Contents

Relative Weyl projectors and the Chern cutoff form

Written and dedicated to the public domain by Codex, September 2026 (CC0).

The matrix index can be represented by two different exact objects. A Fredholm operator and its cutoff inverse produce a trace-class difference of operator idempotents. The same full symbols produce a coefficientwise compact difference of formal Weyl idempotents. The zeroth formal projector has a Chern form whose integral equals the original cutoff differential form; its pointwise difference is an explicit compact exact form. This lesson proves those constructions and keeps both matrix product orders, the original phase coordinates, the cutoff endpoints and the ambient orientation.

For the metric and ordered Weyl product, read Two measuring scales, one Weyl product. For bounded quantization and compactness, read When a moving symbol scale controls an operator. For Fredholm stability, read Finite defects under perturbation. For the trace-class threshold, read Weyl kernels, operator traces, and a finite trace-class test. For the scaled errors and their finite coefficient expansion, read Scaled Weyl parametrices and the surviving differential degree. For the powers-of-errors identity, read Traces that survive passage to cohomology. Every required symbol and operation is also defined where used below.

Let n,ν≥1n,\nu\ge1, z=(x1,ξ1,…,xn,ξn)z=(x_1,\xi_1,\ldots,x_n,\xi_n), Ω=dx1∧dξ1∧⋯∧dxn∧dξn\Omega=dx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_n\wedge d\xi_n, h(z)=(1+|z|2)−1h(z)=(1+|z|^2)^{-1}, and gz=h(z)(|dx|2+|dξ|2)g_z=h(z)(|dx|^2+|d\xi|^2). Assume the full matrix a∈S(1,g;End⁡ℂν)a\in S(1,g;\operatorname{End}\mathbb C^\nu) has a uniformly bounded inverse on an exterior region. Choose a smooth scalar cutoff ψ\psi, equal to one outside a compact set and zero near the complement of that invertibility region. Put b=ψa−1b=\psi a^{-1} there, extended smoothly by zero, and t=1−ψt=1-\psi. Thus ab=ba=ψIνab=ba=\psi I_\nu; K=supp⁡tK=\operatorname{supp}t is compact. Fix the same Weyl scaling and λ\lambda convention as in the scaled-index lesson.

1. Exact operator construction

For fixed 0<ε≤10<\varepsilon\le1, let A=aεw:HX→HYA=a_\varepsilon^w:H_X\to H_Y and B=bεw:HY→HXB=b_\varepsilon^w:H_Y\to H_X, where HX,HYH_X,H_Y are labeled copies of L2(ℝn;ℂν)L^2(\mathbb R^n;\mathbb C^\nu). The metric operator bounds and the scaled Weyl construction make them bounded. Define r=IX−BA,s=IY−AB,rB=Bs,Ar=sA.(RP1) r=I_X-BA,\qquad s=I_Y-AB,\qquad rB=Bs,\qquad Ar=sA. \tag{RP1} The last identities follow by distributing products, without commuting AA and BB.

For an integer N≥n+1N\ge n+1, define the finite corrected parametrix CN=B∑j=0N−1sj=(∑j=0N−1rj)B,R=IX−CNA=rN,S=IY−ACN=sN.(RP2) C_N=B\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}s^j =\left(\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}r^j\right)B,\qquad R=I_X-C_NA=r^N,\qquad S=I_Y-AC_N=s^N. \tag{RP2} Induction from (RP1) gives the equality of sums; both error identities are geometric telescopings. In particular RCN=CNSRC_N=C_NS and AR=SAAR=SA. The scaled-error estimates and the finite trace-class criterion prove that R,SR,S are trace class at the full N≥n+1N\ge n+1 threshold. No trace-class assertion about rr or ss is needed.

On HX⊕HYH_X\oplus H_Y, set E+=(IXCN0IY),E−=(IX0−AIY),U=E+E−E+=(RCN(IY+S)−AS),(RP3) E_+=\begin{pmatrix}I_X&C_N\\0&I_Y\end{pmatrix},\qquad E_-=\begin{pmatrix}I_X&0\\-A&I_Y\end{pmatrix},\qquad U=E_+E_-E_+ =\begin{pmatrix}R&C_N(I_Y+S)\\-A&S\end{pmatrix}, \tag{RP3} U−1=E+−1E−−1E+−1=(R−CN(IY+S)AS).(RP4) U^{-1}=E_+^{-1}E_-^{-1}E_+^{-1} =\begin{pmatrix}R&-C_N(I_Y+S)\\A&S\end{pmatrix}. \tag{RP4} Direct block multiplication using (RP2) verifies each entry; the triangular factorization proves invertibility without assuming AA invertible. Let p=diag⁡(IX,0)p=\operatorname{diag}(I_X,0), e0=diag⁡(0,IY)e_0=\operatorname{diag}(0,I_Y), e=UpU−1e=UpU^{-1}. Then e2=ee^2=e, e02=e0e_0^2=e_0, and the exact block difference is e−e0=(R2−RCN(IY+S)−AR−S2).(RP5) e-e_0= \begin{pmatrix} R^2&-RC_N(I_Y+S)\\ -AR&-S^2 \end{pmatrix}. \tag{RP5} Each block is trace class because R,SR,S are trace class and A,CNA,C_N bounded. This is a relative idempotent pair, with no selfadjointness assertion. The block trace, the powers-of-errors identity at exponent 2N2N, and positive-scaling index transport give Tr⁡HX⊕HY(e−e0)=Tr⁡HXr2N−Tr⁡HYs2N=ind⁡A=ind⁡aw.(RP6) \operatorname{Tr}_{H_X\oplus H_Y}(e-e_0) =\operatorname{Tr}_{H_X}r^{2N}-\operatorname{Tr}_{H_Y}s^{2N} =\operatorname{ind}A =\operatorname{ind}a^w. \tag{RP6} Thus the relative trace-class class and analytic trace arise from the original two orders; no external index theorem is being assumed.

2. A compactly supported flat formal projector

Use the original coordinates z=(x1,ξ1,…,xn,ξn)z=(x_1,\xi_1,\ldots,x_n,\xi_n), the exact ordered Weyl coefficients, and the constant Poisson tensor J2p,2p−1=1J^{2p,2p-1}=1, J2p−1,2p=−1J^{2p-1,2p}=-1. The formal product is f#λg=∑m≥0λm∑p+q+k=mCk(fp,gq),Ck(f,g)=Jj1l1⋯Jjklkk!(2i)k(∂j1⋯∂jkf)(∂l1⋯∂lkg).(RP7) f\#_\lambda g=\sum_{m\ge0}\lambda^m \sum_{p+q+k=m}C_k(f_p,g_q),\qquad C_k(f,g)=\frac{J^{j_1l_1}\cdots J^{j_kl_k}} {k!(2i)^k} (\partial_{j_1}\cdots\partial_{j_k}f) (\partial_{l_1}\cdots\partial_{l_k}g). \tag{RP7} Every coefficient is finite and retains matrix order. On three tensor factors the constant-coefficient Poisson bidifferential operators commute; their exponential identity proves associativity coefficient by coefficient. The parameter identity is ℏ=λ/i\hbar=\lambda/i; no convergence of the infinite formal series is asserted.

On the actual open invertibility region UaU_a of aa, construct a formal star inverse c=∑m≥0λmcmc=\sum_{m\ge0}\lambda^m c_m from c0=a−1c_0=a^{-1} and cm=−(∑k=1mCk(cm−k,a))a−1(m≥1).(RP8) c_m=-\left(\sum_{k=1}^{m}C_k(c_{m-k},a)\right)a^{-1} \qquad(m\ge1). \tag{RP8} This recursion gives c#λa=Ic\#_\lambda a=I. A right-inverse recursion gives a#λd=Ia\#_\lambda d=I; associativity proves c=c#(a#d)=(c#a)#d=dc=c\#(a\#d)=(c\#a)\#d=d, so cc is two-sided. The inverse-derivative formula, the S(1,g)S(1,g) estimates, and the kk derivative pairs in CkC_k show inductively that cm∈S(hm,g)c_m\in S(h^m,g) on the exterior region where a−1a^{-1} is uniformly bounded. On the compact part of supp⁡ψ\operatorname{supp}\psi, all derivatives are bounded and hh is bounded below. Hence B∞=∑m≥0λmbm,bm=ψcm on Ua,bm=0 where ψ=0(RP9) B_\infty=\sum_{m\ge0}\lambda^m b_m,\qquad b_m=\psi c_m\text{ on }U_a,\quad b_m=0\text{ where }\psi=0 \tag{RP9} is a formal series of globally smooth S(hm,g)S(h^m,g) coefficients. Its zeroth coefficient is exactly the original bb.

Put K=supp⁡(1−ψ)K=\operatorname{supp}(1-\psi), a fixed compact set. Outside KK, ψ=1\psi=1 with all derivatives zero, so B∞=cB_\infty=c coefficientwise. The two formal errors ρ=I−B∞#λa,σ=I−a#λB∞(RP10) \rho=I-B_\infty\#_\lambda a,\qquad \sigma=I-a\#_\lambda B_\infty \tag{RP10} have every coefficient supported in KK. This does not say that the actual analytic errors are compactly supported.

