AN-04 · CC0; linked components retain their own terms

Separated characteristic branches and polarization

The energy theorem for a Hermitian matrix principal symbol gives a two-sided evolution without choosing eigenvectors. An oscillatory description needs more structure. Each separated eigenvalue has its own Hamiltonian, and its eigenspace carries the transported vector amplitude. This lesson proves the spectral reduction and the branch kernels, including their global smoothing errors and compatibility across local eigenframes.

The analytic providers are First-order systems and ordered evolution, Sections 1–4, and Oscillatory Cauchy kernels and exact evolution, Sections 1–6. The full Hilbert coefficient calculus, Sections H1–H3, supplies ordered ordinary products, differentiated remainders, adjoints and all real Sobolev bounds. Conic parametrices and localization, Sections K1–K4, proves support-preserving sums, both matrix inverses, proper realization and finite conic partitions. These complete programme proofs provide the calculus; the spectral reduction and branch construction are proved below. The exact proof map binds every use and its prerequisites. Linked components retain their own notices.

Hörmander III, §23.1, Theorem 23.1.4 and the discussion on printed page 390 provide the scalar wavefront and elliptic-FIO context. That scalar result does not supply the several-branch theorem proved here.

1. A gap is a hypothesis on the whole parameter neighborhood

Work on a time interval and a conic neighborhood with compact normalized closure inside a larger neighborhood. A symbol of order mm has, on that larger neighborhood, bounds

∣∂tℓ∂xα∂ξβq∣≤Cℓαβ⟨ξ⟩m−∣β∣.(BR1) |\partial_t^\ell\partial_x^\alpha\partial_\xi^\beta q| \leq C_{\ell\alpha\beta}\langle\xi\rangle^{m-|\beta|}. \tag{BR1}

All statements concern sufficiently large ∣ξ∣|\xi|, uniformly in the time parameter. Smooth bounded-frequency changes are microlocally smoothing in this conic problem.

Let H1(t,x,ξ)=H1(t,x,ξ)∗H_1(t,x,\xi)=H_1(t,x,\xi)^* be homogeneous of degree one. Assume its distinct real eigenvalues λ1<⋯<λk\lambda_1<\cdots<\lambda_k have fixed multiplicities d1,…,dkd_1,\ldots,d_k, and

∑jdj=N,∣λj−λl∣≥c∣ξ∣(j≠l).(BR2) \sum_jd_j=N,\qquad |\lambda_j-\lambda_l|\geq c|\xi|\quad(j\ne l). \tag{BR2}

The multiplicities refer to a single eigenvalue in each branch, not a spectral cluster that may split internally. A cluster with internal crossings leads to a matrix principal block and cannot be treated by the scalar-principal Cauchy lesson merely by renaming that block.

For clarity the coefficient is

P=∂t+A(t),a=iχ0(ξ)H1+C,C∈S0,(BR3) P=\partial_t+A(t),\qquad a=i\chi_0(\xi)H_1+C,\qquad C\in S^0, \tag{BR3}

where χ0\chi_0 is one at large frequency. The full lower symbol CC can be complex, noncommuting and nonclassical. A global realization with bounded symbol families has the energy hypotheses proved in the preceding systems lesson: the pointwise Hermitian real parts of aa and −a-a are uniformly bounded, because iH1iH_1 is skew-Hermitian. The local symbol reduction below makes no assertion that an arbitrary local realization already has global energy or support bounds.

2. Smooth projections without differentiating an eigenvector choice

We give the finite-dimensional argument used at every normalized point. A Hermitian matrix has an orthonormal eigenbasis. Indeed the real Rayleigh function v∗Hvv^*Hv reaches its maximum on the unit sphere. At a maximizing vector vv, variations v+ϵwv+\epsilon w with w⊥vw\perp v, first with real and then with imaginary ϵ\epsilon, give w∗Hv=0w^*Hv=0. Thus Hv=λvHv=\lambda v. The orthogonal complement is invariant, since v∗Hw=(Hv)∗w=0v^*Hw=(Hv)^*w=0. Induction on the dimension proves the claim and reality of all eigenvalues.

Normalize ξ=ρω\xi=\rho\omega, ρ>0\rho>0, ∣ω∣=1|\omega|=1, and set h=H1/ρh=H_1/\rho. At one parameter point choose small, disjoint positively oriented complex circles around its distinct eigenvalues. Nearby, each circle remains a uniform distance from the spectrum. To see that the spectrum cannot escape the prescribed neighborhoods, if h=h0+Eh=h_0+E and dist⁡(z,spec⁡h0)>∥E∥\operatorname{dist}(z,\operatorname{spec}h_0)>\|E\|, then

z−h=(z−h0)(I−(z−h0)−1E) z-h=(z-h_0)\bigl(I-(z-h_0)^{-1}E\bigr)

is invertible by the convergent geometric series. The spectral theorem gives ∥(z−h0)−1∥=dist⁡(z,spec⁡h0)−1\|(z-h_0)^{-1}\|=\operatorname{dist}(z,\operatorname{spec}h_0)^{-1}. The fixed circles can therefore be retained after shrinking the parameter neighborhood.

Define

πj=12πi∫Γj(z−h)−1 dz.(BR4) \pi_j=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\Gamma_j}(z-h)^{-1}\,dz. \tag{BR4}

Diagonalizing the matrix only at each fixed point evaluates this integral: for a real eigenvalue inside the circle the scalar integral of (z−μ)−1(z-\mu)^{-1} is one, and for one outside it is zero. This follows directly by a geometric-series expansion on the circle, or on a circle translated to its center. Consequently πj\pi_j is the orthogonal projection onto precisely that eigenspace. It is independent of the local contour choice, satisfies

πj∗=πj,πjπl=δjlπj,∑jπj=I,H1πj=λjπj.(BR5) \pi_j^*=\pi_j,\quad \pi_j\pi_l=\delta_{jl}\pi_j,\quad \sum_j\pi_j=I,\quad H_1\pi_j=\lambda_j\pi_j. \tag{BR5}

The resolvent is a smooth matrix function of the parameters: its entries are quotients of cofactors by a nonvanishing determinant. More quantitatively, ∂(z−h)−1=(z−h)−1(∂h)(z−h)−1\partial(z-h)^{-1}=(z-h)^{-1}(\partial h)(z-h)^{-1}. Repeated differentiation gives finite sums of such ordered products. The uniform contour distance bounds every differentiated normalized projection. Its rank is its integer trace, a continuous function, hence locally constant. Under the fixed-multiplicity hypothesis, λj=tr⁡(H1πj)/dj\lambda_j=\operatorname{tr}(H_1\pi_j)/d_j; the branches are smooth without selecting individual eigenvectors. Homogeneity gives πj(t,x,ρω)=πj(t,x,ω)\pi_j(t,x,\rho\omega)=\pi_j(t,x,\omega) and λj(t,x,ρω)=ρλj(t,x,ω)\lambda_j(t,x,\rho\omega)=\rho\lambda_j(t,x,\omega). Differentiating radial and angular coordinates gives πj∈S0\pi_j\in S^0, λj∈S1\lambda_j\in S^1, with all bounds (BR1). A finite cover of a compact normalized neighborhood makes these bounds uniform. The locally defined projections agree on overlaps because they select the same ordered eigenspace.

There is also an exact polynomial expression,

πj=∏l≠jH1−λlIλj−λl.(BR6) \pi_j=\prod_{l\ne j} \frac{H_1-\lambda_l I}{\lambda_j-\lambda_l}. \tag{BR6}

On the eigenspace of λj\lambda_j every factor is the identity; on another eigenspace one factor is zero. All factors are polynomials in the same matrix, so they commute. Formula (BR6) does not assume the eigenspace has dimension one.

