Original text: CC0 1.0. Prerequisite proofs and component terms.

Modular time on a crossed-product coefficient algebra

OA-FLOW.DMO.SETTING — Fixed conventions and available inputs

Let GG be an arbitrary locally compact Hausdorff group with fixed left Haar measure, and let α:G→Aut⁡(M)\alpha:G\to\operatorname{Aut}(M) be point-ultraweakly continuous. Fix an n.s.f. weight φ\varphi, with the standard GNS representation on HφH_\varphi. There is no assumption of separability, second countability, sigma compactness, unimodularity, boundedness of the weight, or invariance of φ\varphi.

Use K\mathcal K, bφ\mathfrak b_\varphi, BφB_\varphi, Λ~φ\widetilde\Lambda_\varphi, and Aφ\mathcal A_\varphi from lesson 09. Thus K\mathcal K has right-coefficient convolution, bφ=span⁡(K⋅nφ)\mathfrak b_\varphi=\operatorname{span}(\mathcal K\cdot\mathfrak n_\varphi), Bφ=bφ∩bφ♯B_\varphi=\mathfrak b_\varphi\cap\mathfrak b_\varphi^\sharp, and Aφ=Λ~φ(Bφ)\mathcal A_\varphi=\widetilde\Lambda_\varphi(B_\varphi) is dense in H=L2(G,Hφ)\mathcal H=L^2(G,H_\varphi). The defining operations are

(f∗g)(r)=∫Gαs(f(rs))g(s−1) ds,f♯(r)=ΔG(r)−1αr−1(f(r−1)∗).(M1) (f*g)(r)=\int_G\alpha_s(f(rs))g(s^{-1})\,ds,\qquad f^\sharp(r)=\Delta_G(r)^{-1}\alpha_{r^{-1}}(f(r^{-1})^*). \tag{M1}

The modular function satisfies ∫h(rs) dr=ΔG(s)−1∫h(r) dr\int h(rs)\,dr=\Delta_G(s)^{-1}\int h(r)\,dr. We write σt=σtφ\sigma_t=\sigma_t^\varphi, ψs=φ∘αs\psi_s=\varphi\circ\alpha_s, and

ct(s)=[Dψs:Dφ]t.(M2)c_t(s)=[D\psi_s:D\varphi]_t. \tag{M2}

The jointly sigma-strong-star continuous dependence of ct(s)c_t(s) on (s,t)(s,t) is the theorem OA-FLOW.DW.COCYCLECONT in lesson 10. Its group/time identities and exact factor order are proved in OA-FLOW.AWC.LAWS. These results retain their stated unresolved prerequisites; merely using them does not admit those prerequisites.

OA-FLOW.DMO.IMPORT.MODULAR — Exact OA-MOD operator inputs

In addition to OA-FLOW.DW.IMPORT.GNS and OA-FLOW.DW.IMPORT.TOMITA, the following are the precise general modular inputs, owned by OA-MOD and presently specified imports.

The modular automorphisms form a continuous action in the predual topology, preserve φ\varphi and nφ\mathfrak n_\varphi, and obey

Λφ(σt(a))=ΔφitΛφ(a)(a∈nφ).(M3)\Lambda_\varphi(\sigma_t(a))=\Delta_\varphi^{it}\Lambda_\varphi(a) \qquad(a\in\mathfrak n_\varphi). \tag{M3}

For any n.s.f. ψ\psi, the relative modular operator on this standard Hilbert space is positive, self-adjoint and nonsingular, with

Δψ,φit=[Dψ:Dφ]tΔφit.(M4)\Delta_{\psi,\varphi}^{it}=[D\psi:D\varphi]_t\Delta_\varphi^{it}. \tag{M4}

The relative Tomita operator has the domain inclusion, standard conjugation and transport formulas specified in (D23)–(D24) of lesson 09. In particular, its positive half-power is the one appearing in (M4). The standard implementing representation UsU_s of αs\alpha_s is strongly continuous and commutes with the standard conjugation JJ.

