Borel group measures and isotropy topologies

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026; Lemma 5.3a by Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic). Original text: CC0.

Introduction

A group can be given by its measurable sets before it has a topology. A nonzero sigma-finite measure that is quasi-invariant under every left translation then carries considerable topological information. For an analytic Borel group, it determines a compatible second countable locally compact group structure, and its null sets are exactly the Haar null sets. We prove this Mackey–Weil theorem, including the quasi-invariant form.

The mechanism is concrete. Put the group faithfully into the unitary group of a separable Hilbert space. Analytic-set measure theory supplies a compact set of positive measure in this image. A continuous matrix coefficient detects translations that overlap that set, so a neighborhood of the identity lies in a compact product set. Local compactness follows.

Read Measurable actions and compact models, Theorem 0.1 and Lemma 1.1, for the full density and joint-parameter proofs. The earlier programme lesson Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces supplies the complete analytic-image, Borel-inverse and compact-inner-approximation arguments: Theorem 4.3(1),(3), Theorem 5.6 and Theorem 6.2(1). Haar measure on locally compact groups, Theorem 8.3, Proposition 9.1 and Theorem 10.1, proves Haar existence, positivity on nonempty open sets and the right-translation formula. Ordinary integration and complete separable Hilbert spaces are the remaining prerequisites. The full product-integration argument needed here is given in Lemma 5.3a; the same results are treated in the Axler text, Theorems 5.17, 5.20, 5.27 and 5.28. Its monotone-convergence prerequisite has a full proof in that text, Theorem 3.11, printed p. 78 (PDF p. 93). The simple-function density and completeness proofs are in Measure and Hilbert space tools for Haar integration, Theorems 2.1–3.2.

This bridge repairs the positive topology prerequisite in Countable generation and isotropy topologies. Theorem 5.2 also constructs the required isotropy probability from a standard Borel range fibre, even when the range-fibre measure gives isotropy measure zero. Its section argument uses the complete earlier Polish lesson, Lemma 7.6 and Theorem 7.7. Theorem 5.4 then proves the Haar product formula by averaging, using the full right-translation and inversion arguments in the Haar lesson, Theorems 10.1 and 11.1. The source-label measure is proved sigma-finite, and Proposition 5.6 calculates its change under a new section. The resulting coordinates are used to prove the full standard Borel isotropy commutant theorem in Averaged coefficients and isotropy commutants, Theorem 6.1. That proof obtains one countable coefficient family from the global arrow sigma-field and does not require a jointly measurable choice of Haar coordinates.

1. The measurable hypotheses

An analytic Borel space, also called a Souslin–Borel space, is a countably separated measurable space that is a Borel image of a standard Borel space. Equivalently, it is Borel isomorphic to an analytic subset of a Polish space with its relative Borel sigma-field. This equivalence and the fact that its sigma-field is countably generated are proved in the earlier Polish lesson, Theorem 5.6. Standard Borel spaces are examples; analytic Borel spaces need not initially be standard.

An analytic Borel group is a group GG with this measurable structure, whose multiplication and inversion are measurable for the corresponding product sigma-field. No group topology is assumed. A measure ν\nu is left quasi-invariant if (g∗ν)(A)=ν(g−1A),g∗ν∼ν(g∈G).(1.1) (g_*\nu)(A)=\nu(g^{-1}A),\qquad g_*\nu\sim\nu\quad(g\in G). \tag{1.1} Equivalence means equality of null sets. It does not mean equality of the measures.

Lemma 1.1 (an equivalent probability). Every nonzero sigma-finite measure ν\nu has an equivalent probability μ\mu. Left quasi-invariance passes to μ\mu.

Proof. Partition GG into measurable sets EnE_n with ν(En)<∞\nu(E_n)<\infty, allowing null pieces. The finite measure ω(A)=∑n≥12−nν(A∩En)1+ν(En)(1.2) \omega(A)=\sum_{n\geq1}\frac{2^{-n}\nu(A\cap E_n)}{1+\nu(E_n)} \tag{1.2} has exactly the null sets of ν\nu, and 0<ω(G)≤10<\omega(G)\leq1. Put μ=ω/ω(G)\mu=\omega/\omega(G). For each gg, equivalence is preserved by the measurable bijection of left translation, so g∗μ∼g∗ν∼ν∼μg_*\mu\sim g_*\nu\sim\nu\sim\mu. □\square

2. A faithful unitary model

Lemma 2.1 (the unitary group). For a separable Hilbert space KK, the unitary group U(K)\mathcal U(K), with its strong operator topology, is a Polish topological group. Its Borel maps can be tested on a countable dense family of vectors.

Proof. Choose a sequence (qn)(q_n) dense in the unit ball and use d(U,V)=∑n≥12−n−1(min⁡(1,∥(U−V)qn∥)+min⁡(1,∥(U∗−V∗)qn∥)).(2.1) d(U,V)=\sum_{n\geq1}2^{-n-1}\bigl(\min(1,\|(U-V)q_n\|)+\min(1,\|(U^*-V^*)q_n\|)\bigr). \tag{2.1} This is a metric. Convergence on the dense family implies convergence on every vector because the operators have norm one. Strong convergence of unitaries to a unitary also gives strong convergence of their adjoints: ∥(Uj∗−U∗)ξ∥=∥ξ−UjU∗ξ∥\|(U_j^*-U^*)\xi\|=\|\xi-U_jU^*\xi\|. Thus (2.1) induces the strong topology on the unitary group.

A Cauchy sequence has strong limits AA and BB for the unitaries and their adjoints. Each limit preserves norms. The uniform operator bounds allow passage to the limit in both products, giving AB=BA=1AB=BA=1; the adjoint relation gives B=A∗B=A^*. Hence AA is unitary and the sequence converges in (2.1). The metric is complete. The map U↦(Uqn,U∗qn)nU\mapsto(Uq_n,U^*q_n)_n puts the group in a countable product of separable metric spaces, so it is second countable and separable. Multiplication is continuous by ∥UjVjξ−UVξ∥≤∥Vjξ−Vξ∥+∥(Uj−U)Vξ∥, \|U_jV_j\xi-UV\xi\|\leq\|V_j\xi-V\xi\|+\|(U_j-U)V\xi\|, and inversion is continuous by the adjoint observation. Coordinate maps on (qn)(q_n) generate this topology and its Borel sigma-field. □\square

Lemma 2.2 (weighted regular representation). Let GG be a countably generated, countably separated measurable group and let μ\mu be a left quasi-invariant probability. There is an injective Borel homomorphism U:G⟶U(L2(G,μ)),(Ugξ)(x)=r(g,x)1/2ξ(g−1x),(2.2) U:G\longrightarrow\mathcal U(L^2(G,\mu)),\qquad (U_g\xi)(x)=r(g,x)^{1/2}\xi(g^{-1}x), \tag{2.2} where r(g,⋅)=d(g∗μ)/dμr(g,\cdot)=d(g_*\mu)/d\mu for each fixed gg. The Hilbert space is separable. Here “Borel” on GG means measurable for its specified sigma-field.

Proof. Lemma 1.1 of Measurable actions and compact models applies to any countably generated probability space and jointly measurable nonsingular action. Its finite-partition proof gives a positive finite jointly measurable rr, with r(gh,x)=r(g,x)r(h,g−1x)almost everywhere for each fixed (g,h).(2.3) r(gh,x)=r(g,x)r(h,g^{-1}x) \quad\text{almost everywhere for each fixed }(g,h). \tag{2.3} The change-of-variables identity gives ∥Ugξ∥2=∥ξ∥2\|U_g\xi\|_2=\|\xi\|_2; equation (2.3) gives UgUh=UghU_gU_h=U_{gh}, and Ug−1U_{g^{-1}} is its inverse. These are exact operator identities. A common pointwise exceptional set for all group elements is unnecessary.

The countable Boolean algebra generated by a generating sequence supplies, with rational complex coefficients, a countable dense set in L2(μ)L^2(\mu). Indeed the closed span of its indicators contains bounded monotone limits of its simple functions; the monotone-class theorem and simple approximation give every L2L^2 function. For measurable representatives ξ,η\xi,\eta, ⟨Ugξ,η⟩=∫r(g,x)1/2ξ(g−1x)η(x)‾ dμ(x)(2.4) \langle U_g\xi,\eta\rangle =\int r(g,x)^{1/2}\xi(g^{-1}x)\overline{\eta(x)}\,d\mu(x) \tag{2.4} is a measurable function of gg, by parameter integration. Absolute integrability for each gg follows from Cauchy–Schwarz and the norm identity. In an orthonormal basis, these coefficients make g↦Ugqng\mapsto U_gq_n Borel: squared distances to a fixed vector are countable sums of the squared coordinates. The same holds for Ug∗=Ug−1U_g^*=U_{g^{-1}}. Lemma 2.1 now gives the required Borel map.

