Central averaging and maximal ideals

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

In a von Neumann algebra, finite averages of unitary conjugates can approach the centre in norm. They can do so simultaneously for finitely many elements, and successive averages can be arranged to converge. In a finite algebra the central limit is its centre-valued trace. In general the central limits need not be unique, but they still determine the maximal norm-closed ideals.

Prerequisites are Projections and types, Theorem 5.5 on central comparison, the finite/properly infinite decomposition in Theorem 7.2, and Proposition 15.2 on countable absorption. We use the centre-valued trace already constructed in Traces on von Neumann algebras, Part A, Theorem 5.2. We also use spectral projections and C*-algebra functional calculus, including closed ideals and commutative Gelfand theory. Each of these programme results has a complete proof under its stated background inputs.

Blackadar’s freely accessible corrected manuscript treats Dixmier averaging and its finite-algebra uniqueness form. The proof below develops the spectral-width estimate, simultaneous convergent averages, converse finiteness test and maximal-ideal correspondence in full. The type III argument retains its sigma-finiteness hypothesis, and Lemma 5.1 retains the closure on the central-ideal side.

Let MM be a von Neumann algebra and Z=Z(M)Z=Z(M). No separability or sigma-finiteness is assumed until Section 4. Put D(a)=co⁡‾ ∥⋅∥{uau∗:u∈U(M)},Dw(a)=co⁡‾ σ-weak{uau∗:u∈U(M)}.(0.1) D(a)=\overline{\operatorname{co}}^{\,\|\cdot\|} \{uau^*:u\in\mathcal U(M)\},\qquad D_{\mathrm w}(a)=\overline{\operatorname{co}}^{\,\sigma\text{-weak}} \{uau^*:u\in\mathcal U(M)\}. \tag{0.1} An averaging map is a finite convex combination F(x)=∑j=1rtjujxuj∗,tj≥0,∑jtj=1.(0.2) F(x)=\sum_{j=1}^r t_j u_jxu_j^*, \quad t_j\geq0,\quad \sum_jt_j=1. \tag{0.2} These maps are positive, unital, contractive and fix ZZ. Their composites are averaging maps. In particular dist⁡(F(x),Z)≤dist⁡(x,Z).(0.3) \operatorname{dist}(F(x),Z)\leq\operatorname{dist}(x,Z). \tag{0.3}

1. Shrinking the spectral width

For a self-adjoint hh in a nonzero central corner MzMz, write αz(h)=min⁡σMz(hz),βz(h)=max⁡σMz(hz),wz(h)=βz(h)−αz(h). \alpha_z(h)=\min\sigma_{Mz}(hz),\quad \beta_z(h)=\max\sigma_{Mz}(hz),\quad w_z(h)=\beta_z(h)-\alpha_z(h). The zero-width case is already scalar in that corner.

Lemma 1.1. For h=h∗∈Mh=h^*\in M, there are a central projection zz and a self-adjoint unitary uu such that k=(h+uhu∗)/2k=(h+uhu^*)/2 satisfies wz(k)≤34w1(h),w1−z(k)≤34w1(h)(1.1) w_z(k)\leq\tfrac34w_1(h),\qquad w_{1-z}(k)\leq\tfrac34w_1(h) \tag{1.1} on every nonzero indicated corner.

Proof. Put α=α1(h)\alpha=\alpha_1(h), β=β1(h)\beta=\beta_1(h), m=(α+β)/2m=(\alpha+\beta)/2, and take the lower spectral projection p=1(−∞,m](h),q=1−p. p=1_{(-\infty,m]}(h),\qquad q=1-p. Then αp≤hp≤mp,mq≤hq≤βq.(1.2) \alpha p\leq hp\leq mp,\qquad mq\leq hq\leq\beta q. \tag{1.2} The comparison theorem gives z∈Proj⁡(Z)z\in\operatorname{Proj}(Z) with pz≾qzpz\precsim qz and q(1−z)≾p(1−z)q(1-z)\precsim p(1-z).

