Invariant states and ergodic projections

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

An automorphism group can have many invariant normal states even when it is not compact as a group. Those states determine a unique averaging map onto its fixed algebra. They also control weak compactness of every orbit in the predual. We prove these equivalences without assuming a countable group, a separable predual, or a single faithful invariant state.

We use normal GNS representations, normal vector-functional expansions and preduals from The double commutation theorem and Operator spaces and preduals. Proposition 8.1(3) of the freely readable programme lesson on integral representations gives the full commutant proof for dominated functionals. Its large-group and simplex arguments are used through the exact proof chain given in Section 6 below. We also use the tracial GNS result, Proposition 11.2 of Multiplicity, and Central averaging and maximal ideals. These programme lessons contain the complete prerequisite arguments. Takesaki’s book provides further context.

Section 4 uses Theorem 4.1 of Weak sequences and compact convex hulls, which proves compactness of the closed convex hull of a weakly compact Banach-space set. The fixed-point step is proved in Theorem 5.1 of Weakly compact convex sets and fixed points: a group of weakly continuous affine isometries preserving a nonempty weakly compact convex set has a common fixed point. Both proofs allow arbitrary Banach spaces, and the latter allows an arbitrary group. The arguments below verify their hypotheses. The fixed-point result also supplies the invocation in Theorem 4.7 of Traces, part A. Its weak-compactness criterion is proved in Theorem 10.2 of Polar decomposition and weak compactness; the sequence criterion used there is Theorem 2.1 of the convex-hull lesson.

Let MM be a nonzero von Neumann algebra and G⊆Aut⁡(M)G\subseteq\operatorname{Aut}(M) a group. Automorphisms are normal. Write N=MG={x∈M:g(x)=x for every g∈G},KG(x)=co⁡‾ σ(M,M∗){g(x):g∈G}.(0.1) N=M^G=\{x\in M:g(x)=x\text{ for every }g\in G\}, \qquad K_G(x)=\overline{\operatorname{co}}^{\,\sigma(M,M_*)}\{g(x):g\in G\}. \tag{0.1} The set KG(x)K_G(x) is compact: it is ultraweakly closed and lies in the ball of radius ∥x∥\|x\|, which is ultraweakly compact. The full Banach–Alaoglu proof is Lemma 0.3; its Hahn–Banach proof in Lemma 0.1 also supplies the equality of weak and norm closures of convex sets used below.

Call MM GG-finite if its invariant normal states separate M+M_+: for every nonzero positive xx, at least one such state has positive value on xx. This definition asks for a separating family, not a single faithful member.

1. The minimum seen by an invariant state

For a positive invariant normal functional φ\varphi, use its GNS triple (πφ,Hφ,ξφ)(\pi_\varphi,H_\varphi,\xi_\varphi). Zero functionals can be omitted. The formula Uφ(g)πφ(a)ξφ=πφ(g(a))ξφ U_\varphi(g)\pi_\varphi(a)\xi_\varphi =\pi_\varphi(g(a))\xi_\varphi defines a unitary representation, since φ(g(a)∗g(a))=φ(a∗a)\varphi(g(a)^*g(a))=\varphi(a^*a). Let PφP_\varphi project onto its fixed vectors.

We first recall a Hilbert-space fact, with proof. The norm-closed convex hull of a unitary orbit of a vector vv has a unique vector ww of smallest norm. Existence follows by taking a sequence whose norms tend to the infimum: the parallelogram identity makes it Cauchy. Strict convexity gives uniqueness. Every unitary in the group preserves the hull and its norm, so ww is fixed. The fixed-space projection PP is constant on the hull, because PU(g)v=PvPU(g)v=Pv. Thus w=Pw=Pvw=Pw=Pv. In particular PvPv belongs to that hull.

Proposition 1.1. On KG(x)K_G(x), the function y⟼φ(y∗y)1/2 y\longmapsto\varphi(y^*y)^{1/2} attains its minimum, and a point yy minimizes it exactly when πφ(y)ξφ=Pφπφ(x)ξφ.(1.1) \pi_\varphi(y)\xi_\varphi =P_\varphi\pi_\varphi(x)\xi_\varphi. \tag{1.1}

Proof. The bounded linear map y↦πφ(y)ξφy\mapsto\pi_\varphi(y)\xi_\varphi is ultraweak-to-weak continuous. For vectors πφ(b)ξφ\pi_\varphi(b)\xi_\varphi, its coordinates are the normal functionals y↦φ(b∗y)y\mapsto\varphi(b^*y); approximation of an arbitrary vector gives normal coordinates, since the predual is norm closed. Consequently the image of KG(x)K_G(x) is weakly compact.

