Comparing normal representations with properly infinite commutants

Written by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

This chapter develops the joint-algebra comparison and properly infinite commutant theorem. Results are referred to by their numbers below. The proofs use projection comparison, normal functionals and normal amplification; no trace-coupling or general standard-form theorem is an input. Selection and route notes: GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026; new notes CC0.

1. Conventions

HH is a complex Hilbert space, and inner products ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle are linear in the first variable. M⊆B(H)M\subseteq B(H) is a von Neumann algebra, M′M' its commutant, and Z=M∩M′Z=M\cap M' its centre. For S⊆B(H)S\subseteq B(H) and X⊆HX\subseteq H, [SX][SX] is the closed linear span of the vectors xξx\xi with x∈Sx\in S, ξ∈X\xi\in X, and we identify a closed subspace with the projection onto it. We write ωξ(x)=⟨xξ,ξ⟩\omega_\xi(x)=\langle x\xi,\xi\rangle and ωη,ξ(x)=⟨xη,ξ⟩\omega_{\eta,\xi}(x)=\langle x\eta,\xi\rangle. M∗M_* is the space of normal (σ\sigma-weakly continuous) linear functionals on MM, and M∗+M_*^+ its positive part.

Projections. P(M)\mathcal P(M) is the set of projections of MM. Equivalence e∼fe\sim f, subequivalence e≾fe\precsim f, finite, infinite and properly infinite projections, and the central support c(e)c(e) (the least central projection majorizing ee) are as in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras. MM is σ\sigma-finite if every family of mutually orthogonal nonzero projections in MM is countable, and a projection ee is σ\sigma-finite if eMeeMe is.

Cyclic projections. For ξ∈H\xi\in H, pξ∈Mp_\xi\in M is the projection onto [M′ξ][M'\xi] and pξ′∈M′p'_\xi\in M' the projection onto [Mξ][M\xi]. We call the projections of the form pξp_\xi the cyclic projections of MM, and those of the form pξ′p'_\xi the cyclic projections of M′M'. A vector ξ\xi is cyclic for MM if pξ′=1p'_\xi=1, and separating for MM if x∈Mx\in M, xξ=0x\xi=0 imply x=0x=0.

Reduced and induced algebras. For e∈P(M)e\in\mathcal P(M), the reduced algebra is Me=eMeM_e=eMe, acting on eHeH. For e′∈P(M′)e'\in\mathcal P(M'), the induced algebra is Me′={xe′:x∈M}M_{e'}=\{x_{e'}:x\in M\}, acting on e′He'H, where xe′=xe′∣e′Hx_{e'}=xe'|_{e'H}; the map x↦xe′x\mapsto x_{e'} is the induction. If e∈P(M)e\in\mathcal P(M) and e′∈P(M′)e'\in\mathcal P(M'), then ee′ee' is a projection, and Mee′M_{ee'} denotes the algebra of the restrictions x∣ee′Hx|_{ee'H}, x∈eMex\in eMe, acting on ee′Hee'H.

Representations. A normal representation of MM on a Hilbert space KK is a unital ∗*-homomorphism π:M→B(K)\pi:M\to B(K) that is σ\sigma-weakly continuous. Two representations π1,π2\pi_1,\pi_2 on K1,K2K_1,K_2 are unitarily equivalent, π1≃π2\pi_1\simeq\pi_2, if some unitary U:K1→K2U:K_1\to K_2 satisfies Uπ1(x)=π2(x)UU\pi_1(x)=\pi_2(x)U for all xx. A subrepresentation is the restriction of a representation to a closed invariant subspace. The notation {M,H}≅{N,K}\{M,H\}\cong\{N,K\} means that some unitary W:H→KW:H\to K satisfies WMW∗=NWMW^*=N. An isomorphism π:M→N\pi:M\to N of von Neumann algebras is spatial if π(x)=WxW∗\pi(x)=WxW^* for such a WW.

2. Background used without proof

The following results are used as stated.

Fact 2.1 (Reduced and induced algebras, central supports). Let e∈P(M)e\in\mathcal P(M) and e′∈P(M′)e'\in\mathcal P(M').

  1. eMeeMe and M′eM'e (restricted to eHeH) are von Neumann algebras on eHeH and each is the commutant of the other. Likewise Me′M_{e'} and e′M′e′e'M'e' are mutual commutants on e′He'H.
  2. c(e)c(e) is the projection onto [MeH][MeH]. For a central projection zz, ze=0ze=0 if and only if zc(e)=0zc(e)=0, and c(ze)=zc(e)c(ze)=zc(e). Equivalent projections have the same central support.
  3. The induction x↦xe′x\mapsto x_{e'} is a ∗*-homomorphism of MM onto Me′M_{e'} with kernel M(1−c(e′))M(1-c(e')), where c(e′)c(e') is the central support of e′e' in M′M'. Likewise x′↦x′e∣eHx'\mapsto x'e|_{eH} maps M′M' onto M′eM'e with kernel M′(1−c(e))M'(1-c(e)).
  4. The centre of eMeeMe is ZeZe, and a↦aea\mapsto ae is an isomorphism of Zc(e)Zc(e) onto it.

