Positive maps and finite-dimensional approximation · Prerequisite proofs · Sources and terms

Constructing the natural cone from bounded multiplication

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026. Original text: public domain (CC0).

The methods used here are credited to H. Araki, U. Haagerup, M. Rieffel and A. Van Daele, and F. Hiai. Free primary accounts are Araki's 1974 paper, Haagerup's 1975 paper, Rieffel–Van Daele's 1977 paper, and Hiai's author arXiv version, 2004.02383v1. Hiai's Lemma 3.3 and Theorem 3.2 give a useful cyclic version of the endpoint and middle-cone arguments. We work with the entire spaces of bounded multiplication vectors, so that the endpoint proof also applies to an infinite weight and an arbitrary Hilbert-space cardinality.

NC00. The existing operator construction and its precise interface

Inner products are linear in the second variable. A first-variable-linear source pairing is translated by ⟨u,v⟩=(v∣u)\langle u,v\rangle=(v\mid u). The conjugate-linear adjoint convention is

⟨Su,v⟩=⟨S∗v,u⟩.(1) \langle Su,v\rangle=\langle S^*v,u\rangle. \tag{1}

All operator equalities below include their actual domains. In particular, a displayed product of unbounded operators is not an equality of formal expressions alone.

The preceding proofs used here are the following.

Here is the combined concrete interface, which fixes the objects used in the rest of this proof. For a faithful n.s.f. weight φ\varphi on NN, its GNS representation identifies NN faithfully and normally with M⊂B(H)M\subset B(H), and

A=Λ(nφ∩nφ∗),S=Λ(a)↦Λ(a∗)‾,F=S∗,Δ=S∗S.(2) \mathcal A=\Lambda(\mathfrak n_\varphi\cap\mathfrak n_\varphi^*), \qquad S=\overline{\Lambda(a)\mapsto\Lambda(a^*)}, \qquad F=S^*, \qquad \Delta=S^*S. \tag{2}

The full left and right multiplication spaces are Bl,BrB_l,B_r, with multipliers Lξ∈ML_\xi\in M, Rη∈M′R_\eta\in M'. Their exact defining mixed identity and covariance are

Lξη=Rηξ,Lxξ=xLξ,Ryη=yRη(ξ∈Bl,η∈Br,x∈M,y∈M′).(3) L_\xi\eta=R_\eta\xi, \quad L_{x\xi}=xL_\xi, \quad R_{y\eta}=yR_\eta \quad(\xi\in B_l,\eta\in B_r,x\in M,y\in M'). \tag{3}

The multipliers are injective assignments. Their ranges are left ideals, and

A=Bl∩D(S),D=Br∩D(F),L(A)=L(Bl)∩L(Bl)∗,R(D)=R(Br)∩R(Br)∗.(4) \mathcal A=B_l\cap D(S),\quad \mathcal D=B_r\cap D(F),\quad L(\mathcal A)=L(B_l)\cap L(B_l)^*,\quad R(\mathcal D)=R(B_r)\cap R(B_r)^*. \tag{4}

In particular, a self-adjoint left multiplier puts its vector in A\mathcal A, with Sξ=ξS\xi=\xi; the corresponding assertion holds on the right. Products satisfy ξζ=Lξζ\xi\zeta=L_\xi\zeta, ηθ=Rθη\eta\theta=R_\theta\eta, and the involutions on the two algebras are S,FS,F. Both algebras are dense, and are the graph cores of their involutions.

The modular output is

S=JΔ1/2,F=JΔ−1/2,J2=1,JMJ=M′,JΔzJ=Δ−z‾.(5) S=J\Delta^{1/2},\qquad F=J\Delta^{-1/2},\qquad J^2=1,\quad JMJ=M',\quad J\Delta^zJ=\Delta^{-\overline z}. \tag{5}

Here Δ\Delta is injective; its spectrum may accumulate at zero or infinity. The domain of a real power is

D(Δα)={u:∫(0,∞)t2α d⟨u,EΔ(t)u⟩<∞}.(6) D(\Delta^\alpha) =\{u:\int_{(0,\infty)}t^{2\alpha}\,d\langle u,E_\Delta(t)u\rangle<\infty\}. \tag{6}

The modular group Ut=ΔitU_t=\Delta^{it} implements automorphisms σt\sigma_t of MM. The common analytic algebra A0\mathcal A_0 is invariant under every complex power, and for ξ,ζ∈A0\xi,\zeta\in\mathcal A_0,

Δz(ξζ)=(Δzξ)(Δzζ),JA=D,RJξ=JLξJ.(7) \Delta^z(\xi\zeta)=(\Delta^z\xi)(\Delta^z\zeta), \quad J\mathcal A=\mathcal D,\quad R_{J\xi}=JL_\xi J. \tag{7}

The algebra A0\mathcal A_0 is dense in the stated involution graphs; the Gaussian approximants to ξ∈A\xi\in\mathcal A converge to ξ\xi and SξS\xi, with uniformly bounded left multipliers converging strongly. The additional approximation proved in NC01a is: every η∈Br\eta\in B_r has a net ηi∈D\eta_i\in\mathcal D with

ηi→η,Rηi→Rη strongly,∥Rηi∥≤∥Rη∥.(8) \eta_i\to\eta,\qquad R_{\eta_i}\to R_\eta\text{ strongly}, \qquad\|R_{\eta_i}\|\le\|R_\eta\|. \tag{8}

The analogous approximation holds on the left. The algebraic product reversal by JJ, and FJ=JSFJ=JS, have the graph domains supplied by (5)–(7).

No cone theorem is an input to this interface. In particular, endpoint duality and the middle cone's self-duality are proved below.

NC00a. The bounded-multiplication contracts from the original modular graphs

We record the proof of (3)–(4), to make their bounded tests and adjoint tests explicit. The real-square subspace in RS4 is

K=span⁡R{a♯a:a∈A}‾, K=\overline{\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb R}\{a^\sharp a:a\in\mathcal A\}},

and MC5 proves D(S)=K+iKD(S)=K+iK, S(k+iℓ)=k−iℓS(k+i\ell)=k-i\ell. Approximating kk and ℓ\ell by real square spans proves that A2\mathcal A^2 is a graph core for this original SS. The same conclusion holds for the right algebra and FF, by MC1/MC3/MC5 and MP's adjoint identification.

For a right-bounded vector η\eta, the operator determined by Rηa=LaηR_\eta a=L_a\eta commutes with all LbL_b, by associativity on A\mathcal A, and hence belongs to M′M'. The assignments are linear and injective, because Laη=0L_a\eta=0 for all aa implies η=0\eta=0 by nondegeneracy. For y∈M′y\in M', the defining tests immediately give Ryη=yRηR_{y\eta}=yR_\eta. Thus their range nr\mathfrak n_r is a left ideal.

