operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X} \cap(T^*\partial X\setminus0). \tag{SC5} The boundary cotangent bundle is embedded by the exact compressed anchor (GL8); pure normal compressed directions have not been mistaken for trace covectors.

9.3. A tangential smooth tester for every regular boundary covector

Let u∈𝒩(X)u\in\mathcal N(X), and q=(y′,0,η′,0)≠0q=(y',0,\eta',0)\ne0 on the embedded boundary cotangent bundle. If a properly supported tangential operator Bb=b(x,D′)B_b=b(x,D') is elliptic at (y′,η′)(y',\eta') and BbuB_bu is smooth on XX, then its boundary wave-front set is empty. The exact elliptic inclusion (GT14) immediately gives q∉WF⁡b(u)q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u).

For the converse assume q∉WF⁡b(u)q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u). Closedness of the boundary wave-front set on the compact cosphere gives a small tangential base patch VV about y′y' and a conic tangential frequency patch Γ\Gamma about η′\eta' whose product closure misses WF⁡b(u)|∂X\operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X}. Choose an order-zero tangential symbol b(x′,t,ξ′)b(x',t,\xi') supported in that base and cone, with normal cutoff supported in a small collar, equal to a nonzero scalar or the identity matrix in a smaller patch about (y′,0,η′)(y',0,\eta'), and properly support its kernel. Its boundary symbol b0b_0 is elliptic at qq. By the full tangential theorem (GT11)–(GT12), Bbu∈𝒩B_bu\in\mathcal N and WF⁡b(Bbu)|∂X⊂WF⁡b(u)|∂X∩Γ=⌀on the chosen base patch.(SC6) \operatorname{WF}_b(B_bu)|_{\partial X} \subset\operatorname{WF}_b(u)|_{\partial X} \cap\Gamma=\varnothing \quad\text{on the chosen base patch}. \tag{SC6} The operator has output support in that base patch and normal collar. If a sequence of interior wave-front points of BbuB_bu approached its compact boundary output set, compactness of the cosphere would give a boundary wave-front limit, contradicting (SC6). After shrinking the normal cutoff once, the new operator is multiplication of the old BbB_b on the left by a smooth tt-cutoff equal to one at zero; it remains tangential and elliptic at qq. Its output has empty compressed wave-front set throughout its support; outside that support it is zero. The finite cover (GW7) therefore gives Bbu∈𝒜B_bu\in\mathcal A. As Bbu∈𝒜′B_bu\in\mathcal A' by (GT6), (SP15) gives Bbu∈C∞(X)B_bu\in C^\infty(X). We have proved the exact equivalence q∉WF⁡b(u)⇔∃Bb=b(x,D′) proper, elliptic at q,Bbu∈C∞(X).(SC7) q\notin\operatorname{WF}_b(u) \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \exists\,B_b=b(x,D')\text{ proper, elliptic at }q, \ B_bu\in C^\infty(X). \tag{SC7} The existence assertion is coordinate independent: (GL10) preserves the embedded tangential hyperplane, (GW6) is intrinsic, and in either boundary chart the explicit cutoff construction above supplies a tester. No assertion of all-interior pseudolocality at pure normal covectors is needed; the explicit exception in GT15 remains intact.

10. Examples

Example 10.1 (a changed defining function). Keep the tangential coordinates and set x‾n=ef(x′)xn\bar x_n=e^{f(x')}x_n, where ff is any smooth real function. The exact compressed coordinate law (GL10) reads ξ′=ξ‾′+dfρ‾,ρ=ρ‾. \xi'=\bar\xi'+df\,\bar\rho, \qquad \rho=\bar\rho. Here dfdf is the ordinary coordinate differential, and the hyperplane ρ=0\rho=0 remains the embedded T*∂XT^*\partial X. The tangential component does change when ρ‾≠0\bar\rho\ne0; discarding that term would break the coordinate law.

Example 10.2 (the conormal-only Hardy deficit). In one normal dimension u(t)=χ(t)t−3/4H(t)u(t)=\chi(t)t^{-3/4}H(t) has conormal order zero. Its first derivative has size t−7/4t^{-7/4}, so tu′(t)t u'(t) still has size t−3/4t^{-3/4} and is not square-integrable. The exact delta test (HS6) shows why this function is outside 𝒜′\mathcal A'. Thus the failure of the direct Hardy iteration has an explicit function behind it.

