Completed continuation: compactness and essential norms for ordinary canonical-graph operators now supplies the compactness criterion left open in this earlier mapping source. Broader symbol classes and the full course remain unfinished.

From canonical ranks to Sobolev bounds

A canonical graph carries an order-zero Fourier integral operator boundedly on square-integrable half-densities. A more general canonical relation can often be sliced into a family of such graphs. The number of variables left as parameters determines a sufficient loss of derivatives.

Original programme exposition, completed proofs and examples: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 4 October 2026. This component and its original figure are dedicated under CC0. Earlier linked components retain their stated terms.

W0. Statement, conventions and exact inputs

Let X,YX,Y be smooth manifolds of dimensions nX,nY≥1n_X,n_Y\geq1. Let C⊂(T∗X∖0)×(T∗Y∖0)C\subset(T^*X\setminus0)\times(T^*Y\setminus0) be a closed embedded homogeneous canonical relation: it is Lagrangian for ωX−ωY\omega_X-\omega_Y. Its primed version changes the sign of the input covector. Require C′C' to be closed in T∗(X×Y)∖0T^*(X\times Y)\setminus0, not merely relatively closed after removing the two covector axes. Use ordinary symbols S1,0mS^m_{1,0}, without requiring a classical expansion. Operators act on half-densities; finite matrix ranks are allowed after choosing local frames.

Suppose both base projections C→XC\to X and C→YC\to Y are submersions, and, for a fixed nonnegative integer kk,

rank⁡dπT∗X≥nX+k,rank⁡dπT∗Y≥nY+k.(W1) \operatorname{rank}d\pi_{T^*X}\geq n_X+k,\qquad \operatorname{rank}d\pi_{T^*Y}\geq n_Y+k. \tag{W1}

Put

δk=nX+nY−2k4.(W2) \delta_k=\frac{n_X+n_Y-2k}{4}. \tag{W2}

For every A∈Im(X×Y,C′)A\in I^m(X\times Y,C') and every real ss, we prove

A:Hcomps(Y)⟶Hlocs−m−δk(X).(W3) A:H^s_{\mathrm{comp}}(Y)\longrightarrow H^{s-m-\delta_k}_{\mathrm{loc}}(X). \tag{W3}

Here continuity means a norm estimate for each fixed compact input support and each compact output cutoff. Proper support gives the corresponding continuous maps between local spaces, and between spaces of compactly supported inputs and outputs. No global norm bound on a noncompact manifold without uniform geometric hypotheses is asserted.

For a local canonical graph, nX=nY=nn_X=n_Y=n, k=nk=n, and δk=0\delta_k=0. W3 also proves its order-zero L2L^2 assertion without assuming any mapping theorem about Fourier integral operators.

The exact earlier proofs used below are:

All are linked to exact proof nodes in the accompanying proof map. Finite-dimensional inversion, basis extension, smooth cutoffs and compactness are the U001 proofs already bound to these components. We write f^(ξ)=∫e−ix⋅ξf(x) dx\widehat f(\xi)=\int e^{-ix\cdot\xi}f(x)\,dx, with inverse factor (2π)−n(2\pi)^{-n}, and

∥f∥Hs2=(2π)−n∫⟨ξ⟩2s∣f^(ξ)∣2 dξ.(W4) \|f\|_{H^s}^2=(2\pi)^{-n} \int\langle\xi\rangle^{2s}|\widehat f(\xi)|^2\,d\xi. \tag{W4}

The rank calculation, graph slices and parameter estimate

The diagram records the exact route proved in W2–W6. A slice at a point uses its actual rank r≥kr\geq k, so its parameter count can be smaller than the bound nX+nY−2kn_X+n_Y-2k. It does not assume constant projection rank.

W1. Smooth kernels and a preliminary distribution bound

A smooth kernel supported in a fixed compact chart product maps every HsH^s continuously into every HtH^t. Indeed, for every output derivative, integration by parts in the compact input variable bounds its input Fourier transform by CM⟨η⟩−MC_M\langle\eta\rangle^{-M}. Weighted Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz then bounds that output derivative by C∥f∥HsC\|f\|_{H^s}, choosing M>∣s∣+nY/2M>|s|+n_Y/2. A compact output cutoff and Parseval bound any nonnegative integer Sobolev norm by finitely many such derivative bounds. An integer above tt bounds the HtH^t norm directly from (W4). This also proves all smooth-kernel estimates used below.