These are proved in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras (Proposition 3.5) and The double commutant theorem.

Fact 2.2 (Comparison of projections). The following are proved in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras.

  1. (Additivity, Lemma 3.3.) If {ei}\{e_i\}, {fi}\{f_i\} are families of mutually orthogonal projections with ei∼fie_i\sim f_i (or ei≾fie_i\precsim f_i), then ∑iei∼∑ifi\sum_ie_i\sim\sum_if_i (or ≾\precsim). Central cuts preserve ∼\sim and ≾\precsim.
  2. (Parallelogram law, Proposition 4.4.) (e∨f)−e∼f−(e∧f)(e\vee f)-e\sim f-(e\wedge f).
  3. (Schröder–Bernstein, Proposition 5.1.) e≾fe\precsim f and f≾ef\precsim e imply e∼fe\sim f.
  4. (Equivalent pieces, Lemma 5.3.) If c(e)c(f)≠0c(e)c(f)\ne0, there are nonzero e1≤ee_1\le e, f1≤ff_1\le f with e1∼f1e_1\sim f_1.
  5. (Comparison theorem, Theorem 5.5.) For projections e,fe,f there is a central projection zz with ze≾zfze\precsim zf and (1−z)f≾(1−z)e(1-z)f\precsim(1-z)e.
  6. (Finite and properly infinite parts, Theorem 7.2.) Every projection is e1+e2e_1+e_2 with e1e_1 finite, e2e_2 properly infinite and c(e1)c(e2)=0c(e_1)c(e_2)=0. For e=1e=1 this gives central projections zf+z∞=1z_f+z_\infty=1 with MzfMz_f finite and Mz∞Mz_\infty properly infinite. MM has central projections zI,zII,zIIIz_{\rm I},z_{\rm II},z_{\rm III} with sum 11 cutting out its parts of types I, II and III; they are unique.
  7. (Matrix algebras, Lemma 8.2 and Proposition 8.4.) For a von Neumann algebra NN on KK, (N⊗1)′(N\otimes1)' on K⊗ℓ2(I)K\otimes\ell^2(I) is the algebra MI(N′)\mathbb M_I(N') of operators whose matrix entries lie in N′N', and its centre is (N∩N′)⊗1(N\cap N')\otimes1. The algebra MI(N)\mathbb M_I(N), also written N⊗ˉB(ℓ2(I))N\bar\otimes B(\ell^2(I)), is the von Neumann algebra generated by N⊗1N\otimes1 and 1⊗B(ℓ2(I))1\otimes B(\ell^2(I)). If {ei}i∈I\{e_i\}_{i\in I} are mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent projections of MM with sum 11, there is a unitary W:ei0H⊗ℓ2(I)→HW:e_{i_0}H\otimes\ell^2(I)\to H with W∗x′W=x′ei0∣ei0H⊗1W^*x'W=x'e_{i_0}|_{e_{i_0}H}\otimes1 for every x′∈M′x'\in M'.
  8. (Families of equivalent projections, Proposition 13.1.) Let {ei}i∈I\{e_i\}_{i\in I} be mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent, nonzero projections. There are a nonzero central projection zz and mutually orthogonal, mutually equivalent projections {fj}j∈J\{f_j\}_{j\in J}, J⊇IJ\supseteq I, with fi=zeif_i=ze_i for i∈Ii\in I and z−∑jfj≺fjz-\sum_jf_j\prec f_j for all jj. If JJ is infinite, the fjf_j can be replaced by mutually orthogonal projections fj∼zeif_j\sim ze_{i} (any fixed i∈Ii\in I) with ∑j∈Jfj=z\sum_{j\in J}f_j=z.
  9. (Division by ℵ0\aleph_0, Corollary 13.5.) A properly infinite projection ee is ∑n≥1en\sum_{n\ge1}e_n with mutually orthogonal en∼ee_n\sim e.
  10. (Finite projections, Theorem 14.1.) If ee and ff are finite, so is e∨fe\vee f.
  11. (Absorption, Proposition 15.2.) Let ee be properly infinite. If f1,f2,…f_1,f_2,\ldots are mutually orthogonal with fn≾ef_n\precsim e, then ∑nfn≾e\sum_nf_n\precsim e. If ff is locally σ\sigma-finite (in particular σ\sigma-finite) and c(f)≤c(e)c(f)\le c(e), then f≾ef\precsim e. Here ff is locally σ\sigma-finite if every central zz with zf≠0zf\ne0 majorizes a central z′z' with z′fz'f nonzero and σ\sigma-finite; MM is locally σ\sigma-finite if 11 is (Definition 15.1).

