Original text: CC0 1.0. Prerequisite proofs and component terms.

Changing the Hilbert space of a regular crossed product

CC0 1.0.

The continuity inputs are proved in Continuity of actions. The Haar and Radon foundations and spatial tensor comparison supply the other indicated inputs.

A regular crossed product is represented on a space of Hilbert-valued functions on the group. Changing the Hilbert space changes that concrete representation. The aim is to prove that its named coefficient and group operators still determine the same von Neumann algebra, through a unique normal isomorphism. Scalar matrix coefficients make this comparison possible even when the two Hilbert spaces have different dimensions.

OA-FLOW.REG.SETTING — The two representations being compared

Let GG be an arbitrary locally compact Hausdorff group, with fixed left Haar measure μ\mu, and let MM be a von Neumann algebra. Let α:G→Aut⁡(M)\alpha:G\to\operatorname{Aut}(M) be point-ultraweakly continuous. By OA-FLOW.TOP.PREDUAL and OA-FLOW.TOP.JOINT, its predual orbits are norm continuous, and its evaluation on bounded algebra sets is jointly sigma-strong-star continuous.

For a normal unital representation ρ:M→B(Hρ)\rho:M\to B(H_\rho), use

Hρ=Hρ⊗L2(G,μ)≅L2(G,Hρ),x⊗h⟷[s↦h(s)x].(R1) \mathcal H_\rho=H_\rho\otimes L^2(G,\mu) \cong L^2(G,H_\rho),\qquad x\otimes h\longleftrightarrow[s\mapsto h(s)x]. \tag{R1}

Inner products are linear in the first variable. Sections are strongly measurable, square-integrable functions modulo null sets in the localizable Haar completion. Neither the group nor either Hilbert space is assumed countable, separable, sigma compact or unimodular. There is no weight in this construction.

We first allow ρ\rho to have a kernel. The comparison theorem will use faithful normal unital representations ρ\rho and σ\sigma of the same algebra. If M=0M=0, unitality forces their Hilbert spaces to be zero and the conclusions have their unique zero interpretation. We therefore carry out the nonzero case.

OA-FLOW.REG.IMPORT.FOUNDATIONS — Exact background inputs

The following mathematical foundations are used with their stated hypotheses.

The one infinite tensor-extension result used here is already proved in part (d) of OA-FLOW-DUAL-MULTIPLICITY: a normal isomorphism A→BA\to B extends uniquely and normally to A⊗‾B(K)→B⊗‾B(K)A\overline\otimes B(K)\to B\overline\otimes B(K), with its stated action on elementary tensors. That finite-corner proof has arbitrary Hilbert spaces as its hypotheses. It uses the background operator facts just listed, not the regular-crossed-product or Fourier conclusions elsewhere in lesson 03. We use exactly that proved part and its matrix-coefficient formula, so this lesson does not assume the representation independence it is about to establish.

OA-FLOW.REG.CONSTRUCTION — Bounded coefficient operators and left translations

For ξ∈Cc(G,Hρ)\xi\in C_c(G,H_\rho), set

[πρ(a)ξ](s)=ρ(αs−1(a))ξ(s),[Ltρξ](s)=ξ(t−1s).(R2) [\pi_\rho(a)\xi](s)=\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))\xi(s), \qquad [L^\rho_t\xi](s)=\xi(t^{-1}s). \tag{R2}

Proposition. These formulas extend to a unital star representation πρ:M→B(Hρ)\pi_\rho:M\to B(\mathcal H_\rho) and a strongly continuous unitary representation t↦Ltρt\mapsto L^\rho_t. They satisfy

∥πρ(a)∥≤∥a∥,Ltρπρ(a)(Ltρ)∗=πρ(αt(a)).(R3) \|\pi_\rho(a)\|\leq\|a\|,\qquad L^\rho_t\pi_\rho(a)(L^\rho_t)^*=\pi_\rho(\alpha_t(a)). \tag{R3}

For every fixed a,t,ξa,t,\xi, formula (R2) holds almost everywhere for an arbitrary section ξ∈Hρ\xi\in\mathcal H_\rho.

Proof. The operator orbit s↦ρ(αs−1(a))s\mapsto\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a)) is strongly-star continuous. To see that the possibly nonfaithful ρ\rho causes no problem, apply the intrinsic sigma-strong-star statement from lesson 11 to the normal positive functionals x↦⟨ρ(x)v,v⟩x\mapsto\langle\rho(x)v,v\rangle. Their quadratic forms give the required squared vector norms in HρH_\rho. The orbit is bounded by ∥a∥\|a\|.

