Haar averages and compact translation control

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. New original text is public domain (CC0).

Introduction

For a locally compact group, a finite set of translations is replaced by a compact set. Almost invariance must hold uniformly over that set. Haar measure replaces counting, and convolution supplies the continuity needed to pass from finitely many estimates to a uniform one.

Read Means, Følner sets, and regular representations first. We use Haar measure, its uniqueness, regularity of Radon measures, norm continuity of translations on L1L^1, Hahn–Banach separation, and weak-star compactness. We prove the smoothing and compact-control steps below.

Throughout GG is a locally compact Hausdorff group with a fixed left Haar measure dtdt. No countability or unimodularity assumption is made. Put Lsf(t)=f(s−1t),Rsf(t)=f(ts),(k∗f)(t)=∫Gk(u)f(u−1t) du.(0.1) L_sf(t)=f(s^{-1}t),\qquad R_sf(t)=f(ts),\qquad (k*f)(t)=\int_G k(u)f(u^{-1}t)\,du. \tag{0.1} Let LUC(G)\mathrm{LUC}(G), RUC(G)\mathrm{RUC}(G) denote the bounded continuous functions for which respectively Lsf→fL_sf\to f, Rsf→fR_sf\to f in supremum norm as s→es\to e. Their intersection is UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G).

Proof dependencies and reading order

The four amenability lessons form a proof sequence at two scopes: countable discrete groups, then arbitrary locally compact Hausdorff groups. For the latter scope, a link to another lesson is not a requirement to read that entire lesson first. The following order specifies the results actually needed.

Stage Complete arguments to read What they supply next
1. Discrete model Means, Følner sets, and regular representations, Sections 1–6 Means, finite-set approximation, fixed points, the free-group obstruction, and the regular representation. These establish the countable discrete case; compact-uniform approximation for a general group is proved separately below.
2. Haar means Section 0 and Section 1 of this lesson Locally completed Haar duality, translation continuity, and extension of a mean from uniformly continuous functions to Haar classes.
3. Fixed points and approximation Sections 2–5 of this lesson The fixed-point criterion, two-sided means, Reiter approximation, compact Følner sets, and the full/reduced norm criterion. This branch does not use closed-subgroup heredity.
4. Closed subgroups Closed subgroups and continuous averaging, Lemmas 1.1–1.2 and Theorem 2.1 A quotient partition, a normalized cutoff, and a positive unital averaging map. The theorem uses the Haar extension from Stage 2 and proves heredity without a countable base or a measurable section.
5. Permanence Section 6 of this lesson Closed-subgroup heredity from Stage 4, the fixed-point argument for normal extensions from Stage 3, and direct proofs for compact and abelian groups, quotients, increasing unions, and solvable groups.
6. The radical criterion Almost-connected groups and the solvable radical, Sections 1–4 Radical bookkeeping, discrete free lifting, explicit ping-pong, and the semisimple obstruction combine with Stage 5 and the discrete free-group obstruction to prove the criterion. Section 5 gives examples at the same stated scope.

In particular the closed-subgroup proof depends on Theorem 1.2 here, while Proposition 6.1 here uses that closed-subgroup proof. These dependencies occur in this order; neither proof assumes its own conclusion. The compact-control and representation proofs in Sections 3–5 can be read before the subgroup lesson.

The maps used at the two interfaces matter. Smoothing converts a mean on uniformly continuous functions into a mean on locally completed Haar classes. Continuous subgroup averaging then maps bounded continuous functions on the subgroup to bounded continuous functions on the ambient group; composing with the ambient mean and applying Theorem 1.2 on the subgroup finishes heredity. Restricting arbitrary ambient Haar classes to the subgroup would not define this map: a closed subgroup can have ambient Haar measure zero. The horizontal subgroup of the plane in the subgroup lesson illustrates this obstruction.

The foundational inputs are explicit: Haar existence and uniqueness, Radon approximation and Riesz representation, Hahn–Banach and weak-star compactness, continuous compactly supported partitions and bumps, Stone–Weierstrass, and the integrated representation and group C-star framework. Section 0 supplies the local Haar convention and translation estimates needed when there is no countable base. Its free-lifting and ping-pong arguments are proved there. Reading the application does not supply a proof of those external structure theorems.

All four lessons include complete solutions: five in the discrete lesson, five here, six in the subgroup lesson, and eight in the radical lesson. Their hypotheses remain attached to each argument. The locally compact statements assume neither second countability nor unimodularity; the radical criterion also requires almost-connectedness. This reading order concerns these four group-amenability lessons. The measured-relation lesson has its own additional dependencies.