On MzMz, choose vv with v∗v=pzv^*v=pz, vv∗=f≤qzvv^*=f\leq qz. The operator uz=v+v∗+(qz−f) u_z=v+v^*+(qz-f) is a self-adjoint unitary in the corner: it exchanges pzpz and ff, and is the identity on their orthogonal complement. Inequality (1.2) implies hz≥αpz+mqz,uzhzuz≥αf+m(pz+qz−f). hz\geq\alpha pz+m qz,\qquad u_zhzu_z\geq\alpha f+m(pz+qz-f). Therefore 12(hz+uzhzuz)≥α+m2(pz+f)+m(qz−f)≥α+m2z. \tfrac12(hz+u_zhzu_z) \geq\tfrac{\alpha+m}{2}(pz+f)+m(qz-f) \geq\tfrac{\alpha+m}{2}z. The upper bound is βz\beta z. Their difference is 3(β−α)/43(\beta-\alpha)/4.

On M(1−z)M(1-z), exchange q(1−z)q(1-z) with a subprojection of p(1−z)p(1-z), using a partial isometry in the other comparison. The reversed estimates give α(1−z)≤k(1−z)≤β+m2(1−z). \alpha(1-z)\leq k(1-z) \leq\tfrac{\beta+m}{2}(1-z). Its width has the same bound. The sum of the two corner unitaries gives uu. Zero corners can be omitted. □\square

Corollary 1.2. For every self-adjoint hh and every ε>0\varepsilon>0, some averaging map FF and c∈Zsac\in Z_{\mathrm{sa}} satisfy ∥F(h)−c∥<ε.(1.3) \|F(h)-c\|<\varepsilon. \tag{1.3}

Proof. Start with the central partition {1}\{1\}. Apply Lemma 1.1 separately in every nonzero member of the current finite partition, combine the corner unitaries into a global unitary, and refine the partition by the resulting comparison cuts. After nn steps the largest corner width is at most (3/4)nw1(h). (3/4)^n w_1(h). For the final averaged operator, take cc to be the sum of the corner spectral midpoints multiplied by their central projections. The spectral theorem bounds the norm error by half the largest width. Choose nn large enough. □\square

The comparison cut can change at every step. The proof controls a finite central partition, rather than asserting that the global spectral width itself always shrinks.

2. Simultaneous averages and an actual central limit

Lemma 2.1. Given a1,…,am∈Ma_1,\ldots,a_m\in M and ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is one averaging map FF such that dist⁡(F(ai),Z)<ε(1≤i≤m).(2.1) \operatorname{dist}(F(a_i),Z)<\varepsilon\quad(1\leq i\leq m). \tag{2.1}

Proof. List the real and imaginary parts of the aia_i. Apply Corollary 1.2 to the first, then to the image of the second under the first average, and continue through the finite list. Once an image is within ε/2\varepsilon/2 of ZZ, subsequent averages preserve this bound by (0.3). The final composite works for every aia_i, because distance to ZZ is subadditive and invariant under scalar multiplication. □\square

Theorem 2.2. For every finite family a1,…,ama_1,\ldots,a_m, there is a sequence of averaging maps FnF_n and c1,…,cm∈Zc_1,\ldots,c_m\in Z such that ∥Fn(ai)−ci∥⟶0(1≤i≤m).(2.2) \|F_n(a_i)-c_i\|\longrightarrow0 \quad(1\leq i\leq m). \tag{2.2} Every norm-closed convex subset of MM invariant under unitary conjugation, if nonempty, meets ZZ.

