The intrinsic symbol as a family of tangent Gaussians

The tangent comparison becomes intrinsic once its coefficient is identified with the principal symbol and its Gaussian is allowed to depend on the second jet of the modulating phase. We prove that identification, including ordinary symbols without a fixed leading limit and Hessians of changing rank.

Original programme proof and examples: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 4 October 2026; CC0 to the extent rights exist. Earlier components keep their separate licences.

Z0. Objects and exact earlier proofs

Let XX be a Hausdorff second-countable smooth nn-manifold, n≥1n\ge1, and let Λ⊂T∗X∖0\Lambda\subset T^*X\setminus0 be a closed smooth conic Lagrangian. Use ω=∑dξj∧dxj\omega=\sum d\xi_j\wedge dx_j, D=−i∂D=-i\partial, and distributional half-densities. Fix ρ=(x0,ξ0)∈Λ\rho=(x_0,\xi_0)\in\Lambda. Finite-rank complex bundle values are treated at the end of each construction.

Use the actual earlier programme proofs:

Write

Bρ=ΩΛ,ρ1/2⊗Lρ,r=m−n/4,M=m+n/4.(Z1) \mathscr B_\rho=\Omega^{1/2}_{\Lambda,\rho}\otimes\mathscr L_\rho, \qquad r=m-n/4,\qquad M=m+n/4 . \tag{Z1}

Here L\mathscr L is M5's relative geometric Maslov line. Its evaluation at a common transversal has the convention of M22.

A phase jet at ρ\rho is the second jet of a real smooth function ψ\psi with ψ(x0)=0\psi(x_0)=0 and dψ(x0)=ξ0d\psi(x_0)=\xi_0. The difference of two such jets is an intrinsic real symmetric quadratic form on Tx0XT_{x_0}X: the chain rule terms containing its first derivative vanish. Every symmetric form occurs by taking a quadratic polynomial in any base chart. We retain the whole family of phase jets.

Z1. From the intrinsic class to the graph used by the zoom theorem

Choose the coordinates of C3–C4 near ρ\rho. They give Λ={(H′(ξ),ξ)}\Lambda=\{(H'(\xi),\xi)\} on a smaller conic set, with HH real and homogeneous of degree one. The phase ϕ(x,θ)=x⋅θ−H(θ)\phi(x,\theta)=x\cdot\theta-H(\theta) is nondegenerate: its critical derivative has the identity block in the xx variables.

For u∈Im(X,Λ;ΩX1/2)u\in I^m(X,\Lambda;\Omega_X^{1/2}), K7 and F6 give a sufficiently small compact proper cutoff PP, with full symbol one near ρ\rho, such that PuPu belongs to the frequency-graph class. The forward graph criterion gives eiHe(Pu)coeff^∈Sm−n/4e^{iH_e}\widehat{(Pu)_{\mathrm{coeff}}}\in S^{m-n/4}. Set

b=(2π)−n/4eiHe(Pu)coeff^.ThenPu=(2π)−3n/4∫ei(x⋅ξ−He(ξ))b(ξ) dξ ∣dx∣1/2.(Z2) b=(2\pi)^{-n/4}e^{iH_e}\widehat{(Pu)_{\mathrm{coeff}}}. \quad\text{Then}\quad Pu=(2\pi)^{-3n/4}\int e^{i(x\cdot\xi-H_e(\xi))}b(\xi)\,d\xi \,|dx|^{1/2}. \tag{Z2}

Fourier inversion and the proved distributional pairing justify the identity. W4 makes u−Puu-Pu regular at ρ\rho; T4 makes its normalized zoom rapidly decreasing, for every real mm. Consequently T1 applies to every intrinsic uu, with its exact constant and exponent.

