Orbits, stabilizers, and relation algebras

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. New original text is public domain (CC0).

Introduction

A group action contains two kinds of information. It says which points can be reached from one another, and it records every group element that makes the journey. Those records coincide for a free action. A stabilizer makes them different: several group elements can describe the same journey.

We will construct an algebra that remembers the journeys between points. Its diagonal algebra consists of functions on the original space. We prove that this diagonal is maximal abelian, compute the centre, and explain why an ergodic orbit relation gives a factor even when the action has stabilizers. The proof uses concrete operators and one distinguished vector.

We assume measure theory through the Radon–Nikodym theorem and basic Hilbert space operator theory through the double commutant theorem. Useful preparatory lessons are Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces, Measurable fields of Hilbert spaces and their direct integrals, and The double commutant theorem. Measured groupoids and transverse measures gives the wider setting, and Square-integrable representations and random operators develops its representation theory.

Basic references are [Anantharaman–Popa], [Connes], and [Takesaki]. The arguments below are complete in the countable-action setting stated here.

1. Two ways to record an action

Let a countable group Γ\Gamma act by Borel bijections on a standard Borel space XX. Let μ\mu be a nonzero sigma-finite measure such that every group element preserves its null sets. We call the action nonsingular. Equalities involving measurable functions are understood almost everywhere.

The transformation groupoid has arrows (g,x)(g,x), going from xx to gxgx. Its composition is

(h,gx)(g,x)=(hg,x). (h,gx)(g,x)=(hg,x).

The orbit relation is

R={(z,x)∈X×X:z=gx for some g∈Γ}. R=\{(z,x)\in X\times X:z=gx\text{ for some }g\in\Gamma\}.

An arrow (z,x)(z,x) goes from xx to zz, and

(w,z)(z,x)=(w,x),(z,x)−1=(x,z). (w,z)(z,x)=(w,x),\qquad (z,x)^{-1}=(x,z).

There is just one arrow from xx to zz in RR. In particular, the only arrow from xx to itself is (x,x)(x,x). A groupoid with this property is principal. The transformation groupoid has isotropy group

Γx={g:gx=x}. \Gamma_x=\{g:gx=x\}.

Proposition 1.1. The map (g,x)↦(gx,x)(g,x)\mapsto(gx,x) is a surjective groupoid homomorphism. Over an arrow (z,x)(z,x), its fibre is the left coset gΓxg\Gamma_x, where gx=zgx=z. It is injective exactly when every stabilizer is trivial.

Proof. The displayed composition laws show that the map respects composition. If gx=zgx=z, then hx=zhx=z exactly when g−1h∈Γxg^{-1}h\in\Gamma_x, or h∈gΓxh\in g\Gamma_x. This gives all the assertions. □\square

For a countable group, “almost everywhere trivial stabilizer” means that each set {x:gx=x}\{x:gx=x\}, g≠eg\ne e, is null. The union of these sets is null and invariant. Removing it makes the action free everywhere on the remaining space. Countability is essential to this particular argument.

Example 1.2. Let Γ=Z×C3\Gamma=\mathbb Z\times C_3 act on {0,1}Z\{0,1\}^{\mathbb Z} by the shift of the first factor; the second factor acts trivially. Give the space the fair Bernoulli probability measure. The shift is free almost everywhere: for a fixed nonzero shift, its fixed sequences are periodic and have probability zero. The stabilizer of the Γ\Gamma-action is nevertheless C3C_3 almost everywhere. Each orbit point is recorded three times by the transformation groupoid, and once by the relation.

Presenting every countable Borel relation

The countable-action hypothesis does not restrict the class of countable Borel principal groupoids. The precise descriptive-set prerequisite is Lusin–Novikov: if a Borel map between standard Borel spaces has countable fibres, its domain has a countable Borel partition on each piece of which the map is injective, with Borel images and Borel inverses. In relation form, a Borel subset of a product with countable vertical sections is a countable union of graphs of Borel partial functions with Borel domains. This is stronger than a section measurable only after completing a measure. We reuse the existing proof in Transverse measures of foliations, Lemmas 5.2–5.3 and Theorem 5.4: it gives a uniform well-founded-tree rank bound, closed branch coding, and Borel enumeration through the splitting derivative. Its prerequisites are Polish topology refinement and countable joins, continuous parametrization by Baire space, and the injective Borel image theorem. The last theorem also makes the images and inverses of the injections below Borel.

