Comparing normal representations with properly infinite commutants
Written by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.
This chapter develops the joint-algebra comparison and properly infinite commutant theorem. Results are referred to by their numbers below. The proofs use projection comparison, normal functionals and normal amplification; no trace-coupling or general standard-form theorem is an input. Selection and route notes: GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026; new notes CC0.
1. Conventions
is a complex Hilbert space, and inner products are linear in the first variable. is a von Neumann algebra, its commutant, and its centre. For and , is the closed linear span of the vectors with , , and we identify a closed subspace with the projection onto it. We write and . is the space of normal (-weakly continuous) linear functionals on , and its positive part.
Projections. is the set of projections of . Equivalence , subequivalence , finite, infinite and properly infinite projections, and the central support (the least central projection majorizing ) are as in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras. is -finite if every family of mutually orthogonal nonzero projections in is countable, and a projection is -finite if is.
Cyclic projections. For , is the projection onto and the projection onto . We call the projections of the form the cyclic projections of , and those of the form the cyclic projections of . A vector is cyclic for if , and separating for if , imply .
Reduced and induced algebras. For , the reduced algebra is , acting on . For , the induced algebra is , acting on , where ; the map is the induction. If and , then is a projection, and denotes the algebra of the restrictions , , acting on .
Representations. A normal representation of on a Hilbert space is a unital -homomorphism that is -weakly continuous. Two representations on are unitarily equivalent, , if some unitary satisfies for all . A subrepresentation is the restriction of a representation to a closed invariant subspace. The notation means that some unitary satisfies . An isomorphism of von Neumann algebras is spatial if for such a .
2. Background used without proof
The following results are used as stated.
Fact 2.1 (Reduced and induced algebras, central supports). Let and .
- and (restricted to ) are von Neumann algebras on and each is the commutant of the other. Likewise and are mutual commutants on .
- is the projection onto . For a central projection , if and only if , and . Equivalent projections have the same central support.
- The induction is a -homomorphism of onto with kernel , where is the central support of in . Likewise maps onto with kernel .
- The centre of is , and is an isomorphism of onto it.
These are proved in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras (Proposition 3.5) and The double commutant theorem.
Fact 2.2 (Comparison of projections). The following are proved in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras.
- (Additivity, Lemma 3.3.) If , are families of mutually orthogonal projections with (or ), then (or ). Central cuts preserve and .
- (Parallelogram law, Proposition 4.4.) .
- (Schröder–Bernstein, Proposition 5.1.) and imply .
- (Equivalent pieces, Lemma 5.3.) If , there are nonzero , with .
- (Comparison theorem, Theorem 5.5.) For projections there is a central projection with and .
- (Finite and properly infinite parts, Theorem 7.2.) Every projection is with finite, properly infinite and . For this gives central projections with finite and properly infinite. has central projections with sum cutting out its parts of types I, II and III; they are unique.
- (Matrix algebras, Lemma 8.2 and Proposition 8.4.) For a von Neumann algebra on , on is the algebra of operators whose matrix entries lie in , and its centre is . The algebra , also written , is the von Neumann algebra generated by and . If are mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent projections of with sum , there is a unitary with for every .
- (Families of equivalent projections, Proposition 13.1.) Let be mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent, nonzero projections. There are a nonzero central projection and mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent projections , , with for and for all . If is infinite, the can be replaced by mutually orthogonal projections (any fixed ) with .
- (Division by , Corollary 13.5.) A properly infinite projection is with mutually orthogonal .
- (Finite projections, Theorem 14.1.) If and are finite, so is .
- (Absorption, Proposition 15.2.) Let be properly infinite. If are mutually orthogonal with , then . If is locally -finite (in particular -finite) and , then . Here is locally -finite if every central with majorizes a central with nonzero and -finite; is locally -finite if is (Definition 15.1).
Fact 2.3 (The cyclic support used here). For a vector , is the least projection of fixing , and is the support of . This is Lemma 4.6 of Projections and types.
Fact 2.4 (Normal functionals and -finiteness).
- A set is cyclic for if , and separating for if and imply . A set, in particular a single vector, is cyclic for exactly when it is separating for . is -finite if and only if contains a countable set that is separating for , and if and only if has a faithful normal state The double commutant theorem.
- Every equals with The double commutant theorem.
- Every has a support , the least projection with , and . An isomorphism of von Neumann algebras and its inverse are normal. If is a normal representation of , then for a central projection , the image is a von Neumann algebra, and maps isomorphically onto . These are Lemma 11.1, Corollary 11.4 and Proposition 12.1 of The universal enveloping von Neumann algebra of a -algebra, and -algebras.
