A positive quantization and the sharp lower bound

The energy method needs a lower bound for an operator of order one, uniform over bounded symbol families. A pointwise nonnegative left symbol need not define a nonnegative operator. We construct a positive operator whose difference from the original has one lower order.

This is a modified selection from Elliptic Operators & Boundary Problems: Renewed 2026 Course Draft. Original principal author: AN-03 course-writing task. Original publisher: AN-03 local course project. The AN-03 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex are responsible for the renewed edition. Selection, current prerequisite bindings and explicitly identified connecting proofs: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026; publisher: AN-04 local course project.

Original text: CC0.

G0. Exact scope and complete earlier proofs

This selection retains the moving-probe and cancellation arguments of AN-03, Positivity through a moving family of scalar probes, Sections 4–5. Here their parameters are fixed at ρ=1,δ=0,κ=ρ−δ=1,σ=1/2\rho=1,\delta=0,\kappa=\rho-\delta=1,\sigma=1/2, their coefficient space is C\mathbb C, and all symbols are global ordinary symbols. Thus every norm-valued integral below is a scalar integral and every HH is C\mathbb C. The wider parameter extensions are omitted from this selection; their source remains unchanged. Section G6 supplies the complete receiving inequality at every real Sobolev order using this course's current global operator proofs.

Use D=−i∂D=-i\partial, the inner product linear in its first argument, and

Op⁡(a)u(x)=(2π)−n∫eix⋅ξa(x,ξ)u^(ξ) dξ,pr,L(a)=max⁡∣α∣+∣β∣≤Lsup⁡x,ξ⟨ξ⟩−r+∣α∣∣∂ξα∂xβa(x,ξ)∣.(G1) \operatorname{Op}(a)u(x)=(2\pi)^{-n} \int e^{ix\cdot\xi}a(x,\xi)\widehat u(\xi)\,d\xi,\qquad p_{r,L}(a)=\max_{|\alpha|+|\beta|\le L} \sup_{x,\xi}\langle\xi\rangle^{-r+|\alpha|} |\partial_\xi^\alpha\partial_x^\beta a(x,\xi)|. \tag{G1}

Here n≥1n\ge1. In dimension zero the operator is scalar multiplication and the nonnegative-real-part assertion is immediate. The complete packet estimate E23–E27 holds globally without compact base support. The ordinary composition and adjoint proofs O1–O3 supply finite-seminorm remainders. Fourier L1–L3 and measure M0–M8 supply inversion, Plancherel, every change of variables, dominated convergence, completeness and density. The compact Taylor and derivative proof supplies the Taylor estimates; smooth normalized even bumps come from U001 Appendix A.4. These are actual included proofs, with exact hashes and locators in the proof map.

G1. Global Sobolev bounds with the original norms

Put Es=⟨D⟩sE_s=\langle D\rangle^s. By the complete Fourier proof,

∥u∥s2=(2π)−n∫⟨ξ⟩2s∣u^(ξ)∣2 dξ,Es:Hs⟶L2is an onto isometry with inverse E−s.(G2) \|u\|_s^2=(2\pi)^{-n}\int\langle\xi\rangle^{2s}|\widehat u(\xi)|^2\,d\xi, \qquad E_s:H^s\longrightarrow L^2 \quad\hbox{is an onto isometry with inverse }E_{-s}. \tag{G2}

Completeness and simultaneous Schwartz density in any finite list of these spaces follow by applying the compact smooth density proof to the Fourier function after truncating its support; on that support all the finitely many weights are bounded above and below. Smoothing the truncated Fourier function and then inverting gives Schwartz approximants in every chosen norm. Cauchy–Schwarz in frequency shows convergence in each HsH^s implies convergence in tempered distributions: a Schwartz test absorbs the reciprocal polynomial weight.