For any compactly localized operator TT considered here and any real ss, there is an integer NN such that

∥Tf∥H−N≤C∥f∥Hs.(W5) \|Tf\|_{H^{-N}}\leq C\|f\|_{H^s}. \tag{W5}

This preliminary estimate uses only AC A1, not (W3). Choose an integer q≥max⁡(0,−s)q\geq\max(0,-s). The smooth transpose bound of AC A1, with its compact supports, gives ∥T∗v∥H−s≤∥T∗v∥Hq≤Cmax⁡∣α∣≤M∥∂αv∥∞\|T^*v\|_{H^{-s}}\leq\|T^*v\|_{H^q} \leq C\max_{|\alpha|\leq M}\|\partial^\alpha v\|_\infty. Fourier inversion and Cauchy–Schwarz bound this last seminorm by C′∥v∥HNC'\|v\|_{H^N} for an integer N>M+nX/2N>M+n_X/2: the remaining integral of ⟨ξ⟩2M−2N\langle\xi\rangle^{2M-2N} converges by annular summation. Consequently ∣⟨Tf,v⟩∣≤C′∥f∥Hs∥v∥HN|\langle Tf,v\rangle|\leq C'\|f\|_{H^s}\|v\|_{H^N}.

Here this bound really implies membership in H−NH^{-N}. To see it without an unproved representation theorem for Hilbert duals, first take smooth compact ff, for which AC A1 makes TfTf smooth compact. The Fourier dual norm proved in P1 B5 gives (W5). Approximate a compactly supported HsH^s input by compact smooth functions in a fixed larger compact set: use Schwartz density from P1 B1 and multiply by a fixed cutoff equal to one near the input support; P1 B4 proves convergence. The estimate makes the outputs Cauchy in the complete space H−NH^{-N}. Their distributional limit is TfTf, because the smooth compact transpose tests in AC A1 preserve distributional convergence. Thus (W5) holds for that actual distributional operator. This proof also justifies agreement of extensions obtained using different exponents.

W2. Adjoint, diagonal and the graph estimate

For a phase kernel with real phase ϕ(x,y,θ)\phi(x,y,\theta), the adjoint has phase −ϕ(x,y,θ)-\phi(x,y,\theta) with the base variables interchanged, and amplitude a‾\overline a. Compact frequency cutoffs, ordinary Fubini and passage to the distributional limit prove this assertion from the defining pairing. The fibre differentials remain independent, the amplitude order is unchanged, and the relation is C−1C^{-1}. Thus A∗∈Im(Y×X,(C−1)′)A^*\in I^m(Y\times X,(C^{-1})'). This is also the adjoint on compact smooth inputs for the half-density L2L^2 pairing.

First assume that the part of CC meeting the kernel is one canonical graph κ:V⊂T∗Y∖0→T∗X∖0\kappa:V\subset T^*Y\setminus0\to T^*X\setminus0, and that both base supports are compact. Its composition with its inverse has one matching point for each input covector. The matching tangent equations are those of the invertible differential dκd\kappa, so the composition is clean with excess zero and image the identity relation on VV. On closed supports in this chart the matching map is proper: the intermediate covector is the continuous function κ(y,η)\kappa(y,\eta) of the output covector. A compact output set has compact graph there. We may enlarge the image to the full diagonal, with the amplitude supported in VV. AC A0–A9 therefore gives

A∗A∈I0(Y×Y,Δ′)when m=0.(W6) A^*A\in I^0(Y\times Y,\Delta') \quad\text{when }m=0. \tag{W6}

This class is precisely ordinary pseudodifferential order zero locally. For the needed direction, use the prescribed nondegenerate phase (y−z)⋅η(y-z)\cdot\eta, with N=nYN=n_Y. PH F4–F6 supplies its amplitude of order 0+(2nY)/4−N/2=00+(2n_Y)/4-N/2=0, modulo a smooth kernel. Its normalization is (2π)−nY(2\pi)^{-n_Y}. P2 O2 reduces that amplitude to a left symbol, and P2 O5 gives the compact proper representation. P1 B4 and W1 imply ∥A∗Af∥2≤M∥f∥2\|A^*Af\|_2\leq M\|f\|_2.

