Invertible components and exponential laws

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September–October 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: CC0 1.0.

An invertible element can move continuously without losing its inverse. The connected components of the invertible group record the obstructions to moving it to the identity. Exponentials describe the identity component; in C*-algebras the same components can be studied using unitaries. For continuous functions on a circle, the obstruction becomes an integer winding number.

Prerequisites are Banach algebras, spectrum and holomorphic functional calculus and C*-algebras and continuous functional calculus. We use completeness, the Neumann series and the power-series definitions of exponential and logarithm. Integrals of norm-continuous Banach-space-valued functions over compact intervals can be defined as limits of Riemann sums. All paths and connected components below use the norm topology. Freely readable treatments are Blackadar’s Operator Algebras and Sundar’s Notes on C*-algebras.

1. The identity component is generated by exponentials

Let AA be a unital complex Banach algebra and let G(A)G(A) be its group of invertible elements. Inversion is continuous: if x∈G(A)x\in G(A) and ∥x−1(y−x)∥<1\|x^{-1}(y-x)\|<1, the Neumann series inverts y=x(1+x−1(y−x))y=x(1+x^{-1}(y-x)). Write G0(A)G_0(A) for the connected component of 11.

Recall 1.1. The group G0(A)G_0(A) consists exactly of the finite products exp⁡(a1)exp⁡(a2)⋯exp⁡(aN),aj∈A.(1.1) \exp(a_1)\exp(a_2)\cdots\exp(a_N),\qquad a_j\in A. \tag{1.1} It is an open normal subgroup, and each of its elements can be joined to 11 by a norm-continuous path of invertibles. Every connected component of G(A)G(A) is a coset of G0(A)G_0(A).

This is Proposition 7.1(2), (5) of Banach algebras, spectrum and holomorphic functional calculus, where the complete proof is given. The coset assertion follows by translation of connected components. We will use this result both for the component group and for lifting invertibles from a quotient.

The component group G(A)/G0(A)G(A)/G_0(A) can be noncommutative. We do not assume commutativity when using it.

Size of a local logarithm. If r=∥1−x∥<1r=\|1-x\|<1, the norm-convergent logarithm series in the prerequisite gives ∥log⁡x∥≤∑n=1∞rnn=−log⁡(1−r). \|\log x\|\leq\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{r^n}{n} =-\log(1-r). The bound depends on rr. There is no uniform bound on ∥log⁡x∥\|\log x\| for all elements satisfying ∥1−x∥<1\|1-x\|<1: in A=CA=\mathbb C, the principal logarithm of x=εx=\varepsilon, 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<1, has absolute value −log⁡ε-\log\varepsilon. Thus the logarithm existence statement in [Blackadar, II.1.5.3] is useful here, while the accompanying uniform π/2\pi/2 bound in the accessed version cannot be used.

2. Norm-continuous one-parameter groups

Theorem 2.1. If x:R→G(A)x:\mathbb R\to G(A) is a norm-continuous homomorphism, there is a unique a∈Aa\in A such that x(t)=exp⁡(ta)(t∈R),a=lim⁡t→0x(t)−1t.(2.1) x(t)=\exp(ta)\quad(t\in\mathbb R), \qquad a=\lim_{t\to0}\frac{x(t)-1}{t}. \tag{2.1}

Proof. Choose δ>0\delta>0 so small that B=∫0δx(s) ds B=\int_0^\delta x(s)\,ds is invertible: B/δB/\delta is arbitrarily close to 11 as δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. The group law gives (x(t)−1)B=∫δδ+tx(s) ds−∫0tx(s) ds. (x(t)-1)B =\int_\delta^{\delta+t}x(s)\,ds-\int_0^t x(s)\,ds. Dividing by tt and using norm continuity, for positive or negative tt, shows that the limit in (2.1) exists and equals a=(x(δ)−1)B−1. a=(x(\delta)-1)B^{-1}. The group law now gives x′(t)=x(t)ax'(t)=x(t)a. Since x(t)x(t) commutes with every x(s)x(s), it commutes with their difference quotients and their limit aa. Differentiating exp⁡(−ta)x(t)\exp(-ta)x(t) therefore gives zero. Its value at t=0t=0 is 11, so x(t)=exp⁡(ta)x(t)=\exp(ta). Uniqueness follows by differentiation at zero. □\square

The norm hypothesis explains why the generator is bounded. Strongly continuous groups on Hilbert space can have unbounded generators.

