Quadratic Hamilton maps and positive complex planes

A quadratic Hamiltonian gives a linear flow. A symplectic coordinate change conjugates that flow, preserving information that an arbitrary change of basis can lose. We classify real nonnegative forms and forms with exactly one negative square, including their degenerate blocks. We then develop the positive complex planes associated with a quadratic form whose real part is positive.

We retain the symplectic conventions of Phase space and generating families and the linear Lagrangian geometry developed in Clean Lagrangian pairs and common transversals. The spectral algebra companion proves the polynomial-root, characteristic-identity, generalized-eigenspace, Jordan-chain and contour-projection arguments used here. Its A7–A9 give semidefinite Hermitian Cauchy–Schwarz, positive square roots, orthonormal bases and complete linear flows. Real symmetric diagonalization and singular inertia are proved in U001 Q5 and M0a. Symplectic complements, bases and quotient dimensions are G21–G23. These finite algebra proofs also apply over the complex field; A0 supplies complex rank and basis constructions. The arguments use generalized eigenspaces and include repeated eigenvalues. The source is Hörmander III, Section 21.5, Definition 21.5.1 through Corollary 21.5.11 and its concluding decomposition, printed pages 321–328 / PDF pages 336–343 of the 1994 reprint. The proof map binds every prerequisite to its current proof.

The coordinate changes here are ordinary real linear symplectic changes on a vector space. The quadratic forms have degree two under simultaneous scaling of all vector coordinates; no fiber-homogeneous coordinate assertion is being made.

1. The invariant Hamilton map

Let SS be a real symplectic vector space of dimension 2n2n, with form ω\omega. In ordered coordinates z=(x,ξ)z=(x,\xi), put

ω=∑jdξj∧dxj,J=(0−II0),ω(Y,X)=YTJX.(1.1) \omega=\sum_jd\xi_j\wedge dx_j,\qquad J=\begin{pmatrix}0&-I\\ I&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad \omega(Y,X)=Y^TJX. \tag{1.1}

Our Hamilton convention is ιHfω=−df\iota_{H_f}\omega=-df.

First consider a vector field vv vanishing at a point cc of a manifold. Its derivative there is an intrinsic endomorphism of TcST_cS. Indeed, if y=χ(z)y=\chi(z), the transformed field is Dχ(z)v(z)D\chi(z)v(z). Differentiating at cc gives Dχ(c)Dv(c)D\chi(c)Dv(c): the term involving D2χD^2\chi vanishes because v(c)=0v(c)=0. Thus its derivative changes by conjugacy. Equivalently, the adjoint endomorphism sends dϕ(c)d\phi(c) to d(vϕ)(c)d(v\phi)(c); this depends only on dϕ(c)d\phi(c).

Definition 1.1 (Hamilton map). For a real C2C^2 function ff with df(c)=0df(c)=0, its Hamilton map is the derivative of Hf/2H_f/2 at cc. It depends only on the Hessian of ff there. For a quadratic form

Q(X)=XTBX,BT=B, Q(X)=X^TBX,\qquad B^T=B,

write its polarized form as Q(Y,X)=YTBXQ(Y,X)=Y^TBX. Its Hamilton map FF is characterized by

ω(Y,FX)=Q(Y,X),F=−JB,HQ(X)=2FX.(1.2) \omega(Y,FX)=Q(Y,X),\qquad F=-JB,\qquad H_Q(X)=2FX. \tag{1.2}

For a general ff at the critical point, B=f′′(c)/2B=f''(c)/2. In block notation,

F=12(fξx′′fξξ′′−fxx′′−fxξ′′)c.(1.3) F=\frac12 \begin{pmatrix} f''_{\xi x}&f''_{\xi\xi}\\ -f''_{xx}&-f''_{x\xi} \end{pmatrix}_{c}. \tag{1.3}

The factor 1/21/2 removes the factor two arising from differentiating a quadratic form.

Symmetry of BB gives

ω(FX,Y)=−ω(X,FY),FTJ+JF=0.(1.4) \omega(FX,Y)=-\omega(X,FY),\qquad F^TJ+JF=0. \tag{1.4}

Conversely an endomorphism satisfying (1.4) has symmetric matrix JFJF, so it arises from exactly one quadratic form by (1.2). If z=Cwz=Cw and CTJC=JC^TJC=J, then

B′=CTBC,F′=C−1FC.(1.5) B'=C^TBC,\qquad F'=C^{-1}FC. \tag{1.5}

To verify the second identity, JC−1=CTJJC^{-1}=C^TJ, so both JF′JF' and B′B' equal CTBCC^TB C. Consequently the spectrum, generalized eigenspace dimensions and Jordan lengths of FF are symplectic invariants of QQ.

2. Spectral orthogonality, including Jordan chains

Extend SS, ω\omega, QQ and FF complex linearly to SCS_{\mathbb C}. The form ω\omega remains bilinear. Write VλV_\lambda for the full generalized eigenspace of FF at λ\lambda. The actual direct-sum decomposition, its invariant projections and the finite inverse on each other summand are proved in A1–A3 of the companion; A4 proves the full chain decomposition and its multiplicities.

Lemma 2.1 (opposite eigenvalues pair). If λ+μ≠0\lambda+\mu\ne0, then

ω(Vλ,Vμ)=0.(2.1) \omega(V_\lambda,V_\mu)=0. \tag{2.1}

The pairing between VλV_\lambda and V−λV_{-\lambda} is nondegenerate, and their dimensions are equal. The zero generalized eigenspace is symplectic. Each space Vλ⊕V−λV_\lambda\oplus V_{-\lambda}, λ≠0\lambda\ne0, is symplectic; distinct such pairs are symplectically and quadratically orthogonal.

Proof. From (1.4), for every integer N≥0N\ge0,

ω((F+μ)NX,Y)=ω(X,(−F+μ)NY).(2.2) \omega((F+\mu)^NX,Y)=\omega(X,(-F+\mu)^NY). \tag{2.2}

On VλV_\lambda, F+μF+\mu is invertible when λ+μ≠0\lambda+\mu\ne0. On VμV_\mu, the right-hand operator vanishes for sufficiently large NN. As the left-hand arguments run through all of VλV_\lambda, (2.1) follows.

If X∈VλX\in V_\lambda pairs to zero also with V−λV_{-\lambda}, it pairs to zero with every generalized eigenspace. Their direct sum is SCS_{\mathbb C}, so nondegeneracy of ω\omega gives X=0X=0. The same argument with the two spaces exchanged proves the nondegenerate dual pairing and equality of dimensions. For λ≠0\lambda\ne0, each individual space is isotropic by (2.1), and the pairing makes their sum symplectic. The argument for V0V_0 is identical. Finally Q(X,Y)=ω(X,FY)Q(X,Y)=\omega(X,FY); an invariant symplectically orthogonal splitting is therefore QQ-orthogonal. □

For real QQ, complex conjugation sends VλV_\lambda onto VλˉV_{\bar\lambda}. The associated real invariant subspaces inherit the splitting. In particular, non-real eigenvalues ordinarily occur in the set λ,−λ,λˉ,−λˉ\lambda,-\lambda,\bar\lambda,-\bar\lambda; the signature restrictions below will rule out some of these possibilities.

3. Real blocks and the four-step nilpotent mechanism

For this section assume that QQ is real and its negative index is at most one. Its radical is

Rad⁡Q={X:Q(X,Y)=0 for every Y}=ker⁡F.(3.1) \operatorname{Rad}Q=\{X:Q(X,Y)=0\text{ for every }Y\}=\ker F. \tag{3.1}

Lemma 3.1 (a signature obstruction). If a real subspace EE satisfies Q≤0Q\le0 on EE and E∩Rad⁡Q=0E\cap\operatorname{Rad}Q=0, then dim⁡E≤1\dim E\le1. If Q≥0Q\ge0 on all of SS, such an EE is zero.

Proof. Diagonalize the real symmetric form by an arbitrary real basis, only for this argument. It is a sum of positive squares, at most one negative square, and zero coordinates. The projection from EE to the negative coordinate is injective: if that coordinate vanishes, Q≤0Q\le0 forces every positive coordinate to vanish too, placing the vector in the radical. Thus dim⁡E\dim E is at most the number of negative squares. □

We now split off invariant symplectic blocks; their orthogonal complements are invariant by (1.4).

Real eigenvalues. Suppose Re⁡λ≠0\operatorname{Re}\lambda\ne0. The real subspace Re⁡Vλ\operatorname{Re}V_\lambda is QQ-null. For non-real λ\lambda, all pairings among VλV_\lambda and VλˉV_{\bar\lambda} vanish by Lemma 2.1; for real λ\lambda, the same assertion uses just VλV_\lambda. Also this real subspace has no intersection with ker⁡F\ker F. If λ\lambda is non-real, its real dimension is twice dim⁡CVλ\dim_{\mathbb C}V_\lambda, contradicting Lemma 3.1. Hence λ\lambda is real and VλV_\lambda is one-dimensional. Choose real eigenvectors e,εe,\varepsilon in the dual opposite spaces with ω(ε,e)=1\omega(\varepsilon,e)=1. Then

Fe=λe,Fε=−λε,Q(xe+ξε)=2λxξ.(3.2) Fe=\lambda e,\qquad F\varepsilon=-\lambda\varepsilon,\qquad Q(xe+\xi\varepsilon)=2\lambda x\xi. \tag{3.2}

Exchanging the canonical pair by (e,ε)↦(ε,−e)(e,\varepsilon)\mapsto(\varepsilon,-e) changes the sign of λ\lambda, so take λ>0\lambda>0. This block has one positive and one negative square. It consumes the available negative square, and the orthogonal complement is nonnegative. For a nonnegative QQ, no real nonzero eigenvalue occurs.