This image is the closed convex hull of the orbit of πφ(x)ξφ\pi_\varphi(x)\xi_\varphi. One inclusion follows from weak continuity and separation by vector functionals; the other follows because the image is a weakly closed convex set containing that orbit. Weak and norm closures of a convex set agree. Apply the Hilbert-space fact. The norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, and the smallest vector is unique, giving (1.1). □\square

Let Fφ(x)⊆KG(x)F_\varphi(x)\subseteq K_G(x) be this compact, nonempty set of minimizing points.

Proposition 1.2. For invariant positive normal φ1,…,φm\varphi_1,\ldots,\varphi_m, with φ=∑jφj\varphi=\sum_j\varphi_j, Fφ(x)=⋂j=1mFφj(x).(1.2) F_\varphi(x)=\bigcap_{j=1}^mF_{\varphi_j}(x). \tag{1.2}

Proof. The isometry aξφ⟼(aξφ1,…,aξφm) a\xi_\varphi\longmapsto (a\xi_{\varphi_1},\ldots,a\xi_{\varphi_m}) realizes HφH_\varphi as a closed subspace SS of ⨁jHφj\bigoplus_jH_{\varphi_j}. It intertwines the group representations. Since the action is a group of unitaries, SS and S⊥S^\perp are invariant. The projection onto SS therefore commutes with every group unitary and with its fixed-space projection. Hence the restriction of ⨁jPφj\bigoplus_jP_{\varphi_j} to SS is PφP_\varphi. Equation (1.1) for φ\varphi is now exactly the list of equations (1.1) for all φj\varphi_j. □\square

The same argument works for a finite tuple (x1,…,xr)(x_1,\ldots,x_r) acted on by the same gg. Use the compact orbit hull in MrM^r and the vectors in HφrH_\varphi^r; their fixed-space projection is the coordinatewise PφP_\varphi. It is essential that the same group element acts on every coordinate.

2. A unique fixed point in each orbit hull

Theorem 2.1. If MM is GG-finite, then KG(x)∩N={E(x)}(2.1) K_G(x)\cap N=\{E(x)\} \tag{2.1} for every x∈Mx\in M. The resulting map E:M→NE:M\to N is a faithful normal positive projection of norm one. It satisfies E(g(x))=E(x),E(bxc)=bE(x)c(b,c∈N),φE=φ(2.2) E(g(x))=E(x),\qquad E(bxc)=bE(x)c\quad(b,c\in N),\qquad \varphi E=\varphi \tag{2.2} for every invariant normal positive functional φ\varphi.

Proof. By (1.2) the sets Fφ(x)F_\varphi(x), over all invariant normal states, have the finite intersection property. Compactness gives a common point yy. For every gg, πφ(g(y)−y)ξφ=Uφ(g)Pφπφ(x)ξφ−Pφπφ(x)ξφ=0. \pi_\varphi(g(y)-y)\xi_\varphi =U_\varphi(g)P_\varphi\pi_\varphi(x)\xi_\varphi -P_\varphi\pi_\varphi(x)\xi_\varphi=0. Thus φ((g(y)−y)∗(g(y)−y))=0\varphi((g(y)-y)^*(g(y)-y))=0 for every member of the separating family. It follows that g(y)=yg(y)=y.

Conversely any fixed z∈KG(x)z\in K_G(x) has πφ(z)ξφ\pi_\varphi(z)\xi_\varphi fixed. The fixed-space projection is constant on the image of KG(x)K_G(x), so that vector equals the right side of (1.1). Two fixed points therefore have zero difference under every separating GNS seminorm, and are equal. This proves (2.1).

