Scalar positivity with a bounded negative part

A nonnegative scalar symbol need not quantize to a nonnegative operator. The theorem proved here bounds its negative part on the precise scale h−2h^{-2}. Squared localization has a two-derivative error; a scalar splitting and induction on spatial dimension give uniform local lower bounds.

This is a modified selection of AN03-U019, When a nonnegative scalar symbol acquires a negative part, from Elliptic Operators & Boundary Problems: Renewed 2026 Course Draft. Original principal author: AN-03 course-writing task. Original publisher: AN-03 local course project. The AN-03 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex are responsible for the renewed edition. Selection, exact prerequisite connections and identified additions: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026; publisher: AN-04 local course project.

Original text: CC0. See the rights notice.

F0. Statement, conventions and exact earlier proofs

Use D=−i∂D=-i\partial, the symplectic form in B1 of the operator-bound companion, and its permissible metric g≤gσg\le g^\sigma. Put h2=sup⁡T≠0g(T)/gσ(T)h^2=\sup_{T\ne0}g(T)/g^\sigma(T). All symbol derivatives are normed in the original moving metric. For scalar aa, the conclusion is

0≤a∈S(h−2,g)⟹(awu,u)≥−C∥u∥L22,u∈S(Rn).(MP3) 0\le a\in S(h^{-2},g) \quad\Longrightarrow\quad (a^wu,u)\ge-C\|u\|_{L^2}^2,\qquad u\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R^n). \tag{MP3}

The constant uses only finitely many symbol seminorms and the metric structural constants. This is a quadratic-form assertion on the stated domain; it does not assert positivity.

The scalar splitting and adaptive-scale companion contains the full nonnegative gradient bound, polarization, normalized jet lemma, local splitting with all derivative bounds, squared partition, and value/Hessian metric. Its retained formulas F14–F20 and F25–F30 are used below with their original meanings; in particular

∣∂ka∣≤λ(k−4)/2,H(X)=[max⁡(1,a(X),∥a′′(X)∥)]−1,GX=H(X)e,λ≤H≤1.(MP4) |\partial^k a|\le\lambda^{(k-4)/2},\qquad H(X)=\bigl[\max(1,\sqrt{a(X)},\|a''(X)\|)\bigr]^{-1}, \quad G_X=H(X)e,\quad\lambda\le H\le1. \tag{MP4}

The referenced companion proves both directions of temperateness of GG and HH, every frozen derivative bound, and the strict support margins. Its normalization rescales aa to fν(z)=Hν2a(Xν+z/Hν)f_\nu(z)=H_\nu^2a(X_\nu+z/\sqrt{H_\nu}). The present operator-bound companion supplies the complete coefficient product, uniform Hilbert L2L^2 theorem and symplectic axes. Weyl action and covariance identifies all products on Schwartz space. Its quantization companion supplies every real conversion parameter, derivative gain and remainder. No positivity theorem is assumed in these prerequisites.

References below to the adaptive construction F25–F30 mean the earlier companion, and references to the normalized splitting lemma mean its Section S3. The numbered sections retained below preserve the AN03 source's locators.

5. Squared localization and its two-derivative error

Let gg be permissible and m=h−2m=h^{-2}. Choose real smooth functions ϕν\phi_\nu, supported in permissible metric balls, with

∑νϕν2=1,(ϕν)ν bounded in S(1,g;ℓ2).(F21) \sum_\nu\phi_\nu^2=1, \qquad (\phi_\nu)_\nu\text{ bounded in }S(1,g;\ell^2). \tag{F21}

They are obtained from the ellipsoid cover of Section 2 of Localizing symbols with moving metrics: take cutoffs θν\theta_\nu equal to one on its smaller covering balls and set ϕν=θν/(∑μθμ2)1/2\phi_\nu=\theta_\nu/(\sum_\mu\theta_\mu^2)^{1/2}. The denominator is bounded below by one. Only a fixed number of terms occur at each point, and the product and chain rules give every seminorm in (F21). This also proves boundedness of all derivatives of the column in ℓ2\ell^2, without a factor depending on the number of balls.