Use the same three triangular block matrices (RP3) with A=aA=a, C=B∞C=B_\infty, and every product interpreted as #λ\#_\lambda. Triangular inversion and associativity give an exact idempotent e∞=U∞#p#U∞−1e_\infty=U_\infty\#p\#U_\infty^{-1}. The calculation (RP5) remains valid in this associative algebra with R=ρ,S=σR=\rho,S=\sigma. Every block of e∞−e0e_\infty-e_0 contains ρ\rho or σ\sigma, and every CkC_k is local. Therefore e∞#λe∞=e∞,[λm](e∞−e0)∈Cc∞(ℝ2n;M2ν(ℂ)),supp⁡[λm](e∞−e0)⊆K(m≥0).(RP11) e_\infty\#_\lambda e_\infty=e_\infty,\qquad [\lambda^m](e_\infty-e_0) \in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R^{2n};M_{2\nu}(\mathbb C)), \quad\operatorname{supp}[\lambda^m](e_\infty-e_0)\subseteq K \quad(m\ge0). \tag{RP11} The compact relative pair is the input for the source theorem in the next lesson; its trace normalization is proved there.

3. Comparison with the original finite trace coefficient

Form the finite CNC_N of (RP2) in the formal #λ\#_\lambda algebra, with r=I−b#ar=I-b\#a and s=I−a#bs=I-a\#b. Outside KK, the zeroth coefficients of r,sr,s vanish because b=a−1b=a^{-1}. Locality implies r#N=s#N=O(λN)r^{\#N}=s^{\#N}=O(\lambda^N) there. The formal (RP2) makes CNC_N a two-sided inverse of aa through degree N−1N-1 outside KK; uniqueness of (RP8) yields [λm](CN−B∞)=0 outside K,0≤m<N.(RP12) [\lambda^m](C_N-B_\infty)=0\text{ outside }K, \qquad 0\le m<N. \tag{RP12} Interpolate Cu=(1−u)CN+uB∞C_u=(1-u)C_N+uB_\infty, 0≤u≤10\le u\le1, and build eu=U(Cu)#p#U(Cu)−1e_u=U(C_u)\#p\#U(C_u)^{-1} from the same elementary matrices. Every eue_u is exactly idempotent. Since CuC_u is a two-sided inverse modulo λN\lambda^N outside KK, both eu−e0e_u-e_0 and ∂ueu\partial_u e_u have compact support in each coefficient through degree N−1N-1.

If at least one of f,gf,g has compact support, the constant-coefficient formula (RP7) and integration by parts give ∫ℝ2ntr⁡Ck(f,g)dz={∫tr⁡(fg)dz,k=0,0,k≥1.(RP13) \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}}\operatorname{tr}C_k(f,g)\,dz =\begin{cases} \int\operatorname{tr}(fg)\,dz,&k=0,\\ 0,&k\ge1. \end{cases} \tag{RP13} For k≥1k\ge1, move the derivatives on the compact factor to the other factor; each resulting positive-order term contracts an antisymmetric JjlJ^{jl} with symmetric second derivatives. The boundary terms vanish by compact support. At k=0k=0, finite matrix trace is cyclic. Thus coefficientwise integration of the matrix trace is cyclic for #λ\#_\lambda whenever one factor is compactly supported.

Differentiating eu#eu=eue_u\#e_u=e_u gives eu#eu′#eu=0e_u\#e'_u\#e_u=0 and then the exact identity eu′=[[eu′,eu]#,eu]#.(RP14) e'_u=[[e'_u,e_u]_\# ,e_u]_\#. \tag{RP14} At degrees at most nn when N=n+1N=n+1, every term contains a compactly supported coefficient of eu′e'_u; (RP13) makes its integrated trace zero. Integrating in uu, and then taking the block diagonal of (RP5), proves for 0≤k≤n0\le k\le n ∫tr⁡2ν[λk](e∞−e0)dz=∫tr⁡2ν[λk](eN−e0)dz=∫tr⁡ν[λk](r#2N−s#2N)dz.(RP15) \int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^k](e_\infty-e_0)\,dz =\int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^k](e_N-e_0)\,dz =\int\operatorname{tr}_{\nu}[\lambda^k] (r^{\#2N}-s^{\#2N})\,dz . \tag{RP15} No matrix factor or cutoff contribution has been deleted.

The scaled-degree estimates apply with exponent 2N≥n+12N\ge n+1: the same induction gives a uniform remainder in S(hεn+1,gε)S(h_\varepsilon^{n+1},g_\varepsilon), and every coefficient through degree nn has compact support because 2N>n2N>n. The trace-class remainder is O(ε2)O(\varepsilon^2) by the scaled trace estimate and finite trace-class criterion. Equation (RP6) is constant for ε>0\varepsilon>0, so uniqueness of its finite expansion in powers ε2k−2n\varepsilon^{2k-2n} forces all integrated difference coefficients below nn to vanish and the degree-nn coefficient to equal ind⁡aw\operatorname{ind}a^w. With (RP15), this proves ∫tr⁡2ν[λk](e∞−e0)dz=0(0≤k<n),ind⁡aw=(2π)−n∫ℝ2ntr⁡2ν[λn](e∞−e0)(z)dz.(RP16) \int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^k](e_\infty-e_0)\,dz=0 \quad(0\le k<n),\qquad \boxed{\displaystyle \operatorname{ind}a^w=(2\pi)^{-n} \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}} \operatorname{tr}_{2\nu} [\lambda^n](e_\infty-e_0)(z)\,dz.} \tag{RP16} The integral retains the original dx1dξ1⋯dxndξndx_1\,d\xi_1\cdots dx_n\,d\xi_n orientation and CI12/CT15’s (2π)−n(2\pi)^{-n} factor. The source comparison in the following lesson keeps the exact parameter ℏ=λ/i\hbar=\lambda/i, the coordinate-orientation sign and the full compact projector pair. Equation (RP16) alone makes no equality with the Chern integral proved below.

4. The zeroth projector and its complete Chern density

Keep a,b=ψa−1,t=1−ψa,b=\psi a^{-1},t=1-\psi as defined above, including the full invertibility domain UaU_a, the extension of bb by zero, and the original ambient orientation Ω=dx1∧dξ1∧⋯∧dxn∧dξn\Omega=dx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_n\wedge d\xi_n. On UaU_a, put θ=a−1da\theta=a^{-1}da. All products of matrix-valued forms below retain their written order and the exterior wedge; tr\operatorname{tr} is the ordinary finite matrix trace.

At λ=0\lambda=0, the two formal error symbols RP10 are both tIνtI_\nu, so RP3–RP5 give the exact smooth matrices U0=(tIνb(1+t)−atIν),U0−1=(tIν−b(1+t)atIν),P=U0(Iν000)U0−1.(CP1) U_0= \begin{pmatrix}tI_\nu&b(1+t)\\-a&tI_\nu\end{pmatrix}, \qquad U_0^{-1}= \begin{pmatrix}tI_\nu&-b(1+t)\\a&tI_\nu\end{pmatrix}, \qquad P=U_0\begin{pmatrix}I_\nu&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}U_0^{-1}. \tag{CP1} The inverse is verified by both matrix products using the original ab=ba=ψIνab=ba=\psi I_\nu and ψ=1−t\psi=1-t; no global inverse of aa is required. Thus P2=PP^2=P on all of ℝ2n\mathbb R^{2n}, and P=diag⁡(0,Iν)P=\operatorname{diag}(0,I_\nu) outside supp⁡t\operatorname{supp}t. Its coefficients are smooth even where aa is not invertible.

Set Θ=U0−1dU0\Theta=U_0^{-1}dU_0, a 2ν2\nu-square matrix of one-forms. Differentiating (CP1), with every block multiplication in order, gives Θ12=t(1+t)db−bdt,Θ21=adt−tda.(CP2) \Theta_{12}=t(1+t)\,db-b\,dt,\qquad \Theta_{21}=a\,dt-t\,da. \tag{CP2} With p=diag⁡(Iν,0)p=\operatorname{diag}(I_\nu,0), dP=U0[Θ,p]U0−1dP=U_0[\Theta,p]U_0^{-1}, where [Θ,p]=(0−Θ12Θ210).Consequentlytr⁡2ν(P(dP)2n)=(−1)ntr⁡ν((Θ12∧Θ21)n).(CP3) [\Theta,p]= \begin{pmatrix}0&-\Theta_{12}\\\Theta_{21}&0\end{pmatrix}. \quad\text{Consequently}\quad \operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}\!\left(P(dP)^{2n}\right) =(-1)^n\operatorname{tr}_{\nu} \left((\Theta_{12}\wedge\Theta_{21})^n\right). \tag{CP3} The sign is the nn factors −Θ12∧Θ21-\Theta_{12}\wedge\Theta_{21} in the first diagonal block. Cyclic matrix trace removes the outer U0,U0−1U_0,U_0^{-1}, but does not reorder any interior factor.

On UaU_a, the exact inverse differential and the original cutoff give da=aθ,db=(−dtIν−ψθ)a−1.(CP4) da=a\theta,\qquad db=(-dt\,I_\nu-\psi\theta)a^{-1}. \tag{CP4} Substitute (CP4) into (CP2), keeping dtdt as a scalar one-form: Θ12=[−(1+t2)dtIν−t(1+t)ψθ]a−1,Θ21=a(dtIν−tθ).(CP5) \Theta_{12} =\bigl[-(1+t^2)dt\,I_\nu-t(1+t)\psi\theta\bigr]a^{-1}, \qquad \Theta_{21}=a(dt\,I_\nu-t\theta). \tag{CP5} Since (1+t2)+(1+t)ψ=(1+t2)+(1−t2)=2(1+t^2)+(1+t)\psi=(1+t^2)+(1-t^2)=2, direct multiplication yields the untraced identity X:=Θ12∧Θ21=2tdt∧θ+t2(1−t2)θ2.(CP6) X:=\Theta_{12}\wedge\Theta_{21} =2t\,dt\wedge\theta+t^2(1-t^2)\theta^2. \tag{CP6} All matrix factors remain in the order inherited from a,ba,b. In particular the second term is a genuine noncommutative Maurer–Cartan contribution; it cannot be dropped pointwise.

