Dimensional Analysis
“You can’t add apples and oranges,” the old saying goes. It reflects our experience that in applications the quantities have units and keeping track of those units can help. Everyone has done calculations such as this one that use the units as a check.
We can take the idea of including the units beyond bookkeeping. We can use units to draw conclusions about what relationships are possible among the physical quantities.
To start, consider the falling body equation . If the distance is in feet and the time is in seconds then this is a true statement. However it is not correct in other unit systems, such as meters and seconds, because isn’t the right constant in those systems. We can fix that by attaching units to the , making it a dimensional constant.
Now the equation holds also in the meter-second system because when we align the units (a foot is approximately meters),
the constant gets adjusted. So in order to have equations that are correct across unit systems, we restrict our attention to those that use dimensional constants. Such an equation is complete.
Moving away from a particular unit system allows us to just measure quantities in combinations of some units of length , mass , and time . These three are our physical dimensions. For instance, we could measure velocity in or but at all events it involves a unit of length divided by a unit of time so the dimensional formula of velocity is . Similarly, density’s dimensional formula is .
To write the dimensional formula we shall use negative exponents instead of fractions and we shall include the dimensions with a zero exponent. Thus we will write the dimensional formula of velocity as and that of density as .
With that, “you can’t add apples and oranges” becomes the advice to check that all of an equation’s terms have the same dimensional formula. An example is this version of the falling body equation . The dimensional formula of the term is . For the other term, the dimensional formula of is ( is given above as ) and the dimensional formula of is so that of the entire term is . Thus the two terms have the same dimensional formula. An equation with this property is dimensionally homogeneous.
Quantities with dimensional formula are dimensionless. For example, we measure an angle by taking the ratio of the subtended arc to the radius
which is the ratio of a length to a length and thus angles have the dimensional formula .
The classic example of using the units for more than bookkeeping, using them to draw conclusions, considers the formula for the period of a pendulum.
The period is in units of time . So the quantities on the other side of the equation must have dimensional formulas that combine in such a way that their ’s and ’s cancel and only a single remains. the pendulum quantity table has the quantities that an experienced investigator would consider possibly relevant to the period of a pendulum. The only dimensional formulas involving are for the length of the string and the acceleration due to gravity. For the ’s of these two to cancel when they appear in the equation they must be in ratio, e.g., as , or as , or as . Therefore the period is a function of .
This is a remarkable result: with a pencil and paper analysis, before we ever took out the pendulum and made measurements, we have determined something about what makes up its period.
To do dimensional analysis systematically, we need two facts (arguments for these are in [Bridgman], Chapter II and IV). The first is that each equation relating physical quantities that we shall see involves a sum of terms, where each term has the form
for numbers , …, that measure the quantities.
For the second fact, observe that an easy way to construct a dimensionally homogeneous expression is by taking a product of dimensionless quantities or by adding such dimensionless terms. Buckingham’s Theorem states that any complete relationship among quantities with dimensional formulas can be algebraically manipulated into a form where there is some function such that
for a complete set of dimensionless products. (The first example below describes what makes a set of dimensionless products ‘complete’.) We usually want to express one of the quantities, for instance, in terms of the others. For that we will assume that the above equality can be rewritten
where is dimensionless and the products , …, don’t involve (as with , here is an arbitrary function, this time of arguments). Thus, to do dimensional analysis we should find which dimensionless products are possible.
For example, again consider the formula for a pendulum’s period.
| quantity |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| period | |||
| length of string | |||
| mass of bob | |||
| acceleration due to gravity | |||
| arc of swing |
By the first fact cited above, we expect the formula to have (possibly sums of terms of) the form . To use the second fact, to find which combinations of the powers , …, yield dimensionless products, consider this equation.
It gives three conditions on the powers.
Note that so the mass of the bob does not affect the period. Gaussian reduction and parametrization of that system gives this
(we’ve taken as one of the parameters in order to express the period in terms of the other quantities).
The set of dimensionless products contains all terms subject to the conditions above. This set forms a vector space under the ‘’ operation of multiplying two such products and the ‘’ operation of raising such a product to the power of the scalar (see Exercise 5). The term ‘complete set of dimensionless products’ in Buckingham’s Theorem means a basis for this vector space.