If η∈Br∩D(F)\eta\in B_r\cap D(F), then for a,b∈Aa,b\in\mathcal A,

⟨LaFη,b⟩=⟨Fη,a♯b⟩=⟨b♯a,η⟩=⟨a,Lbη⟩=⟨Rη∗a,b⟩.\begin{aligned} \langle L_aF\eta,b\rangle &=\langle F\eta,a^\sharp b\rangle =\langle b^\sharp a,\eta\rangle\\ &=\langle a,L_b\eta\rangle =\langle R_\eta^*a,b\rangle. \end{aligned}

Density shows that Fη∈BrF\eta\in B_r and RFη=Rη∗R_{F\eta}=R_\eta^*. Conversely, if Rη∗=RθR_\eta^*=R_\theta for another θ∈Br\theta\in B_r, the same chain of pairings, read backwards, proves

⟨S(a♯b),η⟩=⟨θ,a♯b⟩. \langle S(a^\sharp b),\eta\rangle =\langle\theta,a^\sharp b\rangle.

Extend this over the proved product graph core. It is exactly the adjoint-domain test (1), so η∈D(F)\eta\in D(F) and Fη=θF\eta=\theta. Consequently the right algebra defined by the two bounded multiplier tests in GP–MC is precisely D=Br∩D(F)\mathcal D=B_r\cap D(F), and

R(D)=nr∩nr∗. R(\mathcal D)=\mathfrak n_r\cap\mathfrak n_r^*.

The right algebra is full, dense and nondegenerate by MC1–MC6. Apply the proved argument to its opposite left Hilbert algebra. Its closed involution is FF, its adjoint is SS, and its generated algebra is M′M'. This gives all the left assertions of (3)–(4), including covariance, injectivity, the ideal intersection, and equality with the full left completion. In particular, the definition of BlB_l is exactly boundedness of η↦Rηξ\eta\mapsto R_\eta\xi on D\mathcal D, with multiplier LξL_\xi.

The mixed identity initially holds for η∈D\eta\in\mathcal D by that definition. Its extension to every η∈Br\eta\in B_r is proved after the approximating net in NC01a. This derivation of the full bounded tests uses the complete modular graph construction, and supplies the exact product-core density used later in NC03.

NC01. Choosing a weight at arbitrary cardinality

Every von Neumann algebra has a faithful normal semifinite weight. Here is the construction used to choose the weight in (2). Start with a faithful normal concrete presentation. Nonzero positive elements are detected by positive normal vector functionals. The support lemma CG01 constructs the support of a normal positive functional, its faithful restriction, and its compression formula, independently of any natural cone.

Choose a maximal family of normal states (ωi)i∈I(\omega_i)_{i\in I} whose nonzero supports pip_i are mutually orthogonal. The union of a chain remains such a family. Its support join is one: otherwise a vector state on (1−⋁ipi)H(1-\bigvee_i p_i)H provides another nonzero disjoint support. Define

φ(a)=sup⁡E⊂I finite∑i∈Eωi(a),a∈N+.(9) \varphi(a)=\sup_{E\subset I\text{ finite}}\sum_{i\in E}\omega_i(a), \qquad a\in N_+. \tag{9}

Finite nonnegative subsums prove additivity and positive homogeneity. For aj↑aa_j\uparrow a, normality follows by interchanging the two suprema over jj and finite EE. If φ(a)=0\varphi(a)=0, every ωi(a)=0\omega_i(a)=0, so a1/2pi=0a^{1/2}p_i=0. The finite sums of the pip_i converge strongly to one, and therefore a=0a=0. Thus the weight is faithful.

For pE=∑i∈Epip_E=\sum_{i\in E}p_i, supportedness gives φ(pE)=∣E∣\varphi(p_E)=|E|. For every a∈N+a\in N_+,

φ(pEapE)≤∥a∥φ(pE)<∞,pEapE⟶a strongly. \varphi(p_Eap_E)\le\|a\|\varphi(p_E)<\infty, \qquad p_Eap_E\longrightarrow a\text{ strongly}.

These uniformly bounded finite positive elements converge ultraweakly as well, by H03's series-vector tail estimate. Each finite positive element cc lies in the finite span mφ\mathfrak m_\varphi, because c=c1/2c1/2c=c^{1/2}c^{1/2} and φ((c1/2)∗c1/2)=φ(c)<∞\varphi((c^{1/2})^*c^{1/2})=\varphi(c)<\infty. Every element of NN is a complex linear combination of positive elements. Consequently mφ\mathfrak m_\varphi is ultraweakly dense in NN, which is semifiniteness. This also gives the strong density of the finite ideal, since xpExp_E has finite square weight for every x∈Nx\in N. No countability of II is asserted. The zero algebra uses the zero weight and the empty family.

The following direct construction supplies the GNS representation and full left Hilbert algebra for this weight. It retains the original algebra through a faithful normal representation.

NC01a. Approximating the entire bounded-vector space by finite-star vectors

Let n\mathfrak n be either full multiplication left ideal, in its respective von Neumann algebra BB, and let C=n∩n∗\mathcal C=\mathfrak n\cap\mathfrak n^*. This is a nondegenerate *-algebra by the operator construction. For a finite subset E⊂CE\subset\mathcal C and ε>0\varepsilon>0, put

hE=∑x∈Ex∗x,eE,ε=hE(hE+ε)−1. h_E=\sum_{x\in E}x^*x,\qquad e_{E,\varepsilon}=h_E(h_E+\varepsilon)^{-1}.

The positive contraction eE,εe_{E,\varepsilon} belongs to n\mathfrak n by the left-ideal property and bounded calculus, and to n∗\mathfrak n^* by self-adjointness. Thus it belongs to C\mathcal C. These contractions converge strongly to one along finite-set enlargement and ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. Here is a direct bound, avoiding a countability assumption or an assertion of monotonicity for squares. If x∈Ex\in E, then x∗x≤hEx^*x\le h_E, and

∥x(1−eE,ε)∥2≤∥(1−eE,ε)hE(1−eE,ε)∥≤ε/4. \|x(1-e_{E,\varepsilon})\|^2 \le\|(1-e_{E,\varepsilon})h_E(1-e_{E,\varepsilon})\| \le\varepsilon/4.

The last inequality is the scalar bound ε2t/(t+ε)2≤ε/4\varepsilon^2t/(t+\varepsilon)^2\le\varepsilon/4. Taking adjoints shows convergence of eE,εe_{E,\varepsilon} to one on the range of every x∗x^*. Their linear span is dense because C\mathcal C is self-adjoint and nondegenerate. The uniform contraction bound extends convergence to all of HH.

Use this net for nr=R(Br)\mathfrak n_r=R(B_r). For η∈Br\eta\in B_r, set ηi=eiη\eta_i=e_i\eta. Covariance gives Rηi=eiRη∈nrR_{\eta_i}=e_iR_\eta\in\mathfrak n_r. Its adjoint Rη∗eiR_\eta^*e_i also lies in nr\mathfrak n_r, since ei∈nre_i\in\mathfrak n_r and this is a left ideal. The ideal intersection (4) therefore puts ηi\eta_i in D\mathcal D. Strong convergence and the contraction bound give every assertion in (8). The identical proof on nl=L(Bl)\mathfrak n_l=L(B_l) gives the left approximation.

For ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l, the defining equality Lξηi=RηiξL_\xi\eta_i=R_{\eta_i}\xi now tends to Lξη=RηξL_\xi\eta=R_\eta\xi; both operator limits are justified on these fixed vectors. This proves the entire mixed identity in (3). All these proofs apply to nets at arbitrary cardinality and supply no extraneous involution-domain claim for their original merely bounded vectors.

NC01b. Normal GNS models and the original full diagonal-weight algebra

We use the complete Hilbert and concrete-predual constructions H00–H03, their arbitrary-Hilbert-space identification P00, and the bounded calculus F03–F08. H03 identifies a concrete von Neumann algebra NN isometrically with (N∗)∗(N_*)^*. Its quotient predual is a norm-closed subspace of N∗N^*: Hahn–Banach gives the quotient norm as the supremum of its pairings with the unit ball of its dual. The normal coefficients therefore remain normal under functional-norm limits.

Normal positive functionals. For ω∈N∗+\omega\in N_*^+, positivity and the scalar quadratic-polynomial test give

∣ω(b∗c)∣2≤ω(b∗b)ω(c∗c). |\omega(b^*c)|^2\le\omega(b^*b)\omega(c^*c).

Indeed ω((b+zc)∗(b+zc))=A+2Re⁡(zd)+∣z∣2C≥0\omega((b+zc)^*(b+zc))=A+2\operatorname{Re}(z d)+|z|^2C\ge0, with A=ω(b∗b)A=\omega(b^*b), C=ω(c∗c)C=\omega(c^*c), and d=ω(b∗c)d=\omega(b^*c). For C>0C>0, choose z=−d‾/Cz=-\overline d/C; for C=0C=0, arbitrary phases and magnitudes of zz force d=0d=0. This proves both cases. Quotient NN by the null space of this form and complete, using ⟨[b],[c]⟩=ω(b∗c)\langle[b],[c]\rangle=\omega(b^*c). The null space is a left ideal: bounded order and the positive square root give

ω(c∗a∗ac)≤∥a∥2ω(c∗c). \omega(c^*a^*ac)\le\|a\|^2\omega(c^*c).

Thus πω(a)[c]=[ac]\pi_\omega(a)[c]=[ac] defines a contractive unital *-representation on HωH_\omega, with cyclic vector Ωω=[1]\Omega_\omega=[1] representing ω\omega. Multiplication, adjoints and the identity follow on quotient vectors by taking the displayed pairings, and extend by density.

This representation is normal. Indeed every predual functional is a series f(a)=∑j⟨uj,avj⟩f(a)=\sum_j\langle u_j,av_j\rangle with ∑j∥uj∥∥vj∥<∞\sum_j\|u_j\|\|v_j\|<\infty, by H03 and P00. Fixed multiplication gives

f(b∗ac)=∑j⟨buj,acvj⟩,∑j∥buj∥∥cvj∥≤∥b∥∥c∥∑j∥uj∥∥vj∥. f(b^*ac)=\sum_j\langle bu_j,acv_j\rangle, \qquad \sum_j\|bu_j\|\|cv_j\| \le\|b\|\|c\|\sum_j\|u_j\|\|v_j\|.

In particular the coefficients on quotient vectors, ω(b∗ac)\omega(b^*ac), belong to N∗N_*. For arbitrary vectors, approximate both by quotient vectors. Contractivity gives the functional-norm estimate

∥⟨ξ,πω( ⋅ )η⟩−⟨ξ0,πω( ⋅ )η0⟩∥≤∥ξ−ξ0∥∥η∥+∥ξ0∥∥η−η0∥. \|\langle\xi,\pi_\omega(\,\cdot\,)\eta\rangle -\langle\xi_0,\pi_\omega(\,\cdot\,)\eta_0\rangle\| \le\|\xi-\xi_0\|\|\eta\|+\|\xi_0\|\|\eta-\eta_0\|.

The norm-closedness just proved puts each limiting coefficient in N∗N_*. An ultraweak functional on the target is itself a norm-summable series of coefficients. Its pullback is a norm-convergent series in N∗N_*, so πω\pi_\omega is ultraweak continuous. The zero functional gives the zero space.

Arbitrary sums. For any set-indexed family of such representations, take their Hilbert direct sum H=⨁iHiH=\bigoplus_i H_i, with the componentwise action π(a)\pi(a). Each vector has countable support: for every positive integer nn, only finitely many component norms can exceed 1/n1/n. Finite-support vectors are dense, and completeness follows by the coordinate argument in H00. The coefficient series obeys

⟨ξ,π(a)η⟩=∑i⟨ξi,πi(a)ηi⟩,∑i∥ξi∥∥ηi∥≤∥ξ∥∥η∥. \langle\xi,\pi(a)\eta\rangle =\sum_i\langle\xi_i,\pi_i(a)\eta_i\rangle, \qquad\sum_i\|\xi_i\|\|\eta_i\|\le\|\xi\|\|\eta\|.

Its finite sums belong to N∗N_* and its tails converge in functional norm. The same target-predual series argument proves that the direct sum is normal, without a cardinality restriction.

Apply this construction to the supported functionals ωi\omega_i from NC01. In fact the following proof allows any nonzero finite normal positive ωi\omega_i with orthogonal supports pip_i joining to one; it therefore also covers a faithful finite functional as a one-block family. Define

nφ={x:∑iωi(x∗x)<∞},Λ(x)=([x]i)i∈⨁iHi. \mathfrak n_\varphi=\{x:\sum_i\omega_i(x^*x)<\infty\}, \qquad \Lambda(x)=([x]_i)_i\in\bigoplus_i H_i.

Its squared norm is φ(x∗x)\varphi(x^*x). The same left-ideal estimate defines the contractive action π(a)Λ(x)=Λ(ax)\pi(a)\Lambda(x)=\Lambda(ax).

This GNS space is the entire direct sum. For any finite tuple of quotient vectors ([xi]i)i∈E([x_i]_i)_{i\in E}, use x=∑i∈Exipix=\sum_{i\in E}x_ip_i. Supportedness means [ypi]i=[y]i[yp_i]_i=[y]_i and [ypi]j=0[yp_i]_j=0 for j≠ij\ne i, by the support compression and Cauchy–Schwarz. Hence Λ(x)\Lambda(x) is exactly the chosen finite tuple and x∈nφx\in\mathfrak n_\varphi. Such tuples are dense. The normal direct sum above is therefore the original weight's GNS representation.