Naturality and the Connes derivative rules used in lesson 10 give, for all s,r,t,us,r,t,u,

ct+u(s)=ct(s)σt(cu(s)),ct(rs)=αs−1(ct(r))ct(s),ct(s−1)=αs(ct(s)∗),αs−1σtαs=Ad⁡(ct(s))σt.(M5) \begin{gathered} c_{t+u}(s)=c_t(s)\sigma_t(c_u(s)),\qquad c_t(rs)=\alpha_s^{-1}(c_t(r))c_t(s),\\ c_t(s^{-1})=\alpha_s(c_t(s)^*),\qquad \alpha_s^{-1}\sigma_t\alpha_s=\operatorname{Ad}(c_t(s))\sigma_t. \end{gathered} \tag{M5}

These identities include their normalizations at the identity and at time zero. They do not assert that the pullback coefficient s↦ct(s)s\mapsto c_t(s) is an ordinary left α\alpha-cocycle.

OA-FLOW.DMO.IMPORT.SPECTRAL — Exact scalar and Hilbert-space calculus

The harmonic-analysis input is Stone's theorem and the spectral calculus on arbitrary Hilbert spaces, including closed Borel functions of a self-adjoint operator, bounded spectral approximations, and uniqueness of the polar decomposition of a densely defined closed antilinear operator. These are refinements of IMP.HARMONIC and are used here without proof.

We also require scalar Fourier inversion for k∈Cc∞(R)k\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R), in the normalization

k^(t)=12π∫Re−itpk(p) dp,k(p)=∫Rk^(t)eitp dt.(M6)\widehat k(t)=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-itp}k(p)\,dp, \qquad k(p)=\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat k(t)e^{itp}\,dt. \tag{M6}

Here k^∈L1(R)\widehat k\in L^1(\mathbb R). The spectral theorem then gives

k(P)=∫Rk^(t)eitP dt(M7)k(P)=\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat k(t)e^{itP}\,dt \tag{M7}

as a strong integral for self-adjoint PP; its norm is at most ∥k∥∞\|k\|_\infty. In passing from (M6) to (M7), the scalar spectral measures are finite and the Fourier kernel is integrable. This is a one-variable spectral-calculus input. No theorem on decomposable fields of operators is included among the assumptions.

OA-FLOW.DW.COEFFICIENTFLOW — The modular-time action on coefficients

For f∈Kf\in\mathcal K, define

(Rtf)(s)=ΔG(s)itct(s)σt(f(s)).(M8) (R_tf)(s)=\Delta_G(s)^{it}c_t(s)\sigma_t(f(s)). \tag{M8}

Theorem. The maps RtR_t form a one-parameter group of star automorphisms of the convolution algebra K\mathcal K. They preserve supports and the coefficient L1L^1 norm. For a∈Ma\in M,

Rt(a⋅f)=σt(a)⋅Rt(f),Rt(f⋅a)=Rt(f)⋅σt(a).(M9)R_t(a\cdot f)=\sigma_t(a)\cdot R_t(f),\qquad R_t(f\cdot a)=R_t(f)\cdot\sigma_t(a). \tag{M9}

Both bφ\mathfrak b_\varphi and BφB_\varphi are invariant under every RtR_t.

Proof. Joint continuity of ct(s)c_t(s), bounded strong-star continuity of the modular action, and bounded-product continuity imply that (s,t)↦(Rtf)(s)(s,t)\mapsto(R_tf)(s) is jointly strong-star continuous. Each multiplier ΔG(s)itct(s)\Delta_G(s)^{it}c_t(s) is unitary, and σt\sigma_t is isometric. Thus

∥(Rtf)(s)∥=∥f(s)∥,\|(R_tf)(s)\|=\|f(s)\|,

which proves support preservation, membership in K\mathcal K, and preservation of the L1L^1 norm. The time cocycle identity in (M5) gives RtRu=Rt+uR_tR_u=R_{t+u}; the normalizations give R0=1R_0=1, hence Rt−1=R−tR_t^{-1}=R_{-t}.