Imaginary eigenvalues. Let FX=iμXFX=i\mu X, μ>0\mu>0, and write X=X1+iX2X=X_1+iX_2 with real vectors. The two vectors are independent and their span has no intersection with ker⁡F\ker F. The eigenvector equation gives FX1=−μX2FX_1=-\mu X_2, FX2=μX1FX_2=\mu X_1, and

Q(Xˉ,X)=−2μω(X1,X2),Q(t1X1+t2X2)=−μω(X1,X2)(t12+t22).(3.3) \begin{aligned} Q(\bar X,X)&=-2\mu\omega(X_1,X_2),\\ Q(t_1X_1+t_2X_2)&=-\mu\omega(X_1,X_2)(t_1^2+t_2^2). \end{aligned} \tag{3.3}

If ω(X1,X2)≥0\omega(X_1,X_2)\ge0, this is a nonpositive two-plane disjoint from the radical, contradicting Lemma 3.1. Normalize ω(X1,X2)=−1\omega(X_1,X_2)=-1. In the canonical basis e=X1,ε=X2e=X_1,\varepsilon=X_2, the block is

Q=μ(x2+ξ2),F(x,ξ)=(μξ,−μx).(3.4) Q=\mu(x^2+\xi^2),\qquad F(x,\xi)=(\mu\xi,-\mu x). \tag{3.4}

The plane is invariant and symplectic. Split it off and repeat on its invariant complement. At each stage a nonzero imaginary eigenvalue supplies an eigenvector there. This induction exhausts the nonzero imaginary spectral spaces, including repeated frequencies, and proves that there are no nontrivial Jordan blocks at these eigenvalues. It does not assume their semisimplicity in advance.

Rank-one and zero blocks. The residual real generalized zero space is symplectic, and FF is nilpotent on it. If F2X=0F^2X=0 and a=Q(X)≠0a=Q(X)\ne0, then X,FXX,FX span an invariant symplectic two-plane, since ω(X,FX)=a\omega(X,FX)=a. Set

e=X∣a∣,ε=−FXsgn⁡(a)∣a∣.(3.5) e=\frac{X}{\sqrt{|a|}},\qquad \varepsilon=-\frac{FX}{\operatorname{sgn}(a)\sqrt{|a|}}. \tag{3.5}

Then ω(ε,e)=1\omega(\varepsilon,e)=1, Fe=−sgn⁡(a)εFe=-\operatorname{sgn}(a)\varepsilon, Fε=0F\varepsilon=0, and Q=sgn⁡(a)x2Q=\operatorname{sgn}(a)x^2 on the plane. If instead ker⁡F\ker F contains a symplectic pair, split off its plane; FF and QQ are zero there. Repeat these operations on invariant complements.

The residual chain. If a nonzero remainder survives, it has

ker⁡F isotropic,Q=0 on ker⁡F2.(3.6) \ker F\text{ isotropic},\qquad Q=0\text{ on }\ker F^2. \tag{3.6}

A complement of ker⁡F\ker F in ker⁡F2\ker F^2 is QQ-null and disjoint from the radical, so its dimension is at most one by Lemma 3.1. The identity

im⁡F=(ker⁡F)ω(3.7) \operatorname{im}F=(\ker F)^\omega \tag{3.7}

follows from (1.4) and equality of dimensions. Isotropy gives ker⁡F⊂im⁡F\ker F\subset\operatorname{im}F. Hence F:ker⁡F2→ker⁡FF:\ker F^2\to\ker F is onto, with kernel ker⁡F\ker F, and

0⟶ker⁡F⟶ker⁡F2→Fker⁡F⟶0(3.8) 0\longrightarrow\ker F\longrightarrow\ker F^2 \xrightarrow{F}\ker F\longrightarrow0 \tag{3.8}

is exact. Thus dim⁡ker⁡F≤1\dim\ker F\le1. Nilpotence on a nonzero space forces a nonzero kernel. The invariant chain projection (A7) proves the chain decomposition without assuming it: each chain contributes exactly one kernel vector. Hence there is precisely one Jordan chain

X,FX,…,FN−1X,FNX=0.(3.9) X,FX,\ldots,F^{N-1}X,\qquad F^NX=0. \tag{3.9}

The dimension NN is even because the remainder is symplectic. It exceeds two: otherwise F2=0F^2=0, and (3.6) would make Q=0Q=0 on the entire remainder, hence F=0F=0, incompatible with a nonzero symplectic space having isotropic kernel.

Moving powers of FF across ω\omega gives the exact formula

Q(FjX,FkX)=(−1)jω(X,Fj+k+1X).(3.10) Q(F^jX,F^kX)=(-1)^j\omega(X,F^{j+k+1}X). \tag{3.10}

If N≥6N\ge6, this vanishes on the two-plane spanned by FN−3X,FN−2XF^{N-3}X,F^{N-2}X, because the smallest exponent is 2N−5≥N2N-5\ge N. That plane is disjoint from ker⁡F=RFN−1X\ker F=\mathbb RF^{N-1}X, contradicting Lemma 3.1. Therefore N=4N=4.

Put b=ω(X,F3X)b=\omega(X,F^3X). On span⁡(FX,F2X)\operatorname{span}(FX,F^2X), the form is diag⁡(−b,0)\operatorname{diag}(-b,0) by (3.10), and that plane again misses the radical. Thus b<0b<0. Scale XX to make b=−1b=-1, and set

Y=X+tF2X,t=12ω(X,FX).(3.11) Y=X+tF^2X,\qquad t=\frac12\omega(X,FX). \tag{3.11}

Here ω(Y,F3Y)=−1\omega(Y,F^3Y)=-1 and ω(Y,FY)=ω(X,FX)−2t=0\omega(Y,FY)=\omega(X,FX)-2t=0. Define

e1=−F3Y,e2=−FY,ε1=Y,ε2=F2Y.(3.12) e_1=-F^3Y,\quad e_2=-FY,\quad \varepsilon_1=Y,\quad\varepsilon_2=F^2Y. \tag{3.12}

The two diagonal pairings ω(εj,ej)\omega(\varepsilon_j,e_j) equal one. The same-type pairings vanish by (3.11) or F4=0F^4=0. The off-diagonal mixed pairings vanish because ω(Y,F2Y)=0\omega(Y,F^2Y)=0, which follows from (1.4) and alternation. Thus this is a canonical basis. Its Hamilton map is

Fe1=0,Fe2=−ε2,Fε1=−e2,Fε2=−e1.(3.13) Fe_1=0,\quad Fe_2=-\varepsilon_2,\quad F\varepsilon_1=-e_2,\quad F\varepsilon_2=-e_1. \tag{3.13}

Using Q(Z)=ω(Z,FZ)Q(Z)=\omega(Z,FZ), the block is exactly

Q=x22−2ξ1ξ2.(3.14) Q=x_2^2-2\xi_1\xi_2. \tag{3.14}

It has two positive squares, one negative square and one radical direction. Its single Jordan chain has length four. This completes the exhaustion of all residual blocks under the stated signature hypothesis.

4. The complete real classification

Theorem 4.1 (nonnegative and index-one forms). A real nonnegative quadratic form on a 2n2n-dimensional symplectic space has canonical coordinates in which

Q=∑j=1kμj(xj2+ξj2)+∑j=k+1k+lxj2,μj>0,k+l≤n.(4.1) Q=\sum_{j=1}^{k}\mu_j(x_j^2+\xi_j^2) +\sum_{j=k+1}^{k+l}x_j^2, \qquad \mu_j>0,\quad k+l\le n. \tag{4.1}

The unused pairs are zero blocks. If the negative index is exactly one, its canonical form is the nonnegative portion in (4.1) plus precisely one of

−xn2,k+l<n,2λxnξn,λ>0,k+l<n,xn2−2ξn−1ξn,k+l<n−1.(4.2) \begin{array}{ll} -x_n^2,&k+l<n,\\ 2\lambda x_n\xi_n,\quad\lambda>0,&k+l<n,\\ x_n^2-2\xi_{n-1}\xi_n,&k+l<n-1. \end{array} \tag{4.2}

The three types are inequivalent. Within a type, the dimension, the listed positive frequencies with multiplicities, the number of positive rank-one blocks, and λ\lambda when present determine the symplectic equivalence class, up to reordering equal types of pairs.