The scalar form dtdt satisfies (dt∧θ)2=0(dt\wedge\theta)^2=0. Graded cyclicity gives tr⁡θ2n=0\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n}=0: moving the first odd θ\theta past the other 2n−12n-1 odd factors changes the sign. Every mixed term in XnX^n with exactly one dt∧θdt\wedge\theta has the same finite trace, since its two-form factors are cyclically moved with sign +1+1; terms with two such factors vanish. Therefore the complete traced Chern density is tr⁡2ν(P(dP)2n)=(−1)n2nt2n−1(1−t2)n−1dt∧tr⁡ν(θ2n−1)on Ua.(CP7) \operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}\!\left(P(dP)^{2n}\right) =(-1)^n\,2n\,t^{2n-1}(1-t^2)^{n-1} dt\wedge\operatorname{tr}_\nu(\theta^{2n-1}) \quad\text{on }U_a. \tag{CP7} This form extends by zero across the noninvertible region because dt=0dt=0 on a neighborhood where ψ=0\psi=0; it is supported in the compact cutoff transition. Formula (CP7) follows from the full original matrix PP, rather than a rank-one or determinant-only replacement.

For comparison, put Y=db∧daY=db\wedge da. Equation (CP4) gives Y=−dt∧θ−ψθ2Y=-d t\wedge\theta-\psi\theta^2. Terms with two copies of dtdt vanish. Among the remaining nn choices for its position, graded cyclicity makes each traced word equal; the all-θ2\theta^2 trace vanishes. This proves directly from the original b=ψa−1b=\psi a^{-1}, with matrix order intact, that 2tntr⁡ν[(db∧da)n]=(−1)n2ntn(1−t)n−1dt∧tr⁡ν(θ2n−1).(CP8) 2t^n\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(db\wedge da)^n] =(-1)^n\,2n\,t^n(1-t)^{n-1} dt\wedge\operatorname{tr}_\nu(\theta^{2n-1}). \tag{CP8} The two densities (CP7)–(CP8) generally differ pointwise when n>1n>1. Define the exact scalar polynomial Wn(t)=2n∫0t[v2n−1(1−v2)n−1−vn(1−v)n−1]dv.(CP9) W_n(t)=2n\int_0^t \left[v^{2n-1}(1-v^2)^{n-1} -v^n(1-v)^{n-1}\right]\,dv . \tag{CP9} It has Wn(0)=0W_n(0)=0. Its other endpoint also vanishes: substituting u=v2u=v^2 in the first integral gives 12B(n,n)\tfrac12 B(n,n), while the second is B(n+1,n)B(n+1,n); the elementary factorial identities 12((n−1)!)2(2n−1)!=n!(n−1)!(2n)!(CP10) \frac12\,\frac{((n-1)!)^2}{(2n-1)!} =\frac{n!(n-1)!}{(2n)!} \tag{CP10} show these moments are equal. Thus Wn(1)=0W_n(1)=0 with no endpoint suppressed. The Maurer–Cartan equation dθ=−θ2d\theta=-\theta^2 and graded cyclicity give dtr⁡θ2n−1=0d\,\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n-1}=0: the derivative is a signed sum of 2n−12n-1 copies of −tr⁡θ2n-\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n}, and that even trace is zero. Subtract (CP8) from (CP7), use Wn′W_n', and differentiate the full product to obtain the exact pointwise morphism on UaU_a: tr⁡2ν(P(dP)2n)−2tntr⁡ν[(db∧da)n]=(−1)nd(Wn(t)tr⁡ν(θ2n−1)).(CP11) \boxed{\displaystyle \operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}\!\left(P(dP)^{2n}\right) -2t^n\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(db\wedge da)^n] =(-1)^n d\!\left( W_n(t)\operatorname{tr}_\nu(\theta^{2n-1})\right).} \tag{CP11} The right-hand primitive extends by zero to a smooth compactly supported form on the entire phase space. Near a noninvertible point ψ=0,t=1\psi=0,t=1 on a neighborhood and Wn(1)=0W_n(1)=0; outside a compact set ψ=1,t=0\psi=1,t=0 and Wn(0)=0W_n(0)=0. On the remaining compact transition aa is invertible. This proves the support and domain extension, rather than merely ignoring an inner boundary.

Integrate (CP11) in the fixed ambient orientation Ω\Omega. Stokes applied to the compactly supported primitive proves ∫ℝ2ntr⁡2ν(P(dP)2n)=2∫ℝ2n(1−ψ)ntr⁡ν[(db∧da)n].(CP12) \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}}\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu} \!\left(P(dP)^{2n}\right) =2\int_{\mathbb R^{2n}} (1-\psi)^n\operatorname{tr}_{\nu}[(db\wedge da)^n]. \tag{CP12}

5. The exact boundary primitive

Keep the original n≥1n\ge1, cutoff ψ\psi, invertible-region one-form θ=a−1da\theta=a^{-1}da, and ambient orientation Ω=dx1∧dξ1∧⋯∧dxn∧dξn\Omega=dx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_n\wedge d\xi_n. The calculation preceding (CP8), with dψ=−dtd\psi=-dt, gives Tr⁡[(db∧da)n]=n(−1)n−1ψn−1dψ∧Tr⁡(θ2n−1).(BN1) \operatorname{Tr}[(db\wedge da)^n] =n(-1)^{n-1}\psi^{n-1}d\psi\wedge \operatorname{Tr}(\theta^{2n-1}). \tag{BN1} Multiplying by (1−ψ)n(1-\psi)^n retains the full scalar cutoff factor. Define a scalar polynomial primitive Fn(t)=n∫0tun−1(1−u)ndu=n∑j=0n(−1)j(nj)tn+jn+j,Fn′(t)=ntn−1(1−t)n.(BN2) F_n(t) =n\int_0^t u^{n-1}(1-u)^n\,du =n\sum_{j=0}^{n} (-1)^j\binom nj\,{t^{n+j}\over n+j}, \qquad F_n'(t)=nt^{n-1}(1-t)^n . \tag{BN2} The binomial expression is an exact finite sum, including the endpoint t=0t=0. Since Maurer–Cartan and graded cyclicity give dTr⁡(θ2n−1)=0d\,\operatorname{Tr}(\theta^{2n-1})=0, the product form extends smoothly through the noninvertible set and obeys (1−ψ)nTr⁡[(db∧da)n]=(−1)n−1d(Fn(ψ)Tr(θ2n−1)).(BN3) (1-\psi)^n\operatorname{Tr}[(db\wedge da)^n] =(-1)^{n-1}d\!\left( F_n(\psi)\operatorname{Tr}(\theta^{2n-1}) \right). \tag{BN3} The extension by zero is legitimate because ψ\psi is identically zero near the noninvertible region and Fn(0)=0F_n(0)=0.

To compute its outer value with every factorial, use the scalar beta integral. Expand neither endpoint away: Fn(1)=n∫01un−1(1−u)ndu=nB(n,n+1)=nΓ(n)Γ(n+1)Γ(2n+1)=(n!)2(2n)!.(BN4) \begin{aligned} F_n(1) &=n\int_0^1 u^{n-1}(1-u)^n\,du\\ &=n\,B(n,n+1) =n\,{\Gamma(n)\Gamma(n+1)\over\Gamma(2n+1)} ={(n!)^2\over(2n)!}. \end{aligned} \tag{BN4} The beta equality follows directly by changing variables u=s/(s+t)u=s/(s+t), v=s+tv=s+t in Γ(n)Γ(n+1)=∫s,t>0sn−1tne−(s+t)dsdt\Gamma(n)\Gamma(n+1)=\int_{s,t>0}s^{n-1}t^n e^{-(s+t)}\,ds\,dt; the Jacobian is vv, so the vv-integral is Γ(2n+1)\Gamma(2n+1). This proves the value directly with every original factor. For Stokes, choose an actual open ball B=BR={|z|<R}B=B_R=\{|z|<R\} whose interior contains K=supp⁡(1−ψ)K=\operatorname{supp}(1-\psi). Its boundary has an open collar where ψ=1\psi=1 and aa is invertible. The global smooth primitive in (BN3) has derivative supported in KK, so its full-space derivative integral equals its integral over BRB_R. On the boundary its value is Fn(1)Tr⁡(θ2n−1)F_n(1)\operatorname{Tr}(\theta^{2n-1}). Thus Stokes in the original orientation, with no inner boundary omitted, gives the exact identity ∫ℝ2n(1−ψ)nTr⁡[(db∧da)n]=(−1)n−1(n!)2(2n)!∫∂BTr⁡[(a−1da)2n−1].(BN5) \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}} (1-\psi)^n\operatorname{Tr}[(db\wedge da)^n] =(-1)^{n-1}{(n!)^2\over(2n)!} \int_{\partial B} \operatorname{Tr}[(a^{-1}da)^{2n-1}]. \tag{BN5} For n=1n=1, F1(1)=1/2F_1(1)=1/2; for n=2n=2, F2(1)=1/6F_2(1)=1/6. These are checks of the exact scalar moment.