We check convolution without commuting any coefficients. Fix tt, write C(s)=ct(s)C(s)=c_t(s) and d(s)=ΔG(s)itd(s)=\Delta_G(s)^{it}. Since d(rs)d(s−1)=d(r)d(rs)d(s^{-1})=d(r), the convolution integrand is

αs((Rtf)(rs))(Rtg)(s−1)=d(r)αs(C(rs))αs(σt(f(rs)))C(s−1)σt(g(s−1))=d(r)C(r)αs(C(s))αs(σt(f(rs)))αs(C(s)∗)σt(g(s−1))=d(r)C(r)σt(αs(f(rs)))σt(g(s−1)).(M10) \begin{aligned} \alpha_s((R_tf)(rs))(R_tg)(s^{-1}) &=d(r)\alpha_s(C(rs))\alpha_s(\sigma_t(f(rs)))C(s^{-1})\sigma_t(g(s^{-1}))\\ &=d(r)C(r)\alpha_s(C(s))\alpha_s(\sigma_t(f(rs)))\alpha_s(C(s)^*)\sigma_t(g(s^{-1}))\\ &=d(r)C(r)\sigma_t(\alpha_s(f(rs)))\sigma_t(g(s^{-1})). \end{aligned} \tag{M10}

The second line uses both the group identity and the inverse identity in (M5). For the third line, the final identity in (M5) is equivalently

σtαs=αsAd⁡(C(s))σt.\sigma_t\alpha_s=\alpha_s\operatorname{Ad}(C(s))\sigma_t.

Integrating (M10), and using normality of σt\sigma_t to pass it through the compact coefficient integral, proves (Rtf)∗(Rtg)=Rt(f∗g)(R_tf)*(R_tg)=R_t(f*g).

For the involution, put x=f(r−1)∗x=f(r^{-1})^*. Direct substitution gives

(Rtf)♯(r)=ΔG(r)−1d(r)αr−1(σt(x)C(r−1)∗)=ΔG(r)−1d(r)αr−1(σt(x))C(r)=ΔG(r)−1d(r)C(r)σt(αr−1(x))=Rt(f♯)(r).(M11) \begin{aligned} (R_tf)^\sharp(r) &=\Delta_G(r)^{-1}d(r)\alpha_r^{-1}(\sigma_t(x)C(r^{-1})^*)\\ &=\Delta_G(r)^{-1}d(r)\alpha_r^{-1}(\sigma_t(x))C(r)\\ &=\Delta_G(r)^{-1}d(r)C(r)\sigma_t(\alpha_r^{-1}(x))\\ &=R_t(f^\sharp)(r). \end{aligned} \tag{M11}

The third line is again modular naturality in (M5). Complex conjugation of the scalar factor in (Rtf)(r−1)(R_tf)(r^{-1}) has changed it to d(r)d(r); the real factor ΔG(r)−1\Delta_G(r)^{-1} remains from the coefficient involution.

The right identity in (M9) follows by applying σt\sigma_t to the product f(s)af(s)a. For the left identity, (M5) gives

C(s)σt(αs−1(a))=αs−1(σt(a))C(s),C(s)\sigma_t(\alpha_s^{-1}(a))=\alpha_s^{-1}(\sigma_t(a))C(s),

which gives the required equality pointwise. Since σt(nφ)=nφ\sigma_t(\mathfrak n_\varphi)=\mathfrak n_\varphi, the right coefficient identity takes every finite sum in bφ\mathfrak b_\varphi into that same domain. Apply the inverse R−tR_{-t} to obtain equality. Finally (M11) gives Rt(Bφ)=BφR_t(B_\varphi)=B_\varphi. □\square

For fixed ss, the map a↦ct(s)σt(a)a\mapsto c_t(s)\sigma_t(a) is usually not a unital star automorphism of MM. The star automorphism in the theorem acts on the entire twisted convolution algebra. The group identities in (M5) are what make its multiplicativity possible.