Fact 2.3 (The cyclic support used here). For a vector ξ\xi, pξp_\xi is the least projection of MM fixing ξ\xi, and is the support of ωξ∣M\omega_\xi|_M. This is Lemma 4.6 of Projections and types.

Fact 2.4 (Normal functionals and σ\sigma-finiteness).

  1. A set S⊆HS\subseteq H is cyclic for MM if [MS]=H[MS]=H, and separating for MM if x∈Mx\in M and xS={0}xS=\{0\} imply x=0x=0. A set, in particular a single vector, is cyclic for MM exactly when it is separating for M′M'. MM is σ\sigma-finite if and only if HH contains a countable set that is separating for MM, and if and only if MM has a faithful normal state The double commutant theorem.
  2. Every φ∈M∗+\varphi\in M_*^+ equals ∑nωξn\sum_n\omega_{\xi_n} with ∑n∥ξn∥2<∞\sum_n\|\xi_n\|^2<\infty The double commutant theorem.
  3. Every φ∈M∗+\varphi\in M_*^+ has a support s(φ)s(\varphi), the least projection pp with φ(1−p)=0\varphi(1-p)=0, and {x∈M:φ(x∗x)=0}=M(1−s(φ))\{x\in M:\varphi(x^*x)=0\}=M(1-s(\varphi)). An isomorphism of von Neumann algebras and its inverse are normal. If π\pi is a normal representation of MM, then ker⁡π=M(1−z)\ker\pi=M(1-z) for a central projection zz, the image π(M)\pi(M) is a von Neumann algebra, and π\pi maps MzMz isomorphically onto π(M)\pi(M). These are Lemma 11.1, Corollary 11.4 and Proposition 12.1 of The universal enveloping von Neumann algebra of a C∗C^*-algebra, and W∗W^*-algebras.
  4. (Density and topologies.) A ∗*-algebra of operators acting nondegenerately is σ\sigma-weakly dense in its bicommutant, and on bounded sets strong convergence implies σ\sigma-weak convergence The double commutant theorem.
  5. (Cyclic representations.) For every positive linear functional φ\varphi on a C∗C^*-algebra AA there are a representation πφ\pi_\varphi of AA on a Hilbert space HφH_\varphi and a vector ξφ\xi_\varphi such that φ(a)=⟨πφ(a)ξφ,ξφ⟩\varphi(a)=\langle\pi_\varphi(a)\xi_\varphi,\xi_\varphi\rangle and πφ(A)ξφ\pi_\varphi(A)\xi_\varphi is dense in HφH_\varphi [Blackadar, II.6.4]. If AA has a unit, ξφ=πφ(1)ξφ\xi_\varphi=\pi_\varphi(1)\xi_\varphi; in general ξφ\xi_\varphi is the limit of πφ(ui)ξφ\pi_\varphi(u_i)\xi_\varphi along an approximate unit (ui)(u_i) of positive contractions.
  6. (Normal maps.) A positive linear functional on MM is σ\sigma-weakly continuous exactly when it preserves suprema of bounded increasing nets, and M∗M_* is spanned by M∗+M_*^+ [Blackadar, III.2.1.3–III.2.1.4]. Consequently a positive linear map T:M→NT:M\to N between von Neumann algebras that preserves suprema of bounded increasing nets is normal, because ψ∘T\psi\circ T is normal for every ψ∈N∗+\psi\in N_*^+; and a linear bijection that preserves order and suprema in both directions is a homeomorphism for the σ\sigma-weak topologies.

Fact 2.7 (Normal homomorphisms). For a von Neumann algebra N⊆B(L)N\subseteq B(L) and a normal unital ∗*-homomorphism π:N→B(H)\pi:N\to B(H), there are a Hilbert space RR and an isometry V:H→L⊗RV:H\to L\otimes R such that VV∗VV^* commutes with N⊗1RN\otimes1_R and π(y)=V∗(y⊗1R)V\pi(y)=V^*(y\otimes1_R)V for y∈Ny\in N. This is Theorem 8.2 of Spatial tensor products of von Neumann algebras.

