Relation kernels and modular coordinates

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. New original text is public domain (CC0).

Introduction

A bounded operator on a countable orbit has a matrix. The same orbit occurs over several base points in the relation Hilbert space, so its matrix must agree across those occurrences. This lesson proves precisely which measurable families of matrices belong to the relation algebra. It also explains how unequal masses on the base space appear in the modular operator.

Read Orbits, stabilizers, and relation algebras first. We use its counting measures, partial orbit maps, cyclic separating diagonal vector, and commuting source-coordinate operators. We also use the constant separable-fibre decomposition proved in Free actions and the crossed-product diagonal, Lemma 2.1. That lemma concerns scalar multiplication on a direct integral and requires no freeness.

One further prerequisite is the Tomita–Takesaki commutation theorem: if a left Hilbert algebra has closed involution S=JΔ1/2S=J\Delta^{1/2} and generated left algebra MM, then JMJ=M′JMJ=M'. The prerequisite lesson The modular group and its analytic algebra, in Modular theory and weights, proves this for arbitrary left Hilbert algebras. We use the theorem after checking all its hypotheses here. We do not need to assume that our initial analytic algebra is full. Section 6 also uses the weight GNS construction and its finite-cutoff criterion: a weight is semifinite if there are finite-weight positive contractions increasing to one.

Matthew Daws’s Some notes on weights gives useful further reading on the passage between full Hilbert algebras and weights. Its section “Hilbert algebras to von Neumann algebras” and Lemma toB extend modular covariance to left-bounded vectors. That argument presupposes the general Hilbert-algebra correspondence; the correspondence is referred to Takesaki rather than proved in those notes. Our complete kernel and graph-domain arguments below, followed by the exact modular-course prerequisite above, supply the route used in this lesson. The editable notes at the checked revision retain their repository’s CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. No text from that source is imported here.

1. The derivative along an arrow

Let a countable group Γ\Gamma act nonsingularly on a standard Borel probability space (X,μ)(X,\mu). Write R={(y,x):y∈Γx},H=L2(R,νs),M=M(R,μ). R=\{(y,x):y\in\Gamma x\},\qquad H=L^2(R,\nu_s),\qquad M=\mathcal M(R,\mu). The probability hypothesis will be removed in Section 6. The counting measures are ∫F dνs=∫X∑y∼xF(y,x) dμ(x),∫F dνr=∫X∑x∼yF(y,x) dμ(y). \int F\,d\nu_s=\int_X\sum_{y\sim x}F(y,x)\,d\mu(x),\qquad \int F\,d\nu_r=\int_X\sum_{x\sim y}F(y,x)\,d\mu(y). Their equivalence gives a positive finite Borel derivative δ(y,x)=dνrdνs(y,x).(1.1) \delta(y,x)=\frac{d\nu_r}{d\nu_s}(y,x). \tag{1.1} We may remove an invariant null set from XX when choosing its representative.

Lemma 1.1. If θ:D→E\theta:D\to E is a partial orbit map, then μ(θB)=∫Bδ(θx,x) dμ(x)(B⊂D).(1.2) \mu(\theta B)=\int_B\delta(\theta x,x)\,d\mu(x) \quad(B\subset D). \tag{1.2} Moreover, on one invariant conull Borel set, δ(z,x)=δ(z,y)δ(y,x),δ(x,x)=1,(1.3) \delta(z,x)=\delta(z,y)\delta(y,x),\qquad \delta(x,x)=1, \tag{1.3} for every composable pair of arrows. In particular δ(x,y)=δ(y,x)−1\delta(x,y)=\delta(y,x)^{-1}.

Proof. The graph of θ∣B\theta|_B has source-counting measure μ(B)\mu(B) and range-counting measure μ(θB)\mu(\theta B). Integrating (1.1) on this graph proves (1.2).

For each g∈Γg\in\Gamma, let dg(x)d_g(x) be the derivative of the measure B↦μ(gB)B\mapsto\mu(gB) with respect to μ\mu. Equation (1.2) gives dg(x)=δ(gx,x)d_g(x)=\delta(gx,x) almost everywhere. Change of variables in (1.2) and uniqueness of Radon–Nikodym derivatives give dhg(x)=dh(gx)dg(x). d_{hg}(x)=d_h(gx)d_g(x). There are countably many identities, so discard their exceptional sets and their countable saturations. If y=gxy=gx and z=hyz=hy lie in the remaining set, these identities give (1.3). The identity arrow has derivative one. □\square

For an equivalent measure μ′=qμ\mu'=q\mu, the derivative becomes δμ′(y,x)=q(y)q(x)δμ(y,x).(1.4) \delta_{\mu'}(y,x)=\frac{q(y)}{q(x)}\delta_\mu(y,x). \tag{1.4} Indeed the new counting measures have respective densities q(x)q(x) and q(y)q(y) relative to the old ones. Thus the modular coordinates depend on the chosen measure, while the algebra depends only on its measure class.

2. A kernel bound that works on every orbit

For a Borel kernel a:R→Ca:R\to\mathbb C, set ∥a∥S=max⁡{sup⁡x∑y∼x∣a(y,x)∣,sup⁡y∑x∼y∣a(y,x)∣}.(2.1) \|a\|_{\mathrm S} =\max\left\{\sup_x\sum_{y\sim x}|a(y,x)|, \sup_y\sum_{x\sim y}|a(y,x)|\right\}. \tag{2.1} The suprema refer to the chosen invariant conull space. Kernels of finite norm form the Schur kernel algebra. Define (a∗b)(z,x)=∑y∼xa(z,y)b(y,x),a♯(y,x)=a(x,y)‾.(2.2) (a*b)(z,x)=\sum_{y\sim x}a(z,y)b(y,x),\qquad a^\sharp(y,x)=\overline{a(x,y)}. \tag{2.2}

Lemma 2.1 (Schur bound). On each orbit OO, the kernel aa defines a bounded operator AOA_O on ℓ2(O)\ell^2(O), with ∥AO∥≤∥a∥S.(2.3) \|A_O\|\leq\|a\|_{\mathrm S}. \tag{2.3} The kernels in (2.1) form a Banach *-algebra and ∥a∗b∥S≤∥a∥S∥b∥S. \|a*b\|_{\mathrm S}\leq\|a\|_{\mathrm S}\|b\|_{\mathrm S}.

