Complete selected programme proof sections for the orbit commutant route. Original AI programme expression is CC0 1.0; precise authorship and source identities are in the proof guide. This selection does not certify unused claims in the original whole files.

Orbit representations and orthogonal state measures

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

A free action on a compact space gives one irreducible representation for each orbit. Evaluating the identity coefficient at a point gives a pure state, and integrating those states recovers a vector state of the represented crossed-product algebra. We prove the norm bound that makes point evaluation legitimate on the completed algebra, then identify the abelian algebra associated with this representing measure.

The pointwise parameter space is the closed support of the measure. At a point outside that support, evaluation may fail to descend through the represented continuous-function algebra. Our first exercise gives a finite counterexample. For a point in the support, its state and orbit representation are defined even if that point itself has measure zero.

We use the regular construction, coefficient expectation and free-action maximal-abelian test in Crossed-product coefficients and factor tests. Its named existing regular-model prerequisites remain in force. The implemented-action commutant formula is equation E9 of The regular commutant in every covariant representation. Its general proof uses the standard coefficient Hilbert algebra, its closed polar decomposition and OA-MOD-MF-05, followed by Theorem 10.1 of the current double-commutant lesson for representation comparison, arbitrary-cardinal amplification and a rank-one normal slice. SC-02 remains an alternative positive-vector-series proof. We use its specialization to a faithful multiplication representation and a countable discrete group. Section 2.1 below spells out the matrix reconstruction in our group convention.

The decomposable operator norm formula is Theorem 10.1 of Measurable fields and direct integrals. Cyclic representation uniqueness and the pure-state criterion are Theorems 5.5 and 8.3 of Representations, positive functionals and GNS. The operator map and multiplicativity criterion for orthogonal measures are Proposition 9.2 and Theorem 10.2 of Integral representations of states. The multiplication algebra model is Theorem 3.1 of Abelian operator algebras. Their complete programme proofs and the general commutant applications are linked in the accompanying proof guide.

Elementary measure and topology prerequisites are the Radon–Nikodym theorem for equivalent finite measures, the chain rule for transported measures, Fubini, regularity of finite Borel measures on compact metric spaces, density of continuous functions in L2L^2, and Tietze extension from a closed subspace.

For a freely accessible comparison, Kawamura, Takemoto and Tomiyama's State extensions in transformation group C*-algebras, Section 1, proves a unique-extension criterion using singular translated measures; Corollary 1.4 specializes it to points with trivial stabilizer. Their abstract C*-crossed product differs from the represented algebra used here. Our complete arguments below establish the norm bound, purity, orbit equivalence and orthogonal measure in this representation. The arbitrary-covariant commutant provider retains its explicitly named standard-form and modular inputs. [Takesaki] identifies the historical assignment.

1. The support and the implemented model

Let XX be a nonempty compact metrizable space, μ\mu a Borel probability measure, and GG a countable discrete group acting on XX by homeomorphisms. Assume the point action is free: gx=x⟹g=e,(1.1) g x=x\quad\Longrightarrow\quad g=e, \tag{1.1} and μ\mu is quasi-invariant, meaning g∗μg_*\mu and μ\mu have the same null sets for every gg, where (g∗μ)(B)=μ(g−1B)(g_*\mu)(B)=\mu(g^{-1}B).

Write Y=supp⁡μY=\operatorname{supp}\mu. It is a nonempty closed GG-invariant subspace. Indeed, an open set has measure zero exactly when its translate has measure zero, so the complement of the support is invariant. Second countability makes that complement a countable union of null open sets; hence μ(Y)=1\mu(Y)=1. Regard μ\mu as a probability measure on YY. It has full support there, and the restricted point action remains free.

The represented image of C(X)C(X) on L2(X,μ)L^2(X,\mu) is exactly C(Y)C(Y) acting by multiplication on H=L2(Y,μ). H=L^2(Y,\mu). The kernel of multiplication on C(X)C(X) consists precisely of functions vanishing on YY: a continuous function nonzero somewhere on YY is bounded away from zero on an open set of positive measure. Restriction onto C(Y)C(Y) is surjective by Tietze extension. We henceforth work on YY.

