The global principal symbol of a Lagrangian distribution

A local amplitude becomes a geometric symbol after its critical density and phase transition have both been included. We construct that symbol, prove its exact kernel, and realize every global symbol class. The proof includes the support construction on a noncompact base manifold.

Original programme exposition and examples: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 4 October 2026; CC0 to the extent rights exist. Earlier components retain their own licences.

PS0. Statement and exact inputs

Let XX be a Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold of dimension n≥1n\ge1, let E→XE\to X be a smooth finite-rank complex vector bundle, and let Λ⊂T∗X∖0\Lambda\subset T^*X\setminus0 be a smooth closed conic Lagrangian. Use ω=∑dξj∧dxj\omega=\sum d\xi_j\wedge dx_j, D=−i∂D=-i\partial, and

u=Iϕ(a)∣dx∣1/2,Iϕ(a)=(2π)−(n+2N)/4∫eiϕ(x,θ)a(x,θ) dθ.(PS1) u=I_\phi(a)|dx|^{1/2},\qquad I_\phi(a)=(2\pi)^{-(n+2N)/4}\int e^{i\phi(x,\theta)}a(x,\theta)\,d\theta . \tag{PS1}

Coefficients take values in a local frame of EE. The integral has the distributional meaning proved in F2. The intrinsic space ImI^m uses the iterated B2,∞,loc−m−n/4B^{-m-n/4}_{2,\infty,\mathrm{loc}} condition of K6; T3 proves its coordinate and frame invariance.

Let L\mathscr L be the relative Maslov line in M5, with phase coordinates as in M6, and put

B=ΩΛ1/2⊗L⊗π∗E,M=m+n/4.(PS2) \mathscr B=\Omega_\Lambda^{1/2}\otimes\mathscr L\otimes\pi^*E, \qquad M=m+n/4 . \tag{PS2}

With the ordinary-symbol spaces defined in PS2 below, the theorem is the exact sequence

0⟶Im−1(X,Λ;E⊗ΩX1/2)⟶Im(X,Λ;E⊗ΩX1/2)→ σm SM(Λ;B)/SM−1(Λ;B)⟶0.(PS3) \begin{gathered} 0\longrightarrow I^{m-1}(X,\Lambda;E\otimes\Omega_X^{1/2}) \longrightarrow I^m(X,\Lambda;E\otimes\Omega_X^{1/2})\\ \xrightarrow{\ \sigma_m\ } S^M(\Lambda;\mathscr B)/S^{M-1}(\Lambda;\mathscr B) \longrightarrow0 . \end{gathered} \tag{PS3}

All orders are real. A principal symbol here is a class modulo one lower order; an ordinary symbol need not have a homogeneous leading term.

The complete earlier programme proofs are:

PS5 proves the global partition needed here. No global partition, sheaf or phase-equivalence theorem is imported as a prerequisite.

PS1. Critical density and coordinate changes

Fix a nondegenerate phase chart whose critical map κϕ:Cϕ→Λ\kappa_\phi:C_\phi\to\Lambda is a diffeomorphism onto its conic image. Put v=ϕθ′v=\phi_\theta'. Extend coordinates λ=(λ1,…,λn)\lambda=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_n) of CϕC_\phi to a neighborhood. Then (λ,v)(\lambda,v) is an inverse chart after shrinking: on ker⁡dv=TCϕ\ker dv=T C_\phi, dλd\lambda is an isomorphism. Define

dϕ=∣det⁡∂(λ,v)∂(x,θ)∣−1∣dλ∣on v=0.(PS4) d_\phi= \left|\det\frac{\partial(\lambda,v)}{\partial(x,\theta)}\right|^{-1} |d\lambda| \quad\text{on }v=0 . \tag{PS4}

This is independent of the extension. Another extension of the same critical coordinates has derivative (IA0I)\begin{pmatrix}I&A\\0&I\end{pmatrix} in (λ,v)(\lambda,v) at v=0v=0, with determinant one. Replacing the critical coordinates by λ~=h(λ)\widetilde\lambda=h(\lambda) instead gives (DhA0I)\begin{pmatrix}Dh&A\\0&I\end{pmatrix}. The factor ∣det⁡Dh∣−1|\det Dh|^{-1} in (PS4) cancels ∣dλ~∣=∣det⁡Dh∣∣dλ∣|d\widetilde\lambda|=|\det Dh||d\lambda|. Thus dϕd_\phi is a positive density, and its positive square root has the half-density overlap law. We also denote its image on Λ\Lambda under κϕ\kappa_\phi by dϕd_\phi.