0. Haar integration without a countable base

For a group that is not sigma-compact, the usual Haar L∞L^\infty means the locally completed Haar space, equivalently the dual of L1(G)L^1(G). This convention permits bounded measurable classes on each sigma-compact open coset; it does not require a single global Borel representative for an arbitrary such class. Continuous bounded functions have their canonical representatives. Every mean below is a positive unital functional on this L∞L^\infty space.

Lemma 0.1. Every locally compact group has a sigma-compact open subgroup KK. Haar L1(G)L^1(G) is the ℓ1\ell^1 sum of the Haar L1L^1 spaces on the disjoint left cosets of KK; its dual is their ℓ∞\ell^\infty product. Each integrable function is supported, up to locally Haar-null sets, on a countable union of these cosets. Continuous compactly supported functions are dense in Lp(G)L^p(G), 1≤p<∞1\leq p<\infty, and translations are norm continuous there.

Proof. Take a compact neighborhood VV of the identity. The subgroup generated by V∪V−1V\cup V^{-1} is a countable union of compact sets and contains an identity neighborhood, hence is open. Its cosets are disjoint clopen sigma-compact sets. A compact subset of GG meets only finitely many cosets, since those open cosets cover it. Haar integration of a compactly supported function is therefore a finite sum over the cosets. Radon approximation on a sigma-compact coset gives density of continuous compactly supported functions there. Completing their finite coset sums in the integral norm proves the stated ℓ1\ell^1 description. An ℓ1\ell^1 family has at most countably many nonzero entries, by considering entries of norm at least 1/n1/n; its dual is the bounded product of the sigma-finite coset duals. The same approximation proves the LpL^p density assertion.

For a continuous compactly supported function, translations near the identity have support in one compact set. Joint continuity and compactness give uniform convergence on that set, and its Haar measure is finite. This proves norm continuity for these functions. Density and the bounded translation norms give it for all LpL^p functions. Right translations use their Haar modular factor, which is continuous at the identity. □\square

The integrations below consequently require no global sigma-finiteness. Each L1L^1 or L2L^2 vector has sigma-compact support in this sense. Continuous scalar integrands on a compact product are measurable for the product sigma-field: finite sums of products of continuous functions approximate them uniformly by the Stone–Weierstrass theorem. Approximation by compactly supported kernels, followed by L1L^1 bounds, gives the convolution and Fubini identities used here. In particular smoothing an arbitrary L∞L^\infty class can be read through duality: Shf(t)=⟨f,Lth⟩S_hf(t)=\langle f,L_th\rangle. This gives its continuous representative directly and avoids assuming joint Borel measurability for arbitrary representatives on a nonmetrizable group.

1. Smoothing and extending a mean

For a probability density h∈L1(G)h\in L^1(G), define the right smoothing operator (Shf)(t)=∫Gh(v)f(tv) dv.(1.1) (S_hf)(t)=\int_G h(v)f(tv)\,dv. \tag{1.1} Left Haar measure gives RsShf=SLshf,∥RsShf−Shf∥∞≤∥Lsh−h∥1∥f∥∞.(1.2) R_sS_hf=S_{L_sh}f,\qquad \|R_sS_hf-S_hf\|_\infty \leq\|L_sh-h\|_1\|f\|_\infty. \tag{1.2} Thus Shf∈RUC(G)S_hf\in\mathrm{RUC}(G). Similarly, Ls(k∗f)=(Lsk)∗f(1.3) L_s(k*f)=(L_sk)*f \tag{1.3} shows k∗f∈LUC(G)k*f\in\mathrm{LUC}(G). If ff is already right uniformly continuous, then k∗f∈UC(G)k*f\in\mathrm{UC}(G), since right translations commute with left convolution.

Lemma 1.1. A bounded positive left-translation invariant functional on L1(G)L^1(G) is a nonnegative scalar multiple of k↦∫kk\mapsto\int k.

