Tangent zooms and quadratic models

To inspect a singularity at a particular covector, remove a matching oscillation and magnify a shrinking neighborhood of its base point. For a Lagrangian distribution, the resulting model is quadratic. Its Hessians describe two tangent Lagrangian planes, and its coefficient is the leading amplitude at the selected frequency. Ordinary symbols need not have a limiting leading coefficient, so the general result is an asymptotic comparison rather than an assertion that every zoom converges.

The exact earlier programme proofs are:

The exact proof map records every dependency. The primary sources for this restoration are the reprints of Hörmander IV, Section 25.1 and Hörmander III, Section 21.6. They supply the mathematical results; this lesson supplies its own exposition, exercises and full programme proofs. The earlier tangent companion remains available, including its uniform OD′(t−1)O_{\mathcal D'}(t^{-1}) estimate, Gaussian-symbol identification and reproducible figures.

We keep D=−i∂D=-i\partial, the Fourier phase −x⋅ξ-x\cdot\xi, and the inverse coefficient (2π)−n(2\pi)^{-n}. Half densities are written in the local frame ∣dx∣1/2|dx|^{1/2}.

1. Two scales select one tangent problem

Suppose the Lagrangian has the frequency graph

Λ={(H′(ξ),ξ)}, \Lambda=\{(H'(\xi),\xi)\},

where HH is real, smooth and homogeneous of degree one away from zero. Extend it smoothly through low frequencies when writing a Fourier integral. For a compactly supported u∈Im(Rn,Λ)u\in I^m(\mathbb R^n,\Lambda), define the normalized symbol

b(ξ)=(2π)−n/4eiH(ξ)u^(ξ),b∈Sr,r=m−n/4.(1.1) b(\xi)=(2\pi)^{-n/4}e^{iH(\xi)}\widehat u(\xi), \qquad b\in S^r,\quad r=m-n/4. \tag{1.1}

Thus, up to a smooth low-frequency term,

u(x)=(2π)−3n/4∫ei(x⋅ξ−H(ξ))b(ξ) dξ.(1.2) u(x)=(2\pi)^{-3n/4} \int e^{i(x\cdot\xi-H(\xi))}b(\xi)\,d\xi. \tag{1.2}

The normalization in (1.1) differs by a constant from the reduced symbol in the preceding lesson. It is chosen so that the coefficient of the quadratic model will later be a half density on Λ\Lambda.

Fix γ0=(x0,ξ0)∈Λ\gamma_0=(x_0,\xi_0)\in\Lambda, ξ0≠0\xi_0\ne0. Choose a real smooth function ψ\psi near x0x_0 with

ψ(x0)=0,ψ′(x0)=ξ0.(1.3) \psi(x_0)=0,\qquad \psi'(x_0)=\xi_0. \tag{1.3}

For t→+∞t\to+\infty, examine

Wt(x)=t−2m−n/2(ue−it2ψ)(x0+x/t).(1.4) W_t(x)=t^{-2m-n/2} \big(u e^{-it^2\psi}\big)(x_0+x/t). \tag{1.4}

This defines a distribution on every fixed compact set of the new xx variables for sufficiently large tt. The factor t−n/2t^{-n/2} is the half-density Jacobian of the map x↦x0+x/tx\mapsto x_0+x/t; the remaining t−2mt^{-2m} measures order at frequency t2ξ0t^2\xi_0. The spatial scale is t−1t^{-1}, and the frequency deviations from that center have scale tt.

Put

A=H′′(ξ0),B=ψ′′(x0),QA,B(x,η)=x⋅η−12xTBx−12ηTAη.(1.5) A=H''(\xi_0),\qquad B=\psi''(x_0), \qquad Q_{A,B}(x,\eta)=x\cdot\eta-\tfrac12 x^TBx-\tfrac12\eta^TA\eta. \tag{1.5}

Define the tempered quadratic distribution

UA,B(x)=(2π)−3n/4∫eiQA,B(x,η) dη.(1.6) U_{A,B}(x)=(2\pi)^{-3n/4} \int e^{iQ_{A,B}(x,\eta)}\,d\eta. \tag{1.6}

This is (2π)n/4(2\pi)^{n/4} times the inverse Fourier transform of e−iηTAη/2e^{-i\eta^TA\eta/2}, multiplied by e−ixTBx/2e^{-ix^TBx/2}. Both operations are defined on tempered distributions: derivatives of each quadratic exponential are polynomially bounded, so multiplication preserves Schwartz space and extends by transposition.

