AN-04 proof edition · CC0; exact source credit and separately licensed prerequisites

Normal extension and the complete boundary defect

Let t≥0t\ge0 be a product boundary coordinate, Dt=−i∂tD_t=-i\partial_t, and let uu be an interior distribution which has some distribution extension across the boundary. If

P=Dtm+∑j<maj(x′,t,D′)Dtj,m≥1, P=D_t^m+\sum_{j<m}a_j(x',t,D')D_t^j,\qquad m\ge1,

has smooth finite matrix coefficients and Pu=fPu=f in the interior, with ff in the dual conormal class A′\mathcal A', then uu has exactly one extension U∈A′U\in\mathcal A'. It satisfies tm(PU−f)=0t^m(PU-f)=0 as an ambient supported distribution. Moreover it is the only supported distribution extension satisfying that weighted equation. The tangential differential orders of the aja_j can be arbitrary finite integers. The last section proves the invariant version for differential operators of total order mm with an invertible principal normal coefficient.

The proof below retains Sections 5.1–5.5 of AN03-U034, Global boundary operators, compressed wave fronts, and normal extension, with corrected transpose terminology, explicit nested compact sets in the bootstrap, a direct construction of the supported distribution and the complete boundary defect. Original source credit: Codex, September 2026, CC0. Current source connections and clarifications: AN-04 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex, 5 October 2026, CC0.

The mathematical antecedent is the approved Hörmander III, 2007 eBook, ISBN 978-3-540-49938-1, Section 18.3; its use in the higher-order Cauchy problem is in Section 23.2. The proof is supplied here in full, using the exact earlier programme proofs below.

Definitions and exact prerequisites

The conormal amplitude and complete test-space component proves the dyadic Besov norms (C2), smooth coefficient and coordinate bounds at every real index, and conormal completeness. The dual conormal component proves the exact tangent generators (GA1)–(GA2), positive-support approximation (GS1)–(GS7), dual pairing and interior injectivity (GD1)–(GD4), actual boundary trace and intrinsic derivatives (GD5)–(GD12). We retain its conormal index convention κk=−k−n/4\kappa_k=-k-n/4 and smooth-test threshold m0=−(n+2)/4m_0=-(n+2)/4.

All distribution pairings are complex-linear, against the dual density: Dtt=−DtD_t^{\mathrm t}=-D_t. Hilbert adjoints are explicitly identified when used for Sobolev norm estimates. The full Hilbert duality proof, Fourier Sobolev embedding, finite distribution-order and coordinate proof, and locally finite partitions PS5 are included earlier components. Their component licences and credits remain attached to them. The proof map supplies exact source hashes and unique proof locators.

Here extendibility means existence of an ambient distribution with the stated interior restriction; no special boundary values of that temporary extension are assumed. The symbols f,Uf,U denote supported representatives when used in ambient equations. The compressed wave-front and N\mathcal N conclusions require the further compressed operator calculus and are not asserted by this component.

1. The exact local conormal seminorms

Fix K=K0×[0,c/2]K=K_0\times[0,c/2] compactly contained in the coordinate chart, and use a slightly larger compact K′K'. For κk=−k−n/4\kappa_k=-k-n/4, the conormal topology on supported tests is generated by

pk,K,L(ϕ)=∑∣α∣≤L∥xnαnDαϕ∥B2,∞κk(L=0,1,2,…).(GE1) p_{k,K,L}(\phi) =\sum_{|\alpha|\le L} \|x_n^{\alpha_n}D^\alpha\phi\|_{B^{\kappa_k}_{2,\infty}} \quad(L=0,1,2,\ldots). \tag{GE1}

Smooth chart cutoffs are inserted in each norm. Formula (GA2) proves that these weighted normal derivatives span exactly the same filtered family as all words in D′D' and xnDnx_nD_n. No lower term of the triangular polynomial relation is dropped. Tangential differential operators a(x,D′)a(x,D'), of any fixed finite order, and their formal transposes map each AKk\mathcal A^k_K continuously into AK′k\mathcal A^k_{K'}. To verify this, expand a tangent word through aa: every resulting term is another finite tangent word with smooth coefficients, including the derivatives of those coefficients. Multiplication by a compact smooth coefficient is bounded on each B2,∞κkB^{\kappa_k}_{2,\infty} by (C2)–(C3). The number of seminorms needed depends on the actual tangential order; no relation to the normal order is assumed.