Fact 2.10 (Set theory). Zorn's lemma; κ⋅ℵ0=κ\kappa\cdot\aleph_0=\kappa for infinite cardinals κ\kappa; the Cantor–Bernstein theorem, as in Projections and types of von Neumann algebras (Fact 2.9 there).

3. Comparing representations inside one commutant

Let π1\pi_1 and π2\pi_2 be normal representations of MM on K1K_1 and K2K_2. Put K=K1⊕K2K=K_1\oplus K_2, ρ(x)=π1(x)⊕π2(x)\rho(x)=\pi_1(x)\oplus\pi_2(x), P=ρ(M)P=\rho(M), and let qiq_i be the projection of KK onto KiK_i. We call PP the joint algebra of π1\pi_1 and π2\pi_2. The next lemma turns every question about the two representations into a question about q1q_1 and q2q_2.

Lemma 3.1 (Two representations in one commutant).

  1. PP is a von Neumann algebra on KK, and q1,q2q_1,q_2 are projections of P′P' with q1+q2=1q_1+q_2=1.
  2. An operator tt on KK lies in P′P' if and only if its matrix entries tij=qitqj∣Kj:Kj→Kit_{ij}=q_itq_j|_{K_j}:K_j\to K_i satisfy tijπj(x)=πi(x)tijt_{ij}\pi_j(x)=\pi_i(x)t_{ij} for all x∈Mx\in M. In particular the reduced algebra qiP′qiq_iP'q_i, on KiK_i, is πi(M)′\pi_i(M)', and the induced algebra PqiP_{q_i} is πi(M)\pi_i(M).
  3. π1≃π2\pi_1\simeq\pi_2 if and only if q1∼q2q_1\sim q_2 in P′P'. And π1\pi_1 is unitarily equivalent to a subrepresentation of π2\pi_2 if and only if q1≾q2q_1\precsim q_2 in P′P'.
  4. Let c(qi)c(q_i) be the central support of qiq_i in P′P'. Then ker⁡πi={x∈M:ρ(x)∈P(1−c(qi))}\ker\pi_i=\{x\in M:\rho(x)\in P(1-c(q_i))\}. Hence ker⁡π1=ker⁡π2\ker\pi_1=\ker\pi_2 if and only if c(q1)=c(q2)c(q_1)=c(q_2), and c(qi)=1c(q_i)=1 when πi\pi_i is faithful.

Proof. (1) ρ\rho is a normal representation, so PP is a von Neumann algebra (Fact 2.4(3)). Each ρ(x)\rho(x) maps K1K_1 into K1K_1 and K2K_2 into K2K_2, so it commutes with q1q_1 and q2q_2.

(2) Write tt as a 2×22\times2 matrix of operators tijt_{ij}. The entries of tρ(x)t\rho(x) are tijπj(x)t_{ij}\pi_j(x), and those of ρ(x)t\rho(x)t are πi(x)tij\pi_i(x)t_{ij}. They agree for all xx exactly when every entry intertwines. The operators qitqiq_itq_i, t∈P′t\in P', are the operators with a single entry tii∈πi(M)′t_{ii}\in\pi_i(M)', so qiP′qiq_iP'q_i is πi(M)′\pi_i(M)' on KiK_i. Finally ρ(x)qi\rho(x)q_i restricted to KiK_i is πi(x)\pi_i(x).

(3) Let U:K1→K2U:K_1\to K_2 be a unitary with Uπ1(x)=π2(x)UU\pi_1(x)=\pi_2(x)U, and let tt be the operator whose only nonzero entry is t21=Ut_{21}=U. By (2), t∈P′t\in P', and t∗t=q1t^*t=q_1, tt∗=q2tt^*=q_2. Conversely, let t∈P′t\in P' with t∗t=q1t^*t=q_1 and tt∗=q2tt^*=q_2. Then t=q2tq1t=q_2tq_1, so its only nonzero entry is t21t_{21}, which maps K1K_1 isometrically onto K2K_2 and intertwines π1\pi_1 with π2\pi_2 by (2). For the second statement, let t∈P′t\in P' with t∗t=q1t^*t=q_1 and tt∗≤q2tt^*\le q_2. Then t21t_{21} is an isometry of K1K_1 onto L=tt∗K⊆K2L=tt^*K\subseteq K_2. This subspace is invariant under π2(M)\pi_2(M), because tt∗∈P′tt^*\in P', and t21t_{21} intertwines π1\pi_1 with the subrepresentation of π2\pi_2 on LL. Conversely, if an isometry V:K1→K2V:K_1\to K_2 intertwines π1\pi_1 with the subrepresentation on an invariant subspace LL, then the projection VV∗VV^* onto LL commutes with π2(M)\pi_2(M), because an invariant subspace of a self-adjoint set of operators reduces it. The operator tt with the single entry t21=Vt_{21}=V lies in P′P', and t∗t=q1t^*t=q_1, tt∗=VV∗≤q2tt^*=VV^*\le q_2.