2. The asymptotic comparison and its tail estimate

Theorem 2.1 (tangent zoom). With the preceding hypotheses,

Wt−t−2rb(t2ξ0)UA,B⟶0in D′(Rn).(2.1) W_t-t^{-2r}b(t^2\xi_0)U_{A,B}\longrightarrow0 \quad\text{in }\mathcal D'(\mathbb R^n). \tag{2.1}

The scalar coefficient is bounded, but need not converge. The result holds for finite-dimensional vector-valued amplitudes componentwise. A smooth localized error in uu contributes a term tending to zero faster than every inverse power of tt.

Proof. Fix a compactly supported smooth test function ff. In (1.2), substitute ξ=t2ξ0+tη\xi=t^2\xi_0+t\eta. The measure contributes tnt^n, so (1.4) paired with ff is

(2π)−3n/4∫bt(η)Ft(η) dη,bt(η)=t−2rb(t2ξ0+tη),(2.2) (2\pi)^{-3n/4}\int b_t(\eta)F_t(\eta)\,d\eta, \qquad b_t(\eta)=t^{-2r}b(t^2\xi_0+t\eta), \tag{2.2}

where

Ft(η)=∫eiEt(x,η)f(x) dx,Et(x,η)=(x0+x/t)⋅(t2ξ0+tη)−t2ψ(x0+x/t)−H(t2ξ0+tη).(2.3) \begin{aligned} F_t(\eta)&=\int e^{iE_t(x,\eta)}f(x)\,dx,\\ E_t(x,\eta)&=(x_0+x/t)\cdot(t^2\xi_0+t\eta) -t^2\psi(x_0+x/t)-H(t^2\xi_0+t\eta). \end{aligned} \tag{2.3}

These identities can first be taken with frequency cutoffs. The estimates below make their test pairings absolutely convergent and justify removing those cutoffs.

Euler's identity and the graph condition give H(ξ0)=x0⋅ξ0H(\xi_0)=x_0\cdot\xi_0 and H′(ξ0)=x0H'(\xi_0)=x_0. For bounded η\eta, homogeneity and Taylor expansion give

H(t2ξ0+tη)=t2H(ξ0)+tx0⋅η+12ηTAη+O(t−1). H(t^2\xi_0+t\eta) =t^2H(\xi_0)+t x_0\cdot\eta +\tfrac12\eta^TA\eta+O(t^{-1}).

The analogous expansion of t2ψ(x0+x/t)t^2\psi(x_0+x/t) has linear term tξ0⋅xt\xi_0\cdot x and quadratic term xTBx/2x^TBx/2. All constant and linear terms cancel in (2.3), leaving

Et(x,η)⟶QA,B(x,η) E_t(x,\eta)\longrightarrow Q_{A,B}(x,\eta)

uniformly on compact sets, with the needed fixed xx derivatives. Consequently Ft→FF_t\to F on compact η\eta sets, where F(η)=∫eiQA,Bf dxF(\eta)=\int e^{iQ_{A,B}}f\,dx.

The tails are uniformly controlled. On the fixed support of ff,

∂xEt=tξ0+η−tψ′(x0+x/t)=η+O(1).(2.4) \partial_x E_t=t\xi_0+\eta-t\psi'(x_0+x/t)=\eta+O(1). \tag{2.4}

Every xx derivative of order at least two is bounded uniformly: at order kk its phase contribution is −t2−kψ(k)(x0+x/t)-t^{2-k}\psi^{(k)}(x_0+x/t). For large ∣η∣|\eta|, (2.4) therefore has size at least ∣η∣/2|\eta|/2. The full transposed nonstationary vector field from the stationary-phase lesson, including its divergence, gives

∣Ft(η)∣+∣F(η)∣≤CN⟨η⟩−Nfor every N,(2.5) |F_t(\eta)|+|F(\eta)|\leq C_N\langle\eta\rangle^{-N} \quad\text{for every }N, \tag{2.5}

uniformly in large tt. Each bound uses only finitely many derivatives of ff.