If a∈Sra\in S^r, O3 gives a full symbol c∈S0c\in S^0 for Es−rOp⁡(a)E−sE_{s-r}\operatorname{Op}(a)E_{-s}. Each required bounded derivative of cc is controlled by finitely many original seminorms of aa. The global packet estimate therefore proves

∥Op⁡(a)u∥s−r≤Cr,s,npr,J(a)∥u∥s.(G3) \|\operatorname{Op}(a)u\|_{s-r} \le C_{r,s,n}p_{r,J}(a)\|u\|_s . \tag{G3}

The identity first holds on Schwartz functions; density extends it to HsH^s. Simultaneous density and distributional convergence make all these extensions agree with the O3 distributional operator. Thus no compact base support is imposed. In particular a symbol of order 2m2m maps HmH^m to H−mH^{-m}, and the Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz inequality gives

∣(Op⁡(a)u,u)∣≤Cp2m,J(a)∥u∥m2.(G4) |(\operatorname{Op}(a)u,u)|\le C p_{2m,J}(a)\|u\|_m^2. \tag{G4}

The dual pairing is precisely the extension of the original L2L^2 pairing. The symbol bounds for ⟨ξ⟩s\langle\xi\rangle^s follow by repeated differentiation: each term is a polynomial of degree at most the number of derivatives times a corresponding lower real power of 1+∣ξ∣21+|\xi|^2, giving order s−∣α∣s-|\alpha|.

G4. A positive scalar probe and its moving copies

Choose an even φ∈Cc∞(R2n)\varphi\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R^{2n}) with ∥φ∥L2(R2n)=1\|\varphi\|_{L^2(\mathbb R^{2n})}=1. Even means simultaneous inversion of both variables. Let B=Op⁡(φ)B=\operatorname{Op}(\varphi), acting on scalar functions. Its kernel is Schwartz. The kernel

KQ(x,z)=∫KB(t,x)‾KB(t,z) dt(P22) K_Q(x,z)=\int\overline{K_B(t,x)}K_B(t,z)\,dt \tag{P22}

is Schwartz as well: differentiate under the integral and use the rapid decay of the two factors with any desired polynomial weights. Fourier transformation in x−zx-z therefore defines a unique ψ∈S(R2n)\psi\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R^{2n}) with

Op⁡(ψ)=B∗B.(P23) \operatorname{Op}(\psi)=B^*B. \tag{P23}

Conjugation by parity u(x)↦u(−x)u(x)\mapsto u(-x) fixes BB because φ\varphi is even. It fixes B∗BB^*B too, so uniqueness of the Schwartz kernel symbol proves that ψ\psi is even. The function ψ\psi need not be real or pointwise nonnegative: the property being imposed is positivity of its quantization.

The normalization is precisely

∫ψ(x,ξ) dx dξ=1.(P24) \int\psi(x,\xi)\,dx\,d\xi=1. \tag{P24}

Indeed Fourier inversion on the diagonal gives (2π)−n∫ψ=∫KQ(x,x) dx(2\pi)^{-n}\int\psi=\int K_Q(x,x)\,dx. By (P22) the latter equals ∬∣KB(t,x)∣2 dt dx\iint|K_B(t,x)|^2\,dt\,dx. Scalar Plancherel in the kernel formula for BB makes this (2π)−n∥φ∥22(2\pi)^{-n}\|\varphi\|_2^2. Cancelling the common factor proves (P24). This computation uses ordinary integrals of Schwartz kernels, and needs no trace-class theorem.

For q>0q>0 define the scalar unitary

(Uy,η,qv)(x)=qn/2eiη⋅xv(q(x−y)).(P25) (U_{y,\eta,q}v)(x)=q^{n/2}e^{i\eta\cdot x}v(q(x-y)). \tag{P25}

Changing variables in (G1) gives

Uy,η,qOp⁡(ψ)Uy,η,q∗=Op⁡ ⁣(ψ(q(x−y),(ξ−η)/q)).(P26) U_{y,\eta,q}\operatorname{Op}(\psi)U_{y,\eta,q}^* =\operatorname{Op}\!\left( \psi(q(x-y),(\xi-\eta)/q)\right). \tag{P26}

These scalar operators act on HH-valued functions too, by the same kernels. A bounded coefficient A∈L(H)A\in\mathcal L(H) commutes with them. If A≥0A\geq0, then for u∈S(H)u\in\mathcal S(H),

⟨UB∗BU∗Au,u⟩=⟨ABU∗u,BU∗u⟩L2(H)≥0.(P27) \left\langle U B^*B U^*Au,u\right\rangle =\left\langle A B U^*u,B U^*u\right\rangle_{L^2(H)}\geq0. \tag{P27}

No diagonalization of AA, finite rank condition, or separability assumption on HH is used.