Theorem 1.3 (countable Borel presentation). Let R⊂X×XR\subset X\times X be a Borel equivalence relation on a standard Borel space, with countable classes. There is a countable group Γ\Gamma of Borel automorphisms of XX whose orbit relation is exactly RR. The group can be generated by involutions with graphs in RR. If a sigma-finite measure on XX has null saturation for every Borel null set, every element of Γ\Gamma is nonsingular.

Proof. Apply Lusin–Novikov to the source projection s:R→Xs:R\to X, s(y,x)=xs(y,x)=x. It partitions RR into Borel pieces on which ss is injective. On each piece the inverse of ss, followed by the range projection r(y,x)=yr(y,x)=y, gives a Borel partial function θ:D→X\theta:D\to X. Each fibre of θ\theta is contained in an RR-class, hence countable. Apply the same theorem to θ\theta and partition DD into Borel pieces on which it is injective. Their images and inverse maps are Borel. We have therefore covered RR by countably many graphs of Borel partial bijections θ:D→E\theta:D\to E.

Discard the fixed points of each such map. Choose Borel sets AmA_m separating the points of XX. For every remaining xx, there is a first mm for which xx and θx\theta x have different membership in AmA_m. Partition the domain by that first index and by the two orientations. Each resulting Borel piece DjD_j lies entirely in AmA_m or entirely in its complement, while Ej=θDjE_j=\theta D_j lies in the other set. In particular Dj∩Ej=∅D_j\cap E_j=\varnothing. Define

σj(x)={θx,x∈Dj,θ−1x,x∈Ej,x,x∉Dj∪Ej.(1.1) \sigma_j(x)= \begin{cases} \theta x,&x\in D_j,\\ \theta^{-1}x,&x\in E_j,\\ x,&x\notin D_j\cup E_j. \end{cases} \tag{1.1}

The three domains are disjoint Borel sets. This defines a Borel involution, and its graph lies in RR. The collection over all partial bijections is countable. The group it generates is countable because its elements are finite words in countably many generators. Every generator preserves each RR-class, so its group orbit is contained in that class. Conversely, if y≠xy\ne x and yRxyRx, a presenting map takes xx to yy; one of its restrictions in (1.1) does the same. Thus the group orbit contains every point of the class. The identity supplies diagonal pairs. This also covers empty or singleton spaces.

If NN is Borel and null, then σj(N)⊂[N]R\sigma_j(N)\subset[N]_R, which is null by hypothesis. Since σj−1=σj\sigma_j^{-1}=\sigma_j, it preserves null sets in both directions. Finite products do likewise, proving nonsingularity. Completed null sets cause no change: each is contained in a Borel null set. □\square

Corollary 1.4 (principal groupoids). An orbitally countable standard Borel principal groupoid is Borel-isomorphic, through its endpoints, to the orbit relation of a countable Borel automorphism group. If its unit measure is quasi-invariant in the counting sense, that presenting action is nonsingular.

Proof. The endpoint map γ↦(rγ,sγ)\gamma\mapsto(r\gamma,s\gamma) is injective: two arrows with the same endpoints differ by an isotropy arrow, which is a unit in a principal groupoid. Its image is an equivalence relation by the groupoid laws. The injective Borel image theorem makes this image Borel and the inverse Borel. The source and range fibres are countable; hence its classes are countable. Apply Theorem 1.3.

For the measured assertion, cover the relation by its partial-bijection graphs. The counting functions and their coordinate projections are Borel on these graphs. For a Borel null set NN, the set r−1(N)r^{-1}(N) has range-counting measure zero. Equivalence of source and range counting measures makes its source-counting measure zero. Its source is exactly [N]R[N]_R, so this saturation is null. Theorem 1.3 now gives nonsingularity of the action. □\square

This proves the presentation assertion of Takesaki XIII.3.8 at its full Borel generality. No ergodicity, freeness of the presenting action, probability measure, or finite bound on class size is required. The acting group may have stabilizers; the endpoint relation remains principal. The same presentation applies to every Borel reduction R∣BR|_B, so a reduction need not be invariant under the original presenting group.