For injectivity, fix g≠eg\ne e and a sequence (An)(A_n) separating points of GG. The sets Fn+=An∖gAn,Fn−=gAn∖An(2.5) F_n^+=A_n\setminus gA_n, \qquad F_n^-=gA_n\setminus A_n \tag{2.5} cover GG, since xx and g−1xg^{-1}x are distinct. Each Fn±F_n^\pm is disjoint from its own translate by gg: membership and nonmembership in AnA_n at xx and g−1xg^{-1}x give incompatible conditions. Some F=Fn±F=F_n^\pm has μ(F)>0\mu(F)>0. The functions 1F1_F and Ug1FU_g1_F have disjoint supports and the same nonzero norm. Consequently Ug≠1U_g\ne1. The homomorphism is faithful. □\square

3. The Mackey–Weil topology theorem

Theorem 3.1. Let GG be an analytic Borel group with a nonzero sigma-finite left quasi-invariant measure ν\nu. There is a second countable locally compact Hausdorff group topology τ\tau on GG such that:

  1. its Borel sigma-field is the original one;
  2. (G,τ)(G,\tau) is Polish;
  3. ν\nu is equivalent to left Haar measure;
  4. if ν\nu is left invariant, it is a positive scalar multiple of left Haar measure and hence is Radon.

Proof. Choose the equivalent probability μ\mu in Lemma 1.1 and the faithful homomorphism UU in Lemma 2.2. Give GG the topology pulled back from its image H=U(G)⊆U(L2(G,μ)).(3.1) H=U(G)\subseteq\mathcal U(L^2(G,\mu)). \tag{3.1} It is Hausdorff and second countable, and group operations are continuous. We next prove local compactness; it is not being assumed of HH.

A compact set of positive measure. The image HH is analytic, by the earlier Polish lesson, Theorem 4.3(1) and the Souslin–Borel realization of Theorem 5.6. Push μ\mu to a probability ρ\rho on the whole Polish unitary group. Every Borel set containing HH has ρ\rho-measure one, so ρ∗(H)=1\rho^*(H)=1. Theorem 6.2(1) of that lesson, with its complete compact-inner-approximation proof, supplies a compact K⊆HK\subseteq H with ρ(K)>0\rho(K)>0. Put C=U−1(K)C=U^{-1}(K). It is measurable, compact for the pulled-back topology, and μ(C)=ρ(K)>0\mu(C)=\rho(K)>0.

An identity neighborhood inside a compact set. The coefficient a(g)=⟨Ug1C,1C⟩=∫C∩gCr(g,x)1/2 dμ(x)(3.2) a(g)=\langle U_g1_C,1_C\rangle =\int_{C\cap gC}r(g,x)^{1/2}\,d\mu(x) \tag{3.2} is continuous in τ\tau, nonnegative, and satisfies a(e)=μ(C)a(e)=\mu(C). If a(g)>0a(g)>0, the intersection C∩gCC\cap gC is nonempty, and therefore g∈CC−1g\in CC^{-1}. Thus e∈W={g:a(g)>μ(C)/2}⊆CC−1.(3.3) e\in W=\{g:a(g)>\mu(C)/2\}\subseteq CC^{-1}. \tag{3.3} The set WW is open and its closure is contained in the compact set CC−1CC^{-1}. This proves local compactness.

Closedness and the Borel structure. A locally compact subgroup of a Hausdorff topological group is closed. Here is the needed argument. Choose a compact neighborhood LL of the identity in HH and an ambient open set VV with V∩H⊆LV\cap H\subseteq L. Since LL is ambient closed, V∩H‾⊆L⊆HV\cap\overline H\subseteq L\subseteq H. Therefore HH contains a neighborhood of the identity in H‾\overline H. It is an open subgroup of H‾\overline H, hence also closed there, because its other cosets are open. Density gives H=H‾H=\overline H. Lemma 2.1 now makes HH Polish. The injective analytic Borel map UU has Borel inverse on its image, by the earlier Polish lesson, Theorem 4.3(3). Consequently the pulled-back Borel sigma-field is exactly the original one. In particular the original analytic Borel group has become standard Borel.

The Haar null class. Haar existence applies to (G,τ)(G,\tau). Its left Haar measure mm is sigma-finite: second countability gives a countable cover by translates of a relatively compact open identity neighborhood. Choose a strictly positive Borel pp with ∫p dm=1\int p\,dm=1, using the construction in Lemma 1.1 on a finite-measure partition of mm. Define β(A)=∫Gp(g)μ(g−1A) dm(g).(3.4) \beta(A)=\int_G p(g)\mu(g^{-1}A)\,dm(g). \tag{3.4} Tonelli shows that β\beta is a probability. For every gg, μ(g−1A)=0\mu(g^{-1}A)=0 exactly when μ(A)=0\mu(A)=0. A nonnegative measurable function has integral zero exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere, so (3.4) gives β∼μ\beta\sim\mu.

Exchange the two integrals to write β(A)=∫G(∫Ax−1p(g) dm(g))dμ(x).(3.5) \beta(A)=\int_G\left(\int_{Ax^{-1}}p(g)\,dm(g)\right)d\mu(x). \tag{3.5} Right translation preserves Haar null sets, by the Haar lesson, Theorem 10.1. Since p>0p>0 everywhere, the inner integral is zero for every xx if m(A)=0m(A)=0, and is positive for every xx if m(A)>0m(A)>0. Hence β∼m\beta\sim m. Therefore ν∼μ∼β∼m\nu\sim\mu\sim\beta\sim m.

An invariant measure is Haar. If ν\nu is left invariant, its density h=dν/dmh=d\nu/dm is finite and positive almost everywhere, by the sigma-finite Radon–Nikodym theorem. For each fixed gg, invariance and uniqueness of densities give h(gx)=h(x)h(gx)=h(x) for mm-almost every xx. This equality is jointly measurable in (g,x)(g,x). Sigma-finite Fubini implies that for almost every xx it holds for almost every gg. Choose one such xx with 0<h(x)<∞0<h(x)<\infty. Right translation by this xx preserves Haar null sets, so h(y)=h(x)h(y)=h(x) for almost every yy. Thus ν=h(x)m\nu=h(x)m. All four conclusions follow. □\square

The analytic hypothesis enters precisely at the compact-set and Borel-inverse steps. Countable generation and point separation already suffice for the faithful measurable unitary representation. They do not supply a positive compact subset of its image.

4. Uniqueness and the role of sigma-finiteness

Lemma 4.1 (automatic continuity). A Borel homomorphism from a Polish group to a second countable topological group is continuous.

Proof. Borel sets have the Baire property: sets that differ from an open set by a meagre set form a sigma-algebra containing the open sets. If a Baire-property set AA is nonmeagre, write it as an open nonempty OO modulo a meagre set NN. For gg in a sufficiently small identity neighborhood, O∩gOO\cap gO is nonempty and open. Baire's theorem supplies a point outside N∪gNN\cup gN, and hence in A∩gAA\cap gA. Thus AA−1AA^{-1} contains an identity neighborhood.

For an identity neighborhood VV of the target, choose an open identity neighborhood V0V_0 with V0V0−1⊆VV_0V_0^{-1}\subseteq V. Second countability gives a countable cover of the target by right translates V0tnV_0t_n. Their Borel preimages cover the domain. At least one preimage AA is nonmeagre, since the domain is Baire. Its difference set AA−1AA^{-1} is mapped into V0V0−1⊆VV_0V_0^{-1}\subseteq V. The preceding paragraph proves continuity at the identity, hence everywhere. □\square

Corollary 4.2. The topology in Theorem 3.1 is the unique compatible Polish group topology. In particular it does not depend on the equivalent probability chosen in Lemma 1.1. If an analytic Borel group already has a Polish group topology, a nonzero sigma-finite left quasi-invariant measure forces that topology to be locally compact.

Proof. Between any two compatible Polish group topologies, the identity is a Borel homomorphism in both directions. Lemma 4.1 makes both maps continuous. The resulting homeomorphism is the identity on the group. □\square

Proposition 4.3. An infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space, as an additive Polish group with its norm topology, has no nonzero sigma-finite Borel measure quasi-invariant under all translations. Its counting measure is invariant, but is not sigma-finite.

