Weighted endpoint estimates and polynomial decay

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.

Working question: How is one decay estimate promoted to every polynomial weight? The vanishing-tail condition lets an exterior estimate absorb an annular error. A bounded approximation to a polynomial weight first keeps all operator constants uniform. Increasing the weight in finite steps then bootstraps the solution, rather than assuming that an unbounded weight is already allowed in the graph equation.

A solution whose mass per unit radius vanishes has more room for decay estimates than a general endpoint solution. If the forcing has a polynomial weight, the solution acquires the same weight in its endpoint derivative norms. We prove this uniformly on compact sets of regular energies. A homogeneous solution then has every polynomial Sobolev weight. This also makes the noncritical eigenvalues discrete and of finite multiplicity.

Read Admissible differential perturbations for the full rough coefficient class and its local multipliers, The Sobolev domain of an elliptic operator for the realization, and Weighted Sobolev spaces and rough elliptic estimates for the weighted norms. The resolvent away from the energy surface supplies the complete off-energy theorem. The shell maps and unweighted commutator are in A resolvent estimate at noncritical frequencies. The primary rough map is proved in Combining the long-range resolvent estimates. Radiation for limits of long-range resolvents constructs the exterior angular multiplier and proves the vanishing shell characterization. Outgoing flux and vanishing shell mass explains how zero outgoing flux supplies that hypothesis.

The programme's Finite composition and adjoints with spatial weights proves the exact finite products, complete remainders and common distributional action. Weighted positivity from Gaussian packets, Theorem 1, proves the scalar positivity input; Section 6 of the radiation lesson supplies its explicit spatial conjugation at every fixed weight. Agmon [A] supplies the freely readable weighted-decay and eigenvalue construction to compare with. Sections 3–9 prove the finite commutator, arbitrary-weight and rough-coefficient arguments, including the signed escape direction. Lerner [L] and Teschl [T] provide free comparisons, with their actual proof roles specified in the references.

Put D=−i∂D=-i\partial, X=⟨x⟩X=\langle x\rangle, Ξ=⟨ξ⟩\Xi=\langle\xi\rangle, and use an inner product linear in its first entry. Our conventions are

∥u∥s,t=∥Xt⟨D⟩su∥2,Gθ=X−2θ∣dx∣2+Ξ−2∣dξ∣2.(1) \begin{gathered} \|u\|_{s,t}=\|X^t\langle D\rangle^s u\|_2,\\ G_\theta=X^{-2\theta}|dx|^2+\Xi^{-2}|d\xi|^2. \end{gathered} \tag{1}

All quantizations are left quantizations. Integer weighted Sobolev norms are equivalent to the square sum of ∥XtDαu∥2\|X^tD^\alpha u\|_2, ∣α∣≤m|\alpha|\le m.

1. The full uniformly weighted theorem

Let P0(D)P_0(D) be a real scalar constant-coefficient elliptic operator of integer order m≥1m\ge1, and let VV be a symmetric 11-admissible differential perturbation with its full sharp local coefficient hypotheses. Its self-adjoint realization H=P0+VH=P_0+V has domain HmH^m. A free energy is regular when ∇P0≠0\nabla P_0\ne0 on Mλ={P0=λ}M_\lambda=\{P_0=\lambda\}; an empty shell is allowed.

For A0={∣x∣<1}A_0=\{|x|<1\}, Aj={2j−1≤∣x∣<2j}A_j=\{2^{j-1}\le|x|<2^j\}, and Rj=2jR_j=2^j, set

∥f∥B=∑j≥0Rj1/2∥f∥L2(Aj),∥u∥B∗=sup⁡j≥0Rj−1/2∥u∥L2(Aj).(2) \begin{aligned} \|f\|_B&=\sum_{j\ge0}R_j^{1/2}\|f\|_{L^2(A_j)},\\ \|u\|_{B^*}&=\sup_{j\ge0}R_j^{-1/2}\|u\|_{L^2(A_j)}. \end{aligned} \tag{2}

The space B˙∗\dot B^* is the closure of Schwartz functions in B∗B^*. The radiation lesson proves

g∈B˙∗ ⟺ Rj−1∥g∥L2(Aj)2⟶0⟺ R−1∫∣x∣<R∣g∣2 dx⟶0.(3) \begin{gathered} g\in\dot B^* \ \Longleftrightarrow\ R_j^{-1}\|g\|_{L^2(A_j)}^2\longrightarrow0\\ \Longleftrightarrow\ R^{-1}\int_{|x|<R}|g|^2\,dx\longrightarrow0. \end{gathered} \tag{3}

These equivalences include the inner shell and all real radii. The B/B∗B/B^* integral pairing is absolutely convergent.

Theorem 1.1. Let KK be a compact set of regular free energies. Suppose λ∈K\lambda\in K and

Dαu∈B˙∗,∣α∣≤m,(H−λ)u=f,Xγf∈B,γ≥0.(4) \begin{gathered} D^\alpha u\in\dot B^*,\qquad |\alpha|\le m,\\ (H-\lambda)u=f,\qquad X^\gamma f\in B,\quad\gamma\ge0. \end{gathered} \tag{4}

The equation uses the actual local coefficient products. Then

XγDαu∈B∗,∣α∣≤m,∑∣α∣≤m∥XγDαu∥B∗≤Cγ,K(∥Xγf∥B+∑∣α∣≤m∥Dαu∥B∗).(5) \begin{gathered} X^\gamma D^\alpha u\in B^*,\qquad |\alpha|\le m,\\ \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^\gamma D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}\\ \le C_{\gamma,K}\left( \|X^\gamma f\|_B+ \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}\right). \end{gathered} \tag{5}

The constant is independent of u,f,λu,f,\lambda. No directional radiation condition is added. The vanishing shell hypothesis is essential to the cutoff passage in the proof.

We first work in a small neighborhood of one regular energy. Choose a real 0≤χ≤10\le\chi\le1, compactly supported where v=∇P0≠0v=\nabla P_0\ne0, and equal one near every energy shell in this neighborhood. Such a fixed cutoff exists by compactness, ellipticity and regularity. Finitely many neighborhoods cover KK. If the shell is empty, a smaller neighborhood has no free shell and its off-energy estimate suffices.

Use the symmetric split V=VL+VSV=V_L+V_S, with the compact smooth adjustment making P=P0+VLP=P_0+V_L elliptic. Fix a sufficiently small 0<δ≤10<\delta\le1 for all its coefficient bounds, and write

a=1+δ2,VS:Hm,t⟶H0,t+1+δ.(6) a=\frac{1+\delta}{2},\qquad V_S:H^{m,t}\longrightarrow H^{0,t+1+\delta}. \tag{6}

The primary map is consistent with the actual rough expression for every real tt. Its proof and the smooth split are given in the combined-resolvent lesson.

2. A strict step in the weight

Write Uβ=∑∣α∣≤m∥XβDαu∥B∗U_\beta=\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^\beta D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}. If Uγ′<∞U_{\gamma'}<\infty, the shell square sum gives

u∈Hm,t,t<γ′−12,∥u∥m,t≤Ct,γ′Uγ′.(7) \begin{gathered} u\in H^{m,t},\qquad t<\gamma'-\frac12,\\ \|u\|_{m,t}\le C_{t,\gamma'}U_{\gamma'}. \end{gathered} \tag{7}

Indeed on an outer shell each squared weighted derivative norm is at most CRj2(t−γ′)+1Uγ′2C R_j^{2(t-\gamma')+1}U_{\gamma'}^2. Its exponent is strictly negative, so the geometric series converges. The inner shell is finite separately.

