Closed positive forms: representation and the exact square-root domain

Programme exposition: OpenAI Codex (AI). Course selection and prerequisite bindings: GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra. Integration and bounded proof check: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026.

A closed positive form specifies an energy and its finite-energy domain. This lesson recovers its nonnegative self-adjoint operator, proves that the energy domain is exactly the square-root domain, and identifies which vectors have an operator value. Hilbert spaces may have arbitrary dimension, including zero.

Barry Simon treats the form-space construction in A canonical decomposition for quadratic forms with applications to monotone convergence theorems. Zoltán Sebestyén and Zsigmond Tarcsay give a complementary treatment of representation and operator domains in Basic representation theorems of forms. The proof here uses a bounded energy resolvent and a common dense subspace of two Hilbert spaces of finite-energy vectors.

Prerequisites and conventions

Inner products are linear in the first variable. A positive operator means a nonnegative operator; injectivity is an additional condition. Operator equalities include equality of domains.

For completeness, the bounded adjoint works between different Hilbert spaces. If T:V→HT:V\to H is bounded, Riesz representation on VV gives the unique T∗y∈VT^*y\in V such that ⟨Tx,y⟩H=⟨x,T∗y⟩V\langle Tx,y\rangle_H=\langle x,T^*y\rangle_V for all x∈Vx\in V. Uniqueness makes T∗T^* linear, and Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥T∗y∥≤∥T∥∥y∥\|T^*y\|\leq\|T\|\|y\|. Taking the supremum of the same pairing over unit balls gives ∥T∗∥=∥T∥\|T^*\|=\|T\|; this also holds for zero spaces. Reversing the pairing gives T∗∗=TT^{**}=T. Moreover, a vector yy is orthogonal to ran⁡T\operatorname{ran}T exactly when T∗y=0T^*y=0. Orthogonal projection therefore gives ran⁡T‾=(ker⁡T∗)⊥\overline{\operatorname{ran}T}=(\ker T^*)^\perp. Applying this identity to T∗T^* gives ran⁡T∗‾=(ker⁡T)⊥\overline{\operatorname{ran}T^*}=(\ker T)^\perp.

A form includes its domain

A nonnegative sesquilinear form on HH consists of a linear subspace D(q)⊆HD(q)\subseteq H and a sesquilinear map q:D(q)×D(q)→Cq:D(q)\times D(q)\to\mathbb C, linear in the first variable, with q[x]:=q(x,x)≥0q[x]:=q(x,x)\geq0. The reality of q[x+y]q[x+y] and q[x+iy]q[x+iy], after expansion, gives q(y,x)=q(x,y)‾q(y,x)=\overline{q(x,y)}. Positivity then gives

∣q(x,y)∣2≤q[x]q[y].|q(x,y)|^2\leq q[x]q[y].

Indeed, apply positivity to q[x+ty]q[x+t y]; when q[y]>0q[y]>0, minimizing over t∈Ct\in\mathbb C proves the inequality, and when q[y]=0q[y]=0, an arbitrarily large scalar with a suitable phase forces the cross term to vanish. The same expansion determines the form from its diagonal by

q(x,y)=14∑k=03ikq[x+iky].q(x,y)=\frac14\sum_{k=0}^3 i^k q[x+i^k y].

Conversely, the diagonal axioms already contain the whole sesquilinear form. Let DD be a complex vector space and suppose that Q:D→[0,∞)Q:D\to[0,\infty) satisfies

Q(λx)=∣λ∣2Q(x),Q(x+y)+Q(x−y)=2Q(x)+2Q(y).(QF.1)Q(\lambda x)=|\lambda|^2Q(x),\qquad Q(x+y)+Q(x-y)=2Q(x)+2Q(y). \tag{QF.1}

Define first the real polarization

B(x,y)=14(Q(x+y)−Q(x−y)).(QF.2)B(x,y)=\frac14\bigl(Q(x+y)-Q(x-y)\bigr). \tag{QF.2}

This map is symmetric. Two uses of the parallelogram identity give

B(x+z,y)+B(x−z,y)=2B(x,y),B(2x,y)=2B(x,y).B(x+z,y)+B(x-z,y)=2B(x,y), \qquad B(2x,y)=2B(x,y).