OA-FLOW.DW.MODULARUNITARIES — Constructing a unitary group on the section space

Set

As=ΔG(s)Δψs,φ,qt(s)=Asit=ΔG(s)itΔψs,φit.(M12)A_s=\Delta_G(s)\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi},\qquad q_t(s)=A_s^{it}=\Delta_G(s)^{it}\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^{it}. \tag{M12}

Each AsA_s is positive, self-adjoint and nonsingular. Formula (M4) and the joint-continuity theorem give joint strong continuity of (s,t)↦qt(s)(s,t)\mapsto q_t(s), and of its adjoint.

Proposition. There is a strongly continuous unitary group (Qt)(Q_t) on H\mathcal H whose action is

[Qtξ](s)=qt(s)ξ(s).(M13)[Q_t\xi](s)=q_t(s)\xi(s). \tag{M13}

There is a unique positive nonsingular self-adjoint Δ~φ\widetilde\Delta_\varphi such that Qt=Δ~φitQ_t=\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{it}.

Proof. Begin with ξ∈Cc(G,Hφ)\xi\in C_c(G,H_\varphi). The right side of (M13) is continuous with the same compact support, and pointwise unitarity gives ∥Qtξ∥2=∥ξ∥2\|Q_t\xi\|_2=\|\xi\|_2. Thus it extends by density to an isometry on H\mathcal H. The pointwise group law for AsitA_s^{it}, first on these continuous vectors, gives QtQu=Qt+uQ_tQ_u=Q_{t+u} and inverse Q−tQ_{-t}; hence the extensions are unitary.

On a compact support KK, the map (s,t)↦qt(s)ξ(s)(s,t)\mapsto q_t(s)\xi(s) is norm continuous. A finite-subcover argument shows that its difference from ξ(s)\xi(s) tends uniformly to zero in s∈Ks\in K as t→0t\to0. Since KK has finite Haar measure, Qtξ→ξQ_t\xi\to\xi in L2L^2. For any η∈H\eta\in\mathcal H, approximate it by such a ξ\xi and use

∥Qtη−η∥2≤2∥η−ξ∥2+∥Qtξ−ξ∥2.\|Q_t\eta-\eta\|_2\leq2\|\eta-\xi\|_2+\|Q_t\xi-\xi\|_2.

This proves strong continuity. For a general ξ\xi, formula (M13) holds almost everywhere: choose a sequence of compact-support continuous approximants, and pass to subsequences converging almost everywhere both before and after applying the bounded operator QtQ_t. Pointwise unitarity identifies the second limit with qt(s)ξ(s)q_t(s)\xi(s). This also establishes the required strong measurability of the resulting section. The assertion is for each fixed tt and vector; no common null set for all vectors and all times is asserted.

By Stone's theorem there is a self-adjoint PP with Qt=eitPQ_t=e^{itP}. Put Δ~φ=eP\widetilde\Delta_\varphi=e^P. The spectral function epe^p is strictly positive, so its operator has zero kernel, even if its inverse is unbounded. Its imaginary powers are eitPe^{itP}. Conversely, the logarithm of any positive nonsingular operator with those imaginary powers is the same Stone generator, giving uniqueness. □\square

The construction begins on compact-support vector sections. Strong continuity on an entire non-sigma-compact group was not treated as automatic global Bochner measurability of every vector orbit.

OA-FLOW.DMO.FUNCTIONALCALCULUS — Smooth bounded functions act pointwise

Write Ps=log⁡AsP_s=\log A_s, so qt(s)=eitPsq_t(s)=e^{itP_s}. We need only smooth compactly supported spectral functions to obtain all real-power domains.

