AN-04 proof edition · CC0; exact source credit and separately licensed prerequisites

Boundary operators of every nonnegative real order

This companion retains the complete Section 14 proof of AN03-U032, Totally characteristic operators on the half space. Original author: Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), September 2026; editorial additions: Codex, September 2026; both CC0. Exact prerequisite connections and the analytic justifications below: AN-04 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex, 5 October 2026, CC0. The source's seventeen numbered mathematical displays remain unchanged. Its original illustration is retained with the final output label corrected: vv is an operator output, while Ff,g(m)F_{f,g}(m) is the scalar pairing (v,g)(v,g).

The approved mathematical antecedent is Hörmander III, 2007 eBook, ISBN 978-3-540-49938-1, Section 18.3. Reading, proof construction and ordinary citation are valid. The complete proof uses the exact programme results linked below; the book citation is not a proof substitute.

Exact earlier proofs

Original section numbers below refer to the four components of the local boundary calculus. Its kernel component proves the full residual bounds; its operator component proves complete composition, adjoints and actual distribution actions; its continuity component proves the order-zero estimates for every real index, full quotient duality, homogeneous finite-seminorm bounds and the residual no-gain obstruction.

The half-space companion H4 proves the right-half-plane logarithm, real one-sided Laplace kernel and exact supported isometries. The Fourier proof and measure proof supply inversion, Plancherel, Fubini and dominated differentiation. The elementary exponential and real integration proofs are in the earlier stationary-phase foundations. Each earlier component retains its own licence.

Analytic facts used in the strip argument

All scalar holomorphic functions below are constructed with continuous real derivatives of every order and the Cauchy--Riemann equations. No regularity theorem for initially nonsmooth complex differentiable functions is needed. On the right half-plane use

L(h+iτ)=12log⁡(h2+τ2)+iarctan⁡(τ/h),h>0.(PB1) L(h+i\tau)=\tfrac12\log(h^2+\tau^2)+i\arctan(\tau/h),\qquad h>0. \tag{PB1}

The direct derivatives are Lh=(h+iτ)−1L_h=(h+i\tau)^{-1} and Lτ=i(h+iτ)−1L_\tau=i(h+i\tau)^{-1}. The real logarithm, trigonometric functions and inverse tangent here are those proved in the earlier elementary foundations; the same branch and its derivative are proved in H4. Thus LL is smooth and satisfies Cauchy--Riemann, and exp⁡(zL)\exp(zL) is entire in zz. Its parameter derivatives are Ljexp⁡(zL)L^j\exp(zL).

Here is the exact rectangle maximum estimate needed below. If a complex function G=u+ivG=u+iv is C2C^2 on a neighborhood of a closed rectangle and satisfies Cauchy--Riemann in it, differentiating those equations gives Δu=Δv=0\Delta u=\Delta v=0, and hence

Δ∣G∣2=4(ux2+uy2)=4∣G′∣2≥0.(PB2) \Delta |G|^2=4\bigl(u_x^2+u_y^2\bigr)=4|G'|^2\ge0. \tag{PB2}

For δ>0\delta>0, the real function ∣G∣2+δ(x2+y2)|G|^2+\delta(x^2+y^2) has strictly positive Laplacian. Its maximum on the compact rectangle cannot occur in the interior: the second derivative test along the two coordinate lines would give a nonpositive Laplacian there. The maximum is therefore on the boundary. Its boundary value is at most sup⁡∂R∣G∣2+δsup⁡∂R(x2+y2)\sup_{\partial R}|G|^2+\delta\sup_{\partial R}(x^2+y^2). Letting δ↓0\delta\downarrow0 gives sup⁡R∣G∣≤sup⁡∂R∣G∣\sup_R|G|\le\sup_{\partial R}|G|. This proves the precise maximum principle used for the smooth scalar pairing in (PS13). Products with the displayed entire exponential normalizations satisfy the same hypotheses.

