Equation form expr-01208e159d2aec8c
Read as: conjunction
Means: conjunction
Many-valued logics
Read as: conjunction
Means: conjunction
Read as: the disjunction of not A with B
Means: the disjunction of not A with B
Read as: Goedel truth functions. Falsity has value zero. Negation of x has value one if x equals zero, and zero otherwise. Conjunction of x and y has the minimum of x and y as its value. Disjunction has their maximum as its value. The conditional with antecedent value x and consequent value y has value one if x is less than or equal to y, and value y otherwise. End of truth function definitions.
Means: Goedel truth functions. Falsity has value zero. Negation of x has value one if x equals zero, and zero otherwise. Conjunction of x and y has the minimum of x and y as its value. Disjunction has their maximum as its value. The conditional with antecedent value x and consequent value y has value one if x is less than or equal to y, and value y otherwise. End of truth function definitions.
Read as: the three valued Lukasiewicz conditional truth function
Means: the three valued Lukasiewicz conditional truth function
Read as: m greater than or equal to two
Means: m greater than or equal to two
Read as: three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: three valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: the disjunction of the three conditionals: if p then q; if q then r; and if r then s
Means: the disjunction of the three conditionals: if p then q; if q then r; and if r then s
Read as: V subscript the closed interval from zero to one equals that closed interval
Means: V subscript the closed interval from zero to one equals that closed interval
Read as: G subscript infinity
Means: G subscript infinity
Read as: the Goedel disjunction truth function
Means: the Goedel disjunction truth function
Read as: negation
Means: negation
Read as: V subscript infinity equals the set of fractions n divided by m such that n and m are natural numbers and n is less than or equal to m. When considering this infinite truth value set, it is often useful to also consider the subsets V subscript m, which the source writes as the set of n divided by the quantity m minus one, such that n is a natural number and n is less than or equal to m. For instance, V subscript five is the set with five evenly spaced truth values: V subscript five equals the set containing zero, one quarter, one half, three quarters, and one. End of displayed value sets.
Means: V subscript infinity equals the set of fractions n divided by m such that n and m are natural numbers and n is less than or equal to m. When considering this infinite truth value set, it is often useful to also consider the subsets V subscript m, which the source writes as the set of n divided by the quantity m minus one, such that n is a natural number and n is less than or equal to m. For instance, V subscript five is the set with five evenly spaced truth values: V subscript five equals the set containing zero, one quarter, one half, three quarters, and one. End of displayed value sets.
Read as: the three valued Lukasiewicz disjunction truth function
Means: the three valued Lukasiewicz disjunction truth function
Read as: the closed interval from zero to one
Means: the closed interval from zero to one
Read as: disjunction
Means: disjunction
Read as: the negation truth function
Means: the negation truth function
Read as: L C
Means: L C
Read as: the Goedel conditional truth function
Means: the Goedel conditional truth function
Read as: zero
Means: zero
Read as: m
Means: m
Read as: three valued Goedel logic
Means: three valued Goedel logic
Read as: one
Means: one
Read as: V subscript infinity equals the intersection of the closed interval from zero to one with the rational numbers
Means: V subscript infinity equals the intersection of the closed interval from zero to one with the rational numbers
Read as: the Goedel conjunction truth function
Means: the Goedel conjunction truth function
Read as: the three valued Lukasiewicz conjunction truth function
Means: the three valued Lukasiewicz conjunction truth function
Read as: the three valued Goedel negation truth function
Means: the three valued Goedel negation truth function
Read as: Lukasiewicz truth functions. Negation of x has value one minus x. Conjunction of x and y has the minimum of x and y as its value. Disjunction has their maximum as its value. The conditional with antecedent value x and consequent value y has value the minimum of one and the quantity one minus the difference x minus y. Equivalently, its value is one if x is less than or equal to y, and one minus the difference x minus y otherwise. End of truth function definitions.
Means: Lukasiewicz truth functions. Negation of x has value one minus x. Conjunction of x and y has the minimum of x and y as its value. Disjunction has their maximum as its value. The conditional with antecedent value x and consequent value y has value the minimum of one and the quantity one minus the difference x minus y. Equivalently, its value is one if x is less than or equal to y, and one minus the difference x minus y otherwise. End of truth function definitions.
