Direct integrals of von Neumann algebras

Written by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

A direct integral of Hilbert spaces H=∫Γ⊕H(γ) dμ(γ)\mathcal H=\int_\Gamma^\oplus H(\gamma)\,d\mu(\gamma) comes with two von Neumann algebras of its own. The diagonal algebra A\mathcal A multiplies every fibre by a scalar that varies measurably with the point. The decomposable algebra D\mathcal D acts on every fibre by a bounded operator. Each of the two is the commutant of the other. Many algebras lie between them. Pick, at each point γ\gamma, a von Neumann algebra M(γ)M(\gamma) on the fibre H(γ)H(\gamma), and keep the decomposable operators whose fibres lie in M(γ)M(\gamma) at almost every point. The resulting set is written ∫Γ⊕M(γ) dμ(γ)\int_\Gamma^\oplus M(\gamma)\,d\mu(\gamma).

This lesson studies that construction. When the family γ↦M(γ)\gamma\mapsto M(\gamma) is measurable, in the sense of Section 1, the set is a von Neumann algebra. Its commutant is obtained by integrating the commutants M(γ)′M(\gamma)', and its centre by integrating the centres M(γ)∩M(γ)′M(\gamma)\cap M(\gamma)' (Theorems 3.2 and 4.3). So the centre equals the diagonal algebra exactly when almost all the M(γ)M(\gamma) are factors. The family can be recovered from its integral, up to a null set (Theorem 4.1). Conversely, every von Neumann algebra that contains A\mathcal A and is contained in D\mathcal D arises in this way (Theorem 5.3). Measurable families, taken up to null sets, therefore match the von Neumann algebras between A\mathcal A and D\mathcal D one to one.

These facts form the core of von Neumann's reduction theory (1949); see [Blackadar, Section III.1.6]. After a von Neumann algebra has been written as an integral over an abelian subalgebra of its centre, many questions about it become questions about the fibres. When the whole centre is used, the fibres are factors. The delicate point is measurability. That the fields of commutants and of centres are again measurable rests on the Borel space of von Neumann algebras introduced in [Effros 1965].

The base is an arbitrary σ\sigma-finite measure space throughout. We need no standard Borel structure, no completeness of the measure and no separability of H\mathcal H. Section 6 explains where standard bases will matter later. It also gives a base on which a harmless-looking family is not measurable, and on which the commutant formula fails for it.

We assume the lessons Measurable fields of Hilbert spaces and their direct integrals, Decomposable operators and the diagonal algebra and The Effros Borel structure. Every fact we take from them is stated in full in the section Background used without proof. Example 7.2 also uses Spatial tensor products of von Neumann algebras.

Basic references are [Takesaki I, Chapter IV] and [Blackadar, Section III.1.6].

Conventions

Throughout, (Γ,Σ,μ)(\Gamma,\Sigma,\mu) is a σ\sigma-finite measure space, and measurable means Σ\Sigma-measurable. We assume nothing about completeness of μ\mu, standardness of (Γ,Σ)(\Gamma,\Sigma) or countability properties of Σ\Sigma. A null set is a set N∈ΣN\in\Sigma with μ(N)=0\mu(N)=0. A statement holds almost everywhere, or for almost every γ\gamma, if it holds for all γ\gamma outside some null set. A subset E⊆ΓE\subseteq\Gamma is measurable up to a null set if some F∈ΣF\in\Sigma has E △ FE\,\triangle\,F contained in a null set. When Σ\Sigma is complete for μ\mu, these are the familiar notions.

Hilbert spaces are complex, inner products are linear in the first variable, and the zero space is allowed. For a Hilbert space KK, B(K)B(K) is the algebra of bounded operators on KK, and S′S' is the commutant of a set S⊆B(K)S\subseteq B(K). A von Neumann algebra on KK is a ∗*-subalgebra M⊆B(K)M\subseteq B(K) with M′′=MM''=M. The von Neumann algebra generated by a set SS is (S∪S∗)′′(S\cup S^*)''. The centre of MM is M∩M′M\cap M', and MM is a factor if its centre is C1\mathbb C1. For von Neumann algebras M1,M2M_1,M_2 on KK we put M1∨M2=(M1∪M2)′′M_1\vee M_2=(M_1\cup M_2)''. On the zero space, B(0)={0}=C1B(0)=\{0\}=\mathbb C1 is the only von Neumann algebra, and it is a factor by this definition.

We use four elementary facts about commutants. Let S,T⊆B(K)S,T\subseteq B(K).

Proof. (C1) An operator that commutes with all of TT commutes with all of SS. Every element of SS commutes with every element of S′S', so S⊆S′′S\subseteq S''. Applying the first statement to S⊆S′′S\subseteq S'' gives S′′′⊆S′S'''\subseteq S', and applying the second to S′S' gives S′⊆S′′′S'\subseteq S'''.

(C2) Sums and products of operators that commute with SS commute with SS, and so does 11. Let S∗=SS^*=S and x∈S′x\in S'. For s∈Ss\in S we have xs∗=s∗xxs^*=s^*x, and taking adjoints gives sx∗=x∗ssx^*=x^*s. So x∗∈S′x^*\in S', and S′S' is a ∗*-algebra. It equals its own bicommutant by (C1).

(C3) The set S∪S∗S\cup S^* is self-adjoint, so (S∪S∗)′(S\cup S^*)' is a self-adjoint set by (C2), and (S∪S∗)′′(S\cup S^*)'' is a von Neumann algebra by (C2) again. It contains SS by (C1). If a von Neumann algebra PP contains SS, it contains S∪S∗S\cup S^*, and then P=P′′⊇(S∪S∗)′′P=P''\supseteq(S\cup S^*)'' by (C1) used twice. The commutant is (S∪S∗)′′′=(S∪S∗)′(S\cup S^*)'''=(S\cup S^*)' by (C1).

(C4) An operator commutes with every element of M1′∪M2′M_1'\cup M_2' exactly when it lies in M1′′∩M2′′=M1∩M2M_1''\cap M_2''=M_1\cap M_2. The set M1′∪M2′M_1'\cup M_2' is self-adjoint, so M1∩M2M_1\cap M_2 is a von Neumann algebra by (C2). The set M1∪M2M_1\cup M_2 is self-adjoint too, so it generates (M1∪M2)′′=M1∨M2(M_1\cup M_2)''=M_1\vee M_2, whose commutant is (M1∪M2)′=M1′∩M2′(M_1\cup M_2)'=M_1'\cap M_2' by (C3). □\square

The bicommutant theorem is not needed anywhere in this lesson.

Background used without proof

Throughout, (H(γ))γ∈Γ(H(\gamma))_{\gamma\in\Gamma}, with its space M\mathfrak M of measurable sections, is a fixed measurable field of Hilbert spaces over (Γ,Σ,μ)(\Gamma,\Sigma,\mu), and H=∫Γ⊕H(γ) dμ(γ)\mathcal H=\int_\Gamma^\oplus H(\gamma)\,d\mu(\gamma) is its direct integral. The following facts are proved in the lessons named.

From Measurable fields of Hilbert spaces and their direct integrals:

From Decomposable operators and the diagonal algebra:

From The Effros Borel structure:

From Spatial tensor products of von Neumann algebras, for Example 7.2 only:

1. Measurable fields of von Neumann algebras

Definition 1.1. A field of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)) is a family M=(M(γ))γ∈ΓM=(M(\gamma))_{\gamma\in\Gamma} in which each M(γ)M(\gamma) is a von Neumann algebra acting on H(γ)H(\gamma). The field is measurable if there are measurable operator fields x1,x2,…x_1,x_2,\ldots on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)) such that, for almost every γ\gamma, the algebra M(γ)M(\gamma) is generated by {xj(γ):j≥1}\{x_j(\gamma):j\geq1\}. Two fields are equivalent if they agree almost everywhere.

The generating fields need not be essentially bounded; their norms may grow without bound. Finitely many generators are allowed: repeat one of them. For a field MM we write M′M' for the field (M(γ)′)(M(\gamma)') of commutants and ZMZ_M for the field (M(γ)∩M(γ)′)(M(\gamma)\cap M(\gamma)') of centres. For two fields M1,M2M_1,M_2 we write M1∩M2M_1\cap M_2 and M1∨M2M_1\vee M_2 for the fields (M1(γ)∩M2(γ))(M_1(\gamma)\cap M_2(\gamma)) and (M1(γ)∨M2(γ))(M_1(\gamma)\vee M_2(\gamma)). By (C2) and (C4), these are again fields of von Neumann algebras.

A measurably generated family in the sense of (B11) is a measurable field. The only difference is the null set: Proposition 1.3(1) shows that every measurable field is equivalent to a measurably generated family.

Example 1.2.