Choose

0≤γ′<γ<γ′+δ2.(8) 0\le\gamma'<\gamma<\gamma'+\frac{\delta}{2}. \tag{8}

Then

u∈Hm,γ−a∩Hm,γ−1/2−δ,∥u∥m,γ−a+∥u∥m,γ−1/2−δ≤CUγ′.(9) \begin{gathered} u\in H^{m,\gamma-a} \cap H^{m,\gamma-1/2-\delta},\\ \|u\|_{m,\gamma-a} +\|u\|_{m,\gamma-1/2-\delta} \le C U_{\gamma'}. \end{gathered} \tag{9}

The first inclusion uses γ−a<γ′−1/2\gamma-a<\gamma'-1/2; the second has still more margin.

Since B⊂H0,1/2B\subset H^{0,1/2}, the weighted forcing is in H0,γ+1/2H^{0,\gamma+1/2}. The primary rough map puts VSuV_Su in that space as well. Apply the complete real-parameter off-energy theorem to (P−λ)u=f−VSu(P-\lambda)u=f-V_Su, with any finite strict auxiliary weight from the preceding shell bound. Uniformly in the energy neighborhood,

uoff=(1−χ(D))u∈Hm,γ+1/2,∑∣α∣≤m∥XγDαuoff∥B∗≤C(∥Xγf∥B+Uγ′).(10) \begin{gathered} u_{\mathrm{off}}=(1-\chi(D))u\in H^{m,\gamma+1/2},\\ \sum_{|\alpha|\le m} \|X^\gamma D^\alpha u_{\mathrm{off}}\|_{B^*}\\ \le C\bigl(\|X^\gamma f\|_B+U_{\gamma'}\bigr). \end{gathered} \tag{10}

The last bound follows already from the weighted L2L^2 derivatives. Thus the bootstrap step only needs to estimate χ(D)u\chi(D)u.

3. Cutting off the full rough expression

Lemma 3.1. Let ζ\zeta be smooth, equal one on the unit ball and supported in ∣x∣<2|x|<2. Set ζt(x)=ζ(x/t)\zeta_t(x)=\zeta(x/t), t≥2t\ge2. Then

∥[H,ζt]u∥B≤C(t−1∑∣α∣≤m∫∣x∣<3t∣Dαu∣2 dx)1/2⟶0.(11) \begin{gathered} \|[H,\zeta_t]u\|_B\\ \le C\left(t^{-1} \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\int_{|x|<3t}|D^\alpha u|^2\,dx \right)^{1/2} \longrightarrow0. \end{gathered} \tag{11}

Also Dα(ζtu)→DαuD^\alpha(\zeta_tu)\to D^\alpha u in B∗B^* through order mm. Whenever uu is already known in Hm,sH^{m,s}, the same cutoffs converge there.

Proof. Write the complete expression, including the free coefficients, as ∑aα(x)Dα\sum a_\alpha(x)D^\alpha. Its highest coefficients are bounded, and each lower coefficient has a globally bounded translated unit-ball LpαL^{p_\alpha} norm. Compact local membership and the admissible tail bounds give these global bounds. Local HmH^m membership of uu follows from its derivative hypothesis. The actual local product rule is

[H,ζt]u=∑α∑0<β≤α(αβ)aα(Dβζt)Dα−βu.(12) [H,\zeta_t]u =\sum_\alpha\sum_{0<\beta\le\alpha} \binom{\alpha}{\beta} a_\alpha(D^\beta\zeta_t)D^{\alpha-\beta}u. \tag{12}

Only the cutoff is differentiated. Its positive derivatives are O(t−1)O(t^{-1}) or smaller and have support in t≤∣x∣≤2tt\le|x|\le2t.

Choose a fixed translated cutoff ηy\eta_y, supported in B(y,1)B(y,1), equal one on B(y,1/2)B(y,1/2). An originally lower coefficient of derivative gap k=m−∣α∣k=m-|\alpha| is multiplied by a derivative with gap k+∣β∣≥kk+|\beta|\ge k. Its original Sobolev/Hölder exponents therefore still bound the local output by Ct−1Aα(y)∥ηyu∥HmCt^{-1}A_\alpha(y)\|\eta_yu\|_{H^m}. For an originally highest coefficient use its L∞L^\infty norm. Integrate the squared inequalities over the contributing centers t−1/2≤∣y∣≤2t+1/2t-1/2\le|y|\le2t+1/2. The derivative product rule and Fubini from the local multiplier proof give

∥[H,ζt]u∥22≤Ct−2∑∣α∣≤m∫t−3/2<∣x∣<2t+3/2∣Dαu∣2 dx.(13) \begin{gathered} \|[H,\zeta_t]u\|_2^2\\ \le Ct^{-2}\sum_{|\alpha|\le m} \int_{t-3/2<|x|<2t+3/2}|D^\alpha u|^2\,dx. \end{gathered} \tag{13}

The output annulus intersects a uniformly bounded number of dyadic shells. Its BB norm is at most Ct1/2Ct^{1/2} times its L2L^2 norm. Since 2t+3/2≤3t2t+3/2\le3t, this proves the bound; the ball-vanishing characterization makes it tend to zero.

In the derivative rule for ζtu−u\zeta_tu-u, the undifferentiated cutoff term vanishes in B∗B^* by the vanishing tail. Every other term is bounded by Ct−1Ct^{-1} times a lower derivative endpoint norm. This proves endpoint convergence. For a known finite weighted Sobolev norm, the same finite rule, dominated convergence of its derivative square sums and the weighted norm equivalence prove convergence in Hm,sH^{m,s}. □\square

In particular ut=ζtu∈Hmu_t=\zeta_tu\in H^m and

(H−λ)ut=ft,ft=ζtf+[H,ζt]u⟶fin B.(14) \begin{gathered} (H-\lambda)u_t=f_t,\\ f_t=\zeta_t f+[H,\zeta_t]u\longrightarrow f \quad\hbox{in }B. \end{gathered} \tag{14}

We will pass a fixed-radius estimate through this convergence. We do not need convergence of XγftX^\gamma f_t.

4. An exterior estimate with every nonnegative weight

Use the smooth exterior angular convolution Ψ\Psi from the radiation lesson. It is homogeneous of degree zero in its nonzero velocity argument, has all mixed G1G_1 bounds, is zero for ∣x∣<c|x|<c, and satisfies y⋅∂xΨ≥0y\cdot\partial_x\Psi\ge0. That construction includes the half-line formula in dimension one.

