Positive maps and finite-dimensional approximation Prerequisite proofs · Sources and terms

Finite models of a von Neumann algebra

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. New original text: public domain (CC0).

Norm approximation of a C*-algebra controls its minimal and maximal tensor norms. A von Neumann algebra has a weaker, representation-sensitive approximation topology: bounded operators can converge through their values on vectors and normal functionals. Finite completely positive models in that topology lead to semidiscreteness and to injectivity.

We will prove the equivalence between those finite models, a norm bound for multiplication by the commutant, and norm approximation in the predual. We will also prove that these conditions give completely positive extension into the von Neumann algebra. The converse implication from injectivity is proved for finite and semifinite algebras in Hypertraces and finite injective algebras, then for every von Neumann algebra in Averaging, crossed products, and injectivity.

Prerequisites are Completely positive finite models, Tensor positivity and nuclearity, and The positive cone of a standard representation. In particular, we use the exact-marginal correction and the GNS dominated-functional theorem. We also use the predual of a von Neumann algebra, normal maps, the Schwarz inequality for completely positive contractions, and ultraweak compactness. For the norm-one projection criterion we import exactly the positivity and bimodularity conclusions of Tomiyama's Theorem 1, printed pp.608–609: a norm-one linear projection from a unital C*-algebra onto a C*-subalgebra is positive and satisfies E(axb)=aE(x)bE(axb)=aE(x)b for all a,ba,b in its range. Corollary 4.3 proves complete positivity from these conclusions by a matrix argument. The underlying approximation results are due to Effros and Lance; the extension and compactness methods used in Section 4 are proved in the freely readable Arveson article cited below.

We use one precise normal-representation comparison: if π1\pi_1 and π2\pi_2 are faithful normal representations of MM, then π2\pi_2 is unitarily equivalent to the restriction of π1⊗1K\pi_1\otimes1_K to p(H1⊗K)p(H_1\otimes K), for some Hilbert space KK and projection p∈(π1(M)⊗1K)′p\in(\pi_1(M)\otimes1_K)'. The commutant on the restricted space is p(π1(M)′⊗ˉB(K))pp(\pi_1(M)'\bar\otimes B(K))p. The complete trace-class, dominated-form and cyclic-decomposition proof is given in Normal representations inside standard amplifications; it uses no injectivity or semidiscreteness theorem and imposes no separability assumption.

No factor, separability, or faithful normal state hypothesis is imposed. We assume the algebra is nonzero; the zero algebra satisfies the approximation statements trivially. Inner products are linear in the second variable.

1. Which topology should the models approximate?

A von Neumann algebra MM is semidiscrete if there is a net of cpc maps

M→SiMni→TiMM\xrightarrow{S_i}M_{n_i}\xrightarrow{T_i}M

with SiS_i normal and TiSi(x)→xT_iS_i(x)\to x ultraweakly for every x∈Mx\in M. Since the middle algebra is finite-dimensional, TiT_i is automatically normal.

The use of normal recording maps matters when we pass to preduals. An arbitrary completely positive map M→MnM\to M_n can have singular coordinate functionals, which cannot define a map from Mn∗M_n^* into M∗M_*.

Lemma 1.1. Suppose cpc maps Φi:M→M\Phi_i:M\to M converge pointwise ultraweakly to the identity. Then they converge pointwise in the σ\sigma-strong* topology.

Proof. For a cpc map Φ\Phi, a contractive Stinespring operator gives Φ(x)∗Φ(x)=V∗π(x)∗VV∗π(x)V≤V∗π(x∗x)V=Φ(x∗x)\Phi(x)^*\Phi(x)=V^*\pi(x)^*VV^*\pi(x)V\le V^*\pi(x^*x)V=\Phi(x^*x). Thus, for every normal positive functional ff, the Schwarz inequality gives

f((Φi(x)−x)∗(Φi(x)−x))≤f(Φi(x∗x))−2Re⁡f(x∗Φi(x))+f(x∗x)⟶0.\begin{aligned} f((\Phi_i(x)-x)^*(\Phi_i(x)-x)) &\le f(\Phi_i(x^*x)) -2\operatorname{Re}f(x^*\Phi_i(x))+f(x^*x)\\ &\longrightarrow0. \end{aligned}

The functionals a↦f(x∗a)a\mapsto f(x^*a) are normal, so ultraweak convergence applies to the middle term. Apply the same argument to x∗x^*; positive maps preserve adjoints. The seminorms a↦{f(a∗a)+f(aa∗)}1/2a\mapsto\{f(a^*a)+f(aa^*)\}^{1/2}, for normal positive ff, define the σ\sigma-strong* topology. □\square

The special role of the identity limit is visible in this proof: the positive term Φi(x∗x)\Phi_i(x^*x) converges to exactly the product needed for the limiting vector estimate. An arbitrary ultraweak limit of cpc maps need not give strong convergence.