To prove linearity, apply the finite intersection argument to the simultaneous orbit hull of (x1,…,xr)(x_1,\ldots,x_r), using the tuple version after Proposition 1.2. It gives the tuple (E(x1),…,E(xr))(E(x_1),\ldots,E(x_r)) in that hull. Every scalar linear combination of the tuple lies in the orbit hull of the same combination. Since the resulting combination is fixed, uniqueness proves E ⁣(∑jλjxj)=∑jλjE(xj). E\!\left(\sum_j\lambda_jx_j\right)=\sum_j\lambda_jE(x_j). Likewise the hulls commute with taking adjoints, so E(x∗)=E(x)∗E(x^*)=E(x)^*. Positive elements have positive orbit hulls; hence EE is positive. Also E(1)=1E(1)=1, EE fixes NN, and ∥E(x)∥≤∥x∥\|E(x)\|\leq\|x\| from the hull bound. Thus it is a projection of norm one.

The functional φ\varphi is constant on each orbit hull, so φE=φ\varphi E=\varphi. If x≥0x\geq0 and E(x)=0E(x)=0, all invariant normal states vanish on xx; separation gives x=0x=0. This proves faithfulness.

For b∈Nb\in N, πφ(b)\pi_\varphi(b) commutes with the group unitaries and hence with PφP_\varphi. Using (1.1), πφ(E(bx))ξφ=Pφπφ(bx)ξφ=πφ(b)Pφπφ(x)ξφ=πφ(bE(x))ξφ. \pi_\varphi(E(bx))\xi_\varphi =P_\varphi\pi_\varphi(bx)\xi_\varphi =\pi_\varphi(b)P_\varphi\pi_\varphi(x)\xi_\varphi =\pi_\varphi(bE(x))\xi_\varphi. Separation gives E(bx)=bE(x)E(bx)=bE(x). Taking adjoints gives right multiplication, and then the two-sided identity in (2.2). The invariant-hull identity KG(g(x))=KG(x)K_G(g(x))=K_G(x) gives the first part of (2.2).

Finally let xi↑xx_i\uparrow x be a bounded increasing net in M+M_+. The elements E(xi)E(x_i) increase to an element e≤E(x)e\leq E(x) of NN. For every invariant normal state, φ(e)=sup⁡iφ(E(xi))=sup⁡iφ(xi)=φ(x)=φ(E(x)). \varphi(e)=\sup_i\varphi(E(x_i)) =\sup_i\varphi(x_i)=\varphi(x)=\varphi(E(x)). The positive difference E(x)−eE(x)-e vanishes under the separating family, so it is zero. Preservation of these suprema proves normality. □\square

The map EE is the ergodic projection, and (2.2) makes it a conditional expectation onto the fixed algebra.

Theorem 2.2. The following are equivalent:

  1. MM is GG-finite.
  2. There is a faithful normal norm-one projection Q:M→NQ:M\to N satisfying Qg=QQ g=Q for every g∈Gg\in G.

When they hold this projection is unique.

Proof. Theorem 2.1 proves existence from (1). Conversely a projection onto NN fixes 11, so a norm-one QQ is positive. For completeness, each state θ\theta on NN makes θQ\theta Q a norm-one unital functional on MM, hence a state; states detect positivity in NN. If x∈M+∖{0}x\in M_+\setminus\{0\}, faithfulness gives Q(x)≠0Q(x)\ne0. Some normal positive functional θ\theta on NN has θ(Q(x))>0\theta(Q(x))>0. The functional θQ\theta Q is normal, positive and invariant, and its normalization is the required separating state.

If QQ has the stated properties, it is constant on an orbit and, by normality, on its ultraweak convex hull. Since E(x)∈KG(x)∩NE(x)\in K_G(x)\cap N, Q(x)=Q(E(x))=E(x). Q(x)=Q(E(x))=E(x). This proves uniqueness. □\square

Group invariance is one of the hypotheses of this uniqueness statement. Faithful normal norm-one projections onto a given algebra can otherwise be plentiful, as Exercise 7.3 shows.

3. Domination and weakly compact intervals

The predual has its Banach-space weak topology σ(M∗,M)\sigma(M_*,M).

Lemma 3.1. For a positive normal functional ω\omega and C<∞C<\infty, the interval [0,Cω]={θ∈M∗+:0≤θ≤Cω} [0,C\omega]=\{\theta\in M_*^+:0\leq\theta\leq C\omega\} is weakly compact.