Choose its nested excluded angular cutoff c2c_2 with support in the acute cone x⋅y>0x\cdot y>0, and choose a radial smooth ω=1\omega=1 on 1≤∣x∣≤21\le|x|\le2, supported in a fixed larger annulus. The positive probe constant k>0k>0 may be chosen for any positive minimum of ∣v∣|v| on supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi. Define

qR,±=Ψ(x/R,∓v(ξ))χ(ξ),g±=1−c2(x,±v(ξ)),ΦR,±=kω(x/R)g±(x,ξ)χ(ξ).(15) \begin{gathered} q_{R,\pm}=\Psi(x/R,\mp v(\xi))\chi(\xi),\\ g_\pm=1-c_2(x,\pm v(\xi)),\\ \Phi_{R,\pm}=k\omega(x/R)g_\pm(x,\xi)\chi(\xi). \end{gathered} \tag{15}

Precisely, the sign σ=±1\sigma=\pm1 refers to Pσ=σPP_\sigma=\sigma P, free polynomial σP0\sigma P_0, energy σλ\sigma\lambda, and forcing σ(f−VSu)\sigma(f-V_Su). Its free velocity is vPσ=σvv_{P_\sigma}=\sigma v. The escape argument is −vPσ-v_{P_\sigma}, so vPσ⋅∂xΨ(x/R,−vPσ)=−R−1Ψ′(x/R,−vPσ)≤0v_{P_\sigma}\cdot\partial_x\Psi(x/R,-v_{P_\sigma})=-R^{-1}\Psi'(x/R,-v_{P_\sigma})\le0. This opposite direction is necessary for the following nonnegative transport symbol. For either sign let QR=Op⁡(qR)Q_R=\operatorname{Op}(q_R), ΦR\Phi_R its corresponding probe, and vP=vPσv_P=v_{P_\sigma}. The construction gives

sR=−qRvP⋅∂xqR−R−1ΦR2≥0.(16) s_R=-q_R v_P\cdot\partial_xq_R-R^{-1}\Phi_R^2\ge0. \tag{16}

Exterior support, with all differentiated bounds, implies for every fixed γ≥0\gamma\ge0

RγqR∈S(XγΞ−N,G1),R2γsR∈S(X2γ−1,G1),Rγ−1/2ΦR∈S(Xγ−1/2Ξ−N,G1).(17) \begin{gathered} R^\gamma q_R\in S(X^\gamma\Xi^{-N},G_1),\\ R^{2\gamma}s_R\in S(X^{2\gamma-1},G_1),\\ R^{\gamma-1/2}\Phi_R\in S(X^{\gamma-1/2}\Xi^{-N},G_1). \end{gathered} \tag{17}

Each prescribed rapid frequency exponent NN is allowed for the compact-frequency factors.

Lemma 4.1. Under the known finite norm in Section 2, for either sign,

R−1∥Op⁡(ΦR)u∥22≤∣(QRf,QRu)∣+CR−2γ∥u∥m,γ−a2,R≥1.(18) \begin{gathered} R^{-1}\|\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_R)u\|_2^2\\ \le |(Q_R f,Q_Ru)| \\ +CR^{-2\gamma}\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}^2, \\ R\ge1. \end{gathered} \tag{18}

Proof. First take a Schwartz input in the smooth equation. The exact weighted finite calculation is

R2γQR∗[Pσ,QR]/i=Op⁡(R2γsR)+R2γ−1Op⁡(ΦR)∗Op⁡(ΦR)+ER,γ.(19) \begin{gathered} R^{2\gamma}Q_R^*[P_\sigma,Q_R]/i\\ =\operatorname{Op}(R^{2\gamma}s_R)\\ \quad+R^{2\gamma-1}\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_R)^* \operatorname{Op}(\Phi_R)+E_{R,\gamma}. \end{gathered} \tag{19}

Here ER,γE_{R,\gamma} is uniformly in S(X2γ−1−δΞ−N,Gδ)S(X^{2\gamma-1-\delta}\Xi^{-N},G_\delta) for every prescribed NN. We justify the complete error. The free polynomial commutator is the exact finite Leibniz sum. Its terms with two or more position derivatives, and the first adjoint correction multiplied by the first transport term, have weight X2γ−2X^{2\gamma-2}. A long-range product differentiating a coefficient uses its stronger bound X−1−δ∣β∣X^{-1-\delta|\beta|}; a product differentiating the escape factor uses Xγ−∣β∣X^{\gamma-|\beta|} beside the undifferentiated X−δX^{-\delta} coefficient. After the other escape factor, both cases have weight at most X2γ−1−δX^{2\gamma-1-\delta}.

Choose a finite composition order LL with δL≥1\delta L\ge1. Its complete long-range remainder has weight at most X2γ−δ−δLX^{2\gamma-\delta-\delta L}, hence the same required bound. Arbitrary rapid frequency seminorms of the escape factors handle the full differential order. The exact probe adjoint/product correction has weight X2γ−2X^{2\gamma-2}, contained in the required error class since δ≤1\delta\le1. No convergent formal series is asserted.

The weighted map thus gives

ER,γ:H0,γ−a⟶H0,a−γ,∣(ER,γu,u)∣≤C∥u∥0,γ−a2.(20) \begin{gathered} E_{R,\gamma}:H^{0,\gamma-a}\longrightarrow H^{0,a-\gamma},\\ |(E_{R,\gamma}u,u)| \le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{20}

For clarity, the positivity argument also applies when γ\gamma exceeds the small weight used for the graph limit. Put cR=R2γsRc_R=R^{2\gamma}s_R, aR=X−2γcR≥0a_R=X^{-2\gamma}c_R\ge0, and Mγ=XγM_\gamma=X^\gamma. By (17), aRa_R satisfies the full S(X−1,G1)S(X^{-1},G_1) bounds of the proved packet Theorem 1, uniformly in RR. One finite product gives

MγOp⁡(aR)Mγ=Op⁡(cR)+TR,γ,TR,γ∈Op⁡S(X2γ−2,G1). \begin{gathered} M_\gamma\operatorname{Op}(a_R)M_\gamma =\operatorname{Op}(c_R)+T_{R,\gamma},\\ T_{R,\gamma}\in\operatorname{Op}S(X^{2\gamma-2},G_1). \end{gathered}

The right multiplication has leading symbol aRXγa_RX^\gamma and remainder weight Xγ−2Ξ−1X^{\gamma-2}\Xi^{-1}; the outer multiplication is exact. Consequently TR,γ:H0,γ−1→H0,1−γT_{R,\gamma}:H^{0,\gamma-1}\to H^{0,1-\gamma}, with a uniform norm. On Schwartz inputs apply packet positivity to MγuM_\gamma u, use the real multiplication factor in the pairing, and subtract this bounded remainder form. This proves the same weighted reduction as Section 6 of the radiation lesson:

Re⁡(Op⁡(R2γsR)u,u)≥−C∥u∥0,γ−12≥−C∥u∥0,γ−a2.(21) \begin{gathered} \operatorname{Re}(\operatorname{Op}(R^{2\gamma}s_R)u,u)\\ \ge-C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-1}^2 \ge-C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{21}

This uses a≤1a\le1 and applies to every γ≥0\gamma\ge0. All constants use finitely many uniformly bounded seminorms. Large γ\gamma is handled first on Schwartz inputs, where every displayed factor acts. The compact-input approximation and fixed-radius inequality passage below then treat the actual solution; no unweighted boundedness of a positive-order spatial symbol is assumed. Exact Fourier conjugation gives the equivalent lower norm Hγ−1H^{\gamma-1}, but no external sharp theorem is needed.

Symmetry in the smooth real-energy equation gives the commutator form as −Im⁡(QR(f−VSu),QRu)-\operatorname{Im}(Q_R(f-V_Su),Q_Ru). The rough contribution obeys

∥QRVSu∥0,γ+a≤C∥u∥m,γ−a,∥R2γQRu∥0,−γ−a≤C∥u∥0,γ−a.(22) \begin{gathered} \|Q_RV_Su\|_{0,\gamma+a} \le C\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a},\\ \|R^{2\gamma}Q_Ru\|_{0,-\gamma-a} \le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}. \end{gathered} \tag{22}

The first line uses the primary rough map 1+δ=2a1+\delta=2a; the second uses the exterior X2γX^{2\gamma} symbol weight. Their weighted pairing bounds the rough term by CR−2γ∥u∥m,γ−a2CR^{-2\gamma}\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}^2. Combining the identities proves the lemma on Schwartz inputs.