Proof. A norm neighborhood of zero contains a ball and therefore a sequence (cen)(c e_n), with c>0c>0 and an orthonormal sequence (en)(e_n). Distinct terms have distance c2c\sqrt2. No compact set can contain that sequence: finitely many balls of radius less than c/2c/\sqrt2 cannot cover it. Thus the Hilbert group is not locally compact. Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 4.2 rule out the stated sigma-finite measure. Counting measure gives finite measure only to finite sets; countably many such sets cannot cover the uncountable Hilbert space. It is therefore not sigma-finite. □\square

5. What the theorem supplies for isotropy

Corollary 5.1 (one-object groupoids). Let a measurable groupoid have one object, analytic Borel arrow group GG, and a nonzero faithful proper transverse function ν\nu. Then its isotropy group carries the topology of Theorem 3.1, and ν\nu is a positive scalar multiple of Haar measure.

Proof. With one object, a transverse function is a left-invariant measure on the arrow group. Properness provides a countable measurable cover (Bn)(B_n) with ν(Bn)<∞\nu(B_n)<\infty, so it is sigma-finite. Nonzero faithfulness gives a nonzero measure. Theorem 3.1, including its invariant-measure conclusion, applies. □\square

The nonstandard trace-measure subgroup in Countable generation and isotropy topologies has exactly the countable-generation, point-separation, invariance and properness properties used in Lemma 2.2. It has no compatible locally compact topology. Theorem 3.1 consequently excludes an analytic Borel structure as well as a standard Borel structure for that example.

For a groupoid with many objects, its transverse range-fibre measure νy\nu^y is a measure on GyG^y, rather than a measure on GyyG^y_y. The isotropy subgroup can have νy\nu^y-measure zero. Restricting νy\nu^y to it therefore does not supply the nonzero measure required by Theorem 3.1. The following argument constructs a suitable measure from a standard Borel range fibre. It keeps the source coordinate constant under every isotropy translation, so the conull restriction is simultaneously invariant under all those translations.

Theorem 5.2 (a standard Borel range fibre). Let G\mathcal G be a measurable groupoid whose unit space XX has a countable family of measurable sets separating points, and whose unit singletons are measurable. Fix a unit yy, and write

Y=Gy,K=Gyy(5.1) Y=\mathcal G^y,\qquad K=\mathcal G^y_y \tag{5.1}

Assume that YY is standard Borel and that ν\nu is a nonzero sigma-finite measure on YY invariant under every left translation by KK. Then KK has the locally compact Polish topology of Theorem 3.1. More precisely, there are a Borel subset FF of the binary Cantor space, a Borel map t:F→Yt:F\to Y, and a Borel KK-invariant conull subset Y0⊆YY_0\subseteq Y with coordinates

Φ:K×F⟶Y0,Φ(h,z)=h t(z),Φ−1(γ)=(a(γ),σ(γ)),a(γ)=γ t(σ(γ))−1.(5.2) \begin{aligned} \Phi:K\times F&\longrightarrow Y_0,&\Phi(h,z)&=h\,t(z),\\ \Phi^{-1}(\gamma)&=(a(\gamma),\sigma(\gamma)),& a(\gamma)&=\gamma\,t(\sigma(\gamma))^{-1}. \end{aligned} \tag{5.2}

These maps are inverse Borel isomorphisms. The label σ(γ)\sigma(\gamma) records exactly the source unit of γ\gamma. For an equivalent probability μ∼ν\mu\sim\nu on YY, the coordinate pushforward

ρ=a∗(μ∣Y0)(5.3) \rho=a_*(\mu|_{Y_0}) \tag{5.3}

is a quasi-invariant probability on KK. Standard Borel structure is required only on this range fibre; the theorem does not assume it on the entire arrow space.

Proof. The set KK is the Borel subset s−1({y})s^{-1}(\{y\}) of YY, so it is standard Borel. The inherited multiplication and inversion make it a measurable group. Choose the equivalent probability μ\mu from Lemma 1.1. If (Bn)(B_n) separates unit points, set

σ(γ)=(1Bn(s(γ)))n∈C={0,1}N,λ=σ∗μ.(5.4) \sigma(\gamma)=(1_{B_n}(s(\gamma)))_n\in\mathcal C=\{0,1\}^{\mathbb N}, \qquad \lambda=\sigma_*\mu. \tag{5.4}

The map σ:Y→C\sigma:Y\to\mathcal C is Borel. Its fibres are exactly the sets of arrows with the same source, because the BnB_n separate points. Its image AA is analytic, by the earlier Polish lesson, Theorem 4.3(1). The measure λ\lambda is a probability on the whole Cantor space; AA is completion-measurable and has full measure, by that lesson's Theorem 6.2. Its Theorem 7.7 supplies a section v:A→Yv:A\to Y of σ\sigma measurable for the completion of λ\lambda. Extend it by a fixed γ0∈Y\gamma_0\in Y outside AA.

We need a Borel section on a conull set, so we give the replacement step. Embed the standard Borel space YY Borel isomorphically into a Borel subset D⊆CD\subseteq\mathcal C; a countable separating family and the earlier Theorem 4.3(5) provide this embedding jj. Each binary coordinate of j∘vj\circ v has a completion-measurable inverse image of 11. Replace these inverse images by Borel sets modulo λ\lambda-null sets. The resulting map b:C→Cb:\mathcal C\to\mathcal C is Borel and equals j∘vj\circ v outside one null set, since there are only countably many coordinates. In particular b∈Db\in D almost everywhere. Put t~=j−1∘b\widetilde t=j^{-1}\circ b where b∈Db\in D, and t~=γ0\widetilde t=\gamma_0 elsewhere. It is a Borel map into YY. The set

F={z∈C:σ(t~(z))=z}(5.5) F=\{z\in\mathcal C:\sigma(\widetilde t(z))=z\} \tag{5.5}

is Borel, has λ(F)=1\lambda(F)=1, and is contained in AA. Set t=t~∣Ft=\widetilde t|_F and Y0=σ−1(F)Y_0=\sigma^{-1}(F). Then μ(Y0)=1\mu(Y_0)=1, so Y0Y_0 is ν\nu-conull. Left translation by any k∈Kk\in K leaves the source unchanged, hence preserves Y0Y_0 exactly. A Borel section on all of AA was not asserted; the completed section has been converted only on the single conull set FF.

If γ∈Y0\gamma\in Y_0, equality of source codes gives s(γ)=s(t(σ(γ)))s(\gamma)=s(t(\sigma(\gamma))). Thus the product defining a(γ)a(\gamma) in (5.2) is defined and has source and range yy. Conversely h t(z)h\,t(z) has source code zz. Cancellation proves that the two maps in (5.2) are inverse. All their operations are Borel under the given measurable groupoid operations. Therefore they are Borel isomorphisms of the stated standard Borel spaces. They also give

a(kγ)=k a(γ),σ(kγ)=σ(γ).(5.6) a(k\gamma)=k\,a(\gamma),\qquad \sigma(k\gamma)=\sigma(\gamma). \tag{5.6}

Write μ0=μ∣Y0\mu_0=\mu|_{Y_0} and ν0=ν∣Y0\nu_0=\nu|_{Y_0}. For every kk, exact invariance gives k∗ν0=ν0k_*\nu_0=\nu_0, while equivalence gives k∗μ0∼μ0k_*\mu_0\sim\mu_0. Pushforward preserves equivalence of null sets: for a Borel E⊆KE\subseteq K, test its inverse image under aa. Equation (5.6) then gives

k∗ρ=a∗(k∗μ0)∼a∗μ0=ρ.(5.7) k_*\rho=a_*(k_*\mu_0)\sim a_*\mu_0=\rho. \tag{5.7}

This is a probability, so it is nonzero and sigma-finite. Theorem 3.1 applies to the standard Borel group KK. It gives the desired locally compact Polish topology and the Haar null class of ρ\rho. Corollary 4.2 shows that this topology is independent of the weight, the separating codes and the section. □\square

Corollary 5.3. If a measurable groupoid has countably separated units, measurable unit singletons, standard Borel range fibres and a nonzero proper transverse measure on each range fibre, all its isotropy groups have compatible locally compact Polish group topologies.

Proof. Properness makes each range-fibre measure sigma-finite. Transverse invariance includes the isotropy translations on that fibre. Theorem 5.2 applies at every unit. This is a pointwise conclusion; no jointly measurable field of topologies is claimed. □\square

Lemma 5.3a (sections and sigma-finite Tonelli). Let (A,Σ)(A,\Sigma) and (B,𝒯)(B,\mathcal T) be measurable spaces. Their product sigma-field Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T is the sigma-field on A×BA\times B generated by the rectangles C×DC\times D with C∈ΣC\in\Sigma and D∈𝒯D\in\mathcal T. Let u:A×B→[0,∞]u:A\times B\to[0,\infty] be Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T-measurable.