Suppose real symbols aνa_\nu are supported in fixed slightly larger balls, have uniform S(m,g)S(m,g) seminorms there, and satisfy ϕν2aν=ϕν2a\phi_\nu^2a_\nu=\phi_\nu^2a. Then

∑ν∥ϕνwu∥2≤C∥u∥2,∑νϕνwaνwϕνw=aw+Rw,R∈S(1,g).(F22) \sum_\nu\|\phi_\nu^wu\|^2\leq C\|u\|^2, \qquad \sum_\nu\phi_\nu^wa_\nu^w\phi_\nu^w=a^w+R^w, \quad R\in S(1,g). \tag{F22}

The sum in the second identity is interpreted weakly on Schwartz functions. The norm of the remainder uses only finitely many input seminorms. The finite-derivative theorem below applies this identity to compactly supported approximants before taking its final limit.

The first estimate applies Section 7 of When a moving symbol scale controls an operator to the column in (F21). For a finite index set, apply the operator-norm Weyl product to that column, the diagonal matrix with entries aνa_\nu, and its real row. Finite overlap gives uniform symbol bounds for the diagonal as well. The zeroth term is ∑ϕν2aν\sum\phi_\nu^2a_\nu. For each scalar entry the first terms cancel:

{ϕν,aν}ϕν+{ϕνaν,ϕν}=0.(F23) \{\phi_\nu,a_\nu\}\phi_\nu+ \{\phi_\nu a_\nu,\phi_\nu\}=0. \tag{F23}

Expanding the two products to order two, and using the product rule on the first correction, shows that all remaining terms have weight mh2=1mh^2=1. The constants involve only finitely many input seminorms and the fixed overlap. This calculation uses the scalar nature of ϕν\phi_\nu; it does not discard a noncommutative first correction between two arbitrary operator-valued symbols.

For an exhaustion by finite sets, embed all finite columns and diagonal matrices into the same space ℓ2\ell^2 by inserting zero entries. Local finiteness of the larger supports makes these symbols converge locally smoothly in operator norm to their full column and diagonal, with uniform symbol seminorms. The bounded-set local-smooth continuity in Section 1 of When a moving symbol scale controls an operator therefore makes their Weyl products and each finite remainder converge in the corresponding symbol classes in this sense. The principal sums converge locally smoothly to aa, and the remainders converge to a symbol R∈S(1,g)R\in S(1,g). Polynomial control from temperateness makes these bounded local convergences distributional. The Weyl kernel pairing with Schwartz functions passes to the limit and proves (F22), including its weak sum interpretation.

In particular, if every localized operator obeys ⟨aνwv,v⟩≥−C0∥v∥2\langle a_\nu^wv,v\rangle\geq-C_0\|v\|^2 with the same C0C_0, the finite identities followed by this limit give

⟨awu,u⟩≥−C∥u∥2.(F24) \langle a^wu,u\rangle\geq-C\|u\|^2. \tag{F24}

This implication uses no positivity of the quantized cutoffs themselves. It uses their squared L2L^2 estimate, the local lower bounds, and a bounded remainder.

7. The uniform estimate for every constant metric

Theorem. For each spatial dimension nn, there are an integer NnN_n and a constant CnC_n with the following property. Let gg be any constant positive quadratic form with hg≤λ≤1h_g\leq\lambda\leq1. If a≥0a\geq0 is scalar and

∣a∣k,g≤λ−2(0≤k≤Nn),(F31) |a|_{k,g}\leq\lambda^{-2}\quad(0\leq k\leq N_n), \tag{F31}

then ⟨awu,u⟩≥−Cn∥u∥2\langle a^wu,u\rangle\geq-C_n\|u\|^2. The constants are independent of g,a,λg,a,\lambda.

Symplectic normalization. A positive quadratic form has symplectic coordinates in which it is ∑jλj(dxj2+dξj2)\sum_j\lambda_j(dx_j^2+d\xi_j^2), with λj>0\lambda_j>0 and max⁡jλj=hg\max_j\lambda_j=h_g. Here is a direct construction. In a gg-orthonormal basis, the matrix of the symplectic form is real, invertible and skew-adjoint. Orthogonal spectral decomposition produces orthogonal pairs vj,wjv_j,w_j with σ(vj,wj)=κj>0\sigma(v_j,w_j)=\kappa_j>0, all cross-pair symplectic products zero, and all gg-lengths one. Divide both vectors of pair jj by κj\sqrt{\kappa_j}. Their symplectic product becomes one and their squared gg-lengths become λj=κj−1\lambda_j=\kappa_j^{-1}. Order the pairs with the sign convention in F0. In these coordinates the dual form has reciprocal coefficients, so the definition of hh gives hg=max⁡jλjh_g=\max_j\lambda_j. This uses only finite-dimensional spectral decomposition. Unitary covariance transports (F31) and the form inequality. Enlarging the diagonal form to λe\lambda e preserves the derivative bounds, since its unit directions are smaller. Thus it suffices to prove the assertion under (F25), equivalently the first inequality of (MP4).