For each compact input utu_t from Section 3, choose smooth approximants inside a fixed slightly larger compact support. Their HmH^m convergence also gives convergence in the known weighted norm, so the exact forms pass to utu_t. Smooth coefficients are bounded, QRQ_R preserves HmH^m, and the rough map is consistent. Now hold RR fixed and let t→∞t\to\infty. The forcing converges in BB, the solution in B∗B^*, and the known Hm,γ−aH^{m,\gamma-a} norm converges. Shell maps pass the forcing pairing, and annular output support passes the probe in local L2L^2. This proves the displayed inequality for the original solution. □\square

5. Bounded weights with uniform operator constants

For ε>0\varepsilon>0, define

Wε(s)=sγ(1+εs)−γ,wε(x)=Wε(X).(23) W_\varepsilon(s)=s^\gamma(1+\varepsilon s)^{-\gamma}, \qquad w_\varepsilon(x)=W_\varepsilon(X). \tag{23}

These weights increase in ss, and Wε(s)≤ε−γW_\varepsilon(s)\le\varepsilon^{-\gamma} for fixed ε\varepsilon. All normalized derivatives of the weight and its inverse are uniform in ε\varepsilon:

∣∂xαwε∣≤CαX−∣α∣wε,∣∂xαwε−1∣≤CαX−∣α∣wε−1.(24) \begin{gathered} |\partial_x^\alpha w_\varepsilon| \le C_\alpha X^{-|\alpha|}w_\varepsilon,\\ |\partial_x^\alpha w_\varepsilon^{-1}| \le C_\alpha X^{-|\alpha|}w_\varepsilon^{-1}. \end{gathered} \tag{24}

Logarithmic differentiation gives Wε′/Wε=γ/[s(1+εs)]W_\varepsilon'/W_\varepsilon=\gamma/[s(1+\varepsilon s)]. Further derivatives use only factors εs/(1+εs)≤1\varepsilon s/(1+\varepsilon s)\le1; the reciprocal has the opposite logarithmic derivative. The finite chain rule for XX proves the displayed bounds.

Their weight constants are uniform too:

Wε(s)Wε(t)≤max⁡(1,s/t)γ,s,t>0.(25) \frac{W_\varepsilon(s)}{W_\varepsilon(t)} \le\max(1,s/t)^\gamma,\qquad s,t>0. \tag{25}

For s≥ts\ge t this follows from the exact quotient, and for s≤ts\le t from monotonicity. Reverse the variables for inverse weights. Japanese-bracket ratios have fixed polynomial bounds, giving uniform metric temperateness.

Let QR′Q'_R have a slightly larger noncritical frequency cutoff equal one near supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi. Right frequency composition gives QR=QR′χ(D)Q_R=Q'_R\chi(D) exactly. Exterior support implies Wε(R)≤Cwε(x)W_\varepsilon(R)\le Cw_\varepsilon(x) there. Exact weighted products, including their complete remainders, give bounded families in Op⁡S(1,G1)\operatorname{Op}S(1,G_1):

Wε(R)QR′Mwε−1,Wε(R)QRMX−γ.(26) \begin{gathered} W_\varepsilon(R)Q'_R M_{w_\varepsilon^{-1}},\\ W_\varepsilon(R)Q_R M_{X^{-\gamma}}. \end{gathered} \tag{26}

Indeed the first factor has symbol weight wεw_\varepsilon, canceled by its reciprocal; the second has weight XγX^\gamma, canceled by X−γX^{-\gamma}. The normalized seminorms and temperateness constants just proved control the finite product bounds uniformly in ε,R\varepsilon,R. These are operator identities on the common actions, not pointwise symbol division.

Their weighted L2L^2 bounds at exponents ±1\pm1 give uniform BB and B∗B^* bounds by the shell theorem. Put

Fγ=∥Xγf∥B,Nε=∥wεχ(D)u∥B∗<∞.(27) \begin{gathered} F_\gamma=\|X^\gamma f\|_B,\\ N_\varepsilon=\|w_\varepsilon\chi(D)u\|_{B^*}<\infty. \end{gathered} \tag{27}

Finiteness follows from wε≤ε−γw_\varepsilon\le\varepsilon^{-\gamma} and the unweighted shell map. We obtain

∥Wε(R)QRf∥B≤CFγ,∥Wε(R)QRu∥B∗≤CNε.(28) \begin{gathered} \|W_\varepsilon(R)Q_R f\|_B\le CF_\gamma,\\ \|W_\varepsilon(R)Q_R u\|_{B^*}\le CN_\varepsilon. \end{gathered} \tag{28}

Multiply Lemma 4.1 by Wε(R)2W_\varepsilon(R)^2. Since Wε(R)≤RγW_\varepsilon(R)\le R^\gamma, for both signs,

R−1∥Wε(R)Op⁡(ΦR,±)u∥22≤CFγNε+C∥u∥m,γ−a2.(29) \begin{gathered} R^{-1}\|W_\varepsilon(R)\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_{R,\pm})u\|_2^2\\ \le CF_\gamma N_\varepsilon+C\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{29}

6. An exact frame for the radial annulus

The excluded acute cones for c2(x,v)c_2(x,v) and c2(x,−v)c_2(x,-v) are disjoint. Thus at least one g±g_\pm equals one, and d=g+2+g−2≥1d=g_+^2+g_-^2\ge1. Choose ω1=1\omega_1=1 near supp⁡ω\operatorname{supp}\omega, supported in a larger annulus, and a compact noncritical χ1=1\chi_1=1 near supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi. Put

bR,±=k−1ω1(x/R)χ1(ξ)g±d,BR,±=Op⁡(bR,±).(30) \begin{gathered} b_{R,\pm}=k^{-1}\omega_1(x/R)\chi_1(\xi)\frac{g_\pm}{d}, \\ B_{R,\pm}=\operatorname{Op}(b_{R,\pm}). \end{gathered} \tag{30}

The reciprocal of dd has every smooth bound. The spatial cutoff removes zero and the frequency cutoff allows smooth zero extension. The BR,±B_{R,\pm} are uniformly L2L^2 bounded.

Their scalar leading products sum exactly to ω(x/R)χ(ξ)\omega(x/R)\chi(\xi). The complete finite product formula gives

ω(x/R)χ(D)=BR,+Op⁡(ΦR,+)+BR,−Op⁡(ΦR,−)+TR.(31) \begin{gathered} \omega(x/R)\chi(D) =B_{R,+}\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_{R,+})\\ \quad+B_{R,-}\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_{R,-})+T_R. \end{gathered} \tag{31}

The full remainder is uniformly in Op⁡S(X−1Ξ−N,G1)\operatorname{Op}S(X^{-1}\Xi^{-N},G_1) for every prescribed NN: each surviving product has a position derivative, and compact frequency support supplies arbitrary rapid frequency bounds.

Moreover TRT_R has output support in a fixed enlarged annulus. This follows from the exact left product kernels, whose output support lies in that of bR,±b_{R,\pm}, and from the target multiplication operator. The exact left symbol and all its position derivatives vanish outside that annulus. Consequently

RγTR∈Op⁡S(Xγ−1Ξ−N,G1),∥RγTRu∥0,1−a≤C∥u∥0,γ−a.(32) \begin{gathered} R^\gamma T_R\in\operatorname{Op}S(X^{\gamma-1}\Xi^{-N},G_1),\\ \|R^\gamma T_Ru\|_{0,1-a}\le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}. \end{gathered} \tag{32}

On the output support X≍RX\asymp R, so

R−1∥Wε(R)TRu∥22≤CR2a−3∥u∥0,γ−a2≤C∥u∥0,γ−a2.(33) \begin{gathered} R^{-1}\|W_\varepsilon(R)T_Ru\|_2^2\\ \le CR^{2a-3}\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2 \le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{33}

Uniform L2L^2 bounds for the two frame factors, the inequality for the norm of a finite sum, and Section 5 now imply

R−1∥Wε(R)ω(x/R)χ(D)u∥22≤CFγNε+C∥u∥m,γ−a2.(34) \begin{gathered} R^{-1}\|W_\varepsilon(R)\omega(x/R)\chi(D)u\|_2^2\\ \le CF_\gamma N_\varepsilon+C\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{34}

This proves a radial operator estimate. The pointwise angular inequality alone would not be an L2L^2 operator ordering.