Proof. Choose an average F1F_1 making each distance to ZZ less than 2−12^{-1}. Inductively apply Lemma 2.1 to the family Fn(ai)F_n(a_i), with error 2−(n+1)2^{-(n+1)}, and put Fn+1=Gn+1Fn. F_{n+1}=G_{n+1}F_n. Choose ci,n∈Zc_{i,n}\in Z with ∥Fn(ai)−ci,n∥<2−n\|F_n(a_i)-c_{i,n}\|<2^{-n}. Since Gn+1G_{n+1} fixes the centre, ∥Fn+1(ai)−Fn(ai)∥=∥Gn+1(Fn(ai)−ci,n)−(Fn(ai)−ci,n)∥<21−n.(2.3) \begin{aligned} \|F_{n+1}(a_i)-F_n(a_i)\| &=\|G_{n+1}(F_n(a_i)-c_{i,n}) -(F_n(a_i)-c_{i,n})\|\\ &<2^{1-n}. \end{aligned} \tag{2.3} The series of these bounds converges, so each image sequence is norm Cauchy. Its limit is central because its distance to ZZ tends to zero and ZZ is norm closed.

For a nonempty invariant convex set, choose any aa in it. Every averaged image of aa belongs to the set, and its central norm limit belongs by closedness. □\square

In particular D(a)∩Z≠∅D(a)\cap Z\ne\varnothing. An approximate approach to the centre alone would not prove this: the centre need not be norm compact. Estimate (2.3) provides convergence.

3. Finite algebras and uniqueness

Theorem 3.1. The following are equivalent:

  1. MM is finite.
  2. D(a)∩ZD(a)\cap Z is a singleton for every a∈Ma\in M.
  3. Dw(a)∩ZD_{\mathrm w}(a)\cap Z is a singleton for every a∈Ma\in M.

In the finite case both singletons are {TM(a)}\{T_M(a)\}, where TMT_M is the existing centre-valued trace.

Proof. If MM is finite, the imported trace is normal, bounded, fixes ZZ, and satisfies TM(uau∗)=TM(a)T_M(uau^*)=T_M(a). It is therefore constant on both hulls in (0.1). Any central point in either hull equals its own trace and hence equals TM(a)T_M(a). Theorem 2.2 supplies a central point in the smaller hull, proving all the finite-case assertions.

Clearly condition 3 implies condition 2. We prove the converse to finiteness by an explicit witness. If MM is not finite, the imported central decomposition gives a nonzero central projection zz with MzMz properly infinite. In that corner choose orthogonal p,rp,r, both equivalent to zz. Then p∼zp\sim z, and z−p∼zz-p\sim z as well: it contains r∼zr\sim z and is at most zz, so projection Schröder–Bernstein applies.

For every n≥2n\geq2, partition z=q1+⋯+qnz=q_1+\cdots+q_n with qj∼zq_j\sim z. To construct such a finite partition, put nn orthogonal copies of zz inside zz, and absorb the remainder into the last copy by Schröder–Bernstein. For each jj, both qjq_j and z−qjz-q_j are equivalent to zz. The equivalences p∼qjp\sim q_j and z−p∼z−qjz-p\sim z-q_j combine into a unitary of MzMz carrying pp to qjq_j. Extending by 1−z1-z gives a unitary in MM. Their average sends pp to z/nz/n, so 0∈D(p). 0\in D(p). Also pp and z−pz-p are unitarily conjugate. Thus D(p)=D(z−p)=z−D(p), D(p)=D(z-p)=z-D(p), and z∈D(p)z\in D(p) as well. Two different central points contradict condition 2. □\square

The quantifier “for every aa” matters. Even an infinite algebra has singleton central hulls for its central elements.

Corollary 3.2. For every norm-closed two-sided ideal II of a finite MM, TM(I)=I∩Z.(3.1) T_M(I)=I\cap Z. \tag{3.1}

Proof. If a∈Ia\in I, all its unitary conjugates, averages and norm limits lie in II. Theorem 3.1 therefore gives TM(a)∈I∩ZT_M(a)\in I\cap Z. Conversely TMT_M fixes I∩ZI\cap Z. □\square

Finite factors are simple, as already proved in the prerequisite projection lesson, Exercise 15.5(f). Formula (3.1) gives the same conclusion directly for closed ideals by faithfulness of TMT_M; the algebraic-ideal statement follows by the invertible-element argument in that existing exercise.