Combining this proved classical equality with (BN5) yields the fully oriented boundary value ∫ℝ2ntr⁡2ν(P(dP)2n)=2(−1)n−1(n!)2(2n)!∫∂Btr⁡ν[(a−1da)2n−1],(CP13) \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}}\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu} \!\left(P(dP)^{2n}\right) =2(-1)^{n-1}\frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!} \int_{\partial B}\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(a^{-1}da)^{2n-1}], \tag{CP13} where ∂B\partial B has the outward boundary orientation induced from dx1∧dξ1∧⋯∧dxn∧dξndx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_n\wedge d\xi_n. The exact classical cutoff coefficient is therefore the Chern functional (2π)−n2inn!∫(1−ψ)ntr⁡ν[(db∧da)n]=(2π)−n1inn!∫tr⁡2ν[P(dP)2n].(CP14) (2\pi)^{-n}\frac{2}{i^n n!} \int(1-\psi)^n\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(db\wedge da)^n] =(2\pi)^{-n}\frac{1}{i^n n!} \int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[P(dP)^{2n}]. \tag{CP14} This is an exact comparison between the original cutoff expression and its relative-projector Chern form, with the compactly supported defect (CP11). The next lesson proves that (RP16)’s degree-nn formal trace equals the right side of (CP14) by applying the cited source theorem to this same pair. The direct term-by-term expansion of the separate finite Weyl coefficient is a different calculation.

6. Worked example: a full matrix symbol with zero index

For n=ν=1n=\nu=1, take a(x,ξ)=2+arctan⁡xa(x,\xi)=2+\arctan x and choose ψ≡1\psi\equiv1, which is allowed because aa is invertible everywhere. Its Weyl operator is multiplication by 2+arctan⁡x2+\arctan x, whose bounded inverse is multiplication by (2+arctan⁡x)−1(2+\arctan x)^{-1}. Hence its analytic index is zero. The symbol and cutoff are independent of ξ\xi, so the complete exterior 22-form (db∧da)(db\wedge da) vanishes. Formula (CP12) then makes the integrated Chern 22-form zero as well. This is an exact nonconstant operator and formal example, but it is not in the isotropic symbol class assumed at the start of this lesson. In fact ∂xa(0,ξ)=1\partial_xa(0,\xi)=1 for every ξ\xi, whereas that class requires a bound by C(1+ξ2)−1/2C(1+\xi^2)^{-1/2}; this is the same product-metric example checked in RC10 and RT1. Retain the original symbol and its actual class. Since both aa and b=a−1b=a^{-1} depend only on xx, every positive Weyl differential coefficient vanishes: each Poisson pair requires one ξ\xi-derivative. The analytic operators are the exact inverse multiplication pair, so r=s=0r=s=0 and the construction RP1–RP6 gives e=e0e=e_0 directly. The whole formal inverse also has c0=b,cm=0c_0=b,c_m=0 for m>0m>0, so RP7–RP11 give the same constant relative projector. These facts prove the example at its actual generality without invoking the general isotropic argument RP16.

An example satisfying the isotropic hypotheses. Keep n=ν=1n=\nu=1, and use the full original symbol and cutoff aG(x,ξ)=2+e−x2−ξ2,ψG=1,bG=(2+e−x2−ξ2)−1,tG=0.(GE1) a_G(x,\xi)=2+e^{-x^2-\xi^2},\qquad \psi_G=1,\qquad b_G=(2+e^{-x^2-\xi^2})^{-1},\qquad t_G=0. \tag{GE1} Every positive derivative of the Gaussian is a polynomial times that same Gaussian. Every positive derivative of bGb_G is a finite sum of such products with powers of the full denominator 2+e−x2−ξ22+e^{-x^2-\xi^2}, which is at least two. Thus the positive derivatives of both symbols decrease faster than every radial power; their zeroth values are bounded. They belong to the exact original S(1,g)S(1,g) class, and aG≥2a_G\geq2 is uniformly invertible everywhere.

Let g0(x)=π−1/4e−x2/2g_0(x)=\pi^{-1/4}e^{-x^2/2} and let P0f=g0⟨f,g0⟩P_0f=g_0\langle f,g_0\rangle be its actual rank-one orthogonal projector. The full Weyl Fourier calculation CI13 gives aGw=2I+12P0,(aGw)−1=12I−110P0,ind⁡aGw=0.(GE2) a_G^w=2I+\frac12P_0,\qquad (a_G^w)^{-1}=\frac12I-\frac1{10}P_0, \qquad \operatorname{ind}a_G^w=0. \tag{GE2} Indeed P02=P0P_0^2=P_0, and on the exact decomposition L2=span⁡{g0}⊕g0⟂L^2=\operatorname{span}\{g_0\}\oplus g_0^\perp, the first operator has eigenvalues 5/25/2 and 22; the displayed inverse has eigenvalues 2/52/5 and 1/21/2. Both products are the identity on this decomposition, proving bounded invertibility and zero kernel and cokernel. This computes the original operator inverse; it does not identify it with the pointwise cutoff inverse symbol bGb_G.

The full formal inverse (RP8) exists globally since aGa_G is invertible everywhere. Because ψG=1\psi_G=1, its two formal errors in (RP10) are zero at every degree, and e∞=e0e_\infty=e_0. The finite corrected parametrices have the complete trace-class powers in RP2; RP6 proves their relative operator trace is zero. For the classical zeroth projector, tG=0t_G=0 in CP1 gives P=e0P=e_0 pointwise, hence dP=0dP=0. Also aGa_G and bGb_G are scalar functions of the same original x2+ξ2x^2+\xi^2; their differentials are scalar multiples of its differential, so dbG∧daG=0db_G\wedge da_G=0. Thus every side of RP16, CP12 and CP14 is zero with its original factors, as the analytic calculation requires. No individual analytic error is asserted to vanish.

The exact Gaussian isotropic operator and its inverse on both original summands

The two summands, original eigenvalues and full inverse in the diagram are proved by (GE1)–(GE2) and CI13. The actual finite relative trace, full formal projector and classical Chern form are all checked above. This example supplies the lesson’s stated isotropic hypotheses while the earlier product-metric example remains identifiable.

7. Exercises with solutions

Exercise 1. In dimension n=1n=1, compute W1(t)W_1(t) in (CP9) and decide whether the two densities in (CP11) differ pointwise.

Solution. Both terms in the integrand of (CP9) are vv, since (1−v2)0=(1−v)0=1(1-v^2)^0=(1-v)^0=1. Thus W1(t)=0W_1(t)=0 for every tt. Equation (CP11) says the two 22-forms agree pointwise in this dimension, including on the cutoff transition.

Exercise 2. Evaluate F2(1)F_2(1) without quoting a beta-function table and use it to state the factor multiplying the outward boundary integral in (BN5) for n=2n=2.

Solution. Direct polynomial integration gives F2(1)=2∫01u(1−u)2du=2(1/2−2/3+1/4)=1/6F_2(1)=2\int_0^1 u(1-u)^2\,du =2(1/2-2/3+1/4)=1/6. The sign in (BN5) is (−1)2−1=−1(-1)^{2-1}=-1, so the factor is −1/6-1/6, with the boundary oriented by dx1∧dξ1∧dx2∧dξ2dx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge dx_2\wedge d\xi_2.

References

The compact formal projector is prepared for the higher algebraic index theorem of M. Pflaum, H. Posthuma and X. Tang, arXiv:0805.1411v3, original IndThms.tex, theorem thm:higher-algind, lines 412–479. The following lesson proves the exact source product, cyclic pairing, orientation and theorem specialization before using that theorem to identify (RP16) with (CP14).

8. Editorial supplement: the exact algebra and the complete formal trace

The original constructions and formulas above are retained. The following supplies the full finite algebra behind their receiving maps and proves a stronger consequence of (RP16): every integrated formal coefficient other than degree nn is zero, including all degrees greater than nn. It uses the complete finite proofs in the scaled Weyl lesson, not an external higher index theorem. No convergence of the full formal series and no novelty are asserted.

8.1. The actual typed block algebra

For any bounded pair A:HX→HYA:H_X\to H_Y, C:HY→HXC:H_Y\to H_X, put R=IX−CAR=I_X-CA and S=IY−ACS=I_Y-AC. These have the actual types R:HX→HXR:H_X\to H_X, S:HY→HYS:H_Y\to H_Y, and direct multiplication gives RC=CS,AR=SA,CA=IX−R,AC=IY−S.(FB1) RC=CS,\qquad AR=SA,\qquad CA=I_X-R,\qquad AC=I_Y-S. \tag{FB1} Let U(C)U(C) be exactly the three-factor matrix (RP3). Its displayed candidate inverse is (RP4). Their upper left product entry is R2+C(IY+S)A=R2+(IX−R)+(IX−R)R=IX.(FB2) R^2+C(I_Y+S)A =R^2+(I_X-R)+(I_X-R)R=I_X. \tag{FB2} The upper right entry is −RC(IY+S)+C(IY+S)S=0-RC(I_Y+S)+C(I_Y+S)S=0, the lower left is −AR+SA=0-AR+SA=0, and the lower right is AC(IY+S)+S2=IYAC(I_Y+S)+S^2=I_Y. The product in the opposite order has the same diagonal entries and the negatives of these off-diagonal expressions, so it too is the identity. Both inverses are therefore actual bounded maps on HX⊕HYH_X\oplus H_Y. Multiplying the first column of U(C)U(C) by the first row of its inverse gives U(C)pU(C)−1=(R2−RC(IY+S)−ARIY−S2).(FB3) U(C)pU(C)^{-1} =\begin{pmatrix} R^2&-RC(I_Y+S)\\ -AR&I_Y-S^2 \end{pmatrix}. \tag{FB3} This proves every block of (RP5), with its original order. For C=CNC=C_N, the full R=rNR=r^N, S=sNS=s^N are trace class by IP11–IP13 of the scaled lesson at the actual fixed positive scale. Its operator product is the bounded extension of the exact Schwartz product, proved in WO6–WO8 and the scaled lesson’s Section15. Products of these trace-class maps with the bounded factors are trace class by T9 of the trace lesson. Choose the orthonormal basis formed by the union of a basis of HXH_X and a basis of HYH_Y. Absolute trace convergence makes its diagonal sum exactly Tr⁡HXR2−Tr⁡HYS2\operatorname{Tr}_{H_X}R^2-\operatorname{Tr}_{H_Y}S^2; the off-diagonal blocks contribute zero diagonal entries. T28 at exponent 2N2N and IP16 give precisely (RP6). No selfadjointness or bounded inverse of AA is assumed.

