Totally
characteristic operators on the half space
Written by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Public domain (CC0).
Edited and supplemented by Codex, September 2026. The additions
and editorial corrections are also public domain (CC0).
This lesson builds the local calculus of totally
characteristic pseudodifferential operators on the closed half
space
.
The differential operators of this kind are generated by the vector
fields tangent to the boundary, which are the combinations of
and
with smooth coefficients. They respect the boundary: the boundary values
of
depend only on the boundary values of
,
and the normal derivatives of
of order
at the boundary depend only on those of
of order at most
.
The pseudodifferential operators of the class come from symbols
in which the normal frequency
is replaced by
before quantization. A condition on the Fourier transform of the symbol
in
,
called lacunarity, makes the output in the open half space depend only
on the input there.
We prove that these operators act on functions and on distributions
on the half space, and we compute their commutators and the boundary
jets of their outputs. We describe the kernels of the operators of order
near the corner
by blowing up the corner, and we show that these kernels are conormal
there. The class is closed under adjoints and compositions, with
asymptotic formulas for the symbols. Operators of order 0 are bounded on
,
on Sobolev spaces of every real order and on dyadic Besov spaces, and
operators of every order preserve the distributions that are conormal to
the boundary. In one respect the class differs from the ordinary
calculus: operators of order
need not improve regularity at all, because their kernels are singular
at the corner.
These operators matter because they are the pseudodifferential
counterpart of the differential operators tangent to the boundary. Since
they respect the boundary, they can be combined with operators on the
boundary, such as taking boundary values. On manifolds with boundary
they form the b-calculus, which is used for instance in index
theory.
The freely available author versions [Melrose] and [Loya] provide
further reading. The mathematical arguments used here are proved in this
lesson and its linked prerequisites.
1. Conventions and background
Notation
Throughout
,
,
and
We write
,
(inverse factor
),
,
and
,
linear in the first argument. For a function of
we write
.
denotes the functions on
that are smooth in
and whose derivatives all extend continuously to
.
Every such function is the restriction of a smooth function on
;
this is the extension fact in the list below.
means smooth with all derivatives bounded.
Sobolev and Besov spaces.
is the space of tempered distributions
whose Fourier transform is locally square integrable and for which the
norm
is finite. With the sharp annuli
,
and the Fourier projections
onto them, the dyadic Besov norm is
is the space of tempered distributions with locally square-integrable
Fourier transform for which this norm is finite. Since
is comparable to
on
,
with equivalent norms. A distribution
on an open set
lies in the local space
if
,
extended by zero, lies in
for every
.
Values of symbols. All symbols may take values in
for fixed finite
.
Then
is the operator norm, products keep their order, and complex conjugation
of a symbol is replaced by the conjugate transpose
.
Every statement below holds in this generality with the same proof,
except the square-root step in the proof of Theorem 10.1, where we say
what changes. The reader may keep
in mind.
We also use Peetre’s inequality
for real
,
which follows from
.
Symbol classes. For
,
is the space of smooth functions
with
for all
and
.
The best constants are seminorms, and they make
a Fréchet space. We put
.
If
and
decreases to
,
there is an
,
unique modulo
,
with
for every
;
one writes
.
A symbol is polyhomogeneous of degree
with step one if
with
homogeneous of degree
in
for
.
Quantization and kernels. For
,
the operator
maps
into
,
and
is continuous. More generally, let
be any tempered distribution on
.
The formulas
in which the integrals are partial
Fourier transforms of tempered distributions, are inverse to each other.
So every continuous linear map
is the map
with kernel
for exactly one tempered distribution
;
in particular the operator determines its symbol. If
is a measurable function with polynomial bounds, then
is given, for
,
by the absolutely convergent integral above; one checks this by pairing
with a Schwartz function and using Fubini’s theorem and Fourier
inversion.
The Gauss transform.
is the Fourier multiplier with symbol
,
where
are the variables dual to
.
It maps
continuously into itself, and for every
each seminorm of the remainder being
bounded by finitely many seminorms of
.
If a sequence is bounded in
and converges locally uniformly with all derivatives, then so do its
transforms.
The pre-diagonal product estimate. Let
,
,
and let
be the transform
of
in the variables
.
Then for all multi-indices and all
,
at every point
,
with
bounded by finitely many seminorms of
and
.
At
,
,
is the symbol of
.
The Schur test. If
is a measurable function on
,
for two measure spaces
and
,
with
and
,
then
is bounded from
to
with norm at most
.
The preceding unrestricted raw-integral statement is retained for
the visible correction and complete proof in Section1.1. Its applications below use
Lebesgue output measure.
Sobolev and Besov continuity. For
,
maps
continuously into
for every real
.
The spaces
are Banach spaces, and multiplication by a
function is bounded on each of them. If
is summable, then convolution with it is bounded on
,
,
with norm at most
,
by the triangle inequality for translates.
Local spaces. The local spaces
do not depend on the choice of cutoffs, and they are preserved by
multiplication with smooth functions and by changes of coordinates. This
is proved in the lesson Detecting regularity without
choosing coordinates.
Conormal distributions. Let
be a closed submanifold of
of codimension
,
and
.
The space
consists of the
such that
for every
and all first-order differential operators
with smooth coefficients whose principal symbols vanish on the conormal
bundle
.
Such a
is smooth off
,
and its wave front set lies in
.
Suppose
in coordinates
.
Then every
with compact support has the form
with
of compact support in
,
and
is
times the Fourier transform of
in
.
Conversely every such integral lies in
.
Hadamard’s lemma. A smooth function
that vanishes on
equals
.
Hence every smooth vector field tangent to
is a combination, with smooth coefficients, of the fields
and
.
Smooth extension. A function on
that is smooth in
,
and all of whose derivatives extend continuously to
,
is the restriction of a smooth function on
.
Functional analysis.
The Hahn–Banach theorem, seminorm form. Let
be a seminorm on a complex vector space
,
a subspace, and
a linear functional on
with
for
.
Then
extends to a linear functional
on
with
for all
.
Its full seminorm proof is Section14.7 of
the Banach foundations.
Quotients of Fréchet spaces. If
is a closed subspace of a Fréchet space
,
then
with the quotient topology is a Fréchet space. Its full
quotient-topology and completeness proof is Section14.8
of the Banach foundations.
1.1. Schur’s bound
on the original measure spaces
Editorial correction to the background statement.
The preceding Schur statement, as originally written, places no
restriction on either measure space. Its assertion about the raw
integral is false at that generality. We retain that statement above so
the correction is identifiable. Here we prove the counterexample, the
bounded operator that exists on the original arbitrary spaces, and its
exact relationship with the raw integral. In particular, the
raw-integral assertion holds when the output measure is semifinite; the
input measure can remain arbitrary. Every application later in this
lesson has Lebesgue output measure and therefore satisfies this
condition.
Let
and
be arbitrary measure spaces. In this section measurable kernels mean
-measurable,
finite complex-valued kernels. Retain the original two constants and
both pointwise bounds
All
spaces use the original measures and their almost-everywhere equivalence
classes; inner products are linear in their first argument. We do not
assume completeness, sigma-finiteness or semifiniteness of either
measure.
A
measurable counterexample with both bounds at every point
Put
.
On its Borel sets define
Here meager means a countable union of
sets whose closures have empty relative interior. This is a measure: a
countable union of meager sets is meager; if one member of a countable
disjoint family is nonmeager, its union is nonmeager and both the sum
and union measure are infinite. These two cases also prove countable
additivity. The complete-metric Baire theorem, proved in the Banach chapter,
Section6, shows that
is not meager in itself. Thus
,
while every set of finite
-measure
has measure zero.
Enumerate the rationals as
,
and set
Every
is open and dense, and its Lebesgue measure is at most
Consequently
is a Borel null set. Baire’s theorem on
also makes it dense. Each
is closed with empty interior, so
is meager and its complement is Lebesgue null. No finite approximation
of these sets is being substituted for them.
Take
with the measures in (SC2), and define
Addition is continuous and
is Borel, so
is jointly Borel measurable. For every
,
the omitted set of
’s
is
,
a Lebesgue null set; hence its row integral is one. For every
,
the set of
’s
where
is
.
Translation preserves closed sets with empty interior, and restriction
of any such set to the nondegenerate interval
has empty relative interior. Thus this section is meager in
and its column integral is zero. We have the exact values
The original raw-integral assertion
therefore fails. This is not a failure of a matrix estimate or of the
square-root constant: the two measures detect different sections of the
same measurable set.
The exact
operator without measure restrictions
Each
class has a finite-valued measurable representative
.
An infinite value, if allowed in a representative, occurs on a null set
and can be changed to zero. Its actual nonzero support is sigma-finite:
The same construction applies to
.
On the original restricted measures on
,
both factors are sigma-finite. Thus the product and Tonelli/Fubini
proofs in the Banach
chapter, Sections16.2–16.4 apply there, with no assertion of Tonelli
on all of
.
Define
The two nonnegative integrals needed
for product Cauchy–Schwarz obey
Here the first line integrates the
column bound and the second integrates the row bound. Cauchy–Schwarz
uses the two displayed functions
and
,
retaining both factors. All integrals on the right are finite, including
when
or
;
in either zero case the third integral vanishes. These bounds prove
absolute convergence of (SC8). Changing
or
on its original null set changes no pairing: on the sigma-finite union
of the old and new supports, those changes are product-null by the
proved product theorem. The same observation on finite unions of
supports proves sesquilinearity.
We include the Hilbert-space facts needed here at this generality.
Cauchy–Schwarz for any measure follows by integrating
with its minimizing complex
,
treating
separately; it gives Minkowski by expanding
.
If a sequence is Cauchy in
,
choose a subsequence with successive differences
of norms at most
.
For
,
Minkowski and monotone convergence give
The sum is finite off a measurable null
set. There the subsequence converges pointwise; define the limit to be
zero on that null set. Applying the same bound to each tail proves
convergence in
,
and the Cauchy property gives convergence of the whole sequence. This
proves completeness on arbitrary
,
and the proof for
is identical.