Put D=L∞(Y,μ)D=L^\infty(Y,\mu), with its faithful normal multiplication representation on HH, and αg(f)(y)=f(g−1y). \alpha_g(f)(y)=f(g^{-1}y). Let rg=d(g∗μ)/dμr_g=d(g_*\mu)/d\mu. Equivalence makes rgr_g strictly positive and finite almost everywhere. The Radon–Nikodym change-of-variables identity gives the unitary implementation (vgη)(y)=rg(y)1/2η(g−1y).(1.2) (v_g\eta)(y)=r_g(y)^{1/2}\eta(g^{-1}y). \tag{1.2} For clarity, the identity ∫F(y)rg(y) dμ(y)=∫F(gz) dμ(z)\int F(y)r_g(y)\,d\mu(y)=\int F(gz)\,d\mu(z) proves ∥vgη∥2=∥η∥2\|v_g\eta\|_2=\|\eta\|_2. Transporting a transported measure gives rgh(y)=rg(y)rh(g−1y)almost everywhere. r_{gh}(y)=r_g(y)r_h(g^{-1}y) \quad\text{almost everywhere}. Thus vgvh=vghv_gv_h=v_{gh}, vg∗=vg−1v_g^*=v_{g^{-1}}, and vgMfvg∗=Mαg(f)v_gM_fv_g^*=M_{\alpha_g(f)}. These are operator identities on HH, independent of choices of representatives for the densities.

Use the regular model on K=ℓ2(G;H)\mathcal K=\ell^2(G;H): (π(f)ξ)(s)=αs−1(f)ξ(s),(ugξ)(s)=ξ(g−1s),R={π(D),ug:g∈G}′′.(1.3) (\pi(f)\xi)(s)=\alpha_{s^{-1}}(f)\xi(s),\qquad (u_g\xi)(s)=\xi(g^{-1}s),\qquad R=\{\pi(D),u_g:g\in G\}''. \tag{1.3} The multiplication algebra is maximal abelian on HH, so D′=DD'=D. Apply BF77 E9 to the faithful normal multiplication representation ρ:D→B(H)\rho:D\to B(H), the discrete action α\alpha, and its unitary implementation Vg=vgV_g=v_g. The discrete topology makes the continuity hypotheses automatic and gives ΔG(g)=1\Delta_G(g)=1. In the coordinate order ℓ2(G;H)\ell^2(G;H), its regular coefficient operator is exactly π(f)\pi(f) from (1.3); its constant commutant coefficient is π′(f)\pi'(f); and its group generator Vg⊗RgV_g\otimes R_g acts as ξ(s)↦vgξ(sg)\xi(s)\mapsto v_g\xi(sg). Consequently E9 yields S=R′={π′(D),tg:g∈G}′′,(1.4) S=R'=\{\pi'(D),t_g:g\in G\}'', \tag{1.4} where (π′(f)ξ)(s)=fξ(s),(tgξ)(s)=vgξ(sg).(1.5) (\pi'(f)\xi)(s)=f\xi(s),\qquad (t_g\xi)(s)=v_g\xi(sg). \tag{1.5} These conventions agree with the regular convention in (1.3). In particular tgπ′(f)tg∗=π′(αg(f)). t_g\pi'(f)t_g^*=\pi'(\alpha_g(f)).

Define the separable unital C∗C^*-algebra C=C∗(π′(C(Y)),tg:g∈G)⊆S.(1.6) C=C^*(\pi'(C(Y)),t_g:g\in G)\subseteq S. \tag{1.6} Separability follows from that of C(Y)C(Y) and countability of GG. Its weak closure is SS, because continuous multiplications generate DD as a von Neumann algebra. Let C0C_0 be the dense polynomial star algebra of finite sums P=∑g∈Fπ′(fg)tg,fg∈C(Y).(1.7) P=\sum_{g\in F}\pi'(f_g)t_g,\qquad f_g\in C(Y). \tag{1.7} Covariance gives closure under products and adjoints.

2. Exchanging the models and recovering the vector state

Set (Wξ)(s)=vs∗ξ(s−1).(2.1) (W\xi)(s)=v_s^*\xi(s^{-1}). \tag{2.1} Inversion of GG permutes the coordinates, and each vs∗v_s^* is unitary, so WW is unitary. The identity vs−1∗=vsv_{s^{-1}}^*=v_s gives W2=1W^2=1. Direct calculation gives Wπ′(f)W=π(f),WtgW=ug.(2.2) W\pi'(f)W=\pi(f),\qquad Wt_gW=u_g. \tag{2.2} For example (WtgWξ)(s)=vs∗vgvs−1g∗ξ(g−1s)=ξ(g−1s), (Wt_gW\xi)(s) =v_s^*v_gv_{s^{-1}g}^*\xi(g^{-1}s) =\xi(g^{-1}s), since vs−1g∗=vg∗vsv_{s^{-1}g}^*=v_g^*v_s. Thus WSW=RWSW=R, and WCWWCW is the continuous-coefficient regular C∗C^*-algebra. These identities exchange two models after the cited commutant theorem; they do not assert a universal property for arbitrary covariant completions.