For a joint base and degree-one fibre change, write

x=k(y),θ=Θ(y,η),K=Dyk,T=DηΘ,ϕ~=ϕ(k(y),Θ(y,η)).(PS5) x=k(y),\quad \theta=\Theta(y,\eta),\quad K=D_yk,\quad T=D_\eta\Theta, \quad \widetilde\phi=\phi(k(y),\Theta(y,\eta)). \tag{PS5}

The matrices K,TK,T are invertible. On the critical set, v~=TTv\widetilde v=T^Tv and dv~=TTdvd\widetilde v=T^Tdv, since the term involving dTdT is multiplied by v=0v=0. The ambient Jacobian is det⁡Kdet⁡T\det K\det T. Using the same geometric λ\lambda on both critical sets gives

∣det⁡∂(λ,v~)∂(y,η)∣=∣det⁡K∣ ∣det⁡T∣2∣det⁡∂(λ,v)∂(x,θ)∣.(PS6) \left|\det\frac{\partial(\lambda,\widetilde v)}{\partial(y,\eta)}\right| =|\det K|\,|\det T|^2 \left|\det\frac{\partial(\lambda,v)}{\partial(x,\theta)}\right|. \tag{PS6}

Old-coordinate expressions are pulled back in this identity. Hence

dϕ~=∣det⁡K∣−1∣det⁡T∣−2dϕ,a~=∣det⁡K∣1/2∣det⁡T∣ a,a~dϕ~=adϕ.(PS7) \begin{gathered} d_{\widetilde\phi}=|\det K|^{-1}|\det T|^{-2}d_\phi,\qquad \widetilde a=|\det K|^{1/2}|\det T|\,a,\\ \widetilde a\sqrt{d_{\widetilde\phi}}=a\sqrt{d_\phi}. \end{gathered} \tag{PS7}

The amplitude law follows by fibre change of variables in (PS1) and the base half-density law. Apply it first with compact frequency cutoffs, then use F2's cutoff-independent limit. At the critical set the extra base derivative of Θ\Theta also vanishes because it multiplies ϕθ′=0\phi_\theta'=0; the output covector therefore obeys the usual cotangent law. A change of EE frame multiplies both sides by the same matrix at the base point.

In frequency coordinates on Λ\Lambda, take λ=ξ=ϕx′\lambda=\xi=\phi_x'. Formula (PS4) then reads

Qϕ=(ϕxx′′ϕxθ′′ϕθx′′ϕθθ′′),dϕ=∣det⁡Qϕ∣−1∣dξ∣.(PS8) Q_\phi=\begin{pmatrix}\phi_{xx}''&\phi_{x\theta}''\\ \phi_{\theta x}''&\phi_{\theta\theta}''\end{pmatrix}, \qquad d_\phi=|\det Q_\phi|^{-1}|d\xi|. \tag{PS8}

Here QϕQ_\phi is the full Hessian at the unique critical point over ξ\xi. It is nonsingular by F1, or M3 with horizontal test plane.

PS2. Ordinary symbols with half-density values

In a conic frequency chart, a phase trivialization of L\mathscr L and a base frame of EE, write a section of B\mathscr B as

s=t(ξ)∣dξ∣1/2.(PS9) s=t(\xi)|d\xi|^{1/2}. \tag{PS9}

It belongs to SMS^M when, on every compact normalized subchart,

∣∂ξαt(ξ)∣≤Cα∣ξ∣M−n/2−∣α∣,∣ξ∣≥1.(PS10) |\partial_\xi^\alpha t(\xi)| \le C_\alpha|\xi|^{M-n/2-|\alpha|},\qquad |\xi|\ge1 . \tag{PS10}

Estimates are local over compact base sets; no uniform geometry or bound at base infinity is imposed. Bounded-frequency changes belong to every order class. Equivalently these are germs at large positive radial parameter, with no required behavior at the missing zero section.

