Equation form expr-01208e159d2aec8c
Read as: conjunction
Means: conjunction
Many-valued logics
Read as: conjunction
Means: conjunction
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula B and succedent empty
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula B and succedent empty
Read as: conjunction rule at position false
Means: conjunction rule at position false
Read as: the n sided sequent with formula A alone in every position
Means: the n sided sequent with formula A alone in every position
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position formula B, followed by Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position formula B, followed by Delta
Read as: disjunction rule at position false
Means: disjunction rule at position false
Read as: Pi
Means: Pi
Read as: Gamma sub zero prime
Means: Gamma sub zero prime
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A and succedent formula B
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A and succedent formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: with Gamma in the false position, Gamma in the middle position, and A in the true position
Means: with Gamma in the false position, Gamma in the middle position, and A in the true position
Read as: formula A is derivable from Gamma in logic L
Means: formula A is derivable from Gamma in logic L
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: conditional rule at position middle in three valued Goedel logic
Means: conditional rule at position middle in three valued Goedel logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the value of formula B under valuation v is true
Means: the value of formula B under valuation v is true
Read as: n
Means: n
Read as: contraction rule at position i
Means: contraction rule at position i
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B
Read as: v
Means: v
Read as: negation
Means: negation
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the value of formula A under valuation v is false
Means: the value of formula A under valuation v is false
Read as: the source writes the value of formula A equals false, with the valuation argument omitted
Means: the source writes the value of formula A equals false, with the valuation argument omitted
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
Read as: star
Means: star
Read as: conditional rule at position true in strong Kleene logic
Means: conditional rule at position true in strong Kleene logic
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent the conditional from formula A to formula B
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent the conditional from formula A to formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: with Gamma in the false position, Pi in the middle position, and Delta in the true position
Means: with Gamma in the false position, Pi in the middle position, and Delta in the true position
Read as: conditional rule at position middle in strong Kleene logic
Means: conditional rule at position middle in strong Kleene logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: formula A is derivable from Gamma in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: formula A is derivable from Gamma in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the negation of formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the negation of formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Read as: Lambda sub i
Means: Lambda sub i
Read as: right conditional rule
Means: right conditional rule
Read as: conditional rule at position true in three valued Goedel logic
Means: conditional rule at position true in three valued Goedel logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A; and true position formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A; and true position formula A
Read as: three
Means: three
Read as: left conjunction
Means: left conjunction
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: disjunction
Means: disjunction
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Read as: the value of the conditional from A to B under valuation v is false
Means: the value of the conditional from A to B under valuation v is false
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Read as: Gamma
Means: Gamma
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A, followed by formula A
Read as: the n sided sequent whose positions, in order, contain Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n
Means: the n sided sequent whose positions, in order, contain Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n
Read as: the true truth value
Means: the true truth value
Read as: conditional rule at position false in three valued Goedel logic
Means: conditional rule at position false in three valued Goedel logic
Read as: zero
Means: zero
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: all three sided sequents with formula A in every position
Means: all three sided sequents with formula A in every position
Read as: the classical sequent calculus L K
Means: the classical sequent calculus L K
Read as: the middle truth value
Means: the middle truth value
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent formula A
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent formula A
Read as: disjunction rule at position middle
Means: disjunction rule at position middle
Read as: Gamma sub one
Means: Gamma sub one
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B
Read as: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula B, formula A, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences
Means: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula B, formula A, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A
Read as: V equal to the set containing the false, middle, and true truth values
Means: V equal to the set containing the false, middle, and true truth values
Read as: left conditional rule
Means: left conditional rule
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B
Read as: conditional rule at position false
Means: conditional rule at position false
Read as: A
Means: A
Read as: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, with Gamma sub i in position i; the phantom formula is alignment space only
Means: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, with Gamma sub i in position i; the phantom formula is alignment space only
Read as: conditional rule at position false in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: conditional rule at position false in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: Gamma, Delta, Pi, and Lambda
Means: Gamma, Delta, Pi, and Lambda
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the value of formula B under valuation v is false
Means: the value of formula B under valuation v is false
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the negation of formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the negation of formula A
Read as: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains formula A followed by Gamma sub i
Means: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains formula A followed by Gamma sub i
Read as: the value of formula A under valuation v is true
Means: the value of formula A under valuation v is true
Read as: where i differs from j
Means: where i differs from j
Read as: A in Delta
Means: A in Delta
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conditional from formula A to formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conditional from formula A to formula B
Read as: L
Means: L
Read as: Gamma sub zero of Gamma
Means: Gamma sub zero of Gamma
Read as: the value of formula A under valuation v is true
Means: the value of formula A under valuation v is true
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B
Read as: formula A is a theorem of logic L
Means: formula A is a theorem of logic L
Read as: The first row is the sequent with antecedent formulas A sub one through A sub n and succedent formulas B sub one through B sub n. The source says this can be interpreted as the formula whose antecedent is the conjunction of A sub one through A sub m and whose consequent is the disjunction of B sub one through B sub n. The source uses n in the first antecedent list and m in the second; that mismatch is preserved and separately noted.