Proof. For finite-support vectors ξ,η\xi,\eta on OO, Cauchy–Schwarz on the pairs (y,x)(y,x), weighted by ∣a(y,x)∣|a(y,x)|, gives ∣∑y,xa(y,x)ξ(x)η(y)‾∣≤(∑y,x∣a(y,x)∣∣ξ(x)∣2)1/2(∑y,x∣a(y,x)∣∣η(y)∣2)1/2≤∥a∥S∥ξ∥2∥η∥2. \begin{aligned} \left|\sum_{y,x}a(y,x)\xi(x)\overline{\eta(y)}\right| &\leq \left(\sum_{y,x}|a(y,x)||\xi(x)|^2\right)^{1/2} \left(\sum_{y,x}|a(y,x)||\eta(y)|^2\right)^{1/2}\\ &\leq\|a\|_{\mathrm S}\|\xi\|_2\|\eta\|_2. \end{aligned} Density gives (2.3). The row sum of ∣a∗b∣|a*b| is bounded by the row bound of aa times that of bb; the column calculation is the same with the order reversed. Absolute convergence justifies associativity and (a∗b)♯=b♯∗a♯(a*b)^\sharp=b^\sharp*a^\sharp. The involution interchanges the two bounds. Finally a Cauchy sequence for (2.1) converges pointwise to a Borel kernel. Fatou's lemma on each counting fibre gives the same bounds for its limit and for its differences from the sequence. This proves norm completeness. □\square

Let L(a)L(a) act on HH by (L(a)ξ)(z,x)=∑y∼xa(z,y)ξ(y,x).(2.4) (L(a)\xi)(z,x)=\sum_{y\sim x}a(z,y)\xi(y,x). \tag{2.4} The Schur bound, integrated over xx, proves boundedness. Summation on an orbit gives L(a∗b)=L(a)L(b),L(a♯)=L(a)∗.(2.5) L(a*b)=L(a)L(b),\qquad L(a^\sharp)=L(a)^*. \tag{2.5}

Proposition 2.2. Every Schur kernel has L(a)∈ML(a)\in M.

Proof. Enumerate Γ\Gamma, and partition RR into disjoint Borel graph pieces BjB_j, with BjB_j a restriction of the graph of gjg_j. A kernel on one such piece has the form L(a1Bj)=VgjMbj,bj(x)=1Dj(x)a(gjx,x), L(a\mathbf1_{B_j})=V_{g_j}M_{b_j},\qquad b_j(x)=\mathbf1_{D_j}(x)a(g_jx,x), where DjD_j is its domain. The coefficient is bounded by ∥a∥S\|a\|_{\mathrm S}, so each operator lies in MM.

The partial kernel sums an=a1∪j≤nBja_n=a\mathbf1_{\cup_{j\leq n}B_j} have Schur norms at most ∥a∥S\|a\|_{\mathrm S}. On an orbit, L(an)L(a_n) converges strongly to L(a)L(a): for one input basis vector this is convergence of a column in ℓ2\ell^2, since every entry is eventually included; finite-support vectors and the common bound give the assertion for every vector. The column is square summable by (2.3). Dominated convergence of the squared fibre norms then gives strong convergence on HH. Since MM is strongly closed, L(a)∈ML(a)\in M. □\square

3. A dense analytic algebra and its closed involution

Define C={a:δna∈L2(R,νs) and ∥δna∥S<∞ for every n∈Z}.(3.1) \mathcal C=\{a:\delta^n a\in L^2(R,\nu_s) \text{ and }\|\delta^n a\|_{\mathrm S}<\infty \text{ for every }n\in\mathbb Z\}. \tag{3.1} All kernels here have Borel representatives; functions equal almost everywhere represent the same vector. Countable nonsingularity ensures that convolution respects this equivalence.

Theorem 3.1. With convolution, the involution ♯\sharp, and the L2(νs)L^2(\nu_s) inner product, C\mathcal C is a left Hilbert algebra with unit Ω=1{(x,x)}\Omega=\mathbf1_{\{(x,x)\}}. Its closed involution and modular data are (Sξ)(y,x)=ξ(x,y)‾,D(S)={ξ:∫R(1+δ)∣ξ∣2 dνs<∞},(Fξ)(y,x)=δ(y,x)ξ(x,y)‾,F=S∗,(Δξ)(y,x)=δ(y,x)ξ(y,x),D(Δ)={ξ:δξ∈L2(νs)},(Jξ)(y,x)=δ(y,x)1/2ξ(x,y)‾.(3.2) \begin{aligned} (S\xi)(y,x)&=\overline{\xi(x,y)},& D(S)&=\left\{\xi:\int_R(1+\delta)|\xi|^2\,d\nu_s<\infty\right\},\\ (F\xi)(y,x)&=\delta(y,x)\overline{\xi(x,y)},& F&=S^*,\\ (\Delta\xi)(y,x)&=\delta(y,x)\xi(y,x),& D(\Delta)&=\{\xi:\delta\xi\in L^2(\nu_s)\},\\ (J\xi)(y,x)&=\delta(y,x)^{1/2}\overline{\xi(x,y)}.& \end{aligned} \tag{3.2} Its generated left von Neumann algebra is MM.

Proof. The cocycle identity gives δn(a∗b)=(δna)∗(δnb).(3.3) \delta^n(a*b)=(\delta^na)*(\delta^nb). \tag{3.3} The Schur bound and (2.4) prove its L2L^2 and Schur bounds. Reversing coordinates gives ∥a♯∥22=∫Rδ∣a∣2 dνs.(3.4) \|a^\sharp\|_2^2=\int_R\delta|a|^2\,d\nu_s. \tag{3.4} The same identity with powers of δ\delta, and (1.3), shows that ♯\sharp preserves C\mathcal C. Equation (2.5) proves the left Hilbert-algebra adjoint identity.

