Equation form expr-018d386ab2d8f3f7
Read as: Aleph zero of capital X
Means: Aleph zero of capital X
Second-order logic
Read as: Aleph zero of capital X
Means: Aleph zero of capital X
Read as: s
Means: s
Read as: for every x, x belongs to capital X if and only if x belongs to capital Y
Means: for every x, x belongs to capital X if and only if x belongs to capital Y
Read as: Pow applied to capital Y, capital R, and capital X
Means: Pow applied to capital Y, capital R, and capital X
Read as: the power set of the natural numbers
Means: the power set of the natural numbers
Read as: capital Y
Means: capital Y
Read as: capital Z contained in capital X
Means: capital Z contained in capital X
Read as: the set assigned to capital X by s equals the set assigned to capital Y by s
Means: the set assigned to capital X by s equals the set assigned to capital Y by s
Read as: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that both of the following hold. First, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital Y. Second, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y
Means: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that both of the following hold. First, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital Y. Second, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y
Read as: capital X equals capital Y
Means: capital X equals capital Y
Read as: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: there exists x belonging to capital X
Means: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: there exists x belonging to capital X
Read as: N C H abbreviates: for every subset capital X of the domain, if Cont holds of capital X, then there exists a subset capital Y of the domain such that capital Y is a subset of capital X, Count does not hold of capital Y, and capital X and capital Y are not equinumerous
Means: N C H abbreviates: for every subset capital X of the domain, if Cont holds of capital X, then there exists a subset capital Y of the domain such that capital Y is a subset of capital X, Count does not hold of capital Y, and capital X and capital Y are not equinumerous
Read as: Aleph one of capital X abbreviates the conjunction of two conditions. For every subset capital Y of the domain, if capital Y is a subset of capital X, then either not Inf of capital Y or Aleph zero of capital Y. And not Aleph zero of capital X
Means: Aleph one of capital X abbreviates the conjunction of two conditions. For every subset capital Y of the domain, if capital Y is a subset of capital X, then either not Inf of capital Y or Aleph zero of capital Y. And not Aleph zero of capital X
Read as: x
Means: x
Read as: capital X has cardinality at most that of capital Y
Means: capital X has cardinality at most that of capital Y
Read as: the domain of M
Means: the domain of M
Read as: Cont of capital Y abbreviates: there exist a subset capital X of the domain and a binary relation capital R on the domain such that all three conditions hold. Aleph zero holds of capital X. Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X. And for all x and y, if x and y both belong to capital Y and, for every z, capital R relates x to z if and only if capital R relates y to z, then x equals y
Means: Cont of capital Y abbreviates: there exist a subset capital X of the domain and a binary relation capital R on the domain such that all three conditions hold. Aleph zero holds of capital X. Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X. And for all x and y, if x and y both belong to capital Y and, for every z, capital R relates x to z if and only if capital R relates y to z, then x equals y
Read as: the set assigned to capital X by s is a subset of the set assigned to capital Y by s
Means: the set assigned to capital X by s is a subset of the set assigned to capital Y by s
Read as: x in the domain of M
Means: x in the domain of M
Read as: the set of elements y of the domain of M such that capital R relates x to y
Means: the set of elements y of the domain of M such that capital R relates x to y
Read as: capital X of the domain of M
Means: capital X of the domain of M
Read as: M
Means: M
Read as: capital Y of the domain of M
Means: capital Y of the domain of M
Read as: for all subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain and all binary relations capital R on the domain: if Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X, then there does not exist a unary function u on the domain satisfying both conditions. First, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital Y, then u of x belongs to capital X
Means: for all subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain and all binary relations capital R on the domain: if Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X, then there does not exist a unary function u on the domain satisfying both conditions. First, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital Y, then u of x belongs to capital X
Read as: capital P has cardinality at most that of capital X
Means: capital P has cardinality at most that of capital X
Read as: capital X
Means: capital X
Read as: aleph two
Means: aleph two
Read as: for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then x belongs to capital Y
Means: for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then x belongs to capital Y
Read as: C H abbreviates: for every subset capital X of the domain, Aleph one of capital X if and only if Cont of capital X
Means: C H abbreviates: for every subset capital X of the domain, Aleph one of capital X if and only if Cont of capital X
Read as: capital P
Means: capital P
Read as: the set assigned to capital Y by s and the real numbers are equinumerous
Means: the set assigned to capital Y by s and the real numbers are equinumerous
Read as: there exist an element z and a unary function u on the domain such that all three conditions hold. First, z belongs to capital X. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital X. Third, for every subset capital Y of the domain, if z belongs to capital Y and, for every x, membership of x in capital Y implies membership of u of x in capital Y, then capital X equals capital Y
Means: there exist an element z and a unary function u on the domain such that all three conditions hold. First, z belongs to capital X. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital X. Third, for every subset capital Y of the domain, if z belongs to capital Y and, for every x, membership of x in capital Y implies membership of u of x in capital Y, then capital X equals capital Y
Read as: Count of capital X abbreviates
Means: Count of capital X abbreviates
Read as: the real numbers
Means: the real numbers
Read as: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then x belongs to capital Y
Means: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then x belongs to capital Y
Read as: capital Y has cardinality at most that of capital X
Means: capital Y has cardinality at most that of capital X
