Equation form expr-03911c48ca11189d
Read as: N is the set of values in structure M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Means: N is the set of values in structure M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Second-order logic
Read as: N is the set of values in structure M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Means: N is the set of values in structure M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Read as: s
Means: s
Read as: B of lower case x and capital Y abbreviates: capital Y holds of x, and for every lower case y, if capital Y holds of y then it holds of the successor of y
Means: B of lower case x and capital Y abbreviates: capital Y holds of x, and for every lower case y, if capital Y holds of y then it holds of the successor of y
Read as: structure M under assignment s satisfies: capital X holds of zero
Means: structure M under assignment s satisfies: capital X holds of zero
Read as: u
Means: u
Read as: u of the successor of n equals the successor of u of n
Means: u of the successor of n equals the successor of u of n
Read as: the function variable u double prime
Means: the function variable u double prime
Read as: not Count
Means: not Count
Read as: A subscript less than or equal to, of lower case x and lower case y
Means: A subscript less than or equal to, of lower case x and lower case y
Read as: the power set of the natural numbers
Means: the power set of the natural numbers
Read as: N is a subset of the domain of structure M
Means: N is a subset of the domain of structure M
Read as: the value of the numeral for n in structure M
Means: the value of the numeral for n in structure M
Read as: n
Means: n
Read as: A subscript less than or equal to, of lower case x and lower case y, abbreviates: for every unary relation capital Y, if B of x and capital Y then capital Y holds of y
Means: A subscript less than or equal to, of lower case x and lower case y, abbreviates: for every unary relation capital Y, if B of x and capital Y then capital Y holds of y
Read as: the theory P A superscript two logically entails A
Means: the theory P A superscript two logically entails A
Read as: lower case x equals the value of the numeral for n in structure M
Means: lower case x equals the value of the numeral for n in structure M
Read as: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x
Means: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x
Read as: f
Means: f
Read as: the standard natural number structure satisfies A subscript less than or equal to, applied to the numeral for n and the numeral for m
Means: the standard natural number structure satisfies A subscript less than or equal to, applied to the numeral for n and the numeral for m
Read as: the domain of structure M
Means: the domain of structure M
Read as: f from the natural numbers to the sentences of language L
Means: f from the natural numbers to the sentences of language L
Read as: multiplication
Means: multiplication
Read as: f from the natural numbers to the sentences of the language of arithmetic, L subscript A
Means: f from the natural numbers to the sentences of the language of arithmetic, L subscript A
Read as: lower case x in the domain of structure M
Means: lower case x in the domain of structure M
Read as: lower case x belongs to N
Means: lower case x belongs to N
Read as: Structure M satisfies: for every unary relation capital X: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x. Thus, structure M under assignment s satisfies: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Means: Structure M satisfies: for every unary relation capital X: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x. Thus, structure M under assignment s satisfies: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Read as: the theory Q
Means: the theory Q
Read as: the successor symbol
Means: the successor symbol
Read as: structure M
Means: structure M
Read as: k plus l equals m
Means: k plus l equals m
Read as: A superscript at least n belongs to Gamma
Means: A superscript at least n belongs to Gamma
Read as: capital X
Means: capital X
Read as: B subscript f of lower case x and lower case y
Means: B subscript f of lower case x and lower case y
Read as: the value of the numeral for n in structure M belongs to the domain of M
Means: the value of the numeral for n in structure M belongs to the domain of M
Read as: Inf abbreviates: there exists a unary function u such that both of the following hold. For all objects x and y, if u of x equals u of y then x equals y. And there exists an object y such that for every object x, y is different from u of x
Means: Inf abbreviates: there exists a unary function u such that both of the following hold. For all objects x and y, if u of x equals u of y then x equals y. And there exists an object y such that for every object x, y is different from u of x
Read as: Gamma subscript zero does not logically entail A
Means: Gamma subscript zero does not logically entail A
Read as: structure M satisfies the conditional if P then A
Means: structure M satisfies the conditional if P then A
Read as: A superscript at least k belongs to Gamma
Means: A superscript at least k belongs to Gamma
Read as: P
Means: P
Read as: Gamma
Means: Gamma
Read as: the derivability relation
Means: the derivability relation
Read as: lower case z
Means: lower case z
Read as: n is a natural number
Means: n is a natural number
Read as: the standard structure of natural numbers
Means: the standard structure of natural numbers
Read as: the domain of structure M equals the set of values in M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Means: the domain of structure M equals the set of values in M of the numeral for n, as n ranges over the natural numbers
Read as: the standard natural number structure satisfies A
Means: the standard natural number structure satisfies A
Read as: for every lower case x, if capital X holds of x then capital X holds of the successor of x
Means: for every lower case x, if capital X holds of x then capital X holds of the successor of x
Read as: the real numbers
Means: the real numbers
Read as: m equals u of l
Means: m equals u of l
Read as: the set of m such that n is less than or equal to m is a subset of capital Y