  1. The field C1=(C1H(γ))\mathbb C1=(\mathbb C1_{H(\gamma)}) is measurable. It is generated by the identity field, since {1}′′=B(H(γ))′=C1\{1\}''=B(H(\gamma))'=\mathbb C1; the last equality is the computation in (2).
  2. The field (B(H(γ)))(B(H(\gamma))) is measurable: it is generated by the matrix-unit fields ekle_{kl} of (B7). Indeed, fix γ\gamma with n(γ)≥1n(\gamma)\geq1, and let s∈B(H(γ))s\in B(H(\gamma)) commute with every ekl(γ)e_{kl}(\gamma). For k≤n(γ)k\leq n(\gamma) we have ek1(γ)e1(γ)=ek(γ)e_{k1}(\gamma)e_1(\gamma)=e_k(\gamma), so sek(γ)=sek1(γ)e1(γ)=ek1(γ)se1(γ)=⟨se1(γ),e1(γ)⟩ ek(γ). se_k(\gamma)=se_{k1}(\gamma)e_1(\gamma)=e_{k1}(\gamma)se_1(\gamma)=\langle se_1(\gamma),e_1(\gamma)\rangle\,e_k(\gamma). So ss agrees with the scalar c=⟨se1(γ),e1(γ)⟩c=\langle se_1(\gamma),e_1(\gamma)\rangle on an orthonormal basis, and s=c1s=c1. The set {ekl(γ)}\{e_{kl}(\gamma)\} is self-adjoint and its commutant is C1\mathbb C1, so by (C3) the von Neumann algebra it generates is (C1)′=B(H(γ))(\mathbb C1)'=B(H(\gamma)). If n(γ)=0n(\gamma)=0, then B(H(γ))=C1B(H(\gamma))=\mathbb C1, and there is nothing to prove.

Proposition 1.3. Let MM, M1M_1 and M2M_2 be measurable fields of von Neumann algebras.

  1. (Repair on a null set) There are a null set NN and a measurably generated family M~\tilde M with M~(γ)=M(γ)\tilde M(\gamma)=M(\gamma) for all γ∉N\gamma\notin N.
  2. (Generators in the unit ball) There are measurable operator fields yky_k, k≥1k\geq1, with ∥yk(γ)∥≤1\|y_k(\gamma)\|\leq1 for every γ\gamma, such that for almost every γ\gamma the operators yk(γ)y_k(\gamma) lie in M(γ)M(\gamma), are σ\sigma-weakly dense in its unit ball, and generate it.
  3. (Operations) The fields M′M', ZMZ_M, M1∩M2M_1\cap M_2 and M1∨M2M_1\vee M_2 are measurable.
  4. (Fibrewise properties) The set of γ\gamma for which M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor is measurable up to a null set. So are the set where M(γ)M(\gamma) is abelian and the set where M(γ)=B(H(γ))M(\gamma)=B(H(\gamma)).
  5. (Effros form) A field LL of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)) is measurable exactly when, for every dd, some measurable map Φd:Γd→vN(ℓd2)\Phi_d:\Gamma_d\to\mathrm{vN}(\ell^2_d) satisfies Φd(γ)=U(γ)L(γ)U(γ)∗\Phi_d(\gamma)=U(\gamma)L(\gamma)U(\gamma)^* for almost every γ∈Γd\gamma\in\Gamma_d.

Proof. (1) Choose generating fields xjx_j and a null set NN such that M(γ)M(\gamma) is generated by {xj(γ)}\{x_j(\gamma)\} for γ∉N\gamma\notin N. For every γ\gamma, let M~(γ)\tilde M(\gamma) be the von Neumann algebra generated by {xj(γ)}\{x_j(\gamma)\}. Then M~\tilde M is measurably generated, and it agrees with MM off NN.

(2) Apply (B11)(a) to M~\tilde M. It gives fields that, for every γ\gamma, lie in M~(γ)\tilde M(\gamma), are dense in its unit ball and generate it. Off NN, M~(γ)=M(γ)\tilde M(\gamma)=M(\gamma).

(3) Take repairs M~,M~1,M~2\tilde M,\tilde M_1,\tilde M_2 as in (1), with null sets N,N1,N2N,N_1,N_2. By (B11)(b), the families M~′\tilde M', ZM~Z_{\tilde M}, M~1∩M~2\tilde M_1\cap\tilde M_2 and M~1∨M~2\tilde M_1\vee\tilde M_2 are measurably generated. Off the null set N∪N1∪N2N\cup N_1\cup N_2 they agree with M′M', ZMZ_M, M1∩M2M_1\cap M_2 and M1∨M2M_1\vee M_2. The generating fields of a family that agrees with a given field off a null set generate that field almost everywhere. So the four fields are measurable.

(4) By (B11)(c), the set FF of γ\gamma for which M~(γ)\tilde M(\gamma) is a factor lies in Σ\Sigma. The set of γ\gamma for which M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor differs from FF only inside NN. The same argument applies to the other two properties.

(5) Let LL be measurable, with a repair L~\tilde L and a null set NN as in (1). By (B11)(d), the map Φd(γ)=U(γ)L~(γ)U(γ)∗\Phi_d(\gamma)=U(\gamma)\tilde L(\gamma)U(\gamma)^* is measurable on Γd\Gamma_d, and it equals U(γ)L(γ)U(γ)∗U(\gamma)L(\gamma)U(\gamma)^* for γ∈Γd∖N\gamma\in\Gamma_d\setminus N. Conversely, let maps Φd\Phi_d be given, and let Nd⊆ΓdN_d\subseteq\Gamma_d be a null set off which Φd(γ)=U(γ)L(γ)U(γ)∗\Phi_d(\gamma)=U(\gamma)L(\gamma)U(\gamma)^*. For γ∈Γd\gamma\in\Gamma_d put L~(γ)=U(γ)∗Φd(γ)U(γ)\tilde L(\gamma)=U(\gamma)^*\Phi_d(\gamma)U(\gamma). The map a↦U(γ)∗aU(γ)a\mapsto U(\gamma)^*aU(\gamma) is a ∗*-isomorphism of B(ℓd2)B(\ell^2_d) onto B(H(γ))B(H(\gamma)) that carries commutants to commutants, so L~(γ)\tilde L(\gamma) is a von Neumann algebra acting on H(γ)H(\gamma). Since U(γ)L~(γ)U(γ)∗=Φd(γ)U(\gamma)\tilde L(\gamma)U(\gamma)^*=\Phi_d(\gamma), the family L~\tilde L is measurably generated by (B11)(d). It agrees with LL off the null set ⋃dNd\bigcup_dN_d, so LL is measurable. □\square

Remark 1.4.

  1. Every von Neumann algebra PP acting on a separable space KK is generated by a countable set. Indeed, by (B10) the unit ball of PP lies in a compact metrizable space, so it has a countable σ\sigma-weakly dense subset SS. The von Neumann algebra generated by SS is a commutant, hence σ\sigma-weakly closed (B10). It contains SS, hence the unit ball of PP, hence PP; and it lies in PP by (C3). So measurability is not about the number of generators at one point. It asks that the generators be chosen measurably in γ\gamma.
  2. A field that is equivalent to a measurable field is measurable, since the same generating fields serve outside a null set.
  3. By (B10), the maps Φd\Phi_d of Proposition 1.3(5) take values in standard Borel spaces. So a measurable field is, up to a null set, a measurable map from each dimension stratum into a standard Borel space of von Neumann algebras.

2. The direct integral of a field of von Neumann algebras

Definition 2.1. Let MM be a field of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)), measurable or not. Put ∫Γ⊕M(γ) dμ(γ)={∫⊕x: x an essentially bounded measurable operator field with x(γ)∈M(γ) for almost every γ},(2.1) \int_\Gamma^\oplus M(\gamma)\,d\mu(\gamma)=\Big\{\int^\oplus x:\ x\ \text{an essentially bounded measurable operator field with}\ x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma)\ \text{for almost every}\ \gamma\Big\}, \tag{2.1} and abbreviate it to ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M. When MM is measurable, we call ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M the direct integral of the field MM. By definition it is a subset of D\mathcal D.

Proposition 2.2. Let MM, M1M_1 and M2M_2 be fields of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)), measurable or not.

  1. (Representing fields) Let T∈∫⊕MT\in\int^\oplus M. Every essentially bounded measurable operator field xx with T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x satisfies x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma. Moreover, T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x for a measurable operator field xx with x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) and ∥x(γ)∥≤∥T∥\|x(\gamma)\|\leq\|T\| for every γ\gamma.
  2. (Algebra) ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a ∗*-subalgebra of D\mathcal D that contains A\mathcal A, and A⊆(∫⊕M)′\mathcal A\subseteq(\int^\oplus M)'.
  3. (Monotonicity) If M1(γ)⊆M2(γ)M_1(\gamma)\subseteq M_2(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma, then ∫⊕M1⊆∫⊕M2\int^\oplus M_1\subseteq\int^\oplus M_2. In particular, equivalent fields have the same direct integral.
  4. (Intersections) ∫⊕(M1∩M2)=∫⊕M1∩∫⊕M2\int^\oplus(M_1\cap M_2)=\int^\oplus M_1\cap\int^\oplus M_2.
  5. (The extreme fields) ∫⊕B(H(γ)) dμ(γ)=D\int^\oplus B(H(\gamma))\,d\mu(\gamma)=\mathcal D and ∫⊕C1 dμ(γ)=A\int^\oplus\mathbb C1\,d\mu(\gamma)=\mathcal A.