For completeness, the representing-vector argument requires no
separability. For fixed
,
put
,
a bounded linear functional on this Hilbert space. If
,
choose its representing vector to be zero. Otherwise the closed affine
set
is nonempty and its distance
from zero is positive, since
.
A sequence in that set whose norms decrease to
is Cauchy: the parallelogram identity gives
Completeness gives a minimizing vector
in the set. Varying
by
and
,
for real
and
,
shows
.
Since
,
The vector in the second pairing is
unique, as its difference from another would pair to zero with itself.
Define it to be
.
Sesquilinearity and uniqueness prove that
is linear. Taking
in (SC9), and treating its zero norm separately, proves
This operator is defined on the
original spaces. Its adjoint retains the literal swapped kernel
:
absolute Fubini on the two supports gives
,
so
.
The swapped constants are
.
The raw integral
on every finite-measure piece
Fix
and its support in (SC7). For any nonnegative product-measurable
function
on
,
its section integral is a measurable function of
,
without a condition on
.
Indeed, on a
finite-
piece the section-measure argument in Section16.3 of the linked chapter
uses rectangles, finite subtraction for complements, and countable sums
for disjoint unions; its generating-class proof in Section16.2 requires
no outer measure hypothesis. Increasing finite-measure exhaustions of
,
followed by increasing simple approximations to
,
give the assertion. Real and imaginary parts then give measurability of
absolutely convergent complex section integrals.
Consequently the following sets and functions are measurable:
The value zero on
is an explicit convention; it is not an assertion that the divergent raw
integral exists there. For a measurable
with
,
Tonelli on
and the original column bound give
The inner quantity is finite for almost
every
in
.
Weighted Cauchy–Schwarz in
gives, at those points,
If
,
every row is zero almost everywhere in
,
and
at every
;
this also covers the zero-row case before multiplying any infinite
value. Otherwise (SC15)–(SC16) prove
For
supported in such
,
absolute Fubini and (SC9) identify
on
.
Both
and
lie in
;
testing their difference proves
Equality on all finite-measure pieces
is the exact comparison proved so far. In the counterexample it does not
imply equality almost everywhere for the original
.
The
space defined by this defect and its complete quotient map
Let
be the vector space of original almost-everywhere classes of
finite-valued measurable functions
for which
Minkowski on each
proves that
is a seminorm. Its kernel consists exactly of the functions invisible to
every finite-measure test. This definition retains the original global
null classes, so
can contain a class that is nonzero globally.
There is a canonical onto isometry
First, for
,
the finite-measure level sets in (SC7), made increasing by finite
unions, exhaust its support. Monotone convergence gives
.
Thus this map is injective and isometric.
To prove surjectivity, take
,
and put
.
If
,
its class in the quotient is zero. If
,
choose finite-measure sets
such that
.
Replace these sets by the finite unions
,
and put
.
Then
For any finite-measure
,
the disjoint union
still has finite measure, so
Letting
increase proves that the second integral is zero. Therefore
,
establishing surjectivity. Two choices of
differ by an
element of
,
hence are equal in the original
space. The inverse
is consequently canonical and linear, and the quotient is a complete
Hilbert space through this isometry.
Equations (SC17)–(SC18) now give the complete connecting maps
In particular the raw assignment
followed by the quotient is linear, even though the conventions on
divergent sets were only pointwise choices. Any other finite measurable
convention on
has the same quotient class, because every finite-measure intersection
of
is null. In (SC2),
is zero on every finite-valued measurable function,
,
and
.
The raw constant one in (SC6) is a nonzero original class in
;
(SC13) is the zero operator. Thus (SC23) describes exactly what the
counterexample loses under finite-measure testing.
When the
raw-integral assertion is recovered
A measure is semifinite if each measurable set of positive measure
contains a measurable subset of finite positive measure. Under this
condition, a measurable set whose intersection with every finite-measure
set is null is itself null: if it were positive, the defining subset
would contradict the intersection property. Applying this first to
and then to the sets
for
gives
There is no restriction on the input
measure
in this implication.
The defect criterion is exact:
if and only if
is semifinite. Indeed, if semifiniteness fails, its definition supplies
a positive measurable set
with no finite positive-measure subset. Every finite-measure
intersection
has measure zero. The finite-valued function
therefore belongs to
and is a nonzero original almost-everywhere class. This proves the
converse. Equivalently, semifiniteness gives
For finite
this is immediate. If
and the supremum
were finite, choose finite-measure
approaching
,
take their increasing finite unions, and let their union be
.
Measure continuity gives
.
Any finite positive-measure subset of
would raise the supremum by its disjoint union with
,
while
still has infinite measure. This contradicts semifiniteness and proves
(SC25). We have proved the exact vanishing criterion for the defect
space; we do not infer that every kernel on a nonsemifinite space must
fail its raw-integral bound.
Finally, the same construction works for the finite vector dimensions
in this lesson, retaining their order. If
,
replace
in (SC1) and (SC9) by its original operator norm and use
This gives exactly (SC9), with no
dimension factor. Vector-valued
completeness follows by the same norm-sum proof (SC10); the Hilbert
representing argument (SC11)–(SC12) applies unchanged. The raw
convergence proof bounds the norm of its vector integral by
.
Define
with the original Euclidean vector norm; (SC21)–(SC22) prove the same
onto isometry and comparison. The adjoint kernel is exactly
,
reversing the two vector dimensions, as absolute Fubini in (SC8) shows.
All subsequent Schur applications thus retain the full scalar or matrix
constants and the original Lebesgue integral.
Figure SC-F1. The exact kernel
K(x,y)=1_N(x+y) on I=[0,1] has row bound A=1 and column bound B=0. Its
raw integral sends the input constant one of Lebesgue L2 norm one to the
constant one with infinite global output L2 integral. Every
finite-measure output test is zero. The canonical Schur operator is
zero, and the onto isometry F_mu/N_mu=L2(mu) identifies the raw output
with zero through SC20–SC23. This is a diagram of the exact maps, not a
sampled picture of the meager set N. Definitions and full proofs:
SC2–SC6 and SC19–SC24. Reproducible figure source:
figures/schur_arbitrary_measure.py.
2. Totally
characteristic differential operators
Let
be the smooth vector fields
,
,
that are tangent to the boundary, that is,
.
Let
be the algebra of operators on
generated by
and by multiplication with functions in
,
and
the span of products containing at most
vector fields. Its elements are the totally characteristic
differential operators.
Proposition 2.1 (Structure of totally characteristic
differential operators).
is the
-module
generated by
and
.
For every integer
,
Hence
and
span the same space, with constant coefficients.
consists exactly of the finite sums
equivalently of the sums
.
For
as in (2.2) and
,
:
the boundary value of
depends only on the boundary value of
.
Proof. (a) If
,
then
with
.
Thus
.
Conversely each generator is tangent.
For
and
smooth,
,
because
.
So
,
and induction gives (2.1). The polynomial
is monic of degree
,
so the triangular system can be inverted.
Moving a function to the left across a generator produces only
multiplication operators:
and
.
So a product of at most
vector fields and functions is a sum of terms
,
,
with each
one of the generators in (a). These generators commute pairwise, because
for
.
So each word is a constant times
with
,
and (b) rewrites it in the form (2.2). Conversely
is a product of
generators.
At
every term with
carries the factor
,
which vanishes.
Part (d) is the motivation for the whole lesson. An operator that
respects the boundary in this way can be followed by boundary operators.
Theorem 5.1(c) below extends (d) to the pseudodifferential operators of
this lesson and to normal derivatives of every order.
3. Function spaces on the
half space
Restrictions and supports
Two ways to attach a space to the half space. Let
be a space of distributions on
.
is the space of restrictions
,
,
with the quotient topology of
.
is the space of
with
,
with the topology of
.
These are different objects and must be kept apart. A restriction of
a Schwartz function may have any boundary values. A Schwartz function
supported in
vanishes to infinite order on
,
since all its derivatives are continuous and vanish for
.
The zero extension of an element of
is an integrable function in
;
it lies in
only when all its normal derivatives vanish at the boundary. In this
notation,
,
by the smooth extension fact of Section 1.
Lemma 3.1 (Supports in the closed half space). Let
with
,
and let
vanish in
.
Then
.
Proof. First,
whenever
vanishes on a neighbourhood
of
:
for
this is the definition of the support, and in general
in
for a cutoff
equal to 1 near 0, while each
vanishes on
.
Now put
.
It vanishes on
,
a neighbourhood of
,
so
;
and
in
as
.
Restricted Schwartz
functions
For
and multi-indices
put
Lemma 3.2 (Restricted Schwartz functions).
Each
is finite and continuous on
.
For every continuous seminorm
on
there are
and
with
So the
define the quotient topology.
is a Fréchet space.
A function
is the restriction of a Schwartz function if and only if every
is finite.
If
,
,
and
for
,
then
with
.
Proof. (a) For every extension
of
,
;
so
is bounded by a quotient seminorm, hence finite and continuous.
Conversely let
be continuous, and let
be the restriction map. Then
is a continuous seminorm on
,
so there are
with
.
Fix
.
Put
on
and
with
equal to 1 on
.
The two pieces have the same derivatives of order
on
,
so
.
For
,
is bounded by a constant times
:
on
this is clear, and on
the derivatives are combinations of derivatives of
(bounded, with support in a fixed interval) and of
,
,
whose weighted suprema are limits from
.
Now take
with
,
,
.
Then
.
For
the convolution only uses values at
with
,
so
.
For
,
,
and
for
.
Hence
,
uniformly in
.
Since
in
,
(3.1) follows.
The subspace
is closed, since point evaluations are continuous. The quotient of a
Fréchet space by a closed subspace is again a Fréchet space (see the
background list in Section 1).
Necessity is clear. Conversely let every
be finite, let
be the zero extension of
,
and let
be as in (a). Then
,
because
is bounded and rapidly decreasing and all derivatives fall on
.
If
,
then for
near a point of
the integral
only involves points with
,
so we may differentiate under it:
.