This definition is invariant. Two conic frequency charts are related by a degree-one diffeomorphism η=h(ξ)\eta=h(\xi). On compact normalized overlaps, ∣h(ξ)∣≍∣ξ∣|h(\xi)|\asymp|\xi| and ∂αh\partial^\alpha h has degree 1−∣α∣1-|\alpha|. The Jacobian half-density factor and its reciprocal have degree zero. The base point has degree zero, so pulled-back frame matrices have the same degree-zero derivative estimates. Maslov transitions are locally constant by M6. In an iterated chain-rule term involving jj derivatives of tt, the total order is

(M−n/2−j)+(j−∣α∣)=M−n/2−∣α∣.(PS11) (M-n/2-j)+(j-|\alpha|)=M-n/2-|\alpha|. \tag{PS11}

Product differentiation of the degree-zero factors preserves this bound. The inverse chart gives the converse. Compact normalized sets have finite subcovers, so a finite maximum bounds all constants.

For a degree-one phase the unscaled full Hessian satisfies

Qϕ(x,rθ)=r diag⁡(In,r−1IN) Qϕ(x,θ) diag⁡(In,r−1IN).(PS12) Q_\phi(x,r\theta) =r\,\operatorname{diag}(I_n,r^{-1}I_N)\, Q_\phi(x,\theta)\,\operatorname{diag}(I_n,r^{-1}I_N). \tag{PS12}

Thus its determinant has degree n−Nn-N. More generally (PS4), using degree-one critical coordinates, has the same degree: the output weights of (λ,v)(\lambda,v) are nn ones and NN zeros, while the input dilation Jacobian has weight NN. The density dϕd_\phi has total dilation weight NN, and its coefficient relative to ∣dξ∣|d\xi| has degree N−nN-n.

Restriction of an amplitude to CϕC_\phi retains its ordinary order: x(ξ)x(\xi) has degree zero and θ(ξ)\theta(\xi) degree one. In every chain-rule term a frequency derivative of the amplitude costs one order, compensated by the degree-one part of derivatives of θ\theta; derivatives of xx have only their negative derivative degree. This proves all estimates, using ∣θ∣≍∣ξ∣|\theta|\asymp|\xi| on compact normalized subcharts. Consequently

μ=m+n/4−N/2,adϕ=tϕ(ξ)∣dξ∣1/2,tϕ∈S μ+(N−n)/2=Sm−n/4,adϕ∈Sm+n/4.(PS13) \begin{gathered} \mu=m+n/4-N/2,\qquad a\sqrt{d_\phi}=t_\phi(\xi)|d\xi|^{1/2},\\ t_\phi\in S^{\,\mu+(N-n)/2}=S^{m-n/4},\qquad a\sqrt{d_\phi}\in S^{m+n/4}. \end{gathered} \tag{PS13}

Degree-zero smooth cutoffs preserve these spaces. So do sums with only finitely many terms above each compact base set: every seminorm is bounded by a finite sum. PS5 constructs such cutoffs.

PS3. Fourier testing and the local symbol

Write Λ={(H′(ξ),ξ)}\Lambda=\{(H'(\xi),\xi)\} and use the small compact normalized amplitude supports of F3. Put qϕ=sgn⁡Qϕq_\phi=\operatorname{sgn}Q_\phi. The nondegenerate case of F3 gives

eiHIϕ(a)^=(2π)n/4eiπqϕ/4a∣Cϕ∣det⁡Qϕ∣−1/2(modSm−n/4−1).(PS14) e^{iH}\widehat{I_\phi(a)} =(2\pi)^{n/4}e^{i\pi q_\phi/4} a|_{C_\phi}|\det Q_\phi|^{-1/2} \pmod{S^{m-n/4-1}} . \tag{PS14}

The Hessian here is unscaled at frequency ξ\xi; (PS12) absorbs F3's factor ∣ξ∣(N−n)/2|\xi|^{(N-n)/2}. Every further term and differentiated remainder is supplied by F3, without convergence of a formal series.

Compare two phase representations of the same distribution microlocally near a point of Λ\Lambda. Transform both into a common base frequency chart using PS1, and localize their amplitudes to smaller critical neighborhoods, with cutoffs one near the point. F2 shows that discarded parts have no wavefront there. On a smaller angular cone the only possible wavefront base point of either remaining integral is H′(ξ)H'(\xi). Their difference has no wavefront there by microlocal equality, and hence nowhere over that cone. The distributions have compact base support. The finite base-cover and convolution-cutoff proof in F6 shows that their Fourier difference is rapidly decreasing there with all derivatives. Multiplication by eiHe^{iH} preserves this property. Their expressions (PS14) therefore agree modulo the stated lower order.