Lemma. For every k∈Cc∞(R)k\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb R) and ξ∈H\xi\in\mathcal H,

[k(P)ξ](s)=k(Ps)ξ(s)a.e.(M14)[k(P)\xi](s)=k(P_s)\xi(s)\quad\text{a.e.} \tag{M14}

In particular the right side represents a strongly measurable L2L^2 section. Both sides have norm at most ∥k∥∞∥ξ∥2\|k\|_\infty\|\xi\|_2.

Proof. First suppose ξ\xi is continuous with compact support KK. By (M7),

k(P)ξ=∫Rk^(t)Qtξ dt.(M15)k(P)\xi=\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat k(t)Q_t\xi\,dt. \tag{M15}

The integrand is strongly measurable as a Hilbert-space function of tt, and its norm is bounded by ∣k^(t)∣∥ξ∥2|\widehat k(t)|\|\xi\|_2, an integrable scalar function. Pointwise on GG, the candidate integral is

∫Rk^(t)qt(s)ξ(s) dt=k(Ps)ξ(s).(M16)\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat k(t)q_t(s)\xi(s)\,dt=k(P_s)\xi(s). \tag{M16}

This equality is the individual spectral theorem for PsP_s. To compare (M15) and (M16), restrict first to a bounded time interval. The vector integrands are jointly continuous on that interval times KK; they have separable range there because their range is norm compact. On this product, Lebesgue measure is finite and Haar measure of KK is finite. Bochner Fubini, or uniformly convergent vector Riemann sums on the time interval followed by compact-support integration, identifies the two integrals in L2(G,Hφ)L^2(G,H_\varphi).

Let the time interval expand. The omitted tail in the pointwise integral is bounded by

∥ξ(s)∥∫∣t∣>T∣k^(t)∣ dt,\|\xi(s)\|\int_{|t|>T}|\widehat k(t)|\,dt,

and hence its L2L^2 norm is bounded by the same scalar tail times ∥ξ∥2\|\xi\|_2. The tail in (M15) has that bound as well. This proves (M14) for compact-support continuous vectors. It also shows directly that its right side is a continuous compact-support vector function in this case.

For an arbitrary ξ\xi, choose such vectors ξn→ξ\xi_n\to\xi in L2L^2. Since ∥k(Ps)∥≤∥k∥∞\|k(P_s)\|\leq\|k\|_\infty for every ss, the pointwise multiplication formula is uniformly bounded. Choose subsequences with ξn(s)→ξ(s)\xi_n(s)\to\xi(s) and (k(P)ξn)(s)→(k(P)ξ)(s)(k(P)\xi_n)(s)\to(k(P)\xi)(s) outside one null set. The bounded pointwise operators identify the two limits, proving (M14). The left side already supplies a strongly measurable L2L^2 representative. No countable basis for HφH_\varphi, and no general operator-field measurability theorem, has been used. □\square

OA-FLOW.DW.REALPOWERDOMAINS — Every real exponent, with its full domain

Theorem. Let r∈Rr\in\mathbb R. A vector ξ∈H\xi\in\mathcal H belongs to Dom⁡(Δ~φr)\operatorname{Dom}(\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^r) if and only if

ξ(s)∈Dom⁡(Δψs,φr)for almost every s,η(s)=ΔG(s)rΔψs,φrξ(s)represents a strongly measurable L2 section.(M17) \begin{gathered} \xi(s)\in\operatorname{Dom}(\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^r)\quad\text{for almost every }s,\\ \eta(s)=\Delta_G(s)^r\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^r\xi(s) \quad\text{represents a strongly measurable }L^2\text{ section}. \end{gathered} \tag{M17}

On this domain,

[Δ~φrξ](s)=η(s),∥Δ~φrξ∥22=∫GΔG(s)2r∥Δψs,φrξ(s)∥2 ds.(M18)[\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^r\xi](s)=\eta(s),\qquad \|\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^r\xi\|_2^2 =\int_G\Delta_G(s)^{2r}\|\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^r\xi(s)\|^2\,ds. \tag{M18}

The same statement includes negative rr. Nonsingularity does not make the negative powers bounded.