By the mean value theorem along segments, which stay in
,
So
in every
.
By (a) the family is Cauchy in
,
by (b) it converges to some
,
and since
is continuous the limit agrees with
on
.
On
put
.
On
Taylor’s formula with integral remainder and the vanishing jets give
with
.
The two definitions agree for
.
The second one is smooth up to
,
and both have finite weighted suprema of all derivatives (on
the weights are controlled by
).
So
by (c).
4. Symbols,
compressed quantization and lacunarity
The symbol class and its
quantization
Definition 4.1 (The class
).
For
,
is the set of
such that for all multi-indices
and all integers
These seminorms make
a Fréchet space: a sequence that is Cauchy for all of them converges
locally uniformly with all derivatives, and the weighted bounds pass to
the limit. We put
.
The estimates are uniform in
,
with no decay in
,
and require rapid decay in
.
Compression and quantization. For
put
and, for
,
Since
,
the compressed symbol grows at most polynomially and the integral
converges absolutely. We always write the last variable of
as
;
thus
is the derivative of
in its last slot,
its compression, and
.
We also write
for the symbol
;
its compression is
.
Two remarks explain the choice of class. First, away from the
boundary
is an ordinary pseudodifferential operator. Indeed, for
the compressed symbol obeys the ordinary estimates of
uniformly. Each
of
brings a factor
,
and each
brings
or
,
where
.
Moreover
.
So every derivative obeys the estimate of
up to powers of
,
and the rapid decay in
absorbs every power of
.
Second, near
the compressed symbol is not a classical symbol:
gains no power of
.
If
with
vanishing for
,
then
with
:
indeed
,
and left quantization places functions of
on the left. So Proposition 2.1 suggests the definition.
The kernel. The compressed symbol is a polynomially
bounded measurable function. So, by the facts on quantization and
kernels in Section 1, the operator
has the tempered kernel
.
For
the substitution
suggests
For residual symbols this is an
identity of functions (Theorem 6.2(b)). We want
to depend only on
,
that is,
for
.
With
,
the condition
means
.
So
should vanish on
;
this is a condition on the Fourier transform of
in its last variable.
Lacunary symbols
Definition 4.2 (Lacunary symbols). For
and fixed
,
the function
is tempered; let
be its Fourier transform, a tempered distribution in the dual variable
(formally
).
We call
lacunary if
that is,
for every
.
We call
strongly lacunary if these supports lie in
.
denotes the lacunary elements of
and
.
Each defining condition is a continuous linear functional on
,
since
.
So
is a closed subspace and a Fréchet space.
The following closure properties are used constantly. If
is lacunary (strongly lacunary), then so are
,
,
,
,
and
for
.
Indeed
commutes with operations in
and
,
turns
into multiplication by
,
and turns multiplication by
into
;
none of these enlarges the support.
Proposition 4.3 (Lacunarity is exactly the support
condition). For
the following are equivalent.
is lacunary.
in
for every
that vanishes in
.
in
for every
.
Proof. Fix
and
.
Let
,
so that
.
By Fubini,
Substitute
,
and write
.
With
one finds
(1
2) If
in
,
then
for
,
so
vanishes for
.
The translates
vanish on
,
a neighbourhood of
,
and
in
.
Hence
.
So
and
.
(2
3) is trivial.
(3
1) Take
with
and
.
Then
and
with
,
.
For fixed
,
the continuous polynomially bounded function
annihilates every
,
and these are dense in
;
so
.
As
runs through
,
runs through all of
.
This proves (4.5) for
,
and continuity in
gives it at
.
Every symbol
is lacunary up to a residual symbol
Lemma 4.4 (Lacunary modification of a symbol). Let
with
and
near 0. For
put
Then:
is continuous
,
and
is strongly lacunary, with
.
,
and
is continuous from
into every
.
If
is lacunary (strongly lacunary), so is
.
The kernel of
vanishes on the open set
.
The natural map
is bijective.
Proof. (a) By Peetre’s inequality,
By the convolution theorem
,
whose support lies in
.
Since
equals 1 near 0,
and
for
.
Hence, for every
,
Where
,
Taylor’s formula bounds the bracket by
times the supremum of
on the segment from
to
;
there
and the norm of the point differ by a factor at most 2, so the bracket
is at most
.
Where
,
each term of the bracket is at most
,
and
gives
.
Integrating against the rapidly decreasing
gives
for all
.
Derivatives commute with the convolution, so the same argument applied
to
proves (b), with every seminorm controlled by finitely many seminorms of
.
has support inside that of
.
Fix
with
and let
vanish on the closed slab
.
In (4.6) the function
then vanishes on
,
which is a neighbourhood of the compact set
.
Hence
and
.
If
and
have
inside the open set of (d), this gives
;
such products span a dense set of test functions, which proves
(d).
The kernel of the map is
;
surjectivity is (a)–(b).
By (e), the lacunary condition only restricts the residual part of a
symbol. It has no effect on principal symbols or asymptotic
expansions.
5. Action on restricted
Schwartz functions
Continuity,
commutators and boundary jets
Theorem 5.1 (Action, commutators and boundary jets).
Let
.
For
and any
equal to
in
,
the restriction
depends only on
;
we call it
.
It lies in
,
and
is a continuous bilinear map
.
More precisely, for every
there are a seminorm
of
and a continuous seminorm
of
,
depending only on
,
with
.
As operators on
,
for
,
and for the normal direction
For every integer
and
,
Here
,
its
-th
summand has order
,
and
is the left quantization on
.
If
for
,
then
for
.
In particular
maps
into itself.
Correction: The expression
is not the commutator
with
;
the correct term is
,
as in (5.1) and Example 5.2.
Proof. (a) Let
and, for
,
put
,
so
in
.
From (4.2), for
,
By induction,
,
a finite sum with
,
where each
is a constant times some
.
Since
,
each term is at most
,
,
for any
.
For the weight
we integrate by parts in
,
using
;
-derivatives
of
are compressions of
-derivatives
and obey the same bounds. For the weight
we take
.
Thus
with
a seminorm of
and
a Schwartz seminorm. The same bounds justify differentiation under the
integral, and the integrands are continuous up to
;
so
,
and
by Lemma 3.2(c). By Proposition 4.3,
depends only on
.
Taking the infimum over all extensions gives
with the quotient seminorm
,
and Lemma 3.2(a) turns this into joint continuity.
For
and
,
differentiation under the integral gives
,
while
.
Hence
.
For
,
.
For
,
,
and
.
Next,
;
integrating by parts in
gives
,
so
.
For
this is
.
For
,
,
and the factor
stands on the left. The symbols on the right are lacunary, so the
identities pass to
.
By (5.3),
for
.
Regard
as a function of
,
with
in the last slot and
as a parameter. Then
,
and
,
commute; so
.
At
(where
),
The power
occurs for
,
and
.
So
,
and
is the Fourier transform in
of
.
This is (5.2). The symbol
lies in
,
and its restriction to
lies in
.
This is read off from (5.2). If all jets of
vanish, those of
vanish too; the zero extension of
is then smooth, with all weighted derivatives bounded, hence in
.
Formula (5.2) is the purpose of the construction: the normal
derivatives of the output at the boundary are obtained by letting
pseudodifferential operators on the boundary act on normal derivatives
of the input of the same or lower order. Proposition 2.1(d) is the case
for differential operators.
Example 5.2 (The factor
in the normal commutator). Take
with
near 0, and
.
This symbol lies in
,
because its normal Fourier transform is supported at
.
Here
,
and
,
while
.
So
,
as (5.1) says, and there is no term
without the factor
.
Composition
with totally characteristic derivatives
Composing
on the right with a totally characteristic differential operator gives
again an operator of the class, with an exact formula for its
symbol.
Lemma 5.3 (Composition with totally characteristic
derivatives). For
,
on
,
and more generally
Proof. For
,
and
.
By (5.1),
,
so
.
Moreover
,
because
.
Together these give (5.5) and the first two identities in (5.4). The
third identity in (5.4) follows from
.
6. Kernels near the corner
Coordinates at the corner
Kernels of totally characteristic operators live on
the quarter space and its distinguished
boundary. Near
we use
Proposition 6.1 (Blow-up coordinates). Write
.
maps
diffeomorphically onto
,
with
;
hence
.
corresponds to
,
.
The face
is
,
the face
is
,
the diagonal
is
,
and
.
extends smoothly to
and maps the whole line
to the corner: the corner is blown up into the front face
,
of which the segment
lies over
.
Normal dilations
are
,
and the radial field is
.
On
,
for
;
is homogeneous of degree 0, so
on
.
The rescaled normal variable in (4.4) is a function of
alone:
.
Proof. The Jacobian matrix of
has rows
and
,
with determinant
;
the inverse is (6.1). Parts 2–4 and 6 are direct substitutions. For part
5,
when both are nonnegative, and
.
The set
is a closed cone that meets the line
only at the origin; its intersection with the unit circle is a compact
subset of the open set where
is smooth. The derivatives of order
of
are homogeneous of degree
,
so they are bounded by
on that cone.
The point of these coordinates is part 6. The kernel formula (4.4)
involves
and a function of
,
and neither is smooth at the corner. But
becomes a smooth function of
,
as Theorem 6.2 shows.
Residual kernels
Theorem 6.2 (Residual kernels).
Let
and
.
Then
,
for
,
and for all
with
bounded by seminorms of
.
Conversely every
satisfying (6.2) and vanishing for
comes in this way from exactly one
,
namely
.
For
the kernel of
is the locally integrable function
For
and
,
,
and
.
Moreover
and
.
The function
,
,
extends to a
function on
,
which vanishes for
.
For all
and
,
and in particular
On the front face,
Conversely, let
with
,
and suppose that the function
of (c) agrees almost everywhere on
with a function in
that vanishes for
and satisfies (6.5). Then
is, almost everywhere, the kernel of
for exactly one
.
Proof. (a) For
,
integration by parts gives
,
with an integrand bounded by
.