14. Positive order on both original Sobolev spaces

The following proof extends the zero-order bounds without changing the compressed operator or its distribution action.

The original theorem and spaces

Let m≥0m\ge0, s∈Rs\in\mathbb R, and let a∈Slama\in S^m_{\mathrm{la}} take values in L(Cp,Cq)L(\mathbb C^p,\mathbb C^q), with p,qp,q fixed finite positive integers. Use the original symbol estimates

∣∂ξα∂xβa(x,ξ)∣≤Cαβν(1+∣ξ∣)m−∣α∣(1+xn)−ν,xn≥0,ν≥0,supp⁡Fna⊂[−1,∞).(PS1) |\partial_\xi^\alpha\partial_x^\beta a(x,\xi)| \le C_{\alpha\beta\nu} (1+|\xi|)^{m-|\alpha|}(1+x_n)^{-\nu}, \quad x_n\ge0,\quad \nu\ge0, \qquad \operatorname{supp}\mathcal F_n a\subset[-1,\infty). \tag{PS1}

The forward Fourier kernel is e−ix⋅ξe^{-ix\cdot\xi}, D=−i∂D=-i\partial, and

a♭(x,ξ)=a(x,ξ′,xnξn)(xn≥0),a♭(x,ξ)=0(xn<0),Tau=(2π)−n∫eix⋅ξa♭(x,ξ)u^(ξ) dξ.(PS2) a^\flat(x,\xi)=a(x,\xi',x_n\xi_n)\quad(x_n\ge0),\qquad a^\flat(x,\xi)=0\quad(x_n<0),\qquad T_a u=(2\pi)^{-n}\int e^{ix\cdot\xi}a^\flat(x,\xi)\widehat u(\xi)\,d\xi . \tag{PS2}

The full-space norm is ∥u∥(s)2=(2π)−n∫(1+∣ξ∣2)s∣u^(ξ)∣2 dξ\|u\|_{(s)}^2=(2\pi)^{-n}\int(1+|\xi|^2)^s|\widehat u(\xi)|^2\,d\xi. The supported space is the closed subspace of this H(s)H_{(s)} consisting of distributions supported in {xn≥0}\{x_n\ge0\}. The restricted space is its original ambient restriction quotient, with the infimum norm over H(s)H_{(s)} extensions. Neither space is replaced.

We prove

Ta:H˙(s)(R‾+n;Cp)⟶H˙(s−m)(R‾+n;Cq),Ta:H‾(s)(R+n;Cp)⟶H‾(s−m)(R+n;Cq)(PS3) T_a:\dot H_{(s)}(\overline{\mathbb R}{}^n_+;\mathbb C^p) \longrightarrow \dot H_{(s-m)}(\overline{\mathbb R}{}^n_+;\mathbb C^q), \qquad T_a:\overline H_{(s)}(\mathbb R^n_+;\mathbb C^p) \longrightarrow \overline H_{(s-m)}(\mathbb R^n_+;\mathbb C^q) \tag{PS3}

continuously. For each fixed m,sm,s, a finite sum pm,s(a)p_{m,s}(a) of the original symbol seminorms bounds both operator norms. The maps agree with the original distribution action in Theorem 9.1.

Exact integer-order decomposition

Fix the same normal convolution ρ\rho as Lemma 4.4, including its inverse Fourier convention, ρ^=1\widehat\rho=1 near zero and supp⁡ρ^⊂(−1/2,1)\operatorname{supp}\widehat\rho\subset(-1/2,1). For an integer M≥1M\ge1 and a∈SlaMa\in S^M_{\mathrm{la}}, put

wj=ξja1+∣ξ∣2,aj=(wj)ρ(1≤j≤n),a0=a−∑j=1nξjaj=a1+∣ξ∣2+∑j=1nξj(wj−aj).(PS4) w_j=\frac{\xi_j a}{1+|\xi|^2},\quad a_j=(w_j)_\rho\quad(1\le j\le n),\qquad a_0=a-\sum_{j=1}^n\xi_j a_j =\frac{a}{1+|\xi|^2} +\sum_{j=1}^n\xi_j(w_j-a_j). \tag{PS4}

