Weyl action and affine symplectic covariance

The metric symbol product becomes an operator product only after its factors have a common domain. This companion proves the full Schwartz and tempered-distribution action, including bounded-set continuity and the strong-dual topology, before identifying the product. It then proves affine symplectic covariance, including the singular position-block case and uniqueness up to a scalar phase.

This is a modified selection of AN03-U009, From Weyl symbols to operators and changes of coordinates, from Elliptic Operators & Boundary Problems: Renewed 2026 Course Draft. Original principal author: AN-03 course-writing task. Original publisher: AN-03 local course project. The AN-03 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex are responsible for the renewed edition. Selection, exact prerequisite connections and identified additions: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026; publisher: AN-04 local course project.

Original text: CC0.

A0. Exact inputs and selected scope

Use the metric Weyl product and affine-domain companion and its complete metric, Gaussian and Fourier prerequisites. The complete countable-seminorm metric and Baire proofs supply the topological inputs in Section 1; completeness of the Schwartz space with the stated norms is proved in Section 1 below. The measure and L2L^2 proofs supply all convergence, density and null-set statements below. Every additional use of a finite spectral theorem, compactness, inverse, product, Taylor or exponential identity has an exact earlier entry in the proof map.

The retained source sections are 1–4 and 6, including the full original Jacobian calculation AF1–AF2. The source's conformal-enlargement theorem and larger cross-parameter extension are separate and are not used here. The quantization companion gives the remaining reflection-compatible conversion.

The convention is D=−i∂D=-i\partial, on W=Rxn⊕RξnW=\mathbb R_x^n\oplus\mathbb R_\xi^n, n≥1n\ge1, with

σ((x,ξ),(y,η))=ξ⋅y−x⋅η.(A1) \sigma((x,\xi),(y,\eta))=\xi\cdot y-x\cdot\eta. \tag{A1}

Write qX=gXσq_X=g_X^\sigma. A symplectically temperate metric is slowly varying and satisfies, with C≥1C\ge1, N≥0N\ge0,

qX(T)≤CqY(T)(1+qY(X−Y))N.(A2) q_X(T)\le Cq_Y(T)(1+q_Y(X-Y))^N. \tag{A2}

A weight is positive, locally gg-continuous, and satisfies m(Y)≤Cm(X)(1+qY(X−Y))Nm(Y)\le Cm(X)(1+q_Y(X-Y))^N, with its own constants.

1. Polynomial growth and the two topologies

Let e(X)=∣X∣2e(X)=|X|^2 in the fixed canonical coordinates; eσ=ee^\sigma=e. Constants in comparisons with ee may depend on the forms at the origin. There is a finite KK such that

C−1(1+∣X∣2)−Ke≤gX,qX≤C(1+∣X∣2)Ke,C−1(1+∣X∣2)−K≤m(X)≤C(1+∣X∣2)K.(A3) C^{-1}(1+|X|^2)^{-K}e \le g_X,q_X\le C(1+|X|^2)^K e, \qquad C^{-1}(1+|X|^2)^{-K}\le m(X)\le C(1+|X|^2)^K. \tag{A3}

These statements require no uncertainty inequality.

Indeed, (A2) with Y=0Y=0 bounds qXq_X by a fixed form times a power of 1+∣X∣21+|X|^2. In particular qX(X)q_X(X) has such a bound. The primal version of (A2), with the other point at the origin, now gives gX≤Cg0(1+qX(X))Ng_X\le Cg_0(1+q_X(X))^N. Dualizing the two upper bounds gives both lower bounds. The weight inequality with one point at zero gives its upper bound. Its reciprocal is temperate by Section 2 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product, giving the lower bound. Enlarging a common KK proves (A3).

Consequently every coordinate derivative of a∈S(m,g)a\in S(m,g) has polynomial growth, with degree allowed to depend on the derivative order. In particular aa defines a tempered distribution. On a bounded symbol set the growth bound for each fixed derivative is uniform. Thus bounded symbols converging in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\rm loc} converge in S′\mathcal S': pair their zeroth-order common polynomial bound with the rapid decay of a test function, and apply dominated convergence. We call this bounded-set local-smooth topology the weak symbol topology, as in Quadratic Fourier multipliers at a moving scale.

For u∈S(Rn)u\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R^n), use the increasing norms

Qr(u)=∑∣α∣+∣β∣≤r∥xαDβu∥2.(A4) Q_r(u)=\sum_{|\alpha|+|\beta|\le r}\|x^\alpha D^\beta u\|_2. \tag{A4}

They define the usual Schwartz topology. One direction follows by integrating a sufficiently rapidly decreasing bound. For the other, choose an integer s>n/2s>n/2. Fourier inversion, Cauchy–Schwarz and Schwartz Plancherel give

∥v∥∞≤(2π)−n∥v^∥1≤Cs∑∣γ∣≤s∥Dγv∥2.(A5) \|v\|_\infty\le (2\pi)^{-n}\|\widehat v\|_1 \le C_s\sum_{|\gamma|\le s}\|D^\gamma v\|_2. \tag{A5}

Apply this to v=xαDβuv=x^\alpha D^\beta u and expand its derivatives. This controls every usual Schwartz seminorm by a finite QrQ_r. The familiar completeness of Schwartz space also follows directly: uniform limits of all weighted derivatives are compatible derivatives by the fundamental theorem of calculus on coordinate boxes.

