Counterfactuals

Minimal Change Semantics

Equation form expr-00c1e20c7784eecf

M=W,O,V\mModel{M} = \tuple{W, O, V}

Read as: the model capital M equals the ordered triple W, O, V

Means: the model capital M equals the ordered triple W, O, V

Equation form expr-0251db30f8e57014

p□→q,q□→rp□→rp \cif q, q \cif r \Entails/ p \cif r

Read as: if it were p then it would be q, together with if it were q then it would be r, does not entail if it were p then it would be r

Means: if it were p then it would be q, together with if it were q then it would be r, does not entail if it were p then it would be r

Equation form expr-05c2d5f9bd74bcd1

MA□→B[w]\mSat{M}{!A \cif !B}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is satisfied

Equation form expr-0af2ffeac988b1cc

w7w_7

Read as: w sub seven

Means: w sub seven

Equation form expr-0bfe935e70c321c7

uu

Read as: u

Means: u

Equation form expr-0f45d9fdad45f090

M(pq)r[w2]\mSat/{M}{(p \land q) \lif r}[w_2]

Read as: in model capital M at world w sub two, it is not the case that if both p and q then r is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w sub two, it is not the case that if both p and q then r is satisfied

Equation form expr-123965755500cecc

A□→¬B!A \cif \lnot !B

Read as: if it were A then it would be not B

Means: if it were A then it would be not B

Equation form expr-148de9c5a7a44d19

pp

Read as: p

Means: p

Equation form expr-189d66db574b71b1

S1S2{w}S_1 \supsetneq S_2 \supsetneq \dots \supsetneq \{w\}

Read as: S sub one strictly contains S sub two, which strictly contains the continuing sequence of spheres, which strictly contains the singleton set containing w

Means: S sub one strictly contains S sub two, which strictly contains the continuing sequence of spheres, which strictly contains the singleton set containing w

Equation form expr-18fbc71be6dc930c

AB,BCAC!A \lif !B, !B \lif !C \Entails !A \lif !C

Read as: if A then B together with if B then C entails if A then C

Means: if A then B together with if B then C entails if A then C

Equation form expr-192a3e93a81739ba

MB□→C[w]\mSat{M}{!B \cif !C}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were B then it would be C is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were B then it would be C is satisfied

Equation form expr-1beefd8beceeb265

w6w_6

Read as: w sub six

Means: w sub six

Equation form expr-207a39a9c7240f95

V(p)={w5,w6,w7}V(p) = \{w_5, w_6, w_7\}

Read as: V of p equals the set containing w sub five, w sub six, and w sub seven

Means: V of p equals the set containing w sub five, w sub six, and w sub seven

Equation form expr-20a3bd7b3d0a81cc

V(p)={w2}V(p) = \{w_2\}

Read as: V of p equals the singleton set containing w sub two

Means: V of p equals the singleton set containing w sub two

Equation form expr-211265509db5a6e6

Mq□→r[w]\mSat{M}{q \cif r}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were q then it would be r is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were q then it would be r is satisfied

Equation form expr-227bd74fe0ab9bfe

□→\boxright

Read as: Lewis's box-right counterfactual symbol

Means: Lewis's box-right counterfactual symbol

Equation form expr-22fcce974c4bdb33

M\mModel M

Read as: the model capital M

Means: the model capital M

Equation form expr-240381337f804e9f

AB!A \lif !B

Read as: if A then B

Means: if A then B

Equation form expr-241307f534cace2c

V(p)={w1,w2}V(p) = \{w_1, w_2\}

Read as: V of p equals the set containing w sub one and w sub two

Means: V of p equals the set containing w sub one and w sub two

Equation form expr-2632b13f61dc812c

MA□→B[v]\mSat/{M}{!A \cif !B}[v]

Read as: in model capital M at world v, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world v, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is not satisfied