Proof. Restrict it to continuous compactly supported functions. Its bound by a constant times the L1L^1-norm makes it a positive Radon measure dominated by that constant times Haar measure. Translation invariance and uniqueness of Haar measure make it a scalar multiple of Haar measure. Density of compactly supported continuous functions in L1L^1 extends the identity. □\square

Theorem 1.2. A left invariant mean on UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G) produces a left invariant mean MM on L∞(G)L^\infty(G) with the stronger property M(k∗f)=M(f)∫k,k∈L1(G), f∈L∞(G).(1.4) M(k*f)=M(f)\int k,\qquad k\in L^1(G),\ f\in L^\infty(G). \tag{1.4}

Proof. Let mm be the given mean. For f∈RUC(G)f\in\mathrm{RUC}(G), the functional k↦m(k∗f)k\mapsto m(k*f) on L1L^1 is left invariant by (1.3). For positive ff it is positive. Lemma 1.1, followed by decomposition into real and imaginary positive parts, gives a scalar m~(f)\widetilde m(f) with m(k∗f)=m~(f)∫k.(1.5) m(k*f)=\widetilde m(f)\int k. \tag{1.5} Fixing one probability density kk shows that m~\widetilde m is a mean on RUC(G)\mathrm{RUC}(G).

It extends mm: for f∈UC(G)f\in\mathrm{UC}(G), a positive L1L^1 approximate identity has ki∗f→fk_i*f\to f uniformly, so (1.5) gives m~(f)=m(f)\widetilde m(f)=m(f).

It is left invariant. In fact, k∗Lsf=ks∗fk*L_sf=k^s*f, where the measure ks(u) duk^s(u)\,du is the pushforward of k(u) duk(u)\,du under u↦usu\mapsto us. It has the same integral as kk. Apply (1.5) to both sides. This formulation includes the right-translation Haar factor without assuming it is one.

Choose a probability density hh and set M(f)=m~(Shf).(1.6) M(f)=\widetilde m(S_hf). \tag{1.6} It is positive and unital. Right smoothing commutes with left translations, so it is left invariant. The earlier map m~\widetilde m extends mm; the final smoothing in (1.6) need not preserve a mean that was only left invariant.

Finally, Fubini gives Sh(k∗f)=k∗ShfS_h(k*f)=k*S_hf. The latter is in UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G). Equations (1.5)–(1.6) now give (1.4). □\square

A locally compact group is amenable when it has a left invariant mean on L∞(G)L^\infty(G). Restriction and Theorem 1.2 show that the UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G) formulation is equivalent.

2. Fixed points and two-sided means

Theorem 2.1. Amenability is equivalent to the compact convex fixed-point property for affine actions of GG that are continuous in each variable separately.

Proof. Suppose a mean exists and GG acts separately continuously and affinely on a nonempty compact convex KK in a Hausdorff locally convex space. Fix x∈Kx\in K. For every continuous real linear functional ℓ\ell, prescribe ℓ(xˉ)=M(s↦ℓ(sx)).(2.1) \ell(\bar x)=M(s\mapsto\ell(sx)). \tag{2.1} These prescriptions define a point of KK. Indeed, for finitely many functionals, the prescribed vector lies in the compact convex image of KK: otherwise a separating linear combination would put its mean outside the minimum and maximum of that combination on the orbit. Thus the corresponding closed subsets of KK have the finite-intersection property. Compactness gives a point satisfying all prescriptions.

We also need the barycenter identity for every continuous affine function ψ\psi on KK. The restriction of MM to Cb(G)C_b(G) lies in the weak-star closure of finite convex combinations of point evaluations: separation by a real continuous bounded function would contradict its value lying between that function's infimum and supremum. Choose a net of these finite probabilities converging to that restriction, and form the corresponding convex averages of the orbit points sxsx. A compactness subnet converges to xˉ\bar x as determined by (2.1). Affinity and continuity give ψ(xˉ)=M(s↦ψ(sx))\psi(\bar x)=M(s\mapsto\psi(sx)). Apply this to ψ(y)=ℓ(gy)\psi(y)=\ell(gy), for fixed gg. Left invariance yields ℓ(gxˉ)=ℓ(xˉ)\ell(g\bar x)=\ell(\bar x), and separation by the ℓ\ell's makes xˉ\bar x fixed. Only continuity of each orbit map and each individual affine transformation was needed.

Conversely, act on the state space of UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G) by (s⋅m)(f)=m(Ls−1f)(s\cdot m)(f)=m(L_{s^{-1}}f). The inverse makes this a left action. It is continuous in the weak-star topology because translations of each function are norm continuous. The fixed-point property gives an invariant mean there. Theorem 1.2 supplies a Haar mean. □\square

This includes the source's compact convex sets in a Banach dual pair equipped with its weak topology, since the defining representation has continuous orbit maps and continuous linear transformations. The proof constructs the barycenter in the specified compact set; it does not identify an arbitrary bounded bilinear form with an operator on a potentially nonreflexive Banach space.