4. A nonzero central point in the type III case

Theorem 4.1. If MM is sigma-finite of type III and a≠0a\ne0, then D(a)∩Z≠{0}.(4.1) D(a)\cap Z\ne\{0\}. \tag{4.1}

Proof. Choose either h=Re⁡ah=\operatorname{Re}a or h=Im⁡ah=\operatorname{Im}a, nonzero. After changing sign and scaling this component, it suffices to work with a self-adjoint hh of norm at most one and a nonzero spectral projection e=1[δ,1](h),δ>0. e=1_{[\delta,1]}(h),\qquad \delta>0. Let z=c(e)z=c(e). On the central corner MzMz, hz≥δe−(z−e).(4.2) hz\geq\delta e-(z-e). \tag{4.2} If z0=z−c(z−e)≠0z_0=z-c(z-e)\ne0, then e≥z0e\geq z_0, so hz0≥δz0hz_0\geq\delta z_0. This positive lower bound on a central corner is preserved by every averaging map. A central limit of aa supplied by Theorem 2.2 has a nonzero corresponding real or imaginary component on z0z_0.

Otherwise c(z−e)=z=c(e)c(z-e)=z=c(e). In a sigma-finite type III algebra, every nonzero projection is properly infinite. Proposition 15.2(4) of the projection lesson, applied in MzMz, gives e∼z−e∼z. e\sim z-e\sim z. Partition ee into N−1N-1 orthogonal projections each equivalent to zz, where NN is chosen so that (N−1)δ>1. (N-1)\delta>1. Together with z−ez-e these form NN equivalent projections summing to zz. Choose matrix units connecting them; their cyclic shift is a unitary uu in MzMz, with uN=zu^N=z. Average over the cyclic group, extending its unitaries by 1−z1-z. Inequality (4.2) becomes 1N∑j=0N−1ujhz u−j≥(N−1)δ−1Nz>0.(4.3) \frac1N\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}u^jhz\,u^{-j} \geq\frac{(N-1)\delta-1}{N}z>0. \tag{4.3} Apply Theorem 2.2 to the corresponding average of aa. The strictly positive lower bound for the chosen real or imaginary component survives all subsequent averages because zz is central. The resulting central point is nonzero. □\square

Countability enters through equivalence of full-central-support properly infinite projections in Proposition 15.2. The assertion is not extended here to arbitrary non-sigma-finite type III algebras.

5. Closure and central intersection of ideals

We need a closure statement that also applies to algebraic, possibly nonclosed, two-sided ideals.

Lemma 5.1. For any two-sided ideal J⊆MJ\subseteq M, J‾ ∥⋅∥∩Z=J∩Z‾ ∥⋅∥.(5.1) \overline J^{\,\|\cdot\|}\cap Z =\overline{J\cap Z}^{\,\|\cdot\|}. \tag{5.1} If J∩ZJ\cap Z is already norm closed, its closure can be omitted.

Proof. Only the left-to-right inclusion requires work. Let c∈J‾∩Zc\in\overline J\cap Z. A norm-closed two-sided C*-ideal is self-adjoint, so ∣c∣∈J‾|c|\in\overline J. For ε>0\varepsilon>0, the central spectral projection eε=1[ε,∞)(∣c∣) e_\varepsilon=1_{[\varepsilon,\infty)}(|c|) belongs to J‾\overline J, since it is ∣c∣ bε(∣c∣)|c|\,b_\varepsilon(|c|) for a bounded Borel function bεb_\varepsilon. Approximate it by b∈Jb\in J with ∥b−eε∥<1\|b-e_\varepsilon\|<1. The central compression beεbe_\varepsilon is in J∩MeεJ\cap Me_\varepsilon and is invertible in the unital corner MeεMe_\varepsilon. Multiplying by its inverse gives eε∈J∩Ze_\varepsilon\in J\cap Z. Consequently ceε∈J∩Zce_\varepsilon\in J\cap Z, and ∥c−ceε∥≤ε. \|c-ce_\varepsilon\|\leq\varepsilon. This proves (5.1). The zero spectral corner requires no approximation. □\square

The right side in (5.1) must be closed. For example, the finitely supported sequences form a nonclosed ideal in M=Z=ℓ∞M=Z=\ell^\infty; its closure is c0c_0.

