Averaging a perturbation around closed trajectories

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Self-checked by the writing AI. Original exposition: CC0.

Working question: What survives averaging a perturbation along a closed trajectory? An orbit average records the part of the perturbation that commutes with the periodic model. The oscillating remainder is removed by a unitary conjugation with a controlled lower-order error. On the round sphere, exact harmonic multiplicities and the square-root phase provide a concrete check of the cluster normalization before the general averaged staircase is used.

A periodic principal flow lets us average a lower-order perturbation along each closed trajectory. The average commutes with the exact arithmetic spectral model. A unitary change of variables removes the remaining order-zero part, leaving an error of order minus one. This produces a counting approximation that remembers the distribution of the orbit averages inside each cluster.

The clustering article of Sher, Uribe and Villegas-Blas [SUV] supplies the comparison with averaging on Zoll manifolds. Duistermaat and Guillemin [DG], Colin de Verdière [CV] and the text of Guillemin and Sternberg [GS] provide the periodic spectral background. We use the exact lattice operator, multiplicity polynomial and single-cluster probability law from Arithmetic spectral clusters and their distributions, the powers and domains from Positive real powers and spectral rescaling, and Wave evolution and cotangent flow. The ordered symbol rule is proved in Transverse composition and graph operators, Section 9, (G17), after its actual composition and adjoint proofs. The underlying wave construction uses Scalar transport and phase action and qualified-pullback proof. Scalar composition and summation are proved in Classical scalar symbols, summation and regularity.

Throughout, XX is compact, connected and without boundary, and n=dim⁡X≥2n=\dim X\geq2. Operators act on scalar half densities. Let L>0L>0 be a self-adjoint classical elliptic operator of order one, with domain H1H^1, positive principal symbol pp, constant subprincipal symbol cc, and e−iΠL=I,h=2πΠ,χt=exp⁡(tHp).(1) e^{-i\Pi L}=I,\qquad h=\frac{2\pi}{\Pi},\qquad \chi_t=\exp(tH_p). \tag{1} Every nonzero covector orbit has the same minimal period Π\Pi. Write Vk=ker⁡(L−hk),μ(k)=dim⁡Vk,W=∫{p<1}dx dξ.(2) \mathcal V_k=\ker(L-hk),\quad \mu(k)=\dim\mathcal V_k,\quad \mathcal W=\int_{\{p<1\}}dx\,d\xi. \tag{2} Empty low eigenspaces are allowed. For all sufficiently large integers kk, the preceding lesson proves that μ(k)\mu(k) is a positive polynomial of degree n−1n-1, with μ(k)=w(k)+O(kn−3),w(k)=nΠ−nW(k−ch)n−1.(3) \mu(k)=w(k)+O(k^{n-3}),\qquad w(k)=n\Pi^{-n}\mathcal W\left(k-\frac c h\right)^{n-1}. \tag{3} When n=2n=2, μ(k)=w(k)\mu(k)=w(k) exactly for all large kk. Fix k0k_0 beyond these finite exceptions, increasing it so w(k)>0w(k)>0.

Let V∈Ψcl0V\in\Psi^0_{\mathrm{cl}} be self-adjoint, with real principal symbol vv. Here is the precise bounded-perturbation argument used throughout. If A=A∗A=A^* and D=D∗D=D^* is bounded, the adjoint identity shows that y∈D((A+D)∗)y\in\mathcal D((A+D)^*) exactly when the functional u↦(Au,y)u\mapsto(Au,y) is bounded in ∥u∥\|u\|: subtract the bounded term (Du,y)(Du,y). Thus D((A+D)∗)=D(A)\mathcal D((A+D)^*)=\mathcal D(A) and (A+D)∗=A+D(A+D)^*=A+D there. Applying this with A=L,D=VA=L,D=V gives domain H1H^1.

Choose a>∥D∥a>\|D\| for any bounded self-adjoint perturbation DD of LL below. The exact factorization on H1H^1 is L+D+a=(I+D(L+a)−1)(L+a). L+D+a=\bigl(I+D(L+a)^{-1}\bigr)(L+a). Since ∥D(L+a)−1∥≤∥D∥/a<1\|D(L+a)^{-1}\|\le\|D\|/a<1, the inverse of the first factor is its norm-convergent geometric series; multiplying its finite partial sums verifies the inverse identity in the limit. Hence K=(L+D+a)−1=(L+a)−1(I+D(L+a)−1)−1 \begin{aligned} K&=(L+D+a)^{-1}\\ &=(L+a)^{-1}\bigl(I+D(L+a)^{-1}\bigr)^{-1} \end{aligned} is compact and injective. It is self-adjoint: for f=(L+D+a)uf=(L+D+a)u and g=(L+D+a)vg=(L+D+a)v, symmetry gives (Kf,g)=(f,Kg)(Kf,g)=(f,Kg). Its quadratic form is (Kf,f)=(u,(L+D+a)u)≥0(Kf,f)=(u,(L+D+a)u)\ge0. The Positive compact spectra and inverse domains supplies a complete eigenbasis, finite multiplicities and eigenvalues of L+DL+D tending to infinity. Elliptic regularity makes the eigenvectors smooth for the classical perturbations used here. This proves compact resolvent and discreteness in the exact generality used in the count comparison. There are only finitely many eigenvalues below zero.

1. The orbit average and an exact commutator

Set Vt=eitLVe−itL,B=1Π∫0ΠVt dt.(4) V_t=e^{itL}Ve^{-itL},\qquad B=\frac1\Pi\int_0^\Pi V_t\,dt. \tag{4} The graph form of Egorov's theorem makes VtV_t a smooth classical order-zero family, with principal symbol v∘χtv\circ\chi_t. To check its convention, the right factor e−itLe^{-itL} has graph χt\chi_t, and the left factor is its exact inverse. The ordered symbol formula is therefore v(χtz)v(\chi_t z).

The parameter proof in that programme reading reduces the composed identity graph to a fixed phase. Its classical amplitude and every differentiated remainder therefore retain their symbol orders on compact time intervals. This fixed final graph is essential: differentiating an arbitrary moving-graph kernel may raise its order. Here differentiation agrees with dVtdt=i[L,Vt].(5) \frac{dV_t}{dt}=i[L,V_t]. \tag{5} This commutator has order zero. Integration in (4) is legitimate in the classical symbol seminorms and in bounded operators on every HsH^s. More explicitly, on a compact time interval the smooth symbol family has uniformly continuous values in each fixed seminorm. Its Riemann sums are Cauchy in that seminorm, by the uniform modulus of continuity times the interval length. Integrate each homogeneous term and its remainder; their uniform bounds preserve the classical expansion. The finite-seminorm Sobolev bound gives the same limit in operator norm on HsH^s. The smooth kernel remainder and its derivatives integrate by the identical compact-interval estimate. The double integral in (7) follows by the same argument.