- (Density and topologies.) A -algebra of operators acting nondegenerately is -weakly dense in its bicommutant, and on bounded sets strong convergence implies -weak convergence The double commutant theorem.
- (Cyclic representations.) For every positive linear functional on a -algebra there are a representation of on a Hilbert space and a vector such that and is dense in [Blackadar, II.6.4]. If has a unit, ; in general is the limit of along an approximate unit of positive contractions.
- (Normal maps.) A positive linear functional on is -weakly continuous exactly when it preserves suprema of bounded increasing nets, and is spanned by [Blackadar, III.2.1.3–III.2.1.4]. Consequently a positive linear map between von Neumann algebras that preserves suprema of bounded increasing nets is normal, because is normal for every ; and a linear bijection that preserves order and suprema in both directions is a homeomorphism for the -weak topologies.
Fact 2.7 (Normal homomorphisms). For a von Neumann algebra and a normal unital -homomorphism , there are a Hilbert space and an isometry such that commutes with and for . This is Theorem 8.2 of Spatial tensor products of von Neumann algebras.
Fact 2.10 (Set theory). Zorn's lemma; for infinite cardinals ; the Cantor–Bernstein theorem, as in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras (Fact 2.9 there).
3. Comparing representations inside one commutant
Let and be normal representations of on and . Put , , , and let be the projection of onto . We call the joint algebra of and . The next lemma turns every question about the two representations into a question about and .
Lemma 3.1 (Two representations in one commutant).
- is a von Neumann algebra on , and are projections of with .
- An operator on lies in if and only if its matrix entries satisfy for all . In particular the reduced algebra , on , is , and the induced algebra is .
- if and only if in . And is unitarily equivalent to a subrepresentation of if and only if in .
- Let be the central support of in . Then . Hence if and only if , and when is faithful.
Proof. (1) is a normal representation, so is a von Neumann algebra (Fact 2.4(3)). Each maps into and into , so it commutes with and .
(2) Write as a matrix of operators . The entries of are , and those of are . They agree for all exactly when every entry intertwines. The operators , , are the operators with a single entry , so is on . Finally restricted to is .
(3) Let be a unitary with , and let be the operator whose only nonzero entry is . By (2), , and , . Conversely, let with and . Then , so its only nonzero entry is , which maps isometrically onto and intertwines with by (2). For the second statement, let with and . Then is an isometry of onto . This subspace is invariant under , because , and intertwines with the subrepresentation of on . Conversely, if an isometry intertwines with the subrepresentation on an invariant subspace , then the projection onto commutes with , because an invariant subspace of a self-adjoint set of operators reduces it. The operator with the single entry lies in , and , .
(4) The map is the induction of by . By Fact 2.1(3) its kernel is , and by (2) it sends to . This gives the formula for . As maps onto , exactly when . For central projections , forces , because and . If is faithful, then , so .
The centre of equals the centre of , which is : by Fact 2.4(3), maps a central summand of isomorphically onto , so the centre of is . So the central supports in (4) are images of central projections of .
Remark 3.2 (One commutant for all representations). Let be a faithful normal representation of on , and any normal representation on . Fact 2.7, applied to the von Neumann algebra and the normal homomorphism (normal because is, Fact 2.4(3)), gives an isometry with . So is equivalent to the subrepresentation of the amplification on the invariant subspace . Thus the normal representations of correspond to projections in the commutants of the amplifications of one faithful representation.
Lemma 3.3 (Cyclic projections). Let .
- For a central projection , and .
- If is a partial isometry with , then and . Consequently a projection of that is equivalent to a cyclic projection is cyclic.
- If and , then . So a subprojection of a cyclic projection is cyclic.
- Every is the sum of mutually orthogonal cyclic projections with .
- Every cyclic projection is -finite.
- For and , if and only if .
The same holds with and exchanged.
Proof. (1) commutes with , so . The same argument works for .
(2) Since commutes with , . The operator is isometric on , so it maps the closed subspace isometrically onto a closed subspace, which is the closure of . Hence is the projection onto , namely . Next, , and , so . If and , this gives .
(3) , and maps the dense subset of onto a dense subset of . So .
(4) By Zorn's lemma, choose nonzero vectors with mutually orthogonal cyclic projections, the family being maximal for this property. By Fact 2.3(1), . If were nonzero, a nonzero would have , and could be added to the family.
(5) By Fact 2.1(1), the commutant of on is , for which is cyclic. So is separating for (Fact 2.4(1)), which is therefore -finite.