A partial shift split into two involutions with disjoint source and range pieces
Open diagram at full size

Figure 1. A four-point instance of (1.1). The partial map 0↦1↦2↦30\mapsto1\mapsto2\mapsto3 has overlapping domain and range. Restricting it to {0,2}\{0,2\} and {1}\{1\} gives disjoint source/range pairs and therefore the involutions (0 1)(2 3)(0\,1)(2\,3) and (1 2)(1\,2). Their orbits recover the four-point relation. The coordinates are an illustrative finite sample; Theorem 1.3 proves the Borel construction for arbitrary countable classes.

2. Counting distinct orbit points

For a nonnegative Borel function FF on RR, define

∫RF dνs=∫X∑z∈[x]RF(z,x) dμ(x),∫RF dνr=∫X∑x∈[z]RF(z,x) dμ(z).(2.1) \int_R F\,d\nu_s =\int_X\sum_{z\in[x]_R}F(z,x)\,d\mu(x),\qquad \int_R F\,d\nu_r =\int_X\sum_{x\in[z]_R}F(z,x)\,d\mu(z). \tag{2.1}

Here [x]R=Γx[x]_R=\Gamma x is a set of distinct points. Summing over all g∈Γg\in\Gamma would be a different formula in the presence of stabilizers.

Lemma 2.1. The set RR is Borel, the counting functions in (2.1) are measurable, and both measures are sigma-finite.

Proof. Enumerate the group as g0,g1,…g_0,g_1,\ldots, with g0=eg_0=e. Each graph

Gn={(gnx,x):x∈X} G_n=\{(g_nx,x):x\in X\}

is Borel. The union is RR. Make it disjoint by taking B0=G0B_0=G_0 and Bn=Gn∖⋃j<nGjB_n=G_n\setminus\bigcup_{j<n}G_j. Each BnB_n is the graph of the restriction of gng_n to a Borel domain DnD_n. Consequently

∑z∈[x]RF(z,x)=∑n≥01Dn(x)F(gnx,x). \sum_{z\in[x]_R}F(z,x) =\sum_{n\ge0}1_{D_n}(x)F(g_nx,x).

This is a measurable increasing sum. Reversing coordinates gives the other counting function. Choose Borel sets Xk↑XX_k\uparrow X with μ(Xk)<∞\mu(X_k)<\infty. The sets Bn∩(X×Xk)B_n\cap(X\times X_k) cover RR and have νs\nu_s-measure at most μ(Xk)\mu(X_k). Reverse coordinates to obtain a finite-measure cover for νr\nu_r. □\square

Lemma 2.2. The measures νs\nu_s and νr\nu_r have the same null sets exactly when the saturation ΓN\Gamma N of every μ\mu-null Borel set NN is null. In particular, they are equivalent for a nonsingular action.

Proof. For a Borel subset CC of RR, its counting function is positive precisely on its coordinate projection. These projections are Borel by the graph decomposition. Thus

νs(C)=0 ⟺ μ(s(C))=0,νr(C)=0 ⟺ μ(r(C))=0. \nu_s(C)=0\ \Longleftrightarrow\ \mu(s(C))=0, \qquad \nu_r(C)=0\ \Longleftrightarrow\ \mu(r(C))=0.

If null sets have null saturations, then r(C)⊂Γs(C)r(C)\subset\Gamma s(C), and conversely s(C)⊂Γr(C)s(C)\subset\Gamma r(C). This proves equivalence. Conversely, apply equivalence to C=r−1(N)∩RC=r^{-1}(N)\cap R. Its range is NN, while its source is ΓN\Gamma N. Nonsingularity and countability imply the required saturation property. □\square

A sigma-finite measure can be replaced by an equivalent probability measure. Indeed, partition XX into Borel sets EkE_k of finite measure and choose positive constants ckc_k with ∑ckμ(Ek)<∞\sum c_k\mu(E_k)<\infty; normalize the strictly positive density ∑ck1Ek\sum c_k1_{E_k}. We use this replacement to make the diagonal vector square integrable. Proposition 5.1 below proves that it does not change the resulting algebra up to a specified unitary.