The family is Π\Pi-periodic. Translating its integration interval shows that BB commutes with every eisLe^{isL}, hence with LL on H1H^1. It is self-adjoint and classical of order zero, with principal symbol b(z)=1Π∫0Πv(χtz) dt.(6) b(z)=\frac1\Pi\int_0^\Pi v(\chi_t z)\,dt. \tag{6} This symbol is constant along each orbit. Define a self-adjoint order-zero operator S=−1Π∫0Π∫0tVs ds dt=−1Π∫0Π(Π−s)Vs ds.(7) S=-\frac1\Pi\int_0^\Pi\int_0^t V_s\,ds\,dt =-\frac1\Pi\int_0^\Pi(\Pi-s)V_s\,ds. \tag{7} Equations (5) and (7), first on smooth half densities, give [iS,L]=1Π∫0Π∫0ti[L,Vs] ds dt=B−V.(8) [iS,L] =\frac1\Pi\int_0^\Pi\int_0^t i[L,V_s]\,ds\,dt =B-V. \tag{8} The sign comes from interchanging the commutator members. This is an exact operator identity.

There is also an exact block verification that fixes the sign and shows which part survives. Let Pk\mathsf P_k be the orthogonal projection onto Vk\mathcal V_k. On a finite sum of eigenspaces, PkVtPℓ=eih(k−ℓ)tPkVPℓ. \mathsf P_k V_t\mathsf P_\ell =e^{ih(k-\ell)t}\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_\ell. Integration over [0,Π][0,\Pi], using hΠ=2πh\Pi=2\pi, gives PkBPℓ=1{k=ℓ}PkVPk,PkSPℓ=−ih(k−ℓ)PkVPℓ(k≠ℓ),PkSPk=−Π2PkVPk. \begin{aligned} \mathsf P_kB\mathsf P_\ell &=\mathbf1_{\{k=\ell\}}\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_k,\\ \mathsf P_kS\mathsf P_\ell &=-\frac{i}{h(k-\ell)}\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_\ell \quad(k\ne\ell),\\ \mathsf P_kS\mathsf P_k &=-\frac\Pi2\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_k. \end{aligned} Indeed ∫0Π(Π−t)eiat dt=−Π/(ia)\int_0^\Pi(\Pi-t)e^{iat}\,dt=-\Pi/(ia) when a=h(k−ℓ)≠0a=h(k-\ell)\ne0. Multiplying the off-diagonal formula for SS by i(hℓ−hk)i(h\ell-hk) gives −PkVPℓ-\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_\ell; the diagonal commutator is zero. This proves (8) on the spectral core, and continuity H1→L2H^1\to L^2 proves it on the full domain. Moreover, B=∑kPkVPk B=\sum_k\mathsf P_kV\mathsf P_k in the strong operator topology: orthogonality bounds every partial sum by ∥V∥\|V\|, and the squared norm of its tail on uu is at most ∥V∥2∑k in the tail∥Pku∥2\|V\|^2\sum_{k\text{ in the tail}}\|\mathsf P_ku\|^2. The diagonal term in SS is harmless because it commutes with LL. This calculation supplies the exact operator averaging identity; the preceding classical Egorov argument supplies the symbol and Sobolev regularity that the matrix calculation alone would not establish.

2. Conjugation by a bounded generator

On each real Sobolev space HsH^s, the exponential series converges in operator norm and gives ∥eitS∥Hs→Hs≤exp⁡ ⁣(∣t∣ ∥S∥Hs→Hs).(9) \|e^{itS}\|_{H^s\to H^s}\leq \exp\!\left(|t|\,\|S\|_{H^s\to H^s}\right). \tag{9} The extensions agree on smooth half densities and thus on common distribution domains. On L2L^2, termwise adjoints of the norm-convergent series give (eitS)∗=e−itS(e^{itS})^*=e^{-itS}. The absolutely convergent Cauchy product equals the identity: its degree-mm coefficient for m>0m>0 is ∑j=0m(−1)j/(j!(m−j)!)=0\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j/(j!(m-j)!)=0. This proves unitarity directly. The same product on HsH^s gives its inverse there, so it preserves H1H^1 and C∞C^\infty.

Proposition 2.1. For scalar A∈ΨclγA\in\Psi^\gamma_{\mathrm{cl}}, the conjugate eiSAe−iSe^{iS}Ae^{-iS} is classical of order γ\gamma, with asymptotic expansion eiSAe−iS∼∑j=0∞1j!(ad⁡iS)jA,(ad⁡iS)A=[iS,A].(10) e^{iS}Ae^{-iS}\sim \sum_{j=0}^\infty\frac1{j!}(\operatorname{ad}iS)^jA, \qquad (\operatorname{ad}iS)A=[iS,A]. \tag{10} No convergence of the infinite series is asserted.

Proof. Scalar principal symbols commute, so the jj-th iterated commutator has order γ−j\gamma-j. Differentiating A(t)=eitSAe−itSA(t)=e^{itS}Ae^{-itS} on smooth inputs gives A(j)(t)=eitS(ad⁡iS)jA e−itS.(11) A^{(j)}(t)=e^{itS}(\operatorname{ad}iS)^jA\,e^{-itS}. \tag{11} The bounds (9) make these derivatives continuous between the Sobolev spaces permitted by their order. Iterating the fundamental theorem of calculus gives Taylor's formula with its integral remainder; interchanging the continuous integrals over their finite simplex gives the weight (1−t)N/N!(1-t)^N/N!. Thus A(1)−∑j=0N(ad⁡iS)jAj!=1N!∫01(1−t)NeitS(ad⁡iS)N+1A e−itS dt.(12) A(1)-\sum_{j=0}^N\frac{(\operatorname{ad}iS)^jA}{j!} =\frac1{N!}\int_0^1(1-t)^N e^{itS}(\operatorname{ad}iS)^{N+1}A\,e^{-itS}\,dt. \tag{12} The remainder maps HsH^s to Hs−γ+N+1H^{s-\gamma+N+1}.

Classically sum the terms to construct CC with expansion (10). Its difference from the same finite sum has order γ−N−1\gamma-N-1. Given real s,rs,r, choose NN with s−γ+N+1≥rs-\gamma+N+1\geq r. Then A(1)−C:Hs→HrA(1)-C:H^s\to H^r is continuous. This difference has a smooth kernel: localized point masses and their derivatives lie in sufficiently negative Sobolev spaces, and sufficiently positive target spaces allow every required kernel derivative to be evaluated continuously. Thus A(1)=CA(1)=C modulo a smooth kernel. ∎

Applying this proposition to L+VL+V, the terms of orders one and zero are L+V+[iS,L]=L+BL+V+[iS,L]=L+B. Consequently, with U=eiSU=e^{iS}, U(L+V)U∗=L+B+R,R∈Ψcl−1,R=R∗.(13) U(L+V)U^*=L+B+R,\qquad R\in\Psi^{-1}_{\mathrm{cl}},\qquad R=R^*. \tag{13} Both sides have exact self-adjoint domain H1H^1, since UU preserves it. The residual is bounded; its equality and symmetry on smooth inputs extend to L2L^2.