Let RiR_i be the coordinate projection and let ηi=Λ(pi)\eta_i=\Lambda(p_i). They satisfy

RiΛ(x)=Λ(xpi)=π(x)ηi,Ri∈π(N)′,∑iRi=1 strongly.(9a) R_i\Lambda(x)=\Lambda(xp_i)=\pi(x)\eta_i, \qquad R_i\in\pi(N)',\qquad \sum_iR_i=1\text{ strongly}. \tag{9a}

Here xpi∈nφxp_i\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, since its square weight is ωi(x∗x)\omega_i(x^*x). The represented vector functional of ηi\eta_i is ωi\omega_i. If π(a)=0\pi(a)=0, (9a) gives Λ(api)=0\Lambda(ap_i)=0; faithfulness of φ\varphi gives api=0ap_i=0 for every ii, hence a=0a=0. The representation is isometric. To see the norm assertion from the stated bounded calculus, if ∥π(a)∥<∥a∥\|\pi(a)\|<\|a\|, choose a continuous function on the spectrum of a∗aa^*a that vanishes on [0,∥π(a)∥2][0,\|\pi(a)\|^2] but is nonzero at ∥a∥2\|a\|^2. Its nonzero calculus value is killed by π\pi, contradicting faithfulness.

The image is a von Neumann algebra. We give the compactness step explicitly. For a Banach space XX, place its dual unit ball in the product of closed scalar discs ∏x∈X{z:∣z∣≤∥x∥}\prod_{x\in X}\{z:|z|\le\|x\|\}, by evaluation. This product is compact. One direct proof uses choice to extend a filter with the finite-intersection property to an ultrafilter. On each scalar disc, repeated finite subdivision into closed squares chooses a nested square sequence of diameters tending to zero whose intersections with the disc belong to the ultrafilter. Scalar completeness gives a limit point in the disc; every neighbourhood belongs to that coordinate ultrafilter. The coordinate limits therefore give a product limit, because a basic neighbourhood tests only finitely many coordinates. If a family of product-closed sets with the finite-intersection property had empty intersection, its extending ultrafilter would give a limit lying in each of them, a contradiction. This proves compactness. The evaluation families satisfying additivity and complex homogeneity form a closed subset of the product, and the coordinate bound makes them precisely the dual unit ball. Its product topology is the weak* topology. This is Banach–Alaoglu with its scalar and choice inputs displayed.

Since N=(N∗)∗N=(N_*)^*, its unit ball is compact ultraweakly. Put B=π(N)B=\pi(N), a unital norm-closed C*-algebra by isometry. The complete self-adjoint contraction-density proof ODF03–05 supplies, for each self-adjoint contraction T∈B′′T\in B'', a net of self-adjoint contractions π(aλ)\pi(a_\lambda) converging strongly to TT, with ∥aλ∥≤1\|a_\lambda\|\le1. Here the represented algebra has an identity, so the orbit closure in ODF03 contains each test tuple directly by using that identity. Compactness supplies a convergent subnet by the complete net construction in COMPACT. Explicitly, the closures of the tails have a common cluster point; index the subnet by triples consisting of a neighbourhood, an original tail index and a chosen later index hitting that neighbourhood. Shrink the neighbourhood and advance both indices in the order. A hit beyond both previously chosen indices gives a common successor, so this is directed, and projection onto the chosen index is order preserving and eventually beyond each original index. It gives the convergent subnet. Write its ultraweak limit as a∈Na\in N. Normality makes π(aλ)\pi(a_\lambda) converge ultraweakly to π(a)\pi(a), while its bounded strong convergence has limit TT, by H03's series-tail test. Coefficients separate operators, so T=π(a)T=\pi(a). Scaling and taking the real and imaginary self-adjoint parts of an arbitrary T∈B′′T\in B'' prove B′′=BB''=B. We now write M=π(N)M=\pi(N).

The inverse identification is normal as well. On each closed norm ball, π\pi is a continuous bijection from a compact ultraweak space to a Hausdorff ultraweak space, so its inverse is continuous there: a compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed, by separating one exterior point from its points and taking a finite subcover. Let f∈N∗f\in N_*, and put g=f∘π−1∈M∗g=f\circ\pi^{-1}\in M^*. Its restriction to the unit ball is ultraweak continuous. For ε>0\varepsilon>0, continuity at zero gives finitely many h1,…,hn∈M∗h_1,\ldots,h_n\in M_* such that ∣g(x)∣<ε|g(x)|<\varepsilon whenever ∥x∥≤1\|x\|\le1 and all the hj(x)h_j(x) are sufficiently small. In particular gg has norm at most ε\varepsilon on the common kernel V=⋂jker⁡hjV=\bigcap_j\ker h_j. Hahn–Banach F01 extends this restriction to G∈M∗G\in M^* with ∥G∥≤ε\|G\|\le\varepsilon. The functional g−Gg-G vanishes on VV, so it factors through the finite-dimensional map x↦(h1(x),…,hn(x))x\mapsto(h_1(x),\ldots,h_n(x)). Extending a linear functional on its image to Cn\mathbb C^n proves g−G∈span⁡{hj}⊂M∗g-G\in\operatorname{span}\{h_j\}\subset M_*. Since ε\varepsilon is arbitrary and M∗M_* is norm closed, g∈M∗g\in M_*. Thus π−1\pi^{-1} pulls every normal functional back to a normal functional. Normal positive functionals can consequently be transported in both directions without a normality-converse theorem.

The initial left Hilbert algebra and its closed graph. Let A=Λ(nφ∩nφ∗)\mathcal A=\Lambda(\mathfrak n_\varphi\cap\mathfrak n_\varphi^*), with product Λ(x)Λ(y)=Λ(xy)\Lambda(x)\Lambda(y)=\Lambda(xy) and involution Λ(x)♯=Λ(x∗)\Lambda(x)^\sharp=\Lambda(x^*). The left-ideal estimate gives bounded left multiplication, and the original sum pairings give ⟨Λ(x)Λ(y),Λ(z)⟩=⟨Λ(y),Λ(x∗)Λ(z)⟩\langle\Lambda(x)\Lambda(y),\Lambda(z)\rangle=\langle\Lambda(y),\Lambda(x^*)\Lambda(z)\rangle. All these series are absolutely convergent by Cauchy–Schwarz. The finite-star set is a *-algebra: left multiplication preserves nφ\mathfrak n_\varphi, and applying the same fact to adjoints proves stability under products.

For a,b∈nφa,b\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, the inequalities (a∗b)∗(a∗b)≤∥a∥2b∗b(a^*b)^*(a^*b)\le\|a\|^2b^*b and (a∗b)(a∗b)∗≤∥b∥2a∗a(a^*b)(a^*b)^*\le\|b\|^2a^*a put a∗ba^*b in the finite-star set. Thus pExp_Ex belongs to that set for x∈nφx\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, and Λ(pEx)=π(pE)Λ(x)→Λ(x)\Lambda(p_Ex)=\pi(p_E)\Lambda(x)\to\Lambda(x), since normality and pE↑1p_E\uparrow1 give π(pE)↑1\pi(p_E)\uparrow1. This proves density of A\mathcal A. When xx is finite-star, these vectors are products Λ(pE)Λ(x)\Lambda(p_E)\Lambda(x), so the product span is dense as well. Finally pExpFp_Ex p_F is finite-star for every bounded x∈Nx\in N, by the two square bounds with right supports pFp_F and pEp_E. Their represented operators converge strongly to π(x)\pi(x). Consequently the left algebra generates exactly MM.