On the complex-linear distribution dual S′\mathcal S' we use the strong dual topology. In particular, the distribution bracket is linear in its test function; Hilbert-space adjoints will be converted to bilinear transposes explicitly. The strong-dual seminorms are

pB(u)=sup⁡ϕ∈B∣⟨u,ϕ⟩∣,(A6) p_B(u)=\sup_{\phi\in B}|\langle u,\phi\rangle|, \tag{A6}

where BB ranges over bounded subsets of S\mathcal S. A bounded subset U\mathcal U of this dual satisfies a common finite-order estimate

∣⟨u,ϕ⟩∣≤CQr(ϕ)(u∈U, ϕ∈S).(A7) |\langle u,\phi\rangle|\le C Q_r(\phi) \quad(u\in\mathcal U,\ \phi\in\mathcal S). \tag{A7}

Here is the Baire argument, including the point where that prerequisite enters. Strong boundedness gives pointwise boundedness on each ϕ\phi. The closed sets {ϕ:sup⁡u∈U∣⟨u,ϕ⟩∣≤j}\{\phi:\sup_{u\in\mathcal U}|\langle u,\phi\rangle|\le j\}, j=1,2,…j=1,2,\ldots, cover the complete metrizable space S\mathcal S. One has interior. Subtract two points in a small neighborhood inside it to obtain a uniform bound on a neighborhood of zero. That neighborhood contains a set Qr<εQ_r<\varepsilon; rescaling proves (A7). No assertion of joint continuity of the unrestricted distribution action follows from this argument.

2. An affine-invariant Fourier norm

For a∈S(W)a\in\mathcal S(W), set

∥a∥FL1=(2π)−2n∥a^∥L1(W∗).(A8) \|a\|_{\mathcal F L^1}=(2\pi)^{-2n}\|\widehat a\|_{L^1(W^*)}. \tag{A8}

Then

∥aw∥L2→L2≤∥a∥FL1.(A9) \|a^w\|_{L^2\to L^2}\le \|a\|_{\mathcal F L^1}. \tag{A9}

To prove it, write aa by Fourier inversion as the integral of plane waves. Section 5 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product gives norm-one operators for every such wave. For u∈Su\in\mathcal S, their actions depend continuously on the wave frequency in L2L^2, by the explicit translation and modulation formulas. Multiply this continuous Hilbert-space-valued function by a^\widehat a. On every compact cube its Riemann sums converge in L2L^2: uniform continuity makes the difference between any two sufficiently fine sums arbitrarily small, and L2L^2 is complete. The norm of each resulting integral is at most the integral of ∣a^∣∥u∥2|\widehat a|\|u\|_2. This also bounds differences between integrals over increasing cubes, whose tails tend to zero because a^∈L1\widehat a\in L^1. It constructs the full integral in L2L^2 and proves its triangle inequality. Pairing with a Schwartz test and using scalar Fourier inversion identifies it with awua^wu. Formula (A9) follows, first on Schwartz inputs and then on L2L^2 by density. Thus no estimate for a general oscillatory kernel or general vector-valued integration theorem is being assumed.

This norm is unchanged by any invertible affine change of the phase-space variables, even one that is not symplectic. If b(X)=a(TX+Z)b(X)=a(TX+Z), then

b^(Θ)=∣det⁡T∣−1ei⟨T−tΘ,Z⟩a^(T−tΘ). \widehat b(\Theta) =|\det T|^{-1}e^{i\langle T^{-t}\Theta,Z\rangle} \widehat a(T^{-t}\Theta).

Changing variables in its L1L^1 norm cancels the determinant.

It is also controlled by finitely many Schwartz seminorms. More particularly, if aa is supported in a fixed-radius ball for a positive form QQ, centered at X0X_0, then

∥aw∥≤C∑j≤ssup⁡X∣a∣j,Q(X),s>n an integer.(A10) \|a^w\|\le C\sum_{j\le s}\sup_X|a|_{j,Q}(X), \qquad s>n\text{ an integer}. \tag{A10}

Use an affine map making QQ Euclidean and its center zero. The Fourier L1L^1 estimate used in (A5), now in dimension 2n2n, requires s>(2n)/2=ns>(2n)/2=n. On the fixed support, the derivative L2L^2 norms are bounded by their suprema. Affine invariance proves (A10) with no determinant of QQ left over.