For compact smooth ff, AC A1 makes AfAf compact smooth. Hence the already proved adjoint identity and Cauchy–Schwarz give

∥Af∥22=⟨A∗Af,f⟩≤M∥f∥22.(W7) \|Af\|_2^2=\langle A^*Af,f\rangle \leq M\|f\|_2^2. \tag{W7}

Density and completeness extend AA to L2L^2. Its distributional meaning is unchanged, by the transpose argument in W1. In particular, no L2L^2 boundedness was used in forming A∗AA^*A.

If CC is only locally a canonical graph, localize both base variables. PS5 gives a finite phase partition over the compact normalized relation. Shrink its pieces until both cotangent projections are one-to-one. Apply (W7) to each piece separately, and sum their norm bounds; W1 handles the smooth remainder. There is no assertion that the adjoint product of the entire multi-sheeted relation is diagonal. For order m≤0m\leq0, the inclusion of ordinary symbol classes puts the operator in I0I^0.

We also need uniformity for a smooth family of these localized graph phases. Shrink the fixed compact parameter set so that the graph determinants are bounded away from zero on the normalized supports. Every finite integration-by-parts estimate, change of variables and stationary expansion in AC has then uniform constants, provided finitely many amplitude seminorms are bounded. In reducing (W6) to a diagonal symbol, one may stop PH F4–F5 after finitely many corrections. The error has any prescribed sufficiently negative order. In each of the finitely many phase representations its amplitude is absolutely integrable in the fibre once its order is below minus the fibre dimension; it then has a uniformly bounded continuous compact kernel. Schur's estimate in P1 B3 bounds this error on L2L^2. The finite diagonal part is bounded by the finite symbol seminorms in P1 B4. Thus the constant in (W7) is uniform. No uniform infinite asymptotic summation is needed.

W3. The rank matrix and the slicing subspaces

Take a nondegenerate operator phase ϕ(x,y,θ)\phi(x,y,\theta) for C′C', with NN fibre variables, at a point where ϕθ=0\phi_\theta=0. On VX=RnX⊕RNV_X=\mathbb R^{n_X}\oplus\mathbb R^N and VY=RnY⊕RNV_Y=\mathbb R^{n_Y}\oplus\mathbb R^N, consider the bilinear matrix

B=(ϕxyϕxθϕθyϕθθ),R=rank⁡B.(W8) B=\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{xy}&\phi_{x\theta}\\ \phi_{\theta y}&\phi_{\theta\theta} \end{pmatrix},\qquad R=\operatorname{rank}B. \tag{W8}

The two spaces share the fibre subspace Θ=RN\Theta=\mathbb R^N. The critical tangent equation is

ϕθxx˙+ϕθyy˙+ϕθθθ˙=0.(W9) \phi_{\theta x}\dot x+\phi_{\theta y}\dot y +\phi_{\theta\theta}\dot\theta=0. \tag{W9}

Its coefficient matrix has rank NN, by nondegeneracy. Projection of its kernel onto x˙\dot x is onto exactly when [ϕθy ϕθθ][\phi_{\theta y}\ \phi_{\theta\theta}] is onto RN\mathbb R^N. Indeed solvability for every x˙\dot x says that its image contains the image of ϕθx\phi_{\theta x}; their combined image is already all of RN\mathbb R^N. The converse is immediate. Likewise for yy. Thus the base submersion assumptions say exactly that the left and right radicals of BB intersect Θ\Theta only in zero.