For later use, the dyadic Fourier estimates give, for every real ss,

∥w∥B2,∞s≤Cs(∥w∥B2,∞s−1+∑j=1n∥Djw∥B2,∞s−1).(GE2) \|w\|_{B^s_{2,\infty}} \le C_s\left(\|w\|_{B^{s-1}_{2,\infty}} +\sum_{j=1}^{n}\|D_jw\|_{B^{s-1}_{2,\infty}}\right). \tag{GE2}

On the low-frequency block the first norm controls the left side. On the ll-th high block, 2l≍(∑j∣ξj∣2)1/22^l\asymp(\sum_j|\xi_j|^2)^{1/2}; multiply its L2L^2 norm by 2l(s−1)2^{l(s-1)}, use Plancherel for each DjD_j, and take the supremum over ll. This proves (GE2) without a boundary norm convention or an omitted tangential term.

2. The normal primitive gains one conormal order

For ϕ∈Cc∞(X∘)\phi\in C_c^\infty(X^\circ) with support in KK, put

ψ(x′,t)=i∫0tϕ(x′,s) ds,Dnψ=ϕ,ψ=0 below the normal support of ϕ.(GE3) \psi(x',t)=i\int_0^t\phi(x',s)\,ds, \qquad D_n\psi=\phi, \quad \psi=0\text{ below the normal support of }\phi. \tag{GE3}

Choose a fixed normal cutoff χ(t)\chi(t) equal to one on [0,c/2][0,c/2] and smoothly supported in (−c,c)(-c,c), with positive-side support in [0,c)[0,c). Then χψ\chi\psi has compact support in the interior for each such ϕ\phi, although the distance of that support from the boundary need not be uniform.

We first prove that the localized Volterra operator J:ϕ↦χψJ:\phi\mapsto\chi\psi is bounded on B2,∞sB^s_{2,\infty} for every real ss, with fixed chart cutoffs. For this ambient-space estimate, choose a smooth input cutoff equal to one on the original KK, extending a short distance across t=0t=0, and write the integral as iχ(t)∫−∞tθ(s)ϕ(x′,s) dsi\chi(t)\int_{-\infty}^{t}\theta(s)\phi(x',s)\,ds. For the original interior-supported ϕ\phi this is exactly (GE3) after multiplication by χ\chi. The smooth cutoff is necessary in the negative-order dual estimate; a sharp input cutoff at zero would create an unjustified boundary multiplier. For s=0s=0, Cauchy–Schwarz on the finite normal interval gives ∥ψ∥L2≤c∥ϕ∥L2\|\psi\|_{L^2}\le c\|\phi\|_{L^2}. For a nonnegative integer pp, differentiate χψ\chi\psi at most pp times. Tangential derivatives commute with the integral; each positive normal derivative of ψ\psi is the corresponding derivative of ϕ\phi of one lower order; derivatives of χ\chi multiply the same expressions. Thus J:Hp→HpJ:H^p\to H^p is bounded. For real cutoffs the Hilbert adjoint has the reversed integral g(s)↦−iθ(s)∫scχ(t)g(t) dtg(s)\mapsto-i\theta(s)\int_s^c\chi(t)g(t)\,dt. The complex-linear distribution transpose has +i+i instead, without complex conjugation. This distinction fixes the sign convention without changing either norm estimate. Both reversed integrals have the same integer derivative bounds, including every derivative of θ\theta. Hilbert duality therefore gives J:H−p→H−pJ:H^{-p}\to H^{-p}. For a real ss, choose integers p<s<qp<s<q. The dyadic operator matrix estimate between the two Sobolev endpoints is the one proved from (C2)–(C3): after weighting by 2ls−js2^{ls-js}, it decays geometrically in ∣l−j∣|l-j|. Summation proves the claimed B2,∞sB^s_{2,\infty} bound, including negative indices. The constants depend on the fixed cutoffs, not on how near the input support is to t=0t=0.

