Original text: CC0 1.0. Prerequisite proofs and component terms.

Analytic kernels for unbounded modular operators

OA-MOD-MA-01 — Conventions and exact analytic inputs

Hilbert spaces are arbitrary, and their inner products are linear in the first variable. For a positive injective self-adjoint operator AA, the powers AzA^z use the real logarithm on (0,∞)(0,\infty). Injectivity does not mean that A−1A^{-1} is bounded. We use the common spectral bands Pn=1[1/n,n](A),n≥1.(MA.1) P_n=1_{[1/n,n]}(A),\qquad n\geq1. \tag{MA.1} They increase strongly to the identity. A band can be infinite dimensional or zero.

The exact spectral inputs are integral domains for Borel functions, spectral multiplication with its domain conditions, real change of variable, and dominated convergence for each vector's finite spectral measure. In particular, if f(A)ξf(A)\xi is defined, then Pnξ→ξ,f(A)Pnξ→f(A)ξ(MA.2) P_n\xi\to\xi,\qquad f(A)P_n\xi\to f(A)\xi \tag{MA.2} in norm. The spectral kernel supplies these contracts in SK-05, SK-07 and SK-09: measurable integral domains, powers and logarithms, and vectorwise dominated convergence and graph cutoffs. These items also give the strongly continuous unitary group AitA^{it}.

We explicitly retain two elementary analysis contracts:

The Gaussian normalization, Fourier uniqueness, strip-boundary argument, Banach-valued contour calculation and locally convex integration construction are proved below. Separation by bounded linear functionals and continuous seminorms uses OA-MOD-OPEN-CONVEX-HB-NORM and OA-MOD-OPEN-CONVEX-HB-SEMINORM, at their stated norm and seminorm levels. Bounded square roots, continuous functional calculus, adjoints and operator norms use OA-MOD-BK and the Hilbert-space kernel.

OA-MOD-MA-02 — Which integrals take values in which space

Let BB be a Banach space. A norm-continuous function f:R→Bf:\mathbb R\to B satisfying ∥f(t)∥≤m(t)\|f(t)\|\leq m(t) for some integrable nonnegative scalar function has an improper norm integral whenever its integrals over compact intervals exist. In our applications the latter are Riemann integrals: continuity on a compact interval is uniform, so two sufficiently fine Riemann sums differ in norm by at most the interval length times the modulus of continuity. Completeness gives their common limit.

For compact intervals II, these integrals satisfy ∥∫If(t) dt∥≤∫I∥f(t)∥ dt.(MA.3) \left\|\int_I f(t)\,dt\right\|\leq\int_I\|f(t)\|\,dt. \tag{MA.3} The tail bound by ∫∣t∣>Rm(t) dt\int_{|t|>R}m(t)\,dt makes the compact-interval integrals Cauchy as R→∞R\to\infty. Thus the improper integral exists and retains (MA.3). It is the Bochner integral for these functions. Bounded linear maps pass through the integral because they pass through finite sums and norm limits.

We also need a different construction. Suppose T(t)∈B(H)T(t)\in B(H), the function t↦T(t)ξt\mapsto T(t)\xi is norm-continuous for each ξ∈H\xi\in H, and ∥T(t)∥≤C\|T(t)\|\leq C. If the continuous scalar function kk is integrable, define Tkξ=∫Rk(t)T(t)ξ dt.(MA.4) T_k\xi=\int_{\mathbb R}k(t)T(t)\xi\,dt. \tag{MA.4} The preceding construction in HH proves existence. Linearity and (MA.3) give a bounded operator with ∥Tk∥≤C∥k∥1.(MA.5) \|T_k\|\leq C\|k\|_1. \tag{MA.5} We call (MA.4) a vectorwise strong integral. It is not an assertion that t↦k(t)T(t)t\mapsto k(t)T(t) is Bochner integrable for the operator norm on B(H)B(H).