3. A form bound and comparison counts

The exact positive powers give a bounded self-adjoint operator CR=L1/2RL1/2∈Ψcl0.(14) C_R=L^{1/2}RL^{1/2}\in\Psi^0_{\mathrm{cl}}. \tag{14} The identity R=L−1/2CRL−1/2R=L^{-1/2}C_RL^{-1/2} holds first on smooth inputs and then on L2L^2, by boundedness. For C≥∥CR∥C\geq\|C_R\|, it gives −CL−1≤R≤CL−1,L+B−CL−1≤U(L+V)U∗≤L+B+CL−1.(15) -CL^{-1}\leq R\leq CL^{-1},\qquad L+B-CL^{-1}\leq U(L+V)U^*\leq L+B+CL^{-1}. \tag{15} These are quadratic-form inequalities on the common operator domain H1H^1.

The required variational comparison follows directly from the discrete spectrum. For a lower-bounded operator with compact resolvent and increasing eigenvalues λj\lambda_j, λj=inf⁡F⊂Ddim⁡F=j sup⁡0≠u∈F(Au,u)∥u∥2.(16) \lambda_j= \inf_{\substack{F\subset\mathcal D\\ \dim F=j}}\ \sup_{0\ne u\in F}\frac{(Au,u)}{\|u\|^2}. \tag{16} The span of the first jj eigenvectors proves one bound. Every jj-dimensional subspace has a nonzero vector perpendicular to the first j−1j-1 eigenvectors, whose spectral expansion proves the other bound. The quadratic-form sum converges absolutely on the operator domain. Inequalities on the same domain therefore order each eigenvalue; counts reverse that order.

Let N(λ)N(\lambda) count eigenvalues of L+VL+V not exceeding λ\lambda. Equations (13) and (15) give NL+B+CL−1(λ)≤N(λ)≤NL+B−CL−1(λ).(17) N_{L+B+CL^{-1}}(\lambda)\leq N(\lambda) \leq N_{L+B-CL^{-1}}(\lambda). \tag{17} For all sufficiently large kk, write bk,jb_{k,j} for the eigenvalues of B∣VkB|_{\mathcal V_k}, and set ρk=1μ(k)∑j=1μ(k)δbk,j,θk(s)=ρk((−∞,s]).(18) \rho_k=\frac1{\mu(k)}\sum_{j=1}^{\mu(k)}\delta_{b_{k,j}}, \qquad \theta_k(s)=\rho_k((-\infty,s]). \tag{18} The single-cluster theorem gives weak convergence to ρ(f)=1W∫{p<1}f(b(z)) dz,θ(s)=ρ((−∞,s]).(19) \rho(f)=\frac1{\mathcal W}\int_{\{p<1\}}f(b(z))\,dz, \qquad \theta(s)=\rho((-\infty,s]). \tag{19} Choose [−M,M][-M,M] containing all large-block spectra and the range of bb.

The comparison eigenvalues on Vk\mathcal V_k are hk+bk,j±C/(hk)hk+b_{k,j}\pm C/(hk). For large λ\lambda, every low comparison mode is fully counted; its finite total dimension is N0N_0. Thus N0+∑k>k0μ(k) θk ⁣(λ−hk−Chk)≤N(λ),N(λ)≤N0+∑k>k0μ(k) θk ⁣(λ−hk+Chk).(20) \begin{aligned} N_0+\sum_{k>k_0}\mu(k)\, \theta_k\!\left(\lambda-hk-\frac C{hk}\right)&\leq N(\lambda),\\ N(\lambda)&\leq N_0+\sum_{k>k_0}\mu(k)\, \theta_k\!\left(\lambda-hk+\frac C{hk}\right). \end{aligned} \tag{20} Every sum is finite, and all endpoint counts are closed.

4. Uniform distribution bounds, including atoms

Weak convergence need not give convergence of distribution functions at their jumps.

Lemma 4.1. For probability measures ρk\rho_k in a common compact interval converging weakly to ρ\rho, every ε>0\varepsilon>0 admits a threshold beyond which θ(s−ε)−ε≤θk(s)≤θ(s+ε)+ε(s∈R).(21) \theta(s-\varepsilon)-\varepsilon \leq\theta_k(s) \leq\theta(s+\varepsilon)+\varepsilon \qquad(s\in\mathbb R). \tag{21}

Proof. Choose smooth nondecreasing ψ:R→[0,1]\psi:\mathbb R\to[0,1], zero at arguments at most −ε-\varepsilon and one at arguments at least zero. Then θk(s)≤∫ψ(s−t) dρk(t).(22) \theta_k(s)\leq\int\psi(s-t)\,d\rho_k(t). \tag{22} Weak convergence gives pointwise convergence of these integrals. Their Lipschitz constants in ss are bounded by ∥ψ′∥∞\|\psi'\|_\infty. A finite net upgrades convergence to uniform convergence on a compact interval: make both Lipschitz errors small, then choose a common threshold for its finitely many nodes. Outside a larger fixed interval, the integrals and distribution functions are identically zero or one. Thus convergence is uniform on R\mathbb R.

For large kk, (22) is at most ∫ψ(s−t) dρ(t)+ε≤θ(s+ε)+ε\int\psi(s-t)\,d\rho(t)+\varepsilon\leq\theta(s+\varepsilon)+\varepsilon. For the other bound, ψ(s−t−ε)≤1{t≤s}\psi(s-t-\varepsilon)\leq\mathbf1_{\{t\leq s\}}, while its integral against ρ\rho is at least θ(s−ε)\theta(s-\varepsilon). Apply the same uniform convergence. The endpoint values of ψ\psi retain atoms at the displayed endpoints. ∎

If ρ\rho has no atoms, θ\theta is continuous and constant outside a compact interval, hence uniformly continuous. Equation (21) then implies sup⁡s∣θk(s)−θ(s)∣⟶0.(23) \sup_s|\theta_k(s)-\theta(s)|\longrightarrow0. \tag{23} Absolute continuity of ρ\rho is unnecessary.

5. The averaged staircase

Define an increasing function Na(λ)=∑k>k0w(k)θ(λ−hk).(24) N_a(\lambda)=\sum_{k>k_0}w(k)\theta(\lambda-hk). \tag{24} The choice of the finite initial threshold affects it only by a bounded high-energy term.

