Scattering matrices at regular energies

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.

Working question: Can an eigenfunction change the stationary solution without changing scattering? Adding a bound state changes the interior solution but leaves its two radiating amplitudes unchanged. Thus the scattering matrix acts on amplitudes rather than on a chosen representative of the solution. The weighted norm comes from the free velocity on the energy surface and must be preserved even where that weight becomes small.

A stationary scattering solution has incoming and outgoing free waves. Their amplitudes determine each other even when an eigenfunction can be added to the solution. This lesson constructs that amplitude map at every regular energy, proves its compactness and weighted unitarity, and identifies it with the global scattering operator. For further reading, see Kuroda [K1], Section 6.2, Kuroda [K2], Section 3, and Yafaev [Y], Section 2.

Use the real simply characteristic polynomial pp, the absence of invariant directions, the symmetric short-range differential perturbation V:Xp→BV:X_p\to B, and the self-adjoint closure HH from Limiting absorption and point spectrum. In particular VV is compact and symmetric in the extended B,B∗B,B^* pairings. Let R0,±(λ)R_{0,\pm}(\lambda) be the free upper and lower boundary resolvents. For any λ∉Z(p)\lambda\notin Z(p), write

Mλ={p=λ},g=∣∇p∣,Hλ,κ=L2(Mλ,g−κdS),0≤κ≤2.(1) M_\lambda=\{p=\lambda\},\quad g=|\nabla p|,\quad \mathcal H_{\lambda,\kappa}=L^2(M_\lambda,g^{-\kappa}dS), \qquad 0\leq\kappa\leq2. \tag{1}

The threshold estimates give g≥cp~>0g\geq c\widetilde p>0 on this surface. If it is empty, all the spaces in (1) are the zero space, with their unique identity operator. The statements below include that case.

We use the homogeneous-wave, trace and flux theorems from Global radiation and flux, the rapid-decay and domain results from Limiting absorption and point spectrum, the arbitrary-Banach-space compact alternative proved in Self-adjoint short-range operators, and Theorem 3.1 of Compact perturbations in weighted Hilbert spaces. The bounded Fredholm range solver is constructed in the proof of Theorem 3.1 below. The global comparison uses the onto distorted transforms proved in Asymptotic completeness for short-range operators.

1. Energy amplitudes and stationary pairings

For b∈Hλ,0b\in\mathcal H_{\lambda,0}, define

Eλb=F−1(b δ(p−λ))=F−1((b/g)dS).(2) \mathcal E_\lambda b=\mathcal F^{-1}\big(b\,\delta(p-\lambda)\big) =\mathcal F^{-1}\big((b/g)dS\big). \tag{2}

Here F\mathcal F is unitary. The earlier homogeneous-wave lessons use densities v dSv\,dS; the energy amplitude in (2) is b=gvb=gv.

Lemma 1.1. The map Eλ\mathcal E_\lambda is a bounded bijection from Hλ,0\mathcal H_{\lambda,0} onto the homogeneous solutions of (p(D)−λ)u=0(p(D)-\lambda)u=0 in XpX_p. Its inverse is bounded. If u∈Xpu\in X_p solves

(p(D)+V−λ)u=0,(3) (p(D)+V-\lambda)u=0, \tag{3}

there are unique b+,b−∈Hλ,0b_+,b_-\in\mathcal H_{\lambda,0} with

u±=Eλb±=u+R0,∓(λ)Vu,b+−b−=−2πi TλVu.(4) u_\pm=\mathcal E_\lambda b_\pm =u+R_{0,\mp}(\lambda)Vu, \qquad b_+-b_-=-2\pi i\,T_\lambda Vu. \tag{4}

Their physical weighted norms agree:

∥b+∥λ,1=∥b−∥λ,1.(5) \|b_+\|_{\lambda,1}=\|b_-\|_{\lambda,1}. \tag{5}

Proof. For b∈L2(dS)b\in L^2(dS), every polynomial graph component of (2) has surface density (∂αp)b/g(\partial^\alpha p)b/g. These densities are in L2(dS)L^2(dS) because ∣∂αp∣/g|\partial^\alpha p|/g is bounded on MλM_\lambda. The global trace-extension theorem bounds their B∗B^* norms by C∥b∥2C\|b\|_2, proving the forward graph bound.

Conversely the homogeneous classification gives u^=v dS\widehat u=v\,dS, and bounds the L2L^2 density of each graph component by its B∗B^* norm. In particular the gradient components satisfy

∥gv∥22=∑j=1n∥(∂jp)v∥22≤C∥u∥Xp2.(6) \|gv\|_2^2=\sum_{j=1}^n\|(\partial_jp)v\|_2^2 \leq C\|u\|_{X_p}^2. \tag{6}

Thus b=gv∈L2(dS)b=gv\in L^2(dS), and (2) gives the inverse. Uniqueness follows from uniqueness of the surface density. This proves both graph-norm bounds without requiring gg to be bounded above.

For (3), apply the forced decomposition and flux theorem to forcing −Vu∈B-Vu\in B. Since the free resolvent terms belong to XpX_p, both homogeneous additions do too. The first assertion makes their amplitudes lie in L2(dS)L^2(dS). The resolvent jump is R0,+−R0,−=2πiEλTλR_{0,+}-R_{0,-}=2\pi i\mathcal E_\lambda T_\lambda, giving the second identity in (4).