Induction. In spatial dimension zero the quantization is a nonnegative scalar. Assume the constant-metric theorem in dimension n−1n-1. A nonnegative symbol in dimension nn that is independent of ξ1\xi_1 acts, at each fixed x1x_1, as a Weyl operator in the other n−1n-1 variables. Its remaining derivatives obey the same constant-metric bounds, uniformly in the parameter x1x_1. Apply the inductive estimate and integrate in x1x_1. The identity follows first from the Weyl kernel on Schwartz functions, where Fourier inversion in ξ1\xi_1 produces the delta function in that coordinate; the quadratic-form estimate then follows by Fubini. The same conclusion holds for a symbol independent of any fixed real phase direction. Indeed an orthogonal symplectic map sends a unit vector in that direction to the ξ1\xi_1 direction: complete the pair v,Jvv,Jv to orthonormal symplectic pairs in its invariant orthogonal complement. This map preserves ee, and its unitary covariance preserves the lower bound.

Apply the adaptive construction (F26)–(F30). If Hν=1H_\nu=1, the localized symbol has uniformly bounded derivatives through the required order in S(1,e)S(1,e). Section 7 of When a moving symbol scale controls an operator immediately bounds its entire operator norm. This treats the floor of the adaptive scale without subtracting a large constant from a nonnegative function.

If Hν<1H_\nu<1, the rescaled function (F27) satisfies the normalized splitting lemma. Write it as v(z⊥)+q(z)2v(z_\perp)+q(z)^2 on the larger cutoff ball. Choose a nonnegative smooth cutoff in the transverse variables, equal to one on the projection of supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi, supported inside the domain of vv. Multiplying vv by it and extending by zero gives a global smooth nonnegative function v~\widetilde v independent of the same direction. Define

χν(Y)=χ(Hν(Y−Xν)),bν(Y)=Hν−2v~(Hν(Y−Xν)),cν(Y)=Hν−1(χq)(Hν(Y−Xν)).(F32) \begin{split} \chi_\nu(Y)&=\chi(\sqrt{H_\nu}(Y-X_\nu)),\\ b_\nu(Y)&=H_\nu^{-2}\widetilde v(\sqrt{H_\nu}(Y-X_\nu)),\\ c_\nu(Y)&=H_\nu^{-1}(\chi q)(\sqrt{H_\nu}(Y-X_\nu)). \end{split} \tag{F32}

The real function χq\chi q is extended by zero from a domain strictly larger than its support. We have the global identity

aν=χν2bν+cν2.(F33) a_\nu=\chi_\nu^2b_\nu+c_\nu^2. \tag{F33}

The derivative bounds from the splitting lemma give uniform seminorms, through order Nn−2N_n-2, in

χν∈S(1,Hνe),bν∈S(Hν−2,Hνe),cν∈S(Hν−1,Hνe).(F34) \chi_\nu\in S(1,H_\nu e),\quad b_\nu\in S(H_\nu^{-2},H_\nu e),\quad c_\nu\in S(H_\nu^{-1},H_\nu e). \tag{F34}

Since bνb_\nu is independent of one direction, induction yields bνw≥−Cb_\nu^w\geq-C uniformly. Its symbol bounds may have a fixed constant instead of one; division by that constant before using induction and multiplication afterward give the same conclusion with another fixed CC.

Expand the two products in

Tν=χνwbνwχνw+(cνw)2.(F35) T_\nu=\chi_\nu^wb_\nu^w\chi_\nu^w+(c_\nu^w)^2. \tag{F35}

The first-order terms cancel by (F23) and {cν,cν}=0\{c_\nu,c_\nu\}=0. Their remaining symbol weight is Hν2Hν−2=1H_\nu^2H_\nu^{-2}=1. Constant-metric continuity therefore bounds ∥aνw−Tν∥\|a_\nu^w-T_\nu\| independently of ν,λ\nu,\lambda. The cutoff operator χνw\chi_\nu^w is uniformly bounded. Since cνc_\nu is real, its contribution is a square, so

⟨aνwu,u⟩≥−C∥χνwu∥2−C′∥u∥2≥−C′′∥u∥2.(F36) \langle a_\nu^wu,u\rangle \geq-C\|\chi_\nu^wu\|^2-C'\|u\|^2 \geq-C''\|u\|^2. \tag{F36}

These bounds also hold in the previously treated Hν=1H_\nu=1 branch. Apply (F24) for the adaptive metric to obtain the desired bound for aa.