Theorem 5.1. For every δ>0\delta>0, lim sup⁡λ→+∞λ1−n(N(λ)−Na(λ+δ))≤0,lim inf⁡λ→+∞λ1−n(N(λ)−Na(λ−δ))≥0.(25) \begin{aligned} \limsup_{\lambda\to+\infty}\lambda^{1-n} \bigl(N(\lambda)-N_a(\lambda+\delta)\bigr)&\leq0,\\ \liminf_{\lambda\to+\infty}\lambda^{1-n} \bigl(N(\lambda)-N_a(\lambda-\delta)\bigr)&\geq0. \end{aligned} \tag{25} If ρ\rho has no atoms, then N(λ)−Na(λ)=o(λn−1).(26) N(\lambda)-N_a(\lambda)=o(\lambda^{n-1}). \tag{26}

Proof. Fix δ>0\delta>0 and arbitrarily small 0<ε<min⁡(1,δ/3)0<\varepsilon<\min(1,\delta/3). Choose KεK_\varepsilon so (21) holds and C/(hk)≤εC/(hk)\leq\varepsilon for k>Kεk>K_\varepsilon. The comparison summands in (20) are bounded below and above by μ(k)[θ(λ−hk−δ)−ε],μ(k)[θ(λ−hk+δ)+ε].(27) \mu(k)\bigl[\theta(\lambda-hk-\delta)-\varepsilon\bigr], \qquad \mu(k)\bigl[\theta(\lambda-hk+\delta)+\varepsilon\bigr]. \tag{27}

Only a bounded number of summands require these error terms. Enlarge k0k_0 once so C/(hk)≤1C/(hk)\leq1. Outside ∣λ−hk∣≤M+δ+1,(28) |\lambda-hk|\leq M+\delta+1, \tag{28} the empirical comparison function and the corresponding shifted limit function are both exactly zero or both exactly one. Their difference is zero. The lattice centers in (28) occupy an interval of fixed length, so their number is bounded independently of λ\lambda, and each has multiplicity O(λn−1)O(\lambda^{n-1}). Finitely many k≤Kεk\leq K_\varepsilon cause no persistent error: at sufficiently large energy, their counts are exactly full.

Consequently N(λ)≤N0+∑k>k0μ(k)θ(λ−hk+δ)+Cδελn−1,N(λ)≥N0+∑k>k0μ(k)θ(λ−hk−δ)−Cδελn−1.(29) \begin{aligned} N(\lambda)&\leq N_0+\sum_{k>k_0}\mu(k)\theta(\lambda-hk+\delta) +C_\delta\varepsilon\lambda^{n-1},\\ N(\lambda)&\geq N_0+\sum_{k>k_0}\mu(k)\theta(\lambda-hk-\delta) -C_\delta\varepsilon\lambda^{n-1}. \end{aligned} \tag{29} The constant CδC_\delta is independent of the sufficiently small ε\varepsilon.

Replacing μ(k)\mu(k) by w(k)w(k) costs O(λn−2)O(\lambda^{n-2}) when n≥3n\geq3: only k=O(λ)k=O(\lambda) contribute, and sum (3). For n=2n=2, the eventual equality in (3) makes this replacement exact beyond the fixed threshold. The remaining N0N_0 is O(1)=o(λn−1)O(1)=o(\lambda^{n-1}). Divide (29) by λn−1\lambda^{n-1}, take the indicated limits, and let ε\varepsilon decrease to zero. This proves (25).

If ρ\rho is atom-free, let ωθ(r)=sup⁡∣s−t∣≤r∣θ(s)−θ(t)∣\omega_\theta(r)=\sup_{|s-t|\leq r}|\theta(s)-\theta(t)|. For 0<δ≤10<\delta\leq1, Na(λ+δ)−Na(λ−δ)=∑k>k0w(k)[θ(λ+δ−hk)−θ(λ−δ−hk)].(30) N_a(\lambda+\delta)-N_a(\lambda-\delta) =\sum_{k>k_0}w(k) [\theta(\lambda+\delta-hk)-\theta(\lambda-\delta-hk)]. \tag{30} Only uniformly finitely many lattice centers contribute; each weight is at most Cλn−1C\lambda^{n-1}. Thus (30) is bounded by Cλn−1ωθ(2δ)C\lambda^{n-1}\omega_\theta(2\delta), with CC independent of δ≤1\delta\leq1. Use (25) to bound the upper limits of both signed differences N−NaN-N_a and Na−NN_a-N by this quantity. Let δ\delta decrease to zero, proving (26). ∎

Adding an εμ(k)\varepsilon\mu(k) error to every fully counted earlier cluster would instead produce ελn\varepsilon\lambda^n, which does not prove the theorem. The exact cancellations outside (28) prevent that error.

6. Great-circle averages on the round sphere

Let X=S2X=S^2 have its unit round metric, with −ΔS2≥0-\Delta_{S^2}\geq0. Identify functions and half densities using Riemannian volume, and set L=(−ΔS2+14)1/2+12.(31) L=\left(-\Delta_{S^2}+\frac14\right)^{1/2}+\frac12. \tag{31} We verify its exact spectrum. Let Pℓ\mathcal P_\ell be homogeneous polynomials of degree ℓ\ell in three variables, and Hℓ\mathcal H_\ell their harmonic subspace. Put r=∣x∣r=|x|. Inductively, Pℓ=Hℓ⊕r2Pℓ−2.(32) \mathcal P_\ell=\mathcal H_\ell\oplus r^2\mathcal P_{\ell-2}. \tag{32} Negative-degree spaces are zero. To prove the step, the earlier decompositions express Pℓ−2\mathcal P_{\ell-2} as a direct sum of r2jHmr^{2j}H_m, Hm∈HmH_m\in\mathcal H_m, m+2j=ℓ−2m+2j=\ell-2. Direct differentiation gives ΔR3(r2j+2Hm)=2(j+1)(2m+2j+3)r2jHm.(33) \Delta_{\mathbb R^3}(r^{2j+2}H_m) =2(j+1)(2m+2j+3)r^{2j}H_m. \tag{33} All coefficients are positive. Therefore the Laplacian maps r2Pℓ−2r^2\mathcal P_{\ell-2} isomorphically onto Pℓ−2\mathcal P_{\ell-2}. Subtract the unique r2Qr^2Q with the same Laplacian as the given degree-ℓ\ell polynomial. Its remainder is harmonic, and injectivity proves directness.

