Truncated operators and stable scattering amplitudes

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.

Working question: Does local agreement of truncated forces imply agreement of far-field amplitudes? The phase εlog⁡(1+t)\varepsilon\log(1+t) tends to zero for each fixed time as ε→0\varepsilon\to0, but can equal π\pi at an exponentially large time. This simple calculation shows why local coefficient convergence cannot replace uniform resolvent, radiation and amplitude estimates. A growing cutoff must preserve the constants used at infinity.

Cutting off a force makes it act only in a bounded region. We want to recover the original scattering problem as that region grows. Agreement on every bounded set does not by itself control a resolvent at real energy or an amplitude measured at infinite distance. The proof needs a common resolvent bound, a radiation condition that survives the changing operator, and a uniform estimate for the final amplitude.

Read Admissible differential perturbations and Regularizing long-range coefficients for the coefficient classes used here. Limiting absorption for long-range differential perturbations supplies the fixed-operator boundary values and homogeneous radiation uniqueness. The kernel argument comes from Frequency cutoffs and compact scattering remainders. The local Hamilton geometry is in Hamilton trajectories under a long-range force, Escaping Lagrangians on regular energy surfaces, and Generating functions and the end of a localized force. Finally, Commuting coordinates for long-range evolution and Transverse moments and outgoing amplitudes give the factored evolution and its amplitude stability theorem.

We use Fourier inversion, Plancherel and smooth finite-dimensional flows. The complete Hilbert-valued integration receiver proves the norm fundamental theorem, bounded-map integral rule, propagator variation and integrable tails used below. The arbitrary-self-adjoint spectral theorem, including its original second-moment domain, is proved in Self-adjoint spectral calculus with the original domain, through the complete bundled unitary and Cayley-transform proofs, with no lower-bound or separability assumption. Section 1 of Wave operators and modified phases proves the group and generator criterion. Distorted Fourier transforms and spectral density, Lemma 1.1, proves continuous-test spectral inversion. Hörmander's freely accessible wave-operator paper [H76] treats differential perturbations and phase comparison; Yafaev [Y] treats a Schrödinger model. Their comparison theorems do not supply the uniform truncation and strong channel-amplitude assertion proved here. Teschl [T] and Oh [O] supply spectral and analytic background.

1. The approximation statements

Use D=−i∂D=-i\partial, left quantization, and an inner product linear in its first entry. Put X=⟨x⟩X=\langle x\rangle, Ξ=⟨ξ⟩\Xi=\langle\xi\rangle, and

∥u∥s,t=∥Xt⟨D⟩su∥2.(1) \|u\|_{s,t}=\|X^t\langle D\rangle^s u\|_2. \tag{1}

For rk=2kr_k=2^k, let S0={∣x∣<1}S_0=\{|x|<1\} and Sk={2k−1≤∣x∣<2k}S_k=\{2^{k-1}\le|x|<2^k\}, k≥1k\ge1. The endpoint norms are

∥f∥B=∑k≥0rk1/2∥f∥L2(Sk),∥u∥B∗=sup⁡k≥0rk−1/2∥u∥L2(Sk),∥u∥Ym=∑∣α∣≤m∥Dαu∥B∗.(2) \begin{aligned} \|f\|_B&=\sum_{k\ge0}r_k^{1/2}\|f\|_{L^2(S_k)},\\ \|u\|_{B^*}&=\sup_{k\ge0}r_k^{-1/2}\|u\|_{L^2(S_k)},\\ \|u\|_{\mathcal Y_m} &=\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}. \end{aligned} \tag{2}

Every component of Ym\mathcal Y_m is a derivative of the same distribution. Weak-star convergence in this space means convergence of every displayed derivative against every BB test. Write B˙∗\dot B^* for the B∗B^*-norm closure of Schwartz space.

Let P0P_0 be a real scalar elliptic polynomial of integer order m≥1m\ge1. Let VV be a symmetric, elliptic, 22-admissible differential perturbation, with the continuous highest coefficients and sharp local coefficient products of the first prerequisite. Its realization is

H=P0(D)+V,D(H)=Hm.(3) H=P_0(D)+V,\qquad \mathcal D(H)=H^m. \tag{3}

Choose real ρ∈Cc∞(Rn)\rho\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R^n), equal to one on the unit ball, and define

ρj(x)=ρ(x/j),Hj=P0(D)+ρjVρj.(4) \rho_j(x)=\rho(x/j),\qquad H_j=P_0(D)+\rho_jV\rho_j. \tag{4}

Let Z(P0)Z(P_0) be the critical values of P0P_0, let A\mathcal A be the eigenvalues of HH outside that set, and put Ω=R∖(Z(P0)∪A)\Omega=\mathbb R\setminus(Z(P_0)\cup\mathcal A).

Theorem 1.1. Let I⊂ΩI\subset\Omega be a compact interval. For all sufficiently large jj, HjH_j is self-adjoint on the common domain HmH^m, has no eigenvalue on II, and has both boundary resolvents there. There are a complex neighborhood O\mathcal O of II and CIC_I, independent of jj, such that

∥(Hj−z)−1f∥Ym≤CI∥f∥B,z∈O,Im⁡z≠0.(5) \begin{gathered} \|(H_j-z)^{-1}f\|_{\mathcal Y_m}\le C_I\|f\|_B,\\ z\in\mathcal O,\qquad \operatorname{Im}z\ne0. \end{gathered} \tag{5}

The same bound holds for Rj,σ(λ)=(Hj−λ−σi0)−1R_{j,\sigma}(\lambda)=(H_j-\lambda-\sigma i0)^{-1}, σ=±1\sigma=\pm1. If λj→λ\lambda_j\to\lambda in II and fj→ff_j\to f in BB, then

DαRj,σ(λj)fj⇀∗DαRσ(λ)f,∣α∣≤m,Rj,σ(λj)fj⟶Rσ(λ)fin Hm,−b,b>1/2.(6) \begin{gathered} D^\alpha R_{j,\sigma}(\lambda_j)f_j \rightharpoonup^*D^\alpha R_\sigma(\lambda)f,\\ |\alpha|\le m,\\ R_{j,\sigma}(\lambda_j)f_j\longrightarrow R_\sigma(\lambda)f\\ \text{in }H^{m,-b},\qquad b>1/2. \end{gathered} \tag{6}

For fixed ff, these convergences are uniform in λ∈I\lambda\in I, with weak-star uniformity understood for each BB test. They also hold for norm-continuous BB-valued f(λ)f(\lambda), or for fj(λ)f_j(\lambda) converging to it uniformly in BB.

Theorem 1.2. Work in a fixed regular frequency chart with a positive distinguished free velocity component. Use one compact frequency cutoff χ\chi, one transverse cutoff, and the normalized Hamilton constructions with one common starting time. Let Gj,GG_j,G be their local real generating functions, and set

vj,λ(s)=[χ(D)Rj,+(λ)f](s,⋅),vλ(s)=[χ(D)R+(λ)f](s,⋅).(7) \begin{aligned} v_{j,\lambda}(s)&=[\chi(D)R_{j,+}(\lambda)f](s,\cdot),\\ v_\lambda(s)&=[\chi(D)R_+(\lambda)f](s,\cdot). \end{aligned} \tag{7}

Each line takes the transverse slice at x1=sx_1=s after applying the full frequency-localized resolvent. These slices have continuous L2(Rn−1)L^2(\mathbb R^{n-1}) representatives. On every compact energy interval for which this chart and cutoff are valid, their strong amplitudes satisfy

aj(λ)=lim⁡s→∞e−iGj(s,Dz,λ)vj,λ(s),a(λ)=lim⁡s→∞e−iG(s,Dz,λ)vλ(s),sup⁡λ∥aj(λ)−a(λ)∥Lz2⟶0.(8) \begin{gathered} a_j(\lambda)=\lim_{s\to\infty} e^{-iG_j(s,D_z,\lambda)}v_{j,\lambda}(s),\\ a(\lambda)=\lim_{s\to\infty} e^{-iG(s,D_z,\lambda)}v_\lambda(s),\\ \sup_\lambda\|a_j(\lambda)-a(\lambda)\|_{L^2_z}\longrightarrow0. \end{gathered} \tag{8}

The conclusion also holds for the compact forcing families in Theorem 1.1. The other boundary sign and outgoing direction have the corresponding signed construction. In dimension one the transverse Hilbert space is C\mathbb C. Empty free shells have no local channels, and are covered by the off-energy estimates.

We prove the resolvent statement first. We then obtain strong localized forcing, compare finite Hamilton trajectories and normalized actions, and apply the amplitude stability theorem.

2. What the cutoff changes

Regularization permits a real-left splitting V=Lr+SrV=L^{\mathrm r}+S^{\mathrm r}, where Lr=∑ℓαDαL^{\mathrm r}=\sum\ell_\alpha D^\alpha is smooth. For some 0<δ0<1/30<\delta_0<1/3, its coefficients have every derivative bound

∣∂xβℓα(x)∣≤CαβX−μ0(∣β∣),μ0(k)={δ0+k,0≤k≤2,1+(1+δ0)k/2,k≥2.(9) \begin{gathered} |\partial_x^\beta\ell_\alpha(x)|\le C_{\alpha\beta}X^{-\mu_0(|\beta|)},\\ \mu_0(k)= \begin{cases} \delta_0+k,&0\le k\le2,\\ 1+(1+\delta_0)k/2,&k\ge2. \end{cases} \end{gathered} \tag{9}

The short-range coefficients cαc_\alpha of SrS^{\mathrm r} obey

∥cα∥Lpα(B(y,1))≤Cα⟨y⟩−1−ϵ0,ϵ0>0.(10) \|c_\alpha\|_{L^{p_\alpha}(B(y,1))} \le C_\alpha\langle y\rangle^{-1-\epsilon_0}, \qquad \epsilon_0>0. \tag{10}

Here pα=∞p_\alpha=\infty at order mm. At lower order, put k=m−∣α∣>0k=m-|\alpha|>0: take pα=n/kp_\alpha=n/k when n>2kn>2k, a fixed finite pα>2p_\alpha>2 when n=2kn=2k, and pα=2p_\alpha=2 when n<2kn<2k. The highest coefficients are continuous. A fixed compact adjustment can make LrL^{\mathrm r} zero on a sufficiently large ball for the energy-root construction; that adjustment is included in SrS^{\mathrm r}.