Proof. (1) Choose an essentially bounded x0x_0 with T=∫⊕x0T=\int^\oplus x_0 and x0(γ)∈M(γ)x_0(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) off a null set N0N_0. If T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x, then x=x0x=x_0 off a null set N1N_1 by (B4), so x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) off N0∪N1N_0\cup N_1. For the second claim, TT lies in D=A′\mathcal D=\mathcal A', so (B6) gives a measurable operator field yy with T=∫⊕yT=\int^\oplus y and ∥y(γ)∥≤∥T∥\|y(\gamma)\|\leq\|T\| for every γ\gamma. By the first claim, y(γ)∈M(γ)y(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) off a null set N2N_2. The field x=1Γ∖N2 yx=1_{\Gamma\setminus N_2}\,y is measurable by (B3), and it agrees with yy almost everywhere, so ∫⊕x=T\int^\oplus x=T. At each γ\gamma, x(γ)x(\gamma) is either y(γ)∈M(γ)y(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) or 0∈M(γ)0\in M(\gamma), and ∥x(γ)∥≤∥T∥\|x(\gamma)\|\leq\|T\|.

(2) Let S=∫⊕xS=\int^\oplus x and T=∫⊕yT=\int^\oplus y lie in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M, and let c∈Cc\in\mathbb C. By (B4), S+cT=∫⊕(x+cy)S+cT=\int^\oplus(x+cy), ST=∫⊕xyST=\int^\oplus xy and S∗=∫⊕x∗S^*=\int^\oplus x^*. The fields x+cyx+cy, xyxy and x∗x^* are measurable and essentially bounded by (B3). Their values lie in M(γ)M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma, because M(γ)M(\gamma) is a ∗*-algebra. So ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a ∗*-subalgebra of D\mathcal D. For bounded measurable ff, mf=∫⊕f(γ)1 dμ(γ)m_f=\int^\oplus f(\gamma)1\,d\mu(\gamma) by (B6), and f(γ)1∈M(γ)f(\gamma)1\in M(\gamma); so A⊆∫⊕M\mathcal A\subseteq\int^\oplus M. Every element of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is decomposable, so it commutes with A\mathcal A by (B4).

(3) An essentially bounded field whose values lie in M1(γ)M_1(\gamma) almost everywhere has its values in M2(γ)M_2(\gamma) almost everywhere, because a union of two null sets is null.

(4) The inclusion ⊆\subseteq follows from (3). Let T∈∫⊕M1∩∫⊕M2T\in\int^\oplus M_1\cap\int^\oplus M_2, and write T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x. By (1), applied to M1M_1 and to M2M_2, the operator x(γ)x(\gamma) lies in M1(γ)M_1(\gamma) and in M2(γ)M_2(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma. So T∈∫⊕(M1∩M2)T\in\int^\oplus(M_1\cap M_2).

(5) The first equality is the definition of D\mathcal D. For the second, every mf=∫⊕f(γ)1 dμ(γ)m_f=\int^\oplus f(\gamma)1\,d\mu(\gamma) lies in ∫⊕C1\int^\oplus\mathbb C1. Conversely, a decomposable operator whose field is scalar almost everywhere lies in A\mathcal A by (B6). □\square

Proposition 2.3 (Unitary transfer). Let (K(γ)),N(K(\gamma)),\mathfrak N be a second measurable field over (Γ,Σ,μ)(\Gamma,\Sigma,\mu), with direct integral K\mathcal K. Let vv be a measurable field of unitaries v(γ):H(γ)→K(γ)v(\gamma):H(\gamma)\to K(\gamma), and put V=∫⊕vV=\int^\oplus v. For a field MM on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)), let vMv∗vMv^* be the field (v(γ)M(γ)v(γ)∗)(v(\gamma)M(\gamma)v(\gamma)^*) on (K(γ))(K(\gamma)). Then V(∫⊕M)V∗=∫⊕vMv∗. V\Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)V^*=\int^\oplus vMv^* . If MM is measurable, so is vMv∗vMv^*.

Proof. The map a↦v(γ)av(γ)∗a\mapsto v(\gamma)av(\gamma)^* is a ∗*-isomorphism of B(H(γ))B(H(\gamma)) onto B(K(γ))B(K(\gamma)) that carries commutants to commutants. So vMv∗vMv^* is a field of von Neumann algebras, and the map carries the von Neumann algebra generated by a set SS to the one generated by v(γ)Sv(γ)∗v(\gamma)Sv(\gamma)^*. The operator VV is unitary by (B8). Let T∈∫⊕MT\in\int^\oplus M, and write T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x with x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) for every γ\gamma (Proposition 2.2(1)). By (B4), VTV∗=∫⊕vxv∗VTV^*=\int^\oplus vxv^*. The field vxv∗vxv^* is measurable by (B3). It has the same norm function as xx, and its values lie in v(γ)M(γ)v(γ)∗v(\gamma)M(\gamma)v(\gamma)^*. So V(∫⊕M)V∗⊆∫⊕vMv∗V(\int^\oplus M)V^*\subseteq\int^\oplus vMv^*. The adjoint field v∗v^* is a measurable field of unitaries from (K(γ))(K(\gamma)) to (H(γ))(H(\gamma)), and ∫⊕v∗=V∗\int^\oplus v^*=V^*. So the same argument gives V∗(∫⊕vMv∗)V⊆∫⊕v∗vMv∗v=∫⊕MV^*(\int^\oplus vMv^*)V\subseteq\int^\oplus v^*vMv^*v=\int^\oplus M. Conjugating by VV gives the reverse inclusion. Finally, if measurable fields xjx_j generate M(γ)M(\gamma) off a null set, then the measurable fields vxjv∗vx_jv^* generate v(γ)M(γ)v(γ)∗v(\gamma)M(\gamma)v(\gamma)^* off the same null set. □\square

3. The commutant theorem

Lemma 3.1.

  1. Let xx be an essentially bounded measurable operator field, and let T=∫⊕t∈DT=\int^\oplus t\in\mathcal D. Then TT commutes with ∫⊕x\int^\oplus x if and only if t(γ)x(γ)=x(γ)t(γ)t(\gamma)x(\gamma)=x(\gamma)t(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma.
  2. (Truncation) Let xx be a measurable operator field and m≥1m\geq1. Then x[m]=1{∥x∥≤m} xx^{[m]}=1_{\{\|x\|\leq m\}}\,x is a measurable operator field with ∥x[m](γ)∥≤m\|x^{[m]}(\gamma)\|\leq m for every γ\gamma, and x[m](γ)=x(γ)x^{[m]}(\gamma)=x(\gamma) whenever ∥x(γ)∥≤m\|x(\gamma)\|\leq m. If MM is a field of von Neumann algebras with x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma, then ∫⊕x[m]\int^\oplus x^{[m]} and its adjoint lie in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M.

Proof. (1) By (B4), T∫⊕x−(∫⊕x)T=∫⊕(tx−xt)T\int^\oplus x-(\int^\oplus x)T=\int^\oplus(tx-xt). The field tx−xttx-xt is measurable and essentially bounded by (B3). By (B4), it defines the zero operator exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere.

(2) The norm function of xx is measurable (B3), so 1{∥x∥≤m}1_{\{\|x\|\leq m\}} is a measurable function and x[m]x^{[m]} is a measurable operator field (B3). The bound and the equality are clear. Where x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma), the operator x[m](γ)x^{[m]}(\gamma), which is x(γ)x(\gamma) or 00, lies in M(γ)M(\gamma). So ∫⊕x[m]∈∫⊕M\int^\oplus x^{[m]}\in\int^\oplus M, and its adjoint lies there too by Proposition 2.2(2). □\square

Theorem 3.2 (Commutant theorem). Let MM be a measurable field on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)), as in Definition 1.1.

  1. (∫⊕M)′=∫⊕M′\big(\int^\oplus M\big)'=\int^\oplus M'.
  2. ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a von Neumann algebra acting on H\mathcal H, and its centre contains the diagonal algebra A\mathcal A.
  3. ∫⊕M′\int^\oplus M' is also a von Neumann algebra, with commutant (∫⊕M′)′=∫⊕M\big(\int^\oplus M'\big)'=\int^\oplus M.

Proof. (1) The inclusion ⊇\supseteq. Let S∈∫⊕M′S\in\int^\oplus M' and T∈∫⊕MT\in\int^\oplus M. Write S=∫⊕sS=\int^\oplus s and T=∫⊕tT=\int^\oplus t, with s(γ)∈M(γ)′s(\gamma)\in M(\gamma)' and t(γ)∈M(γ)t(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma. Then s(γ)t(γ)=t(γ)s(γ)s(\gamma)t(\gamma)=t(\gamma)s(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma, and Lemma 3.1(1) gives ST=TSST=TS. This part holds for every field MM.