Put

σ=ρ+δ2,q(η)=⟨η⟩σ,0<σ<1.(P28) \sigma=\frac{\rho+\delta}{2},\quad q(\eta)=\langle\eta\rangle^\sigma, \qquad 0<\sigma<1. \tag{P28}

For a scalar symbol bb, and any Schwartz function vv on phase space, define

(Ivb)(x,ξ)=∬v ⁣(q(η)(x−y),ξ−ηq(η))b(y,η) dy dη.(P29) (\mathcal I_v b)(x,\xi)=\iint v\!\left(q(\eta)(x-y),\frac{\xi-\eta}{q(\eta)}\right) b(y,\eta)\,dy\,d\eta. \tag{P29}

This is an absolutely convergent scalar integral for every symbol of finite order. To see this, first integrate its scalar majorant in yy. For every large MM, the result is at most

CM∫q(η)−n⟨η⟩r(1+∣ξ−η∣q(η))−Mdη.(P30) C_M\int q(\eta)^{-n}\langle\eta\rangle^r \left(1+\frac{|\xi-\eta|}{q(\eta)}\right)^{-M}d\eta. \tag{P30}

For large ∣η∣|\eta| with ξ\xi fixed, the parenthesis grows like ⟨η⟩1−σ\langle\eta\rangle^{1-\sigma}, so an arbitrarily large MM dominates the remaining polynomial factors. Differentiating the integrand only creates further polynomial factors and Schwartz derivatives. The same reasoning gives local uniform convergence of every differentiated integral, hence norm smoothness.

For a nonnegative a(x,ξ)∈L(H)a(x,\xi)\in\mathcal L(H) in any finite-order symbol class, set a+=Iψaa_+=\mathcal I_\psi a. Then

⟨Op⁡(a+)u,u⟩=∬⟨a(y,η)BUy,η,q(η)∗u,BUy,η,q(η)∗u⟩ dy dη≥0.(P31) \langle\operatorname{Op}(a_+)u,u\rangle =\iint\left\langle a(y,\eta)B U_{y,\eta,q(\eta)}^*u, B U_{y,\eta,q(\eta)}^*u\right\rangle \,dy\,d\eta\geq0. \tag{P31}

We verify convergence of the quadratic integral, since its parameter domain is unbounded. A direct Fourier transformation gives

BUy,η,q∗u(t)=(2π)−nqn/2∫ei(t+qy)⋅θφ(t,θ)u^(η+qθ) dθ.(P32) B U_{y,\eta,q}^*u(t) =(2\pi)^{-n}q^{n/2}\int e^{i(t+qy)\cdot\theta}\varphi(t,\theta) \widehat u(\eta+q\theta)\,d\theta. \tag{P32}

For the original nonnegative range, both tt and θ\theta in this integral lie in fixed compact sets. As ∣η∣→∞|\eta|\to\infty, q(η)=o(∣η∣)q(\eta)=o(|\eta|), so ∣η+qθ∣≥∣η∣/2|\eta+q\theta|\geq|\eta|/2 there. Integrating by parts in θ\theta gives arbitrary powers of ⟨t+qy⟩−1\langle t+qy\rangle^{-1}; the derivatives of u^\widehat u still decrease faster than any frequency power, and the factors qq they create have polynomial growth in η\eta. Since q≥1q\geq1, this proves an arbitrary product decay in ⟨y⟩\langle y\rangle and ⟨η⟩\langle\eta\rangle for the Lt2(H)L^2_t(H) norm of (P32). Bounded η\eta is handled by the same integration by parts. This decay makes (P31) absolutely convergent even after the factor ∥a(y,η)∥≤C⟨η⟩r\|a(y,\eta)\|\leq C\langle\eta\rangle^r. For compact parameter cutoffs, (P26), Fubini and polarization prove the equality in (P31). Letting the cutoffs tend to one, (P30), (P32), and dominated convergence prove the displayed equality for all Schwartz inputs. Thus (P31) constructs positivity as a quadratic-form statement, without asserting a bounded operator when the order is positive.