For density, let EmE_m be the union of the first mm group graphs and their inverse graphs. It has at most 2m2m points in each row and column. Cut a vector off to Em∩{m−1≤δ≤m}∩{∣ξ∣≤m}.(3.5) E_m\cap\{m^{-1}\leq\delta\leq m\}\cap\{|\xi|\leq m\}. \tag{3.5} The resulting bounded finite-degree kernel belongs to C\mathcal C, since μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1. These increasing cutoffs exhaust RR and prove L2L^2 density. If ξ\xi is in the domain displayed for SS, they also converge for the norm squared ∫(1+δ)∣ξ∣2 dνs\int(1+\delta)|\xi|^2\,d\nu_s. Consequently C\mathcal C is a graph core for the closed flip-conjugation operator in (3.2).

The flip changes νs\nu_s to νr=δνs\nu_r=\delta\nu_s. Thus JJ is antiunitary, J2=1J^2=1, and S=JΔ1/2S=J\Delta^{1/2}, with equality of domains. The adjoint pairing, or this polar decomposition, gives F=JΔ−1/2F=J\Delta^{-1/2} and the formula in (3.2); its domain is {ξ:δ−1/2ξ∈L2}\{\xi:\delta^{-1/2}\xi\in L^2\}. Therefore FS=ΔFS=\Delta, including its displayed domain. This proves closability and every modular formula.

The diagonal kernel Ω\Omega belongs to C\mathcal C and is its convolution unit. Hence the product span is dense, the last left Hilbert-algebra axiom.

Proposition 2.2 gives L(C)′′⊂ML(\mathcal C)''\subset M. Diagonal bounded kernels belong to C\mathcal C, so all MfM_f lie in the generated algebra. The indicator of the graph of gg, cut off where m−1≤δ≤mm^{-1}\leq\delta\leq m, belongs to C\mathcal C; its operator converges strongly to VgV_g. These generators give the reverse inclusion. □\square

The algebra is analytic as well. For z∈Cz\in\mathbb C, set V(z)a=δiza.(3.6) V(z)a=\delta^{iz}a. \tag{3.6} These are algebra automorphisms by (1.3). On a finite horizontal strip, the modulus and every derivative are bounded by a constant times δN+δ−N\delta^N+\delta^{-N}, for a sufficiently large integer NN. Condition (3.1) therefore proves entire dependence in L2L^2, by dominated difference quotients. It also proves preservation of (3.1). In particular V(z)a♯=(V(z‾)a)♯,⟨Sa,Sb⟩=⟨Δb,a⟩(a,b∈C),(3.7) V(z)a^\sharp=(V(\overline z)a)^\sharp,\qquad \langle Sa,Sb\rangle=\langle\Delta b,a\rangle \quad(a,b\in\mathcal C), \tag{3.7} where inner products are linear in the first variable. These are the analytic identities of a Tomita algebra. No boundedness of δ\delta on all of RR is assumed.

4. The commutant and measurable orbit matrices

For a partial orbit map θ:D→E\theta:D\to E, put jθ=dθ∗(μ∣D)dμ∣E. j_\theta=\frac{d\theta_*(\mu|_D)}{d\mu}\bigg|_E. The commuting source operators from the first lesson are (Nfξ)(y,x)=f(x)ξ(y,x),(Wθξ)(y,x)=1E(x)jθ(x)1/2ξ(y,θ−1x).(4.1) (N_f\xi)(y,x)=f(x)\xi(y,x),\qquad (W_\theta\xi)(y,x)=\mathbf1_E(x)j_\theta(x)^{1/2}\xi(y,\theta^{-1}x). \tag{4.1}

Theorem 4.1. The commutant is M′={Nf,Wg:f∈L∞(X), g∈Γ}′′.(4.2) M'=\{N_f,W_g:f\in L^\infty(X),\ g\in\Gamma\}''. \tag{4.2} Every operator in MM has a measurable essentially bounded orbit field Tx∈B(ℓ2([x]R)),(Tξ)(⋅,x)=Txξ(⋅,x).(4.3) T_x\in B(\ell^2([x]_R)),\qquad (T\xi)(\cdot,x)=T_x\xi(\cdot,x). \tag{4.3} Conversely such a field defines an operator in MM exactly when, after discarding one invariant null set, Tx=Tywhenever x∼y.(4.4) T_x=T_y\quad\text{whenever }x\sim y. \tag{4.4} The equality uses the identity of the sets [x]R=[y]R[x]_R=[y]_R, with their common point-indexed bases. Its operator norm is ess supx∥Tx∥\mathop{\mathrm{ess\,sup}}_x\|T_x\|.

Proof. Theorem 3.1 allows the Tomita commutation theorem to be applied. Direct calculation gives JMf∗J=Nf,JVθJ=Wθ.(4.5) JM_f^*J=N_f,\qquad JV_\theta J=W_\theta. \tag{4.5} In the second calculation the scalar is [δ(y,x)δ(θ−1x,y)]1/2=δ(θ−1x,x)1/2=jθ(x)1/2; \bigl[\delta(y,x)\delta(\theta^{-1}x,y)\bigr]^{1/2} =\delta(\theta^{-1}x,x)^{1/2}=j_\theta(x)^{1/2}; the last equality is the inverse change-of-variables formula in Lemma 1.1. Since MM is generated by the Mf,VgM_f,V_g, (4.2) follows from JMJ=M′JMJ=M'.