The forced flux identity has left side ∫g(∣v+∣2−∣v−∣2)dS\int g(|v_+|^2-|v_-|^2)dS and right side 4πIm⁡(u,−Vu)4\pi\operatorname{Im}(u,-Vu). Symmetry makes the right side zero. Substitute v±=b±/gv_\pm=b_\pm/g to obtain (5). Both separate integrals are finite here, because 1/g1/g is bounded and b±∈L2(dS)b_\pm\in L^2(dS). □\square

Let Σ\Sigma be the closed countable exceptional set from the spectral-density lesson, and Ω=R∖Σ\Omega=\mathbb R\setminus\Sigma. At λ∈Ω\lambda\in\Omega, define for f∈Bf\in B

h±=(I+VR0,±(λ))−1f,(J±f)λ=Tλh±.(7) h_\pm=(I+VR_{0,\pm}(\lambda))^{-1}f, \qquad (J_\pm f)_\lambda=T_\lambda h_\pm. \tag{7}

These are the canonical traces of the distorted transforms.

Lemma 1.2. For every solution in Lemma 1.1, every f∈Bf\in B, and λ∈Ω\lambda\in\Omega,

((J±f)λ,b±)λ,1=(f,u).(8) \big((J_\pm f)_\lambda,b_\pm\big)_{\lambda,1}=(f,u). \tag{8}

Proof. Trace-extension adjointness in (2) gives the left side as (h±,u±)(h_\pm,u_\pm). Insert (4) and use free boundary adjointness:

(h±,u±)=(h±,u)+(h±,R0,∓Vu)=(h±,u)+(R0,±h±,Vu)=(h±+VR0,±h±,u)=(f,u).(9) \begin{aligned} (h_\pm,u_\pm) &= (h_\pm,u)+(h_\pm,R_{0,\mp}Vu)\\ &= (h_\pm,u)+(R_{0,\pm}h_\pm,Vu)\\ &= (h_\pm+VR_{0,\pm}h_\pm,u)=(f,u). \end{aligned} \tag{9}

The middle equality uses extended symmetry of VV on XpX_p. All pairings are defined: Vu,VR0,±h±∈BVu,VR_{0,\pm}h_\pm\in B, while the other vectors are in B∗B^*. Free boundary adjointness follows from adjointness at conjugate nonreal points and their weak-star limits against fixed elements of BB. With the unitary Fourier convention there is no additional (2π)n(2\pi)^n factor in (8). □\square

2. The exact Fredholm obstruction

Set

A±=I+R0,±(λ)V:Xp⟶Xp.(10) A_\pm=I+R_{0,\pm}(\lambda)V:X_p\longrightarrow X_p. \tag{10}

They are identity plus compact operators. Their kernels agree; call the common kernel NλN_\lambda.

Theorem 2.1. The space NλN_\lambda is exactly the space of XpX_p solutions of (3) whose two homogeneous additions in (4) vanish. It is the entire L2L^2 eigenspace of HH at λ\lambda, and is finite dimensional. For either sign,

ran⁡A±={v∈Xp:(v,Vw)=0 for every w∈Nλ}.(11) \operatorname{ran}A_\pm =\{v\in X_p:(v,Vw)=0\ \hbox{for every }w\in N_\lambda\}. \tag{11}

Proof. If A+u=0A_+u=0, applying p(D)−λp(D)-\lambda gives (3), and u−=0u_-=0. Equation (5) makes u+=0u_+=0 as well. Thus A−u=0A_-u=0. Exchange the signs for the reverse inclusion. The converse characterization follows directly from (4).

The rapid-decay theorem and its closure-domain argument put every such vector in the actual closed domain of HH, with Hu=λuHu=\lambda u. The theorem identifying every L2L^2 eigenfunction gives the converse, including equality with these two boundary kernels. Identity plus compact gives finite dimension and closed range of codimension r=dim⁡Nλr=\dim N_\lambda.

The map V:Nλ→BV:N_\lambda\to B is injective: Vw=0Vw=0 and A±w=0A_\pm w=0 give w=0w=0. For arbitrary u∈Xpu\in X_p and w∈Nλw\in N_\lambda, the opposite-sign kernel equation and symmetry give

(A±u,Vw)=(u,Vw)+(Vu,R0,∓Vw)=(u,Vw)−(Vu,w)=0.(12) \begin{aligned} (A_\pm u,Vw) &= (u,Vw)+(Vu,R_{0,\mp}Vw)\\ &= (u,Vw)-(Vu,w)=0. \end{aligned} \tag{12}

Choose a basis w1,…,wrw_1,\ldots,w_r of NλN_\lambda. The functionals v↦(v,Vwj)v\mapsto(v,Vw_j) are independent on XpX_p: if a combination vanishes, testing against all compact smooth v∈Xpv\in X_p says that the corresponding combination of VwjVw_j's is the zero distribution; injectivity of VV on NλN_\lambda forces all coefficients to vanish. Their simultaneous kernel has codimension rr. By (12) it contains the closed range, which has the same codimension. Hence they are equal, proving (11). This argument identifies the annihilator without assuming that every element of the Banach dual of XpX_p is represented by an element of BB. □\square

3. A matrix at every regular energy

Theorem 3.1. For every λ∉Z(p)\lambda\notin Z(p), assigning the outgoing amplitude to an incoming amplitude by (4) defines a bounded bijection

Sλ:b−⟼b+on Hλ,0.(13) S_\lambda:b_-\longmapsto b_+ \quad\hbox{on }\mathcal H_{\lambda,0}. \tag{13}

It extends compatibly to a bounded bijection on every Hλ,κ\mathcal H_{\lambda,\kappa}, 0≤κ≤20\leq\kappa\leq2. It is unitary for κ=1\kappa=1, and Sλ−IS_\lambda-I is compact in all these spaces. This includes regular energies in the point spectrum.