Let Je:H→KJ_e:H\to\mathcal K put a vector in coordinate ee, and let E:R→DE:R\to D be the regular coefficient expectation. Transport it by WW: F:S⟶D,F(x)=E(WxW)=Je∗xJe.(2.3) F:S\longrightarrow D,\qquad F(x)=E(WxW)=J_e^*xJ_e. \tag{2.3} The last equality holds because WJe=JeWJ_e=J_e. Hence FF is faithful, normal, unital and completely positive, with F(π′(f))=f,F(π′(f)xπ′(h))=fF(x)h. F(\pi'(f))=f,\qquad F(\pi'(f)x\pi'(h))=fF(x)h. It selects fef_e from (1.7). It also defines unique coefficients F(xtg∗)F(xt_g^*) for arbitrary x∈Sx\in S, by transport of the regular coefficient theorem. The corresponding bounded matrix reconstruction uses both coordinate indices. No assertion about convergence of unordered operator Fourier sums is needed.

Let ξ0=Je1\xi_0=J_e1, a unit vector, and define Φ(x)=⟨xξ0,ξ0⟩(x∈S),φ=Φ∣C. \Phi(x)=\langle x\xi_0,\xi_0\rangle\qquad(x\in S),\qquad \varphi=\Phi|_C. Compression at ee proves the complete vector-state formula Φ(x)=∫YF(x)(y) dμ(y)(x∈S).(2.4) \Phi(x)=\int_Y F(x)(y)\,d\mu(y)\qquad(x\in S). \tag{2.4} For a polynomial it is ∫Yfe dμ\int_Y f_e\,d\mu. For a general element of SS, F(x)F(x) is an L∞L^\infty class and the integral is well-defined.

The expectation on CC has continuous values: F(C)⊆C(Y).(2.5) F(C)\subseteq C(Y). \tag{2.5} Indeed, approximate x∈Cx\in C in norm by polynomials PnP_n. Contractivity of FF makes F(Pn)F(P_n) Cauchy in L∞(Y,μ)L^\infty(Y,\mu). On continuous functions, full support makes this norm equal to the uniform norm. Consequently F(Pn)F(P_n) converges uniformly to a function in C(Y)C(Y), representing F(x)F(x). This continuous representative is unique.

2.1. Commutant coefficients determine the matrix

The commutant formula is a statement about a generated von Neumann algebra. A formal Fourier expression also requires a precise convergence convention. Here is the bounded reconstruction that will suffice.

Use the regular convention from the coefficient lesson: on ℓ2(G;H)\ell^2(G;H), (π(a)ξ)(s)=αs−1(a)ξ(s),(uhξ)(s)=ξ(h−1s). (\pi(a)\xi)(s)=\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a)\xi(s),\qquad (u_h\xi)(s)=\xi(h^{-1}s). Assume VgaVg∗=αg(a)V_g a V_g^*=\alpha_g(a), and set (wgξ)(s)=Vgξ(sg),(π′(b)ξ)(s)=bξ(s)(b∈A′). (w_g\xi)(s)=V_g\xi(sg),\qquad (\pi'(b)\xi)(s)=b\xi(s)\quad(b\in A'). The two displayed families commute with π(A)\pi(A) and all uhu_h: for wgw_g, the coefficient identity is Vgα(sg)−1(a)=αs−1(a)Vg. V_g\alpha_{(sg)^{-1}}(a)=\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a)V_g. Let TT belong to the commutant. Write PsP_s for coordinate evaluation and Ts,t=PsTPt∗T_{s,t}=P_sTP_t^*. Commutation with every left translation gives Ths,ht=Ts,t,Ts,t=Te,s−1t. T_{hs,ht}=T_{s,t},\qquad T_{s,t}=T_{e,s^{-1}t}. Commutation with the coefficient operators gives aTe,g=Te,gαg−1(a). aT_{e,g}=T_{e,g}\alpha_{g^{-1}}(a). Consequently bg=PeTwg∗Pe∗=Te,gVg∗∈A′,Ts,t=bs−1tVs−1t. b_g=P_eTw_g^*P_e^*=T_{e,g}V_g^*\in A',\qquad T_{s,t}=b_{s^{-1}t}V_{s^{-1}t}. Indeed, wg∗Pe∗η=Pg∗Vg∗ηw_g^*P_e^*\eta=P_g^*V_g^*\eta, and αg−1(a)Vg∗=Vg∗a\alpha_{g^{-1}}(a)V_g^*=V_g^*a; substituting this in the preceding identity proves abg=bgaab_g=b_ga. Thus the family (bg)(b_g) determines every matrix entry and determines TT uniquely. The matrix entry of the formal expression ∑gπ′(bg)wg\sum_g\pi'(b_g)w_g at (s,t)(s,t) is exactly the same one: only g=s−1tg=s^{-1}t contributes there.