The same calculation is an identity in any of the finite associative matrix algebras used below. Its entries retain the labeled fiber maps ℂXν\mathbb C_X^\nu and ℂYν\mathbb C_Y^\nu. It is a polynomial identity in A,CA,C, their ordered products and their two errors, so it also holds coefficient by coefficient in the original formal algebra.

8.2. The original coefficient convention and both inverse recursions

Write the original phase coordinates in their original interleaved order. The tensor of (RP7) has J2p,2p−1=1J^{2p,2p-1}=1 and J2p−1,2p=−1J^{2p-1,2p}=-1. Thus its first contraction is exactly Jjl2i(∂jf)(∂lg)=i2∑p=1n((∂xpf)(∂ξpg)−(∂ξpf)(∂xpg)).(FB4) {J^{jl}\over2i}(\partial_jf)(\partial_lg) ={i\over2}\sum_{p=1}^n \bigl((\partial_{x_p}f)(\partial_{\xi_p}g) -(\partial_{\xi_p}f)(\partial_{x_p}g)\bigr). \tag{FB4} Commuting coordinate derivatives and applying the finite multinomial formula gives, for every nonnegative integer kk, Ck(f,g)=(i2)k∑|α|+|β|=k(−1)|β|α!β!(∂xα∂ξβf)(∂ξα∂xβg).(FB5) C_k(f,g)=\left({i\over2}\right)^k \sum_{|\alpha|+|\beta|=k} {(-1)^{|\beta|}\over\alpha!\beta!} (\partial_x^\alpha\partial_\xi^\beta f) (\partial_\xi^\alpha\partial_x^\beta g). \tag{FB5} This is the identical coefficient proved in OC1–OC5 of the scaled lesson; each factor has exactly kk derivatives and its matrix order is unchanged. For three independent phase variables, its scalar contraction operators are L12,L13,L23L_{12},L_{13},L_{23} of OC2. The diagonal chain rule turns an outer contraction against a product of the first two slots into L13+L23L_{13}+L_{23}. Expanding the two finite parenthesizations of total contraction degree mm therefore gives the same finite expression δ3∑a+b+c=mL12aL13bL23ca!b!c!f(X1)g(X2)h(X3).(FB6) \delta_3\sum_{a+b+c=m} {L_{12}^aL_{13}^bL_{23}^c\over a!b!c!} f(X_1)g(X_2)h(X_3). \tag{FB6} All three operators have scalar constant coefficients, so their derivatives commute even in shared slots. This reorders differential operators only. Summing over the finite intrinsic degrees proves formal associativity at every finite coefficient, as in OC6–OC13. Restriction to an open set commutes with every CkC_k, because these are local differential expressions.

On the actual open inverse domain UaU_a, the degree-mm equation c#λa=Ic\#_\lambda a=I is cma+∑k=1mCk(cm−k,a)=0(m≥1).(FB7) c_m a+\sum_{k=1}^mC_k(c_{m-k},a)=0\quad(m\ge1). \tag{FB7} Right multiplication by the original a−1a^{-1} proves exactly (RP8). The opposite recursion is d0=a−1,dm=−a−1∑k=1mCk(a,dm−k),a#λd=I.(FB8) d_0=a^{-1},\qquad d_m=-a^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^m C_k(a,d_{m-k}), \qquad a\#_\lambda d=I. \tag{FB8} In every coefficient the associativity just proved makes c=c#(a#d)=(c#a)#d=dc=c\#(a\#d)=(c\#a)\#d=d. This proves both inverse identities, their uniqueness, and both multiplication orders on their actual domain. No formal inverse has been extended across a noninvertible point.

For clarity, the weight assertion also includes every derivative order. OC24–OC26 of the scaled lesson prove the full ordered inverse derivative formula. On an exterior region where the original inverse is bounded, it gives ∥∂γa−1∥≤Cγh|γ|/2\|\partial^\gamma a^{-1}\|\le C_\gamma h^{|\gamma|/2}. If the estimates ∥∂γcj∥≤Cj,γhj+|γ|/2\|\partial^\gamma c_j\|\le C_{j,\gamma}h^{j+|\gamma|/2} hold for j<mj<m, differentiation of the full finite sum (FB7) distributes all additional derivatives between its two factors. Each resulting term has weight hm−k+(k+|γ1|)/2h(k+|γ2|)/2=hm+|γ|/2,γ1+γ2=γ.(FB9) h^{m-k+(k+|\gamma_1|)/2} h^{(k+|\gamma_2|)/2} =h^{m+|\gamma|/2},\qquad \gamma_1+\gamma_2=\gamma. \tag{FB9} Multiplication by a−1a^{-1}, with its own distributed derivative order, retains this exponent. This proves the assertion for cmc_m by induction. On the compact part of supp⁡ψ\operatorname{supp}\psi, smoothness of the inverse and positivity of hh give the same estimates with finite constants. The complete product rule for bm=ψcmb_m=\psi c_m uses these estimates and compactly supported cutoff derivatives. Near every point outside UaU_a, ψ\psi is identically zero, so the zero extension and all its derivatives are smooth there. Hence every original bmb_m is globally in S(hm,g)S(h^m,g), with no domain contribution discarded.

The scalar parameter map is also exact. Substitution λ=iℏ\lambda=i\hbar, with inverse ℏ=λ/i\hbar=\lambda/i, sends the original coefficient λkJj1l1⋯Jjklk/(k!(2i)k)\lambda^kJ^{j_1l_1}\cdots J^{j_kl_k}/(k!(2i)^k) to ℏkJj1l1⋯Jjklk/(k!2k)\hbar^kJ^{j_1l_1}\cdots J^{j_kl_k}/(k!2^k). Both expressions and every ii factor remain explicit. This is a coefficientwise isomorphism of scalar formal series; it is not an analytic scaling limit.

8.3. The compact ideal, its cyclic integral, and every finite homotopy degree

Let ℱd=Md(C∞(ℝ2n))[[λ]]\mathcal F_d=M_d(C^\infty(\mathbb R^{2n}))[[\lambda]] with the original product (RP7), and let ℐd\mathcal I_d be its coefficientwise compactly supported subspace. Its coefficients need not have a single common support. For a fixed coefficient of a product, only finitely many input coefficients and derivatives occur. A derivative of a compactly supported function is supported in the same compact set, and a pointwise ordered product containing it is supported there. A finite union of these compact sets is compact. Therefore ℐd\mathcal I_d is a two-sided ideal of ℱd\mathcal F_d.

Define the exact coefficientwise map τd:ℐd→ℂ[[λ]],τd(f)=∑m≥0λm∫ℝ2ntr⁡dfm(z)dz.(FC1) \tau_d:\mathcal I_d\longrightarrow\mathbb C[[\lambda]], \qquad \tau_d(f)=\sum_{m\ge0}\lambda^m \int_{\mathbb R^{2n}}\operatorname{tr}_d f_m(z)\,dz. \tag{FC1} Every coefficient integral is absolutely defined. For each k≥1k\ge1, if ff is compact, integrate all j1,…,jkj_1,\ldots,j_k derivatives in (RP7) off ff. The resulting expression has the full factor (−1)k/(k!(2i)k)(-1)^k/(k!(2i)^k) and the differential operator Jj1l1⋯Jjklk∂j1⋯∂jk∂l1⋯∂lkg.(FC2) J^{j_1l_1}\cdots J^{j_kl_k} \partial_{j_1}\cdots\partial_{j_k} \partial_{l_1}\cdots\partial_{l_k}g. \tag{FC2} Its contraction in the first pair is zero: the complete sum Jjl∂j∂lJ^{jl}\partial_j\partial_l vanishes by antisymmetry of JJ and commutation of the two derivatives. The other constant derivatives commute with that sum. If gg is the compact factor instead, move its ll-derivatives onto ff; the identical antisymmetric contraction vanishes. All integrations have zero boundary terms because the moved-from factor is compact. At k=0k=0 the finite matrix trace satisfies tr⁡(fg)=tr⁡(gf)\operatorname{tr}(fg)=\operatorname{tr}(gf), by its finite entry sum. Summing the finite terms of each formal coefficient proves τd(f#g)=τd(g#f)whenever one factor belongs to ℐd.(FC3) \tau_d(f\#g)=\tau_d(g\#f) \quad\hbox{whenever one factor belongs to }\mathcal I_d. \tag{FC3} No integral of the noncompact identity has been defined.

For any integer N≥1N\ge1, work also in ℱd/(λN)\mathcal F_d/(\lambda^N) and its compact ideal ℐd/(λN)\mathcal I_d/(\lambda^N). A coefficient of degree at least NN cannot contribute to a lower degree, since all intrinsic and contraction degrees are nonnegative. The product and τd\tau_d therefore descend to these finite quotients exactly. For d=2νd=2\nu, the original CNC_N, B∞B_\infty and Cu=(1−u)CN+uB∞C_u=(1-u)C_N+uB_\infty can now be used without any infinite analytic assertion.