Editorial reconstruction: the original support form and every Jacobian. Retain the positive form QQ, its original coordinate matrix GG, the center X0X_0, and the support condition Q(X−X0)≤R2Q(X-X_0)\le R^2. Write d=2nd=2n. Choose an invertible real matrix LL with LtGL=IL^tGL=I, and put J=∣det⁡L∣J=|\det L|, b(z)=a(X0+Lz)b(z)=a(X_0+Lz). This is a comparison map; the original form and symbol remain the objects in (A10). The original Fourier transforms give

b^(η)=J−1ei⟨L−tη,X0⟩a^(L−tη),a^(Θ)=Je−i⟨Θ,X0⟩b^(LtΘ),∫∣a^(Θ)∣ dΘ=∫J∣b^(LtΘ)∣ dΘ=∫J∣b^(η)∣J−1 dη.(AF1) \begin{aligned} \widehat b(\eta)&=J^{-1}e^{i\langle L^{-t}\eta,X_0\rangle} \widehat a(L^{-t}\eta),\\ \widehat a(\Theta)&=J e^{-i\langle\Theta,X_0\rangle} \widehat b(L^t\Theta),\\ \int|\widehat a(\Theta)|\,d\Theta &=\int J|\widehat b(L^t\Theta)|\,d\Theta =\int J|\widehat b(\eta)|J^{-1}\,d\eta. \end{aligned} \tag{AF1}

The inverse Fourier factor is still (2π)−d(2\pi)^{-d}. For an integer s>d/2s>d/2, put Id,s=∫(1+∣η∣2)−s dηI_{d,s}=\int(1+|\eta|^2)^{-s}\,d\eta. It is finite: the unit ball contributes at most its finite volume, and the shell 2r≤∣η∣<2r+12^r\le|\eta|<2^{r+1} contributes at most ωd2d2r(d−2s)\omega_d2^d2^{r(d-2s)}, a summable geometric series. Cauchy--Schwarz, the full multinomial and Plancherel give

∥a∥FL1≤(2π)−d/2Id,s1/2(∑∣α∣≤ss!(s−∣α∣)! α!∥Dzαb∥22)1/2,∥Dzαb∥22=J−1∫Q(X−X0)≤R2∣∏r=1d(∑i=1dLirDXi)αra(X)∣2dX≤J−1(JωdRd)(sup⁡X∣a∣∣α∣,Q(X))2.(AF2) \begin{aligned} \|a\|_{\mathcal FL^1} &\le (2\pi)^{-d/2}I_{d,s}^{1/2} \left(\sum_{|\alpha|\le s} \frac{s!}{(s-|\alpha|)!\,\alpha!}\|D_z^\alpha b\|_2^2\right)^{1/2},\\ \|D_z^\alpha b\|_2^2 &=J^{-1}\int_{Q(X-X_0)\le R^2} \left|\prod_{r=1}^d\left(\sum_{i=1}^dL_{ir}D_{X_i}\right)^{\alpha_r}a(X)\right|^2dX\\ &\le J^{-1}(J\omega_dR^d) \left(\sup_X|a|_{|\alpha|,Q}(X)\right)^2. \end{aligned} \tag{AF2}

Each column LerLe_r has original QQ-length one. The full coordinate expansion in the second line is the sum over all βir≥0\beta_{ir}\ge0 with ∑iβir=αr\sum_i\beta_{ir}=\alpha_r, with coefficient ∏rαr!∏i,rLirβir/βir!\prod_r\alpha_r!\prod_{i,r}L_{ir}^{\beta_{ir}}/\beta_{ir}! and derivative ∏iDXi∑rβira\prod_iD_{X_i}^{\sum_r\beta_{ir}}a. Thus no coordinate coefficient or derivative has been removed. The support measure is exactly JωdRdJ\omega_dR^d, and the derivative integral has the separate factor J−1J^{-1}; (AF2) displays both before their cancellation. Applying (A9) proves (A10), with its original operator and original directional seminorms. This arbitrary affine comparison proves a Fourier norm estimate. Unitary covariance of a Weyl operator has the separate symplectic hypothesis in Section6.

3. Localized decay and counting

Choose the partition (ϕν)(\phi_\nu) of Localizing symbols with moving metrics and fixed radii 0<a<b<c<r∗0<a<b<c<r_*, with supports in BXν(a)B_{X_\nu}(a). Put

gν=gXν,mν=m(Xν),Uν=BXν(b),Uν′=BXν(c),aν=ϕνa. g_\nu=g_{X_\nu},\quad m_\nu=m(X_\nu),\quad U_\nu=B_{X_\nu}(b),\quad U'_\nu=B_{X_\nu}(c),\quad a_\nu=\phi_\nu a.

The larger balls have bounded multiplicity. Localization gives sup⁡∣aν∣j,gν≤Cjmνp≤j(a;m,g)\sup|a_\nu|_{j,g_\nu}\le C_jm_\nu p_{\le j}(a;m,g). The notation p≤jp_{\le j} denotes the sum of symbol seminorms of orders at most jj.

The form

rν=(e+gν)σ,rν(Y)=min⁡Y=U+V(gνσ(U)+∣V∣2),Rν=inf⁡Y∈Uνrν(Y)1/2(A11) r_\nu=(e+g_\nu)^\sigma,\qquad r_\nu(Y)=\min_{Y=U+V}\big(g_\nu^\sigma(U)+|V|^2\big), \qquad R_\nu=\inf_{Y\in U_\nu}r_\nu(Y)^{1/2} \tag{A11}

uses the dual-of-a-sum identity proved in Section 1 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. There is no factor2 here, since the primal form is a sum rather than a mean. All forms are positive definite and the balls nonempty, so RνR_\nu is finite; it can be zero.

