Reading guide · Proof index

Sequences and convergence

Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis I–II, version 6.3. Free author edition of this section. Selection and attribution · Notation.

L7.3.9: Coordinatewise and Euclidean convergence agree for every finite n

Proof.

Suppose {xm}m=1∞\{ x_m \}_{m=1}^\infty converges to y=(y1,y2,…,yn)∈Rn.y = (y_1,y_2,\ldots,y_n) \in \R^n\text{.} Given ϵ>0,\epsilon > 0\text{,} there exists an MM such that for all m≥M,m \geq M\text{,} we have
d(y,xm)<ϵ.\begin{equation*} d(y,x_m) < \epsilon. \end{equation*}
Fix some k=1,2,…,n.k=1,2,\ldots,n\text{.} For all m≥M,m \geq M\text{,}
∣yk−xm,k∣=(yk−xm,k)2≤∑ℓ=1n(yℓ−xm,ℓ)2=d(y,xm)<ϵ.\begin{equation*} \bigl\lvert y_k - x_{m,k} \bigr\rvert = \sqrt{{\bigl(y_k - x_{m,k} \bigr)}^2} \leq \sqrt{\sum_{\ell=1}^n {\bigl(y_\ell-x_{m,\ell}\bigr)}^2} = d(y,x_m) < \epsilon . \end{equation*}
Hence, the sequence {xm,k}m=1∞\{ x_{m,k} \}_{m=1}^\infty converges to yk.y_k\text{.}
For the other direction, suppose {xm,k}m=1∞\{ x_{m,k} \}_{m=1}^\infty converges to yky_k for every k=1,2,…,n.k=1,2,\ldots,n\text{.} Given ϵ>0,\epsilon > 0\text{,} pick an MM such that if m≥M,m \geq M\text{,} then ∣yk−xm,k∣<ϵ ⁣/ ⁣n\bigl\lvert y_k-x_{m,k} \bigr\rvert < \nicefrac{\epsilon}{\sqrt{n}} for all k=1,2,…,n.k=1,2,\ldots,n\text{.} Then
d(y,xm)=∑k=1n(yk−xm,k)2<∑k=1n(ϵn)2=∑k=1nϵ2n=ϵ.\begin{equation*} d(y,x_m) = \sqrt{\sum_{k=1}^n {\bigl(y_k-x_{m,k}\bigr)}^2} < \sqrt{\sum_{k=1}^n {\left(\frac{\epsilon}{\sqrt{n}}\right)}^2} = \sqrt{\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{{\epsilon^2}}{n}} = \epsilon . \end{equation*}
That is, the sequence {xm}m=1∞\{ x_m \}_{m=1}^\infty converges to y=(y1,y2,…,yn)∈Rn.y = (y_1,y_2,\ldots,y_n) \in \R^n\text{.}

L7.3.11: Metric and neighbourhood definitions of convergence agree

Proof.

Suppose {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty converges to p.p\text{.} Let UU be an open neighborhood of p.p\text{.} There exists an ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 such that B(p,ϵ)⊂U.B(p,\epsilon) \subset U\text{.} As the sequence converges, find an M∈NM \in \N such that for all n≥M,n \geq M\text{,} we have d(p,xn)<ϵ,d(p,x_n) < \epsilon\text{,} or in other words xn∈B(p,ϵ)⊂U.x_n \in B(p,\epsilon) \subset U\text{.}
Let us prove the other direction. Given ϵ>0,\epsilon > 0\text{,} let U≔B(p,ϵ)U \coloneqq B(p,\epsilon) be the neighborhood of p.p\text{.} Then there is an M∈NM \in \N such that for n≥M,n \geq M\text{,} we have xn∈U=B(p,ϵ),x_n \in U = B(p,\epsilon)\text{,} or in other words, d(p,xn)<ϵ.d(p,x_n) < \epsilon\text{.}

L7.3.12: Closed sets contain convergent sequence limits

Proof.

Let us prove the contrapositive. Suppose {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty is a sequence in XX that converges to p∈Ec.p \in E^c\text{.} As EcE^c is open, Proposition 7.3.11 says that there is an MM such that for all n≥M,n \geq M\text{,} xn∈Ec.x_n \in E^c\text{.} So {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty is not a sequence in E.E\text{.}