Read as: for all subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain, if capital X has cardinality at most that of capital Y and capital Y has cardinality at most that of capital X, then capital X and capital Y are equinumerous
Means: for all subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain, if capital X has cardinality at most that of capital Y and capital Y has cardinality at most that of capital X, then capital X and capital Y are equinumerous
Read as: capital Y in capital Z
Means: capital Y in capital Z
Read as: not C H
Means: not C H
Read as: capital R, a subset of the Cartesian square of the domain of M,
Means: capital R, a subset of the Cartesian square of the domain of M,
Read as: capital R
Means: capital R
Read as: aleph zero
Means: aleph zero
Read as: the real numbers have cardinality at most that of the domain of M
Means: the real numbers have cardinality at most that of the domain of M
Read as: capital Z, a subset of the power set of the domain of M,
Means: capital Z, a subset of the power set of the domain of M,
Read as: Codes applied to x, capital R, and capital Z abbreviates: for every y, y belongs to capital Z if and only if capital R relates x to y
Means: Codes applied to x, capital R, and capital Z abbreviates: for every y, y belongs to capital Z if and only if capital R relates x to y
Read as: there exists x belonging to capital X
Means: there exists x belonging to capital X
Read as: the power set of capital X
Means: the power set of capital X
Read as: for every capital Y, capital P applied to capital Y if and only if capital Y is a subset of capital X
Means: for every capital Y, capital P applied to capital Y if and only if capital Y is a subset of capital X
Read as: Aleph zero of capital X if and only if both Inf of capital X and Count of capital X
Means: Aleph zero of capital X if and only if both Inf of capital X and Count of capital X
Read as: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: for every x, x belongs to capital X if and only if x belongs to capital Y
Means: M under assignment s satisfies the formula: for every x, x belongs to capital X if and only if x belongs to capital Y
Read as: the set assigned to capital Y by s
Means: the set assigned to capital Y by s
Read as: M satisfies the following sentence. There exist subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain and a binary relation capital R on the domain such that Aleph zero holds of capital X, Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X, and there exists a unary function u on the domain satisfying both conditions. For all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. And for every y, if y belongs to capital Y, then there exists x such that y equals u of x
Means: M satisfies the following sentence. There exist subsets capital X and capital Y of the domain and a binary relation capital R on the domain such that Aleph zero holds of capital X, Pow holds of capital Y, capital R, and capital X, and there exists a unary function u on the domain satisfying both conditions. For all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. And for every y, if y belongs to capital Y, then there exists x such that y equals u of x
Read as: the domain of M and the real numbers are equinumerous
Means: the domain of M and the real numbers are equinumerous
Read as: the set assigned to capital X by s is not empty
Means: the set assigned to capital X by s is not empty
Read as: f from capital X to capital Y
Means: f from capital X to capital Y
Read as: capital X and capital Y are equinumerous
Means: capital X and capital Y are equinumerous
Read as: Inf of capital X abbreviates
Means: Inf of capital X abbreviates
Read as: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that both of the following hold. First, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Second, there exists y belonging to capital X such that, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then y is not equal to u of x
Means: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that both of the following hold. First, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Second, there exists y belonging to capital X such that, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then y is not equal to u of x
Read as: capital X is a subset of capital Y
Means: capital X is a subset of capital Y
Read as: capital Z
Means: capital Z
Read as: C H
Means: C H
Read as: the relation assigned to capital R by s
Means: the relation assigned to capital R by s
Read as: the element assigned to x by s
Means: the element assigned to x by s
Read as: the set assigned to capital X by s
Means: the set assigned to capital X by s
Read as: the set of elements y of the domain of M such that capital R relates x to y
Means: the set of elements y of the domain of M such that capital R relates x to y
Read as: aleph one
Means: aleph one
Read as: capital X is not empty
Means: capital X is not empty
Read as: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that all three conditions hold. First, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital Y. Second, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Third, for every y, if y belongs to capital Y, then there exists x belonging to capital X such that y equals u of x
Means: there exists a unary function u on the domain such that all three conditions hold. First, for every x, if x belongs to capital X, then u of x belongs to capital Y. Second, for all x and y in the domain, if u of x equals u of y, then x equals y. Third, for every y, if y belongs to capital Y, then there exists x belonging to capital X such that y equals u of x
Read as: capital Z contained in the domain of M
Means: capital Z contained in the domain of M
Read as: x in capital Y
Means: x in capital Y
Read as: the set assigned to capital Z by s
Means: the set assigned to capital Z by s
Read as: capital P applied to capital Y
Means: capital P applied to capital Y
Read as: Pow applied to capital Y, capital R, and capital X abbreviates two conditions. First, for every subset capital Z of the domain, if capital Z is a subset of capital X, then there exists x belonging to capital Y such that Codes holds of x, capital R, and capital Z. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital Y, then for every subset capital Z of the domain, if Codes holds of x, capital R, and capital Z, then capital Z is a subset of capital X
Means: Pow applied to capital Y, capital R, and capital X abbreviates two conditions. First, for every subset capital Z of the domain, if capital Z is a subset of capital X, then there exists x belonging to capital Y such that Codes holds of x, capital R, and capital Z. Second, for every x, if x belongs to capital Y, then for every subset capital Z of the domain, if Codes holds of x, capital R, and capital Z, then capital Z is a subset of capital X
For every domain element x, membership in capital X implies membership in capital Y. Under an assignment s, the formula is satisfied exactly when the set assigned to capital X is a subset of the set assigned to capital Y. This compares subsets through unary relation variables, without adding a set membership predicate to the language.