Write V=∑aαDαV=\sum a_\alpha D^\alpha. The finite product rule gives the exact splitting

Ljr=ρj2Lr,Sjr=ρj2Sr+ρj∑∣α∣≤maα∑β<α(αβ)(Dα−βρj)Dβ.(11) \begin{aligned} L_j^{\mathrm r}&=\rho_j^2L^{\mathrm r},\\ S_j^{\mathrm r}&=\rho_j^2S^{\mathrm r}\\ &\quad+\rho_j\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}a_\alpha \sum_{\beta<\alpha}\binom{\alpha}{\beta} (D^{\alpha-\beta}\rho_j)D^\beta. \end{aligned} \tag{11}

In the inner sum, β≤α\beta\le\alpha coordinatewise and β≠α\beta\ne\alpha. It uses every coefficient of VV. The total ρjVρj\rho_jV\rho_j is symmetric by two test pairings with real ρj\rho_j. Its real-left part LjrL_j^{\mathrm r} need not be separately symmetric.

The slope of the concave function μ0\mu_0 is at most one. Therefore

μ0(k)≤q+μ0(k−q),0≤q≤k.(12) \mu_0(k)\le q+\mu_0(k-q),\qquad 0\le q\le k. \tag{12}

A positive cutoff derivative of order qq has size Cqj−qC_qj^{-q} on j≤∣x∣≤Cjj\le|x|\le Cj. There jj and XX are comparable. Every distributed derivative of ρj2ℓα\rho_j^2\ell_\alpha thus retains (9), with common constants. The commutator terms containing a long-range coefficient gain at least one cutoff derivative, so their size is at most CX−1−δ0CX^{-1-\delta_0}.

For a rough coefficient, the exponent required at the lower order β\beta is no greater than the exponent at order α\alpha. The inclusion between these local LpL^p spaces on a unit ball is bounded. Multiplication by a cutoff derivative therefore preserves the required product estimate and short-range decay. All commutator terms have lower order, so the continuous highest coefficients are retained.

The full principal coefficients agree with those of HH on ∣x∣<j|x|<j. Outside that ball the perturbing principal coefficients are uniformly small for large jj. The bounded cutoff gives a common ellipticity modulus through its transition region. The Sobolev domain of an elliptic operator consequently gives the asserted realization of HjH_j.

The same actual local product estimate yields

ej:=∥Hj−H∥Hm→L2≤C(j−δ0+j−1−ϵ0)⟶0.(13) \begin{aligned} e_j&:=\|H_j-H\|_{H^m\to L^2}\\ &\le C\bigl(j^{-\delta_0}+j^{-1-\epsilon_0}\bigr) \longrightarrow0. \end{aligned} \tag{13}

For the main coefficient differences use their support outside jj; unit balls enlarge it by at most one. A long-range cutoff commutator has the better rate j−1−δ0j^{-1-\delta_0}. The rough commutators have an extra cutoff power as well. This argument includes the actual highest derivative products.

Insert H=Hj+(H−Hj)H=H_j+(H-H_j) in the fixed graph inequality. For u∈Hmu\in H^m,

∥u∥Hm≤CH(∥Hju∥+∥u∥)+CHej∥u∥Hm.(14) \|u\|_{H^m}\le C_H(\|H_ju\|+\|u\|) +C_He_j\|u\|_{H^m}. \tag{14}

Absorption for large jj gives one graph constant. The opposite bound follows from the common coefficient product estimates.

For later use, the unitary groups converge strongly on finite time intervals. For f∈Hmf\in H^m, spectral evolution preserves its graph norm, and the common-domain product rule gives

ddt(eitHje−itHf)=ieitHj(Hj−H)e−itHf.(15) \frac d{dt}\bigl(e^{itH_j}e^{-itH}f\bigr) =i e^{itH_j}(H_j-H)e^{-itH}f. \tag{15}

Here is the common-domain product rule explicitly. Put w(t)=e−itHfw(t)=e^{-itH}f. Spectral dominated convergence in the measure (1+λ2)d(EH(λ)f,f)(1+\lambda^2)d(E_H(\lambda)f,f) makes this path continuous in the graph norm of HH, hence in HmH^m and in the graph norm of each fixed HjH_j. Its Hilbert derivative is −iHw(t)-iHw(t). In the difference quotient of eitHjw(t)e^{itH_j}w(t), split the increment into the change of the group on the fixed vector w(t)∈D(Hj)w(t)\in\mathcal D(H_j) and the change of ww multiplied by the unitary at the new time. The self-adjoint generator criterion gives iHjw(t)iH_jw(t) for the first quotient; strong continuity and w′=−iHww'=-iHw give the second. This proves (15) in Hilbert norm. Its right side is continuous because Hj−H:Hm→L2H_j-H:H^m\to L^2 is bounded and ww is HmH^m-continuous. The norm fundamental theorem therefore integrates (15). Integration and unitarity give

sup⁡∣t∣≤T∥e−itHjf−e−itHf∥≤CTej∥f∥Hm.(16) \sup_{|t|\le T}\|e^{-itH_j}f-e^{-itH}f\| \le C_T e_j\|f\|_{H^m}. \tag{16}

Approximate any L2L^2 vector by HmH^m vectors. The two unitary approximation errors have sum at most 2∥f−fk∥2\|f-f_k\|. Choose kk, then jj. This proves strong finite-time convergence for every L2L^2 vector.

3. Bounded graphs have strong weighted limits

Suppose (Hj−zj)uj=fj(H_j-z_j)u_j=f_j, zj→λz_j\to\lambda, fj→ff_j\to f in BB, and ∥uj∥Ym\|u_j\|_{\mathcal Y_m} is bounded. The derivative-graph compactness lemma in the limiting-absorption prerequisite supplies a subsequence with weak-star derivatives and

uj⟶uin H0,−b,b>1/2.(17) u_j\longrightarrow u\quad\text{in }H^{0,-b}, \qquad b>1/2. \tag{17}

Its proof uses local Sobolev compactness and the summable shell tail ∑rk1−2b\sum r_k^{1-2b}. On every fixed ball, Hj=HH_j=H eventually, including all differential products. The sharp local coefficient product is a bounded map from local HmH^m to L2L^2. Its weak continuity identifies the equation (H−λ)u=f(H-\lambda)u=f.

The derivative endpoint bound also puts every uj,uu_j,u in Hm,−bH^{m,-b}. Insert the comparable weight on each unit ball in the coefficient product proof. The coefficients of Hj−HH_j-H have uniformly small local norms by (13). Weighted integer derivative equivalence, proved in Weighted Sobolev spaces and rough elliptic estimates, gives

∥(Hj−H)uj∥0,−b≤Cbej′∑∣α∣≤m∥X−bDαuj∥,ej′⟶0.(18) \begin{gathered} \|(H_j-H)u_j\|_{0,-b} \le C_b e'_j\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^{-b}D^\alpha u_j\|,\\ e'_j\longrightarrow0. \end{gathered} \tag{18}

No rough coefficient is differentiated. Thus

H(uj−u)=fj−f+(zj−λ)uj+λ(uj−u)+(H−Hj)uj⟶0in H0,−b.(19) \begin{aligned} H(u_j-u)={}&f_j-f+(z_j-\lambda)u_j\\ &+\lambda(u_j-u)+(H-H_j)u_j\\ \longrightarrow{}&0\quad\text{in }H^{0,-b}. \end{aligned} \tag{19}

Apply the fixed weighted graph inequality to these already known weighted Sobolev inputs. Together with (17), it proves

uj⟶uin Hm,−b,b>1/2.(20) u_j\longrightarrow u\quad\text{in }H^{m,-b},\qquad b>1/2. \tag{20}

This conclusion is conditional on a bounded endpoint graph. The common resolvent bound will be proved below.

4. A symmetric split for the resolvent estimate

For the commutator argument use a different split of the same VV. Combining the long-range resolvent estimates, Sections 2–4, constructs V=L+SV=L+S, with both parts symmetric on compact smooth tests, LL smooth and P0+LP_0+L elliptic. Its coefficients satisfy, for some δL>0\delta_L>0,

∣ℓα∣≤CαX−δL,∣∂βℓα∣≤CαβX−1−δL∣β∣,∣β∣≥1.(21) \begin{gathered} |\ell_\alpha|\le C_\alpha X^{-\delta_L},\\ |\partial^\beta\ell_\alpha|\le C_{\alpha\beta}X^{-1-\delta_L|\beta|}, \qquad|\beta|\ge1. \end{gathered} \tag{21}

Complex lower coefficients are allowed in this symmetric left expression. The coefficients of SS are short range with a gap ϵS>0\epsilon_S>0.

Set Lj=ρjLρjL_j=\rho_jL\rho_j, Sj=ρjSρjS_j=\rho_jS\rho_j. Both are symmetric, and Hj=P0+Lj+SjH_j=P_0+L_j+S_j. Choose once

0<δ<min⁡(δL,ϵS,δ0,ϵ0,1/3),d∗=1+δ,a∗=(1+δ)/2.(22) \begin{gathered} 0<\delta<\min(\delta_L,\epsilon_S,\delta_0,\epsilon_0,1/3),\\ d_*=1+\delta,\qquad a_*=(1+\delta)/2. \end{gathered} \tag{22}

The cutoff coefficient expansion is the same finite rule as (11). Its smooth coefficients obey (21) with the smaller gap δ\delta, uniformly in jj. For a physical derivative of total order k≥1k\ge1, a term with q<kq<k cutoff derivatives has exponent at least q+1+δL(k−q)q+1+\delta_L(k-q). If all derivatives hit the cutoff, it has exponent k+δL≥1+δkk+\delta_L\ge1+\delta k. The commutator terms have an additional cutoff derivative. These bounds hold at every fixed derivative order. The principal part is ρj2\rho_j^2 times that of LL, and the argument of Section 2 gives a common ellipticity modulus.

The primary short-range map and its symmetric integral dual are uniform:

Sj:Hm,t⟶H0,t+d∗,Sj:H0,t⟶H−m,t+d∗.(23) \begin{gathered} S_j:H^{m,t}\longrightarrow H^{0,t+d_*},\\ S_j:H^{0,t}\longrightarrow H^{-m,t+d_*}. \end{gathered} \tag{23}

For the second line apply the primary map at weight −t−d∗-t-d_* and use symmetry with the exact weighted-space integral dual.

The strict choice of gap also gives, for every fixed tt,

∥Sj−S∥Hm,t→H0,t+d∗≤Ctj−(ϵS−δ)⟶0.(24) \|S_j-S\|_{H^{m,t}\to H^{0,t+d_*}} \le C_tj^{-(\epsilon_S-\delta)} \longrightarrow0. \tag{24}

Indeed, Xd∗X^{d_*} times the local norm of (ρj2−1)cα(\rho_j^2-1)c_\alpha is bounded by Cj−(ϵS−δ)Cj^{-(\epsilon_S-\delta)}. Each commutator coefficient gains a cutoff power. Conjugating the input weight adds derivatives of X−tX^{-t} and lowers the differential order; its new local LpL^p exponent is no larger than the old one. Apply the unit-ball product estimate, integrate over centers by Fubini, and sum the finitely many differentiated terms. This proves (24) for the actual products.