(4) The map y↦yqi∣Kiy\mapsto yq_i|_{K_i} is the induction of PP by qi∈P′q_i\in P'. By Fact 2.1(3) its kernel is P(1−c(qi))P(1-c(q_i)), and by (2) it sends ρ(x)\rho(x) to πi(x)\pi_i(x). This gives the formula for ker⁡πi\ker\pi_i. As ρ\rho maps MM onto PP, ker⁡π1=ker⁡π2\ker\pi_1=\ker\pi_2 exactly when P(1−c(q1))=P(1−c(q2))P(1-c(q_1))=P(1-c(q_2)). For central projections w1,w2w_1,w_2, Pw1=Pw2Pw_1=Pw_2 forces w1=w1w2=w2w_1=w_1w_2=w_2, because w1∈Pw2w_1\in Pw_2 and w2∈Pw1w_2\in Pw_1. If πi\pi_i is faithful, then P(1−c(qi))=ρ(ker⁡πi)={0}P(1-c(q_i))=\rho(\ker\pi_i)=\{0\}, so c(qi)=1c(q_i)=1. □\square

The centre of P′P' equals the centre of PP, which is ρ(Z)\rho(Z): by Fact 2.4(3), ρ\rho maps a central summand MzMz of MM isomorphically onto PP, so the centre of PP is ρ(Zz)=ρ(Z)\rho(Zz)=\rho(Z). So the central supports in (4) are images of central projections of MM.

Remark 3.2 (One commutant for all representations). Let π\pi be a faithful normal representation of MM on LL, and σ\sigma any normal representation on KK. Fact 2.7, applied to the von Neumann algebra π(M)\pi(M) and the normal homomorphism π(x)↦σ(x)\pi(x)\mapsto\sigma(x) (normal because π−1\pi^{-1} is, Fact 2.4(3)), gives an isometry V:K→L⊗RV:K\to L\otimes R with Vσ(x)=(π(x)⊗1)VV\sigma(x)=(\pi(x)\otimes1)V. So σ\sigma is equivalent to the subrepresentation of the amplification x↦π(x)⊗1Rx\mapsto\pi(x)\otimes1_R on the invariant subspace VKVK. Thus the normal representations of MM correspond to projections in the commutants of the amplifications of one faithful representation.

Lemma 3.3 (Cyclic projections). Let ξ∈H\xi\in H.

  1. For a central projection zz, pzξ=zpξp_{z\xi}=zp_\xi and pzξ′=zpξ′p'_{z\xi}=zp'_\xi.
  2. If v∈Mv\in M is a partial isometry with v∗v≥pξv^*v\ge p_\xi, then pvξ=vpξv∗p_{v\xi}=vp_\xi v^* and pvξ′=pξ′p'_{v\xi}=p'_\xi. Consequently a projection of MM that is equivalent to a cyclic projection is cyclic.
  3. If g∈P(M)g\in\mathcal P(M) and g≤pξg\le p_\xi, then g=pgξg=p_{g\xi}. So a subprojection of a cyclic projection is cyclic.
  4. Every e∈P(M)e\in\mathcal P(M) is the sum of mutually orthogonal cyclic projections pξip_{\xi_i} with ξi∈eH\xi_i\in eH.
  5. Every cyclic projection is σ\sigma-finite.
  6. For e∈P(M)e\in\mathcal P(M) and e′∈P(M′)e'\in\mathcal P(M'), ee′=0ee'=0 if and only if c(e)c(e′)=0c(e)c(e')=0.

The same holds with MM and M′M' exchanged.

Proof. (1) zz commutes with M′M', so [M′zξ]=z[M′ξ][M'z\xi]=z[M'\xi]. The same argument works for MM.

(2) Since v∈Mv\in M commutes with M′M', M′vξ=vM′ξM'v\xi=vM'\xi. The operator vv is isometric on v∗vH⊇pξHv^*vH\supseteq p_\xi H, so it maps the closed subspace pξH=[M′ξ]p_\xi H=[M'\xi] isometrically onto a closed subspace, which is the closure of vM′ξvM'\xi. Hence pvξp_{v\xi} is the projection onto vpξHvp_\xi H, namely vpξv∗vp_\xi v^*. Next, [Mvξ]⊆[Mξ][Mv\xi]\subseteq[M\xi], and ξ=v∗vξ∈Mvξ\xi=v^*v\xi\in Mv\xi, so [Mvξ]=[Mξ][Mv\xi]=[M\xi]. If v∗v=pξv^*v=p_\xi and vv∗=gvv^*=g, this gives g=pvξg=p_{v\xi}.