One measure. If α\alpha is a sigma-finite measure on AA, then a↦u(a,b)a\mapsto u(a,b) is Σ\Sigma-measurable for every b∈Bb\in B, and the function

b↦∫Au(a,b)dα(a)(5.T1) b\longmapsto \int_A u(a,b)\,d\alpha(a) \tag{5.T1}

is 𝒯\mathcal T-measurable. This assertion uses no measure on BB.

Two measures. If, in addition, β\beta is a sigma-finite measure on BB, then exactly one measure α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta on Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T satisfies (α⊗β)(C×D)=α(C)β(D)(\alpha\otimes\beta)(C\times D)=\alpha(C)\beta(D) for all C∈ΣC\in\Sigma and D∈𝒯D\in\mathcal T, with the convention 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0. This measure is sigma-finite, the function a↦∫Bu(a,b)dβ(b)a\mapsto\int_Bu(a,b)\,d\beta(b) is Σ\Sigma-measurable, and

∫A×Bud(α⊗β)=∫B∫Au(a,b)dα(a)dβ(b)=∫A∫Bu(a,b)dβ(b)dα(a),(5.T2) \begin{aligned} \int_{A\times B}u\,d(\alpha\otimes\beta) &=\int_B\!\int_A u(a,b)\,d\alpha(a)\,d\beta(b)\\ &=\int_A\!\int_B u(a,b)\,d\beta(b)\,d\alpha(a), \end{aligned} \tag{5.T2}

where all three members may equal ∞\infty. Only the two sigma-fields and the two measures enter: no topology on AA or BB is used, and no local finiteness or Radon condition is imposed.

Proof. The integration facts we use are proved in Measure and Hilbert space tools for Haar integration, Section 2: continuity of a measure from below, monotone convergence (Theorem 2.1), additivity of the integral on nonnegative functions, termwise integration of a series of nonnegative functions (formula (2.1)), and the increasing simple approximations obtained by truncating at height kk and rounding down to multiples of 2−k2^{-k}. Positive homogeneity, ∫cf=c∫f\int cf=c\int f for a constant c≥0c\geq0, is immediate for simple functions and follows for every nonnegative measurable ff by monotone convergence.

Dynkin classes. A family 𝒟\mathcal D of subsets of a set Ω\Omega is a Dynkin class if Ω∈𝒟\Omega\in\mathcal D, if F∖E∈𝒟F\setminus E\in\mathcal D whenever E⊂FE\subset F are members of 𝒟\mathcal D, and if the union of every increasing sequence of members of 𝒟\mathcal D belongs to 𝒟\mathcal D. We show: a Dynkin class 𝒟\mathcal D that contains a family 𝒫\mathcal P closed under finite intersections contains the sigma-field generated by 𝒫\mathcal P. Let 𝒟0\mathcal D_0 be the intersection of all Dynkin classes containing 𝒫\mathcal P; it is itself a Dynkin class, and 𝒟0⊂𝒟\mathcal D_0\subset\mathcal D. For G∈𝒟0G\in\mathcal D_0, let 𝒟G\mathcal D_G consist of the sets E⊂ΩE\subset\Omega with E∩G∈𝒟0E\cap G\in\mathcal D_0. It is a Dynkin class, because Ω∩G=G\Omega\cap G=G, (F∖E)∩G=(F∩G)∖(E∩G)(F\setminus E)\cap G=(F\cap G)\setminus(E\cap G), and intersecting with GG preserves increasing unions. If G∈𝒫G\in\mathcal P, then 𝒫⊂𝒟G\mathcal P\subset\mathcal D_G, hence 𝒟0⊂𝒟G\mathcal D_0\subset\mathcal D_G. In other words, every member of 𝒫\mathcal P lies in 𝒟E\mathcal D_E for each E∈𝒟0E\in\mathcal D_0, and therefore 𝒟0⊂𝒟E\mathcal D_0\subset\mathcal D_E. Thus 𝒟0\mathcal D_0 is closed under finite intersections. It is closed under complements, which are the differences Ω∖E\Omega\setminus E, and hence under finite unions. A countable union is the increasing union of its finite partial unions. So 𝒟0\mathcal D_0 is a sigma-field containing 𝒫\mathcal P, and it lies in 𝒟\mathcal D.

The rectangles are closed under finite intersections, since (C×D)∩(C′×D′)=(C∩C′)×(D∩D′)(C\times D)\cap(C'\times D')=(C\cap C')\times(D\cap D'), and they generate Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T. Hence any Dynkin class of product-measurable sets that contains all rectangles is the whole of Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T.

Sections. For E⊂A×BE\subset A\times B, a∈Aa\in A and b∈Bb\in B, write Eb={a′:(a′,b)∈E}E^b=\{a':(a',b)\in E\} and Ea={b′:(a,b′)∈E}E_a=\{b':(a,b')\in E\}. The sets EE all of whose sections EbE^b belong to Σ\Sigma form a sigma-field, because forming sections commutes with complements and countable unions. This sigma-field contains each rectangle, whose sections are CC or ⌀\varnothing. So Eb∈ΣE^b\in\Sigma for all E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T, and in the same way Ea∈𝒯E_a\in\mathcal T. Since {a:u(a,b)>t}={u>t}b\{a:u(a,b)>t\}=\{u>t\}^b for every real tt, each function a↦u(a,b)a\mapsto u(a,b) is Σ\Sigma-measurable; likewise each b↦u(a,b)b\mapsto u(a,b) is 𝒯\mathcal T-measurable.

Section masses. We prove that b↦α(Eb)b\mapsto\alpha(E^b) is 𝒯\mathcal T-measurable for every E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T. First let α(A)<∞\alpha(A)<\infty, and let 𝒟\mathcal D consist of those E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T for which this holds. A rectangle gives α((C×D)b)=α(C)1D(b)\alpha((C\times D)^b)=\alpha(C)1_D(b). If E⊂FE\subset F both lie in 𝒟\mathcal D, then α((F∖E)b)=α(Fb)−α(Eb)\alpha((F\setminus E)^b)=\alpha(F^b)-\alpha(E^b) is a difference of finite measurable functions. If En∈𝒟E_n\in\mathcal D increase to EE, continuity from below makes α(Eb)\alpha(E^b) the pointwise limit of the measurable functions α(Enb)\alpha(E_n^b). So 𝒟\mathcal D is a Dynkin class containing the rectangles, and 𝒟=Σ⊗𝒯\mathcal D=\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T. For a general sigma-finite α\alpha, choose An∈ΣA_n\in\Sigma with An⊂An+1A_n\subset A_{n+1}, α(An)<∞\alpha(A_n)<\infty and ⋃nAn=A\bigcup_nA_n=A. The finite case, applied to the measures S↦α(S∩An)S\mapsto\alpha(S\cap A_n), shows that each function b↦α(Eb∩An)b\mapsto\alpha(E^b\cap A_n) is measurable, and these functions increase to α(Eb)\alpha(E^b). Finiteness was used only for the subtraction.

The one-measure assertion. Let sks_k be the simple approximations of uu described above. Each sks_k takes finitely many values c1,…,crc_1,\ldots,c_r in [0,k][0,k], on the sets Ej={sk=cj}∈Σ⊗𝒯E_j=\{s_k=c_j\}\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T, and sks_k increases to uu at every point, including the points where u=∞u=\infty. For fixed bb, the sections EjbE_j^b are disjoint, so

∫Ask(a,b)dα(a)=∑j=1rcjα(Ejb), \int_A s_k(a,b)\,d\alpha(a)=\sum_{j=1}^r c_j\,\alpha(E_j^b),

which is a 𝒯\mathcal T-measurable function of bb by the previous paragraph. By monotone convergence in aa, these functions increase to ∫Au(a,b)dα(a)\int_Au(a,b)\,d\alpha(a) for every bb. A pointwise limit of measurable functions is measurable, and (5.T1) follows. With the two factors exchanged, the same arguments show that a sigma-finite β\beta makes a↦β(Ea)a\mapsto\beta(E_a) and a↦∫Bu(a,b)dβ(b)a\mapsto\int_Bu(a,b)\,d\beta(b) measurable.

Two iterated measures. Let β\beta also be sigma-finite. For E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T put

π1(E)=∫Bα(Eb)dβ(b),π2(E)=∫Aβ(Ea)dα(a). \pi_1(E)=\int_B\alpha(E^b)\,d\beta(b),\qquad \pi_2(E)=\int_A\beta(E_a)\,d\alpha(a).