Let cj=sgn⁡ϕj,θθ′′c_j=\operatorname{sgn}\phi_{j,\theta\theta}''. M3 gives qj=cj−τq_j=c_j-\tau with the same τ\tau for the common horizontal test plane. The preceding equality gives

ajdϕj=eiπ(ck−cj)/4akdϕk(modSM−1).(PS15) a_j\sqrt{d_{\phi_j}} =e^{i\pi(c_k-c_j)/4}a_k\sqrt{d_{\phi_k}}\pmod{S^{M-1}} . \tag{PS15}

Define the phase coordinate of the principal symbol by

sj=eiπNj/4ajdϕj.(PS16) s_j=e^{i\pi N_j/4}a_j\sqrt{d_{\phi_j}}. \tag{PS16}

Then

sj=iajksk(modSM−1),ajk=(ck−Nk)−(cj−Nj)2.(PS17) s_j=i^{a_{jk}}s_k\pmod{S^{M-1}},\qquad a_{jk}=\frac{(c_k-N_k)-(c_j-N_j)}2 . \tag{PS17}

These are precisely M6's phase transitions. The factor depending on NjN_j is part of this fourth-root normalization. Together with PS1 this proves invariance under phase, base coordinates and bundle frame.

Every intrinsic u∈Imu\in I^m has these local representatives. Choose a sufficiently small proper conic cutoff with full symbol one near the point; K7 and F6 represent its output in any prescribed nondegenerate phase modulo a smooth remainder. W4 says that this output differs microlocally smoothly from uu. The comparison above proves independence of cutoff, representative and smooth remainder. Representing summands in the same phase also proves linearity.

The local kernel is exact:

sj∈SM−1 ⟺ eiHIϕj(aj)^∈Sm−n/4−1⟺ Iϕj(aj)∈Im−1microlocally.(PS18) \begin{gathered} s_j\in S^{M-1} \ \Longleftrightarrow\ e^{iH}\widehat{I_{\phi_j}(a_j)}\in S^{m-n/4-1}\\ \Longleftrightarrow\ I_{\phi_j}(a_j)\in I^{m-1}\quad\text{microlocally}. \end{gathered} \tag{PS18}

The first equivalence uses the nonzero leading weight and the one-order remainder in F3. The second is F6a–F7, already proved in both directions. Conversely an Im−1I^{m-1} representation has its amplitude order reduced by one and hence its symbol order reduced by one in (PS13). These arguments work in every component of EE.

PS4. Extending a local symbol to an amplitude

Suppose s=t(ξ)∣dξ∣1/2s=t(\xi)|d\xi|^{1/2} is supported in a compact normalized subset of one sufficiently small phase chart. Prescribe

aC(ξ)=e−iπN/4 t(ξ)∣det⁡Qϕ(ξ)∣1/2.(PS19) a_C(\xi)=e^{-i\pi N/4}\,t(\xi)|\det Q_\phi(\xi)|^{1/2}. \tag{PS19}

It has order m+n/4−N/2m+n/4-N/2, by (PS12). Here is a same-order smooth extension with the needed support. F4 proves that

(x,θ)⟼(ξ,v)=(ϕx′(x,θ),ϕθ′(x,θ))(PS20) (x,\theta)\longmapsto(\xi,v) =(\phi_x'(x,\theta),\phi_\theta'(x,\theta)) \tag{PS20}

is an inverse chart near CϕC_\phi, with weights 1,01,0. Refine the compact normalized support finitely if necessary. Choose a small product angular/normal box inside this chart. Multiply aC(ξ)a_C(\xi) by a compact normal cutoff η(v)\eta(v) equal to one near zero, an angular cutoff one near its prescribed support, and a high-frequency cutoff. Pull back by (PS20) and extend by zero. Strictly interior supports make that extension smooth. By continuity on the compact critical support, the normal box can be chosen so its compact base projection lies inside any prescribed base neighborhood of that support.

