Normal abelian representations over a given measure space

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

This chapter constructs the diagonal field for a normal representation of an already specified L∞L^\infty algebra. It supplies the concrete starting step in comparing representations that agree on a given abelian subalgebra.

1. Exact assumptions and inputs

Let (X,Σ,μ)(X,\Sigma,\mu) be a sigma-finite measure space, let HH be a separable Hilbert space, and let ρ:L∞(X,μ)⟶B(H) \rho:L^\infty(X,\mu)\longrightarrow B(H) be a unital normal star representation. Normality means preservation of suprema of bounded increasing nets of positive elements. The representation need not be faithful. If it is faithful, the field constructed below is nonzero almost everywhere. A zero Hilbert space is allowed when the representation is zero.

The exact inputs are the Hilbert space basis and orthogonal-projection theorems; monotone convergence, density of bounded measurable functions in L2L^2 of a finite measure, and the positive Radon–Nikodym theorem on a sigma-finite measure space; and the definition and elementary orthogonal-coordinate construction of measurable fields and direct integrals. The measure inputs are proved in Measure and Hilbert space tools. No spectral multiplicity assertion is assumed.

2. Countably many reducing cyclic summands

There is a finite or countable orthogonal decomposition H=⨁j∈JHj,Hj=ρ(L∞(X,μ))ξj‾, H=\bigoplus_{j\in J}H_j,\qquad H_j=\overline{\rho(L^\infty(X,\mu))\xi_j}, where the ξj\xi_j are nonzero and each HjH_j reduces ρ\rho.

Proof. Let (ηn)(\eta_n) be a countable norm-dense sequence in HH. Proceed through its terms. At stage nn, take the orthogonal component of ηn\eta_n in the complement of the sum of the cyclic summands already chosen. If it is nonzero, call it ξj\xi_j and add its cyclic subspace. A subspace generated by a vector under a star algebra is invariant under both the algebra and its adjoints, so it is reducing. The already chosen orthogonal sum and its complement are also reducing; the new cyclic subspace therefore lies in that complement. At the end, every ηn\eta_n lies in the closed sum: at its stage its old projection lies in the earlier sum and its remaining component either vanishes or lies in the newly added summand. Density gives the asserted equality. At most one summand is added per stage. □\square

3. A cyclic summand as a weighted scalar space

For each jj, set νj(E)=⟨ρ(1E)ξj,ξj⟩(E∈Σ). \nu_j(E)=\langle\rho(1_E)\xi_j,\xi_j\rangle\quad(E\in\Sigma). This is a finite positive measure absolutely continuous with respect to μ\mu. Indeed, disjoint partial unions give an increasing sequence of indicator functions with supremum the indicator of their union. Normality of ρ\rho, followed by the normal vector functional, gives countable additivity. Also νj(X)=∥ξj∥2\nu_j(X)=\|\xi_j\|^2, and a μ\mu-null indicator represents zero in L∞L^\infty, so its νj\nu_j measure is zero. By positive Radon–Nikodym there is a measurable hj≥0h_j\ge0, finite almost everywhere, such that νj(E)=∫Ehj dμ,∫Xhj dμ=∥ξj∥2. \nu_j(E)=\int_Eh_j\,d\mu,\qquad \int_Xh_j\,d\mu=\|\xi_j\|^2. Changing hjh_j on a measurable null set, make it finite everywhere, and put Sj={hj>0}S_j=\{h_j>0\}.

For bounded measurable functions f,gf,g, the representation identities give ⟨ρ(f)ξj,ρ(g)ξj⟩=⟨ρ(g‾f)ξj,ξj⟩=∫Xfg‾ dνj. \langle\rho(f)\xi_j,\rho(g)\xi_j\rangle =\langle\rho(\overline g f)\xi_j,\xi_j\rangle =\int_X f\overline g\,d\nu_j. The last equality holds first for simple functions by the definition of νj\nu_j, and then for bounded measurable functions by uniform simple approximation and continuity on both sides. Thus f↦ρ(f)ξjf\mapsto\rho(f)\xi_j is an isometry from the bounded functions modulo νj\nu_j-null equality into HjH_j. Bounded functions are dense in L2(X,νj)L^2(X,\nu_j) by truncation and simple approximation. The isometry consequently extends to a unitary Vj:L2(X,νj)⟶Hj. V_j:L^2(X,\nu_j)\longrightarrow H_j. It is onto because its range contains the dense cyclic subspace and an isometry from a complete Hilbert space has closed range. For a∈L∞(X,μ)a\in L^\infty(X,\mu), it intertwines multiplication by aa with ρ(a)∣Hj\rho(a)|_{H_j}, first on bounded functions and then on all of L2(X,νj)L^2(X,\nu_j) by density. Absolute continuity ensures that the multiplication depends only on the μ\mu-equivalence class of aa.