Proof. Choose a smooth function χ:R→[0,1]\chi:\mathbb R\to[0,1] supported in [−2,2][-2,2] and equal to 11 on [−1,1][-1,1]. Put

χn(p)=χ(p/n),hn(p)=erpχn(p).(M19)\chi_n(p)=\chi(p/n),\qquad h_n(p)=e^{rp}\chi_n(p). \tag{M19}

Both are smooth and compactly supported. The spectral theorem gives χn(P)→1\chi_n(P)\to1 and χn(Ps)→1\chi_n(P_s)\to1 strongly, and

erPχn(P)=hn(P),erPsχn(Ps)=hn(Ps),(M20)e^{rP}\chi_n(P)=h_n(P),\qquad e^{rP_s}\chi_n(P_s)=h_n(P_s), \tag{M20}

where the operators in (M20) are everywhere defined and bounded for each fixed nn. No bound uniform in nn is needed for hnh_n.

Suppose first that ξ∈Dom⁡(erP)\xi\in\operatorname{Dom}(e^{rP}), with ζ=erPξ\zeta=e^{rP}\xi. The spectral calculus gives

χn(P)ξ→ξ,hn(P)ξ=χn(P)ζ→ζ(M21)\chi_n(P)\xi\to\xi,\qquad h_n(P)\xi=\chi_n(P)\zeta\to\zeta \tag{M21}

in L2L^2. By (M14), these bounded operators act pointwise as their counterparts for PsP_s. Take a subsequence along which (hn(P)ξ)(s)→ζ(s)(h_n(P)\xi)(s)\to\zeta(s) almost everywhere, and remove the countable collection of null sets from (M14). At each remaining point, χn(Ps)ξ(s)→ξ(s)\chi_n(P_s)\xi(s)\to\xi(s) by the individual spectral theorem, while its image under the closed operator erPse^{rP_s} tends to ζ(s)\zeta(s). Closedness therefore yields

ξ(s)∈Dom⁡(erPs),erPsξ(s)=ζ(s).\xi(s)\in\operatorname{Dom}(e^{rP_s}),\qquad e^{rP_s}\xi(s)=\zeta(s).

Since erPs=Asr=ΔG(s)rΔψs,φre^{rP_s}=A_s^r=\Delta_G(s)^r\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^r, this proves (M17), including measurability and integrability of the image.

Conversely, suppose (M17) holds. Applying (M14) to hnh_n and χn\chi_n, and commuting the cutoff with the individual spectral power on its domain, gives

[hn(P)ξ](s)=hn(Ps)ξ(s)=χn(Ps)η(s)=[χn(P)η](s)(M22)[h_n(P)\xi](s) =h_n(P_s)\xi(s) =\chi_n(P_s)\eta(s) =[\chi_n(P)\eta](s) \tag{M22}

almost everywhere. Hence hn(P)ξ=χn(P)η→ηh_n(P)\xi=\chi_n(P)\eta\to\eta in L2L^2, while χn(P)ξ→ξ\chi_n(P)\xi\to\xi. Equation (M20) and closedness of erPe^{rP} imply that ξ\xi is in its domain and that erPξ=ηe^{rP}\xi=\eta. This proves the reverse inclusion and the operator formula. The norm equality in (M18) is then the definition of the section norm. □\square

Strong measurability in (M17) is explicit so that the operator domain is well-typed. In fact it follows already from the pointwise domain condition in this setting: by (M14), each hn(Ps)ξ(s)h_n(P_s)\xi(s) has a strongly measurable representative; on the full-measure set of domain membership these vectors converge to erPsξ(s)e^{rP_s}\xi(s). A countable almost-everywhere pointwise limit of strongly measurable Hilbert-space functions is strongly measurable. Thus one can equivalently use pointwise domain membership and the finiteness of the norm integral. There is no additional measurable-field hypothesis hidden in this reformulation.