Polar coordinates give −ΔS2(Hℓ∣S2)=ℓ(ℓ+1)Hℓ∣S2,dim⁡Hℓ=(ℓ+22)−(ℓ2)=2ℓ+1.(34) -\Delta_{S^2}(H_\ell|_{S^2})=\ell(\ell+1)H_\ell|_{S^2}, \quad \dim\mathcal H_\ell= \binom{\ell+2}{2}-\binom{\ell}{2}=2\ell+1. \tag{34} The second binomial is zero for ℓ<2\ell<2. Restriction of a homogeneous harmonic polynomial is injective. These spaces are orthogonal by Green's identity and complete: (32) decomposes every polynomial restriction; polynomial restrictions are dense in continuous functions by radial extension to a cube and tensor Bernstein approximation, using the sum of the three coordinate variance bounds. Continuous functions are dense in L2(S2)L^2(S^2). Thus this is the full spectral description.

The operator in parentheses in (31) has eigenvalues (ℓ+1/2)2(\ell+1/2)^2. Hence L∣Hℓ=ℓ+1,μ(k)=2k−1(k≥1).(35) L|_{\mathcal H_\ell}=\ell+1,\qquad \mu(k)=2k-1\quad(k\geq1). \tag{35} The real-power theorem gives domain H1H^1 and principal symbol p=∣ξ∣p=|\xi|. The half-density Laplacian has zero subprincipal symbol: conjugation by ∣g∣1/4|g|^{1/4} gives the degree-one left-symbol term −i(∂igij)ξj-i(\partial_i g^{ij})\xi_j, canceled by (i/2)∂x∂ξ(gijξiξj)(i/2)\partial_x\partial_\xi(g^{ij}\xi_i\xi_j). Thus LL has subprincipal symbol c=1/2c=1/2. Unit-speed covector geodesics return minimally after Π=2π\Pi=2\pi; (35) also gives e−2πiL=Ie^{-2\pi iL}=I. The phase volume is W=4π2\mathcal W=4\pi^2, so (3) agrees exactly with w(k)=2k−1w(k)=2k-1.

For VV multiplication by x32x_3^2, a great circle with oriented normal ν\nu is x(t)=ecos⁡t+fsin⁡tx(t)=e\cos t+f\sin t, with e,f,νe,f,\nu an oriented orthonormal frame. Its orbit mean is b(ν)=e32+f322=1−ν322.(36) b(\nu)=\frac{e_3^2+f_3^2}{2}=\frac{1-\nu_3^2}{2}. \tag{36} The normalized phase-volume law of ν=x×ξ♯/∣ξ∣\nu=x\times\xi^\sharp/|\xi| is uniform sphere probability. Rotation preserves phase volume and carries this map equivariantly, so the law is rotation invariant. To verify uniqueness, every spherical cap of a fixed radius has the same mass. Integrate its centers against normalized area and use Fubini: its mass must equal its area probability. Averaging a continuous function over shrinking caps converges uniformly to that function. Fubini then shows that its integral against the invariant law equals its area integral.

For normalized area, u=ν3u=\nu_3 is uniform on [−1,1][-1,1], since the area element in (u,φ)(u,\varphi) is du dφdu\,d\varphi. Therefore θ(s)={0,s<0,1−1−2s,0≤s≤12,1,s>12.(37) \theta(s)= \begin{cases} 0,&s<0,\\ 1-\sqrt{1-2s},&0\leq s\leq\tfrac12,\\ 1,&s>\tfrac12. \end{cases} \tag{37} In the middle range, b≤sb\leq s means ∣u∣≥1−2s|u|\geq\sqrt{1-2s}. Neither endpoint has an atom. The density (1−2s)−1/2(1-2s)^{-1/2} on (0,1/2)(0,1/2) has integral one. The count satisfies NL+x32(λ)=∑k≥1(2k−1)θ(λ−k)+o(λ).(38) N_{L+x_3^2}(\lambda)= \sum_{k\geq1}(2k-1)\theta(\lambda-k)+o(\lambda). \tag{38} Extending the sum through finitely many low blocks costs only O(1)O(1).

The spectral lattice in every sphere dimension

The same square-root comparison applies to the unit round sphere SnS^n for every n≥2n\geq2. We extend the polynomial argument to prove that restrictions of degree-ℓ\ell homogeneous harmonic polynomials in Rn+1\mathbb R^{n+1} form a complete orthogonal collection of eigenspaces, with

−ΔSn∣Hℓ=ℓ(ℓ+n−1),mn(ℓ)=dim⁡Hℓ=(ℓ+nn)−(ℓ+n−2n),ℓ≥0. -\Delta_{S^n}|_{\mathcal H_\ell}=\ell(\ell+n-1),\qquad m_n(\ell)=\dim\mathcal H_\ell =\binom{\ell+n}{n}-\binom{\ell+n-2}{n},\qquad \ell\geq0.

The second binomial is zero for ℓ=0,1\ell=0,1. The proof includes completeness, so these eigenspaces give the entire spectrum.

The harmonic decomposition in every dimension. For this proof, let Pℓ\mathcal P_\ell be the complex homogeneous polynomials on Rn+1\mathbb R^{n+1}, and Hℓ=ker⁡(Δ:Pℓ→Pℓ−2)\mathcal H_\ell=\ker(\Delta:\mathcal P_\ell\to\mathcal P_{\ell-2}), with negative-degree spaces zero. Euler's identity gives x⋅∇Hm=mHmx\cdot\nabla H_m=mH_m for Hm∈HmH_m\in\mathcal H_m. Since ∇ra=ara−2x,Δra=a(a+n−1)ra−2, \nabla r^a=ar^{a-2}x,\qquad \Delta r^a=a(a+n-1)r^{a-2}, the product rule at a=2j+2a=2j+2 gives Δ(r2j+2Hm)=2(j+1)(2m+2j+n+1)r2jHm,j≥0. \begin{gathered} \Delta(r^{2j+2}H_m)\\ =2(j+1)(2m+2j+n+1)r^{2j}H_m,\\ j\geq0. \end{gathered} Every coefficient is strictly positive. Induct on ℓ\ell to obtain the decomposition (32) in this ambient dimension. Degrees zero and one are harmonic. At the inductive step, the lower-degree decomposition writes Pℓ−2\mathcal P_{\ell-2} as the direct sum of r2jHmr^{2j}\mathcal H_m with m+2j=ℓ−2m+2j=\ell-2. The displayed coefficients make Δ:r2Pℓ−2⟶Pℓ−2 \Delta:r^2\mathcal P_{\ell-2}\longrightarrow\mathcal P_{\ell-2} an isomorphism. For any P∈PℓP\in\mathcal P_\ell, subtract the unique r2Qr^2Q whose Laplacian equals ΔP\Delta P. The remainder is harmonic, and injectivity of this isomorphism makes the sum direct. Thus Pℓ=Hℓ⊕r2Pℓ−2,dim⁡Hℓ=(ℓ+nn)−(ℓ+n−2n). \begin{gathered} \mathcal P_\ell=\mathcal H_\ell\oplus r^2\mathcal P_{\ell-2},\\ \dim\mathcal H_\ell= \binom{\ell+n}{n}-\binom{\ell+n-2}{n}. \end{gathered} Restriction to the sphere is injective: a homogeneous polynomial vanishing there vanishes at every nonzero point by homogeneity, and hence everywhere. For completeness, the polar metric is dr2+r2gSndr^2+r^2g_{S^n}: differentiating x=rωx=r\omega gives the radial unit vector orthogonal to the angular tangent vectors. Its volume density is rndr dσr^n dr\,d\sigma by the determinant. Integration by parts in coordinates gives the metric Laplacian ∣g∣−1/2∂i(∣g∣1/2gij∂j)|g|^{-1/2}\partial_i(|g|^{1/2}g^{ij}\partial_j), and substituting this block metric gives ΔRn+1=∂r2+nr∂r+r−2ΔSn. \Delta_{\mathbb R^{n+1}} =\partial_r^2+\frac nr\partial_r+r^{-2}\Delta_{S^n}. Applying it to rℓHℓ∣Snr^\ell H_\ell|_{S^n} proves the displayed eigenvalue ℓ(ℓ+n−1)\ell(\ell+n-1). The dimension of Pℓ\mathcal P_\ell is the number of nonnegative exponent vectors summing to ℓ\ell. A row of ℓ\ell marks and nn separators encodes each vector uniquely, giving (ℓ+nn)\binom{\ell+n}{n}. This verifies the dimension formula used above. These eigenvalues are strictly increasing in ℓ\ell. Coordinate integration by parts, using a smooth partition of unity and cancellation of its summed derivatives, gives ∫Sn(−Δf)g‾ dσ=∫Sn⟨∇f,∇g‾⟩ dσ=∫Snf −Δg‾ dσ. \int_{S^n}(-\Delta f)\overline g\,d\sigma =\int_{S^n}\langle\nabla f,\overline{\nabla g}\rangle\,d\sigma =\int_{S^n}f\,\overline{-\Delta g}\,d\sigma. Applying this to two harmonic restrictions proves orthogonality. This also proves positivity and symmetry in the operator argument below.