2. Multiplication by the commutant

Represent MM in standard form on HH, and put N=M′N=M'. The commuting actions give an algebraic *-homomorphism

μ:M⊙N→B(H),μ(∑jxj⊗yj)=∑jxjyj.\mu:M\odot N\to B(H),\qquad \mu\left(\sum_jx_j\otimes y_j\right)=\sum_jx_jy_j.

It always extends to the maximal tensor product. The relevant extra assertion is

∥∑jxjyj∥≤∥∑jxj⊗yj∥min⁡.(1)\left\|\sum_jx_jy_j\right\| \le\left\|\sum_jx_j\otimes y_j\right\|_{\min}. \tag{1}

Theorem 2.1. A von Neumann algebra is semidiscrete if and only if (1) holds in one faithful normal representation. In that case (1) holds in every faithful normal concrete representation. The finite models may be chosen with unital recording maps.

Proof. Suppose first that Φi=TiSi\Phi_i=T_iS_i is a semidiscrete approximation. In any faithful normal representation M⊂B(K)M\subset B(K), let yj∈M′y_j\in M'. For each ii, the map

Mni⊙M′→B(K),z⊗y↦Ti(z)yM_{n_i}\odot M'\to B(K),\qquad z\otimes y\mapsto T_i(z)y

is a completely positive contraction on the maximal tensor product. This follows from the commuting Stinespring construction in Completely positive finite models: the commutant action lifts to the dilation of TiT_i, and compression gives the displayed product map. Matrix algebras have a unique C*-tensor norm, so the map is contractive for the minimal norm as well. Compose it with the minimal tensor map Si⊗id⁡M′S_i\otimes\operatorname{id}_{M'}. We obtain

∥∑jΦi(xj)yj∥≤∥∑jxj⊗yj∥min⁡.\left\|\sum_j\Phi_i(x_j)y_j\right\| \le\left\|\sum_jx_j\otimes y_j\right\|_{\min}.

The left-hand operators converge ultraweakly to ∑jxjyj\sum_jx_jy_j. An operator-norm ball is ultraweakly closed, proving (1).

Conversely suppose (1) holds in a faithful normal representation. Lemma 2.2 below transfers the inequality to a standard representation; use that representation for the rest of the proof. Fix finitely many normal positive functionals f1,…,frf_1,\ldots,f_r on MM, and put w=∑jfjw=\sum_jf_j. Let ξw\xi_w be its standard-cone vector. The functional

Ω(x⊗y)=⟨ξw,xyξw⟩\Omega(x\otimes y)=\langle\xi_w,xy\xi_w\rangle

is positive on the maximal tensor product. By (1) it is bounded on the minimal tensor product. Its associated map is

θ:M→N∗,θ(x)(y)=⟨ξw,xyξw⟩.\theta:M\to N_*,\qquad \theta(x)(y)=\langle\xi_w,xy\xi_w\rangle.

Approximate Ω\Omega weak* by convex combinations of vector functionals whose vectors are finite sums of elementary tensors in the faithful spatial representation on H⊗HH\otimes H. The factorization of such a vector functional from Tensor positivity and nuclearity has recording map

S(x)kl=⟨uk,xul⟩.S(x)_{kl}=\langle u_k,xu_l\rangle.

It is normal on MM, because every coordinate is a normal vector functional. Its reconstruction map has values in N∗N_*. The associated maps converge pointwise weakly in N∗N_*. Convexity and Hahn–Banach on each finite product of preduals give pointwise norm approximation there.

Apply exact-marginal correction to these factorizations, with marginal ψ=θ(1)=ωξw∣N\psi=\theta(1)=\omega_{\xi_w}|_N. Its recording maps remain normal. To check this last point, finite block sums and multiplication by fixed scalar matrices preserve normality, and the added scalar block can use a normal state of MM. Such a state exists on every nonzero von Neumann algebra: normalize any nonzero normal positive functional. The normalization at the finite-dimensional support also preserves normality. We obtain a normal ucp S:M→MnS:M\to M_n and a completely positive T:Mn→N∗T:M_n\to N_*, with T(1)=ψT(1)=\psi, whose composite meets any specified finite set of norm tests against θ\theta.