If ξ\xi varies with ss, the estimate

∥ρ(αs−1(a))ξ(s)−ρ(αr−1(a))ξ(r)∥≤∥a∥ ∥ξ(s)−ξ(r)∥+∥[ρ(αs−1(a))−ρ(αr−1(a))]ξ(r)∥ \begin{aligned} &\|\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))\xi(s) -\rho(\alpha_{r^{-1}}(a))\xi(r)\|\\ &\quad\leq\|a\|\,\|\xi(s)-\xi(r)\| +\|[\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))-\rho(\alpha_{r^{-1}}(a))]\xi(r)\| \end{aligned}

proves continuity. The output has compact support contained in that of ξ\xi. Its norm estimate integrates to

∥πρ(a)ξ∥2≤∥a∥ ∥ξ∥2.\|\pi_\rho(a)\xi\|_2\leq\|a\|\,\|\xi\|_2.

Density therefore gives a bounded extension. On continuous compact-support vectors, multiplication, linearity and the identity follow pointwise from the same properties of ρ\rho and αs\alpha_s. For the adjoint, integrating the pointwise inner-product identity gives

⟨πρ(a)ξ,η⟩=⟨ξ,πρ(a∗)η⟩. \langle\pi_\rho(a)\xi,\eta\rangle =\langle\xi,\pi_\rho(a^*)\eta\rangle.

Density extends these identities to all vectors, proving that πρ\pi_\rho is a unital star representation.

Left Haar invariance gives ∥Ltρξ∥2=∥ξ∥2\|L^\rho_t\xi\|_2=\|\xi\|_2. The pointwise group law and inverse Lt−1ρL^\rho_{t^{-1}} show that the extensions are unitary. To prove strong continuity at the identity, take ξ∈Cc(G,Hρ)\xi\in C_c(G,H_\rho), with support KK, and choose a compact identity neighborhood VV. For tt near the identity, the difference s↦ξ(t−1s)−ξ(s)s\mapsto\xi(t^{-1}s)-\xi(s) is supported in VK∪KVK\cup K, a fixed compact set. Joint continuity and a finite subcover give

sup⁡s∈VK∪K∥ξ(t−1s)−ξ(s)∥⟶0. \sup_{s\in VK\cup K}\|\xi(t^{-1}s)-\xi(s)\|\longrightarrow0.

The support has finite measure, so the difference tends to zero in L2L^2. Approximation by these vectors and the unitary norm bound extend this convergence to every ξ\xi. The group law proves continuity at every tt.

On the same dense section space,

[Ltρπρ(a)(Ltρ)∗ξ](s)=ρ(α(t−1s)−1(a))ξ(s)=ρ(αs−1(αt(a)))ξ(s). \begin{aligned} [L^\rho_t\pi_\rho(a)(L^\rho_t)^*\xi](s) &=\rho(\alpha_{(t^{-1}s)^{-1}}(a))\xi(s)\\ &=\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(\alpha_t(a)))\xi(s). \end{aligned}

This proves covariance. No modular factor occurs: all translations used here are left translations for left Haar measure.

For a general section, choose continuous compact-support approximants in L2L^2. A subsequence converges almost everywhere, both before and after applying a fixed bounded operator in (R2). Indeed, choose the subsequence so that the sum of the squared L2L^2 errors of inputs and outputs is finite. Scalar monotone convergence makes the sum of the pointwise squared errors finite almost everywhere, which gives both pointwise limits. The bounded pointwise coefficient operators identify those limits; left translation preserves null sets and gives the same conclusion for LtρL^\rho_t. Thus the output field has a strongly measurable representative. This is a statement for a fixed operator and section; it requires no universal exceptional null set. □\square

OA-FLOW.REG.NORMALITY — Compact monotonicity handles arbitrary nets

Theorem. The representation πρ\pi_\rho is normal. Its kernel is

ker⁡πρ={a:ρ(αs−1(a))=0 for every s∈G}=⋂s∈Gαs(ker⁡ρ).(R4) \ker\pi_\rho =\{a:\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))=0\text{ for every }s\in G\} =\bigcap_{s\in G}\alpha_s(\ker\rho). \tag{R4}

In particular, if ρ\rho is faithful then πρ\pi_\rho is faithful and isometric.