Both vanish on the empty set. If EE is the disjoint union of E1,E2,…E_1,E_2,\ldots, then EbE^b is the disjoint union of the sections EnbE_n^b, so α(Eb)=∑nα(Enb)\alpha(E^b)=\sum_n\alpha(E_n^b), and termwise integration gives π1(E)=∑nπ1(En)\pi_1(E)=\sum_n\pi_1(E_n). Thus π1\pi_1 is a measure, and so, symmetrically, is π2\pi_2. On a rectangle, π1(C×D)\pi_1(C\times D) is the integral of the function α(C)1D\alpha(C)1_D with respect to β\beta, which equals α(C)β(D)\alpha(C)\beta(D); when α(C)=∞\alpha(C)=\infty, monotone convergence applied to the functions k1Dk1_D gives this value under the convention 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0. In the same way π2(C×D)=α(C)β(D)\pi_2(C\times D)=\alpha(C)\beta(D).

Uniqueness. Let ρ\rho and ρ′\rho' be measures on Σ⊗𝒯\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T with ρ(C×D)=ρ′(C×D)=α(C)β(D)\rho(C\times D)=\rho'(C\times D)=\alpha(C)\beta(D) for every rectangle. Choose increasing sequences An∈ΣA_n\in\Sigma and Bn∈𝒯B_n\in\mathcal T of finite measure with unions AA and BB, and put Rn=An×BnR_n=A_n\times B_n. Fix nn. The sets E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T with ρ(E∩Rn)=ρ′(E∩Rn)\rho(E\cap R_n)=\rho'(E\cap R_n) include every rectangle, since a rectangle meets RnR_n in a rectangle. They form a Dynkin class. Indeed, for E⊂FE\subset F in this class, ρ((F∖E)∩Rn)=ρ(F∩Rn)−ρ(E∩Rn)\rho((F\setminus E)\cap R_n)=\rho(F\cap R_n)-\rho(E\cap R_n) is a difference of finite numbers bounded by ρ(Rn)=α(An)β(Bn)\rho(R_n)=\alpha(A_n)\beta(B_n), and the same identity holds for ρ′\rho'; increasing unions are covered by continuity from below. Hence the equality holds for every E∈Σ⊗𝒯E\in\Sigma\otimes\mathcal T. The rectangles RnR_n increase to A×BA\times B, so continuity from below gives ρ(E)=lim⁡nρ(E∩Rn)=lim⁡nρ′(E∩Rn)=ρ′(E)\rho(E)=\lim_n\rho(E\cap R_n)=\lim_n\rho'(E\cap R_n)=\rho'(E).

In particular π1=π2\pi_1=\pi_2. This common measure is the required α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta: it has the stated rectangle values, no other measure has them, and it is sigma-finite because the sets RnR_n have finite measure and cover A×BA\times B.

The iterated integrals. For u=1Eu=1_E, the three members of (5.T2) are (α⊗β)(E)(\alpha\otimes\beta)(E), π1(E)\pi_1(E) and π2(E)\pi_2(E), which are equal. For the simple function sks_k, the integral over A×BA\times B is ∑jcj(α⊗β)(Ej)\sum_jc_j(\alpha\otimes\beta)(E_j) by the definition of the integral of a simple function. The inner integrals of sks_k were computed above, in both orders, and additivity and positive homogeneity of the outer integral give the iterated integrals ∑jcjπ1(Ej)\sum_jc_j\pi_1(E_j) and ∑jcjπ2(Ej)\sum_jc_j\pi_2(E_j). So (5.T2) holds for sks_k. For general uu, let k→∞k\to\infty. Monotone convergence applies on A×BA\times B; it also applies to each inner integral, and then, since the inner integrals increase with kk, to the outer integrals. All three members of (5.T2) therefore converge to the corresponding members for uu, which are consequently equal. □\square

In the averaging proof below, the first part of Lemma 5.3a makes the Haar section integral measurable on FF before any sigma-finiteness of its label measure is known. Formula (5.T2) is used only with two measures already proved sigma-finite. The ordinary nonnegative integration rules invoked in the lemma are proved in [Axler], Theorems 3.4, 3.7–3.11; they require neither sigma-finiteness nor a topology.

The coordinates (5.2) put the invariant measure on K×FK\times F. The next argument proves its product structure directly. It applies to any measurable label space; its measure need not already be the pushforward of the original measure.

Theorem 5.4 (an invariant product measure). Let KK be a locally compact Polish group with left Haar measure mm, let FF be a measurable space, and let MM be a sigma-finite measure on the product sigma-field of K×FK\times F. Suppose that (h,z)↦(kh,z)(h,z)\mapsto(kh,z) preserves MM for every k∈Kk\in K. Then there is a unique sigma-finite measure κ\kappa on FF such that

M=m⊗κ.(5.8) M=m\otimes\kappa. \tag{5.8}

For any strictly positive finite Borel function qq on KK with ∫q dm=1\int q\,dm=1, it is given by

κ(B)=∫K×Fq(h)1B(z) dM(h,z).(5.9) \kappa(B)=\int_{K\times F}q(h)1_B(z)\,dM(h,z). \tag{5.9}

It is nonzero if MM is nonzero. No regularity or local finiteness of MM is assumed.

Proof. Haar measure is nonzero and sigma-finite, as in Theorem 3.1. Lemma 1.1 therefore supplies such a function qq. We use the Haar lesson's convention

m(Eh)=Δ(h)m(E),∫f(gh) dm(g)=Δ(h)−1∫f(g) dm(g),(5.10) m(Eh)=\Delta(h)m(E),\qquad \int f(gh)\,dm(g)=\Delta(h)^{-1}\int f(g)\,dm(g), \tag{5.10}

with Δ\Delta a continuous positive homomorphism. Its complete Theorem 11.1 gives

∫f(g−1) dm(g)=∫f(g)Δ(g)−1 dm(g).(5.11) \int f(g^{-1})\,dm(g) =\int f(g)\Delta(g)^{-1}\,dm(g). \tag{5.11}

These formulas apply to all nonnegative Borel functions. Set p=qΔp=q\Delta. Left invariance and (5.11), with g=hug=hu, give, for every hh,

∫Kp(g−1h) dm(g)=∫Kp(u−1) dm(u)=∫Kq(u) dm(u)=1.(5.12) \int_K p(g^{-1}h)\,dm(g) =\int_K p(u^{-1})\,dm(u) =\int_K q(u)\,dm(u)=1. \tag{5.12}

Define κ\kappa by (5.9). It is a measure, by monotone convergence, although sigma-finiteness has yet to be proved. Multiplication and inversion on KK are jointly Borel, so the averaging integrands below are product-measurable. For a nonnegative product-measurable ff, the function Tf(z)=∫Kf(k,z) dm(k)Tf(z)=\int_K f(k,z)\,dm(k) is measurable by the one-measure assertion of Lemma 5.3a. Apply (5.T2) to the already sigma-finite measures mm and MM, then apply the assumed invariance for each fixed gg, and exchange these same two integrals again:

∫f dM=∫K ⁣∫K×Fp(g−1h)f(h,z) dM(h,z) dm(g)=∫K ⁣∫K×Fp(h)f(gh,z) dM(h,z) dm(g)=∫K×Fp(h)(∫Kf(gh,z) dm(g))dM(h,z)=∫K×Fq(h)Tf(z) dM(h,z)=∫FTf(z) dκ(z).(5.13) \begin{aligned} \int f\,dM &=\int_K\!\int_{K\times F} p(g^{-1}h)f(h,z)\,dM(h,z)\,dm(g)\\ &=\int_K\!\int_{K\times F} p(h)f(gh,z)\,dM(h,z)\,dm(g)\\ &=\int_{K\times F}p(h) \left(\int_K f(gh,z)\,dm(g)\right)dM(h,z)\\ &=\int_{K\times F}q(h)Tf(z)\,dM(h,z) =\int_F Tf(z)\,d\kappa(z). \end{aligned} \tag{5.13}

The third-to-fourth equality uses (5.10); the last equality is the pushforward integration formula for the weighted measure in (5.9). All integrands are nonnegative. No finite quantity is subtracted from an infinite one, and no Tonelli exchange against an as-yet unproved sigma-finite κ\kappa occurs.

Choose a measurable cover (En)(E_n) of K×FK\times F with M(En)<∞M(E_n)<\infty. Write

un(z)=m({h:(h,z)∈En}),Bn,j={z:un(z)≥1/j},j≥1.(5.14) u_n(z)=m(\{h:(h,z)\in E_n\}),\qquad B_{n,j}=\{z:u_n(z)\geq1/j\},\quad j\geq1. \tag{5.14}

The functions unu_n are measurable. Equation (5.13) for f=1Enf=1_{E_n} gives

∫Fun dκ=M(En),κ(Bn,j)≤jM(En)<∞.(5.15) \int_F u_n\,d\kappa=M(E_n),\qquad \kappa(B_{n,j})\leq jM(E_n)<\infty. \tag{5.15}

For each zz, the slices of the EnE_n cover KK. They cannot all have Haar measure zero, since m(K)>0m(K)>0. Thus the countably many Bn,jB_{n,j} cover FF, proving sigma-finiteness. Only now does the two-measure part of Lemma 5.3a supply the sigma-finite product m⊗κm\otimes\kappa; its formula (5.T2) and (5.13) agree on every indicator. This proves (5.8). If κ=0\kappa=0, the same formula gives M=0M=0.