The inclusion ⊆\subseteq. Let T∈(∫⊕M)′T\in(\int^\oplus M)'. Since A⊆∫⊕M\mathcal A\subseteq\int^\oplus M (Proposition 2.2(2)), TT commutes with A\mathcal A, so T∈DT\in\mathcal D by (B6); write T=∫⊕tT=\int^\oplus t. Choose measurable operator fields xjx_j and a null set N0N_0 such that M(γ)M(\gamma) is generated by {xj(γ)}\{x_j(\gamma)\} for γ∉N0\gamma\notin N_0. For all j,m≥1j,m\geq1, the operators ∫⊕xj[m]\int^\oplus x_j^{[m]} and (∫⊕xj[m])∗=∫⊕(xj[m])∗(\int^\oplus x_j^{[m]})^*=\int^\oplus(x_j^{[m]})^* lie in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M (Lemma 3.1(2)), so TT commutes with them. By Lemma 3.1(1), there is a null set Nj,mN_{j,m} outside which t(γ)t(\gamma) commutes with xj[m](γ)x_j^{[m]}(\gamma) and with xj[m](γ)∗x_j^{[m]}(\gamma)^*. Let NN be the union of N0N_0 and all the Nj,mN_{j,m}; it is a null set. Fix γ∉N\gamma\notin N and jj, and take m≥∥xj(γ)∥m\geq\|x_j(\gamma)\|. Then xj[m](γ)=xj(γ)x_j^{[m]}(\gamma)=x_j(\gamma), so t(γ)t(\gamma) commutes with xj(γ)x_j(\gamma) and xj(γ)∗x_j(\gamma)^*. Hence t(γ)t(\gamma) lies in {xj(γ),xj(γ)∗:j≥1}′\{x_j(\gamma),x_j(\gamma)^*:j\geq1\}', which is M(γ)′M(\gamma)' by (C3). Therefore T∈∫⊕M′T\in\int^\oplus M'.

(2) The field M′M' is measurable by Proposition 1.3(3). Applying (1) to it gives (∫⊕M′)′=∫⊕M′′=∫⊕M(\int^\oplus M')'=\int^\oplus M''=\int^\oplus M. Together with (1) for MM itself, (∫⊕M)′′=(∫⊕M′)′=∫⊕M. \Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)''=\Big(\int^\oplus M'\Big)'=\int^\oplus M . Since ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a ∗*-algebra (Proposition 2.2(2)), it is a von Neumann algebra. By Proposition 2.2(2), A\mathcal A lies both in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M and in its commutant, hence in its centre.

(3) By (1), ∫⊕M′\int^\oplus M' is the commutant of the self-adjoint set ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M, so it is a von Neumann algebra by (C2). The identity (∫⊕M′)′=∫⊕M(\int^\oplus M')'=\int^\oplus M was shown in (2). □\square

Remark 3.3 (What the proof uses).

  1. The inclusion ∫⊕M′⊆(∫⊕M)′\int^\oplus M'\subseteq(\int^\oplus M)' holds for every field. The reverse inclusion uses only the generating fields of MM, cut down by truncation. The Effros Borel structure enters once, through Proposition 1.3(3): it tells us that M′M' is measurable, so that part (1) can be applied to M′M' in the proof of part (2).
  2. The base enters only through (B4), which gives the norm formula and the uniqueness of representing fields, and through the identity A′=D\mathcal A'=\mathcal D of (B6). Both use the σ\sigma-finiteness of μ\mu and the separability of the fibres. No completeness of μ\mu, no standard Borel structure, no countable generation of Σ\Sigma and no separability of H\mathcal H is used. For instance, take the product of uncountably many copies of {0,1}\{0,1\}, with the product of the fair-coin measures. There the direct integral of the constant field C\mathbb C is an L2L^2-space that is not separable (Decomposable operators and the diagonal algebra, Remark 5.2), and the theorem applies.
  3. For M(γ)=B(H(γ))M(\gamma)=B(H(\gamma)), part (1) says D′=∫⊕C1=A\mathcal D'=\int^\oplus\mathbb C1=\mathcal A, which is part of (B6).
  4. The measurability of MM cannot be dropped from parts (1) and (3): see Example 6.3.

4. Uniqueness of the field, centres and factors

Theorem 4.1 (Uniqueness of the field). Let MM be a measurable field and LL any field of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)). Then ∫⊕M⊆∫⊕L\int^\oplus M\subseteq\int^\oplus L if and only if M(γ)⊆L(γ)M(\gamma)\subseteq L(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma. In particular, two measurable fields have the same direct integral if and only if they are equivalent.

Proof. If M(γ)⊆L(γ)M(\gamma)\subseteq L(\gamma) almost everywhere, the inclusion follows from Proposition 2.2(3). Conversely, assume ∫⊕M⊆∫⊕L\int^\oplus M\subseteq\int^\oplus L. Choose generating fields xjx_j of MM and a null set N0N_0 as in Definition 1.1. For all j,mj,m, the operator ∫⊕xj[m]\int^\oplus x_j^{[m]} lies in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M (Lemma 3.1(2)), hence in ∫⊕L\int^\oplus L. By Proposition 2.2(1), applied to LL and to the representing field xj[m]x_j^{[m]}, there is a null set Nj,mN_{j,m} outside which xj[m](γ)∈L(γ)x_j^{[m]}(\gamma)\in L(\gamma). Outside the null set N=N0∪⋃j,mNj,mN=N_0\cup\bigcup_{j,m}N_{j,m}, every xj(γ)x_j(\gamma) lies in L(γ)L(\gamma): take m≥∥xj(γ)∥m\geq\|x_j(\gamma)\|. Then L(γ)L(\gamma), a von Neumann algebra that contains all the xj(γ)x_j(\gamma), contains the algebra M(γ)M(\gamma) that they generate, by (C3). The last sentence follows by using the first one in both directions. □\square

Only MM has to be measurable in the first statement. Example 6.3 shows that the uniqueness fails for a field that is not measurable.

Corollary 4.2. Let MM be a measurable field.

  1. ∫⊕M=D\int^\oplus M=\mathcal D if and only if M(γ)=B(H(γ))M(\gamma)=B(H(\gamma)) for almost every γ\gamma.
  2. ∫⊕M=A\int^\oplus M=\mathcal A if and only if M(γ)=C1M(\gamma)=\mathbb C1 for almost every γ\gamma.

Proof. The fields (B(H(γ)))(B(H(\gamma))) and C1\mathbb C1 are measurable (Example 1.2), and their direct integrals are D\mathcal D and A\mathcal A (Proposition 2.2(5)). Apply Theorem 4.1. □\square

Theorem 4.3 (Centre). Let MM be a measurable field. The field ZMZ_M of centres is measurable, and (∫⊕M)∩(∫⊕M)′=∫⊕ZM.(4.1) \Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)\cap\Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)'=\int^\oplus Z_M . \tag{4.1} In particular, the centre of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M equals A\mathcal A exactly when almost every fibre M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor.

Proof. The field ZMZ_M is measurable by Proposition 1.3(3). By Theorem 3.2(1) and Proposition 2.2(4), (∫⊕M)∩(∫⊕M)′=∫⊕M∩∫⊕M′=∫⊕(M∩M′)=∫⊕ZM. \Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)\cap\Big(\int^\oplus M\Big)'=\int^\oplus M\cap\int^\oplus M'=\int^\oplus(M\cap M')=\int^\oplus Z_M . If almost every M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor, then ZMZ_M is equivalent to C1\mathbb C1, and ∫⊕ZM=∫⊕C1=A\int^\oplus Z_M=\int^\oplus\mathbb C1=\mathcal A by Proposition 2.2(3) and (5). Conversely, if the centre is A\mathcal A, then ∫⊕ZM=A\int^\oplus Z_M=\mathcal A, and Corollary 4.2(2), applied to the measurable field ZMZ_M, gives ZM(γ)=C1Z_M(\gamma)=\mathbb C1 for almost every γ\gamma. □\square

Remark 4.4.

  1. By Proposition 1.3(4), the set of γ\gamma where M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor is measurable up to a null set. So the criterion of Theorem 4.3 is a condition on one set that is measurable up to a null set: its complement must be contained in a null set.
  2. Over Γ0\Gamma_0 every fibre is the zero space, and {0}\{0\} counts as a factor. The diagonal algebra does not see Γ0\Gamma_0 at all, since mf=0m_f=0 whenever ff vanishes on {n≥1}\{n\geq1\} (B6). If one prefers not to call the zero algebra a factor, Theorem 4.3 holds with "almost every γ\gamma with n(γ)≥1n(\gamma)\geq1".
  3. For M(γ)=B(H(γ))M(\gamma)=B(H(\gamma)), Theorem 4.3 says that A\mathcal A is the centre of D\mathcal D.

5. Von Neumann algebras between the diagonal and the decomposable algebra

Lemma 5.1 (Countably many generators). Let S⊆DS\subseteq\mathcal D be a countable set. For each s∈Ss\in S choose an essentially bounded measurable operator field βs\beta_s with s=∫⊕βss=\int^\oplus\beta_s, and let MS(γ)M_S(\gamma) be the von Neumann algebra generated by {βs(γ):s∈S}\{\beta_s(\gamma):s\in S\}. Then MSM_S is a measurable field, and the von Neumann algebra generated by A∪S\mathcal A\cup S equals ∫⊕MS\int^\oplus M_S. Another choice of the fields βs\beta_s changes MSM_S only on a null set.

Proof. The field MSM_S is generated at every point by the countably many measurable fields βs\beta_s, so it is measurable. If SS is empty, then MS=C1M_S=\mathbb C1, which the identity field generates (Example 1.2(1)). Let BS\mathcal B_S be the von Neumann algebra generated by A∪S\mathcal A\cup S.