For Sections 3 and 4, therefore, assume μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1.

3. Moving the first coordinate

Set

H=L2(R,νs). \mathcal H=L^2(R,\nu_s).

For f∈L∞(X,μ)f\in L^\infty(X,\mu), let

(Mfξ)(z,x)=f(z)ξ(z,x). (M_f\xi)(z,x)=f(z)\xi(z,x).

This depends only on the class of ff. A change on a null set changes MfM_f on its null saturation only. The map f↦Mff\mapsto M_f is isometric: the diagonal of RR already detects the essential supremum of ff.

It is also a normal representation, including for a sigma-finite base. To prove this, for ξ∈H\xi\in\mathcal H define the finite measure λξ(B)=∫X∑z∈[x]R1B(z)∣ξ(z,x)∣2 dμ(x).(3.6) \lambda_\xi(B)=\int_X\sum_{z\in[x]_R}\mathbf1_B(z)|\xi(z,x)|^2\,d\mu(x). \tag{3.6} Null saturation gives λξ≪μ\lambda_\xi\ll\mu. Theorem 0.1 of Measurable actions and compact models supplies kξ∈L1(μ)+k_\xi\in L^1(\mu)_+, and hence ⟨Mfξ,ξ⟩=∫fkξ dμ\langle M_f\xi,\xi\rangle=\int f k_\xi\,d\mu. This integral preserves bounded increasing suprema even for nets. Here is the reduction to monotone convergence for sequences. Use an equivalent probability pp. For a bounded increasing net 0≤fi≤C0\leq f_i\leq C, let a=sup⁡i∫fi dpa=\sup_i\int f_i\,dp; choose an increasing sequence of indices ini_n with these integrals tending to aa, using directedness. Put g=sup⁡nfing=\sup_n f_{i_n}. For any ii, an index dominating ii and ini_n gives ∫max⁡(fi,fin) dp≤a\int\max(f_i,f_{i_n})\,dp\leq a. Monotone convergence yields ∫max⁡(fi,g) dp≤a=∫g dp\int\max(f_i,g)\,dp\leq a=\int g\,dp, so fi≤gf_i\leq g almost everywhere. Thus gg is the essential supremum of the net. Applying monotone convergence to finkξf_{i_n}k_\xi proves that the supremum of the net of integrals is ∫gkξ dμ\int g k_\xi\,d\mu. This proves normality of f↦Mff\mapsto M_f.

For a group element gg, first-coordinate counting gives a unitary VgV_g, with VgVh=VghV_gV_h=V_{gh} and VgMfVg∗=Mf∘g−1V_gM_fV_g^*=M_{f\circ g^{-1}}. In the direct-integral realization H=∫X⊕ℓ2([x]R) dμ(x)\mathcal H=\int_X^\oplus\ell^2([x]_R)\,d\mu(x), these are exactly multiplication by f(z)f(z) and the permutation ξ(z,x)↦ξ(g−1z,x)\xi(z,x)\mapsto\xi(g^{-1}z,x). Countability makes the fibre coordinates measurable by the distinct-graph enumeration in Lemma 2.1. These formulas supply a normal covariant representation on orbit points even when the action has stabilizers. Its generated algebra below is the Krieger relation algebra, in the convention of [Takesaki], Chapter XIII, Definition 2.1. All these formulas and the partial-map argument below hold for sigma-finite μ\mu; the probability assumption is needed only for the unit vector in Section 4.

A partial orbit map is a Borel bijection θ:D→E\theta:D\to E whose graph lies in RR. Every such map is nonsingular. To see this, partition DD according to the first gng_n for which θx=gnx\theta x=g_nx. On each piece it is a restriction of a nonsingular group element; the countable union preserves null sets in both directions.