Let e∈Me\in M be the projection onto Nξw‾\overline{N\xi_w}. The dominated-functional inverse converts TT into a ucp map T′:Mn→eMeT':M_n\to eMe, whose unit is ee. As a map into MM, it is cpc. Each fj≤wf_j\le w has a GNS Radon–Nikodym contraction bj∈Nb_j\in N with fj(x)=⟨bjξw,xbjξw⟩f_j(x)=\langle b_j\xi_w,xb_j\xi_w\rangle. Consequently,

∣fj(x−T′S(x))∣=∣(θ(x)−TS(x))(bj∗bj)∣≤∥θ(x)−TS(x)∥.|f_j(x-T'S(x))| =|(\theta(x)-TS(x))(b_j^*b_j)| \le\|\theta(x)-TS(x)\|.

If all the selected functionals are zero, use the normal-state recording map and zero reconstruction map instead. Every normal functional is a linear combination of four positive normal functionals. Thus, by directing finite sets of operators, finite sets of normal functional tests and positive tolerances, these cpc factorizations approximate the identity pointwise ultraweakly. Their recording maps are normal and unital. This proves semidiscreteness. The first half of the proof gives (1) in every faithful normal representation. □\square

This proof uses one normal positive functional at a time to organize finitely many tests. It does not replace an arbitrary von Neumann algebra by a countably decomposable one.

Lemma 2.2 (Transfer between normal representations). Inequality (1) passes to Hilbert-space amplifications and to faithful commutant restrictions. Consequently it passes between any two faithful normal representations.

Proof. Suppose M⊂B(H)M\subset B(H) satisfies (1), so its multiplication map extends to a *-homomorphism on M⊗min⁡M′M\otimes_{\min}M'. Amplify the representation to H⊗KH\otimes K. The commutant is M′⊗ˉB(K)M'\bar\otimes B(K).

For a finite-dimensional subspace F⊂KF\subset K, compression

M′⊗ˉB(K)→M′⊗B(F),y↦(1⊗pF)y(1⊗pF)M'\bar\otimes B(K)\to M'\otimes B(F),\qquad y\mapsto(1\otimes p_F)y(1\otimes p_F)

is cpc. If z=∑jxj⊗yjz=\sum_jx_j\otimes y_j, this compression followed by multiplication is precisely the restriction to H⊗FH\otimes F of the compressed operator ∑j(xj⊗1)yj\sum_j(x_j\otimes1)y_j. On that finite corner, multiplication is the matrix amplification of the original minimal-tensor *-homomorphism, after permuting the tensor factors. It is contractive. CP tensor functoriality for the compression therefore gives

∥(1⊗pF)∑j(xj⊗1)yj(1⊗pF)∥≤∥z∥min⁡.\left\|(1\otimes p_F)\sum_j(x_j\otimes1)y_j(1\otimes p_F)\right\| \le\|z\|_{\min}.

As FF increases, these compressions converge strongly to the original operator. Their uniform norm bound proves (1) for the amplification, with no restriction on the dimension of KK.

Next take p∈M′⊗ˉB(K)p\in M'\bar\otimes B(K) such that the restriction of M⊗1M\otimes1 to p(H⊗K)p(H\otimes K) is faithful. The commutant of that restriction is p(M′⊗ˉB(K))pp(M'\bar\otimes B(K))p. Inclusion of this corner into the larger commutant preserves the minimal tensor norm. The product operator on the restricted space is the compression by pp of the corresponding product in the amplification. Hence (1) passes to the restriction. Apply the complete normal-representation construction linked in the prerequisites to obtain the final assertion. □\square

3. The predual formulation uses dual matrix norms

The Banach predual M∗M_* inherits the dual matrix order from M∗M^*. The middle space in a contractive predual factorization is Mn∗M_n^*, with trace norm, rather than MnM_n with operator norm.

Theorem 3.1. The following are equivalent:

  1. MM is semidiscrete.
  2. The identity of M∗M_* is approximated pointwise in norm by cpc factorizations
    M∗→γiMni∗→δiM∗.M_*\xrightarrow{\gamma_i}M_{n_i}^* \xrightarrow{\delta_i}M_*.

Complete positivity in 2 uses the dual matrix orders, and contractivity uses the Banach norms.