Every wj∈S+M−1w_j\in S^{M-1}_+. Lemma 4.4 gives aj∈SlaM−1a_j\in S^{M-1}_{\mathrm{la}} and wj−aj∈S+−∞w_j-a_j\in S^{-\infty}_+, continuously with all the stipulated seminorms. Thus a0∈S+M−2⊂S+M−1a_0\in S^{M-2}_+\subset S^{M-1}_+. It is lacunary because the first definition in (PS4) is a difference of lacunary symbols. The residual sum in the second definition is retained exactly; its separate summands need not themselves be lacunary.

Multiplication of a symbol by xnx_n preserves every original order and lacunarity: a weighted seminorm uses one extra xnx_n-decay seminorm, and differentiating xnx_n produces only a derivative of aja_j. On the original test spaces the exact left-quantization identity is

Ta=∑j<nTajDj+TxnanDn+Ta0=∑j<nTajDj+xnTanDn+Ta0.(PS5) T_a=\sum_{j<n}T_{a_j}D_j+ T_{x_n a_n}D_n+T_{a_0} =\sum_{j<n}T_{a_j}D_j+ x_n T_{a_n}D_n+T_{a_0}. \tag{PS5}

In the normal term the uncompressed derivative frequency is ξn\xi_n; the left factor xnx_n supplies precisely the original compression xnξnx_n\xi_n. No derivative is commuted past this factor.

The zero-order theorem is the induction base, for every real ss, on both spaces. Suppose the bound of order M−1M-1 has been proved for every ss. Each ambient Dj:H(s)→H(s−1)D_j:H_{(s)}\to H_{(s-1)} has norm at most one, since ∣ξj∣2≤1+∣ξ∣2|\xi_j|^2\le1+|\xi|^2. Derivatives preserve supported distributions and descend continuously to the restriction quotient. Hence every derivative term in (PS5) maps index ss to s−Ms-M. The term Ta0T_{a_0} maps index ss to s−(M−1)s-(M-1), which embeds into index s−Ms-M with norm at most one. The same inequality descends to quotient norms. This proves both integer bounds, with finite original symbol seminorm control.

The identities initially hold on supported or restricted Schwartz test functions. Proposition 10.2(a) gives density for every real index, and Theorem 9.1 gives their weakly continuous distribution actions. Consequently the bounded extensions retain precisely (PS5) and the original distribution action; no boundary delta term is removed by an arbitrary extension. The supported proof uses functions smooth and flat on the boundary before taking density.

A support-preserving exact change of Sobolev index

Set

ℓ(ξ)=1+∣ξ′∣2+iξn,−π2<arg⁡ℓ<π2,Λ+z=F−1ℓ(ξ)zF,ℓz=exp⁡(zlog⁡ℓ).(PS6) \ell(\xi)=\sqrt{1+|\xi'|^2}+i\xi_n,\qquad -\frac{\pi}{2}<\arg\ell<\frac{\pi}{2},\qquad \Lambda_+^z=\mathcal F^{-1}\ell(\xi)^z\mathcal F, \quad \ell^z=\exp(z\log\ell). \tag{PS6}

In dimension one the first term is 11, with its zero-dimensional Fourier factor. The full factor ℓ\ell is retained. In particular

∣ℓ∣2=1+∣ξ′∣2+ξn2=1+∣ξ∣2,∣ℓz∣=(1+∣ξ∣2)Re⁡z/2e−Im⁡z arg⁡ℓ.(PS7) |\ell|^2=1+|\xi'|^2+\xi_n^2=1+|\xi|^2,\qquad |\ell^z|=(1+|\xi|^2)^{\operatorname{Re}z/2} e^{-\operatorname{Im}z\,\arg\ell}. \tag{PS7}