Putting u=x+zu=x+z, v=x−zv=x-z in the first identity and using the second shows B(u+v,y)=B(u,y)+B(v,y)B(u+v,y)=B(u,y)+B(v,y). Thus BB is additive in each variable. For rational rr, it follows that B(rx,y)=rB(x,y)B(rx,y)=rB(x,y). Positivity of

Q(x+ry)=Q(x)+2rB(x,y)+r2Q(y)Q(x+r y)=Q(x)+2rB(x,y)+r^2Q(y)

for rational rr yields

∣B(x,y)∣2≤Q(x)Q(y).(QF.3)|B(x,y)|^2\leq Q(x)Q(y). \tag{QF.3}

If rn∈Qr_n\in\mathbb Q tends to a real number tt, additivity, (QF.3), and the first identity in (QF.1) give

∣B(tx,y)−rnB(x,y)∣=∣B((t−rn)x,y)∣≤∣t−rn∣Q(x)1/2Q(y)1/2.|B(tx,y)-r_nB(x,y)| =|B((t-r_n)x,y)| \leq |t-r_n|Q(x)^{1/2}Q(y)^{1/2}.

Hence B(tx,y)=tB(x,y)B(tx,y)=tB(x,y), so BB is real bilinear. The invariance Q(ix)=Q(x)Q(ix)=Q(x) implies

B(ix,iy)=B(x,y),B(ix,y)=−B(x,iy).B(ix,iy)=B(x,y),\qquad B(ix,y)=-B(x,iy).

Therefore

s(x,y)=B(x,y)−iB(ix,y)=14∑k=03ikQ(x+iky)(QF.4)s(x,y)=B(x,y)-iB(ix,y) =\frac14\sum_{k=0}^3 i^kQ(x+i^ky) \tag{QF.4}

is complex linear in its first variable, conjugate linear in its second, and Hermitian. Moreover B(ix,x)=0B(ix,x)=0, so s(x,x)=Q(x)s(x,x)=Q(x). Thus ss is the unique positive sesquilinear form with diagonal QQ. The argument is algebraic: no topology or density assumption on DD is hidden in the polarization step.

The same statement covers an extended-valued diagonal on a larger vector space. If Q:V→[0,∞]Q:V\to[0,\infty] satisfies (QF.1), with 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0, then

D(Q)={x∈V:Q(x)<∞}D(Q)=\{x\in V:Q(x)<\infty\}

is a complex subspace. Indeed, homogeneity handles scalar multiples, while the parallelogram identity shows that Q(x+y)<∞Q(x+y)<\infty whenever Q(x)Q(x) and Q(y)Q(y) are finite. Formula (QF.4) then gives the associated sesquilinear form on this exact finite-value domain.

The form norm and its inner product are

∥x∥q2=∥x∥2+q[x],⟨x,y⟩q=⟨x,y⟩+q(x,y).\|x\|_q^2=\|x\|^2+q[x],\qquad \langle x,y\rangle_q=\langle x,y\rangle+q(x,y).

The form is closed if D(q)D(q) is complete for this norm. It is densely defined if D(q)‾=H\overline{D(q)}=H. These conditions are independent.

It is useful to extend the diagonal by

q~[x]={q[x],x∈D(q),+∞,x∉D(q).\widetilde q[x]= \begin{cases}q[x],&x\in D(q),\\+\infty,&x\notin D(q).\end{cases}

For two forms, q1≤q2q_1\leq q_2 means q~1[x]≤q~2[x]\widetilde q_1[x]\leq\widetilde q_2[x] for every x∈Hx\in H. Equivalently,

D(q2)⊆D(q1),q1[x]≤q2[x](x∈D(q2)).D(q_2)\subseteq D(q_1),\qquad q_1[x]\leq q_2[x]\quad(x\in D(q_2)).

Thus an increasing family of forms can have decreasing domains. Statements about this order never mean only an inequality on an unspecified common core.