Proof. Adjoint a normal cpc factorization Φi=TiSi\Phi_i=T_iS_i on MM. Its preadjoint is

(Φi)∗=(Si)∗(Ti)∗,M∗→(Ti)∗Mni∗→(Si)∗M∗.(\Phi_i)_*=(S_i)_*(T_i)_*, \quad M_*\xrightarrow{(T_i)_*}M_{n_i}^* \xrightarrow{(S_i)_*}M_*.

Preadjoints preserve norms and complete positivity in the dual orders. Ultraweak convergence of Φi(x)\Phi_i(x) to xx says that (Φi)∗(f)→f(\Phi_i)_*(f)\to f weakly in M∗M_*, for every f∈M∗f\in M_*.

The set of such composites is convex. Indeed, take finite convex combinations of the primal factorizations using a block diagonal recording map and a convex sum reconstruction map. Both remain cpc and the recording map remains normal. Pass to the preadjoints. Applying Hahn–Banach to the image in (M∗)r(M_*)^r, for each finite list of functionals, changes weak approximation into norm approximation. This proves 2.

Conversely, adjoint a factorization in 2. The adjoint of δi\delta_i is a normal cpc recording map M→MniM\to M_{n_i}, and the adjoint of γi\gamma_i is a cpc reconstruction map Mni→MM_{n_i}\to M. Normality of the first map follows precisely because δi\delta_i has range in the predual. For x∈Mx\in M, f∈M∗f\in M_*,

∣f(γi∗δi∗(x)−x)∣≤∥δiγi(f)−f∥ ∥x∥⟶0.|f(\gamma_i^*\delta_i^*(x)-x)| \le\|\delta_i\gamma_i(f)-f\|\,\|x\|\longrightarrow0.

Thus these maps prove semidiscreteness. □\square

Under separability of M∗M_*, norm approximation in 2 can be arranged as a sequence by the usual dense-list argument with a uniform contractive bound. Without separability, the finite-set formulation gives a net. Lemma 1.1 also shows that the primal approximations converge in the σ\sigma-strong* topology.

4. The finite models give an extension property

Call a von Neumann algebra MM injective if every completely positive map from an operator system S⊂CS\subset C, where CC is a unital C*-algebra, to MM extends completely positively to CC. The extension retains the value at the unit, hence retains the norm; unital maps have unital extensions. No normality of the extension is requested.

Proposition 4.1. In a faithful normal representation M⊂B(H)M\subset B(H), injectivity is equivalent to the existence of a ucp retraction E:B(H)→ME:B(H)\to M. This criterion is independent of the faithful normal representation.

Proof. Extend the identity map on the operator system MM to B(H)B(H) by injectivity. The extension takes the unit to the unit, has range in MM, and fixes MM, giving the retraction.

Conversely, given EE, first extend a completely positive ϕ:S→M⊂B(H)\phi:S\to M\subset B(H) by Arveson's theorem to a map Φ:C→B(H)\Phi:C\to B(H). Then EΦE\Phi has range in MM and agrees with ϕ\phi on SS. Its unit value is unchanged because EE fixes MM. Hence it has the same norm and is unital when ϕ\phi is unital. This is an abstract property of MM, proving the representation assertion. □\square

Theorem 4.2. Every semidiscrete von Neumann algebra is injective.

Proof. Represent M⊂B(H)M\subset B(H) faithfully and normally, and take its normal cpc finite models TiSiT_iS_i. Arveson's theorem extends each SiS_i to a cpc map S^i:B(H)→Mni\widehat S_i:B(H)\to M_{n_i}; its value at the unit is preserved. The composite Ei=TiS^i:B(H)→ME_i=T_i\widehat S_i:B(H)\to M is cpc.

For each a∈B(H)a\in B(H), the values Ei(a)E_i(a) lie in the ultraweakly compact ball of radius ∥a∥\|a\| in MM. A subnet converges ultraweakly at every aa, by compactness of the product of these balls. The limit EE is linear and completely positive, since matrix positive cones are ultraweakly closed. For x∈Mx\in M, Ei(x)=TiSi(x)→xE_i(x)=T_iS_i(x)\to x, so E(x)=xE(x)=x. In particular E(1)=1E(1)=1. It is a ucp retraction, and Proposition 4.1 gives injectivity. □\square

The extension S^i\widehat S_i and the limiting retraction need not be normal. Ultraweak compactness gives their existence but does not assert ultraweak continuity. This is consistent with the definition of injectivity.