One may replace ee throughout this construction by any fixed positive form e0e_0. There are constants c,C>0c,C>0 with ce≤e0≤Cece\le e_0\le Ce. Adding gνg_\nu, and then dualizing, shows that (e0+gν)σ(e_0+g_\nu)^\sigma and rνr_\nu are comparable with constants independent of ν\nu. Their distances and center-growth bounds are consequently equivalent. Choosing canonical Euclidean coordinates therefore imposes no restriction on the reference form.

Localized decay. For each integer M≥0M\ge0 there is a finite JMJ_M such that

∥aνwu∥2≤CMmν(1+Rν)−Mp≤JM(a;m,g)QM(u).(A12) \|a_\nu^w u\|_2 \le C_Mm_\nu(1+R_\nu)^{-M} p_{\le J_M}(a;m,g)Q_M(u). \tag{A12}

The constants are uniform in ν\nu.

Here are the geometric and differential details. If Rν>0R_\nu>0, minimize the rνr_\nu-norm on the compact closure of UνU_\nu. Let PP be a minimizing point. Differentiating along each segment from PP into that closed ellipsoid gives a supporting linear form

L(Y)=rν(P,Y)/rν(P)1/2=σ(Y,t),e(t)+gν(t)=1,L(Y)≥Rν(Y∈Uν).(A13) L(Y)=r_\nu(P,Y)/r_\nu(P)^{1/2} =\sigma(Y,t),\qquad e(t)+g_\nu(t)=1,\qquad L(Y)\ge R_\nu\quad(Y\in U_\nu). \tag{A13}

The normalization follows by ordinary quadratic duality, composed with σ\sigma. In particular Lν=L(Xν)≥RνL_\nu=L(X_\nu)\ge R_\nu. Positivity on the gνg_\nu-ball of radius bb gives gνσ(t)≤Lν/b\sqrt{g_\nu^\sigma(t)}\le L_\nu/b. On the support ball of radius aa, therefore, L≥(1−a/b)LνL\ge(1-a/b)L_\nu. Differentiating the reciprocal shows explicitly that

sup⁡∣Lν/L∣k,gν≤k! b−k(1−a/b)−k−1.(A14) \sup|L_\nu/L|_{k,g_\nu} \le k!\,b^{-k}(1-a/b)^{-k-1}. \tag{A14}

Division of a supported smooth symbol by LL, followed by extension by zero outside UνU_\nu, is consequently smooth and preserves its support.

The affine Weyl identity of Section 5 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product, used on the right, is

aνwu=(aν/L)wLwu+i2{aν/L,L}wu,{aν/L,L}=−L−1∂taν.(A15) a_\nu^wu =(a_\nu/L)^w L^wu +\frac{i}{2}\{a_\nu/L,L\}^wu, \qquad \{a_\nu/L,L\}=-L^{-1}\partial_t a_\nu. \tag{A15}

There is no derivative of LL in the last expression, since ∂tL=σ(t,t)=0\partial_t L=\sigma(t,t)=0. Both new symbols have frozen seminorm bounds with weight mν/Lνm_\nu/L_\nu; the differentiated one uses one additional source derivative and gν(t)1/2≤1g_\nu(t)^{1/2}\le1. Repeat (A15) MM times. Every resulting symbol has weight mνLν−Mm_\nu L_\nu^{-M}, and every input is (Lw)ju(L^w)^j u with j≤Mj\le M. Since ∣t∣≤1|t|\le1, expanding these powers and commuting coordinates and derivatives bounds their L2L^2 norms by CMQM(u)C_MQ_M(u). Apply (A10) to each of the finitely many terms. This proves (A12) when Rν>1R_\nu>1. For Rν≤1R_\nu\le1, (A10) itself proves it after enlarging the constant. Thus zero distance causes no division by zero.

Polynomial counting. There are finite constants B,P,CB,P,C such that

∣Xν∣2≤C(1+Rν2)B,#{ν:Rν≤r}≤C(1+r)P.(A16) |X_\nu|^2\le C(1+R_\nu^2)^B,\qquad \#\{\nu:R_\nu\le r\}\le C(1+r)^P. \tag{A16}

Consequently

∑ν(1+Rν)−L<∞(L>P).(A17) \sum_\nu(1+R_\nu)^{-L}<\infty\qquad(L>P). \tag{A17}

We give the missing volume argument in full. Let T≥1T\ge1 and Rν2≤TR_\nu^2\le T. Choose Y∈UνY\in U_\nu with rν(Y)≤2Tr_\nu(Y)\le2T, and take a minimizing decomposition Y=U+VY=U+V in (A11). Then gνσ(U)≤2Tg_\nu^\sigma(U)\le2T and ∣V∣2≤2T|V|^2\le2T. Slow variation gives qY(U)≤CTq_Y(U)\le C T. Formula (A2), comparing VV to YY, implies

qV≤CTNqY,qV(U)≤CTN+1.(A18) q_V\le CT^Nq_Y,\qquad q_V(U)\le CT^{N+1}. \tag{A18}

By (A3), both gVg_V and qVq_V lie between C−1T−KeC^{-1}T^{-K}e and CTKeCT^Ke. Hence ∣U∣2≤CTK+N+1|U|^2\le CT^{K+N+1}. Applying (A2) in the other direction, with its now controlled distance qV(U)q_V(U), gives

qY≤CTK+N(N+1)e,gY≤CTK+Ne.(A19) q_Y\le CT^{K+N(N+1)}e, \qquad g_Y\le CT^{K+N}e. \tag{A19}