Proof. Section 3 constructs invariant symplectic blocks until the dimension is exhausted. Each complement remains real, symplectic and of negative index at most one, so its argument applies repeatedly. In the nonnegative case only positive oscillators, positive rank-one blocks and zero pairs can occur. In the index-one case exactly one block uses the negative square. These are precisely the three choices in (4.2); the others must be nonnegative. Their sizes give the displayed dimension constraints.

The eigenvalues on the positive imaginary axis are exactly iμji\mu_j, counted with multiplicity. The hyperbolic block adds the real eigenvalues ±λ\pm\lambda. The four-dimensional block adds a Jordan chain of length four at zero. In the remaining negative rank-one case there is no such real pair or length-four chain; its negative square is detected by inertia. These invariants separate the three types. Each positive rank-one block has a length-two zero chain, and each unused zero pair has two length-one chains. After the type is fixed, the zero Jordan data and dimension determine their counts. In the negative rank-one type, one of the length-two chains belongs to that negative block. Conversely, if these data agree, reorder the canonical blocks and map their displayed canonical bases to one another. This is a symplectic change and preserves the displayed form. □

The theorem is a complete classification under these two signature hypotheses. Forms with two or more negative squares can have longer real Jordan blocks and complex quartets; Lemma 3.1 is the step that fails in that wider setting.

Example 4.2 (frequencies survive). For a,c>0a,c>0 and ac−b2>0ac-b^2>0,

Q=ax2+2bxξ+cξ2 Q=ax^2+2bx\xi+c\xi^2

has frequency μ=ac−b2\mu=\sqrt{ac-b^2}, because F=(bc−a−b)F=\begin{pmatrix}b&c\\-a&-b\end{pmatrix} has eigenvalues ±iμ\pm i\mu. The canonical shear η=ξ+(b/c)x\eta=\xi+(b/c)x, followed by y=rx,ν=η/ry=rx,\nu=\eta/r with r4=(ac−b2)/c2r^4=(ac-b^2)/c^2, gives Q=μ(y2+ν2)Q=\mu(y^2+\nu^2). Its one-form satisfies ν dy=ξ dx+d(bx2/(2c))\nu\,dy=\xi\,dx+d(bx^2/(2c)), so the whole change is symplectic. Different μ\mu's cannot be removed by a symplectic change.

Example 4.3 (the actual nilpotent orbit). For (3.14),

F(x1,x2,ξ1,ξ2)=(−ξ2,−ξ1,0,−x2). F(x_1,x_2,\xi_1,\xi_2)=(-\xi_2,-\xi_1,0,-x_2).

Starting at ε1=(0,0,1,0)\varepsilon_1=(0,0,1,0), its half-Hamiltonian flow is

etFε1=(−t36,−t,1,t22).(4.3) e^{tF}\varepsilon_1=\left(-\frac{t^3}{6},-t,1,\frac{t^2}{2}\right). \tag{4.3}

Substitution gives Q=0Q=0 for every real tt. The full Hamiltonian flow uses 2F2F, so the parameter in (4.3) would be replaced by 2t2t.

Real quadratic Hamilton flows and a specified projection of the four-step nilpotent orbit

Open the full-size figure.

Figure 4.1. The first two panels show exact orbits of F=HQ/2F=H_Q/2 for the unit oscillator and unit real hyperbolic block, with arrows in increasing flow time. The third shows only the (x2,ξ2)(x_2,\xi_2) projection of the exact four-coordinate orbit (4.3); the omitted coordinates are given explicitly. A projected parabola alone does not encode the full length-four chain. The formulas (3.12)–(3.14) identify that chain and its symplectic form. All curves are original plots of the stated formulas.

5. Sectorial complex forms, kernels and reduction

Now allow Q=P+iRQ=P+iR to be complex valued, with real quadratic forms P,RP,R. Assume P≥0P\ge0 and that for some finite C≥0C\ge0,

∣R(U)∣≤CP(U)(U∈S),Γ={w∈C:∣Im⁡w∣≤CRe⁡w}.(5.1) |R(U)|\le C P(U)\quad(U\in S),\qquad \Gamma=\{w\in\mathbb C:|\operatorname{Im}w|\le C\operatorname{Re}w\}. \tag{5.1}

The nonnegative-real-part hypothesis is retained also when C=0C=0; the inequality alone would then impose no sign on a real form. The closed convex sector Γ\Gamma contains all real-vector values of QQ. The Hamilton map F=−JBF=-JB is complex linear; it need not preserve the real space SS.

Theorem 5.1 (sectorial kernel and spectrum). Under (5.1), for X∈SCX\in S_{\mathbb C},

Q(Xˉ,X)=0⟺FX=0⟺FRe⁡X=FIm⁡X=0⟺FˉX=0.(5.2) \begin{aligned} Q(\bar X,X)=0 &\Longleftrightarrow FX=0\\ &\Longleftrightarrow F\operatorname{Re}X=F\operatorname{Im}X=0 \Longleftrightarrow\bar F X=0. \end{aligned} \tag{5.2}

Thus ker⁡F\ker F is spanned by its real elements. On the zero generalized eigenspace, F2V0=0F^2V_0=0, and

V0=ker⁡F2={X:Q(X,Y)=0 whenever ω(ker⁡F,Y)=0}.(5.3) V_0=\ker F^2 =\{X:Q(X,Y)=0\text{ whenever }\omega(\ker F,Y)=0\}. \tag{5.3}

Every eigenvalue satisfies

λ/i∈Γ or λ/i∈−Γ.(5.4) \lambda/i\in\Gamma\ \text{or}\ \lambda/i\in-\Gamma. \tag{5.4}

Proof. We first identify the real radical. If P(U)=0P(U)=0, then (5.1) gives R(U)=0R(U)=0. For a real nonnegative quadratic form AA, A(U)=0A(U)=0 implies A(U,Y)=0A(U,Y)=0 for all real YY: the quadratic polynomial A(U+tY)A(U+tY) would otherwise have a nonzero linear term and take negative values for one sign of small tt. Apply this to PP. To get the same conclusion for RR, choose any small nonzero real ε\varepsilon with ∣ε∣C<1|\varepsilon|C<1. The form

Re⁡((1+iε)Q)=P−εR \operatorname{Re}((1+i\varepsilon)Q)=P-\varepsilon R

is nonnegative and vanishes at UU; its polarized row there is zero. Together with the row of PP, this gives R(U,Y)=0R(U,Y)=0. Therefore

ker⁡P={U∈S:Q(U,Y)=0 for every real Y}.(5.5) \ker P=\{U\in S:Q(U,Y)=0\text{ for every real }Y\}. \tag{5.5}

Here ker⁡P\ker P means the radical of the polarized real form, equivalently its zero set because it is nonnegative.

For X=U+iVX=U+iV, symmetry and bilinearity give

Q(Xˉ,X)=Q(U)+Q(V).(5.6) Q(\bar X,X)=Q(U)+Q(V). \tag{5.6}

If this is zero, its real part is P(U)+P(V)=0P(U)+P(V)=0. Both vectors belong to (5.5), hence FU=FV=0FU=FV=0, and therefore FX=0FX=0. Conversely FX=0FX=0 implies Q(Xˉ,X)=ω(Xˉ,FX)=0Q(\bar X,X)=\omega(\bar X,FX)=0. This also shows that FX=0FX=0 forces its two real components separately into the kernel. The real vectors in that kernel are in the common radical of P,RP,R, so they are also killed by Fˉ\bar F. Applying the same reasoning to Qˉ\bar Q, which satisfies the same bound, proves the reverse implication from FˉX=0\bar F X=0. This establishes every equivalence in (5.2).

If F3X=0F^3X=0, then F2X∈ker⁡FF^2X\in\ker F, and (5.2) gives FˉF2X=0\bar F F^2X=0. Using (1.4) for Fˉ\bar F,

Q(FX‾,FX)=ω(FX‾,F2X)=−ω(Xˉ,FˉF2X)=0.(5.7) Q(\overline{FX},FX) =\omega(\overline{FX},F^2X) =-\omega(\bar X,\bar F F^2X)=0. \tag{5.7}

Apply (5.2) to FXFX to obtain F2X=0F^2X=0. Thus no Jordan chain at zero has length three or more: such a chain would contain a vector with F3X=0F^3X=0, F2X≠0F^2X\ne0. Hence V0=ker⁡F2V_0=\ker F^2 and F2V0=0F^2V_0=0.

Identity (3.7) remains valid over the complex numbers. For Y∈(ker⁡F)ωY\in(\ker F)^\omega, write Y=FZY=FZ. Then

Q(X,Y)=ω(X,F2Z)=ω(F2X,Z).(5.8) Q(X,Y)=\omega(X,F^2Z)=\omega(F^2X,Z). \tag{5.8}

This vanishes for all ZZ exactly when F2X=0F^2X=0, proving (5.3).