Means: The first row is the sequent with antecedent formulas A sub one through A sub n and succedent formulas B sub one through B sub n. The source says this can be interpreted as the formula whose antecedent is the conjunction of A sub one through A sub m and whose consequent is the disjunction of B sub one through B sub n. The source uses n in the first antecedent list and m in the second; that mismatch is preserved and separately noted.
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B; and true position formula B
Read as: the value of formula A under valuation v is the middle truth value
Means: the value of formula A under valuation v is the middle truth value
Read as: conjunction rule at position middle
Means: conjunction rule at position middle
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A
Read as: conjunction rule at position true
Means: conjunction rule at position true
Read as: Cut rule at distinct positions i and j. The first premise is the n sided sequent with formula A followed by Gamma sub i in position i and Gamma sub k in every other position k. The second premise has formula A followed by Delta sub j in position j and Delta sub k in every other position k. From both premises, in this order, infer the n sided sequent whose position k contains Gamma sub k followed by Delta sub k. Formula A is removed from the two distinguished positions. End cut rule.
Means: Cut rule at distinct positions i and j. The first premise is the n sided sequent with formula A followed by Gamma sub i in position i and Gamma sub k in every other position k. The second premise has formula A followed by Delta sub j in position j and Delta sub k in every other position k. From both premises, in this order, infer the n sided sequent whose position k contains Gamma sub k followed by Delta sub k. Formula A is removed from the two distinguished positions. End cut rule.
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B; and true position formula B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B; and true position formula B
Read as: with A in both the antecedent and the succedent
Means: with A in both the antecedent and the succedent
Read as: A in Gamma
Means: A in Gamma
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: v
Means: v
Read as: conditional rule at position middle
Means: conditional rule at position middle
Read as: the value of the conditional from A to B under valuation v is true
Means: the value of the conditional from A to B under valuation v is true
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the negation of formula A
Means: the negation of formula A
Read as: conditional rule at position false in strong Kleene logic
Means: conditional rule at position false in strong Kleene logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position formula A, followed by Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position formula A, followed by Delta
Read as: the value of formula A under valuation v is false
Means: the value of formula A under valuation v is false
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta
Read as: Gamma sub zero
Means: Gamma sub zero
Read as: the conditional connective
Means: the conditional connective
Read as: disjunction rule at position true
Means: disjunction rule at position true
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: right disjunction
Means: right disjunction
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
Read as: formula A is not a theorem of logic L
Means: formula A is not a theorem of logic L
Read as: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conditional from formula A to formula B and succedent empty
Means: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conditional from formula A to formula B and succedent empty
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position the negation of formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position the negation of formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: conditional rule at position middle in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: conditional rule at position middle in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: conditional rule at position true in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: conditional rule at position true in three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the set V of truth values
Means: the set V of truth values
Read as: i
Means: i
Read as: with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta
Means: with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta
Read as: with Gamma in the false position, Pi in the middle position, and Delta in the true position
Means: with Gamma in the false position, Pi in the middle position, and Delta in the true position
Read as: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains one visible copy of formula A followed by Gamma sub i; the phantom copy is alignment space only
Means: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains one visible copy of formula A followed by Gamma sub i; the phantom copy is alignment space only
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta
Read as: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains two consecutive copies of formula A followed by Gamma sub i
Means: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains two consecutive copies of formula A followed by Gamma sub i
Read as: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula A, formula B, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences
Means: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula A, formula B, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences
Read as: weakening rule at position i
Means: weakening rule at position i
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conjunction of formulas A and B
Means: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conjunction of formulas A and B
Read as: A in Pi
Means: A in Pi
Read as: L
Means: L
Read as: Delta
Means: Delta
Read as: with A in each of the false, middle, and true positions
Means: with A in each of the false, middle, and true positions
Read as: the n sided sequent whose positions, in order, contain Lambda sub one through Lambda sub n
Means: the n sided sequent whose positions, in order, contain Lambda sub one through Lambda sub n
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A
Read as: formula A is not derivable from Gamma
Means: formula A is not derivable from Gamma
Read as: exchange rule at position i
Means: exchange rule at position i
Read as: with star in one position
Means: with star in one position
Read as: the false truth value
Means: the false truth value
Read as: the truth value assigned by the nullary truth function for star, which belongs to V
Means: the truth value assigned by the nullary truth function for star, which belongs to V
Read as: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
Means: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A
The display relates a classical sequent to a conditional with a conjunction as antecedent and a disjunction as consequent. The source switches from n to m for the end of the antecedent list. Both original rows and the mismatch are preserved; no silently repaired equivalence is asserted.
The left conditional rule has two ordered premises, empty antecedent with A as succedent, then B as antecedent with empty succedent. Its conclusion has the conditional from A to B as antecedent and empty succedent. The right conditional rule has one premise, A as antecedent and B as succedent, and concludes with empty antecedent and that conditional as succedent. Side formulas are omitted as stated in the source.
Proof tree. Classical left conditional rule. Premise node one: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent formula A. Premise node two: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula B and succedent empty. The label of the next inference is left conditional rule. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conditional from formula A to formula B and succedent empty. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Classical right conditional rule. Premise node one: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A and succedent formula B. The label of the next inference is right conditional rule. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the two sided sequent with antecedent empty and succedent the conditional from formula A to formula B. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
The left conjunction version replaces adjacent formulas A and B in the antecedent by their conjunction. The right disjunction version replaces adjacent formulas A and B in the succedent by their disjunction. Each has one premise, and all Gamma and Delta side sequences retain their positions.
Proof tree. Alternative classical left conjunction rule. Premise node one: the two sided sequent with antecedent formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta. The label of the next inference is left conjunction rule. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the two sided sequent with antecedent the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma and succedent Delta. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Alternative classical right disjunction rule. Premise node one: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is right disjunction rule. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the two sided sequent with antecedent Gamma and succedent Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
An n sided sequent has one finite, possibly empty sequence of sentences in each of its n positions. The displayed list runs from Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n. The following prose erroneously repeats Gamma sub one and uses the plural sequences after a singular subject; those source defects are preserved with a note.
One initial sequent contains the same sentence A in every position. A nullary connective also supplies an initial sequent with that propositional constant in its associated truth value position, all other positions empty. These are two source-specified forms, not extra derivations supplied by the edition.
A sentence is a theorem when a derivation concludes with that sentence in every position corresponding to a designated truth value. The positive and negative provability notations are distinguished. A non-designated position is not filled with an invented formula.
Choose a finite subset of Gamma and an ordered sequence of its sentences. In each designated position put the conclusion sentence A; in each other position put that chosen premise sequence. A derivation of the resulting n sided sequent establishes derivability. The finite set Gamma sub zero and its sequence Gamma sub zero prime have different roles. The final notation denotes failure of derivability.
Weakening inserts a sentence at position i. Contraction replaces two adjacent occurrences by one. Exchange reverses the order of two adjacent sentences between the unchanged context sequences at position i. Every other position is unchanged. Phantom text in the displayed schemata is invisible alignment material and is not an extra premise formula.