Density, including the approximation estimate. Iterating the direct decomposition expresses every polynomial restriction as a finite sum of harmonic restrictions. Given f∈C(Sn)f\in C(S^n), extend it to the cube [−1,1]n+1[-1,1]^{n+1} by F(x)={min⁡(1,∣x∣)f(x/∣x∣),x≠0,0,x=0. F(x)=\begin{cases} \min(1,|x|)f(x/|x|),&x\ne0,\\ 0,&x=0. \end{cases} It agrees with ff on the sphere and is continuous, including at zero since ∣F(x)∣≤∣x∣∥f∥∞|F(x)|\leq |x|\|f\|_\infty there. Put G(t)=F(2t−1)G(t)=F(2t-1) on [0,1]n+1[0,1]^{n+1}. The tensor Bernstein polynomial BMG(t)B_MG(t) is the expectation of G(J1/M,…,Jn+1/M)G(J_1/M,\ldots,J_{n+1}/M), where the independent JiJ_i have binomial parameters (M,ti)(M,t_i). Their coordinate variances are at most 1/(4M)1/(4M). On the event that one coordinate error exceeds η>0\eta>0, the sum of all squared coordinate errors exceeds η2\eta^2. Multiply this pointwise inequality by the finite product weights and sum. The expectation of that sum of squared errors is at most (n+1)/(4M)(n+1)/(4M), so P ⁣(max⁡i∣Ji/M−ti∣>η)≤n+14Mη2. \mathbb P\!\left(\max_i|J_i/M-t_i|>\eta\right) \leq\frac{n+1}{4M\eta^2}. Off this event the physical cube distance is at most 2n+1η2\sqrt{n+1}\eta. If ωF\omega_F is the Euclidean modulus of continuity, the resulting uniform bound is sup⁡t∣BMG(t)−G(t)∣≤ωF(2n+1η)+(n+1)∥F∥∞2Mη2. \begin{gathered} \sup_t|B_MG(t)-G(t)|\\ \leq\omega_F(2\sqrt{n+1}\eta) +\frac{(n+1)\|F\|_\infty}{2M\eta^2}. \end{gathered} First choose η\eta small, then MM large. This proves uniform polynomial approximation on the sphere and hence density of the harmonic restrictions in C(Sn)C(S^n).

To pass to L2L^2, use the written Euclidean finite-norm density proof and surface-coordinate and finite-partition construction. Multiply an arbitrary sphere L2L^2 function by a finite smooth partition subordinate to relatively compact coordinate patches. Each coordinate piece has compact support inside its chart. On a fixed larger compact chart set, the smooth surface density is bounded above and below by positive constants, so weighted and ordinary L2L^2 norms are comparable. Approximate the piece by Euclidean compact smooth functions in L2L^2, multiplying the approximants by a fixed chart cutoff equal to one on its support. This retains convergence and makes extension by zero smooth on the sphere. Summing the finitely many approximants proves that smooth, hence continuous, functions are dense in sphere L2L^2. The uniform polynomial approximation above now proves that the harmonic restrictions are a complete orthogonal collection in L2(Sn)L^2(S^n).

The full operator spectrum. Start −ΔSn-\Delta_{S^n} on smooth functions. It is densely defined, symmetric and nonnegative by the just-proved Green identity. Define DD to be the diagonal operator on the complete harmonic decomposition, with eigenvalues ℓ(ℓ+n−1)\ell(\ell+n-1) and domain consisting exactly of the vectors satisfying ∑ℓ≥0[ℓ(ℓ+n−1)]2∥Pℓu∥22<∞, \sum_{\ell\geq0} [\ell(\ell+n-1)]^2\|\mathsf P_\ell u\|_2^2<\infty, where Pℓ\mathsf P_\ell is the orthogonal projection onto the harmonic restrictions. Testing the adjoint against each basis vector forces its image coordinates to be these real eigenvalues times the coordinates of its input. Such an image is in L2L^2 exactly on the displayed domain; there the pairing identity holds by Cauchy–Schwarz. Thus D=D∗D=D^*. Finite harmonic sums approximate every vector in this domain in graph norm, by truncating the two convergent squared sums. For smooth uu, integration by parts identifies the coefficients of −Δu-\Delta u with those of DuDu; Parseval gives the domain condition and equality. Hence the smooth operator is contained in the closed operator DD, while its graph closure contains the graph closure of all finite harmonic sums, which is DD. Both inclusions prove that its closure is exactly DD, with no separate deficiency-index theorem. The eigenvalues tend to infinity with finite multiplicities, so the diagonal resolvent is compact and there is no additional spectrum. The classical scalar elliptic-domain proof and the preceding real-power lesson identify the usual domain as H2H^2 and the square-root domain as H1H^1. This proves the full harmonic spectrum. ∎

We can now determine the square-root shifts, multiplicity products and both return phases in every dimension.