Differentiating the denominators in (BR6), or the reciprocal gap directly, gives

(λj−λl)−1∈S−1.(BR7) (\lambda_j-\lambda_l)^{-1}\in S^{-1}. \tag{BR7}

For example its first derivative is −(λj−λl)−2∂(λj−λl)-(\lambda_j-\lambda_l)^{-2}\partial(\lambda_j-\lambda_l). The general derivative is a finite sum of products of differentiated gaps divided by an additional power of the gap. The order in (BR1) is exactly −1−∣β∣-1-|\beta|; time and base derivatives do not cost a frequency power. The lower bound in (BR2) is essential for uniform constants.

3. Local orthonormal frames and their actual domains

At one normalized point choose an NN by djd_j matrix BjB_j whose columns are an orthonormal basis of ran⁡πj\operatorname{ran}\pi_j. Keep BjB_j fixed on the neighboring parameter set and put

Fj=πjBj,Gj=Fj∗Fj,Uj=FjGj−1/2,U=(U1,…,Uk).(BR8) F_j=\pi_jB_j,\quad G_j=F_j^*F_j,\quad U_j=F_jG_j^{-1/2},\quad U=(U_1,\ldots,U_k). \tag{BR8}

After shrinking, ∥Gj−I∥<1/2\|G_j-I\|<1/2. The scalar binomial series for (1+z)−1/2(1+z)^{-1/2}, applied to Gj−IG_j-I, converges in matrix norm. Its differentiated series converge uniformly on every smaller bound ∥Gj−I∥≤q<1\|G_j-I\|\leq q<1: differentiation of the mm-th matrix power gives finitely many ordered products and at most a fixed polynomial in mm, which is summable against qm−rq^{m-r}. Its square times GjG_j is the identity by multiplication of the absolutely convergent series. The spectral theorem makes it the positive inverse square root.

Here is the scalar-series input with its full matrix derivative control. Put a0=1a_0=1, am=(−1)m(2mm)/4ma_m=(-1)^m\binom{2m}{m}/4^m and f(z)=∑m≥0amzmf(z)=\sum_{m\ge0}a_mz^m. Since (2mm)≤4m\binom{2m}{m}\le4^m, the series and all its derivatives converge uniformly for ∣z∣≤q<1|z|\le q<1. The recurrence (m+1)am+1=−(m+12)am(m+1)a_{m+1}=-(m+\tfrac12)a_m gives (1+z)f′(z)=−f(z)/2(1+z)f'(z)=-f(z)/2. Thus the derivative of (1+z)f(z)2(1+z)f(z)^2 vanishes and its value at zero is one. This identity also follows along each radial segment by the real fundamental theorem of calculus. On the real interval (−1,1)(-1,1), the continuous function ff cannot vanish and starts at one, so it is the positive inverse square root. For a Hermitian matrix XX with ∥X∥≤q<1\|X\|\le q<1, absolutely convergent products and the finite spectral theorem therefore give

f(X)∗=f(X),f(X)(I+X)f(X)=I.(BRA1) f(X)^* = f(X),\qquad f(X)(I+X)f(X)=I. \tag{BRA1}

For any fixed total parameter derivative order rr, differentiation of XmX^m produces at most a fixed multiple of (1+m)r(1+m)^r ordered products. For m≥rm\ge r, each has at least m−rm-r undifferentiated factors; the differentiated factors have uniformly bounded norms on the compact parameter set. The majorant is Cr(1+m)rqm−rC_r(1+m)^rq^{m-r}, and the finitely many cases m<rm<r are harmless. This is summable by the ratio test, with a ratio eventually less than a fixed number below one. Difference quotients and the fundamental theorem of calculus now justify termwise differentiation successively. Applied to X=Gj−IX=G_j-I, this proves every derivative assertion in (BR8), rather than assuming a matrix functional calculus.

It follows that Uj∗Uj=IdjU_j^*U_j=I_{d_j}. Distinct ranges are orthogonal by (BR5); their dimensions sum to NN. Hence

U∗U=UU∗=I,U∗H1U=Λ=diag⁡(λ1Id1,…,λkIdk).(BR9) U^*U=UU^*=I,\qquad U^*H_1U=\Lambda =\operatorname{diag}(\lambda_1I_{d_1},\ldots,\lambda_kI_{d_k}). \tag{BR9}

These frames are homogeneous of degree zero and have all ordinary symbol bounds on a smaller compact normalized neighborhood. The construction works with repeated eigenvalues of fixed multiplicity. It provides a local frame, not a global trivialization of every eigenspace bundle. Exercise 3 gives an explicit complex bundle obstruction despite a uniform gap.

4. Remove every off-diagonal ordinary term

We use left quantization with Dx=−i∂xD_x=-i\partial_x. Its full ordinary product has the expansion

q#v∼∑α1i∣α∣α!(∂ξαq)(∂xαv).(BR10) q\#v\sim\sum_\alpha\frac{1}{i^{|\alpha|}\alpha!} (\partial_\xi^\alpha q)(\partial_x^\alpha v). \tag{BR10}

Matrix products retain this order. To apply the preceding scalar composition estimates to finite matrices, write each product entry as a finite sum over the intermediate matrix index. The integral proof and each remainder estimate apply to every summand, and summing finitely many bounds gives the matrix bound. A time derivative distributes among the factors by the ordinary product rule; the same remainder proof then applies to each differentiated term. This gives (BR10), with a remainder of order m+m′−Lm+m'-L after all terms with ∣α∣<L|\alpha|<L, for every time, base and frequency derivative. No factors may be commuted. The summation and two ordered inverse proofs cited above retain the same finite parameter seminorms.

Quantize UU, using proper support on the larger neighborhood, and let RUR_U be a full microlocal inverse, rather than just its pointwise adjoint. Its conjugation has the precise form

RUP Op⁡(U)=∂t+Op⁡(q)+E1∂t+E0,q=RU#(a#U+∂tU)=iΛ+q0,q0∈S0.(BR11) R_U P\,\operatorname{Op}(U) =\partial_t+\operatorname{Op}(q)+E_1\partial_t+E_0,\qquad q=R_U\#(a\# U+\partial_tU)=i\Lambda+q_0,\quad q_0\in S^0. \tag{BR11}

Here E0,E1E_0,E_1 are microlocally spatially smoothing families, and E1=RUOp⁡(U)−IE_1=R_U\operatorname{Op}(U)-I. A parametrix inverse need not be an exact inverse: its smoothing defect multiplies ∂t\partial_t. The symbolic coefficient calculation takes place in the algebra of evolution operators modulo operators whose spatial coefficients are smoothing, retaining this time derivative explicitly. All symbol equalities in this section take place on a fixed smaller cone; cutoffs are identically one on a neighborhood of its normalized closure. Terms supported outside that neighborhood are not declared globally smoothing.