Proof. In the normal GNS representation of ω\omega, Proposition 8.1(3) of the integral-representation lesson identifies this interval with θh(x)=⟨hπω(x)ξω,ξω⟩,h∈πω(M)′,0≤h≤C1. \theta_h(x)=\langle h\pi_\omega(x)\xi_\omega,\xi_\omega\rangle, \qquad h\in\pi_\omega(M)',\quad0\leq h\leq C1. The operator interval is ultraweakly compact. Every scalar coordinate θh(x)\theta_h(x) is ultraweakly continuous in hh. All θh\theta_h are normal because πω\pi_\omega is normal. Thus its image is a weakly compact subset of M∗M_*, and the domination theorem says this image is exactly the displayed interval. □\square

Lemma 3.2. If φ,ω\varphi,\omega are positive normal functionals with s(φ)≤s(ω)s(\varphi)\leq s(\omega), then for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there are C<∞C<\infty and a positive normal θ≤Cω\theta\leq C\omega with ∥φ−θ∥<ε.(3.1) \|\varphi-\theta\|<\varepsilon. \tag{3.1}

Proof. Write p=s(ω)p=s(\omega) and work in pMppMp, where ω\omega is faithful. Its normal GNS representation is faithful, and ξω\xi_\omega is separating: πω(x)ξω=0\pi_\omega(x)\xi_\omega=0 implies ω(x∗x)=0\omega(x^*x)=0, hence x=0x=0. It is cyclic for the commutant as well. Indeed the projection onto [πω(M)′ξω][\pi_\omega(M)'\xi_\omega] belongs to πω(M)\pi_\omega(M), fixes ξω\xi_\omega, and is 11 because that vector is separating.

By the normal positive vector-functional expansion, φ\varphi is a sum of vector functionals in this representation, with summable squared vector norms. Truncate this sum and approximate its finitely many vectors ηj\eta_j by yj′ξωy'_j\xi_\omega, yj′∈πω(M)′y'_j\in\pi_\omega(M)'. The estimate ∥ωη−ωζ∥≤∥η−ζ∥(∥η∥+∥ζ∥) \|\omega_\eta-\omega_\zeta\| \leq\|\eta-\zeta\|(\|\eta\|+\|\zeta\|) makes the resulting positive sum θ\theta as close to φ\varphi as desired. For x≥0x\geq0, commutation gives θ(x)=∑j∥πω(x)1/2yj′ξω∥2≤(∑j∥yj′∥2)ω(x). \theta(x)=\sum_j \|\pi_\omega(x)^{1/2}y'_j\xi_\omega\|^2 \leq\left(\sum_j\|y'_j\|^2\right)\omega(x). This proves domination in the corner. Extend by x↦pxpx\mapsto pxp. Since both φ\varphi and ω\omega are supported on pp, (3.1) and the domination inequality also hold on MM. □\square

We will also use this elementary compactness observation. If a bounded set SS in a Banach space XX can be approximated uniformly in norm, to every positive accuracy, by a relatively weakly compact set, then SS is relatively weakly compact. To prove it, take the weak-star closure of SS in X∗∗X^{**}. A cluster point aa has distance at most ε\varepsilon from XX: along a subnet the approximating points converge weakly to a point of XX, and the error lies in the weak-star compact ball of radius ε\varepsilon. Since XX is norm closed in X∗∗X^{**} and ε\varepsilon is arbitrary, every cluster point is in XX. The resulting compact closure carries precisely the weak topology of XX.

4. Weak compactness of the predual orbits

Theorem 4.1. MM is GG-finite if and only if every orbit {φ∘g:g∈G}⊆M∗(4.1) \{\varphi\circ g:g\in G\}\subseteq M_* \tag{4.1} is relatively weakly compact. It suffices to check positive normal φ\varphi.

Proof. Suppose first that MM is GG-finite, and let EE be its ergodic projection. For φ≥0\varphi\geq0, put ω=φE\omega=\varphi E. This functional is normal and invariant. Its support pp is fixed by GG, because the support is determined by the functional. Since EE fixes pp, φ(1−p)=φ(E(1−p))=ω(1−p)=0. \varphi(1-p)=\varphi(E(1-p))=\omega(1-p)=0. Thus s(φ)≤p=s(ω)s(\varphi)\leq p=s(\omega).

Apply Lemma 3.2. The orbit of an approximation θ≤Cω\theta\leq C\omega is contained in [0,Cω][0,C\omega], because ω\omega is invariant. It is relatively weakly compact by Lemma 3.1. Composition with an automorphism preserves norm, so this approximation works uniformly for the whole orbit of φ\varphi. The compactness observation proves relative weak compactness of (4.1). Every normal functional is a linear combination of four positive normal functionals, by taking real and imaginary parts and their Jordan decompositions. The corresponding sum of four weakly compact closures is weakly compact, proving the claim for all φ\varphi.