G5. Two cancellations and the full error

Let v∈S(R2n)v\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R^{2n}) be even and let cv=∫vc_v=\int v. For every scalar b∈Sρ,δrb\in S^r_{\rho,\delta},

Tvb:=Ivb−cvb∈Sρ,δr−κ.(P33) T_vb:=\mathcal I_vb-c_vb \in S^{r-\kappa}_{\rho,\delta}. \tag{P33}

Every seminorm of this difference is bounded by finitely many seminorms of bb and vv. We first prove its undifferentiated form and then derive exact identities for all derivatives.

Write λ=⟨ξ⟩\lambda=\langle\xi\rangle and Q=λσQ=\lambda^\sigma. Separate the integral into ∣η−ξ∣≥λ/2|\eta-\xi|\geq\lambda/2 and its complement. The first region contributes O(λ−L)O(\lambda^{-L}) for every desired LL, using finitely many Schwartz seminorms. Here is the original nonnegative-exponent estimate behind that assertion. If ∣η∣≤4λ|\eta|\leq4\lambda, then q(η)≤Cλσq(\eta)\leq C\lambda^\sigma and the ratio in (P30) is at least cλ1−σc\lambda^{1-\sigma}; its arbitrary negative power absorbs the region's polynomial volume and symbol weight. If ∣η∣>4λ|\eta|>4\lambda, the ratio is at least c⟨η⟩1−σc\langle\eta\rangle^{1-\sigma}, and integration of the resulting power gives the same conclusion. The estimate also holds after inserting any fixed polynomial in y−xy-x and η−ξ\eta-\xi: integrate the position polynomial against the Schwartz decay first, and increase MM. This will allow us to replace truncated polynomial moments by full moments.

In the complementary region, ⟨η⟩\langle\eta\rangle, ⟨ξ⟩\langle\xi\rangle, and the weights along their connecting segment are comparable. Set

z=Q(y−x),θ=(η−ξ)/Q,R=q(ξ+Qθ)Q.(P34) z=Q(y-x),\qquad \theta=(\eta-\xi)/Q, \qquad R=\frac{q(\xi+Q\theta)}{Q}. \tag{P34}

The Jacobian dy dηdy\,d\eta is dz dθdz\,d\theta. Evenness replaces the kernel by v(Rz,θ/R)v(Rz,\theta/R). The ratios R,R−1R,R^{-1} are bounded in this region. Taylor's formula for qq, using ∂γq=O(λσ−∣γ∣)\partial^\gamma q=O(\lambda^{\sigma-|\gamma|}), gives

R−1=∇q(ξ)⋅θ+O(λ2σ−2∣θ∣2),∣R−1∣≤Cλσ−1∣θ∣.(P35) R-1=\nabla q(\xi)\cdot\theta +O(\lambda^{2\sigma-2}|\theta|^2), \qquad |R-1|\leq C\lambda^{\sigma-1}|\theta|. \tag{P35}

Define the scalar differential operator

Lv(z,θ)=z⋅∂zv−θ⋅∂θv.(P36) \mathcal L v(z,\theta)=z\cdot\partial_zv-\theta\cdot\partial_\theta v. \tag{P36}

Uniformly for bounded positive R,R−1R,R^{-1}, Taylor expansion in the scalar dilation parameter implies, for every MM,

v(Rz,θ/R)=v(z,θ)+(∇q(ξ)⋅θ)Lv(z,θ)+Eξ(z,θ), v(Rz,\theta/R) =v(z,\theta)+(\nabla q(\xi)\cdot\theta)\mathcal L v(z,\theta) +E_\xi(z,\theta),
∣Eξ(z,θ)∣≤CMλ2σ−2⟨(z,θ)⟩−M∣θ∣2.(P37) |E_\xi(z,\theta)| \leq C_M\lambda^{2\sigma-2} \langle(z,\theta)\rangle^{-M}|\theta|^2. \tag{P37}

Indeed the first and second dilation derivatives of v(Rz,θ/R)v(Rz,\theta/R) are Schwartz with uniformly controlled seminorms on a compact interval of RR's; then use both parts of (P35). This proves (P37) without treating the moving scale as a constant.