For uniqueness choose a Borel C⊆KC\subseteq K with 0<m(C)<∞0<m(C)<\infty, for example a compact identity neighborhood. Any product representation has M(C×B)=m(C)κ(B)M(C\times B)=m(C)\kappa(B). Dividing by this fixed positive finite number determines κ(B)\kappa(B) for every measurable BB, including those of infinite measure. In particular (5.9) is independent of the normalized function qq. □\square

The proof uses exact invariance of the whole product measure for every translation. It never chooses conditional measures with translation-dependent exceptional sets. The only product on which the two central integrations are exchanged is m⊗Mm\otimes M, whose factors are known sigma-finite at that point.

Corollary 5.5 (the fixed-range-fibre Haar formula). Under Theorem 5.2, fix a left Haar measure mym_y on KK. There is a unique nonzero sigma-finite measure κy\kappa_y on its Borel label set FF such that, for every nonnegative Borel ff on Y0Y_0,

∫Y0f(γ) dν(γ)=∫F ⁣∫Kf(h t(z)) dmy(h) dκy(z).(5.16) \int_{Y_0} f(\gamma)\,d\nu(\gamma) =\int_F\!\int_K f(h\,t(z))\,dm_y(h)\,d\kappa_y(z). \tag{5.16}

Moreover κy∼λ∣F\kappa_y\sim\lambda|_F, for the probability λ\lambda in (5.4).

Proof. Set M=(Φ−1)∗(ν∣Y0)M=(\Phi^{-1})_*(\nu|_{Y_0}). A Borel isomorphism preserves sigma-finiteness. Equations (5.2) and (5.6) transfer every isotropy translation to left translation in the first coordinate, so Theorem 5.4 applies. Its integral formula is (5.16). For a Borel B⊆FB\subseteq F, κy(B)=0\kappa_y(B)=0 exactly when M(K×B)=0M(K\times B)=0, because mym_y is nonzero. This is equivalent to ν(σ−1B)=0\nu(\sigma^{-1}B)=0, then to μ(σ−1B)=0\mu(\sigma^{-1}B)=0, and finally to λ(B)=0\lambda(B)=0. Nonzero ν∣Y0\nu|_{Y_0} gives nonzero κy\kappa_y. □\square

Proposition 5.6 (a change of section). On the same label set FF, replace t(z)t(z) by t′(z)=b(z)t(z)t'(z)=b(z)t(z), where b:F→Kb:F\to K is Borel. Keep the same left Haar measure and convention (5.10). Then the source-label measure in (5.16) changes by

dκy′(z)=Δ(b(z)) dκy(z).(5.17) d\kappa'_y(z)=\Delta(b(z))\,d\kappa_y(z). \tag{5.17}

In particular the null class is unchanged; the measure itself need not be unchanged in a nonunimodular group. Replacing mym_y by cmyc m_y instead replaces κy\kappa_y by c−1κyc^{-1}\kappa_y.

Proof. The old and new coordinates satisfy h=h′b(z)h=h'b(z), so the map from old coordinates to new ones is (h,z)↦(hb(z)−1,z)(h,z)\mapsto(hb(z)^{-1},z). For each fixed zz, (5.10) gives ∫Kf(hb(z)−1,z) dmy(h)=Δ(b(z))∫Kf(h′,z) dmy(h′). \int_K f(hb(z)^{-1},z)\,dm_y(h) =\Delta(b(z))\int_K f(h',z)\,dm_y(h'). Tonelli proves the asserted product formula for the new coordinates. The density is positive and finite; it preserves the null class and sigma-finiteness, the latter by subdividing a finite-measure cover according to Δ(b)≤n\Delta(b)\leq n. Uniqueness in Theorem 5.4 identifies κy′\kappa'_y. The scalar change of Haar normalization follows directly from (5.16). □\square

Connes's author-hosted Proposition 15, PDF 38–39, uses this topology and an isotropy Haar product decomposition in its positive argument. The unrestricted countably generated assertions have complete counterexamples in Countable generation and isotropy topologies and Principal groupoids with extra fibre information. Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.5 now provide the topology and full Haar product formula on each fixed standard Borel range fibre. Averaged coefficients and isotropy commutants, Theorems 5.1 and 6.1, supplies the full operator step at the global standard Borel scope, with one countable total family working at every unit. Its completed-probability descent and proper global kernel approximation avoid a jointly measurable choice of these topologies, Haar measures and sections. Such a joint field is therefore neither proved here nor needed for that adopted route. The broader countably generated counterexamples and the separate weak-measurable two-copy factor problem retain their exact scope. Modular spectral disintegration and the flow of weights retain their exact prerequisites in the modular and flow courses.

6. Five concrete models

Example 6.1 (translation overlap). On R\mathbb R with Lebesgue measure, the ordinary regular representation is (λtf)(x)=f(x−t)(\lambda_t f)(x)=f(x-t). For C=[−1,1]C=[-1,1], ⟨λt1C,1C⟩=(2−∣t∣)+,{t:(2−∣t∣)+>1}=(−1,1)⊆C−C=[−2,2].(6.1) \begin{gathered}\langle\lambda_t1_C,1_C\rangle=(2-|t|)_+,\\\{t:(2-|t|)_+>1\}=(-1,1)\\\subseteq C-C=[-2,2].\end{gathered} \tag{6.1} The integral is the length of [−1,1]∩[t−1,t+1][-1,1]\cap[t-1,t+1]. Normalizing an equivalent positive-density probability changes the representation by a unitary conjugacy, as Exercise 7.1 proves, so it leaves the constructed topology unchanged.

A positive compact set creates a compact identity neighborhood
Open diagram at full size

Figure 6.1. The upper panel shows the proof's exact maps and hypotheses: an analytic Borel group enters its faithful unitary model, a positive compact set is pulled back, and the overlap coefficient places an open identity neighborhood inside CC−1CC^{-1}. The lower panel is the exact real translation calculation (6.1), with C=[−1,1]C=[-1,1], m(C)=2m(C)=2 for this Haar example, threshold 11, and C−C=[−2,2]C-C=[-2,2]. The general probability-space construction uses its own μ(C)/2\mu(C)/2; the plotted Haar coefficient is a concrete model, not a formula for every measure. Proof locators: Lemma 2.2, Theorem 3.1 and Example 6.1. Classical source context: [Mackey] and [Ramsay].

Example 6.2 (the rationals). Give Q\mathbb Q its usual relative Borel structure. Every subset is Borel, since it is a countable union of singletons. An enumeration (qn)(q_n) and masses μ({qn})=2−n\mu(\{q_n\})=2^{-n}, for n≥1n\geq1, give a quasi-invariant probability. The topology of Theorem 3.1 is discrete: a countable locally compact Polish group is Baire, so its decomposition into closed singletons forces an isolated point, and translations make every point isolated. This differs from the inherited real topology, which is not locally compact. That topology is not Polish: in a countable nondiscrete metrizable group every singleton is nowhere dense, contradicting the Baire theorem if a compatible complete metric existed.

Example 6.3 (affine transformations). On G=(0,∞)×RG=(0,\infty)\times\mathbb R, let (a,b)(c,d)=(ac,b+ad),dν(a,b)=a−2 da db.(6.2) (a,b)(c,d)=(ac,b+ad),\qquad d\nu(a,b)=a^{-2}\,da\,db. \tag{6.2} The usual topology is Polish and locally compact. Left translation has Jacobian a02a_0^2, which cancels the denominator (a0a)2(a_0a)^2, so ν\nu is left invariant. It is sigma-finite on the rectangles [1/n,n]×[−n,n][1/n,n]\times[-n,n]. Right translation by (c,d)(c,d) has Jacobian cc, and hence ν(E(c,d))=c−1ν(E).(6.3) \nu(E(c,d))=c^{-1}\nu(E). \tag{6.3} This is a nonunimodular example. The theorem produces the usual topology, by Corollary 4.2. The use of right translation in (3.5) requires preservation of null sets, rather than right invariance of the Haar measure.