Proof. Let 0≤ai↑a0\leq a_i\uparrow a be a bounded increasing net in MM. Fix ξ∈Cc(G,Hρ)\xi\in C_c(G,H_\rho), with compact support KK. For each index ii, the scalar function

Fi(s)=⟨ρ(αs−1(a−ai))ξ(s),ξ(s)⟩(R5) F_i(s)=\langle\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a-a_i))\xi(s),\xi(s)\rangle \tag{R5}

is continuous and nonnegative on KK. It decreases with ii. At every fixed ss, normality of αs−1\alpha_{s^{-1}} and ρ\rho implies Fi(s)↓0F_i(s)\downarrow0.

For ε>0\varepsilon>0, the open subsets {s∈K:Fi(s)<ε}\{s\in K:F_i(s)<\varepsilon\} cover KK. Choose a finite subcover and then a single index dominating its finitely many indices. Since the functions decrease, every larger index has Fi<εF_i<\varepsilon throughout KK. Consequently sup⁡KFi→0\sup_K F_i\to0, and

0≤⟨πρ(a−ai)ξ,ξ⟩=∫KFi(s) dμ(s)⟶0.(R6) 0\leq\langle\pi_\rho(a-a_i)\xi,\xi\rangle =\int_KF_i(s)\,d\mu(s)\longrightarrow0. \tag{R6}

This is a compactness argument for a directed net, not an interchange of a measure integral with an arbitrary monotone net.

The positive operators πρ(a−ai)\pi_\rho(a-a_i) are uniformly bounded by ∥a∥\|a\|. If η∈Hρ\eta\in\mathcal H_\rho and ξ\xi approximates it in L2L^2, the difference of their quadratic forms has absolute value at most

∥a∥ ∥η−ξ∥2(∥η∥2+∥ξ∥2). \|a\|\,\|\eta-\xi\|_2(\|\eta\|_2+\|\xi\|_2).

Thus (R6) holds for every η\eta. The bounded increasing net πρ(ai)\pi_\rho(a_i) has a supremum, and its quadratic forms show that this supremum is πρ(a)\pi_\rho(a). The normality criterion in the foundations proves normality.

If all the pointwise coefficients in (R4) vanish, (R2) gives πρ(a)=0\pi_\rho(a)=0. Conversely, suppose ρ(αs0−1(a))v≠0\rho(\alpha_{s_0^{-1}}(a))v\ne0 for some s0,vs_0,v. Continuity gives an open neighborhood UU of s0s_0 and c>0c>0 on which the norm of this vector is at least cc. Choose a nonzero scalar h∈Cc(G)h\in C_c(G) supported in UU. Haar positivity gives ∥h∥2>0\|h\|_2>0, and

∥πρ(a)(v⊗h)∥22≥c2∥h∥22>0. \|\pi_\rho(a)(v\otimes h)\|_2^2 \geq c^2\|h\|_2^2>0.

Thus πρ(a)≠0\pi_\rho(a)\ne0. This proves the first equality in (R4); applying αs\alpha_s gives the second. If ρ\rho is faithful, evaluating the pointwise condition at the identity forces a=0a=0. A faithful star representation is isometric by the foundational C∗C^*-norm fact. □\square

Faithfulness is tested on an open neighborhood, not by assigning positive measure to the single identity element. For a nondiscrete group that singleton can have measure zero.

OA-FLOW.REG.SUPPORT — If a representation is allowed to be degenerate

The unital convention in the comparison theorem is necessary. More generally, suppose ρ:M→B(Hρ)\rho:M\to B(H_\rho) is normal but is not required to be unital. Put

p=ρ(1),H+=pHρ,H−=(1−p)Hρ. p=\rho(1),\qquad H_+=pH_\rho,\qquad H_-=(1-p)H_\rho.

The projection pp is the identity on every value of ρ\rho. Its compression ρ+:M→B(H+)\rho_+:M\to B(H_+) is normal and unital; it is faithful when ρ\rho is faithful. The formulas (R2) still define bounded coefficient operators and unitary translations. All the preceding construction, normality and kernel arguments apply, with πρ(1)=p⊗1\pi_\rho(1)=p\otimes1 in place of the identity.