Finally let FX=λXFX=\lambda X, X=U+iV≠0X=U+iV\ne0, with λ≠0\lambda\ne0. Then

Q(U)+Q(V)=Q(Xˉ,X)=2iλω(U,V).(5.9) Q(U)+Q(V)=Q(\bar X,X)=2i\lambda\omega(U,V). \tag{5.9}

The left side belongs to Γ\Gamma, by convexity and (5.1). The real scalar ω(U,V)\omega(U,V) is nonzero: if it were zero, (5.2) would give FX=0FX=0, a contradiction. Dividing (5.9) by this scalar gives (5.4), with the sign depending on the scalar. For λ=0\lambda=0, (5.4) holds trivially. □

In particular a nonzero eigenvalue never lies on the real axis: a purely imaginary number in Γ∪−Γ\Gamma\cup-\Gamma must be zero. The theorem permits nontrivial Jordan blocks at nonzero complex eigenvalues. The real semidefinite conclusion in Section 3 does not assert their absence here.

Proposition 5.2 (remove the real radical symplectically). Set

W=S∩ker⁡F,S′=Wω/(W∩Wω).(5.10) W=S\cap\ker F,\qquad S'=W^\omega/(W\cap W^\omega). \tag{5.10}

This is a real symplectic space. The form QQ descends to Q′Q' there, satisfying (5.1), and Re⁡Q′\operatorname{Re}Q' is positive definite. Its Hamilton map is isomorphic, after complexification, to the restriction of FF to the sum of its nonzero generalized eigenspaces.

Proof. The radical of ω∣Wω\omega|_{W^\omega} is Wω∩(Wω)ω=Wω∩WW^\omega\cap(W^\omega)^\omega=W^\omega\cap W. Quotienting by precisely this radical gives a nondegenerate alternating form. Every vector of WW is in the quadratic radical (5.5), so adding a vector of W∩WωW\cap W^\omega changes neither QQ nor its polarized values. Thus Q′Q' is well-defined, as is the bound (5.1). If a real representative U∈WωU\in W^\omega has P(U)=0P(U)=0, (5.5) puts UU in W∩WωW\cap W^\omega; its quotient class is zero. This proves strict real positivity.

By (5.2), ker⁡F=WC\ker F=W_{\mathbb C}. Hence (Wω)C=im⁡F(W^\omega)_{\mathbb C}=\operatorname{im}F, and

SC′=im⁡F/(ker⁡F∩im⁡F)≃⨁λ≠0Vλ.(5.11) S'_{\mathbb C} =\operatorname{im}F/(\ker F\cap\operatorname{im}F) \simeq\bigoplus_{\lambda\ne0}V_\lambda. \tag{5.11}

To verify the last isomorphism, split into V0V_0 and the nonzero spectral sum. On the latter, FF is invertible. On V0V_0, F2=0F^2=0, so its image is exactly the part removed by the intersection with the kernel. Both the symplectic form and the quadratic form agree under this identification by spectral orthogonality. The defining identity (1.2) therefore identifies the induced Hamilton map with the nonzero restriction of FF. □

The quotient in (5.10) uses the symplectic orthogonal space. The quotient S/WS/W need not carry a symplectic form and does not give this construction.

6. A strictly positive spectral plane

For a complex subspace of SCS_{\mathbb C}, introduce the Hermitian form

h(X,Y)=iω(Yˉ,X).(6.1) h(X,Y)=i\omega(\bar Y,X). \tag{6.1}

It is linear in its first argument and conjugate linear in its second; alternation of ω\omega gives h(Y,X)=h(X,Y)‾h(Y,X)=\overline{h(X,Y)}. A complex Lagrangian plane Λ\Lambda is positive when h(X,X)≥0h(X,X)\ge0 for X∈ΛX\in\Lambda, and strictly positive when equality forces X=0X=0.

Theorem 6.1 (positive spectral plane). If Re⁡Q\operatorname{Re}Q is positive definite, then

S+=⨁Im⁡λ>0Vλ=⨁λ∈iΓVλ(6.2) S^+=\bigoplus_{\operatorname{Im}\lambda>0}V_\lambda =\bigoplus_{\lambda\in i\Gamma}V_\lambda \tag{6.2}

is an FF-invariant, strictly positive Lagrangian plane. For its Hermitian form, the numerical range satisfies

h(FX,X)h(X,X)∈iΓ(0≠X∈S+).(6.3) \frac{h(FX,X)}{h(X,X)}\in i\Gamma \qquad(0\ne X\in S^+). \tag{6.3}

Some finite CC as in (5.1) always exists under this strict hypothesis.

Proof. On the real unit sphere, PP has a positive minimum and ∣R∣|R| a finite maximum; their ratio gives such a CC. Theorem 5.1 excludes zero and real eigenvalues. Lemma 2.1 pairs the upper spectral spaces with the lower ones with equal dimensions. The sum in (6.2) thus has dimension nn and is isotropic, since two upper eigenvalues cannot sum to zero. It is Lagrangian and invariant.

When QQ is real positive definite, Theorem 4.1 gives only oscillator blocks. On each such block the upper eigenvector has ξ=ix\xi=ix. Thus

S+={(x,ix):x∈Cn},h(X,X)=2∑j∣xj∣2>0.(6.4) S^+=\{(x,ix):x\in\mathbb C^n\},\qquad h(X,X)=2\sum_j|x_j|^2>0. \tag{6.4}

For the general form use Qt=P+itRQ_t=P+itR, 0≤t≤10\le t\le1, with Hamilton map FtF_t. Every QtQ_t has the same positive real part and a uniform sector bound. Its spectrum avoids the real axis. Here is the common-domain spectral argument. Bound ∥Ft∥≤M\|F_t\|\le M by continuity on the compact parameter interval. Every eigenvalue obeys ∣λ∣≤M|\lambda|\le M. If no uniform positive imaginary-part bound existed, a convergent subsequence of pairs (tj,λj)(t_j,\lambda_j) would have a real limiting λ\lambda and det⁡(λI−Ft)=0\det(\lambda I-F_t)=0 by determinant continuity, contradicting the spectral exclusion. Thus ∣Im⁡λ∣≥δ>0|\operatorname{Im}\lambda|\ge\delta>0. Companion A6 constructs an actual common circle: with L=M2/δ+δL=M^2/\delta+\delta and radius L−δ/2L-\delta/2, the circle centered at iLiL lies in the upper half-plane and encloses all upper spectra. Choose this one simple closed contour γ\gamma in the upper half-plane, enclosing all upper spectra and none of the lower spectra for all tt, with counterclockwise orientation. Then

Πt=12πi∮γ(zI−Ft)−1 dz(6.5) \Pi_t=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_\gamma(zI-F_t)^{-1}\,dz \tag{6.5}

is a continuous family of rank-nn projections onto the upper generalized spectral sum. This assertion does not require choosing individual eigenvectors: on a Jordan block λI+N\lambda I+N, the resolvent is ∑j≥0Nj(z−λ)−j−1\sum_{j\ge0}N^j(z-\lambda)^{-j-1}, and the direct circle calculation A5 proves that the integral is the identity if λ\lambda is inside, zero if outside. The integrand is uniformly continuous in tt on the fixed contour. This proves continuity and the claimed range.

Strict positivity is open for this family of planes, by the positive compact-sphere lower bound in companion A7. For instance, near a fixed t0t_0, Πt\Pi_t applied to a basis of ran⁡Πt0\operatorname{ran}\Pi_{t_0} stays a basis of ran⁡Πt\operatorname{ran}\Pi_t; its Hermitian Gram matrix varies continuously. Suppose now tj→tt_j\to t and these planes are strictly positive. For each X∈ran⁡ΠtX\in\operatorname{ran}\Pi_t, the vectors ΠtjX\Pi_{t_j}X tend to XX, so h≥0h\ge0 on the limiting plane. If h(X,X)=0h(X,X)=0, the semidefinite Cauchy–Schwarz inequality proved in A7 gives h(FtX,X)=0h(F_tX,X)=0, because FtXF_tX lies in that plane. But

h(FtX,X)=iQt(Xˉ,X).(6.6) h(F_tX,X)=iQ_t(\bar X,X). \tag{6.6}

Its vanishing implies X=0X=0 by (5.2) and strict positivity of PP. Thus the limiting plane is also strictly positive. The set of tt with the desired property is nonempty by (6.4), open and closed in [0,1][0,1]; it is the whole interval. This proves strict positivity at t=1t=1, even through repeated eigenvalues and Jordan degeneracies.

For the numerical range, write X=U+iVX=U+iV. Equations (5.6) and (6.6) give h(FX,X)=i(Q(U)+Q(V))h(FX,X)=i(Q(U)+Q(V)). The sum belongs to the convex sector Γ\Gamma, and h(X,X)>0h(X,X)>0. Division by this positive scalar proves (6.3). □

Formula (6.5) states both its resolvent sign and its orientation. Using (Ft−zI)−1(F_t-zI)^{-1} instead requires the opposite prefactor or the opposite orientation. The positivity proof uses a whole spectral plane, so it also covers a nonsemisimple example developed in Section 10.

7. The compatible complex structure and metric

The construction in this section applies to every strictly positive complex Lagrangian plane, whether it arose from a quadratic form or was given independently.