It follows by the original Plancherel norm that

∥Λ+zu∥(r−Re⁡z)≤eπ∣Im⁡z∣/2∥u∥(r).(PS8) \|\Lambda_+^z u\|_{(r-\operatorname{Re}z)} \le e^{\pi|\operatorname{Im}z|/2}\|u\|_{(r)}. \tag{PS8}

For real zz this is equality. The inverse is the literal multiplier Λ+−z\Lambda_+^{-z}, so the real-index map is an isometry onto the full H(r−z)H_{(r-z)}, and it will be an isometry of the supported subspaces once support is proved. All multipliers have smooth derivatives of polynomial growth; they act continuously on S,S′\mathcal S,\mathcal S'. On each bounded real strip their Schwartz operator seminorms grow at most as a polynomial in ∣Im⁡z∣|\operatorname{Im}z| times eπ∣Im⁡z∣/2e^{\pi|\operatorname{Im}z|/2}. This follows by differentiating the full ℓz\ell^z: every derivative is a finite sum of derivatives of ℓ\ell, powers of ℓ−1\ell^{-1}, and polynomial factors in zz. Parameter derivatives add powers of log⁡ℓ\log\ell, bounded by any fixed positive power of 1+∣ξ∣1+|\xi|, which proves holomorphy on the test spaces.

Here is a proof of support, with the transform constants. For Re⁡q>0\operatorname{Re}q>0, the elementary Laplace identity gives

ℓ−q=1Γ(q)∫0∞tq−1e−t1+∣ξ′∣2e−itξn dt.(PS9) \ell^{-q}=\frac1{\Gamma(q)} \int_0^\infty t^{q-1} e^{-t\sqrt{1+|\xi'|^2}}e^{-it\xi_n}\,dt . \tag{PS9}

We prove this identity for every complex qq with Re⁡q>0\operatorname{Re}q>0, without leaving an identity theorem as a prerequisite. Write ℓ=h+iτ\ell=h+i\tau, h>0h>0, and I(τ)=∫0∞tq−1e−(h+iτ)t dtI(\tau)=\int_0^\infty t^{q-1}e^{-(h+i\tau)t}\,dt, where tq−1=exp⁡((q−1)log⁡t)t^{q-1}=\exp((q-1)\log t). The absolute near-zero bound is tRe⁡q−1t^{\operatorname{Re}q-1}, and the exponential dominates every required large-tt factor. Dominated differentiation and integration by parts of tqe−(h+iτ)tt^qe^{-(h+i\tau)t}, whose two boundary values vanish, give

I′(τ)=−iqh+iτI(τ),I(0)=h−qΓ(q).(PB3) I'(\tau)=-\frac{iq}{h+i\tau}I(\tau),\qquad I(0)=h^{-q}\Gamma(q). \tag{PB3}

The derivative in (PB1) shows that (h+iτ)qI(τ)(h+i\tau)^q I(\tau) has derivative zero on the real line. Its value at zero is Γ(q)\Gamma(q). Thus I(τ)=Γ(q)(h+iτ)−qI(\tau)=\Gamma(q)(h+i\tau)^{-q} with precisely the indicated branch. The nonzero denominator is proved next. The same dominated bounds with powers of log⁡t\log t justify every complex-qq derivative on compact subsets of Re⁡q>0\operatorname{Re}q>0.

For clarity, the gamma denominator here is nonzero. Integration by parts in the beta integral gives

∫01uq−1(1−u)N du=N!q(q+1)⋯(q+N). \int_0^1 u^{q-1}(1-u)^N\,du =\frac{N!}{q(q+1)\cdots(q+N)}.

Multiply by NqN^q and put t=Nut=Nu. The integrand is bounded in modulus by tRe⁡q−1e−tt^{\operatorname{Re}q-1}e^{-t} on 0<t<N0<t<N, so dominated convergence gives Γ(q)\Gamma(q). Rewriting the finite product, its limit is

Γ(q)=1qexp⁡ ⁣(−γq+∑k≥1[qk−log⁡(1+qk)]),γ=lim⁡N→∞(∑k=1N1k−log⁡N). \Gamma(q)=\frac1q\exp\!\left( -\gamma q+\sum_{k\ge1} \left[\frac qk-\log\left(1+\frac qk\right)\right]\right), \quad \gamma=\lim_{N\to\infty}\left(\sum_{k=1}^N\frac1k-\log N\right).