(6) If , then lies in the kernel of the induction of , which is (Fact 2.1(3)). So , and the central projection majorizes ; hence . Conversely, gives .
Lemma 3.4 (Properly infinite commutants). If is properly infinite, every positive normal functional on is a vector functional .
Proof. By division by (Fact 2.2(9)) in , with mutually orthogonal projections , each equivalent to . By Fact 2.2(7), applied to the algebra , whose commutant is , there is a unitary with for . The induction is injective, because its kernel is and (Fact 2.1). Let . The functional is positive and normal on (Fact 2.4(3)), so it equals with and (Fact 2.4(2)). Put . Then
Example 3.5 (Matrix algebras). Every normal representation of is unitarily equivalent to on for one cardinal : the images of the matrix units are mutually equivalent projections with sum , and Fact 2.2(7) splits the space. For two such representations, with and copies, the joint algebra is on . Its commutant is , and are projections of rank and there. They are equivalent exactly when . This recovers the multiplicity of the introduction.
4. Representations with properly infinite commutant
If the commutants are properly infinite and not too large, there is no room for multiplicity at all: only the kernel matters.
Theorem 4.1. Let and be normal representations of whose commutants and are properly infinite and locally -finite (for example, -finite). Then if and only if . In particular, two faithful normal representations with -finite, properly infinite commutants are unitarily equivalent.
Proof. Equivalent representations have the same kernel. Conversely, let , and use the joint algebra of Lemma 3.1. By Lemma 3.1(2), the reduced algebra is . Its central projections are the with central in (Fact 2.1(4)), and the reduced algebra of by is . So the hypotheses say that is a properly infinite and locally -finite projection of . By Lemma 3.1(4), . The absorption property (Fact 2.2(11)) gives and , so by Schröder–Bernstein, and by Lemma 3.1(3).
Example 4.2 (Both conditions are needed). Let . A normal representation is the scalar action on a Hilbert space , it is faithful if , and its commutant is .
- and give faithful representations with -finite commutants that are not equivalent. The commutants and are not properly infinite.
- and with give properly infinite commutants and faithful representations that are not equivalent, since the dimensions differ. The factor is not -finite (the rank-one projections of the basis form an uncountable orthogonal family), and a factor is locally -finite only if it is -finite.
Theorem 4.3. Let be the centre of .
- has a faithful normal representation with -finite commutant if and only if is -finite.
- If is -finite, has a faithful normal representation whose commutant is -finite and properly infinite, and any two such representations are unitarily equivalent.
Proof. (1) Let be faithful and normal with -finite. The centre of is -finite, because an orthogonal family of central projections is an orthogonal family in ; and .
Conversely, let be -finite. By Zorn's lemma choose normal states of whose supports have mutually orthogonal central supports , the family being maximal for this property. The are nonzero, mutually orthogonal central projections, so there are countably many; index them by . If were nonzero, a unit vector would give the normal state with support (Fact 2.3(1)), and hence , against maximality. So . Put , divided by . This is a normal state, and exactly when for all ; so , and .
Let be the cyclic representation of (Fact 2.4(5)). It is normal. Let be a bounded increasing net in , and let be the supremum of the bounded increasing net . For , normality of gives . These vectors form a dense subspace, so polarization and continuity give . Thus preserves suprema, and it is normal (Fact 2.4(6)). It is faithful: means for all , that is, for all (Fact 2.4(3)); so vanishes on (Fact 2.1(2)). Finally is cyclic for , hence separating for , which is therefore -finite (Fact 2.4(1)).
(2) Let be as above and on . It is faithful and normal. By Fact 2.2(7), , with centre . For a nonzero central projection , the operator , where is the unilateral shift, lies in ; it has initial projection and final projection , where projects onto . So every nonzero central projection is infinite, and is properly infinite. The countable set is cyclic for , hence separating for , which is therefore -finite (Fact 2.4(1)). Uniqueness is Theorem 4.1.
The next lemma counts orthogonal projections without assuming that the whole algebra is -finite.
Lemma 4.5 (Counting orthogonal projections). Let be mutually orthogonal -finite projections of with . If are mutually orthogonal nonzero projections of , then . If is infinite, then .
Reference: [Takesaki I, Lemma V.3.17] states the bound for every orthogonal family of projections; this fails because the zero projection may be repeated any number of times, so we require the to be nonzero.
Proof. For each , the algebra is -finite, so it has a faithful normal state (Fact 2.4(1)); put . Let . For a finite , , so is countable. Fix . Since and strongly, some . Then , and by faithfulness. So , and . If is infinite, (Fact 2.10).