The inclusion BS⊆∫⊕MS\mathcal B_S\subseteq\int^\oplus M_S. By Theorem 3.2(2), ∫⊕MS\int^\oplus M_S is a von Neumann algebra. It contains A\mathcal A (Proposition 2.2(2)), and it contains every s∈Ss\in S, because βs(γ)∈MS(γ)\beta_s(\gamma)\in M_S(\gamma) for every γ\gamma. By (C3) it contains BS\mathcal B_S.

The inclusion ∫⊕MS⊆BS\int^\oplus M_S\subseteq\mathcal B_S. By (C3), BS′=(A∪S∪S∗)′\mathcal B_S'=(\mathcal A\cup S\cup S^*)'. Let T∈BS′T\in\mathcal B_S'. Then TT commutes with A\mathcal A, so T=∫⊕tT=\int^\oplus t by (B6). For s∈Ss\in S, TT commutes with s=∫⊕βss=\int^\oplus\beta_s and with s∗=∫⊕βs∗s^*=\int^\oplus\beta_s^*. By Lemma 3.1(1) there is a null set NsN_s outside which t(γ)t(\gamma) commutes with βs(γ)\beta_s(\gamma) and βs(γ)∗\beta_s(\gamma)^*. Outside the null set ⋃s∈SNs\bigcup_{s\in S}N_s, the operator t(γ)t(\gamma) lies in {βs(γ),βs(γ)∗:s∈S}′\{\beta_s(\gamma),\beta_s(\gamma)^*:s\in S\}', which is MS(γ)′M_S(\gamma)' by (C3). So T∈∫⊕MS′=(∫⊕MS)′T\in\int^\oplus M_S'=(\int^\oplus M_S)', by Theorem 3.2(1). This shows BS′⊆(∫⊕MS)′\mathcal B_S'\subseteq(\int^\oplus M_S)'. Taking commutants and using (C1) and Theorem 3.2(2), ∫⊕MS=(∫⊕MS)′′⊆BS′′=BS\int^\oplus M_S=(\int^\oplus M_S)''\subseteq\mathcal B_S''=\mathcal B_S.

Finally, two representing fields of the same operator agree almost everywhere (B4). As SS is countable, a new choice of all the βs\beta_s changes the generators only on one null set. □\square

Lemma 5.2 (Countable generation over the diagonal algebra). Let B\mathcal B be a von Neumann algebra on H\mathcal H with A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D. Then there is a countable set S0⊆BS_0\subseteq\mathcal B such that B\mathcal B is generated by A∪S0\mathcal A\cup S_0.

Proof. For each b∈Bb\in\mathcal B, fix an essentially bounded measurable operator field βb\beta_b with b=∫⊕βbb=\int^\oplus\beta_b. For every countable S⊆BS\subseteq\mathcal B, let MSM_S be the field of Lemma 5.1 built with these βb\beta_b, and let BS\mathcal B_S be the von Neumann algebra generated by A∪S\mathcal A\cup S. Then BS=∫⊕MS\mathcal B_S=\int^\oplus M_S, and BS⊆B\mathcal B_S\subseteq\mathcal B by (C3). If S⊆TS\subseteq T, then MS(γ)⊆MT(γ)M_S(\gamma)\subseteq M_T(\gamma) for every γ\gamma, because the generating set grows.

A size function. For each d≥1d\geq1, choose a sequence (ψid)i≥1(\psi^d_i)_{i\geq1} that is dense in the unit ball of the separable space B(ℓd2)∗B(\ell^2_d)_* (B10). For a countable S⊆BS\subseteq\mathcal B and γ∈Γd\gamma\in\Gamma_d with d≥1d\geq1, put FS(γ)=∑i≥12−i pPS(γ)(ψid),wherePS(γ)=U(γ)MS(γ)U(γ)∗∈vN(ℓd2),(5.1) F_S(\gamma)=\sum_{i\geq1}2^{-i}\,p_{P_S(\gamma)}(\psi^d_i),\qquad\text{where}\quad P_S(\gamma)=U(\gamma)M_S(\gamma)U(\gamma)^*\in\mathrm{vN}(\ell^2_d), \tag{5.1} and put FS=0F_S=0 on Γ0\Gamma_0. Three properties hold.

An essential supremum. Let λ\lambda be the finite measure of (B9), and let cc be the supremum of ∫FS dλ\int F_S\,d\lambda over all countable S⊆BS\subseteq\mathcal B. Then c≤λ(Γ)<∞c\leq\lambda(\Gamma)<\infty. Choose countable sets S1,S2,…S_1,S_2,\ldots with ∫FSk dλ→c\int F_{S_k}\,d\lambda\to c, and let S0=⋃kSkS_0=\bigcup_kS_k, again countable. Since FS0≥FSkF_{S_0}\geq F_{S_k} for every kk, we get ∫FS0 dλ=c\int F_{S_0}\,d\lambda=c.

Conclusion. Let b∈Bb\in\mathcal B, and put T=S0∪{b}T=S_0\cup\{b\}. Then FT≥FS0F_T\geq F_{S_0}, while ∫FT dλ≤c=∫FS0 dλ\int F_T\,d\lambda\leq c=\int F_{S_0}\,d\lambda. So the nonnegative measurable function FT−FS0F_T-F_{S_0} has integral 00. It vanishes λ\lambda-almost everywhere, hence outside a μ\mu-null set (B9). By the third property, MT(γ)=MS0(γ)M_T(\gamma)=M_{S_0}(\gamma) outside that null set. Proposition 2.2(3) and Lemma 5.1 give BT=∫⊕MT=∫⊕MS0=BS0\mathcal B_T=\int^\oplus M_T=\int^\oplus M_{S_0}=\mathcal B_{S_0}. Hence b∈BT=BS0b\in\mathcal B_T=\mathcal B_{S_0}. As bb was arbitrary, B⊆BS0⊆B\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal B_{S_0}\subseteq\mathcal B. □\square

Theorem 5.3 (Von Neumann algebras between A\mathcal A and D\mathcal D). Let B\mathcal B be a von Neumann algebra on H\mathcal H. Then B=∫⊕M\mathcal B=\int^\oplus M for some measurable field MM if and only if A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D. In that case:

  1. the field MM is unique up to equivalence;
  2. B′=∫⊕M′\mathcal B'=\int^\oplus M', and the centre of B\mathcal B is ∫⊕ZM\int^\oplus Z_M;
  3. MM can be chosen so that each M(γ)M(\gamma) is generated by the fibres βs(γ)\beta_s(\gamma) of countably many elements ss of B\mathcal B.

Proof. If B=∫⊕M\mathcal B=\int^\oplus M with MM measurable, then A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D by Proposition 2.2(2). Conversely, let A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D. Lemma 5.2 gives a countable S0⊆BS_0\subseteq\mathcal B such that B\mathcal B is generated by A∪S0\mathcal A\cup S_0, and Lemma 5.1 gives B=∫⊕MS0\mathcal B=\int^\oplus M_{S_0}. This proves the equivalence and (3). Part (1) is Theorem 4.1, and part (2) is Theorems 3.2(1) and 4.3. □\square

Remark 5.4 (The separable case). If H\mathcal H is separable, Lemma 5.2 is immediate. By (B10), the unit ball of B(H)B(\mathcal H) is compact and metrizable in the σ\sigma-weak topology. So the unit ball of B\mathcal B has a countable σ\sigma-weakly dense subset S0S_0, and S0S_0 generates B\mathcal B by the argument of Remark 1.4(1). The essential supremum in the proof of Lemma 5.2 replaces the separability of H\mathcal H by that of the fibres. This matters when H\mathcal H is not separable, which can happen when Σ\Sigma is not countably generated up to null sets (Remark 3.3(2)).

Corollary 5.5 (Dictionary). The map M↦∫⊕MM\mapsto\int^\oplus M induces a bijection from the equivalence classes of measurable fields of von Neumann algebras on (H(γ))(H(\gamma)) onto the von Neumann algebras B\mathcal B with A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D. It preserves and reflects inclusion. It carries

Proof. The map is well defined and preserves inclusion by Proposition 2.2(3); it is injective and reflects inclusion by Theorem 4.1; and it is onto by Theorem 5.3. The four items are Theorem 3.2(1), Proposition 2.2(4), Theorem 4.3 and Proposition 2.2(5). □\square

Joins are treated in Exercise 8.3.

6. Standard and non-standard bases

Remark 6.1. Sections 1 to 5 hold over every σ\sigma-finite measure space. In particular they hold when Σ\Sigma is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of a standard Borel space, and also when Σ\Sigma is its completion for μ\mu, which is the setting of μ\mu-measurable fields. Standard bases matter for two later questions. How can a given abelian von Neumann algebra be realized as a diagonal algebra? And is the base of such a realization determined by the algebra? Corollary 6.2 collects what the standard case adds, and Example 6.3 shows what can go wrong without it.

Corollary 6.2 (Standard bases). Let Γ\Gamma be a standard Borel space, Σ\Sigma its Borel σ\sigma-algebra, and μ\mu a σ\sigma-finite measure on Σ\Sigma.