Define

(Vθξ)(z,x)=1E(z)ξ(θ−1z,x).(3.1) (V_\theta\xi)(z,x) =1_E(z)\xi(\theta^{-1}z,x). \tag{3.1}

The expression is taken as zero outside EE.

Lemma 3.1. The operator VθV_\theta is a partial isometry with

Vθ∗=Vθ−1,Vθ∗Vθ=M1D,VθVθ∗=M1E.(3.2) V_\theta^*=V_{\theta^{-1}},\qquad V_\theta^*V_\theta=M_{1_D},\qquad V_\theta V_\theta^*=M_{1_E}. \tag{3.2}

It implements

VθMfVθ∗=M1E(f∘θ−1).(3.3) V_\theta M_fV_\theta^*=M_{1_E(f\circ\theta^{-1})}. \tag{3.3}

Proof. For each fixed xx, the map θ\theta is a bijection between D∩[x]RD\cap[x]_R and E∩[x]RE\cap[x]_R. Reindex the counting sum in the norm of (3.1). It is the squared norm of M1DξM_{1_D}\xi. The same reindexing in the inner product proves the adjoint formula. Equation (3.3) follows by applying both sides to a function. No density factor appears, because the measured coordinate xx has stayed fixed. □\square

Define the relation algebra by

M(R,μ)={Mf,Vg:f∈L∞(X), g∈Γ}′′.(3.4) \mathcal M(R,\mu)=\{M_f,V_g:f\in L^\infty(X),\ g\in\Gamma\}''. \tag{3.4}

Every partial orbit map belongs to this algebra. In the partition of its domain used above, write θ=gn\theta=g_n on DnD_n. Then

Vθ=∑nVgnM1Dn(3.5) V_\theta=\sum_n V_{g_n}M_{1_{D_n}} \tag{3.5}

in the strong operator topology. The initial projections are orthogonal, as are the final projections: their ranges are the disjoint sets θDn\theta D_n. The tails in (3.5) therefore tend to zero on each vector.

Equation (3.5) shows that (3.4) depends on all partial orbit maps, rather than on a particular list of group elements generating RR.

4. A cyclic vector and a maximal abelian diagonal

Let Ω=1{(x,x):x∈X}\Omega=1_{\{(x,x):x\in X\}}. Its norm is one.

To see that it is separating, we need operators moving the second coordinate. Put

jθ(y)=d(θ∗(μ∣D))d(μ∣E)(y). j_\theta(y)=\frac{d(\theta_*(\mu|_D))}{d(\mu|_E)}(y).

This density is finite and strictly positive almost everywhere on EE. Define

(Wθξ)(z,x)=1E(x)jθ(x)1/2ξ(z,θ−1x),(Nhξ)(z,x)=h(x)ξ(z,x).(4.1) (W_\theta\xi)(z,x) =1_E(x)j_\theta(x)^{1/2}\xi(z,\theta^{-1}x), \qquad (N_h\xi)(z,x)=h(x)\xi(z,x). \tag{4.1}

Lemma 4.1. Each WθW_\theta is a partial isometry from the second-coordinate domain DD to EE. The operators Wθ,NhW_\theta,N_h commute with M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu). The vector Ω\Omega is cyclic both for M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu) and for the algebra generated by Wg,NhW_g,N_h. Hence Ω\Omega is separating for M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu).

Proof. Reindexing does not change the set of orbit points, since [x]R=[θ−1x]R[x]_R=[\theta^{-1}x]_R. The change-of-variables identity gives

∥Wθξ∥2=∫Ejθ(x)∑z∈[x]R∣ξ(z,θ−1x)∣2 dμ(x)=∫D∑z∈[y]R∣ξ(z,y)∣2 dμ(y). \begin{aligned} \|W_\theta\xi\|^2 &=\int_E j_\theta(x) \sum_{z\in[x]_R}|\xi(z,\theta^{-1}x)|^2\,d\mu(x)\\ &=\int_D\sum_{z\in[y]_R}|\xi(z,y)|^2\,d\mu(y). \end{aligned}

This proves the partial-isometry assertion; applying the inverse change of variables gives its adjoint. The first-coordinate operators do not change xx, and the second-coordinate operators do not change zz. Their formulas therefore commute, including all domain indicators and the density.