For this graph phase,

Qϕ=(0II−H′′),∣det⁡Qϕ∣=1,sgn⁡Qϕ=0,dϕ=∣dξ∣.(Z3) Q_\phi=\begin{pmatrix}0&I\\I&-H''\end{pmatrix},\qquad |\det Q_\phi|=1,\qquad \operatorname{sgn}Q_\phi=0,\qquad d_\phi=|d\xi|. \tag{Z3}

Indeed the change x=x~+12H′′θx=\widetilde x+\tfrac12H''\theta reduces its quadratic form to 2x~⋅θ2\widetilde x\cdot\theta. Splitting each such pair into its sum and difference gives one positive and one negative square. The change has determinant one. This proves all assertions in (Z3), also for singular H′′H''. PS28–PS29 therefore identify the principal symbol in the geometric evaluation at the horizontal transversal μ0={(v,0)}\mu_0=\{(v,0)\} as

σm(u)(μ0)=b(ξ)∣dξ∣1/2(modSM−1).(Z4) \sigma_m(u)(\mu_0)=b(\xi)|d\xi|^{1/2} \pmod{S^{M-1}} . \tag{Z4}

The horizontal plane is transverse to the frequency graph tangent {(H′′η,η)}\{(H''\eta,\eta)\}, regardless of the rank of H′′H''.

Z2. Nonzero Gaussian frames, including changes of rank

In this chart put A=H′′(ξ0)A=H''(\xi_0). For a phase jet with Hessian B=ψ′′(x0)B=\psi''(x_0), use T1's model

UA,B(v)=(2π)−3n/4∫ei(v⋅η−vTBv/2−ηTAη/2) dη.(Z5) U_{A,B}(v)=(2\pi)^{-3n/4} \int e^{i(v\cdot\eta-v^TBv/2-\eta^TA\eta/2)}\,d\eta . \tag{Z5}

It is a distribution on the tangent vector space with its indicated coordinate half-density attached below.

First, UA,B≠0U_{A,B}\ne0 for every real symmetric A,BA,B. In T6's range/kernel coordinates take a compact test

φ(y,z)=e−iyT(AR−1−BR)y/2α(y)γ(z), \varphi(y,z)=e^{-iy^T(A_R^{-1}-B_R)y/2}\alpha(y)\gamma(z),

where ∫α>0\int\alpha>0 and γ(0)=1\gamma(0)=1. Smooth nonnegative bumps provide these choices. Formula T6 gives its pairing as a nonzero constant times ∫α\int\alpha. When the range is zero, use γ\gamma alone; when the kernel is zero, use α\alpha alone. Thus all ranks are included.

Second, UA,BU_{A,B} depends smoothly on A,BA,B as a distribution, even across rank changes. For a compactly supported test φ\varphi, integrate in vv first in (Z5). Each parameter derivative in AA inserts a polynomial in η\eta. Each derivative in BB inserts a polynomial in vv before taking that Fourier transform. For parameters in a compact set, Q3 bounds the latter transform by any inverse power of ⟨η⟩\langle\eta\rangle, uniformly in finitely many seminorms of φ\varphi. Choose that inverse power larger than the inserted polynomial degree plus n+1n+1. The resulting integrable bound justifies each derivative by Q1 and the segment difference-quotient formula. Repeating the argument gives derivatives of every order and their local finite-seminorm bounds. No inverse of AA is used here.

Finally, changing the phase jet by a symmetric form CC gives

UA,B+C=e−ivTCv/2UA,B.(Z6) U_{A,B+C}=e^{-iv^TCv/2}U_{A,B}. \tag{Z6}

This is the test integral itself. These multipliers are invertible and compose by addition of CC.

Thus, in one frequency chart, the families

(β UA,B∣dv∣1/2)phase jets B,β∈C,(Z7) \bigl(\beta\,U_{A,B}|dv|^{1/2}\bigr)_{\text{phase jets }B}, \qquad \beta\in\mathbb C, \tag{Z7}

form a one-dimensional complex vector space. We next prove that this space, with its half-density transformation, is independent of the chart.