Multiplication by hj\sqrt{h_j} is a unitary Wj:L2(X,νj)⟶L2(Sj,μ). W_j:L^2(X,\nu_j)\longrightarrow L^2(S_j,\mu). The isometry follows from the Radon–Nikodym integral formula, first for simple nonnegative functions and then by monotone convergence. For b∈L2(Sj,μ)b\in L^2(S_j,\mu), the measurable function b/hjb/\sqrt{h_j} on SjS_j, extended by zero off SjS_j, belongs to L2(X,νj)L^2(X,\nu_j) and maps to bb. This proves surjectivity. The unitary WjW_j commutes with every bounded scalar multiplier. Combining these unitaries identifies ρ\rho with multiplication on ⨁jL2(Sj,μ)\bigoplus_jL^2(S_j,\mu).

4. The measurable Hilbert field and the full intertwiner

Let (ej)j∈J(e_j)_{j\in J} be the standard orthonormal basis of ℓ2(J)\ell^2(J), and define K(x)=span⁡‾{ej:x∈Sj},sj(x)=1Sj(x)ej. K(x)=\overline{\operatorname{span}}\{e_j:x\in S_j\},\qquad s_j(x)=1_{S_j}(x)e_j. The Gram coefficients ⟨sj(x),sk(x)⟩=δjk1Sj(x)\langle s_j(x),s_k(x)\rangle=\delta_{jk}1_{S_j}(x) are measurable, and the sj(x)s_j(x) have dense span in K(x)K(x). The measurable-field construction therefore makes K(x)K(x) a measurable field with this fundamental sequence. The zero space occurs exactly when no SjS_j contains xx.

A section bb is measurable precisely when its scalar coordinates bj(x)=⟨b(x),ej⟩b_j(x)=\langle b(x),e_j\rangle, zero off SjS_j, are measurable. Indeed, these are its scalar products with the fundamental sections, and every measurable section is determined by these coordinates. Conversely, measurable coordinates whose values form a square-summable family at each point give a section: finite coordinate sums are measurable and converge pointwise in norm, which is the defining closure property of this field. Consequently T:∫X⊕K(x) dμ(x)⟶⨁jL2(Sj,μ),T(b)=(bj)j T:\int_X^\oplus K(x)\,d\mu(x)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_jL^2(S_j,\mu),\qquad T(b)=(b_j)_j is a unitary. The norm identity is ∫X∥b(x)∥2,dμ=∫X∑j∣bj(x)∣2,dμ=∑j∫Sj∣bj(x)∣2,dμ. \int_X\|b(x)\|^2,d\mu =\int_X\sum_j|b_j(x)|^2,d\mu =\sum_j\int_{S_j}|b_j(x)|^2,d\mu. Here the last equality is simply monotone convergence for the increasing finite coordinate sums. For surjectivity, choose measurable representatives of an element (bj)j(b_j)_j of the direct sum. The displayed sum is finite, so ∑j∣bj(x)∣2<∞\sum_j|b_j(x)|^2<\infty outside one measurable null set; set all coordinates to zero on that set. The resulting measurable section lies in the direct integral and maps to the given element. This also proves surjectivity without any choice of uncountably many representatives. The case J=∅J=\varnothing gives the zero space.

Let V=⨁jVjV=\bigoplus_jV_j and W=⨁jWjW=\bigoplus_jW_j. The unitary U=T−1WV−1:H⟶∫X⊕K(x) dμ(x) U=T^{-1}WV^{-1}:H\longrightarrow\int_X^\oplus K(x)\,d\mu(x) satisfies, for every a∈L∞(X,μ)a\in L^\infty(X,\mu), Uρ(a)U∗=Ma, U\rho(a)U^*=M_a, where (Mab)(x)=a(x)b(x)(M_ab)(x)=a(x)b(x). All three constituent unitaries intertwine the scalar multipliers, so the equality holds for every aa, rather than just a chosen countable stock.

If ρ\rho is faithful, put E=X∖⋃jSjE=X\setminus\bigcup_jS_j. Multiplication by 1E1_E vanishes on every scalar summand, hence ρ(1E)=0\rho(1_E)=0. Faithfulness gives 1E=01_E=0 in L∞(X,μ)L^\infty(X,\mu), so μ(E)=0\mu(E)=0 and K(x)≠0K(x)\ne0 almost everywhere. Conversely, if ⋃jSj\bigcup_jS_j is conull and Ma=0M_a=0, then a=0a=0 almost everywhere on each SjS_j. To see this, multiply aa by the indicators of the finite-measure pieces of a sigma-finite exhaustion of SjS_j, which belong to L2(Sj,μ)L^2(S_j,\mu). Each such product must vanish. Countable union over the pieces and over jj gives a=0a=0 almost everywhere on XX. Thus this field realization is faithful exactly when it is nonzero almost everywhere. □\square

For two faithful normal representations on separable Hilbert spaces, this construction puts both over the same given base (X,μ)(X,\mu). Their other operators can then be decomposed whenever they commute with the diagonal algebra, by the complete diagonal-commutant theorem in Decomposable operators and the diagonal algebra. This conclusion assumes the specified L∞L^\infty base and does not construct a centre decomposition for an arbitrary abstract von Neumann algebra.

Editable source · Sources and component terms