Proposition 2.2. An amenable group has a mean on L∞(G)L^\infty(G) invariant under both left and right translations.

Proof. Inversion converts a left mean into a right mean. For f∈UC(G)f\in\mathrm{UC}(G), form the iterated mean m0(f)=mL(g↦mR(v↦f(gv))).(2.2) m_0(f)=m_L(g\mapsto m_R(v\mapsto f(gv))). \tag{2.2} The outer function is bounded and continuous: its variation under g↦sgg\mapsto sg is bounded by ∥Ls−1f−f∥∞\|L_{s^{-1}}f-f\|_\infty. Thus it is measurable. As in the discrete proof, outer left invariance and inner right invariance make m0m_0 two-sided.

In Theorem 1.2, extend m0m_0 first to m~\widetilde m on RUC(G)\mathrm{RUC}(G). This extension is also right invariant, since k∗Rsf=Rs(k∗f)k*R_sf=R_s(k*f). For arbitrary positive f∈L∞(G)f\in L^\infty(G), the functional h⟼m~(Shf) h\longmapsto\widetilde m(S_hf) on L1(G)L^1(G) is positive and left invariant, by (1.2) and right invariance of m~\widetilde m. Lemma 1.1 makes it a scalar multiple of ∫h\int h. By linear decomposition the same independence of the probability density hh holds for every bounded ff.

Now Sh(Rsf)=ShsfS_h(R_sf)=S_{h^s}f, where hs dvh^s\,dv is the right-translation pushforward of h dvh\,dv, again a probability density. The independence just proved shows that (1.6) is right invariant. Its left invariance was already proved. □\square

3. Normal densities and uniform compact control

Let P(G)={p∈L1(G):p≥0,∫p=1}\mathcal P(G)=\{p\in L^1(G):p\geq0,\int p=1\}.

The weak convolution condition is the existence of a net pi∈P(G)p_i\in\mathcal P(G) such that ∫f(k∗pi−pi) dt⟶0(f∈L∞(G), k∈P(G)).(3.0) \int f(k*p_i-p_i)\,dt\longrightarrow0 \quad\bigl(f\in L^\infty(G),\ k\in\mathcal P(G)\bigr). \tag{3.0} The strong convolution condition replaces these scalar limits by ∥k∗pi−pi∥1→0\|k*p_i-p_i\|_1\to0 for every fixed kk. Both are equivalent to the following three formulations of amenability.

Theorem 3.1 (Reiter approximation). Amenability is equivalent to each of the following conditions:

  1. For every finite family k1,…,kN∈P(G)k_1,\ldots,k_N\in\mathcal P(G) and ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is p∈P(G)p\in\mathcal P(G) with ∑i∥ki∗p−p∥1<ε.(3.1) \sum_i\|k_i*p-p\|_1<\varepsilon. \tag{3.1}
  2. For every compact C⊂GC\subset G and ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is p∈P(G)p\in\mathcal P(G) with sup⁡s∈C∥Lsp−p∥1<ε.(3.2) \sup_{s\in C}\|L_sp-p\|_1<\varepsilon. \tag{3.2}
  3. In condition 2 one may require pp to be continuous and compactly supported.

Proof. Construct MM with (1.4). Normal states, identified with P(G)\mathcal P(G), are weak-star dense in the state space of L∞(G)L^\infty(G): separation by a real bounded function would contradict the fact that its supremum over normal states is its essential supremum.

For k∈P(G)k\in\mathcal P(G), the adjoint of p↦k∗pp\mapsto k*p sends ff to (Tkf)(t)=∫k(s)f(st) ds. (T_kf)(t)=\int k(s)f(st)\,ds. This equals k#∗fk^\#*f, where k# dsk^\#\,ds is the pushforward of k dsk\,ds under inversion. This is a probability density, and (1.4) gives M(Tkf)=M(f)M(T_kf)=M(f). Approximating MM by normal states therefore places zero in the weak closure of the convex set {(ki∗p−p)i:p∈P(G)} \{(k_i*p-p)_i:p\in\mathcal P(G)\} in a finite direct sum of L1L^1 spaces. Hahn–Banach makes its norm closure contain zero, proving (3.1).