This proves smoothness and (6.2). For fixed
,
,
so
is a continuous function; by (4.5) it vanishes for
.
Since
,
for
,
and by continuity for
.
Conversely, if
satisfies (6.2), then
is bounded by
,
so
;
Fourier inversion recovers
from
;
and
vanishes for
.
Uniqueness is Fourier inversion.
For
fixed,
,
because
decreases rapidly in
.
So
converges absolutely, and the substitution
gives (6.3). Fubini gives
.
The change of variables
,
,
gives
.
Hence
for
,
with absolute convergence; so
,
which is locally integrable, is the Schwartz kernel. If
,
.
If
,
then
and
.
So
vanishes outside
,
up to the null set
.
Smoothness off
.
Near a point with
,
(6.3) is smooth. Near a point with
,
or with
and
,
.
Let
.
For
small and
near
,
the normal argument
satisfies
.
By the chain rule, a derivative of order
of
is a finite sum of terms
with
,
,
and
.
So
and all its derivatives tend to 0 as
,
uniformly near the point. Since
for
,
is smooth there.
For
and
we have
,
and
.
So by (6.3)
The right side is smooth on
,
because
is smooth up to
.
It vanishes for
,
where
.
For
,
we have
and
.
Now let
and write
,
,
.
Then
The first inequality holds because
when
,
and
when
.
By the chain rule,
is a finite sum of terms
with
and
:
an
-derivative
may hit
,
the argument
(factor
)
or the argument
(factor
);
a
-derivative
brings the factor
.
By (6.8) and (6.2), each term is at most
On the other hand
and
.
Choosing
large gives (6.4) for
;
for
the left side vanishes. In particular every derivative of
tends to 0 as
,
locally uniformly (also at
);
so
,
extended by 0 to
,
is smooth, and it equals
.
Since
on the support, (6.4) implies (6.5). Formula (6.6) is (6.7) at
.
Taylor’s formula at
,
where
vanishes to infinite order, turns (6.5) into (6.4):
.
Define, for
,
On
both definitions give 0, because then
;
so
is smooth. For
put
and
.
Then
and
.
Every derivative of
is a finite sum of terms (polynomial in
)
(smooth function of
growing at most polynomially on
)
(a derivative of
at the displayed point). By (6.4) such a term is at most
,
and choosing
large gives (6.2). By (a),
comes from a unique
.
Finally, for
,
inserting
into (6.9) gives
,
and
,
so the kernel (6.3) of
equals
almost everywhere; for
both vanish.
Remark 6.3 (Singular kernels of order
).
For an ordinary pseudodifferential operator of order
the kernel is smooth. Here, by (c),
near the corner, and the leading part
is homogeneous of degree
in
.
It is not smooth, and not even bounded, unless
vanishes on the front face. This singularity is what makes residual
operators fail to improve regularity in Section 12.
A kernel bound at
finite negative order
Proposition 6.4 (A kernel bound). Let
.
Then the kernel of
is a function, and
with
bounded by a seminorm of
.
Consequently
and
are at most
.
Proof. For
,
is integrable in
,
so
converges absolutely,
,
and (6.3) holds with the bounded continuous function
.
As in Theorem 6.2(a),
is now a continuous function, so
for
.
Integration by parts gives
for
,
because
is integrable; so
.
Likewise
and
for
.
Since
,
the mean value theorem gives
for
.
If
,
then
,
,
and
,
because
.
If
,
then
and
.
For the marginals,
and
;
the bound is symmetric in
.
The two cases correspond to the two sides of the diagonal: for
the decay of
in
is used, for
the vanishing of
at
,
that is, lacunarity.
Examples of residual kernels
Example 6.5 (Without lacunarity the operator sees
below the boundary). Let
be supported near
,
with
,
and
.
Then
does not vanish on
,
so
is not lacunary. For
supported near
,
with
,
formula (6.3), whose derivation for
in Theorem 6.2(b) does not use lacunarity, gives
,
since
is near
there. So
in
although
in
:
lacunarity cannot be dropped from Theorem 5.1(a), in accordance with
Proposition 4.3.
Example 6.6 (A residual kernel in one dimension).
Let
,
and
.
Then
for
,
and
The kernel vanishes unless
,
and
vanishes unless
.
Along the diagonal
,
which is unbounded if
:
a symbol of order
with an unbounded kernel.
is bounded on
by Proposition 6.4 and gains no derivative by Theorem 12.1. The model
on the front face (so
)
is not in the class, since its symbol does not decay in
.
It commutes with the unitary dilations
of
,
and Minkowski’s inequality gives
,
since
.
Example 6.7 (The resolved kernel near
).
In Example 6.6,
vanishes identically near
because
has compact support. For a lacunary but not strongly lacunary symbol,
take
and
with
vanishing for
but not near
,
for instance
for
and
for
.
Then
,
and as
the argument
,
where
decreases rapidly; this is the flatness at
used in (6.4). At
the argument tends to 1, where
vanishes to infinite order.
Residual
kernels are polyhomogeneous conormal distributions
Smoothness of the resolved kernel
has an invariant meaning: it says precisely that
is a polyhomogeneous conormal distribution of order
with respect to
.
We prove this now.
The class. Conormal distributions
are defined by tangential regularity. A compactly supported
has, in coordinates, the normal form
with
,
where
,
is the codimension, and
is
times the Fourier transform of
in the normal variables; conversely every such
is conormal. (All of this is in the background list of Section 1.) The
polyhomogeneous class
requires in addition that these amplitudes be polyhomogeneous with step
one. Step one is needed here, because a term of degree
in
would put a factor
into
.
For
,
we have
,
,
normal variables
,
tangential variables
,
and
gives amplitude degree
.
So
means:
is smooth off
,
and for all
,
,
in the sense of asymptotic sums of
symbols (Section 1); the Fourier transform is taken in
.
Proposition 6.8 (Residual kernels are conormal). Let
with
,
and let
for
.
Then
if and only if
agrees almost everywhere with a function in
;
such a function vanishes for
.
In particular
for every
.
The global decay (6.5) is not a conormal property. So Theorem 6.2 and
Proposition 6.8 together say: residual kernels are exactly the kernels
supported in
,
polyhomogeneous conormal of order
at
,
with the uniform decay (6.5).
We need four lemmas. In them
ranges over
,
all functions have compact
-support,
and every estimate holds with
-derivatives,
uniformly in
.
Lemma 6.9 (Homogeneous pieces). Let
vanish for
,
let
,
and let
on
,
off
.
Then
is smooth off
,
homogeneous of degree
in
,
and locally integrable. If
equals 1 near 0, then
,
where
is smooth on
and homogeneous of degree
in
,
and
is smooth with all derivatives
for
.
In particular
.
Proof.
vanishes to infinite order at
,
so
is smooth across the faces of
;
it is smooth elsewhere off
by Proposition 6.1. Also
,
so
is locally integrable and tempered, and its Fourier transform
is homogeneous of degree
(compare
with
).
Write
,
.
The first term is smooth. The function
is smooth, with
for
.
If
,
then
is integrable, so
is a bounded continuous function. Hence
is smooth on
and all its derivatives are
for
.
So
is smooth and homogeneous, and
on
(with
there). The symbol estimates follow from homogeneity on
and smoothness on
.
Lemma 6.10 (Remainders). Let
vanish for
,
let
,
and let
on
,
off
.
Then
.
Proof. By Proposition 6.1(5), each
-derivative
of
or
costs at most
,
and
is comparable to
on
.
So
satisfies
,
and
satisfies
with
.
Fix
and
equal to 1 on
.
The Fourier transform of
is at most
.
For the rest,
;
integrating by parts
times, and noting that derivatives of
are
where they do not vanish, gives the bound
.
Since
,
we get
.
Lemma 6.11 (Inverse transforms of homogeneous
terms). Let
,
let
be smooth on
and homogeneous of degree
in
,
let
equal 1 near 0, and put
and
.
Then
is smooth off
,
rapidly decreasing with all derivatives as
,
locally integrable, and on
where
is smooth off
and homogeneous of degree
,
is a homogeneous polynomial of degree
in
with coefficients smooth in
(
when
),
and
is smooth on
.
Proof.
.
For
large,
is the absolutely convergent integral of
against a constant times
;
this gives smoothness off 0 and rapid decay. Put
,
which is smooth with compact support in
(Euler’s relation kills
),
and
.
Since
for tempered
,
On a ray
,
,
this says
.
Since
as
,
.
Write
,
where
is the Taylor polynomial of
of degree
at 0 and the
are smooth. For
split
:
is homogeneous of degree
and smooth off 0.
For the
degree-
part
of
,
:
,
a polynomial minus a homogeneous function of degree
.
For
:
.
So
.
.
The first part is homogeneous of degree
.
In the second,
and
,
which is smooth in
.
Collecting terms gives (6.12). Local integrability follows from
(6.12), since
.
Lemma 6.12 (Uniqueness of expansions). If
as
,
then all
and
vanish.
Proof. Multiply by
:
tends to a finite limit (namely 0), so
and then
.
Repeat with the next power.
Proof of Proposition 6.8.
()
Off
,
is smooth in the interior of
,
smooth across its faces because
is flat at
,
and zero outside
.
Near
,
fix cutoffs
,
.
Taylor’s formula in
gives
,
with
and
smooth and vanishing for
.
Hence
.
By Lemma 6.9,
equals a function homogeneous of degree
for
,
up to
;
by Lemma 6.10 the last term has transform in
.
As
is arbitrary, (6.11) holds.
()
Off
,
is smooth, so
is smooth on
,
and
for
because
.
Fix
and choose
near
and
on
.
Let
,
with
.
Let
be the inverse transforms of Lemma 6.11 and
.
Since
in two variables,
.
So for
near
and
,
Let
,
an open cone on which
.
For
,
,
and
we have
.
Insert homogeneity,
,
and Taylor’s formula
with homogeneous polynomials
of degree
.
The term
is
.
Lemma 6.12 gives, for
:
on
,
hence
;
and
on
(with
).