The vector VgΩV_g\Omega is the indicator of the graph {(gx,x)}\{(gx,x)\}. Multiplication by NhN_h, which equals MhM_h on Ω\Omega, supplies arbitrary bounded coefficients on that graph:

VgMhΩ(z,x)=h(x)1{z=gx}. V_gM_h\Omega(z,x)=h(x)1_{\{z=gx\}}.

The disjoint graph decomposition in Lemma 2.1 and bounded truncation now prove left cyclicity.

Similarly, WgΩW_g\Omega is supported on the inverse graph, with a nonzero density factor. Multiplying by bounded second-coordinate functions and truncating both a desired coefficient and the reciprocal density yields a dense set of square-integrable functions on that graph. The inverse graphs cover RR, so right cyclicity follows. Finally, if T∈M(R,μ)T\in\mathcal M(R,\mu) and TΩ=0T\Omega=0, then TSΩ=STΩ=0TS\Omega=ST\Omega=0 for each right-algebra operator SS. Its cyclicity implies T=0T=0. □\square

Theorem 4.2. The algebra A={Mf:f∈L∞(X)}\mathcal A=\{M_f:f\in L^\infty(X)\} is maximal abelian in M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu). Moreover,

Z(M(R,μ))={Mf:f(gx)=f(x) almost everywhere for every g∈Γ}.(4.2) Z(\mathcal M(R,\mu)) =\{M_f:f(gx)=f(x)\text{ almost everywhere for every }g\in\Gamma\}. \tag{4.2}

Proof. Let T∈M(R,μ)T\in\mathcal M(R,\mu) commute with A\mathcal A. Since MfΩ=NfΩM_f\Omega=N_f\Omega, Lemma 4.1 gives

MfTΩ=TMfΩ=TNfΩ=NfTΩ. M_fT\Omega=TM_f\Omega=TN_f\Omega=N_fT\Omega.

A standard Borel space has a countable family of Borel sets separating its points. Apply the preceding identity to their indicators. Off one νs\nu_s-null set, TΩ(z,x)T\Omega(z,x) can be nonzero only when every separating indicator takes the same value at zz and xx. Thus TΩT\Omega is supported on the diagonal. Write TΩ=aΩT\Omega=a\Omega, initially with a∈L2(X)a\in L^2(X).

For each Borel set BB,

∥1Ba∥2=∥M1BTΩ∥=∥TM1BΩ∥≤∥T∥μ(B)1/2. \|1_Ba\|_2=\|M_{1_B}T\Omega\| =\|TM_{1_B}\Omega\|\le\|T\|\mu(B)^{1/2}.

If ∣a∣>∥T∥+ε|a|>\|T\|+\varepsilon on a set of positive measure, this inequality fails on that set. Hence a∈L∞(X)a\in L^\infty(X) and ∥a∥∞≤∥T∥\|a\|_\infty\le\|T\|. The operator T−MaT-M_a kills Ω\Omega, so Lemma 4.1 makes it zero. This proves maximal abelianness.

A central operator consequently has the form MfM_f. It commutes with VgV_g exactly when f(gx)=f(x)f(gx)=f(x) almost everywhere, by (3.3). These conditions are also sufficient because the displayed operators generate M(R,μ)\mathcal M(R,\mu). □\square

The action is ergodic if every invariant measurable set is null or conull. Invariance modulo null sets gives the same condition here: intersect the translates of an almost invariant set over the countable group to obtain an exactly invariant representative.

Corollary 4.3. The relation algebra is a factor exactly when the action is ergodic. No freeness assumption is required.

Proof. In an ergodic action, the level sets of an invariant real-valued bounded function are null or conull. Rational levels show that it is constant almost everywhere. Apply this separately to real and imaginary parts in (4.2). Conversely, a nontrivial invariant set gives a nontrivial central projection. □\square

This conclusion concerns the principal relation algebra. For the transformation groupoid, stabilizers can contribute additional operators. For example, if a finite group KK acts trivially and another group Γ\Gamma acts freely, the crossed product for Γ×K\Gamma\times K is

(L∞(X)⋊Γ) ⊗ˉ L(K). (L^\infty(X)\rtimes\Gamma)\,\bar\otimes\,L(K).