OA-FLOW.DMO.INTERTWINING — Modular time preserves the common domain

Proposition. For every f∈bφf\in\mathfrak b_\varphi and every real tt,

Δ~φitΛ~φ(f)=Λ~φ(Rtf).(M23)\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{it}\widetilde\Lambda_\varphi(f) =\widetilde\Lambda_\varphi(R_tf). \tag{M23}

In particular Δ~φitAφ=Aφ\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{it}\mathcal A_\varphi=\mathcal A_\varphi.

Proof. The coefficient-flow theorem proves Rtf∈bφR_tf\in\mathfrak b_\varphi. For each ss, left multiplication by a bounded coefficient and (M3) give

Λφ((Rtf)(s))=ΔG(s)itct(s)Λφ(σt(f(s)))=ΔG(s)itct(s)ΔφitΛφ(f(s))=ΔG(s)itΔψs,φitΛφ(f(s)). \begin{aligned} \Lambda_\varphi((R_tf)(s)) &=\Delta_G(s)^{it}c_t(s)\Lambda_\varphi(\sigma_t(f(s)))\\ &=\Delta_G(s)^{it}c_t(s)\Delta_\varphi^{it}\Lambda_\varphi(f(s))\\ &=\Delta_G(s)^{it}\Delta_{\psi_s,\varphi}^{it}\Lambda_\varphi(f(s)). \end{aligned}

This is (M23) by (M13). The invariance of BφB_\varphi under RtR_t gives the final assertion, including equality by applying −t-t. □\square

Only pointwise weight-finite elements were used in the GNS formulas, and their membership was supplied by lesson 09 and φ\varphi-invariance of σt\sigma_t. No assertion about applying the GNS map to an arbitrary element of MM is made.

OA-FLOW.DW.INVARIANTCORE — The closed involution and its polar decomposition

Theorem. The space Aφ\mathcal A_\varphi is a graph-norm core for Δ~φ1/2\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2}, and

S0‾=JΔ~φ1/2.(M25)\overline{S_0}=\mathcal J\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2}. \tag{M25}

This is the polar decomposition of the closed coefficient involution. Consequently the modular operator and conjugation of the conditional left Hilbert algebra from lesson 09 are precisely Δ~φ\widetilde\Delta_\varphi and J\mathcal J.

Proof. The full domain theorem with r=1/2r=1/2 identifies T=Δ~φ1/2T=\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2}, including equality of domains. The pointwise relative Tomita computation of lesson 09 therefore gives

Aφ⊂Dom⁡(Δ~φ1/2),S0ξ=JΔ~φ1/2ξ(ξ∈Aφ).\mathcal A_\varphi\subset\operatorname{Dom}(\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2}),\qquad S_0\xi=\mathcal J\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2}\xi \quad(\xi\in\mathcal A_\varphi).

Lesson 09 proved that Aφ\mathcal A_\varphi is dense. Equation (M23) supplies its invariance under every imaginary power. All the hypotheses of OA-FLOW.GRAPH.POWERS now hold, so Aφ\mathcal A_\varphi is a core for the half-power. Applying the bounded isometry 1⊕J1\oplus\mathcal J to the relevant graphs proves (M25).

The positive factor Δ~φ1/2\widetilde\Delta_\varphi^{1/2} is nonsingular and has dense range, and J\mathcal J is antiunitary. Thus (M25) is its polar decomposition, by the uniqueness statement in the operator-calculus import. The terminology of modular objects for the left Hilbert algebra refers to these polar factors; it does not yet invoke a dual-weight formula on arbitrary crossed-product positive elements. □\square

The domain theorem covers every real exponent on its own maximal domain. The common coefficient algebra has been proved to lie in the half-power domain. It has not thereby been shown to lie in every higher-power domain; a solved problem below exhibits the distinction.

Editable source · Proof dependencies and component terms