Proof. Given b−∈Hλ,0b_-\in\mathcal H_{\lambda,0}, we must solve A+u=Eλb−A_+u=\mathcal E_\lambda b_-. If w∈Nλw\in N_\lambda, its two boundary values agree, so the zero-trace criterion gives TλVw=0T_\lambda Vw=0. Trace-extension adjointness now gives

(Eλb−,Vw)=∫Mλ(b−/g)TλVw‾ dS=0.(14) (\mathcal E_\lambda b_-,Vw) =\int_{M_\lambda}(b_-/g)\overline{T_\lambda Vw}\,dS=0. \tag{14}

The range formula (11) therefore proves solvability. Applying p(D)−λp(D)-\lambda gives (3). Two choices of uu differ by a vector of NλN_\lambda, whose two additions vanish, so their outgoing amplitudes are equal. The map in (13) is well defined and linear.

Reverse the signs: for any prescribed b+b_+, the same obstruction calculation solves A−u=Eλb+A_-u=\mathcal E_\lambda b_+. The two constructions undo each other, since one solution supplies both its amplitudes, and their uniqueness was just proved. Thus (13) is a bijection.

Here is the required bounded range solver. Choose a basis w1,…,wrw_1,\ldots,w_r of NλN_\lambda. The finite-dimensional complement proof gives continuous coordinate functionals and their bounded extensions to XpX_p by Hahn–Banach. They define a bounded projection PNP_N onto NλN_\lambda. The closed subspace Y=ker⁡PNY=\ker P_N complements the kernel, so A+∣YA_+|_Y is a bijection onto the closed range in (11). Its inverse is bounded directly: otherwise there would be unit yj∈Yy_j\in Y with A+yj→0A_+y_j\to0; compactness of R0,+VR_{0,+}V would give a subsequence for which yj=A+yj−R0,+Vyjy_j=A_+y_j-R_{0,+}Vy_j converges to a unit vector in Y∩Nλ=0Y\cap N_\lambda=0, a contradiction. Compose this inverse with the inclusion Y↪XpY\hookrightarrow X_p to obtain a bounded linear range solver G+G_+. The same argument applies to the opposite sign. Consequently we may take u=G+Eλb−u=G_+\mathcal E_\lambda b_-, and (4) gives

Sλ−I=−2πi TλVG+Eλ.(15) S_\lambda-I=-2\pi i\,T_\lambda V G_+\mathcal E_\lambda. \tag{15}

All the maps in (15) are bounded on their stated spaces, and V:Xp→BV:X_p\to B is compact. Thus the difference is compact on unweighted L2(dS)L^2(dS), and SλS_\lambda is bounded there. The reverse-sign solver likewise bounds its inverse. In particular a bound-state ambiguity in uu does not enter the operator in (15).

Equation (5) says that this identity-plus-compact map preserves the norm of L2(dS/g)L^2(dS/g) on L2(dS)L^2(dS). Apply the weighted theorem with a=1/ga=1/g, μ=dS\mu=dS, and T=Sλ−IT=S_\lambda-I. The positive bounded continuous weight meets all its hypotheses. It gives every assertion for 0≤κ≤20\leq\kappa\leq2, including physical unitarity and compactness. □\square

The term “matrix” permits an infinite-dimensional energy shell. The construction proves boundedness at each fixed regular energy. It does not assert operator norm continuity as the energy varies.

4. Identification with the global scattering operator

Let W±W_\pm be the complete wave operators, S=W+∗W−\mathscr S=W_+^*W_-, and

Q=FSF−1=J+J−−1on L2(dξ).(16) Q=\mathcal F\mathscr S\mathcal F^{-1}=J_+J_-^{-1} \quad\hbox{on }L^2(d\xi). \tag{16}

The inverse J−−1J_-^{-1} in (16) takes values in the absolutely continuous subspace of HH. Both sides of (16) were proved in the completeness lesson. Coarea writes the momentum norm as

∥h∥L2(dξ)2=∫R∥hλ∥λ,12 dλ.(17) \|h\|_{L^2(d\xi)}^2 =\int_{\mathbb R}\|h_\lambda\|_{\lambda,1}^2\,d\lambda. \tag{17}

Fiber restrictions in (17) are understood for almost every energy.

Theorem 4.1. For every h∈L2(dξ)h\in L^2(d\xi),

(Qh)λ=Sλhλfor almost every λ.(18) (Qh)_\lambda=S_\lambda h_\lambda \quad\hbox{for almost every }\lambda. \tag{18}

The right side has a measurable momentum representative, as an L2L^2 section. The almost-everywhere meaning in (18) is independent of all choices of representatives.