The original involution is closable. First the subspace K=span⁡{b′ηi:b′∈M′,i∈I}‾K=\overline{\operatorname{span}\{b'\eta_i:b'\in M',i\in I\}} is all of HH. It reduces M′M'; its projection belongs to (M′)′=M(M')'=M, hence equals π(p)\pi(p) for a projection p∈Np\in N. Since π(p)ηi=ηi\pi(p)\eta_i=\eta_i, we have ωi(1−p)=0\omega_i(1-p)=0, so each support pi≤pp_i\le p. Their join is one, whence K=HK=H. For every finite-star xx, every b′∈M′b'\in M', and all i,ji,j, (9a), commutation and adjoints give the exact second-variable-linear identity

⟨Rib′ηj,Λ(x∗)⟩=⟨Λ(x),Rjb′∗ηi⟩.(9b) \langle R_i b'\eta_j,\Lambda(x^*)\rangle =\langle\Lambda(x),R_jb'^*\eta_i\rangle. \tag{9b}

If Λ(xn)→0\Lambda(x_n)\to0 and Λ(xn∗)→ζ\Lambda(x_n^*)\to\zeta, (9b) makes ζ\zeta orthogonal to RiKR_iK for every ii. These spaces together span HH, so ζ=0\zeta=0. This proves closability of precisely the initial involution. Let its closure be SS. We have now supplied the left Hilbert algebra to which the complete RC–GP–RS–IK–MC–MP construction applies.

The bounded part of the original closed graph. If x∈nφx\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, Λ(x)∈D(S)\Lambda(x)\in D(S), and SΛ(x)=ηS\Lambda(x)=\eta, take finite-star xnx_n converging in this original graph. Identity (9b) passes to the limit. The same bounded adjoint computation with xx on the right gives

⟨Rib′ηj,η⟩=⟨Rib′ηj,π(x∗)ηi⟩. \langle R_i b'\eta_j,\eta\rangle =\langle R_i b'\eta_j,\pi(x^*)\eta_i\rangle.

The projected commutant-orbit spans are dense in RiHR_iH, so Riη=π(x∗)ηiR_i\eta=\pi(x^*)\eta_i. Summing squares yields φ(xx∗)=∑i∥π(x∗)ηi∥2=∥η∥2<∞\varphi(xx^*)=\sum_i\|\pi(x^*)\eta_i\|^2=\|\eta\|^2<\infty, and then (9a) gives η=Λ(x∗)\eta=\Lambda(x^*). Conversely finite-star vectors belong to the initial graph. Thus its closure has added no extra bounded finite-star vectors.

Fullness. For ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l, its multiplier belongs to MM, so Lξ=π(x)L_\xi=\pi(x) for a unique x∈Nx\in N. The vectors ηi\eta_i are right-bounded with Rηi=RiR_{\eta_i}=R_i, by testing Laηi=RiaL_a\eta_i=R_i a on A\mathcal A. Their self-adjoint multipliers and NC00a put them in D\mathcal D. The defining mixed test gives

Riξ=Lξηi=π(x)ηi,φ(x∗x)=∑i∥Riξ∥2=∥ξ∥2. R_i\xi=L_\xi\eta_i=\pi(x)\eta_i, \qquad \varphi(x^*x)=\sum_i\|R_i\xi\|^2=\|\xi\|^2.

Thus x∈nφx\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, and (9a) gives ξ=Λ(x)\xi=\Lambda(x). Conversely, for x∈nφx\in\mathfrak n_\varphi, the finite-star vectors Λ(pEx)→Λ(x)\Lambda(p_Ex)\to\Lambda(x) have multipliers π(pEx)→π(x)\pi(p_Ex)\to\pi(x) strongly with bound ∥x∥\|x\|. For every η∈D\eta\in\mathcal D, pass to the limit in RηΛ(pEx)=π(pEx)ηR_\eta\Lambda(p_Ex)=\pi(p_Ex)\eta. This proves Λ(x)∈Bl\Lambda(x)\in B_l and LΛ(x)=π(x)L_{\Lambda(x)}=\pi(x). Therefore Bl=Λ(nφ)B_l=\Lambda(\mathfrak n_\varphi). Combining this with the preceding original-graph domain check gives

Bl∩D(S)=Λ(nφ∩nφ∗)=A. B_l\cap D(S)=\Lambda(\mathfrak n_\varphi\cap\mathfrak n_\varphi^*)=\mathcal A.

To check fullness as an algebra, let A′′\mathcal A'' be the double completion from MC6. Every ξ∈A′′\xi\in\mathcal A'' satisfies the bounded left-multiplier tests MC6.2, so ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l. MC6.5 and MC5 prove that its closed involution has the same original graph SS, so ξ∈D(S)\xi\in D(S). Therefore A′′⊂Bl∩D(S)=A\mathcal A''\subset B_l\cap D(S)=\mathcal A; the reverse inclusion is also proved by MC6.2. Hence A′′=A\mathcal A''=\mathcal A. This is the full original left Hilbert algebra required in (2)–(4). The proof uses no normality converse for a general weight, no opposite-weight reconstruction, and no separability hypothesis.

NC02. A positive symmetric operator has a covariant positive extension

Let T0T_0 be a densely defined positive symmetric linear operator, with domain DD. Complete DD for

∥v∥V2=∥v∥2+⟨v,T0v⟩.(10) \|v\|_V^2=\|v\|^2+\langle v,T_0v\rangle. \tag{10}

The inclusion into HH extends to a contraction ι:V→H\iota:V\to H. This map is injective. Indeed, if vnv_n tends to v∈Vv\in V and to zero in HH, then for every w∈Dw\in D,

⟨w,vn⟩V=⟨(1+T0)w,vn⟩H⟶0. \langle w,v_n\rangle_V =\langle (1+T_0)w,v_n\rangle_H\longrightarrow0.

Consequently vv is orthogonal in VV to its dense subspace DD, and v=0v=0. Identify VV with ιV⊂H\iota V\subset H. The continuous extension of the second term in (10) is a densely defined closed positive form qq, since its form norm is exactly the complete VV-norm.

QF03 constructs its positive self-adjoint representing operator hh. Its operator-domain criterion says that v∈D(h)v\in D(h) precisely when the form q(w,v)q(w,v) is ⟨w,f⟩\langle w,f\rangle for some f∈Hf\in H, for every w∈Vw\in V, and then hv=fhv=f. For v∈Dv\in D, symmetry and form-norm approximation give q(w,v)=⟨w,T0v⟩q(w,v)=\langle w,T_0v\rangle, so hh extends T0T_0.