Corollary 4.3 (Norm-one projection criterion). A nonzero von Neumann algebra M⊂B(H)M\subset B(H) is injective if and only if it is the range of a bounded linear projection of norm one on B(H)B(H).

Proof. Injectivity gives the ucp retraction of Proposition 4.1. It is a projection of norm one because it is contractive and fixes the unit.

Conversely, let E:B(H)→ME:B(H)\to M be a norm-one projection. It fixes MM, and Tomiyama's Theorem 1 gives positivity and MM-bimodularity. We derive complete positivity explicitly. For X=[xij]≥0X=[x_{ij}]\ge0 in Mn(B(H))M_n(B(H)), put Y=[E(xij)]Y=[E(x_{ij})]. Positivity of EE makes YY self-adjoint. For every column b=(b1,…,bn)Tb=(b_1,\ldots,b_n)^{\mathsf T} with entries in MM,

b∗Yb=∑i,jbi∗E(xij)bj=E(∑i,jbi∗xijbj)≥0.(2)b^*Yb=\sum_{i,j}b_i^*E(x_{ij})b_j =E\left(\sum_{i,j}b_i^*x_{ij}b_j\right)\ge0. \tag{2}

Here the last input is positive because it equals b∗Xbb^*Xb.

To see that these tests imply Y≥0Y\ge0, let R=Y−R=Y_- be its negative part and let ckc_k be the kk-th column of R1/2∈Mn(M)R^{1/2}\in M_n(M). Functional calculus gives

ck∗Yck=(R1/2YR1/2)kk=−(R2)kk.c_k^*Yc_k=(R^{1/2}YR^{1/2})_{kk}=-(R^2)_{kk}.

Equation (2) makes this nonnegative, whereas (R2)kk≥0(R^2)_{kk}\ge0. Thus 0=(R2)kk=∑iRik∗Rik0=(R^2)_{kk}=\sum_iR_{ik}^*R_{ik} for every kk, so every entry of RR vanishes. Hence Y≥0Y\ge0. This holds for every nn, proving that EE is completely positive. It fixes the shared unit, so is ucp. Proposition 4.1 gives injectivity. No normality of the projection follows or is needed. □\square

5. Exercises with solutions

Exercise 1 (A normal finite model for all bounded operators; intermediate). On an arbitrary Hilbert space HH, let pKp_K range over the finite-dimensional subspace projections. Show that compression B(H)→B(K)B(H)\to B(K), followed by inclusion B(K)→B(H)B(K)\to B(H), proves semidiscreteness of B(H)B(H).

Solution. Both maps are cpc and normal, and the composite is x↦pKxpKx\mapsto p_Kxp_K. The net pKp_K converges strongly to one. On bounded operators this gives strong convergence of the composites to xx, and applying it to x∗x^* gives strong* convergence. The same conclusion holds in the σ\sigma-strong* topology: normal positive functionals are sums of vector functionals, and the uniform norm bound controls the tails of such sums. Thus the algebra is semidiscrete. When HH is nonseparable, the finite subspaces are directed by inclusion rather than a sequence.

Exercise 2 (Why the limit map matters; intermediate). Give cpc maps converging pointwise ultraweakly to a map other than the identity, but failing pointwise strong convergence.

Solution. Let H=Ce0⊕Cf⊕ℓ2(N)H=\mathbb Ce_0\oplus\mathbb Cf\oplus\ell^2(\mathbb N), with all the indicated vectors orthonormal. Let unu_n be the self-adjoint unitary exchanging e0e_0 and the nn-th basis vector ene_n of the last summand and fixing the orthogonal complement. The automorphisms Φn(x)=unxun\Phi_n(x)=u_nxu_n are ucp. Compactness of the product of the ultraweak operator-norm balls gives a subnet converging pointwise ultraweakly to a ucp map Φ\Phi.

For x=∣e0⟩⟨f∣x=|e_0\rangle\langle f|, the images are ∣en⟩⟨f∣|e_n\rangle\langle f|. They converge weakly as operators to zero and are uniformly bounded, hence converge ultraweakly to zero. Thus Φ(x)=0\Phi(x)=0. But ∥Φn(x)f∥=∥en∥=1\|\Phi_n(x)f\|=\|e_n\|=1, so the subnet cannot converge strongly on this xx. The limit is not the identity: the images of the rank-one projection p0p_0 are pnp_n, which converge ultraweakly to zero, giving Φ(p0)=0\Phi(p_0)=0.