Thus
is homogeneous of degree
,
smooth off 0, and supported in
,
and
All derivatives of
of order
are continuous and tend to 0 at
,
so
.
Now
with
,
which is smooth and vanishes for
.
Hence, for small
and
,
is
,
and
for
.
Since
is arbitrary,
is smooth. The last assertion of the proposition follows from Theorem
6.2(c).
7. Adjoints
The adjoint of
with respect to
is again an operator of the class. We first compute it for strongly
lacunary residual symbols, where the transposed kernel can be read off
from Theorem 6.2. Then we extend the formula by an adjoint transform
defined on all of
.
The
adjoint of a strongly lacunary residual operator
Proposition 7.1 (A residual adjoint formula). Let
be strongly lacunary, and let
equal 1 on
.
There is exactly one
with
and for
,
with the inner integral taken first,
Proof.Existence and uniqueness. The
transposed kernel
is locally integrable and supported in
,
and its resolved form is
,
which has all the properties in Theorem 6.2(c). By Theorem 6.2(d),
for a unique
,
and Fubini’s theorem, justified by the bounds of Theorem 6.2(b), gives
(7.1). An operator determines its symbol (see quantization and kernels
in Section 1), so
is unique.
The formula. By the inversion formula for kernels in Section
1, for
,
,
an absolutely convergent integral. Strong lacunarity says that
vanishes unless
;
in
the normal argument is
,
so
unless
.
So we may insert
,
since it equals 1 almost everywhere on the support. Writing
and substituting
,
we get
Now
.
Substitute
,
,
:
then
,
becomes
,
and
.
This is (7.2). Finally, for a function
that is a residual symbol,
(test with
,
for which both sides equal
).
With
,
a residual symbol for fixed
,
and
,
this is (7.2).
The adjoint transform
Lemma 7.2 (The adjoint transform). Let
equal 1 near 1, with
,
.
For
put
is a continuous conjugate-linear map
.
In
,
the
-th
term lying in
,
with the remainder after
terms in
and controlled by finitely many seminorms of
.
For
the
-th
term equals
at
,
,
.
If
,
then
,
and
has the kernel
for
(and 0 elsewhere).
Proof. (a), (b) On
we have
,
hence
and
.
A
-derivative
of
produces
(the factor
is absorbed by the decay in
)
or
(the factor
is paid for by the lower order); an
-derivative
produces
.
Hence
is bounded in the classical class
,
uniformly in
,
for every
,
and so is every
(it has the same form, with
).
By the facts on the Gauss transform in Section 1,
is continuous on
,
with the expansion
and remainder in
.
The map
is
into
(difference quotients converge, by the mean value theorem and the bounds
on the next derivative), so
is smooth in all variables, with
.
Evaluating at
,
(so
-derivatives
are
-derivatives)
gives
,
continuously in
.
Since
near
,
the expansion terms at
are those of (7.5). The
-th
term is in
:
the operators
and
produced by
preserve
,
and each
lowers the order by one (also when it hits a factor
,
since
).
The second form of the terms follows from
with
,
,
under which
.
Lacunarity. First let
.
Then
is a residual symbol and
is given by the integral (7.2) with this
.
Substitute
in the inner integral:
is the Fourier transform, in
,
of
So
,
which vanishes unless
,
that is
.
For general
,
take
with
equal to 1 near 0; then
in
,
so
in
by (a), and
is lacunary because
is closed.
The support statement was just proved. For the kernel, the
computation in the proof of Proposition 7.1 applies to any
and shows that
is the transform
of
.
The kernel statement in (c) explains the construction: the cutoff
multiplies the transposed kernel by a function of the ratio of the
normal variables, and that makes the result lacunary.
Adjoints of lacunary
operators
Theorem 7.3 (Adjoints).
For every
there is exactly one
with
The map
is conjugate-linear and continuous
,
,
and
.
If
is strongly lacunary and
equals 1 on
,
then
;
in particular
has the expansion (7.5).
Since
on
,
(7.6) says
for
.
Proof. (b) For residual
this is Proposition 7.1. Let
be strongly lacunary, and let
be as in Lemma 4.4. Take
,
so that
in
(the error
has
seminorms
).
Then
is strongly lacunary, and
in
.
By the residual case,
.
Let
:
in
by Lemma 7.2, and Theorem 5.1(a) lets us pass to the limit on both
sides. So the formula holds for
.
The difference
is residual and strongly lacunary (Lemma 4.4(b),(c)), so the formula
holds for it too, and
is additive and conjugate-linear.
Write
.
The first term is strongly lacunary, so it has the adjoint symbol
by (b). The second is in
;
by Theorem 6.2 its transposed kernel is the kernel of
for some
,
as in the proof of Proposition 7.1. Put
.
Uniqueness follows because
determines
(an operator determines its symbol), hence
on
,
hence
by continuity. Additivity, conjugate-linearity and
follow from uniqueness. Indeed
and the inner product is linear in its first argument, so the unique
adjoint symbol is
.
For continuity, each step is continuous:
and
by Lemma 4.4,
by Lemma 7.2, and the residual adjoint by the explicit formulas of
Theorem 6.2
(,
each with seminorm bounds). Finally
by (7.5), and
.
is immediate.
8. Composition
The composition of two operators of the class is again in the class.
Its symbol is the sum of a near part, given by a Gauss transform as in
the ordinary calculus, and a residual far part.
Theorem 8.1 (Composition). Let
,
,
and let
equal 1 near 1, with
.
Put
where the Gauss transform acts in
with
as parameters, and
with the integrand taken to be 0 for
.
Then
;
;
the map
is continuous and bilinear;
does not depend on
;
and
the
-term
having order
.
If
and
vanishes for large
,
then for
an absolutely convergent integral.
Formally,
at
,
;
the sum (8.1)+(8.2) is the precise meaning of this formula.
The truncation used below needs boundedness and pointwise
convergence; its lack of convergence in the full symbol topology is
proved in Remark 8.2.
Proof.Step 1: the near part. Put
,
with
a parameter. On
,
,
so
is comparable to
.
A
-derivative
produces
(the factor
is absorbed by the decay of
in
)
or
,
and
.
A
-derivative
lowers the order by one. So
is a classical symbol of order
in
,
uniformly in
,
and so are its
-derivatives.
Likewise
is a symbol of order
in
for every
.
We apply the pre-diagonal product estimate of Section 1 to the product
,
with the multiplier acting in
and
a passive parameter. That estimate holds at every
;
at
,
it gives
with
controlled by finitely many seminorms of
and
(differentiation in
commutes with the multiplier, and a derivative of the evaluation at
,
is a sum of derivatives in the two sets of variables, each controlled by
the estimate). Since
near 1,
.
So
with the expansion (8.3), continuously in
.
Step 2: the far part is residual. The factor
vanishes near
.
Off
the inverse transform of
is smooth, and for
bounded below its derivatives are bounded by
(integrate by parts in
).
So
satisfies (6.2). By lacunarity
for
,
and Taylor’s formula at
gives
Let
be the integrand of (8.2) without the exponential. For
we have
.
So a derivative of
of order
in
is bounded by
times a factor
;
the powers of
come from
-derivatives
falling on the second argument. The factor
absorbs all of this. Near
the factor
is paid for by
in (8.5). For large
the growth is paid for by the decay in
.
The powers of
are paid for by the decay of
in
.
Hence
is smooth across
,
and
The phase is
,
so
.
Derivatives of
in
and
bring factors
(treated the same way) or
,
(absorbed by the decay of
).
So
,
continuously in
.
Step 3: the product formula for residual
and compactly supported
.
Let
,
with
for
,
and
.
Then
is a bounded function with compact support, zero for
.
For
the kernel
is a Schwartz function vanishing for
(Theorem 6.2), so for every Schwartz extension
of
,
.
Here
,
absolutely convergent. Combining the integrals (absolutely convergent
for fixed
),
Put
,
so
.
The substitutions
,
,
turn
into (8.4); the double integral converges absolutely because
is residual and
stays in a compact set. Now insert
.
The first part is the Gauss transform (8.1) of a residual symbol with
compact
-support,
written as an absolutely convergent integral (as in Proposition 7.1). In
the second part, integrate in
first:
,
multiplied by
with
,
is
;
what remains is (8.2). So
on
,
in
.
Step 4: general
.
Let
equal 1 near 0 and
.
These are lacunary, bounded in
,
and converge to
locally uniformly with all derivatives. Since functions of
stand on the left,
in
;
so
by Theorem 5.1. On the other side,
pointwise by dominated convergence. The near parts
are Gauss transforms of symbols in
that stay bounded in
and converge locally smoothly; by the facts on the Gauss transform in
Section 1, the transforms converge locally uniformly with all
derivatives, so
pointwise. All
are bounded in
(here
is any real number, since
is residual), so
for each
by dominated convergence. Hence
.
Step 5: general
.
Write
with
(Lemma 4.4); Step 4 applies to
.
Let
,
equal to 1 near 0. Then
and
in
.
By Step 4,
,
where
is built from
and
.
As
,
the left side converges to
(Theorem 5.1, continuity in the symbol), and
converges in
by Steps 1–2, so the right side converges to
with
built from
.
Bilinearity gives the formula for
.
Step 6: conclusions.
depends only on
,
so
is lacunary by Proposition 4.3. The operator determines the symbol, so
does not depend on
.
Continuity and the expansion come from Steps 1–2.
Remark 8.2 (The truncated symbols do not converge in
the symbol topology). For the tangential-translation example in this
paragraph assume
.
In Step 4 the symbols
are bounded and converge pointwise, but they need not converge to
in the Fréchet topology of
,
even when
is residual. Take
,
with
equal to 1 on
,
and
with
,
.
Both are lacunary,
is multiplication by
,
and
commutes with translations in
.
If
in
,
then
in the operator norm on
,
by the Schur bound of Proposition 6.4, which is linear in a seminorm of
the symbol. But let
be a bump near
,
and let
be a translate of
in
far outside the support of
.
Then
,
independently of
.
So only boundedness together with pointwise convergence is available,
and that is what Step 4 uses.