Now set s=κk=−k−n/4s=\kappa_k=-k-n/4. We prove the stronger precise primitive estimate

pk,K′,L(χψ)≤Ck,K,L pk+1,K,L′(ϕ)for a finite L′=L′(L),(GE4) p_{k,K',L}(\chi\psi) \le C_{k,K,L}\,p_{k+1,K,L'}(\phi) \quad\text{for a finite }L'=L'(L), \tag{GE4}

since κk+1=s−1\kappa_{k+1}=s-1. For a tangent word with no normal derivative, D′β(χψ)=J(D′βϕ)D'^\beta(\chi\psi)=J(D'^\beta\phi), so the Volterra bound controls its Bs−1B^{s-1} norm by the corresponding ϕ\phi seminorm. Apply (GE2) to gain the missing one degree. Its tangential derivatives are J(D′β+ejϕ)J(D'^{\beta+e_j}\phi), and its normal derivative is χD′βϕ+(Dnχ)D′βψ\chi D'^\beta\phi+(D_n\chi)D'^\beta\psi. The same Volterra estimate controls all these Bs−1B^{s-1} norms by a finite set of (GE1) seminorms for ϕ\phi.

For a word with positive normal order a≥1a\ge1, preserve its entire normal weight:

xnaDnaD′βψ=xnaDna−1D′βϕ.(GE5) x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\psi =x_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi. \tag{GE5}

The right side has a factor xnx_n times a tangent word in ϕ\phi, so its Bs−1B^{s-1} norm is controlled. Its normal derivative is

Dn(xnaDnaD′βψ)=xnaDnaD′βϕ−ia xna−1Dna−1D′βϕ.(GE6) D_n(x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\psi) =x_n^aD_n^aD'^\beta\phi -ia\,x_n^{a-1}D_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi. \tag{GE6}

This is the full product rule, including its −ia-ia term; when a=0a=0 that term is absent and the earlier calculation applies. The tangential derivative is xnaDna−1D′β+ejϕx_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^{\beta+e_j}\phi, again a smooth multiple of a tangent word. A cutoff derivative contributes (Dnχ)xnaDna−1D′βϕ(D_n\chi)x_n^aD_n^{a-1}D'^\beta\phi, which has the same bound. Applying (GE2) proves the BsB^s estimate for each word, and summing finitely many words proves (GE4).

The gain just proved also holds with any fixed smooth normal output cutoff η\eta in place of χ\chi; its being one on the input support was needed only for the later equation, not for this bound. Indeed expand

taDta(ηψ)=∑b=0a(ab) ta(Dta−bη)Dtbψ. t^aD_t^a(\eta\psi) =\sum_{b=0}^a\binom ab\,t^a(D_t^{a-b}\eta)D_t^b\psi .

For b≥1b\ge1, use (GE5)–(GE6) at order bb, with the smooth additional coefficient ta−bDta−bηt^{a-b}D_t^{a-b}\eta. For b=0b=0, use the zero-normal-order Volterra estimate with output cutoff taDtaηt^aD_t^a\eta. Smooth coefficients preserve the same Besov index. This treats every derivative on the cutoff, including the case η=Dtχ\eta=D_t\chi needed in (GE9).

3. First-order normal equations at every test order

Let A0(x,D′)A_0(x,D') be a finite matrix of tangential differential operators with smooth coefficients of arbitrary finite orders, and let the extendible interior vector distribution uu solve

(Dn+A0(x,D′))u=fin X∘,f∈A′(X).(GE7) (D_n+A_0(x,D'))u=f\quad\text{in }X^\circ, \qquad f\in\mathcal A'(X). \tag{GE7}

We prove that uu has a unique extension in A′\mathcal A'. For interior compact smooth tests ϕ\phi supported in KK, we first establish the bound