Proof. First take f∈Bf\in B and λ∈Ω\lambda\in\Omega. For arbitrary b∈Hλ,0b\in\mathcal H_{\lambda,0}, choose the stationary solution with incoming bb and outgoing SλbS_\lambda b. The two pairings in (8) give

((J+f)λ,Sλb)λ,1=((J−f)λ,b)λ,1. \big((J_+f)_\lambda,S_\lambda b\big)_{\lambda,1} =\big((J_-f)_\lambda,b\big)_{\lambda,1}.

The unweighted space is dense in the physical space: for h∈Hλ,1h\in\mathcal H_{\lambda,1}, the truncations hN=1{g≤N}hh_N=\mathbf1_{\{g\leq N\}}h satisfy ∥hN∥λ,02≤N∥h∥λ,12\|h_N\|_{\lambda,0}^2\leq N\|h\|_{\lambda,1}^2, while hN→hh_N\to h in the physical norm by dominated convergence. Since SλS_\lambda is unitary in that space,

(J+f)λ=Sλ(J−f)λ(λ∈Ω).(19) (J_+f)_\lambda=S_\lambda(J_-f)_\lambda \qquad(\lambda\in\Omega). \tag{19}

This is an equality of canonical BB-trace amplitudes at every good energy.

Surjectivity of J−J_- and density of BB in the initial Hilbert space imply that J−BJ_-B is dense in L2(dξ)L^2(d\xi). Given hh, choose fj∈Bf_j\in B so that hj=J−fjh_j=J_-f_j satisfies ∥hj−h∥2≤2−j\|h_j-h\|_2\leq2^{-j}. Put qj=J+fj=Qhjq_j=J_+f_j=Qh_j. Unitarity of QQ gives ∥qj−Qh∥2≤2−j\|q_j-Qh\|_2\leq2^{-j}.

By (17) and the triangle inequality in scalar L2(dλ)L^2(d\lambda),

∥∑j∥(hj−h)λ∥λ,1∥L2(dλ)≤∑j∥hj−h∥2<∞.(20) \left\|\sum_j\|(h_j-h)_\lambda\|_{\lambda,1} \right\|_{L^2(d\lambda)} \leq\sum_j\|h_j-h\|_2<\infty. \tag{20}

Use monotone convergence on the increasing partial sums to justify the infinite sum. The same bound holds for qj−Qhq_j-Qh. Thus outside one null set both sequences converge in the fiber Hilbert norm to the restrictions of hh and QhQh. The canonical representatives from the distorted-transform lesson agree with these momentum restrictions almost everywhere; take a countable union of their null sets. On the remaining good energies, (19) and the fiber unitarity show that the limit of (qj)λ(q_j)_\lambda is SλhλS_\lambda h_\lambda. It is also (Qh)λ(Qh)_\lambda, proving (18).

The omitted energy set Σ\Sigma is countable and hence Lebesgue null. Its momentum preimage is null, as proved in the distorted-transform lesson. The limit just constructed supplies measurability of the fiberwise action for every input. Two ambient representatives agree on almost all fibers by (17), and a bounded SλS_\lambda preserves that agreement. This proves the asserted independence. □\square

Example 4.2. A bound state can change the stationary solution without changing its incoming or outgoing amplitudes. Indeed, add any w∈Nλw\in N_\lambda to uu. Equation (4) changes each u±u_\pm by w+R0,∓Vw=0w+R_{0,\mp}Vw=0. For an explicit instance, the bound-state example gives H=−∂x2−2sech⁡2xH=-\partial_x^2-2\operatorname{sech}^2x with eigenfunction sech⁡x\operatorname{sech}x at −1-1. That energy is regular for p(ξ)=ξ2p(\xi)=\xi^2, but its free shell is empty; the amplitude spaces are zero while N−1N_{-1} is nonzero. This is consistent with the unique identity on the zero space in Theorem 3.1.

Fast decay need not make the forward kernel vanish. A smooth compactly supported potential satisfies bounds ∣∂αV(x)∣≤Cα⟨x⟩−ρ−∣α∣|\partial^\alpha V(x)|\leq C_\alpha\langle x\rangle^{-\rho-|\alpha|} for every multi-index and every fixed ρ>1\rho>1. Nevertheless, such a potential need not have a scattering kernel satisfying

∣k(ω,ω′)∣≤C∣ω−ω′∣−d+ρ |k(\omega,\omega')|\leq C|\omega-\omega'|^{-d+\rho}

for all those exponents. When ρ>d\rho>d, that inequality would force the kernel to vanish as the two directions approach one another. The following example gives a positive lower bound near the diagonal for d=3,ρ=4d=3,\rho=4.