Under the orthogonal decomposition

Hρ=(H+⊗L2(G))⊕(H−⊗L2(G)), \mathcal H_\rho=(H_+\otimes L^2(G))\oplus(H_-\otimes L^2(G)),

the coefficient operators are πρ+(a)⊕0\pi_{\rho_+}(a)\oplus0, and the group operators are Lt+⊕Lt−L^+_t\oplus L^-_t. The projection P=p⊗1=πρ(1)P=p\otimes1=\pi_\rho(1) belongs to their generated von Neumann algebra and commutes with every generator. It is therefore central in that algebra. Consequently

Nρα=Nρ+α⊕(1H−⊗VN⁡(G)),VN⁡(G)={Lt:t∈G}′′. N_\rho^\alpha =N_{\rho_+}^\alpha \oplus\bigl(1_{H_-}\otimes\operatorname{VN}(G)\bigr), \qquad \operatorname{VN}(G)=\{L_t:t\in G\}''.

To verify the formula, multiply each generator by PP and 1−P1-P. In the first corner the resulting generators are exactly the compressed regular pair. In the second corner all coefficients vanish and the remaining generators are the scalar left regular representation with multiplicity H−H_-. The central projection separates the two corners, so these identifications give both inclusions. Omit a summand when its Hilbert space is zero.

Thus the faithful-model comparison proved below always applies on the coefficient-support subspaces. On the uncompressed spaces, a degenerate model can have the extra group-algebra summand. For example, let GG be the one-element group and compare the faithful normal maps

ρ(a)=a on C2,σ(a)=a⊕0 on C2⊕C,a∈M2(C). \rho(a)=a\text{ on }\mathbb C^2,\qquad \sigma(a)=a\oplus0\text{ on }\mathbb C^2\oplus\mathbb C, \qquad a\in M_2(\mathbb C).

The generated algebras are M2(C)M_2(\mathbb C) and M2(C)⊕CM_2(\mathbb C)\oplus\mathbb C. In particular, a generator-preserving isomorphism on the full spaces would have to take πρ(1)=1\pi_\rho(1)=1 to the proper projection πσ(1)\pi_\sigma(1), which is impossible for an algebra isomorphism. This explains exactly why “faithful normal representation” must either include nondegeneracy by convention or be followed by compression to its support.

OA-FLOW.REG.AVERAGES — Ultraweak L1L^1 averages and matrix coefficients

For h∈L1(G)h\in L^1(G) and a∈Ma\in M, define Ah(a)∈MA_h(a)\in M by

ω(Ah(a))=∫Gh(s)ω(αs−1(a)) dμ(s)(ω∈M∗).(R7) \omega(A_h(a)) =\int_G h(s)\omega(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))\,d\mu(s) \qquad(\omega\in M_*). \tag{R7}

Lemma. Formula (R7) defines a unique element with

∥Ah(a)∥≤∥h∥1∥a∥.\|A_h(a)\|\leq\|h\|_1\|a\|.

For every normal bounded linear map Φ:M→N\Phi:M\to N,

Φ(Ah(a))=∫Guwh(s)Φ(αs−1(a)) dμ(s).(R8) \Phi(A_h(a)) =\int_G^{\mathrm{uw}}h(s)\Phi(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))\,d\mu(s). \tag{R8}

The integral on the right has the same scalar-pairing meaning. No operator-norm Bochner integral is asserted.

Proof. The scalar orbit in (R7) is continuous and bounded by ∥ω∥∥a∥\|\omega\|\|a\|. Its product with hh is integrable. The integral is a bounded linear functional of ω\omega, with norm at most ∥h∥1∥a∥\|h\|_1\|a\|. Since (M∗)∗=M(M_*)^*=M, it defines the stated element uniquely. If ν∈N∗\nu\in N_*, normality of Φ\Phi gives ν∘Φ∈M∗\nu\circ\Phi\in M_*. Substitute that functional in (R7). The resulting scalar identity is (R8), because normal functionals separate elements of NN. □\square

For u∈L2(G)u\in L^2(G), let Vuρ:Hρ→HρV^\rho_u:H_\rho\to\mathcal H_\rho be the bounded map Vuρx=x⊗uV^\rho_u x=x\otimes u. The coefficient operators of the regular copy are

(Vuρ)∗πρ(a)Vvρ=ρ(Au‾v(a))(u,v∈L2(G)).(R9) (V^\rho_u)^*\pi_\rho(a)V^\rho_v =\rho(A_{\overline u v}(a)) \qquad(u,v\in L^2(G)). \tag{R9}

Indeed u‾v∈L1(G)\overline u v\in L^1(G) by Cauchy–Schwarz. For x,y∈Hρx,y\in H_\rho, the scalar pairing of the left side is

∫Gv(s)u(s)‾⟨ρ(αs−1(a))x,y⟩ dμ(s). \int_Gv(s)\overline{u(s)} \langle\rho(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))x,y\rangle\,d\mu(s).