Theorem 7.1 (unique compatible Hermitian structure). If Λ⊂SC\Lambda\subset S_{\mathbb C} is strictly positive Lagrangian, the real-part map r:Λ→Sr:\Lambda\to S is a real-linear bijection. It induces a complex structure II on SS by

I(rX)=r(iX)=−Im⁡X.(7.1) I(rX)=r(iX)=-\operatorname{Im}X. \tag{7.1}

There is a unique positive definite Hermitian form HH, linear in its first argument with respect to II, such that

Im⁡H(U,V)=−ω(U,V)(U,V∈S).(7.2) \operatorname{Im}H(U,V)=-\omega(U,V) \quad(U,V\in S). \tag{7.2}

Its real part and its expression on Λ\Lambda are

g(U,V)=ω(U,IV),H(rX,rY)=i2ω(Yˉ,X).(7.3) g(U,V)=\omega(U,IV),\qquad H(rX,rY)=\frac{i}{2}\omega(\bar Y,X). \tag{7.3}

Proof. For X=U+iV∈ΛX=U+iV\in\Lambda,

h(X,X)=2ω(V,U).(7.4) h(X,X)=2\omega(V,U). \tag{7.4}

If rX=U=0rX=U=0, this is zero, hence X=0X=0. The real dimensions of Λ\Lambda and SS are both 2n2n, so rr is a bijection. Transporting multiplication by ii through it gives (7.1) and I2=−1I^2=-1. The inverse map is

Z(U)=U−iIU∈Λ.(7.5) Z(U)=U-iIU\in\Lambda. \tag{7.5}

Expand ω(Z(U),Z(V))=0\omega(Z(U),Z(V))=0. Its real and imaginary parts yield

ω(IU,IV)=ω(U,V),ω(IU,V)=−ω(U,IV).(7.6) \omega(IU,IV)=\omega(U,V),\qquad \omega(IU,V)=-\omega(U,IV). \tag{7.6}

Consequently g(U,V)=ω(U,IV)g(U,V)=\omega(U,IV) is symmetric, and (7.4) gives h(Z(U),Z(U))=2g(U,U)h(Z(U),Z(U))=2g(U,U). It is positive definite.

Define H(U,V)=g(U,V)−iω(U,V)H(U,V)=g(U,V)-i\omega(U,V). Symmetry of gg and alternation of ω\omega give Hermitian symmetry. Identities (7.6) give H(IU,V)=iH(U,V)H(IU,V)=iH(U,V), and hence H(U,IV)=−iH(U,V)H(U,IV)=-iH(U,V); thus it has the required complex linearities. It is positive definite and satisfies (7.2). Expanding iω(Z(V)‾,Z(U))/2i\omega(\overline{Z(V)},Z(U))/2 gives exactly g(U,V)−iω(U,V)g(U,V)-i\omega(U,V), proving (7.3).

For uniqueness, a Hermitian form satisfying (7.2) must obey H(U,IV)=−iH(U,V)H(U,IV)=-iH(U,V). Taking imaginary parts gives −Re⁡H(U,V)=−ω(U,IV)-\operatorname{Re}H(U,V)=-\omega(U,IV). Its real part must therefore be gg, while its imaginary part was prescribed. □

Corollary 7.2 (coordinates adapted to a real and a positive plane). Given a real Lagrangian plane L⊂SL\subset S and a strictly positive complex Lagrangian plane Λ\Lambda, there are real canonical coordinates such that

L={x=0},Λ={(x,ix):x∈Cn}.(7.7) L=\{x=0\},\qquad\Lambda=\{(x,ix):x\in\mathbb C^n\}. \tag{7.7}

Proof. Use the explicit Gram–Schmidt construction A8 to choose a gg-orthonormal real basis ε1,…,εn\varepsilon_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_n of LL, and put ej=Iεje_j=I\varepsilon_j. Since LL is Lagrangian and II preserves ω\omega, both ω(εj,εk)\omega(\varepsilon_j,\varepsilon_k) and ω(ej,ek)\omega(e_j,e_k) vanish. Also

ω(εj,ek)=g(εj,εk)=δjk. \omega(\varepsilon_j,e_k)=g(\varepsilon_j,\varepsilon_k)=\delta_{jk}.

Thus (e1,…,en,ε1,…,εn)(e_1,\ldots,e_n,\varepsilon_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_n) is a real canonical basis, and LL is its momentum plane. By (7.5), εj−iej∈Λ\varepsilon_j-ie_j\in\Lambda, so multiplying these vectors by ii gives the spanning vectors ej+iεje_j+i\varepsilon_j. This is the graph in (7.7). □

Apply the corollary to Λ=S+\Lambda=S^+ from Theorem 6.1. Invariance and isotropy give Q(X)=ω(X,FX)=0Q(X)=\omega(X,FX)=0 on that plane. In the adapted coordinates, the complex polynomial QQ therefore belongs to the ideal

(x1+iξ1,…,xn+iξn).(7.8) (x_1+i\xi_1,\ldots,x_n+i\xi_n). \tag{7.8}

For completeness, the invertible complex linear variables u=x+iξu=x+i\xi, v=x−iξv=x-i\xi identify the plane with u=0u=0. A quadratic polynomial vanishing there has no terms involving only vv. Every remaining monomial contains some uju_j, so Q=∑jujℓj(u,v)Q=\sum_j u_j\ell_j(u,v), with linear ℓj\ell_j. This is a statement about a complex polynomial on a complex plane.

8. Positive graph matrices in arbitrary coordinates

Proposition 8.1 (graph criterion). In any real canonical coordinates, a strictly positive complex Lagrangian plane is the graph

Λ={(z,Az):z∈Cn},A=A1+iA2,AjT=Aj real,A2>0.(8.1) \Lambda=\{(z,Az):z\in\mathbb C^n\},\qquad A=A_1+iA_2,\quad A_j^T=A_j\text{ real},\quad A_2>0. \tag{8.1}

Conversely every matrix in (8.1) defines such a plane.

Proof. A vertical vector X=(0,ξ)X=(0,\xi) has h(X,X)=0h(X,X)=0. Strict positivity excludes any nonzero such vector in Λ\Lambda. Projection of the nn-dimensional plane to the nn-dimensional position space is thus a bijection, so it is a graph. For graph vectors,

ω((z,Az),(w,Aw))=zT(AT−A)w. \omega((z,Az),(w,Aw))=z^T(A^T-A)w.

The graph is Lagrangian precisely when AT=AA^T=A. Its Hermitian diagonal is

h((z,Az),(z,Az))=2zˉTA2z.(8.2) h((z,Az),(z,Az))=2\bar z^T A_2z. \tag{8.2}

Thus strict positivity is equivalent to A2>0A_2>0. Both implications follow, including nondegeneracy and the exact factor two. □

The whole real symplectic coordinate change normalizing this graph is explicit. Let D=A21/2D=A_2^{1/2} be the positive real symmetric square root constructed from the proved real diagonalization in companion A8. Set

y=Dx,η=D−1(ξ−A1x).(8.3) y=Dx,\qquad \eta=D^{-1}(\xi-A_1x). \tag{8.3}

Then

ηTdy=ξTdx−d(12xTA1x),(8.4) \eta^Tdy=\xi^Tdx-d\left(\frac12x^TA_1x\right), \tag{8.4}

so differentiation gives ∑dηj∧dyj=∑dξj∧dxj\sum d\eta_j\wedge dy_j=\sum d\xi_j\wedge dx_j. On the graph, η=iDx=iy\eta=iDx=iy. This verifies the change on the entire real vector space as well as on the plane.

The compatible structure and metric can also be read directly from AA. For a real vector U=(u,v)U=(u,v), the real part of (z,Az)(z,Az), with z=a+ibz=a+ib, is (a,A1a−A2b)(a,A_1a-A_2b). Hence a=ua=u, b=A2−1(A1u−v)b=A_2^{-1}(A_1u-v). Multiplication by ii, followed by taking the real part, gives

I=(−A2−1A1A2−1−A2−A1A2−1A1A1A2−1).(8.5) I= \begin{pmatrix} -A_2^{-1}A_1&A_2^{-1}\\ -A_2-A_1A_2^{-1}A_1&A_1A_2^{-1} \end{pmatrix}. \tag{8.5}

In particular I2=−1I^2=-1, ITJI=JI^TJI=J, and gg has matrix JIJI. Its diagonal is the positive expression

g((u,v),(u,v))=uTA2u+(v−A1u)TA2−1(v−A1u).(8.6) g((u,v),(u,v)) =u^TA_2u+(v-A_1u)^TA_2^{-1}(v-A_1u). \tag{8.6}

This also verifies the metric without having to guess a Euclidean structure first.

9. Non-strict positivity and its real part

Theorem 9.1 (reduce a positive plane). Let Λ⊂SC\Lambda\subset S_{\mathbb C} be positive Lagrangian, and let

LR=Λ∩S,r=dim⁡RLR. L_{\mathbb R}=\Lambda\cap S,\qquad r=\dim_{\mathbb R}L_{\mathbb R}.