∣u(ϕ)∣≤Ck,Kpk,K,L(ϕ)(GE8) |u(\phi)|\le C_{k,K}p_{k,K,L}(\phi) \tag{GE8}

for every real kk, with a finite LL depending on k,Kk,K. Since uu is extendible, choose one ambient distribution extension temporarily. On a fixed compact set it has finite order MM, so its action on interior ϕ\phi is bounded by finitely many CMC^M seminorms. Choose s>M+n/2s>M+n/2. Fourier inversion and Cauchy–Schwarz bound those seminorms by HsH^s, and a slightly larger B2,∞s+ϵB^{s+\epsilon}_{2,\infty} norm bounds HsH^s by a geometric dyadic sum. Choose k0k_0 sufficiently negative that −k0−n/4>s+ϵ-k_0-n/4>s+\epsilon. The α=0\alpha=0 term of (GE1) then proves (GE8) for k0k_0. The extension's boundary values do not enter this interior-test estimate.

There is no uniform-support assumption hidden in the induction. For a requested target order kk, choose a fixed outer compact product collar K∗K_* containing the desired compact KK in its relative interior. The preceding finite-order argument on K∗K_* fixes k0k_0. Choose a finite integer N≥max⁡(0,k−k0)N\ge\max(0,k-k_0). Fit N+1N+1 nested compact product collars between KK and K∗K_*, with a positive margin at each step. The tangential compact may be enlarged once; normal primitives preserve its support. Start with the bound at k0k_0 on the largest collar, then prove the bound at k0+1k_0+1 on the next smaller collar, and continue inward. Every cutoff and its derivative has support in the next larger collar. All constants may depend on this finite chain. When N=0N=0, only the initial estimate and inclusion are needed.

Here is the single induction step. Assume (GE8) at order kk on the larger collar, and take the input ϕ\phi in the smaller one. Let ψ\psi be (GE3), χ\chi the fixed cutoff, and use the bilinear distribution pairing. The formal tangential transpose A0tA_0^{\mathrm t} retains every coefficient derivative and reverses the matrix maps. Since Dn(χψ)=ϕ+(Dnχ)ψD_n(\chi\psi)=\phi+(D_n\chi)\psi everywhere (because χϕ=ϕ\chi\phi=\phi), the exact equation (GE7) gives

u(ϕ)=−f(χψ)+u(A0t(χψ)−(Dnχ)ψ).(GE9) u(\phi) =-f(\chi\psi) +u\bigl(A_0^{\mathrm t}(\chi\psi) -(D_n\chi)\psi\bigr). \tag{GE9}

All arguments of uu in this formula are smooth and supported in the interior. The functional ff is continuous on compact Ak\mathcal A^k tests for every kk: for k≥m0k\ge m_0 this is its defining property, and for k<m0k<m_0 the inclusion Ak↪Am0\mathcal A^k\hookrightarrow\mathcal A^{m_0} is continuous. The full A0tA_0^{\mathrm t} is continuous on Ak\mathcal A^k by Section 1, regardless of its tangential order. The primitive bound with output cutoffs χ\chi and DnχD_n\chi controls the two arguments in (GE9). Apply the induction bound on the larger collar, and the bound for ff there, followed by (GE4). This gives (GE8) at k+1k+1 on the smaller collar, with a finite, possibly increased LL. For the chosen finite chain this proves (GE8) at k0+Nk_0+N on KK. The continuous inclusion Ak↪Ak0+N\mathcal A^k\hookrightarrow \mathcal A^{k_0+N} gives the bound at the requested real order. Since the requested order and inner compact were arbitrary, this proves (GE8) on every compact at every real order.

Construct the supported extension rather than identify it with the temporary ambient one. For a compactly supported smooth boundary test ϕ\phi, the notation Qεϕ\mathcal Q_\varepsilon\phi below means Qε(Hϕ)\mathcal Q_\varepsilon(H\phi), where HϕH\phi is zero extension. It is smooth and interior-supported. All small ε\varepsilon have one fixed compact output enlargement; their distance from the boundary may tend to zero. By (GD2) and (GS7) they converge to HϕH\phi in Ak1\mathcal A^{k_1} for every k1>m0k_1>m_0. The bound (GE8) on that output compact makes their pairings Cauchy, so define

U(ϕ):=lim⁡ε↓0u(Qεϕ)(GE10) U(\phi):=\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow0} u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon\phi) \tag{GE10}

The same estimate on a common enlargement makes the limit independent of the smoothing family: subtract any two interior-supported smooth approximants converging to HϕH\phi in the same Ak1\mathcal A^{k_1}.