For the real limit, HN−log⁡NH_N-\log N is positive by comparison with ∫1Ndx/x\int_1^N dx/x, and is decreasing because log⁡(1+1/N)>1/(N+1)\log(1+1/N)>1/(N+1). Hence it converges by completeness of the real numbers. For the complex series, the derivative of the right half-plane logarithm gives

log⁡(1+w)−w=−w2∫01t1+tw dt,∣w∣<1.(PB4) \log(1+w)-w=-w^2\int_0^1\frac{t}{1+tw}\,dt,\qquad |w|<1. \tag{PB4}

For ∣w∣≤1/2|w|\le1/2 its modulus is at most ∣w∣2|w|^2. Apply this with w=q/kw=q/k for all sufficiently large kk, bounding the finite initial part separately. Thus the displayed series is absolutely convergent, with its actual O(k−2)O(k^{-2}) tail. Each logarithm is in the right half-plane branch, so the displayed value is nonzero. This proves the division in (PS9), including complex qq.

Let

Et(x′)=(2π)−(n−1)∫eix′⋅ξ′e−t1+∣ξ′∣2 dξ′. E_t(x')=(2\pi)^{-(n-1)} \int e^{ix'\cdot\xi'}e^{-t\sqrt{1+|\xi'|^2}}\,d\xi'.

In dimension one Et=e−tE_t=e^{-t}. The inverse Fourier kernel of (PS9) is

K−q(x′,xn)=1Γ(q)∫0∞tq−1Et(x′)δ(xn−t) dt.(PS10) K_{-q}(x',x_n)=\frac1{\Gamma(q)} \int_0^\infty t^{q-1}E_t(x')\delta(x_n-t)\,dt . \tag{PS10}

This is a tempered distribution: near zero the tested integrand has the integrable bound CtRe⁡q−1C t^{\operatorname{Re}q-1}, and at infinity the factor e−te^{-t}, with finitely many test seminorms, makes it integrable. The kernel is supported in xn≥0x_n\ge0. The tangential Fourier factor is exactly (2π)−(n−1)(2\pi)^{-(n-1)}; inverse transformation of e−itξne^{-it\xi_n} is the displayed delta, without an extra factor.

For arbitrary z∈Cz\in\mathbb C, choose an integer k≥0k\ge0 with k>Re⁡zk>\operatorname{Re}z. Then ℓz=ℓkℓ−(k−z)\ell^z=\ell^k\ell^{-(k-z)}. The second multiplier has the kernel (PS10); the first is the finite operator (1+∣D′∣2+∂n)k(\sqrt{1+|D'|^2}+\partial_n)^k. Tangential multipliers and normal derivatives preserve normal support. Thus Λ+z\Lambda_+^z preserves support for every zz. More explicitly, its action on a Schwartz function supported in the positive half space has that support by (PS10) and the finite operator; the one-sided mollification and compact cutoff approximation in Theorem 9.1(e) extends this conclusion to every supported tempered distribution. All the operators are continuous on S′\mathcal S', so the support is retained in the weak limit. The same argument applies to −z-z.

It follows that, for real rr,

Λ+−r:H˙(0)⟶H˙(r),Λ+r:H˙(r)⟶H˙(0)(PS11) \Lambda_+^{-r}:\dot H_{(0)}\longrightarrow\dot H_{(r)}, \qquad \Lambda_+^{r}:\dot H_{(r)}\longrightarrow\dot H_{(0)} \tag{PS11}

are inverse isometries, with exactly the original full-space norms. This proves the support-preserving index change rather than assuming that the multiplier (1+∣D∣2)r/2(1+|D|^2)^{r/2} preserves half-space support.