To verify the factorization, rearrange the regular Hilbert space ℓ2(Γ×K)⊗L2(X)≅(ℓ2(Γ)⊗L2(X))⊗ℓ2(K). \ell^2(\Gamma\times K)\otimes L^2(X) \cong\bigl(\ell^2(\Gamma)\otimes L^2(X)\bigr)\otimes\ell^2(K). The coefficient copy of f∈L∞(X)f\in L^\infty(X) acts at coordinate (g,k)(g,k) by multiplication by αg−1(f)\alpha_{g^{-1}}(f), independent of kk, because KK acts trivially. Thus it becomes πΓ(f)⊗1\pi_\Gamma(f)\otimes1. The group generator for (g,k)(g,k) becomes λg⊗λk\lambda_g\otimes\lambda_k. In particular the choices k=ek=e and g=eg=e supply all generators of the first crossed product tensored with 11, and 11 tensored with L(K)L(K). Taking their generated von Neumann algebra is exactly the displayed spatial tensor product. This checks the claim in the faithful regular representation; it does not identify a nonfree transformation groupoid with its principal relation.

The relation algebra has forgotten the KK-arrows. These are different constructions.

5. Changing coordinates and changing the measure

Proposition 5.1. Suppose μ′=qμ\mu'=q\mu, where 0<q<∞0<q<\infty almost everywhere. The unitary

U:L2(R,νsμ′)⟶L2(R,νsμ),(Uξ)(z,x)=q(x)1/2ξ(z,x)(5.1) U:L^2(R,\nu_s^{\mu'})\longrightarrow L^2(R,\nu_s^\mu), \qquad (U\xi)(z,x)=q(x)^{1/2}\xi(z,x) \tag{5.1}

intertwines all MfM_f and VθV_\theta. It therefore identifies the relation algebras.

Proof. The norm identity follows immediately from (2.1). The inverse multiplies by q(x)−1/2q(x)^{-1/2}, with its domain norm computed using μ′\mu'; hence it is defined on the whole target Hilbert space. Both generators leave xx fixed, so they commute with this multiplication between the two Hilbert spaces. □\square

An orbit equivalence is a Borel isomorphism ϕ:X→Y\phi:X\to Y, after discarding invariant null sets if necessary, that takes the relation RR onto a relation SS and takes the measure class of μ\mu onto that of η\eta.

Theorem 5.2. An orbit equivalence gives a spatial isomorphism of relation algebras taking their diagonal algebras onto one another.

Proof. First give YY the measure ϕ∗μ\phi_*\mu. Pullback under

(z,x)⟼(ϕz,ϕx) (z,x)\longmapsto(\phi z,\phi x)

is a unitary between the relation Hilbert spaces: it bijects each counting fibre and respects the outer integral. It transports multiplication functions and partial orbit maps exactly. Formula (3.5) shows that their generated algebras agree. Then use Proposition 5.1 to change ϕ∗μ\phi_*\mu to the equivalent measure η\eta. □\square

The theorem is a forward implication. Reconstructing a measured relation from an abstract algebra with a distinguished diagonal requires further hypotheses and a separate argument.

6. Exercises with solutions

Level 1 asks for a computation or a direct application. Level 2 asks for a proof using the lesson’s framework. Level 3 combines results or examines a hypothesis whose failure changes the conclusion.

Exercise 6.1 (first computations). Level 1. A countable set II carries positive masses pip_i with ∑pi=1\sum p_i=1. Let R=I×IR=I\times I. Identify its relation algebra and diagonal.

Solution. Identify H\mathcal H with ℓ2(I)⊗ℓ2(I,p)\ell^2(I)\otimes\ell^2(I,p), with the first factor indexed by the range. A partial map with domain {j}\{j\} and range {i}\{i\} gives Vθ=∣ei⟩⟨ej∣⊗1V_\theta=|e_i\rangle\langle e_j|\otimes1. These matrix units generate B(ℓ2(I))⊗1B(\ell^2(I))\otimes1: finite-rank compressions of each bounded operator converge strongly to it. The diagonal is the bounded diagonal operators on the first factor. The second factor records the source and is representation multiplicity. In particular the algebra is type I∣I∣I_{|I|}, even if the group producing the relation is infinite.