The zeroth moment of Lv\mathcal L v is zero, by integration by parts and equality of the two dimensions. Also vv and Lv\mathcal L v are even. Consequently the ordinary degree-one moments of vv, and the integral of θjLv\theta_j\mathcal L v, vanish. Write MαβM_{\alpha\beta} for the kernel moment with factor (η−ξ)α(y−x)β(\eta-\xi)^\alpha(y-x)^\beta, restricted to the complementary region. Equations (P34)–(P37), together with the tail estimate, yield

M00=cv+O(λ2σ−2),∣Mαβ∣≤CQ∣α∣−∣β∣λσ−1(∣α∣+∣β∣=1),∣Mαβ∣≤CQ∣α∣−∣β∣(∣α∣+∣β∣=2).(P38) \begin{aligned} M_{00}&=c_v+O(\lambda^{2\sigma-2}),\\ |M_{\alpha\beta}|&\leq C Q^{|\alpha|-|\beta|} \lambda^{\sigma-1} &&(|\alpha|+|\beta|=1),\\ |M_{\alpha\beta}|&\leq C Q^{|\alpha|-|\beta|} &&(|\alpha|+|\beta|=2). \end{aligned} \tag{P38}

For the first line the fixed zeroth moment is cvc_v, the linear scale correction integrates to zero by parity, and (P37) controls the remainder. For the second line the fixed moment vanishes, the scale correction is O(λσ−1)O(\lambda^{\sigma-1}), and its second-order remainder is smaller since σ<1\sigma<1. For the third line an absolute Schwartz moment bound suffices. Thus the first cancellation comes from odd symbol moments and the second comes from the scale correction to total mass.

Expand b(y,η)b(y,\eta) at (x,ξ)(x,\xi) through total degree two. In the scaled variables, a position increment contributes Q−1λδ=λ−κ/2Q^{-1}\lambda^\delta=\lambda^{-\kappa/2}, and a frequency increment contributes Qλ−ρ=λ−κ/2Q\lambda^{-\rho}=\lambda^{-\kappa/2}. The integral remainder is therefore bounded in norm by

Cλr−3κ/2(∣z∣+∣θ∣)3.(P39) C\lambda^{r-3\kappa/2}(|z|+|\theta|)^3. \tag{P39}

This estimate is uniform in position because the symbol bounds are global there; the frequency segment stays in the comparable-weight region. Multiplication by the actual kernel and integration leaves the same power of λ\lambda.

The constant term after subtraction of cvbc_vb is at most Cλr+2σ−2C\lambda^{r+2\sigma-2}. Each linear term is at most Cλr−κ/2+σ−1C\lambda^{r-\kappa/2+\sigma-1}; each quadratic term is at most Cλr−κC\lambda^{r-\kappa}. Since

2σ−2≤−κ,σ−1≤−κ/2,(P40) 2\sigma-2\leq-\kappa, \qquad \sigma-1\leq-\kappa/2, \tag{P40}

both inequalities being equivalent to ρ≤1\rho\leq1, these terms and (P39) prove ∥Tvb(x,ξ)∥≤Cλr−κ\|T_vb(x,\xi)\|\leq C\lambda^{r-\kappa}.

To obtain all derivatives, put Fj(η)=q(η)−1∂jq(η)∈S1,0−1F_j(\eta)=q(\eta)^{-1}\partial_jq(\eta)\in S^{-1}_{1,0}. Direct differentiation of the kernel, followed by integration by parts in yy or η\eta, gives the exact identities

∂xjIvb=Iv(∂xjb),∂ξjIvb=Iv(∂ξjb)+ILv(Fjb).(P41) \partial_{x_j}\mathcal I_v b=\mathcal I_v(\partial_{x_j}b), \qquad \partial_{\xi_j}\mathcal I_v b =\mathcal I_v(\partial_{\xi_j}b)+\mathcal I_{\mathcal L v}(F_jb). \tag{P41}