If Tj(t)ξ→T(t)ξT_j(t)\xi\to T(t)\xi for every t,ξt,\xi, all the operator norms are bounded by the same CC, and all the relevant vector functions are continuous, then ∥∫k(t)(Tj(t)−T(t))ξ dt∥≤∫∣k(t)∣ ∥(Tj(t)−T(t))ξ∥ dt⟶0(MA.6) \left\|\int k(t)(T_j(t)-T(t))\xi\,dt\right\| \leq\int |k(t)|\,\|(T_j(t)-T(t))\xi\|\,dt\longrightarrow0 \tag{MA.6} for a sequence jj, by scalar dominated convergence. All spectral cutoff passages below use this sequence. Global operator limits and strip domains impose no countability hypothesis on HH.

The same statements hold for integrals over piecewise smooth finite contours, using their parametrizations. A Banach-valued holomorphic function has the contour identities obtained by applying the scalar theorems to every bounded linear functional: (MA.3) permits scalarization, and Hahn–Banach separates two candidate Banach-space values. Similarly, a locally uniform limit of Banach-valued holomorphic functions is holomorphic. To see the latter assertion, take a circle lying inside the common open domain. The vector Cauchy formula passes to the uniform limit on that circle and in its interior. Expanding (ζ−z)−1(\zeta-z)^{-1} as a geometric series on a smaller concentric disc gives a norm-convergent power series for the limit, hence complex differentiability there.

OA-MOD-MA-03 — Gaussian normalization and its Fourier transform

For r>0r>0, put gr(t)=rπ e−rt2.(MA.7) g_r(t)=\sqrt{\frac r\pi}\,e^{-rt^2}. \tag{MA.7} These are probability densities. Indeed, if I=∫Re−t2 dtI=\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-t^2}\,dt, positivity and Fubini give I2=∫R2e−(x2+y2) dx dy=2π∫0∞e−u2u du=π. I^2=\int_{\mathbb R^2}e^{-(x^2+y^2)}\,dx\,dy =2\pi\int_0^\infty e^{-u^2}u\,du=\pi. The polar-coordinate Jacobian is uu, and the last integral is 1/21/2 by the substitution v=u2v=u^2. Thus I=πI=\sqrt\pi, and scaling proves ∫gr=1\int g_r=1.

Our Fourier convention is f^(s)=∫Re−istf(t) dt.(MA.8) \widehat f(s)=\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-ist}f(t)\,dt. \tag{MA.8} Gaussian identity. For every real ss, ∫Re−t2e−ist dt=π e−s2/4.(MA.9) \int_{\mathbb R}e^{-t^2}e^{-ist}\,dt =\sqrt\pi\,e^{-s^2/4}. \tag{MA.9} Proof. Call the left side G(s)G(s). Since ∣t∣e−t2|t|e^{-t^2} is integrable, differentiation under the integral is justified by dominated convergence. Integration by parts, with vanishing boundary terms, gives ∫te−t2e−ist dt=−is2G(s),G′(s)=−s2G(s). \int t e^{-t^2}e^{-ist}\,dt=-\frac{is}{2}G(s), \qquad G'(s)=-\frac s2G(s). Hence the derivative of es2/4G(s)e^{s^2/4}G(s) is zero. Its value at zero is π\sqrt\pi, proving (MA.9). □\square

Scaling and replacing ss by −s-s now give the exact inverse formula gr(v)=12π∫Re−s2/(4r)eisv ds.(MA.10) g_r(v)=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R} e^{-s^2/(4r)}e^{isv}\,ds. \tag{MA.10} No general Fourier inversion theorem was used to obtain it.

OA-MOD-MA-04 — Fourier uniqueness from Gaussian approximation

Theorem. If f:R→Cf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb C is continuous and integrable, and f^(s)=0\widehat f(s)=0 for all real ss, then f(t)=0f(t)=0 for every tt.

Proof. Formula (MA.10) and Fubini give (f∗gr)(t)=∫Rf(u)gr(t−u) du=12π∫Re−s2/(4r)eistf^(s) ds=0.(MA.11) \begin{aligned} (f*g_r)(t) &=\int_{\mathbb R}f(u)g_r(t-u)\,du\\ &=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R} e^{-s^2/(4r)}e^{ist}\widehat f(s)\,ds=0. \end{aligned} \tag{MA.11} Absolute integrability for the interchange follows from ∥f∥1∫e−s2/(4r)ds<∞\|f\|_1\int e^{-s^2/(4r)}ds<\infty.