A compact-potential counterexample. Take d=3d=3, λ=1\lambda=1, the closed unit ball B={x∈R3:∣x∣≤1}\mathbb B=\{x\in\mathbb R^3:|x|\leq1\}, and

V(x)=κw(x),κ=116,w(x)={exp⁡[−1/(1−∣x∣2)],∣x∣<1,0,∣x∣≥1,Iw=∫Bw(y) dy>0. \begin{gathered} V(x)=\kappa w(x),\qquad \kappa=\tfrac1{16},\\ w(x)=\begin{cases} \exp[-1/(1-|x|^2)],&|x|<1,\\ 0,&|x|\geq1, \end{cases}\\ I_w=\int_{\mathbb B}w(y)\,dy>0. \end{gathered}

The flat smooth cutoff, composed with 1−∣x∣21-|x|^2, proves that ww is smooth through ∣x∣=1|x|=1. Each derivative is compactly supported and bounded, so every weighted derivative has finite supremum. Thus this real potential satisfies the displayed derivative bounds with ρ=4\rho=4. It is positive on the open ball, which proves Iw>0I_w>0; for example it has a positive minimum on the ball of radius 1/21/2. The bounded-potential realization of −Δ+V-\Delta+V has domain H2(R3)H^2(\mathbb R^3), as proved in Resolvents, domains and spectral density. The free upper boundary kernel at energy one is G(x)=ei∣x∣/(4π∣x∣)G(x)=e^{i|x|}/(4\pi|x|).

For a radial function F(r)F(r), differentiating r=∣x∣r=|x| gives ΔF=F′′+2F′/r\Delta F=F''+2F'/r off zero; substituting GG gives (−Δ−1)G=0(-\Delta-1)G=0 there. Here is its distributional normalization. Choose a smooth scalar cutoff η\eta equal to zero on (−∞,1]( -\infty,1] and one on [2,∞)[2,\infty), and set χδ(x)=η(∣x∣/δ)\chi_\delta(x)=\eta(|x|/\delta). For a compact smooth test ϕ\phi, the function χδϕ\chi_\delta\phi is supported away from zero, where ordinary compactly supported integration by parts gives ∫G(−Δ−1)(χδϕ)=0\int G(-\Delta-1)(\chi_\delta\phi)=0. Expanding this product gives ∫χδG(−Δ−1)ϕ=∫G(2∇χδ⋅∇ϕ+ϕΔχδ)\int\chi_\delta G(-\Delta-1)\phi=\int G(2\nabla\chi_\delta\cdot\nabla\phi+\phi\Delta\chi_\delta). The first term on the right is O(δ)O(\delta): its support is δ≤∣x∣≤2δ\delta\leq|x|\leq2\delta, and its factors have sizes O(δ−1)O(\delta^{-1}), O(δ−1)O(\delta^{-1}) and O(1)O(1), in a region of volume O(δ3)O(\delta^3). For the second term, the radial measure formula, with G=IG=I, and the sphere area 4π4\pi give, after r=δtr=\delta t, the limit ϕ(0)∫12(tη′′(t)+2η′(t))dt=ϕ(0)\phi(0)\int_1^2(t\eta''(t)+2\eta'(t))dt=\phi(0). The last integral is one by scalar integration by parts and the endpoint values of η\eta. Dominated convergence on the fixed annulus justifies this limit. On the left, local integrability of GG gives convergence to ∫G(−Δ−1)ϕ\int G(-\Delta-1)\phi. Hence (−Δ−1)G=δ0(-\Delta-1)G=\delta_0. The direct flux check is consistent: −4πr2∂rG=eir(1−ir)→1-4\pi r^2\partial_rG=e^{ir}(1-ir)\to1, while the integral of GG over the shrinking ball tends to zero.

For z=1+iεz=1+i\varepsilon, take the explicit root ζε=aε+ibε\zeta_\varepsilon=a_\varepsilon+ib_\varepsilon, where aε=((1+ε2+1)/2)1/2a_\varepsilon=((\sqrt{1+\varepsilon^2}+1)/2)^{1/2} and bε=ε/(2aε)>0b_\varepsilon=\varepsilon/(2a_\varepsilon)>0. Then ζε2=z\zeta_\varepsilon^2=z, ζε→1\zeta_\varepsilon\to1, and Gε(x)=eiζε∣x∣/(4π∣x∣)G_\varepsilon(x)=e^{i\zeta_\varepsilon|x|}/(4\pi|x|) lies in L1∩L2L^1\cap L^2. The same cutoff computation proves (−Δ−z)Gε=δ0(-\Delta-z)G_\varepsilon=\delta_0. For a bounded compactly supported hh, Young's inequality gives v=Gε∗h∈L2v=G_\varepsilon*h\in L^2; distributionally −Δv=zv+h∈L2-\Delta v=zv+h\in L^2. Plancherel gives ∣ξ∣2v^∈L2|\xi|^2\widehat v\in L^2, so v∈H2v\in H^2, and nonreal resolvent uniqueness identifies v=R0(z)hv=R_0(z)h. On bounded sets, ∣Gε(x)∣≤1/(4π∣x∣)|G_\varepsilon(x)|\leq1/(4\pi|x|). Splitting the convolution into ∣x−y∣<η|x-y|<\eta and its complement bounds the first part uniformly by ∥h∥∞η2/2\|h\|_\infty\eta^2/2, while on the second the kernels converge uniformly on compact sets. Thus Gε∗h→G∗hG_\varepsilon*h\to G*h locally uniformly. The free boundary theorem, applied to h∈Bh\in B, also gives distributional convergence to R0,+(1)hR_{0,+}(1)h. Uniqueness of the limit proves R0,+(1)h=G∗hR_{0,+}(1)h=G*h.

Define on C(B)C(\mathbb B)

(Kq)(x)=κ∫BG(x−y)w(y)q(y) dy. (Kq)(x)=\kappa\int_{\mathbb B}G(x-y)w(y)q(y)\,dy.