Exercise 6.2 (why the density matters). Level 1. On I={a,b}I=\{a,b\}, take pa=1/4p_a=1/4, pb=3/4p_b=3/4. For the partial map θ(a)=b\theta(a)=b, compute WθW_\theta and verify its norm on a function supported over source aa.

Solution. The pushforward of μ∣{a}\mu|_{\{a\}} gives mass 1/41/4 to bb; hence jθ(b)=1/3j_\theta(b)=1/3. Therefore Wθξ(z,b)=ξ(z,a)/3W_\theta\xi(z,b)=\xi(z,a)/\sqrt3, and it vanishes over aa. Its squared norm is (3/4)(1/3)∑z∣ξ(z,a)∣2=(1/4)∑z∣ξ(z,a)∣2(3/4)(1/3)\sum_z|\xi(z,a)|^2=(1/4)\sum_z|\xi(z,a)|^2. Omitting the density would multiply the squared norm by three.

Exercise 6.3 (orbit points versus group labels). Level 1. A finite group KK acts transitively on a set II of size nn, with stabilizer HH. Compare the dimensions of the two regular Hilbert spaces obtained by counting arrows of the transformation groupoid and of the relation, using uniform probability on II.

Solution. Each transformation-groupoid source fibre has ∣K∣=n∣H∣|K|=n|H| arrows, so the whole Hilbert space has dimension n2∣H∣n^2|H|. Each relation source fibre has nn points, so its Hilbert space has dimension n2n^2. The relation algebra is Mn(C)M_n(\mathbb C) with multiplicity nn. The extra factor ∣H∣|H| counts distinct arrows, not additional orbit points.

Exercise 6.4 (a common conull set). Level 2. Suppose f(gx)=f(x)f(gx)=f(x) almost everywhere for each g∈Γg\in\Gamma. Show that a representative of ff is constant on every orbit outside an invariant null set.

Solution. Take the countable union NN of all exceptional sets for the identities, using a Borel representative of ff. Its saturation ΓN\Gamma N is null by nonsingularity. Outside that saturation every required identity holds, and the complement is invariant. Changing ff to zero on the saturation gives the desired representative.

Exercise 6.5 (changing the presenting group). Level 2. Suppose two countable nonsingular group actions on the same measured space have exactly the same orbit relation. Prove that their relation algebras agree in the relation Hilbert space.

Solution. A transformation from either group is a partial orbit map for the other relation. Partition its domain according to the first element of the other group with the same value. Formula (3.5) puts its operator in the algebra generated by that other group. Multiplication operators are already common. The two inclusions give equality.

Exercise 6.6 (a reduction needs new generators). Level 2. Let RR be the full relation on {0,1,2,3}\{0,1,2,3\}, presented by the two involutions in Figure 1, and let B={0,2}B=\{0,2\}. Show that neither restricted generator produces the full relation on BB. Construct a nonsingular presentation of R∣BR|_B. Explain the corresponding construction for a Borel reduction of a countable nonsingular relation.

Solution. The involution (0 1)(2 3)(0\,1)(2\,3) takes both points of BB outside BB. The involution (1 2)(1\,2) fixes 00 and takes 22 outside BB. Restricting these generators to points whose images remain in BB leaves only the identity arrow at 00; it misses the arrow from 00 to 22. The swap (0 2)(0\,2) presents the full reduced relation. For a general reduction, first cover R∣BR|_B by the restrictions of all presenting group elements, not just a generating list. Those graphs include every reduced arrow. They are nonsingular partial bijections. Split them by a countable separating family as in (1.1), obtaining Borel involutions of BB. Each is nonsingular because its pieces and inverse pieces are restrictions of nonsingular maps. Equivalently apply Theorem 1.3 to the reduced relation: its null saturations are contained in the original null saturations.

References