If (3.0) is assumed instead, its scalar limits place zero in the weak closure of exactly the same convex set, so the same separation proves (3.1). Conversely, direct the finite-family choices in (3.1) by all finite families and decreasing tolerances. They give the strong convolution net, which gives (3.0). This verifies both net formulations, including simultaneous estimates for any finite family.

To obtain (3.2), fix h∈P(G)h\in\mathcal P(G). The set {Lsh:s∈C}\{L_sh:s\in C\} is norm compact in L1L^1. Choose finitely many sis_i such that every LshL_sh is within ε/3\varepsilon/3 of some LsihL_{s_i}h. Use (3.1) for hh and these translates, obtaining pp with all their convolution errors below ε/3\varepsilon/3. Then g=h∗pg=h*p is a probability density and ∥Lsg−g∥1≤∥(Lsh−Lsih)∗p∥1+∥(Lsih)∗p−p∥1+∥p−h∗p∥1<ε.(3.3) \begin{aligned} \|L_sg-g\|_1 &\leq\|(L_sh-L_{s_i}h)*p\|_1\\ &\quad+\|(L_{s_i}h)*p-p\|_1+\|p-h*p\|_1 <\varepsilon. \end{aligned} \tag{3.3}

Positive compactly supported continuous probability densities are dense in P(G)\mathcal P(G), by Radon regularity and approximation in L1L^1, followed by normalization. Replacing gg by such a density changes every translation error by at most twice the L1L^1 approximation error. Thus condition 3 follows.

Conversely, probability densities satisfying (3.2), directed by compact sets and decreasing error, define normal states. A weak-star cluster point is invariant under each fixed translation, hence is a mean. □\square

The compactness used in (3.3) belongs to the translated smoothing density hh. Pointwise estimates on an arbitrary family of densities alone would not give the uniform conclusion.

4. Compact Følner sets

Write ∣A∣|A| for left Haar measure.

Theorem 4.1. Amenability is equivalent to the following condition: for every compact C⊂GC\subset G and ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is a compact set FF with 0<∣F∣<∞0<|F|<\infty and ∣sF△F∣<ε∣F∣(s∈C).(4.1) |sF\triangle F|<\varepsilon|F|\quad(s\in C). \tag{4.1}

Proof. The reverse implication follows by using 1F/∣F∣\mathbf1_F/|F| in (3.2). For the forward implication, enlarge CC to a compact set DD of positive Haar measure. Put Q=D∪D−1DQ=D\cup D^{-1}D. For every s∈Ds\in D, D⊂sQ∩Q.(4.2) D\subset sQ\cap Q. \tag{4.2} Consequently, any Borel B⊂QB\subset Q with ∣Q∖B∣<∣D∣/2|Q\setminus B|<|D|/2 satisfies ∣sB∩B∣>0|sB\cap B|>0 for all s∈Ds\in D, and hence D⊂BB−1D\subset BB^{-1}.

Choose a continuous compactly supported probability density pp with translation error less than δ\delta on QQ, where 2δ∣Q∣/ε<∣D∣/22\delta|Q|/\varepsilon<|D|/2. For a>0a>0, set Fa={t:p(t)≥a}F_a=\{t:p(t)\geq a\}. These sets are compact. The layer identity gives ∫0∞∣Fa∣ da=1,∫0∞∣sFa△Fa∣ da<δ(s∈Q).(4.3) \int_0^\infty|F_a|\,da=1,\qquad \int_0^\infty|sF_a\triangle F_a|\,da<\delta\quad(s\in Q). \tag{4.3} For levels with positive measure, let Ba={s∈Q:∣sFa△Fa∣<(ε/2)∣Fa∣}. B_a=\{s\in Q:|sF_a\triangle F_a|<(\varepsilon/2)|F_a|\}. At levels with zero measure put Ba=QB_a=Q; their contribution to the following weighted integral is zero. Fubini and (4.3) imply ∫0∞∣Q∖Ba∣ ∣Fa∣ da≤2ε∫Q∫0∞∣sFa△Fa∣ da ds<2δ∣Q∣ε<∣D∣2.(4.4) \int_0^\infty |Q\setminus B_a|\,|F_a|\,da \leq\frac{2}{\varepsilon}\int_Q\int_0^\infty |sF_a\triangle F_a|\,da\,ds <\frac{2\delta|Q|}{\varepsilon}<\frac{|D|}{2}. \tag{4.4} Thus some level has 0<∣Fa∣<∞0<|F_a|<\infty and ∣Q∖Ba∣<∣D∣/2|Q\setminus B_a|<|D|/2. The product measurability in this calculation also holds without metrizability. For s∈Qs\in Q, all the relevant tt's lie in the fixed compact set supp⁡p∪Qsupp⁡p\operatorname{supp}p\cup Q\operatorname{supp}p. On this compact product the continuous scalar functions p(t)p(t) and p(s−1t)p(s^{-1}t) are product measurable by the approximation in Lemma 0.1. Comparing them with the real parameter aa gives product measurable indicators. The restricted Haar measures are finite, so Fubini applies. Integrating in tt also proves measurability of (s,a)↦∣sFa△Fa∣(s,a)\mapsto|sF_a\triangle F_a| and of the sets BaB_a.