For actual operator convergence, let QF=∑s∈FPs∗PsQ_F=\sum_{s\in F}P_s^*P_s, with FF ranging over finite subsets of GG. Then QFTQF=∑s,t∈FPs∗bs−1tVs−1tPt,∥QFTQF∥≤∥T∥. Q_FTQ_F =\sum_{s,t\in F}P_s^*b_{s^{-1}t}V_{s^{-1}t}P_t, \qquad \|Q_FTQ_F\|\leq\|T\|. These compressions tend strongly to TT, and their adjoints tend strongly to T∗T^*. To verify the first assertion on a vector ξ\xi, use ∥QFTQFξ−Tξ∥≤∥T∥ ∥QFξ−ξ∥+∥(QF−1)Tξ∥⟶0; \|Q_FTQ_F\xi-T\xi\| \leq\|T\|\,\|Q_F\xi-\xi\| +\|(Q_F-1)T\xi\|\longrightarrow0; the same estimate applies to T∗T^*. This bounded two-coordinate limit supplies reconstruction, independently of a regrouping by group element. The compressions need not lie in the commutant; its generation by π′(A′)\pi'(A') and w(G)w(G) is the separate existing E9 theorem. Unordered Fourier partial sums need not converge strongly: already the scalar G=ZG=\mathbb Z case has the unbounded partial sums proved in Example 2.2 of the coefficient lesson.

3. A representation at every point of the support

For y∈Yy\in Y, define on ℓ2(G)\ell^2(G) (dy(f)η)(h)=f(hy)η(h),(ℓgη)(h)=η(g−1h).(3.1) (d_y(f)\eta)(h)=f(hy)\eta(h),\qquad (\ell_g\eta)(h)=\eta(g^{-1}h). \tag{3.1} They satisfy ℓgdy(f)ℓg∗=dy(αg(f))\ell_gd_y(f)\ell_g^*=d_y(\alpha_g(f)). On polynomials set ρy(P)=∑g∈Fdy(fg)ℓg.(3.2) \rho_y(P)=\sum_{g\in F}d_y(f_g)\ell_g. \tag{3.2}

Theorem 3.1. For every y∈Yy\in Y, (3.2) extends to a unital star representation ρy:C→B(ℓ2(G))\rho_y:C\to B(\ell^2(G)), with ∥ρy(x)∥≤∥x∥(x∈C).(3.3) \|\rho_y(x)\|\leq\|x\|\qquad(x\in C). \tag{3.3} Moreover ωy(x)=⟨ρy(x)δe,δe⟩=F(x)(y)(3.4) \omega_y(x)=\langle\rho_y(x)\delta_e,\delta_e\rangle=F(x)(y) \tag{3.4} is a state, and y↦ωy(x)y\mapsto\omega_y(x) is continuous for every x∈Cx\in C.

Proof. The continuous coefficients in (1.7) are unique. If P=0P=0, normal coefficient recovery gives fg=0f_g=0 as an L∞L^\infty class for each gg, and full support makes each continuous fgf_g identically zero. Thus (3.2) is well-defined on represented polynomials. Covariance makes it a unital star homomorphism there.