Suppose an intermediate coefficient has diagonal blocks iλjIdj+cji\lambda_jI_{d_j}+c_j, cj∈S0c_j\in S^0, and off-diagonal part e∈S−me\in S^{-m}, m≥0m\geq0. Set its diagonal correction blocks to zero and, at high frequency, set

Kjl=−ejli(λj−λl)(j≠l),Kjj=0.(BR12) K_{jl}=-\frac{e_{jl}}{i(\lambda_j-\lambda_l)} \quad(j\ne l),\qquad K_{jj}=0. \tag{BR12}

Then K∈S−m−1K\in S^{-m-1} by (BR7). A fixed low-frequency cutoff gives a smooth symbol without changing the microlocal conclusion. For V=I+KV=I+K, the full inverse has V−1=I−KV^{-1}=I-K modulo S−m−2S^{-m-2} when m≥0m\geq0, with its further terms determined by (BR10). Its conjugated coefficient is

q′=V−1#(q#V+∂tV)=q+[iΛ,K](modS−m−1).(BR13) q'=V^{-1}\#(q\#V+\partial_tV) =q+[i\Lambda,K]\pmod{S^{-m-1}}. \tag{BR13}

Here the leading commutator is the pointwise one. Composition derivatives of iΛi\Lambda against KK, and time derivatives of KK, have order −m−1-m-1. Products of an order-zero lower term and KK also have this order. Quadratic corrections containing the order-one principal term have order −2m−1-2m-1, which is at most −m−1-m-1. These estimates include every parameter derivative. In an off-diagonal block, [iΛ,K]jl=i(λj−λl)Kjl=−ejl[i\Lambda,K]_{jl}=i(\lambda_j-\lambda_l)K_{jl}=-e_{jl}. Thus q′q' is block diagonal modulo S−m−1S^{-m-1}. No order-zero matrix terms within a repeated-eigenvalue block have been divided away.

Iterate this construction. After the step indexed by mm, the off-diagonal remainder has order −m−1-m-1. Successive conjugators differ by S−m−1S^{-m-1}, and successive diagonal coefficients differ by S−m−1S^{-m-1}. In particular the principal frame remains UU, and each diagonal principal part remains iλjIdji\lambda_j I_{d_j}.

For precision, asymptotic summation here is in the complete ordinary classes, not a presumed homogeneous expansion of CC. At the mm-th step retain the whole current off-diagonal symbol and divide it by the gap. To sum the successive corrections, multiply the correction of order −m−1-m-1 by a cutoff that is one for ∣ξ∣≥2Rm|\xi|\geq2R_m and zero for ∣ξ∣≤Rm|\xi|\leq R_m. Choose RmR_m increasingly so that the correction has size at most 2−m2^{-m} in the first mm seminorms of each stronger class whose order is −L-L with L<m+1L<m+1. The negative difference of orders supplies that smallness, also for derivatives falling on the cutoff. Include all time derivatives through order mm in this finite list. The same radii work for the compact time family. Every fixed seminorm then has a convergent tail; after subtracting the first MM terms the tail has order −M−1-M-1. This is the required ordinary asymptotic sum.

Summing the conjugators and diagonal coefficients therefore yields T∈S0T\in S^0, principal frame UU, and

D=∂t+diag⁡(Op⁡(iχ0λjIdj+cj)),PT−TD∈S−∞(BR14) D=\partial_t+\operatorname{diag} \bigl(\operatorname{Op}(i\chi_0\lambda_j I_{d_j}+c_j)\bigr), \qquad PT-TD\in S^{-\infty} \tag{BR14}

microlocally, with cj∈S0c_j\in S^0. To verify the infinite-order identity, compare the summed symbols to a finite construction through a depth exceeding any prescribed order. The omitted conjugator has correspondingly negative order; multiplication by an order-one coefficient loses only one order, while its time derivative loses none. The finite construction already has that prescribed residual order. Since the target order was arbitrary, the residual and every differentiated family are microlocally smoothing.

The full microlocal inverse RR of TT exists because UU is unitary. Choose the leading inverse U∗U^* and use (BR10) recursively. If L#T=I+eL\#T=I+e at the next negative order, add −eU∗-eU^* to LL; if T#R′=I+e′T\#R'=I+e', add −U∗e′-U^*e' to R′R'. The ordered products cancel the respective leading errors, and composition derivatives gain another negative order. Summing the corrections with the same parameter rule gives both inverses to all orders. They agree modulo smoothing, since L=L(TR′)=(LT)R′=R′L=L(TR')=(LT)R'=R' modulo that ideal. Thus

RT=TR=I(modS−∞),RPT−D=S1∂t+S0,S0,S1∈S−∞(BR15) RT=TR=I\pmod{S^{-\infty}},\qquad RP T-D=S_1\partial_t+S_0,\qquad S_0,S_1\in S^{-\infty} \tag{BR15}

The second identity is microlocal, with proper quantization understood, and retains the possible smoothing coefficient of the time derivative. Indeed if PT−TD=EPT-TD=E and D=∂t+BD=\partial_t+B, then S1=RT−IS_1=RT-I and S0=RE+(RT−I)BS_0=RE+(RT-I)B; the latter is spatially smoothing because the smoothing ideal is preserved by finite-order proper composition. The identity also includes the derivative of TT. It is not obtained by conjugating A(t)A(t) alone.

5. The leading polarization coefficient, with left-quantization signs

The order-zero diagonal coefficient can be computed before the negative-order off-diagonal corrections. Let UjU_j be the frame in (BR8). At high frequency, modulo S−1S^{-1}, its jj-th block is

cj≡Uj∗CUj+Uj∗(∂t+Hλj)Uj+∑ν(∂ξνUj∗)(λjI−H1)∂xνUj.(BR16) c_j\equiv U_j^*CU_j +U_j^*\bigl(\partial_t+H_{\lambda_j}\bigr)U_j +\sum_\nu(\partial_{\xi_\nu}U_j^*) (\lambda_jI-H_1)\partial_{x_\nu}U_j. \tag{BR16}

Here Hλj=∑ν(∂ξνλj)∂xν−(∂xνλj)∂ξνH_{\lambda_j}=\sum_\nu (\partial_{\xi_\nu}\lambda_j)\partial_{x_\nu} -(\partial_{x_\nu}\lambda_j)\partial_{\xi_\nu} acts on the frame entries. The third term is retained; a rotating eigenframe is not represented by the projected original lower coefficient alone.

To check the formula, the inverse of the pointwise symbol UU has first correction

r−1=−1i∑ν(∂ξνU∗)(∂xνU)U∗(modS−2). r_{-1}=-\frac1i\sum_\nu (\partial_{\xi_\nu}U^*)(\partial_{x_\nu}U)U^* \pmod{S^{-2}}.

This is forced by r#U=Ir\#U=I. In r#(iH1#U+∂tU+C#U)r\#(iH_1\#U+\partial_tU+C\#U), retain all terms of order zero. The terms involving (∂ξνU∗)(∂xνU)iΛ/i(\partial_{\xi_\nu}U^*)(\partial_{x_\nu}U)i\Lambda/i cancel exactly against r−1iH1Ur_{-1}iH_1U. What remains is

U∗CU+U∗∂tU+∑νU∗(∂ξνH1)∂xνU+∑ν(∂ξνU∗)U ∂xνΛ. U^*CU+U^*\partial_tU+ \sum_\nu U^*(\partial_{\xi_\nu}H_1)\partial_{x_\nu}U +\sum_\nu(\partial_{\xi_\nu}U^*)U\,\partial_{x_\nu}\Lambda.

Use (∂ξUj∗)Uj=−Uj∗∂ξUj(\partial_\xi U_j^*)U_j=-U_j^*\partial_\xi U_j, and differentiate H1Uj=λjUjH_1U_j=\lambda_jU_j to obtain

Uj∗(∂ξH1)=(∂ξλj)Uj∗+(∂ξUj∗)(λjI−H1). U_j^*(\partial_\xi H_1) =(\partial_\xi\lambda_j)U_j^* +(\partial_\xi U_j^*)(\lambda_jI-H_1).