Dualizing supplies the lower bounds as well. Take, for example, B=K+(N+1)2B=K+(N+1)^2, enlarged if needed to absorb the preceding fixed exponents. Local comparison with gνg_\nu, and gν(Xν−Y)<b2g_\nu(X_\nu-Y)<b^2, now give

C−1T−Be≤gν≤CTBe,∣Y∣2+∣Xν∣2≤CTB.(A20) C^{-1}T^{-B}e\le g_\nu\le CT^Be,\qquad |Y|^2+|X_\nu|^2\le CT^B. \tag{A20}

A Euclidean ball centered at this YY with radius κT−B/2\kappa T^{-B/2} lies in Uν′U'_\nu, for a fixed small κ>0\kappa>0, because its gνg_\nu-radius is less than the gap c−bc-b. These small balls inherit the bounded multiplicity of Uν′U'_\nu, while all lie in one Euclidean ball of radius CTB/2C T^{B/2}. Integrating their characteristic functions bounds the number of indices by CT2nBCT^{2nB}. The argument applies first to every finite subcollection, so it bounds the whole index set. This proves (A16), for example with P=4nBP=4nB. Its center bound follows by taking T=1+Rν2T=1+R_\nu^2. Finally split the indices into dyadic bands of 1+Rν1+R_\nu; their contributions in (A17) form a geometric series when L>PL>P. No uncertainty assumption or bound on a vertical part of the metric was used.

4. Action on Schwartz functions and distributions

Theorem 4.1 (Schwartz and distribution action). If gg is symplectically temperate and mm is a temperate weight for gg, then

aw:S⟶S,aw:S′⟶S′(a∈S(m,g))(A21) a^w:\mathcal S\longrightarrow\mathcal S,\qquad a^w:\mathcal S'\longrightarrow\mathcal S' \quad(a\in S(m,g)) \tag{A21}

are continuous. For each rr there are finite J,tJ,t such that

Qr(awu)≤Crp≤J(a;m,g)Qt(u).(A22) Q_r(a^wu)\le C_r p_{\le J}(a;m,g)Q_t(u). \tag{A22}

The first action is jointly continuous in symbol and function. Both actions depend continuously on a bounded symbol set with its weak symbol topology, uniformly on bounded sets of inputs, using the Schwartz topology or the strong distribution topology respectively. The distribution action is separately continuous and hypocontinuous: fixing a bounded set in either factor gives continuity uniformly over that set. It is not, in general, jointly continuous on the unrestricted product.

To prove (A22) first for r=0r=0, sum (A12). By (A3) and (A16), mνm_\nu is bounded by a power of 1+Rν1+R_\nu. Choosing MM larger than that power plus PP makes the sum finite by (A17).

For all output derivatives and moments, let F(X)=σ(X,t)+dF(X)=\sigma(X,t)+d be a fixed affine form. The distributional identity

Fwaνw=(Faν+{F,aν}/(2i))w(A23) F^w a_\nu^w =\big(Fa_\nu+\{F,a_\nu\}/(2i)\big)^w \tag{A23}

holds before any general operator-composition theorem. On the support ball,

∣F(X)∣≤∣F(Xν)∣+agνσ(t),∣∂taν∣k,gν≤gν(t) ∣aν∣k+1,gν. |F(X)|\le |F(X_\nu)|+a\sqrt{g_\nu^\sigma(t)},\qquad |\partial_t a_\nu|_{k,g_\nu} \le \sqrt{g_\nu(t)}\,|a_\nu|_{k+1,g_\nu}.

Both forms gν,gνσg_\nu,g_\nu^\sigma obey (A3). Thus the new symbol in (A23) has frozen seminorms bounded by Ckmν(1+∣Xν∣2)K1p≤k+1(a;m,g)C_km_\nu(1+|X_\nu|^2)^{K_1}p_{\le k+1}(a;m,g). Iterating for any fixed word of rr coordinates and derivatives gives the same assertion with a finite exponent KrK_r and rr additional derivatives. Apply (A12) to these new supported symbols, then use (A16) and choose its decay order large enough to dominate the polynomial factors and the counting exponent. This proves (A22) for every word, hence every QrQ_r.

Each partial sum ∑aνwu\sum a_\nu^wu is Schwartz, and the estimates just proved make the series Cauchy in all Schwartz seminorms. It therefore converges in S\mathcal S. The symbol partial sums remain bounded in S(m,g)S(m,g) and converge locally smoothly to aa. By (A3) they converge in S′\mathcal S', so continuity of the distributional kernel construction identifies the Schwartz limit with the already defined awua^wu. This also proves independence of the partition.