(3) gM′ξ=M′gξgM'\xi=M'g\xi, and gg maps the dense subset M′ξM'\xi of pξHp_\xi H onto a dense subset of gpξH=gHgp_\xi H=gH. So [M′gξ]=gH[M'g\xi]=gH.

(4) By Zorn's lemma, choose nonzero vectors ξi∈eH\xi_i\in eH with mutually orthogonal cyclic projections, the family being maximal for this property. By Fact 2.3(1), pξi≤ep_{\xi_i}\le e. If r=e−∑ipξir=e-\sum_ip_{\xi_i} were nonzero, a nonzero η∈rH\eta\in rH would have pη≤rp_\eta\le r, and could be added to the family.

(5) By Fact 2.1(1), the commutant of pξMpξp_\xi Mp_\xi on pξHp_\xi H is M′pξM'p_\xi, for which ξ\xi is cyclic. So ξ\xi is separating for pξMpξp_\xi Mp_\xi (Fact 2.4(1)), which is therefore σ\sigma-finite.

(6) If ee′=0ee'=0, then e′e' lies in the kernel of the induction x′↦x′e∣eHx'\mapsto x'e|_{eH} of M′M', which is M′(1−c(e))M'(1-c(e)) (Fact 2.1(3)). So e′c(e)=0e'c(e)=0, and the central projection 1−c(e)1-c(e) majorizes e′e'; hence c(e′)≤1−c(e)c(e')\le1-c(e). Conversely, c(e)c(e′)=0c(e)c(e')=0 gives ee′=ec(e)c(e′)e′=0ee'=ec(e)c(e')e'=0. □\square

Lemma 3.4 (Properly infinite commutants). If M′M' is properly infinite, every positive normal functional on MM is a vector functional ωζ∣M\omega_\zeta|_M.

Proof. By division by ℵ0\aleph_0 (Fact 2.2(9)) in M′M', 1=∑n≥1en′1=\sum_{n\ge1}e'_n with mutually orthogonal projections en′∈M′e'_n\in M', each equivalent to 11. By Fact 2.2(7), applied to the algebra M′M', whose commutant is MM, there is a unitary W:e1′H⊗ℓ2(N)→HW:e'_1H\otimes\ell^2(\mathbb N)\to H with W∗xW=xe1′⊗1W^*xW=x_{e'_1}\otimes1 for x∈Mx\in M. The induction x↦xe1′x\mapsto x_{e'_1} is injective, because its kernel is M(1−c(e1′))M(1-c(e'_1)) and c(e1′)=c(1)=1c(e'_1)=c(1)=1 (Fact 2.1). Let φ∈M∗+\varphi\in M_*^+. The functional xe1′↦φ(x)x_{e'_1}\mapsto\varphi(x) is positive and normal on Me1′M_{e'_1} (Fact 2.4(3)), so it equals ∑nωξn\sum_n\omega_{\xi_n} with ξn∈e1′H\xi_n\in e'_1H and ∑n∥ξn∥2<∞\sum_n\|\xi_n\|^2<\infty (Fact 2.4(2)). Put ζ=W(∑nξn⊗δn)\zeta=W(\sum_n\xi_n\otimes\delta_n). Then ωζ(x)=⟨(xe1′⊗1)∑nξn⊗δn,∑mξm⊗δm⟩=∑n⟨xe1′ξn,ξn⟩=φ(x).□ \omega_\zeta(x)=\Bigl\langle(x_{e'_1}\otimes1)\sum_n\xi_n\otimes\delta_n,\sum_m\xi_m\otimes\delta_m\Bigr\rangle=\sum_n\langle x_{e'_1}\xi_n,\xi_n\rangle=\varphi(x).\qquad\square

Example 3.5 (Matrix algebras). Every normal representation of Mn(C)M_n(\mathbb C) is unitarily equivalent to x↦x⊗1mx\mapsto x\otimes1_m on Cn⊗Cm\mathbb C^n\otimes\mathbb C^m for one cardinal mm: the images of the matrix units are mutually equivalent projections with sum 11, and Fact 2.2(7) splits the space. For two such representations, with m1m_1 and m2m_2 copies, the joint algebra is Mn(C)⊗1M_n(\mathbb C)\otimes1 on Cn⊗(Cm1⊕Cm2)\mathbb C^n\otimes(\mathbb C^{m_1}\oplus\mathbb C^{m_2}). Its commutant is 1⊗B(Cm1⊕Cm2)1\otimes B(\mathbb C^{m_1}\oplus\mathbb C^{m_2}), and q1,q2q_1,q_2 are projections of rank m1m_1 and m2m_2 there. They are equivalent exactly when m1=m2m_1=m_2. This recovers the multiplicity mm of the introduction.