Example 6.4 (zero measure on isotropy). Let the units be R\mathbb R, and write arrows as (x,h,z):z→x(x,h,z):z\to x, with

(x,h,z)(z,k,u)=(x,h+k,u),(x,h,z)−1=(z,−h,x).(6.4) (x,h,z)(z,k,u)=(x,h+k,u),\qquad (x,h,z)^{-1}=(z,-h,x). \tag{6.4}

Give each range fibre its measure dνx(h,z)=dh dzd\nu^x(h,z)=dh\,dz. Left translation changes hh by a constant and keeps zz fixed, so this is a transverse function. The sets where all three coordinates have absolute value at most nn cover the arrow space and have range-fibre measure at most 4n24n^2. Thus it is faithful and proper. The isotropy at yy is the line z=yz=y and has νy\nu^y-measure zero. Its group is the additive real line.

Choose t(z)=(y,0,z)t(z)=(y,0,z). Then a(y,h,z)=ha(y,h,z)=h, and the equivalent probability

dμy(h,z)=14e−∣h∣−∣z∣ dh dz,dρ(h)=12e−∣h∣ dh(6.5) d\mu_y(h,z)=\tfrac14e^{-|h|-|z|}\,dh\,dz, \qquad d\rho(h)=\tfrac12e^{-|h|}\,dh \tag{6.5}

has the asserted nonzero pushforward. Every translated density is strictly positive, so ρ\rho is quasi-invariant. This constructs the isotropy measure without restricting νy\nu^y to its null isotropy line. Pushing the unweighted νy\nu^y to the same coordinate would give infinite mass to every set of positive Lebesgue measure; Exercise 7.9 explains why that measure is not sigma-finite.

Range-fibre coordinates create an isotropy probability
Open diagram at full size

Figure 6.2. The model fixes y=0y=0, so Y=G0Y=\mathcal G^0 has coordinates (h,z)(h,z). Its Haar-isotropy line z=0z=0 is null for dh dzdh\,dz; the section is t(z)=(0,0,z)t(z)=(0,0,z), and a(0,h,z)=ha(0,h,z)=h. The square is the schematic window [−2,2]2[-2,2]^2 in the full plane; the right-hand density curve is sampled every 0.0250.025 on [−3,3][-3,3]. The marked arrow is exactly (0,1.4,0.9)(0,1.4,0.9). The probability and its pushforward in (6.5) are defined on the full plane and line, respectively. The diagram traces the mechanism proved in Theorem 5.2 and calculated in Example 6.4; its source context is Connes's Proposition 15 and the programme's full Jankov–von Neumann section theorem.

Example 6.5 (the affine section factor). Use the affine group KK of Example 6.3 as the isotropy in the transitive groupoid with arrows (x,h,z):z→x(x,h,z):z\to x, multiplication (x,h,z)(z,k,u)=(x,hk,u)(x,h,z)(z,k,u)=(x,hk,u), and range measures dm(h) dzdm(h)\,dz. Fix a range unit yy. For the section t(z)=(y,(1,0),z)t(z)=(y,(1,0),z), the label measure is dzdz. Our modular convention is Δ(a,b)=a−1\Delta(a,b)=a^{-1}, since (6.3) gives m(E(c,d))=c−1m(E)m(E(c,d))=c^{-1}m(E).

Choose instead t′(z)=(y,(ez,0),z)t'(z)=(y,(e^z,0),z). Then

(a,b)=(a′,b′)(ez,0)=(a′ez,b′),da dba2 dz=da′ db′(a′)2 e−zdz.(6.6) (a,b)=(a',b')(e^z,0)=(a'e^z,b'),\qquad \frac{da\,db}{a^2}\,dz =\frac{da'\,db'}{(a')^2}\,e^{-z}dz. \tag{6.6}

The Jacobian is eze^z; the density denominator contributes e−2ze^{-2z}. Thus the new label measure is e−zdze^{-z}dz, exactly Δ(ez,0)dz\Delta(e^z,0)dz. Both label measures are sigma-finite and equivalent, but give different masses to every positive-length bounded interval lying wholly in the positive or negative half-line.

Haar averaging gives an invariant product measure
Open diagram at full size

Figure 6.3. The upper schematic traces the exact proof of Theorem 5.4: normalize qq against left Haar measure, use p=qΔp=q\Delta, average against the already sigma-finite measures mm and MM, and recover κ\kappa as the weighted label pushforward. The right panel gives the explicit finite-mass cover bound (5.15). The lower panel is the exact affine coordinate change (6.6), including its Jacobian and modular sign. It is a symbolic proof diagram, with no numerical samples or unstated geometric projection. Proof locators: Theorem 5.4, Proposition 5.6 and Example 6.5; Haar translation and inversion context: the programme Haar lesson, Theorems 10.1 and 11.1.

7. Exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 7.1. Level 2. If μ=wν\mu=w\nu for a positive finite measurable ww, show that the weighted regular representations for equivalent sigma-finite measures μ\mu and ν\nu are unitarily equivalent. Identify the unitary and the two derivative conventions.

Solution. Multiplication Jξ=w1/2ξJ\xi=w^{1/2}\xi is a unitary from L2(μ)L^2(\mu) onto L2(ν)L^2(\nu), with inverse multiplication by w−1/2w^{-1/2} on almost-everywhere representatives. If rgν=d(g∗ν)/dνr_g^\nu=d(g_*\nu)/d\nu, the pushforward calculation gives rgμ(x)=w(g−1x)rgν(x)/w(x)r_g^\mu(x)=w(g^{-1}x)r_g^\nu(x)/w(x) almost everywhere. Therefore JUgμξ(x)=(rgν(x))1/2w(g−1x)1/2ξ(g−1x)=UgνJξ(x)JU_g^\mu\xi(x)=(r_g^\nu(x))^{1/2}w(g^{-1}x)^{1/2}\xi(g^{-1}x)=U_g^\nu J\xi(x). Unitarily conjugating the unitary image preserves its strong topology. The derivative is always that of pushforward by gg, not by g−1g^{-1}.

Exercise 7.2. Level 1. For C=[−a,a]C=[-a,a], a>0a>0, calculate the overlap coefficient and the neighborhood in (3.3) for Lebesgue measure.

Solution. The overlap of [−a,a][-a,a] and [t−a,t+a][t-a,t+a] has length (2a−∣t∣)+(2a-|t|)_+. The value at zero is 2a2a, so the half-value test is (2a−∣t∣)+>a(2a-|t|)_+>a, or ∣t∣<a|t|<a. Thus the neighborhood is (−a,a)(-a,a), its closure is [−a,a][-a,a], and it lies in C−C=[−2a,2a]C-C=[-2a,2a], exactly as the proof requires.

Exercise 7.3. Level 2. Prove that every countable group with its full power-set sigma-field admits the theorem's construction, and identify the measure class and topology.

Solution. Give every point a positive mass, with total one; on a finite group use normalized counting measure, and on an infinite enumeration use 2−n2^{-n}. Every translation preserves the null class, whose only null set is empty. A countable discrete space is Polish, so the measurable group is standard Borel and its operations are measurable. Theorem 3.1 applies. The countable Baire argument in Example 6.2 makes its topology discrete, and Haar measure is counting measure up to scale. This is exactly the original positive-at-every-point null class.

Exercise 7.4. Level 2. Verify the affine group's left and right Jacobians in (6.2)–(6.3). Explain why the modular factor does not invalidate (3.5).

Solution. Left translation by (a0,b0)(a_0,b_0) is (a,b)↦(a0a,b0+a0b)(a,b)\mapsto(a_0a,b_0+a_0b), with determinant a02a_0^2; dividing by the square of the new first coordinate gives a02/(a0a)2=1/a2a_0^2/(a_0a)^2=1/a^2. Right translation by (c,d)(c,d) is (a,b)↦(ac,b+ad)(a,b)\mapsto(ac,b+ad), with determinant cc; its density factor is c/(ac)2=c−1a−2c/(ac)^2=c^{-1}a^{-2}. Thus right translation rescales Haar measure by a strictly positive finite constant. It preserves zero and positive measure, which are the only properties used in (3.5).

Exercise 7.5. Level 3. Prove that a group in Theorem 3.1 with finite invariant ν\nu is compact. Explain why finite quasi-invariant measure alone gives no such conclusion.

Solution. The theorem makes ν\nu a scalar multiple of Haar measure mm, so m(G)<∞m(G)<\infty. Choose a nonempty relatively compact open VV; then 0<m(V)<∞0<m(V)<\infty. If GG were not compact, recursively choose gn+1g_{n+1} outside the compact union ⋃j≤ngjV‾V‾−1\bigcup_{j\leq n}g_j\overline V\overline V^{-1}. The sets gnVg_nV are pairwise disjoint, because an intersection would put gn+1g_{n+1} in that union. Their equal positive measures force m(G)=∞m(G)=\infty, a contradiction. Hence GG is compact. On R\mathbb R, the probability with density e−∣x∣/2e^{-|x|}/2 relative to Lebesgue measure is equivalent to every translate and is therefore quasi-invariant; its compatible Polish topology is the usual noncompact one. Invariance was essential.