  1. H\mathcal H is separable.
  2. A field MM of von Neumann algebras is measurable exactly when, for each dd, the map γ↦U(γ)M(γ)U(γ)∗\gamma\mapsto U(\gamma)M(\gamma)U(\gamma)^* agrees almost everywhere on Γd\Gamma_d with a Borel map into the standard Borel space vN(ℓd2)\mathrm{vN}(\ell^2_d).
  3. Let B\mathcal B be a von Neumann algebra with A⊆B⊆D\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal D. There is a sequence (bk)(b_k) that is σ\sigma-weakly dense in the unit ball of B\mathcal B. For each kk choose a representing field βk\beta_k of bkb_k, and let M(γ)M(\gamma) be the von Neumann algebra generated by {βk(γ):k≥1}\{\beta_k(\gamma):k\geq1\}. Then B=∫⊕M\mathcal B=\int^\oplus M.
  4. For a measurable field MM, the set of γ\gamma where M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor is a Borel set up to a null set, and the centre of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is A\mathcal A exactly when its complement is contained in a null set.

Proof. (1) is (B4). (2) is Proposition 1.3(5) together with (B10). (3) By (1) and Remark 5.4, such a sequence exists and generates B\mathcal B. Since A⊆B\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal B, the set A∪{bk}\mathcal A\cup\{b_k\} generates B\mathcal B as well, and Lemma 5.1 applies. (4) is Proposition 1.3(4) with Theorem 4.3. □\square

Example 6.3 (A separating σ\sigma-algebra that is not countably generated). Let Γ=[0,1]\Gamma=[0,1]. For γ∈Γ\gamma\in\Gamma, let p(γ)p(\gamma) be the orthogonal projection of C2\mathbb C^2 onto the line spanned by (cos⁡γ,sin⁡γ)(\cos\gamma,\sin\gamma), and let E(γ)=Cp(γ)+C(1−p(γ))⊆M2(C). \mathcal E(\gamma)=\mathbb Cp(\gamma)+\mathbb C\big(1-p(\gamma)\big)\subseteq M_2(\mathbb C). We compare the same family E\mathcal E over two σ\sigma-algebras on [0,1][0,1], in both cases on the constant field C2\mathbb C^2.

Two facts about 2×22\times2 matrices. First, E(γ)′=E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma)'=\mathcal E(\gamma). An operator that commutes with p(γ)p(\gamma) maps the range and the kernel of p(γ)p(\gamma) into themselves. Both are lines, so the operator is a combination of p(γ)p(\gamma) and 1−p(γ)1-p(\gamma). Conversely E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma) is abelian. So E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma) is a von Neumann algebra, generated by p(γ)p(\gamma), and it is not a factor, since it is abelian of dimension 22. Second, E(γ)∩E(γ′)=C1\mathcal E(\gamma)\cap\mathcal E(\gamma')=\mathbb C1 for γ≠γ′\gamma\neq\gamma'. Let a=αp(γ)+β(1−p(γ))a=\alpha p(\gamma)+\beta(1-p(\gamma)) lie in E(γ′)\mathcal E(\gamma'). If α≠β\alpha\neq\beta, then p(γ)=(a−β)/(α−β)p(\gamma)=(a-\beta)/(\alpha-\beta) commutes with p(γ′)p(\gamma'). Then p(γ′)p(\gamma') maps the range of p(γ)p(\gamma), a line, into itself, so that line lies in the range or in the kernel of p(γ′)p(\gamma'). But the two lines are neither equal nor orthogonal, because 0<∣γ−γ′∣≤1<π/20<|\gamma-\gamma'|\leq1<\pi/2. So α=β\alpha=\beta, and aa is a scalar.

The Borel sets. Give [0,1][0,1] its Borel σ\sigma-algebra and Lebesgue measure. The entries of p(γ)p(\gamma) are continuous in γ\gamma, so pp is a measurable operator field on the constant field C2\mathbb C^2 (B8). It generates E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma) at every point, so E\mathcal E is measurable. Since E′=E\mathcal E'=\mathcal E, Theorem 3.2 gives (∫⊕E)′=∫⊕E(\int^\oplus\mathcal E)'=\int^\oplus\mathcal E. So the direct integral is a maximal abelian von Neumann algebra and its own centre. No fibre is a factor.

The countable–co-countable sets. Now let Σc\Sigma_c consist of the countable subsets of [0,1][0,1] and their complements. Let μc(E)\mu_c(E) be 00 for countable EE and 11 otherwise. This is a probability measure. The σ\sigma-algebra Σc\Sigma_c contains every singleton, so it separates points, and its null sets are the countable sets.

A function f:[0,1]→Cf:[0,1]\to\mathbb C is Σc\Sigma_c-measurable exactly when it is constant outside a countable set. Such a function is clearly measurable. Conversely, let ff be measurable and k≥1k\geq1. Cover C\mathbb C by countably many disjoint squares of side 2−k2^{-k}. Their preimages are disjoint sets in Σc\Sigma_c that cover [0,1][0,1]. They cannot all be countable, and two of them cannot both be co-countable, so exactly one of them, for a square QkQ_k, is co-countable. Outside one countable set, ff takes its values in every QkQ_k at once. Two values in QkQ_k differ by at most 2−k22^{-k}\sqrt2, so ff is constant outside that countable set.

Consequently, over Σc\Sigma_c the measurable sections of the constant field C2\mathbb C^2 are the maps that are constant outside a countable set (B5). The direct integral is C2\mathbb C^2 itself: every class has a constant representative vv, and its norm is ∥v∥\|v\|. By (B8), a family of operators is a measurable operator field exactly when it is constant outside a countable set. So D=M2(C)\mathcal D=M_2(\mathbb C), acting on C2\mathbb C^2, and A=C1\mathcal A=\mathbb C1.

The family E\mathcal E is not measurable for Σc\Sigma_c. Suppose that measurable fields xjx_j generated E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma) for all γ\gamma outside a countable set. Each xjx_j equals a constant aja_j outside a countable set. So outside one countable set, E(γ)\mathcal E(\gamma) would be the algebra generated by the aja_j, the same for all such γ\gamma. This contradicts E(γ)≠E(γ′)\mathcal E(\gamma)\neq\mathcal E(\gamma') for γ≠γ′\gamma\neq\gamma'.

Now compute. Let T=∫⊕xT=\int^\oplus x with x(γ)∈E(γ)x(\gamma)\in\mathcal E(\gamma) outside a countable set. Then xx equals a constant aa outside a countable set, so a∈E(γ)a\in\mathcal E(\gamma) for all γ\gamma outside a countable set, and in particular for two different γ\gamma. So aa is a scalar, and ∫⊕E=A=C1\int^\oplus\mathcal E=\mathcal A=\mathbb C1. Since E′=E\mathcal E'=\mathcal E, also ∫⊕E′=C1\int^\oplus\mathcal E'=\mathbb C1. But (∫⊕E)′=(C1)′=M2(C)≠C1=∫⊕E′. \Big(\int^\oplus\mathcal E\Big)'=(\mathbb C1)'=M_2(\mathbb C)\neq\mathbb C1=\int^\oplus\mathcal E' . So Theorem 3.2(1) fails for this field. Theorem 4.1 fails as well: ∫⊕E=∫⊕C1\int^\oplus\mathcal E=\int^\oplus\mathbb C1, although E(γ)≠C1\mathcal E(\gamma)\neq\mathbb C1 for every γ\gamma.

What the base does not see. Over Σc\Sigma_c, the diagonal algebra is C1\mathbb C1, and the direct integral of the constant field is C2\mathbb C^2, exactly as over a single point of mass one. But no bijection exists between a co-countable subset of [0,1][0,1] and a point. So without standardness, the base of a direct integral cannot be recovered from its diagonal algebra, even up to null sets. For standard σ\sigma-finite bases, an isomorphism between the L∞L^\infty-algebras does come from a Borel isomorphism of the bases, defined outside null sets [Takesaki I, Lemma IV.8.22]. This is why the uniqueness of disintegrations is stated for standard bases.

7. Examples

Example 7.1 (A countable base). Let Γ\Gamma be countable, Σ\Sigma the set of all subsets, and 0<μ({γ})<∞0<\mu(\{\gamma\})<\infty for every γ\gamma. Every section is measurable. The direct integral H\mathcal H is the Hilbert sum of the fibres, with inner products weighted by μ({γ})\mu(\{\gamma\}), and m1{γ}m_{1_{\{\gamma\}}} is the projection onto the γ\gamma-th summand (Measurable fields of Hilbert spaces and their direct integrals, Example 11.1). Every family of bounded operators is a measurable operator field, and the only null set is empty. So every field MM of von Neumann algebras is measurable. By Remark 1.4(1), each M(γ)M(\gamma) is generated by a sequence (aγ,j)j(a_{\gamma,j})_j, and the families xj(γ)=aγ,jx_j(\gamma)=a_{\gamma,j} are measurable operator fields. The direct integral ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is the set of uniformly bounded families (x(γ))(x(\gamma)) with x(γ)∈M(γ)x(\gamma)\in M(\gamma) for every γ\gamma.

