Reading guide · Proof index

Cauchy sequences

Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis I–II, version 6.3. Free author edition of this section. Selection and attribution · Notation.

L2.4.5: Cauchy sequences are bounded and real Cauchy sequences converge

Proof.

Suppose {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty is Cauchy. Pick an MM such that for all n,k≥M,n,k \geq M\text{,} we have ∣xn−xk∣<1.\sabs{x_n-x_k} < 1\text{.} In particular, for all n≥M,n \geq M\text{,}
∣xn−xM∣<1.\begin{equation*} \sabs{x_n - x_M} < 1 . \end{equation*}
By the reverse triangle inequality, ∣xn∣−∣xM∣≤∣xn−xM∣<1.\sabs{x_n} - \sabs{x_M} \leq \sabs{x_n - x_M} < 1\text{.} Hence, for n≥M,n \geq M\text{,}
∣xn∣<1+∣xM∣.\begin{equation*} \sabs{x_n} < 1 + \sabs{x_M}. \end{equation*}
Let
B≔max⁡{∣x1∣,∣x2∣,…,∣xM−1∣,1+∣xM∣}.\begin{equation*} B \coloneqq \max \bigl\{ \sabs{x_1}, \sabs{x_2}, \ldots, \sabs{x_{M-1}}, 1+ \sabs{x_M} \bigr\} . \end{equation*}
Then ∣xn∣≤B\sabs{x_n} \leq B for all n∈N.n \in \N\text{.}

Proof.

Suppose {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty converges to x,x\text{,} and let ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 be given. Then there exists an MM such that for n≥M,n \geq M\text{,}
∣xn−x∣<ϵ2.\begin{equation*} \sabs{x_n - x} < \frac{\epsilon}{2} . \end{equation*}
Hence, for n≥Mn \geq M and k≥M,k \geq M\text{,}
∣xn−xk∣=∣xn−x+x−xk∣≤∣xn−x∣+∣x−xk∣<ϵ2+ϵ2=ϵ.\begin{equation*} \sabs{x_n - x_k} = \sabs{x_n - x + x - x_k} \leq \sabs{x_n-x} + \sabs{x-x_k} < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon . \end{equation*}
Alright, that direction was easy. Now suppose {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty is Cauchy. We have shown that {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty is bounded. For a bounded sequence, liminf and limsup exist, and this is where we use the least-upper-bound property. If we show that
lim inf⁡n→∞xn=lim sup⁡n→∞xn,\begin{equation*} \liminf_{n\to \infty} x_n = \limsup_{n\to\infty} x_n , \end{equation*}
then {xn}n=1∞\{ x_n \}_{n=1}^\infty must be convergent by Proposition 2.3.5.
Define a≔lim sup⁡n→∞xna \coloneqq \limsup_{n\to\infty} x_n and b≔lim inf⁡n→∞xn.b \coloneqq \liminf_{n\to\infty} x_n\text{.} By Theorem 2.3.4, there exist subsequences {xni}i=1∞\{ x_{n_i} \}_{i=1}^\infty and {xmi}i=1∞\{ x_{m_i} \}_{i=1}^\infty such that
lim⁡i→∞xni=aandlim⁡i→∞xmi=b.\begin{equation*} \lim_{i\to\infty} x_{n_i} = a \qquad \text{and} \qquad \lim_{i\to\infty} x_{m_i} = b. \end{equation*}
Given an ϵ>0,\epsilon > 0\text{,} there exists an M1M_1 such that ∣xni−a∣<ϵ ⁣/ ⁣3\sabs{x_{n_i} - a} < \nicefrac{\epsilon}{3} for all i≥M1i \geq M_1 and an M2M_2 such that ∣xmi−b∣<ϵ ⁣/ ⁣3\sabs{x_{m_i} - b} < \nicefrac{\epsilon}{3} for all i≥M2.i \geq M_2\text{.} There also exists an M3M_3 such that ∣xn−xk∣<ϵ ⁣/ ⁣3\sabs{x_n-x_k} < \nicefrac{\epsilon}{3} for all n,k≥M3.n,k \geq M_3\text{.} Let M≔max⁡{M1,M2,M3}.M \coloneqq \max \{ M_1, M_2, M_3 \}\text{.} If i≥M,i \geq M\text{,} then ni≥Mn_i \geq M and mi≥M.m_i \geq M\text{.} Hence,
∣a−b∣=∣a−xni+xni−xmi+xmi−b∣≤∣a−xni∣+∣xni−xmi∣+∣xmi−b∣<ϵ3+ϵ3+ϵ3=ϵ.\begin{equation*} \begin{split} \sabs{a-b} & = \sabs{a-x_{n_i}+x_{n_i} -x_{m_i}+x_{m_i} -b} \\ & \leq \sabs{a-x_{n_i}} + \sabs{x_{n_i} -x_{m_i}} + \sabs{x_{m_i} -b} \\ & < \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} = \epsilon . \end{split} \end{equation*}
As ∣a−b∣<ϵ\sabs{a-b} < \epsilon for all ϵ>0,\epsilon > 0\text{,} we have a=ba=b and the sequence converges.