7. Absorption, the inner shell and removal of the bounded weight

For R<∣x∣<2RR<|x|<2R, R≥1R\ge1, we have 1≤X/R≤51\le X/R\le\sqrt5. The weight quotient bound shows

Wε(R)≤wε(x)≤5γ/2Wε(R).(35) W_\varepsilon(R)\le w_\varepsilon(x) \le5^{\gamma/2}W_\varepsilon(R). \tag{35}

Because ω=1\omega=1 on this annulus, Section 6 controls every outer squared dyadic endpoint term of wεχ(D)uw_\varepsilon\chi(D)u. On A0A_0, wε≤2γ/2w_\varepsilon\le2^{\gamma/2}, and its endpoint term is bounded by C∥χ(D)u∥B∗2≤CU02C\|\chi(D)u\|_{B^*}^2\le CU_0^2. Therefore

Nε2≤CFγNε+C∥u∥m,γ−a2+CU02.(36) N_\varepsilon^2 \le CF_\gamma N_\varepsilon +C\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}^2+CU_0^2. \tag{36}

Since NεN_\varepsilon is finite for fixed ε\varepsilon, Young's inequality absorbs half its square and gives a bound independent of ε\varepsilon. On each fixed shell wεw_\varepsilon increases to XγX^\gamma as ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. Monotone convergence first bounds that shell norm; taking the supremum then gives

∥Xγχ(D)u∥B∗≤C(Fγ+∥u∥m,γ−a+U0).(37) \|X^\gamma\chi(D)u\|_{B^*} \le C\bigl(F_\gamma+\|u\|_{m,\gamma-a}+U_0\bigr). \tag{37}

Choose compact noncritical χ2=1\chi_2=1 near supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi. Exact right frequency multiplication yields

XγDαχ(D)u=(MXγDαχ2(D)MX−γ)(Xγχ(D)u).(38) \begin{gathered} X^\gamma D^\alpha\chi(D)u\\ =\bigl(M_{X^\gamma}D^\alpha\chi_2(D)M_{X^{-\gamma}}\bigr) (X^\gamma\chi(D)u). \end{gathered} \tag{38}

The conjugated operator is in Op⁡S(1,G1)\operatorname{Op}S(1,G_1), with its complete finite product remainder. Its shell map recovers every near-energy derivative through mm.

8. Finite bootstrap and homogeneous decay

Add the off-energy derivative bounds from Section 2 and use its strict shell estimate. One step gives

Uγ≤Cγ,γ′(Fγ+Uγ′),0<γ−γ′<δ/2.(39) U_\gamma\le C_{\gamma,\gamma'}(F_\gamma+U_{\gamma'}), \qquad 0<\gamma-\gamma'<\delta/2. \tag{39}

The case γ=0\gamma=0 is already given. For any fixed target γ>0\gamma>0, partition [0,γ][0,\gamma] into finitely many increments smaller than δ/2\delta/2. Each lower forcing norm is at most the target FγF_\gamma, since X≥1X\ge1. Finite induction gives Uγ≤C(Fγ+U0)U_\gamma\le C(F_\gamma+U_0). A finite cover of KK gives one uniform constant. This proves Theorem 1.1, including empty-shell neighborhoods. □\square

Corollary 8.1 (homogeneous polynomial decay). If f=0f=0 in Theorem 1.1, then u∈Hm,tu\in H^{m,t} for every real tt. On every fixed compact regular-energy set, its weighted norm is bounded by a constant times U0U_0.

Proof. The theorem gives every UγU_\gamma. For a specified tt, choose γ>t+1/2\gamma>t+1/2. The strict shell square sum in Section 2 puts every XtDαuX^tD^\alpha u in L2L^2. The integer weighted norm equivalence proves the assertion and its uniform bound. □\square

This applies in particular to the zero-forcing outgoing graph pairs considered in the radiation and flux lessons: zero flux gives their vanishing derivative hypothesis before this theorem is used.

9. Consequences for the noncritical point spectrum

Theorem 9.1. The eigenvalues of HH in the regular free-energy set have finite multiplicity and form a discrete subset of that set. Every corresponding eigenfunction lies in Hm,tH^{m,t} for every real tt.

Proof. An L2L^2 eigenfunction is in the domain HmH^m. All its derivatives through mm are therefore in L2⊂B˙∗L^2\subset\dot B^*, so Corollary 8.1 gives every polynomial weight.

More quantitatively, suppose uju_j are normalized orthogonal eigenfunctions with λj\lambda_j in one compact regular-energy set KK. The graph norm equivalence gives

∥uj∥Hm≤C(∥Huj∥2+∥uj∥2)≤C(1+max⁡λ∈K∣λ∣).(40) \begin{gathered} \|u_j\|_{H^m} \\ \le C(\|Hu_j\|_2+\|u_j\|_2) \\ \le C(1+\max_{\lambda\in K}|\lambda|). \end{gathered} \tag{40}

Thus their unweighted endpoint derivative sums are uniformly bounded. The uniform homogeneous estimates and the strict shell sum give a common bound in Hm,tH^{m,t} for each fixed tt.

For t>0t>0, the L2L^2 tails obey

∥1{∣x∣>R}uj∥2≤CR−t,R≥1.(41) \|1_{\{|x|>R\}}u_j\|_2 \le C R^{-t},\qquad R\ge1. \tag{41}

On a fixed ball the bounded HmH^m family is precompact in L2L^2, by the complete finite-rank kernel argument in the radiation lesson, Lemma 3.1. Specifically, insert compact input and output cutoffs and a smooth Fourier cutoff at frequency NN. The high-frequency error is O(N−m)O(N^{-m}) on this bounded HmH^m family. The low-frequency kernel between bounded supports is square integrable; approximation by finite sums of products, and Cauchy–Schwarz, approximate that operator in norm by finite-rank maps. Their finite-dimensional convergent subsequences and a diagonal extraction make the original local outputs Cauchy. This gives the asserted compactness using exactly the programme proof. Successive extraction on a countable increasing sequence of balls gives a subsequence converging on every fixed ball. To see global convergence, first make the two tails in (41) smaller than any prescribed error, then use local convergence on that fixed ball. Completeness of L2L^2 supplies the global limit.

An infinite orthonormal sequence cannot have such a subsequence, since the distance between any two distinct terms is 2\sqrt2. For eigenvectors u,vu,v with distinct real eigenvalues λ,μ\lambda,\mu, symmetry gives (λ−μ)(u,v)=(Hu,v)−(u,Hv)=0(\lambda-\mu)(u,v)=(Hu,v)-(u,Hv)=0, so they are orthogonal. If an eigenspace were infinite dimensional, choose successively a vector outside the span of the previously chosen orthonormal vectors, subtract its finite orthogonal projection onto that span, and normalize the nonzero result. This constructs an infinite orthonormal family in that eigenspace. Either possibility contradicts the compactness just proved. Thus each compact regular-energy set contains only finitely many eigenvalues, counted with multiplicity, proving both conclusions. □\square

Use the conclusion

Check the bounded-weight constants and the exact annular frame, then count the finite steps needed for a prescribed weight. Use the homogeneous conclusion to establish discreteness only away from the stated thresholds.

10. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 1 — Basic — the strict bootstrap increment.

Let 0<δ≤10<\delta\le1, a=(1+δ)/2a=(1+\delta)/2, and suppose Xγ′Dαu∈B∗X^{\gamma'}D^\alpha u\in B^* for every ∣α∣≤m|\alpha|\le m. Show that u∈Hm,γ−au\in H^{m,\gamma-a} if 0≤γ′<γ<γ′+δ/20\le\gamma'<\gamma<\gamma'+\delta/2, with a bound by the preceding endpoint derivative norms. Explain why equality at the increment δ/2\delta/2 does not follow from the endpoint hypothesis, even when the unweighted derivatives are in B˙∗\dot B^*.

Solution 1. Write t=γ−at=\gamma-a. On an outer dyadic shell of radius RjR_j, the bracket XX is comparable to RjR_j; hence

∥XtDαu∥L2(Aj)2≤CRj2(t−γ′)+1∥Xγ′Dαu∥B∗2.(42) \|X^t D^\alpha u\|_{L^2(A_j)}^2 \le C R_j^{2(t-\gamma')+1} \|X^{\gamma'}D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}^2. \tag{42}

The exponent is

2(t−γ′)+1=2(γ−γ′)−δ<0.(43) 2(t-\gamma')+1 =2(\gamma-\gamma')-\delta<0. \tag{43}

The sum over outer shells is geometric and finite. On A0A_0 the weights are bounded, and the endpoint hypothesis gives the finite local contribution. Summing over the finite derivative family proves

∑∣α∣≤m∥XtDαu∥2≤Cδ,γ−γ′,m∑∣α∣≤m∥Xγ′Dαu∥B∗.(44) \begin{gathered} \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^t D^\alpha u\|_2 \\ \le C_{\delta,\gamma-\gamma',m} \\ \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^{\gamma'}D^\alpha u\|_{B^*}. \end{gathered} \tag{44}

The integer weighted derivative characterization from the weighted Sobolev lesson identifies the left side with a norm equivalent to ∥u∥m,t\|u\|_{m,t}.

For sharpness of this embedding alone, take the smooth radial function

g(x)=X−(n−1)/2−γ′(log⁡(2+X))−1/2.(45) g(x)=X^{-(n-1)/2-\gamma'} \bigl(\log(2+X)\bigr)^{-1/2}. \tag{45}

Its weighted normalized shell masses are O(1/log⁡Rj)O(1/\log R_j), so Xγ′gX^{\gamma'}g is in B˙∗\dot B^*. Every positive derivative gains an extra inverse radius (up to smaller logarithmic factors), so Xγ′Dαg∈B˙∗X^{\gamma'}D^\alpha g\in\dot B^* through every fixed order. In particular the unweighted derivatives are in the closure. At the borderline increment γ−γ′=δ/2\gamma-\gamma'=\delta/2, however, t=γ′−1/2t=\gamma'-1/2, and for large radius the radial integral for ∥Xtg∥22\|X^t g\|_2^2 is comparable to

∫2∞drrlog⁡r=∞.(46) \int_2^\infty \frac{dr}{r\log r}=\infty. \tag{46}

Thus the strict increment is necessary for the embedding step used by the proof. This example imposes no equation or forcing condition and is not a counterexample to the weighted endpoint theorem.

Exercise 2 — Intermediate — cutoffs with rough local multipliers.

Let H=∑∣α∣≤maα(x)DαH=\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}a_\alpha(x)D^\alpha have the complete 11-admissible coefficient bounds. For smooth ζ=1\zeta=1 on the unit ball, supported in ∣x∣<2|x|<2, set ζt(x)=ζ(x/t)\zeta_t(x)=\zeta(x/t), t≥2t\ge2. Prove the actual commutator estimate

∥[H,ζt]u∥B≤C(t−1∑∣α∣≤m∫∣x∣<3t∣Dαu∣2 dx)1/2(47) \begin{gathered} \|[H,\zeta_t]u\|_B \\ \le C\left(t^{-1} \sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\int_{|x|<3t}|D^\alpha u|^2\,dx \right)^{1/2} \end{gathered} \tag{47}

for inputs with all derivatives through mm in B∗B^*. Deduce convergence to zero for B˙∗\dot B^* derivatives, and identify exactly which coefficient derivatives enter.

Solution 2. Local HmH^m membership follows from the derivative bounds. The local differential product rule gives

[H,ζt]u=∑α∑0<β≤α(αβ)aα(Dβζt)Dα−βu.(48) [H,\zeta_t]u =\sum_\alpha\sum_{0<\beta\le\alpha} \binom{\alpha}{\beta} a_\alpha(D^\beta\zeta_t)D^{\alpha-\beta}u. \tag{48}

There are no derivatives of aαa_\alpha. All these terms have output support in t≤∣x∣≤2tt\le|x|\le2t, and ∥Dβζt∥∞≤Cβt−∣β∣≤Cβt−1\|D^\beta\zeta_t\|_\infty\le C_\beta t^{-|\beta|}\le C_\beta t^{-1}.

Choose a translated cutoff ηy\eta_y, equal one on B(y,1/2)B(y,1/2), supported in B(y,1)B(y,1). For an originally lower coefficient aαa_\alpha, put k=m−∣α∣k=m-|\alpha| and use its assigned finite exponent pαp_\alpha, with 1/pα+1/qα=1/21/p_\alpha+1/q_\alpha=1/2. On the half-ball, Dα−βu=Dα−β(ηyu)D^{\alpha-\beta}u=D^{\alpha-\beta}(\eta_yu). The derivative has available Sobolev gap k+∣β∣≥kk+|\beta|\ge k, so the original Hk→LqαH^k\to L^{q_\alpha} inequality remains valid there. Hölder bounds its output by Ct−1Aα(y)∥ηyu∥HmC t^{-1}A_\alpha(y)\|\eta_yu\|_{H^m}. For an originally highest coefficient use its bounded L∞L^\infty norm and the local derivative L2L^2 norm. All coefficient sizes Aα(y)A_\alpha(y) have a fixed global bound in the admissible class.

Only centers with t−1/2≤∣y∣≤2t+1/2t-1/2\le|y|\le2t+1/2 contribute. Integrate these squared inequalities in yy. The fixed-cutoff derivative product rule and Fubini, exactly as in Proposition 2.1 of the admissible-perturbation lesson, give

∥[H,ζt]u∥22≤Ct−2∑∣α∣≤m∫t−3/2<∣x∣<2t+3/2∣Dαu∣2 dx.(49) \begin{gathered} \|[H,\zeta_t]u\|_2^2 \\ \le C t^{-2}\sum_{|\alpha|\le m} \int_{t-3/2<|x|<2t+3/2}|D^\alpha u|^2\,dx. \end{gathered} \tag{49}

The output annulus intersects a uniformly bounded number of dyadic shells, each with endpoint weight O(t1/2)O(t^{1/2}); hence its BB norm is at most Ct1/2C t^{1/2} times its L2L^2 norm. Since 2t+3/2≤3t2t+3/2\le3t, the displayed commutator bound follows. The ball-vanishing characterization of B˙∗\dot B^* makes its right side tend to zero when all the derivatives lie in that closure.