The j,jj,j block is exactly (BR16). The first correction KK in (BR12) changes only off-diagonal blocks at order zero, by (BR13), so (BR16) is also the diagonal coefficient of the fully reduced system modulo S−1S^{-1}. Since CC is allowed to be a full ordinary symbol, (BR16) is an ordinary order-zero identity modulo S−1S^{-1}; it does not assign a nonexistent homogeneous principal part to CC.

Changing a local frame within this eigenspace to UjGjU_jG_j, with unitary Gj∈S0G_j\in S^0, changes the effective block by

qj′=Gj#−1#(qj#Gj+∂tGj),cj′≡Gj∗cjGj+Gj∗(∂t+Hλj)Gj(modS−1).(BR20) q'_j=G_j^{\#-1}\#(q_j\#G_j+\partial_tG_j),\qquad c'_j\equiv G_j^*c_jG_j+ G_j^*(\partial_t+H_{\lambda_j})G_j\pmod{S^{-1}}. \tag{BR20}

The first inverse is the full ordinary symbol inverse; its leading part is Gj∗G_j^*. For the second identity, expand the full inverse and product through order zero as in (BR16). Since the principal block is scalar, the inverse correction cancels the product term containing ∂xGj\partial_xG_j next to iλji\lambda_j, leaving exactly the Hamilton and time derivatives displayed. Under a change of eigenframe, the last term of (BR16) is conjugated by GjG_j: additional differentiated GjG_j factors disappear because (λjI−H1)Uj=0=Uj∗(λjI−H1)(\lambda_jI-H_1)U_j=0=U_j^*(\lambda_jI-H_1). Thus the two computations agree.

6. A short-time branch kernel and its global error estimate

Here is the precise receiving theorem. Assume a global bounded-symbol realization of (BR3), so that the full system energy theorem gives UP(t,s)U_P(t,s) on every HrH^r in both directions. Let KK be a compact set of base points and normalized covectors, contained in the larger gap neighborhood. Let Ψ\Psi be a properly supported order-zero matrix cutoff with compact base support and conic microsupport inside KK. We first take a sufficiently short compact time interval such that all branch flows from KK remain in one frame neighborhood; a finite cover removes this restriction below. Every frequency statement refers to nonzero covectors. The desired short-time conclusion is

UP(t,s)Ψ=∑j=1kFj(t,s)+S(t,s),WF⁡′(Fj)⊂graph⁡(Φj(t,s)),(BR21) U_P(t,s)\Psi =\sum_{j=1}^k F_j(t,s)+S(t,s), \qquad \operatorname{WF}'(F_j)\subset \operatorname{graph}(\Phi_j(t,s)), \tag{BR21}

over the input microsupport. Here Φj\Phi_j is the Hamilton flow of λj\lambda_j, each FjF_j is an order-zero matrix FIO, and SS has a jointly smooth kernel. The remainder has all differentiated bounds H−M→HLH^{-M}\to H^L, for arbitrary finite M,LM,L, after the compact input localization. Its spatial output need not be compact. Endpoint time derivatives are included. A local smoothing coefficient in (BR15) alone would not prove this assertion.

We first make an auxiliary global system to which the block construction genuinely applies everywhere. Shrink the normalized frame neighborhood until U0∗UU_0^*U is uniformly close to the identity, where U0U_0 is its value at the center. The convergent power series for log⁡(I+Z)\log(I+Z) gives a smooth matrix L=log⁡(U0∗U)L=\log(U_0^*U). To prove it is skew-Hermitian, a unitary matrix VV has commuting Hermitian parts (V+V∗)/2(V+V^*)/2 and (V−V∗)/(2i)(V-V^*)/(2i). Diagonalize the first using Section 2; its eigenspaces are invariant under the second, which can then be diagonalized on each eigenspace. This gives an orthonormal eigenbasis for VV, with unit-modulus eigenvalues. Their logarithms in the small arc about one are imaginary, and the power series agrees with those logarithms. Thus L∗=−LL^*=-L and exp⁡L=U0∗U\exp L=U_0^*U. Every differentiated series converges uniformly on a smaller bound ∥Z∥≤q<1\|Z\|\leq q<1, by the same polynomial-times-geometric estimate used in (BR8). For completeness the logarithm identity used here follows from a scalar computation. For ∣z∣<1|z|<1, let ℓ(z)=∑m≥1(−1)m+1zm/m\ell(z)=\sum_{m\ge1}(-1)^{m+1}z^m/m. Differentiating the absolutely convergent series gives ℓ′(z)=(1+z)−1\ell'(z)=(1+z)^{-1}. On each segment tztz, differentiating exp⁡(ℓ(tz))/(1+tz)\exp(\ell(tz))/(1+tz) gives zero; its initial value is one. Hence exp⁡ℓ(z)=1+z\exp\ell(z)=1+z. If ∣1+z∣=1|1+z|=1, then 1=∣exp⁡ℓ(z)∣=exp⁡(Re⁡ℓ(z))1=|\exp\ell(z)|=\exp(\operatorname{Re}\ell(z)), so Re⁡ℓ(z)=0\operatorname{Re}\ell(z)=0. Diagonalizing the unitary matrix as above evaluates the matrix series on these scalar values and proves both L∗=−LL^*=-L and exp⁡L=U0∗U\exp L=U_0^*U. The derivative majorants just proved for (BRA1), with the additional harmless factor 1/m1/m, give every matrix-logarithm derivative. The factorial majorant for the exponential gives the same control for exp⁡(ϑL)\exp(\vartheta L).

Choose a scalar smooth cutoff ϑ\vartheta, supported in this neighborhood and one on a smaller one. Set

Ue=U0exp⁡(ϑL),μje=μj0+ϑ(μj−μj0),μj=λj/∣ξ∣.(BR22) U^{\mathrm e}=U_0\exp(\vartheta L),\qquad \mu_j^{\mathrm e}=\mu_j^0+\vartheta(\mu_j-\mu_j^0), \qquad \mu_j=\lambda_j/|\xi|. \tag{BR22}

Extend ϑL\vartheta L and ϑ(μj−μj0)\vartheta(\mu_j-\mu_j^0) by zero. The scalar cutoff is common to every branch. Hence each extended gap is a convex combination of two positive gaps and is uniformly positive. The exponential is unitary. Outside the support, these objects are constant. They have globally bounded normalized derivatives; radial differentiation therefore gives ordinary symbol bounds. At bounded frequency, replace the exponent by χ0ϑL\chi_0\vartheta L and regularize the degree-one symbols. This retains unitarity and all high-frequency statements.

Let λje=∣ξ∣μje\lambda_j^{\mathrm e}=|\xi|\mu_j^{\mathrm e} at high frequency, H1e=Uediag⁡(λjeIdj)(Ue)∗H_1^{\mathrm e}=U^{\mathrm e}\operatorname{diag}(\lambda_j^{\mathrm e}I_{d_j})(U^{\mathrm e})^*, and extend CC using a cutoff one on the smaller neighborhood. The resulting PeP^{\mathrm e} agrees microlocally with PP there and has global energy estimates. Apply Sections 2–4 to this globally separated, globally framed system. All summation radii now control the global bounded symbol seminorms. The properly quantized Te,ReT^{\mathrm e},R^{\mathrm e} and diagonal DeD^{\mathrm e} satisfy

PeTe−TeDe=E,TeRe=I+S0,E,S0:H−M⟶HL(BR23) P^{\mathrm e}T^{\mathrm e}-T^{\mathrm e}D^{\mathrm e}=E, \quad T^{\mathrm e}R^{\mathrm e}=I+S_0, \qquad E,S_0:H^{-M}\longrightarrow H^L \tag{BR23}

for every M,LM,L, with all time derivatives. This follows because each coefficient is a global bounded S−∞S^{-\infty} family: apply the ordinary mapping theorem at a sufficiently negative order for the requested pair of Sobolev indices. Proper quantization changes the full symbol by another bounded smoothing family. The first identity is an intertwining identity and contains no uncanceled time derivative.

