Self-adjoint spectral calculus with the original domain

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.

The bounded input is the complete local Unitary spectral foundation: finite norm control of Laurent polynomials, Fejér density, a full compact-metric positive measure construction, cyclic representations and an arbitrary-cardinality reducing direct sum. That proof requires no normal spectral theorem or general C*-algebra representation. The bounded-normal spectral theorem is a compatible CC0 comparison, with original credit to Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol. The active proof input is the checked local unitary construction, including its proof of integration against an arbitrary PVM by finite simple sums. That full domain passage is the following argument.

For further reading, Gerald Teschl's Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, second author edition, 2014, Theorem 2.26, printed pp.91–92, gives the Cayley correspondence, and Section 3.1, pp.100–110, gives bounded and unbounded spectral multipliers. The construction below supplies every domain equality it uses. The local unitary foundation proves the arbitrary-cardinality cyclic decomposition; the countable decomposition in Teschl's separable setting is not assumed for an arbitrary Hilbert space.

The precise theorem

Let HH be any complex Hilbert space and A:D(A)⊂H→HA:D(A)\subset H\to H be densely defined and self-adjoint. No separability or lower bound is assumed. There is a unique strongly countably additive orthogonal projection-valued measure EE on the Borel sets of R\mathbb R, with E(R)=IE(\mathbb R)=I, such that, for μu(B)=∥E(B)u∥2\mu_u(B)=\|E(B)u\|^2, D(A)={u∈H:∫Rt2 dμu(t)<∞},Au=lim⁡k→∞∫[−k,k]t dE(t)u.(1) D(A)=\left\{u\in H:\int_{\mathbb R}t^2\,d\mu_u(t)<\infty\right\}, \qquad Au=\lim_{k\to\infty}\int_{[-k,k]}t\,dE(t)u. \tag{1} For each finite-valued complex Borel function ff, its spectral operator has the exact maximal domain D(f(A))={u:∫∣f∣2 dμu<∞},∥f(A)u∥2=∫∣f∣2 dμu.(2) D(f(A))=\left\{u:\int|f|^2\,d\mu_u<\infty\right\}, \qquad \|f(A)u\|^2=\int|f|^2\,d\mu_u. \tag{2} Bounded Borel functions act everywhere, form a unital star homomorphism, and satisfy strong bounded-pointwise convergence. Formula (1) is equality with the given domain, not a new closure or an extension of AA. The zero Hilbert space has the unique zero measure and zero operators, so assume H≠0H\ne0 below. Inner products are linear in the first variable.

Cayley transform of the original operator

An adjoint is closed: if uj→uu_j\to u and A∗uj→vA^*u_j\to v, its defining identity against each vector in D(A)D(A) passes to the limit and gives u∈D(A∗)u\in D(A^*), A∗u=vA^*u=v. Thus our self-adjoint AA is closed. For u∈D(A)u\in D(A), ∥(A±i)u∥2=∥Au∥2+∥u∥2,(3) \|(A\pm i)u\|^2=\|Au\|^2+\|u\|^2, \tag{3} since ⟨Au,u⟩\langle Au,u\rangle is real. These operators are injective and have closed range: a convergent sequence of their images makes both the vectors and their AA-images Cauchy by (3), and closedness supplies the limiting preimage. The orthogonal complement of each range is ker⁡(A∓i)\ker(A\mp i), by the definition of the adjoint, so is zero by (3). A closed dense range is all of HH. Consequently R+=(A+i)−1,R−=(A−i)−1 R_+=(A+i)^{-1},\quad R_-=(A-i)^{-1} are everywhere-defined bounded operators of norm at most one, with ranges exactly D(A)D(A), and R+∗=R−R_+^*=R_- by the adjoint pairing identity. Direct multiplication on the original domains gives R+−R−=−2iR+R−=−2iR−R+. R_+-R_-=-2iR_+R_-=-2iR_-R_+. For example apply both sides to a vector and use (A+i)R−=I+2iR−(A+i)R_-=I+2iR_-; the reversed identity follows in the same way. The bounded operator U=I−2iR+=(A−i)(A+i)−1 U=I-2iR_+=(A-i)(A+i)^{-1} is unitary: U∗=I+2iR−U^*=I+2iR_- and the displayed resolvent identity cancels the cross terms in both products. Also ker⁡(I−U)=ker⁡R+=0\ker(I-U)=\ker R_+=0.

Apply the local unitary spectral foundation to UU and denote its PVM by FF. Its spectrum is contained in the unit circle: for ∣z∣>1|z|>1 the usual convergent geometric series in U/zU/z gives an inverse, and for ∣z∣<1|z|<1 use the series in zU∗zU^*. This proves that support assertion directly. The squared-norm formula for (1−z)(U)=I−U(1-z)(U)=I-U shows that F({1})F(\{1\}) projects onto ker⁡(I−U)\ker(I-U): its range is killed by I−UI-U, while a vector killed by I−UI-U has scalar spectral measure supported on {1}\{1\}. Hence F({1})=0F(\{1\})=0.