Let B:ℓ2(G;L2(Y,μ))→L2(Y,μ;ℓ2(G))B:\ell^2(G;L^2(Y,\mu))\to L^2(Y,\mu;\ell^2(G)) be the Fubini reordering unitary, and put U=BWU=BW. Equations (2.2) identify UPU∗=∫Y⊕ρy(P) dμ(y).(3.5) UPU^*=\int_Y^\oplus \rho_y(P)\,d\mu(y). \tag{3.5} Explicitly, on the right a term acts by fg(hy)η(y,g−1h)f_g(hy)\eta(y,g^{-1}h), exactly the reordered regular action. The field is measurable: its matrix entries are continuous functions of yy. It is uniformly bounded by ∑g∥fg∥∞\sum_g\|f_g\|_\infty. The existing decomposable-norm theorem therefore gives ∥P∥=ess sup⁡y∈Y∥ρy(P)∥.(3.6) \|P\|=\operatorname*{ess\,sup}_{y\in Y}\|\rho_y(P)\|. \tag{3.6}

For a finitely supported vector η∈ℓ2(G)\eta\in\ell^2(G), the vector ρy(P)η\rho_y(P)\eta has support in the fixed finite set Fsupp⁡ηF\operatorname{supp}\eta, and all its entries are continuous in yy. Thus y↦∥ρy(P)η∥y\mapsto\|\rho_y(P)\eta\| is continuous. The operator norm is the supremum over finitely supported unit vectors, so y↦∥ρy(P)∥y\mapsto\|\rho_y(P)\| is lower semicontinuous.

If its value at some y0∈Yy_0\in Y exceeded ∥P∥\|P\|, one such finite vector would give that strict inequality on a neighborhood of y0y_0. Full support gives this neighborhood positive measure, contradicting (3.6). Thus (3.3) holds for every polynomial at every point, and norm completion extends ρy\rho_y to CC. Multiplication and adjoints persist by norm continuity.

On a polynomial, the inner product in (3.4) selects its identity coefficient fe(y)f_e(y). Both sides extend continuously in xx, the right side by (2.5) and the left side by (3.3). This proves (3.4). The unit vector state of a unital representation is a state. Uniform approximation by polynomials also makes y↦ωy(x)y\mapsto\omega_y(x) continuous. □\square

This proof supplies a representation at every point of YY, including points of measure zero. An almost-everywhere field assertion by itself would not supply that pointwise conclusion.

4. Purity and unitary equivalence

Theorem 4.1. Each ωy\omega_y, y∈Yy\in Y, is pure, and its GNS representation is ρy\rho_y with cyclic vector δe\delta_e. The representations ρy1\rho_{y_1} and ρy2\rho_{y_2} are unitarily equivalent exactly when Gy1=Gy2.(4.1) Gy_1=Gy_2. \tag{4.1}

Proof. The vector δe\delta_e is cyclic because ρy(tg)δe=δg\rho_y(t_g)\delta_e=\delta_g. Let TT commute with ρy(C)\rho_y(C). Commutation with dy(C(Y))d_y(C(Y)) gives, for its matrix entries, (f(hy)−f(ky))Th,k=0(f∈C(Y), h,k∈G).(4.2) \bigl(f(hy)-f(ky)\bigr)T_{h,k}=0 \quad(f\in C(Y),\ h,k\in G). \tag{4.2} Freeness makes hy≠kyhy\ne ky when h≠kh\ne k, and continuous functions separate these points. Hence all off-diagonal entries vanish. Commutation with every left translation ℓg\ell_g then makes all diagonal entries equal. Thus TT is scalar. The representation is irreducible. Cyclic representation uniqueness identifies it with the GNS representation of (3.4), and the existing pure-state theorem makes ωy\omega_y pure.

Identify ℓ2(G)\ell^2(G) with ℓ2(Gy)\ell^2(Gy) by δh↦δhy\delta_h\mapsto\delta_{hy}, using freeness. In this orbit model the representation Πy\Pi_y satisfies (Πy(π′(f))η)(z)=f(z)η(z),(Πy(tg)η)(z)=η(g−1z),z∈Gy.(4.3) \begin{aligned} (\Pi_y(\pi'(f))\eta)(z)&=f(z)\eta(z),\\ (\Pi_y(t_g)\eta)(z)&=\eta(g^{-1}z), \qquad z\in Gy. \end{aligned} \tag{4.3} These formulas depend only on the orbit set. Equal orbits therefore give the same representation after the canonical basis identification, proving one direction of (4.1).