Finite derivative dependence and approximation. Every use of the product, remainder, partition and continuity estimates above asks for finitely many input seminorms. The structural constants of the adaptive metric depend only on the fourth-derivative normalization and dimension. Let JnJ_n exceed all input orders needed to bound the order-two product errors, their required output seminorms, the cutoff operators and the squared-localization error in this proof. These are finite indices supplied by the continuity estimates, independent of a,λa,\lambda. Choose

N0=0,Nn≥max⁡{4,Jn+2,Nn−1+2}.(F37) N_0=0,\qquad N_n\geq\max\{4,J_n+2,N_{n-1}+2\}. \tag{F37}

The two additional derivatives pay for the splitting lemma. Formula (F28) bounds all the rescaled input derivatives up to this chosen order. Thus neither the induction nor the summation asks for infinitely many uniformly bounded derivatives.

To justify the symbol calculus when only these finite global bounds are assumed, first multiply aa by ζ(X/R)2\zeta(X/R)^2, with a fixed nonnegative compactly supported cutoff equal to one near zero. Take R≥λ−1/2R\geq\lambda^{-1/2}. The product rule and (F25) give the same finite bounds up to a fixed constant independent of R,λR,\lambda, because a derivative on the cutoff contributes at most λ1/2\lambda^{1/2}. A fixed normalization absorbs that constant. The compactly supported symbols have every seminorm finite, so all preceding calculus operations are legitimate. Their adaptive structural constants and all constants actually used are uniform. Let R→∞R\to\infty at fixed λ,a\lambda,a. The cutoffs converge locally smoothly to one, with a common polynomial bound, and pairing against the Schwartz Wigner function passes to the limit. This proves the theorem as stated. □\square

8. Gluing the constant estimates for a variable metric

Scalar Fefferman–Phong theorem. Let gg be permissible and let 0≤a∈S(h−2,g)0\leq a\in S(h^{-2},g) be scalar. Then the second line of (F5) holds.

Proof. Construct a real squared partition for gg. Choose nonnegative cutoffs ψν\psi_\nu in slightly larger metric balls, equal to one on supp⁡ϕν\operatorname{supp}\phi_\nu, with uniform S(1,g)S(1,g) bounds. Put aν=ψνaa_\nu=\psi_\nu a. The functions are nonnegative. On each support, slow variation compares gg with gν=gXνg_\nu=g_{X_\nu}, and hh with hν=h(Xν)h_\nu=h(X_\nu). The product rule gives

∣aν∣k,gν≤Ckhν−2(F38) |a_\nu|_{k,g_\nu}\leq C_k h_\nu^{-2} \tag{F38}

globally, since the function vanishes outside its support. The constant metric gνg_\nu has Planck parameter hν≤1h_\nu\leq1. Divide by max⁡k≤NnCk\max_{k\leq N_n}C_k, apply Section 7 with λ=hν\lambda=h_\nu, and multiply back. The lower bound is uniform in ν\nu. Section 5 applies because ϕν2aν=ϕν2a\phi_\nu^2a_\nu=\phi_\nu^2a, so (F24) proves the theorem. This application uses the completed constant-metric induction, never the theorem currently being proved. □\square

9. The classical endpoint and a change of quantization

For 0≤δ<ρ≤10\leq\delta<\rho\leq1, take

gx,ξ=⟨ξ⟩2δ∣dx∣2+⟨ξ⟩−2ρ∣dξ∣2,h=⟨ξ⟩δ−ρ.(F39) g_{x,\xi}=\langle\xi\rangle^{2\delta}|dx|^2+ \langle\xi\rangle^{-2\rho}|d\xi|^2, \qquad h=\langle\xi\rangle^{\delta-\rho}. \tag{F39}