Example 10.3 (the raw and corrected normal equations). Take P=Dn+a0P=D_n+a_0, with constant scalar a0a_0, and u(t)=e−tu(t)=e^{-t} on t>0t>0. Then f=(i+a0)e−tf=(i+a_0)e^{-t}. The supported extension is U=H(t)e−tU=H(t)e^{-t}. Its raw distributional derivative is DnU=iH(t)e−t−iδ(t)D_nU=iH(t)e^{-t}-i\delta(t), so PU−Hf=−iδ(t),t(PU−Hf)=0. PU-Hf=-i\delta(t),\qquad t(PU-Hf)=0. The corrected derivative (GD9) is ∇nintU=iH(t)e−t\nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U=iH(t)e^{-t}, which has the prescribed interior restriction. The boundary delta is essential to the weighted equation and to its uniqueness calculation.

11. Exercises and complete solutions

Exercise 11.1. Let x‾′=x′\bar x'=x' and x‾n=ef(x′)xn\bar x_n=e^{f(x')}x_n. Prove the inverse compressed covector law and identify which part is an ordinary cotangent covector on the boundary.

Solution. Example 10.1 gives ρ=ρ‾\rho=\bar\rho and ξ′=ξ‾′+dfρ‾\xi'=\bar\xi'+df\,\bar\rho. Solving without suppressing the mixed term gives ρ‾=ρ\bar\rho=\rho, ξ‾′=ξ′−dfρ\bar\xi'=\xi'-df\,\rho. At xn=0x_n=0, the embedded ordinary boundary cotangent vectors are exactly ρ=0\rho=0, so their tangential coordinate is unchanged. For a compressed covector with ρ≠0\rho\ne0, the tangential coordinate changes by the precise term −dfρ-df\,\rho. These two formulas are inverses on the entire compressed fibre, not only on the boundary hyperplane.

Exercise 11.2. In one normal dimension replace the exponent 3/43/4 in Example 10.2 by any β\beta with 1/2<β<11/2<\beta<1. Find its conormal order, its safe weighted L2L^2 threshold, and use a boundary delta test to decide membership in 𝒜′\mathcal A'.

Solution. The normal Fourier amplitude of χ(t)t−βH(t)\chi(t)t^{-\beta}H(t) has order μ=β−1\mu=\beta-1. Formula (HS1) with n=1n=1 has μ=m−1/4\mu=m-1/4, so the exact conormal order is m=β−3/4m=\beta-3/4. Formula (HS2) for the undifferentiated function requires ν>m+1/4=β−1/2\nu>m+1/4=\beta-1/2 for tνu∈L2t^{\nu}u\in L^2. Its unweighted squared integral diverges because 2β>12\beta>1. For any nonnegative unit-mass q∈Cc∞((1,2))q\in C_c^\infty((1,2)), the test qε=Qεδq_\varepsilon=Q_\varepsilon\delta converges to δ\delta in every conormal order above 1/41/4, while the actual pairing is ε−β∫12s−βq(s)ds→+∞\varepsilon^{-\beta}\int_1^2s^{-\beta}q(s)ds\to+\infty. Continuity on those conormal tests is required of 𝒜′\mathcal A', so the function is not in that dual class.

Exercise 11.3. For the constant-coefficient normal equation in Example 10.3, let V=U+cδV=U+c\delta be another supported extension, with scalar cc. Compute t(PV−Hf)t(PV-Hf) exactly and verify that the weighted equation forces c=0c=0.

Solution. The original extension has t(PU−Hf)=0t(PU-Hf)=0. For the added term, P(cδ)=cDnδ+a0cδ=−icδ′+a0cδP(c\delta)=cD_n\delta+a_0c\delta=-ic\delta'+a_0c\delta. The exact distribution identities are tδ=0t\delta=0 and tδ′=−δt\delta'=-\delta. Thus t(PV−Hf)=icδt(PV-Hf)=ic\delta. It vanishes only when c=0c=0. This is the m=1,μ=0m=1,\mu=0 leading-coefficient case of (GE19)–(GE20); the lower coefficient a0a_0 remains in the calculation but is killed by the actual factor tδ=0t\delta=0.

12. References and onward use

The local formulas used as prerequisites are written in the linked lessons at the start of this chapter. The compressed geometry, full kernel factors, boundary trace, normal extension and wave-front tests in Sections 1–11 form one continuous argument; later boundary-value lessons use these exact supported and restricted objects.