Example 8.3 (A totally characteristic differential
operator: product, adjoint, jets). Let
equal 1 on
and
.
It lies in
(strongly lacunary, since
is supported at
),
and
.
Product. In (8.3) only
and
contribute:
,
and
.
Directly,
,
whose compressed symbol is the same. Where
this is
,
in agreement with (2.1).
Adjoint for a real cutoff. If the cutoff is real valued, the
following calculation applies. The full complex-cutoff formula and proof
follow below. By (7.5), the term
is
,
the term
is
,
and all later terms vanish. Directly,
.
The expansion is exact here: the difference is a differential operator
with symbol in
,
hence 0.
Jets. In (5.2) only
is nonzero near the boundary, so
;
this is Leibniz’ rule for
at
.
Complex cutoffs in
the differential example
Example 8.3 allows a complex-valued cutoff. Its product and jet
calculations already hold for that original choice. The adjoint
calculation displayed there requires a real-valued cutoff; here is the
exact formula for the full stated class. With the same
,
equal to 1 on
,
retain the original operator and its compression:
Both terms of the last symbol remain:
the derivative of the full coefficient
is
.
It is in
,
with normal Fourier support at zero, including the constant
normal-frequency term.
For
,
integration by parts in
gives the complete pairing identity
The boundary contribution is
:
the original factor
kills its value at zero, and the compact support of
kills its value at infinity. Every integral is absolutely convergent.
For
the tangential integral is over
,
with measure one. Theorem 7.3 gives uniqueness of the adjoint symbol, so
(CC1) is its full symbol. Equivalently, (7.5) has zeroth term
,
first term
,
and no later terms. When
,
this proves exactly the earlier display.
The omitted conjugation can change even the sign of the pairing.
Choose real cutoffs
,
with
on
,
on
,
,
and
on a nonempty open interval
about
.
Then
satisfies all the original hypotheses. On
,
its original operator is
;
(CC1) gives
,
while the display without conjugation would give
.
Take a nonzero real
,
and a real tangential
with
,
using
when
.
For
,
the exact values are
Indeed
,
with both endpoint terms zero. Thus conjugation is necessary for the
original complex class. Theorem 7.3 and the antidual extension in
Theorem 9.1 already retain this conjugation. Their proofs and actions
require no change. The product in Example 8.3, its boundary jets and the
delta calculation in Example 11.3 also retain their original
formulas.
9. Extension to distributions
By duality with the adjoints of Section 7, the operators act on
supported and on restricted tempered distributions.
Supported and restricted
distributions
Theorem 9.1 (Extension to distributions). Let
.
For
and
the pairing
,
any Schwartz extension of
,
is well defined, and it identifies
with the space of continuous antilinear functionals on
.
The formula
defines a continuous map
.
For
with zero extension
,
is the zero extension of the function
.
The restriction map
is surjective, and its kernel is
for every
.
Hence
induces a map
.
Identifying
with the antidual of
,
this map is again given by (9.1), now with
.
Every element of
,
and every element of
,
is a weak limit of a sequence in
.
So the action of
on either space is determined by its action on
.
Proof. (a) If two extensions differ by
,
then
in
,
and
by Lemma 3.1. Since
for a Schwartz seminorm
and every extension
,
with the quotient seminorm, so the functional is continuous. Conversely,
a continuous antilinear
on
gives
,
which is linear and continuous on
,
vanishes on
(so
),
and satisfies
.
is continuous on
(Theorem 5.1), so (9.1) defines a continuous map by (a). For
,
by Theorem 7.3(c).
Surjectivity. Let
,
.
There is a Schwartz seminorm
with
.
On the subspace
(restriction is injective on it),
equals the corresponding sum of suprema over
,
a continuous seminorm
of
by Lemma 3.2(a). The antilinear functional
on this subspace is bounded by
.
By the Hahn–Banach theorem in seminorm form (Section 1), applied to the
linear functional
,
it extends to
with the same bound. By (a) the extension is some
,
and
on
.
So
.
Kernel. An element of
that vanishes in
has support in
;
conversely
forces
on
.
Let
.
Being tempered,
satisfies
for some
.
Let
equal 1 on
and vanish outside
,
and
.
For
,
vanishes near
,
so
.
A derivative of order
of
is a sum of terms of size
,
,
on
;
each is
,
with the weights
carried by
.
So
,
that is,
.
Let
and
.
Then
.
The jets of
of order
vanish, so by Theorem 5.1(d) those of
do too, and Lemma 3.2(d) writes it as
,
.
So
.
For the last assertion:
is
modulo the distributions vanishing in
,
and these are exactly the tempered distributions that annihilate the
closed subspace
(one inclusion is Lemma 3.1 with the half spaces exchanged, the other
holds because
).
With the Hahn–Banach theorem this identifies
with the antidual of
.
If
restricts to
and
,
then
(Theorem 5.1(d)) and
.
Let
.
Choose
with
and
equal to 1 near 0, and put
,
.
Then
,
since
.
For
,
,
and
in
.
So
weakly. Restricting gives the statement for
.
Both actions of
are weakly continuous, being transposes of continuous maps.
In the ordinary calculus one works modulo smooth functions, the range
of operators of order
.
Here one also loses the distributions supported on the boundary when
passing to
:
they are the kernel (9.2).
By (e), the composition formula
of Theorem 8.1 holds on
and on
as well. Indeed, both sides are weakly continuous, and by (b) they agree
on
.
Residual
operators produce conormal distributions
Lemma 9.2 (Bounded order implies conormality). Let
.
Suppose there is
such that every
has order at most
on every compact set (the constants may depend on
and the set). Then
.
Proof. If
has order
near the support of
,
then
,
so
and
.
Products of first-order operators whose principal symbols vanish on
are, by Hadamard’s lemma and the commutation argument of Proposition
2.1(c), finite sums of smooth functions times
;
multiplication by smooth functions preserves the local order. So all
these products map
into
.
By the definition of conormal distributions in Section 1, this says that
,
since
.
Theorem 9.3 (Conormal outputs). Let
and
.
Then
and
for some
.
More precisely, if
,
then there is
,
depending only on
and
,
such that every
has order at most
on every compact set, and
.
Proof. The support statement is part of Theorem 9.1.
Since
is continuous on
,
a bound of the stated form holds by Lemma 3.2(a). For
,
using the formal adjoints
and (5.4),
By Theorem 5.1(a), applied in the fixed
class
,
there are
(depending only on
and
)
and a seminorm
with
.
For
supported in a fixed compact set the right side is at most
.
So the order is at most
,
with constants depending on
only through
.
Lemma 9.2 finishes the proof.
In particular the wave front set of
lies in the conormal bundle of the boundary, since this holds for every
element of
(Section 1).
10. Boundedness on
,
Sobolev and Besov spaces
Operators of order 0 are bounded on
.
We prove this first. Then we extend it to Sobolev spaces of integer
order, using the commutator identities and duality, and to all real
orders and all Besov exponents by interpolation.
Boundedness on
Theorem 10.1 (Boundedness on
).
If
,
then
extends to a bounded operator on
,
with norm bounded in terms of finitely many seminorms of
.
Proof.Step A (order
).
For
,
Proposition 6.4 and the proved Schur test in Section1.1, whose
raw-integral assertion applies here to Lebesgue measure, give
for
,
since
.
Restrictions of Schwartz functions are dense in
.
Step B (doubling). Suppose every operator with symbol in
is bounded, and let
.
For
,
Theorems 7.3 and 8.1 give
with
(writing
for the composition symbol of Theorem 8.1). So
.
Step C. By Steps A–B, operators with symbols in
are bounded for
,
then for
,
and so on; after finitely many steps, for every
.
Step D (order 0). Let
and
.
The function
lies in
:
it is
with
smooth on a neighbourhood of the closed range and
,
so by the chain rule every derivative is a sum of products containing at
least one derivative of
(or
itself, since
),
which gives the decay in
.
Let
(Lemma 4.4). For
,
using
,
and
.
The symbol
is lacunary. Its leading part, by Theorem 7.3(a) and (8.3), is
modulo
(recall
and
is real). This equals
.
So
,
is bounded by Step C, and
.
Matrix-valued symbols. For
with values in
take
and
The full square-root series, including
its constant term, is
The square root is positive;
is its displayed difference from
.
For
,
the ordered power series and all its real and imaginary entry
derivatives converge uniformly. Its first term is
;
hence
and its first derivative at zero is zero. The square root itself equals
there. The product and chain rules, with the uniform derivative bounds
on this ball, prove
.
The leading symbol of
,
with all identities explicit, is
Thus the same ordered proof applies,
with the input and output vector dimensions retained.
Sobolev spaces on the half
space
Let
,
with the norm of
,
and let
be the space of restrictions, with
.
Define
in the same way as
.
We prove the three facts about these spaces that we need.
Proposition 10.2 (Sobolev spaces on the half
space).
is dense in
,
and
is dense in
,
for every real
.
The sesquilinear form
,
for
and
any extension of
,
is well defined. It identifies each of
and
isometrically with the antidual of the other. For
,
it equals
.
Let
be an integer. For
,
.
For
,
with
,
Proof. (a) Let
.
The translates
,
supported in
,
converge to
in
as
,
by dominated convergence on the Fourier side. Mollifying with a kernel
supported in
gives smooth functions supported in
,
converging in
;
these lie in
for every
.
Cutting off with
converges in
for integers
(Leibniz’ rule and dominated convergence), hence in
.
The second statement holds because
is dense in
and restriction is continuous and onto.
and
are each other’s antiduals, isometrically, under this form:
Cauchy–Schwarz with the weights
,
with equality for
.
If
in
,
then
for
,
and by (a)
for all
;
so the form is well defined, and the annihilator of
in
is exactly
.
A continuous antilinear functional on the closed subspace
extends with the same norm to
(orthogonal projection) and is then represented by some
;
two representatives differ by an element of the annihilator. So the
antidual of
is
modulo the annihilator, that is
,
and the norms agree (the infimum over the coset is at most the norm of
the norm-preserving extension). Conversely, a functional on the quotient
is a functional on
vanishing on the annihilator; it is represented by
orthogonal to the annihilator, and the double annihilator of the closed
subspace
is itself. The last statement is Plancherel.