Theorem 3.2(1) can be checked by hand here. An operator TT that commutes with ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M commutes with the projections m1{γ}∈Am_{1_{\{\gamma\}}}\in\mathcal A. So it maps each summand into itself and is a bounded family (t(γ))(t(\gamma)). For γ0∈Γ\gamma_0\in\Gamma and a∈M(γ0)a\in M(\gamma_0), the family equal to aa at γ0\gamma_0 and to 00 elsewhere lies in ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M. Commuting with it forces t(γ0)a=at(γ0)t(\gamma_0)a=at(\gamma_0). So t(γ0)∈M(γ0)′t(\gamma_0)\in M(\gamma_0)' for every γ0\gamma_0, and T∈∫⊕M′T\in\int^\oplus M'. The centre of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M consists of the bounded families of central elements. It equals A\mathcal A, the bounded families of scalars, exactly when every M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor.

Example 7.2 (Constant fields and tensor products). Let K0K_0 be a separable Hilbert space. Let H(γ)=K0H(\gamma)=K_0 be the constant field of (B5), with its unitary W:L2(Γ,μ)⊗K0→HW:L^2(\Gamma,\mu)\otimes K_0\to\mathcal H, and let M0M_0 be a von Neumann algebra on K0K_0. Consider the constant field M(γ)=M0M(\gamma)=M_0.

(a) The field is measurable. By Remark 1.4(1), M0M_0 is generated by a sequence (aj)(a_j). A constant family aa of operators has constant matrix entries, so it is a measurable operator field (B8). Hence the constant fields aja_j generate M(γ)M(\gamma) at every point.

(b) The operators involved. Write mm for the representation of L∞(Γ,μ)L^\infty(\Gamma,\mu) by multiplication operators on L2(Γ,μ)L^2(\Gamma,\mu). For g∈L2(Γ,μ)g\in L^2(\Gamma,\mu), v∈K0v\in K_0, a bounded measurable ff and a∈B(K0)a\in B(K_0), W((mf⊗1)(g⊗v))=(γ↦f(γ)g(γ)v)=mfW(g⊗v),W((1⊗a)(g⊗v))=(γ↦g(γ)av)=(∫⊕a)W(g⊗v). W\big((m_f\otimes1)(g\otimes v)\big)=\big(\gamma\mapsto f(\gamma)g(\gamma)v\big)=m_fW(g\otimes v),\qquad W\big((1\otimes a)(g\otimes v)\big)=\big(\gamma\mapsto g(\gamma)av\big)=\Big(\int^\oplus a\Big)W(g\otimes v). The elementary tensors are total and all these operators are bounded. So W(mf⊗1)W∗=mfW(m_f\otimes1)W^*=m_f, and W(1⊗a)W∗=∫⊕aW(1\otimes a)W^*=\int^\oplus a is the decomposable operator with constant fibre aa.

(c) The direct integral is a tensor product. By Lemma 5.1 with S={∫⊕aj:j≥1}S=\{\int^\oplus a_j:j\geq1\}, the algebra ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is generated by A∪S\mathcal A\cup S. By (b), W∗(∫⊕M)WW^*(\int^\oplus M)W is generated by m(L∞)⊗1m(L^\infty)\otimes1 and the operators 1⊗aj1\otimes a_j. Here m(L∞)m(L^\infty) is a von Neumann algebra acting on L2(Γ,μ)L^2(\Gamma,\mu), because it is the diagonal algebra of the constant field C\mathbb C (B6). The self-adjoint set {aj,aj∗}\{a_j,a_j^*\} generates M0M_0. So (B12) gives W∗(∫⊕M0 dμ)W=m(L∞(Γ,μ))⊗ˉM0.(7.1) W^*\Big(\int^\oplus M_0\,d\mu\Big)W=m\big(L^\infty(\Gamma,\mu)\big)\bar\otimes M_0 . \tag{7.1} (d) Consequences. Apply (7.1) also to M0′M_0' and to the centre Z0=M0∩M0′Z_0=M_0\cap M_0'. Then Theorems 3.2(1) and 4.3 give (m(L∞)⊗ˉM0)′=m(L∞)⊗ˉM0′,(m(L∞)⊗ˉM0)∩(m(L∞)⊗ˉM0)′=m(L∞)⊗ˉZ0. \big(m(L^\infty)\bar\otimes M_0\big)'=m(L^\infty)\bar\otimes M_0',\qquad \big(m(L^\infty)\bar\otimes M_0\big)\cap\big(m(L^\infty)\bar\otimes M_0\big)'=m(L^\infty)\bar\otimes Z_0 . The first identity is the commutation theorem of (B12) for this pair, obtained here without it, for a σ\sigma-finite measure and a separable K0K_0. If M0M_0 is a factor, then Z0=C1Z_0=\mathbb C1, and by (7.1) for C1\mathbb C1 the centre is W∗AW=m(L∞)⊗1W^*\mathcal AW=m(L^\infty)\otimes1, in line with Theorem 4.3.

Example 7.3 (Varying dimension and zero fibres). Let Γ=(0,2]\Gamma=(0,2] with Lebesgue measure on its Borel sets. Put d(γ)=kd(\gamma)=k for γ∈(1k+1,1k]\gamma\in(\tfrac1{k+1},\tfrac1k], k≥1k\geq1, and d(γ)=0d(\gamma)=0 for γ∈(1,2]\gamma\in(1,2]. Let H(γ)=Cd(γ)H(\gamma)=\mathbb C^{d(\gamma)}, where C0=0\mathbb C^0=0. Let ξk(γ)\xi_k(\gamma) be the kk-th standard basis vector of Cd(γ)\mathbb C^{d(\gamma)} if k≤d(γ)k\leq d(\gamma), and 00 otherwise. The functions ⟨ξk,ξl⟩=δkl1{d≥k}\langle\xi_k,\xi_l\rangle=\delta_{kl}1_{\{d\geq k\}} are measurable, and the ξk(γ)\xi_k(\gamma) span every fibre. So by (B1) exactly one measurable field contains them. All fibres over (1,2](1,2] are zero.

For j≥1j\geq1, let qj(γ)q_j(\gamma) be the jj-th diagonal matrix unit of Md(γ)(C)M_{d(\gamma)}(\mathbb C) if j≤d(γ)j\leq d(\gamma), and 00 otherwise. Since qjξk=δjkξkq_j\xi_k=\delta_{jk}\xi_k, each qjq_j is a measurable operator field (B3). Let M(γ)=Δd(γ)M(\gamma)=\Delta_{d(\gamma)}, the algebra of diagonal matrices in Md(γ)(C)M_{d(\gamma)}(\mathbb C), with Δ0={0}\Delta_0=\{0\}.

Example 7.4 (Null sets are invisible). Let Γ=[0,1)\Gamma=[0,1) with Lebesgue measure on its Borel sets, and let H(γ)=ℓ2(Z)H(\gamma)=\ell^2(\mathbb Z) be the constant field, with standard basis (εm)m∈Z(\varepsilon_m)_{m\in\mathbb Z}. Let uγu_\gamma be the unitary with uγεm=e2πiγmεmu_\gamma\varepsilon_m=e^{2\pi i\gamma m}\varepsilon_m. Its matrix entries are continuous in γ\gamma, so uu is a measurable operator field (B8). Let M(γ)M(\gamma) be the von Neumann algebra generated by uγu_\gamma; the field MM is measurable. Let Δ⊆B(ℓ2(Z))\Delta\subseteq B(\ell^2(\mathbb Z)) be the algebra of diagonal operators.

An operator xx commutes with uγu_\gamma exactly when ⟨xεm,εm′⟩(e2πiγm−e2πiγm′)=0\langle x\varepsilon_m,\varepsilon_{m'}\rangle\big(e^{2\pi i\gamma m}-e^{2\pi i\gamma m'}\big)=0 for all m,m′m,m'. If γ\gamma is irrational, the numbers e2πiγme^{2\pi i\gamma m} are distinct, so xx is diagonal: {uγ}′=Δ\{u_\gamma\}'=\Delta. An operator that commutes with a unitary also commutes with its inverse, which is its adjoint, so {uγ,uγ∗}′=Δ\{u_\gamma,u_\gamma^*\}'=\Delta. The same computation with the projections onto the lines Cεm\mathbb C\varepsilon_m gives Δ′=Δ\Delta'=\Delta. Hence M(γ)=Δ′=ΔM(\gamma)=\Delta'=\Delta for irrational γ\gamma. At rational points the fibre is different: for example M(0)=C1M(0)=\mathbb C1, and at γ=p/q\gamma=p/q in lowest terms with q≥2q\geq2 the fibre is a qq-dimensional abelian algebra (The Effros Borel structure, Example 9.4). The rational points form a null set.

So MM is equivalent to the constant field Δ\Delta, and ∫⊕M=∫⊕Δ\int^\oplus M=\int^\oplus\Delta by Proposition 2.2(3). Since Δ′=Δ\Delta'=\Delta, Theorem 3.2(1) gives (∫⊕M)′=∫⊕M(\int^\oplus M)'=\int^\oplus M: the direct integral is maximal abelian and its own centre. The set of γ\gamma where M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor is {0}\{0\}. It is null, and the centre is not A\mathcal A, in line with Theorem 4.3. By Example 7.2, W∗(∫⊕Δ)W=m(L∞[0,1))⊗ˉΔW^*(\int^\oplus\Delta)W=m(L^\infty[0,1))\bar\otimes\Delta.