The finite rule for Dα(ζtu−u)D^\alpha(\zeta_tu-u) also gives convergence in B∗B^*: the undifferentiated cutoff term vanishes by the endpoint tail, while each differentiated cutoff term is bounded by Ct−1C t^{-1} times a lower derivative endpoint norm. If (H−λ)u=f∈B(H-\lambda)u=f\in B, the compact-input forcing is ft=ζtf+[H,ζt]u→ff_t=\zeta_t f+[H,\zeta_t]u\to f in BB. For each fixed escape radius, its forcing pairing therefore passes to the original input. No weighted convergence of XγftX^\gamma f_t is required at this stage.

Exercise 3 — Intermediate — bounded spatial weights without a growing constant.

For γ≥0\gamma\ge0, ε>0\varepsilon>0, define

Wε(s)=(s1+εs)γ,wε(x)=Wε(X).(50) W_\varepsilon(s)=\left(\frac{s}{1+\varepsilon s}\right)^\gamma, \qquad w_\varepsilon(x)=W_\varepsilon(X). \tag{50}

Prove uniform normalized derivative and temperateness bounds for wεw_\varepsilon and its inverse. If an exterior symbol qR′q_R' vanishes for ∣x∣<cR|x|<cR, has compact frequency support and uniform G1G_1 bounds, prove

Wε(R)QR′Mwε−1has a uniform order-zeroshell bound.(51) \begin{gathered} W_\varepsilon(R)Q'_R M_{w_\varepsilon^{-1}} \\ \text{has a uniform order-zero}\\ \text{shell bound}. \end{gathered} \tag{51}

Explain why Nε=∥wεχ(D)u∥B∗N_\varepsilon=\|w_\varepsilon\chi(D)u\|_{B^*} is finite for fixed ε\varepsilon.

Solution 3. The logarithmic derivative is

Wε′(s)Wε(s)=γs(1+εs).(52) \frac{W_\varepsilon'(s)}{W_\varepsilon(s)} =\frac{\gamma}{s(1+\varepsilon s)}. \tag{52}

Each further derivative is a finite sum of factors bounded by Cks−kC_k s^{-k}, since εs/(1+εs)≤1\varepsilon s/(1+\varepsilon s)\le1. Inductively

∣Wε(k)(s)∣≤Cks−kWε(s).(53) |W_\varepsilon^{(k)}(s)| \le C_k s^{-k}W_\varepsilon(s). \tag{53}

The same argument for the reciprocal, whose logarithmic derivative has the opposite sign, gives its corresponding bound. Composing with X=⟨x⟩X=\langle x\rangle and applying the finite chain rule gives every G1G_1 normalized position derivative, uniformly in ε\varepsilon.

Monotonicity and the exact quotient yield

Wε(s)Wε(t)≤max⁡(1,s/t)γ.(54) \frac{W_\varepsilon(s)}{W_\varepsilon(t)} \le\max(1,s/t)^\gamma. \tag{54}

For s≥ts\ge t, the extra quotient (1+εt)/(1+εs)(1+\varepsilon t)/(1+\varepsilon s) is at most1; for s≤ts\le t, monotonicity suffices. Reverse s,ts,t for the inverse weight. Japanese-bracket ratios have fixed polynomial bounds in the position difference, so the metric temperateness constants are independent of ε\varepsilon.

On the exterior output support, Wε(R)≤Cγ,cwε(x)W_\varepsilon(R)\le C_{\gamma,c}w_\varepsilon(x). Thus Wε(R)qR′W_\varepsilon(R)q_R' is uniformly in S(wεΞ−N,G1)S(w_\varepsilon\Xi^{-N},G_1) for every NN. Exact finite composition with multiplication by the inverse weight, including its complete remainder, lies uniformly in S(1,G1)S(1,G_1). Its weighted L2L^2 maps at exponents ±1\pm1 give the consistent shell bounds by Section 2 of the near-frequency lesson. This proves the operator assertion; a pointwise quotient of symbols alone would not prove it.

Finally wε≤ε−γw_\varepsilon\le\varepsilon^{-\gamma}, and χ(D)\chi(D) is bounded on B∗B^*. Hence Nε≤ε−γC∥u∥B∗<∞N_\varepsilon\le\varepsilon^{-\gamma}C\|u\|_{B^*}<\infty for each fixed positive ε\varepsilon. This bound may grow as ε\varepsilon decreases; the absorption argument supplies a new bound uniform in ε\varepsilon.

Exercise 4 — Advanced — a directional frame as an exact operator identity.

On a fixed scaled annulus let g±=1−c2(x,±v(ξ))g_\pm=1-c_2(x,\pm v(\xi)), where the two excluded angular cones are disjoint and v≠0v\ne0 on the compact frequency support. Let

ΦR,±=kω(x/R)g±(x,ξ)χ(ξ),k>0.(55) \Phi_{R,\pm}=k\omega(x/R)g_\pm(x,\xi)\chi(\xi), \qquad k>0. \tag{55}

Construct uniformly bounded BR,±B_{R,\pm} and prove

ω(x/R)χ(D)=BR,+Op⁡(ΦR,+)+BR,−Op⁡(ΦR,−)+TR,(56) \begin{gathered} \omega(x/R)\chi(D) \\ =B_{R,+}\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_{R,+}) \\ +B_{R,-}\operatorname{Op}(\Phi_{R,-})+T_R, \end{gathered} \tag{56}

where RγTRR^\gamma T_R has weight Xγ−1X^{\gamma-1} and rapid frequency decay, with annular output support. For a=(1+δ)/2≤1a=(1+\delta)/2\le1, bound its normalized weighted annular mass using only u∈H0,γ−au\in H^{0,\gamma-a}.

Solution 4. At each point at most one excluded cutoff is nonzero, so at least one g±g_\pm equals1. Therefore d=g+2+g−2≥1d=g_+^2+g_-^2\ge1. Choose smooth ω1=1\omega_1=1 near supp⁡ω\operatorname{supp}\omega, supported in a larger fixed annulus, and compact noncritical χ1=1\chi_1=1 near supp⁡χ\operatorname{supp}\chi. Define

bR,±=k−1ω1(x/R)χ1(ξ)g±d,BR,±=Op⁡(bR,±).(57) \begin{gathered} b_{R,\pm}=k^{-1}\omega_1(x/R)\chi_1(\xi)\frac{g_\pm}{d}, \\ B_{R,\pm}=\operatorname{Op}(b_{R,\pm}). \end{gathered} \tag{57}

The denominator has a smooth reciprocal with all normalized derivatives because d≥1d\ge1. The spatial cutoff removes the origin, and the frequency cutoff permits smooth zero extension outside the noncritical neighborhood. All bR,±b_{R,\pm} are uniformly in S(1,G1)S(1,G_1), so the operators are uniformly bounded on L2L^2.

Their scalar leading products sum exactly to ω(x/R)χ(ξ)\omega(x/R)\chi(\xi). The complete finite product formula gives the displayed operator identity with TR∈Op⁡S(X−1Ξ−N,G1)T_R\in\operatorname{Op}S(X^{-1}\Xi^{-N},G_1) for every prescribed NN. Every subsequent finite product has a position derivative, and the finite remainder has the same allowed first position loss; both compact frequency factors supply arbitrary rapid frequency bounds. Each required seminorm uses a finite product order.

The exact product kernel has output support inside the output support of its left factor bR,±b_{R,\pm}. The target multiplication operator has annular output support too. Thus the complete error has output support in one fixed enlarged annulus, and its exact left symbol and all position derivatives vanish outside that annulus. Consequently RγTRR^\gamma T_R has weight Xγ−1X^{\gamma-1}, uniformly in RR.