The symbol variation can now be frozen at the central frequency. In ∣η∣<ct|\eta|<c t, with c<∣ξ0∣/2c<|\xi_0|/2, the segment from t2ξ0t^2\xi_0 to t2ξ0+tηt^2\xi_0+t\eta remains in a fixed high-frequency annulus after scaling by t2t^2. The derivative estimate for bb gives

∣bt(η)−bt(0)∣≤Ct−1∣η∣.(2.6) |b_t(\eta)-b_t(0)|\leq C t^{-1}|\eta|. \tag{2.6}

For the complementary region ∣η∣≥ct|\eta|\geq c t, we only need a uniform polynomial bound. There t≤C⟨η⟩t\leq C\langle\eta\rangle. If r≥0r\geq0, the growth bound for bb gives ∣bt(η)∣≤C⟨η⟩2r|b_t(\eta)|\leq C\langle\eta\rangle^{2r}. If r<0r<0, boundedness of bb at all frequencies gives ∣bt(η)∣≤C⟨η⟩−2r|b_t(\eta)|\leq C\langle\eta\rangle^{-2r}. Thus

∣bt(η)∣≤C⟨η⟩2∣r∣,∣bt(0)∣≤C.(2.7) |b_t(\eta)|\leq C\langle\eta\rangle^{2|r|}, \qquad |b_t(0)|\leq C. \tag{2.7}

On the small region, (2.5)–(2.6) bound the integral of (bt−bt(0))Ft(b_t-b_t(0))F_t by C/tC/t. On the complementary region, (2.5)–(2.7), with N>2∣r∣+n+1N>2|r|+n+1, give a tail tending to zero. Hence

∫(bt(η)−bt(0))Ft(η) dη⟶0. \int (b_t(\eta)-b_t(0))F_t(\eta)\,d\eta\longrightarrow0.

Compact convergence and (2.5) also give ∫Ft dη→∫F dη\int F_t\,d\eta\to\int F\,d\eta. Multiplying by the bounded bt(0)b_t(0) proves (2.1).

Finally, a compactly localized smooth distribution has a rapidly decreasing Fourier transform. In the same integral, its transform decreases rapidly near t2ξ0t^2\xi_0, while (2.4) controls the complementary frequencies. The more general wavefront-regular argument in the next section proves the asserted rapid decay, including the fixed polynomial factor in (1.4). ∎

If bb is classical with leading term brb_r homogeneous of the real degree rr, then

t−2rb(t2ξ0)⟶br(ξ0),Wt⟶br(ξ0)UA,B.(2.8) t^{-2r}b(t^2\xi_0)\longrightarrow b_r(\xi_0), \qquad W_t\longrightarrow b_r(\xi_0)U_{A,B}. \tag{2.8}

The remainder of symbol order r−1r-1 contributes O(t−2)O(t^{-2}) to this coefficient. A complex homogeneous degree r+iνr+i\nu has the additional factor t2iνt^{2i\nu}; without removing that factor, (2.8) is not a claimed limit when ν≠0\nu\ne0.

3. A regular covector disappears under every zoom

Proposition 3.1. Let u∈D′u\in\mathcal D' near x0x_0, with (x0,ξ0)∉WF⁡(u)(x_0,\xi_0)\notin\operatorname{WF}(u), ξ0≠0\xi_0\ne0. For ψ\psi satisfying (1.3), and every real KK,

tK(ue−it2ψ)(x0+x/t)⟶0in D′.(3.1) t^K\big(u e^{-it^2\psi}\big)(x_0+x/t) \longrightarrow0\quad\text{in }\mathcal D'. \tag{3.1}

Proof. Insert a compact cutoff equal to one near x0x_0, small enough that the compact distribution's Fourier transform is rapidly decreasing in a cone about ξ0\xi_0. On every fixed zoomed test support, this replacement is exact for large tt.