Proof tree. Weakening at an arbitrary position. Premise node one: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, with Gamma sub i in position i; the phantom formula is alignment space only. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position i. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains formula A followed by Gamma sub i. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Contraction at an arbitrary position. Premise node one: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains two consecutive copies of formula A followed by Gamma sub i. The label of the next inference is contraction rule at position i. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the n sided sequent containing Gamma sub one through Gamma sub n, except that position i contains one visible copy of formula A followed by Gamma sub i; the phantom copy is alignment space only. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Exchange at an arbitrary position. Premise node one: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula A, formula B, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences. The label of the next inference is exchange rule at position i. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the n sided sequent with position i containing Gamma sub i, formula B, formula A, then Gamma sub i prime; all other positions retain their respective Gamma sequences. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Cut uses two premises in which A occupies different truth value positions i and j. The conclusion concatenates the respective Gamma and Delta context sequences at each position and removes the two displayed distinguished occurrences of A. The source explicitly requires i and j to differ. The whole proof is one frozen outer display occurrence; its internal node topology is retained separately.
Cut rule at distinct positions i and j. The first premise is the n sided sequent with formula A followed by Gamma sub i in position i and Gamma sub k in every other position k. The second premise has formula A followed by Delta sub j in position j and Delta sub k in every other position k. From both premises, in this order, infer the n sided sequent whose position k contains Gamma sub k followed by Delta sub k. Formula A is removed from the two distinguished positions. End cut rule.
The three rules move A from true to the negation of A at false, keep a middle valued A as its negation at middle, or move a false A to its negation at true. Each rule has one premise and preserves all side contexts.
Proof tree. False position negation rule for Lukasiewicz and Kleene logics. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is negation rule at position false. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position the negation of formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position negation rule for Lukasiewicz and Kleene logics. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is negation rule at position middle. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the negation of formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position negation rule for Lukasiewicz and Kleene logics. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is negation rule at position true. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the negation of formula A. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
The false negation rule has one premise placing A in both middle and true positions; satisfaction of that premise permits either value. Its conclusion places not A in the false position. The true negation rule moves A from false to not A at true. No middle negation rule is given, because Goedel negation never has the middle value.
Proof tree. False position negation rule for Goedel logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is negation rule at position false in Goedel logic. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position the negation of formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position negation rule for Goedel logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is negation rule at position true in Goedel logic. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the negation of formula A. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
For false conjunction there is one premise with both conjuncts on the false side. For middle conjunction there are three premises: A in middle or true, B in middle or true, and at least one conjunct in middle. For true conjunction there are two premises, one requiring A true and one requiring B true. Side formulas remain as printed. The premises of a multi-premise inference are jointly required, not alternatives.
Proof tree. False position conjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is conjunction rule at position false. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position conjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position formula A, followed by Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position formula B, followed by Delta. Premise node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is conjunction rule at position middle. From nodes one, and two, and three, in that order, infer node four: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node four. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position conjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is conjunction rule at position true. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conjunction of formulas A and B. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
For false disjunction both A false and B false premises are required. For middle disjunction three premises require each disjunct to be false or middle and at least one to be middle. For true disjunction a single premise permits either disjunct on the true side. Formula order and multiplicity are preserved.
Proof tree. False position disjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is disjunction rule at position false. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position disjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is disjunction rule at position middle. From nodes one, and two, and three, in that order, infer node four: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the disjunction of formulas A and B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node four. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position disjunction rule. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is disjunction rule at position true. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the disjunction of formulas A and B. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
False, middle, and true conditional rules each have two ordered premises. Within any one sequent the displayed positions are interpreted disjunctively; distinct premises of an inference must all be satisfied. The proof templates retain the exact occurrences of A and B in each position and the Lukasiewicz rule labels.