The weighted map gives

∥RγTRu∥0,1−a≤C∥u∥0,γ−a.(58) \|R^\gamma T_Ru\|_{0,1-a} \le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}. \tag{58}

On its output annulus X≍RX\asymp R, so

R−1∥Wε(R)TRu∥22≤CR2a−3∥u∥0,γ−a2≤C∥u∥0,γ−a2.(59) \begin{gathered} R^{-1}\|W_\varepsilon(R)T_Ru\|_2^2 \\ \le C R^{2a-3}\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2 \\ \le C\|u\|_{0,\gamma-a}^2. \end{gathered} \tag{59}

Here Wε(R)≤RγW_\varepsilon(R)\le R^\gamma and a≤1a\le1. The norm of the sum of the two BR,±B_{R,\pm} probe terms is bounded by a constant times the sum of their norms. This proves radial control from the two directional inequalities with a fully specified operator error. Pointwise positivity of the scalar symbols was used to construct an inverse frame, not asserted as an exact operator ordering.

Exercise 5 — Advanced — a finite bootstrap and homogeneous decay.

Assume the complete weighted proof adapters and let δ=1/3\delta=1/3. Suppose all derivatives through mm of a solution lie in B˙∗\dot B^*, the energy lies in a fixed compact regular-energy set, and X3/2f∈BX^{3/2}f\in B. Use a concrete finite sequence of weights to prove the estimate at γ=3/2\gamma=3/2 with only the unweighted endpoint derivative sum on its right side. Deduce every polynomial Sobolev weight for a homogeneous solution.

Solution 5. Here a=(1+δ)/2=2/3a=(1+\delta)/2=2/3. Take twelve steps

γk=k/8,0≤k≤12.(60) \gamma_k=k/8,\qquad 0\le k\le12. \tag{60}

Each increment 1/81/8 is strictly less than δ/2=1/6\delta/2=1/6. Let Uk=∑∣α∣≤m∥XγkDαu∥B∗U_k=\sum_{|\alpha|\le m}\|X^{\gamma_k}D^\alpha u\|_{B^*} and F=∥X3/2f∥BF=\|X^{3/2}f\|_B. The base U0U_0 is finite by hypothesis.

At step kk, the known preceding weight gives u∈Hm,γk−au\in H^{m,\gamma_k-a}, because

(γk−a)−(γk−1−1/2)=1/8−1/6=−1/24.(61) \begin{gathered} (\gamma_k-a)-(\gamma_{k-1}-1/2) \\ =1/8-1/6=-1/24. \end{gathered} \tag{61}

The squared shell series in Solution1 has ratio 2−1/122^{-1/12}; hence its constant is fixed over these twelve steps. The lower input weight needed by the primary rough map for the off-energy forcing is γk−1/2−δ=γk−5/6\gamma_k-1/2-\delta=\gamma_k-5/6, still strictly below γk−1−1/2=γk−5/8\gamma_{k-1}-1/2=\gamma_k-5/8. Thus VSu∈H0,γk+1/2V_Su\in H^{0,\gamma_k+1/2} with a bound by Uk−1U_{k-1}. Since Xγkf∈BX^{\gamma_k}f\in B and its norm is at most FF, the full real off-energy theorem bounds each off-energy weighted derivative by Ck(F+Uk−1)C_k(F+U_{k-1}), uniformly in energy.

The two exact exterior estimates, their directional frame and the uniform bounded-weight maps give

Nε,k2≤CkFNε,k+CkUk−12+CkU02,(62) N_{\varepsilon,k}^2 \le C_k F N_{\varepsilon,k} +C_k U_{k-1}^2+C_k U_0^2, \tag{62}

where Nε,k=∥Xγk(1+εX)−γkχ(D)u∥B∗N_{\varepsilon,k}=\|X^{\gamma_k}(1+\varepsilon X)^{-\gamma_k}\chi(D)u\|_{B^*} is finite. Young's inequality absorbs half its square. Letting ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0 on each shell gives

∥Xγkχ(D)u∥B∗≤Ck(F+Uk−1+U0).(63) \|X^{\gamma_k}\chi(D)u\|_{B^*} \le C_k(F+U_{k-1}+U_0). \tag{63}

The exact conjugated compact frequency derivative maps recover all near-energy derivatives. Add their off-energy bounds. Since Uk−1≥U0U_{k-1}\ge U_0 in these nonnegative weights, enlarge the constants to obtain

Uk≤Ck′(F+Uk−1).(64) U_k\le C_k'(F+U_{k-1}). \tag{64}

Finite induction yields U12≤C(F+U0)U_{12}\le C(F+U_0). Twelve fixed steps and a finite energy cover give one constant depending on the operator, cutoff cover and target weight, independent of u,f,λu,f,\lambda.

For f=0f=0, use the same argument with as many fixed increments 1/81/8 as needed for any prescribed γ\gamma (choose a smaller final increment when necessary). All weighted endpoint derivatives follow. For any real Sobolev position weight tt, choose γ>t+1/2\gamma>t+1/2. Then the strict endpoint shell sum gives XtDαu∈L2X^tD^\alpha u\in L^2 through mm, hence u∈Hm,tu\in H^{m,t}. This is every polynomial position weight, with quantitative uniform bounds on each compact regular-energy set.

In particular an L2L^2 eigenfunction has its derivatives in L2⊂B˙∗L^2\subset\dot B^* because the operator domain is HmH^m; the homogeneous conclusion applies. This deduction does not by itself assert the full boundary-value theorem, its spectral measure formula or the eigenvalue graph decomposition.

11. Further questions

The remaining limiting-absorption argument uses these decay and compactness conclusions to remove the compact error from the resolvent estimate away from eigenvalues. It then proves both boundary values, their radiation characterization and continuity. The spectral measure identity and the graph decomposition at an eigenvalue require their additional precise statements.

References

The accessible scalar comparisons in the limiting-absorption lesson give Ito–Skibsted's quantitative radiation bounds for 0<β<min⁡(2,1+σ+ρ)0<\beta<\min(2,1+\sigma+\rho), with V∈C4V\in C^4, q=0q=0, d≥2d\ge2, and no positive eigenvalues. Those additional scalar estimates have a finite weight range. Sections 3–9 here prove the separate arbitrary-weight decay conclusion and regular-eigenvalue compactness for the full differential class.

[A] Shmuel Agmon, notes by Karl Gustafson, reworked by Michael Taylor, Limiting Absorption Principle for Long Range Potentials, lectures of 17–21 July 1978, §3, Corollaries 3.G–3.H, Theorem 3.I and its point-spectrum corollary, gives the freely readable weighted-decay programme. Those arguments depend on Proposition 3.F, whose complete proof is omitted there. The present proof does not invoke it: Section 3 proves the rough cutoff passage; Section 4 proves the finite commutator at every required weight; Sections 5–7 prove uniform bounded-weight products, the exact two-direction frame and absorption; Sections 8–9 prove the finite bootstrap and compact-energy conclusion. The written programme calculus, packet positivity and local compactness proof supply the needed inputs.

[L] Nicolas Lerner, Metrics on the Phase Space and Non-Selfadjoint Pseudo-Differential Operators, free author chapter on phase-space metrics, Proposition 2.4.3, printed pp. 101–103, provides the positive-packet construction reconstructed in the programme's weighted-positivity proof. The broader general-metric Theorems 2.5.1 and 2.5.4, printed pp. 111–115, are comparisons. Section 4 uses the programme's packet theorem and finite product with spatial weights to prove (21) for every fixed nonnegative weight. Its full weight range does not depend on an externally cited sharp theorem.

[T] Gerald Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, author's online edition, treats self-adjoint operators, resolvents and spectral measures.