5. One estimate with a compact error

We first allow eigenvalues. On a complex neighborhood of any compact regular free-energy interval,

∥u∥Ym≤C(∥f∥B+∥u∥0,−1),(Hj−z)u=f,u∈Hm,Im⁡z≠0,(25) \begin{gathered} \|u\|_{\mathcal Y_m}\le C\bigl(\|f\|_B+\|u\|_{0,-1}\bigr),\\ (H_j-z)u=f,\qquad u\in H^m,\qquad\operatorname{Im}z\ne0, \end{gathered} \tag{25}

with one constant for all large jj.

The weighted version of (13) at weight −d∗-d_* makes the fixed weighted graph inequality uniform by absorption. Since d∗≥1d_*\ge1 and zz stays bounded,

∥u∥m,−d∗≤C(∥f∥B+∥u∥0,−1).(26) \|u\|_{m,-d_*} \le C\bigl(\|f\|_B+\|u\|_{0,-1}\bigr). \tag{26}

The primary SjS_j map at weight −d∗-d_* bounds ∥Sju∥2\|S_ju\|_2 by the same expression.

Choose χ0,χ∈Cc∞\chi_0,\chi\in C_c^\infty, equal one near the free shells, with χ=1\chi=1 near supp⁡χ0\operatorname{supp}\chi_0. Their support lies away from critical frequencies. The resolvent away from the energy surface gives, uniformly,

∥(1−χ(D))u∥m,0≤C(∥f∥B+∥u∥0,−1).(27) \|(1-\chi(D))u\|_{m,0} \le C\bigl(\|f\|_B+\|u\|_{0,-1}\bigr). \tag{27}

Here is a finite construction of the required common constant. The common principal ellipticity, coefficient decay and bounded energies choose the same reciprocal region in that prerequisite. Its inverse has common differentiated bounds. Write its exact first identity as

EjAj=1−C0−Rj,Aj=P0+Lj−z,C0=χ0(D),(28) \begin{gathered} E_jA_j=1-C_0-\mathscr R_j,\\ A_j=P_0+L_j-z,\qquad C_0=\chi_0(D), \end{gathered} \tag{28}

where Rj\mathscr R_j has symbol weight h=X−δΞ−1h=X^{-\delta}\Xi^{-1}. Put C=1−χ(D)C=1-\chi(D). Keep the ordered finite identity

(∑ℓ<NCRjℓEj)Aj=C−CRjN−∑ℓ<NCRjℓC0.(29) \begin{aligned} \left(\sum_{\ell<N}C\mathscr R_j^\ell E_j\right)A_j & =C-C\mathscr R_j^N\\ &\quad-\sum_{\ell<N}C\mathscr R_j^\ell C_0. \end{aligned} \tag{29}

Choose N≥mN\ge m with δN≥1\delta N\ge1. Then hN≤X−1Ξ−mh^N\le X^{-1}\Xi^{-m}, so the first remainder maps H0,−1H^{0,-1} to Hm,0H^{m,0}. In the separated-cutoff terms, right multiplication by C0C_0 is exact. Every finite coefficient with the left CC vanishes on supp⁡χ0\operatorname{supp}\chi_0. A sufficiently long finite remainder therefore has the same required weight. The finite inverse sum has weight Ξ−m\Xi^{-m} and maps L2L^2 to HmH^m. All constants use finitely many common bounds. Apply (29) to Aju=f−SjuA_ju=f-S_ju and use (26) to obtain (27).

For the near-energy part, u∈Hmu\in H^m already implies Sju∈H0,d∗⊂BS_ju\in H^{0,d_*}\subset B. The symmetric dual map at weight −a∗-a_*, followed by the compact-frequency smoothing χ(D)\chi(D), gives

∥χ(D)Sju∥B≤C∥u∥0,−a∗.(30) \|\chi(D)S_ju\|_B\le C\|u\|_{0,-a_*}. \tag{30}

Its output weight is a∗>1/2a_*>1/2. A resolvent estimate at noncritical frequencies, applied to the symmetric P0+LjP_0+L_j, consequently gives

∥χ(D)u∥B∗≤C(∥f∥B+∥u∥0,−a∗).(31) \|\chi(D)u\|_{B^*} \le C\bigl(\|f\|_B+\|u\|_{0,-a_*}\bigr). \tag{31}

The free monotone multiplier and minimum free speed are fixed. The full long-range commutator has common stronger positive derivative bounds, and one finite order δN≥1\delta N\ge1 controls its remainder. Its positive-symbol and endpoint estimates therefore have common constants.

A fixed compact-frequency multiplier bounds every derivative of χ(D)u\chi(D)u by its zeroth endpoint norm. Combine (27) and (31). For b0=1/2+δ/4<a∗b_0=1/2+\delta/4<a_*, endpoint embedding gives ∥u∥0,−b0≤Cb0∥u∥Ym\|u\|_{0,-b_0}\le C_{b_0}\|u\|_{\mathcal Y_m}. Split physical space at a large radius to obtain

∥u∥0,−a∗≤ηCb0∥u∥Ym+Cη∥u∥0,−1.(32) \|u\|_{0,-a_*} \le\eta C_{b_0}\|u\|_{\mathcal Y_m} +C_\eta\|u\|_{0,-1}. \tag{32}

Choose η\eta after the common constant from (27)–(31) and absorb. This proves (25). Apply the same argument to −Hj-H_j for the lower half-plane. A finite energy cover supplies one neighborhood of the whole interval. If the nearby free shells are empty, take χ=0\chi=0 and use only (27).

6. Radiation survives the changing operator

Suppose uj=(Hj−zj)−1fju_j=(H_j-z_j)^{-1}f_j has a bounded derivative graph, with Im⁡zj>0\operatorname{Im}z_j>0, zj→λz_j\to\lambda regular, and fj→ff_j\to f in BB. Section 3 gives its subsequential equation and strong weighted convergence. Choose

0<γ<δ/2,b=a∗−γ>1/2.(33) 0<\gamma<\delta/2,\qquad b=a_*-\gamma>1/2. \tag{33}

Then d∗−b=a∗+γ>1/2d_*-b=a_*+\gamma>1/2. By (23)–(24),

Sjuj−Su=S(uj−u)+(Sj−S)uj⟶0in H0,d∗−b⊂B.(34) \begin{aligned} S_ju_j-Su&=S(u_j-u)+(S_j-S)u_j\\ &\longrightarrow0\quad\text{in }H^{0,d_*-b}\subset B. \end{aligned} \tag{34}

Thus fj0=fj−Sjuj→f0=f−Suf_j^0=f_j-S_ju_j\to f^0=f-Su strongly in BB.

Use the escape family qR,QR,ΦR,sRq_R,Q_R,\Phi_R,s_R constructed in Radiation for limits of long-range resolvents, Sections 5–6. It depends on the free polynomial, limiting energy and one fixed frequency cutoff, and is independent of jj. Its positive symbol is free geometry. In the exact finite commutator for P0+LjP_0+L_j, scalar zero-order products cancel. Positive coefficient derivatives have (21), and a fixed finite order with δN≥1\delta N\ge1 controls all full differential-order remainders. After the escape scaling, the error has the common class

S(X2γ−1−δ,Gδ)=S(X−2b,Gδ),Gδ=X−2δ∣dx∣2+Ξ−2∣dξ∣2.(35) \begin{gathered} S(X^{2\gamma-1-\delta},G_\delta)=S(X^{-2b},G_\delta),\\ G_\delta=X^{-2\delta}|dx|^2+\Xi^{-2}|d\xi|^2. \end{gathered} \tag{35}

Its quadratic bound is C∥uj∥0,−b2C\|u_j\|_{0,-b}^2. The domain identity is valid because uj∈Hmu_j\in H^m, QRQ_R preserves this space, and P0+LjP_0+L_j is symmetric there. The term −Im⁡zj∥QRuj∥2-\operatorname{Im}z_j\|Q_Ru_j\|^2 is nonpositive. The escape estimate therefore reads

R−1∥Op⁡(ΦR)uj∥2≤−Im⁡(QRfj0,QRuj)+CR−2γ∥uj∥0,−b2.(36) \begin{aligned} R^{-1}\|\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_R)u_j\|^2 \le{}&-\operatorname{Im}(Q_Rf_j^0,Q_Ru_j)\\ &+CR^{-2\gamma}\|u_j\|_{0,-b}^2. \end{aligned} \tag{36}

Fix RR first. Compact output support and frequency smoothing give strong convergence of the left output. The forcing in the pairing converges strongly in BB; the solution converges weak-star in B∗B^*. The last norm converges by (20). Hence

R−1∥Op⁡(ΦR)u∥2≤−Im⁡(QRf0,QRu)+CR−2γ∥u∥0,−b2.(37) \begin{aligned} R^{-1}\|\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_R)u\|^2 \le{}&-\operatorname{Im}(Q_Rf^0,Q_Ru)\\ &+CR^{-2\gamma}\|u\|_{0,-b}^2. \end{aligned} \tag{37}

Now let R→∞R\to\infty. The escape kernel is zero on an inner ball of radius cRcR, and has a common bounded BB map. Its action on a Schwartz input has a rapidly decreasing outer tail. Density gives QRf0→0Q_Rf^0\to0 in BB, whereas QRuQ_Ru is uniformly bounded in B∗B^*. Thus the annular escape mass in (37) tends to zero.

The remaining radiation argument concerns the fixed limiting equation. Its off-energy part belongs to Hm,1/2H^{m,1/2}, because f0∈B⊂H0,1/2f^0\in B\subset H^{0,1/2}. On the frequency collar, a symbol vanishing on an outgoing angular neighborhood factors through ΦR\Phi_R on the output annulus, up to an X−1X^{-1} error. For a symbol vanishing exactly on the outgoing free bundle, split it into such a piece and a piece with arbitrarily small supremum on a thin energy-angular collar. The derivative-independent shell limsup estimate in Section 8 of the radiation prerequisite treats the second piece. Take the radius limit before shrinking that collar. The exact full-order decomposition through derivatives then gives

h∈S(Ξm,G1),G1=X−2∣dx∣2+Ξ−2∣dξ∣2,h∣N+(Mλ)=0⟹h(x,D)u∈B˙∗.(38) \begin{gathered} h\in S(\Xi^m,G_1),\\ G_1=X^{-2}|dx|^2+\Xi^{-2}|d\xi|^2,\\ h|_{N_+(M_\lambda)}=0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad h(x,D)u\in\dot B^*. \end{gathered} \tag{38}

Here Mλ={P0=λ}M_\lambda=\{P_0=\lambda\} and N+(Mλ)={(t∇P0(ξ),ξ):t>0, ξ∈Mλ}N_+(M_\lambda)=\{(t\nabla P_0(\xi),\xi):t>0,\ \xi\in M_\lambda\}. This is the full radiation condition. In dimension one the escape construction uses its signed half-line form. Empty shells are entirely off-energy.