4. Representations with properly infinite commutant

If the commutants are properly infinite and not too large, there is no room for multiplicity at all: only the kernel matters.

Theorem 4.1. Let π1\pi_1 and π2\pi_2 be normal representations of MM whose commutants π1(M)′\pi_1(M)' and π2(M)′\pi_2(M)' are properly infinite and locally σ\sigma-finite (for example, σ\sigma-finite). Then π1≃π2\pi_1\simeq\pi_2 if and only if ker⁡π1=ker⁡π2\ker\pi_1=\ker\pi_2. In particular, two faithful normal representations with σ\sigma-finite, properly infinite commutants are unitarily equivalent.

Proof. Equivalent representations have the same kernel. Conversely, let ker⁡π1=ker⁡π2\ker\pi_1=\ker\pi_2, and use the joint algebra PP of Lemma 3.1. By Lemma 3.1(2), the reduced algebra qiP′qiq_iP'q_i is πi(M)′\pi_i(M)'. Its central projections are the wqiwq_i with ww central in P′P' (Fact 2.1(4)), and the reduced algebra of qiP′qiq_iP'q_i by wqiwq_i is (wqi)P′(wqi)(wq_i)P'(wq_i). So the hypotheses say that qiq_i is a properly infinite and locally σ\sigma-finite projection of P′P'. By Lemma 3.1(4), c(q1)=c(q2)c(q_1)=c(q_2). The absorption property (Fact 2.2(11)) gives q1≾q2q_1\precsim q_2 and q2≾q1q_2\precsim q_1, so q1∼q2q_1\sim q_2 by Schröder–Bernstein, and π1≃π2\pi_1\simeq\pi_2 by Lemma 3.1(3). □\square

Example 4.2 (Both conditions are needed). Let M=C1M=\mathbb C1. A normal representation is the scalar action on a Hilbert space KK, it is faithful if K≠0K\ne0, and its commutant is B(K)B(K).

Theorem 4.3. Let ZZ be the centre of MM.

  1. MM has a faithful normal representation with σ\sigma-finite commutant if and only if ZZ is σ\sigma-finite.
  2. If ZZ is σ\sigma-finite, MM has a faithful normal representation whose commutant is σ\sigma-finite and properly infinite, and any two such representations are unitarily equivalent.

Proof. (1) Let π\pi be faithful and normal with π(M)′\pi(M)' σ\sigma-finite. The centre π(Z)\pi(Z) of π(M)′\pi(M)' is σ\sigma-finite, because an orthogonal family of central projections is an orthogonal family in π(M)′\pi(M)'; and Z≅π(Z)Z\cong\pi(Z).

Conversely, let ZZ be σ\sigma-finite. By Zorn's lemma choose normal states φi\varphi_i of MM whose supports have mutually orthogonal central supports zi=c(s(φi))z_i=c(s(\varphi_i)), the family {φi}\{\varphi_i\} being maximal for this property. The ziz_i are nonzero, mutually orthogonal central projections, so there are countably many; index them by i=1,2,…i=1,2,\ldots. If w=1−∑iziw=1-\sum_iz_i were nonzero, a unit vector ξ∈wH\xi\in wH would give the normal state ωξ∣M\omega_\xi|_M with support pξ≤wp_\xi\le w (Fact 2.3(1)), and hence c(pξ)≤wc(p_\xi)\le w, against maximality. So ∑izi=1\sum_iz_i=1. Put φ=∑i2−iφi\varphi=\sum_i2^{-i}\varphi_i, divided by φ(1)\varphi(1). This is a normal state, and φ(1−q)=0\varphi(1-q)=0 exactly when φi(1−q)=0\varphi_i(1-q)=0 for all ii; so s(φ)=⋁is(φi)s(\varphi)=\bigvee_is(\varphi_i), and c(s(φ))=⋁izi=1c(s(\varphi))=\bigvee_iz_i=1.