Conversely suppose every positive normal orbit is relatively weakly compact. Its weakly closed convex hull is weakly compact by the convex-hull theorem. It consists of positive normal functionals of the same value at 11. Use Tgφ=φ∘g−1T_g\varphi=\varphi\circ g^{-1}; these maps form a group of surjective linear isometries of the Banach space M∗M_*. They are weakly continuous because bounded linear maps are continuous for the weak topologies, and they preserve the hull. Theorem 5.1 of the fixed-point lesson gives an invariant positive normal functional in it. Starting with a state gives an invariant state.

We still need separation. Let pp be the supremum of the supports of all invariant normal states. It is fixed by GG. If q=1−p≠0q=1-p\ne0, choose a normal state φ\varphi supported on qq; normal functionals separate the positive elements of the nonzero corner qMqqMq. Every point in its orbit hull remains supported on qq, since the equation θ(q)=1\theta(q)=1 is weakly closed and g(q)=qg(q)=q. The fixed point just constructed would be an invariant normal state with nonzero support below qq, contradicting the definition of pp. Hence p=1p=1.

If x≥0x\geq0 vanishes under every invariant normal state θ\theta, then x1/2s(θ)=0x^{1/2}s(\theta)=0: on the support corner θ\theta is faithful, and θ(x)=θ(s(θ)xs(θ))\theta(x)=\theta(s(\theta)xs(\theta)). Since those supports have supremum 11, x1/2=0x^{1/2}=0. Thus the invariant normal states separate M+M_+. □\square

5. The topology on bounded maps

Let L(M)\mathcal L(M) be the bounded linear maps from MM to itself and L∗(M)\mathcal L_*(M) its normal maps. The natural weak-star topology on L(M)\mathcal L(M) comes from L(M)=(M⊗^πM∗)∗,⟨S,x⊗φ⟩=φ(Sx).(5.1) \mathcal L(M)=(M\widehat\otimes_\pi M_*)^*, \qquad \langle S,x\otimes\varphi\rangle=\varphi(Sx). \tag{5.1} Here ⊗^π\widehat\otimes_\pi is the Banach projective tensor product. The identity follows from the correspondence between bounded bilinear forms on M×M∗M\times M_* and bounded maps M→(M∗)∗=MM\to(M_*)^*=M. On uniformly norm-bounded sets this topology is just convergence of every scalar φ(Sx)\varphi(Sx): finite sums of elementary tensors are dense, and the uniform norm bound controls their approximation.

Every automorphism has norm one, so its weak-star closure CC in L(M)\mathcal L(M) is compact. Saying that GG is relatively compact within the normal maps means C⊆L∗(M).(5.2) C\subseteq\mathcal L_*(M). \tag{5.2} It includes a condition on the limits.

Theorem 5.1. Condition (5.2) holds exactly when the predual orbits in Theorem 4.1 are relatively weakly compact, hence exactly when MM is GG-finite.

Proof. If every predual orbit has weakly compact closure, take S∈CS\in C and a net gi→Sg_i\to S in the topology (5.1). For φ∈M∗\varphi\in M_*, the functionals φgi\varphi g_i have a subnet converging weakly in M∗M_*, to θ\theta. Evaluation on xx gives θ(x)=lim⁡iφ(gi(x))=φ(Sx). \theta(x)=\lim_i\varphi(g_i(x))=\varphi(Sx). Thus φS\varphi S is normal for every normal φ\varphi, which is precisely normality of SS.

Conversely if all S∈CS\in C are normal, the map C⟶M∗,S⟼φS C\longrightarrow M_*,\qquad S\longmapsto\varphi S is continuous for the weak topology of M∗M_*, by (5.1). Its image is compact and contains the predual orbit of φ\varphi. □\square

Corollary 5.2. For a factor MM, the full automorphism group is relatively compact within the normal maps in this topology if and only if MM is finite.

Proof. If MM is finite, its normalized normal trace is faithful and unique. Every automorphism preserves it, so it is an invariant separating state. Apply Theorem 5.1.