For weak symbol continuity, the summable tails of these estimates are uniform on bounded symbol sets and on bounded sets of Schwartz inputs. Each finite sum is continuous under local smooth convergence: its symbols have fixed compact support, and (A10) and the preceding finite derivative estimates apply. Uniformly small tails and continuous finite sums prove the assertion for S\mathcal S.

Let Cϕ=ϕ‾C\phi=\overline\phi. The adjoint identity (aw)∗=(a‾)w(a^w)^*=(\overline a)^w gives the bilinear transpose test map (aw)t=C(a‾)wC(a^w)^t=C(\overline a)^wC. Define the extension by ⟨awu,ϕ⟩=⟨u,(aw)tϕ⟩\langle a^wu,\phi\rangle=\langle u,(a^w)^t\phi\rangle. It agrees with the operator already constructed on regular distributions from Schwartz functions. Conjugation preserves every QrQ_r, so a bounded set of tests has bounded image under this transpose for fixed aa, proving strong-dual continuity through (A6). For symbols in a bounded set, (A22) makes the union of those images bounded, giving uniform continuity in the distribution input. For distributions in a bounded set, apply (A7) and then (A22) to the transpose tests; this gives a finite symbol-seminorm estimate, uniformly over that set. The weak symbol continuity already proved for bounded sets of test functions gives the corresponding strong-dual conclusion. These observations prove all stated hypocontinuity and bounded-set assertions.

The distinction from unrestricted joint continuity is necessary. Already take g=eg=e, m=1m=1, and symbols independent of ξ\xi, so that quantization is ordinary multiplication. A symbol neighborhood controls only finitely many seminorms, say through order JJ. With a fixed cutoff χ=1\chi=1 near zero, the functions

ak(x)=ck−Jχ(x)eikx1(A24) a_k(x)=c k^{-J}\chi(x)e^{ikx_1} \tag{A24}

lie in that neighborhood for a sufficiently small fixed c>0c>0. Every neighborhood of zero in S′\mathcal S' contains a sufficiently small fixed multiple of ∂x1J+1δ0\partial_{x_1}^{J+1}\delta_0, because scalar multiplication is continuous. Pairing its product with aka_k against a test equal to one near zero has magnitude proportional to kk. Thus no pair of unrestricted input neighborhoods controls even this one scalar output seminorm. The same argument applies to the weak distribution topology. For a bounded set of distributions, (A7) rules out this defect by supplying a common order.

Theorem 4.2 (operator composition). Under either the one-metric or the compatible two-metric hypotheses of Theorem 7.1 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product,

(a#b)w=awbwon both S and S′.(A25) (a\#b)^w=a^wb^w \quad\hbox{on both }\mathcal S\hbox{ and }\mathcal S'. \tag{A25}

Choose bounded Schwartz approximants aj,bja_j,b_j from Localizing symbols with moving metrics. The identity holds for them by Section 6 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. Formula (A22) makes the family ajwa_j^w equicontinuous on Schwartz space, while weak symbol continuity gives bjwu→bwub_j^wu\to b^wu and ajwbwu→awbwua_j^wb^wu\to a^wb^wu in S\mathcal S. Thus their composites converge to awbwua^wb^wu. The symbol products are bounded and converge weakly to a#ba\#b by Theorem 7.1 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product; the theorem just proved identifies the other limit with (a#b)wu(a\#b)^wu. This proves (A25) on S\mathcal S without circularity.

For completeness, Schwartz functions are weakly dense in S′\mathcal S'. If ρ\rho is a compact smooth mollifier of integral one and χ\chi a compact cutoff equal to one near zero, then χ(X/R)(u∗ρ1/R)(X)\chi(X/R)(u*\rho_{1/R})(X) is Schwartz and converges to uu distributionally. On tests this is the convergence ρˇ1/R∗(χ(⋅/R)ϕ)→ϕ\check\rho_{1/R}*(\chi(\cdot/R)\phi)\to\phi in S\mathcal S, proved by Taylor's formula and the rapid decay seminorms. All fixed operators in (A25) are transposes of continuous Schwartz maps and are therefore weakly continuous on S′\mathcal S'. The identity extends from the dense subspace to every distribution.

6. Affine symplectic covariance

A map χ(X)=SX+Z\chi(X)=SX+Z is affine symplectic when σ(ST,SU)=σ(T,U)\sigma(ST,SU)=\sigma(T,U). The following five types generate all such maps:

(x,ξ)↦(x+a,ξ),(x,ξ)↦(x,ξ+b),(xj,ξj)↦(ξj,−xj),(x,ξ)↦(Tx,T−tξ),(x,ξ)↦(x,ξ−Ax),A=At.(A28) \begin{gathered} (x,\xi)\mapsto(x+a,\xi),\qquad (x,\xi)\mapsto(x,\xi+b),\\ (x_j,\xi_j)\mapsto(\xi_j,-x_j),\\ (x,\xi)\mapsto(Tx,T^{-t}\xi),\qquad (x,\xi)\mapsto(x,\xi-Ax),\quad A=A^t. \end{gathered} \tag{A28}