Outside the actual K=supp⁡(1−ψ)K=\operatorname{supp}(1-\psi), both original zeroth errors r0,s0r_0,s_0 vanish on a neighborhood. In a degree less than NN of an NN-fold product, at least one of its NN intrinsic degrees is zero; all contraction degrees are nonnegative. Every derivative of that factor is zero on this neighborhood. Thus r#N=s#N=0r^{\#N}=s^{\#N}=0 modulo λN\lambda^N there. Equations (RP2) and the uniqueness recursion (FB7) show that CN=B∞C_N=B_\infty in this finite quotient outside KK, proving (RP12) for every N≥1N\ge1.

The exact polynomial block formula (FB3) applies to eue_u. Its coefficients are polynomials in uu, with smooth phase coefficients. Modulo λN\lambda^N, its two errors vanish outside KK; hence both eu−e0e_u-e_0 and eu′e'_u belong to the compact ideal in this finite quotient, with the same fixed support KK. Differentiating eu#eu=eue_u\#e_u=e_u and multiplying on both sides by eue_u proves eu#eu′#eu=0e_u\#e'_u\#e_u=0. Consequently [[eu′,eu]#,eu]#=eu′#eu−2eu#eu′#eu+eu#eu′=eu′.(FC4) \begin{aligned} [[e'_u,e_u]_\#,e_u]_\# &=e'_u\#e_u-2e_u\#e'_u\#e_u+e_u\#e'_u\\ &=e'_u. \end{aligned} \tag{FC4} The inner commutator is in the compact ideal in this quotient, so (FC3) kills the trace of its outer commutator. For each m<Nm<N, phase support lies in the fixed compact KK and the coefficient is smooth in u∈[0,1]u\in[0,1]. A finite coefficient integral can therefore be differentiated and integrated in uu, by the bounded continuous derivative on [0,1]×K[0,1]\times K. This proves the strengthening of (RP15): ∫tr⁡2ν[λm](e∞−e0)dz=∫tr⁡2ν[λm](eN−e0)dz=∫tr⁡ν[λm](r#2N−s#2N)dz,0≤m<N,N≥1.(FC5) \begin{aligned} \int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^m](e_\infty-e_0)\,dz &=\int\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^m](e_N-e_0)\,dz\\ &=\int\operatorname{tr}_{\nu}[\lambda^m] (r^{\#2N}-s^{\#2N})\,dz, \qquad 0\le m<N,\quad N\ge1. \end{aligned} \tag{FC5} The second equality is the diagonal of the unchanged full block formula (FB3). Each diagonal coefficient is compact in these degrees, by the same zero-slot argument with 2N2N slots. All matrix orders, off-diagonal terms and cutoff contributions were retained before taking the trace.

8.4. Vanishing in every degree other than n

Set Tm=∫ℝ2ntr⁡2ν[λm](e∞−e0)(z)dz(m≥0).(FC6) T_m=\int_{\mathbb R^{2n}} \operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}[\lambda^m] (e_\infty-e_0)(z)\,dz\quad(m\ge0). \tag{FC6} These are all absolutely defined by (RP11), independently of NN. Fix any integer M>nM>n, and choose any integer N≥MN\ge M. The original analytic construction (RP1)–(RP6) uses the full symbols aε,bεa_\varepsilon,b_\varepsilon, not B∞B_\infty. Its relative trace is exactly the original index at every positive scale.

Apply DE5 of the scaled lesson to each ordered error power of exponent 2N2N, truncated at the integer MM. The coefficient is its original Fj,m(2N)F_{j,m}^{(2N)}. By the exact finite scaling identity DE3, this is also [λm]r#2N[\lambda^m]r^{\#2N} or [λm]s#2N[\lambda^m]s^{\#2N}, respectively; the scalar exponent is precisely λ=ε2\lambda=\varepsilon^2 in this finite coefficient comparison. Since m<M≤N<2Nm<M\le N<2N, OC29 supplies compact support of every retained coefficient in the original KK. The complete remainder Ej,ε(2N,M)E_{j,\varepsilon}^{(2N,M)} is uniform in S(hεM,gε)S(h_\varepsilon^M,g_\varepsilon). At each analytic product the actual provider factor is (1+hε/4)4n(1+h_\varepsilon/4)^{4n}; RP1–RP5 of the scaled lesson prove its full receiving inclusion, with 1≤(1+hε/4)4n≤(1+ε2/4)4n1\le(1+h_\varepsilon/4)^{4n}\le(1+\varepsilon^2/4)^{4n}. Its finite product constants and all high intrinsic-degree products are retained in that remainder proof.

RA1–RA10 of the scaled lesson now prove the actual trace-norm bound ∥(Ej,ε(2N,M))w∥1≤CM,Nε2M−2n\|(E_{j,\varepsilon}^{(2N,M)})^w\|_1\le C_{M,N}\varepsilon^{2M-2n}. Each compact coefficient is trace class and has the original CI12 trace, with inverse Fourier factor (2π)−n(2\pi)^{-n} and phase Jacobian ε−2n\varepsilon^{-2n}. Equations (RP6) and (FC5) therefore give the finite equality ind⁡aw=(2π)−n∑m=0M−1Tmε2m−2n+OM,N(ε2M−2n)(0<ε≤1).(FC7) \operatorname{ind}a^w =(2\pi)^{-n}\sum_{m=0}^{M-1} T_m\varepsilon^{2m-2n} +O_{M,N}(\varepsilon^{2M-2n}) \quad(0<\varepsilon\le1). \tag{FC7} It has a separately proved trace-norm remainder, not an evaluation of a convergent formal series.

The case M=n+1M=n+1 recovers (RP16): T0=⋯=Tn−1=0,Tn=(2π)nind⁡aw.(FC8) T_0=\cdots=T_{n-1}=0, \qquad T_n=(2\pi)^n\operatorname{ind}a^w. \tag{FC8} For completeness, multiply (FC7) by the power corresponding to a least nonzero lower coefficient to prove its vanishing, exactly as in DE10–DE11, and then take ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0 to obtain its degree-nn value. Now let k>nk>n, and suppose inductively that Tm=0T_m=0 for n<m<kn<m<k. Choose M=k+1M=k+1, N≥MN\ge M in (FC7). Subtract its exactly known constant term and divide by the positive power ε2k−2n\varepsilon^{2k-2n}. Every remaining lower term is zero, so 0=(2π)−nTk+Ok+1,N(ε2).(FC9) 0=(2\pi)^{-n}T_k+O_{k+1,N}(\varepsilon^2). \tag{FC9} Passage to zero proves Tk=0T_k=0. Starting at k=n+1k=n+1 and applying ordinary induction proves this for every higher degree. Thus the full original coefficientwise integral satisfies the exact formal identity τ2ν(e∞−e0)=(2π)nλnind⁡aw.(FC10) \boxed{\displaystyle \tau_{2\nu}(e_\infty-e_0) =(2\pi)^n\lambda^n\operatorname{ind}a^w.} \tag{FC10} In the other explicitly retained parameter this reads τ2ν(e∞−e0)=(2π)n(iℏ)nind⁡aw=(2πi)nℏnind⁡aw,ℏ=λ/i.(FC11) \tau_{2\nu}(e_\infty-e_0) =(2\pi)^n(i\hbar)^n\operatorname{ind}a^w =(2\pi i)^n\hbar^n\operatorname{ind}a^w, \qquad \hbar=\lambda/i. \tag{FC11} These statements concern formal coefficients only. All original Fourier, phase, parameter and orientation factors remain present. They prove no equality between this formal trace and the classical Chern functional in (CP14).

9. Editorial supplement: exterior signs, Euclidean integration and cutoff independence

9.1. The full graded matrix trace and zero extensions

For homogeneous matrix-valued forms α,β\alpha,\beta of exterior degrees p,qp,q, their finite entry sums give tr⁡(α∧β)=∑i,jαij∧βji=(−1)pq∑i,jβji∧αij=(−1)pqtr⁡(β∧α).(ES1) \operatorname{tr}(\alpha\wedge\beta) =\sum_{i,j}\alpha_{ij}\wedge\beta_{ji} =(-1)^{pq}\sum_{i,j}\beta_{ji}\wedge\alpha_{ij} =(-1)^{pq}\operatorname{tr}(\beta\wedge\alpha). \tag{ES1} On the actual UaU_a, differentiation of aa−1=Iaa^{-1}=I gives da−1=−a−1(da)a−1d a^{-1}=-a^{-1}(da)a^{-1}, so dθ=−θ2,d(θr)=−∑j=0r−1(−1)jθr+1.(ES2) d\theta=-\theta^2,\qquad d(\theta^r)=-\sum_{j=0}^{r-1}(-1)^j\theta^{r+1}. \tag{ES2} In particular tr⁡θ2n=0\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n}=0 by (ES1), and the full alternating sum in (ES2) proves dtr⁡θ2n−1=0d\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n-1}=0. Matrix multiplication has never been replaced by scalar multiplication.