Read as: the disjunction of if p then q with if q then p
Means: the disjunction of if p then q with if q then p
Read as: Gamma entails B in m valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: Gamma entails B in m valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: V equals V subscript m
Means: V equals V subscript m
Read as: the disjunction of if A then B with if B then A
Means: the disjunction of if A then B with if B then A
Read as: Gamma entails B in infinite valued Goedel logic
Means: Gamma entails B in infinite valued Goedel logic
Read as: Gamma entails B in infinite valued Lukasiewicz logic
Means: Gamma entails B in infinite valued Lukasiewicz logic
Read as: V subscript infinity
Means: V subscript infinity
Read as: the designated value set V plus is the singleton set containing one
Means: the designated value set V plus is the singleton set containing one
Read as: the falsity constant
Means: the falsity constant
Read as: conditional
Means: conditional
Read as: Gamma entails B in m valued Goedel logic
Means: Gamma entails B in m valued Goedel logic
Read as: L subscript infinity
Means: L subscript infinity
Read as: L subscript zero
Means: L subscript zero
Read as: one half
Means: one half
Read as: V
Means: V
Read as: Six formulas, read across each source row from left to right. Row one, left: p or not p. Row one, right: if the conditional if p then q holds, then not p or q. Row two, left: if not not p then p. Row two, right: if it is not the case that both not p and not q, then p or q. Row three, left: if the conditional from if p then q to p holds, then p. Row three, right: if it is not the case that if p then q, then both p and not q. End of six formulas.
Means: Six formulas, read across each source row from left to right. Row one, left: p or not p. Row one, right: if the conditional if p then q holds, then not p or q. Row two, left: if not not p then p. Row two, right: if it is not the case that both not p and not q, then p or q. Row three, left: if the conditional from if p then q to p holds, then p. Row three, right: if it is not the case that if p then q, then both p and not q. End of six formulas.
The display gives a rational value set, a finite evenly spaced value set, and the five element example zero, one quarter, one half, three quarters and one. The source finite-set upper bound and omitted denominator restriction are retained with a caveat.
Only one is designated. Negation is one minus the input, conjunction is minimum, disjunction is maximum, and the conditional is the minimum of one and one minus the difference of antecedent and consequent values. The finite version restricts the value set. The source identifies this section as a stub.
The displayed conditional has two branches: one when the antecedent value is at most the consequent value, and one minus their difference otherwise. The subtraction groups the antecedent minus consequent difference as a whole.
The proposition identifies the earlier symbolic true, undefined and false truth tables with the numeric values one, one half and zero, respectively. Four tables demonstrate the agreement.
In source input order one, one half, zero, negation gives zero, one half, one respectively.
Both input axes are ordered one, one half, zero. Each result is the lesser input. The full source row sequence is retained in the separate table reading.
Both input axes are ordered one, one half, zero. Each result is the greater input. The full source row sequence is retained in the separate table reading.
Rows are antecedent values and columns consequent values, each ordered one, one half, zero. The middle row is one, one, one half, distinguishing this conditional from the Goedel conditional.
Consequence in infinite valued Lukasiewicz logic implies consequence in each m valued version for every m at least two. The proof is left as an exercise; the subsequent source sentence also states the converse without proving it.
Prove that infinite valued consequence implies consequence for every finite number of values at least two. No solution is supplied.
Show that the disjunction of if p then q and if q then p is a tautology of infinite valued Lukasiewicz logic. No solution is supplied.
Only one is designated. Falsity is zero; negation is one only at zero and otherwise zero; conjunction is minimum; disjunction is maximum. The conditional is one when antecedent is at most consequent and otherwise equals the consequent. The source identifies this section as a stub.
The equations include a zero-valued falsity constant and explicit two-branch definitions of negation and conditional. Negation at a positive intermediate value is zero, not its complement.
The proposition identifies the earlier symbolic truth values with one, one half and zero. The following four numeric tables show the same truth functions.
In source input order one, one half, zero, negation gives zero, zero, one respectively.
Both axes are ordered one, one half, zero, and each cell is their minimum. All rows and cells are explicitly linearized.
Both axes are ordered one, one half, zero, and each cell is their maximum. All rows and cells are explicitly linearized.
Rows are antecedent values and columns consequent values, each ordered one, one half, zero. The middle row is one, one, zero. That final zero differs from the one half in Lukasiewicz logic.
Consequence in infinite valued Goedel logic implies consequence in each m valued version for every m at least two. The source leaves the proof to an exercise and subsequently states the converse without proof.
Prove the preceding implication from infinite valued Goedel consequence to every finite valued version with at least two values. No solution is supplied.
The source arranges six formulas in three rows and two columns. They are read across each row, left then right, retaining scope. The list includes excluded middle, double negation elimination and Peirce law among other formulas.
Show that the disjunction of if p then q with if q then p is a tautology of infinite valued Goedel logic. No solution is supplied.
Show that the disjunction of the three conditionals from p to q, q to r, and r to s, which is a three valued Goedel tautology, is not an infinite valued Goedel tautology. No solution is supplied.
the infinite and finite valued Lukasiewicz matrix definition
the infinite and finite valued Lukasiewicz matrix definition
the proposition on restricting infinite Lukasiewicz consequence to finitely many values
the proposition on restricting infinite Goedel consequence to finitely many values