We can get a basis by first taking , , and then taking , . The associated dimensionless products are and . Because the set is complete, Buckingham’s Theorem says that
where is a function that we cannot determine from this analysis (a first year physics text will show by other means that for small angles it is approximately the constant function ).
Thus, analysis of the relationships that are possible between the quantities with the given dimensional formulas has given us a fair amount of information: a pendulum’s period does not depend on the mass of the bob, and it rises with the square root of the length of the string.
For the next example we try to determine the period of revolution of two bodies in space orbiting each other under mutual gravitational attraction. An experienced investigator could expect that these are the relevant quantities.
| quantity |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| period | |||
| mean separation | |||
| first mass | |||
| second mass | |||
| gravitational constant |
To get the complete set of dimensionless products we consider the equation
which results in a system
with this solution.
As earlier, the set of dimensionless products of these quantities forms a vector space and we want to produce a basis for that space, a ‘complete’ set of dimensionless products. One such set, gotten from setting and and also setting and is . With that, Buckingham’s Theorem says that any complete relationship among these quantities is stateable this form.
Remark. An important application of the prior formula is when is the mass of the sun and is the mass of a planet. Because is very much greater than , the argument to is approximately , and we can wonder whether this part of the formula remains approximately constant as varies. One way to see that it does is this. The sun is so much larger than the planet that the mutual rotation is approximately about the sun’s center. If we vary the planet’s mass by a factor of (e.g., Venus’s mass is times Earth’s mass), then the force of attraction is multiplied by , and times the force acting on times the mass gives, since , the same acceleration, about the same center (approximately). Hence, the orbit will be the same and so its period will be the same, and thus the right side of the above equation also remains unchanged (approximately). Therefore, is approximately constant as varies. This is Kepler’s Third Law: the square of the period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the mean radius of its orbit about the sun.
The final example was one of the first explicit applications of dimensional analysis. Lord Raleigh considered the speed of a wave in deep water and suggested these as the relevant quantities.
| quantity |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| velocity of the wave | |||
| density of the water | |||
| acceleration due to gravity | |||
| wavelength |
The equation
gives this system
with this solution space.
There is one dimensionless product, , and so is times a constant; is constant since it is a function of no arguments. The quantity is not involved in the relationship.
The three examples above show that dimensional analysis can bring us far toward expressing the relationship among the quantities. For further reading, the classic reference is [Bridgman]—this brief book is delightful. Another source is [Giordano, Wells, Wilde]. A description of dimensional analysis’s place in modeling is in [Giordano, Jaye, Weir].
Exercises
Exercise 1 Worked answer
[de Mestre] Consider a projectile, launched with initial velocity , at an angle . To study its motion we may guess that these are the relevant quantities.
quantity dimensional formula horizontal position vertical position initial speed angle of launch acceleration due to gravity time Show that is a complete set of dimensionless products. (Hint. One way to go is to find the appropriate free variables in the linear system that arises but there is a shortcut that uses the properties of a basis.)
These two equations of motion for projectiles are familiar: and . Manipulate each to rewrite it as a relationship among the dimensionless products of the prior item.
Answer.
Assuming that this
equals gives rise to this linear system
(there is no restriction on ). The natural parametrization uses the free variables to give and . The resulting description of the solution set
gives as a complete set of dimensionless products (recall that “complete” in this context does not mean that there are no other dimensionless products; it simply means that the set is a basis). This is, however, not the set of dimensionless products that the question asks for.
There are two ways to proceed. The first is to fiddle with the choice of parameters, hoping to hit on the right set. For that, we can do the prior paragraph in reverse. Converting the given dimensionless products , , , and into vectors gives this description (note the ?’s where the parameters will go).
The is already in place. Examining the rows shows that we can also put in place , , and .
The second way to proceed, following the hint, is to note that the given set is of size four in a four-dimensional vector space and so we need only show that it is linearly independent. That is easily done by inspection, by considering the sixth, first, second, and fourth components of the vectors.
The first equation can be rewritten
so that Buckingham’s function is . The second equation can be rewritten
and Buckingham’s function here is .