Representation with the exact square-root domain

Theorem. For each densely defined closed nonnegative form qq on HH, there is a unique nonnegative self-adjoint operator AA on HH such that

D(q)=D(A1/2),q(x,y)=⟨A1/2x,A1/2y⟩.D(q)=D(A^{1/2}),\qquad q(x,y)=\langle A^{1/2}x,A^{1/2}y\rangle.

Moreover,

D(A)={x∈D(q):there exists y∈H with q(x,v)=⟨y,v⟩ for every v∈D(q)},\begin{aligned} D(A)=\{x\in D(q):{}&\text{there exists }y\in H\text{ with }\\ &q(x,v)=\langle y,v\rangle\text{ for every }v\in D(q)\}, \end{aligned}

and the vector yy in this formula equals AxAx. Conversely, every nonnegative self-adjoint AA gives a densely defined closed form by these formulas.

Proof. Equip V=D(q)V=D(q) with the energy inner product ⟨x,v⟩V=⟨x,v⟩H+q(x,v).\langle x,v\rangle_V=\langle x,v\rangle_H+q(x,v). Closedness makes VV a Hilbert space. The inclusion j:V→Hj:V\to H is an injective contraction with dense range. Its bounded adjoint exists by the Hilbert-space argument above. Set B=jj∗B=jj^*. For f∈Hf\in H, 0≤⟨Bf,f⟩H=∥j∗f∥V2≤∥f∥2.(QF.R1)0\leq\langle Bf,f\rangle_H=\|j^*f\|_V^2\leq\|f\|^2. \tag{QF.R1} If Bf=0Bf=0, this identity gives j∗f=0j^*f=0; density of jVjV then gives f=0f=0. Thus BB is an injective positive contraction. In particular its spectral projection at zero is zero, even if zero belongs to its spectrum.

For u=Bfu=Bf, its preimage in VV is j∗fj^*f. The adjoint identity gives, for every v∈Vv\in V, ⟨u,v⟩H+q(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩H.(QF.R2)\langle u,v\rangle_H+q(u,v)=\langle f,v\rangle_H. \tag{QF.R2} The spectral calculus of BB defines A=B−1−I,a(t)=t−1−1(0<t≤1).(QF.R3)A=B^{-1}-I,\qquad a(t)=t^{-1}-1\quad(0<t\leq1). \tag{QF.R3} This is a nonnegative self-adjoint operator. Its domain is exactly ran⁡B\operatorname{ran}B: the inverse-domain assertion is proved in SK-07, and the inequalities (t−1−1)2≤t−2≤2(t−1−1)2+2(t^{-1}-1)^2\leq t^{-2}\leq 2(t^{-1}-1)^2+2 show that the two square-integrability conditions coincide. Equation (QF.R2) already proves q(u,v)=⟨Au,v⟩q(u,v)=\langle Au,v\rangle for u∈D(A)u\in D(A), v∈Vv\in V.

We now recover the entire form domain. Put W=D(B−1/2)W=D(B^{-1/2}), with norm ∥x∥W=∥B−1/2x∥\|x\|_W=\|B^{-1/2}x\|. It dominates the Hilbert norm because 0<B≤I0<B\leq I. It is complete: if xnx_n is Cauchy in this norm, then xn→xx_n\to x in HH and B−1/2xn→yB^{-1/2}x_n\to y in HH; closedness of the spectral operator gives x∈Wx\in W and B−1/2x=yB^{-1/2}x=y.