If every unitary in a von Neumann algebra BB preserves DD and commutes with T0T_0 there, it preserves (10), hence VV and qq. QF04's uniqueness and transport prove uhu∗=huhu^*=h, including domains, for every such unitary. The spectral calculus then places every bounded transform of hh in B′B'. Thus hh is affiliated with B′B'. This proves the extension and its covariance, including the form-closure step used in Hiai's endpoint argument.

NC03. Endpoint duality using all right-bounded vectors

Define the two closed square sets

Cl={ξSξ:ξ∈A}‾,Cr={ηFη:η∈D}‾.(11) C_l=\overline{\{\xi S\xi:\xi\in\mathcal A\}}, \qquad C_r=\overline{\{\eta F\eta:\eta\in\mathcal D\}}. \tag{11}

For any subset C⊂HC\subset H, its dual is

C∨={v:⟨u,v⟩∈[0,∞) for every u∈C}.(12) C^\vee=\{v:\langle u,v\rangle\in[0,\infty)\text{ for every }u\in C\}. \tag{12}

We claim

Cl=Cr∨,Cr=Cl∨.(13) \boxed{C_l=C_r^\vee,\qquad C_r=C_l^\vee.} \tag{13}

First, commuting multipliers and the adjoint identities in (3)–(4) give

⟨ξSξ,ηFη⟩=⟨LξLξ∗η,η⟩=∥Lξ∗η∥2≥0.(14) \langle\xi S\xi,\eta F\eta\rangle =\langle L_\xi L_\xi^*\eta,\eta\rangle =\|L_\xi^*\eta\|^2\ge0. \tag{14}

The pair is real, so its order is unchanged by conjugation. This proves one inclusion in each equality.

Now let v∈Cr∨v\in C_r^\vee. Define on the whole dense right-bounded space

Tvη=Rηv,η∈Br.(15) T_v\eta=R_\eta v, \qquad \eta\in B_r. \tag{15}

For η∈D\eta\in\mathcal D,

⟨η,Tvη⟩=⟨Rη∗η,v⟩=⟨ηFη,v⟩≥0. \langle\eta,T_v\eta\rangle =\langle R_\eta^*\eta,v\rangle =\langle\eta F\eta,v\rangle\ge0.

For general η∈Br\eta\in B_r, use (8). Both ηi→η\eta_i\to\eta and Rηiv→RηvR_{\eta_i}v\to R_\eta v, so the same nonnegative diagonal inequality passes to η\eta. Polarization makes TvT_v symmetric and positive on its full domain. In particular it is closable: if ηn→0\eta_n\to0 and Tvηn→wT_v\eta_n\to w, testing symmetry against every θ∈Br\theta\in B_r gives ⟨θ,w⟩=0\langle\theta,w\rangle=0, and density gives w=0w=0.

The full-domain choice in (15) also proves covariance directly. Every y∈M′y\in M' preserves BrB_r, and (3) gives

Tv(yη)=Ryηv=yRηv=yTvη.(16) T_v(y\eta)=R_{y\eta}v=yR_\eta v=yT_v\eta. \tag{16}

NC02 therefore supplies a positive self-adjoint extension hh affiliated with MM. It was not necessary first to put vv in an involution domain.

Use the bounded resolvents

bn=(1+h/n)−1∈M,vn=bnv.(17) b_n=(1+h/n)^{-1}\in M, \qquad v_n=b_nv. \tag{17}

For η∈Br\eta\in B_r, affiliation gives commutation with RηR_\eta, and the fact that hh extends (15) gives

Rηvn=bnRηv=bnhη.(18) R_\eta v_n=b_nR_\eta v=b_nh\eta. \tag{18}

The operator bnhb_nh is bounded and positive. Equations (3)–(4), or the defining bounded-multiplier test, show that vn∈Blv_n\in B_l and Lvn=bnh≥0L_{v_n}=b_nh\ge0. Also bn→1b_n\to1 strongly, so vn→vv_n\to v.

Every left-bounded vector ww with a=Lw≥0a=L_w\ge0 is a norm limit of left squares. Here is a proof entirely within bounded multiplication. For ε>0\varepsilon>0, put

ξε=(a+ε)−1/2w,cε=Lξε=a(a+ε)−1/2,fε(a)=a(a+ε)−1.(19) \xi_\varepsilon=(a+\varepsilon)^{-1/2}w, \qquad c_\varepsilon=L_{\xi_\varepsilon}=a(a+\varepsilon)^{-1/2}, \qquad f_\varepsilon(a)=a(a+\varepsilon)^{-1}. \tag{19}

Covariance puts ξε\xi_\varepsilon in BlB_l. Its positive self-adjoint multiplier and (4) put it in A\mathcal A, with Sξε=ξεS\xi_\varepsilon=\xi_\varepsilon. Therefore

ξεSξε=cεξε=fε(a)w⟶w.(20) \xi_\varepsilon S\xi_\varepsilon =c_\varepsilon\xi_\varepsilon =f_\varepsilon(a)w\longrightarrow w. \tag{20}

Indeed fε(a)f_\varepsilon(a) tends strongly to the range support pp of aa, and injectivity of multiplication gives (1−p)w=0(1-p)w=0 from L(1−p)w=(1−p)a=0L_{(1-p)w}=(1-p)a=0. Thus (20) has the stated vector limit.

Apply this to every vnv_n, then use closedness of the square set: v∈Clv\in C_l. This proves Cr∨⊂ClC_r^\vee\subset C_l. Run the same proof on the opposite right Hilbert algebra to obtain Cl∨⊂CrC_l^\vee\subset C_r. This proves (13), without a cyclic vector or a prior convexity assumption on the square sets. Dual sets are closed convex cones, so both endpoint sets are now closed convex cones.

Each left square is fixed by SS; closedness gives

Cl⊂D(S),Su=u (u∈Cl).(21) C_l\subset D(S),\quad Su=u\ (u\in C_l). \tag{21}

The right assertion is Fv=vFv=v on CrC_r. Product reversal by JJ, including FJ=JSFJ=JS, gives

JCl=Cr,Δ1/2Cl=Cr.(22) JC_l=C_r, \qquad \Delta^{1/2}C_l=C_r. \tag{22}

The square spans are dense: complex polarization spans the product algebra by squares, and the product graph-core theorem gives density in HH. Thus neither cone has a nonzero vector together with its negative. This also records the endpoint graph domains needed for taking the quarter powers.

NC04. Defining the middle cone and identifying both power descriptions

For ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l, define the always meaningful vector

Q(ξ)=LξJξ. Q(\xi)=L_\xi J\xi.