The kernel of the cotangent projection to T∗XT^*X consists of x˙=0\dot x=0 and B(y˙,θ˙)T=0B(\dot y,\dot\theta)^T=0. Its dimension is nY+N−Rn_Y+N-R. Since the critical manifold has dimension nX+nYn_X+n_Y, and its map to CC is a local diffeomorphism by PH F1, this proves

rank⁡dπT∗X=nX+r,rank⁡dπT∗Y=nY+r,r=R−N.(W10) \operatorname{rank}d\pi_{T^*X}=n_X+r,\qquad \operatorname{rank}d\pi_{T^*Y}=n_Y+r,\qquad r=R-N. \tag{W10}

The second equality follows by the same kernel computation with the transpose of BB. In particular the two rank excesses agree pointwise, r≥kr\geq k, and r≤min⁡(nX,nY)r\leq\min(n_X,n_Y).

Here is the full linear-algebra step. For any bilinear form whose two radicals miss a common subspace Θ\Theta, extend a basis of its image from Θ\Theta to a basis of the entire image of dimension RR. Choose lifts of the added basis vectors. This constructs subspaces WX⊃ΘW_X\supset\Theta, WY⊃ΘW_Y\supset\Theta, each of dimension RR, on which the two maps into the opposite dual space are injective. Their images equal the full images. If w∈WYw\in W_Y annihilates WXW_X, it therefore annihilates all of VXV_X, and injectivity on WYW_Y forces w=0w=0. Hence B∣WX×WYB|_{W_X\times W_Y} is nonsingular. Subtracting fibre components from the lifted bases shows that

WX=EX⊕Θ,WY=EY⊕Θ,dim⁡EX=dim⁡EY=r,(W11) W_X=E_X\oplus\Theta,\qquad W_Y=E_Y\oplus\Theta, \qquad\dim E_X=\dim E_Y=r, \tag{W11}

with EX⊂RnXE_X\subset\mathbb R^{n_X}, EY⊂RnYE_Y\subset\mathbb R^{n_Y}.

In this setting r≥1r\geq1. If r=0r=0, (W11) would make ϕθθ\phi_{\theta\theta} invertible. Homogeneity differentiated in θ\theta gives ϕθθθ=0\phi_{\theta\theta}\theta=0 at a critical point, whereas θ≠0\theta\ne0. This is a contradiction.

The restricted covectors are automatically nonzero for these subspaces. Euler's identity differentiated in the base variables gives ϕxθθ=ϕx\phi_{x\theta}\theta=\phi_x and ϕyθθ=ϕy\phi_{y\theta}\theta=\phi_y. If ϕx∣EX=0\phi_x|_{E_X}=0, the nonzero right fibre vector θ∈Θ⊂WY\theta\in\Theta\subset W_Y is annihilated by the restricted matrix: its upper block is that restricted covector and its lower block is ϕθθθ=0\phi_{\theta\theta}\theta=0. This contradicts nonsingularity. The left fibre vector proves ϕy∣EY≠0\phi_y|_{E_Y}\ne0 in the same way. Thus no generic-choice assertion is needed.

W4. Actual graph slices and the quarter-codimension shift

Choose separate linear coordinates x=(x′,a)x=(x',a), y=(y′,b)y=(y',b) with tangent x′,y′x',y' directions EX,EYE_X,E_Y; both primed variables have dimension rr. Regard a∈RnX−ra\in\mathbb R^{n_X-r}, b∈RnY−rb\in\mathbb R^{n_Y-r} as parameters. The restricted phase is ϕa,b(x′,y′,θ)=ϕ(x′,a,y′,b,θ)\phi_{a,b}(x',y',\theta)=\phi(x',a,y',b,\theta). Its graph matrix is the nonsingular restriction of (W8):

D=(ϕx′y′ϕx′θϕθy′ϕθθ).(W12) D=\begin{pmatrix} \phi_{x'y'}&\phi_{x'\theta}\\ \phi_{\theta y'}&\phi_{\theta\theta} \end{pmatrix}. \tag{W12}

In particular its last NN rows are independent, so this is a nondegenerate phase. The two restricted base covectors are nonzero. For fixed x′x', the derivative of (y′,θ)↦(ϕx′,ϕθ)(y',\theta)\mapsto(\phi_{x'},\phi_\theta) is DD. The inverse theorem therefore makes the cotangent projection to (x′,ξ′)(x',\xi') a local diffeomorphism on its critical manifold. The transpose calculation does the same for the other projection. The critical image is Lagrangian: on the critical manifold, dϕ=ϕx′dx′+ϕy′dy′d\phi=\phi_{x'}dx'+\phi_{y'}dy', so taking its differential makes the pulled-back symplectic form zero; the dimension is 2r2r. It is consequently a local canonical graph.