For lower resolvents apply the argument to −Hj,−H,−P0-H_j,-H,-P_0, with −zj,−fj-z_j,-f_j. Its positive bundle is the original negative bundle. The same actual products, weights and domain assertions hold.

7. Remove the compact error and take boundary limits

Return to I⊂ΩI\subset\Omega. If no common bound (5) existed, choose jk≥kj_k\ge k, nonreal zkz_k of distance at most 1/k1/k from II, and normalized graphs

∥uk∥Ym=1,∥fk∥B<1/k,uk=(Hjk−zk)−1fk.(39) \begin{gathered} \|u_k\|_{\mathcal Y_m}=1,\qquad\|f_k\|_B<1/k,\\ u_k=(H_{j_k}-z_k)^{-1}f_k. \end{gathered} \tag{39}

Extract an energy limit λ∈I\lambda\in I and one imaginary sign. Graph compactness and (25) give a limit with

1≤C∥u∥0,−1,(H−λ)u=0.(40) 1\le C\|u\|_{0,-1},\qquad (H-\lambda)u=0. \tag{40}

Section 6 gives its signed radiation condition. The homogeneous radiation characterization in the limiting-absorption prerequisite makes uu an eigenfunction of HH. Since λ∈I⊂Ω\lambda\in I\subset\Omega, this is impossible. A common neighborhood and bound therefore exist.

Each HjH_j separately satisfies that prerequisite. Its regular-energy eigenvectors have every polynomial weight, so belong to BB and have finite nonzero derivative graph norm. An eigenvector ee with eigenvalue λ∈I\lambda\in I would obey

(Hj−λ−iη)−1e=iη−1e.(41) (H_j-\lambda-i\eta)^{-1}e=i\eta^{-1}e. \tag{41}

This contradicts (5) for small η>0\eta>0. Hence large jj have no eigenvalues on II, and their own boundary values exist. Weak lower semicontinuity gives the same common endpoint bound.

Let λj→λ\lambda_j\to\lambda, fj→ff_j\to f, and fix a sign. Choose a countable dense set of BB tests. At the jj-th fixed operator and energy, choose 0<ηj<1/j0<\eta_j<1/j so that

Dα[(Hj−λj−σiηj)−1fj−Rj,σ(λj)fj](42) D^\alpha\bigl[(H_j-\lambda_j-\sigma i\eta_j)^{-1}f_j -R_{j,\sigma}(\lambda_j)f_j\bigr] \tag{42}

has pairing less than 1/j1/j against the first jj tests, for all ∣α∣≤m|\alpha|\le m. Boundary existence permits this finite choice. The common endpoint bound extends the small difference to every test by density. Section 6 applies to the genuine nonreal graphs and gives the limiting-energy radiation condition. Every subsequential limit is consequently Rσ(λ)fR_\sigma(\lambda)f, by homogeneous uniqueness. Bounded graph compactness excludes a subsequence separated from that limit in any weak-star test.

The real boundary graphs themselves satisfy their actual equations and the common derivative bound. Section 3 upgrades this weak convergence to (6) for every b>1/2b>1/2. For fixed ff, a failed uniform conclusion on II would give a sequence of energies with a convergent subsequence. Apply (6) along it and the fixed-HH boundary continuity, with the same weighted graph upgrade. Both limits coincide, a contradiction. The same compactness argument works for the forcing families stated in Theorem 1.1. This proves that theorem.

8. Real roots and changing compact kernels

Use the real-left split again. On a small common graph collar,

P0(ξ)+Ljr(x,ξ)−λ=(ξ1−aj(x,η,λ))Qj(x,ξ,λ),P0(ξ)+Lr(x,ξ)−λ=(ξ1−a(x,η,λ))Q(x,ξ,λ).(43) \begin{aligned} &P_0(\xi)+L_j^{\mathrm r}(x,\xi)-\lambda\\ &\qquad=(\xi_1-a_j(x,\eta,\lambda))Q_j(x,\xi,\lambda),\\ &P_0(\xi)+L^{\mathrm r}(x,\xi)-\lambda\\ &\qquad=(\xi_1-a(x,\eta,\lambda))Q(x,\xi,\lambda). \end{aligned} \tag{43}

The fixed large zero region for LrL^{\mathrm r}, all common regularized coefficient bounds, and positive ∂ξ1P0\partial_{\xi_1}P_0 give one collar and one nonzero quotient bound. Energy-shell factors and outgoing equations, Sections 5–7, gives the unique real roots and all their physical and frequency derivatives. Energy is a smooth external parameter throughout its finite implicit recursion. Put

Tj,λ=Op⁡(bj,λ),bj,λ=χ/Qj,Tλ=Op⁡(χ/Q).(44) \begin{gathered} T_{j,\lambda}=\operatorname{Op}(b_{j,\lambda}),\qquad b_{j,\lambda}=\chi/Q_j,\\ T_\lambda=\operatorname{Op}(\chi/Q). \end{gathered} \tag{44}

Every fixed frequency derivative of the difference of the root symbols, quotients and reciprocals has supremum O(j−δ0)O(j^{-\delta_0}), uniformly in x,λx,\lambda. To prove this, interpolate Lθr=(1−θ)Lr+θLjrL_\theta^{\mathrm r}=(1-\theta)L^{\mathrm r}+\theta L_j^{\mathrm r}. The root has a common positive derivative denominator. Its exact differentiated equation is

∂θaθ=−(Ljr−Lr)(x,aθ,η)∂ξ1(P0+Lθr)(x,aθ,η).(45) \partial_\theta a_\theta =-\frac{(L_j^{\mathrm r}-L^{\mathrm r})(x,a_\theta,\eta)} {\partial_{\xi_1}(P_0+L_\theta^{\mathrm r}) (x,a_\theta,\eta)}. \tag{45}

Every frequency derivative of the numerator contains a coefficient difference O(j−δ0)O(j^{-\delta_0}). All root and denominator derivatives are commonly bounded. Differentiate this finite formula and integrate in θ\theta. The finite quotient recurrence and reciprocal identity give the same rate.

Compact frequency support and integration by parts imply a kernel difference bounded by CNj−δ0(1+∣x−y∣)−NC_Nj^{-\delta_0}(1+|x-y|)^{-N}. The endpoint kernel estimate therefore gives

sup⁡λ∥Tj,λ−Tλ∥B→B≤Cj−δ0⟶0.(46) \sup_\lambda\|T_{j,\lambda}-T_\lambda\|_{B\to B} \le Cj^{-\delta_0}\longrightarrow0. \tag{46}

The exact coefficients of Sjr−SrS_j^{\mathrm r}-S^{\mathrm r} vanish inside jj and have common short-range decay with κ=min⁡(δ0,ϵ0)>0\kappa=\min(\delta_0,\epsilon_0)>0. The enlarged-shell product estimate, summed only over those outer shells, gives

∥Sjr∥Ym→B≤C,∥Sjr−Sr∥Ym→B≤Cj−κ.(47) \begin{gathered} \|S_j^{\mathrm r}\|_{\mathcal Y_m\to B}\le C,\\ \|S_j^{\mathrm r}-S^{\mathrm r}\|_{\mathcal Y_m\to B} \le Cj^{-\kappa}. \end{gathered} \tag{47}

This includes the rough highest coefficient products.

Extend aj,aa_j,a by one real transverse cutoff ψ\psi, equal to one over the projection of supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi, and denote them by a~j,a~\widetilde a_j,\widetilde a. The exact energy-factor remainder is

Rj,λ=(Ds−a~j(x,Dz))χ(D)−Tj,λ(P0+Ljr−λ)=−∑∣α∣≤m[Tj,λ,ℓj,α]Dα,(48) \begin{aligned} \mathcal R_{j,\lambda} &=(D_s-\widetilde a_j(x,D_z))\chi(D)\\ &\quad-T_{j,\lambda}(P_0+L_j^{\mathrm r}-\lambda)\\ &=-\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}[T_{j,\lambda},\ell_{j,\alpha}]D^\alpha, \end{aligned} \tag{48}

where ℓj,α=ρj2ℓα\ell_{j,\alpha}=\rho_j^2\ell_\alpha. The pre-derivative kernels are Kbj,λ(x,y)(ℓj,α(x)−ℓj,α(y))K_{b_{j,\lambda}}(x,y)(\ell_{j,\alpha}(x)-\ell_{j,\alpha}(y)). The coefficient segment formula when ∣x−y∣≤X(x)/2|x-y|\le X(x)/2, and arbitrary kernel distance decay in the complementary region, give

∣Kα,j,λ(x,y)∣≤CNX(x)−1−δ0⋅(1+∣x−y∣)−N.(49) \begin{aligned} |K_{\alpha,j,\lambda}(x,y)| &\le C_NX(x)^{-1-\delta_0}\\ &\quad\cdot(1+|x-y|)^{-N}. \end{aligned} \tag{49}

The double annular coefficient sum for these compact kernels has one summable majorant, independent of j,λj,\lambda. Its omitted sum outside a finite input-output shell window is uniformly small. Inside any fixed pair of balls the kernels are exactly equal to their untruncated kernels for large jj: coefficients, roots and quotients agree there. Choose the window first, then jj. Composition with the derivative graph components proves

sup⁡λ∥Rj,λ−Rλ∥Ym→B⟶0.(50) \sup_\lambda\|\mathcal R_{j,\lambda}-\mathcal R_\lambda \|_{\mathcal Y_m\to B}\longrightarrow0. \tag{50}

The fixed Rλ\mathcal R_\lambda and TλSrT_\lambda S^{\mathrm r} are compact graph maps by the frequency-kernel prerequisite. They send bounded derivative-wise weak-star convergence to norm convergence, and are norm continuous in energy.