Conversely GG-finiteness for G=Aut⁡(M)G=\operatorname{Aut}(M) gives a nonzero invariant normal state. Invariance under inner automorphisms implies that it is tracial: for self-adjoint bb, differentiate θ(eitbxe−itb)=θ(x)\theta(e^{itb}xe^{-itb})=\theta(x) at zero to obtain θ(bx)=θ(xb)\theta(bx)=\theta(xb), then extend linearly in bb. The support of a normal trace is central, hence is 11 in a factor. A faithful finite trace makes MM finite: if v∗v=1v^*v=1, then the trace of 1−vv∗1-vv^* is zero, so faithfulness gives vv∗=1vv^*=1. □\square

6. Tracial states form a simplex

Let BB be a unital C*-algebra. Its tracial state space T(B)={θ∈S(B):θ(ab)=θ(ba) for all a,b∈B} \mathcal T(B)=\{\theta\in\mathcal S(B):\theta(ab)=\theta(ba)\text{ for all }a,b\in B\} is a weak-star closed convex set. A nonempty compact convex set is a simplex here in the sense of Definition 7.1 of the integral-representation lesson; equivalently, its points have unique maximal representing probability measures. If T(B)\mathcal T(B) is empty, the assertion concerns no points.

Proposition 6.1. When nonempty, T(B)\mathcal T(B) is a simplex.

Proof. It is the invariant state space for the inner automorphism group G=Int⁡(B)G=\operatorname{Int}(B). Traces are invariant. Conversely the exponential differentiation argument in Corollary 5.2 works in any unital C*-algebra and proves traciality from invariance.

We verify the large-group hypothesis (S) of Theorem 24.1 of the integral-representation lesson. Fix an invariant state θ\theta, its GNS representation π\pi, and b∈Bb\in B. The tracial GNS theorem makes R=π(B)′′R=\pi(B)'' finite, with faithful normal vector trace. Let CbC_b be the weak operator closed convex hull of {π(ubu∗):u∈U(B)}. \{\pi(ubu^*):u\in\mathcal U(B)\}. Every unitary w∈Rw\in R is a strong-star limit of unitaries in π(B)\pi(B) obtained from exponentials in BB. To check this, take a bounded self-adjoint logarithm hh of ww in RR, approximate hh strongly by uniformly bounded self-adjoint elements of π(B)\pi(B) using Kaplansky density, and exponentiate. Uniform polynomial approximation of the exponential gives strong-star convergence. Thus wπ(b)w∗∈Cbw\pi(b)w^*\in C_b for every unitary w∈Rw\in R.

Central averaging in the finite von Neumann algebra RR puts TR(π(b))T_R(\pi(b)) in the norm-closed convex hull of that larger unitary orbit. Since CbC_b contains the larger orbit and is weakly closed and convex, TR(π(b))∈Cb∩Z(R). T_R(\pi(b))\in C_b\cap Z(R). This is exactly hypothesis (S), for every invariant state and every bb. The full proof of Theorem 24.1(b) shows that compression of π(B)\pi(B) to the fixed-vector space is commutative. Proposition 23.3, using the explicit lifting argument of Proposition 12.3(b), then makes π(B)′∩U(G)′\pi(B)'\cap U(G)' abelian. Proposition 17.1(6) constructs a representing measure for this abelian algebra and proves that it majorizes every other representing probability measure on the invariant state space. It therefore gives the unique maximal measure for each invariant state. Finally Theorem 7.4, with its full three-implication proof, identifies this property with being a simplex. This chain applies to every unital BB, without separability or a claim that one measure is carried by the extreme points in the nonmetrizable case. □\square

For B=Mn(C)B=M_n(\mathbb C), this simplex is a single point, the normalized trace. For a finite direct sum of full matrix algebras it is the simplex of weights on the summands. A general unital C*-algebra may have no tracial states.

7. Exercises with solutions

Exercise 7.1 — Basic: averaging a sign action. On M3(C)M_3(\mathbb C), let g=Ad⁡diag⁡(1,1,−1)g=\operatorname{Ad}\operatorname{diag}(1,1,-1) and G={1,g}G=\{1,g\}. Find N=M3GN=M_3^G and its ergodic projection. Prove faithfulness directly.