Derivatives of vv have degree −1-1 in frequency and zero in the base. Derivatives of ξ\xi have degree zero in frequency and one in the base. Each degree-one base factor compensates the loss from differentiating aCa_C in ξ\xi; every frequency derivative has one net order loss. Repeated chain and product rules give all ordinary symbol estimates, since ∣ξ∣≍∣θ∣|\xi|\asymp|\theta|. The low-frequency change has all negative orders. This proves the extension claim in full.

F6 puts the integral in ImI^m, and (PS16) gives its requested symbol modulo SM−1S^{M-1}. F2 confines its wavefront to the chosen critical support: away from the original angular support, the extension vanishes on a full neighborhood of critical points. Different extensions or phase choices with the same symbol differ by Im−1I^{m-1} locally. Their difference is in ImI^m, has zero symbol by PS3's comparison and linearity, and (PS18) applies. This is the local right inverse with its exact ambiguity and support.

PS5. A partition with locally finite base supports

First construct a countable precompact coordinate-ball cover B1,B2,…B_1,B_2,\ldots of XX. At each point, nested Euclidean balls in a chart provide such neighborhoods, with compact closed smaller balls. Their images are closed because XX is Hausdorff. A countable basis reduces this cover to a countable subcover: for each basis element contained in a cover member choose one such member; every point belongs to a choice.

There is a compact exhaustion

Kj⊂int⁡Kj+1,X=⋃j≥1int⁡Kj.(PS21) K_j\subset\operatorname{int}K_{j+1},\qquad X=\bigcup_{j\ge1}\operatorname{int}K_j . \tag{PS21}

Recursively cover the compact union of KjK_j and B‾1,…,B‾j+1\overline B_1,\ldots,\overline B_{j+1} by finitely many precompact open balls, and take their closed union as Kj+1K_{j+1}. Start with a finite such cover of B‾1\overline B_1. This proves compactness, the interior inclusion and exhaustion. Every compact set lies in some int⁡KJ\operatorname{int}K_J: a finite subcover of these nested open sets has a largest index.

Put K0=K−1=∅K_0=K_{-1}=\varnothing. The compact layer Kj∖int⁡Kj−1K_j\setminus\operatorname{int}K_{j-1} lies in int⁡Kj+1∖Kj−2\operatorname{int}K_{j+1}\setminus K_{j-2}. Cover it by finitely many small balls, each with two larger precompact balls inside that open set and a chart trivializing EE. Call the largest balls OiO_i, using one index over all layers. This family is locally finite: a compact set in KJK_J meets no layer balls with j≥J+2j\ge J+2, and the earlier layers contain finitely many balls. The small balls cover XX, because every point belongs to a first layer in the exhaustion.

U001 A.4 supplies nonnegative hih_i, positive on the small ball and supported in the middle ball. Their locally finite sum hh is positive and smooth; its reciprocal is smooth. Thus

ψi=hi/h,∑iψi=1,supp⁡ψi⋐Oi.(PS22) \psi_i=h_i/h,\qquad \sum_i\psi_i=1,\qquad \operatorname{supp}\psi_i\Subset O_i . \tag{PS22}

This proves the required base partition, rather than assuming it.

Let ∣ξ∣i2|\xi|_i^2 be the Euclidean covector norm in the chart of OiO_i, and define

ρ(x,ξ)2=∑iψi(x)∣ξ∣i2.(PS23) \rho(x,\xi)^2=\sum_i\psi_i(x)|\xi|_i^2 . \tag{PS23}

Each term extends smoothly by zero; the locally finite sum is positive away from the zero section. Its positive square root is smooth there and homogeneous of degree one. The radial derivative of ρ\rho equals ρ\rho; the implicit theorem therefore makes Σ=Λ∩{ρ=1}\Sigma=\Lambda\cap\{\rho=1\} a smooth (n−1)(n-1)-manifold. There is an explicit diffeomorphism

Σ×(0,∞)⟶Λ,(λ,r)⟼rλ,(x,ξ)⟼((x,ξ/ρ),ρ)for its inverse.(PS24) \Sigma\times(0,\infty)\longrightarrow\Lambda,\qquad (\lambda,r)\longmapsto r\lambda,\qquad (x,\xi)\longmapsto((x,\xi/\rho),\rho) \quad\text{for its inverse}. \tag{PS24}