For a norm-closed ideal L⊆ZL\subseteq Z, define JL={x∈M:D(axb)∩Z⊆L for every a,b∈M}.(5.2) J_L=\{x\in M: D(axb)\cap Z\subseteq L \ \hbox{for every }a,b\in M\}. \tag{5.2}

Lemma 5.2. JLJ_L is a norm-closed two-sided ideal, JL∩Z=LJ_L\cap Z=L, and it contains every norm-closed ideal I⊆MI\subseteq M satisfying I∩Z⊆LI\cap Z\subseteq L.

Proof.

Addition and scalar multiplication. Multiplication on either side follows immediately by changing the labels a,ba,b in (5.2). Scalar multiplication follows from D(λx)=λD(x)D(\lambda x)=\lambda D(x), with zero handled separately. To prove addition, take x,y∈JLx,y\in J_L, a,b∈Ma,b\in M, and c∈D(a(x+y)b)∩Zc\in D(a(x+y)b)\cap Z. For ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose an averaging map FF with ∥F(a(x+y)b)−c∥<ε. \|F(a(x+y)b)-c\|<\varepsilon. Apply Theorem 2.2 simultaneously to F(axb)F(axb) and F(ayb)F(ayb). Their central limits c1,c2c_1,c_2 lie in D(axb)∩ZD(axb)\cap Z and D(ayb)∩ZD(ayb)\cap Z, hence in LL. Subsequent averages fix cc and are contractions, so ∥c1+c2−c∥≤ε. \|c_1+c_2-c\|\leq\varepsilon. Closedness of LL, as ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0, gives c∈Lc\in L.

Central intersection. If x∈JL∩Zx\in J_L\cap Z, take a=b=1a=b=1 to get x∈Lx\in L. Conversely let x∈Lx\in L. Identify Z=C(S)Z=C(S) by commutative Gelfand theory, and let F⊆SF\subseteq S be the common zero set of LL. A closed ideal of C(S)C(S) consists exactly of the functions vanishing on FF. One elementary justification is this: away from FF, finitely many squared absolute values of elements of LL have a strictly positive sum on any specified compact set; division by that sum and a cutoff approximates every function vanishing on FF.

Fix a,ba,b and c∈D(axb)∩Zc\in D(axb)\cap Z. At s∈Fs\in F, x(s)=0x(s)=0. The central positive contraction fε=max⁡{0,1−∣x∣/ε} f_\varepsilon=\max\{0,1-|x|/\varepsilon\} satisfies fε(s)=1f_\varepsilon(s)=1 and ∥fεx∥≤ε\|f_\varepsilon x\|\leq\varepsilon. Multiplying every average converging to cc by fεf_\varepsilon gives ∣c(s)∣≤∥fεc∥≤ε∥a∥ ∥b∥. |c(s)|\leq\|f_\varepsilon c\| \leq\varepsilon\|a\|\,\|b\|. Thus c(s)=0c(s)=0, so c∈Lc\in L. This proves L⊆JLL\subseteq J_L and therefore JL∩Z=LJ_L\cap Z=L.