Fix tt and ε>0\varepsilon>0. Continuity supplies δ>0\delta>0 such that ∣f(t−v)−f(t)∣<ε|f(t-v)-f(t)|<\varepsilon for ∣v∣<δ|v|<\delta. The integral of this difference against grg_r on that interval is at most ε\varepsilon. Outside it, the contribution involving f(t−v)f(t-v) is bounded by ∥f∥1sup⁡∣v∣≥δgr(v)=∥f∥1r/π e−rδ2⟶0. \|f\|_1\sup_{|v|\geq\delta}g_r(v) =\|f\|_1\sqrt{r/\pi}\,e^{-r\delta^2}\longrightarrow0. The contribution involving f(t)f(t) is bounded by ∣f(t)∣π∫∣u∣≥δre−u2 du⟶0. \frac{|f(t)|}{\sqrt\pi} \int_{|u|\geq\delta\sqrt r}e^{-u^2}\,du\longrightarrow0. Thus (f∗gr)(t)→f(t)(f*g_r)(t)\to f(t), proving the conclusion. The proof did not assume that a continuous integrable function is globally bounded. □\square

Operator and vector consequence. Let T(t)T(t) be a uniformly bounded, weak-operator-continuous family in B(H)B(H). If ∫Re−ist2cosh⁡(πt)⟨T(t)ξ,η⟩ dt=0(s∈R, ξ,η∈H),(MA.12) \int_{\mathbb R}\frac{e^{-ist}}{2\cosh(\pi t)} \langle T(t)\xi,\eta\rangle\,dt=0 \quad(s\in\mathbb R,\ \xi,\eta\in H), \tag{MA.12} then T(t)=0T(t)=0 for every tt. Each scalar function (2cosh⁡(πt))−1⟨T(t)ξ,η⟩(2\cosh(\pi t))^{-1}\langle T(t)\xi,\eta\rangle is continuous and integrable, so the theorem makes it identically zero. Its scalar prefactor is strictly positive. Varying ξ,η\xi,\eta proves the assertion. The identical argument applies to a bounded weakly continuous Hilbert-space-valued function, by pairing it with arbitrary vectors. Only scalar integrals are needed for these consequences.

OA-MOD-MA-05 — An inverse in a Banach algebra

Let BB be a unital complex Banach algebra, and let u:C→GL(B)u:\mathbb C\to\mathrm{GL}(B) be entire in norm, with u(z+w)=u(z)u(w),M:=sup⁡t∈R∥u(t)∥<∞.(MA.13) u(z+w)=u(z)u(w),\qquad M:=\sup_{t\in\mathbb R}\|u(t)\|<\infty. \tag{MA.13} For s∈Rs\in\mathbb R, define ks(t)=e−isteπt+e−πt,Ds=e−s/2u(−i/2)+es/2u(i/2).(MA.14) k_s(t)=\frac{e^{-ist}}{e^{\pi t}+e^{-\pi t}},\qquad D_s=e^{-s/2}u(-i/2)+e^{s/2}u(i/2). \tag{MA.14} Theorem. The norm integral Is=∫Rks(t)u(t) dt(MA.15) I_s=\int_{\mathbb R}k_s(t)u(t)\,dt \tag{MA.15} exists, and DsIs=IsDs=1BD_sI_s=I_sD_s=1_B. Equivalently, Is=es/2u(−i/2)(u(−i)+es1B)−1.(MA.16) I_s=e^{s/2}u(-i/2)\bigl(u(-i)+e^s1_B\bigr)^{-1}. \tag{MA.16}

Proof. The denominator in ksk_s makes it absolutely integrable, since (eπt+e−πt)−1≤e−π∣t∣(e^{\pi t}+e^{-\pi t})^{-1}\leq e^{-\pi|t|}. Norm continuity and (MA.13) therefore give (MA.15) by MA-02.