Push the bounded measure to the real line

The maps c(t)=t−it+i,τ(z)=i1+z1−z c(t)=\frac{t-i}{t+i},\qquad \tau(z)=i\frac{1+z}{1-z} are inverse homeomorphisms between R\mathbb R and the unit circle minus 11. Indeed ∣t−i∣=∣t+i∣|t-i|=|t+i| for real tt, c(t)≠1c(t)\ne1, and for ∣z∣=1|z|=1, z≠1z\ne1, replacing zˉ\bar z by z−1z^{-1} shows τ(z)‾=τ(z)\overline{\tau(z)}=\tau(z). Direct substitution gives both inverse identities. Their denominators never vanish on their respective domains, so the maps are continuous. Define E(B)=F(c(B))(B⊂R Borel).(4) E(B)=F(c(B))\qquad(B\subset\mathbb R\text{ Borel}). \tag{4} Homeomorphisms preserve Borel sets, since their inverse maps are continuous and inverse images respect complements and countable unions. A Borel subset of the punctured circle is also Borel in the circle, because the punctured circle is open. This gives orthogonal projections, intersection products and strong countable additivity from FF; the omitted point has zero projection, so E(R)=IE(\mathbb R)=I. For bounded Borel ff, define f(E)f(E) by the bounded FF-calculus of f∘τf\circ\tau on the punctured circle, with any chosen value at 11. That value changes no operator. The proved unitary foundation therefore gives the full bounded calculus, including ∥f(E)u∥2=∫∣f∣2 dμu,f(E)∗=f‾(E).(5) \|f(E)u\|^2=\int|f|^2\,d\mu_u, \qquad f(E)^*=\overline f(E). \tag{5} The change-of-variable identity for the scalar spectral integrals follows first for indicators from (4), then for simple functions by linearity, and for nonnegative functions by increasing simple approximation; real and imaginary parts give integrable complex functions. The finite-simple-sum proof at the end of the local unitary reading works on any measurable base, including R\mathbb R: disjoint projections give the norm identity, and uniform simple approximation gives every bounded Borel multiplier. This is also the comparison in Proposition 4.3 of the pinned bounded programme theorem.

For every bounded Borel hh and Borel set BB, bounded multiplicativity gives the useful identity μh(E)u(B)=∥(1Bh)(E)u∥2=∫B∣h∣2 dμu.(S1) \begin{gathered} \mu_{h(E)u}(B)=\|(1_Bh)(E)u\|^2\\ =\int_B|h|^2\,d\mu_u. \end{gathered} \tag{S1} In particular μE(B)u=1Bμu\mu_{E(B)u}=1_B\mu_u. The associated identity for integrating nonnegative functions follows by simple approximation and monotone convergence.

Unbounded multipliers, their domains and adjoints

For a finite-valued Borel ff put Qk=E({∣f∣≤k})Q_k=E(\{|f|\leq k\}) and fk=f1{∣f∣≤k}f_k=f1_{\{|f|\leq k\}}. On the domain in (2), (5) makes fk(E)uf_k(E)u Cauchy, because the squared norm of a tail difference is the integral of ∣f∣2|f|^2 over that tail. The moment domain is a linear subspace: μαu=∣α∣2μu\mu_{\alpha u}=|\alpha|^2\mu_u and μu+v(B)≤2μu(B)+2μv(B)\mu_{u+v}(B)\leq2\mu_u(B)+2\mu_v(B), by the squared triangle inequality for E(B)u+E(B)vE(B)u+E(B)v. Integration of nonnegative simple functions and then monotone convergence transfer this inequality to ∣f∣2|f|^2. Define TfuT_fu to be the limit of the bounded truncations. Their linearity makes TfT_f linear on that domain. Monotone convergence in (5) gives exactly (2). This domain is dense: Qku→uQ_ku\to u for every uu, since ff is finite-valued and μu(R)=∥u∥2\mu_u(\mathbb R)=\|u\|^2, and Qku∈D(Tf)Q_ku\in D(T_f) by (S1).

All spectral projections preserve the domain by (S1), since restricting the finite ∣f∣2|f|^2 integral can only decrease it. Passing their bounded commutation identity to the defining limit proves that they commute with TfT_f on its domain. Moreover QkTfu=fk(E)u.(6) Q_kT_fu=f_k(E)u. \tag{6} This also proves that TfT_f is closed. If uj→uu_j\to u and Tfuj→vT_fu_j\to v, then Qkv=fk(E)uQ_kv=f_k(E)u for every kk. Hence ∥fk(E)u∥≤∥v∥\|f_k(E)u\|\leq\|v\|. Monotone convergence gives u∈D(Tf)u\in D(T_f); letting kk increase in (6) gives Tfu=vT_fu=v.