Largest ideal and closedness. If II is norm closed and I∩Z⊆LI\cap Z\subseteq L, then axb∈Iaxb\in I for x∈Ix\in I, and D(axb)⊆ID(axb)\subseteq I. Hence x∈JLx\in J_L. To apply this to JL‾\overline{J_L}, first use Lemma 5.1: JL‾∩Z=JL∩Z‾=L. \overline{J_L}\cap Z =\overline{J_L\cap Z}=L. The largest-ideal property gives JL‾⊆JL\overline{J_L}\subseteq J_L. Thus JLJ_L is norm closed. □\square

6. Maximal ideals are parametrized by the centre

Theorem 6.1. Intersection with the centre gives a bijection {maximal proper two-sided ideals of M}⟷{maximal proper ideals of Z}.(6.1) \{\text{maximal proper two-sided ideals of }M\} \longleftrightarrow \{\text{maximal proper ideals of }Z\}. \tag{6.1} Its inverse sends LL to JLJ_L from (5.2). In particular a factor has exactly one maximal proper two-sided ideal.

Proof. Maximal proper ideals in a unital C*-algebra are norm closed. Indeed, a dense ideal contains an element within distance less than one of the identity, hence an invertible element, so it cannot be proper. The closure of a proper ideal is therefore proper, and maximality makes the ideal equal to its closure.

If LL is maximal in ZZ, then JLJ_L is proper since its central intersection is LL. Let II be a proper closed ideal containing JLJ_L. Its central intersection contains LL and is proper, because it does not contain 11. Hence I∩Z=LI\cap Z=L, and Lemma 5.2 gives I⊆JLI\subseteq J_L. Any larger proper algebraic ideal would have a proper closed ideal as its closure, so JLJ_L is maximal.

Conversely, for a maximal proper ideal II of MM, choose a maximal ideal LL of the unital commutative algebra ZZ containing I∩ZI\cap Z. Lemma 5.2 gives I⊆JLI\subseteq J_L, and JLJ_L is proper. Thus I=JLI=J_L, with I∩Z=LI\cap Z=L. The inverse is unique by this construction.

For a factor, Z=C1Z=\mathbb C1 has only the maximal proper ideal {0}\{0\}, yielding exactly one maximal ideal of MM. That maximal ideal need not itself be zero. □\square

Corollary 6.2. For a finite MM, let SS be the spectrum of ZZ. The maximal ideal at s∈Ss\in S is Is={x∈M:TM(x∗x)(s)=0}.(6.2) I_s=\{x\in M:T_M(x^*x)(s)=0\}. \tag{6.2}

Proof. The functional τs(x)=TM(x)(s)\tau_s(x)=T_M(x)(s) is a tracial state. It need not be normal. By Theorem 3.1, x∈Jker⁡sx\in J_{\ker s} implies TM(x∗x)(s)=0T_M(x^*x)(s)=0, by taking a=x∗,b=1a=x^*,b=1.

Conversely, suppose τs(x∗x)=0\tau_s(x^*x)=0. For every a,ba,b, τs((axb)∗(axb))≤∥a∥2τs(b∗x∗xb)=∥a∥2τs(x∗xbb∗)≤∥a∥2∥b∥2τs(x∗x)=0. \begin{aligned} \tau_s((axb)^*(axb)) &\leq\|a\|^2\tau_s(b^*x^*xb)\\ &=\|a\|^2\tau_s(x^*xbb^*)\\ &\leq\|a\|^2\|b\|^2\tau_s(x^*x)=0. \end{aligned} The middle expression is real and nonnegative by the trace identity, or by writing it as the trace of a positive sandwich. Cauchy–Schwarz gives τs(axb)=0\tau_s(axb)=0. Since the central hull of axbaxb is its trace, every such hull lies in ker⁡s\ker s. Thus x∈Jker⁡s=Isx\in J_{\ker s}=I_s. □\square

7. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 7.1 — An exact matrix average (basic)

Let h=diag⁡(5,1,−2)∈M3(C)h=\operatorname{diag}(5,1,-2)\in M_3(\mathbb C). Average it over the three powers of the cyclic basis permutation. Compute the result and identify the central point of D(h)D(h). Explain what happens for an arbitrary matrix aa.