Exercise 2 Worked answer
[Einstein] conjectured that the infrared characteristic frequencies of a solid might be determined by the same forces between atoms as determine the solid’s ordinary elastic behavior. The relevant quantities are these.
quantity dimensional formula characteristic frequency compressibility number of atoms per cubic cm mass of an atom Show that there is one dimensionless product. Conclude that, in any complete relationship among quantities with these dimensional formulas, is a constant times . This conclusion played an important role in the early study of quantum phenomena.
Answer. Consider
which gives these relations among the powers.
This is the solution space (because we wish to express as a function of the other quantities, we take as the parameter).
Thus, is the dimensionless combination, and we have that equals times a constant (the function is constant since it has no arguments).
Exercise 3 Worked answer
[Giordano, Wells, Wilde] The torque produced by an engine has dimensional formula . We may first guess that it depends on the engine’s rotation rate (with dimensional formula ), and the volume of air displaced (with dimensional formula ).
Try to find a complete set of dimensionless products. What goes wrong?
Adjust the guess by adding the density of the air (with dimensional formula ). Now find a complete set of dimensionless products.
Answer.
Setting
gives this
which implies that . That is, among quantities with these dimensional formulas, the only dimensionless product is the trivial one.
Setting
gives this.
Taking as parameter to express the torque gives this description of the solution set.
Denoting the torque by , the rotation rate by , the volume of air by , and the density of air by we have that , and so the torque is times a constant.
Exercise 4 Worked answer
[Tilley] Dominoes falling make a wave. We may conjecture that the wave speed depends on the spacing between the dominoes, the height of each domino, and the acceleration due to gravity .
Find the dimensional formula for each of the four quantities.
Show that is a complete set of dimensionless products.
Show that if is fixed then the propagation speed is proportional to the square root of .
Answer.
These are the dimensional formulas.
quantity dimensional formula speed of the wave separation of the dominoes height of the dominoes acceleration due to gravity The relationship
gives this linear system.
Taking and as parameters, we can describe the solution set in this way.
That gives as a complete set.
Buckingham’s Theorem says that and so, since is a constant, if is fixed then is proportional to .
Exercise 5 Worked answer
Prove that the dimensionless products form a vector space under the operation of multiplying two such products and the operation of raising such the product to the power of the scalar. (The vector arrows are a precaution against confusion.) That is, prove that, for any particular homogeneous system, this set of products of powers of , …,
is a vector space under:
and
(assume that all variables represent real numbers).
Answer. Checking the conditions in the definition of a vector space is routine.
Exercise 6 Worked answer
The advice about apples and oranges is not right. Consider the familiar equations for a circle and .
Check that and have different dimensional formulas.
Produce an equation that is not dimensionally homogeneous (i.e., it adds apples and oranges) but is nonetheless true of any circle.
The prior item asks for an equation that is complete but not dimensionally homogeneous. Produce an equation that is dimensionally homogeneous but not complete.
(Just because the old saying isn’t strictly right doesn’t keep it from being a useful strategy. Dimensional homogeneity is often used to check the plausibility of equations used in models. For an argument that any complete equation can easily be made dimensionally homogeneous, see [Bridgman], Chapter I, especially page 15.)
Answer.
The dimensional formula of the circumference is , that is, . The dimensional formula of the area is .
One is .
One example is this formula relating the the length of arc subtended by an angle to the radius and the angle measure in radians: . Both terms in that formula have dimensional formula . The relationship holds for some unit systems (inches and radians, for instance) but not for all unit systems (inches and degrees, for instance).
References cited in this section
Bridgman
P.W. Bridgman, Dimensional Analysis, Yale University Press, 1931.
Giordano, Wells, Wilde
Frank R. Giordano, Michael E. Wells, Carroll O. Wilde, Dimensional Analysis, UMAP Unit 526, in UMAP Modules, 1987, COMAP, 1987.
Giordano, Jaye, Weir
Frank R. Giordano, Michael J. Jaye, Maurice D. Weir, The Use of Dimensional Analysis in Mathematical Modeling, UMAP Unit 632, in UMAP Modules, 1986, COMAP, 1986.
de Mestre
Neville de Mestre, The Mathematics of Projectiles in Sport, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Einstein
A. Einstein, Annals of Physics, v. 35, 1911, p. 686.
Tilley
Burt Tilley, private communication, 1996.