The original analytic symbol family and the strip estimate

Fix 0<m<M0<m<M, with MM an integer, and retain

bz=a(1+∣ξ∣2)(z−m)/2,Az=(bz)ρ+(a−aρ),0≤Re⁡z≤M.(PS12) b_z=a(1+|\xi|^2)^{(z-m)/2},\qquad A_z=(b_z)_\rho+(a-a_\rho),\qquad 0\le\operatorname{Re}z\le M. \tag{PS12}

The residual contribution is present for every zz; Am=aA_m=a exactly. For each zz, Az∈SlaRe⁡zA_z\in S^{\operatorname{Re}z}_{\mathrm{la}}. Frequency differentiation of the displayed scalar factor yields finite polynomials in z−mz-m, the full powers of 1+∣ξ∣21+|\xi|^2, and the original frequency coordinates. Hence each indicated symbol seminorm is bounded by C(1+∣Im⁡z∣)Lp(a)C(1+|\operatorname{Im}z|)^L p(a), uniformly on this real strip, with a finite original seminorm pp. The convolution and residual bounds of Lemma 4.4 retain the same property. Holomorphy holds in any fixed slightly larger symbol order, such as S+M+1S^{M+1}_+: parameter derivatives produce powers of log⁡(1+∣ξ∣2)\log(1+|\xi|^2), which the one extra order bounds. No assertion of order-MM holomorphy at its borderline is needed.

For f,gf,g in the original supported Schwartz spaces of dimensions p,qp,q, respectively, set

Ff,g(z)=(Λ+s−zTAzΛ+−sf,g)L2.(PS13) F_{f,g}(z)= \left(\Lambda_+^{s-z}T_{A_z}\Lambda_+^{-s}f,g\right)_{L^2}. \tag{PS13}

The expression acts in the supported Schwartz space at every stage. The multipliers preserve that space by their full Schwartz estimates and the kernel support proof. The local Theorem 5.1 gives all boundary jets of TAzuT_{A_z}u; all are zero when the input is supported Schwartz and hence flat on the boundary. Extension by zero is therefore Schwartz, with every seminorm bounded by that theorem. These bounds are continuous in AzA_z in a fixed sufficiently large symbol order, including the extra order for each prescribed finite number of parameter derivatives. Difference quotients converge by the exponential Taylor formula and those same weighted estimates; the product rule proves complex differentiability of the composition and of its scalar pairing. All real derivatives are continuous. This is holomorphic on the strip, continuous on its closed boundary, and C2C^2 on a neighborhood of each finite closed rectangle. The preceding test-space estimates and Theorem 5.1 bound its growth throughout the strip by Cf,g(1+∣Im⁡z∣)Leπ∣Im⁡z∣/2C_{f,g}(1+|\operatorname{Im}z|)^L e^{\pi|\operatorname{Im}z|/2}. On the two boundary lines, the proved integer bounds, (PS8) and (PS11) give

∣Ff,g(iτ)∣≤C0(1+∣τ∣)Leπ∣τ∣/2p(a)∥f∥2∥g∥2,∣Ff,g(M+iτ)∣≤CM(1+∣τ∣)Leπ∣τ∣/2p(a)∥f∥2∥g∥2.(PS14) |F_{f,g}(i\tau)| \le C_0(1+|\tau|)^L e^{\pi|\tau|/2} p(a)\|f\|_2\|g\|_2,\qquad |F_{f,g}(M+i\tau)| \le C_M(1+|\tau|)^L e^{\pi|\tau|/2} p(a)\|f\|_2\|g\|_2 . \tag{PS14}

Take a single finite seminorm pp large enough for both endpoints. The zero-order norm depends continuously on finitely many original symbol seminorms, as proved in Section 10. Rescaling a symbol by their sum gives a linear bound in that sum; the integer induction uses only continuous linear symbol operations. Thus the stated p(a)p(a) bounds are homogeneous, including p(a)=0p(a)=0.