Equation form expr-28e51fe3865b29fe

Ow={S1,S2,S3}O_w = \{S_1, S_2, S_3\}

Read as: O sub w equals the set containing S sub one, S sub two, and S sub three

Means: O sub w equals the set containing S sub one, S sub two, and S sub three

Equation form expr-2a05fbee69d682f7

V(q)={w1,w2}V(q) = \{w_1, w_2\}

Read as: V of q equals the set containing w sub one and w sub two

Means: V of q equals the set containing w sub one and w sub two

Equation form expr-3106fac3e3c8f992

w2w_2

Read as: w sub two

Means: w sub two

Equation form expr-36e4d0d8a8262c01

p□→r(pq)□→rp \cif r \Entails/ (p \land q) \cif r

Read as: if it were p then it would be r does not entail if it were both p and q then it would be r

Means: if it were p then it would be r does not entail if it were both p and q then it would be r

Equation form expr-39c3d5a5ec4b06af

\subseteq

Read as: is a subset of or equal to

Means: is a subset of or equal to

Equation form expr-3f4b7d2b1b570acc

A\formula{A}

Read as: A

Means: A

Equation form expr-41a68720a6849e03

B\formula{B}

Read as: B

Means: B

Equation form expr-438757f12dd8c3fc

w1w_1

Read as: w sub one

Means: w sub one

Equation form expr-454349e422f05297

rr

Read as: r

Means: r

Equation form expr-461d8f2f2223ec1f

W={w,w1,,w7}W = \{w, w_1, \dots, w_7\}

Read as: W equals the set containing w, w sub one, continuing through w sub seven

Means: W equals the set containing w, w sub one, continuing through w sub seven

Equation form expr-4794277b410dfc51

¬p\lnot p

Read as: not p

Means: not p

Equation form expr-4c94485e0c21ae6c

vv

Read as: v

Means: v

Equation form expr-4ddd9a2680586f8f

MC[v]\mSat{M}{!C}[v]

Read as: in model capital M at world v, C is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world v, C is satisfied

Equation form expr-50e721e49c013f00

ww

Read as: w

Means: w

Equation form expr-52eb11ddfa24980c

V(r)={w1}V(r) = \{w_1\}

Read as: V of r equals the singleton set containing w sub one

Means: V of r equals the singleton set containing w sub one

Equation form expr-536ae23e1ad19805

{w}Ow\{w\} \in O_w

Read as: the singleton set containing w is a member of O sub w

Means: the singleton set containing w is a member of O sub w

Equation form expr-5604c95d023face1

w1,w2,w3w_1, w_2, w_3

Read as: w sub one, w sub two, and w sub three

Means: w sub one, w sub two, and w sub three

Equation form expr-5857d55749449d15

V(q)={w,w1}V(q) = \{w, w_1\}

Read as: V of q equals the set containing w and w sub one

Means: V of q equals the set containing w and w sub one

Equation form expr-594963fb341972fa

O:W((W))O\colon W \to \Pow{\Pow{W}}

Read as: O is a function from W to the power set of the power set of W

Means: O is a function from W to the power set of the power set of W

Equation form expr-5af5d83af9d1d3cc

OwO_w

Read as: O sub w

Means: O sub w

Equation form expr-6017291547d45908

B□→C!B \cif !C

Read as: if it were B then it would be C

Means: if it were B then it would be C

Equation form expr-614c21994adfa8b6

S={w,w1,w2}S' = \{w, w_1, w_2\}

Read as: S prime equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: S prime equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-62b67e1f685b7fef

>>

Read as: Stalnaker's greater-than counterfactual symbol

Means: Stalnaker's greater-than counterfactual symbol

Equation form expr-6899808994f71ef2

p□→q¬q□→¬pp \cif q \Entails/ \lnot q \cif \lnot p

Read as: if it were p then it would be q does not entail if it were not q then it would be not p

Means: if it were p then it would be q does not entail if it were not q then it would be not p

Equation form expr-698cd4222a287d75

SiS_i

Read as: S sub i

Means: S sub i

Equation form expr-69ef9ee2c45eb3b7

MA[w]\mSat{M}{!A}[w']

Read as: in model capital M at world w prime, A is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w prime, A is satisfied

