Bounded strips and the three-lines inequality
Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.
The circle mean-value formula is proved in Cauchy's theorem for cycles and its consequences, Lemma 1.1 and Theorems 2.1–2.3. That CC0 lesson is credited to Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI). Elementary functions supplies the complex exponential and real logarithm; compactness and scalar integration supplies the maxima and continuous-integral facts. The strip argument is proved below.
The finite-rectangle maximum principle
A function continuous on a closed rectangle and holomorphic inside it has its maximum modulus on the boundary. Indeed compactness supplies a maximum . If it is attained at an interior point , the Cauchy formula on each sufficiently small circle about gives When , multiply by the unit complex number that makes . The real part of the integrand is at most and has mean , so continuity forces it to be everywhere on the circle. The modulus bound then forces the imaginary part to vanish. Every sufficiently small circle is therefore constant with value , so is constant on a neighbourhood of . More generally the set of interior points where is closed and, by this argument, open. The rectangle interior is connected: the segment between any two of its points stays inside, and a nonempty subset of a segment that is both open and closed cannot have a first exit, by the least-upper-bound property of the real interval. Thus the maximum-modulus set is the whole interior if nonempty. Continuity gives the same value on the boundary. For the assertion is immediate. This proves the rectangle principle from the actual mean-value proof, with no bounded-domain theorem left implicit.
Bounded-strip maximum principle
Let . Let be bounded and continuous on , holomorphic on its interior, and satisfy for all real . Then everywhere on .
For put . On the vertical boundaries its modulus is at most . On the horizontal boundaries it is at most . Choose large enough that the latter is at most . The finite-rectangle principle gives on that rectangle. For each fixed choose such an ; then Let . The boundary points already satisfy the claim. This proves the full strip principle including the horizontal exhaustion estimate.
Independent boundary bounds
Under the same continuity, holomorphy and boundedness hypotheses, suppose Then for and every real , If both constants are positive, set The logarithms are real. Thus the factor has modulus , uniformly bounded for , so is bounded on the whole strip. Its two boundary moduli are at most one. Apply the preceding theorem and rearrange. If a boundary constant vanishes, apply the positive case with and let ; for interior the resulting bound is zero if either constant is zero. On each boundary retain its own original bound. The two constants are never replaced by a single maximum in the interior inequality.
Translation and positive horizontal rescaling give the same result on any strip , , with replaced by . The two boundary constants remain separate after rescaling as well.