First take ψ0(y)=ξ0⋅(y−x0)\psi_0(y)=\xi_0\cdot(y-x_0). The Fourier transform in the zoomed xx variable is

tK+neix0⋅(t2ξ0+tη)u^(t2ξ0+tη).(3.2) t^{K+n}e^{ix_0\cdot(t^2\xi_0+t\eta)} \widehat u(t^2\xi_0+t\eta). \tag{3.2}

For ∣η∣<ct|\eta|<c t, with cc sufficiently small, the argument stays in the good cone and has size comparable to t2t^2. Its rapid decrease beats the fixed factor tK+nt^{K+n}, uniformly on every bounded η\eta set. A compact distribution has a global polynomial Fourier bound. For ∣η∣≥ct|\eta|\geq c t, the inequalities t≤C⟨η⟩t\leq C\langle\eta\rangle and ∣t2ξ0+tη∣≤C⟨η⟩2|t^2\xi_0+t\eta|\leq C\langle\eta\rangle^2 therefore bound (3.2) by one fixed polynomial in η\eta, independently of tt. The inner region is bounded as well, by choosing enough decay in the good cone. Dominated convergence against Schwartz functions gives convergence to zero in S′\mathcal S'.

For the actual ψ\psi, write p=ψ−ψ0p=\psi-\psi_0. Both its value and first derivative vanish at x0x_0, so

t2p(x0+x/t)⟶12xTψ′′(x0)xin C∞ on compact sets. t^2p(x_0+x/t)\longrightarrow\tfrac12x^T\psi''(x_0)x \quad\text{in }C^\infty\text{ on compact sets}.

The additional exponential multipliers and all their derivatives consequently converge on each compact test support. They preserve the conclusion just obtained. Explicitly, along any sequence tj→∞t_j\to\infty, the convergent distributions in (3.2) have a common finite-order bound there; applying that bound to the difference between the varying multiplied test and its limit, then using weak convergence on the fixed limit test, proves (3.1). Since this works along every such sequence, it proves the full limit. ∎

This result makes the tangent model microlocal. Changes in a distribution away from the selected wavefront direction cannot change the model, even if they are singular in other directions.

4. Nonlinear coordinates become linear in the limit

Lemma 4.1 (rescaling a change of coordinates). Let Mε(x)=εxM_\varepsilon(x)=\varepsilon x, and suppose distributions uεu_\varepsilon, defined near zero, satisfy

Mε∗uε⟶Vin D′,ε↓0. M_\varepsilon^*u_\varepsilon\longrightarrow V \quad\text{in }\mathcal D',\qquad\varepsilon\downarrow0.

If κ\kappa is a smooth local diffeomorphism, κ(0)=0\kappa(0)=0, and T=κ′(0)T=\kappa'(0), then

Mε∗κ∗uε⟶T∗V.(4.1) M_\varepsilon^*\kappa^*u_\varepsilon\longrightarrow T^*V. \tag{4.1}

The statement holds for scalar distributions and for half-density distributions, with their respective pullback conventions.

Proof. Put vε=Mε∗uεv_\varepsilon=M_\varepsilon^*u_\varepsilon. The exact conjugated map is

κε=Mε−1∘κ∘Mε,κε(x)=ε−1κ(εx). \kappa_\varepsilon=M_\varepsilon^{-1}\circ\kappa\circ M_\varepsilon, \qquad \kappa_\varepsilon(x)=\varepsilon^{-1}\kappa(\varepsilon x).

Thus the left side of (4.1) is κε∗vε\kappa_\varepsilon^*v_\varepsilon. Taylor's formula and differentiation give κε→T\kappa_\varepsilon\to T in C∞C^\infty on every compact set. The inverse maps are ε−1κ−1(εy)\varepsilon^{-1}\kappa^{-1}(\varepsilon y), which likewise converge to T−1T^{-1}.