For each compact K⊂XK\subset X, the set ΣK=Σ∩π−1K\Sigma_K=\Sigma\cap\pi^{-1}K is compact. Cover KK by finitely many smaller coordinate neighborhoods with compact closures in larger charts. On each closure, the continuous positive quadratic form (PS23) has a positive minimum and a finite maximum on the Euclidean unit sphere. Thus ρ=1\rho=1 bounds the covector above and away from zero. The points lie in finitely many compact base-times-annulus sets. In each, intersect with π−1K\pi^{-1}K, ρ=1\rho=1, and the closed subset Λ\Lambda of the punctured cotangent bundle. The resulting sets are compact and their finite union is ΣK\Sigma_K. This is the use of closedness of Λ\Lambda.

For each ii, cover Σsupp⁡ψi\Sigma_{\operatorname{supp}\psi_i} by finitely many small normalized phase charts, with compact closures in larger phase charts and base projections in OiO_i. C3 may change base coordinates within OiO_i. Refine sufficiently for the product construction of PS4. Nonnegative chart bumps βij\beta_{ij} supported in the larger charts can be chosen so Bi=∑jβij>0B_i=\sum_j\beta_{ij}>0 near that compact set. Choose a compact smooth ζi\zeta_i, supported in {Bi>0}\{B_i>0\} and one near the compact set, using finitely many bumps and U001 A.4. On Σ\Sigma define χij=0\chi_{ij}=0 where Bi=0B_i=0. Where Bi>0B_i>0, use the first formula below. These functions satisfy the displayed partition identity on all of Σ\Sigma:

χij=(ψi∘π)ζiβij/Bi,∑i,jχij=1.(PS25) \begin{gathered} \chi_{ij}=(\psi_i\circ\pi)\zeta_i\beta_{ij}/B_i,\\ \sum_{i,j}\chi_{ij}=1 . \end{gathered} \tag{PS25}

The support of ζi\zeta_i proves smoothness at Bi=0B_i=0. Where ψi∘π≠0\psi_i\circ\pi\ne0, ζi=1\zeta_i=1, so summing in jj gives ψi∘π\psi_i\circ\pi, and then summing in ii gives one. An empty compact set contributes no terms. Extend homogeneously by (PS24). Each normalized support is compactly inside one phase chart. There are finitely many jj's per ii, and PS4's amplitude base supports can be chosen compactly inside OiO_i. They are therefore locally finite in the base. Local finiteness on Λ\Lambda alone would not have proved this last property.

PS6. Global gluing, surjectivity and the kernel

For u∈Imu\in I^m, take its local symbol representatives sijs_{ij} on the phase charts from PS5. They are genuine local sections of B\mathscr B, whose differences on overlaps lie in SM−1S^{M-1}. The sum

s=∑i,jχijsij(PS26) s=\sum_{i,j}\chi_{ij}s_{ij} \tag{PS26}

is a global section of SMS^M: terms extend by zero at their normalized chart boundaries, and there are finitely many above each compact base set. In a selected chart subtract a local representative s0s_0. The identity ∑χij=1\sum\chi_{ij}=1 leaves the locally finite sum ∑χij(sij−s0)\sum\chi_{ij}(s_{ij}-s_0), in SM−1S^{M-1}. Finite normalized covers give estimates over each compact base set. Thus (PS26) represents all the local classes. The same argument for another choice of representatives or partition proves independence modulo SM−1S^{M-1}. This defines the global linear map σm(u)=[s]\sigma_m(u)=[s].

For surjectivity, split an arbitrary s∈SMs\in S^M into χijs\chi_{ij}s. PS4 extends each summand to an amplitude supported in its phase chart, with compact base support in OiO_i. A bounded-frequency cutoff changes its symbol only by SM−1S^{M-1}. Extend the resulting half-density uiju_{ij} by zero to XX; its base support is strictly inside its coordinate domain. F6 proves intrinsic order mm near its critical image. F2 confines its wavefront to that image, contained in Λ\Lambda; elsewhere it is microlocally smooth. K6, using sufficiently small tests and K7 where a graph extension was introduced, gives uij∈Im(X,Λ)u_{ij}\in I^m(X,\Lambda). Its global symbol is χijs\chi_{ij}s modulo lower order; outside its critical support both local symbol classes vanish.