Each block of DeD^{\mathrm e} has scalar principal symbol λjeIdj\lambda_j^{\mathrm e}I_{d_j} and a full ordinary S0S^0 matrix lower symbol. The preceding Cauchy kernel lesson supplies its exact evolution Vje(t,s)V_j^{\mathrm e}(t,s) and its graph FIO representation, with the complete ordered transport and all endpoint parameters. Define

Wje=TeEjVjeEjRe(s),We=∑jWje,(BR24) W_j^{\mathrm e} =T^{\mathrm e}E_jV_j^{\mathrm e}E_jR^{\mathrm e}(s), \qquad W^{\mathrm e}=\sum_j W_j^{\mathrm e}, \tag{BR24}

where EjE_j denotes the constant coordinate block projection, and the block evolution acts on that block. The derivative of Re(s)R^{\mathrm e}(s) is irrelevant to the equation in tt, but is retained when differentiating the family in ss. Direct differentiation gives PeWe=E VeRe(s)P^{\mathrm e}W^{\mathrm e}=E\,V^{\mathrm e}R^{\mathrm e}(s). This has all the bounds in (BR23), since each evolution preserves every Sobolev order. Its initial value is I+S0(s)I+S_0(s). Thus WeW^{\mathrm e} differs from the exact auxiliary system evolution by a globally smoothing family, by variation of constants. This use of (BR23) avoids trying to treat S1∂tS_1\partial_t in (BR15) as an order-zero error.

We now localize and compare with the actual system. Choose a compact spatial output cutoff φ\varphi one near all the short-time branch images of KK, and use input and conic cutoffs with margins inside the smaller frame neighborhood. Put V=φWeΨV=\varphi W^{\mathrm e}\Psi, with the conic output cutoffs understood. These cutoffs equal one on a neighborhood of every relevant graph point. Composition of a PDO with a graph FIO has the ordered stationary expansion proved in the preceding oscillatory lessons. If the PDO symbol and all its derivatives vanish near those graph points, every term vanishes. Each remainder is of arbitrarily negative order. With compact input and spatial output support, such a remainder has all H−M→HLH^{-M}\to H^L bounds: the frequency integrals for any differentiated kernel converge after taking the order sufficiently negative; integrating by parts in the input frequency variables supplies arbitrary off-diagonal decay. The same argument applies to every endpoint derivative.

Consequently all differences between PP and PeP^{\mathrm e}, and all derivatives of the localization cutoffs, give smoothing residuals when applied to these branch pieces. A full PDO may also create output outside supp⁡φ\operatorname{supp}\varphi. Choose a second compact spatial cutoff φ1\varphi_1 equal to one on a neighborhood of supp⁡φ\operatorname{supp}\varphi. The preceding compact-output argument applies inside supp⁡φ1\operatorname{supp}\varphi_1; outside it the source and output have a fixed positive separation. Repeated frequency integration by parts in the ordinary PDO kernel gives

∥∂xα∂zβKA(x,z)∥≤CαβL⟨x⟩−L(z∈supp⁡φ, x∉supp⁡φ1),(BRA4) \|\partial_x^\alpha\partial_z^\beta K_A(x,z)\| \le C_{\alpha\beta L}\langle x\rangle^{-L} \quad(z\in\operatorname{supp}\varphi,\ x\notin\operatorname{supp}\varphi_1), \tag{BRA4}

for arbitrary LL, also after all time derivatives. The global symbol bounds make the constants uniform; sufficiently many integrations make the remaining frequency integral absolutely convergent. A compact cutoff in zz, equal to one on supp⁡φ\operatorname{supp}\varphi, makes each kernel row an HzMH^M_z test with the same rapid xx decay. Sobolev duality bounds its pairing with a compactly supported Hz−MH^{-M}_z input. Every xx derivative has this bound, and square integration for sufficiently large decay proves every output Sobolev order, first at integer orders and then by the Fourier weights. The compactly localized graph factor maps each Sobolev space to itself; hence composing this exterior operator with that factor retains every H−M→HLH^{-M}\to H^L gain. Endpoint derivatives of the graph factor lose only finitely many spatial orders, absorbed by choosing the exterior test order larger. This supplies the complete global tail estimate, including the finite matrix coefficients, with an actual positive separation.

It follows that

PV=R,V(s,s)=Ψ+B,B,R:H−M⟶HLfor every M,L.(BR25) PV=R,\qquad V(s,s)=\Psi+B,\qquad B,R:H^{-M}\longrightarrow H^L \quad\hbox{for every }M,L. \tag{BR25}

The two defects are distinct. Variation of constants in the actual system gives

V(t,s)−UP(t,s)Ψ=UP(t,s)B(s)+∫stUP(t,τ)R(τ,s) dτ.(BR26) V(t,s)-U_P(t,s)\Psi =U_P(t,s)B(s)+ \int_s^t U_P(t,\tau)R(\tau,s)\,d\tau. \tag{BR26}

All terms on the right are globally smoothing. For a chosen output index use the energy evolution at that index; its time derivatives lose only finitely many spatial orders, which can be supplied by the arbitrary smoothing gain of B,RB,R. Differentiate the integral and the two endpoint evolution equations; each derivative introduces finitely many coefficient operators and boundary terms, with the same bounds. The delta-column and Sobolev reconstruction argument of the preceding Cauchy lesson therefore gives an actual jointly smooth kernel. This proves (BR21), including the global error estimate, in a short frame tube.

The norm estimates needed for these time differentiations hold for the actual matrix-principal evolution as well. Write U=UPU=U_P. The energy bounds and the integrated equation give

∥U(t+h,t)−I∥Hq+1→Hq≤Cq∣h∣,∥U(t+h,t)−I+hA(t)∥Hq+2→Hq≤Cqh2.(BRA2) \|U(t+h,t)-I\|_{H^{q+1}\to H^q}\le C_q|h|,\qquad \|U(t+h,t)-I+hA(t)\|_{H^{q+2}\to H^q}\le C_qh^2. \tag{BRA2}

Indeed U(t+h,t)−I=−∫tt+hA(v)U(v,t) dvU(t+h,t)-I=-\int_t^{t+h}A(v)U(v,t)\,dv. Smooth time-symbol seminorms and the finite-seminorm Sobolev bound make A(v)−A(t)A(v)-A(t) of norm O(∣v−t∣)O(|v-t|) from Hq+1H^{q+1} to HqH^q. Split A(v)U(v,t)−A(t)A(v)U(v,t)-A(t) into (A(v)−A(t))U(v,t)+A(t)(U(v,t)−I)(A(v)-A(t))U(v,t)+A(t)(U(v,t)-I); the first estimate one spatial order higher bounds the second term. Integration over either orientation proves (BRA2). The group law then gives ∂tU=−A(t)U\partial_tU=-A(t)U and ∂sU=UA(s)\partial_sU=UA(s) in operator norm with sufficiently many extra input orders. Repeated difference quotients distribute among finitely many factors and prove the corresponding higher mixed derivatives, with a finite additional spatial loss at each step. Every smoothing family in (BR23)–(BR26) supplies those orders, so these are norm estimates uniform on the input unit ball. The differentiated Bochner integral therefore has an integrable norm majorant on the compact time interval. Applying the delta-column construction of the preceding Cauchy lesson proves the claimed joint kernel smoothness without assuming operator-norm continuity on a fixed Sobolev space.