More generally for any compactly supported v∈Akv\in\mathcal A^k, use convergence in Ak+δ\mathcal A^{k+\delta}, δ>0\delta>0, and the bound (GE8) at k+δk+\delta to define the same limit L(v)=lim⁡εu(Qεv)L(v)=\lim_\varepsilon u(\mathcal Q_\varepsilon v). For continuity at the original order kk, apply (GE8) at kk to these approximants. The full commutator formula (GS2), bounded Fourier multipliers and coordinate cutoffs bound every output Ak\mathcal A^k seminorm by finitely many input seminorms at that same order, uniformly in ε\varepsilon. Taking the limit therefore gives an actual finite Ak\mathcal A^k bound for LL. On intersections of test orders these definitions agree by using a common larger order. This constructs one continuous pairing with the full filtered test space, including every endpoint, without assuming endpoint convergence.

To construct its ambient supported representative directly, for an ambient compact smooth test Φ\Phi set U(Φ)=L(H(Φ∣t≥0))U(\Phi)=L(H(\Phi|_{t\ge0})). The smooth-to-conormal bound (GD2) controls this pairing by finitely many ordinary smooth seminorms on a fixed compact, so it is an ambient distribution. It is supported in t≥0t\ge0, and its pairing with a smooth boundary test depends only on the restriction of Φ\Phi. Thus it has precisely the required dual conormal bounds (GD3). On an interior test, positive mollification converges in every ordinary smooth seminorm with compact support still away from the boundary. The action of the original interior uu consequently converges to its original value, proving the claimed interior restriction. Interior injectivity (GD4) proves uniqueness in A′\mathcal A'. No additional supported-distribution duality theorem is invoked.

4. Full normal order by the actual companion system

Let m≥1m\ge1 and retain the original normal-monic equation

P=Dnm+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Dnj,Pu=f in X∘,f∈A′(X).(GE11) P=D_n^m+\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')D_n^j, \qquad Pu=f\text{ in }X^\circ, \quad f\in\mathcal A'(X). \tag{GE11}

Each aja_j is an arbitrary finite-order tangential differential operator with smooth matrix coefficients; the orders of different aja_j are not required to be at most m−jm-j. Set uj=Dnjuu_j=D_n^ju, 0≤j<m0\le j<m. Each uju_j is extendible, because an ordinary derivative of an ambient extension remains an ambient extension of the interior derivative. The exact first-order companion system is

Dn(u0u1⋮um−1)+(0−I0⋯000−I⋯0⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮a0a1a2⋯am−1)(u0u1⋮um−1)=(00⋮f).(GE12) D_n\begin{pmatrix}u_0\\u_1\\\vdots\\u_{m-1}\end{pmatrix} +\begin{pmatrix} 0&-I&0&\cdots&0\\ 0&0&-I&\cdots&0\\ \vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots\\ a_0&a_1&a_2&\cdots&a_{m-1} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}u_0\\u_1\\\vdots\\u_{m-1}\end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\\vdots\\f\end{pmatrix}. \tag{GE12}

For m=1m=1 this is just (GE11), with its single matrix entry a0a_0; the displayed larger companion matrix is read for m≥2m\ge2. Section 3 applies componentwise to its actual tangential matrix, giving a unique vector extension Uj∈A′U_j\in\mathcal A' for every jj.