This is real isotropic. The nullspace of h∣Λh|_\Lambda is exactly (LR)C(L_{\mathbb R})_{\mathbb C}. The image of Λ\Lambda in

S′=LRω/LR(9.1) S'=L_{\mathbb R}^\omega/L_{\mathbb R} \tag{9.1}

is a strictly positive Lagrangian plane. There is also a real symplectically orthogonal splitting S=S1⊕S2S=S_1\oplus S_2 for which LRL_{\mathbb R} is Lagrangian in S1S_1 and

Λ=(LR)C⊕Λ2,Λ2⊂(S2)C strictly positive Lagrangian.(9.2) \Lambda=(L_{\mathbb R})_{\mathbb C}\oplus\Lambda_2, \qquad \Lambda_2\subset(S_2)_{\mathbb C}\text{ strictly positive Lagrangian}. \tag{9.2}

Proof. A semidefinite Hermitian form satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz. This follows, including null vectors, by applying nonnegativity to X+tYX+tY for all complex tt: if h(X,X)=0h(X,X)=0 and h(Y,X)≠0h(Y,X)\ne0, choose a small tt with its linear term negative. Thus a null vector X∈ΛX\in\Lambda satisfies h(Y,X)=iω(Xˉ,Y)=0h(Y,X)=i\omega(\bar X,Y)=0 for all Y∈ΛY\in\Lambda. Since a Lagrangian plane equals its symplectic orthogonal, Xˉ∈Λ\bar X\in\Lambda. Hence Re⁡X,Im⁡X∈LR\operatorname{Re}X,\operatorname{Im}X\in L_{\mathbb R}. Conversely for real U∈ΛU\in\Lambda, isotropy gives h(Y,U)=iω(U,Y)=0h(Y,U)=i\omega(U,Y)=0 for all Y∈ΛY\in\Lambda. Its complex span is the whole nullspace.

Real vectors in LRL_{\mathbb R} pair to zero, so it is isotropic, and Λ⊂(LRω)C\Lambda\subset(L_{\mathbb R}^\omega)_{\mathbb C}. The real quotient (9.1) is symplectic of dimension 2(n−r)2(n-r): the radical of the restricted form is exactly LRL_{\mathbb R}. The image of Λ\Lambda has complex dimension n−rn-r, because its kernel is (LR)C(L_{\mathbb R})_{\mathbb C}; it is isotropic and hence Lagrangian. Its Hermitian form descends, since these kernel vectors are null against all of Λ\Lambda. A null class has a null representative and hence lies in the kernel just identified; its class is zero. This proves strict positivity.

For the direct-sum version, complete a real basis ε1,…,εr\varepsilon_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_r of LRL_{\mathbb R} to a real canonical basis. Such a completion follows by successively choosing a vector pairing to one with the first nonzero isotropic vector and continuing on that pair's symplectic orthogonal complement. At each step subtract components along the already chosen pairs to preserve their orthogonality. Let S1S_1 be the span of the first rr complete pairs, and S2=S1ωS_2=S_1^\omega. In these coordinates, orthogonality to LRL_{\mathbb R} is exactly x1=⋯=xr=0x_1=\cdots=x_r=0, so

LRω=LR⊕S2. L_{\mathbb R}^\omega=L_{\mathbb R}\oplus S_2.

Every X∈ΛX\in\Lambda has a unique decomposition X=U+X2X=U+X_2, U∈(LR)CU\in(L_{\mathbb R})_{\mathbb C}, X2∈(S2)CX_2\in(S_2)_{\mathbb C}. Since U∈ΛU\in\Lambda, also X2∈ΛX_2\in\Lambda. This proves (9.2), with Λ2=Λ∩(S2)C\Lambda_2=\Lambda\cap(S_2)_{\mathbb C}. Its dimension, isotropy and strict positivity are the quotient properties just proved. □

The theorem includes a real Lagrangian plane, where r=nr=n and the quotient is zero, and a strictly positive plane, where r=0r=0. A positive plane with r>0r>0 can contain vertical vectors; Proposition 8.1 requires its strict hypothesis.

10. A positive plane with a nonsemisimple Hamilton map

Consider in dimension four

Q=x12+x22+ξ12+ξ22+(x1+iξ1)(x2−iξ2).(10.1) Q=x_1^2+x_2^2+\xi_1^2+\xi_2^2 +(x_1+i\xi_1)(x_2-i\xi_2). \tag{10.1}

Its real and imaginary parts are

P=∣x∣2+∣ξ∣2+x1x2+ξ1ξ2,R=ξ1x2−x1ξ2. P=|x|^2+|\xi|^2+x_1x_2+\xi_1\xi_2,\qquad R=\xi_1x_2-x_1\xi_2.

The inequality 2∣ab∣≤a2+b22|ab|\le a^2+b^2 gives P≥12(∣x∣2+∣ξ∣2)P\ge\tfrac12(|x|^2+|\xi|^2) and ∣R∣≤12(∣x∣2+∣ξ∣2)|R|\le\tfrac12(|x|^2+|\xi|^2). Hence ∣R∣≤P|R|\le P, and PP is positive definite. The plane Λ={ξ=ix}\Lambda=\{\xi=ix\} is strictly positive. Direct differentiation of (10.1) yields, on this plane,

F(x,ix)=(iNx,i(iNx)),N=(1101).(10.2) F(x,ix)=\left(iNx,i(iNx)\right),\qquad N=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{pmatrix}. \tag{10.2}

Thus F∣ΛF|_\Lambda is a single length-two Jordan block with eigenvalue ii. Its upper generalized spectral plane is exactly Λ\Lambda; the other spectral eigenvalue is −i-i, by Lemma 2.1. The positive-plane theorem covers this example although a basis of upper eigenvectors alone cannot span its plane.

With h((x,ix),(x,ix))=2∣x∣2h((x,ix),(x,ix))=2|x|^2, its numerical range is

i+ixˉ1x2∣x1∣2+∣x2∣2,x≠0.(10.3) i+i\frac{\bar x_1x_2}{|x_1|^2+|x_2|^2},\qquad x\ne0. \tag{10.3}

The fraction has modulus at most 1/21/2 by Cauchy–Schwarz, and every complex value of modulus at most 1/21/2 occurs: choose the relative phase and the nonnegative ratio ∣x2∣/∣x1∣|x_2|/|x_1|, whose value t/(1+t2)t/(1+t^2) ranges from zero to 1/21/2. So this range is the closed disk centered at ii with radius 1/21/2. It lies in iΓi\Gamma for C=1C=1. This exhibits the numerical-range information beyond the repeated eigenvalue itself.

11. Graded exercises with complete solutions

Exercise 1 (critical-point normalization). Let f(x,ξ)=x2+3ξ2+2x2ξf(x,\xi)=x^2+3\xi^2+2x^2\xi. Find its Hamilton map at zero, its eigenvalues, and the derivative of its full Hamilton field there.

Solution. The first differential vanishes at zero. Its Hessian there is diag⁡(2,6)\operatorname{diag}(2,6), because the cubic term contributes zero. Thus

F=(03−10),spec⁡F={i3,−i3}. F=\begin{pmatrix}0&3\\-1&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad \operatorname{spec}F=\{i\sqrt3,-i\sqrt3\}.

The full field is Hf=(6ξ+2x2)∂x−(2x+4xξ)∂ξH_f=(6\xi+2x^2)\partial_x-(2x+4x\xi)\partial_\xi, so its derivative at zero is 2F2F. Its linearized full-flow frequencies are 232\sqrt3, while the Hamilton map frequency is 3\sqrt3; they refer to these two distinct time normalizations.

Exercise 2 (an exact symplectic oscillator change). For Q=5x2+4xξ+2ξ2Q=5x^2+4x\xi+2\xi^2, find a real symplectic change giving μ(y2+η2)\mu(y^2+\eta^2), and verify its one-form identity.

Solution. Here a=5,b=2,c=2a=5,b=2,c=2, so ac−b2=6ac-b^2=6. Put r=(3/2)1/4r=(3/2)^{1/4}, y=rxy=rx, η=(ξ+x)/r\eta=(\xi+x)/r. Completing the square gives Q=3x2+2(ξ+x)2Q=3x^2+2(\xi+x)^2, and r2=3/2r^2=\sqrt{3/2} makes both new coefficients 6\sqrt6. Thus Q=6(y2+η2)Q=\sqrt6(y^2+\eta^2). The exact identity η dy=(ξ+x) dx=ξ dx+d(x2/2)\eta\,dy=(\xi+x)\,dx=\xi\,dx+d(x^2/2) proves symplecticity. The eigenvalues of F=(22−5−2)F=\begin{pmatrix}2&2\\-5&-2\end{pmatrix} are ±i6\pm i\sqrt6, so no canonical change can turn this into the unit-frequency oscillator.

Exercise 3 (a Jordan block excluded by index one). For λ>0\lambda>0, let

A=(λ10λ),F=(A00−AT) A=\begin{pmatrix}\lambda&1\\0&\lambda\end{pmatrix},\qquad F=\begin{pmatrix}A&0\\0&-A^T\end{pmatrix}

on R4\mathbb R^4 with ordered (x,ξ)(x,\xi). Find its quadratic form and inertia. Identify its generalized opposite spaces and explain why it is outside Theorem 4.1.