Z3. Realize any fibre value by a local leading homogeneous symbol

In a frequency chart, evaluation at μ0\mu_0 writes any s0∈Bρs_0\in\mathscr B_\rho uniquely as β∣dξ∣1/2\beta|d\xi|^{1/2}. Evaluation is an isomorphism by M5. Choose a smooth angular cutoff equal to one near ξ0\xi_0 and supported inside the chart. At sufficiently large ∣ξ∣|\xi|, set

br(ξ)=β(∣ξ∣∣ξ0∣)rχ(ξ/∣ξ∣).(Z8) b_r(\xi)= \beta\left(\frac{|\xi|}{|\xi_0|}\right)^r \chi(\xi/|\xi|). \tag{Z8}

Extend with a smooth high-frequency cutoff. This has ordinary symbol order rr, by the proved homogeneous derivative estimates. Its leading homogeneous value at ξ0\xi_0 is β\beta.

Use this amplitude in the graph integral (Z2), and multiply the result by a compact base cutoff equal to one near the relevant critical base points. Such points form a compact set after a smaller angular restriction, by continuity of H′H'. F6 proves local ImI^m membership. F2 confines the wavefront to this phase image; K6 gives the required intrinsic membership after extension by zero if a global representative is desired. The base and angular cutoffs have supports strictly inside their charts.

At those critical points the base cutoff is one. F3's leading formula and its full one-order remainder therefore show that the actual reduced frequency symbol equals brb_r modulo Sr−1S^{r-1} on a smaller cone. By (Z4), the principal symbol has leading homogeneous section sMs_M with sM(ρ)=s0s_M(\rho)=s_0. This constructs the needed realization without assuming a new theorem about classical symbol surjectivity.

A leading homogeneous section is unique. If a degree-MM section is of order M−1M-1, its coefficient in frequency coordinates is homogeneous of degree rr and has order r−1r-1. Along a ray, division by RrR^r bounds its fixed value by C/RC/R. Letting R→∞R\to\infty proves that value is zero. The argument works for every real rr.

In another frequency chart, PS3 transforms the symbol by the exact Maslov and half-density laws. The frequency transition is homogeneous of degree one; its Jacobian factor has degree zero, and Maslov transitions are locally constant. Hence the transformed leading coefficient is again homogeneous of degree rr, with an Sr−1S^{r-1} remainder. This verifies the classical leading hypothesis of T2 in both charts for the same realizing distribution.

Z4. The intrinsic Gaussian line and its canonical map

Define in a chosen chart

Jρ(s0)ψ=β UA,B∣dv∣1/2,s0(μ0)=β∣dξ∣1/2.(Z9) \mathcal J_\rho(s_0)_\psi =\beta\,U_{A,B}|dv|^{1/2}, \qquad s_0(\mu_0)=\beta|d\xi|^{1/2}. \tag{Z9}

We prove coordinate independence, rather than postulating a Gaussian transformation formula.

Realize s0s_0 by the distribution just constructed in Z3. In each of two frequency charts, T2 identifies its normalized half-density zoom limit with the corresponding expression (Z9). T5 proves that these limits transform by the tangent linear change of variables, with the absolute determinant to the one-half power. The modulating function is the same geometric ψ\psi in both charts. Therefore the two expressions define the same distributional half-density on Tx0XT_{x_0}X.

This argument applies to every s0s_0, because Z3 realizes every fibre value. It is independent of the chosen realization: T2's limit in any fixed chart is exactly the right side of (Z9), determined solely by β,A,B\beta,A,B. It also applies to every phase jet. Jets differing only in terms of order three give the same limit, by T1's Taylor estimate; jets differing in their Hessian obey (Z6).

There is a useful explicit warning about nonlinear charts. For x=κ(y)x=\kappa(y), T=Dκ(y0)T=D\kappa(y_0), the Hessian of the same phase is

By=TTBxT+∑j(ξ0)jD2κj(y0).(Z10) B_y=T^TB_xT+ \sum_j(\xi_0)_j D^2\kappa_j(y_0). \tag{Z10}

This is the second derivative chain rule. The second term need not vanish even if T=IT=I. The proof above uses this actual transformed phase. Dropping that term would give a false model transformation.