9. Strong forcing produces strong local slices

Write uj,λ=Rj,+(λ)fu_{j,\lambda}=R_{j,+}(\lambda)f, uλ=R+(λ)fu_\lambda=R_+(\lambda)f. The localized equation has the exact forcing

gj,λ=Tj,λf−Tj,λSjruj,λ+Rj,λuj,λ,(Ds−a~j(s))vj,λ=gj,λ.(51) \begin{aligned} g_{j,\lambda} &=T_{j,\lambda}f-T_{j,\lambda}S_j^{\mathrm r}u_{j,\lambda}\\ &\quad+\mathcal R_{j,\lambda}u_{j,\lambda},\\ (D_s-\widetilde a_j(s))v_{j,\lambda} &=g_{j,\lambda}. \end{aligned} \tag{51}

All these forcings have a common BB bound. Along any sequence of energies converging in the compact chart interval, Theorem 1.1 gives weak-star derivative graph convergence. Equations (46)–(50) remove the varying operators with small norm errors. The fixed compact maps then give strong convergence. For the term on ff, the bounded BB map suffices. The limiting forcing is BB-norm continuous in energy, by the frequency-kernel prerequisite. Compactness of the energy interval therefore gives

sup⁡λ∥gj,λ−gλ∥B⟶0.(52) \sup_\lambda\|g_{j,\lambda}-g_\lambda\|_B\longrightarrow0. \tag{52}

The same argument permits the compact forcing families in the theorem.

The root comparison and compact transverse kernels also give

sup⁡λ,s∥a~j(s)−a~(s)∥≤Cj−δ0,∥a~j(s)−a~j(s)∗∥≤C⟨s⟩−1−δ.(53) \begin{gathered} \sup_{\lambda,s}\|\widetilde a_j(s)-\widetilde a(s)\| \le Cj^{-\delta_0},\\ \|\widetilde a_j(s)-\widetilde a_j(s)^*\| \le C\langle s\rangle^{-1-\delta}. \end{gathered} \tag{53}

The second line follows from the real-kernel adjoint calculation and the common first physical derivative bound. Its integral is finite. Time derivatives of those kernels give local operator-norm continuity.

Each boundary solution has its own directional radiation. A fixed angular cutoff away from its outgoing velocity rays gives vanishing normalized ball mass in the region s<Ts<T, for every fixed TT. The outgoing theorem in the energy-root prerequisite identifies its continuous transverse representative as

vj,λ(s)=i∫−∞sUj,λ(s,t)gj,λ(t) dt.(54) v_{j,\lambda}(s) =i\int_{-\infty}^s U_{j,\lambda}(s,t)g_{j,\lambda}(t)\,dt. \tag{54}

The propagators have one bound in both time directions, from the common adjoint-defect integral. On a compact two-time rectangle, Duhamel's formula and (53) give uniform operator-norm convergence of propagators.

The embedding B⊂L1(Rs;Lz2)B\subset L^1(\mathbb R_s;L^2_z) turns (52) into strong integrable forcing convergence. To compare (54), split its integral at a large negative time. The old tail is uniformly small because the limiting forcing family is a compact subset of L1L^1; the forcing differences are uniformly small in that norm. On the remaining finite rectangle use propagator convergence. Thus, with H=L2(Rn−1)\mathcal H=L^2(\mathbb R^{n-1}),

sup⁡λ, ∣s∣≤S∥vj,λ(s)−vλ(s)∥H⟶0,S<∞.(55) \sup_{\lambda,\ |s|\le S} \|v_{j,\lambda}(s)-v_\lambda(s)\|_{\mathcal H} \longrightarrow0,\qquad S<\infty. \tag{55}

All slices have one common bound for every ss. This argument also proves strong slice continuity in energy. In transverse dimension zero the root operator is real scalar and its adjoint defect is zero.

10. Compare the normalized Hamilton phases

The real coefficient family has common full regularized bounds with the smaller gap δ\delta from (22). In the scaled Hamilton proof, the low-order bounds choose one contraction tube, one positive interior margin and one starting time TT. The Hessian bound Ct−1−δCt^{-1-\delta} is integrable. Variation of constants and the finite derivative partitions give common constants at every higher fixed order.

The near-shell initial-sheet contraction has one regular collar and one inverse coefficient bound. The mixed projection inverse has a common first-derivative inverse bound, and every higher derivative follows by isolating it in the finite chain rule. The generating-function proof consequently gives, with μ\mu defined as in (9) using δ\delta,

∣∂sq∂ηα(Gj−sE)∣≤Cq,αs1+∣α∣−μ(q+∣α∣),s≥s0,(56) \begin{gathered} |\partial_s^q\partial_\eta^\alpha(G_j-sE)| \le C_{q,\alpha}s^{1+|\alpha|-\mu(q+|\alpha|)},\\ s\ge s_0, \end{gathered} \tag{56}

for one s0>2CTs_0>2CT. The initial finite action integral is commonly bounded on a fixed slice; integration of the first radial derivative controls the zeroth-order term too. All choices are uniform on the compact energy chart.

Fix S<∞S<\infty. The inverse projection puts each relevant trajectory at a Hamilton time T≤t≤C∗ST\le t\le C_*S. Its initial frequencies belong to one compact outer collar. The common escape estimates give

∣x(t)∣≤C0t≤C0C∗S.(57) |x(t)|\le C_0t\le C_0C_*S. \tag{57}

Choose a radius RSR_S containing these entire finite trajectory segments and the initial positions T∇P0(ζ)T\nabla P_0(\zeta), with ζ\zeta denoting the full initial frequency, uniformly in energy and jj. Use a slightly larger slice interval as well.

For j>RSj>R_S, the forces and all derivatives agree in that region. The near-shell initial sheet equations therefore have the same unique root. Their initial action values agree. ODE uniqueness makes their finite trajectories agree, and so does their normalized action

ψ(t,ζ)=−TLr(T∇P0(ζ),ζ)+∫Ttx(τ,ζ)⋅ξ′(τ,ζ) dτ.(58) \begin{aligned} \psi(t,\zeta) &=-T L^{\mathrm r}(T\nabla P_0(\zeta),\zeta)\\ &\quad+\int_T^t x(\tau,\zeta)\cdot\xi'(\tau,\zeta)\,d\tau. \end{aligned} \tag{58}

The two projection maps are identical there, and their unique inverses select the same point at (s,η)(s,\eta). Since G=sξ1−ψG=s\xi_1-\psi,

Gj(s,η,λ)=G(s,η,λ),s0≤s≤S,j>RS.(59) \begin{gathered} G_j(s,\eta,\lambda)=G(s,\eta,\lambda),\\ s_0\le s\le S,\qquad j>R_S. \end{gathered} \tag{59}

This holds on an open neighborhood of the common cutoff support. All frequency jets agree, and the fixed real compact-frequency extensions agree everywhere. The comparison fixes action constants as well as differentials; Exercise 4 explains why that matters.

11. The factored equations have common constants

Apply the explicit coordinate-telescoping factors from the commuting-coordinates prerequisite to each Gj,ajG_j,a_j, using the same cutoffs. Its near and far derivative partitions use only their common root and phase bounds. The metric is the same:

gs=Xs−1−δ∣dz∣2+Xs1−δ∣dη∣2,Xs=(1+s2+∣z∣2)1/2.(60) \begin{gathered} g_s=X_s^{-1-\delta}|dz|^2+X_s^{1-\delta}|d\eta|^2,\\ X_s=(1+s^2+|z|^2)^{1/2}. \end{gathered} \tag{60}

Its Planck weight is Xs−δX_s^{-\delta}. One finite product order Kδ≥1K\delta\ge1 gives the individual ordering and adjoint defects, coordinate commutators and factor bounds with common constants.

Write kk for a transverse coordinate index and jj for truncation. With Aj,k=zk+Gj,ηkA_{j,k}=z_k+G_{j,\eta_k}, Fj,k=Bj,kAj,kF_{j,k}=B_{j,k}A_{j,k}, the exact bounded generator and ordering correction are

Mj=Gj,s(Dz)−∑kOp⁡(Fj,k)−Tj,Tj=−i∑kOp⁡(∂ηkBj,k).(61) \begin{aligned} M_j&=G_{j,s}(D_z)-\sum_k\operatorname{Op}(F_{j,k}) -\mathcal T_j,\\ \mathcal T_j&=-i\sum_k\operatorname{Op}(\partial_{\eta_k}B_{j,k}). \end{aligned} \tag{61}

They have the common bounds ∥Tj(s)∥+∥Mj(s)−Mj(s)∗∥≤Cs−1−δ\|\mathcal T_j(s)\|+\|M_j(s)-M_j(s)^*\|\le Cs^{-1-\delta}.

For fixed SS, (59) makes all canonical coordinates identical. On the near branch ∣A∣≤2s|A|\le2s, every coordinate path point has ∣z∣≤CS|z|\le CS, so the roots and near factors are identical for large jj. On the far branch their difference is a−aja-a_j, multiplied by Ak/∣A∣2A_k/|A|^2 or Ak2/∣A∣2A_k^2/|A|^2. These ratios and their needed frequency derivatives are bounded on ∣A∣≥s0|A|\ge s_0, on the entire transverse space. The root comparison gives small frequency seminorms CSj−δ0C_Sj^{-\delta_0} for the individual FkF_k differences and ∂ηBk\partial_\eta B_k differences. Compact frequency support and Schur's kernel inequality give

sup⁡λ, s0≤s≤S∥Mj(s)−M(s)∥⟶0,sup⁡λ, s0≤s≤S∥Tj(s)−T(s)∥⟶0.(62) \begin{gathered} \sup_{\lambda,\ s_0\le s\le S}\|M_j(s)-M(s)\|\longrightarrow0,\\ \sup_{\lambda,\ s_0\le s\le S}\|\mathcal T_j(s)-\mathcal T(s)\| \longrightarrow0. \end{gathered} \tag{62}

Smooth dependence of finite sheets, flows, actions and their inverses on energy gives local norm continuity in that parameter by the same kernel bounds. When there are no transverse coordinates, the sums are empty and Gs=aG_s=a.