Equation form expr-6d82acc81495ce5c

M(pq)□→r[w]\mSat/{M}{(p \land q) \cif r}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were both p and q then it would be r is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were both p and q then it would be r is not satisfied

Equation form expr-6f19307cf53b8de7

S1={w}S_1 = \{w\}

Read as: S sub one equals the singleton set containing w

Means: S sub one equals the singleton set containing w

Equation form expr-7230056d6fa6dea8

O={{w},{w,w1},{w,w1,w2}}O = \{\{w\}, \{w, w_1\}, \{w, w_1, w_2\}\}

Read as: O equals the set of three spheres: the singleton w; the set containing w and w sub one; and the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: O equals the set of three spheres: the singleton w; the set containing w and w sub one; and the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-74af6e6e3971777c

M1=W,O,V\mModel{M_1} = \tuple{W, O, V}

Read as: the model capital M sub one equals the ordered triple W, O, V

Means: the model capital M sub one equals the ordered triple W, O, V

Equation form expr-7d16ee82599976fd

S={w,w1}S = \{w, w_1\}

Read as: S equals the set containing w and w sub one

Means: S equals the set containing w and w sub one

Equation form expr-7f37d047e0568165

S1S_1

Read as: S sub one

Means: S sub one

Equation form expr-7f6cf40b81199c63

uSu \in S

Read as: u is a member of S

Means: u is a member of S

Equation form expr-822b488cc527e9ff

¬q\lnot q

Read as: not q

Means: not q

Equation form expr-8238c028f61fc0f7

A!A

Read as: A

Means: A

Equation form expr-858e88771bf016c5

SSS' \setminus S

Read as: S prime minus S

Means: S prime minus S

Equation form expr-890370556cd21de5

S={w,w1}S' = \{w, w_1\}

Read as: S prime equals the set containing w and w sub one

Means: S prime equals the set containing w and w sub one

Equation form expr-89cd02eacd5a9ed0

Ow={{w},{w,w1},{w,w1,w2}}O_w = \{\{w\}, \{w, w_1\}, \{w, w_1, w_2\}\}

Read as: O sub w equals the set of three spheres: the singleton w; the set containing w and w sub one; and the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: O sub w equals the set of three spheres: the singleton w; the set containing w and w sub one; and the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-8a97403a309cea3b

vSv \in S

Read as: v is a member of S

Means: v is a member of S

Equation form expr-8cf9f0ef3fca196b

Si+1S_{i+1}

Read as: S sub i plus one

Means: S sub i plus one

Equation form expr-8de0b3c47f112c59

SS

Read as: S

Means: S

Equation form expr-8e35c2cd3bf6641b

qq

Read as: q

Means: q

Equation form expr-9763a163e7ff6591

w3w_3

Read as: w sub three

Means: w sub three

Equation form expr-9954b8d1073d15e2

(pq)(p \land q)

Read as: both p and q

Means: both p and q

Equation form expr-9bce9b18cabace59

Mqr\mSat/{M}{q \lif r}

Read as: model capital M does not satisfy if q then r

Means: model capital M does not satisfy if q then r

Equation form expr-9dd4e4b646218a71

MB[w]\mSat{M}{!B}[w']

Read as: in model capital M at world w prime, B is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w prime, B is satisfied

Equation form expr-9fb3053a4827ef20

S2OwS_2 \in O_w

Read as: S sub two is a member of O sub w

Means: S sub two is a member of O sub w

Equation form expr-a08f60fda3f22844

MA□→B[u]\mSat{M}{!A \cif !B}[u]

Read as: in model capital M at world u, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world u, the counterfactual if it were A then it would be B is satisfied

Equation form expr-a43e0d8c06476226

SS'

Read as: S prime

Means: S prime

Equation form expr-a6613ea09a4716da

MB[u]\mSat/{M}{!B}[u]

Read as: in model capital M at world u, B is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world u, B is not satisfied

Equation form expr-a983a9f5438c641c

S2S1S_2 \subseteq S_1

Read as: S sub two is a subset of or equal to S sub one

Means: S sub two is a subset of or equal to S sub one

Equation form expr-abb2c7d2e90d1c0c

W={w,w1,w2}W = \{w, w_1, w_2\}

Read as: W equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: W equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-b4c1a8ce5b685884