These assertions persist in a neighborhood in (a,b)(a,b), the base variables and normalized frequency. The inverse theorem with parameters, and homogeneity in the radial variable, give one uniformly controlled conic graph chart after shrinking. In particular both sliced covectors are bounded below by a positive multiple of ∣θ∣|\theta| on the closed normalized support. This is exactly the uniform setting in W2. No constant-rank hypothesis on the original projections was used.

Write the original kernel coefficient in this phase as

K(x,y)=(2π)−(nX+nY+2N)/4∫eiϕ(x,y,θ)a0(x,y,θ) dθ,a0∈Sm+(nX+nY)/4−N/2.(W13) K(x,y)=(2\pi)^{-(n_X+n_Y+2N)/4} \int e^{i\phi(x,y,\theta)}a_0(x,y,\theta)\,d\theta, \quad a_0\in S^{m+(n_X+n_Y)/4-N/2}. \tag{W13}

Coordinate half-density factors are smooth and are included in a0a_0. Let c=nX+nY−2rc=n_X+n_Y-2r. The sliced kernel has normalization (2π)−(2r+2N)/4(2\pi)^{-(2r+2N)/4}, amplitude (2π)−c/4a0(2\pi)^{-c/4}a_0, and order

ma,b=m+c4.(W14) m_{a,b}=m+\frac c4. \tag{W14}

Indeed the unchanged amplitude order equals (m+c/4)+(2r)/4−N/2(m+c/4)+(2r)/4-N/2. Base parameter derivatives preserve all ordinary symbol bounds on the compact parameter set.

This slicing is defined by the displayed phase integrals. No general restriction theorem for distributions is being assumed. For compact smooth inputs, fibre cutoffs make every integral ordinary. The uniform nonstationary estimates of AC A1, now in y′y', give smooth convergence after applying the sliced kernels. Their constants are uniform in (a,b)(a,b), by the lower covector bounds just proved. Compact parameter integration therefore commutes with that limit and agrees with the original distributional kernel, using P2 O0.1 product-test uniqueness.

W5. Integrating the graph estimates

Assume first m≤−δkm\leq-\delta_k. At each selected point r≥kr\geq k, so (W14) gives

m+nX+nY−2r4≤k−r2≤0.(W15) m+\frac{n_X+n_Y-2r}{4} \leq\frac{k-r}{2}\leq0. \tag{W15}

W2 supplies a uniform L2(Rr)L^2(\mathbb R^r) bound MM for every sliced operator Ta,bT_{a,b}. Choose bounded parameter boxes E,FE,F containing the kernel support. For compact smooth ff, W4 gives

Af( ⋅,a)=∫FTa,bf( ⋅,b) db.(W16) Af(\,\cdot,a)=\int_F T_{a,b}f(\,\cdot,b)\,db. \tag{W16}

Pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz in bb, followed by Tonelli and the sliced estimate, yields

∥Af∥22≤∣F∣∫E∫F∥Ta,bf( ⋅,b)∥22 db da≤M2∣E∣∣F∣∫F∥f( ⋅,b)∥22 db.(W17) \begin{split} \|Af\|_2^2 &\leq |F|\int_E\int_F\|T_{a,b}f(\,\cdot,b)\|_2^2\,db\,da\\ &\leq M^2|E||F|\int_F\|f(\,\cdot,b)\|_2^2\,db. \end{split} \tag{W17}

For a zero-dimensional parameter space its box has measure one and its integral means evaluation. Thus the proof includes graph relations. All integrands for smooth ff are continuous in the parameters by the convergence in W4, so measurability is established before Tonelli. Density extends the estimate to L2L^2; the transpose proves agreement with the original operator as in W1.