12. Take the amplitude limit

The actual localized solution has transverse frequency support where the chosen cutoff equals one. The exact factor identity therefore gives

(Ds−Mj(s))vj,λ=hj,λ,hj,λ=gj,λ+Tj(s)vj,λ.(63) \begin{aligned} (D_s-M_j(s))v_{j,\lambda}&=h_{j,\lambda},\\ h_{j,\lambda}&=g_{j,\lambda}+\mathcal T_j(s)v_{j,\lambda}. \end{aligned} \tag{63}

Its initial values at s0s_0 converge strongly and uniformly in energy by (55). The forcing converges in L1([s0,∞);H)L^1([s_0,\infty);\mathcal H). Indeed, on a finite interval use (52), (55) and (62). Beyond SS, the correction terms have a common integral bound CS−δCS^{-\delta}, by the uniform slice bound. Choose SS, then jj. Hence

sup⁡λ∥hj,λ−hλ∥L1⟶0.(64) \sup_\lambda\|h_{j,\lambda}-h_\lambda\|_{L^1} \longrightarrow0. \tag{64}

The limiting pair λ↦(vλ(s0),hλ)\lambda\mapsto(v_\lambda(s_0),h_\lambda) is norm continuous into H×L1\mathcal H\times L^1. Slice continuity treats the initial value; local norm continuity of the ordering correction and its common integrable tail treat the forcing. Its image is compact.

All hypotheses of the uniform amplitude theorem in the transverse-moments prerequisite now hold: common factor, coordinate and individual adjoint bounds; local generator convergence; fixed-time phase convergence, which here is eventual equality; and strong convergence of the initial data and integrable forcing.

To recall its order of limits, approximate the compact limiting data family by finitely many weighted data pairs. For each fixed pair the canonical moment estimate gives a common amplitude tail CkS−δC_kS^{-\delta}, in addition to its integrable forcing tail. Choose the finite approximation, then SS, then jj. At this fixed SS, Duhamel and (59) give convergence of phase-corrected solutions. Uniform energy bounds remove the data approximation. This proves (8) for arbitrary data in H×L1\mathcal H\times L^1, with no first-moment assumption on the original forcing.

Here is the explicit compact-family estimate behind this passage. Equip data with ∥(w,h)∥D=∥w∥+∥h∥L1\|(w,h)\|_{\mathcal D}=\|w\|+\|h\|_{L^1}. The common propagator bound and the unitary phase correction bound both the finite-slice maps and their amplitude limits by one constant CAC_A on D\mathcal D. For ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose a finite ε\varepsilon-net d1,…,dNd_1,\ldots,d_N for the limiting data family, with each dkd_k having smooth compactly supported transverse data and time forcing. Such pairs are dense in D\mathcal D: approximate simple L1L^1 forcing functions by smooth compactly supported functions, and approximate their finitely many H\mathcal H values in the same way. On the compact energy interval these pairs have uniformly bounded canonical moments at s0s_0, because every required phase jet there is commonly bounded. The moment estimate therefore gives one KεK_\varepsilon, valid for these finitely many pairs, all energies and all sufficiently large jj. Take SS beyond their forcing supports. With dj,λ=(vj,λ(s0),hj,λ)d_{j,\lambda}=(v_{j,\lambda}(s_0),h_{j,\lambda}) and dλ=(vλ(s0),hλ)d_\lambda=(v_\lambda(s_0),h_\lambda), the triangle inequality gives

sup⁡λ∥aj(λ)−a(λ)∥≤CAsup⁡λ∥dj,λ−dλ∥D+2CAε+2KεS−δ+τj,ε(S), \begin{aligned} \sup_\lambda\|a_j(\lambda)-a(\lambda)\| \le{}&C_A\sup_\lambda\|d_{j,\lambda}-d_\lambda\|_{\mathcal D} +2C_A\varepsilon\\ &+2K_\varepsilon S^{-\delta}+\tau_{j,\varepsilon}(S), \end{aligned}

where τj,ε(S)→0\tau_{j,\varepsilon}(S)\to0 for fixed S,εS,\varepsilon, uniformly in energy, by the finite-time generator and phase convergence for the finite net. First fix ε\varepsilon, then choose SS, then use (55) and (64) to choose jj. Finally send ε\varepsilon to zero. The constant KεK_\varepsilon need not remain bounded in that last step; the stated order of choices is why arbitrary integrable forcing is allowed.

Taking the unitary transverse Fourier transform gives the same strong iterated limit in transverse frequency. For the lower boundary apply the construction to −Hj,−H,−P0-H_j,-H,-P_0; its positive free bundle is the original negative one. A chart with negative distinguished position direction uses the paired reflection of that position and frequency. The normalized initial action and all norm arguments transform with these signs. This proves Theorem 1.2.

Use the conclusion

Keep the order of cutoff, spectral-boundary and amplitude limits explicit. Verify strong local slices and the comparison of normalized Hamilton phases before taking the final amplitude limit.

13. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 1 — Basic: two exact cutoff splittings. On the line take H=D(1+b)D+cH=D(1+b)D+c, V=DbD+cV=DbD+c, with real smooth long-range bb, real bounded short-range cc, and 1+b1+b bounded below by a positive constant. For a real smooth cutoff ρ\rho, compute ρVρ\rho V\rho in left differential form. Give a symmetric smooth split and a real-left split, and explain their different lower-order terms.

Solution 1. The rules D(ρu)=ρDu−iρ′uD(\rho u)=\rho Du-i\rho'u and D2(ρu)=ρD2u−2iρ′Du−ρ′′uD^2(\rho u)=\rho D^2u-2i\rho'Du-\rho''u give, with q=ρ2bq=\rho^2b,

ρVρ=qD2−iq′D+ρ2c−ρ(bρ′)′.(65) \rho V\rho=qD^2-iq'D+\rho^2c-\rho(b\rho')'. \tag{65}

The last scalar sign includes (−i)(−i)=−1(-i)(-i)=-1 in the b′ρ′b'\rho' term. A symmetric smooth part is Lsym=DqD−ρ(bρ′)′L^{\mathrm{sym}}=DqD-\rho(b\rho')', with Ssym=ρ2cS^{\mathrm{sym}}=\rho^2c. This is exactly ρDbDρ\rho DbD\rho, with its cutoff potential displayed separately, and each part is symmetric on compact smooth tests.

For the real-left choice take Lr=qD2L^{\mathrm r}=qD^2 and Sr=−iq′D+ρ2c−ρ(bρ′)′S^{\mathrm r}=-iq'D+\rho^2c-\rho(b\rho')'. The symbol qξ2q\xi^2 is real; its operator need not be symmetric. Its remaining terms restore total symmetry. For ρ(x)=ρ0(x/j)\rho(x)=\rho_0(x/j), q′=ρ2b′+2ρρ′bq'=\rho^2b'+2\rho\rho'b. Each term has short-range decay, using respectively a physical coefficient derivative or a cutoff inverse radius. The scalar commutator has two derivatives in total and has at least that decay.

Exercise 2 — Intermediate: strict weight margins. Take δ=1/10\delta=1/10, γ=1/40\gamma=1/40, ϵS=1/4\epsilon_S=1/4, and m=4m=4. Compute bb, d∗−bd_*-b, the escape error exponent, the cutoff short-range norm-error power, and a finite off-energy order NN. Explain the strict endpoint margins.

Solution 2. Direct calculation gives

a∗=1120,b=2140,d∗−b=2340,2γ−1−δ=−2120=−2b.(66) \begin{gathered} a_*=\frac{11}{20},\qquad b=\frac{21}{40},\\ d_*-b=\frac{23}{40},\\ 2\gamma-1-\delta=-\frac{21}{20}=-2b. \end{gathered} \tag{66}

Both input compactness and output embedding weights exceed 1/21/2. The small short-range map has rate j−3/20j^{-3/20}. Choose N=10N=10: then N≥mN\ge m, δN=1\delta N=1, and hN≤X−1Ξ−mh^N\le X^{-1}\Xi^{-m}. At input b=1/2b=1/2, the compact graph tail sums a constant over infinitely many shells. At output weight 1/21/2, the Cauchy–Schwarz embedding into BB has a nonsummable shell factor. The two arguments require strict inequalities.

Exercise 3 — Intermediate: a strong weighted limit with no strong graph limit. Let nonzero ϕ∈Cc∞({1<∣x∣<2})\phi\in C_c^\infty(\{1<|x|<2\}), rj=2jr_j=2^j, and wj(x)=rj(1−n)/2ϕ(x/rj)w_j(x)=r_j^{(1-n)/2}\phi(x/r_j). Compute its derivative endpoint norms. Prove derivative-wise weak-star convergence to zero and strong Hm,−bH^{m,-b} convergence for b>1/2b>1/2, while its Ym\mathcal Y_m norm stays positive. For ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and smooth ω\omega supported in the unit ball, show that Tw=X−1−ϵ(ω∗w)Tw=X^{-1-\epsilon}(\omega*w) sends it to zero in BB.

Solution 3. Its support lies in Sj+1S_{j+1}, with outer radius 2rj2r_j. Scaling gives

∥Dαwj∥2=rj1/2−∣α∣∥Dαϕ∥2,∥Dαwj∥B∗=2−1/2rj−∣α∣∥Dαϕ∥2.(67) \begin{aligned} \|D^\alpha w_j\|_2&=r_j^{1/2-|\alpha|}\|D^\alpha\phi\|_2,\\ \|D^\alpha w_j\|_{B^*} &=2^{-1/2}r_j^{-|\alpha|}\|D^\alpha\phi\|_2. \end{aligned} \tag{67}

The graph is bounded, and its zeroth norm is the fixed positive number 2−1/2∥ϕ∥22^{-1/2}\|\phi\|_2. Pairing any derivative with a BB test is bounded by its common endpoint norm times the test's norm on the receding shell. That tail tends to zero.

On the support XX is comparable to rjr_j. Weighted integer derivative equivalence gives ∥wj∥m,−b≤Crj1/2−b→0\|w_j\|_{m,-b}\le Cr_j^{1/2-b}\to0 for b>1/2b>1/2. The convolution output is supported in rj−1≤∣x∣≤2rj+1r_j-1\le|x|\le2r_j+1, meeting at most three comparable shells for large jj. Its L2L^2 norm is at most ∥ω∥1∥wj∥2\|\omega\|_1\|w_j\|_2. Therefore

∥Twj∥B≤Crj1/2rj−1−ϵ∥ω∗wj∥2≤Crj−ϵ⟶0.(68) \begin{aligned} \|Tw_j\|_B&\le Cr_j^{1/2}r_j^{-1-\epsilon}\|\omega*w_j\|_2\\ &\le Cr_j^{-\epsilon}\longrightarrow0. \end{aligned} \tag{68}

These examples impose no resolvent equation. They explain how compact kernel actions can have strong limits when their input graphs have only weak-star limits.

Exercise 4 — Advanced: the action constant matters. In the scalar transverse case solve (Ds−E)v=0(D_s-E)v=0, v(s0)=1v(s_0)=1, for a real constant EE. Use G(s)=sEG(s)=sE and Gj(s)=sE+θjG_j(s)=sE+\theta_j, where θj=0\theta_j=0 for even jj and π\pi for odd jj. Show that the generators and positive phase derivatives agree, with common bounds, but the amplitudes do not converge. Identify the missing hypothesis and the Hamilton normalization that supplies it.