S2={w,w1,w2,w3}S_2 = \{w, w_1, w_2, w_3\}

Read as: S sub two equals the set containing w, w sub one, w sub two, and w sub three

Means: S sub two equals the set containing w, w sub one, w sub two, and w sub three

Equation form expr-b5b446abb4d0323b

MA[w]\mSat{M}{!A}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, A is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, A is satisfied

Equation form expr-b7b96c57fe5a9d1c

MB[u]\mSat{M}{!B}[u]

Read as: in model capital M at world u, B is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world u, B is satisfied

Equation form expr-b99d2e5f37ae7e17

ww'

Read as: w prime

Means: w prime

Equation form expr-bde413ec3eb41d19

uOwu \in \bigcup O_w

Read as: u is a member of the union of O sub w

Means: u is a member of the union of O sub w

Equation form expr-c457dbcdd3b49987

w4w_4

Read as: w sub four

Means: w sub four

Equation form expr-c49d2ec94024e19d

S1S2S_1 \subseteq S_2

Read as: S sub one is a subset of or equal to S sub two

Means: S sub one is a subset of or equal to S sub two

Equation form expr-c5bf73cb03229b8b

pqp \lif q

Read as: if p then q

Means: if p then q

Equation form expr-c655e97f84b9ea86

M¬q¬p[w2]\mSat/{M}{\lnot q \lif \lnot p}[w_2]

Read as: in model capital M at world w sub two, if not q then not p is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w sub two, if not q then not p is not satisfied

Equation form expr-cb6e9e560afb4ede

{w}\{w\}

Read as: the singleton set containing w

Means: the singleton set containing w

Equation form expr-ccd37b1c10ab75cf

A□→B!A \cif !B

Read as: if it were A then it would be B

Means: if it were A then it would be B

Equation form expr-cd615a60e0e9e377

Mpr[w2]\mSat/{M}{p \lif r}[w_2]

Read as: in model capital M at world w sub two, if p then r is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w sub two, if p then r is not satisfied

Equation form expr-cdc525abf7a300b5

S3S_3

Read as: S sub three

Means: S sub three

Equation form expr-d04658a0d836a4c4

prp \lif r

Read as: if p then r

Means: if p then r

Equation form expr-d055ee4dbcdd0c8b

B!B

Read as: B

Means: B

Equation form expr-d0a918b38a513fd7

w5w_5

Read as: w sub five

Means: w sub five

Equation form expr-d17c79af91cd9cfc

SOwS \in O_w

Read as: S is a member of O sub w

Means: S is a member of O sub w

Equation form expr-d61252d38c5eba2f

BC!B \lif !C

Read as: if B then C

Means: if B then C

Equation form expr-d926cf57c0e537a8

MB[v]\mSat/{M}{!B}[v]

Read as: in model capital M at world v, B is not satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world v, B is not satisfied

Equation form expr-d963f46ee5546d2e

{w,w1,w2}\{w, w_1, w_2\}

Read as: the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-dc064a096251ec8f

□→\cif

Read as: the counterfactual conditional connective

Means: the counterfactual conditional connective

Equation form expr-de7d1b721a1e0632

ii

Read as: i

Means: i

Equation form expr-e3212229d200318d

¬B\lnot !B

Read as: not B

Means: not B

Equation form expr-e3fa6a55b84ca1b5

Mp□→r[w]\mSat{M}{p \cif r}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were p then it would be r is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were p then it would be r is satisfied

Equation form expr-e999586c3d48ee28

S={w,w1,w2}S = \{w, w_1, w_2\}

Read as: S equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Means: S equals the set containing w, w sub one, and w sub two

Equation form expr-ee5f174b0f9497a5

AC(AB)C!A \lif !C \Entails (!A \land !B) \lif !C

Read as: if A then C entails if both A and B then C

Means: if A then C entails if both A and B then C

Equation form expr-ef636ba8b6892981

V(q)={w2}V(q) = \{w_2\}

Read as: V of q equals the singleton set containing w sub two

Means: V of q equals the singleton set containing w sub two

Equation form expr-f74e33870c5cf950

SSS \subsetneq S'