By (4.2), every s∈C⊂Ds\in C\subset D can be written s=uv−1s=uv^{-1} with u,v∈Bau,v\in B_a. Left Haar invariance gives ∣uv−1Fa△Fa∣≤∣v−1Fa△Fa∣+∣uFa△Fa∣=∣vFa△Fa∣+∣uFa△Fa∣<ε∣Fa∣. |uv^{-1}F_a\triangle F_a| \leq|v^{-1}F_a\triangle F_a|+|uF_a\triangle F_a| =|vF_a\triangle F_a|+|uF_a\triangle F_a| <\varepsilon|F_a|. This is (4.1). □\square

The extra overlap argument is what turns almost invariance for most translations in QQ into invariance estimates for every translation in CC.

5. Regular vectors and the group norms

Let λsξ(t)=ξ(s−1t)\lambda_s\xi(t)=\xi(s^{-1}t) on L2(G)L^2(G).

Theorem 5.1. Amenability is equivalent to the existence of a net of unit vectors ξi\xi_i with sup⁡s∈C∥λsξi−ξi∥2⟶0for every compact C.(5.1) \sup_{s\in C}\|\lambda_s\xi_i-\xi_i\|_2\longrightarrow0 \quad\text{for every compact }C. \tag{5.1} It is also equivalent to faithfulness of C∗(G)→Cr∗(G)C^*(G)\to C_r^*(G).

Proof. For Reiter densities, ξ=p1/2\xi=p^{1/2} is a unit vector and ∥λsξ−ξ∥22≤∥Lsp−p∥1. \|\lambda_s\xi-\xi\|_2^2\leq\|L_sp-p\|_1. Conversely, ∥∣λsξ∣2−∣ξ∣2∥1≤2∥λsξ−ξ∥2\||\lambda_s\xi|^2-|\xi|^2\|_1 \leq2\|\lambda_s\xi-\xi\|_2, as in the discrete proof. These estimates are uniform on the same compact set.

For a strongly continuous unitary representation π\pi on KK, the unitary WF(t)=π(t)−1F(t)WF(t)=\pi(t)^{-1}F(t) on L2(G;K)L^2(G;K) conjugates λs⊗π(s)\lambda_s\otimes\pi(s) to λs⊗1\lambda_s\otimes1. Compress with Jiv=ξi⊗vJ_iv=\xi_i\otimes v. For f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G), the compression of the integrated representation differs from π(f)\pi(f) by at most ∫G∣f(s)∣ ∣1−⟨λsξi,ξi⟩∣ ds.(5.2) \int_G |f(s)|\,|1-\langle\lambda_s\xi_i,\xi_i\rangle|\,ds. \tag{5.2} Compact-uniform convergence and an L1L^1 tail estimate make this tend to zero. Thus ∥π(f)∥≤∥λ(f)∥\|\pi(f)\|\leq\|\lambda(f)\| for every π\pi, proving equality of the full and reduced norms.

Conversely, faithfulness makes the trivial representation a state ϵ\epsilon on Cr∗(G)C_r^*(G). Extend it, through unitization if necessary, to a state ψ\psi on B(L2(G))B(L^2(G)) by Hahn–Banach. The norm-one unital extension is positive by the argument in the discrete group-norm theorem.