This follows first for continuous compact-support u,vu,v from (R2), and then for all u,vu,v by L2L^2 approximation and the L1L^1 bound on their products. Apply (R7) to the normal functional b↦⟨ρ(b)x,y⟩b\mapsto\langle\rho(b)x,y\rangle. Since these vectors are arbitrary, (R9) follows. The scalar conjugation in u‾v\overline u v reflects our first-variable-linear convention.

OA-FLOW.REG.TENSORLOCATION — Locating the regular algebra in one tensor product

Write K=L2(G)K=L^2(G). Define the concrete regular crossed product

Nρα={πρ(M),Ltρ:t∈G}′′⊂B(Hρ⊗K).(R10) N_\rho^\alpha =\{\pi_\rho(M),L^\rho_t:t\in G\}'' \subset B(H_\rho\otimes K). \tag{R10}

Proposition. For every normal unital ρ\rho,

πρ(M)⊂ρ(M)⊗‾B(K),Nρα⊂ρ(M)⊗‾B(K).(R11) \pi_\rho(M)\subset\rho(M)\overline\otimes B(K), \qquad N_\rho^\alpha\subset\rho(M)\overline\otimes B(K). \tag{R11}

Proof. Here is the finite-corner test that we need. If T∈B(H⊗K)T\in B(H\otimes K) has all its coefficient operators Vu∗TVvV_u^*TV_v in a concrete von Neumann algebra A⊂B(H)A\subset B(H), choose any orthonormal basis (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I} of KK. There is no countability requirement on II. For finite J⊂IJ\subset I, set pJ=∑i∈JEiip_J=\sum_{i\in J}E_{ii}. Then

(1⊗pJ)T(1⊗pJ)=∑i,j∈J(Vei∗TVej)⊗Eij∈A⊗B(K).(R12) (1\otimes p_J)T(1\otimes p_J) =\sum_{i,j\in J}(V_{e_i}^*TV_{e_j})\otimes E_{ij} \in A\otimes B(K). \tag{R12}

As JJ increases over finite subsets, the projections converge strongly to 11, so the compressions converge strongly to TT. Strong closedness of the spatial tensor product proves T∈A⊗‾B(K)T\in A\overline\otimes B(K). This is the finite-corner argument also used in part (b) of OA-FLOW-DUAL-MULTIPLICITY.

Apply this test to (R9), with A=ρ(M)A=\rho(M). Finally Ltρ=1Hρ⊗LtL^\rho_t=1_{H_\rho}\otimes L_t belongs to the same tensor product. That tensor product is a von Neumann algebra containing all the generators of (R10), so it contains their generated algebra. □\square

The integral in (R7) takes values in the abstract coefficient algebra before a representation is selected. Equation (R9) is therefore a way to compare regular operators without comparing their Hilbert vectors point by point.

OA-FLOW.REG.INDEPENDENCE — The normal comparison and its generators

Theorem. Let ρ:M→B(Hρ)\rho:M\to B(H_\rho) and σ:M→B(Hσ)\sigma:M\to B(H_\sigma) be faithful normal unital representations. There is a unique normal isomorphism

Cσ,ρα:Nρα⟶Nσα C_{\sigma,\rho}^\alpha:N_\rho^\alpha\longrightarrow N_\sigma^\alpha

such that

Cσ,ρα(πρ(a))=πσ(a),Cσ,ρα(Ltρ)=Ltσ.(R13) C_{\sigma,\rho}^\alpha(\pi_\rho(a))=\pi_\sigma(a), \qquad C_{\sigma,\rho}^\alpha(L^\rho_t)=L^\sigma_t. \tag{R13}

For a third faithful normal unital representation τ\tau, these maps satisfy

Cτ,σαCσ,ρα=Cτ,ρα,Cρ,ρα=1.(R14) C_{\tau,\sigma}^\alpha C_{\sigma,\rho}^\alpha=C_{\tau,\rho}^\alpha, \qquad C_{\rho,\rho}^\alpha=1. \tag{R14}

In particular Cρ,σαC_{\rho,\sigma}^\alpha is the inverse of Cσ,ραC_{\sigma,\rho}^\alpha.