The corrected derivative (GD9) has the same interior restriction as Uj+1U_{j+1} for j<m−1j<m-1. Both belong to A′\mathcal A', so interior injectivity (GD4) gives the exact equality

∇nintUj=Uj+1,DnUj−Uj+1=−i (Uj∣xn=0)⊗δ(xn),xn(DnUj−Uj+1)=0.(GE13) \nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U_j=U_{j+1}, \qquad D_nU_j-U_{j+1} =-i\,(U_j|_{x_n=0})\otimes\delta(x_n), \quad x_n(D_nU_j-U_{j+1})=0. \tag{GE13}

Similarly the final companion equation gives

∇nintUm−1+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Uj=f,xn(DnUm−1+∑j=0m−1aj(x,D′)Uj−f)=0.(GE14) \nabla_n^{\mathrm{int}}U_{m-1} +\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')U_j=f, \quad x_n\left(D_nU_{m-1} +\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a_j(x,D')U_j-f\right)=0. \tag{GE14}

The tangential operators act on A′\mathcal A' by (GD9), with no normal delta correction of their own.

We keep the powers of xnx_n through the elimination. The full commutator is

Dn(xnj+1W)=xnj+1DnW−i(j+1)xnjW.(GE15) D_n(x_n^{j+1}W) =x_n^{j+1}D_nW-i(j+1)x_n^jW. \tag{GE15}

Start with U0=Dn0U0U_0=D_n^0U_0. If xnj(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^j(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0, then (GE13) implies xnj+1(Uj+1−DnUj)=0x_n^{j+1}(U_{j+1}-D_nU_j)=0, while (GE15) implies xnj+1Dn(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^{j+1}D_n(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0. Hence induction gives

xnjUj=xnjDnjU0(0≤j<m).(GE16) x_n^jU_j=x_n^jD_n^jU_0\qquad(0\le j<m). \tag{GE16}

Apply (GE15) once more at j=m−1j=m-1 to replace the first term of (GE14) after multiplication by xnmx_n^m. For each lower term j<mj<m, xnx_n commutes with aj(x,D′)a_j(x,D'), and xnmaj(Uj−DnjU0)=xnm−jajxnj(Uj−DnjU0)=0x_n^m a_j(U_j-D_n^jU_0) =x_n^{m-j}a_jx_n^j(U_j-D_n^jU_0)=0. Therefore the complete weighted equation is

xnm(PU0−f)=0.(GE17) x_n^m(PU_0-f)=0. \tag{GE17}

No original tangential coefficient or lower normal term was removed.

5. Uniqueness among all supported distribution extensions

Let VV be the difference of two supported distribution extensions of the same interior uu, each satisfying (GE17). Then supp⁡V⊂{xn=0}\operatorname{supp}V\subset\{x_n=0\}. We derive its finite normal structure here. Work in an open product subchart with a compact enlargement, and let MM bound the distribution order of VV on that enlargement. The equation is used for VV on the open subchart; we do not assume that an arbitrary localized distribution satisfies the same equation. Taylor-expand a test h(x′,t)h(x',t) through degree MM at t=0t=0, with a fixed normal cutoff η(t)=1\eta(t)=1 near zero:

h(x′,t)=η(t)∑j=0Mtjj!∂tjh(x′,0)+tM+1r(x′,t)near supp⁡V.(GE18a) h(x',t)=\eta(t)\sum_{j=0}^{M} \frac{t^j}{j!}\partial_t^jh(x',0)+t^{M+1}r(x',t) \quad\text{near }\operatorname{supp}V. \tag{GE18a}

The remainder has every normal derivative through degree MM zero on t=0t=0; multiplication by a cutoff supported in a shrinking normal neighborhood and the order-MM bound show that VV annihilates it: a derivative of total order at most MM, including derivatives on the shrinking cutoff, is bounded by CεC\varepsilon because the remainder has the factor tM+1t^{M+1}. Tangential derivatives leave that factor intact. Define tangential distributions vj(g)=(−1)jV(η(t)tjg(x′)/j!)v_j(g)=(-1)^jV(\eta(t)t^jg(x')/j!). Then applying VV to (GE18a) gives, with no omitted coefficient,

V=∑j=0μvj(x′)⊗δ(j)(xn),vμ≠0 unless V=0.(GE18) V=\sum_{j=0}^{\mu}v_j(x')\otimes\delta^{(j)}(x_n), \qquad v_\mu\ne0\text{ unless }V=0. \tag{GE18}