Here is the variable-fibre decomposition explicitly. Enumerate the distinct points in [x]R[x]_R by retaining the first occurrence of each gjxg_jx. Let DjD_j be the Borel set of base points where that occurrence is retained. The map ξ⟼(1Dj(x)ξ(gjx,x))j≥0(4.6) \xi\longmapsto\bigl(\mathbf1_{D_j}(x)\xi(g_jx,x)\bigr)_{j\geq0} \tag{4.6} is a unitary onto the range of the measurable diagonal projection p(x)=diag⁡(1Dj(x))p(x)=\operatorname{diag}(\mathbf1_{D_j}(x)) in L2(X;ℓ2(N))L^2(X;\ell^2(\mathbb N)). An operator commuting with every NfN_f extends by zero on the complementary range of pp. The constant-fibre decomposition lemma gives a measurable operator field on ℓ2(N)\ell^2(\mathbb N). It is compressed by p(x)p(x), because the extension equals its compression. Transporting back gives (4.3), with the stated essential bound. This also defines precisely what measurable means in (4.3): all coefficients in the enumeration (4.6) are measurable.

The equation TWg=WgTTW_g=W_gT now reads Tgx=TxT_{gx}=T_x almost everywhere, because WgW_g changes the base point by gg, leaves the orbit-point coordinate intact, and has a strictly positive scalar density. Equality can be tested on the countably many matrix coefficients in (4.6). Remove all these exceptional sets and their saturations to obtain (4.4) on one invariant conull set.

Conversely, (4.4) gives commutation with every WgW_g, and decomposability gives commutation with every NfN_f. Equation (4.2) and the double commutant theorem then put TT in MM. Finally the upper norm bound follows by integration. For the reverse bound, enumerate finite rational-coordinate unit vectors in the measurable fibres. Their norms under TxT_x detect ∥Tx∥\|T_x\|; if a smaller bound held for the global operator, tensoring one such vector with the indicator of its positive-measure violating set would contradict it. □\square

No measurable quotient space of orbits was introduced. A field can be measurable on XX and constant on orbits even when the set of orbits admits no useful Borel parametrization.

5. The diagonal state and its modular action

Let E:M→AE:M\to\mathcal A be the diagonal expectation proved in Diagonal expectations and invariant measures, and let φ(T)=⟨TΩ,Ω⟩=∫XE(T)(x) dμ(x).(5.1) \varphi(T)=\langle T\Omega,\Omega\rangle=\int_X E(T)(x)\,d\mu(x). \tag{5.1} It is a faithful normal state.

Proposition 5.1. The GNS Hilbert space of φ\varphi is HH, with GNS map T↦TΩT\mapsto T\Omega, and its modular data are (3.2). Consequently σtφ(L(a))=L(δita),σtφ(Mf)=Mf.(5.2) \sigma_t^\varphi(L(a))=L(\delta^{it}a),\qquad \sigma_t^\varphi(M_f)=M_f. \tag{5.2} For a=b♯∗ca=b^\sharp*c, with b,c∈Cb,c\in\mathcal C, φ(L(a))=∫Xa(x,x) dμ(x).(5.3) \varphi(L(a))=\int_Xa(x,x)\,d\mu(x). \tag{5.3}

Proof. The cyclic separating property of Ω\Omega identifies the GNS representation with the given faithful representation. Its involution on MΩM\Omega extends the involution on C\mathcal C, since L(a)Ω=aL(a)\Omega=a and L(a)∗Ω=a♯L(a)^*\Omega=a^\sharp.

This extension has exactly the closed involution (3.2). Indeed, by Theorem 4.1, if T∈MT\in M, its kernel vector is TΩ(y,x)=⟨Txex,ey⟩T\Omega(y,x)=\langle T_xe_x,e_y\rangle. Orbit invariance gives T∗Ω(y,x)=TΩ(x,y)‾T^*\Omega(y,x)=\overline{T\Omega(x,y)}. Both vectors are in HH, so TΩ∈D(S)T\Omega\in D(S). Thus the full GNS involution is contained in SS; the graph-core assertion of Theorem 3.1 gives the reverse inclusion after closure.

Conjugating (2.4) by multiplication by δit\delta^{it}, and using the cocycle identity, gives (5.2). The first equality of (5.1) applied to L(a)Ω=aL(a)\Omega=a gives (5.3). In particular, when a=b♯∗ba=b^\sharp*b, its diagonal is ∑y∣b(y,x)∣2\sum_y|b(y,x)|^2, so the integral is ∥b∥22\|b\|_2^2. The integral for a general product is absolutely convergent by Cauchy–Schwarz. □\square

Example 5.2. For X={a,b}X=\{a,b\} with masses 1/4,3/41/4,3/4 and the complete relation, δ(y,x)=μ({y})μ({x}),δ=(11/331) \delta(y,x)=\frac{\mu(\{y\})}{\mu(\{x\})},\qquad \delta=\begin{pmatrix}1&1/3\\3&1\end{pmatrix} when rows and columns are ordered a,ba,b. The algebra is M2(C)M_2(\mathbb C), represented by left multiplication on matrices with norm squared ∥ξ∥H2=14∑y∣ξ(y,a)∣2+34∑y∣ξ(y,b)∣2. \|\xi\|_H^2=\tfrac14\sum_y|\xi(y,a)|^2+ \tfrac34\sum_y|\xi(y,b)|^2. If D=diag⁡(1/4,3/4)D=\operatorname{diag}(1/4,3/4), the state is φ(T)=Tr⁡(DT)\varphi(T)=\operatorname{Tr}(DT), and (5.2) is σt(T)=DitTD−it\sigma_t(T)=D^{it}TD^{-it}. The matrix entries of δ\delta are modular eigenvalues, including both reciprocal off-diagonal values.

Two-point relation: orbit matrices, source masses, and modular multipliers
Open diagram at full size

Figure 1. Rows are orbit points and columns are base points. The two columns carry masses 1/41/4 and 3/43/4. An orbit operator acts on both columns by the same matrix. The indicated partial source move carries column aa into column bb with factor 1/31/\sqrt3. The four entries of δ\delta multiply the corresponding kernel coordinates. This is Example 5.2 and the concrete mechanism in Theorems 3.1 and 4.1; the relation-kernel construction has its antecedent in [Takesaki].