For any fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0, multiply FF by exp⁡(ε(z−m)2)\exp(\varepsilon(z-m)^2). Its boundary bounds now have finite constants C0′,CM′C'_0,C'_M, since (1+∣τ∣)Leπ∣τ∣/2−ετ2(1+|\tau|)^L e^{\pi|\tau|/2-\varepsilon\tau^2} is bounded. Its modulus tends to zero on the horizontal edges of large rectangles in the strip. Dividing it by p(a)∥f∥2∥g∥2C0′p(a)\|f\|_2\|g\|_2 C'_0 and multiplying by exp⁡[−(z/M)log⁡(CM′/C0′)]\exp[-(z/M)\log(C'_M/C'_0)] makes the two vertical-edge bounds at most one. The proved rectangle maximum principle (PB2), followed by the expanding limit, therefore gives

∣Ff,g(m)∣≤(C0′)1−m/M(CM′)m/Mp(a)∥f∥2∥g∥2.(PS15) |F_{f,g}(m)| \le (C'_0)^{1-m/M}(C'_M)^{m/M} p(a)\|f\|_2\|g\|_2 . \tag{PS15}

The zero-seminorm or zero-test-function case is immediate and does not require dividing by zero. This is the required strip estimate with its growth control proved.

Since Am=aA_m=a, duality in the supported L2L^2 space and density of its Schwartz subspace show that Λ+s−mTaΛ+−s\Lambda_+^{s-m}T_a\Lambda_+^{-s} is bounded on supported L2L^2. Conjugating by the exact isometries (PS11) gives the supported bound (PS3) for this real mm, with finite original seminorm control. Together with the integer case it covers every m≥0m\ge0 and every real ss. The bounded extension agrees with the original supported distribution action by test-space density and its weak continuity.

The full restriction quotient

Theorem 7.3 gives a†∈Slama^\dagger\in S^m_{\mathrm{la}}, continuously and conjugate-linearly, with the original reversed vector dimensions. Apply the supported result at the index m−sm-s:

Ta†:H˙(m−s)(Cq)⟶H˙(−s)(Cp).(PS16) T_{a^\dagger}:\dot H_{(m-s)}(\mathbb C^q) \longrightarrow\dot H_{(-s)}(\mathbb C^p). \tag{PS16}

For the supported/restricted duality of Proposition 10.2(b),

∣(Tau,v)∣=∣(u,Ta†v)∣≤Cpm,s(a)∥u∥H‾(s)∥v∥H˙(m−s).(PS17) |(T_a u,v)|=|(u,T_{a^\dagger}v)| \le C p_{m,s}(a) \|u\|_{\overline H_{(s)}}\|v\|_{\dot H_{(m-s)}} . \tag{PS17}

The antidual of H˙(m−s)\dot H_{(m-s)} is exactly H‾(s−m)\overline H_{(s-m)} with its original quotient norm, so (PS17) proves the restricted bound, without choosing or identifying a supported extension of the restricted input. Density and Theorem 9.1(d) retain the original quotient distribution action. This completes both assertions of (PS3).

For m<0m<0, the same zero-order membership proves boundedness at the same index, but the argument above does not assert a gain of −m-m. Theorem 12.1 gives nonzero residual examples forbidding every such gain. The full residual term, and this exact limitation, remain part of the calculus.

Figure PS-F1. PS6–PS11 keeps the full multiplier sqrt(1+|xi'|^2)+i xi_n, the original weighted norm, Gamma(q), the inverse Fourier factor and normal kernel support, with Re q>0. PS12–PS15 uses integer M>m and epsilon>0, retaining the residual in A_z. The strip is a schematic with 0<m<M. All four spaces and arrows have their original vector dimensions; PS16–PS17 gives the restriction quotient. The last vector is v = Lambda_+^(s-m) T_a Lambda_+^(-s) f, and F_(f,g)(m) = (v,g). The figure source is figures/positive_order_halfspace.py.