The sum

u=∑i,juij(PS27) u=\sum_{i,j}u_{ij} \tag{PS27}

defines a distribution because every compact test support meets only finitely many OiO_i's. It belongs to ImI^m. Indeed a compact proper conic cutoff PP has a compact input projection, so PuPu is a finite sum of PuijPu_{ij}. Each term is in ImI^m by K6. Such cutoffs exist elliptic at every nonzero covector, so K6's converse gives u∈Imu\in I^m. Local linearity yields σm(u)=∑χij[s]=[s]\sigma_m(u)=\sum\chi_{ij}[s]=[s], proving surjectivity.

If σm(u)=0\sigma_m(u)=0, PS18 gives intrinsic order m−1m-1 microlocally at every point of Λ\Lambda. Outside Λ\Lambda, K6's wavefront containment makes uu microlocally smooth. Choose sufficiently small compact proper tests at every covector and apply K6's converse at order m−1m-1. This proves u∈Im−1u\in I^{m-1} globally. The reverse inclusion follows from local amplitude representation at order m−1m-1 and (PS13). The left map in (PS3) is inclusion; Im−1⊂ImI^{m-1}\subset I^m follows by the dyadic order inclusion of P1, applied to every admissible word. This proves (PS3). □\square

Combining (PS16) with the explicit geometric isomorphism M22 gives evaluation at a common transversal μ\mu:

σm(u)(μ)=eiπqϕ(μ)/4adϕ(modSM−1).(PS28) \sigma_m(u)(\mu)=e^{i\pi q_\phi(\mu)/4}a\sqrt{d_\phi} \pmod{S^{M-1}} . \tag{PS28}

The half-density and EE factors remain unchanged. The two NN factors cancel. In a frequency chart with horizontal test plane, (PS14) therefore gives

σm(u)(μ)=(2π)−n/4eiH(ξ)u^coeff(ξ)∣dξ∣1/2(modSM−1).(PS29) \sigma_m(u)(\mu)=(2\pi)^{-n/4} e^{iH(\xi)}\widehat u_{\rm coeff}(\xi)|d\xi|^{1/2} \pmod{S^{M-1}} . \tag{PS29}

The coefficient is a sufficiently small compactly localized representative as in PS3. This is a local test interpretation, not a global Fourier transform on an arbitrary manifold.

Two local routes to the geometric principal symbol.

Figure PS1. These are the exact maps of PS1–PS3 and PS28–PS29, modulo one lower order. The two NN factors cancel on the phase-line route. The Fourier coefficient has order m−n/4m-n/4; its half-density has geometric order m+n/4m+n/4. The diagram depicts maps, not a spatial projection.

PS7. Three examples with complete solutions

Exercise PS1: both Jacobians matter. Start with ϕ(x,θ)=xθ\phi(x,\theta)=x\theta and make x=cy,θ=dηx=cy,\theta=d\eta, where c,d>0c,d>0. Compute the density and symbol, including the output frequency ζ=cdη\zeta=cd\eta.

Solution. Initially v=xv=x, Cϕ={x=0}C_\phi=\{x=0\}, and dϕ=∣dθ∣d_\phi=|d\theta|. The transformed phase is cdyηcdy\eta and its critical equation is cd y=0cd\,y=0. Hence

dϕ~=(cd)−1∣dη∣,a~=c1/2d a(0,dη).(PS30) d_{\widetilde\phi}=(cd)^{-1}|d\eta|,\qquad \widetilde a=c^{1/2}d\,a(0,d\eta). \tag{PS30}

Their product is d1/2a(0,dη)∣dη∣1/2d^{1/2}a(0,d\eta)|d\eta|^{1/2}, exactly the pullback of a(0,θ)∣dθ∣1/2a(0,\theta)|d\theta|^{1/2}. In ζ\zeta it is c−1/2a(0,ζ/c)∣dζ∣1/2c^{-1/2}a(0,\zeta/c)|d\zeta|^{1/2}. Both phases have N=1N=1, so the common factor eiπ/4e^{i\pi/4} in (PS16) preserves equality. Omitting one fibre determinant factor from (PS6) would fail this calculation. □\square

Exercise PS2: stabilization. On θ>0\theta>0, replace xθx\theta by xθ+ϵz2/(2θ)x\theta+\epsilon z^2/(2\theta), ϵ=±1\epsilon=\pm1. Find the leading new amplitude representing the symbol of an old amplitude a0(θ)a_0(\theta).