Consider the meromorphic Banach-valued function F(z)=e−iszu(z)eπz−e−πz.(MA.17) F(z)=\frac{e^{-isz}u(z)}{e^{\pi z}-e^{-\pi z}}. \tag{MA.17} On the positively oriented rectangle with vertices ±R±i/2\pm R\pm i/2, its only pole inside is z=0z=0, with residue 1B/(2π)1_B/(2\pi). Indeed, u(0)=1Bu(0)=1_B by the group law and invertibility, and the denominator has derivative 2π2\pi at zero. The Banach-valued residue identity of MA-02 gives contour integral i1Bi1_B.

For z=t+irz=t+ir, with ∣r∣≤1/2|r|\leq1/2, the group law gives ∥F(t+ir)∥≤Mesr∥u(ir)∥∣eπ(t+ir)−e−π(t+ir)∣.(MA.18) \|F(t+ir)\| \leq\frac{M e^{sr}\|u(ir)\|} {|e^{\pi(t+ir)}-e^{-\pi(t+ir)}|}. \tag{MA.18} The numerator is uniformly bounded on these rr's. At t=±Rt=\pm R, the denominator is at least eπR−e−πRe^{\pi R}-e^{-\pi R}. Thus both vertical contour integrals tend to zero. On the bottom and top edges respectively, F(t−i/2)=ie−s/2u(−i/2)ks(t)u(t), F(t-i/2)=i e^{-s/2}u(-i/2)k_s(t)u(t), F(t+i/2)=−ies/2u(i/2)ks(t)u(t). F(t+i/2)=-i e^{s/2}u(i/2)k_s(t)u(t). The bottom edge runs to the right and the top edge to the left. Taking the limit of their integrals therefore gives iDsIs=i1BiD_sI_s=i1_B. Every value of uu commutes with every other value, by (MA.13). Consequently DsD_s commutes with IsI_s, and it has the asserted two-sided inverse.

Finally, Ds=e−s/2u(i/2)(u(−i)+es1B). D_s=e^{-s/2}u(i/2)\bigl(u(-i)+e^s1_B\bigr). Both DsD_s and u(i/2)u(i/2) are invertible. Inverting this factorization, and using commutation, proves (MA.16). □\square

Taking u(z)=eiβzu(z)=e^{i\beta z} in B=CB=\mathbb C yields the scalar formula ∫Rks(t)eiβt dt=12cosh⁡((β−s)/2).(MA.19) \int_{\mathbb R}k_s(t)e^{i\beta t}\,dt =\frac1{2\cosh((\beta-s)/2)}. \tag{MA.19} In particular, ∫∣ks(t)∣dt=∫k0(t)dt=1/2\int |k_s(t)|dt=\int k_0(t)dt=1/2. Thus the general inverse satisfies ∥Is∥≤M/2\|I_s\|\leq M/2.

OA-MOD-MA-06 — A spectral resolvent as a strong integral

Let AA be positive, injective and self-adjoint on HH. No modular interpretation is required.

Theorem. For every real ss, ∫Rks(t)Ait dt=es/2A1/2(A+esI)−1.(MA.20) \int_{\mathbb R}k_s(t)A^{it}\,dt =e^{s/2}A^{1/2}(A+e^sI)^{-1}. \tag{MA.20} The integral is vectorwise strong. The right side is the everywhere-defined bounded spectral multiplier hs(λ)=es/2λλ+es,0≤hs(λ)≤12.(MA.21) h_s(\lambda)=\frac{e^{s/2}\sqrt\lambda}{\lambda+e^s}, \qquad 0\leq h_s(\lambda)\leq\frac12. \tag{MA.21} The displayed composition is also legitimate as an operator product: the resolvent maps HH into D(A)D(A), which is contained in D(A1/2)D(A^{1/2}).

Proof. Strong continuity of AitA^{it} and unitarity give existence of the integral by MA-02. On PnHP_nH, the restriction AnA_n is bounded and boundedly invertible. The zero band is trivial. Otherwise Ln=log⁡AnL_n=\log A_n is bounded self-adjoint, and un(z)=exp⁡(izLn)u_n(z)=\exp(izL_n) is an entire group in B(PnH)B(P_nH), by its norm-convergent exponential series. Real values are unitary. MA-05 gives (MA.20) on this band.