Read as: S is a proper subset of S prime

Means: S is a proper subset of S prime

Equation form expr-f8a56090efa9857e

S3={w,w1,,w6}S_3 = \{w, w_1, \dots, w_6\}

Read as: S sub three equals the set containing w, w sub one, continuing through w sub six

Means: S sub three equals the set containing w, w sub one, continuing through w sub six

Equation form expr-fcb5f40df9be6bae

WW

Read as: W

Means: W

Equation form expr-fd9031b91e56c996

Mp□→q[w]\mSat{M}{p \cif q}[w]

Read as: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were p then it would be q is satisfied

Means: in model capital M at world w, the counterfactual if it were p then it would be q is satisfied

Equation form expr-fe0701bc4d1e66b6

V:At0(W)V\colon \PVar \to \Pow{W}

Read as: V is a function from propositional variables to the power set of W

Means: V is a function from propositional variables to the power set of W

Closest-world sphere illustration

Five nested spheres are centered on w. The A and B proposition regions show that every closest A world is a B world, illustrating the truth condition for if it were A then it would be B.

Source

Definition of a sphere model

A sphere model is a triple W, O, V. W is nonempty, V is a propositional valuation, and O assigns each world a centered, nested system of spheres closed under nonempty unions and intersections.

Source

Figure: diagram of a sphere model

The figure contains three nested spheres centered on w, worlds w through w sub seven, and the region where p holds. Its complete world and region structure is linearized in the enclosed diagram.

Source

Diagram of a sphere model

The inner sphere contains w; the second contains w through w sub three; the outer contains w through w sub six; w sub seven lies outside every sphere. The p region contains w sub five, w sub six, and w sub seven.

Source

Sphere-model satisfaction clause for counterfactuals

If it were B then it would be C is true at w either vacuously, when B is false throughout all spheres around w, or nonvacuously, when some B-admitting sphere makes if B then C true throughout.

Source

Figure: nonvacuously true counterfactual

The closest A worlds around w all lie in the B region. The complete nested-region relationship is read in the enclosed diagram.

Source

Nonvacuously true counterfactual diagram

Five spheres surround w; the closest A-admitting part lies wholly within B, so if it were A then it would be B is nonvacuously true.

Source

Figure: vacuously true counterfactual

The A region is outside every sphere around w. The complete nested-region relationship is read in the enclosed diagram.

Source

Vacuously true counterfactual diagram

Five spheres surround w, while the A region does not meet any sphere. There is no A-admitting sphere, so the counterfactual is vacuously true.

Source

Figure: false counterfactual and false opposite

Some but not all closest A worlds are B worlds, so both the counterfactual and its opposite are false. The enclosed diagram is fully linearized.

Source

False counterfactual, false opposite diagram

Five spheres surround w. The closest A worlds overlap B only partly, making both if it were A then B and if it were A then not B false.

Source

Figure: false counterfactual and true opposite

No closest A world lies in B, so the counterfactual is false and its opposite is true. The enclosed diagram is fully linearized.

Source

False counterfactual, true opposite diagram

Five spheres surround w. The closest A worlds are disjoint from B, so if it were A then B is false and if it were A then not B is true.

Source

Figure: contingent counterfactual

Overlapping sphere systems centered on u and v show that the closest A worlds to u are all B worlds, while some closest A worlds to v are not B worlds.

Source

Contingent counterfactual diagram

A solid sphere system is centered on u and a dashed system on v. The A and B regions make the counterfactual true at u and false at v.

Source

Counterexample to antecedent strengthening

A three-world sphere model makes if it were p then r true at w but if it were both p and q then r false at w. The enclosed diagram preserves the spheres and valuations.

Source

Figure: counterexample to antecedent strengthening

The figure depicts the three-world model used by the surrounding example. Its exact sphere and proposition-region structure is linearized in the enclosed diagram.