The normed space C(B)C(\mathbb B) is complete: a uniformly Cauchy sequence converges pointwise by scalar completeness, converges uniformly to that limit, and the uniform limit is continuous. The singular part with ∣x−y∣<η|x-y|<\eta has norm at most κ∥q∥∞η2/2\kappa\|q\|_\infty\eta^2/2, by radial integration. To justify continuity, multiply the kernel by a continuous radial cutoff that is zero below η\eta and one above 2η2\eta. The resulting kernel is continuous on the compact set of pairs (x,y)∈B2(x,y)\in\mathbb B^2, so its integral is continuous in xx by uniform continuity. The removed part has norm at most 2κ∥q∥∞η22\kappa\|q\|_\infty\eta^2. Thus KqKq is a uniform limit of continuous functions. Since B−x⊂{∣z∣≤2}\mathbb B-x\subset\{|z|\leq2\},

∥K∥≤κ∫∣z∣≤2dz4π∣z∣=2κ=18. \|K\|\leq\kappa\int_{|z|\leq2}\frac{dz}{4\pi|z|} =2\kappa=\tfrac18.

The Neumann series has norm tail at most (1/8)N+1/(1−1/8)(1/8)^{N+1}/(1-1/8). Multiplying its finite partial sums by I+KI+K, on either side, leaves remainder (−K)N+1(-K)^{N+1}; its norm tends to zero, proving both inverse identities. The bound ∥(I+K)−1−I∥≤(1/8)/(1−1/8)=1/7\|(I+K)^{-1}-I\|\leq(1/8)/(1-1/8)=1/7 gives, for each ω′∈S2\omega'\in\mathbb S^2,

ψω′∣B=(I+K)−1eiω′⋅x∣B,∥ψω′−eiω′⋅x∥C(B)≤17. \begin{gathered} \psi_{\omega'}|_{\mathbb B}=(I+K)^{-1}e^{i\omega'\cdot x}|_{\mathbb B},\\ \|\psi_{\omega'}-e^{i\omega'\cdot x}\|_{C(\mathbb B)}\leq\tfrac17. \end{gathered}

Extend it by ψω′=eiω′⋅x−R0,+(1)Vψω′\psi_{\omega'}=e^{i\omega'\cdot x}-R_{0,+}(1)V\psi_{\omega'}. It restricts to the stated solution on B\mathbb B, solves (−Δ+V−1)ψω′=0(-\Delta+V-1)\psi_{\omega'}=0 distributionally, and has an outgoing correction. This dependence on the incident direction is smooth as a C(B)C(\mathbb B)-valued map. In any smooth sphere chart, each parameter derivative of eiω′⋅xe^{i\omega'\cdot x} is a finite sum of bounded polynomials in xx times the exponential, with smooth parameter coefficients. Taylor remainders are uniform for ∣x∣≤1|x|\leq1 on a compact subchart, so these are derivatives in the supremum norm. The fixed bounded inverse commutes with those norm limits.

The exact scattering kernel. Put

J(ω,ω′)=∫Be−iω⋅yw(y)ψω′(y) dy. J(\omega,\omega')=\int_{\mathbb B}e^{-i\omega\cdot y} w(y)\psi_{\omega'}(y)\,dy.

At this energy M1=S2M_1=\mathbb S^2 and g=2g=2, so (2) gives the coefficient 1/[2(2π)3/2]1/[2(2\pi)^{3/2}] when integrating the incident waves against an amplitude b∈L2(S2)b\in L^2(\mathbb S^2). Integrate the constructed solutions against b(ω′)dS(ω′)b(\omega')dS(\omega') with this same coefficient. Cauchy–Schwarz and the finite sphere measure give ∥b∥1≤(4π)1/2∥b∥2\|b\|_1\leq(4\pi)^{1/2}\|b\|_2. The continuous, uniformly bounded C(B)C(\mathbb B)-valued family of solutions, multiplied by this measurable bb, is strongly measurable and has integrable norm. The Banach-valued integral theorem therefore constructs its integral and allows the bounded inverse and point evaluations to commute with it. For the extension off the ball, scalar Fubini applies because ∫B∣G(x−y)∣dy<∞\int_{\mathbb B}|G(x-y)|dy<\infty for each fixed xx, and the incident solutions are uniformly bounded on the ball. Consequently the averaged function satisfies u=E1b−R0,+(1)Vuu=\mathcal E_1b-R_{0,+}(1)Vu everywhere. Its free term E1b\mathcal E_1b belongs to XpX_p, and its forcing VuVu is bounded with compact support, hence belongs to the course's endpoint space BB. The free boundary map then puts the integrated solution in XpX_p. This applies (15) to an actual graph-space solution without asserting that an individual plane wave is in XpX_p.

The unitary Fourier trace of VuVu has kernel κJ/[2(2π)3]\kappa J/[2(2\pi)^3]; multiplying by the jump factor −2πi-2\pi i in (15) gives

k(ω,ω′)=−iκ8π2J(ω,ω′). k(\omega,\omega')=-\frac{i\kappa}{8\pi^2}J(\omega,\omega').