Exercise 3 (Normality belongs to the predual; intermediate). Why does an arbitrary bounded map S:M→MnS:M\to M_n not always give a preadjoint Mn∗→M∗M_n^*\to M_*?

Solution. Its Banach adjoint always maps Mn∗M_n^* into M∗M^*. It has range in M∗M_* exactly when each scalar coordinate functional of SS is normal, which is equivalent to normality of SS. For example, a singular state on an infinite-dimensional von Neumann algebra, viewed as a map to C\mathbb C, has an adjoint sending the scalar unit to that singular state, outside M∗M_*.

Exercise 4 (The unit of a corner; introductory). In Theorem 2.1, why is T′T' cpc as a map into MM even though it is unital only as a map into eMeeMe?

Solution. Its value at 1n1_n is ee, a projection of norm at most one. For a completely positive map from a unital algebra, its norm is the norm of its value at the unit. Inclusion of the corner preserves positivity at every matrix size. Hence it is cpc in MM.

Exercise 5 (Amplifying weak convergence; intermediate). In Lemma 1.1, show that a↦f(x∗a)a\mapsto f(x^*a) is a normal functional whenever f∈M∗f\in M_* and x∈Mx\in M.

Solution. Left multiplication by a fixed element is ultraweakly continuous in a von Neumann algebra. Composing it with the normal functional ff gives a normal functional. Equivalently, realize ff as an absolutely summable series of vector coefficients; replace the first vector in each coefficient by its image under xx. The bounded multiplier preserves absolute summability.

Exercise 6 (Keep the extension's unit value; intermediate). In Theorem 4.2, do the cpc maps EiE_i have to be unital? Why is their limit unital?

Solution. The reconstruction map can have unit value a proper projection or another positive contraction, so the composite need not be unital. On the particular input 1∈M1\in M, however, Ei(1)=TiSi(1)→1E_i(1)=T_iS_i(1)\to1 ultraweakly. The limit therefore satisfies E(1)=1E(1)=1. It is the approximation to the identity on the subalgebra that gives unitality at the limit.

References

Jun Tomiyama, On the projection of norm one in W*-algebras, Proceedings of the Japan Academy 33, no.10 (1957), 608–612. Theorem 1 and its complete proof, printed pp.608–609 (PDF pp.1–2), give positivity, bimodularity, and the Schwarz inequality for a norm-one projection from a unital C*-algebra onto a C*-subalgebra. Its proof first reduces to the biduals and then uses range projections and norm estimates to obtain bimodularity; the final positive-square computation gives Schwarz. Corollary 4.3 uses precisely positivity and bimodularity, and supplies the additional matrix argument needed for complete positivity. In its concrete von Neumann algebra setting no separability, finite-dimensionality, or normality of the projection is assumed.

William B. Arveson, Subalgebras of C*-algebras, Acta Mathematica 123 (1969), 141–224. Theorem 1.1.1 gives the dilation underlying Lemma 1.1’s Schwarz estimate. Theorem 1.2.3 and its proof give the completely positive extension and bounded compactness methods expanded in Completely positive finite models. Section 4 applies those methods to construct the retraction explicitly, for arbitrary Hilbert spaces and von Neumann algebras. It proves semidiscreteness implies injectivity without a separability or faithful normal state assumption.

The commutant characterization in Section 2 also uses the tensor-positivity lesson's exact-marginal correction and its explicit proof of both matrix-order directions for dominated functionals. Arveson's Lemma 1.4.1 and Theorem 1.4.2, printed pp.159–160, supply the corresponding dilation-commutant order method. The finite models in Section 2 retain normal recording maps through every block sum, scalar addition and support normalization; Section 3 then uses their actual preadjoints with dual matrix norms.

Huzihiro Araki, Some properties of modular conjugation operator of von Neumann algebras and a non-commutative Radon–Nikodym theorem with a chain rule, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 50 (1974), 309–354, Theorem 4(8), printed p.332, gives the cone-vector estimate used in marginal correction. Uffe Haagerup, The standard form of von Neumann algebras, Mathematica Scandinavica 37 (1975), 271–283, Lemma 2.10, carries that estimate to arbitrary von Neumann algebras by support corners. These inputs do not require a faithful normal state on the whole algebra. The normal representation comparison and Tomiyama's norm-one projection theorem retain their exact stated prerequisites.