6. Sigma-finite bases and reduced relations

The density of one positive sigma-finite measure relative to another is proved in Measurable actions and compact models, Theorem 0.1. Apply it to the equivalent counting measures νr,νs\nu_r,\nu_s to obtain the positive finite modulus δ\delta. The graph integration proof of (1.2) is unchanged for sigma-finite μ\mu, including sets whose integrals are infinite. Uniqueness of these densities gives the same fixed-pair chain rule, and Lemma 1.1's countable null-saturation argument makes all cocycle identities simultaneous on an invariant conull base. Thus the partial-map derivative and the common-conull cocycle of Section 1 hold at this scope as well. We now give the analytic construction directly for this base measure, before using an equivalent probability to describe its orbit fields.

Proposition 6.0 (the analytic algebra without a finite unit vector). Let μ\mu be any nonzero sigma-finite nonsingular base measure. Define Cμ\mathcal C_\mu by (3.1), using νsμ\nu_s^\mu. It is a dense Tomita algebra on Hμ=L2(R,νsμ)H_\mu=L^2(R,\nu_s^\mu), its closed involution and modular data are (3.2), and L(Cμ)′′=M(R,μ)L(\mathcal C_\mu)''=\mathcal M(R,\mu). The diagonal identity is a vector in this algebra exactly when μ(X)<∞\mu(X)<\infty; a unit vector is not required for the construction.

Proof. The cocycle proves (3.3) with the present measure. The two Schur estimates of Section 2 prove the Schur and L2L^2 bounds for every integer power of a product. For adjoints, δna♯=(δ−na)♯,∥δna♯∥22=∫Rδ1−2n∣a∣2 dνsμ.(6.4) \delta^n a^\sharp=(\delta^{-n}a)^\sharp,\qquad \|\delta^n a^\sharp\|_2^2 =\int_R\delta^{1-2n}|a|^2\,d\nu_s^\mu. \tag{6.4} The Schur norm is unchanged by flip-conjugation. Moreover δ1−2n≤δ−2n+δ2−2n\delta^{1-2n}\leq\delta^{-2n}+\delta^{2-2n}, so the last integral is finite by the powers −n-n and 1−n1-n in (3.1). Thus the involution preserves Cμ\mathcal C_\mu. Associativity follows from absolutely convergent row sums for Schur kernels; the adjoint identity is (2.5). Left multiplication is bounded on HμH_\mu by the same Schur estimate.

Choose Borel sets Xm↑XX_m\uparrow X of finite measure. Let EmE_m be the first mm group graphs together with their inverses; its row and column degrees are at most 2m2m. For ξ∈Hμ\xi\in H_\mu, use the increasing cutoffs ξm=ξ 1Em∩(Xm×Xm)1{m−1≤δ≤m}1{∣ξ∣≤m}.(6.5) \xi_m=\xi\,\mathbf1_{E_m\cap(X_m\times X_m)} \mathbf1_{\{m^{-1}\leq\delta\leq m\}} \mathbf1_{\{|\xi|\leq m\}}. \tag{6.5} Their supports have νsμ\nu_s^\mu-measure at most 2mμ(Xm)2m\mu(X_m). Each integer power of δ\delta is bounded on the support, and the row and column degrees are finite. Hence ξm∈Cμ\xi_m\in\mathcal C_\mu. These cutoffs exhaust every arrow on the chosen conull relation, so dominated convergence proves ξm→ξ\xi_m\to\xi in HμH_\mu. For ξ∈D(S)\xi\in D(S), the same argument with weight 1+δ1+\delta proves convergence in the graph norm of flip-conjugation. This proves both density and the graph-core assertion.

Flip-conjugation on its displayed maximal domain is closed: convergence of a sequence and its flips in L2L^2 has almost everywhere convergent subsequences, and the equivalent flipped measure identifies the limit with the flip of the original limit. Changing coordinates proves that JJ in (3.2) is antiunitary and J2=1J^2=1. Thus S=JΔ1/2S=J\Delta^{1/2}, its adjoint is F=JΔ−1/2F=J\Delta^{-1/2}, and FS=ΔFS=\Delta, with precisely the domains in (3.2). These computations prove closability of the algebra involution and all the modular formulas without assuming finite μ(X)\mu(X).

Put em(y,x)=1{y=x∈Xm}e_m(y,x)=\mathbf1_{\{y=x\in X_m\}}. Since δ(x,x)=1\delta(x,x)=1, we have em∈Cμe_m\in\mathcal C_\mu, (em∗a)(y,x)=1Xm(y)a(y,x),(a∗em)(y,x)=1Xm(x)a(y,x).(6.6) (e_m*a)(y,x)=\mathbf1_{X_m}(y)a(y,x),\qquad (a*e_m)(y,x)=\mathbf1_{X_m}(x)a(y,x). \tag{6.6} Both tend to aa in L2L^2 by dominated convergence. Therefore the span of products is dense, completing the left Hilbert-algebra axioms in the absence of an identity vector.

The entire maps a↦δizaa\mapsto\delta^{iz}a preserve Cμ\mathcal C_\mu. On any bounded horizontal strip, each difference quotient and each derivative is dominated in L2L^2 by a constant times (δN+δ−N)∣a∣(\delta^N+\delta^{-N})|a|, for a sufficiently large integer NN. This follows from ∣log⁡t∣k≤Ck,ε(tε+t−ε)|\log t|^k\leq C_{k,\varepsilon}(t^\varepsilon+t^{-\varepsilon}) for t>0t>0. Dominated difference quotients give entire HμH_\mu-valued dependence, while the same power bounds give every required Schur estimate. The cocycle and the flip identity give (3.7). Hence this is a Tomita algebra.