Take a positive contractive approximate identity eje_j of Cr∗(G)C_r^*(G). We have ψ(ej)=ϵ(ej)→1\psi(e_j)=\epsilon(e_j)\to1. For every ss, λsej∈Cr∗(G)\lambda_se_j\in C_r^*(G) and ϵ(λsej)=ϵ(ej)\epsilon(\lambda_se_j)=\epsilon(e_j). Moreover, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∣ψ(λs(1−ej))∣2≤ψ((1−ej)2)≤1−ψ(ej)⟶0. |\psi(\lambda_s(1-e_j))|^2 \leq\psi((1-e_j)^2)\leq1-\psi(e_j)\longrightarrow0. Hence ψ(λs)=1\psi(\lambda_s)=1. The same zero-variance argument as in the discrete theorem yields ψ(λsBλs∗)=ψ(B)\psi(\lambda_sB\lambda_s^*)=\psi(B) for every BB.

Restrict ψ\psi to the multiplication algebra L∞(G)L^\infty(G). Since λsMfλs∗=MLsf\lambda_sM_f\lambda_s^*=M_{L_sf}, the restriction is a left invariant mean. □\square

Corollary 5.2 (the unit-ball coefficient formulation). Amenability is also equivalent to a net ξi\xi_i in the unit ball of L2(G)L^2(G) such that cξi(s)=∫Gξi(t)ξi(s−1t)‾ dt⟶1uniformly on each compact subset of G.(5.3) c_{\xi_i}(s)=\int_G\xi_i(t)\overline{\xi_i(s^{-1}t)}\,dt \longrightarrow1 \quad\text{uniformly on each compact subset of }G. \tag{5.3} With ξ∨(t)=ξ(t−1)‾\xi^\vee(t)=\overline{\xi(t^{-1})}, this integral is the coefficient customarily denoted ξ∗ξ∨(s)\xi*\xi^\vee(s). It is well defined by Cauchy–Schwarz even when inversion does not preserve the Haar L2L^2-norm.

Proof. Almost invariant unit vectors give (5.3), since ∣cξ(s)−1∣≤∥λsξ−ξ∥2|c_\xi(s)-1|\leq\|\lambda_s\xi-\xi\|_2. Conversely (5.3) at the identity gives ri=∥ξi∥2→1r_i=\|\xi_i\|_2\to1. Eventually ri>0r_i>0; normalize ηi=ξi/ri\eta_i=\xi_i/r_i. The normalized coefficients cηi=cξi/ri2c_{\eta_i}=c_{\xi_i}/r_i^2 still converge uniformly to one on compact sets. Now ∥λsηi−ηi∥22=2−2Re⁡cηi(s), \|\lambda_s\eta_i-\eta_i\|_2^2 =2-2\operatorname{Re}c_{\eta_i}(s), which yields (5.1). Theorem 5.1 finishes the equivalence. □\square

The tensor unitary used in Theorem 5.1 also requires no separable representation space: first apply it to finite sums of scalar compactly supported functions times Hilbert-space vectors. On compact supports, the strongly continuous vector orbits have separable metric range and are Bochner measurable. The isometric formula and density extend it to the full tensor Hilbert space. All convergence is by nets and compact sets.

6. Permanence with topology

Proposition 6.1. Compact groups and abelian locally compact groups are amenable. Closed subgroups, quotients by closed normal subgroups, extensions by closed normal subgroups, and increasing unions of closed amenable subgroups preserve amenability.

Proof. A compact group has normalized Haar measure. For an abelian group, evaluate bounded continuous functions on finite rectangular averages in any finitely generated subgroup. That subgroup is a quotient of Zd\mathbb Z^d, so the rectangular probability errors for any prescribed finite family of translations tend to zero. Direct these averages by finite subsets of GG; a cluster point on UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G) is invariant.

The full closed-subgroup assertion is proved in Closed subgroups and continuous averaging, Theorem 2.1. A continuous positive unital averaging map T:Cb(H)→Cb(G)T:C_b(H)\to C_b(G) intertwines each left HH-translation. Composing it with the ambient mean and applying Theorem 1.2 makes HH amenable. Its construction works without a Borel cross-section or a countable base; arbitrary Haar-null classes on HH are never pulled back to GG.

For a quotient by a closed normal subgroup, pull functions in its UC\mathrm{UC} algebra back to GG and restrict a mean.

For an extension with amenable closed normal subgroup HH and amenable quotient G/HG/H, use Theorem 2.1. In any compact convex GG-space, the HH-fixed set is nonempty, compact, convex, and GG-invariant. The quotient acts continuously on it and has a fixed point. Thus GG has the fixed-point property.