The exact adjoint is Tf∗=Tf‾T_f^*=T_{\overline f}. One inclusion follows by taking limits of the bounded adjoint identity on their common domain D(Tf)=D(Tfˉ)D(T_f)=D(T_{\bar f}). Conversely let v∈D(Tf∗)v\in D(T_f^*) with w=Tf∗vw=T_f^*v. Test its defining identity against vectors in QkH⊂D(Tf)Q_kH\subset D(T_f). It gives Qkw=f‾k(E)v. Q_kw=\overline f_k(E)v. The right-hand side has norm at most ∥w∥\|w\| for every kk. Formula (5) and monotone convergence give v∈D(Tfˉ)v\in D(T_{\bar f}), and then Tfˉv=wT_{\bar f}v=w. In particular TfT_f is self-adjoint for real ff.

For later domain calculations, the spectral measure of TguT_gu satisfies μTgu(B)=∫B∣g∣2 dμu(u∈D(Tg)).(7) \mu_{T_gu}(B)=\int_B|g|^2\,d\mu_u\qquad(u\in D(T_g)). \tag{7} Indeed E(B)TguE(B)T_gu is the limit of (1Bgk)(E)u(1_Bg_k)(E)u, so (5) proves (7). Consequently the ordered product has exactly D(TfTg)={u:∫∣g∣2dμu<∞, ∫∣fg∣2dμu<∞},TfTgu=Tfgu.(8) D(T_fT_g)=\{u:\int|g|^2d\mu_u<\infty, \ \int|fg|^2d\mu_u<\infty\}, \quad T_fT_gu=T_{fg}u. \tag{8} To verify the action equality, put Dk={∣f∣≤k,∣g∣≤k}D_k=\{|f|\leq k,|g|\leq k\} and Pk=E(Dk)P_k=E(D_k). For uu in the displayed product domain, (7) gives Tgu∈D(Tf)T_gu\in D(T_f), and bounded multiplication on PkHP_kH gives PkTfTgu=(fg1Dk)(E)u=PkTfgu.(S2) \begin{gathered} P_kT_fT_gu=(fg1_{D_k})(E)u\\ =P_kT_{fg}u. \end{gathered} \tag{S2} Here Tf,Tg,TfgT_f,T_g,T_{fg} commute with PkP_k, and all multipliers restricted to this range are bounded. The projections PkP_k increase strongly to II because f,gf,g are finite-valued. Taking the limit proves the equality of the two fixed vectors, without presuming convergence in an unproved product graph norm. The extra gg-domain condition is retained. Thus (8) never replaces an ordered product domain by a larger maximal multiplier domain without justification. Likewise Tf+Tg=Tf+gT_f+T_g=T_{f+g} on D(Tf)∩D(Tg)D(T_f)\cap D(T_g): the inequality ∣f+g∣2≤2∣f∣2+2∣g∣2|f+g|^2\leq2|f|^2+2|g|^2 puts this intersection in D(Tf+g)D(T_{f+g}), and the same PkP_k applied to the three fixed vectors gives their equality. That intersection is not asserted to be the maximal domain of the sum. Finally Cauchy–Schwarz for the finite measure μu\mu_u shows f∈L1(μu)f\in L^1(\mu_u) on D(Tf)D(T_f). The bounded pairing identity and dominated convergence therefore give ⟨Tfu,u⟩=∫f dμu\langle T_fu,u\rangle=\int f\,d\mu_u.

Recover the exact original domain

Set r(t)=(t+i)−1r(t)=(t+i)^{-1}. The bounded FF-calculus gives r(E)=I−U2i=R+.(9) r(E)=\frac{I-U}{2i}=R_+. \tag{9} For u=R+vu=R_+v, bounded multiplication and (5) give μu(B)=∫B∣r(t)∣2 dμv(t),∫t2dμu≤∥v∥2. \mu_u(B)=\int_B|r(t)|^2\,d\mu_v(t),\qquad \int t^2d\mu_u\leq\|v\|^2. Thus D(A)=Ran⁡R+⊂D(Tt)D(A)=\operatorname{Ran}R_+\subset D(T_t), and TtR+v=(tr)(E)v=(1−ir)(E)v=v−iR+v=AR+v.(10) T_tR_+v=(tr)(E)v=(1-ir)(E)v=v-iR_+v=AR_+v. \tag{10} The multiplier trtr is bounded, so this limit follows directly from (5), or from (8). Conversely if u∈D(Tt)u\in D(T_t), put v=(Tt+i)uv=(T_t+i)u. The bounded multiplier rr and the proved product identity give R+v=r(E)(Tt+i)u=u, R_+v=r(E)(T_t+i)u=u, since r(t)(t+i)=1r(t)(t+i)=1. Hence u∈Ran⁡R+=D(A)u\in\operatorname{Ran}R_+=D(A) and (10) gives Au=TtuAu=T_tu. This proves both statements of (1) for the original operator. Truncation by [−k,k][-k,k] is the same construction used to define TtT_t.