Solution. Each diagonal entry occurs once in every coordinate, so the average is 5+1−2313=43 13. \frac{5+1-2}{3}1_3=\frac43\,1_3. The centre-valued trace of M3M_3 is Tr⁡(a)13/3\operatorname{Tr}(a)1_3/3, and Theorem 3.1 makes it the unique central hull point. For a general matrix, cyclic permutation alone need not remove the off-diagonal entries. First average conjugation by the three diagonal unitaries diag⁡(1,ωj,ω2j),j=0,1,2,ω=e2πi/3. \operatorname{diag}(1,\omega^j,\omega^{2j}),\qquad j=0,1,2,\quad \omega=e^{2\pi i/3}. The geometric sums kill every off-diagonal entry. A subsequent cyclic-permutation average yields exactly Tr⁡(a)13/3\operatorname{Tr}(a)1_3/3.

Exercise 7.2 — The unique maximal ideal of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2) (intermediate)

Use Theorem 6.1 to show that the Calkin algebra is simple. Do not assume its simplicity in applying the theorem. Identify the maximal ideal of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2).

Solution. The nonzero unital Calkin algebra has a maximal proper ideal: apply Zorn's lemma, observing that a union of a chain of proper ideals cannot contain the identity. Its inverse image under the quotient map is a maximal ideal of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2) containing the compact operators. Theorem 6.1 says that this factor has only one maximal ideal, say II.

Every proper ideal of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2) consists of compact operators. Indeed, if it contains a noncompact aa, then for some ε>0\varepsilon>0 the spectral projection p=1[ε,∞)(∣a∣)p=1_{[\varepsilon,\infty)}(|a|) has infinite rank. Otherwise cutting ∣a∣|a| by these finite-rank projections would approximate it in norm, making ∣a∣|a|, and hence aa, compact. Since the norm-closed ideal generated by aa contains ∣a∣|a|, the projection pp belongs to it by bounded Borel division. On the separable infinite-dimensional space p∼1p\sim1, so that closed ideal contains 11. It follows that the original ideal is dense and hence contains an invertible element. It is the whole algebra. Therefore the proper maximal ideal II is contained in K\mathcal K, and its known containment of K\mathcal K gives I=KI=\mathcal K.

Now every proper ideal of the quotient has proper inverse image containing K\mathcal K, so its inverse image equals K\mathcal K. The quotient ideal is zero. Thus the Calkin algebra is simple. The normality corollary in Proper infiniteness and automatic normality also explains why the quotient cannot be represented nontrivially on a separable Hilbert space.

Exercise 7.3 — A maximal ideal at infinity in a finite matrix product (advanced)

Let M=∏n≥1Mn(C)M=\prod_{n\geq1}M_n(\mathbb C), and fix a free ultrafilter V\mathcal V on N\mathbb N. Write tr⁡n=Tr⁡/n\operatorname{tr}_n=\operatorname{Tr}/n. Identify the maximal ideal associated with the central character lim⁡V\lim_{\mathcal V}. Show that the coordinate rank-one projections form an element of that ideal with norm one. Does the ideal contain the identity?

Solution. MM is finite, with TM((an))=(tr⁡n(an))n. T_M((a_n))=(\operatorname{tr}_n(a_n))_n. Corollary 6.2 gives IV={(an):lim⁡Vtr⁡n(an∗an)=0}. I_{\mathcal V}= \{(a_n):\lim_{\mathcal V}\operatorname{tr}_n(a_n^*a_n)=0\}. Choose a rank-one projection pnp_n in every coordinate. Then ∥(pn)∥=1\|(p_n)\|=1, while lim⁡Vtr⁡n(pn)=lim⁡V1n=0. \lim_{\mathcal V}\operatorname{tr}_n(p_n)= \lim_{\mathcal V}\frac1n=0. Thus (pn)∈IV(p_n)\in I_{\mathcal V}. On the other hand TM(1)=1T_M(1)=1, so the identity is not in the ideal. This maximal quotient detects normalized trace size, rather than requiring coordinate operator norms to tend to zero.

References

Editable source · Sources and component terms