3. Two exponential approximation formulas

The commutator of a,b∈Aa,b\in A is [a,b]=ab−ba[a,b]=ab-ba.

For these estimates we may work with a Banach-algebra norm for which ∥1∥=1\|1\|=1. This does not restrict the theorem. For nonzero AA, if the original norm has a different identity norm, define the left-multiplication norm ∥a∥L=sup⁡∥x∥≤1∥ax∥. \|a\|_L=\sup_{\|x\|\leq1}\|ax\|. Submultiplicativity gives ∥a∥L≤∥a∥\|a\|_L\leq\|a\|; using x=1/∥1∥x=1/\|1\| gives ∥a∥≤∥1∥∥a∥L\|a\|\leq\|1\|\|a\|_L. Hence the norms are equivalent, and the new norm is complete. Also ∥ab∥L≤∥a∥L∥b∥L\|ab\|_L\leq\|a\|_L\|b\|_L and ∥1∥L=1\|1\|_L=1. They give the same convergent series, norm limits, paths and connected components. In the zero algebra all formulas are immediate. We use the normalized norm in the following proof and then transfer its limits back to the given norm.

Theorem 3.1. For arbitrary a,b∈Aa,b\in A, exp⁡(a+b)=lim⁡n→∞(exp⁡(a/n)exp⁡(b/n))n,(3.1) \exp(a+b)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\bigl(\exp(a/n)\exp(b/n)\bigr)^n, \tag{3.1} and exp⁡([a,b])=lim⁡n→∞(exp⁡(−a/n)exp⁡(−b/n)exp⁡(a/n)exp⁡(b/n))n2.(3.2) \exp([a,b]) =\lim_{n\to\infty} \bigl(\exp(-a/n)\exp(-b/n)\exp(a/n)\exp(b/n)\bigr)^{n^2}. \tag{3.2} Both limits are in norm.

Proof. We first record an estimate. For elements u,vu,v and an integer m≥1m\geq1, um−vm=∑j=0m−1um−1−j(u−v)vj,∥um−vm∥≤m∥u−v∥max⁡(∥u∥,∥v∥)m−1.(3.3) u^m-v^m=\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}u^{m-1-j}(u-v)v^j, \qquad \|u^m-v^m\|\leq m\|u-v\|\max(\|u\|,\|v\|)^{m-1}. \tag{3.3} No commutativity is needed; the sum telescopes.

The exponential series gives, for fixed a,ba,b, un=exp⁡(a/n)exp⁡(b/n)=1+(a+b)/n+O(n−2), u_n=\exp(a/n)\exp(b/n)=1+(a+b)/n+O(n^{-2}), while vn=exp⁡((a+b)/n)v_n=\exp((a+b)/n) has the same first two terms. Their difference is O(n−2)O(n^{-2}), and their norms are at most exp⁡(C/n)\exp(C/n) for a fixed CC. Taking m=nm=n in (3.3) gives ∥unn−vnn∥=O(n−1)\|u_n^n-v_n^n\|=O(n^{-1}). Since vnn=exp⁡(a+b)v_n^n=\exp(a+b), (3.1) follows.

For (3.2), set w(t)=exp⁡(−ta)exp⁡(−tb)exp⁡(ta)exp⁡(tb). w(t)=\exp(-ta)\exp(-tb)\exp(ta)\exp(tb). Multiplication of the four series through degree two yields w(t)=1+t2(ab−ba)+O(∣t∣3).(3.4) w(t)=1+t^2(ab-ba)+O(|t|^3). \tag{3.4} To justify the remainder, each exponential remainder after degree two is bounded by ∣t∣3∥a∥3e∣t∣∥a∥/6|t|^3\|a\|^3e^{|t|\|a\|}/6, or its bb-analogue. Multiplying the four finite quadratic parts leaves finitely many terms of degree at least three, also O(∣t∣3)O(|t|^3) for ∣t∣≤1|t|\leq1. Thus the estimate holds in an arbitrary Banach algebra. In particular ∥w(1/n)∥≤1+C/n2\|w(1/n)\|\leq1+C/n^2, a sharper bound than estimating the four factors separately. Compare it with zn=exp⁡([a,b]/n2)z_n=\exp([a,b]/n^2). Their difference is O(n−3)O(n^{-3}), and both norms are at most 1+C′/n21+C'/n^2. Taking m=n2m=n^2 in (3.3) gives a difference O(n−1)O(n^{-1}), while znn2=exp⁡([a,b])z_n^{n^2}=\exp([a,b]). □\square

