The scalar subprincipal symbol on half densities

This companion retains the calculation in Section 3, equations G11–G14, of AN03-U012, Detecting regularity without choosing coordinates, in Elliptic Operators & Boundary Problems: Renewed 2026 Course Draft. The equations and index calculation are unchanged. Its two references to the general coordinate expansion now point to the explicitly proved first-correction formula (SC2), and its multiplication formula points to the exact existing programme proof. Section S1 below supplies the required coordinate correction with every differentiated remainder.

Original principal author and publisher: AN-03 course-writing task / AN-03 local course project, 2026. Earlier modification: AN-03 course-writing task and OpenAI Codex. Selection, prerequisite bindings and Section S1: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026; publisher: AN-04 local course project.

Original text: CC0.

The exact earlier proofs are coordinate transport T1–T2, amplitude reduction O4 and composition O3, finite calculus and inverses, determinants and finite algebra, P9.1–P9.5, and positive powers and complex exponentials, P14–P15. The proof map gives each exact provider. All symbol estimates here are ordinary S1,0S_{1,0} estimates on compact base sets.

S1. The first coordinate correction with its full remainder

Write the old and new coordinates as xx and z=κ(x)z=\kappa(x). Put Mkj=∂xjκkM_{kj}=\partial_{x_j}\kappa_k, N=M−1N=M^{-1}, J=∣det⁡M∣J=|\det M|, and ξ=MTη\xi=M^T\eta. For the second base variable use yy, w=κ(y)w=\kappa(y). The proved coordinate transport T1 gives

L(x,y)=∫01Dκ(y+t(x−y)) dt,c(z,w,η)=a(x,L(x,y)Tη)∣det⁡L(x,y)∣J(y).(SC1) L(x,y)=\int_0^1D\kappa(y+t(x-y))\,dt,\qquad c(z,w,\eta)=a(x,L(x,y)^T\eta)\frac{|\det L(x,y)|}{J(y)}. \tag{SC1}

Compact cutoffs, equal to one near the diagonal under examination, are understood. Their derivatives vanish at that diagonal; separated pieces have smooth kernels. T1 proves that L,L−1L,L^{-1}, the determinant factors and all their derivatives are bounded after this localization, and that every base derivative of the frequency-linear argument has net order zero. Its amplitude therefore has ordinary order mm, with a loss of one for each frequency derivative. The amplitude reduction O4 at N=2N=2 gives aκ=c∣w=z−i∑k∂ηk∂wkc∣w=za_\kappa=c|_{w=z}-i\sum_k\partial_{\eta_k}\partial_{w_k}c|_{w=z} modulo Sm−2S^{m-2}, with every derivative estimate.

Here is the complete derivative at that diagonal. With ℓ\ell an old-coordinate index,

∂yℓLkj∣y=x=12∂xℓMkj,∂yℓlog⁡∣det⁡L∣J(y)∣y=x=−12∂xℓlog⁡J,∂wk∣w=z=∑ℓNℓk∂yℓ.(SC1a) \partial_{y_\ell}L_{kj}|_{y=x} =\tfrac12\partial_{x_\ell}M_{kj},\qquad \partial_{y_\ell}\log\frac{|\det L|}{J(y)}\bigg|_{y=x} =-\tfrac12\partial_{x_\ell}\log J,\qquad \partial_{w_k}|_{w=z}=\sum_\ell N_{\ell k}\partial_{y_\ell}. \tag{SC1a}

The first identity integrates 1−t1-t. The second is the determinant derivative, since L=ML=M there. One can verify that derivative directly by multilinearity: differentiating one determinant column at a time gives ∂det⁡M=(det⁡M)tr⁡(M−1∂M)\partial\det M=(\det M)\operatorname{tr}(M^{-1}\partial M). The sign of det⁡M\det M is locally constant, so the logarithmic derivative is also that of JJ.

In ∑k∂ηk∂wkc\sum_k\partial_{\eta_k}\partial_{w_k}c, the derivatives of aa of frequency order two give 12∑ℓ,j,haξℓξjηh∂xℓMhj\frac12\sum_{\ell,j,h}a_{\xi_\ell\xi_j}\eta_h\partial_{x_\ell}M_{hj}, because ∑kNℓkMki=δℓi\sum_kN_{\ell k}M_{ki}=\delta_{\ell i}. The remaining terms are

12∑k,ℓ,jNℓk(∂xℓMkj)aξj−12∑ℓ(∂xℓlog⁡J)aξℓ=0.(SC1b) \frac12\sum_{k,\ell,j}N_{\ell k}(\partial_{x_\ell}M_{kj})a_{\xi_j} -\frac12\sum_\ell(\partial_{x_\ell}\log J)a_{\xi_\ell}=0. \tag{SC1b}

Indeed mixed derivatives give ∂xℓMkj=∂xjMkℓ\partial_{x_\ell}M_{kj}=\partial_{x_j}M_{k\ell}, and the determinant identity identifies the first sum's coefficient with ∂xjlog⁡J\partial_{x_j}\log J. Consequently

aκ(κ(x),η)=a(x,MTη)−i2∑i,j,kaξiξj(x,MTη)ηk∂xi∂xjκk(modSm−2).(SC2) a_\kappa(\kappa(x),\eta)=a(x,M^T\eta) -\frac i2\sum_{i,j,k} a_{\xi_i\xi_j}(x,M^T\eta)\eta_k\partial_{x_i}\partial_{x_j}\kappa_k \pmod {S^{m-2}}. \tag{SC2}

This conclusion holds for a general ordinary symbol. Its correction has order m−1m-1. Every discarded term has the stated differentiated Sm−2S^{m-2} bound by O4, and T1 supplies those bounds uniformly on the fixed compact coordinate sets. For a classical symbol a=p+ra=p+r modulo Sm−2S^{m-2}, use pp in the correction: two derivatives of rr, followed by the one frequency factor, have order m−2m-2. Thus both the leading and next homogeneous terms transform by the displayed rule. This is precisely the part of the coordinate expansion required below; no assertion about a higher expansion is needed.