Here is a block proof that also handles singular position blocks. Translations remove ZZ. Write the linear symplectic matrix as S=(ABCD)S=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}A&B\\ C&D\end{smallmatrix}\right). Its first nn columns are linearly independent and AtC=CtAA^tC=C^tA. Consequently

(A+iC)∗(A+iC)=AtA+CtC (A+iC)^*(A+iC)=A^tA+C^tC

is positive definite: the right side vanishes on a vector only if both AA and CC annihilate it. Thus the real polynomial det⁡(A+tC)\det(A+tC) is not identically zero, since its value at t=it=i is nonzero. It has degree at most nn, so one of any n+1n+1 distinct real values of tt makes A+tCA+tC invertible. The root bound used here follows by dividing out t−tjt-t_j at each distinct root tjt_j; each division lowers the degree by one. Left multiplication by the upper shear (ItI0I)\left(\begin{smallmatrix}I&tI\\0&I\end{smallmatrix}\right) makes the position block invertible. Upper shears are conjugates of lower shears by the product of the pair swaps in (A28).

For an invertible position block, the symplectic identities imply that CA−1CA^{-1} and A−1BA^{-1}B are symmetric and D=A−t+CA−1BD=A^{-t}+CA^{-1}B. Hence

S=(I0CA−1I)(A00A−t)(IA−1B0I).(A29) S= \begin{pmatrix}I&0\\ CA^{-1}&I\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}A&0\\0&A^{-t}\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}I&A^{-1}B\\0&I\end{pmatrix}. \tag{A29}

Each factor is generated by (A28); undo the preliminary shear to finish the proof. This uses only determinants, elementary polynomial division and the positive quadratic identity above.

Theorem 6.1 (affine symplectic covariance). For every affine symplectic χ\chi there is a unitary UχU_\chi on L2(Rn)L^2(\mathbb R^n), preserving S\mathcal S and extending to an automorphism of S′\mathcal S', such that

Uχ−1LwUχ=(L∘χ)w,Uχ−1awUχ=(a∘χ)w.(A30) U_\chi^{-1}L^wU_\chi=(L\circ\chi)^w,\qquad U_\chi^{-1}a^wU_\chi=(a\circ\chi)^w. \tag{A30}

The first identity holds for every real affine LL, as an equality of the selfadjoint closures described in Section 5 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. The second holds for every tempered symbol aa, as an identity S→S′\mathcal S\to\mathcal S'. The unitary is unique up to a constant of modulus one.

For the generators, take respectively

χUχu(x)(x+a,ξ)u(x−a)(x,ξ+b)eib⋅xu(x)(xj,ξj)↦(ξj,−xj)F0,ju(x)(Tx,T−tξ)∣det⁡T∣−1/2u(T−1x)(x,ξ−Ax)e−ix⋅Ax/2u(x).(A31) \begin{array}{c|c} \chi& U_\chi u(x)\\ \hline (x+a,\xi)&u(x-a)\\ (x,\xi+b)&e^{ib\cdot x}u(x)\\ (x_j,\xi_j)\mapsto(\xi_j,-x_j)&\mathcal F_{0,j}u(x)\\ (Tx,T^{-t}\xi)&|\det T|^{-1/2}u(T^{-1}x)\\ (x,\xi-Ax)&e^{-ix\cdot Ax/2}u(x). \end{array} \tag{A31}

Here F0,j\mathcal F_{0,j} is the normalized Fourier transform in just the jj-th variable. Change of variables and Plancherel prove unitarity. Differentiation proves preservation of Schwartz space and of its topology; each inverse has the same property. The bilinear transpose Uχt=CUχ−1CU_\chi^t=CU_\chi^{-1}C therefore defines the distribution extension by ⟨Uχu,ϕ⟩=⟨u,Uχtϕ⟩\langle U_\chi u,\phi\rangle=\langle u,U_\chi^t\phi\rangle; it agrees with the original map on Schwartz functions. Direct substitution gives the intertwining of xj,Djx_j,D_j, hence of every affine LL. Since Schwartz space is a core for each real affine observable, these identities pass to the selfadjoint closures. Products of the displayed unitaries implement products of the affine maps.

We justify both uniqueness and the distributional extension of covariance. A bounded unitary commuting with all closed xj,Djx_j,D_j commutes with their translation and modulation groups. For example, on the domain of xjx_j, differentiate e−itxjUeitxjue^{-itx_j}Ue^{itx_j}u; domain preservation follows from commutation with the closed operator, and the derivative is zero. Density extends the resulting equality to L2L^2. The same argument applies to DjD_j, whose group is the translation group explicitly proved in Section 5 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. Thus no prior preservation of S\mathcal S by this unknown unitary has been assumed.

Fourier inversion of ϕ∈S(Rn)\phi\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R^n) then shows that UU commutes with multiplication by ϕ\phi. Fix h(x)=e−∣x∣2>0h(x)=e^{-|x|^2}>0 and set b=Uh/hb=Uh/h, initially a locally square-integrable function. For every ϕ∈Cc∞\phi\in C_c^\infty,

U(ϕh)=ϕUh=bϕh. U(\phi h)=\phi Uh=b\phi h.