Means: the set of m such that n is less than or equal to m is a subset of capital Y
Read as: the binary relation variable L
Means: the binary relation variable L
Read as: the value of the constant zero in structure M belongs to N
Means: the value of the constant zero in structure M belongs to N
Read as: structure M satisfies not Inf
Means: structure M satisfies not Inf
Read as: the natural numbers
Means: the natural numbers
Read as: the less than or equal to relation
Means: the less than or equal to relation
Read as: the numeral for n
Means: the numeral for n
Read as: A of lower case x
Means: A of lower case x
Read as: A
Means: A
Read as: k
Means: k
Read as: structure M satisfies the theory P A superscript two
Means: structure M satisfies the theory P A superscript two
Read as: capital X equals the whole domain of structure M
Means: capital X equals the whole domain of structure M
Read as: the set N
Means: the set N
Read as: the standard natural number structure satisfies A subscript plus applied to the numeral for k, the numeral for l, and the numeral for m
Means: the standard natural number structure satisfies A subscript plus applied to the numeral for k, the numeral for l, and the numeral for m
Read as: the interpretation of the constant zero in structure M
Means: the interpretation of the constant zero in structure M
Read as: Count abbreviates: there exists an object lower case z and a unary function u such that for every unary relation capital X, if capital X holds of z and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of u of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Means: Count abbreviates: there exists an object lower case z and a unary function u such that for every unary relation capital X, if capital X holds of z and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of u of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Read as: for every object lower case z, every unary function u, every binary function u prime, every binary function u double prime, and every binary relation L: if P prime then A prime
Means: for every object lower case z, every unary function u, every binary function u prime, every binary function u double prime, and every binary relation L: if P prime then A prime
Read as: there exists a lower case x such that B subscript f of x and lower case y
Means: there exists a lower case x such that B subscript f of x and lower case y
Read as: Eight arithmetic axioms. First: for every x, the successor of x is not zero. Second: for all x and y, if the successor of x equals the successor of y then x equals y. Third: for every x, x equals zero or there exists y such that x equals the successor of y. Fourth: for every x, x plus zero equals x. Fifth: for all x and y, x plus the successor of y equals the successor of the sum x plus y. Sixth: for every x, x times zero equals zero. Seventh: for all x and y, x times the successor of y equals x times y, plus x. Eighth: for all x and y, x is less than y if and only if there exists z such that the successor of z plus x equals y. Plus all sentences of the following form: if A of zero and, for every x, A of x implies A of the successor of x, then for every x, A of x. End of arithmetic axioms and induction schema.
Means: Eight arithmetic axioms. First: for every x, the successor of x is not zero. Second: for all x and y, if the successor of x equals the successor of y then x equals y. Third: for every x, x equals zero or there exists y such that x equals the successor of y. Fourth: for every x, x plus zero equals x. Fifth: for all x and y, x plus the successor of y equals the successor of the sum x plus y. Sixth: for every x, x times zero equals zero. Seventh: for all x and y, x times the successor of y equals x times y, plus x. Eighth: for all x and y, x is less than y if and only if there exists z such that the successor of z plus x equals y. Plus all sentences of the following form: if A of zero and, for every x, A of x implies A of the successor of x, then for every x, A of x. End of arithmetic axioms and induction schema.
Read as: Gamma subscript zero of Gamma
Means: Gamma subscript zero of Gamma
Read as: addition
Means: addition
Read as: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x equals the value in M of the numeral for n plus one, and this value belongs to N
Means: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x equals the value in M of the numeral for n plus one, and this value belongs to N
Read as: the theory P A superscript two dagger
Means: the theory P A superscript two dagger
Read as: A subscript plus of lower case x, lower case y, and lower case z abbreviates: there exists a unary function u such that u of zero equals x; and for every lower case w, u of the successor of x equals the successor of u of x; and u of y equals z
Means: A subscript plus of lower case x, lower case y, and lower case z abbreviates: there exists a unary function u such that u of zero equals x; and for every lower case w, u of the successor of x equals the successor of u of x; and u of y equals z
Read as: Gamma logically entails A
Means: Gamma logically entails A
Read as: A superscript at least n abbreviates: there exist x subscript one through x subscript n such that x subscript one differs from x subscript two, x subscript one differs from x subscript three, and so on through all distinct pairs, ending with x subscript n minus one different from x subscript n
Means: A superscript at least n abbreviates: there exist x subscript one through x subscript n such that x subscript one differs from x subscript two, x subscript one differs from x subscript three, and so on through all distinct pairs, ending with x subscript n minus one different from x subscript n
Read as: structure M under assignment s satisfies: for every lower case x, capital X holds of x
Means: structure M under assignment s satisfies: for every lower case x, capital X holds of x
Read as: capital Y contained in the natural numbers
Means: capital Y contained in the natural numbers
Read as: the language L
Means: the language L
Read as: for every unary relation capital X: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Means: for every unary relation capital X: if capital X holds of zero and, for every lower case x, capital X holding of x implies capital X holding of the successor of x, then capital X holds of every lower case x