Set

P={Q(ξ):ξ∈A0}‾.(23) P=\overline{\{Q(\xi):\xi\in\mathcal A_0\}}. \tag{23}

On the analytic multiplication algebra, (5) and (7) give

Δ1/4(ξSξ)=(Δ1/4ξ)J(Δ1/4ξ)=Q(Δ1/4ξ).(24) \Delta^{1/4}(\xi S\xi) = (\Delta^{1/4}\xi)J(\Delta^{1/4}\xi) =Q(\Delta^{1/4}\xi). \tag{24}

Every expression in this equality belongs to its stated domain; Δ1/4\Delta^{1/4} maps A0\mathcal A_0 onto itself.

Analytic left squares are dense in ClC_l. For the approximants from NC00, the estimate

∥LξrSξr−LξSξ∥≤∥Lξr∥ ∥Sξr−Sξ∥+∥(Lξr−Lξ)Sξ∥ \|L_{\xi_r}S\xi_r-L_\xi S\xi\| \le\|L_{\xi_r}\|\,\|S\xi_r-S\xi\| +\|(L_{\xi_r}-L_\xi)S\xi\|

gives this assertion first for each square, then for the whole closure. If un,u∈Clu_n,u\in C_l, (21) gives Δ1/2(un−u)=J(un−u)\Delta^{1/2}(u_n-u)=J(u_n-u), and the spectral pairing inequality gives

∥Δ1/4(un−u)∥2≤∥un−u∥ ∥Δ1/2(un−u)∥=∥un−u∥2.(25) \|\Delta^{1/4}(u_n-u)\|^2 \le\|u_n-u\|\,\|\Delta^{1/2}(u_n-u)\| =\|u_n-u\|^2. \tag{25}

Therefore (24) extends to the closure description

P=Δ1/4Cl‾=Δ−1/4Cr‾.(26) P=\overline{\Delta^{1/4}C_l} =\overline{\Delta^{-1/4}C_r}. \tag{26}

For the second equality use (22) and the spectral domain identity on ClC_l. Both images in (26) are convex cones because the respective powers are linear on their entire cone domains. Their closures are convex too.

Equation (7) gives JQ(ξ)=Q(ξ)JQ(\xi)=Q(\xi), so JJ fixes PP pointwise. Covariance and commutation of JJ with the real group give

UtQ(ξ)=Q(Utξ),UtP=P.(27) U_tQ(\xi)=Q(U_t\xi),\qquad U_tP=P. \tag{27}

No cone order theorem is being used to assert this group invariance.

NC05. Self-duality by a positive Gaussian smoothing

For u∈Clu\in C_l, v∈Crv\in C_r, the spectral pairing identity and (13) give

⟨Δ1/4u,Δ−1/4v⟩=⟨u,v⟩≥0.(28) \langle\Delta^{1/4}u,\Delta^{-1/4}v\rangle =\langle u,v\rangle\ge0. \tag{28}

One obtains the identity first on bounded spectral bands and then by convergence in the two quarter-power domains. The two descriptions in (26) imply P⊂P∨P\subset P^\vee.

Suppose w∈P∨w\in P^\vee. Define

wn=Gnw,Gn=n/π∫Re−nt2Ut dt=exp⁡ ⁣(−(log⁡Δ)24n).(29) w_n=G_nw, \qquad G_n=\sqrt{n/\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}e^{-nt^2}U_t\,dt =\exp\!\left(-\frac{(\log\Delta)^2}{4n}\right). \tag{29}

The integral is a Hilbert-vector integral, obtained by truncation and scalar pairing; its absolute norm bound is one. The Gaussian Fourier formula in MA03/16 proves the spectral equality. The scalar multiplier converges to one and is bounded by one, so wn→ww_n\to w. For every real α\alpha,

sup⁡s∈Rexp⁡(αs−s24n)<∞, \sup_{s\in\mathbb R}\exp\left(\alpha s-\frac{s^2}{4n}\right)<\infty,

which, together with (6), proves wn∈D(Δα)w_n\in D(\Delta^\alpha). Thus every power used next has an actual vector value.

The kernel in (29) is nonnegative. Equation (27) implies that GnG_n preserves PP; self-adjointness of GnG_n implies that it preserves P∨P^\vee. For u∈Clu\in C_l,

⟨u,Δ1/4wn⟩=⟨Δ1/4u,wn⟩≥0. \langle u,\Delta^{1/4}w_n\rangle =\langle\Delta^{1/4}u,w_n\rangle\ge0.

Endpoint duality gives Δ1/4wn∈Cr\Delta^{1/4}w_n\in C_r. Its inverse quarter power is defined, and equals wnw_n; (26) therefore puts wn∈Pw_n\in P. Closedness and its vector limit give w∈Pw\in P. We have proved

P=P∨.(30) \boxed{P=P^\vee.} \tag{30}

NC06. Preservation by every bounded algebra element

The generating set in (23) can be enlarged to all left-bounded vectors:

P={Q(ξ):ξ∈Bl}‾.(31) P=\overline{\{Q(\xi):\xi\in B_l\}}. \tag{31}

First use Gaussian approximation for ξ∈A\xi\in\mathcal A. Its vector convergence and strong multiplier convergence with a uniform bound give Q(ξr)→Q(ξ)Q(\xi_r)\to Q(\xi). Next approximate ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l by the left version of (8); the same estimate gives Q(ξi)→Q(ξ)Q(\xi_i)\to Q(\xi). Both limits lie in PP. The reverse containment follows from A0⊂Bl\mathcal A_0\subset B_l.

For a∈Ma\in M, ξ∈Bl\xi\in B_l, covariance says that aξa\xi is still in BlB_l. Since JaJ∈M′JaJ\in M',

Q(aξ)=aLξJ(aξ)=aLξ(JaJ)Jξ=aJaJ Q(ξ).(32) Q(a\xi)=aL_\xi J(a\xi) =aL_\xi(JaJ)J\xi =aJaJ\,Q(\xi). \tag{32}

Equations (31)–(32) and boundedness give

aJaJ(P)⊂P(a∈M).(33) \boxed{aJaJ(P)\subset P\quad(a\in M).} \tag{33}

This proof uses the genuine left ideal BlB_l; it does not put aξa\xi in the finite-star algebra, which need not be a left ideal.

NC07. Central conjugation with its domain proof

Let z∈Z(M)z\in Z(M). The finite-star ideal is preserved by zz, since it is a left ideal in each of its two factors and zz commutes with them. On its GNS core,

S(zΛ(a))=Λ((za)∗)=z∗SΛ(a).(34) S(z\Lambda(a))=\Lambda((za)^*)=z^*S\Lambda(a). \tag{34}

Closed graph approximation extends this to zD(S)⊂D(S)zD(S)\subset D(S), with Sz=z∗SSz=z^*S there. For a central unitary uu, apply it also to u∗u^* to obtain equality uD(S)=D(S)uD(S)=D(S). Thus uu preserves the closed form ∥Sξ∥2\|S\xi\|^2 on D(S)D(S). The form representation and transport give uΔu∗=Δu\Delta u^*=\Delta, including domains, so uu commutes with Δ1/2\Delta^{1/2}. In the polar factorization,

JuΔ1/2=Su=u∗S=u∗JΔ1/2. Ju\Delta^{1/2}=Su=u^*S=u^*J\Delta^{1/2}.