For a fixed compact test support, the transposed pullbacks of that test have their supports in one fixed compact set. For scalars, the transposed test is

f(κε−1(y))∣det⁡Dκε−1(y)∣. f(\kappa_\varepsilon^{-1}(y)) |\det D\kappa_\varepsilon^{-1}(y)|.

For half densities its Jacobian exponent is 1/21/2. In either case these tests converge in Cc∞C_c^\infty to the corresponding test for TT. Along an arbitrary sequence εj↓0\varepsilon_j\downarrow0, uniform boundedness of the convergent vεjv_{\varepsilon_j} supplies a common finite-order estimate. It bounds their pairing with the difference of the varying test and its limit by a quantity tending to zero. Their pairing with the fixed limit test tends to that of VV. This proves (4.1) along every sequence, and hence the result. ∎

After centering charts at x0x_0, the lemma says that an existing tangent limit is a distribution on Tx0XT_{x_0}X. For half densities, it transforms with the half-density Jacobian of the tangent linear map. Changing a smooth bundle frame contributes only its value at x0x_0, by the same varying-test argument, so vector coefficients belong to the fiber Ex0E_{x_0}.

The function ψ\psi is also a choice. If it is replaced by ψ+p\psi+p, where p(x0)=p′(x0)=0p(x_0)=p'(x_0)=0, then the tangent limit is multiplied by

e−ixTp′′(x0)x/2.(4.2) e^{-ix^Tp''(x_0)x/2}. \tag{4.2}

Equivalently BB in the quadratic model becomes B+p′′(x0)B+p''(x_0). These chirp identifications are transitive because their exponents add. They are the elementary change between the linear reference Lagrangian planes η=Bx\eta=Bx.

5. Evaluate the model even when the Hessian is singular

Let AA be any real symmetric matrix, with rank kk. Split orthogonally

Rn=ran⁡A⊕ker⁡A,x=(y,z),AR=A∣ran⁡A. \mathbb R^n=\operatorname{ran}A\oplus\ker A, \qquad x=(y,z),\qquad A_R=A|_{\operatorname{ran}A}.

The restriction ARA_R is invertible, and let BRB_R be the restriction of the quadratic form BB to ran⁡A\operatorname{ran}A. Exact Fourier inversion in the kernel variables gives a point mass δ0(z)\delta_0(z). The Fresnel identity in the other kk variables gives

UA,B(y,z)=(2π)n/4−k/2∣det⁡AR∣−1/2e−iπsgn⁡AR/4×eiyT(AR−1−BR)y/2δ0(z).(5.1) \begin{aligned} U_{A,B}(y,z) ={}&(2\pi)^{n/4-k/2}|\det A_R|^{-1/2} e^{-i\pi\operatorname{sgn}A_R/4}\\ &\quad\times e^{iy^T(A_R^{-1}-B_R)y/2}\delta_0(z). \end{aligned} \tag{5.1}

When k=0k=0, the empty determinant is one, the empty signature is zero, and (5.1) is (2π)n/4δ0(x)(2\pi)^{n/4}\delta_0(x). The sign in the Fresnel factor is negative because the frequency Hessian of the phase is −AR-A_R. Terms in BB containing zz vanish on multiplication with δ0(z)\delta_0(z), so only BRB_R remains.

For the tangent model of a conic graph, Aξ0=0A\xi_0=0: differentiate Euler's identity for HH. Thus its frequency Hessian is always singular at a nonzero covector. Formula (5.1) covers precisely that possibility, and the model is a nonzero Gaussian simple layer on ran⁡A\operatorname{ran}A.

The phase in (1.6) has critical equation x=Aηx=A\eta and output covector η−Bx\eta-Bx. Its linear Lagrangian is therefore

λA,B={(Aη,η−BAη):η∈Rn}.(5.2) \lambda_{A,B}=\{(A\eta,\eta-BA\eta):\eta\in\mathbb R^n\}. \tag{5.2}

The tangent plane of the original graph is {(Aη,η)}\{(A\eta,\eta)\}. Removing the Hessian of ψ\psi applies the canonical shear (x,η)↦(x,η−Bx)(x,\eta)\mapsto(x,\eta-Bx). This explains why the model is determined by those two tangent planes rather than by higher derivatives of HH or ψ\psi.

6. Exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 6.1 (the two scales; introductory). Replace the substitution in the zoom proof by ξ=taξ0+tbη\xi=t^a\xi_0+t^b\eta and the spatial scale by x0+t−cxx_0+t^{-c}x. Determine the relations among a,b,ca,b,c that keep both the cross term x⋅ηx\cdot\eta and the quadratic frequency term at order one.

Solution. The cross term has factor tb−ct^{b-c}, so b=cb=c. By degree-one homogeneity the frequency Hessian at taξ0t^a\xi_0 is t−aH′′(ξ0)t^{-a}H''(\xi_0), so its quadratic deviation has factor t2b−at^{2b-a}; thus a=2b=2ca=2b=2c. The phase-removal frequency is tat^a, and its spatial quadratic term has factor ta−2c=1t^{a-2c}=1 as well. Taking c=1c=1 gives the scales t2,t,t−1t^2,t,t^{-1} used above. If the particular Hessian vanishes, its term imposes no constraint, but these relations give the common nondegenerate quadratic scaling across all graphs.

Exercise 6.2 (a sphere tangent model; intermediate). Take H(ξ)=c∣ξ∣H(\xi)=c|\xi|, c≠0c\ne0, ξ0=se1\xi_0=s e_1, s>0s>0, and ψ(x)=ξ0⋅(x−ce1)\psi(x)=\xi_0\cdot(x-ce_1). Compute UA,0U_{A,0}.

Solution. Here x0=ce1x_0=ce_1 and

A=cs(I−e1e1T). A=\frac cs(I-e_1e_1^T).

It has kernel Re1\mathbb R e_1, rank n−1n-1, and signature (n−1)sgn⁡c(n-1)\operatorname{sgn}c. Writing x=(x1,x′)x=(x_1,x'), formula (5.1) gives

UA,0=(2π)n/4−(n−1)/2∣c/s∣−(n−1)/2e−iπ(n−1)sgn⁡c/4eis∣x′∣2/(2c)δ0(x1). U_{A,0}=(2\pi)^{n/4-(n-1)/2} |c/s|^{-(n-1)/2} e^{-i\pi(n-1)\operatorname{sgn}c/4} e^{is|x'|^2/(2c)}\delta_0(x_1).

The supporting hyperplane is the tangent plane of the sphere ∣x∣=∣c∣|x|=|c| at ce1ce_1, in the translated tangent variables. For n=1n=1 the empty-factor convention gives (2π)1/4δ0(2\pi)^{1/4}\delta_0.

Exercise 6.3 (an ordinary symbol with no zoom limit; intermediate). In dimension one take H=0H=0, ξ0=1\xi_0=1, and, for positive high frequencies,

b(ξ)=ξr(2+sin⁡(log⁡ξ)), b(\xi)=\xi^r\big(2+\sin(\log\xi)\big),

with a smooth cutoff that removes low and negative frequencies. Show that this is an ordinary symbol and that a compact localization of its inverse phase integral can have no limit in (1.4).

Solution. Each frequency derivative is bounded by Ckξr−kC_k\xi^{r-k}, because differentiating log⁡ξ\log\xi or the power costs one inverse frequency. Thus b∈Srb\in S^r, with m=r+1/4m=r+1/4. The normalized central coefficient is t−2rb(t2)=2+sin⁡(2log⁡t)t^{-2r}b(t^2)=2+\sin(2\log t). A compact base cutoff equal to one near zero changes the reduced symbol only by Sr−1S^{r-1}, by Fourier reduction for xξx\xi; that change contributes O(t−2)O(t^{-2}) to the coefficient. Take ψ(x)=x\psi(x)=x. Here A=B=0A=B=0 and U=(2π)1/4δ0U=(2\pi)^{1/4}\delta_0. Along tj=exp⁡(πj+π/4)t_j=\exp(\pi j+\pi/4) the coefficient tends to three, and along sj=exp⁡(πj+3π/4)s_j=\exp(\pi j+3\pi/4) it tends to one. Theorem 2.1 gives these two distinct distributional limits. A test nonzero at zero distinguishes them. The general asymptotic comparison is therefore strictly more general than (2.8).