Solution. In the decomposition C3=C2⊕C\mathbb C^3=\mathbb C^2\oplus\mathbb C, conjugation changes the signs of the two off-diagonal blocks. Thus N=M2(C)⊕C,E ⁣(Abcd)=(A00d)=12(x+g(x)). N=M_2(\mathbb C)\oplus\mathbb C,\qquad E\!\begin{pmatrix}A&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix}A&0\\0&d\end{pmatrix} =\tfrac12(x+g(x)). This map is normal, positive, unital and invariant. For x≥0x\geq0, E(x)=0E(x)=0 implies Tr⁡(x)=Tr⁡(E(x))=0\operatorname{Tr}(x)=\operatorname{Tr}(E(x))=0, hence x=0x=0. Equivalently the faithful normalized trace is invariant, proving GG-finiteness.

Exercise 7.2 — Intermediate: the bilateral shift. Let M=ℓ∞(Z)M=\ell^\infty(\mathbb Z), and let GG be the translation group. Prove that there is no invariant normal state, and show directly that the orbit of the coordinate state at 00 is not relatively weakly compact in M∗=ℓ1(Z)M_*=\ell^1(\mathbb Z).

Solution. A normal state has nonnegative weights (aj)(a_j) summing to one. Translation invariance would make all weights equal; a summable constant sequence on Z\mathbb Z is zero, a contradiction.

The coordinate state orbit is {δj:j∈Z}\{\delta_j:j\in\mathbb Z\}. If it were relatively weakly compact, the sequence δn\delta_n, n≥1n\geq1, would have a weakly convergent subnet with limit a∈ℓ1a\in\ell^1. Every coordinate evaluation tends to zero, so aj=0a_j=0 for all jj. But evaluation at the bounded constant sequence 11 is identically one on the subnet and would give ∑jaj=1\sum_ja_j=1. This contradiction also explains why compactness of the orbit hull in the larger dual M∗M^* does not ensure a normal limit.

Exercise 7.3 — Advanced: why invariance belongs in uniqueness. Let M=M2(C)M=M_2(\mathbb C), G=Int⁡(M)G=\operatorname{Int}(M), and Qρ(x)=Tr⁡(ρx)1,ρ=(3/4001/4). Q_\rho(x)=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho x)1, \qquad \rho=\begin{pmatrix}3/4&0\\0&1/4\end{pmatrix}. Show that QρQ_\rho is a faithful normal norm-one projection onto MGM^G, but is not GG-invariant. Determine the unique invariant projection and describe the tracial states of M2(C)⊕M3(C)M_2(\mathbb C)\oplus M_3(\mathbb C).

Solution. Commutation with all unitaries forces MG=C1M^G=\mathbb C1. The density matrix ρ\rho is strictly positive with trace one. Thus QρQ_\rho is positive and unital, has norm one, fixes scalars and is a projection. In finite dimension it is normal; if x≥0x\geq0, its value is zero only when x=0x=0, by strict positivity of ρ\rho. But a unitary exchanging the two basis vectors sends e11e_{11} to e22e_{22}, while Qρ(e11)=34 1,Qρ(e22)=14 1. Q_\rho(e_{11})=\tfrac34\,1,\qquad Q_\rho(e_{22})=\tfrac14\,1. It therefore fails invariance. The unique invariant projection is E(x)=12Tr⁡(x)1E(x)=\frac12\operatorname{Tr}(x)1, by Theorem 2.2, or by uniqueness of the normalized trace.

For the direct sum, restriction of a tracial state to each matrix summand is a nonnegative multiple of its normalized trace. Consequently all tracial states are θt(a,b)=t tr⁡2(a)+(1−t)tr⁡3(b),0≤t≤1. \theta_t(a,b)=t\,\operatorname{tr}_2(a)+(1-t)\operatorname{tr}_3(b), \qquad0\leq t\leq1. The extreme points are the two endpoint traces, and the unique maximal representing measure of θt\theta_t gives them weights tt and 1−t1-t. This is a segment simplex, rather than a singleton.

References

[Namioka–Asplund] I. Namioka and E. Asplund, A geometric proof of Ryll-Nardzewski's fixed point theorem, Bulletin of the AMS 73 (1967), 443–445. Freely accessible paper. The paper treats a broader locally convex semigroup setting. The linked fixed-point lesson supplies the arbitrary-group Banach-space theorem used here.

[Whitley] R. Whitley, The Krein–Šmulian theorem, Proceedings of the AMS 97 (1986), 376–377. Freely accessible paper. The linked programme proof supplies the sequence and barycentre arguments explicitly, including the nonseparable case.

[Takesaki] M. Takesaki, Theory of Operator Algebras I, Springer.

Editable source · Sources and component terms