In (CP6), put D=dt∧θD=dt\wedge\theta, Q=θ2Q=\theta^2. Any ordered word containing two DD’s is zero: move its second scalar dtdt past the intervening one-forms, retaining their exterior signs, until it meets the first dtdt, whose square is zero. Among words with one DD and n−1n-1 copies of QQ, (ES1) moves the two-form blocks with sign +1+1, and each finite trace is dt∧tr⁡θ2n−1dt\wedge\operatorname{tr}\theta^{2n-1}. The all-QQ trace is zero by (ES1). Their original scalar coefficients are therefore exactly the nn copies of 2t[t2(1−t2)]n−12t[t^2(1-t^2)]^{n-1} in (CP7). Applying the same reasoning to the complete Y=−dt∧θ−ψθ2Y=-dt\wedge\theta-\psi\theta^2 gives the nn copies of (−1)nψn−1(-1)^n\psi^{n-1} in (CP8) and (BN1). This proves the full signed expansions, including every mixed word before tracing.

There is also a direct verification where the inverse is unavailable. On a neighborhood on which ψ=0\psi=0, the original b=0b=0, t=1t=1, and (CP1) gives P=(Iν0−a0),dP=(00−da0),(dP)2=0.(ES3) P=\begin{pmatrix}I_\nu&0\\-a&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad dP=\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\-da&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad (dP)^2=0. \tag{ES3} Hence the actual classical Chern top form and cutoff top form are both zero there, for every n≥1n\ge1. The expressions involving θ\theta in (CP7), (CP8), (CP11) and (BN3) therefore agree with the globally defined forms after the stated zero extension. At every such point the extension is zero on an entire neighborhood, so all its derivatives are zero as well. The original matrix PP itself has not been made constant there.

9.2. All scalar moments and the exact ball boundary orientation

For positive integers p,qp,q, ordinary integration by parts, with both endpoints retained, gives ∫01up−1(1−u)q−1du=(p−1)!(q−1)!(p+q−1)!.(ES4) \int_0^1 u^{p-1}(1-u)^{q-1}\,du ={(p-1)!(q-1)!\over(p+q-1)!}. \tag{ES4} For q=1q=1 the value is 1/p1/p. For q>1q>1, the boundary term up(1−u)q−1/pu^p(1-u)^{q-1}/p is zero at both endpoints, and the integral is (q−1)/p(q-1)/p times the same integral with (p,q)(p,q) replaced by (p+1,q−1)(p+1,q-1). Repeating proves (ES4). The change u=v2u=v^2, with dv=du/(2u)dv=du/(2\sqrt u), makes the first moment in (CP9) exactly one half of the (p,q)=(n,n)(p,q)=(n,n) moment. Its second moment is the (n+1,n)(n+1,n) moment. Equation (ES4) yields every factorial in (CP10), Wn(1)=0W_n(1)=0, and Fn(1)=(n!)2/(2n)!F_n(1)=(n!)^2/(2n)!. The Euler Gamma integral and its full beta change of variables are proved in TG1–TG4 of the trace criterion lesson; they give the identical Gamma expression in (BN4), without replacing these original scalar integrals.

Here is the precise Euclidean integration theorem needed for both uses of Stokes. Put d=2nd=2n, retain the interleaved original coordinate list z1=x1,z2=ξ1,…,zd=ξnz_1=x_1,z_2=\xi_1,\ldots,z_d=\xi_n, and write a smooth (d−1)(d-1)-form as β=∑j=1d(−1)j−1Vj(z)dz1∧⋯∧dzĵ∧⋯∧dzd.(ES5) \beta=\sum_{j=1}^d(-1)^{j-1}V_j(z) dz_1\wedge\cdots\wedge\widehat{dz_j} \wedge\cdots\wedge dz_d. \tag{ES5} The hat omits that factor only. Direct exterior differentiation gives dβ=(∑j∂jVj)Ωd\beta=(\sum_j\partial_jV_j)\Omega. If β\beta is compactly supported, each coordinate derivative integral is zero by the one-dimensional fundamental theorem of calculus along the full line and Fubini; all functions involved are compact smooth and absolutely integrable. Thus ∫ℝddβ=0\int_{\mathbb R^d}d\beta=0.

If β\beta is smooth on a neighborhood of the closed original ball BR¯\overline{B_R}, the same coordinate calculation and Fubini, now on its chords, give for each jj ∫BR∂jVjdz=∫|y|<R[Vj(y,+R2−|y|2)−Vj(y,−R2−|y|2)]dy.(ES6) \int_{B_R}\partial_jV_j\,dz =\int_{|y|<R} \bigl[V_j(y,+\sqrt{R^2-|y|^2}) -V_j(y,-\sqrt{R^2-|y|^2})\bigr]\,dy. \tag{ES6} Here yy consists of all original coordinates other than zjz_j, in their retained order; the endpoint values are inserted in slot jj. On the upper and lower hemispheres in that direction, the pullback of the jj-th summand of (ES5), with the outward induced orientation, is respectively +Vjdy+V_j\,dy and −Vjdy-V_j\,dy. Indeed its oriented normal factor is νjdS=+dy\nu_jdS=+dy or −dy-dy, obtained by differentiating the graph zj=±R2−|y|2z_j=\pm\sqrt{R^2-|y|^2}; the sign (−1)j−1(-1)^{j-1} is exactly the sign already present in (ES5). The equator is covered by finitely many smooth sphere graph charts in the other coordinate directions; its chart preimage lies in a coordinate hyperplane, which has zero Lebesgue measure by Fubini. It therefore has zero surface measure. The form is smooth there, and its j-th component has zero normal factor there. Integration of this summand over the full oriented sphere is therefore the right side of (ES6). Summing over jj proves ∫BRdβ=∫∂BRβ,(ES7) \int_{B_R}d\beta=\int_{\partial B_R}\beta, \tag{ES7} with the actual outward orientation induced by Ω\Omega. This proves the version used in (CP12) and (BN5), including its full sign; there is no interior boundary. The global primitives in those formulas were already shown smooth across the noninvertible set. The primitive in (CP11) is compact, so its full-space derivative integral is zero by (ES5). The derivative of the primitive in (BN3) is supported in the original KK, and K⊂BRK\subset B_R, so (ES7) applies to that original primitive and yields exactly (BN5) and (CP13).

9.3. The compact defect and every admissible cutoff

Define the original two top forms by ηψ=tr⁡2ν(Pψ(dPψ)2n),αψ=2(1−ψ)ntr⁡ν[(dbψ∧da)n].(CX1) \eta_\psi=\operatorname{tr}_{2\nu}(P_\psi(dP_\psi)^{2n}), \qquad \alpha_\psi=2(1-\psi)^n \operatorname{tr}_\nu[(db_\psi\wedge da)^n]. \tag{CX1} Both are compact smooth, and the exact compact primitive is Γψ=(−1)nWn(1−ψ)tr⁡νθ2n−1,ηψ−αψ=dΓψ.(CX2) \Gamma_\psi=(-1)^n W_n(1-\psi) \operatorname{tr}_\nu\theta^{2n-1}, \qquad \eta_\psi-\alpha_\psi=d\Gamma_\psi. \tag{CX2} It is defined on UaU_a and extended by zero as proved above. In particular the exact defect is a specified compact form and a specified differential, not an omitted pointwise contribution. If 𝒬c2n=Ωc2n(ℝ2n)/dΩc2n−1(ℝ2n)\mathcal Q_c^{2n}=\Omega_c^{2n}(\mathbb R^{2n})/d\Omega_c^{2n-1}(\mathbb R^{2n}), the full-space integral in orientation Ω\Omega is a well-defined linear map 𝒬c2n→ℂ\mathcal Q_c^{2n}\to\mathbb C, by (ES5), and (CX2) proves [ηψ]=[αψ][\eta_\psi]=[\alpha_\psi] in this exact quotient.

Let ψ0,ψ1\psi_0,\psi_1 be any two original admissible cutoffs for the same unchanged aa; set tj=1−ψjt_j=1-\psi_j, bj=ψja−1b_j=\psi_j a^{-1} on UaU_a, and keep their zero extensions. Their union of compact supports K0∪K1K_0\cup K_1 contains the support of the following primitive: Ξ1,0=2(−1)n−1(Fn(ψ1)−Fn(ψ0))tr⁡νθ2n−1+(−1)n(Wn(t1)−Wn(t0))tr⁡νθ2n−1.(CX3) \begin{aligned} \Xi_{1,0}={}& 2(-1)^{n-1}\bigl(F_n(\psi_1)-F_n(\psi_0)\bigr) \operatorname{tr}_\nu\theta^{2n-1}\\ &+(-1)^n\bigl(W_n(t_1)-W_n(t_0)\bigr) \operatorname{tr}_\nu\theta^{2n-1}. \end{aligned} \tag{CX3} Outside that union both cutoffs are one and both tjt_j are zero; near every point outside UaU_a both cutoffs vanish and both tjt_j equal one. Every scalar difference in (CX3) is therefore zero on those neighborhoods. This proves that its zero extension is globally smooth and compact. Using the closed odd trace in (ES2), differentiating each full scalar factor, and retaining (BN3) and (CX2) proves ηψ1−ηψ0=dΞ1,0,αψ1−αψ0=2(−1)n−1d[(Fn(ψ1)−Fn(ψ0))tr⁡νθ2n−1].(CX4) \eta_{\psi_1}-\eta_{\psi_0}=d\Xi_{1,0}, \qquad \alpha_{\psi_1}-\alpha_{\psi_0} =2(-1)^{n-1}d\!\left[ (F_n(\psi_1)-F_n(\psi_0)) \operatorname{tr}_\nu\theta^{2n-1}\right]. \tag{CX4} Thus both compact classes and both exact full integrals are independent of the admissible cutoff. This proves more than equality of the two integrals for a single cutoff. Choose one ball containing K0∪K1K_0\cup K_1; (BN5) and (CP13) compute both integrals from the same original exterior aa, with the identical orientation and factorials. For any two containing radii R1<R2R_1<R_2, apply (ES7) separately to the globally smooth primitive of (BN3) on both balls. Its derivative has the same compact support in the smaller ball, so the two boundary integrals of the primitive are equal. On each boundary its scalar value is Fn(1)≠0F_n(1)\ne0. Consequently ∫∂BR1tr⁡ν[(a−1da)2n−1]=∫∂BR2tr⁡ν[(a−1da)2n−1],(CX5) \int_{\partial B_{R_1}}\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(a^{-1}da)^{2n-1}] =\int_{\partial B_{R_2}}\operatorname{tr}_\nu[(a^{-1}da)^{2n-1}], \tag{CX5} with each boundary oriented outward from the retained ambient Ω\Omega. This is the actual radius comparison, with no unavailable inverse inside the balls assumed.