Solution 4. The solution is v(s)=eiE(s−s0)v(s)=e^{iE(s-s_0)}. There are no transverse factors or commutators; the evolutions coincide and are unitary. The bounded phase constants have a common zeroth-order growth bound too. However

e−iGj(s)v(s)=e−iEs0e−iθj(69) e^{-iG_j(s)}v(s)=e^{-iEs_0}e^{-i\theta_j} \tag{69}

alternates between two different amplitudes. The fixed-time phase difference fails to tend to zero. Agreement of phase derivatives alone does not fix the additive constant. In Section 10 the action has its specified value on the entire initial near-shell sheet and its specified finite trajectory integral. Equality of the coefficients and finite trajectories fixes both, on every component.

Exercise 5 — Advanced: no first moment is needed. Let real bounded continuous aj,aa_j,a on the line agree on [−j,j][-j,j]. Choose real primitives Gj′=ajG_j'=a_j, G′=aG'=a, with the same value at s0s_0, for j>∣s0∣j>|s_0|. Use g(s)=(1+∣s∣)−2g(s)=(1+|s|)^{-2} in each outgoing equation. Prove existence of the amplitudes, show that the first time moment of gg is infinite, and prove the amplitude error bound 4/(1+j)4/(1+j).

Solution 5. The outgoing representative and its amplitude are

vj(s)=ieiGj(s)∫−∞se−iGj(t)g(t) dt,a∞,j=i∫Re−iGj(t)g(t) dt.(70) \begin{aligned} v_j(s)&=i e^{iG_j(s)} \int_{-\infty}^s e^{-iG_j(t)}g(t)\,dt,\\ a_{\infty,j}&=i\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-iG_j(t)}g(t)\,dt. \end{aligned} \tag{70}

The integrands are absolutely integrable because their phases have modulus one and ∥g∥1=2\|g\|_1=2. Differentiation verifies the equation with the factor ii displayed. The primitive equality gives Gj=GG_j=G on [−j,j][-j,j], whereas 2∫0∞t(1+t)−2 dt=∞2\int_0^\infty t(1+t)^{-2}\,dt=\infty. Thus the forcing has no finite first time moment. The phase differences vanish on that interval and have modulus at most two elsewhere, so

∣a∞,j−a∞∣≤2∫∣t∣>jg(t) dt=41+j.(71) |a_{\infty,j}-a_\infty| \le2\int_{|t|>j}g(t)\,dt=\frac4{1+j}. \tag{71}

Only fixed-time phase comparison and integrable forcing were needed.

14. The full compact-force stationary comparison

The next lesson needs a stationary transform for each fixed HjH_j. Its highest differential coefficients may change inside the cutoff. Thus the compact-map hypothesis of Asymptotic completeness for short-range operators cannot be assumed here: a compactly supported coefficient multiplying an order-mm derivative need not give a compact map on the order-mm graph. We prove the needed comparison using the full elliptic limiting-absorption theorem instead. The highest-order terms are retained throughout.

Fix a real elliptic p=P0p=P_0 of order m≥1m\ge1, and let K=p(D)+C(x,D),D(K)=Hm, K=p(D)+C(x,D),\qquad \mathcal D(K)=H^m, where CC is a symmetric 11-admissible differential perturbation with all its coefficients supported in one bounded set, including any continuous highest coefficients. The total expression is elliptic. Each sufficiently large HjH_j satisfies these assumptions by Section 2. Constants in this subsection may depend on this fixed compact force. The full limiting-absorption theorem applies because it is a special case of its admissible decay class; it does not require a compact perturbation map.

Put ΣK=Z(p)∪AK\Sigma_K=Z(p)\cup\mathcal A_K, where AK\mathcal A_K consists of the regular-energy eigenvalues, and let ΩK=R∖ΣK\Omega_K=\mathbb R\setminus\Sigma_K. That theorem proves that ΣK\Sigma_K is closed and countable and gives the boundary resolvents RK,σ(λ):B→YmR_{K,\sigma}(\lambda):B\to\mathcal Y_m, their actual equations and their full signed radiation uniqueness. We will construct canonical transforms JK,σJ_{K,\sigma} and ordinary wave operators WK,σW_{K,\sigma} such that JK,σ∗JK,σ=EK(ΩK),JK,σWK,σ=F,WK,σ=JK,σ∗F,ran⁡WK,σ=EK(ΩK)L2=Hac(K). \begin{gathered} J_{K,\sigma}^*J_{K,\sigma}=E_K(\Omega_K),\qquad J_{K,\sigma}W_{K,\sigma}=\mathcal F,\\ W_{K,\sigma}=J_{K,\sigma}^*\mathcal F,\qquad \operatorname{ran}W_{K,\sigma}=E_K(\Omega_K)L^2 =\mathcal H_{\mathrm{ac}}(K). \end{gathered} The transform vanishes on all eigenvectors, including eigenvectors at critical energies. These are statements about the full compact-force class just specified.

We will use that every level set of the nonconstant polynomial pp is null. The full dimension-induction and Fubini proof is in Distorted Fourier transforms and spectral density, Section 2: outside the common zero set of a nonzero one-variable coefficient, a polynomial section has only finitely many roots. In particular the free Fourier multiplier has no L2L^2 eigenvectors, so its good energies are precisely the regular ones.

Boundary factorization without compactness

Choose a compact smooth cutoff ζ=1\zeta=1 on a neighbourhood of every coefficient support. The actual local coefficient-product estimates give ∥Cu∥B≤CC∥ζu∥Hm≤CC′∥u∥Ym. \|Cu\|_B\le C_C\|\zeta u\|_{H^m} \le C'_C\|u\|_{\mathcal Y_m}. The first inequality uses that the output is supported in a fixed ball, on which BB and L2L^2 have comparable norms. The second follows by summing the finitely many derivatives on that ball. The same first inequality holds for global HmH^m inputs. No coefficient is differentiated. Symmetry extends to HmH^m by compact smooth approximation and these product bounds.

For later use, λ↦CRK,σ(λ)f\lambda\mapsto CR_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)f is norm continuous in BB for each f∈Bf\in B; the corresponding nonreal approach has the same limit. Indeed the fixed-operator graph argument in Section 3, or Lemma 2.2 of the limiting-absorption lesson, gives strong Hm,−bH^{m,-b} convergence for every b>1/2b>1/2. Its hypotheses are the common endpoint graph bound, convergence of the forcing in BB, and the actual equation. With the operator fixed, the coefficient-difference term in (19) is zero. Multiplication by ζ\zeta and the preceding estimate then give strong BB convergence of the products. The free operator has the same property with CC as the compactly supported output map.

For λ∈ΩK\lambda\in\Omega_K set Aσ(λ)=I−CRK,σ(λ):B⟶B. A_\sigma(\lambda)=I-CR_{K,\sigma}(\lambda):B\longrightarrow B. It is bounded locally uniformly in energy and strongly continuous by the preceding paragraph. If u=RK,σ(λ)fu=R_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)f, then f0=f−Cu∈Bf_0=f-Cu\in B, (p(D)−λ)u=f0(p(D)-\lambda)u=f_0, and uu has the free signed radiation condition. Free uniqueness, which is the full elliptic limiting-absorption theorem with zero perturbation, gives RK,σ(λ)f=R0,σ(λ)Aσ(λ)f. R_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)f =R_{0,\sigma}(\lambda)A_\sigma(\lambda)f. Conversely, for f∈Bf\in B, the free solution u0=R0,σ(λ)fu_0=R_{0,\sigma}(\lambda)f belongs to Ym\mathcal Y_m, and (K−λ)u0=f+Cu0∈B(K-\lambda)u_0=f+Cu_0\in B. Its radiation condition is exactly the one in the uniqueness theorem for KK, since that condition uses the free polynomial. Consequently RK,σ(λ)(I+CR0,σ(λ))f=R0,σ(λ)f,Aσ(λ)(I+CR0,σ(λ))=I,(I+CR0,σ(λ))Aσ(λ)=I. \begin{aligned} R_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)(I+CR_{0,\sigma}(\lambda))f &=R_{0,\sigma}(\lambda)f,\\ A_\sigma(\lambda)(I+CR_{0,\sigma}(\lambda))&=I,\\ (I+CR_{0,\sigma}(\lambda))A_\sigma(\lambda)&=I. \end{aligned} The last identity follows from the first factorization and Aσf=f−CRK,σfA_\sigma f=f-CR_{K,\sigma}f. Thus AσA_\sigma is the actual bounded inverse of I+CR0,σI+CR_{0,\sigma}. This proof uses radiation uniqueness, with no Fredholm or relative-compactness inference.

Construct the stationary transform and its spectral norm

Let TλT_\lambda be the canonical free Fourier trace from Global radiation and flux. This prerequisite applies to the elliptic polynomial: its strength is at most C⟨ξ⟩m≤C′(1+∣p(ξ)∣)C\langle\xi\rangle^m\le C'(1+|p(\xi)|), so its simple-characteristic condition holds; an invariant direction would contradict ellipticity of the highest homogeneous part. On compact regular bands the free shell is compact and ∣∇p∣|\nabla p| is bounded below.

For f∈Bf\in B, prescribe the shell values (JK,σf)∣Mλ=TλAσ(λ)f,λ∈ΩK, (J_{K,\sigma}f)|_{M_\lambda} =T_\lambda A_\sigma(\lambda)f,\qquad \lambda\in\Omega_K, and prescribe zero on p−1(ΣK)p^{-1}(\Sigma_K). Here is the precise measurability input. The construction in Section 2 of Distorted Fourier transforms and spectral density applies to any continuous BB-valued path a(λ)a(\lambda). It approximates that path by locally finite parameter partitions with fixed compact-Fourier values and errors at most 2−k2^{-k} in BB. In energy coordinates the approximants are jointly measurable. The uniform trace bounds on compact energy sets make their successive shell L2L^2 differences summable, so their pointwise sums define a measurable representative with the prescribed limit on every shell. Apply that proved construction to the actual path a=Aσfa=A_\sigma f above. It uses strong continuity of this path, not compactness of CC.