For fixed compact input and output localizations, the relation has compact normalized support. It lies away from both zero covector axes: a sequence approaching one axis in that compact normalization would contradict closedness and the assumed exclusion of the axes. PS5 gives a finite cover by the sliced phase neighborhoods just proved. Sum their bounds, and use W1 for the smooth remainder. Finite coordinate changes preserve L2L^2 half-density norms by substitution; finite frame changes have bounded coefficients. We have proved

m≤−δk⟹A:Lcomp2(Y)⟶Lloc2(X).(W18) m\leq-\delta_k\quad\Longrightarrow\quad A:L^2_{\mathrm{comp}}(Y)\longrightarrow L^2_{\mathrm{loc}}(X). \tag{W18}

W6. All real Sobolev orders and proper supports

We give the localization details of the usual conjugation argument. In a fixed chart, let QaQ^a be a properly supported ordinary operator of order aa, elliptic with leading symbol ⟨ξ⟩a\langle\xi\rangle^a near a selected compact base set. Such an operator is constructed by inserting a smooth kernel cutoff equal to one near the diagonal in the Fourier multiplier: P2 O4–O5 proves its order and the smooth off-diagonal error. Repeated differentiation shows ∣∂ξα⟨ξ⟩a∣≤Cα⟨ξ⟩a−∣α∣|\partial_\xi^\alpha\langle\xi\rangle^a| \leq C_\alpha\langle\xi\rangle^{a-|\alpha|}, since each derivative is a sum of a polynomial of degree at most its number of differentiations times a lower power of 1+∣ξ∣21+|\xi|^2. This verifies the symbol hypothesis. K1–K3 constructs a left parametrix P−aP^{-a} of order −a-a, with

P−aQa=I+R(W19) P^{-a}Q^a=I+R \tag{W19}

near that compact set, where the localized error has smooth kernel. Compact cutoffs may be chosen around every input and output used here. For clarity, K3's conic inverses give this full-direction assertion as follows. Cover the compact base/unit-sphere set by finitely many of its inverse cones. K4 supplies operators EjE_j supported in these cones with ∑Ej=I\sum E_j=I near the selected compact set, modulo a smooth error. If PjQa=I+RjP_jQ^a=I+R_j on the corresponding cone, take P−a=∑EjPjP^{-a}=\sum E_jP_j. The localized products EjRjE_jR_j are smoothing by the essential-support product inclusion proved in P2 and K0. Their finite sum proves (W19), and has the stated order and proper support.

Two consequences, with actual norm bounds, will be useful. First Qa:Hcompa→Lcomp2Q^a:H^a_{\mathrm{comp}}\to L^2_{\mathrm{comp}}, by P1 B4 and proper support. Second, if uu is supported in the selected compact set, u∈H−Nu\in H^{-N}, and Qau∈L2Q^a u\in L^2, multiply (W19) by a cutoff equal to one on that support to obtain

∥u∥Ha≤C(∥Qau∥2+∥u∥H−N).(W20) \|u\|_{H^a}\leq C\bigl(\|Q^a u\|_2+\|u\|_{H^{-N}}\bigr). \tag{W20}

The first term uses P1 B4 for P−aP^{-a}; the second uses W1 for the compact smooth error. Thus elliptic regularity here has a supplied proof.

Now fix compact input support and an output cutoff χ\chi. Put t=s−m−δkt=s-m-\delta_k. For an input f∈Hsf\in H^s with that support, set g=QYsfg=Q_Y^s f. Equation (W19), followed by a cutoff ρ=1\rho=1 near the input support, gives the exact identity

f=Dg+Sf,D=ρPY−s∈Ψ−s,S=−ρRY.(W21) f=Dg+Sf,\qquad D=\rho P_Y^{-s}\in\Psi^{-s},\qquad S=-\rho R_Y. \tag{W21}

All sampled supports are fixed compact sets; the smooth operator SS maps HsH^s to compact smooth functions with each required seminorm bounded. AC A1 therefore makes χASf\chi ASf bounded in every HtH^t.