Exercise 6.4 (a nonlinear chart; intermediate). In dimension one let κ(x)=ax+dx2\kappa(x)=a x+d x^2, a≠0a\ne0, near zero. If a rescaled half-density family has limit Cδ0C\delta_0, compute its limit after changing coordinates by κ\kappa.

Solution. The conjugated map is ε−1κ(εx)=ax+dεx2\varepsilon^{-1}\kappa(\varepsilon x)=a x+d\varepsilon x^2, converging to multiplication by aa. The scalar pullback of δ0\delta_0 is ∣a∣−1δ0|a|^{-1}\delta_0. Half-density pullback contributes the Jacobian factor ∣a∣1/2|a|^{1/2}, so the resulting coefficient is C∣a∣−1/2δ0C|a|^{-1/2}\delta_0 in the new half-density frame. The quadratic chart coefficient dd does not enter the tangent pullback. This concerns the full rescaled family; its phase-removal function must be transformed with the same coordinate change.

Exercise 6.5 (complex conjugation; advanced). Show directly that UA,B‾=U−A,−B\overline{U_{A,B}}=U_{-A,-B}. If the Fourier phase of uu is HH, find the graph phase and central covector for u‾\overline u.

Solution. Conjugate (1.6) and replace η\eta by −η-\eta. The cross term returns to x⋅ηx\cdot\eta, and both quadratic matrices change sign. This proves the model identity, including the opposite Fresnel signature. Since u‾^(ξ)=u^(−ξ)‾\widehat{\overline u}(\xi)=\overline{\widehat u(-\xi)}, the new graph function is H~(ξ)=−H(−ξ)\widetilde H(\xi)=-H(-\xi), and its base gradient is H′(−ξ)H'(-\xi). The selected point is therefore (x0,−ξ0)(x_0,-\xi_0), and the new normalized amplitude is b(−ξ)‾\overline{b(-\xi)}. The Hessian at −ξ0-\xi_0 is −A-A; taking phase removal −ψ-\psi gives −B-B. Thus the conjugated zoom has exactly the conjugated quadratic model. Patching this statement globally will also require conjugating the Maslov transition factors.

Exercise 6.6 (an exact distributional zoom; advanced). On R\mathbb R, take u=Dqδ0u=D^q\delta_0, with qq a nonnegative integer, H=0H=0, and ψ(y)=ξ0y\psi(y)=\xi_0y, ξ0≠0\xi_0\ne0. Compute (1.4) exactly and identify its limit.

Solution. The Fourier transform of uu is ξq\xi^q, so its intrinsic order is m=q+1/4m=q+1/4. Fourier transformation of the rescaled and modulated distribution gives

W^t(η)=t−2q(tη+t2ξ0)q=(ξ0+η/t)q. \widehat W_t(\eta)=t^{-2q}(t\eta+t^2\xi_0)^q =(\xi_0+\eta/t)^q.

Thus the exact formula is

Wt=∑k=0q(qk)ξ0q−kt−kDkδ0. W_t=\sum_{k=0}^q\binom qk\xi_0^{q-k}t^{-k}D^k\delta_0.

The limit is ξ0qδ0\xi_0^q\delta_0. In Theorem 2.1, the normalized coefficient is (2π)−1/4ξ0q(2\pi)^{-1/4}\xi_0^q, and U0,0=(2π)1/4δ0U_{0,0}=(2\pi)^{1/4}\delta_0, giving exactly that limit. For q≥1q\geq1, the first correction is qξ0q−1t−1Dδ0q\xi_0^{q-1}t^{-1}D\delta_0; its order shows why a universal O(t−2)O(t^{-2}) error is not supplied by the classical coefficient's O(t−2)O(t^{-2}) remainder alone.

References

Written by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, September 2026. Restoration and exact prerequisite review: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026. Self-checked by the writing AI. Original text: public domain (CC0).