Solution. Matrix multiplication gives JF=(0ATA0)JF=\begin{pmatrix}0&A^T\\A&0\end{pmatrix}, which is symmetric. Therefore

Q=2ξTAx=2λ(x1ξ1+x2ξ2)+2x2ξ1. Q=2\xi^TAx=2\lambda(x_1\xi_1+x_2\xi_2)+2x_2\xi_1.

Since AA is invertible, the arbitrary invertible real substitution u=Axu=Ax writes the form as 2ξTu2\xi^Tu, of inertia (2,2,0)(2,2,0). This substitution is used only to compute inertia. The +λ+\lambda generalized space is the position plane, with chain e2↦e1↦0e_2\mapsto e_1\mapsto0 under F−λF-\lambda; the −λ-\lambda space is the momentum plane, with chain ε1↦−ε2↦0\varepsilon_1\mapsto-\varepsilon_2\mapsto0 under F+λF+\lambda. Each is isotropic, and ω(εj,ek)=δjk\omega(\varepsilon_j,e_k)=\delta_{jk} gives their nondegenerate dual pairing. The real eigenspace has a length-two Jordan block and its generalized dimension is two. Its two negative squares violate the index-one hypothesis, which is exactly where the exclusion argument in Section 3 was used.

Exercise 4 (the whole nilpotent flow). For Q=x22−2ξ1ξ2Q=x_2^2-2\xi_1\xi_2, compute etFe^{tF} on an arbitrary vector and verify that it is symplectic and preserves QQ.

Solution. The map is F(x1,x2,ξ1,ξ2)=(−ξ2,−ξ1,0,−x2)F(x_1,x_2,\xi_1,\xi_2)=(-\xi_2,-\xi_1,0,-x_2). Its fourth power is zero and its third power is nonzero, so the exponential terminates:

y1=x1−tξ2+t22x2−t36ξ1,y2=x2−tξ1,η1=ξ1,η2=ξ2−tx2+t22ξ1. \begin{aligned} y_1&=x_1-t\xi_2+\frac{t^2}{2}x_2-\frac{t^3}{6}\xi_1,\\ y_2&=x_2-t\xi_1,\\ \eta_1&=\xi_1,\\ \eta_2&=\xi_2-tx_2+\frac{t^2}{2}\xi_1. \end{aligned}

If Tt=etFT_t=e^{tF}, differentiating TtTJTtT_t^TJT_t gives TtT(FTJ+JF)Tt=0T_t^T(F^TJ+JF)T_t=0; at t=0t=0 it is JJ. Thus the entire map is symplectic. Substitution gives

y22−2η1η2=(x2−tξ1)2−2ξ1(ξ2−tx2+t2ξ1/2)=x22−2ξ1ξ2. y_2^2-2\eta_1\eta_2 =(x_2-t\xi_1)^2-2\xi_1(\xi_2-tx_2+t^2\xi_1/2) =x_2^2-2\xi_1\xi_2.

The initial vector ε1\varepsilon_1 gives (4.3). The polynomial terms through degree three encode the actual length-four Jordan chain.

Exercise 5 (same inertia, different canonical classes). Compare Qa=x12+x22−ξ22Q_a=x_1^2+x_2^2-\xi_2^2 with Qb=x22−2ξ1ξ2Q_b=x_2^2-2\xi_1\xi_2. They have the same ordinary inertia. Are they symplectically equivalent?

Solution. Both have inertia (2,1,1)(2,1,1): for QbQ_b, diagonalize −2ξ1ξ2-2\xi_1\xi_2 as one positive and one negative square, leaving x1x_1 radical. For QaQ_a, the first pair is a positive rank-one block. The second has Hamilton matrix (0−1−10)\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}, with eigenvalues ±1\pm1. Thus the characteristic polynomial is ζ2(ζ2−1)\zeta^2(\zeta^2-1). For QbQ_b, it is ζ4\zeta^4, with one length-four Jordan block. Conjugate Hamilton maps have the same characteristic polynomial, so these forms are not symplectically equivalent. Ordinary inertia alone does not decide the canonical class.

Exercise 6 (mixed block data). On R8\mathbb R^8, determine the inertia, rank, Hamilton spectrum and zero Jordan blocks of

Q=2(x12+ξ12)+3(x22+ξ22)+x32−x42. Q=2(x_1^2+\xi_1^2)+3(x_2^2+\xi_2^2)+x_3^2-x_4^2.

Solution. There are five positive squares, one negative square, and two radical directions ξ3,ξ4\xi_3,\xi_4. The inertia is (5,1,2)(5,1,2), with rank six. The first two pairs have eigenvalues ±2i\pm2i and ±3i\pm3i. On the last two pairs, Fe3=−ε3Fe_3=-\varepsilon_3, Fe4=ε4Fe_4=\varepsilon_4, and Fε3=Fε4=0F\varepsilon_3=F\varepsilon_4=0. They are two length-two chains at zero. Hence

det⁡(ζI−F)=ζ4(ζ2+4)(ζ2+9),rank⁡F=6,rank⁡Fj=4 (j≥2). \det(\zeta I-F)=\zeta^4(\zeta^2+4)(\zeta^2+9),\qquad \operatorname{rank}F=6,\quad\operatorname{rank}F^j=4\ (j\ge2).

This is the negative rank-one alternative with k=2,l=1,n=4k=2,l=1,n=4, satisfying k+l<nk+l<n. The negative block does not create real nonzero eigenvalues.

Exercise 7 (a degenerate sector and its quotient). Let

Q=(1+i/3)x12+(2+i/2)(x22+ξ22). Q=(1+i/3)x_1^2+(2+i/2)(x_2^2+\xi_2^2).

Find a sharp sector constant, its real radical, V0V_0, and the positive spectral plane on the symplectic quotient.

Solution. The real part is P=x12+2(x22+ξ22)P=x_1^2+2(x_2^2+\xi_2^2), while the imaginary part is R=x12/3+(x22+ξ22)/2≥0R=x_1^2/3+(x_2^2+\xi_2^2)/2\ge0. The ratio is at most 1/31/3, attained on the x1x_1 axis, so C=1/3C=1/3 is sharp. The common real radical is W=Rε1W=\mathbb R\varepsilon_1. Its symplectic orthogonal is x1=0x_1=0, and Wω/WW^\omega/W has coordinates (x2,ξ2)(x_2,\xi_2), with the inherited form dξ2∧dx2d\xi_2\wedge dx_2. The descended form is (2+i/2)(x22+ξ22)(2+i/2)(x_2^2+\xi_2^2). Its upper eigenvalue is −1/2+2i-1/2+2i, and its strictly positive plane is ξ2=ix2\xi_2=ix_2. Before quotienting, V0=span⁡C(e1,ε1)V_0=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb C}(e_1,\varepsilon_1), where Fe1=−(1+i/3)ε1Fe_1=-(1+i/3)\varepsilon_1, Fε1=0F\varepsilon_1=0. Thus F2V0=0F^2V_0=0, but the original real part is not positive definite.

Exercise 8 (why the sector hypotheses matter). Give a quadratic form with nonnegative real part for which Q(Xˉ,X)=0Q(\bar X,X)=0 does not imply FX=0FX=0. Also find a complex quadratic form whose Hamilton kernel is not spanned by real vectors. Identify the failed hypotheses in each example.

Solution. In dimension four take Q=x12+i(ξ12−ξ22)Q=x_1^2+i(\xi_1^2-\xi_2^2), with X=ε1+iε2X=\varepsilon_1+i\varepsilon_2. Its real part is nonnegative, and

Q(Xˉ,X)=i−i=0,FX=ie1+e2≠0. Q(\bar X,X)=i-i=0,\qquad FX=ie_1+e_2\ne0.

Its imaginary part is nonzero at a real vector with x1=0x_1=0, so no finite bound ∣R∣≤CP|R|\le CP holds. This shows that real semidefiniteness alone does not give the scalar-zero implication in (5.2).

In dimension two take Q=(x+iξ)2Q=(x+i\xi)^2. Its symmetric matrix and Hamilton map are

B=(1ii−1),F=(i−1−1−i). B=\begin{pmatrix}1&i\\i&-1\end{pmatrix},\qquad F=\begin{pmatrix}i&-1\\-1&-i\end{pmatrix}.

The kernel is the complex line spanned by (1,i)(1,i), with no nonzero real vector. Indeed F(1,i)=0F(1,i)=0, but F(1,0)≠0F(1,0)\ne0 and F(0,1)≠0F(0,1)\ne0. Here P=x2−ξ2P=x^2-\xi^2 is indefinite, so even the nonnegative-real-part consequence of (5.1) fails. Neither example contradicts the sectorial theorem.

Exercise 9 (a full positive graph and metric). Let

A1=(122−1),A2=(21/31/31). A_1=\begin{pmatrix}1&2\\2&-1\end{pmatrix},\qquad A_2=\begin{pmatrix}2&1/3\\1/3&1\end{pmatrix}.

Verify strict positivity of the graph of A=A1+iA2A=A_1+iA_2, give its whole canonical normalization, and compute its compatible metric without unspecified matrix choices.