The sphere normalization in Yafaev [Y], (2.7), has spectral trace 2−1/2f^∣S22^{-1/2}\widehat f|_{\mathbb S^2} at d=3,λ=1d=3,\lambda=1. The conversion from the physical shell norm L2(dS/g)L^2(dS/g) is multiplication by 1/21/\sqrt2; conjugating by that same scalar on input and output leaves this integral kernel unchanged.

The spherical outgoing amplitude can also be read directly. Uniformly for ∣y∣≤1|y|\leq1 and ω∈S2\omega\in\mathbb S^2, the identity ∣rω−y∣−(r−ω⋅y)=(∣y∣2−(ω⋅y)2)/(∣rω−y∣+r−ω⋅y)|r\omega-y|-(r-\omega\cdot y)=(|y|^2-(\omega\cdot y)^2)/(|r\omega-y|+r-\omega\cdot y) gives ∣rω−y∣=r−ω⋅y+O(r−1)|r\omega-y|=r-\omega\cdot y+O(r^{-1}). Also ∣rω−y∣−1=r−1+O(r−2)|r\omega-y|^{-1}=r^{-1}+O(r^{-2}). The bound ∣eit−eis∣≤∣t−s∣|e^{it}-e^{is}|\leq|t-s| therefore gives G(rω−y)=eire−iω⋅y/(4πr)+O(r−2)G(r\omega-y)=e^{ir}e^{-i\omega\cdot y}/(4\pi r)+O(r^{-2}), uniformly. Integrating the bounded compact forcing proves the outgoing expansion with amplitude a=−κJ/(4π)a=-\kappa J/(4\pi). Multiplication by the normalization factor γc(1)=i/(2π)\gamma c(1)=i/(2\pi) in [Y], (2.15), gives the same kk.

If δ=∣ω−ω′∣\delta=|\omega-\omega'|, then ∣ei(ω′−ω)⋅y−1∣≤δ|e^{i(\omega'-\omega)\cdot y}-1|\leq\delta on B\mathbb B. Together with the Neumann bound this yields

∣J(ω,ω′)−Iw∣≤Iw(17+δ),∣k(ω,ω′)∣≥5κIw56π2>0,0<δ≤17. \begin{gathered} |J(\omega,\omega')-I_w|\leq I_w(\tfrac17+\delta),\\ |k(\omega,\omega')|\geq\frac{5\kappa I_w}{56\pi^2}>0, \qquad 0<\delta\leq\tfrac17. \end{gathered}

For ρ=4,d=3\rho=4,d=3, the proposed estimate would instead be ∣k∣≤Cδ|k|\leq C\delta, which is incompatible with this positive lower bound as δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. For any proposed finite C>0C>0, choose a nonempty open set of direction pairs with 0<δ<min⁡(1/7,5κIw/(56π2C))0<\delta<\min(1/7,5\kappa I_w/(56\pi^2C)). Such a set has positive product surface measure, by the positive surface Jacobians in local sphere charts. The two bounds contradict each other there. The case C=0C=0 is immediate. Thus changing a kernel on a null set cannot repair the estimate. This example has a smooth bounded kernel, with ∣k∣≤κIw/(7π2)|k|\leq\kappa I_w/(7\pi^2); fast spatial decay does not force forward vanishing. Smoothness follows by differentiating the compact integral in both direction variables, using the previously proved supremum-norm derivatives of ψω′\psi_{\omega'}. Choosing a smaller decay exponent gives a different inequality and does not establish the ρ=4\rho=4 bound.

The spectral point at one. The point 11 must be treated separately even when Sλ−IS_\lambda-I is compact. For V=0V=0, Sλ=IS_\lambda=I; on the sphere this has an infinite-dimensional 11-eigenspace. For example the bands 2−j−1<ω3<2−j2^{-j-1}<\omega_3<2^{-j}, j≥1j\geq1, have positive area 2π 2−j−12\pi\,2^{-j-1} by the sphere coordinates above. Their normalized indicators are mutually orthogonal nonzero vectors.

Here is the full compactness consequence in the physical Hilbert space. Write Sλ=I+KλS_\lambda=I+K_\lambda. Unitarity confines the spectrum to ∣s∣=1|s|=1: if ∣s∣>1|s|>1, invert Sλ−sI=−s(I−Sλ/s)S_\lambda-sI=-s(I-S_\lambda/s) by a Neumann series; if ∣s∣<1|s|<1, invert Sλ−sI=Sλ(I−sSλ∗)S_\lambda-sI=S_\lambda(I-sS_\lambda^*) in the same way. For s≠1s\ne1, the factorization Sλ−sI=(1−s)(I+Kλ/(1−s))S_\lambda-sI=(1-s)(I+K_\lambda/(1-s)) and the compact alternative show that every noninvertible value is an eigenvalue. Its eigenspace is finite dimensional, since on that space Kλ=(s−1)IK_\lambda=(s-1)I, and an infinite orthonormal sequence would contradict compactness. Distinct eigenvalues have orthogonal eigenvectors: for unitary SλS_\lambda, (u,v)=(Sλu,Sλv)=st‾(u,v)(u,v)=(S_\lambda u,S_\lambda v)=s\overline t(u,v), and distinct unit-modulus s,ts,t have st‾≠1s\overline t\ne1. If infinitely many distinct eigenvalues stayed a positive distance from one, normalized eigenvectors would have pairwise separated images under KλK_\lambda, again contradicting compactness. Hence eigenvalues different from one have finite multiplicity and can accumulate only at one, while no finite multiplicity is asserted at one itself.