7. Glue the polarization bundles over a finite time interval

Let a compact finite-time family of all the branch trajectories from KK lie inside a larger normalized neighborhood on which the fixed multiplicities and uniform gap hold. The flow bounds follow from the homogeneous degree-one Hamilton equations as in the preceding Cauchy lesson. Their images have compact normalized closure, so finitely many frame neighborhoods and sufficiently short time steps cover them. We prove why this construction does not introduce spurious paths that switch branches at an intermediate time.

In each frame patch define a full ordinary microlocal projection

Πj=TEjR,Πj2=Πj,ΠjΠl=0 (j≠l),∑jΠj=I,[P,Πj]=0(modS−∞).(BR27) \Pi_j=T E_jR,\qquad \Pi_j^2=\Pi_j,\quad \Pi_j\Pi_l=0\ (j\ne l),\quad \sum_j\Pi_j=I,\quad [P,\Pi_j]=0 \pmod{S^{-\infty}}. \tag{BR27}

All equalities concern spatial coefficients on the patch. The algebraic identities follow from RT=TR=IRT=TR=I modulo smoothing. For the commutation identity use PT=TD+EPT=TD+E, the block diagonal form of DD, and differentiate the inverse family explicitly:

[P,Πj]=(∂tT+AT−TB)EjR+TEj(∂tR+BR−RA)+T[B,Ej]R. [P,\Pi_j]=(\partial_tT+AT-TB)E_jR +T E_j(\partial_tR+BR-RA)+T[B,E_j]R.

Substitute ∂tT+AT−TB=E\partial_tT+AT-TB=E, D=∂t+BD=\partial_t+B, and differentiate RT=IRT=I modulo smoothing to obtain ∂tR+BR−RA∈S−∞\partial_tR+BR-RA\in S^{-\infty}. Indeed (∂tR)T+R(∂tT)(\partial_tR)T+R(\partial_tT) is smoothing; substituting the equation for TT and multiplying by its right parametrix gives the asserted identity. Since BEj=EjBBE_j=E_jB, every displayed term is smoothing. This calculation involves the derivative of the inverse family, and does not replace a parametrix by an exact inverse.

These projections are unique to all orders with these properties and principal symbols πj\pi_j. Here is the needed uniqueness argument. If Π~j−Πj=δ∈S−m\widetilde\Pi_j-\Pi_j=\delta\in S^{-m}, m≥1m\geq1, idempotence implies

πjδ+δπj−δ∈S−m−1.(BR28) \pi_j\delta+\delta\pi_j-\delta \in S^{-m-1}. \tag{BR28}

The quadratic difference has order at most −2m-2m, and products with the negative-order parts of the projections lose another order. In the eigenframe, (BR28) forces the j,jj,j block and all blocks with neither index jj to have order −m−1-m-1. The commutation equations imply [iH1,δ]∈S−m[iH_1,\delta]\in S^{-m}: the time derivative and composition derivatives have order at most −m-m. In a remaining j,lj,l or l,jl,j block, dividing this bound by the gap improves its order to −m−1-m-1. Thus δ∈S−m−1\delta\in S^{-m-1}. Induction proves uniqueness modulo S−∞S^{-\infty}. The same proof applies with every parameter derivative, because the gap reciprocal has (BR7).

Thus projections from different frames agree to all orders on their overlaps. Smooth finite partitions on the normalized cover glue their symbols. To see that the equations survive gluing, near any point replace every local representative by one fixed representative plus a smoothing symbol. The partition sums to one there; its differentiated sums are zero. All additional terms are smoothing. This gives Πj\Pi_j on a neighborhood of the compact trajectory family, without any global eigenframe. Extend the symbols arbitrarily outside a larger neighborhood, retaining bounded symbol estimates and proper support. The identities (BR27) are asserted only near the trajectories. Operators supported outside this region become globally smoothing after composition with the compactly localized branch kernels, by the argument following (BR24).

At one short time step take a finite partition {χa}\{\chi_a\} of the input phase neighborhood, subordinate to the frame tubes, with ∑aχa=1\sum_a\chi_a=1 near the full intermediate trajectory set. Quantize its symbols properly. Use the local branch kernels of Section 6 with input Πj(s)Op⁡(χa)Πj(s)\Pi_j(s)\operatorname{Op}(\chi_a)\Pi_j(s), and if needed apply Πj(t)\Pi_j(t) at the output. The inserted projections have the same microsupport and preserve the global residual estimates. At the initial endpoint the sum over aa is Πj(s)\Pi_j(s) modulo smoothing; summing over jj gives the identity on the required input neighborhood. Denote the resulting short-step branch families by FrjF_{rj}. They satisfy

Πj(tr)Frj=Frj=FrjΠj(tr−1)(modglobally smoothing)(BR29) \Pi_j(t_r)F_{rj}=F_{rj} =F_{rj}\Pi_j(t_{r-1}) \pmod{\text{globally smoothing}} \tag{BR29}

after the declared compact phase localization. Indeed in one patch the inverse and intertwiner reduce Πj\Pi_j to EjE_j, and VjeV_j^{\mathrm e} acts only in that block. The local and glued projections agree to all orders; the remaining errors vanish near the graph and have the global estimates already proved. Applying an output projection adds [P,Πj]Frj[P,\Pi_j]F_{rj} to the residual, which is smoothing for exactly the same reason.

Compose the finitely many short-step sums, inserting spatial and conic cutoffs one near the entire output microsupport of the preceding factor. The actual evolution group law and (BR26) show that their product equals UP(t,s)ΨU_P(t,s)\Psi modulo a globally smoothing family. Each finite product containing a smoothing factor remains smoothing, since the other factors are bounded on every Sobolev space. Expanding the product produces words in the branch indices. If two consecutive indices differ, (BR29) places Πj(tr)Πl(tr)\Pi_j(t_r)\Pi_l(t_r) between the factors, and (BR27) makes that word smoothing. Only words staying in one branch remain:

UP(t,s)Ψ=∑jFmj⋯F1jΨ+S(t,s).(BR30) U_P(t,s)\Psi =\sum_j F_{mj}\cdots F_{1j}\Psi+S(t,s). \tag{BR30}

The canonical graphs in each surviving word compose with zero excess: every intermediate phase point is uniquely the Hamilton image of the input one, and the tangent intersection is transverse because every graph is a diffeomorphism. The complete ordinary graph-composition proof in the preceding oscillatory lessons then gives an order-zero FIO on graph⁡(Φj(t,s))\operatorname{graph}(\Phi_j(t,s)). All cutoffs are one near its full output microsupport, so their removed tails are smoothing with the stated global bounds. Reversing the time subdivision proves the same result for the other direction. On compact endpoint families choose a common sufficiently large number of affine time steps; differentiated endpoint parameters remain in the same proved symbol and remainder classes.

The transport has an invariant meaning. Here the transport map is described before multiplication by the scalar input cutoff; an elliptic scalar cutoff preserves its rank. In local frames the branch amplitude is the invertible ordered matrix transport from the scalar-principal Cauchy lesson, multiplied by its nonzero half-density factor. The endpoint frame maps identify this amplitude as

ran⁡πj(s,y,η)⟶ran⁡πj(t,Φj(t,s)(y,η)).(BR31) \operatorname{ran}\pi_j(s,y,\eta) \longrightarrow \operatorname{ran}\pi_j(t,\Phi_j(t,s)(y,\eta)). \tag{BR31}

Its initial map is the identity on that eigenspace. Inverse ordered transport and bounded flow Jacobians give an inverse with uniform ordinary order-zero estimates, modulo the lower-order corrections. The map therefore has rank djd_j and is elliptic as a map of these two bundles. Formula (BR20) gives the frame-change rule; frame changes at consecutive endpoints cancel in the composition. Phase and Maslov changes are those of the proved graph calculus. No globally chosen eigenvectors are needed, as Exercise 3 already requires.