Solution. Both matrices are symmetric; A2A_2's leading minors are 22 and 17/917/9, so it is positive definite. Proposition 8.1 gives a Lagrangian graph with h=2zˉTA2z>0h=2\bar z^TA_2z>0. Its inverse is

A2−1=117(9−3−318). A_2^{-1}=\frac1{17}\begin{pmatrix}9&-3\\-3&18\end{pmatrix}.

An explicit positive square root is

D=A2+(17/3)I3+217/3. D=\frac{A_2+(\sqrt{17}/3)I}{\sqrt{3+2\sqrt{17}/3}}.

To verify it, the characteristic identity A22−3A2+(17/9)I=0A_2^2-3A_2+(17/9)I=0 gives (A2+(17/3)I)2=(3+217/3)A2(A_2+(\sqrt{17}/3)I)^2=(3+2\sqrt{17}/3)A_2. The numerator is positive definite, so DD is the positive square root. Set y=Dxy=Dx, η=D−1(ξ−A1x)\eta=D^{-1}(\xi-A_1x). Identity (8.4) proves symplecticity on all vectors, and the graph maps to η=iy\eta=iy. For U=(u,v)U=(u,v), put r=v−A1ur=v-A_1u. The metric is exactly

g(U,U)=2u12+23u1u2+u22+117(9r12−6r1r2+18r22). g(U,U)=2u_1^2+\frac23u_1u_2+u_2^2 +\frac1{17}(9r_1^2-6r_1r_2+18r_2^2).

It is positive definite by its two positive quadratic summands. The full complex structure is (8.5) with the displayed inverse, and the Hermitian form is g−iωg-i\omega; no extra metric is chosen.

Exercise 10 (the factor one-half). For the standard positive plane Λ={(z,iz)}\Lambda=\{(z,iz)\}, find the induced complex structure and Hermitian form on the real space. Check (7.3) directly.

Solution. The real part of (a+ib,i(a+ib))(a+ib,i(a+ib)) is (a,−b)(a,-b). Thus I(x,ξ)=(ξ,−x)I(x,\xi)=(\xi,-x), and a complex coordinate on the real space is ζ=x−iξ\zeta=x-i\xi, for which ζ(IU)=iζ(U)\zeta(IU)=i\zeta(U). The compatible form is

H((x,ξ),(y,η))=x⋅y+ξ⋅η+i(x⋅η−ξ⋅y)=∑jζj(U)ζj(V)‾. H((x,\xi),(y,\eta)) =x\cdot y+\xi\cdot\eta+i(x\cdot\eta-\xi\cdot y) =\sum_j\zeta_j(U)\overline{\zeta_j(V)}.

Its imaginary part is −ω(U,V)-\omega(U,V). For X=(z,iz)X=(z,iz), Y=(w,iw)Y=(w,iw), direct multiplication gives iω(Yˉ,X)=2∑jzjwˉji\omega(\bar Y,X)=2\sum_jz_j\bar w_j. Dividing by two gives precisely H(rX,rY)H(rX,rY). Omitting this division would double the required imaginary part.

Exercise 11 (complex scalar flow and numerical range). For Q=(2+i)(x2+ξ2)Q=(2+i)(x^2+\xi^2), determine S+S^+, its numerical range, and the real-time flow of FF restricted to it.

Solution. The eigenvalues are ±i(2+i)=±(−1+2i)\pm i(2+i)=\pm(-1+2i). The upper plane is ξ=ix\xi=ix; its Hermitian diagonal is 2∣x∣22|x|^2. The restriction is scalar multiplication by −1+2i-1+2i, so the numerical range is the singleton −1+2i-1+2i, agreeing with iΓi\Gamma for C=1/2C=1/2. A vector XX in this plane evolves by etFX=e(−1+2i)tXe^{tF}X=e^{(-1+2i)t}X for real tt, and its squared Hermitian norm is multiplied by e−2te^{-2t}. This is a flow on the complex plane; the complex Hamilton map does not define a real flow on SS in this example.

Exercise 12 (a Jordan degeneracy throughout a homotopy). In (10.1), multiply the last term by s∈[0,1]s\in[0,1]. Determine the upper generalized plane, its restriction of FsF_s, and its flow. Explain what happens at s=0s=0.

Solution. The same real-part estimate gives Ps≥(1−s/2)(∣x∣2+∣ξ∣2)≥12(∣x∣2+∣ξ∣2)P_s\ge(1-s/2)(|x|^2+|\xi|^2)\ge\tfrac12(|x|^2+|\xi|^2), and ∣Rs∣≤Ps|R_s|\le P_s. The plane Λ={ξ=ix}\Lambda=\{\xi=ix\} stays invariant and strictly positive. Its restriction is

Fs∣Λ=i(1s01). F_s|_\Lambda=i\begin{pmatrix}1&s\\0&1\end{pmatrix}.

For s>0s>0, the upper eigenvalue ii has algebraic multiplicity two and geometric multiplicity one: the displayed nilpotent off-diagonal entry is nonzero. Lemma 2.1 pairs it with a lower block of eigenvalue −i-i; the whole characteristic polynomial is (ζ2+1)2(\zeta^2+1)^2. Thus Λ\Lambda is the entire upper generalized plane. With initial position column (a,b)(a,b), the restricted flow has

x(t)=eit(a+istb,b),ξ(t)=ix(t). x(t)=e^{it}(a+istb,b),\qquad \xi(t)=ix(t).

At s=0s=0, the upper restriction becomes iIiI, with a two-dimensional eigenspace, while its generalized plane and Hermitian form are unchanged. The contour projection varies continuously across this change in geometric multiplicity. Individual eigenvector bases for s>0s>0 cannot be used as a basis of that two-dimensional plane.

Exercise 13 (a vertical null direction). Let Λ⊂C4\Lambda\subset\mathbb C^4 be spanned by ε1\varepsilon_1 and e2+iε2e_2+i\varepsilon_2. Compute its Hermitian form, real part and quotient plane. Can it be a graph over these position coordinates?

Solution. The spanning vectors pair to zero under ω\omega, and they are independent, so the plane is Lagrangian. For X=aε1+b(e2+iε2)X=a\varepsilon_1+b(e_2+i\varepsilon_2),

h(X,X)=2∣b∣2. h(X,X)=2|b|^2.

Its nullspace is Cε1\mathbb C\varepsilon_1, and its real part Λ∩S\Lambda\cap S is Rε1\mathbb R\varepsilon_1: the coefficient bb must be zero for the pair (b,ib)(b,ib) to be real. The quotient by this real isotropic line removes the first canonical pair and leaves the strictly positive graph ξ2=ix2\xi_2=ix_2. The original position projection has rank one and a nonzero vertical kernel, so it cannot be a graph over both position coordinates. It satisfies positivity but not strict positivity.

Exercise 14 (a positive graph can cease to be a graph). Start with Λ={ξ=idiag⁡(1,0)x}\Lambda=\{\xi=i\operatorname{diag}(1,0)x\}. Determine its nullspace and positive quotient. Apply the real Fourier rotation (y2,η2)=(ξ2,−x2)(y_2,\eta_2)=(\xi_2,-x_2), leaving the first pair unchanged, and examine its position projection.

Solution. The graph matrix is symmetric, and its imaginary part is diag⁡(1,0)\operatorname{diag}(1,0). Hence it is positive Lagrangian with h(X,X)=2∣x1∣2h(X,X)=2|x_1|^2. Its real isotropic part is Re2\mathbb Re_2 and its nullspace is Ce2\mathbb Ce_2. The symplectic quotient retains the first pair and its strictly positive graph ξ1=ix1\xi_1=ix_1. The Fourier rotation is symplectic, since dη2∧dy2=−dx2∧dξ2=dξ2∧dx2d\eta_2\wedge dy_2=-dx_2\wedge d\xi_2=d\xi_2\wedge dx_2. On the original graph, y2=0y_2=0, η2=−x2\eta_2=-x_2 is arbitrary, so the image contains a vertical real line and its position projection has rank one. The graph description can fail after a real symplectic change for a non-strict positive plane. Strict positivity is the condition that makes Proposition 8.1 valid in arbitrary coordinates.

The restored lesson and its exact current programme prerequisites have been reviewed for the stated scope.

Sources and restoration

Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III: Pseudo-Differential Operators, reprint of the second edition (1994), Section 21.5, printed 321–328 / PDF 336–343. The source treatment runs from Definition 21.5.1 through Corollary 21.5.11 and the ensuing decomposition. Its full nonnegative/index-one classification and strict/non-strict positive complex geometry are retained. The sector hypothesis explicitly includes a nonnegative real part even when the sector constant is zero.

The source and restoration record identifies the edition used. The spectral algebra companion supplies complete finite-dimensional proofs, including the common-circle calculation. The original flow figure and the new contour diagram retain their DejaVu font notice.

Original lesson, fourteen solutions and flow illustration: GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026, CC0. Restoration, added proof companion and contour illustration: GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Ultra, 5 October 2026, CC0. Linked earlier components retain their own licences. No book text, figure or file is reproduced.