Reflection-compatible changes of quantization

This companion retains the reflection-compatible conversion from AN03-U009 Section 7. The all-parameter proof below replaces its reference to a larger-parameter Gaussian extension by a complete finite-step argument on the original metric.

This is a modified selection of AN03-U009, From Weyl symbols to operators and changes of coordinates, from Elliptic Operators & Boundary Problems: Renewed 2026 Course Draft. Original principal author: AN-03 course-writing task. Original publisher: AN-03 local course project. The AN-03 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex are responsible for the renewed edition. Selection, exact prerequisite connections and identified additions: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026; publisher: AN-04 local course project.

Original text: CC0.

The metric Weyl product proves the dual metric and weight comparisons; the action companion proves polynomial growth, Schwartz action, distribution action and their precise topologies. The included Gaussian remainder theorem, Section 8 applies directly to phases whose actual parameter is at most one. The proof map gives all exact earlier proofs used here.

7. Reflection and changes of quantization

Assume now that gg is symplectically temperate, g≤gσg\le g^\sigma, mm is a temperate weight, and

g(x,ξ)(t,τ)=g(x,ξ)(t,−τ).(A33) g_{(x,\xi)}(t,\tau)=g_{(x,\xi)}(t,-\tau). \tag{A33}

This reflection condition says that the position and frequency directions are orthogonal for gg at each point. It is needed here to keep the same metric class under all quantization changes; it was not needed for (A21).

For every fixed k∈Rk\in\mathbb R, the distributional Fourier multiplier

Tk=exp⁡(ik⟨Dx,Dξ⟩)(A34) T_k=\exp(i k\langle D_x,D_\xi\rangle) \tag{A34}

is a continuous automorphism of S(m,g)S(m,g), weakly continuous on bounded symbol sets, with inverse T−kT_{-k}. If h2=sup⁡g/gσh^2=\sup g/g^\sigma, then for every integer N≥0N\ge0,

Tka−∑j<N(ik⟨Dx,Dξ⟩)jj!a∈S(hNm,g),(A35) T_k a-\sum_{j<N}\frac{(ik\langle D_x,D_\xi\rangle)^j}{j!}a \in S(h^Nm,g), \tag{A35}

with finite source-seminorm estimates for all output derivatives and the same bounded-set continuity.

To check the normalization, the doubled auxiliary phase 2p⋅q2p\cdot q has symmetric representing map (p,q)↦(q,p)(p,q)\mapsto(q,p). Its phase dual at (t,τ)(t,\tau) is gσ(t,−τ)g^\sigma(t,-\tau), which equals gσ(t,τ)g^\sigma(t,\tau) by (A33) and quadratic inversion. The actual phase kp⋅qk p\cdot q, for k≠0k\ne0, therefore has dual 4k−2gσ4k^{-2}g^\sigma and parameter ∣k∣h/2|k|h/2 in the convention of Quadratic Fourier multipliers at a moving scale. First suppose 0<∣k∣≤20<|k|\le2. The actual parameter is at most one, and

1+qY(X−Y)≤max⁡(1,k2/4)(1+4k−2qY(X−Y)).(A35a) 1+q_Y(X-Y)\le\max(1,k^2/4) \bigl(1+4k^{-2}q_Y(X-Y)\bigr). \tag{A35a}

This verifies the Gaussian metric and weight hypotheses at the original distance base; scalar multiplication of the dual form cancels on the two sides of its form comparisons. The included Gaussian Theorems 7.1 and 8.1 therefore give A34–A35, with every differentiated remainder and bounded-set continuity, for this range. For k=0k=0 the map is the identity; the remainder is zero for N≥1N\ge1, and is aa for N=0N=0.

The derivative weight used in finite steps. Put L=i⟨Dx,Dξ⟩L=i\langle D_x,D_\xi\rangle. For every integer j,l≥0j,l\ge0,

pl(Lja;hjm,g)≤Cn,jpl+2j(a;m,g).(WC2) p_l(L^ja;h^jm,g)\le C_{n,j}p_{l+2j}(a;m,g). \tag{WC2}