Apply AC composition to

B=QXtχAD.(W22) B=Q_X^t\chi A D. \tag{W22}

Composition on either side with an identity canonical graph is transverse with excess zero: matching determines the identity covector uniquely, and imposes no additional equation on the tangent to CC. The base cutoffs give proper compact supports. Its relation is contained in CC, its order is t+m−s=−δkt+m-s=-\delta_k, and the same rank and base submersion conditions hold on that relation. Thus (W18) gives ∥Bg∥2≤C∥g∥2\|Bg\|_2\leq C\|g\|_2, with compact supports chosen for these localizations. Also u=χADgu=\chi A Dg satisfies ∥u∥H−N≤C∥g∥2\|u\|_{H^{-N}}\leq C\|g\|_2 for some NN, by W1 applied to the composed FIO χAD\chi AD. Use (W20) with a=ta=t to conclude

∥χAf∥Ht≤C∥g∥2+C′∥f∥Hs≤C′′∥f∥Hs.(W23) \|\chi Af\|_{H^t} \leq C\|g\|_2+C'\|f\|_{H^s} \leq C''\|f\|_{H^s}. \tag{W23}

The estimates initially valid on compact smooth inputs extend by their proved density to the specified spaces; W1 identifies all limits with the distributional operators. This proves (W3) for every real ss. Coordinate invariance for these real orders is P1 B5, and finite-rank bundle changes are finite smooth multiplications, so chartwise estimates give the manifold statement.

Finally, if AA is proper, a fixed compact output cutoff sees only one compact input set. Multiply the input by a cutoff equal to one there and apply (W23); this proves the local-space continuity. A fixed compact input support has compact output support under a proper kernel. For smooth approximants this follows from the actual kernel support, and the distributional limit has the same support by testing outside it. A finite cover of that output compact set gives the compact-space estimate. No support assertion about frequency-regularized kernels is needed.

W7. Four worked tests of the theorem

Exercise W1 — Quarter orders in a redundant base variable. Take X=Y=R2X=Y=\mathbb R^2, with coordinates (x,a),(y,b)(x,a),(y,b), and phase ϕ=(x−y)θ\phi=(x-y)\theta, θ≠0\theta\ne0. With compact smooth factors α(a),β(b)\alpha(a),\beta(b), consider

Af(x,a)=α(a)∫β(b)f(x,b) db.(W24) Af(x,a)=\alpha(a)\int\beta(b)f(x,b)\,db. \tag{W24}

Find the canonical ranks, its FIO order and its L2L^2 norm.

Solution. Its relation is x=y, ξx=ηy=θ, ξa=ηb=0x=y,\ \xi_x=\eta_y=\theta,\ \xi_a=\eta_b=0, with free a,ba,b. Both base projections are onto. Each cotangent projection has rank three, so r=k=1r=k=1, c=2c=2, δk=1/2\delta_k=1/2. In the variables ordered (x,a,θ)(x,a,\theta) and (y,b,θ)(y,b,\theta), the matrix (W8) is

(001000−100).(W25) \begin{pmatrix}0&0&1\\0&0&0\\-1&0&0\end{pmatrix}. \tag{W25}

It has rank two, giving r=R−N=1r=R-N=1. The usual delta normalization is (2π)−1∫ei(x−y)θ dθ(2\pi)^{-1}\int e^{i(x-y)\theta}\,d\theta, whereas (W13) has factor (2π)−3/2(2\pi)^{-3/2}. Its normalized amplitude is therefore (2π)1/2αβ(2\pi)^{1/2}\alpha\beta, of order zero, so m=−1/2m=-1/2. The sliced normalized amplitude is αβ\alpha\beta, by (W14), and the sliced order is zero. Cauchy–Schwarz gives the exact norm ∥A∥2→2=∥α∥2∥β∥2\|A\|_{2\to2}=\|\alpha\|_2\|\beta\|_2: equality is attained on f(x,b)=h(x)β(b)‾f(x,b)=h(x)\overline{\beta(b)} with nonzero h∈L2h\in L^2, after normalization. If either factor is zero both sides are zero. One may multiply by compact xx cutoffs for the local statement.