The identity is Plancherel with
.
For (10.1), any extension
gives
.
For the other inequality, let
solve the Vandermonde system
,
(the nodes
are distinct). For
let
on
and
for
.
The normal derivatives of order
from both sides agree on
,
so
,
and
.
Hence
on the dense set
,
and by continuity of both sides everywhere.
Sobolev continuity at
integer orders
Theorem 10.3 (Integer orders). Let
and
.
Then
is bounded on
and on
.
These bounded operators are the restrictions of the maps of Theorem
9.1.
Proof. Iterating the commutator identities (5.1)
gives, for every
,
each
being a constant-coefficient combination of
-
and
-derivatives
of
,
linear in
.
(Indeed
,
and
.)
Nonnegative
,
supported spaces. For
,
(Theorem 5.1(d)), and its derivatives on
are the zero extensions of the derivatives in
.
By Proposition 10.2(c), (10.2) and Theorem 10.1,
.
By density (Proposition 10.2(a))
extends to
.
Nonnegative
,
restricted spaces. For
,
(10.1), (10.2) and Theorem 10.1 give
;
then use density.
Negative
.
Let
.
For
and
,
Theorem 7.3 gives
,
so
by the supported case for
.
By Proposition 10.2(a),(b),
,
and density extends
.
In the same way, for
and
,
,
which bounds
on
.
Consistency. The maps of Theorem 9.1 are weakly continuous,
the spaces here embed continuously into
or
,
and the two definitions agree on the dense subspaces used above.
All real orders and all
Besov exponents
Lemma 10.4 (A mollifier supported in the half
space). Let
with
,
and put
.
Then
,
,
and for all
With
and
,
Proof.
.
is a Schwartz function, and
since
;
this gives (10.3). For (10.4) with
:
the first integral is at most
(as
),
and the second at most
.
For
substitute
and extend to
:
the integrals become
and
,
which converge because
,
and
.
The quadratic vanishing of
at 0 is needed for
,
and it cannot be had with
:
see Example 10.5. That is why
is built from
in this way.
Example 10.5 (A positive mollifier is not good
enough). Let
with
.
Its first moment
has
,
and
.
For
we get
when
is small, so
for
.
So the second inequality of (10.4) fails for
,
and it fails for every
supported in
:
quadratic vanishing forces
,
which is impossible when
and
on the support. The function
of Lemma 10.4 takes negative values.
Theorem 10.6 (Sobolev and Besov continuity). Let
,
and
.
Then
is bounded on
.
In particular:
()
is bounded on
,
and, by duality with
(Proposition 10.2(b)), on
,
for every real
.
()
is bounded on
.
First proof, for
(continuous interpolation). Write
with
,
,
and let
.
The pieces
and
are supported in
,
because
;
they lie in
and
.
By (10.4) and Fubini,
Put
,
and
.
By Theorem 10.3 the same integral with
in place of the two pieces is at most
.
If
,
then
.
Multiply by
and integrate over these
(all in
):
the left side becomes
with
,
and the right side is at most the integrand of the previous display,
evaluated for
at the frequency
.
Integrating in
gives
.
Second proof, for all
(dyadic form). Let
as before and
.
Since
for every
(the squares
are at most
times the square of the norm in
,
so they are summable) and
,
.
For each
put
,
,
.
Then
(the maps of Theorems 9.1 and 10.3 agree), and, since
is comparable to
on
,
On
,
and
by (10.3). With
this gives
For
both brackets are at most
:
for
they are
and
;
for
they are
and
.
Since
,
we get
.
Convolution with the summable sequence
is bounded on
for every
,
by the triangle inequality for translates (Section 1), so
.
Finally
is supported in
.
The dyadic proof treats all
at once and contains the case
.
11. Conormal distributions
are preserved
Let
be the set of operators
with
and any
.
For
put
the distributions supported in the
closed half space that are conormal to the boundary uniformly at
infinity.
Lemma 11.1 (Exact compositions). Let
.
If
has order
,
then
on
,
where
with
from (2.1).
Let
be even and
.
Then
is the operator with compressed symbol
,
and for
If
and
is an even integer with
,
then
with
.
Proof. (a) By (5.3),
for
,
and
,
because
.
So
and
,
and
.
These symbol operators preserve lacunarity and raise the order by at
most one (the factor
is absorbed by the decay in
).
By (2.1),
,
which gives (11.2).
Expanding
and quantizing on the left gives
.
By (5.5),
.
Expanding
shows
.
Let
equal 1 near 0; then
.
Put
.
Given
,
put
(Lemma 4.4) and
.
Then
since the first two terms are in
and the last is in
by (b); it is lacunary as a combination of lacunary symbols. After
steps with
,
,
with
and
.
Theorem 11.2 (Conormal distributions are preserved).
Let
and
.
.
For every real
and every
,
.
If
and
,
then
.
Proof. (a) Let
and
.
By (2.1),
is a sum of words in the tangent operators
()
and
,
times
functions. By the definition of conormal distributions (Section 1),
these words map
into
,
since
;
and multiplication by
preserves that space.
has compact support, so
with
equal to 1 near
.
For the second inclusion, let
be first-order operators on
whose principal symbols vanish on
,
and
.
By Hadamard’s lemma and the commutation argument of Proposition 2.1,
is an element of
(with compactly supported coefficients). So
for
,
which is the definition of
.
Let
and
of order
.
By Lemma 11.1(a),
with
.
Choose an even
,
,
and write
as in Lemma 11.1(c). Then
.
These identities hold on
,
hence on
:
both sides are weakly continuous and agree on
(Theorem 9.1(e)). They agree there because every element of
commutes with extension by zero: if
has zero extension
,
then
and the zero extension of
differ by terms
with
,
and these vanish. With Theorem 9.1(b), both sides therefore send
to the zero extension of the same function. Now
because
,
it is supported in
,
and
(take
).
By Theorem 10.6 with
,
and
are bounded on
.
So
for every
,
that is,
.
follows from (a) and (b).
The order
of
plays no role: conormal distributions are infinitely regular in the
directions of the totally characteristic operators, so any loss of order
can be moved onto the elliptic b-operator
,
which conormality controls. The exact formulas (11.2)–(11.3) do not need
the coefficients of
to decay in
,
as the composition theorem would; this is what allows the global class
in (b). Without conormality nothing of this kind holds; see Example
11.3.
Example 11.3 (Besov regularity alone is not
preserved at positive order). Let
be as in Example 8.3, of order 1, and
with
.
Then
and
has compact support, but
is not conormal to the boundary. The exact distributional identity is
Editorial correction to the Fourier lower bound. It
holds on a bounded tangential set where
is bounded below, rather than at every point of
.
Since Fourier inversion and
imply
,
continuity gives a bounded set
of positive measure and a constant
with
on
.
In dimension one,
,
with its measure one and the nonzero scalar
.
For sufficiently large
,
Thus
,
so
.
For the original input, integration over
is bounded above by integration over
and all tangential frequencies, giving
The order-zero annulus is finite as
well, so the stated input membership follows. It is not conormal to the
boundary: it is singular on
wherever
,
whereas a boundary-conormal distribution is smooth off
.
Conormality is what makes the order irrelevant in Theorem 11.2.
12. Residual
operators need not gain regularity
An ordinary pseudodifferential operator of order
maps every Sobolev space into every other. For totally characteristic
operators this fails: the singularity of the kernel at the corner
(Remark 6.3) can prevent any gain.
Theorem 12.1 (No gain of regularity). Let
with resolved kernel
(Theorem 6.2).
Suppose that for some
there is
with
which holds in particular if
maps
continuously into
.
Then
for all
.
There are
with
.
For these,
maps no
into any
with
.
There are also
,
,
for which
maps
into
for all
.
Proof. (a) Test functions. Let
,
,
and integers
.
Put
,
,
and
,
,
.
Then
,
so
For
the weight is at most
.
For
it is at most
,
and
,
so the integral is finite if
.
Hence
when
,
and likewise for
.
Choosing
and
,
(12.1) gives
.
The limit. By Theorem 6.2(b),
.
Substitute
,
.
Since
with
,
and
is bounded with decay in
,
while
stay in a compact subset of
,
dominated convergence gives
So this integral vanishes for all
choices above.
Conclusion. Let
,
a smooth function on
,
homogeneous of degree
.
Integrating by parts in
and
,
the vanishing says
for all
,
so
.
Hence, for fixed
,
is a polynomial of degree
.
But
with
,
and
is smooth on
and flat at
(as
,
,
where
vanishes to infinite order); so
as
,
and the polynomial is 0. So
,
and the same argument in
(now using
)
gives
.
As
are arbitrary and
takes every value in
,
for
;
for
it vanishes anyway.
Let
and
,
and put
.
Then
and
,
which vanishes for
;
so
is (strongly) lacunary. By (6.6),
,
and
runs through
as
runs through
;
so
.
By (a), no gain is possible.
Let
,
,
and
with
as in (b). On
,
is bounded above and below, so
is an ordinary symbol of order
on
,
and
maps
into
for all
,
by the Sobolev continuity of ordinary pseudodifferential operators
(Section 1). Its outputs are supported in
.
Here
for
.
So a residual operator may or may not improve regularity: by (b) some
gain nothing at all, and by (c) others gain every amount. The reason for
(a) is dilation invariance. Near the corner the kernel is
,
homogeneous of degree
in
.
Normal dilations
preserve the
norm but change the
norms of normal oscillations by different powers of
,
so an operator that commutes with them cannot gain derivatives unless it
vanishes. Test functions with vanishing normal moments make the argument
work at every
:
with generic bumps the norms
are of size
for
,
and the estimate then says nothing when
or
.
13. Exercises
Exercise 1. Express
in the basis
,
and check the result on
for
.
Solution. Write
.
By (2.1),
and
.
Hence
.