The full formal integrated coefficients are likewise independent of the admissible cutoff: construct each original B∞B_\infty and relative e∞e_\infty with its own ψj\psi_j, then apply the fully proved (FC10) to the same unchanged operator awa^w. Both coefficientwise integrals equal (2π)nλnind⁡aw(2\pi)^n\lambda^n\operatorname{ind}a^w. This conclusion includes all higher zero coefficients. It still does not equate the formal trace with (CP14)’s classical Chern value.

9.4. An exact endpoint sample of the compact defect

The original polynomial has a full finite expression in every dimension: Wn(t)=2n∑j=0n−1(−1)j(n−1j)[t2n+2j2n+2j−tn+j+1n+j+1].(EW1) W_n(t)=2n\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}(-1)^j\binom{n-1}{j} \left[{t^{2n+2j}\over2n+2j} -{t^{n+j+1}\over n+j+1}\right]. \tag{EW1} This follows by expanding both retained binomials in (CP9) and integrating each term; no summand is removed. For n=1n=1 the two summands agree and the polynomial is identically zero. For n≥2n\ge2, the least nonzero degree in (EW1) is n+1n+1, with coefficient −2n/(n+1)-2n/(n+1). At the other endpoint the exact derivative is Wn′(t)=2ntn(1−t)n−1[tn−1(1+t)n−1−1].(EW2) W_n'(t)=2n t^n(1-t)^{n-1} [t^{n-1}(1+t)^{n-1}-1]. \tag{EW2} The bracket equals 2n−1−1≠02^{n-1}-1\ne0 at t=1t=1, and Wn(1)=0W_n(1)=0. Integrating its finite Taylor polynomial about this endpoint gives Wn(t)=−2(2n−1−1)(1−t)n+O((1−t)n+1)W_n(t)=-2(2^{n-1}-1)(1-t)^n+O((1-t)^{n+1}). Thus, for every n≥2n\ge2, its endpoint zeros have exactly orders n+1n+1 and nn, and polynomial division gives an exact polynomial QnQ_n such that Wn(t)=tn+1(1−t)nQn(t),deg⁡Qn=2n−3,Qn(0)=−2nn+1,Qn(1)=−2(2n−1−1).(EW3) W_n(t)=t^{n+1}(1-t)^nQ_n(t),\qquad \deg Q_n=2n-3,\qquad Q_n(0)=-{2n\over n+1},\qquad Q_n(1)=-2(2^{n-1}-1). \tag{EW3} The degree follows because the nonzero highest-degree term in (EW1) has degree 4n−24n-2, with coefficient 2n(−1)n−1/(4n−2)2n(-1)^{n-1}/(4n-2), whereas its second retained binomial has degree at most 2n2n. These are exact polynomial identities and endpoint multiplicities of the original compact-defect scalar factor.

For n=2n=2, the original polynomial (CP9), with both full summands retained, is W2(t)=4∫0t[v3(1−v2)−v2(1−v)]dv=−43t3+2t4−23t6=−23t3(1−t)2(t+2).(EP1) \begin{aligned} W_2(t) &=4\int_0^t[v^3(1-v^2)-v^2(1-v)]\,dv\\ &=-{4\over3}t^3+2t^4-{2\over3}t^6 =-{2\over3}t^3(1-t)^2(t+2). \end{aligned} \tag{EP1} The last equality is an exact polynomial comparison, not a replacement for (CP9). It displays its zero of order three at t=0t=0 and order two at t=1t=1. The scalar coefficients in the two actual traced four-form densities are dC(t)=4t3(1−t2),dA(t)=4t2(1−t),dC(t)−dA(t)=W2′(t),∫01dC(t)dt=∫01dA(t)dt=13.(EP2) d_C(t)=4t^3(1-t^2),\qquad d_A(t)=4t^2(1-t),\qquad d_C(t)-d_A(t)=W_2'(t),\qquad \int_0^1d_C(t)\,dt=\int_0^1d_A(t)\,dt={1\over3}. \tag{EP2} They multiply the unchanged form dt∧tr⁡θ3dt\wedge\operatorname{tr}\theta^3; these scalar curves alone are not matrix-valued forms or numerical operators. At the actual outer boundary, (CP13) has the coefficient −1/3-1/3 when n=2n=2, with outward orientation dx1∧dξ1∧dx2∧dξ2dx_1\wedge d\xi_1\wedge dx_2\wedge d\xi_2. The positive moment in (EP2) is consistent with that sign: the cutoff coordinate is one on the inner zero-cutoff region and zero on the outer unit-cutoff region, so it runs from t=1t=1 to t=0t=0 in the outward passage. Equations (BN3)–(BN5), already proved globally, supply the exact orientation argument without assuming a radial cutoff.

The complete formal trace and an exact scalar section of the Chern cutoff defect

The upper map is the proved formal coefficient identity (FC10), including every higher zero coefficient. The lower plots are the exact n=2n=2 scalar polynomials (EP1)–(EP2) on 0≤t≤10\le t\le1, with their full factors and endpoints; they are a coefficient sample, not a restriction on the admissible cutoff. The compact matrix-form defect is (CX2), and its full cutoff comparison is (CX3)–(CX4). The reproducible figure source accompanies these complete proofs.

10. Operative scope of the retained free reference

The original product-metric example’s references RC10 and RT1 identify those exact passages of Radial symbols and index transport. They are context for the same example; its complete inverse multiplication calculation, failed isotropic estimate and vanishing Weyl contractions are proved directly in Section6 above. A repeated equation prefix in a different lesson does not identify that source or supply a missing proof.

Its bounded inverse can also be checked using only its defining scalar derivative. The original arctan⁡0=0\arctan 0=0, (arctan⁡)′(x)=(1+x2)−1(\arctan)'(x)=(1+x^2)^{-1} and the fundamental theorem of calculus give |arctan⁡x|≤∫0∞du1+u2≤12+1245+∫1∞u−2du=1910.(EX1) |\arctan x|\le\int_0^\infty{du\over1+u^2} \le {1\over2}+{1\over2}{4\over5} +\int_1^\infty u^{-2}\,du ={19\over10}. \tag{EX1} The three retained terms integrate the intervals [0,1/2][0,1/2], [1/2,1][1/2,1], and [1,∞)[1,\infty), respectively. Hence the unchanged multiplier 2+arctan⁡x2+\arctan x is at least 1/101/10, and its original reciprocal is bounded by ten. In CI4 the original (2π)−1(2\pi)^{-1} inverse Fourier integral in ξ\xi is the delta distribution at x−yx-y, as proved by Fourier inversion in the Fourier prerequisite. For a symbol depending only on xx, its midpoint value on that delta is its original value at xx; the exact Weyl operator is therefore multiplication by that symbol on Schwartz functions and then on L2L^2 by boundedness. Both products with the displayed reciprocal multiplication operator are exactly the identity. Each positive CkC_k in (FB5) contains a frequency derivative in one of its two factors, so it is zero for this pair. This verifies every analytic, formal and classical assertion of that example directly at its stated scope, without using isotropic estimates it does not satisfy.

For the Gaussian example, every full coordinate derivative of e−|z|2e^{-|z|^2} is a polynomial times that same full Gaussian, by induction using its exact derivative −2zje−|z|2-2z_j e^{-|z|^2}. Differentiation of the original ordinary inverse identity, with the complete product rule of OC25–OC26, retains powers of the complete denominator 2+e−|z|2≥22+e^{-|z|^2}\ge2; every positive derivative term contains at least one full Gaussian. A polynomial of degree qq times that Gaussian is bounded by any required radial inverse power, since the positive exponential series has a term of degree greater than qq plus that power. This proves all derivative orders required for the exact S(1,g)S(1,g) estimates of (GE1). The full Gaussian kernel in CI13 is 12g0(x)g0(y)¯\frac12g_0(x)\overline{g_0(y)} in the actual n=1n=1 case. Thus (GE2) and its two explicit inverse products hold on the full orthogonal sum already displayed, with no identification of the operator inverse and the pointwise symbol inverse.

The freely accessible preprint already referenced above is a route for the later comparison between formal trace and classical Chern value. Its original-author source IndThms.tex, theorem thm:higher-algind, states a more general pairing theorem and proves it using its earlier reduction and local Riemann–Roch results. That theorem is not used in any statement proved in this lesson, including (FC10). The exact block algebra, finite cyclic integral, all analytic remainder and trace maps, exterior calculations, endpoint values and boundary integration needed here have complete proofs in this lesson or the explicitly linked earlier programme lessons. Reading or citing that preprint does not replace those proofs. No claim of a whole-paper reading, an external higher-index proof completed here, or a novelty comparison is made.