Every left Schur-kernel operator lies in M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu) by Proposition 2.2, whose graph decomposition and strong-sum estimates use no probability assumption. This gives one inclusion. For bounded ff, the diagonal kernels f(y)em(y,x)f(y)e_m(y,x) belong to Cμ\mathcal C_\mu, and their operators are MfM1XmM_fM_{\mathbf1_{X_m}}, tending strongly to MfM_f. For a group element gg, let Dm={x:x,gx∈Xm, m−1≤δ(gx,x)≤m}.(6.7) D_m=\{x:x,gx\in X_m,\ m^{-1}\leq\delta(gx,x)\leq m\}. \tag{6.7} The indicator of {(gx,x):x∈Dm}\{(gx,x):x\in D_m\} belongs to Cμ\mathcal C_\mu: both degrees are one, its source measure is finite, and every modulus power is bounded there. Its operator is VgM1DmV_gM_{\mathbf1_{D_m}}. Since Dm↑XD_m\uparrow X modulo a null set, these converge strongly to VgV_g; null saturation justifies the first-coordinate multiplication. These are the generators of M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu), proving the reverse inclusion. Finally the squared norm of the diagonal identity is μ(X)\mu(X); when finite it satisfies (3.1), and when infinite it does not belong to HμH_\mu. □\square

For a sigma-finite base, choose an equivalent probability μ′=qμ\mu'=q\mu. The unitary U:Hμ′→Hμ,(Uξ)(y,x)=q(x)1/2ξ(y,x) U:H_{\mu'}\to H_\mu,\qquad (U\xi)(y,x)=q(x)^{1/2}\xi(y,x) leaves every orbit matrix unchanged. It transports the source multiplications and the corresponding WgW_g's. Theorem 4.1 therefore holds for any nonzero sigma-finite μ\mu, with the same measure-class interpretation.

If B⊂XB\subset X has positive measure, set e=M1Be=M_{\mathbf1_B} and RB=R∩(B×B)R_B=R\cap(B\times B). The relation algebra of RBR_B is the corner eMeeMe, as an abstract von Neumann algebra with its diagonal. This assertion does not say that the whole corner representation space eHeH equals L2(RB)L^2(R_B).

Proposition 6.1. If μ\mu is a probability, the normalized state on eMeeMe is φB(T)=φ(T)/μ(B)\varphi_B(T)=\varphi(T)/\mu(B). Its GNS Hilbert space is L2(RB,νs)/μ(B)L^2(R_B,\nu_s)/\sqrt{\mu(B)} in the norm sense, its modular operator is multiplication by δ∣RB\delta|_{R_B}, and Sp⁡(ΔB)=ess range⁡RBδ.(6.1) \operatorname{Sp}(\Delta_B) =\operatorname{ess\,range}_{R_B}\delta. \tag{6.1} Here the essential range is a closed subset of [0,∞)[0,\infty); it may include zero.

Proof. Compression of the field in (4.3) restricts its orbit matrix to [x]R∩B[x]_R\cap B. Restrict eHeH further to the source-coordinate subspace N1BeH=L2(RB)N_{\mathbf1_B}eH=L^2(R_B), which is reducing for eMeeMe. The restriction is faithful: if a compressed orbit field vanishes for almost every base point in BB, invariance and null saturation make it vanish on every orbit meeting BB, while it is already zero on the other orbits. The corner is generated, on this subspace, by its diagonal and restricted partial orbit maps. To see generation, compress the Schur kernels used in Section 3, or compress finite words MfVgM_fV_g; the latter words linearly span a strongly dense algebra. These are exactly the generators of M(RB,μ∣B)\mathcal M(R_B,\mu|_B).

Their diagonal vector is 1{(x,x):x∈B}/μ(B)\mathbf1_{\{(x,x):x\in B\}}/\sqrt{\mu(B)}. It is cyclic separating by the same graph and source-operator argument as in the first lesson, so it realizes φB\varphi_B. The derivative for RBR_B, including normalization of μ∣B\mu|_B, is the restriction of δ\delta. The proof of (3.2) applies to this reduced relation, using restrictions of the countably many presenting graphs. Hence its modular operator is the stated multiplier.

A real number λ≥0\lambda\geq0 outside the essential range has a neighbourhood avoided almost everywhere by δ\delta, so multiplication by (δ−λ)−1(\delta-\lambda)^{-1} is a bounded inverse. If λ\lambda belongs to the essential range, every set {∣δ−λ∣<ε}\{|\delta-\lambda|<\varepsilon\} has positive measure. Sigma-finiteness supplies a finite positive-measure subset, whose normalized indicator is an approximate eigenvector. These two implications prove (6.1). □\square

For an ergodic relation on any nonzero sigma-finite base, the asymptotic ratio set is r∞(R,μ)=⋂μ(B)>0ess range⁡RBδ.(6.3) r_\infty(R,\mu)=\bigcap_{\mu(B)>0} \operatorname{ess\,range}_{R_B}\delta. \tag{6.3} Here δ\delta is the modulus for the given measure μ\mu, and the essential range is taken for νsμ\nu_s^\mu restricted to RBR_B. Explicitly, λ≥0\lambda\geq0 belongs to it exactly when νsμ{(y,x)∈RB:∣δ(y,x)−λ∣<ε}>0for every ε>0. \nu_s^\mu\{(y,x)\in R_B:|\delta(y,x)-\lambda|<\varepsilon\}>0 \quad\text{for every }\varepsilon>0. The definition includes every Borel BB of positive measure, whether its measure is finite or infinite. It needs no probability normalization and no diagonal unit vector. A positive modulus can have zero in its closed essential range. For a probability base, intersecting (6.1) over positive-measure BB gives precisely this set. For a general sigma-finite base, apply Theorem 6.2 below to RBR_B with its restricted measure: the resulting diagonal weight has the same multiplication modular operator, and the essential-range proof in Proposition 6.1 applies to that multiplier without a unit vector. Ratio sets and intrinsic modular spectra, Theorems 2.1 and 3.1, proves the equality with the factor's intrinsic modular spectrum, using the exact fixed-corner prerequisite and a separate argument at zero. The explicit multiplication spectrum supplies the concrete corner calculation for that proof. An ergodic relation is called type IIIλIII_\lambda, II1II_1, or II∞II_\infty when its relation factor has that type; this terminology refers to the algebra, not to the presenting group.