Here is the full contraction estimate. At a fixed point, reflection makes the metric block diagonal, g=diag⁡(A,B)g=\operatorname{diag}(A,B) with A,BA,B positive definite. The real spectral theorem constructs the positive square roots. In the gg-orthonormal position and frequency frames given by A−1/2A^{-1/2} and B−1/2B^{-1/2}, the coefficient matrix of the contraction ∑r∂xr∂ξr\sum_r\partial_{x_r}\partial_{\xi_r} is A1/2B1/2A^{1/2}B^{1/2}. Its singular values are at most hh, because their squares are the eigenvalues of B1/2AB1/2B^{1/2}AB^{1/2}, whose largest eigenvalue equals sup⁡g/gσ\sup g/g^\sigma. To justify the singular frames explicitly, diagonalize CtCC^tC for C=A1/2B1/2C=A^{1/2}B^{1/2}; if vrv_r is a unit eigenvector with eigenvalue sr2>0s_r^2>0, then Cvr/srCv_r/s_r are an orthonormal basis. Thus the contraction is a sum of nn pairs of gg-unit directions with coefficients at most hh. Its jj-th power has at most njn^j terms and coefficients at most hjh^j. Since the differential operator has constant coordinate coefficients, its ll output derivatives are simply the corresponding contractions of Dl+2jaD^{l+2j}a. No derivative of a chosen frame or of gg is taken. This proves WC2. The weight hh and all its real powers are legitimate temperate weights by the metric-product proof following W34.

Every real parameter on the same metric. Given k≠0k\ne0, choose the integer M=max⁡(1,⌈∣k∣/2⌉)M=\max(1,\lceil |k|/2\rceil) and set q=k/Mq=k/M. Let

Pq=∑j<NqjLjj!,Tk=TqM.(WC3) P_q=\sum_{j<N}\frac{q^jL^j}{j!},\qquad T_k=T_q^M. \tag{WC3}

Initially these are the distributional Fourier multipliers, so the equality in WC3 is exact. The small-parameter argument proves that TqT_q preserves each S(hrm,g)S(h^rm,g), while Tq−PqT_q-P_q sends S(m,g)S(m,g) to S(hNm,g)S(h^Nm,g). WC2 and h≤1h\le1 show that PqP_q also preserves each of those spaces. The finite telescoping identity

TqM−PqM=∑ℓ=0M−1TqM−1−ℓ(Tq−Pq)Pqℓ(WC4) T_q^M-P_q^M= \sum_{\ell=0}^{M-1}T_q^{M-1-\ell}(T_q-P_q)P_q^\ell \tag{WC4}

therefore has values in S(hNm,g)S(h^Nm,g). Each composition has a finite source-seminorm bound; chaining the finitely many bounds gives such a bound for the sum, for every output derivative. All maps retain continuity on bounded sets with their local smooth topology.

In the polynomial PqMP_q^M, the coefficients of degrees below NN equal those in exp⁡(MqL)\exp(MqL). Indeed the coefficient of degree j<Nj<N is the finite sum over j1+⋯+jM=jj_1+\cdots+j_M=j of qj/(j1!⋯jM!)=(Mq)j/j!q^j/(j_1!\cdots j_M!)= (Mq)^j/j!, by the multinomial theorem; none of the truncations remove a summand. Each remaining term has degree at least NN and therefore lies in S(hNm,g)S(h^Nm,g) by WC2. This proves A35 for every real kk. For N=0N=0, the assertion is simply preservation of S(m,g)S(m,g) by TqMT_q^M, already proved. Every constant depends on the specified k,N,lk,N,l and structural data; no bound uniform in unbounded kk is asserted.

For each small step the Gauss extension agrees with the stated distributional multiplier. Indeed bounded compact approximants converge in S′\mathcal S' by (A3); their Gauss images are bounded in the asserted polynomially growing target class and converge locally smoothly. Thus both definitions are limits of the same sequence in distributional pairings. Multiplication of the Fourier multipliers now proves TkTl=Tk+lT_kT_l=T_{k+l}, hence the automorphism assertion. No uniform estimate for unbounded kk is claimed.

Let Op⁡τ\operatorname{Op}_\tau have the kernel base point (1−τ)x+τy(1-\tau)x+\tau y, as in Section 4 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. Here is the kernel coordinate calculation for every tempered symbol. For a plane wave a(z,ξ)=ei(p⋅z+q⋅ξ)a(z,\xi)=e^{i(p\cdot z+q\cdot\xi)}, use the kernel coordinates z=(1−s)x+sy, t=x−yz=(1-s)x+sy,\ t=x-y. The old base point is z+(s−τ)tz+(s-\tau)t; partial inverse Fourier transformation sets t=−qt=-q, leaving the factor ei(τ−s)p⋅qe^{i(\tau-s)p\cdot q}. This is exactly the multiplier Tτ−sT_{\tau-s} on the symbol Fourier variables. Fourier inversion proves the identity for Schwartz symbols. The two kernel constructions, the multiplier and the affine pullback are continuous in tempered-distribution pairings; the explicit cutoff-and-mollifier density proof after A25 extends the equality to all tempered symbols. Thus