Call the intrinsic space of families in (Z7), now identified between charts, Gρ\mathscr G_\rho. Equations (Z7) and (Z9) give a linear isomorphism

Jρ:Bρ⟶Gρ.(Z11) \mathcal J_\rho:\mathscr B_\rho \longrightarrow\mathscr G_\rho . \tag{Z11}

It is injective because the Gaussian frame is nonzero, and surjective by (Z7). On chart overlaps its transition is exactly the transition of B\mathscr B, by coordinate independence. These nonzero smooth transitions glue a complex line bundle over Λ\Lambda: one can transport M5's bundle charts for B\mathscr B through J\mathcal J. This also gives the Hausdorff and countable chart structure, rather than assuming it separately. The local Gaussian frames are smooth families of distributions by Z2, including at changes of rank. Consequently J:B→G\mathcal J:\mathscr B\to\mathscr G is a smooth line bundle isomorphism.

For a finite-rank complex bundle EE, take components in a local frame and tensor (Z11) with Ex0E_{x_0}. T5 replaces a smooth frame change by its value at x0x_0, with OD′(t−1)O_{\mathcal D'}(t^{-1}) error. Thus the construction is independent of that frame as well. This proves the global Gaussian/Maslov identification with its exact half-density normalization; it makes no assertion of a preferred trivialization of either line.

Z5. Ordinary intrinsic symbols and the actual tangent comparison

For a symbol representative s∈SM(Λ;B⊗π∗E)s\in S^M(\Lambda;\mathscr B\otimes\pi^*E), let δR(x,ξ)=(x,Rξ)\delta_R(x,\xi)=(x,R\xi) and form at ρ\rho

st=t−2M (δt2∗s)ρ,t→∞.(Z12) s_t=t^{-2M}\,(\delta_{t^2}^*s)_\rho,\qquad t\to\infty . \tag{Z12}

The pullback uses the natural half-density action on Λ\Lambda, the positive dilation action on L\mathscr L proved in M5–M6, and the unchanged base fibre of EE. In frequency coordinates the half-density contributes tnt^n. The horizontal transversal is preserved by this dilation. Using (Z4), its coefficient is therefore

st(μ0)=t−2rb(t2ξ0)∣dξ∣1/2+O(t−2)∣dξ∣1/2.(Z13) s_t(\mu_0) =t^{-2r}b(t^2\xi_0)|d\xi|^{1/2} +O(t^{-2})|d\xi|^{1/2}. \tag{Z13}

A different representative of the same principal-symbol class changes sts_t by O(t−2)O(t^{-2}): the lower-order coefficient has size O((t2)r−1)O((t^2)^{r-1}), and the normalizing factor is t−2rt^{-2r}. This is a bound in a fixed finite-dimensional fibre, so its image under Jρ\mathcal J_\rho, evaluated at a fixed phase jet, is OD′(t−2)O_{\mathcal D'}(t^{-2}).

Let at(v)a_t(v) denote the local map with coordinates x0+v/tx_0+v/t. Then for every u∈Im(X,Λ;E⊗ΩX1/2)u\in I^m(X,\Lambda;E\otimes\Omega_X^{1/2}),

t−2mat∗(e−it2ψu)=Jρ(st)ψ+OD′(t−1).(Z14) t^{-2m}a_t^*(e^{-it^2\psi}u) =\mathcal J_\rho(s_t)_\psi+O_{\mathcal D'}(t^{-1}). \tag{Z14}

To prove it, use Z1 to replace uu by its exact local graph representative; T4 handles the regular difference. The half-density pullback contributes t−n/2t^{-n/2}, so its coefficient on the left is T1's WtW_t. Equations T1, (Z9) and (Z13) give (Z14). T5 proves its invariance under nonlinear coordinates and frames with the same finite-order error. The phase two-jet rule is (Z6). Every used error is uniform in a finite test seminorm on each fixed compact support, as required by the definition of OD′O_{\mathcal D'}.