The scalar inequality 2es/2λ≤λ+es2e^{s/2}\sqrt\lambda\leq\lambda+e^s proves (MA.21). Hence the band multipliers converge strongly to hs(A)h_s(A). On the integral side, AitPnξ→AitξA^{it}P_n\xi\to A^{it}\xi for every tt, and all norms are bounded by ∥ξ∥\|\xi\|. Equation (MA.6) passes to the full strong integral. The product interpretation follows from the spectral domain criterion and the scalar bounds on λ/(λ+es)\lambda/(\lambda+e^s) and λ/(λ+es)\sqrt\lambda/(\lambda+e^s). □\square

OA-MOD-MA-07 — Solving an equation expressed through unbounded pairings

Put D=D(A1/2)∩D(A−1/2).(MA.22) \mathcal D=D(A^{1/2})\cap D(A^{-1/2}). \tag{MA.22} This is dense, since it contains every PnHP_nH. For X∈B(H)X\in B(H), define Rs(X)=∫Rks(t)AitXA−it dt.(MA.23) \mathcal R_s(X)=\int_{\mathbb R} k_s(t)A^{it}XA^{-it}\,dt. \tag{MA.23} The integral exists vectorwise strongly. Indeed, strong continuity of the two unitary groups makes t↦AitXA−itξt\mapsto A^{it}XA^{-it}\xi norm-continuous, and its norm is at most ∥X∥∥ξ∥\|X\|\|\xi\|.

Theorem. For every X∈B(H)X\in B(H) there is exactly one bounded YY satisfying ⟨Xξ,η⟩=⟨YA−1/2ξ,A1/2η⟩+es⟨YA1/2ξ,A−1/2η⟩(ξ,η∈D).(MA.24) \langle X\xi,\eta\rangle =\langle YA^{-1/2}\xi,A^{1/2}\eta\rangle +e^s\langle YA^{1/2}\xi,A^{-1/2}\eta\rangle \quad(\xi,\eta\in\mathcal D). \tag{MA.24} It is Y=e−s/2Rs(X),∥Y∥≤12e−s/2∥X∥.(MA.25) Y=e^{-s/2}\mathcal R_s(X),\qquad \|Y\|\leq\tfrac12 e^{-s/2}\|X\|. \tag{MA.25} No assertion that YY preserves either unbounded domain is part of (MA.24).

Proof of uniqueness and the formula. Suppose (MA.24) holds. Write Xn=PnX∣PnHX_n=P_nX|_{P_nH}, Yn=PnY∣PnHY_n=P_nY|_{P_nH}. In the Banach algebra of bounded linear maps on the Banach space B(PnH)B(P_nH), consider σz(T)=AnizTAn−iz.(MA.26) \sigma_z(T)=A_n^{iz}TA_n^{-iz}. \tag{MA.26} This is an entire group; for real tt, its norm is one on a nonzero band, because conjugation by a unitary is an isometry. The boundedness of log⁡An\log A_n justifies entire norm dependence. Restricting (MA.24) to vectors in the band gives Xn=(σ−i/2+esσi/2)(Yn).(MA.27) X_n=(\sigma_{-i/2}+e^s\sigma_{i/2})(Y_n). \tag{MA.27} For example, the first pairing is the pairing of An1/2YnAn−1/2A_n^{1/2}Y_nA_n^{-1/2}, which is σ−i/2(Yn)\sigma_{-i/2}(Y_n). This verifies the signs before applying the inverse formula.

MA-05 in this Banach algebra gives es/2Yn=∫Rks(t)AnitXnAn−it dt.(MA.28) e^{s/2}Y_n=\int_{\mathbb R}k_s(t)A_n^{it}X_nA_n^{-it}\,dt. \tag{MA.28} Extend the band operators by zero on (I−Pn)H(I-P_n)H. Their integrands are PnAitXA−itPnP_nA^{it}XA^{-it}P_n, which converge strongly pointwise to AitXA−itA^{it}XA^{-it} and have norm at most ∥X∥\|X\|. Equation (MA.6) and PnYPn→YP_nYP_n\to Y strongly prove (MA.25). This proves uniqueness; the norm bound follows from ∥ks∥1=1/2\|k_s\|_1=1/2.