The quadratic bound on w(1/n)w(1/n) is essential: a bound of the form eC/ne^{C/n}, raised to n2n^2, would grow with nn and would not prove convergence.

4. Unitaries carry the same components

Now let AA be a unital C*-algebra. Write U(A)U(A) for its unitary group and U0(A)U_0(A) for the connected component of 11 in that group.

Theorem 4.1. For x∈G(A)x\in G(A), the element u(x)=x∣x∣−1,∣x∣=(x∗x)1/2,(4.1) u(x)=x|x|^{-1},\qquad |x|=(x^*x)^{1/2}, \tag{4.1} is unitary, and depends continuously on xx. Moreover G(A)=U(A)G0(A),U(A)∩G0(A)=U0(A),(4.2) G(A)=U(A)G_0(A),\qquad U(A)\cap G_0(A)=U_0(A), \tag{4.2} and inclusion induces a group isomorphism U(A)/U0(A)≅G(A)/G0(A).(4.3) U(A)/U_0(A)\cong G(A)/G_0(A). \tag{4.3}

Proof. In the zero algebra all assertions are immediate. Otherwise, since xx is invertible, x∗x≥∥x−1∥−21x^*x\geq\|x^{-1}\|^{-2}1; continuous functional calculus makes ∣x∣|x| invertible. Direct multiplication gives u(x)∗u(x)=1u(x)^*u(x)=1. The product x∣x∣−1x|x|^{-1} is invertible, so its inverse is its adjoint and u(x)u(x)∗=1u(x)u(x)^*=1. The square-root map is norm-continuous on positive elements: on any fixed bounded spectral interval it is uniformly approximable by polynomials, and polynomial evaluation is continuous. Continuity of inversion proves continuity of (4.1).

Every positive invertible hh has a continuous-functional-calculus logarithm, so h=exp⁡(log⁡h)∈G0(A)h=\exp(\log h)\in G_0(A). The decomposition x=u(x)∣x∣x=u(x)|x| proves the first part of (4.2).

The unitary group is locally path connected. If a unitary vv is sufficiently close to 11, its spectrum is in an arc admitting a continuous argument, and functional calculus gives v=exp⁡(ik)v=\exp(ik) for self-adjoint kk; t↦exp⁡(itk)t\mapsto\exp(itk) is a unitary path. Translation gives the same assertion near any unitary. Hence connected components of U(A)U(A) are path components. If u∈U(A)∩G0(A)u\in U(A)\cap G_0(A), Recall 1.1 gives an invertible path from 11 to uu; applying the continuous map u(⋅)u(\cdot) to that path gives a unitary path with the same endpoints. This proves U(A)∩G0(A)⊆U0(A)U(A)\cap G_0(A)\subseteq U_0(A), and the reverse inclusion follows from any unitary path. The quotient map from U(A)U(A) to G(A)/G0(A)G(A)/G_0(A) is a homomorphism, surjective by the first part of (4.2), with kernel U0(A)U_0(A) by the second. This proves (4.3). □\square

Although u(⋅)u(\cdot) is useful for paths, it is generally not a group homomorphism. The quotient isomorphism uses the inclusion of unitaries, which is a homomorphism.

A continuous deformation to the unitary group

Adapted and expanded from S. Sundar [Sundar], Section 4.2, the remark following the opening proposition defining the stabilized component group. This entire subsection is CC0. AI changes by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra: joint continuity and the fixed-unitary property are proved explicitly; stabilization is not needed for this assertion.