Conversely, if a unitary T:ℓ2(G)→ℓ2(G)T:\ell^2(G)\to\ell^2(G) intertwines ρy1\rho_{y_1} with ρy2\rho_{y_2}, multiplication intertwining gives (f(hy2)−f(ky1))Th,k=0(f∈C(Y)). \bigl(f(hy_2)-f(ky_1)\bigr)T_{h,k}=0 \qquad(f\in C(Y)). A unitary has some nonzero matrix entry. At that entry, separation by continuous functions implies hy2=ky1hy_2=ky_1. The two orbits intersect and hence are equal. □\square

For a polynomial, the orbit formula is explicitly (Πy(P)η)(hy)=∑g∈Ffg(hy)η(g−1hy).(4.4) (\Pi_y(P)\eta)(hy) =\sum_{g\in F} f_g(hy)\eta(g^{-1}hy). \tag{4.4} General elements of CC act by the norm-continuous extension of these finite formulas.

The state retains the point: ωy(π′(f))=f(y)\omega_y(\pi'(f))=f(y), so distinct yy give distinct states. The representation retains the orbit, as (4.1) states.

5. The orthogonal representing measure

Let S(C)\mathfrak S(C) be the compact state space of CC, with its weak-star topology. Define j:Y⟶S(C),j(y)=ωy,ν=j∗μ.(5.1) j:Y\longrightarrow\mathfrak S(C),\qquad j(y)=\omega_y,\qquad \nu=j_*\mu. \tag{5.1} Theorem 3.1 makes jj continuous. Its restriction to continuous coefficient functions makes it injective, so it is a homeomorphism from compact YY onto its closed image. This image consists entirely of pure states.

Theorem 5.1. The measure ν\nu represents φ=Φ∣C\varphi=\Phi|_C: φ(x)=∫Yωy(x) dμ(y)=∫S(C)ω(x) dν(ω).(5.2) \varphi(x)=\int_Y\omega_y(x)\,d\mu(y) =\int_{\mathfrak S(C)}\omega(x)\,d\nu(\omega). \tag{5.2} It is orthogonal, and its associated abelian algebra in the GNS commutant is exactly the original coefficient algebra π(D)\pi(D), which is maximal abelian in R=S′R=S'.

Proof. Equation (5.2) follows from (2.4) and (3.4). We first identify the GNS space of φ\varphi. Since Wξ0=ξ0W\xi_0=\xi_0, the reordered vector Uξ0U\xi_0 is the constant section y↦δey\mapsto\delta_e. The vectors π(f)ugξ0 \pi(f)u_g\xi_0 in the regular model have only coordinate gg nonzero, with value αg−1(f)∈C(Y)\alpha_{g^{-1}}(f)\in C(Y). As ff varies, these values range over all C(Y)C(Y). Their span is dense in ℓ2(G;L2(Y,μ))\ell^2(G;L^2(Y,\mu)), by density of continuous functions and finite-coordinate vectors. Thus ξ0\xi_0 is cyclic for CC, and its given representation on K\mathcal K is the GNS representation of φ\varphi.

For h∈L∞(Y,μ)h\in L^\infty(Y,\mu), let mhm_h denote multiplication by h(y)h(y) on L2(Y,μ;ℓ2(G))L^2(Y,\mu;\ell^2(G)). Equations (2.2) give Uπ(h)U∗=mh.(5.3) U\pi(h)U^*=m_h. \tag{5.3} This multiplier commutes with the reordered action of CC. For q∈L∞(S(C),ν)q\in L^\infty(\mathfrak S(C),\nu), put κ(q)=U∗mq∘jU=π(q∘j).(5.4) \kappa(q)=U^*m_{q\circ j}U=\pi(q\circ j). \tag{5.4} It is a normal unital star homomorphism into the GNS commutant. For every x∈Cx\in C, the polynomial calculation in (3.5), followed by norm approximation, gives ⟨κ(q)xξ0,ξ0⟩=∫Yq(j(y))⟨ρy(x)δe,δe⟩ dμ(y)=∫S(C)q(ω)ω(x) dν(ω).(5.5) \begin{aligned} \langle\kappa(q)x\xi_0,\xi_0\rangle &=\int_Y q(j(y)) \langle\rho_y(x)\delta_e,\delta_e\rangle\,d\mu(y)\\ &=\int_{\mathfrak S(C)}q(\omega)\omega(x)\,d\nu(\omega). \end{aligned} \tag{5.5} Hence uniqueness in the existing operator-map theorem identifies (5.4) with κν\kappa_\nu. Its multiplicativity makes ν\nu orthogonal by the existing orthogonal-measure criterion. The homeomorphism jj onto a closed full-ν\nu-measure subspace identifies L∞(ν)L^\infty(\nu) with L∞(Y,μ)L^\infty(Y,\mu). Thus the range in (5.4) is exactly π(D)\pi(D).