Exercise 7.6. Level 3. Locate the precise obstruction to applying Theorem 3.1 to the nonstandard subgroup of Countable generation and isotropy topologies, and explain why counting measure on an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert group is a different obstruction.

Solution. The subgroup's trace measure is nonzero, invariant and sigma-finite; its operations are measurable and the sigma-field is countably generated and separates points. Lemma 2.2 therefore applies. If the group were analytic Borel, its unitary image would have a positive compact subset by the analytic compact-inner-approximation theorem, and (3.3) would produce the forbidden locally compact topology. Thus the analytic Borel hypothesis fails. The Hilbert group's norm Borel space is standard, but counting measure is not sigma-finite, as Proposition 4.3 proves. Replacing it by a nonzero sigma-finite measure quasi-invariant under every translation is impossible by that proposition. These are distinct missing hypotheses.

Exercise 7.7. Level 2. Justify the passage from fixed-translation invariance of the density hh to a constant density in the last paragraph of Theorem 3.1. Is a simultaneous pointwise invariant representative being asserted?

Solution. For each fixed gg, the exceptional set of xx where h(gx)≠h(x)h(gx)\ne h(x) is Haar null. The relation is jointly Borel, so Tonelli on sigma-finite Haar measure says it is null in the product measure, and Fubini gives a conull set of xx for which the equality holds for almost every gg. Choose one such xx where hh is finite and positive. The bijection g↦gxg\mapsto gx preserves the Haar null class, hence h(y)=h(x)h(y)=h(x) almost everywhere. This proves equality of measures ν=h(x)m\nu=h(x)m. No original representative was claimed invariant simultaneously at every point and every translation.

Exercise 7.8. Level 2. In Example 6.4 verify the two probabilities in (6.5), calculate the derivative of ρ\rho under translation by bb, and identify the topology given by Theorem 5.2.

Solution. Since ∫Re−∣u∣ du=2\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-|u|}\,du=2, the plane density has integral 4/4=14/4=1. Integrating in zz gives the marginal e−∣h∣/2e^{-|h|}/2, also of integral one. Its translated density at hh is e−∣h−b∣/2e^{-|h-b|}/2; hence d(b∗ρ)/dρ(h)=e∣h∣−∣h−b∣d(b_*\rho)/d\rho(h)=e^{|h|-|h-b|}, which is finite and strictly positive for every hh. The usual real topology is a compatible Polish group topology, so Corollary 4.2 identifies it with the constructed topology. The restriction of plane Lebesgue measure to z=yz=y remains zero.

Exercise 7.9. Level 3. For the unweighted plane measure in Example 6.4, prove that its coordinate pushforward is not sigma-finite. Explain exactly where the equivalent probability repairs this problem.

Solution. For a Borel set E⊆RE\subseteq\mathbb R, the inverse image is E×RE\times\mathbb R. Tonelli gives zero measure if m(E)=0m(E)=0, and infinite measure if m(E)>0m(E)>0. Thus every finite-measure set for this pushforward is Lebesgue null. A countable union of such sets is still Lebesgue null and cannot cover the line; the pushforward is not sigma-finite. The positive integrable plane density in (6.5) first replaces the measure by an equivalent probability. Its pushforward is then a probability automatically, and equivariance preserves quasi-invariance. Sigma-finiteness of a measure does not in general pass to an arbitrary pushforward.

Exercise 7.10. Level 2. For the plane range measure in Example 6.4, use Theorem 5.4 to determine the label measure with q(h)=e−∣h∣/2q(h)=e^{-|h|}/2. Compare it with the unweighted source-label pushforward and with the probability label measure in (5.4).

Solution. Formula (5.9) gives κ(B)=∫R×Bq(h) dh dz=m(B)\kappa(B)=\int_{\mathbb R\times B}q(h)\,dh\,dz=m(B), so dh dz=dh⊗dzdh\,dz=dh\otimes dz. The unweighted source-label pushforward is νy(R×B)\nu^y(\mathbb R\times B), equal to zero for a Lebesgue null BB and to infinity otherwise. Its finite-measure sets cannot cover the line countably, so it is not sigma-finite. The equivalent plane probability in (6.5) has label pushforward dλ(z)=e−∣z∣dz/2d\lambda(z)=e^{-|z|}dz/2, which is equivalent to κ=dz\kappa=dz and has total mass one. Formula (5.9) uses a density normalized in the Haar coordinate; κ\kappa need not be a probability on labels.

Exercise 7.11. Level 3. For the affine group with dm=a−2da dbdm=a^{-2}da\,db, verify that q(a,b)=a2e−a−∣b∣/2q(a,b)=a^2e^{-a-|b|}/2 is normalized, calculate p=qΔp=q\Delta, and check the modular sign for the changed section in Example 6.5. If the Haar measure is doubled, what happens to the label measure?

Solution. The positive density satisfies ∫q dm=12(∫0∞e−ada)(∫Re−∣b∣db)=1\int q\,dm=\frac12(\int_0^\infty e^{-a}da)(\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-|b|}db)=1. Since Δ(a,b)=a−1\Delta(a,b)=a^{-1}, one has p(a,b)=ae−a−∣b∣/2p(a,b)=a e^{-a-|b|}/2 and pΔ−1=qp\Delta^{-1}=q. Inversion therefore gives ∫p(g−1h)dm(g)=1\int p(g^{-1}h)dm(g)=1, for every fixed hh, as required in (5.12). The old affine coordinate is (a′ez,b′)(a'e^z,b'); substitution in a−2da dba^{-2}da\,db gives the factor e−ze^{-z}. This equals Δ(ez,0)\Delta(e^z,0), not its reciprocal. With the original section, doubling mm replaces dzdz by dz/2dz/2; with the new section it replaces e−zdze^{-z}dz by e−zdz/2e^{-z}dz/2. In each case the product measure is unchanged.

Exercise 7.12. Level 3. Let K=ZK=\mathbb Z with counting Haar measure, let FF be any measurable space, and suppose a sigma-finite invariant measure MM on Z×F\mathbb Z\times F is given as in Theorem 5.4. Initially no sigma-finite measure on FF has been supplied. Explain why the functions T1E(z)=∑h∈Z1E(h,z)T1_E(z)=\sum_{h\in\mathbb Z}1_E(h,z) are measurable. With q(h)=2−∣h∣/3q(h)=2^{-|h|}/3, calculate κ\kappa, prove κ(B)=M({0}×B)\kappa(B)=M(\{0\}\times B), and explain why sigma-finiteness of MM makes this particular section measure sigma-finite. Contrast this argument with restricting plane measure to its null isotropy line in Example 6.4.

Solution. The sum is a pointwise increasing limit of finite sums of measurable section indicators, which is also the one-measure conclusion of Lemma 5.3a. It needs no measure on FF. The weight is normalized because ∑h∈Z2−∣h∣=1+2∑n≥12−n=3\sum_{h\in\mathbb Z}2^{-|h|}=1+2\sum_{n\geq1}2^{-n}=3. Left invariance gives M({h}×B)=M({0}×B)M(\{h\}\times B)=M(\{0\}\times B) for every hh and measurable BB. Nonnegative integration over the countable disjoint slices therefore gives

κ(B)=∑h∈Zq(h)M({h}×B)=M({0}×B).(7.1) \kappa(B)=\sum_{h\in\mathbb Z}q(h)M(\{h\}\times B) =M(\{0\}\times B). \tag{7.1}

This holds also when the common slice mass is infinite, since every q(h)>0q(h)>0; when it is zero all terms are zero. For a cover M(En)<∞M(E_n)<\infty, the measurable sections Dn={z:(0,z)∈En}D_n=\{z:(0,z)\in E_n\} cover FF and satisfy κ(Dn)=M({0}×Dn)≤M(En)\kappa(D_n)=M(\{0\}\times D_n)\leq M(E_n). Thus κ\kappa is sigma-finite. Formula (5.T2) can now be applied to counting measure and κ\kappa. The corresponding shortcut fails for Example 6.4: a singleton in the continuous Haar coordinate has zero measure, so restricting to the section h=0h=0 yields zero. Restriction to the isotropy line z=yz=y also yields zero, in this case because the label singleton is null. The normalized averaging and slice-mass argument of Theorem 5.4 work in both settings.

8. References and source context