Op⁡s(Tτ−sa)=Op⁡τ(a).(A36) \operatorname{Op}_s(T_{\tau-s}a)=\operatorname{Op}_\tau(a). \tag{A36}

Uniqueness of the symbol follows by inverse partial Fourier transformation of the kernel. In particular, if a,ca,c are left and right symbols and bb is their Weyl symbol, then

b=T−1/2a=T1/2c,a=T1/2b=T1c,c=T−1a=T−1/2b.(A37) \begin{gathered} b=T_{-1/2}a=T_{1/2}c,\qquad a=T_{1/2}b=T_1c,\\ c=T_{-1}a=T_{-1/2}b. \end{gathered} \tag{A37}

All these symbols lie in the same S(m,g)S(m,g). Combining (A36) with (A21) proves their Schwartz and distribution actions, with precisely the topologies stated in Section 4.

There is an elementary action proof under the additional vertical bound

g(x,ξ)(0,τ)≤∣τ∣2.(A38) g_{(x,\xi)}(0,\tau)\le|\tau|^2. \tag{A38}

It is useful to see exactly what this stronger hypothesis buys. For each fixed β\beta, directional symbol estimates and (A3) give

∣∂ξα∂xβa(x,ξ)∣≤Cα,βp≤∣α∣+∣β∣(a;m,g)(1+∣x∣+∣ξ∣)Kβ,(A39) |\partial_\xi^\alpha\partial_x^\beta a(x,\xi)| \le C_{\alpha,\beta}p_{\le|\alpha|+|\beta|}(a;m,g) (1+|x|+|\xi|)^{K_\beta}, \tag{A39}

where KβK_\beta is independent of α\alpha. The vertical factor contributes at most one to each coordinate frequency derivative; the factors from the fixed position derivatives have a polynomial bound. The left operator is (2π)−n∫eix⋅ξa(x,ξ)u^(ξ) dξ(2\pi)^{-n}\int e^{ix\cdot\xi}a(x,\xi)\widehat u(\xi)\,d\xi. After any fixed output derivatives, multiplication by (1+∣x∣2)M(1+|x|^2)^M transfers (1−Δξ)M(1-\Delta_\xi)^M onto the amplitude. Formula (A39) leaves only a fixed power of 1+∣x∣1+|x|, independent of MM, and the Schwartz decay of u^\widehat u makes the frequency integrals finite. Choosing MM large proves every desired output seminorm with finitely many source seminorms. Adjoint transposition and the quantization changes give the other actions. The more general proof of (A21) removes (A38) entirely, while the reflection condition remains in the same-class quantization theorem.

Q8. The ordinary real order-two receiver

For the ordinary metric g=∣dx∣2+⟨ξ⟩−2∣dξ∣2g=|dx|^2+\langle\xi\rangle^{-2}|d\xi|^2, the included ordinary-metric proof O2 verifies every metric and weight hypothesis. Reflection is immediate and h=⟨ξ⟩−1h=\langle\xi\rangle^{-1}. If a real left symbol aa has order two, A37 and A35 with k=−1/2,N=2k=-1/2,N=2 give its Weyl symbol

b=a+i2∑j∂xj∂ξja+r,r∈S1,00.(WC5) b=a+\frac{i}{2}\sum_j\partial_{x_j}\partial_{\xi_j}a+r, \qquad r\in S^0_{1,0}. \tag{WC5}

The first correction is purely imaginary. Hence the symmetric part of Op⁡0(a)\operatorname{Op}_0(a) has Weyl symbol 2a+2Re⁡r2a+2\operatorname{Re}r. For any r0∈S1,00r_0\in S^0_{1,0}, the inverse conversion T1/2r0T_{1/2}r_0 remains in S1,00S^0_{1,0}, and the complete global scalar bound G1 shows r0wr_0^w is bounded on L2L^2. This proves that any established lower bound for awa^w transfers to the real part of the left quantization with only a bounded error. The scalar Fefferman–Phong lower bound itself remains a separate theorem.

As a sign check the left symbol xξx\xi in one dimension has Weyl symbol xξ+i/2x\xi+i/2: its left operator is xDxD, while (xξ)w=(xD+Dx)/2=xD−i/2(x\xi)^w=(xD+Dx)/2=xD-i/2. All higher corrections vanish because the polynomial has degree two.

The retained AN03-U009 reflection and conversion results are modified by the explicit finite-step proof WC2–WC4 and the complete plane-wave kernel calculation. Their mathematical antecedent is Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, 2007 edition, Theorem 18.5.10, printed 159 (PDF 174). No source access restriction is imposed on that book. The extended calculus, unrestricted cross parameter, metric operator bound and Fefferman–Phong induction are separate from this component.