If σm(u)\sigma_m(u) has leading homogeneous section sMs_M, then

t−2mat∗(e−it2ψu)⟶Jρ(sM(ρ))ψ.(Z15) t^{-2m}a_t^*(e^{-it^2\psi}u) \longrightarrow\mathcal J_\rho(s_M(\rho))_\psi . \tag{Z15}

Indeed st=sM(ρ)+O(t−2)s_t=s_M(\rho)+O(t^{-2}). For a leading section of complex degree M+iνM+i\nu, multiply the left side by t−2iνt^{-2i\nu}; the limit is the corresponding leading fibre value under J\mathcal J. This follows from the same radial identity and ∣t−2iν∣=1|t^{-2i\nu}|=1.

For ordinary symbols no homogeneous leading section is assumed, and sts_t can fail to converge. T1's bounded moving coefficient and its O(t−1)O(t^{-1}) comparison are the conclusion. The six worked examples of the tangent lesson, including its nonconvergent compactly localized example and sharp first error, remain in force.

Z6. Dilation and the signature on a constant-rank stratum

These checks identify the factors in (Z11) more explicitly. For a positive scalar RR, homogeneity gives H′′(Rξ0)=R−1AH''(R\xi_0)=R^{-1}A, while the phase RψR\psi has Hessian RBRB. Substitution η=R ζ\eta=\sqrt R\,\zeta in the tested integral gives

UA/R,RB(v)=Rn/2UA,B(R v).(Z16) U_{A/R,RB}(v)=R^{n/2}U_{A,B}(\sqrt R\,v). \tag{Z16}

The same identity for half-densities is

UA/R,RB∣dv∣1/2=Rn/4dR ∗(UA,B∣dv∣1/2),dR(v)=R v.(Z17) U_{A/R,RB}|dv|^{1/2} =R^{n/4}d_{\sqrt R}^{\,*} (U_{A,B}|dv|^{1/2}),\qquad d_{\sqrt R}(v)=\sqrt R\,v . \tag{Z17}

The substitution is justified in the Schwartz test pairing. If sMs_M is homogeneous of degree M=m+n/4M=m+n/4, its coefficient at RρR\rho is Rm−n/4R^{m-n/4} times that at ρ\rho. Combining this with (Z17) gives the exact classical scaling

JRρ(sM(Rρ))Rψ=RmdR ∗Jρ(sM(ρ))ψ.(Z18) \mathcal J_{R\rho}(s_M(R\rho))_{R\psi} =R^m d_{\sqrt R}^{\,*}\mathcal J_\rho(s_M(\rho))_\psi . \tag{Z18}

On a constant-rank stratum of AA, M7's canonical relative-line trivialization has coefficient

β e−iπsgn⁡AR/4.(Z19) \beta\,e^{-i\pi\operatorname{sgn}A_R/4}. \tag{Z19}

In fact the graph phase has N=nN=n, fibre signature c=−sgn⁡ARc=-\operatorname{sgn}A_R, and phase coordinate z=eiπn/4βz=e^{i\pi n/4}\beta. M7 multiplies zz by eiπ(c−n)/4e^{i\pi(c-n)/4}, proving (Z19). This is exactly the signature factor in T6. The determinant ∣det⁡AR∣−1/2|\det A_R|^{-1/2}, the power (2π)n/4−k/2(2\pi)^{n/4-k/2}, the range chirp and the kernel delta are the additional explicit factors in the Gaussian distribution.

When the rank changes, (Z19) is a stratum-specific description; it is not a global smooth frame through that change. Z2 and Z11 supply the smooth distribution family and bundle identification there without dividing by a vanishing determinant.