The following direct verification shows that this metric is permissible, and h−2=⟨ξ⟩2(ρ−δ)h^{-2}=\langle\xi\rangle^{2(\rho-\delta)}. Therefore

0≤a∈Sρ,δ2(ρ−δ)⟹aw≥−C.(F40) 0\leq a\in S_{\rho,\delta}^{2(\rho-\delta)} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad a^w\geq-C. \tag{F40}

The metric hypotheses in the original coordinates. Write w(ξ)=⟨ξ⟩w(\xi)=\langle\xi\rangle, which satisfies ∣w(ξ)−w(η)∣≤∣ξ−η∣|w(\xi)-w(\eta)|\le|\xi-\eta| by the Euclidean triangle inequality in one extra dimension. If gX(X−Y)≤r2g_X(X-Y)\le r^2, r<1/2r<1/2, then ∣ξ−η∣≤rw(ξ)ρ≤rw(ξ)|\xi-\eta|\le r w(\xi)^\rho\le r w(\xi), giving 1−r≤w(η)/w(ξ)≤1+r1-r\le w(\eta)/w(\xi)\le1+r. The two coefficient ratios of gg, and every fixed power of ww, are therefore locally comparable.

For temperateness based at Y=(y,η)Y=(y,\eta), put d=∣ξ−η∣/w(η)δd=|\xi-\eta|/w(\eta)^\delta. If ∣ξ−η∣≤w(η)/2|\xi-\eta|\le w(\eta)/2, the ratios of w(ξ)w(\xi) and w(η)w(\eta) are bounded by two. Otherwise d≥w(η)1−δ/2d\ge w(\eta)^{1-\delta}/2. In both cases

max⁡ ⁣(w(ξ)w(η),w(η)w(ξ))≤Cδ(1+d)1/(1−δ)≤Cδ′(1+gYσ(X−Y))1/[2(1−δ)].(MP5) \max\!\left(\frac{w(\xi)}{w(\eta)},\frac{w(\eta)}{w(\xi)}\right) \le C_\delta(1+d)^{1/(1-\delta)} \le C'_\delta\bigl(1+g_Y^\sigma(X-Y)\bigr)^{1/[2(1-\delta)]}. \tag{MP5}

Indeed the forward ratio is at most 1+d1+d, since w(η)δ−1≤1w(\eta)^{\delta-1}\le1; in the second case the reverse ratio is at most w(η)≤(2d)1/(1−δ)w(\eta)\le(2d)^{1/(1-\delta)}, since w(ξ)≥1w(\xi)\ge1. Raising these estimates to the fixed coefficient powers proves both metric and weight temperateness, with the stated distance base. The dual is gXσ=w(ξ)2ρ∣dx∣2+w(ξ)−2δ∣dξ∣2g_X^\sigma=w(\xi)^{2\rho}|dx|^2+w(\xi)^{-2\delta}|d\xi|^2, so h=wδ−ρ≤1h=w^{\delta-\rho}\le1. The coordinate derivative bounds defining Sρ,δmS_{\rho,\delta}^m are equivalent, in finite dimension, to the multilinear metric seminorms of S(wm,g)S(w^m,g): expand each direction in the normalized coordinate frame for one implication, and test coordinate directions for the other. This verifies every hypothesis of the variable-metric theorem and its reflection-compatible quantization conversion. Constants may depend on ρ,δ\rho,\delta; no uniform limit as δ↑1\delta\uparrow1 is asserted.

The same conclusion, with another constant, holds for the symmetric part a(x,D)+a(x,D)∗a(x,D)+a(x,D)^*. Indeed the Weyl symbol of the left quantization has expansion

b=a+i2∑j∂xj∂ξja+r,r∈Sρ,δ0,(F41) b=a+\frac{i}{2}\sum_j\partial_{x_j}\partial_{\xi_j}a+r, \qquad r\in S_{\rho,\delta}^{0}, \tag{F41}

with the sign fixed by D=−i∂D=-i\partial; for instance the left symbol xξx\xi has Weyl symbol xξ+i/2x\xi+i/2. The first correction is purely imaginary since aa is real. Thus the symmetric part has Weyl symbol b+b‾=2a+2Re⁡rb+\overline b=2a+2\operatorname{Re}r, and the last term is bounded on L2L^2. Apply (F40) to 2a2a. The stated corollary retains the strict inequality δ<ρ\delta<\rho; no type (1,1)(1,1) endpoint is being added by this argument.