Theorem 6.2. For any nonzero sigma-finite base measure, the formula φμ(T)=∫XE(T)(x) dμ(x),T∈M+,(6.2) \varphi_\mu(T)=\int_X E(T)(x)\,d\mu(x),\qquad T\in M_+, \tag{6.2} defines a faithful normal semifinite weight. Its GNS representation is the relation representation on L2(R,νsμ)L^2(R,\nu_s^\mu), and its modular operator is multiplication by δμ\delta_\mu. In particular (5.2) holds without the probability assumption. For a=b♯∗ca=b^\sharp*c in the analytic kernel algebra, (5.3) holds with φμ\varphi_\mu.

Proof. Integration and the faithful normal expectation give a faithful normal weight. Choose Xn↑XX_n\uparrow X of finite measure and put en=M1Xne_n=M_{\mathbf1_{X_n}}. For T∈MT\in M, φμ((Ten)∗(Ten))≤∥T∥2μ(Xn)<∞. \varphi_\mu((Te_n)^*(Te_n))\leq\|T\|^2\mu(X_n)<\infty. In particular φμ(en)=μ(Xn)<∞\varphi_\mu(e_n)=\mu(X_n)<\infty, and en↑1e_n\uparrow1. The stated finite-cutoff criterion proves semifiniteness. The displayed inequality also shows explicitly that its finite-square left ideal is ultraweakly dense, since Ten→TTe_n\to T strongly.

For a bounded orbit field TxT_x, diagonal compression gives E(T∗T)(x)=∥Txex∥22. E(T^*T)(x)=\|T_xe_x\|_2^2. This compression identity follows first on finite-measure diagonal corners from (5.1), with the corresponding diagonal test vectors; those corners exhaust XX. Consequently the GNS map is the kernel column Λφμ(T)(y,x)=⟨Txex,ey⟩,∥Λφμ(T)∥22=φμ(T∗T). \Lambda_{\varphi_\mu}(T)(y,x)=\langle T_xe_x,e_y\rangle, \qquad \|\Lambda_{\varphi_\mu}(T)\|_2^2=\varphi_\mu(T^*T). The field theorem makes left multiplication of operators agree with the represented action on these columns.

Proposition 6.0 proves density, the graph-core property, dense products, and generation of MM for exactly this sigma-finite analytic kernel algebra. In particular, no infinite-measure diagonal identity has been treated as a GNS vector.

This dense analytic kernel algebra lies in the GNS image of the finite-square ideal and its adjoint ideal. Therefore the GNS map above has dense range and identifies the GNS Hilbert space with L2(R,νsμ)L^2(R,\nu_s^\mu). The kernel of T∗T^* is again the flip-conjugate of the kernel of TT, by orbit invariance. The graph-core argument from Proposition 5.1 thus identifies the closed GNS involution with (3.2), now for δμ\delta_\mu. This proves the modular formulas. Finally the diagonal of b♯∗cb^\sharp*c is ∑yb(y,x)‾c(y,x)\sum_y\overline{b(y,x)}c(y,x), integrable by Cauchy–Schwarz. Its integral is the GNS pairing and hence the stated weight formula, using the linear extension of the weight to its finite definition algebra. □\square

For clarity, the product formula in the weight theorem also covers kernels whose product is not positive.

Corollary 6.3 (the weight of an arbitrary kernel product). For g,h∈Cμg,h\in\mathcal C_\mu, the operator L(g)L(h)=L(g∗h)L(g)L(h)=L(g*h) belongs to the finite definition algebra of φμ\varphi_\mu, and φμ(L(g)L(h))=∫X∑y∼xg(x,y)h(y,x) dμ(x).(6.8) \varphi_\mu(L(g)L(h)) =\int_X\sum_{y\sim x}g(x,y)h(y,x)\,d\mu(x). \tag{6.8} The integral is absolutely convergent; the weight is understood through its linear extension on this algebra.

Proof. Proposition 6.0 gives b=g♯∈Cμb=g^\sharp\in\mathcal C_\mu, so g∗h=b♯∗hg*h=b^\sharp*h. The finite definition algebra is the linear span of products A∗BA^*B with A,BA,B in the finite-square ideal. Theorem 6.2 places L(b),L(h)L(b),L(h) in that ideal and identifies their GNS vectors with b,hb,h. Its product formula therefore gives (6.8). Directly, the integral of the absolute values is at most ∥g♯∥2∥h∥2\|g^\sharp\|_2\|h\|_2, by Cauchy–Schwarz on (R,νsμ)(R,\nu_s^\mu). This also justifies reading the diagonal convolution sum under the integral. □\square

7. Exercises with solutions

Level 1 asks for a computation or a direct application. Level 2 asks for a proof using the lesson’s framework. Level 3 combines results or examines a hypothesis whose failure changes the conclusion.

Exercise 7.1 (derivative convention). Level 1. For positive masses pip_i on a countable set, compute δ(i,j)\delta(i,j), JJ, and WθW_\theta when θ(j)=i\theta(j)=i. Verify that JVθJ=WθJV_\theta J=W_\theta.

Solution. The arrow (i,j)(i,j) has source mass pjp_j and range mass pip_i, so δ(i,j)=pi/pj\delta(i,j)=p_i/p_j. Thus (Jξ)(i,j)=pi/pj ξ(j,i)‾(J\xi)(i,j)=\sqrt{p_i/p_j}\,\overline{\xi(j,i)}. The source move sends column jj to column ii, multiplying it by pj/pi\sqrt{p_j/p_i}, because its pushforward mass is pjp_j. In the composition JVθJJV_\theta J, the two square-root factors have product pj/pi\sqrt{p_j/p_i}; the point-indexed row remains fixed. This is exactly WθW_\theta.