Finally the induced action on DD is free in the algebraic sense. If a projection p=1Bp=1_B supported an identity part for αg\alpha_g, then (f(g−1y)−f(y))1B(y)=0 (f(g^{-1}y)-f(y))1_B(y)=0 for every f∈C(Y)f\in C(Y). Take a countable norm-dense separating family of such functions and remove the union of its null exceptional sets. For the remaining y∈By\in B, equality holds for the dense family, hence for every continuous function. Separation gives g−1y=yg^{-1}y=y. If g≠eg\ne e, point freeness excludes this, so BB is null and p=0p=0. The free-action MASA theorem now gives π(D)′∩R=π(D)\pi(D)'\cap R=\pi(D). Since C′′=S=R′C''=S=R', its GNS commutant is RR, proving the final assertion. □\square

The integral in (5.2) is a representing measure for the state on the separable C∗C^*-algebra CC. Formula (2.4) separately describes its normal vector-state extension to SS.

Proposition 5.2. The pure state ωy\omega_y has a normal state extension to SS exactly when μ({y})>0\mu(\{y\})>0.

Proof. If μ({y})=0\mu(\{y\})=0, choose a compatible metric on YY and set fn(z)=max⁡{1−n d(z,y),0}. f_n(z)=\max\{1-n\,d(z,y),0\}. These continuous positive contractions decrease pointwise to 1{y}1_{\{y\}}, which is zero as an L∞(μ)L^\infty(\mu) class. Thus π′(fn)↓0\pi'(f_n)\downarrow0 in SS. A normal state extension would have values decreasing to zero. But its values on these elements must be ωy(π′(fn))=fn(y)=1\omega_y(\pi'(f_n))=f_n(y)=1, a contradiction.

If μ({y})>0\mu(\{y\})>0, the section ζ(z)=μ({y})−1/21{y}(z)δe \zeta(z)=\mu(\{y\})^{-1/2}1_{\{y\}}(z)\delta_e is a unit vector in L2(Y,μ;ℓ2(G))L^2(Y,\mu;\ell^2(G)). The vector state at U∗ζU^*\zeta, restricted to SS, is normal, and (3.5) gives its value ωy(P)\omega_y(P) for every polynomial PP. Norm density gives the same equality on all CC. It is the required normal state extension. □\square

6. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 6.1 (introductory: the support qualification). Let X={0,1,2,3}X=\{0,1,2,3\} with the discrete topology. The two-element group acts by the permutation (0 1)(2 3)(0\,1)(2\,3). Give 0,10,1 mass 1/21/2 each and 2,32,3 mass zero. Check freeness and quasi-invariance, then show that evaluation of the identity coefficient at 22 does not define a state on the represented algebra CC. Identify the correct support space and the represented C∗C^*-algebra.

Solution. The only nonidentity group element moves every point, so the point action is free. It preserves the measure, hence the measure is quasi-invariant. Its support is Y={0,1}Y=\{0,1\}.

The continuous function q=1{2,3}q=1_{\{2,3\}} acts as zero on L2(X,μ)L^2(X,\mu), and therefore π′(q)=0\pi'(q)=0 in CC. Its putative identity-coefficient evaluation at 22 would be q(2)=1q(2)=1. The same represented zero element also has the zero polynomial expression, whose evaluation is 00. Thus the proposed functional is not even well-defined.

On YY, continuous functions give both diagonal projections in the orbit model, and the group generator swaps the two basis vectors. Compressing this swap between the diagonal projections gives the two off-diagonal matrix units. Hence the orbit representation has image M2(C)M_2(\mathbb C). The two support points have the same orbit and unitarily equivalent representations. The norm formula in Theorem 3.1, with this finite full support, identifies the represented algebra CC with M2(C)M_2(\mathbb C). Its two point states are the two diagonal vector states.