Here μ≤M\mu\le M is the highest nonzero coefficient. The definition of vjv_j is independent of the cutoff because VV is supported at t=0t=0. The representation is an identity of distributions on the smaller open subchart. A cutoff may be used to prove it, but the following equation is applied to that local identity for VV itself. The coefficients are tangential distributions, possibly vector valued. The normal distribution formulas, with every factor, are

Dnkδ(j)=(−i)kδ(j+k),xnmδ(j+k)={(−1)m(j+k)!(j+k−m)!δ(j+k−m),j+k≥m,0,j+k<m.(GE19) D_n^k\delta^{(j)}=(-i)^k\delta^{(j+k)},\qquad x_n^m\delta^{(j+k)} =\begin{cases} (-1)^m\dfrac{(j+k)!}{(j+k-m)!}\delta^{(j+k-m)},&j+k\ge m,\\ 0,&j+k<m. \end{cases} \tag{GE19}

They follow by applying the distributions to a test function and differentiating xnmx_n^m exactly mm times at zero; no coefficient is normalized away. In xnmPVx_n^mPV, the original leading term xnmDnm(vμδ(μ))x_n^mD_n^m(v_\mu\delta^{(\mu)}) has the top normal coefficient

im(μ+m)!μ!vμ(x′)⊗δ(μ)(xn),(GE20) i^m\frac{(\mu+m)!}{\mu!} v_\mu(x')\otimes\delta^{(\mu)}(x_n), \tag{GE20}

which is nonzero when vμ≠0v_\mu\ne0. Every lower normal term aj(x,D′)Dnja_j(x,D')D_n^j, j<mj<m, has normal order at most μ+j−m≤μ−1\mu+j-m\le\mu-1 after multiplication by xnmx_n^m. Taylor coefficients of aja_j at the boundary can lower that order further, never raise it. Contributions from vlv_l with l<μl<\mu also have order below μ\mu. The coefficient of δ(μ)\delta^{(\mu)} in xnmPV=0x_n^mPV=0 therefore forces vμ=0v_\mu=0, a contradiction. Repeating downward gives V=0V=0. This proves uniqueness among all supported distribution extensions satisfying (GE17), stronger than uniqueness only in A′\mathcal A'.

The boundary delta derivatives are linearly independent over tangential distributions: test against η(t)trg(x′)/r!\eta(t)t^r g(x')/r! and isolate the rr-th coefficient. Thus the top-coefficient comparison is an equality of actual distributions. This local uniqueness on each chart proves uniqueness on the whole collar.

6. The full boundary defect with every coefficient in order

Write am=Ia_m=I, and let Ur=(∇tint)rUU_r=(\nabla_t^{\mathrm{int}})^rU and γr=Ur∣t=0\gamma_r=U_r|_{t=0}. All these vectors belong to A′\mathcal A' by the intrinsic derivative proof. Their interior restrictions are the ordinary derivatives of uu. The original equation and injectivity therefore give ∑j=0maj(x′,t,D′)Uj=f\sum_{j=0}^m a_j(x',t,D')U_j=f.

The identity DtUr=Ur+1−iγr⊗δ(t)D_tU_r=U_{r+1}-i\gamma_r\otimes\delta(t) implies, by induction on jj,

DtjU=Uj−i∑r=0j−1γr⊗Dt j−1−rδ(t).(NE1) D_t^jU =U_j-i\sum_{r=0}^{j-1} \gamma_r\otimes D_t^{\,j-1-r}\delta(t). \tag{NE1}

For j=1j=1 it is the intrinsic derivative identity. Applying DtD_t to the formula for jj differentiates each displayed delta and adds the term with γj\gamma_j from DtUjD_tU_j, proving the next formula with all signs intact. Consequently

PU−f=−i∑j=1maj(x′,t,D′)∑r=0j−1γr⊗Dt j−1−rδ(t).(NE2) PU-f =-i\sum_{j=1}^m a_j(x',t,D') \sum_{r=0}^{j-1}\gamma_r\otimes D_t^{\,j-1-r}\delta(t). \tag{NE2}