8. Exercises

Exercise 8.1 (Abelian and maximal abelian direct integrals). Let MM be a measurable field. Show that ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is abelian if and only if M(γ)M(\gamma) is abelian for almost every γ\gamma. Show also that (∫⊕M)′=∫⊕M(\int^\oplus M)'=\int^\oplus M if and only if M(γ)′=M(γ)M(\gamma)'=M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma.

Solution. A von Neumann algebra PP is abelian exactly when P⊆P′P\subseteq P'. By Theorem 3.2(1), ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is abelian if and only if ∫⊕M⊆∫⊕M′\int^\oplus M\subseteq\int^\oplus M'. By Theorem 4.1, applied to the measurable field MM and to L=M′L=M', this holds if and only if M(γ)⊆M(γ)′M(\gamma)\subseteq M(\gamma)' for almost every γ\gamma, that is, if and only if M(γ)M(\gamma) is abelian for almost every γ\gamma. For the second claim, (∫⊕M)′=∫⊕M′(\int^\oplus M)'=\int^\oplus M' by Theorem 3.2(1), and the fields MM and M′M' are both measurable (Proposition 1.3(3)). By Theorem 4.1, ∫⊕M′=∫⊕M\int^\oplus M'=\int^\oplus M if and only if M(γ)′=M(γ)M(\gamma)'=M(\gamma) for almost every γ\gamma. Examples 7.3 and 7.4, and Example 6.3 over the Borel sets, are instances of the second claim.

Exercise 8.2 (When is a direct integral a factor?). Let MM be a measurable field, assume H≠0\mathcal H\neq0, and put Γ+={n≥1}\Gamma_+=\{n\geq1\}. Show that ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a factor if and only if

Check that (i) holds for the countable–co-countable base of Example 6.3.

Solution. Suppose ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a factor. Its centre is C1\mathbb C1 and contains A\mathcal A (Theorem 3.2(2)), so A=C1\mathcal A=\mathbb C1, and the centre equals A\mathcal A. Theorem 4.3 gives (ii). For (i), let E⊆Γ+E\subseteq\Gamma_+ be measurable. Then m1Em_{1_E} is a projection in C1\mathbb C1, so it is 00 or 11; these differ because H≠0\mathcal H\neq0. If m1E=0m_{1_E}=0, then 1E=01_E=0 almost everywhere on Γ+\Gamma_+ by (B6), so μ(E)=0\mu(E)=0. If m1E=1=m1m_{1_E}=1=m_1, then 1E−1=01_E-1=0 almost everywhere on Γ+\Gamma_+, so μ(Γ+∖E)=0\mu(\Gamma_+\setminus E)=0.

Conversely, assume (i) and (ii). By (ii) and Theorem 4.3, the centre of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is A\mathcal A, so it suffices to show A=C1\mathcal A=\mathbb C1. Note that μ(Γ+)>0\mu(\Gamma_+)>0, since otherwise every vector of H\mathcal H would vanish almost everywhere. Let ff be a bounded measurable real function, and let RR be the set of rationals tt with μ(Γ+∩{f≤t})=0\mu(\Gamma_+\cap\{f\leq t\})=0. If t∈Rt\in R and s<ts<t is rational, then s∈Rs\in R. Every rational below −sup⁡∣f∣-\sup|f| lies in RR, and no rational t≥sup⁡∣f∣t\geq\sup|f| does. Let c=sup⁡Rc=\sup R. For rational t<ct<c, we have t∈Rt\in R, so f>tf>t almost everywhere on Γ+\Gamma_+. For rational t>ct>c, we have t∉Rt\notin R, so Γ+∩{f≤t}\Gamma_+\cap\{f\leq t\} is not null; by (i), its complement Γ+∩{f>t}\Gamma_+\cap\{f>t\} in Γ+\Gamma_+ is null, and f≤tf\leq t almost everywhere on Γ+\Gamma_+. Using countably many rationals on each side, f=cf=c almost everywhere on Γ+\Gamma_+, and so mf=mc=c1m_f=m_c=c1 by (B6). For complex ff, apply this to the real and imaginary parts. So A=C1\mathcal A=\mathbb C1, and ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M is a factor.

In Example 6.3, every set in Σc\Sigma_c is countable or has a countable complement, so it is null or has a null complement. Hence (i) holds for every field over that base. For instance, let M0M_0 be a factor on a separable K0≠0K_0\neq0. The constant field M0M_0 is measurable (Example 7.2(a)), so its direct integral over Σc\Sigma_c is a factor. In fact, as in Example 6.3, every measurable section of the constant field K0K_0 is constant outside a countable set, and the direct integral is M0M_0 itself, acting on K0K_0.

Exercise 8.3 (Joins). Let M1M_1 and M2M_2 be measurable fields. Show that ∫⊕(M1∨M2)=∫⊕M1∨∫⊕M2\int^\oplus(M_1\vee M_2)=\int^\oplus M_1\vee\int^\oplus M_2, where the right side is the von Neumann algebra generated by the two direct integrals.

Solution. The field M1∨M2M_1\vee M_2 is measurable (Proposition 1.3(3)), so its direct integral is a von Neumann algebra (Theorem 3.2(2)); so are ∫⊕M1\int^\oplus M_1 and ∫⊕M2\int^\oplus M_2. By (C4), Theorem 3.2(1) and Proposition 2.2(4), (∫⊕M1∨∫⊕M2)′=(∫⊕M1)′∩(∫⊕M2)′=∫⊕M1′∩∫⊕M2′=∫⊕(M1′∩M2′). \Big(\int^\oplus M_1\vee\int^\oplus M_2\Big)'=\Big(\int^\oplus M_1\Big)'\cap\Big(\int^\oplus M_2\Big)'=\int^\oplus M_1'\cap\int^\oplus M_2'=\int^\oplus(M_1'\cap M_2'). By (C4) at each point, M1(γ)′∩M2(γ)′=(M1(γ)∨M2(γ))′M_1(\gamma)'\cap M_2(\gamma)'=(M_1(\gamma)\vee M_2(\gamma))'. So the last term is ∫⊕(M1∨M2)′\int^\oplus(M_1\vee M_2)', which equals (∫⊕(M1∨M2))′(\int^\oplus(M_1\vee M_2))' by Theorem 3.2(1). Two von Neumann algebras with the same commutant are equal, since each is the commutant of its commutant.

Exercise 8.4 (Central projections). Let MM be a measurable field. Show that a projection PP on H\mathcal H lies in the centre of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M if and only if P=∫⊕pP=\int^\oplus p for a measurable operator field pp such that p(γ)p(\gamma) is a projection in the centre of M(γ)M(\gamma) for every γ\gamma. Deduce that if almost every M(γ)M(\gamma) is a factor, the central projections of ∫⊕M\int^\oplus M are exactly the operators m1Em_{1_E}, E∈ΣE\in\Sigma.

Solution. If pp is such a field, then ∥p(γ)∥≤1\|p(\gamma)\|\leq1, and P=∫⊕pP=\int^\oplus p lies in ∫⊕ZM\int^\oplus Z_M, which is the centre (Theorem 4.3). By (B4), P∗=∫⊕p∗=PP^*=\int^\oplus p^*=P and P2=∫⊕p2=PP^2=\int^\oplus p^2=P, so PP is a projection. Conversely, let PP be a central projection. By Theorem 4.3 and Proposition 2.2(1), P=∫⊕xP=\int^\oplus x with x(γ)x(\gamma) in the centre of M(γ)M(\gamma) for every γ\gamma. From P=P∗PP=P^*P and (B4), x(γ)=x(γ)∗x(γ)x(\gamma)=x(\gamma)^*x(\gamma) outside a null set NN. Put p=1Γ∖N xp=1_{\Gamma\setminus N}\,x. Then p(γ)=p(γ)∗p(γ)p(\gamma)=p(\gamma)^*p(\gamma) for every γ\gamma. Taking adjoints gives p(γ)∗=p(γ)p(\gamma)^*=p(\gamma), and then p(γ)2=p(γ)p(\gamma)^2=p(\gamma). So each p(γ)p(\gamma) is a projection in the centre of M(γ)M(\gamma), and ∫⊕p=P\int^\oplus p=P.

Now let M(γ)M(\gamma) be a factor outside a null set N′N'. The function c=⟨pe1,e1⟩c=\langle pe_1,e_1\rangle is measurable (B1); let E={c=1}E=\{c=1\}. For γ∉N′\gamma\notin N' with n(γ)≥1n(\gamma)\geq1, p(γ)p(\gamma) is a projection in C1\mathbb C1, so it is 00 or 11, and it equals c(γ)1=1E(γ)1c(\gamma)1=1_E(\gamma)1. For n(γ)=0n(\gamma)=0, both sides are the zero operator. So p(γ)=1E(γ)1p(\gamma)=1_E(\gamma)1 almost everywhere, and P=m1EP=m_{1_E} by (B4) and (B6). Conversely, every m1Em_{1_E} is a projection in A\mathcal A, which lies in the centre.

Where this leads

References

Editable source · Sources and component terms