Set α=(n−1)/2\alpha=(n-1)/2 and, for a fixed c>0c>0, let Ac=(−ΔSn+c)1/2A_c=(-\Delta_{S^n}+c)^{1/2}. The positive spectral square root acts on the same eigenspaces, so

ac(ℓ)=ℓ(ℓ+n−1)+c=(ℓ+α)2+c−α2. a_c(\ell)=\sqrt{\ell(\ell+n-1)+c} =\sqrt{(\ell+\alpha)^2+c-\alpha^2}.

At c=α2c=\alpha^2, every eigenvalue is exactly ℓ+α\ell+\alpha. For any other fixed c>0c>0, rationalizing gives, for ℓ≥1\ell\geq1,

ac(ℓ)−(ℓ+α)=c−α2(ℓ+α)2+c−α2+ℓ+α,∣ac(ℓ)−ℓ−α∣≤∣c−α2∣ℓ+α. a_c(\ell)-(\ell+\alpha) =\frac{c-\alpha^2}{\sqrt{(\ell+\alpha)^2+c-\alpha^2}+\ell+\alpha},\qquad |a_c(\ell)-\ell-\alpha| \leq\frac{|c-\alpha^2|}{\ell+\alpha}.

Thus the displacement is O(ℓ−1)O(\ell^{-1}), with its sign fixed by c−α2c-\alpha^2. The finitely many low degrees require no asymptotic claim, and their multiplicities remain unchanged.

Expanding the binomials, including degrees zero and one directly, gives the exact polynomial

mn(ℓ)=2ℓ+n−1(n−1)!∏r=1n−2(ℓ+r). m_n(\ell)=\frac{2\ell+n-1}{(n-1)!} \prod_{r=1}^{n-2}(\ell+r).

For n=2n=2 the product is empty and equals one. In the natural spectral coordinate κ=ℓ+α\kappa=\ell+\alpha, this becomes

mn(ℓ)=2κ(n−1)!∏r=1n−2(κ+r−α). m_n(\ell)=\frac{2\kappa}{(n-1)!} \prod_{r=1}^{n-2}(\kappa+r-\alpha).

The shifts r−αr-\alpha sum to zero. Hence for n≥3n\geq3 the coefficient of κn−2\kappa^{n-2} vanishes, and

mn(ℓ)=2(n−1)!κn−1+O(κn−3). m_n(\ell)=\frac{2}{(n-1)!}\kappa^{n-1} +O(\kappa^{n-3}).

For n=2n=2, the exact formula is m2(ℓ)=2κm_2(\ell)=2\kappa. The first three dimension examples are 2ℓ+12\ell+1, (ℓ+1)2(\ell+1)^2, and (2ℓ+3)(ℓ+1)(ℓ+2)/6(2\ell+3)(\ell+1)(\ell+2)/6.

The spectral phase of the unshifted exact model is

e−2πiAα2=(−1)n−1I. e^{-2\pi i A_{\alpha^2}}=(-1)^{n-1}I.

Indeed each eigenspace has multiplier e−2πi(ℓ+α)e^{-2\pi i(\ell+\alpha)}, and completeness supplies the operator identity. If an integer lattice is wanted, put β=⌈α⌉−α\beta=\lceil\alpha\rceil-\alpha, which is zero or one half. Then Ln=Aα2+βL_n=A_{\alpha^2}+\beta has eigenvalues ℓ+⌈α⌉\ell+\lceil\alpha\rceil and e−2πiLn=Ie^{-2\pi iL_n}=I. Formula (31) is precisely the case n=2n=2.

The corresponding classical period is also 2π2\pi. Under the metric identification of tangent and cotangent vectors, the canonical one-form is v⋅dxv\cdot dx. At ∣x∣=∣v∣=1|x|=|v|=1, x⋅v=0x\cdot v=0, the vector (v,−x)(v,-x) is tangent to the sphere's tangent bundle: it differentiates both constraints ∣x∣2=1|x|^2=1 and x⋅v=0x\cdot v=0 to zero. For any tangent variation (δx,δv)(\delta x,\delta v), its pairing with the canonical symplectic form is v⋅δv+x⋅δx=v⋅δvv\cdot\delta v+x\cdot\delta x=v\cdot\delta v, since x⋅δx=0x\cdot\delta x=0. This equals d∣v∣(δx,δv)d|v|(\delta x,\delta v) at ∣v∣=1|v|=1. Thus the Hamilton equations for p=∣ξ∣p=|\xi| on the unit energy surface are exactly x′=vx'=v, v′=−xv'=-x. Differentiation and the initial values verify their unique solution:

x(t)=xcos⁡t+vsin⁡t,v(t)=−xsin⁡t+vcos⁡t. x(t)=x\cos t+v\sin t,\qquad v(t)=-x\sin t+v\cos t.

Both vectors return exactly when cos⁡t=1\cos t=1 and sin⁡t=0\sin t=0, whose least positive solution is 2π2\pi. The metric identifies the tangent with its covector, so this is a full phase-space return. The phase factor (−1)n−1(-1)^{n-1} above records why the classical period need not make the unshifted quantum evolution the identity.

The complete round-sphere harmonic spectrum and its quantum phase

The proof diagram records the positive Laplacian coefficient, the direct decomposition, injective restriction and complete orthogonal spectral resolution proved above. The multiplicity table contains exact values of the retained binomial formula. The phase table uses the exact α=(n−1)/2\alpha=(n-1)/2, β=⌈α⌉−α\beta=\lceil\alpha\rceil-\alpha, unshifted phase (−1)n−1(-1)^{n-1}, and lowest eigenvalue of LnL_n; the additive shift is retained in every dimension. Section 6, “The harmonic decomposition,” “Density” and “The full operator spectrum,” supplies the proof, and the displayed square-root and phase formulas supply the model constants. Vector figure. The diagram collects the polynomial and spectral calculations above.

Use the conclusion

Use the complete local round-sphere proof to check the quantum return phase in every dimension. Then distinguish the averaged principal observable, the conjugation error and the distribution bounds at atoms.

7. Exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 7.1 (the commutator sign; introductory). Suppose Π=2π\Pi=2\pi and Vt=V0cos⁡t+V1sin⁡tV_t=V_0\cos t+V_1\sin t is the exact evolved self-adjoint family. Find B,SB,S and check (8).

Solution 7.1. The two period integrals vanish, so B=0B=0. Integration by parts gives ∫02π(2π−s)cos⁡s ds=0,∫02π(2π−s)sin⁡s ds=2π.(39) \int_0^{2\pi}(2\pi-s)\cos s\,ds=0,\qquad \int_0^{2\pi}(2\pi-s)\sin s\,ds=2\pi. \tag{39} Hence S=−V1S=-V_1. Comparing derivatives of the assumed evolution gives i[L,V0]=V1i[L,V_0]=V_1 and i[L,V1]=−V0i[L,V_1]=-V_0. Thus [iS,L]=−i[V1,L]=i[L,V1]=−V0=B−V0[iS,L]=-i[V_1,L]=i[L,V_1]=-V_0=B-V_0.