Every aja_j remains in its original position on the left. In particular a tt-dependent coefficient acts on the delta derivatives; it has not been replaced by its boundary value. Its full action is determined by the product rule

b(x′,t)(v(x′)⊗δ(ℓ)(t))=∑q=0ℓ(−1)q(ℓq)((∂tqb)(x′,0)v)⊗δ(ℓ−q)(t).(NE3) b(x',t)\bigl(v(x')\otimes\delta^{(\ell)}(t)\bigr) =\sum_{q=0}^{\ell}(-1)^q\binom{\ell}{q} \bigl((\partial_t^q b)(x',0)v\bigr) \otimes\delta^{(\ell-q)}(t). \tag{NE3}

To prove this, pair against a test, expand its ℓ\ell-th normal derivative after multiplication by bb, and use δ(s)(h)=(−1)sh(s)(0)\delta^{(s)}(h)=(-1)^s h^{(s)}(0); the sign ratio is (−1)ℓ/(−1)ℓ−q=(−1)q(-1)^\ell/(-1)^{\ell-q}=(-1)^q. For matrix coefficients this is the same entrywise identity with the indicated matrix order. Tangential derivatives act on vv in their original operator order. Equations (NE2)–(NE3) exhibit every lower boundary term and show again that tm(PU−f)=0t^m(PU-f)=0. The original companion elimination gives the same conclusion independently.

7. Leading coefficients, charts and the precise global scope

For the invariant conclusion let PP have total differential order mm between bundles of the same finite rank over a manifold with boundary, and assume its principal coefficient on the nonzero normal covectors is invertible. In a boundary chart with defining coordinate tt, collect its ordered derivatives as P=am(x′,t)Dtm+∑j<maj(x′,t,D′)DtjP=a_m(x',t)D_t^m+\sum_{j<m}a_j(x',t,D')D_t^j. Its leading matrix remains invertible in a sufficiently small chart: its determinant is continuous and nonzero at the boundary point. The inverse is smooth there, since the cofactor formula divides polynomials in smooth entries by that nonvanishing determinant; ordinary differentiation proves every required local derivative bound. Left multiplication by am−1a_m^{-1} gives the proved monic equation with source am−1f∈A′a_m^{-1}f\in\mathcal A'. No derivative is moved across am−1a_m^{-1}. Its supported solution satisfies tm(PU−f)=0t^m(PU-f)=0, by multiplying the normalized equation on the left by ama_m, which commutes with tmt^m.

The local supported distributions agree on overlaps after the actual bundle and density coordinate maps. Indeed these maps preserve the conormal test spaces and their full dual pairings by the earlier coordinate proof, and the two local extensions have the same interior restriction. Their difference vanishes by interior injectivity. Choose the proved locally finite partition subordinate to the charts and the interior, and define the global functional by the sum of local functionals on the partitioned test. Only finitely many summands meet a compact test; the overlap equality makes the result independent of the partition and equal to each local functional. Finite local conormal bounds give its full dual conormal continuity on each compact. In the interior use the original uu, so this constructs the required global supported extension, unique by the same local injectivity.

If ρ\rho is another positive defining function in a chart, then ρ=a(x′,t)t\rho=a(x',t)t, where a(x′,t)=∫01∂tρ(x′,st) dsa(x',t)=\int_0^1\partial_t\rho(x',st)\,ds is smooth and positive near the boundary. Therefore ρm(PU−f)=amtm(PU−f)=0\rho^m(PU-f)=a^m t^m(PU-f)=0, and conversely by multiplication by a−ma^{-m}. This proves that the weighted equation is independent of defining function. It holds for any smooth choices of ambient coefficient extensions: their differences vanish to every order at the boundary and on the interior side, so multiplication with a supported finite-order distribution vanishes by the earlier flat-test argument. The same argument applies after the finitely many derivatives in each differential term. Existence and uniqueness among all supported extensions are thus well defined independently of these choices.

The arbitrary tangential-order statement in the opening theorem is a statement on a fixed product collar. The coordinate-invariant assertion here uses the stated total-order and noncharacteristic hypotheses. The remaining compressed wave-front statement is a separate theorem; the proof above establishes the extension, all intrinsic jets and the exact distributional boundary defect needed for it.