The range of Δ1/2\Delta^{1/2} is dense, so Ju=u∗JJu=u^*J, and hence JuJ=u∗JuJ=u^*. Every central element is a complex linear combination of central unitaries: for a self-adjoint central contraction cc, the two elements c±i(1−c2)1/2c\pm i(1-c^2)^{1/2} are central unitaries; split a general central element into real and imaginary parts and scale. Conjugating the coefficients gives

JzJ=z∗(z∈Z(M)).(35) \boxed{JzJ=z^*\quad(z\in Z(M)).} \tag{35}

Together, (5), (30), pointwise fixedness by JJ, and (33) construct the standard form for the chosen arbitrary-weight GNS representation.

NC08. The universal cyclic core and natural cone

Let A⊂B(K)A\subset B(K) be any von Neumann algebra and let γ\gamma be cyclic and separating. This includes any support-corner algebra used in CG09. The finite vector weight ωγ\omega_\gamma is faithful and normal. Its GNS map a↦aγa\mapsto a\gamma identifies its GNS representation with the given one. The finite-star Hilbert algebra is therefore A=Aγ\mathcal A=A\gamma, with algebra unit γ\gamma, and

S=aγ↦a∗γ‾.(36) S=\overline{a\gamma\mapsto a^*\gamma}. \tag{36}

Apply the operator construction NC00, so (5) holds for this same original graph.

A direct pairing on AγA\gamma gives, for b′∈A′b'\in A',

⟨S(aγ),b′γ⟩=⟨γ,ab′γ⟩=⟨b′∗γ,aγ⟩. \langle S(a\gamma),b'\gamma\rangle =\langle\gamma,ab'\gamma\rangle =\langle b'^*\gamma,a\gamma\rangle.

Thus b′γ∈D(S∗)b'\gamma\in D(S^*) and S∗(b′γ)=b′∗γS^*(b'\gamma)=b'^*\gamma. Taking a=b′=1a=b'=1 gives Sγ=S∗γ=γS\gamma=S^*\gamma=\gamma, hence Δγ=γ\Delta\gamma=\gamma and Jγ=γJ\gamma=\gamma. From (5),

F=S∗=JSJ(37) F=S^*=JSJ \tag{37}

with equality of domains, since JΔ1/2J=Δ−1/2J\Delta^{1/2}J=\Delta^{-1/2}. The original graph core AγA\gamma is sent by JJ to A′γA'\gamma, by JAJ=A′JAJ=A' and Jγ=γJ\gamma=\gamma. Therefore (37) proves

F=b′γ↦b′∗γ‾,A′γ is an actual graph core of F.(38) \boxed{F=\overline{b'\gamma\mapsto b'^*\gamma}, \quad A'\gamma\text{ is an actual graph core of }F.} \tag{38}

In particular the modular graph-core assertion is proved for the given cyclic representation, rather than inferred from the axioms of a self-dual cone.

Here every left-bounded vector is aγa\gamma, a∈Aa\in A: its multiplier applied to the right unit γ\gamma equals that vector by (3). Conversely each aγa\gamma is left bounded with multiplier aa. Thus (31) becomes

Pγ={aJaJγ:a∈A}‾.(39) P_\gamma=\overline{\{aJaJ\gamma:a\in A\}}. \tag{39}

The endpoint square set is Cl=A+γ‾C_l=\overline{A_+\gamma}, since a left square is aa∗γaa^*\gamma and every positive element has a bounded square root. The corresponding right statement is Cr=A+′γ‾C_r=\overline{A'_+\gamma}. Equation (26) consequently gives

Pγ={Δ1/4aγ:a∈A+}‾={Δ−1/4b′γ:b′∈A+′}‾.(40) \boxed{P_\gamma =\overline{\{\Delta^{1/4}a\gamma:a\in A_+\}} =\overline{\{\Delta^{-1/4}b'\gamma:b'\in A'_+\}}.} \tag{40}

Every aγa\gamma lies in D(Δ1/2)D(\Delta^{1/2}), and

Δ1/2aγ=Ja∗γ.(41) \Delta^{1/2}a\gamma=Ja^*\gamma. \tag{41}

The natural cone (39) is self-dual by NC05, and has all the preservation and central identities proved above. Real modular covariance, the actual spectral powers/logarithm domains, the Gaussian entire-vector cores, (38), and (40)–(41) are precisely the cyclic outputs used in CG09 and in the cyclic realization proof. No faithful state on the original arbitrary algebra has been assumed.

An exact finite-weight model

Quarter powers turn the two endpoint vectors into the same positive matrix In the Hilbert Schmidt model with density d equal to diagonal one and four, the positive algebra element a has entries two one one two. Its left GNS vector has entries two two one four and its right endpoint vector has entries two one two four. Applying Delta to the quarter power on the left or negative quarter power on the right gives the positive matrix with entries two square root two square root two four. Quarter powers meet at the positive matrix M = M₂(C), H = Hilbert–Schmidt matrices, d = diag(1, 4), Δ(X) = dXd⁻¹, J(X) = X* u ∈ Cₗu = a d¹ᐟ²2214 w ∈ Pw = d¹ᐟ⁴ a d¹ᐟ⁴2√2√24 v ∈ Cᵣv = d¹ᐟ² a2124 Δ¹ᐟ⁴Δ⁻¹ᐟ⁴ a = [2, 1; 1, 2] ≥ 0. The middle matrix has trace 6 and determinant 6, so it is positive. In this finite model: Cᵣ = Cₗ∨ and P = {positive Hilbert–Schmidt matrices} = P∨. Exact three-vector example of NC03–NC05. General domains and closures are proved there; the full space has eight real dimensions.

The diagram uses the second-variable-linear Hilbert–Schmidt pairing ⟨X,Y⟩=Tr⁡(X∗Y)\langle X,Y\rangle=\operatorname{Tr}(X^*Y), the weight φ(a)=Tr⁡(da)\varphi(a)=\operatorname{Tr}(da) with d=diag⁡(1,4)d=\operatorname{diag}(1,4), and Λ(a)=ad1/2\Lambda(a)=ad^{1/2}. The vector multiplication is X⋆Y=Xd−1/2YX\mathbin{\star}Y=Xd^{-1/2}Y. Thus the left endpoint contains u=ad1/2u=ad^{1/2}, the right contains v=d1/2av=d^{1/2}a, and both quarter-power paths give w=d1/4ad1/4w=d^{1/4}ad^{1/4}. For the displayed positive aa, these are exactly the three matrices in the figure. The finite model has PP equal to all positive Hilbert–Schmidt matrices. This illustrates the domains and identities of NC03–NC05; their arbitrary-weight proof remains in the text. Hiai's Example 3.6(2), printed page22, supplies the related tracial Hilbert–Schmidt standard model. The density matrix and the diagram's coordinates are explicit substitutions into (5), (24) and (26).