For the second identity, the sum of differentiation in ξj\xi_j and ηj\eta_j of the kernel is FjF_j times the kernel with vv replaced by Lv\mathcal L v. Boundary terms vanish by (P30) with larger exponents. Since cLv=0c_{\mathcal L v}=0, subtraction gives

∂xjTvb=Tv(∂xjb),∂ξjTvb=Tv(∂ξjb)+TLv(Fjb).(P42) \partial_{x_j}T_vb=T_v(\partial_{x_j}b), \qquad \partial_{\xi_j}T_vb=T_v(\partial_{\xi_j}b)+T_{\mathcal L v}(F_jb). \tag{P42}

Iterating (P42) produces finitely many terms with even Schwartz kernels Lkv\mathcal L^kv. Each position differentiation increases the input order by δ\delta; each frequency differentiation either decreases it by ρ\rho on bb, or introduces a factor of order minus one. Derivatives of those factors decrease their orders further. Since ρ≤1\rho\leq1, every term after α\alpha frequency and β\beta position derivatives has input order at most r−ρ∣α∣+δ∣β∣r-\rho|\alpha|+\delta|\beta|. Applying the undifferentiated estimate just proved to each term proves (P33) with its full differentiated bounds. Every step uses only finitely many input derivatives and Schwartz moments for any specified output seminorm. ∎

There is a useful more precise classical estimate. With (ρ,δ)=(1,0)(\rho,\delta)=(1,0), so Q=λ1/2Q=\lambda^{1/2}, (P38) gives for total degree at most two a coefficient bounded by Cλ∣α∣−1C\lambda^{|\alpha|-1}, except that the zeroth coefficient is understood after subtracting cvc_v. Retaining the derivatives of bb instead of bounding them by its order gives

∥Tvb(x,ξ)∥≤C1∑∣α∣+∣β∣≤2λ∣α∣−1∥∂ξα∂xβb(x,ξ)∥+C2pr,L(b)λr−3/2.(P43) \|T_vb(x,\xi)\| \leq C_1\sum_{|\alpha|+|\beta|\leq2} \lambda^{|\alpha|-1} \|\partial_\xi^\alpha\partial_x^\beta b(x,\xi)\| +C_2p_{r,L}(b)\lambda^{r-3/2}. \tag{P43}

Here LL is finite, C1,C2C_1,C_2 depend on the chosen kernel, dimension and order, and the high-frequency tail has been included by choosing sufficiently many of its powers. Formula (P43) is an estimate by actual derivatives at the specified point, together with a controlled higher-derivative remainder. It is stronger than the order assertion alone.

G6. The full sharp lower bound and its energy receiver

Theorem. For every real mm, an ordinary scalar symbol a∈S2m+1a\in S^{2m+1} with Re⁡a≥0\operatorname{Re}a\ge0 satisfies

Re⁡(Op⁡(a)u,u)≥−Cm,np2m+1,J(a)∥u∥m2,u∈S,(G5) \operatorname{Re}(\operatorname{Op}(a)u,u) \ge -C_{m,n}p_{2m+1,J}(a)\|u\|_m^2,\qquad u\in\mathcal S, \tag{G5}

for a fixed finite JJ. The constant is uniform over each bounded symbol family.

For real a≥0a\ge0, P24 and P31 give a nonnegative quadratic form for a+=Iψaa_+=\mathcal I_\psi a, and P33–P42 give a−a+∈S2ma-a_+\in S^{2m}, with each output seminorm bounded by finitely many input seminorms. The full convergence proof of P31 justifies this form even for positive input order. Apply G4 to that difference. This proves G5 for real aa.

For complex aa, write a=A+iBa=A+iB, with A=Re⁡a≥0A=\operatorname{Re}a\ge0 and B=Im⁡aB=\operatorname{Im}a real. The first case controls AA. O3 gives Op⁡(B)∗−Op⁡(B)∈Op⁡(S2m)\operatorname{Op}(B)^*-\operatorname{Op}(B)\in\operatorname{Op}(S^{2m}), with finite-seminorm control, and

Re⁡(iOp⁡(B)u,u)=i2((Op⁡(B)−Op⁡(B)∗)u,u).(G6) \operatorname{Re}(i\operatorname{Op}(B)u,u) =\frac{i}{2}\big((\operatorname{Op}(B)-\operatorname{Op}(B)^*)u,u\big). \tag{G6}

The inner product convention in G1 gives this sign: the second adjoint pairing is the conjugate of the first. G4 bounds the absolute value of the right side, proving G5.