Corollary 4.2. For every unital C*-algebra, the maps rs(x)=x∣x∣−s=xexp⁡(−slog⁡∣x∣),0≤s≤1,x∈G(A), \begin{gathered} r_s(x)=x|x|^{-s}=x\exp(-s\log|x|),\\ 0\leq s\leq1,\quad x\in G(A), \end{gathered} give a strong deformation retraction of G(A)G(A) onto U(A)U(A): the map (s,x)↦rs(x)(s,x)\mapsto r_s(x) is continuous, r0(x)=xr_0(x)=x, r1(x)=u(x)r_1(x)=u(x), and rs(v)=vr_s(v)=v for every unitary vv.

Proof. The zero algebra gives a constant deformation on a singleton. Otherwise all factors are invertible. Near a fixed invertible xx, the spectra of ∣x∣|x| lie in one compact interval [δ,M]⊂(0,∞)[\delta,M]\subset(0,\infty): continuity of ∣x∣|x| gives the upper bound, and continuity of inversion gives a positive lower bound. Uniform polynomial approximation to the scalar logarithm on that interval, followed by continuous polynomial evaluation, proves continuity of x↦log⁡∣x∣x\mapsto\log|x|. The norm-convergent exponential series is uniformly convergent on bounded sets, so (s,x)↦exp⁡(−slog⁡∣x∣)(s,x)\mapsto\exp(-s\log|x|) is continuous. Multiplication proves joint continuity of rsr_s. The endpoints follow from functional calculus. For a unitary vv, ∣v∣=1|v|=1, so every rs(v)r_s(v) equals vv. □\square

5. Winding on a circle

For A=C(S1)A=C(S^1), unitaries are continuous functions u:S1→S1u:S^1\to S^1.

Lemma 5.1. Every continuous g:R→S1g:\mathbb R\to S^1 has a continuous lift f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R with g(t)=e2πif(t)g(t)=e^{2\pi if(t)}. Two lifts differ by a constant integer.

Proof. On a compact interval, uniform continuity gives a finite partition such that g(t)/g(tj)g(t)/g(t_j) stays in a small arc around 11 for t∈[tj,tj+1]t\in[t_j,t_{j+1}]. On this arc choose the continuous argument that is zero at 11. Once f(tj)f(t_j) is chosen, set f(t)=f(tj)+12πArg⁡(g(t)/g(tj)) f(t)=f(t_j)+\frac1{2\pi}\operatorname{Arg}\bigl(g(t)/g(t_j)\bigr) on that subinterval. Successive choices agree at their shared endpoints. Starting from a chosen lift of g(0)g(0), apply this construction on [k,k+1][k,k+1] successively for all nonnegative integers kk, and on [−k−1,−k][-k-1,-k] backwards for the negative side. The resulting lift is continuous on all of R\mathbb R. The difference of two lifts is continuous and integer-valued, hence constant. □\square

Apply the lemma to g(t)=u(e2πit)g(t)=u(e^{2\pi it}). For any lift fuf_u, define deg⁡u=fu(1)−fu(0)∈Z.(5.1) \deg u=f_u(1)-f_u(0)\in\mathbb Z. \tag{5.1}

Theorem 5.2. Degree is a surjective homomorphism U(C(S1))→ZU(C(S^1))\to\mathbb Z, with kernel U0(C(S1))U_0(C(S^1)). Consequently G(C(S1))/G0(C(S1))≅Z.(5.2) G(C(S^1))/G_0(C(S^1))\cong\mathbb Z. \tag{5.2}

Proof. The difference fu(t+1)−fu(t)f_u(t+1)-f_u(t) is continuous and integer-valued, so is constant. At t=0t=0 it is (5.1), an integer since g(1)=g(0)g(1)=g(0). Changing a lift by a constant integer does not change degree. Adding lifts for u,vu,v gives a lift for uvuv; hence deg⁡(uv)=deg⁡u+deg⁡v\deg(uv)=\deg u+\deg v. The functions u(z)=zku(z)=z^k have degree kk, proving surjectivity.