The common subspace D(A)=ran⁡BD(A)=\operatorname{ran}B is dense in each of VV and WW, with the same norm on that subspace. Indeed, ran⁡j∗\operatorname{ran}j^* is dense in VV, since its orthogonal complement is ker⁡j=0\ker j=0. Its image under jj is ran⁡B\operatorname{ran}B, and for x=Bfx=Bf, ∥x∥V2=∥j∗f∥V2=⟨Bf,f⟩=∥B1/2f∥2=∥B−1/2x∥2=∥x∥W2.(QF.R4)\|x\|_V^2=\|j^*f\|_V^2 =\langle Bf,f\rangle =\|B^{1/2}f\|^2 =\|B^{-1/2}x\|^2=\|x\|_W^2. \tag{QF.R4} For density in WW, take Pn=EB([1/n,1])P_n=E_B([1/n,1]). If x∈Wx\in W, then xn=Pnx∈ran⁡Bx_n=P_nx\in\operatorname{ran}B, because t−11[1/n,1](t)t^{-1}\mathbf1_{[1/n,1]}(t) is bounded. Moreover ∥x−xn∥W2=∫(0,1/n)t−1 d⟨EB(t)x,x⟩⟶0.(QF.R5)\|x-x_n\|_W^2 =\int_{(0,1/n)}t^{-1}\,d\langle E_B(t)x,x\rangle\longrightarrow0. \tag{QF.R5} This is dominated convergence for the finite integral defining WW.

For clarity, density and equal norms here give equality of actual subsets of HH. Approximate any x∈Vx\in V by a sequence in ran⁡B\operatorname{ran}B in its VV-norm. The sequence is Cauchy in WW, hence has a limit there, and both limits equal xx in HH. Thus V⊆WV\subseteq W. Conversely the spectral approximants in (QF.R5) are Cauchy in VV; completeness and their Hilbert-space limit put x∈Wx\in W in VV. Their limiting norms agree. No countable basis or cofinal subset of a later directed set is involved.

Consequently, D(q)=D(B−1/2),∥x∥2+q[x]=∫(0,1]t−1 d⟨EB(t)x,x⟩.(QF.R6)D(q)=D(B^{-1/2}),\qquad \|x\|^2+q[x]=\int_{(0,1]}t^{-1}\,d\langle E_B(t)x,x\rangle. \tag{QF.R6} Since the scalar spectral measure is finite, subtracting ∥x∥2\|x\|^2 gives D(q)=D(A1/2),q[x]=∥A1/2x∥2.(QF.R7)D(q)=D(A^{1/2}),\qquad q[x]=\|A^{1/2}x\|^2. \tag{QF.R7} Polarization proves the sesquilinear identity in the theorem.

For the converse graph criterion, suppose x∈Vx\in V and q(x,v)=⟨y,v⟩q(x,v)=\langle y,v\rangle for all v∈Vv\in V. Then ⟨x,v⟩V=⟨x+y,jv⟩H=⟨j∗(x+y),v⟩V.\langle x,v\rangle_V=\langle x+y,jv\rangle_H =\langle j^*(x+y),v\rangle_V. Riesz uniqueness in VV gives x=j∗(x+y)x=j^*(x+y) there. Applying jj gives x=B(x+y)x=B(x+y), so x∈D(A)x\in D(A) and Ax=yAx=y. Density makes yy unique. This proves the exact graph formula in both directions.

If a nonnegative self-adjoint CC represents the same form, the spectral form-pairing identity in SK-07 gives q(x,v)=⟨Cx,v⟩q(x,v)=\langle Cx,v\rangle for x∈D(C)x\in D(C), v∈D(q)v\in D(q). The graph criterion therefore gives C⊆AC\subseteq A. Adjoints reverse this inclusion: if z∈D(A∗)z\in D(A^*), then the identity ⟨Ax,z⟩=⟨x,A∗z⟩\langle Ax,z\rangle=\langle x,A^*z\rangle restricts to D(C)D(C), so z∈D(C∗)z\in D(C^*) with the same value. Hence A=A∗⊆C∗=CA=A^*\subseteq C^*=C, and A=CA=C.

Finally, a nonnegative self-adjoint AA has a closed densely defined square root by SK-05–SK-07. The graph map x↦(x,A1/2x)x\mapsto(x,A^{1/2}x) identifies the form norm with the norm on its closed graph in H⊕HH\oplus H, which is complete. This gives the converse form and finishes the proof. □\square

The operator domain requires a Hilbert-space vector representing the form functional; the square-root domain requires only finite energy. Equation (QF.R4) also proves that the operator domain is dense in the form norm.

Editable source · Sources and component terms