Use the conclusion

Check the exact kernel of the amplitude map and the sign in the Lippmann–Schwinger equation. Then distinguish construction at a fixed regular energy from its identification with the global scattering operator.

5. Exercises and checked solutions

Exercise 5.1 (foundation). For p(ξ)=ξ2p(\xi)=\xi^2, λ=k2>0\lambda=k^2>0, write Eλb\mathcal E_\lambda b explicitly in terms of b(k),b(−k)b(k),b(-k). Determine its physical amplitude norm.

Exercise 5.2 (intermediate). Let r=dim⁡Nλr=\dim N_\lambda. Explain why the rr functionals in (11) determine the whole Fredholm range, even if the full Banach dual of XpX_p is larger than the functions in BB.

Exercise 5.3 (intermediate). Write Kλ=Sλ−IK_\lambda=S_\lambda-I. Prove the exact relation 2Re⁡(Kλb,b)λ,1+∥Kλb∥λ,12=02\operatorname{Re}(K_\lambda b,b)_{\lambda,1} +\|K_\lambda b\|_{\lambda,1}^2=0. If bb is an eigenvector of SλS_\lambda with eigenvalue ss, show that ∣s∣=1|s|=1.

Exercise 5.4 (intermediate). If two stationary solutions have identical incoming amplitudes, prove that their difference is a rapidly decreasing L2L^2 eigenfunction, and that their outgoing amplitudes coincide. Does an incoming amplitude determine the solution itself?

Exercise 5.5 (advanced). In the proof of Theorem 4.1 replace the error bound 2−j2^{-j} by any summable positive sequence. Prove convergence on almost every fiber. Explain why arbitrary L2(dξ)L^2(d\xi) convergence alone would not justify passing to every fixed energy surface.

Solution 5.1. Surface measure on the two-point shell is counting measure and g=2kg=2k. Hence

Eλb(x)=b(k)eikx+b(−k)e−ikx2k2π,∥b∥λ,12=∣b(k)∣2+∣b(−k)∣22k. \mathcal E_\lambda b(x)= \frac{b(k)e^{ikx}+b(-k)e^{-ikx}}{2k\sqrt{2\pi}},\qquad \|b\|_{\lambda,1}^2= \frac{|b(k)|^2+|b(-k)|^2}{2k}.

The common factor 2k2π2k\sqrt{2\pi} converts physical plane-wave coefficients into energy amplitudes. It therefore cancels from a matrix mapping incoming to outgoing coefficients.

Solution 5.2. Index zero gives a closed range of codimension rr. Injectivity of VV on NλN_\lambda and compact smooth testing make the rr indicated continuous functionals independent. Their joint kernel also has codimension rr: the map to Cr\mathbb C^r given by their values is onto, since a proper range would have a nonzero linear annihilator, contradicting independence. Equation (12) puts the Fredholm range inside that joint kernel. Equal finite codimension forces equality, by taking the quotient of one subspace by the other. No representation theorem for the entire dual is involved.

Solution 5.3. Expand ∥b+Kλb∥λ,12=∥b∥λ,12\|b+K_\lambda b\|_{\lambda,1}^2=\|b\|_{\lambda,1}^2 using a pairing linear in the first variable. The cross terms are twice the real part of (Kλb,b)(K_\lambda b,b), giving the identity. For a nonzero eigenvector, physical unitarity gives ∣s∣2∥b∥λ,12=∥b∥λ,12|s|^2\|b\|_{\lambda,1}^2=\|b\|_{\lambda,1}^2, so ∣s∣=1|s|=1. Equivalently the displayed relation becomes 2Re⁡(s−1)+∣s−1∣2=02\operatorname{Re}(s-1)+|s-1|^2=0, the same condition.

Solution 5.4. The difference ww solves (3) and has w−=0w_-=0. Equation (5) makes w+=0w_+=0, so w∈Nλw\in N_\lambda. Theorem 2.1 and its rapid-decay input identify it as a rapidly decreasing L2L^2 eigenfunction in the actual domain of HH. Both amplitudes of ww vanish, proving equality of the outgoing amplitudes. The solution itself is unique exactly when Nλ=0N_\lambda=0; in general its ambiguity is precisely that finite-dimensional space.

Solution 5.5. If ∑jεj<∞\sum_j\varepsilon_j<\infty and ∥hj−h∥2≤εj\|h_j-h\|_2\leq\varepsilon_j, coarea and the triangle inequality bound the L2(dλ)L^2(d\lambda) norm of each partial sum of fiber errors by ∑jεj\sum_j\varepsilon_j. Monotone convergence of their squares gives a finite-norm infinite sum. It is finite almost everywhere, so the fiber errors tend to zero there. Apply the same argument to Qhj−QhQh_j-Qh. For arbitrary L2L^2 convergence one may first select a subsequence with summable errors, but one cannot evaluate unrestricted ambient representatives on a fixed surface. Changing a function solely on that surface leaves its ambient L2L^2 class unchanged. The canonical trace construction and the almost-everywhere coarea limit provide the two distinct meanings used in this proof.

References