Source

Antecedent-strengthening countermodel diagram

The spheres are the singleton w, then w with w sub one, then all three worlds. p holds at w sub one and w sub two, q only at w sub two, and r only at w sub one.

Source

Exercise finding a failure of counterfactual transitivity

Find a convincing intuitive example showing that counterfactual conditionals are not transitive. No solution is supplied.

Source

Three-world counterexample to transitivity

The example defines a sphere model in which if it were p then q and if it were q then r are true at w, while if it were p then r fails.

Source

Exercise drawing the transitivity countermodel

Draw the sphere diagram for the preceding three-world counterexample to transitivity. No solution is supplied.

Source

Exercise varying the Hoover countermodel

Determine whether the relative closeness of the two described Hoover worlds is necessary and construct a counterexample without that assumption. No solution is supplied.

Source

Counterexample to contraposition

A three-world sphere model makes if it were p then q true at w while if it were not q then not p fails. The enclosed diagram records the exact worlds, spheres, and proposition regions.

Source

Figure: counterexample to contraposition

The figure depicts the three-world Goethe model from the surrounding example. Its complete sphere and region structure is linearized in the enclosed diagram.

Source

Contraposition countermodel diagram

The spheres are the singleton w, then w with w sub one, then all three worlds. p holds at w sub one and w sub two; q holds at w and w sub one.

Source

Cross-reference reference-001164

the diagram of a sphere model

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001165

the nonvacuous sphere-model satisfaction condition

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001166

the nonvacuously true counterfactual figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001167

the vacuously true counterfactual figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001168

the false counterfactual and false opposite figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001169

the false counterfactual and true opposite figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001170

the contingent counterfactual figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001171

the counterexample to antecedent strengthening figure

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001172

the three-world counterexample to counterfactual transitivity

Source occurrence

Cross-reference reference-001173

the three-world counterexample to counterfactual transitivity

Source occurrence

Source disclosures

Ordered structures

Closest-world sphere illustration

Structure: diagram tikz.

Five nested spheres are centered on w. The proposition region B contains all worlds in the closest A region reached from the center; the A region also extends farther out. Thus every closest A world is a B world. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Diagram of a sphere model

Structure: diagram tikz.

Three nested spheres are centered on w. The second sphere adds w sub two, w sub three, and w sub one. The outer sphere adds w sub five, w sub six, and w sub four. w sub seven is outside every sphere. The proposition region p contains w sub five, w sub six, and w sub seven. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Nonvacuously true counterfactual diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Five nested spheres are centered on w. The closest portion of proposition region A lies entirely within proposition region B. Therefore the counterfactual is nonvacuously true. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Vacuously true counterfactual diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Five nested spheres are centered on w. Proposition region B meets the sphere system, but proposition region A lies outside all five spheres. There is no A-admitting sphere, so the counterfactual is vacuously true. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

False counterfactual, false opposite diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Five nested spheres are centered on w. At the closest A worlds, proposition region B overlaps only part of the A region. Some closest A worlds satisfy B and some do not, so both the counterfactual and its opposite are false. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

False counterfactual, true opposite diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Five nested spheres are centered on w. The closest A worlds do not overlap proposition region B at all. Thus the original counterfactual is false and its opposite is true. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Contingent counterfactual diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

A solid system of seven spheres is centered on u, and a dashed system of four spheres is centered on v. Proposition regions A and B cross both systems. All A worlds closest to u are B worlds, while some A worlds closest to v are not B worlds. The counterfactual is true at u and false at v. End of diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Antecedent-strengthening countermodel diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Three nested spheres are centered on w. The middle sphere adds w sub one, and the outer sphere adds w sub two. Proposition q holds only at w sub two; r holds only at w sub one; and p holds at both w sub one and w sub two. End of countermodel diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context

Contraposition countermodel diagram

Structure: diagram tikz.

Three nested spheres are centered on w. The middle sphere adds w sub one, and the outer sphere adds w sub two. Region labels show q at w and w sub one, not q at w sub two, p at w sub one and w sub two, and not p at w. End of countermodel diagram.

Read the source-bound structure in context