Proof of existence. Define YY by (MA.25). Compression by PnP_n passes through the vector integrals and identifies PnY∣PnHP_nY|_{P_nH} with the right side of (MA.28). The inverse identity in MA-05 consequently proves (MA.27), and hence (MA.24) for pairs of vectors in PnHP_nH.

For general ξ,η∈D\xi,\eta\in\mathcal D, use Pnξ,PnηP_n\xi,P_n\eta. Spectral convergence (MA.2) holds simultaneously for the constant function 11 and for both functions λ1/2\lambda^{1/2} and λ−1/2\lambda^{-1/2}. Thus all four unbounded-vector terms in the pairings converge in norm. Since X,YX,Y are bounded, passing to the limit gives (MA.24) on precisely D×D\mathcal D\times\mathcal D. □\square

This argument also shows Rs(X)∗=R−s(X∗).(MA.29) \mathcal R_s(X)^*=\mathcal R_{-s}(X^*). \tag{MA.29} It follows by scalarizing the integral and conjugating ksk_s. For s=0s=0, averaging positive operators proves positivity of R0\mathcal R_0. Such a positivity claim for general ss would require more: the kernel then has a complex phase.

OA-MOD-MA-08 — Two facts about closed strips

Let a>0a>0, and let Sa={z∈C:−a≤Im⁡z≤0}. S_a=\{z\in\mathbb C:-a\leq\operatorname{Im}z\leq0\}. Boundary uniqueness. A Banach-valued function continuous on SaS_a, holomorphic in its interior, and zero on the real boundary is zero on the whole strip.

Proof. Scalarize by any bounded linear functional. Near a real point, extend the scalar function by zero into the upper half-plane. The extension is continuous. To verify Morera's condition for a triangle crossing the real line, cut its interior into the portions above and below that line. Replace any segment on the line by a parallel segment at distance ε\varepsilon inside the corresponding half-plane. Cauchy's theorem gives zero integrals on the resulting polygonal contours; continuity on the compact triangle makes their boundary integrals converge as ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. The contributions on the common line cancel. Thus the original triangle has zero integral. Triangles contained in one half-plane already satisfy the condition.

Morera makes the extension holomorphic near the boundary. It vanishes on an open upper half-disc, so the identity theorem makes it zero in that disc and then throughout the connected strip interior. Continuity includes the opposite boundary. Scalar functionals separate values, proving the Banach-valued conclusion. □\square

Bounded-strip maximum principle. Suppose a Banach-valued FF is bounded and continuous on SaS_a, holomorphic inside, and has norm at most MM on both boundary lines. Then ∥F(z)∥≤M\|F(z)\|\leq M throughout SaS_a.

Proof. Scalarize with a functional of norm at most one, obtaining a bounded scalar function ff, say ∣f∣≤C|f|\leq C. Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0 and apply the maximum-modulus principle on the rectangle [−R,R]+i[−a,0][-R,R]+i[-a,0] to f(z)e−εz2f(z)e^{-\varepsilon z^2}. On its horizontal edges the modulus is at most Meεa2Me^{\varepsilon a^2}. On its vertical edges it is at most Ce−εR2+εa2Ce^{-\varepsilon R^2+\varepsilon a^2}. If M>0M>0, sufficiently large RR makes the latter bound no larger than the former. For each fixed interior zz, this gives ∣f(z)∣e−εRe⁡(z2)≤Meεa2. |f(z)|e^{-\varepsilon\operatorname{Re}(z^2)} \leq Me^{\varepsilon a^2}. Let ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. If M=0M=0, apply the same argument with any positive bound δ\delta on the horizontal edges and then let δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. Hahn–Banach recovers the Banach norm from its scalar tests. □\square

Reflecting the variable handles strips above the real line. The boundedness hypothesis in the second assertion cannot be discarded merely because the boundary values are bounded.

OA-MOD-MA-09 — A spectral domain is a strip-extension condition

For α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb R, define the closed strip Sα={z:min⁡(0,−α)≤Im⁡z≤max⁡(0,−α)}.(MA.30) S_\alpha=\{z:\min(0,-\alpha)\leq\operatorname{Im}z \leq\max(0,-\alpha)\}. \tag{MA.30} Theorem. For α≠0\alpha\ne0 and ξ∈H\xi\in H, the following are equivalent:

  1. ξ∈D(Aα)\xi\in D(A^\alpha).
  2. The orbit t↦Aitξt\mapsto A^{it}\xi extends to a bounded norm-continuous function F:Sα→HF:S_\alpha\to H, norm-holomorphic in the interior.