Exercise 7.2 (the first residual symbol; intermediate). With ss the principal symbol of SS, find the order-minus-one principal symbol of RR. Explain the exact domain in (13).

Solution 7.2. Retain the first commutator of VV and the second of LL; all further terms have order at most minus two. Equation (8) gives R≡[iS,V]+12[iS,[iS,L]]=12[iS,V+B](modΨcl−2),r−1=12{s,v+b}.(40) R\equiv[iS,V]+\frac12[iS,[iS,L]] =\frac12[iS,V+B]\pmod{\Psi^{-2}_{\mathrm{cl}}}, \qquad r_{-1}=\frac12\{s,v+b\}. \tag{40} The scalar rule i[S,A]prin={s,a}i[S,A]_{\mathrm{prin}}=\{s,a\} uses {s,a}=sξax−sxaξ\{s,a\}=s_\xi a_x-s_x a_\xi, consistent with D=−i∂D=-i\partial. Its order is minus one. The exponential and its inverse are bounded on H1H^1, so U(H1)=H1U(H^1)=H^1. A unitary conjugate of L+VL+V has that domain. Bounded self-adjoint B+RB+R also leaves the domain of LL equal to H1H^1.

Exercise 7.3 (an atomic obstruction; intermediate). In (31), take V=dL−1V=dL^{-1}, 0<d<1/20<d<1/2. Find ρ,Na\rho,N_a and N(K)−Na(K)N(K)-N_a(K) at positive integer energies KK. Does (26) hold?

Solution 7.3. The order-zero principal symbol is zero, and B=VB=V since it commutes with LL. Thus ρ=δ0\rho=\delta_0 and θ(s)=1{s≥0}\theta(s)=\mathbf1_{\{s\geq0\}}. Including all positive blocks, Na(K)=K2,N(K)=(K−1)2,N(K)−Na(K)=−2K+1.(41) N_a(K)=K^2,\qquad N(K)=(K-1)^2,\qquad N(K)-N_a(K)=-2K+1. \tag{41} Indeed the true eigenvalue of block kk is k+d/kk+d/k. Every k≤K−1k\leq K-1 is below KK, and every k≥Kk\geq K is above it. The normalized difference tends to −2-2, so (26) fails. A different finite threshold changes only a bounded constant. The shifted bounds remain valid because d/kd/k eventually lies below every fixed positive shift.

Exercise 7.4 (quantitative distribution information; advanced). Suppose additionally, for β>0\beta>0 and 0<α≤10<\alpha\leq1, sup⁡s∣θk(s)−θ(s)∣≤Ck−β,∣θ(s)−θ(t)∣≤C∣s−t∣α.(42) \sup_s|\theta_k(s)-\theta(s)|\leq Ck^{-\beta}, \qquad |\theta(s)-\theta(t)|\leq C|s-t|^\alpha. \tag{42} Prove N(λ)−Na(λ)=O ⁣(λn−1−min⁡(1,α,β)).(43) N(\lambda)-N_a(\lambda) =O\!\left(\lambda^{n-1-\min(1,\alpha,\beta)}\right). \tag{43}

Solution 7.4. On each active block of (20), replacing the empirical law costs O(k−β)O(k^{-\beta}), and the shift C/(hk)C/(hk) costs O(k−α)O(k^{-\alpha}). There are uniformly finitely many active blocks, with kk comparable to λ\lambda and multiplicities O(λn−1)O(\lambda^{n-1}). Their total error is O(λn−1−β+λn−1−α)O(\lambda^{n-1-\beta}+\lambda^{n-1-\alpha}). Earlier full blocks and later empty blocks agree exactly, so contribute neither error. Multiplicity replacement adds O(λn−2)O(\lambda^{n-2}) when n≥3n\geq3, and no eventual error for n=2n=2. Finite low modes add O(1)O(1), covered by (43) since its exponent is nonnegative. Taking the largest bound proves the formula. Weak convergence alone does not supply the additional rate (42).

Exercise 7.5 (a term invisible to the orbit average; advanced). On S2S^2, take the multiplication potential ax3+dx32a x_3+d x_3^2, a∈Ra\in\mathbb R, d>0d>0. Find its orbit law and averaged count. Prove that adding the linear term changes the count by o(λ)o(\lambda).

Solution 7.5. A great circle has x3(t)=e3cos⁡t+f3sin⁡tx_3(t)=e_3\cos t+f_3\sin t, whose mean is zero. Its mean square is (36). Hence b(ν)=d2(1−ν32),Na(λ)=∑k≥1(2k−1)θ ⁣(λ−kd),(44) b(\nu)=\frac d2(1-\nu_3^2),\qquad N_a(\lambda)=\sum_{k\geq1}(2k-1) \theta\!\left(\frac{\lambda-k}{d}\right), \tag{44} where θ\theta is the unscaled law (37). This law is atom-free and independent of aa. Theorem 5.1 gives the same NaN_a, up to o(λ)o(\lambda), for L+ax3+dx32L+a x_3+d x_3^2 and L+dx32L+d x_3^2. Subtracting proves the assertion. Individual eigenvalues may still change.

References

The normal-form source has a different order convention. [SUV, §3.1, Proposition 3.1] treats the order-two Laplacian plus an order-zero, possibly complex potential; its proof is explicitly a sketch of an iteration producing a commuting term and a smoothing residual. For the scalar order-one model here, (4)–(8) and the block verification solve the commutator exactly, and Proposition 2.1 proves the required classical conjugation with an order-minus-one residual. The form comparison and distribution argument then establish the full atom-qualified counting statement. No all-orders smoothing normal form is needed. [SUV, §5.1] identifies the space of oriented great circles on S2S^2 and its averaging transform; our direct great-circle computation obtains (36)–(37). The full harmonic-spectrum proof and the shifts in every dimension nn are the local arguments of Section 6.

[CV, §§1–3] supplies the lattice and single-cluster setting used in the preceding lesson. [Z, §4, Proposition 4.9] explains the periodic transport obstruction for a Zoll Laplacian's band symbol; its geometric Theorem 3 is restricted to S2S^2. Those results contextualize the averaging mechanism without replacing the exact bounded-generator and domain argument here. [GS, §10.2] constructs an unscaled-time semiclassical pseudodifferential family. The Hamiltonian-graph evolution required in (4) instead uses the classical wave construction and ordered Egorov formula proved in the linked lessons; §§11.3–11.4 of [GS] are trace and mapping-torus background.