Read as: Gamma is the set containing not Inf, A superscript at least one, A superscript at least two, A superscript at least three, and so on
Means: Gamma is the set containing not Inf, A superscript at least one, A superscript at least two, A superscript at least three, and so on
Read as: lower case x belongs to s of capital X, which equals N
Means: lower case x belongs to s of capital X, which equals N
Read as: not Count
Means: not Count
Read as: the constant zero
Means: the constant zero
Read as: A is derivable from Gamma
Means: A is derivable from Gamma
Read as: s assigns the set N to capital X
Means: s assigns the set N to capital X
Read as: the conditional if P then A is logically valid
Means: the conditional if P then A is logically valid
Read as: the theory P A
Means: the theory P A
Read as: the less than relation
Means: the less than relation
Read as: structure M does not satisfy A superscript at least k plus one
Means: structure M does not satisfy A superscript at least k plus one
Read as: B of the numeral for n and capital Y
Means: B of the numeral for n and capital Y
Read as: the theory P A superscript two
Means: the theory P A superscript two
Read as: structure M under assignment s satisfies both: capital X holds of zero, and for every lower case x, if capital X holds of x then it holds of the successor of x
Means: structure M under assignment s satisfies both: capital X holds of zero, and for every lower case x, if capital X holds of x then it holds of the successor of x
Read as: u of zero equals k
Means: u of zero equals k
Read as: n is greater than k
Means: n is greater than k
Read as: Gamma subscript zero logically entails A
Means: Gamma subscript zero logically entails A
Read as: Count and Inf
Means: Count and Inf
Read as: A superscript at least n
Means: A superscript at least n
Read as: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x has its value in N
Means: the successor function of structure M applied to lower case x has its value in N
Read as: the domain of structure M is included in N
Means: the domain of structure M is included in N
Read as: the function variable u prime
Means: the function variable u prime
Read as: n is less than or equal to m
Means: n is less than or equal to m
Read as: structure M satisfies every sentence in Gamma subscript zero
Means: structure M satisfies every sentence in Gamma subscript zero
The aligned display contains eight separately quantified arithmetic axioms, followed by the family of induction instances. They concern nonzero and injective successor, predecessors, recursion for addition and multiplication, and the less than relation. The final schema uses a formula A, not a quantified relation variable. Every row is read in full in the formula speech.
For a model of P A superscript two, form N from the values of all standard numerals. The proof shows N lies inside the domain and is closed under successor. Full second order induction applies to this actual subset, forcing it to contain the whole domain. No nonstandard domain elements remain.
The first row states satisfaction of the universally quantified induction axiom. The second row, introduced by thus, states satisfaction of its instance under assignment s. This is an implication from a universal relation quantifier to a particular assignment, not an equation between rows.
Any two models of P A superscript two are isomorphic. The source combines the preceding theorem that numerals exhaust the domain with the linked theorem about standard models of Q, identifying every such model with the standard natural number structure.
The theory P A superscript two dagger contains only the first two successor axioms and second order induction. The proposition says that order, addition, and multiplication are definable. The source sketches order by successor-closed sets and addition by a successor-preserving function. The printed addition formula has a variable mismatch and the prose about closed sets has a caveat; both are disclosed. Multiplication is left to the following exercise.
Complete the proof that the reduced second order arithmetic theory defines order, addition, and multiplication. The reference points to the preceding proposition. No missing multiplication definition or proof is supplied.
A first order sentence is valid under first order semantics exactly when it is valid when considered in second order logic. Therefore a decision procedure for second order validity would decide first order validity, contrary to the known undecidability result.
The source reduces truth in the standard natural numbers to validity of a pure second order sentence. It conjoins the nine second order arithmetic axioms, replaces arithmetic symbols by object, function, and relation variables, and universally quantifies those variables. A sound complete effective proof system would enumerate arithmetic truth; representability would then define that truth set, contradicting Tarski's theorem. The source's omitted explicit quantification over structures in one displayed equivalence is disclosed.
Gamma contains the sentence asserting finiteness together with a sentence requiring at least n elements for every positive integer n. Each finite collection of requirements can be satisfied in a sufficiently large finite domain, whereas their union cannot. The proof's use of Gamma in place of its finite subset when choosing a bound is retained with a source caveat.
Give a set Gamma and sentence A such that Gamma entails A but no finite subset of Gamma entails A. The negative entailment condition is preserved explicitly. No example or solution is added.
The negation of Count has models on nonenumerable domains such as the power set of the natural numbers or the real numbers, but it has no enumerable model. Thus a second order sentence can have infinite models without an enumerable model.
Count and Inf together hold in the natural numbers but not in any nonenumerable domain. This gives a sentence with a denumerable model and no nonenumerable model.
the theorem that second order arithmetic models contain only numeral values
the proposition defining arithmetic from successor and second order induction