F10. An exact square defect

The necessity of a bounded negative allowance can already be seen in one dimension. Let s(x,ξ)=xξs(x,\xi)=x\xi and A=sw=xD−i/2A=s^w=xD-i/2. Direct multiplication on Schwartz functions gives

(x2ξ2)w=−x2∂x2−2x∂x−12=A2−14,x2ξ2≥0.(MP6) (x^2\xi^2)^w=-x^2\partial_x^2-2x\partial_x-\tfrac12 =A^2-\tfrac14,\qquad x^2\xi^2\ge0. \tag{MP6}

The same sign follows from the second Weyl correction s#s=s2+1/4s\#s=s^2+1/4; all higher terms vanish. On x>0x>0, the substitution t=log⁡xt=\log x and u(x)=x−1/2v(log⁡x)u(x)=x^{-1/2}v(\log x) is an isometry from L2(dt)L^2(dt) to L2(dx)L^2(dx) and gives Au=−ix−1/2v′(t)Au=-ix^{-1/2}v'(t). Choose

vL(t)=π−1/4L−1/2e−t2/(2L2),uL(x)={x−1/2vL(log⁡x),x>0,0,x≤0.∥uL∥=1,((x2ξ2)wuL,uL)=12L2−14.(MP7) \begin{aligned} v_L(t)&=\pi^{-1/4}L^{-1/2}e^{-t^2/(2L^2)},\\ u_L(x)&= \begin{cases}x^{-1/2}v_L(\log x),&x>0,\\0,&x\le0.\end{cases} \quad \|u_L\|=1,\\ ((x^2\xi^2)^wu_L,u_L)&=\frac1{2L^2}-\frac14. \end{aligned} \tag{MP7}

Gaussian integration gives ∥vL∥=1\|v_L\|=1 and ∥vL′∥2=1/(2L2)\|v_L'\|^2=1/(2L^2). Each derivative of uLu_L is x−k−1/2x^{-k-1/2} times a polynomial in log⁡x\log x times the same Gaussian. For every real bb, ebt−t2/(2L2)e^{bt-t^2/(2L^2)} tends to zero faster than any polynomial as t→±∞t\to\pm\infty, by completing the square. Hence the extension is smooth and flat at zero and is Schwartz at both ends. The integration by parts for A2A^2 has no boundary terms. The expectation is negative when L>2L>\sqrt2, and tends to −1/4-1/4. This polynomial calculation is an exact example of the square correction; it is not an application of the bounded-symbol constant-metric hypothesis.

An exact Weyl square defect and its normalized test family

The left panel shows the probability density ∣v2(t)∣2|v_2(t)|^2 in the actual logarithmic coordinate t=log⁡xt=\log x, with Lebesgue measure dtdt. The right panel plots the proved expectation 1/(2L2)−1/41/(2L^2)-1/4, with its zero at 2\sqrt2, its value −1/8-1/8 at L=2L=2, and its limiting lower value −1/4-1/4. These are exact formulas sampled for drawing, not a numerical proof of the theorem. Editable figure source.

F11. Sources and receiving scope

The mathematical bodies of AN03-U019 Sections 5 and 7–9 through F41 are retained, with exact current prerequisite connections and the added verification MP5 of the classical metrics. The general scalar theorem, constant-form uniformity, finite-derivative dependence, cutoff limits, squared-localization weak sum and the classical range 0≤δ<ρ≤10\le\delta<\rho\le1 are preserved. The source's separate endpoint extensions are not selected.

The approved antecedents are Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, 2007 eBook, ISBN 978-3-540-49938-1, §18.6, Theorem 18.6.8 and its scalar splitting and constant-metric lemmas (printed 171–175; PDF 186–190), and Theorem 18.1.15 for the classical statement. The explicit programme proofs supply every required step; citations are attribution, not proof substitutes. MP6–MP7 are direct calculations in the Weyl convention already proved.

For the boundary Cauchy receiver, a real nonnegative ordinary symbol b∈S1,02b\in S^2_{1,0} therefore satisfies (bwu,u)≥−C∥u∥2(b^wu,u)\ge-C\|u\|^2, uniformly for a family with bounded relevant seminorms. The symmetric part of left quantization obeys the same form bound, with the imaginary first correction retained as in F41. This completes that positivity prerequisite; the complete boundary-energy lesson and its remaining arguments still require their own review.