Z7. A nonlinear chart with a nontrivial fourth-root factor

This example checks the simultaneous phase, density and Maslov changes. Take n=2n=2, ρ=(0;(1,0))\rho=(0;(1,0)), and

H(ξ)=ξ222ξ1,ξ1>0,ψ(x)=x1,x=κ(y)=(y1−y22,y2).(Z20) H(\xi)=\frac{\xi_2^2}{2\xi_1},\quad \xi_1>0,\qquad \psi(x)=x_1,\qquad x=\kappa(y)=(y_1-y_2^2,y_2). \tag{Z20}

At zero Dκ=ID\kappa=I and det⁡Dκ=1\det D\kappa=1. Originally A=diag⁡(0,1)A=\operatorname{diag}(0,1) and B=0B=0. The transformed phase is ψ∘κ=y1−y22\psi\circ\kappa=y_1-y_2^2, so By=diag⁡(0,−2)B_y=\operatorname{diag}(0,-2).

On the original Lagrangian put q=ξ2/ξ1q=\xi_2/\xi_1. Then x=(−q2/2,q)x=(-q^2/2,q), y=(q2/2,q)y=(q^2/2,q), and ζ=Dκ(y)Tξ=(ξ1,−ξ2)\zeta=D\kappa(y)^T\xi=(\xi_1,-\xi_2). Thus the new frequency potential is H~(ζ)=−ζ22/(2ζ1)\widetilde H(\zeta)=-\zeta_2^2/(2\zeta_1), and Ay=diag⁡(0,−1)A_y=\operatorname{diag}(0,-1). The half-density frequency Jacobian has absolute determinant one.

Choose a leading symbol with old geometric coefficient β=1\beta=1. The canonical coefficient (Z19) is e−iπ/4e^{-i\pi/4}. In the new coordinates it is βyeiπ/4\beta_y e^{i\pi/4}, with the same density and intrinsic constant-intersection trivialization. Therefore βy=−i\beta_y=-i. T6 gives, writing v=(v1,v2)v=(v_1,v_2),

UA,0=e−iπ/4eiv22/2δ0(v1),UAy,By=eiπ/4eiv22/2δ0(v1),(−i)UAy,By=UA,0.(Z21) \begin{aligned} U_{A,0}&=e^{-i\pi/4}e^{iv_2^2/2}\delta_0(v_1),\\ U_{A_y,B_y}&=e^{i\pi/4}e^{iv_2^2/2}\delta_0(v_1),\\ (-i)U_{A_y,B_y}&=U_{A,0}. \end{aligned} \tag{Z21}

The range determinants and the (2π)(2\pi) factors are one. The tangent coordinate change is the identity, so the last equality is exactly the required half-density covariance. Both the quadratic term in (Z10) and the fourth-root transition are necessary for this equality.

The same Lagrangian in the two nonlinear charts, followed by the real and imaginary parts of the common coefficient along its delta support.

The upper curves use the exact parametrizations in (Z20); they are two coordinate descriptions of one Lagrangian base image. The lower plot shows the coefficient w(v2)=ei(v22/2−π/4)w(v_2)=e^{i(v_2^2/2-\pi/4)} multiplying δ0(v1)\delta_0(v_1), not pointwise values of that distribution. The two normalized models coincide by (Z21). The sampling illustrates the proved identity. Reproducible figure source.

Free sources and the completed scope

The local rescaling comparison uses the free human sources and exact programme proofs listed in the tangent lesson. The relative-line and principal-symbol inputs come from the programme proofs based on Lars Hörmander's freely readable Fourier integral operators. I, Sections 3.2–3.3. Guillemin and Sternberg's free author draft, Semi-classical Analysis, 13 January 2010, Section 5.15.4, supplies a quadratic generating-function comparison. No source prose, Gaussian transformation formula, phase-equivalence theorem, or unproved reduction or surjectivity assertion is imported.

Z1 supplies the intrinsic graph input. Z2–Z6 supply the global Gaussian/Maslov identification, including all ranks, all real orders, ordinary symbol classes and finite-rank bundle values. Further Fourier-integral composition and the rest of AN-04 remain separate work.