3. The second symbol term and the density it measures

Equation (SC2) first gives aκ(κ(x),η)−a(x,κ′(x)Tη)∈Sm−1a_\kappa(\kappa(x),\eta)-a(x,\kappa'(x)^T\eta)\in S^{m-1}. Suppose that a∼am+am−1+⋯a\sim a_m+a_{m-1}+\cdots is classical with step one. Define

s(a)=am−1+i2∑j∂xj∂ξjam.(G11) s(a)=a_{m-1}+\frac{i}{2}\sum_j\partial_{x_j}\partial_{\xi_j}a_m. \tag{G11}

For operators on functions, this is generally not a scalar on the cotangent bundle. If J=∣det⁡κ′∣J=|\det\kappa'|, then

s(aκ)(κ(x),η)=s(a)(x,κ′(x)Tη)−12∑j(∂ξjam)(x,κ′(x)Tη)DxjJJ.(G12) s(a_\kappa)(\kappa(x),\eta) =s(a)(x,\kappa'(x)^T\eta) -\frac12\sum_j(\partial_{\xi_j}a_m)(x,\kappa'(x)^T\eta) \frac{D_{x_j}J}{J}. \tag{G12}

Here is an index verification of the correction. Write Mkj=∂jκkM_{kj}=\partial_j\kappa_k, N=M−1N=M^{-1}, and ξ=MTη\xi=M^T\eta. The order-m−1m-1 term added by (SC2) is −i2∑j,l,k(∂ξj∂ξlam) ηk∂j∂lκk-\frac i2\sum_{j,l,k}(\partial_{\xi_j}\partial_{\xi_l}a_m)\,\eta_k\partial_j\partial_l\kappa_k. In ∑k∂zk∂ηk[am(x,MTη)]\sum_k\partial_{z_k}\partial_{\eta_k}[a_m(x,M^T\eta)], the chain rule produces ∑j∂xj∂ξjam\sum_j\partial_{x_j}\partial_{\xi_j}a_m, the same Hessian term with coefficient +1+1, and ∑j,k,lNlk(∂lMkj)∂ξjam\sum_{j,k,l}N_{lk}(\partial_lM_{kj})\partial_{\xi_j}a_m. The Hessian terms cancel after multiplication by i/2i/2. Since mixed derivatives commute, ∑k,lNlk∂lMkj=∑k,lNlk∂jMkl=∂jlog⁡J\sum_{k,l}N_{lk}\partial_lM_{kj}=\sum_{k,l}N_{lk}\partial_jM_{kl}=\partial_j\log J, by the determinant derivative formula. The remainder is (i/2)∑j∂ξjam ∂jlog⁡J(i/2)\sum_j\partial_{\xi_j}a_m\,\partial_j\log J, which is (G12). Orientation reversal changes the sign of det⁡M\det M only by a locally constant factor, so its logarithmic derivative is that of JJ.

The density line bundle Ω\Omega has local generator ∣dx∣|dx|. For any z∈Cz\in\mathbb C, define Ωz\Omega^z using positive Jacobians raised to zz: tz=ezlog⁡tt^z=e^{z\log t} for t>0t>0. The real logarithm makes (t1t2)z=t1zt2z(t_1t_2)^z=t_1^zt_2^z, proving the cocycle relation, including complex exponents. Components transform by uκ(κ(x))=J(x)−zu(x)u_\kappa(\kappa(x))=J(x)^{-z}u(x). Thus an operator on zz-densities is transported as the function operator conjugated in the old coordinates by J−zAJzJ^{-z}AJ^z. Its symbol differs from aa, modulo Sm−2S^{m-2}, by

z∑j∂ξja DjJJ.(G13) z\sum_j\partial_{\xi_j}a\,\frac{D_jJ}{J}. \tag{G13}

Indeed Section O3 of Ordinary symbols, composition and proper localization applied to multiplication by JzJ^z gives J−z(aJz+∑j∂ξjaDjJz)J^{-z}(aJ^z+\sum_j\partial_{\xi_j}a D_jJ^z) through the first correction; all higher frequency derivatives have order at most m−2m-2. The identity DjJz=zJzDjJ/JD_jJ^z=zJ^zD_jJ/J proves (G13). At z=12z=\frac12 it cancels (G12).

There is a version without homogeneity. For scalar half-density operators, the local quantity

σ[2](A)=a+i2∑j∂xj∂ξja(modSm−2)(G14) \sigma_{[2]}(A)=a+\frac i2\sum_j\partial_{x_j}\partial_{\xi_j}a \pmod {S^{m-2}} \tag{G14}

agrees on overlaps as a scalar symbol class on T∗XT^*X. Repeat the preceding calculation with aa in place of ama_m: omitted terms contain at least two net frequency losses, so they are of order m−2m-2. A partition of unity patches the local quantities to a global symbol, and any two patches differ by Sm−2S^{m-2} because they agree in each chart modulo that space. Its homogeneous term of degree m−1m-1, when present, is (G11). Formula (G12) also shows invariance for function operators at double zeros of ama_m, and under transformations with locally constant Jacobian. The refined assertion (G14) is specifically for scalar half-densities; a varying vector-bundle frame introduces its own first-order correction.