For a∈S1a\in S^1 with Re⁡a≥−C0\operatorname{Re}a\ge-C_0, apply G5 with m=0m=0 to a+C0a+C_0 and subtract C0∥u∥22C_0\|u\|_2^2. We obtain a uniform cc with

Re⁡(Op⁡(a)u,u)≥−c∥u∥22(u∈H1).(G7) \operatorname{Re}(\operatorname{Op}(a)u,u)\ge-c\|u\|_2^2 \quad(u\in H^1). \tag{G7}

Indeed Schwartz approximation in H1H^1 and G3 with r=s=1r=s=1 pass both pairings to the limit. For every real ss, O3 gives the full symbol of EsOp⁡(a)E−sE_s\operatorname{Op}(a)E_{-s} equal to a+dsa+d_s, where ds∈S0d_s\in S^0 uniformly on bounded subsets of S1S^1: the zeroth product is exactly aa, and each differentiated term and its complete remainder lose at least one order. The global packet bound for dsd_s then gives the same lower form bound with a constant csc_s. Thus all real energy orders are justified without requiring positivity of the conjugated pointwise symbol.

G7. Strong time continuity under local symbol continuity

Suppose a(t)a(t) is bounded in SrS^r and continuous in distributions in (x,ξ)(x,\xi). On every compact box, the derivatives form bounded equicontinuous families, since one more derivative is uniformly bounded. Here is the needed compactness argument. Choose the countable set of rational grid points in all integer boxes and all derivative orders. Successive convergent scalar subsequences and a diagonal subsequence give convergence at all those points. Finite sufficiently fine nets and the common derivative bound turn convergence on that dense set into uniform convergence on each compact box. The fundamental theorem on coordinate segments shows that these limits are successive derivatives of one smooth function. The distributional limit identifies it with a(t0)a(t_0). If local smooth convergence as t→t0t\to t_0 failed, a sequence witnessing failure would have a subsequence of the preceding kind, a contradiction. Thus distributional continuity and boundedness give precisely local smooth continuity.

For fixed w∈Sw\in\mathcal S, the integral G1 and dominated convergence give local smooth convergence of Op⁡(a(t))w\operatorname{Op}(a(t))w. O1 bounds every output Schwartz seminorm uniformly. On the complement of a large base ball, one extra position weight makes the tail arbitrarily small; on the ball use local convergence. This proves convergence in S\mathcal S. Now G3 and Schwartz density give strong continuity Hs→Hs−rH^s\to H^{s-r}: approximate a fixed vector by a Schwartz vector, bound the difference of its two images by twice the uniform G3 constant, and then use the already proved convergence on that Schwartz vector.

For u∈C([0,T];Hs)u\in C([0,T];H^s), add and subtract Op⁡(a(t))u(t0)\operatorname{Op}(a(t))u(t_0). The uniform bound controls the varying-vector error, and strong continuity controls the fixed-vector error. Hence t↦Op⁡(a(t))u(t)t\mapsto\operatorname{Op}(a(t))u(t) is continuous in Hs−rH^{s-r}. No operator-norm continuity or global symbol-seminorm continuity follows or is used.

Sources and exact receiving scope

The retained P22–P43 proof is a modified ordinary-parameter selection from AN03-U011, Positivity through a moving family of scalar probes. Its moving-window normalization, quadratic positivity, both moment cancellations and complete differentiated remainder are retained. Wider parameter extensions were omitted, and G1, G6–G7 give explicit current receiving arguments. The mathematical antecedent is Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, the approved 2007 edition, Theorem 18.1.14 and its proof; the first-order energy application is §23.1. No book text or files are included.

This companion completes the sharp lower-bound and global continuity inputs of U030. It does not yet certify U030's spacetime composition, restriction or entire dependency chain.