Proof tree. False position conditional rule for three valued Lukasiewicz logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position false in three valued Lukasiewicz logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position conditional rule for three valued Lukasiewicz logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position middle in three valued Lukasiewicz logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position conditional rule for three valued Lukasiewicz logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position true in three valued Lukasiewicz logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conditional from formula A to formula B. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
The false conditional rule has two premises, the middle conditional rule three, and the true conditional rule one. Their position patterns encode the corresponding strong Kleene truth conditions. A formula repeated across positions represents a disjunction of value possibilities within that sequent, not several separate required truth values.
Proof tree. False position conditional rule for strong Kleene logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position false in strong Kleene logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position conditional rule for strong Kleene logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position middle in strong Kleene logic. From nodes one, and two, and three, in that order, infer node four: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node four. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position conditional rule for strong Kleene logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position true in strong Kleene logic. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conditional from formula A to formula B. The root conclusion is node two. End proof tree.
The false, middle, and true conditional rules each have two premises. The false rule allows A in the middle or true position while B is false. The middle rule requires B middle and A true. The true rule uses the two displayed disjunctive premises, preserving all repetitions and side contexts.
Proof tree. False position conditional rule for three valued Goedel logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position false in three valued Goedel logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. Middle position conditional rule for three valued Goedel logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position middle in three valued Goedel logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
Proof tree. True position conditional rule for three valued Goedel logic. Premise node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula B, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. Premise node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by Gamma; middle position formula A, followed by Pi; and true position Delta, followed by formula B. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position true in three valued Goedel logic. From nodes one, and two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position Gamma; middle position Pi; and true position Delta, followed by the conditional from formula A to formula B. The root conclusion is node three. End proof tree.
The figure is a source-provided branched derivation, not a solution added by this edition. Four initial-sequent leaves are combined through weakening and exchange, two middle conditional inferences, and a final false conditional inference. The final sequent has the conditional from A to B followed by A at both false and middle positions, and B at true. The accompanying proof structure records every branch, rule label, repeated formula and final conclusion; the sideways print orientation has no semantic force.
Proof tree. Worked branched derivation in three valued Lukasiewicz logic. Initial sequent node one: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position true. From node one, in that order, infer node two: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position middle. From node two, in that order, infer node three: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position middle. From node three, in that order, infer node four: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. Initial sequent node five: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position true. From node five, in that order, infer node six: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position true. From node six, in that order, infer node seven: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position false. From node seven, in that order, infer node eight: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position middle. From nodes four, and eight, in that order, infer node nine: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. Initial sequent node ten: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position middle. From node ten, in that order, infer node eleven: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is exchange rule at position middle. From node eleven, in that order, infer node twelve: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position middle. From node twelve, in that order, infer node thirteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position false. From node thirteen, in that order, infer node fourteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula A, followed by formula B; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is exchange rule at position false. From node fourteen, in that order, infer node fifteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. Initial sequent node sixteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position true. From node sixteen, in that order, infer node seventeen: the three sided sequent with false position formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position false. From node seventeen, in that order, infer node eighteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is weakening rule at position false. From node eighteen, in that order, infer node nineteen: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula B, followed by formula A; middle position formula A; and true position formula B, followed by formula A. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position middle. From nodes fifteen, and nineteen, in that order, infer node twenty: the three sided sequent with false position formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. The label of the next inference is conditional rule at position false. From nodes nine, and twenty, in that order, infer node twenty one: the three sided sequent with false position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; middle position the conditional from formula A to formula B, followed by formula A; and true position formula B. The root conclusion is node twenty one. End proof tree.
Read as: left conditional rule
Read as: right conditional rule
Read as: left conjunction rule
Read as: right disjunction rule
Read as: negation rule at position false
Read as: negation rule at position middle
Read as: negation rule at position true
Read as: negation rule at position false in Goedel logic
Read as: negation rule at position true in Goedel logic
Read as: weakening rule at position true
Read as: weakening rule at position middle
Read as: weakening rule at position middle
Read as: weakening rule at position true
Read as: weakening rule at position true
Read as: weakening rule at position false
Read as: weakening rule at position middle
Read as: exchange rule at position middle
Read as: weakening rule at position middle
Read as: weakening rule at position false
Read as: exchange rule at position false
Read as: weakening rule at position true
Read as: weakening rule at position false
Read as: weakening rule at position false