Exercise 6.2 (intermediate: unequal finite orbit weights). Let Y=Z/3ZY=\mathbb Z/3\mathbb Z, let G=Z/3ZG=\mathbb Z/3\mathbb Z act by addition, and give the points 0,1,20,1,2 respective masses 1/7,2/7,4/71/7,2/7,4/7. Identify CC, the three pure states, their GNS representations, the barycentre state and its orthogonal measure. Is the barycentre tracial?

Solution. The action is free. Every point has positive mass, so the support is all of YY, and each transported measure is equivalent to μ\mu. In the common orbit space ℓ2(Y)\ell^2(Y), the coefficient functions act by all diagonal matrices and the group generator acts by the cyclic permutation matrix. The diagonal compressions of its powers give every matrix unit. Thus C≅M3(C)C\cong M_3(\mathbb C), with the represented norm justified by Theorem 3.1.

For each yy, (4.3) is the usual irreducible representation of M3M_3 on C3\mathbb C^3, using the same orbit basis. The state is ωy(x)=xy,y\omega_y(x)=x_{y,y}. These are the three pure diagonal vector states. Their GNS representations are all unitarily equivalent, though their restrictions to the diagonal distinguish the three points.

The barycentre is φ(x)=x0,0+2x1,1+4x2,27=Tr⁡ ⁣(diag⁡(1,2,4)x/7). \varphi(x)=\frac{x_{0,0}+2x_{1,1}+4x_{2,2}}7 =\operatorname{Tr}\!\left( \operatorname{diag}(1,2,4)x/7\right). Its representing measure places masses 1/7,2/7,4/71/7,2/7,4/7 at the respective ωy\omega_y. Theorem 5.1 makes it orthogonal. More concretely, its GNS space is the weighted sum of three copies of the usual irreducible representation, of total dimension 99; diagonal multiplication on the copy index is the associated three-atom algebra in the commutant.

It is not tracial: for the matrix unit e0,1e_{0,1}, φ(e0,1∗e0,1)=27,φ(e0,1e0,1∗)=17. \varphi(e_{0,1}^*e_{0,1})=\frac27,\qquad \varphi(e_{0,1}e_{0,1}^*)=\frac17. Quasi-invariance suffices for the orbit-state decomposition; it does not impose invariance of the finite weights.

Exercise 6.3 (advanced: pure states on irrational circle orbits). Let an irrational real number θ\theta define the action n⋅x=x+nθ(mod1) n\cdot x=x+n\theta\pmod1 of Z\mathbb Z on T\mathbb T, with normalized Lebesgue measure. Prove that every point defines a pure state. Compare the representations at 0,θ,θ/20,\theta,\theta/2. Determine whether any of these point states has a normal extension to SS.

Solution. Lebesgue measure is invariant and has full support. If nθn\theta is an integer for n≠0n\ne0, then θ\theta is rational; hence the point action is free. Theorem 4.1 gives a pure state at every point, with GNS space ℓ2(Z)\ell^2(\mathbb Z).

The points 00 and θ\theta lie in the same orbit, so their GNS representations are unitarily equivalent. Their states are distinct: evaluation on the coefficient function f(x)=e2πixf(x)=e^{2\pi i x} gives 11 and e2πiθe^{2\pi i\theta}, respectively.

The point θ/2\theta/2 is not in the orbit of 00. Otherwise θ/2=nθ+k\theta/2=n\theta+k for integers n,kn,k, which would make θ=−k/(n−1/2)\theta=-k/(n-1/2) rational. Thus its orbit is disjoint from that of 00, and Theorem 4.1 makes the two representations inequivalent.

Every singleton has Lebesgue measure zero. Proposition 5.2 therefore excludes a normal state extension to SS for every one of these point states. Nevertheless their continuous pure-state family has the normal vector-state restriction φ\varphi as its integral, with the orthogonal measure supplied by Theorem 5.1.

References

[Takesaki] M. Takesaki, Theory of Operator Algebras I, Springer-Verlag, 1979, Chapter V, §7, Exercise 2(a–d), printed p. 373. The pointwise assertions require the support qualification proved above.

[Existing commutant theorem] OA-FLOW, The regular commutant in every covariant representation, equation E9, specialized to the multiplication representation. Its proof uses the standard-form commutant and normal representation-comparison results linked above.

[Earlier lessons] The exact regular coefficient, decomposable norm, GNS and orthogonal-measure proof contracts linked above.

Editable source · Proof dependencies and component terms