L7.3.9: Coordinatewise and Euclidean convergence agree for every finite n
Proposition7.3.9.
Let {xm}m=1∞ be a sequence in Rn, where xm=(xm,1,xm,2,…,xm,n)∈Rn. Then {xm}m=1∞ converges if and only if {xm,k}m=1∞ converges for every k=1,2,…,n, in which case
Hence, the sequence {xm,k}m=1∞ converges to yk.
For the other direction, suppose {xm,k}m=1∞ converges to yk for every k=1,2,…,n. Given ϵ>0, pick an M such that if m≥M, then yk−xm,k<ϵ/n for all k=1,2,…,n. Then
That is, the sequence {xm}m=1∞ converges to y=(y1,y2,…,yn)∈Rn.
L7.3.11: Metric and neighbourhood definitions of convergence agree
Proposition7.3.11.
Let (X,d) be a metric space and {xn}n=1∞ a sequence in X. Then {xn}n=1∞ converges to p∈X if and only if for every open neighborhood U of p, there exists an M∈N such that for all n≥M, we have xn∈U.
Proof.
Suppose {xn}n=1∞ converges to p. Let U be an open neighborhood of p. There exists an ϵ>0 such that B(p,ϵ)⊂U. As the sequence converges, find an M∈N such that for all n≥M, we have d(p,xn)<ϵ, or in other words xn∈B(p,ϵ)⊂U.
Let us prove the other direction. Given ϵ>0, let U:=B(p,ϵ) be the neighborhood of p. Then there is an M∈N such that for n≥M, we have xn∈U=B(p,ϵ), or in other words, d(p,xn)<ϵ.
Let (X,d) be a metric space, E⊂X a closed set, and {xn}n=1∞ a sequence in E that converges to some p∈X. Then p∈E.
Proof.
Let us prove the contrapositive. Suppose {xn}n=1∞ is a sequence in X that converges to p∈Ec. As Ec is open, Proposition 7.3.11 says that there is an M such that for all n≥M,xn∈Ec. So {xn}n=1∞ is not a sequence in E.