Solution. At x=z=0x=z=0, the output is ξ=θ\xi=\theta, and

Qϕ~=(01010000ϵ/θ),∣det⁡Qϕ~∣=θ−1,qϕ~=ϵ.(PS31) Q_{\widetilde\phi}= \begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\1&0&0\\0&0&\epsilon/\theta\end{pmatrix}, \quad |\det Q_{\widetilde\phi}|=\theta^{-1},\quad q_{\widetilde\phi}=\epsilon . \tag{PS31}

Thus dϕ~=θ∣dθ∣d_{\widetilde\phi}=\theta|d\theta|. Formula (PS14) gives the old leading coefficient when

a~C=e−iπϵ/4θ−1/2a0.(PS32) \widetilde a_C=e^{-i\pi\epsilon/4}\theta^{-1/2}a_0. \tag{PS32}

PS4 supplies such an amplitude. Its order is one half lower, as required when NN increases by one. The old phase symbol is eiπ/4a0∣dθ∣1/2e^{i\pi/4}a_0|d\theta|^{1/2}; the new is eiπ(2−ϵ)/4a0∣dθ∣1/2e^{i\pi(2-\epsilon)/4}a_0|d\theta|^{1/2}. The ratio is eiπ(ϵ−1)/4e^{i\pi(\epsilon-1)/4}, equal to 11 for the positive square and −i-i for the negative square, exactly M6's transition. Geometric evaluation (PS28) gives a0∣dθ∣1/2a_0|d\theta|^{1/2} in both descriptions. The distributions agree modulo Im−1I^{m-1}; agreement to all orders requires F5's further amplitude correction. □\square

Exercise PS3: the point mass. For X=RX=\mathbb R and Λ={(0,ξ):ξ≠0}\Lambda=\{(0,\xi):\xi\ne0\}, compute the principal symbol and intrinsic order of δ0∣dx∣1/2\delta_0|dx|^{1/2}.

Solution. Fourier inversion gives δ0=(2π)−1∫eixθ dθ\delta_0=(2\pi)^{-1}\int e^{ix\theta}\,d\theta in distributions. For n=N=1n=N=1, (PS1) therefore uses a=(2π)−1/4a=(2\pi)^{-1/4}. Cutting off near zero frequency changes only a smooth function. Use the two half-lines separately if a connected phase cone is desired. The amplitude order zero equals m−1/4m-1/4, so m=1/4m=1/4, and

s=eiπ/4(2π)−1/4∣dξ∣1/2,M=1/2.(PS33) \begin{gathered} s=e^{i\pi/4}(2\pi)^{-1/4}|d\xi|^{1/2},\\ M=1/2 . \end{gathered} \tag{PS33}

Its coefficient has order M−n/2=0M-n/2=0. Here c=0,N=1c=0,N=1, so M7's constant-intersection trivialization multiplies by e−iπ/4e^{-i\pi/4}, giving the geometric half-density (2π)−1/4∣dξ∣1/2(2\pi)^{-1/4}|d\xi|^{1/2}. Equivalently use H=0,δ0^=1H=0,\widehat{\delta_0}=1 in (PS29). This symbol is not in SM−1S^{M-1} on either ray, so the exact sequence also gives δ0∉I−3/4(Λ)\delta_0\notin I^{-3/4}(\Lambda). □\square

Free human source and scope

The freely readable source is Lars Hörmander, Fourier integral operators. I, Section 3.2, printed pages 142–154: critical densities, phase normalization and the global symbol construction. The internal proof uses the already proved ordinary Fourier-testing argument; the global support construction is supplied in PS5–PS6. No source prose, figure, PDF, phase-equivalence proof or cohomology argument is imported.

The theorem concerns ordinary symbols on a closed embedded conic Lagrangian, finite-rank bundle values, all real orders and local estimates on an arbitrary such base manifold. It does not choose a natural global trivialization of the Maslov line. The tangent lesson still needs its Gaussian-model identification and convention reconciliation. Fourier-integral composition and the remaining AN-04 course are separate obligations.