If deg⁡u=0\deg u=0, the lift fuf_u is one-periodic and descends to a continuous real function hh on S1S^1. The path us(z)=e2πish(z)u_s(z)=e^{2\pi ish(z)}, for 0≤s≤10\leq s\leq1, joins 11 to uu. Conversely, degree is locally constant in the uniform norm: if vv is sufficiently close to uu, the unitary vu−1vu^{-1} has values in an arc around 11 and has a single-valued continuous real logarithm on the circle, so has degree zero. The homomorphism law gives deg⁡v=deg⁡u\deg v=\deg u. It follows that degree is constant along any unitary path, and therefore vanishes on U0U_0. The kernel assertion and Theorem 4.1 prove (5.2). □\square

6. Exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 6.1 — A generator from one short interval (intermediate). Let x:R→G(A)x:\mathbb R\to G(A) be norm continuous and multiplicative. If ∥x(s)−1∥≤η<1\|x(s)-1\|\leq\eta<1 for 0≤s≤δ0\leq s\leq\delta, prove that the generator satisfies ∥a∥≤∥x(δ)−1∥δ(1−η). \|a\|\leq\frac{\|x(\delta)-1\|}{\delta(1-\eta)}.

Solution. Put e=1−B/δe=1-B/\delta and c=x(δ)−1c=x(\delta)-1. The average in Theorem 2.1 gives ∥e∥≤η\|e\|\leq\eta. The Neumann series and the formula for the generator yield a=1δc(1−e)−1=1δ∑n=0∞cen. a=\frac1\delta c(1-e)^{-1} =\frac1\delta\sum_{n=0}^\infty ce^n. The first summand is cc; for n≥1n\geq1, submultiplicativity gives ∥cen∥≤∥c∥ηn\|ce^n\|\leq\|c\|\eta^n. Summing proves the stated bound in the original norm, even if ∥1∥>1\|1\|>1.

Exercise 6.2 — Checking the commutator sign (basic). In M2(C)M_2(\mathbb C), put a=e12,b=e21a=e_{12},b=e_{21}. Compute the first nonzero term of exp⁡(−ta)exp⁡(−tb)exp⁡(ta)exp⁡(tb)\exp(-ta)\exp(-tb)\exp(ta)\exp(tb), and the limit in (3.2).

Solution. Here a2=b2=0a^2=b^2=0, so all four exponentials equal 1±ta1\pm ta or 1±tb1\pm tb. Multiplication gives 1+t2(e11−e22)+O(t3)1+t^2(e_{11}-e_{22})+O(t^3). Thus [a,b]=diag⁡(1,−1)[a,b]=\operatorname{diag}(1,-1), and the limit is diag⁡(e,e−1)\operatorname{diag}(e,e^{-1}). Reversing a,ba,b reverses the sign and exchanges these two entries.

Exercise 6.3 — A circle with a harmless oscillation (intermediate). For k∈Zk\in\mathbb Z and real c≠0c\neq0, consider u(e2πit)=exp⁡(2πi[kt+csin⁡(2πt)])u(e^{2\pi it})=\exp(2\pi i[kt+c\sin(2\pi t)]). Determine its component in U(C(S1))U(C(S^1)), and produce a path to z↦zkz\mapsto z^k. Can it be joined to 11 when k≠0k\neq0?

Solution. The displayed bracket is a lift; its endpoint difference is kk. The path us(e2πit)=exp⁡(2πi[kt+(1−s)csin⁡(2πt)])u_s(e^{2\pi it})=\exp(2\pi i[kt+(1-s)c\sin(2\pi t)]) is well-defined on the circle and joins uu to zkz^k. Its degree stays kk. If k≠0k\neq0, Theorem 5.2 prohibits a path to 11.

References

[Blackadar] Bruce Blackadar, Operator Algebras: Theory of C-Algebras and von Neumann Algebras*, author's revised and corrected online version of the 2005 book, accessed 3 October 2026.

[Sundar] S. Sundar, Notes on C*-algebras, arXiv:2505.17456v1, 23 May 2025, opening of Section 4.2 and its polar-path remark. Author-supplied TeX; CC0 licence.

Editable source · Sources and component terms