Exercise W2 — Why the rank bound is a sufficient bound. In (W24), replace the input integral by ∫β(b)f(x,b) db\int\beta(b)f(x,b)\,db as before, and apply the Fourier multiplier ⟨Dx⟩ν\langle D_x\rangle^\nu in the common variable xx, for ν>0\nu>0. Determine the FIO order and show failure of an L2L^2 bound on this model when α,β\alpha,\beta are nonzero.

Solution. The normalized amplitude gains order ν\nu, so m=ν−1/2m=\nu-1/2. The threshold in (W18) would require ν≤0\nu\leq0. Choose smooth frequency functions h^R\widehat h_R supported in [R,R+1][R,R+1], normalized so that ∥hR∥2=1\|h_R\|_2=1, and put fR(x,b)=hR(x)β(b)‾/∥β∥2f_R(x,b)=h_R(x)\overline{\beta(b)}/\|\beta\|_2. Parseval gives ∥AfR∥2≥∥α∥2∥β∥2⟨R⟩ν\|Af_R\|_2\geq\|\alpha\|_2\|\beta\|_2\langle R\rangle^\nu. Thus the global model is unbounded on L2L^2. This example illustrates the threshold; it does not claim that (W18) is a necessary condition for every relation or every cancelling amplitude.

Exercise W3 — Base surjectivity cannot be omitted. For X=Y=RX=Y=\mathbb R, use ϕ=xθ+yσ\phi=x\theta+y\sigma, localized to a cone where θ,σ≠0\theta,\sigma\ne0. Compute (W8) and identify the failed hypothesis.

Solution. Its critical manifold has x=y=0x=y=0, with free θ,σ\theta,\sigma. The relation is a product of the nonzero conormals of two points, so both base projections have rank zero. With rows (x,θ,σ)(x,\theta,\sigma), columns (y,θ,σ)(y,\theta,\sigma),

B=(010000100).(W26) B=\begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\0&0&0\\1&0&0\end{pmatrix}. \tag{W26}

Its rank is two and R−N=0R-N=0; its radicals meet the fibre subspaces. The construction of (W11) is unavailable. Sufficiently low symbol orders can still give bounded operators, but the graph-slicing proof and the claimed rank criterion cannot be applied without their base hypotheses.

Exercise W4 — Compute the promised Sobolev loss. Suppose nX=3,nY=2n_X=3,n_Y=2, the base projections are submersions and the cotangent ranks are at least four and three. For an order m=1/4m=1/4 operator, find the guaranteed output order for an HsH^s input. Compare a point where the actual ranks are five and four.

Solution. The uniform lower bound is k=1k=1, so δk=(3+2−2)/4=3/4\delta_k=(3+2-2)/4=3/4. Formula (W3) gives Hs−1H^{s-1}. At the specified point r=2r=2; on a sufficiently small sliced neighborhood the construction instead gives loss m+(3+2−4)/4=1/2m+(3+2-4)/4=1/2, hence the local estimate Hs−1/2H^{s-1/2}. The improved local bound follows because the chosen graph determinant remains invertible there. No assertion that projection ranks are constant nearby is needed.

Free source and remaining scope

The human source used for the graph argument, rank matrix, slicing lemma and sufficient rank bound is Lars Hörmander's freely readable Fourier integral operators. I, Acta Mathematica 127 (1971), Sections 4.1 and 4.3, especially Propositions 4.1.3–4.1.4, Lemma 4.1.8 and Theorems 4.1.9, 4.3.1–4.3.2. The actual reading and exact free snapshot are recorded separately. W1–W6 supply the proofs and parameter, normalization, density and Sobolev-extension details needed here. No reference in that paper's bibliography is adopted by citing the paper.

This component proves the ordinary-symbol mapping theorem (W3). The graph compactness criterion, sharp essential norms, symbol classes with derivative losses, and the remaining propagation and boundary course are still separate obligations. A source citation settles none of them.