The two unary relation variables agree on every domain element. Under assignment s this says that their assigned subsets have exactly the same members and hence are equal.
There exists a domain element satisfying capital X. The assigned subset is therefore not empty.
The displayed second-order formula quantifies over a unary function on the whole domain. It sends every member of capital X into capital Y and is injective on all domain elements. The scope of the injectivity condition is preserved explicitly, rather than silently restricted to capital X.
The function sends capital X into capital Y, is injective on the whole domain, and maps capital X onto capital Y. A source caveat explains why requiring a globally injective extension is stronger than a bijection between arbitrary subsets. The formula and the source claim are both retained.
Read the three conditions in order: image of capital X lies in capital Y; equality of function values implies equality of arguments throughout the domain; every element of capital Y is the image of an element of capital X. The third conjunct does not cancel or restrict the domain-wide quantifiers in the second.
For any two subsets, cardinal comparison in each direction is asserted to imply equinumerosity. The source proof appeals to the Schroeder Bernstein theorem for ordinary sets. Its use of the source's formal equinumerosity abbreviation remains subject to the preceding caveat about global injectivity.
Inf of capital X asks for an injective unary function on the domain and an element of capital X absent from the image of capital X. The source does not require the function to map capital X into itself. The caveat records that even a singleton in a two element domain can satisfy this printed condition.
The first conjunct quantifies over all domain elements and expresses injectivity. The second selects an element y in capital X and states that no x in capital X maps to y. No closure conjunct is added in either MathML or the spoken formula.
Count of capital X asks for an initial member z, closure under a unary function, and equality with every subset containing z and closed under that function. Only delimiter nesting is repaired. The mathematical caveat explains that equality with the whole domain is forced and that the empty set is excluded.
The existential z and function u bind all three conjuncts. In the final conjunct, every unary relation variable capital Y is considered, not merely subsets of capital X. Its conclusion is equality with capital X, exactly as printed, rather than inclusion.
An element x codes, using capital R, the subset consisting of all domain elements y related to x by capital R. The order of arguments matters: x is the code, and y ranges over members of the coded subset.
Codes of x, capital R, and capital Z says that capital Z contains exactly the elements related to x by capital R. Pow of capital Y, capital R, and capital X says that every subset of capital X has a code in capital Y and that every code in capital Y represents a subset of capital X. Multiple elements of capital Y may code the same subset.
Every subset capital Z of capital X is coded by some element x of capital Y. Conversely, if x belongs to capital Y, every subset that x codes with capital R is a subset of capital X. The missing outer closing parenthesis is disclosed and balanced without changing these conditions.
The source asserts validity of a sentence saying that, if capital Y codes the power set of capital X using capital R, no injective domain function can send all of capital Y into capital X. Quantification ranges over two subsets, a binary relation, and then the proposed unary function. The source supplies no proof here, and none is added.
For every capital X, capital Y, and capital R satisfying Pow, negate the existence of a function with both global injectivity and image of capital Y contained in capital X. The negation applies to the entire existential conjunction, not just one of its conditions.
Assuming the domain is at least continuum-sized, Cont of capital Y asks for a set capital X satisfying Aleph zero and a relation coding its power set with capital Y. The final conjunct requires distinct elements of capital Y to code distinct subsets. The source proof describes this injectivity argument, with its variable mismatch and earlier definitional dependencies disclosed.
The first conditions are Aleph zero of capital X and Pow of capital Y, capital R, and capital X. The last condition says that any two elements x and y of capital Y having the same capital R successors are equal. Equality of coded subsets is tested by equivalence for every z in the domain.
The source equates domain size with the continuum using the existence of a countable base, a power set coding set, and an injective domain function whose range contains that coding set. The last condition is satisfied by the identity and does not provide the claimed upper bound. The formula and claim are preserved with a caveat, not silently replaced.
M satisfies an existential statement about capital X, capital Y, capital R, and u. The function is injective on the domain, and every member of capital Y has a preimage. The source does not require every image of u to belong to capital Y; the two directions must not be reversed in speech.
C H universally equates the Aleph one and Cont conditions on subsets of the domain. The source states that its validity is equivalent to the Continuum Hypothesis. This remains a source assertion with the earlier definitional defects disclosed. No missing proof or replacement definition is supplied.
N C H says that every subset satisfying Cont has a subset that fails Count and is not equinumerous with it. The source asserts that validity of this sentence is equivalent to failure of the Continuum Hypothesis. The same earlier definitional caveats apply, and the absence of a source proof is preserved.