Exercise 7.2 (the two Schur bounds). Level 1. Explain why a uniform column-sum bound alone does not imply boundedness on ℓ2(N)\ell^2(\mathbb N).

Solution. Take a(0,j)=1a(0,j)=1 for every jj, and all other entries zero. Each column sum is one. For ξN=N−1/21{0,…,N−1}\xi_N=N^{-1/2}\mathbf1_{\{0,\ldots,N-1\}}, the output has its only nonzero coordinate equal to N\sqrt N, although ∥ξN∥2=1\|\xi_N\|_2=1. The row bound fails, and the operator is unbounded. The weighted Cauchy–Schwarz proof uses one bound for each of its two factors.

Exercise 7.3 (a field which fails orbit invariance). Level 2. On the complete two-point relation with uniform measure, set Ta=IT_a=I and Tb=2IT_b=2I. Does the decomposable field belong to the relation algebra? Identify the global operator and its failed commutation.

Solution. It is NfN_f, where f(a)=1f(a)=1 and f(b)=2f(b)=2. It is bounded and decomposable, but its two orbit matrices differ. The unitary source swap WW gives WNf=Nf∘swapWWN_f=N_{f\circ\mathrm{swap}}W, which differs from NfWN_fW. Thus it fails (4.2). In the tensor model M2⊗1M_2\otimes1, it acts on the multiplicity factor rather than on the matrix factor.

Exercise 7.4 (a measure change can remove the derivative). Level 2. Suppose δ(y,x)=h(y)/h(x)\delta(y,x)=h(y)/h(x) with a positive finite Borel hh. Prove that h−1μh^{-1}\mu is sigma-finite and invariant. Conversely, derive such a formula from an equivalent sigma-finite invariant measure.

Solution. On the sets where h−1≤nh^{-1}\leq n, the new measure is at most nμn\mu, so these sets give a countable finite-measure cover. Equation (1.4) with q=h−1q=h^{-1} makes the new derivative one. Formula (1.2) consequently gives invariance under all partial orbit maps. Conversely write the invariant measure as qμq\mu, with 0<q<∞0<q<\infty almost everywhere. Its derivative is one, so (1.4) gives δ(y,x)=q(x)/q(y)\delta(y,x)=q(x)/q(y). Take h=q−1h=q^{-1}. The simultaneous cocycle representative is obtained by the same countable null-saturation removal as in Lemma 1.1.

Exercise 7.5 (zero in a multiplication spectrum). Level 2. Let X=NX=\mathbb N have probability masses pn=2−n−1p_n=2^{-n-1}, and use its complete relation. Compute the essential range of δ\delta. Why does zero belong to the spectrum even though Δ\Delta has zero kernel?

Solution. The values are pi/pj=2j−ip_i/p_j=2^{j-i}. Every arrow has positive measure, so the essential range is {2k:k∈Z}∪{0}\{2^k:k\in\mathbb Z\}\cup\{0\}, the closure of these values in [0,∞)[0,\infty). Positive values tend to zero; normalized indicators of the corresponding arrows are approximate zero-eigenvectors. Yet δ>0\delta>0 on every arrow, so a vector annihilated by the multiplier is zero. An injective positive operator can have an unbounded inverse and zero in its continuous spectrum.

Exercise 7.6 (finite cutoffs of an infinite diagonal). Level 2. On X=N={0,1,…}X=\mathbb N=\{0,1,\ldots\} with counting measure, take the complete relation. Compute its modulus and identify its relation algebra on L2(N×N)L^2(\mathbb N\times\mathbb N). For the diagonal indicators eme_m of {0,…,m−1}\{0,\ldots,m-1\}, compare their vector norms with their left-operator norms and limits. Why does Proposition 6.0 use products with these vectors instead of a unit vector?

Solution. Both counting measures on the relation are counting measure on the pair set, so δ=1\delta=1. The Hilbert space is ℓ2(N)⊗ℓ2(N)\ell^2(\mathbb N)\otimes\ell^2(\mathbb N), with the first factor indexing rows. Each single-arrow kernel gives a row matrix unit on the first factor and the identity on the second. The von Neumann algebra they generate is B(ℓ2(N))⊗1B(\ell^2(\mathbb N))\otimes1, since finite matrix corners approximate every bounded operator strongly. The diagonal identity has infinitely many entries equal to one and is not in this Hilbert space. In contrast, ∥em∥22=m\|e_m\|_2^2=m, whereas L(em)L(e_m) is a row projection of operator norm one for m≥1m\geq1, converging strongly to the identity. For any a∈Cμa\in\mathcal C_\mu, (6.6) cuts its rows or columns; the tails of the square-summable entries tend to zero. Thus em∗a→ae_m*a\to a and a∗em→aa*e_m\to a as vectors even though eme_m itself has no vector limit. These products prove the required dense-product axiom.

Exercise 7.7 (a complex value of the diagonal weight). Level 1. On the complete relation X={a,b}X=\{a,b\}, give the points masses 2,32,3. Let gg be the single-arrow kernel eabe_{ab} and h=iebah=i e_{ba}. Compute φμ(L(g)L(h))\varphi_\mu(L(g)L(h)) and φμ(L(h)L(g))\varphi_\mu(L(h)L(g)). Why are complex values legitimate, and what does their difference tell you?

Solution. All finite kernels belong to Cμ\mathcal C_\mu, since there are only four arrows with positive finite modulus. The matrix products are g∗h=ieaag*h=i e_{aa} and h∗g=iebbh*g=i e_{bb}. Formula (6.8) gives 2i2i and 3i3i, respectively. These products are in the weight's finite definition algebra, where its linear extension can take complex values. Positivity is required only when evaluating the weight on positive operators. The unequal values show that this diagonal weight is not a trace; its underlying point masses are unequal. No probability normalization was used.

References