Proof. The map

γ=σ∘ρ−1:ρ(M)⟶σ(M) \gamma=\sigma\circ\rho^{-1}:\rho(M)\longrightarrow\sigma(M)

is a normal isomorphism of concrete von Neumann algebras. By the proved finite-corner tensor-extension theorem, it has a unique normal extension

Θ=γ⊗id⁡B(K):ρ(M)⊗‾B(K)⟶σ(M)⊗‾B(K).(R15) \Theta=\gamma\otimes\operatorname{id}_{B(K)}: \rho(M)\overline\otimes B(K) \longrightarrow\sigma(M)\overline\otimes B(K). \tag{R15}

That proof identifies every matrix coefficient of Θ(T)\Theta(T) with γ\gamma applied to the corresponding coefficient of TT. This identity also holds for coefficient pairs u,v∈Ku,v\in K: one may first choose an orthonormal basis of their finite-dimensional span and extend it to a basis of KK, and then use linearity in the two coordinates. Equations (R9) and (R15) give

(Vuσ)∗Θ(πρ(a))Vvσ=γ(ρ(Au‾v(a)))=σ(Au‾v(a))=(Vuσ)∗πσ(a)Vvσ.(R16) \begin{aligned} (V^\sigma_u)^*\Theta(\pi_\rho(a))V^\sigma_v &=\gamma\bigl(\rho(A_{\overline u v}(a))\bigr)\\ &=\sigma(A_{\overline u v}(a))\\ &=(V^\sigma_u)^*\pi_\sigma(a)V^\sigma_v. \end{aligned} \tag{R16}

Thus Θ(πρ(a))=πσ(a)\Theta(\pi_\rho(a))=\pi_\sigma(a), since elementary tensor vectors span a dense space and determine a bounded operator. Equivalently, the middle step transports the ultraweak integral through the normal map γ\gamma, as justified by its preadjoint in (R8). No spatial unitary implementing γ\gamma has been chosen.

The tensor extension takes 1⊗Lt1\otimes L_t to 1⊗Lt1\otimes L_t. It therefore takes each group generator to its counterpart. Since Θ\Theta and its inverse are normal, they carry the ultraweakly closed algebras generated by the two named families onto each other. Its restriction gives the desired normal isomorphism.

Any two normal star homomorphisms with (R13) agree on the unital star algebra of finite words in the named generators. That algebra is ultraweakly dense in the generated von Neumann algebra, so normality gives equality everywhere. The composites in (R14) have the same generator values; this uniqueness proves both identities and the inverse assertion. □\square

The result is a normal algebra isomorphism between concrete models. It need not be implemented by a unitary between the particular Hilbert spaces originally chosen.

OA-FLOW.REG.SYSTEMNATURALITY — Relabeling the coefficient system

Suppose (P,β)(P,\beta) is another von Neumann system over the same GG, and η:M→P\eta:M\to P is a normal isomorphism satisfying

ηαt=βtη(t∈G).\eta\alpha_t=\beta_t\eta\qquad(t\in G).

Choose faithful normal unital ρ\rho of MM and σ\sigma of PP. There is a unique normal isomorphism

Cη:Nρα⟶Nσβ,Cη(πρα(a))=πσβ(η(a)),Cη(Ltρ)=Ltσ.(R17) C_\eta:N_\rho^\alpha\longrightarrow N_\sigma^\beta, \qquad C_\eta(\pi^\alpha_\rho(a))=\pi^\beta_\sigma(\eta(a)), \quad C_\eta(L^\rho_t)=L^\sigma_t. \tag{R17}

Proof. Use the normal coefficient isomorphism σηρ−1\sigma\eta\rho^{-1} in (R15). Equivariance and (R8) give

η(∫Guwh(s)αs−1(a) dμ(s))=∫Guwh(s)βs−1(η(a)) dμ(s). \eta\left(\int_G^{\mathrm{uw}}h(s)\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a)\,d\mu(s)\right) =\int_G^{\mathrm{uw}}h(s)\beta_{s^{-1}}(\eta(a))\,d\mu(s).

Consequently its matrix coefficients satisfy the analogue of (R16). The proof of restriction and uniqueness is unchanged. Composition of coefficient-system isomorphisms agrees with composition of the resulting crossed-product maps, because their values on every named generator agree. □\square

This functorial statement concerns normal isomorphisms. It is not a universal property for arbitrary covariant representations or a statement about arbitrary homomorphisms.

Editable source · Proof dependencies and component terms