The inverse assertion for a branch can be made directly at the operator level. Work near an input-output pair where the scalar input cutoff is elliptic, or choose the localization to be one near that pair. Shrinking the cone gives a uniform inverse for that scalar cutoff. Choose the two endpoint frames and restrict to the djd_j-dimensional coordinate block. The forward graph amplitude there has an invertible ordinary order-zero matrix coefficient, including its nonvanishing half-density factor. The two-sided graph inverse proof in the preceding Cauchy and graph lessons applies to this square block: choose its inverse coefficient on the reversed graph, use the full graph product to identify the two order-minus-one errors, and remove them by the ordered parametrix recursion and parameter-aware summation. Restore the endpoint frame operators and sandwich by the full projections. This gives a localized reverse graph family GjG_j satisfying

GjFj=Πj(s),FjGj=Πj(t)(modsmooth kernels).(BRA3) G_jF_j=\Pi_j(s),\qquad F_jG_j=\Pi_j(t) \pmod{\text{smooth kernels}}. \tag{BRA3}

Every equality is on the smaller declared cone, where all cutoffs are one; the other pieces have the same global smoothing bounds after compact input localization. On an overlap, the two inverses agree modulo smoothing, since Gj=Gj(FjG~j)=(GjFj)G~j=G~jG_j=G_j(F_j\widetilde G_j)=(G_jF_j)\widetilde G_j=\widetilde G_j in the projected algebra. A finite conic partition therefore gives compatible local inverses. The diagonal projection kernel is not smooth at any nonzero covector in the rank-djd_j block: conjugating by the full local frame reduces it to the identity on that block modulo smoothing, and the arbitrary-cutoff diagonal Fourier proof in the preceding Cauchy lesson supplies every such direction. Thus (BRA3) gives the exact reverse wavefront implication even though FjF_j has rank less than NN in the ambient matrix space.

On an input cone where the scalar cutoff Ψ\Psi is elliptic, the full matrix wavefront of the kernel is exactly the union of these branch graphs. The upper inclusion follows from (BR30). For the reverse inclusion, multiply the kernel at an output graph point by Πj(t)\Pi_j(t) and at the input by Πj(s)\Pi_j(s). This kills the other branches to all orders, even if their graphs happen to meet at that point. The jj-th branch has the elliptic rank-djd_j amplitude (BR31), so its kernel is not smooth there by the inverse graph argument in the preceding Cauchy lesson. Hence that graph point belongs to the full matrix wavefront. This does not claim that each individual matrix entry is singular there: an entry or a chosen polarization can vanish.

For compactly supported distributional data ff with normalized wavefront contained in KK, choose a scalar Ψ\Psi one near that wavefront. The precise projected statement on a declared branch tube is this: (y,η)(y,\eta) belongs to WF⁡(Πj(s)f)\operatorname{WF}(\Pi_j(s)f) if and only if Φj(t,s)(y,η)\Phi_j(t,s)(y,\eta) belongs to WF⁡(Πj(t)UP(t,s)f)\operatorname{WF}(\Pi_j(t)U_P(t,s)f). Use cutoffs one near the entire intervening branch trajectory. The remainder f−Ψff-\Psi f is smooth with compact support, hence belongs to every Sobolev space and stays smooth under the energy evolution. Formula (BR29) reduces the localized statement to the elliptic bundle map (BR31), whose inverse graph parametrix proves the reverse implication. These are the full projections (BR27); the pointwise principal projection alone need not detect a weaker singularity created by a negative-order correction. Initial support alone gives no such equivalence. The theorem covers compact trajectory families satisfying the gap hypothesis. Crossings and internally splitting clusters remain outside it; their energy evolution does not supply this scalar-block FIO construction.

8. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 1 — intermediate: a rotating frame contributes a lower term. Let ρ=∣ξ∣>0\rho=|\xi|>0 on a fixed frequency cone and

Rθ=(cos⁡θ−sin⁡θsin⁡θcos⁡θ),H1(t,ξ)=ρRθ(t)(100−1)Rθ(t)T. R_\theta=\begin{pmatrix}\cos\theta&-\sin\theta\\ \sin\theta&\cos\theta\end{pmatrix}, \qquad H_1(t,\xi)=\rho R_{\theta(t)} \begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}R_{\theta(t)}^T.

Take C=0C=0. Compute the coefficient in the rotating frame, its first off-diagonal correction, and the exact eigenvalues when θ′(t)=ω\theta'(t)=\omega is constant.

Solution. There are no base-variable composition corrections. For this calculation label the positive branch first and the negative branch second; (BR12) uses the signed difference for that labeling. With U=RθU=R_\theta,

q=iρ(100−1)+θ′(0−110),K12=K21=θ′2iρ,K11=K22=0.(BR17) q=i\rho\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} +\theta'\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad K_{12}=K_{21}=\frac{\theta'}{2i\rho},\quad K_{11}=K_{22}=0. \tag{BR17}

For the 1,21,2 block, the gap commutator equals i(2ρ)θ′/(2iρ)=θ′i(2\rho)\theta'/(2i\rho)=\theta', cancelling −θ′-\theta'; for the 2,12,1 block it equals −θ′-\theta', cancelling θ′\theta'. The time derivative of KK and all remaining products have order −1-1. Omitting U∗UtU^*U_t would incorrectly give no first correction.

For constant ω\omega,

q=(iρ−ωω−iρ),det⁡(ζI−q)=ζ2+ρ2+ω2. q=\begin{pmatrix}i\rho&-\omega\\\omega&-i\rho\end{pmatrix}, \quad \det(\zeta I-q)=\zeta^2+\rho^2+\omega^2.

Its eigenvalues are ±iρ2+ω2\pm i\sqrt{\rho^2+\omega^2}. On the positive-ρ\rho cone their expansions are ±i(ρ+ω2/(2ρ)+O(ρ−3))\pm i(\rho+\omega^2/(2\rho)+O(\rho^{-3})). The order-zero time connection therefore affects the reduced diagonal coefficient at order minus one even though its diagonal part at order zero vanishes. The eigenvalues of the principal matrix alone do not give this full coefficient.

Exercise 2 — intermediate: energy can survive a closing spectral gap. On a compact time interval containing zero, take

q(t,ξ)=itρ(100−1)+ω(0−110),ω≠0. q(t,\xi)=it\rho\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} +\omega\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \omega\ne0.

Explain why the energy evolution is two-sided and why (BR12) is not uniform across t=0t=0.

Solution. Both summands are skew-Hermitian. After a smooth low-frequency regularization of ρ\rho, the pointwise Hermitian real part is zero, and the compact time family satisfies the ordinary order-one estimates. The preceding systems energy theorem gives both time directions, with every real Sobolev order. In this spatially constant model the Fourier evolution is unitary at each frequency, since ∂t∣u^∣2=−2Re⁡⟨qu^,u^⟩=0\partial_t|\widehat u|^2=-2\operatorname{Re}\langle q\widehat u,\widehat u\rangle=0; integrating with the Sobolev weight gives exact preservation of the Sobolev norm.

Away from zero the branch gap is 2∣t∣ρ2|t|\rho. The correction contains ω/(2itρ)\omega/(2it\rho), which has no uniform bound, much less uniform time-derivative bounds, on an interval containing zero. The principal eigenspaces in this example are constant, so the failure is not caused by a bad eigenvector choice. What fails is the uniformly invertible off-diagonal commutator. Neither this example nor the energy theorem establishes a general crossing FIO construction.