The extension is unique, and its exact values are F(z)=Aizξ,F(t−iα)=AitAαξ.(MA.31) F(z)=A^{iz}\xi,\qquad F(t-i\alpha)=A^{it}A^\alpha\xi. \tag{MA.31} For α=0\alpha=0, the domain is all of HH, the strip is the real axis, and the bounded norm-continuous unitary orbit is the entire assertion; interior holomorphy is vacuous.

Proof for α>0\alpha>0, starting with the domain. Write z=t−iuz=t-iu, where 0≤u≤α0\leq u\leq\alpha. If μξ\mu_\xi is the scalar spectral measure of ξ\xi, then ∣λiz∣2=λ2u≤1+λ2α. |\lambda^{iz}|^2=\lambda^{2u}\leq1+\lambda^{2\alpha}. The right side is integrable by the domain hypothesis. Thus AizξA^{iz}\xi is defined on the whole strip. On each band, Fn(z)=AizPnξ F_n(z)=A^{iz}P_n\xi is entire, by the bounded logarithm and its exponential series. The uniform estimate sup⁡z∈Sα∥Aiz(I−Pn)ξ∥2≤∫(0,∞)∖[1/n,n](1+λ2α) dμξ(λ)⟶0(MA.32) \sup_{z\in S_\alpha}\|A^{iz}(I-P_n)\xi\|^2 \leq\int_{(0,\infty)\setminus[1/n,n]} (1+\lambda^{2\alpha})\,d\mu_\xi(\lambda) \longrightarrow0 \tag{MA.32} shows uniform convergence on the entire closed strip. Consequently its limit is continuous there, bounded by (∥ξ∥2+∥Aαξ∥2)1/2(\|\xi\|^2+\|A^\alpha\xi\|^2)^{1/2}, and holomorphic inside by MA-02. Spectral multiplication gives the boundary identity in (MA.31).

Proof starting with the extension. For each nn, the function Gn(z)=PnF(z)−AizPnξ G_n(z)=P_nF(z)-A^{iz}P_n\xi is continuous on the strip, holomorphic inside, and zero on the real boundary. MA-08 gives Gn=0G_n=0. At the other boundary, PnF(−iα)=AαPnξ.(MA.33) P_nF(-i\alpha)=A^\alpha P_n\xi. \tag{MA.33} It follows that ∫[1/n,n]λ2α dμξ(λ)=∥AαPnξ∥2≤∥F(−iα)∥2. \int_{[1/n,n]}\lambda^{2\alpha}\,d\mu_\xi(\lambda) =\|A^\alpha P_n\xi\|^2 \leq\|F(-i\alpha)\|^2. Monotone convergence proves ξ∈D(Aα)\xi\in D(A^\alpha). Now (MA.33) and strong convergence of PnP_n give Aαξ=F(−iα)A^\alpha\xi=F(-i\alpha). The first half of the proof supplies the spectral extension, and boundary uniqueness identifies it with FF. This also proves uniqueness directly.

For α<0\alpha<0, use the positive injective self-adjoint operator A−1A^{-1}, put β=−α>0\beta=-\alpha>0, and replace F(z)F(z) by F(−z)F(-z). Its real orbit is (A−1)itξ(A^{-1})^{it}\xi, and the lower-strip theorem gives the required domain and formulas. No bounded inverse or positive lower spectral bound is inserted. □\square