Check:
,
so
,
while the right side gives
.
Exercise 2. Show that the pointwise product of two
lacunary symbols need not be lacunary, although by Theorem 8.1 the
composition symbol always is.
Solution. With
we have
,
so supports add. Take
,
with
,
,
and
.
Then
is a multiple of
,
which is supported in
and is not zero (its Fourier transform is a multiple of
).
So
is not lacunary.
Exercise 3. Show that on
,
for
,
so commutators with the generators of
do not raise the order, unlike
.
Solution. By the proof of Lemma 11.1(a),
and
.
By (5.4),
and
.
Subtract. Since
is absorbed by the decay in
,
.
In contrast
by (5.1), and
is not in
.
Exercise 4. For the symbol of Example 6.6, find the
ratios
at which the kernel can be nonzero, and show directly that
is smooth for
.
Solution.
requires
,
that is
.
In the formula for
,
requires
,
that is
.
On this interval
,
so
is a product of smooth functions of
for
,
with support in
;
it vanishes near
.
The two descriptions agree, because
maps
onto
.
Exercise 5. Let
and
with
.
Show that
and compute
.
Solution. By (5.2) with
,
.
With
,
,
where
.
The first term is the value of the symbol at the boundary with the
normal frequency compressed to 0; the second is a correction of order
.
14. Positive
order on both original Sobolev spaces
The following proof extends the zero-order bounds without changing
the compressed operator or its distribution action.
The original theorem and
spaces
Let
,
,
and let
take values in
,
with
fixed finite positive integers. Use the original symbol estimates
The forward Fourier kernel is
,
,
and
The full-space norm is
.
The supported space is the closed subspace of this
consisting of distributions supported in
.
The restricted space is its original ambient restriction quotient, with
the infimum norm over
extensions. Neither space is replaced.
We prove
continuously. For each fixed
,
a finite sum
of the original symbol seminorms bounds both operator norms. The maps
agree with the original distribution action in Theorem 9.1.
Exact integer-order
decomposition
Fix the same normal convolution
as Lemma 4.4, including its inverse Fourier convention,
near zero and
.
For an integer
and
,
put
Every
.
Lemma 4.4 gives
and
,
continuously with all the stipulated seminorms. Thus
.
It is lacunary because the first definition in (PS4) is a difference of
lacunary symbols. The residual sum in the second definition is retained
exactly; its separate summands need not themselves be lacunary.
Multiplication of a symbol by
preserves every original order and lacunarity: a weighted seminorm uses
one extra
-decay
seminorm, and differentiating
produces only a derivative of
.
On the original test spaces the exact left-quantization identity is
In the normal term the uncompressed
derivative frequency is
;
the left factor
supplies precisely the original compression
.
No derivative is commuted past this factor.
The zero-order theorem is the induction base, for every real
,
on both spaces. Suppose the bound of order
has been proved for every
.
Each ambient
has norm at most one, since
.
Derivatives preserve supported distributions and descend continuously to
the restriction quotient. Hence every derivative term in (PS5) maps
index
to
.
The term
maps index
to
,
which embeds into index
with norm at most one. The same inequality descends to quotient norms.
This proves both integer bounds, with finite original symbol seminorm
control.
The identities initially hold on supported or restricted Schwartz
test functions. Candidate Proposition 10.2(a) gives density for every
real index, and Theorem 9.1 gives their weakly continuous distribution
actions. Consequently the bounded extensions retain precisely (PS5) and
the original distribution action; no boundary delta term is removed by
an arbitrary extension. The supported proof uses functions smooth and
flat on the boundary before taking density.
A
support-preserving exact change of Sobolev index
Set
In dimension one the first term is
,
with its zero-dimensional Fourier factor. The full factor
is retained. In particular
It follows by the original Plancherel
norm that
For real
this is equality. The inverse is the literal multiplier
,
so the real-index map is an isometry onto the full
,
and it will be an isometry of the supported subspaces once support is
proved. All multipliers have smooth derivatives of polynomial growth;
they act continuously on
.
On each bounded real strip their Schwartz operator seminorms grow at
most as a polynomial in
times
.
This follows by differentiating the full
:
every derivative is a finite sum of derivatives of
,
powers of
,
and polynomial factors in
.
Parameter derivatives add powers of
,
bounded by any fixed positive power of
,
which proves holomorphy on the test spaces.
Here is a proof of support, with the transform constants. For
,
the elementary Laplace identity gives
It is valid first for positive real
by substitution in the gamma integral and then for
by holomorphy and the identity theorem.
For clarity, the gamma denominator here is nonzero. Integration by
parts in the beta integral gives
Multiply by
and put
.
The integrand is bounded in modulus by
on
,
so dominated convergence gives
.
Rewriting the finite product, its limit is
The latter real limit exists by
integral comparison; the complex series converges absolutely, with
summands
.
Each logarithm is in the right half-plane branch, so the displayed value
is nonzero. This proves the division in (PS9), including complex
.
Let
In dimension one
.
The inverse Fourier kernel of (PS9) is
This is a tempered distribution: near
zero the tested integrand has the integrable bound
,
and at infinity the factor
,
with finitely many test seminorms, makes it integrable. The kernel is
supported in
.
The tangential Fourier factor is exactly
;
inverse transformation of
is the displayed delta, without an extra factor.
For arbitrary
,
choose an integer
with
.
Then
.
The second multiplier has the kernel (PS10); the first is the finite
operator
.
Tangential multipliers and normal derivatives preserve normal support.
Thus
preserves support for every
.
More explicitly, its action on a Schwartz function supported in the
positive half space has that support by (PS10) and the finite operator;
the one-sided mollification and compact cutoff approximation in Theorem
9.1(e) extends this conclusion to every supported tempered distribution.
All the operators are continuous on
,
so the support is retained in the weak limit. The same argument applies
to
.
It follows that, for real
,
are inverse isometries, with exactly
the original full-space norms. This proves the support-preserving index
change rather than assuming that the multiplier
preserves half-space support.
The
original analytic symbol family and the strip estimate
Fix
,
with
an integer, and retain
The residual contribution is present
for every
;
exactly. For each
,
.
Frequency differentiation of the displayed scalar factor yields finite
polynomials in
,
the full powers of
,
and the original frequency coordinates. Hence each indicated symbol
seminorm is bounded by
,
uniformly on this real strip, with a finite original seminorm
.
The convolution and residual bounds of Lemma 4.4 retain the same
property. Holomorphy holds in any fixed slightly larger symbol order,
such as
:
parameter derivatives produce powers of
,
which the one extra order bounds. No assertion of
order-
holomorphy at its borderline is needed.
For
in the original supported Schwartz spaces of dimensions
,
respectively, set
This is holomorphic on the strip,
continuous on its closed boundary. The preceding test-space estimates
and Theorem 5.1 bound its growth throughout the strip by
. On the
two boundary lines, the proved integer bounds, (PS8) and (PS11) give
Take a single finite seminorm
large enough for both endpoints. The zero-order norm depends
continuously on finitely many original symbol seminorms, as proved in
Section 10. Rescaling a symbol by their sum gives a linear bound in that
sum; the integer induction uses only continuous linear symbol
operations. Thus the stated
bounds are homogeneous, including
.
For any fixed
,
multiply
by
.
Its boundary bounds now have finite constants
,
since
is bounded. Its modulus tends to zero on the horizontal edges of large
rectangles in the strip. Dividing it by
and multiplying by
makes the two vertical-edge bounds at most one. The maximum principle on
these rectangles, followed by their expanding limit, therefore gives
The zero-seminorm or zero-test-function
case is immediate and does not require dividing by zero. This is the
required strip estimate with its growth control proved.
Since
,
duality in the supported
space and density of its Schwartz subspace show that
is bounded on supported
.
Conjugating by the exact isometries (PS11) gives the supported bound
(PS3) for this real
,
with finite original seminorm control. Together with the integer case it
covers every
and every real
.
The bounded extension agrees with the original supported distribution
action by test-space density and its weak continuity.
The full restriction
quotient
Theorem 7.3 gives
,
continuously and conjugate-linearly, with the original reversed vector
dimensions. Apply the supported result at the index
:
For the supported/restricted duality of
Proposition 10.2(b),
The antidual of
is exactly
with its original quotient norm, so (PS17) proves the restricted bound,
without choosing or identifying a supported extension of the restricted
input. Density and Theorem 9.1(d) retain the original quotient
distribution action. This completes both assertions of (PS3).
For
,
the same zero-order membership proves boundedness at the same index, but
the argument above does not assert a gain of
.
Theorem 12.1 gives nonzero residual examples forbidding every such gain.
The original residual term, and this exact limitation, remain part of
the calculus.
Figure PS-F1. PS6–PS11 keeps the full
multiplier sqrt(1+|xi’|^2)+i xi_n, the original weighted norm, Gamma(q),
the inverse Fourier factor and normal kernel support, with Re q>0.
PS12–PS15 uses integer M>m and epsilon>0, retaining the residual
in A_z. The strip is a schematic with 0<m<M. All four spaces and
arrows have their original vector dimensions; PS16–PS17 gives the
restriction quotient. The figure source is
figures/positive_order_halfspace.py.
Where this leads
Operators of positive order. An operator with symbol in
,
,
maps
continuously into
(Section 14). So the order bounds the loss of regularity, while by
Theorem 12.1 an operator of negative order need not gain any.
The global calculus. The class is invariant under changes
of variables that preserve the boundary, so it makes sense on manifolds
with boundary. Its kernels live on the product blown up at the corner,
as in Section 6, and the calculus has principal symbols, wave front sets
and a notion of ellipticity. This is Melrose’s b-calculus. The free
author version [Melrose] develops its index theory, and [Loya] surveys
related Dirac-operator constructions.
Not treated here. We do not discuss whether, conversely,
the vanishing of the resolved kernel
on the front face makes a residual operator improve regularity. Nor do
we treat continuity on the restricted Besov spaces
for
,
which would need a duality theorem for dyadic Besov spaces on the half
space. For
these are the spaces
of Theorem 10.6.