For u=RK,σ(λ)fu=R_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)f, the compactly supported HmH^m vector ζu\zeta u justifies the real quadratic form (u,Cu)=(ζu,Cζu)(u,Cu)=(\zeta u,C\zeta u). The equality holds because ζ\zeta is identically one near the coefficient support; symmetry and HmH^m approximation make the value real. The exact free forcing-flux identity therefore gives σπIm⁡(RK,σ(λ)f,f)=∫Mλ∣TλAσ(λ)f∣2dS∣∇p∣. \frac{\sigma}{\pi}\operatorname{Im}(R_{K,\sigma}(\lambda)f,f) =\int_{M_\lambda}|T_\lambda A_\sigma(\lambda)f|^2 \frac{dS}{|\nabla p|}. Continuous-test spectral inversion, Lemma 1.1 of the same earlier lesson, applies to every self-adjoint operator. The full limiting-absorption bound permits dominated convergence on each compact good interval. It identifies the scalar spectral measure of f∈Bf\in B there with the displayed continuous density. Coarea is the proved coordinate formula CI7 in Coordinate inverses and integration. Integrate over compact good intervals and increase to ΩK\Omega_K. Monotone convergence gives ∥JK,σf∥22=∥EK(ΩK)f∥22. \|J_{K,\sigma}f\|_2^2=\|E_K(\Omega_K)f\|_2^2. Dense B⊂L2B\subset L^2 thus gives a unique bounded extension JK,σJ_{K,\sigma}, with norm at most one, and polarization gives JK,σ∗JK,σ=EK(ΩK)J_{K,\sigma}^*J_{K,\sigma}=E_K(\Omega_K).

The same density calculation with a real continuous compactly supported energy test bb gives JK,σ∗b(p)JK,σ=b(K)EK(ΩK)J_{K,\sigma}^*b(p)J_{K,\sigma}=b(K)E_K(\Omega_K). Using it for b2b^2 and expanding a squared norm proves b(p)JK,σ=JK,σb(K)EK(ΩK)b(p)J_{K,\sigma}=J_{K,\sigma}b(K)E_K(\Omega_K). Complex linearity includes complex continuous tests. To extend this to bounded Borel functions on ΩK\Omega_K, approximate relatively open interval indicators by continuous compactly supported functions there, bounded by one; an increasing compact exhaustion supplies their support cutoffs. Dominated convergence in both spectral measures passes the identity to the limit. The sets whose indicators intertwine are closed under complements relative to ΩK\Omega_K, intersections by multiplying the identities, and countable disjoint unions by strong additivity. Disjointifying a countable union shows that they form a sigma algebra, hence contain all Borel subsets. The transform vanishes on EK(ΣK)L2E_K(\Sigma_K)L^2 by its norm identity and has zero values on p−1(ΣK)p^{-1}(\Sigma_K). Bounded simple approximation therefore proves the assertion for every bounded Borel multiplier on R\mathbb R, including the unitary groups.

There is no remaining continuous spectral mass on ΣK\Sigma_K. On ΩK\Omega_K, the spectral density makes every null-set projection annihilate dense BB, hence all of L2L^2. On the countable complement, the spectral theorem gives EK({λ})L2=ker⁡(K−λ)E_K(\{\lambda\})L^2=\ker(K-\lambda): the second-moment domain formula proves one direction, and integrating ∣t−λ∣2|t-\lambda|^2 proves the other. Countable strong additivity makes EK(ΣK)L2E_K(\Sigma_K)L^2 precisely the closed span of all eigenvectors. Thus EK(ΩK)L2=Hac(K)E_K(\Omega_K)L^2=\mathcal H_{\mathrm{ac}}(K), and there is no singular continuous part.

Ordinary waves for a full-order compact force

Take a packet f=F−1af=\mathcal F^{-1}a, with a∈Cc∞({∇p≠0})a\in C_c^\infty(\{\nabla p\ne0\}), and put Ft=e−itp(D)fF_t=e^{-itp(D)}f. On the fixed coefficient support, the phase gradient x−t∇p(ξ)x-t\nabla p(\xi) has size at least c∣t∣c|t| for sufficiently large ∣t∣|t|. Repeated integration by parts with the normalized phase-gradient operator from Section 2 of Modified waves and the direction of escape gives sup⁡x∈supp⁡C∣DαFt(x)∣≤CN,α,f(1+∣t∣)−N,∣α∣≤m. \sup_{x\in\operatorname{supp}C}|D^\alpha F_t(x)| \le C_{N,\alpha,f}(1+|t|)^{-N},\qquad |\alpha|\le m. All coefficients of CC are L2L^2 on their fixed support, by their local exponents pα≥2p_\alpha\ge2. Multiplying these pointwise estimates by the coefficient norms proves ∫R∥CFt∥2 dt<∞\int_{\mathbb R}\|CF_t\|_2\,dt<\infty. On bounded time intervals, FtF_t is continuous in HmH^m, and C:Hm→BC:H^m\to B is bounded. In fact t↦CFtt\mapsto CF_t is continuous and uniformly bounded in BB, since the free group preserves the HmH^m norm.

The common-domain difference quotient used in (15) gives ∂t(eitKFt)=ieitKCFt\partial_t(e^{itK}F_t)=i e^{itK}CF_t. The norm integral and the integrable bound above construct the two limits WK,σf=lim⁡t→σ∞eitKe−itp(D)f. W_{K,\sigma}f=\lim_{t\to\sigma\infty}e^{itK}e^{-itp(D)}f. They are isometries and extend from these dense packets to all of L2L^2. Packet density follows by smooth approximation off the null zero set of a nonzero polynomial derivative, with the compact cutoff argument already proved in Section 1 of Modified waves and the direction of escape. Time translation of the defining limits gives group intertwining; the spectral-intertwining proof in Wave operators and modified phases, Proposition 2.1, then gives all Borel energy projections. Every level set of the nonconstant polynomial pp is null by the polynomial-zero-set proof identified at the start of this section. Hence p−1(ΣK)p^{-1}(\Sigma_K) is null and ran⁡WK,σ⊂EK(ΩK)L2\operatorname{ran}W_{K,\sigma}\subset E_K(\Omega_K)L^2.

The matching-sign comparison

For the same packet and ε>0\varepsilon>0, define the damped vector yσ,ε=f+σ∫σt>0ie−ε∣t∣eitKCFt dt. y_{\sigma,\varepsilon} =f+\sigma\int_{\sigma t>0}i e^{-\varepsilon|t|} e^{itK}CF_t\,dt. The undamped integrable L2L^2 majorant makes yσ,ε→WK,σfy_{\sigma,\varepsilon}\to W_{K,\sigma}f. The scalar integrals i∫0∞e−εte−ita dt=(a−iε)−1,−i∫−∞0eεte−ita dt=(a+iε)−1 i\int_0^\infty e^{-\varepsilon t}e^{-it a}\,dt=(a-i\varepsilon)^{-1}, \qquad -i\int_{-\infty}^0e^{\varepsilon t}e^{-it a}\,dt=(a+i\varepsilon)^{-1} give the exact BB-valued identity σ∫σt>0ie−ε∣t∣eitλCFt dt=CR0(λ+σiε)f. \sigma\int_{\sigma t>0}i e^{-\varepsilon|t|}e^{it\lambda}CF_t\,dt =CR_0(\lambda+\sigma i\varepsilon)f. To justify applying CC, first take the integral in HmH^m; the free orbit has a constant HmH^m norm, so damping makes it norm integrable. Fourier transformation evaluates it as the free resolvent. The bounded map C:Hm→BC:H^m\to B commutes with this integral. This argument includes every order-mm term.

Apply JK,σJ_{K,\sigma} to the damped vector, and use its group intertwining. On a compact good energy interval the continuous path CFtCF_t is uniformly bounded in BB; Aσ(λ)A_\sigma(\lambda) and the canonical trace have common bounds. Their trace integrand is therefore bounded in shell L2L^2 by Ce−ε∣t∣C e^{-\varepsilon|t|}. The parameter-partition construction above works with (λ,t)(\lambda,t) as parameter, giving a jointly measurable representative. Coarea and Cauchy–Schwarz on each compact energy-coordinate patch make its absolute integral in (t,ξ)(t,\xi) finite. Scalar Fubini identifies its time integral with the Hilbert integral: for a test q∈L2q\in L^2 the absolute paired integral is bounded by ∥q∥2∫∥F(t)∥2dt\|q\|_2\int\|F(t)\|_2dt; truncated tests q=h1{∣h∣≤N}q=h1_{\{|h|\le N\}}, followed by monotone convergence, show that the scalar time integral hh belongs to L2L^2 with this same norm bound. This is also the complete scalar-interchange proof in Section 2 of the earlier short-range comparison lesson, with all its actual hypotheses now verified for CC.

Consequently, for almost every energy and shell point, the transform of the damped vector has representative TλAσ(λ)[f+CR0(λ+σiε)f]. T_\lambda A_\sigma(\lambda) [f+CR_0(\lambda+\sigma i\varepsilon)f]. The free strong weighted graph limit, followed by the compactly supported coefficient-product map, gives CR0(λ+σiε)f→CR0,σ(λ)fCR_0(\lambda+\sigma i\varepsilon)f\to CR_{0,\sigma}(\lambda)f in BB. The proved inverse identity makes the displayed limit TλfT_\lambda f. Uniform bounds on every compact good energy interval, coarea and dominated convergence prove convergence in local momentum L2L^2. The global L2L^2 limit is JK,σWK,σfJ_{K,\sigma}W_{K,\sigma}f, so a countable compact exhaustion and the null set p−1(ΣK)p^{-1}(\Sigma_K) give JK,σWK,σf=f^. J_{K,\sigma}W_{K,\sigma}f=\widehat f. The dense packet class and the common operator bounds extend this identity to every f∈L2f\in L^2.

Finally, JK,σJ_{K,\sigma} is isometric on EK(ΩK)L2E_K(\Omega_K)L^2, and the wave range lies there. For v=EK(ΩK)vv=E_K(\Omega_K)v, put f=F−1JK,σvf=\mathcal F^{-1}J_{K,\sigma}v. The matching identity gives JK,σWK,σf=JK,σvJ_{K,\sigma}W_{K,\sigma}f=J_{K,\sigma}v; injectivity on that subspace gives WK,σf=vW_{K,\sigma}f=v. Thus both maps are onto their stated spaces, and WK,σ=JK,σ∗FW_{K,\sigma}=J_{K,\sigma}^*\mathcal F. Their band restrictions satisfy the same identities with the corresponding energy projections. In particular all stationary and wave comparison inputs required for the actual cutoffs HjH_j have now been proved, without imposing a lower-order condition on their compact perturbations.

15. From local amplitudes to the long-range spectral transform

The two approximation theorems and the full compact-force comparison provide the inputs for passing from bounded-support forces to the long-range stationary transform. The next lesson proves chart compatibility, flux normalization, the band preimage and the assembly over all good energies.

References