OA-MOD-MA-16 — Gaussian continuation of bounded real orbits

Let U(t)U(t), t∈Rt\in\mathbb R, be a strongly continuous group on HH, with sup⁡t∥U(t)∥≤M\sup_t\|U(t)\|\leq M. For ξ∈H\xi\in H and r>0r>0, define Fr(z)=∫Rgr(t−z)U(t)ξ dt,gr(w)=r/π e−rw2,z∈C.(MA.44) F_r(z)=\int_{\mathbb R}g_r(t-z)U(t)\xi\,dt, \qquad g_r(w)=\sqrt{r/\pi}\,e^{-rw^2},\quad z\in\mathbb C. \tag{MA.44} Theorem. The integral exists in Hilbert norm, FrF_r is norm-entire, and ∥Fr(z)∥≤Mer(Im⁡z)2∥ξ∥,U(s)Fr(z)=Fr(z+s)(s∈R).(MA.45) \|F_r(z)\|\leq M e^{r(\operatorname{Im}z)^2}\|\xi\|, \qquad U(s)F_r(z)=F_r(z+s)\quad(s\in\mathbb R). \tag{MA.45} Moreover Fr(0)→ξF_r(0)\to\xi in norm as r→∞r\to\infty. If U(t)=AitU(t)=A^{it} for a positive injective self-adjoint AA, then Fr(0)∈⋂α∈RD(Aα),AizFr(0)=Fr(z)(z∈C).(MA.46) F_r(0)\in\bigcap_{\alpha\in\mathbb R}D(A^\alpha), \qquad A^{iz}F_r(0)=F_r(z)\quad(z\in\mathbb C). \tag{MA.46}

Proof. If z=x+iyz=x+iy, then ∣gr(t−z)∣=ery2gr(t−x). |g_r(t-z)|=e^{ry^2}g_r(t-x). This proves existence and the bound in (MA.45). On a compact set of zz's, both the kernel and its complex derivative are bounded in modulus by a constant times (1+∣t∣)e−rt2/2(1+|t|)e^{-rt^2/2}. Such a bound follows by expanding (t−x)2(t-x)^2 and using 2∣tx∣≤t2/2+2x22|tx|\leq t^2/2+2x^2. The derivative adds only the factor 2r(t−z)2r(t-z). The fundamental theorem of calculus on a small complex line segment and scalar dominated convergence therefore justify differentiating the norm integral. Thus FrF_r is entire.

Bounded U(s)U(s) passes through the integral. Substituting v=t+sv=t+s and using the group law gives U(s)Fr(z)=∫gr(v−(z+s))U(v)ξ dv=Fr(z+s). U(s)F_r(z)=\int g_r(v-(z+s))U(v)\xi\,dv=F_r(z+s). For convergence at zero, integrate U(t)ξ−ξU(t)\xi-\xi against gr(t)g_r(t). Strong continuity makes its norm small near zero; away from zero it is bounded by (M+1)∥ξ∥(M+1)\|\xi\|, and the Gaussian tail tends to zero. This proves the norm limit.

For the spectral group, (MA.45) makes FrF_r a bounded continuous holomorphic extension on every closed horizontal strip, and its real restriction is AitFr(0)A^{it}F_r(0). Apply MA-09 for each real α\alpha. It gives every domain in (MA.46) and identifies the extension at every zz. □\square

There is a parallel operator statement useful for algebra-valued averages. If X(t)∈N⊆B(H)X(t)\in N\subseteq B(H) is strongly continuous, NN is a von Neumann algebra, and sup⁡t∥X(t)∥≤C\sup_t\|X(t)\|\leq C, then Xr(z)=∫Rgr(t−z)X(t) dt(MA.47) X_r(z)=\int_{\mathbb R}g_r(t-z)X(t)\,dt \tag{MA.47} is defined vectorwise strongly, belongs to NN, has norm at most Cer(Im⁡z)2Ce^{r(\operatorname{Im}z)^2}, and is operator-norm entire in zz. Membership in NN follows by approximating the integrals by their finite Riemann sums, which lie in NN, and taking strong limits; the uniform scalar tail bound handles the infinite interval. The kernel difference quotients converge in scalar L1L^1 by the derivative bound just proved. The estimate (MA.5) then shows convergence of the corresponding operator difference quotients in norm, proving the holomorphy assertion despite the original family's merely strong continuity. If X(t)=V(t)XV(−t)X(t)=V(t)XV(-t) for a unitary group normalizing NN, the change of variable above gives the same real covariance for Xr(z)X_r(z). These conclusions do not assert that arbitrary imaginary conjugations of the unsmoothed operator are defined.

Editable source · Proof dependencies and component terms