Since every compact smooth function is of the form ϕh\phi h, boundedness gives ∥bψ∥2≤∥U∥∥ψ∥2\|b\psi\|_2\le\|U\|\|\psi\|_2 for all such ψ\psi. For a bounded measurable set EE, approximate its indicator in L2L^2 by compact smooth functions and select a subsequence converging almost everywhere. To obtain that subsequence, choose squared errors at most 2−j2^{-j}; Tonelli makes the sum of the pointwise squared errors finite almost everywhere. Fatou's inequality gives ∫E∣b∣2≤∥U∥2∣E∣\int_E|b|^2\le\|U\|^2|E|. The needed nonnegative Fatou inequality follows from the increasing tail infima: their integrals are bounded by the liminf of the original integrals, and monotone convergence follows from Tonelli applied to their nonnegative successive differences. Applying the resulting set inequality to the intersection of a ball with {∣b∣>∥U∥+ε}\{|b|>\|U\|+\varepsilon\} proves ∣b∣≤∥U∥|b|\le\|U\| almost everywhere. Density now gives Uu=buUu=bu on all L2L^2. Commutation with translations means b(x+t)=b(x)b(x+t)=b(x) almost everywhere for each fixed tt. Convolving with a compact smooth mollifier makes this an everywhere translation-invariant smooth function, hence a constant. Letting the mollifier radius tend to zero in distributions shows that bb itself is constant: the constants converge by testing against one function of integral one. Unitarity makes its modulus one. Comparing any two implementations of χ\chi reduces to this commuting case, proving uniqueness.

For covariance of symbols, first exponentiate the affine intertwining. This can be checked without an abstract functional calculus: the explicit affine groups in Section 5 of Two measuring scales, one Weyl product preserve S\mathcal S; differentiating the product of one inverse group with the conjugate of the other gives zero there. Density supplies equality on L2L^2. Thus (A30) holds for all plane-wave symbols. Fourier inversion and their norm-one operator bounds extend it to Schwartz symbols. Finally, the symbol-to-kernel map, affine pullback of distributions, and conjugation by UχU_\chi are continuous in distributional pairings. The weak density proved after (A25) extends (A30) to every a∈S′(W)a\in\mathcal S'(W).

An affine pullback here uses the usual distributional change of variables. Symplectic matrices have ∣det⁡S∣=1|\det S|=1, as follows already by taking determinants in StJS=JS^tJS=J. The conclusion does not supply a canonical simultaneous choice of the phases of all UχU_\chi; products implement composition but may differ from another chosen implementation by a scalar.

The metric version follows directly. Define

(χ∗g)X(T)=gχ(X)(ST),χ∗m=m∘χ.(A32) (\chi^*g)_X(T)=g_{\chi(X)}(ST),\qquad \chi^*m=m\circ\chi. \tag{A32}

Symplectic duality commutes with this pullback, slow variation and temperateness keep the same constants, and hχ∗g=hg∘χh_{\chi^*g}=h_g\circ\chi. The chain rule identifies the symbol seminorms under a↦a∘χa\mapsto a\circ\chi. Thus covariance also transports the full metric symbol classes without changing their structural hypotheses.

A8. An exact shear and its metric

In one position variable take χ(x,ξ)=(x,ξ−x)\chi(x,\xi)=(x,\xi-x). The implementing unitary and a metric pullback are

Uχu(x)=e−ix2/2u(x),g=14 dx2+dξ2,χ∗g=14 dx2+(dξ−dx)2.(WC1) U_\chi u(x)=e^{-ix^2/2}u(x),\qquad g=\tfrac14\,dx^2+d\xi^2,\qquad \chi^*g=\tfrac14\,dx^2+(d\xi-dx)^2. \tag{WC1}

Differentiating the displayed phase gives Uχ−1DUχ=D−xU_\chi^{-1}DU_\chi=D-x, which fixes the sign of the shear. The matrices of gg and χ∗g\chi^*g have determinant 1/41/4; direct symplectic duality gives h=1/2h=1/2 for both. Their unit ellipses therefore both have area 2π2\pi. The image by χ−1\chi^{-1} of the first ellipse is the second. These conclusions also follow from A32; here every constant can be checked directly.

A symplectic shear pulls back the metric ellipse and preserves its area

The curves are parameterized by (2cos⁡t,sin⁡t)(2\cos t,\sin t) and (2cos⁡t,2cos⁡t+sin⁡t)(2\cos t,2\cos t+\sin t), 0≤t≤2π0\le t\le2\pi. They are unit ellipses of the original and pulled-back metrics in the same coordinates. Their four marked points correspond to t=0,π/2,π,3π/2t=0,\pi/2,\pi,3\pi/2. This illustrates the exact pullback in WC1; it is not a numerical proof of general covariance. The editable figure source accompanies it.

The selected programme exposition is AN03-U009. The mathematical antecedents are Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, 2007 edition, Lemma 18.5.8, Theorem 18.5.9 and the Schwartz-action discussion in §18.6. The approved covariance statement and proof at printed 157–159 (PDF 172–174) were compared with the retained block-factorization and explicit uniqueness proofs. The book uses an induction on symplectic generators; the programme proof uses the invertible A+tCA+tC block. No book text or files are included.