Finally, for an increasing union of closed amenable subgroups, restrict a function in UC(G)\mathrm{UC}(G) to each subgroup and apply its mean. A weak-star cluster point of these means is invariant under every element of the union, since that element belongs to all sufficiently late subgroups. □\square

In particular, locally compact solvable groups are amenable: use the closures in the finite derived series. Continuity of the commutator puts the commutators of each closure in the next closure, so the successive Hausdorff quotients are abelian. Apply the extension result inductively.

For example, the discrete group of permutations of N\mathbb N moving only finitely many points is the increasing union of its finite symmetric subgroups, so is amenable. In contrast, every discrete free group FnF_n, n≥2n\geq2, contains the closed subgroup generated by its first two free generators, isomorphic to F2F_2. The reduced-word obstruction in the discrete means lesson and the closed-subgroup theorem therefore prove its nonamenability. The subgroup topology matters, as Exercise 4.4 of the continuous averaging lesson shows.

7. Exercises with solutions

Level 1 asks for a computation or a direct application. Level 2 asks for a proof using the lesson’s framework. Level 3 combines results or examines a hypothesis whose failure changes the conclusion.

Exercise 7.1 (where compactness enters). Level 2. Identify the two uses of compactness in the proofs of Reiter and Følner approximation.

Solution. In (3.3), the continuous L1L^1-orbit of a fixed density over a compact set has a finite norm cover. In the Følner argument, QQ has finite Haar measure, permitting the averaged bad-translation estimate (4.4); positive compact DD also supplies the overlap bound (4.2).

Exercise 7.2 (a nonunimodular example). Level 2. On the affine group with multiplication (a,b)(a′,b′)=(aa′,b+ab′)(a,b)(a',b')=(aa',b+ab'), a,a′>0a,a'>0, verify the left Haar density da db/a2da\,db/a^2 and compute the effect of right translation by (a0,b0)(a_0,b_0) on set measure.

Solution. Left translation by (a0,b0)(a_0,b_0) has Jacobian a02a_0^2, while the new squared first coordinate contributes the same factor in the denominator. The density is left invariant. Right translation sends (a,b)(a,b) to (aa0,b+ab0)(aa_0,b+ab_0), with Jacobian a0a_0; its denominator contributes a02a_0^2. Thus ∣E(a0,b0)∣=a0−1∣E∣|E(a_0,b_0)|=a_0^{-1}|E|. The group is solvable and hence amenable, although this right-translation factor is generally not one.

Exercise 7.3 (the square-root estimate). Level 1. Prove ∥p−q∥22≤∥p−q∥1\|\sqrt p-\sqrt q\|_2^2\leq\|p-q\|_1 for nonnegative integrable functions.

Solution. Pointwise, (p−q)2≤∣p−q∣(p+q)=∣p−q∣(\sqrt p-\sqrt q)^2\leq|\sqrt p-\sqrt q|(\sqrt p+\sqrt q)=|p-q|. Integration gives the inequality. Taking q=Lspq=L_sp proves the first estimate in Theorem 5.1.

Exercise 7.4 (an overlap factorization). Level 1. Show directly that ∣sB∩B∣>0|sB\cap B|>0 implies s∈BB−1s\in BB^{-1}, and explain why this implication alone does not require BB to be compact.

Solution. Choose any z∈sB∩Bz\in sB\cap B. Write z=swz=sw with w∈Bw\in B; since z∈Bz\in B, s=zw−1∈BB−1s=zw^{-1}\in BB^{-1}. Positive measure ensures nonemptiness. Compactness is used elsewhere to construct the finite-measure test set and the compact Følner level, not in this algebraic implication.

Exercise 7.5 (the nonunital step). Level 3. Why does ϵ(λsej)=ϵ(ej)\epsilon(\lambda_se_j)=\epsilon(e_j) suffice to recover ψ(λs)=1\psi(\lambda_s)=1, even if λs∉Cr∗(G)\lambda_s\notin C_r^*(G)?

Solution. The extension ψ\psi is defined on the larger unital algebra B(L2(G))B(L^2(G)). The product λsej\lambda_se_j lies in the reduced algebra, so its value is known. The estimate displayed in Theorem 5.1 makes ψ(λs−λsej)→0\psi(\lambda_s-\lambda_se_j)\to0. Therefore ψ(λs)=lim⁡jϵ(ej)=1\psi(\lambda_s)=\lim_j\epsilon(e_j)=1, without asserting that the multiplier itself belongs to the reduced algebra.

References

[Takesaki] Masamichi Takesaki, Theory of Operator Algebras III, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 127, Springer, 2003. Publisher record.