Let (πφ,Hφ,ξφ)(\pi_\varphi,H_\varphi,\xi_\varphi) be the cyclic representation of φ\varphi (Fact 2.4(5)). It is normal. Let xj↑xx_j\uparrow x be a bounded increasing net in M+M_+, and let SS be the supremum of the bounded increasing net πφ(xj)\pi_\varphi(x_j). For η=πφ(y)ξφ\eta=\pi_\varphi(y)\xi_\varphi, normality of φ\varphi gives ⟨Sη,η⟩=lim⁡jφ(y∗xjy)=φ(y∗xy)=⟨πφ(x)η,η⟩\langle S\eta,\eta\rangle=\lim_j\varphi(y^*x_jy)=\varphi(y^*xy)=\langle\pi_\varphi(x)\eta,\eta\rangle. These vectors form a dense subspace, so polarization and continuity give S=πφ(x)S=\pi_\varphi(x). Thus πφ\pi_\varphi preserves suprema, and it is normal (Fact 2.4(6)). It is faithful: πφ(x)=0\pi_\varphi(x)=0 means φ(y∗x∗xy)=0\varphi(y^*x^*xy)=0 for all y∈My\in M, that is, xys(φ)=0xys(\varphi)=0 for all yy (Fact 2.4(3)); so xx vanishes on [Ms(φ)H]=c(s(φ))H=H[Ms(\varphi)H]=c(s(\varphi))H=H (Fact 2.1(2)). Finally ξφ\xi_\varphi is cyclic for πφ(M)\pi_\varphi(M), hence separating for πφ(M)′\pi_\varphi(M)', which is therefore σ\sigma-finite (Fact 2.4(1)).

(2) Let πφ\pi_\varphi be as above and σ(x)=πφ(x)⊗1\sigma(x)=\pi_\varphi(x)\otimes1 on Hφ⊗ℓ2(N)H_\varphi\otimes\ell^2(\mathbb N). It is faithful and normal. By Fact 2.2(7), σ(M)′=MN(πφ(M)′)\sigma(M)'=\mathbb M_{\mathbb N}(\pi_\varphi(M)'), with centre {w⊗1}\{w\otimes1\}. For a nonzero central projection w⊗1w\otimes1, the operator w⊗sw\otimes s, where ss is the unilateral shift, lies in σ(M)′\sigma(M)'; it has initial projection w⊗1w\otimes1 and final projection w⊗(1−e0)w\otimes(1-e_0), where e0e_0 projects onto Cδ0\mathbb C\delta_0. So every nonzero central projection is infinite, and σ(M)′\sigma(M)' is properly infinite. The countable set {ξφ⊗δn}\{\xi_\varphi\otimes\delta_n\} is cyclic for σ(M)\sigma(M), hence separating for σ(M)′\sigma(M)', which is therefore σ\sigma-finite (Fact 2.4(1)). Uniqueness is Theorem 4.1. □\square

The next lemma counts orthogonal projections without assuming that the whole algebra is σ\sigma-finite.

Lemma 4.5 (Counting orthogonal projections). Let {ej}j∈J\{e_j\}_{j\in J} be mutually orthogonal σ\sigma-finite projections of MM with ∑jej=1\sum_je_j=1. If {fi}i∈I\{f_i\}_{i\in I} are mutually orthogonal nonzero projections of MM, then ∣I∣≤ℵ0⋅∣J∣|I|\le\aleph_0\cdot|J|. If JJ is infinite, then ∣I∣≤∣J∣|I|\le|J|.

Reference: [Takesaki I, Lemma V.3.17] states the bound for every orthogonal family of projections; this fails because the zero projection may be repeated any number of times, so we require the fif_i to be nonzero.

Proof. For each jj, the algebra ejMeje_jMe_j is σ\sigma-finite, so it has a faithful normal state ψj\psi_j (Fact 2.4(1)); put φj(x)=ψj(ejxej)\varphi_j(x)=\psi_j(e_jxe_j). Let Ij={i:φj(fi)>0}I_j=\{i:\varphi_j(f_i)>0\}. For a finite F⊆IF\subseteq I, ∑i∈Fφj(fi)=φj(∑i∈Ffi)≤1\sum_{i\in F}\varphi_j(f_i)=\varphi_j(\sum_{i\in F}f_i)\le1, so IjI_j is countable. Fix ii. Since fi≠0f_i\ne0 and fi=∑jfiejf_i=\sum_jf_ie_j strongly, some fiej≠0f_ie_j\ne0. Then ejfiej=(fiej)∗(fiej)≠0e_jf_ie_j=(f_ie_j)^*(f_ie_j)\ne0, and φj(fi)=ψj(ejfiej)>0\varphi_j(f_i)=\psi_j(e_jf_ie_j)>0 by faithfulness. So I=⋃jIjI=\bigcup_jI_j, and ∣I∣≤ℵ0⋅∣J∣|I|\le\aleph_0\cdot|J|. If JJ is infinite, ℵ0⋅∣J∣=∣J∣\aleph_0\cdot|J|=|J| (Fact 2.10). □\square

Editable source · Sources and component terms