Original text: CC0 1.0. Prerequisite proofs and component terms.

OA-MOD-SC-02. Positive observations can be implemented by vector sums

Lemma. If A⊆B(L)A\subseteq B(L) is a concrete unital von Neumann algebra and ω∈A∗+\omega\in A_*^+, there are vectors vj∈Lv_j\in L, indexed by positive integers, such that ∑j∥vj∥2=ω(1),ω(a)=∑j⟨avj,vj⟩(a∈A).(SC.3) \sum_j\|v_j\|^2=\omega(1),\qquad \omega(a)=\sum_j\langle av_j,v_j\rangle \quad(a\in A). \tag{SC.3} The series is absolutely convergent. Every component functional ωvj\omega_{v_j} is positive normal and satisfies ωvj≤ω\omega_{v_j}\le\omega. No separability hypothesis on LL is needed.

Proof. CP-08 gives square-summable vectors ζ=(ζj)∈ℓ2(N,L)\zeta=(\zeta_j)\in\ell^2(\mathbb N,L) such that ω(a)≤ϑ(a):=∑j⟨aζj,ζj⟩(a≥0). \omega(a)\le\vartheta(a):= \sum_j\langle a\zeta_j,\zeta_j\rangle \qquad(a\ge0). Let ρ(a)=diag⁡(a,a,…)\rho(a)=\operatorname{diag}(a,a,\ldots), a bounded *-representation on ℓ2(N,L)\ell^2(\mathbb N,L), and put K=ρ(A)ζ‾K=\overline{\rho(A)\zeta}. The subspace is invariant under ρ(A)\rho(A) and its adjoints, so it reduces this representation. Also ζ∈K\zeta\in K, because AA is unital.

On the dense subspace ρ(A)ζ⊆K\rho(A)\zeta\subseteq K, define B(ρ(a)ζ,ρ(b)ζ)=ω(b∗a). B(\rho(a)\zeta,\rho(b)\zeta)=\omega(b^*a). The inequality ω(a∗a)≤ϑ(a∗a)=∥ρ(a)ζ∥2\omega(a^*a)\le\vartheta(a^*a)=\|\rho(a)\zeta\|^2, together with the positive-functional Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, proves that this rule is well-defined and ∣B(ρ(a)ζ,ρ(b)ζ)∣≤∥ρ(a)ζ∥ ∥ρ(b)ζ∥. |B(\rho(a)\zeta,\rho(b)\zeta)| \le\|\rho(a)\zeta\|\,\|\rho(b)\zeta\|. It extends to a positive bounded sesquilinear form on KK. The bounded-form theorem gives a unique positive contraction h∈B(K)h\in B(K) with B(u,v)=⟨hu,v⟩B(u,v)=\langle hu,v\rangle.

For c∈Ac\in A, the equality B(ρ(c)ρ(a)ζ,ρ(b)ζ)=B(ρ(a)ζ,ρ(c∗)ρ(b)ζ) B(\rho(c)\rho(a)\zeta,\rho(b)\zeta) =B(\rho(a)\zeta,\rho(c^*)\rho(b)\zeta) holds because both sides equal ω(b∗ca)\omega(b^*ca). Extension from the dense cyclic subspace shows that hh commutes with ρ(c)∣K\rho(c)|_K. Its square root commutes as well. Set v=h1/2ζ∈Kv=h^{1/2}\zeta\in K, and write its components as vj∈Lv_j\in L. For every a∈Aa\in A, ω(a)=B(ρ(a)ζ,ζ)=⟨ρ(a)v,v⟩=∑j⟨avj,vj⟩. \omega(a)=B(\rho(a)\zeta,\zeta) =\langle\rho(a)v,v\rangle =\sum_j\langle av_j,v_j\rangle. Evaluation at 11 gives the asserted sum of squared norms. Absolute convergence follows from ∣⟨avj,vj⟩∣≤∥a∥∥vj∥2|\langle av_j,v_j\rangle|\le\|a\|\|v_j\|^2. For positive aa, each nonnegative summand is at most the sum, proving ωvj≤ω\omega_{v_j}\le\omega. Single-vector functionals are ultraweakly continuous by CP. If ω=0\omega=0, the construction may be replaced by the zero sequence. ∎

The use of a countable series concerns one predual functional. The family of all normal functionals can be arbitrarily large. We have not chosen a countable family which detects the entire algebra.

Editable source · Proof dependencies and component terms