For every nonreal zz, the bounded Borel function rz(t)=(t−z)−1r_z(t)=(t-z)^{-1} satisfies ∣rz∣≤∣Im⁡z∣−1|r_z|\leq|\operatorname{Im}z|^{-1} and ∣trz∣≤1+∣z∣/∣Im⁡z∣|tr_z|\leq1+|z|/|\operatorname{Im}z|. Formula (7) thus places rz(E)Hr_z(E)H in D(A)D(A). The exact product rule proves (A−z)rz(E)=I(A-z)r_z(E)=I on HH and rz(E)(A−z)=Ir_z(E)(A-z)=I on D(A)D(A). Hence (A−z)−1=rz(E),∥(A−z)−1∥≤∣Im⁡z∣−1,((A−z)−1)∗=(A−zˉ)−1.(S3) \begin{gathered} (A-z)^{-1}=r_z(E),\\ \|(A-z)^{-1}\|\leq|\operatorname{Im}z|^{-1},\\ ((A-z)^{-1})^*=(A-\bar z)^{-1}. \end{gathered} \tag{S3} Its range is exactly D(A)D(A), as both inverse identities show.

Uniqueness

Suppose GG is any PVM satisfying the exact domain and operator identities (1) for this same AA. Construct its bounded and maximal unbounded multiplier calculus by the simple-sum and truncation arguments already given. The bounded operator r(G)r(G) is the inverse of A+iA+i: (t+i)r(t)=1(t+i)r(t)=1 and ∣tr(t)∣≤1|t r(t)|\leq1 show its range lies in the moment domain and (A+i)r(G)=I(A+i)r(G)=I; on D(A)D(A) the opposite identity is the same multiplier computation. Thus r(G)=R+r(G)=R_+ and c(G)=I−2iR+=Uc(G)=I-2iR_+=U.

Push GG forward along cc to a PVM on the unit circle, assigning zero mass to 11. Its integral of the coordinate function is UU. Uniqueness in the local unitary spectral foundation makes it equal to FF. Pulling back through the inverse homeomorphism gives G=EG=E. No uniqueness theorem for an unbounded operator was assumed.

Groups, powers and lower-bound specializations

For real ss, eisA=(eist)(E)e^{isA}=(e^{ist})(E) is unitary and its group law follows from bounded multiplicativity. Dominated convergence in (5) proves strong continuity. For u∈D(A)u\in D(A), eisAu−us⟶iAu, \frac{e^{isA}u-u}{s}\longrightarrow iAu, because scalar differentiation and the fundamental theorem give (eist−1)/s=it∫01eiθst dθ(e^{ist}-1)/s=it\int_0^1e^{i\theta st}\,d\theta. Its absolute value is at most ∣t∣|t|, its pointwise limit is itit, and the difference from itit is dominated by 2∣t∣2|t|. Formula (2) and dominated convergence apply because the squared-integral domain is finite. The exponential, its derivative and the scalar fundamental theorem have their complete proofs in the elementary reading and the continuous scalar integral. Conversely, if this quotient has a strong limit as s→0s\to0, its norms are bounded along a sequence sj→0s_j\to0. Fatou in (5) gives ∫t2dμu<∞\int t^2d\mu_u<\infty, so u∈D(A)u\in D(A) and the limit is iAuiAu. Thus the full generator criterion has exactly the original domain.

For every integer m≥1m\geq1, induction using (8) gives D(Am)={u:∫∣t∣2mdμu<∞},Am=Ttm. D(A^m)=\{u:\int|t|^{2m}d\mu_u<\infty\},\qquad A^m=T_{t^m}. The lower moments needed at each step follow from ∣t∣2j≤1+∣t∣2m|t|^{2j}\leq1+|t|^{2m} for j≤mj\leq m. If A≥aIA\geq aI, its measure is supported on [a,∞)[a,\infty): on a bounded spectral interval contained in (−∞,a−ε](-\infty,a-\varepsilon], vectors in its projection range lie in D(A)D(A) and (1) would give ⟨Au,u⟩≤(a−ε)∥u∥2\langle Au,u\rangle\leq(a-\varepsilon)\|u\|^2. Such a projection must vanish; a countable union of these bounded intervals covers (−∞,a)(-\infty,a). This is a specialization of the full result and never a lower-bound assumption in its construction.