Exercise 3 — advanced: a uniform gap need not give a global complex frame. For ξ∈R3∖0\xi\in\mathbb R^3\setminus0, set ρ=∣ξ∣\rho=|\xi|, ω=ξ/ρ\omega=\xi/\rho, and

H1=ρ(ω3ω1−iω2ω1+iω2−ω3).(BR18) H_1=\rho\begin{pmatrix} \omega_3&\omega_1-i\omega_2\\ \omega_1+i\omega_2&-\omega_3 \end{pmatrix}. \tag{BR18}

Compute its eigenprojections. Construct local positive-eigenvalue unit vectors on the northern and southern charts, and prove that no smooth nonvanishing global vector can span the positive eigenspace on the whole sphere.

Solution. Direct multiplication gives H12=ρ2IH_1^2=\rho^2I, and its trace is zero. Its eigenvalues are ±ρ\pm\rho, with gap 2ρ2\rho, and π±=(I±H1/ρ)/2\pi_\pm=(I\pm H_1/\rho)/2. They are smooth homogeneous projections on every nonzero covector. The vectors

vN=(1+ω3, ω1+iω2)T2(1+ω3),vS=(ω1−iω2, 1−ω3)T2(1−ω3)(BR19) v_N=\frac{(1+\omega_3,\ \omega_1+i\omega_2)^T} {\sqrt{2(1+\omega_3)}},\qquad v_S=\frac{(\omega_1-i\omega_2,\ 1-\omega_3)^T} {\sqrt{2(1-\omega_3)}} \tag{BR19}

have unit norm and satisfy H1v=ρvH_1v=\rho v on their charts. Their excluded poles are respectively the south and north pole. On the equator ω=(cos⁡ϕ,sin⁡ϕ,0)\omega=(\cos\phi,\sin\phi,0), vN=(1,eiϕ)T/2v_N=(1,e^{i\phi})^T/\sqrt2 and vS=(e−iϕ,1)T/2v_S=(e^{-i\phi},1)^T/\sqrt2, so vS=e−iϕvNv_S=e^{-i\phi}v_N.

Suppose a global smooth nonvanishing section exists and normalize it to unit length. On the northern closed hemisphere it equals avNa v_N, and on the southern it equals bvSb v_S, where a,ba,b are smooth circle-valued functions on disks. Each such function has a periodic real argument on the boundary. To prove this without a topological assumption, pull the disk back by polar coordinates and choose an argument α0\alpha_0 of its value at the center. Define

α(r,ϕ)=α0+∫0rIm⁡(a(s,ϕ)−1∂sa(s,ϕ)) ds. \alpha(r,\phi)=\alpha_0+ \int_0^r\operatorname{Im} \bigl(a(s,\phi)^{-1}\partial_s a(s,\phi)\bigr)\,ds.

Since ∣a∣=1|a|=1, its logarithmic radial derivative is purely imaginary. Differentiation shows ∂r(e−iαa)=0\partial_r(e^{-i\alpha}a)=0, and the value at the center is one. Thus a=eiαa=e^{i\alpha}. The integrand and initial value are periodic in ϕ\phi, so its boundary argument is periodic. The same construction gives a periodic boundary argument β\beta for bb.

On the equator the proposed section gives eiα=eiβ−iϕe^{i\alpha}=e^{i\beta-i\phi}. Hence α−β+ϕ\alpha-\beta+\phi is a continuous integer multiple of 2π2\pi, and therefore constant. Its value increases by 2π2\pi as ϕ\phi runs from zero to 2π2\pi, because α\alpha and β\beta are periodic. This contradiction excludes the global section. Any global unitary diagonalizer would have such a column. Local frames and compatible bundle maps are consequently necessary even in this explicit uniformly separated Hermitian example.

Exercise 4 — advanced: an exact two-branch kernel with rotating polarization. In one space dimension let θ(t)\theta(t) be smooth, J=(0−110)J=\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}, and

P=∂t+Rθ(t)(100−1)Rθ(t)T∂x−θ′(t)J.(BR32) P=\partial_t+ R_{\theta(t)}\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} R_{\theta(t)}^T\partial_x-\theta'(t)J. \tag{BR32}

Find the exact kernel, including its two endpoint polarization maps, and compare it with Exercise 1.

Solution. Put u=Rθ(t)vu=R_{\theta(t)}v. The rotation satisfies ∂tRθ=θ′JRθ\partial_tR_\theta=\theta'J R_\theta. Multiplying by RθTR_\theta^T, the time connection cancels the specified lower coefficient, leaving ∂tv+diag⁡(1,−1)∂xv=0\partial_tv+\operatorname{diag}(1,-1)\partial_xv=0. Therefore v+(t,x)=v+(s,x−(t−s))v_+(t,x)=v_+(s,x-(t-s)) and v−(t,x)=v−(s,x+(t−s))v_-(t,x)=v_-(s,x+(t-s)). With e+=(1,0)Te_+=(1,0)^T, e−=(0,1)Te_-=(0,1)^T, the exact distribution kernel is

K(t,s;x,y)=∑ϵ=±1Rθ(t)eϵeϵTRθ(s)Tδ(x−y−ϵ(t−s)).(BR33) K(t,s;x,y)= \sum_{\epsilon=\pm1} R_{\theta(t)}e_\epsilon e_\epsilon^T R_{\theta(s)}^T \delta\bigl(x-y-\epsilon(t-s)\bigr). \tag{BR33}

Each nonzero endpoint matrix has rank one and maps the input eigenline onto the output eigenline. Its canonical graph is (y,η)↦(y+ϵ(t−s),η)(y,\eta)\mapsto(y+\epsilon(t-s),\eta). On the cone η>0\eta>0, the principal eigenvalues are +η,−η+\eta,-\eta, with gap 2η2\eta; on the negative cone their ordered labels reverse. The physical kernel formula is valid in both cones. At t=st=s, the sum of its endpoint projections is the identity, so the initial kernel is Iδ(x−y)I\delta(x-y).

For the pictured instance s=0s=0, y=0y=0, θ(t)=πt/4\theta(t)=\pi t/4, the two rays end at x=1x=1 and x=−1x=-1 when t=1t=1, their covectors stay η=1\eta=1, and their output polarization vectors are respectively (1,1)T/2(1,1)^T/\sqrt2 and (−1,1)T/2(-1,1)^T/\sqrt2. This exact model keeps the two branches distinct while their polarizations rotate. In Exercise 1 the lower coefficient was zero; its time connection survived and required negative-order corrections. Here the explicit lower coefficient cancels that connection exactly.

Exact two-branch transport in Exercise 4: rays x=±t, fixed covectors η=1, and the endpoint polarization maps of BR33.

On a narrow screen, scroll the diagram horizontally to read the labels.

Figure: the horizontal axis is xx and the vertical axis is tt, with s=y=0s=y=0. The arrows in the separate polarization plane represent actual vector components, not additional spatial rays. Both rank-one maps are given by (BR33); the gap is 22 at η=1\eta=1. Reproducible figure source and finite model checks accompany this lesson. Proof locators: Sections 6–7 and Exercise 4.

References: Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III, Springer, §23.1, especially Theorem 23.1.4 and the following scalar FIO discussion on printed page 390. The complete proofs used in this system argument are written above or in the exact earlier programme lessons linked in the introduction.

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra; restoration and additional receiving proofs by GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text and figure: CC0-1.0; linked components retain their own terms.